英语论文结论部分写作特点总结

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

英语论文写作

论文结论部分(Conclusion写作特点总结

Conclusion

Conclusion 是作者对所研究课题进行的总体性讨论,具有严密的科学性和客观性,反映本研究课题的价值,同时对以后的研究具有指导意义。

Conclusion 与Introduction 遥相呼应,因为Introduction 部分介绍了本课题的研究目的,那么Conclusion 要告诉读者这些目的是否达到,在研究中做了哪些工作,取得了什么结果,这些结果说明了什么问题,有何价值和意义,研究过程中存在或发现了哪些问题,原因是什么,建议如何解决等。

Conclusion 的具体内容通常包含以下几个部分:

(1) 概括说明本课题的研究内容、结果及其意义与价值。

(2) 比较具体地说明本研究证明了什么假设或理论,得出了什么结论,研究结果有何实用价值,有何创

造性成果或见解,解决了什么实际问题,有何应用前景等。

(3) 与他人的相关研究进行比较。

(4) 本课题的局限性、不足之处,还有哪些尚待解决的问题。

(5) 展望前景,或指出进一步研究的方向。

Conclusion 通常使用现在时态

Result 和Conclusion

本次选取5 篇文章,

第一篇,论文中的主要Result 已在第2 部分和第三部分中叙述,在Conclusion 又重新总结了一下。

第二篇,论文中的主要Result 写在Conclusion 中。

第三篇,论文中的主要Result 写在第3 部分( 3.CASE STUDIES AND RESULTS )中,Result 和Conclusion 是分开的。

第四篇,论文中的主要Result 已第4 部分的( IV. Results and Discussion )中进行叙述,Result 和Conclusion 是分开的。

第五篇,论文中的主要Result已第4部分的(4. Results and discussion)中进行叙述,Result 和Conclusion 是分开的。

第1 篇

题目:An overview of NACA 6-digit airfoil series characteristics with reference to airfoils for

large wind turbine blades

IV. Conclusions

The two-dimensional aerodynamics characteristics of the NACA 63 and 64 six-digit series of airfoils measured in the NASA LTPT have been investigated, with a view to verify RFOIL calculations at high Reynolds numbers. The following conclusions can be drawn:

- The zero-lift angle of the NACA 64-618 airfoil needs to be adjusted with -0.4 degrees.

- The zero-lift angle of The NACA 63-615 needs to be corrected with -0.87 degrees in the smooth case and with +1 degree in case of wrap around roughness.

-The maximum lift coefficients predicted with RFOIL match the LTPT data well at Re=3x106, but under predict the Cl,max at Re=6x106 by 3.5 % , up to 6.5% at Re=9x106.

-It is uncertain if the established differences in lift between experiment and calculations are caused by a constant bias in the measurements or by the fact that the RFOIL code fails to predict the right level of maximum lift.

-RFOIL consistently under predicts the drag coefficient. The difference is about 9% for a wide range of airfoils and Reynolds numbers

-NACA standard roughness causes a reduction in the lift coefficient of 18% to 20% for most airfoils from the NACA

64 series

-The zero-lift angle of airfoil NACA 64-418 with wrap-around roughness needs a correction of +0.54 degrees.

-Wind tunnel experiments and side-by-side tests in the field with one clean rotor need to be done to be able to better predict the effects of roughness.

写作特点:内容:第1句,概括了文章的的主要研究内容。第2句至第8句逐条的列出了文章的得出结论。

使用了被动语态,The two-dimensional aerodynamics characteristics of the NACA 63 and 64 six-digit series of airfoils measured in the NASA LTPT have been investigated have been investigated.

主要时态为一般现在时态

第2篇

题目:HIGH-LIFT ENHANCEMENT USING ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL

V. CONCLUSIONS

The high-lift performance of an airfoil with a single-element flap is enhanced significantly using an

active flow control system consisting of spanwise fluidic actuators that are integrated near the separati on point. Span wise arrays of spa nwise-oscillati ng or non-oscillat ing jets issue tangen tially to the local surface from a miniature downstreamfacing surface step. Jet actuation leads to flow attachment of varying streamwise extent that depends on the jet momentum coefficient and the formation of a low pressure domain near the juncture between the main body and the flap. As a result, lift is iiicrtcised subsianiKilly, by as much as Cl. k40L 1.22 and 1.04 al l

相关文档
最新文档