SCI List-Energy and Fuels
(Use Browser Back button to return to previous page)
SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED - ENERGY & FUELS
JOURNAL LIST
Total journals: 67
1. AAPG BULLETIN
Monthly
ISSN: 0149-1423
AMER ASSOC PETROLEUM GEOLOGIST, 1444 S BOULDER AVE, PO BOX 979, TULSA, USA, OK, 74119-3604
2. APPLIED ENERGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0306-2619
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD,
ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
3. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Semimonthly
ISSN: 1359-4311
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
4. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0961-9534
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
5. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Semimonthly
ISSN: 0960-8524
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD,
ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
6. BULLETIN OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 0007-4802
CANADIAN SOC PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, SUITE 600, 640 - 8TH AVE SW, CALGARY, CANADA, ALBERTA, T2P 1G7
7. BWK
Monthly
ISSN: 1618-193X
SPRINGER-V D I VERLAG GMBH, ATTN: MRS. CLAUDIA BANOS, HEINRICHSTRASSE 24, DUSSELDORF, GERMANY, D-40239
8. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING
Monthly
ISSN: 0255-2701
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
9. CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS OF CARBON
Annual
ISSN: 0069-3138
MARCEL DEKKER, 270 MADISON AVE, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10016
10. CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY OF FUELS AND OILS
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0009-3092
CONSULTANTS BUREAU/SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013 11. COAL PREPARATION
Quarterly
ISSN: 0734-9343
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
12. COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Monthly
ISSN: 0010-2180
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710 13. COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0010-5082
CONSULTANTS BUREAU/SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013 14. COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0010-2202
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
15. COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1364-7830
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, ENGLAND, OXON, OX14 4RN
16. DIESEL PROGRESS NORTH AMERICAN EDITION
Monthly
ISSN: 1091-370X
DIESEL & GAS TURBINE PUBL, 20855 WATERTOWN RD # 220, WAUKESHA, USA, WI, 53186-1873
17. ENERGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0360-5442
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
18. ENERGY & FUELS
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0887-0624
AMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
19. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0378-7788
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
20. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Semimonthly
ISSN: 0196-8904
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
21. ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0144-5987
MULTI SCIENCE PUBL CO LTD, 5 WATES WAY, BRENTWOOD, ENGLAND, ESSEX,
CM15 9TB
22. ENERGY JOURNAL
Quarterly
ISSN: 0195-6574
INT ASSOC ENERGY ECONOMICS, 28790 CHAGRIN BLVD, STE 210, CLEVELAND, USA, OH, 44122
23. ENERGY POLICY
Monthly
ISSN: 0301-4215
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD,
ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
24. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Quarterly
ISSN: 1556-7036
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
25. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY
Quarterly
ISSN: 1556-7257
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
26. FUEL
Monthly
ISSN: 0016-2361
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD,
ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
27. FUEL CELLS
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1615-6846
WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH, PO BOX 10 11 61, WEINHEIM, GERMANY, D-69451
28. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0378-3820
