[考研类试卷]2013年天津外国语大学英语翻译基础真题试卷.doc

[考研类试卷]2013年天津外国语大学英语翻译基础真题试卷英译汉

1 affluenza

2 back translation

3 brain drain

4 buzzword

5 communication studies

6 cultural default

7 Davos Forum

8 dream team

9 Eurozone

10 IMF

11 NEET

12 netbook

13 OPEC

14 Reuters

15 sit-in

16 Skopos theory

17 SOHO

18 subtitling

19 think tank

20 Webzine

汉译英

21 钓鱼岛

22 对外传播

23 翻译专业资格(水平)考试

24 峰会

25 公示语

26 宏观调控

27 开放包容

28 孔子课堂

29 绿色增长

30 民心工程

31 十八大

32 团购

33 务实合作

34 协同创新

35 月光族

36 战略性新兴产业

37 政府采购

38 政客

39 中小企业

40 中央文献

英译汉

41 Whatever their political party, American leaders have generally subscribed to one of two competing economic philosophies. One is a small-government Jeffersonian perspective that abhors bigness and holds that prosperity flows from competition among independent businessmen, farmers and other producers. The other is a Hamiltonian agenda that believes a large, powerful country needs large, powerful organizations. The most important of those organizations is the federal government, which serves as a crucial partner to private enterprise, building roads and schools, guaranteeing loans and financing scientific research in ways that individual businesses would not.

Today, of course, Republicans are the Jeffersonians and Democrats are the Hamiltonians. But it hasn't always been so. The Jeffersonian line includes Andrew Jackson, the leaders of the Confederacy, William Jennings Bryan, Louis Brandeis, Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. The Harailtonian line includes George Washington, Henry Clay, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, both Roosevelts and Dwight Eisenhower. Michael Lind's Land of Promise uses this divide to offer an ambitious economic history of the United States. The book is rich with details, more than a few of them surprising, and its subject is central to what is arguably the single most important question facing the country today: How can our economy grow more quickly, more sustainably and more equitably than it has been growing, both to maintain the United States' position as the world's pre-eminent power and to improve the lives of its citizens?

Lind, a founder of the New America Foundation in Washington and the author of several political histories, acknowledges from the beginning that his thesis will make some readers uncomfortable. " In the spirit of philosophical bipartisanship, it would be pleasant to conclude that each of these traditions of political economy has made its own valuable contribution to the success of the American economy and that the vector created by these opposing forces has been more beneficial than the complete victory of either would have been," he writes.

" But that would not be true," he continues. " What is good about the American economy is largely the result of the Hamiltonian developmental tradition, and what is bad about it is largely the result of the Jeffersonian producerist school.

汉译英

42 粮食安全始终是人类生存发展面临的首要问题，“人人粮食安全”是基本人权。世界粮食安全面临越来越多的非传统挑战和日趋复杂的形势。世界粮食安全的薄弱环节在发展中国家。利用粮食等生产生物燃料对粮食安全的影响不容忽视，气候变化对粮食安全也带来长期挑战。

中国高度重视农业和粮食问题，坚持立足国内实现粮食基本自给的方针，通过加大资金投人、加强农田水利建设、加快农业科技进步等政策和措施，稳定提高粮食和农业综合生产能力。中国用占不到世界9％的耕地，解决了世界近21％人口的吃饭问题，提前实现了联合国千年发展目标(MDG)减贫目标。

中国政府在解决自身粮食安全问题的同时，还在南南合作框架内向有关发展中国家提供了力所能及的农业援助，包括建设农业技术示范中心、提供农业技术援助、提供紧急人道主义粮食援助等，为这些发展中国家提高粮食安全水平做出了自己的贡献。