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
29. GEOTHERMICS
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0375-6505
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
30. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
Monthly
ISSN: 0018-8190
GULF PUBL CO, BOX 2608, HOUSTON, USA, TX, 77252-2608
31. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION
Quarterly
ISSN: 0885-8969
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE,
PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855
32. INTERNATIONAL GAS ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Monthly
ISSN: 1465-7058
INST GAS ENGINEERS & MANAGERS, CHARNWOOD WING, HOLYWELL PARK, ASHBY RD LOUGHBOROUGH, LEICESTERSHIRE, ENGLAND, LE11 3GR
33. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0166-5162
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
34. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Monthly
ISSN: 0363-907X
JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER, ENGLAND, W SUSSEX, PO19 8SQ
35. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 1742-8297
INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD, WORLD TRADE CENTER BLDG, 29 ROUTE DE PRE-BOIS, CASE POSTALE 896, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND, CH-1215
36. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 1543-5075
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA,
19106
37. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0360-3199
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
38. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 1110-662X
HINDAWI PUBLISHING CORPORATION, 410 PARK AVENUE, 15TH FLOOR, #287 PMB, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10022
39. JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY
Tri-annual
ISSN: 1556-6560
AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS, 25650 NORTH LEWIS WAY, STEVENSON RANCH, USA, CA, 91381-1439
40. JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0021-9487
CANADIAN INST MINING METALLURGY PETROLEUM, 3400 DE MAISONNEUVE BLVD W, STE 855, MONTREAL, CANADA, PQ, H3Z 3B8
41. JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING-ASCE
Tri-annual
ISSN: 0733-9402
ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, USA, VA, 20191-4400
42. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME
Quarterly
ISSN: 0195-0738
ASME-AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENG, THREE PARK AVE, NEW YORK, USA, NY,
10016-5990
43. JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 1550-624X
ASME-AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENG, THREE PARK AVE, NEW YORK, USA, NY,
10016-5990
44. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 0141-6421
BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX4 2ZG
45. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Monthly
ISSN: 0378-7753
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
46. JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME
Quarterly
ISSN: 0199-6231
ASME-AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENG, THREE PARK AVE, NEW YORK, USA, NY,
10016-5990
47. JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
Quarterly
ISSN: 1743-9671
MANEY PUBLISHING, STE 1C, JOSEPHS WELL, HANOVER WALK, LEEDS, ENGLAND, W YORKS, LS3 1AB
48. JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1346-8804
JAPAN PETROLEUM INST, COSMO HIRAKAWA-CHO BLDG, 3-14, 1-CHOME
HIRAKAWA-CHO, CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO, JAPAN, 102
49. NUCLEAR PLANT JOURNAL
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0892-2055
EQES INC, 799 ROOSEVELT RD, BUILDING 6, STE 208, GLEN ELLYN, USA, IL,
60137-5925
50. OIL & GAS JOURNAL
Weekly
ISSN: 0030-1388
PENNWELL PUBL CO ENERGY GROUP, 1421 S SHERIDAN RD PO BOX 1260, TULSA, USA, OK, 74112
51. OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE DE L INSTITUT FRANCAIS DU PETROLE
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1294-4475
EDITIONS TECHNIP, 27 RUE GINOUX, PARIS 15, FRANCE, 75737
52. OIL GAS-EUROPEAN MAGAZINE
Quarterly
ISSN: 0342-5622
URBAN-VERLAG GMBH, PO BOX 70 16 06, HAMBURG, GERMANY, D-22016
53. OIL SHALE
Quarterly
ISSN: 0208-189X
ESTONIAN ACAD PUBLISHERS, ESTONIA BLVD 7, TALLINN, ESTONIA, 10143
54. PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0965-5441
MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY,
10013-1578
55. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Monthly
ISSN: 1091-6466
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
56. POWER
Monthly
ISSN: 0032-5929
TRADEFAIR GROUP, 11000 RICHMOND, STE 500, HOUSTON, USA, TX, 77042
57. POWER ENGINEER
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1479-8344
INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET, MICHAEL FARADAY HOUSE SIX HILLS WAY STEVENAGE, HERTFORD, ENGLAND, SG1 2AY
58. POWER ENGINEERING
Monthly
ISSN: 0032-5961
PENNWELL PUBL CO ENERGY GROUP, 1421 S SHERIDAN RD PO BOX 1260, TULSA, USA, OK, 74112
59. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Annual
ISSN: 1540-7489
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710 60. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE
Bimonthly
ISSN: 0360-1285
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
61. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1062-7995
JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER, ENGLAND, W SUSSEX, PO19 8SQ
62. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Quarterly
ISSN: 1364-0321
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
63. RENEWABLE ENERGY
Monthly
ISSN: 0960-1481
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
64. SOLAR ENERGY
Semimonthly
ISSN: 0038-092X
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE,
KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
65. SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Monthly
ISSN: 0927-0248
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
66. SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING
Bimonthly
ISSN: 1094-6470
SOC PETROLEUM ENG, 222 PALISADES CREEK DR,, RICHARDSON, USA, TX, 75080 67. WIND ENERGY
Quarterly
ISSN: 1095-4244
JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER, ENGLAND, W SUSSEX, PO19 8SQ
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见规范文本材料模板全集
SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見範文模板大全 修改稿回答審稿人の意見（最重要の部分） List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿號). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corr ections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……) Response: ×××××× 。。。。。。 逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏 針對不同の問題有下列幾個禮貌術語可適當用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
sci修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
sci修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Realtime Monitoring of Xylitol Fermentation by Micro-Raman )Spectroscopy”(LANL-2014-0001. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: 1. Response to comment (Reviewer 1): (The proposed method was established with the lack of the process of the optimization. The curve was adopted to illustrate the changes of absorption peak in the process of fermentation, but the absorption peak couldn’t be confirmed the identical to the reference peak of xylitol. It needs more data to prove the reliability of the method) Response: Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, the experiment of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is added to verify the reliability of the
SCI答复审稿人的回信技巧
SCI答复审稿人的回信技巧 一篇稿子从酝酿到成型历经艰辛，投出去之后又是漫长的等待，好容易收到编辑的回信，得到的往往又是审稿人不留情面的一顿狂批。这时候，如何有策略有技巧的回复审稿人就显得尤为重要。好的回复是文章被接收的重要砝码，而不恰当的回复轻则导致再次修改从而拖延发稿时间，重则导致文章被拒，前功尽弃。下面把我平时总结的一些答复审稿人的策略和写回复信的格式和技巧跟大家交流一下。 首先，绝对服从编辑的意见。在审稿人给出各自的意见之后，编辑一般不会再提出自己的意见。但是，编辑一旦提出某些意见，就意味着他认为这是文章里的重大缺陷，至少是不合他的口味。这时，我们唯一能够做的只能是服从。因为毕竟是人家掌握着生杀予夺的大权。第二，永远不要跟审稿人争执。跟审稿人起争执是非常不明智的一件事情。审稿人意见如果正确那就不用说了，直接照办就是。如果不正确的话，也大可不必在回复中冷嘲热讽，心平气和的说明白就是了。大家都是青年人，血气方刚，被人拍了当然不爽，被人错拍了就更不爽了。尤其是一些名门正派里的弟子，看到一审结果是major而不是minor本来就已经很不爽了，难得抓住审稿人的尾巴，恨不得拖出来打死。有次审稿，一个审稿人给的意见是增加两篇参考文献（估计也就是审稿人自己的文章啦），结果作者在回复中写到，making a reference is not charity！看到之后我当时就笑喷了，可以想象审稿人得被噎成什么样。正如大家所想的那样，这篇稿子理所当然的被拒了，虽然后来经编辑调解改成了major revision，但毕竟耽误的是作者自己的时间不是？ 第三，合理掌握修改和argue的分寸。所谓修改就是对文章内容进行的修改和补充，所谓argue 就是在回复信中对审稿人的答复。这其中大有文章可做，中心思想就是容易改的照改，不容易改的或者不想改的跟审稿人argue。对于语法、拼写错误、某些词汇的更换、对某些公式和图表做进一步解释等相对容易做到的修改，一定要一毫不差的根据审稿意见照做。而对于新意不足、创新性不够这类根本没法改的，还有诸如跟算法A，B，C，D做比较，补充大量实验等短时间内根本没法完成的任务，我们则要有理有据的argue。在Argue的时候首先要肯定审稿人说的很对，他提出的方法也很好，但本文的重点是blablabla，跟他说的不是一回事。然后为了表示对审稿人的尊重，象征性的在文中加上一段这方面的discussion，这样既照顾到了审稿人的面子，编辑那也能交待的过去。 第四，聪明的掌握修改时间。拿到审稿意见，如果是minor，意见只有寥寥数行，那当然会情不自禁的一蹴而就，一天甚至几小时搞定修改稿。这时候，问题在于要不要马上投回去了？我的意见是放一放，多看一看，两个星期之后再投出去。这样首先避免了由于大喜过望而没能及时检查出的小毛病，还不会让编辑觉得你是在敷衍他。如果结果是major，建议至少放一个月再投出去，显得比较郑重。 上面是一些一般性的答复审稿人的策略，在实际中的应用还需要大家见仁见智。下面谈谈答复信的写法。 写答复信的唯一目的是让编辑和审稿人一目了然的知道我们做了哪些修改。因此，所有的格式和写法都要围绕这一目的。一般来说可以把答复信分成三部分，即List of Actions, Responses to Editor, Responses to Reviewers。第一部分List of Actions的作用是简明扼要的列出所有修改的条目，让编辑和审稿人在第一时间对修改量有个概念，同时它还充当着修改目录的作用，详见下面的例子。剩下的两部分是分别对编辑和审稿人所做的答复，格式可以一样，按照“意见”－“argue”（如果有的话）－“修改”这样逐条进行。清楚醒目起见，可以用不
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全 修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分） List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corr ections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 。。。。。。 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
(完整word版)回复审稿人意见模板
如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见（精典语句整理） 如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见 1.所有问题必须逐条回答。 2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。 3.满足不了的也不要回避，说明不能做的合理理由。 4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用，并讨论透彻。 以下是本人对审稿人意见的回复一例，仅供参考。 续两点经验： 1. 最重要的是逐条回答，即使你答不了，也要老实交代；不要太狡猾，以至于耽误事； 2. 绝大部分实验是不要真追加的，除非你受到启发，而想改投另外高档杂志----因为你既然已经写成文章，从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story” 了。 以上指国际杂志修稿。国内杂志太多，以至于稿源吃紧，基本没有退稿，所以你怎么修都是接受。 我的文章水平都不高，主要是没有明显的创新性，也很苦恼。但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外，其他都在国际杂志（也都是SCI）发表。以我了解的情况，我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿，退稿的极少，只有一次被《某某科学进展》拒绝。究其原因，除了我上面说的，另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃，导师把关也比较严的缘故。 自我感觉总结（不一定对）： 1）国内杂志审稿极慢（少数除外），但现在也有加快趋势； 2）国内杂志编辑人员认真负责的人不多，稿子寄去后，少则几个月，多则一年多没有任何消息； 3）国内杂志要求修改的稿子，如果你自己不修，他最后也给你发； 4）国外杂志要求补充实验的，我均以解释而过关，原因见少帖）。还因为：很少杂志编辑把你的修改稿再寄给当初审稿人的，除非审稿人特别请求。编辑不一定懂你的东西，他只是看到你认真修改，回答疑问了，也就接受了（当然高档杂志可能不是这样，我的经验只限定一般杂志（影响因子1-5）。 欢迎大家批评指正。 我常用的回复格式: Dear reviewer: I am very grateful to your comments for the manuscript. According with your advice, we amended the relevant part in manuscript. Some of your questions were answered below. 1）
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板 SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部 分） List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿 号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as w ell as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully a nd have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red i n the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ××××××。。。。。。 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用 用： We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing …….. It is really true as Reviewer suggested that…… We have made correction according to the Reviewer’ s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’ s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that…… Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见： Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: ×××××× Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………” 2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. Thes e changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will m eet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions 以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享。 从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见分布在文章的各个地方。我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见，我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高文章的质量。
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全
SCI 修改稿回答審稿人意見範文模板大全 修改稿回答審稿人①意見（最重要①部分） List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers' comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” （ID: 文章稿號）. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches.We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corer ctions in the paper and the responds to the reviewer are as flowing: s co Responds to the reviewer ' s comments: Reviewer #1: 1.Response to comment：?（?…簡要歹U出意見） Respo nse: xxxxxx 2.Response to comment: ?（…簡要歹U出意見.） Response: xxxxxx 。。。。。。 逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏 針對不同①問題有下列幾個禮貌術語可適當用用： We are very sorry for our negligenee of .. ... We are very sorry for our in correct writi ng ... ... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that ...
sci审稿意见回复范文
论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒）所投杂志：Life Sciences 投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 编辑信内容（注：有删节）： Dear Mr. XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below. If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures. A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission. … You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area. We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript. To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely, Joseph J. Bahl, PhD Editor Life Sciences ， Format Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style. Reviewers' comments:
SCI投稿全过程 与编辑沟通的邮件模板
一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: 一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) Name A E-mail: ××××@×××× 2) Name B E-mail: ××××@×××× We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, ×××××× Corresponding author: Name: ××× E-mail: ××××@×××× 二、催稿信 Dear Prof. ×××: Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not? I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments. Thank you very much for your consideration. Best regards! Yours sincerely, ×××××× Corresponding author: Name: ××× E-mail: ××××@×××× 三、修改稿Cover letter Dear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）: On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise
SCI修改的回复信经验
你真的会写SCI修改的回复信吗？（转载） 文章修回一般都要回复审稿人，而一篇文章能不能接收，与如何回复审稿人有着极为重要的关系。好的回复是文章接收的重要砝码，而不恰当的回复轻则可能导致再次修改，从而拖延发稿时间；重则导致文章被拒，前功尽弃。那么如何进行精简全面的回复审稿人呢，请您往下看： 1：回复信开头， （1）若给我们的修回邮件中有主编名字则要写上其名字：Dear Dr. **，以示尊重；若没有编辑个人信息则可以写为：Dear editor等。 （2）文章编号即文章的ID，要与邮件中显示的编号一致，也可以去投稿系统中查找。因为编辑每天要处理许多稿件，回复信中这样写可以让编辑和审稿人清楚的知道我们是哪篇文章，正所谓与人方便，与己方便。 （3）回复信开头一般要先说明稿件中如何进行的修改，例如在文中以加粗，红色字或者MS模式修订等标亮；然后感谢审稿人及编辑的审阅及评价；另外，还需要在该部分体现出文章题目（最好加粗或者斜体等方式标亮）；最后是客套话，如我们还想继续提交到您的****杂志，希望您再帮忙审阅等等。 要注意语言一定表达中肯、谦逊，语言流畅。 2. 接下来，就可以对审稿人的意见一一回复，主要包括各审稿人的各个问题，还有我们的一一感谢，及修改方式。这里，需要注意的是： （1）能够清楚的区分不同审稿人之间的意见、一个审稿人不同的 comment； （2）每一条意见回复前最好先对审稿人表示感谢，礼多人不怪，为了顺利发表，多写几个字又何妨呢； （3）能准确完整的补充审稿人提出的要求；不能补充的资料能够引用文献充分的论证，有理有据； （4）详细的列出修改的内容；
（5）语气委婉，谦逊； （6）能够随机应变，回复审稿人的意见最好恰到好处。 3. 第三部分就是信件的结束语。 这里无非还是再次感谢，最后就是Your sincerely及通讯作者的署名了。 回复审稿人信件犹如点睛之笔，如果回复不合适就可能是弄巧成拙，所以，有疑问的亲们，赶紧提问吧，我们会一一接招解答。
SCI审稿人的意见很多,我要全盘接受吗
第一，审稿人对文章观点提出质疑 这类问题经常出现在论文的introduction部分。因为在introduction中，我们要引用现有的相关研究，进而引出我们研究工作的创新点和必要性。这样就不可避免地对现有研究表达我们的观点，作出评述和总结。 这个过程中，审稿人会就你对其他研究的评价和观点作出质疑，要求你进一步说明或者提供相关证据。 这类问题回答的主要方法有三种： a. 继续检索相关文献，用别人对该研究的评价和总结来佐证自己的观点。一项研究完成并发表后，即必将接受全世界该领域学者们的共同审视和验证，这样在其他学者对该项研究的评述中应该能找到对自己有利的观点。这个方法的关键在于检索论文的技巧要比较高明，才能迅速准确定位文献。 b. 重新分析别人这项研究的数据和结论，找出更加明显的“点”来佐证自己的观点。 c. 有条件的话，重复别人的实验和工作，以证明前人研究确有不足。 第二，审稿人要求补充研究 这也许是审稿人所提出的最令人煎熬的问题了。
也许自己的研究在体系和过程上都已完备，但审稿人还是不屈不挠的要求增加他所认为重要 的部分研究。完全按照审稿人的要求来，很有可能我们的实验要重做，或者研究体系要调整，因而在此必须严格掌握obey和argue的分寸，哪怕是规避和拒绝，也要做到有理、有利、有节。 对于此类问题的回复主要有以下几种情况： a. 对于确实难以补充的研究内容，用你的研究重点和创新点进行规避 任何研究都不是完美无缺的，我们只要有理有据地提出了问题，合理地确定研究边界并解决 问题，就是好的研究。因此当我们确实无法满足审稿人补充研究的要求时，可以以论文的研 究重点或主要创新点来进行解释和规避。 b. 对于可以补充的研究内容，尽量进行补充研究并详细说明 若是有可能依据审稿人的要求进行补充的，则尽量进行补充研究。若没有完全按照审稿人的 要求进行修改，如只补充了部分研究，则应该从实际情况详细介绍补充研究的内容。
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Realtime Monitoring of Xylitol Fermentation by Micro-Raman Spectroscopy”(LANL-2014-0001). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The ma in corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: 1. Response to comment (Reviewer 1): (The proposed method was established with the lack of the process of the optimization. The curve was adopted to illustrate the changes of absorption peak in the process of fermentation, but the absorption peak couldn’t be confirmed the identical to the reference peak of xylitol. It needs more data to prove the reliability of the method) Response: C onsidering the Reviewer’s suggestion, the experiment of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is added to verify the reliability of the Raman data. Raman paek is a kind of inelastic scattering paek（not absorption peak）, Raman spectrum of the standard xylitol and xylose solutions was uesd to selecte the most appropriate characteristic bands of xylitol and xylose for our experiment based on their comparative strength without overlap with other bands. 2. Response to comment(Reviewer 1): (The literature data(table 1) was used in
(完整版)回答SCI审稿人的方法
如何有策略有技巧的回复审稿人尤为重要。好的回复是文章被接收的重要砝码，而不恰当的回复轻则导致再次修改从而拖延发稿时间，重则导致文章被拒，前功尽弃。下面把我平时总结的一些答复审稿人的策略和写回复信的格式和技巧跟大家交流一下。 首先，绝对服从编辑的意见。在审稿人给出各自的意见之后，编辑一般不会再提出自己的意见。但是，编辑一旦提出某些意见，就意味着他认为这是文章里的重大缺陷，至少是不合他的口味。这时，我们唯一能够做的只能是服从。因为毕竟是人家掌握着生杀予夺的大权。 第二，永远不要跟审稿人争执。跟审稿人起争执是非常不明智的一件事情。审稿人意见如果正确那就不用说了，直接照办就是。如果不正确的话，也大可不必在回复中冷嘲热讽，心平气和的说明白就是了。大家都是青年人，血气方刚，被人拍了当然不爽，被人错拍了就更不爽了。尤其是一些名门正派里的弟子，看到一审结果是major而不是minor本来就已经很不爽了，难得抓住审稿人的尾巴，恨不得拖出来打死。有次审稿，一个审稿人给的意见是增加两篇参考文献（估计也就是审稿人自己的文章啦），结果作者在回复中写到，making a reference is not charity！看到之后我当时就笑喷了，可以想象审稿人得被噎成什么样。正如大家所想的那样，这篇稿子理所当然的被拒了，虽然后来经编辑调解改成了major revision，但毕竟耽误的是作者自己的时间不是？ 第三，合理掌握修改和argue的分寸。所谓修改就是对文章内容进行的修改和补充，所谓argue 就是在回复信中对审稿人的答复。这其中大有文章可做，中心思想就是容易改的照改，不容易改的或者不想改的跟审稿人argue。对于语法、拼写错误、某些词汇的更换、对某些公式和图表做进一步解释等相对容易做到的修改，一定要一毫不差的根据审稿意见照做。而对于新意不足、创新性不够这类根本没法改的，还有诸如跟算法A，B，C，D做比较，补充大量实验等短时间内根本没法完成的任务，我们则要有理有据的argue。在Argue的时候首先要肯定审稿人说的很对，他提出的方法也很好，但本文的重点是blablabla，跟他说的不是一回事。然后为了表示对审稿人的尊重，象征性的在文中加上一段这方面的discussion，这样既照顾到了审稿人的面子，编辑那也能交待的过去。 第四，聪明的掌握修改时间。拿到审稿意见，如果是minor，意见只有寥寥数行，那当然会情不自禁的一蹴而就，一天甚至几小时搞定修改稿。这时候，问题在于要不要马上投回去了？我的意见是放一放，多看一看，两个星期之后再投出去。这样首先避免了由于大喜过望而没能及时检查出的小毛病，还不会让编辑觉得你是在敷衍他。如果结果是major，建议至少放一个月再投出去，显得比较郑重。 上面是一些一般性的答复审稿人的策略，在实际中的应用还需要大家见仁见智。下面谈谈答复信的写法。 写答复信的唯一目的是让编辑和审稿人一目了然的知道我们做了哪些修改。因此，所有的格式和写法都要围绕这一目的。一般来说可以把答复信分成三部分，即List of Actions, Responses to Editor, Responses to Reviewers。第一部分List of Actions的作用是简明扼要的列出所有修改的条目，让编辑和审稿人在第一时间对修改量有个概念，同时它还充当着修改目录的作用，详见下面的例子。剩下的两部分是分别对编辑和审稿人所做的答复，格式可以一样，按照“意见”－“argue”（如果有的话）－“修改”这样逐条进行。清楚醒目起见，可以用不同字体分别标出，比如“意见”用italic，“argue”正常字体，“修改”用bold。下面
如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见
如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见 首次分享者：刘功伟已被分享1次评论(0)复制链接分享转载删除 1.所有问题必须逐条回答。 2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。 3.满足不了的也不要回避，说明不能做的合理理由。 4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用，并讨论透彻。 以下是本人对审稿人意见的回复一例，仅供参考。 续两点经验： 1. 最重要的是逐条回答，即使你答不了，也要老实交代；不要太狡猾，以至于耽误事； 2. 绝大部分实验是不要真追加的，除非你受到启发，而想改投另外高档杂志----因为你既然已经写成文章，从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story”了。 以上指国际杂志修稿。国内杂志太多，以至于稿源吃紧，基本没有退稿，所以你怎么修都是接受。 我的文章水平都不高，主要是没有明显的创新性，也很苦恼。但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外，其他都在国际杂志（也都是SCI）发表。以我了解的情况，我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿，退稿的极少，只有一次被《某某科学进展》拒绝。究其原因，除了我上面说的，另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃，导师把关也比较严的缘故。 自我感觉总结（不一定对）： 1）国内杂志审稿极慢（少数除外），但现在也有加快趋势； 2）国内杂志编辑人员认真负责的人不多，稿子寄去后，少则几个月，多则一年多没有任何消息； 3）国内杂志要求修改的稿子，如果你自己不修，他最后也给你发； 4）国外杂志要求补充实验的，我均以解释而过关，原因见少帖）。还因为：很少杂志编辑把你的修改稿再寄给当初审稿人的，除非审稿人特别请求。编辑不一定懂你的东西，他只是看到你认真修改，回答疑问了，也就接受了（当然高档杂志可能不是这样，我的经验只限定一般杂志（影响因子1-5）。 欢迎大家批评指正。 我常用的回复格式: Dear reviewer: I am very grateful to your comments for the manuscript. According with your advice, we amended the relevant part in manuscript. Some of your questions were answered below. 1）
SCI审稿意见回复
ListofResponses DearEditorsandReviewers: Thankyouforyour Respondstothereviewer'scomments: Reviewer#1: 1.Responsetocomment:(……简要列出意见……) Response:×××××× 2.Responsetocomment:(……简要列出意见……) Response:×××××× ...... 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……... Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……... ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer'scomments. Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer'ssuggestion AsReviewersuggestedthat…… ConsideringtheReviewer'ssuggestion,wehave…… 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments. Reviewer#2: 同上述 Reviewer#3: ×××××× Otherchanges: 1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………” 2.Line107,“……”wasadded 3.Line129,“……”wasdeleted ×××××× WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers'warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwill meetwithapproval. Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions.