2013年数模美赛论文

2013年数模美赛论文
2013年数模美赛论文

地球健康的网络建模

摘要

随着当今科学技术的快速发展,地球的生态和环境压力正在变的越来越大,但是却很少有准确有信服力的数学模型来验证这个观点,所以全社会都迫切地希望建立一个模型来准确的描述和预测地球健康。

为了方便模型的建立,我们选择以EHI(earth health index)作为衡量地球压力的指标,EHI的决定因素包括无机环境和有机生物两个部分,其中无机环境部分我们选择了地球大气状况、水资源及土地资源作为研究对象,有机生物则研究地球上的物种状况。由网络的相关概念,我们选择以不同地区作为网络节点,并将全球分为12个网络节点,每个网络节点即地区选择具有代表性的国家为研究对象.通过研究12个网络节点的EHI进而得出全球的EHI。

研究12个网络节点时,我们选该地区4个决定性因素的数据做研究,通过相关关系即可得出该地区的EHI,进而即可得出全球,得到历年全球EHI的数据后,我们用Matlab做仿真模拟得出曲线图,并可找到模拟函数,通过计算出模拟函数的系数后,即可得到该模拟函数,由模拟函数,我们即可模拟出未来几年内全球EHI的情况,并且成功找到了该函数及全球压力的临界状态,另外如果某地区条件变化引起全球变化,该模型模型能为此提供预警。

最后,我们分别从自然因素和社会因素两个方面对的到的模型进行测试。分别选择了马尔代夫和中国作为测试对象,测试结果与实际数据吻合良好,表明该模型可以准确模拟全球生态和环境压力状况。

关键词:EHI,网络节点,仿真模拟

1.问题重述

我们能否利用地球健康的本地或地区性参数,建立一个全球模型,来预测潜在的状态变化,以政策对地球健康的潜在影响为基础,帮助政策制定者设计出有效的政策。尽管许多警示性的信号已经出现,没人知道地球是否已经在全球范围内逼近了临界点,以及这样一个极端的状态是否是不可避免的。

要求完成以下任务:

问题1: 通过确定影响地球健康某一方面的本土因素(网络节点),并且通过恰当的方式把这些节点关联起来(网络链接)进行关系和属性影响的跟踪分析,在此基础上建立一个动态的全球网络模型。由于这些影响是动态变化的,因此重要的一点是,该模式必须包括能够对该健康状况未来发展势头进行预测的动态时间因素。比如,你的节点可能是国家,大陆,海洋,栖息地,等因素或以上几个因素的结合,这些因素共同构成一个全球模型。你的链接可能代表随时间变化而变化的节点影响或环境影响,或物理因素(比如污染)的走势。你所参照的地球健康因子可以是包括人口、生物、环境、社会、政治、物理和(或)化学在内的地球状态的任何要素。一定要明确定义你的模型中的所有要素,并且解释你在建模过程中界定网络建构考量因素、节点实体和链接特性的科学依据。如果有足够的数据的话,确定一个方法来设定参数和解释你如何测试你所建立的模型。什么类型的数据可以用来证明或验证你所建立的模型的有效性?(注意:如果你缺乏必要的数据来确定参数或进行验证,请不要否决你的模式。你的导师确信,在这个阶段,有创意的想法和理论和有充分数据支持验证的模型同样重要。)请在模型中考虑人的因素,并解释人类的行为和政府的政策会在什么方面影响你的模型结果。

问题2:运行你的模型,观察它是如何预测未来地球的健康的。对通常从数据中中确定出的参数,你可能需要进行评估。

2.相关概念

为了建立一个合适需求的模型,首先,我们要建立一个叫做EHI(Abbreviation of earth health index)的指数来描述这个问题。

2.1 EHI的决定因素和相关指数

2.2 选择以上因素的原因

1.地球包含有机生物和无机环境,以上两部分对EHI都有非常重要的影响。

2.生物圈是地球上最大的生态系统,它有大气、水圈和岩石圈组成。前三个决定因素可以全面的代表无机环境。

3.物种是地球上有机生命存在的客观形式,因此物种状况可以最准确地衡量地球有机生命的状态。

4.为了实现EHI的定性计算,我们选择以上四个相关指数来代表EHI的决定因素。

3.全球网络模型的建立

3.1 EHI的计算方法

3.1.1特定地区EHI计算

假设我们要计算全球的EHI,我们应该先选择一个地方的EHI进行计算,然后我们可以选择多个特定地区的EHI来代表全球的EHI.

(一个特定的地方,特定的时间)

}

,,

,

{:

P

d GEF

c API

b IWS

a FAR

i

d

c

b

a

= =

= =

通过这些因素之间的相互关系,局部地区的EHI可以有上图中的有四条边组成的四边形的面积描述,每条边代表一种指数。指数的大小可以由边的长短来衡量。

通过原理图的图解

?

+

S?

+

?

(a

+

?

=

d

b

)/2

d

a

c

b

c

=

S

m(P

)

i

S=

EHI

(local)

3.1.2 全球EHI计算

了解每个地方的EHI,我们开始连接节点来构建E HI的全球网络模型,我们从全球选择12个节点相连。对节点的描述如下:

选择网络连接节点的原则

1.通过地理划分来选择节点

2.每个节点必须准确地描述出特定地区的EHI

3.所选地区要保持相对平衡

4.组成的网络要能够最大化的覆盖全球

设定

1.用字母i来标示每一个节点

2.每个地区的面积=Ai

3.每个节点的局部EHI=Si;

4.全球的EHI的三维图表如下

通过计算原则,全球的EHI 可以用上图的体积来描述。

∑∑==?=12112

1

)

/()(i i Ai Ai Si S

用最终结果“S ”来表示,全球EHI 就很明显了。人们使用这个指数就可以来判断全球的健康状况。

全球网络模型可以处理各种各样的变化因素,包括自然因素和社会因素。不管那种因素变化,都可能造成这四种决定因素的变化。当基本因素变化时,EHI 的最终结果会变成一个新的数据,由此就能反应地球健康水平的变化。

4.全球网络模型的求解

全球网络模型可以用来预测未来地球健康状况的发展。使用这个模型可以了解EHI 的发展趋势,步骤如下:

我们用一些国家的数据来描述12个节点的数据.结果如下:

FAR

IWS

用以上方法,我们可以计算每个网络节点的EHI,计算结果如下:

利用以上数据,我们可以绘制每个网络节点的EHI图,结果如下:

这是每个网络节点的局部EHI图形,由此,我们可以很容易的计算出每年全球的EHI,相关的数据和图表如下:

数据

图形

为了预测EHI的趋势,我们用MATLAB软件来做仿真模拟。

我们用现有的数据来找到一个合适的函数,由软件仿真结果可知,这个函数如下:

))(E/(t )

/(2Csin B At S(t)F M D t +?+++=π

注释:

1.在公式中,字母A 、B 、C 、D 、E 、F 、M 都是系数。 2.所有的系数都由具体节点的复杂程度来描述。 3.12个系数可以由一个确定的矩阵来描述。 A : p1=[ 0.002329 0.002236 0.001331 0.001339 -0.003669 -0.006524

0.000973 0.001474 0.001561 0.0004794 0.001311 0.005169 ];

B : p2=

[ -4.167 -4.043 -2.604

-2.358 7.922 13.64

-1.176 -2.478 -2.65

-0.4775 -2.162 -10.11 ];

C: p3=[ -0.002182 0.001647 -2.91e-006 0.009545 0.007509 -0.001384

-0.0005095 0.0007418 5.447e-005

0.001176 -0.005093 -0.008302 ];

D: p4= [ 2.8 2.8 3.4

3 2.8 2 .8

2.4

3.6 3.6

2.8 2.4 2.8 ];

M: p5=[ 1.549 1.59 0.9853

1.57 1.413 1.744

1.705

2.012 1.168

1.672

2.32 1.749 ];

E: p6=[ 5531 3.08 -9.827

1.46 1

2.05 4334

-5.738 4670 4507

13.09 1.558 4732 ];

F: p7=[ 3257 -2001 0.3918

0.8031 -1993 2584

-2001 2009 1991

-2000 -2003 3357 ];

趋势图如下:

我们可以得到全球EHI的函数系数

通过全球EHI函数,我们可以得到其未来发展趋势图。

从上述图表,我们得出:

1.这个曲线可以看做一种特殊的阻尼振荡。

2.纺锤式振荡的曲线可以用一个时间函数来描述它的解析公式为:

p(x)=0.0006675x - 0.8887

公式中(x +E) /F 可以用来描述函数的振幅,由以上图表可知,这个因素基

本保持不变,并且

))

/(

(

)

/

2

sin(F

t

E

M

D

C+

?

+

π

几乎不不减弱,所以很

明显振幅基本上保持不变。

由函数的特征,我们可以预测全球健康的未来趋势。

1.在很长的时间内,EHI缓慢增长,所以我们可以预测地球的健康状况基本保持在一个比较稳定的水平,保持振荡平衡。

2.如果负面的因素变得更加严重,那么系数A将会变成负数,同时EHI将震荡衰减。当A=0时,它将达到临界状态。假如这种情况发生,振幅会突然增加。如果函数图像接近纺锤形,将会达到严重的临界状态。如果超过临界状态,任何措施都将无济于事,地球必然走向灭亡。

5.模型测试

为了测试这个模型,我们需要分析每个节点的连接情况。当地球上某个地区的自然环境或社会环境发生变化,EHI 将会受到影响。我们需要讨论局部因素和全球EHI 的关系,结果如下:

当局部因素发生变化时,它首先会影响到四个决定因素的变化。

决定因素:i P

决定因素的变化量:i P ? EHI 的初始值:0S EHI 的瞬时值:S

)(i i P P m S ?+=

0S S S -=?

由于每一种影响因素都是离散的,这些因素的影响将被分为两种变量,即为时间增量和空间增量。

通过微观物质理论和量子力学理论,我们可以对模型做如下讨论:

起点A的坐标:ξ

随机点B 的坐标:x A和B间距离:ξ-x

相关范围内的密度函数:)(ξ?

时间:t

因素对B 的影响函数:),(t x u

)(),(?E t x u =

通过积分得到:

t

x e t

R

t x u βξπβ4)(24),(--

?=

从微观到宏观,此公式依然适用。

结论:

?

?=

??

-?++==?+=?+=-=???=?∑∑==--12

1

12

1

4)(0000)

()()(4)}()({)()()

()()()()()

()()(),()()(2i i

i i

i

t

x Ai Ai Ai i i i A

B A B S global S e t

R

p m p p m B S B S p m S p p m S B S B S B S A S A S A S t x u A S B S βξπβ

β的相关因素:

1.自然因素

n lg =β

其中n 为扩散系数,为物质的属性。

2.社会因素

β为常数(所有社会因素的影响速度都是相同的)

5.1 自然因素测试

2003年,印度尼西亚遭受严重的海啸,一年之后,我们以马尔代夫为测试对象。

根据所设模型,通过计算可得,马尔代夫的局部EHI 为: 模拟结果:0.4844 实际数据:0.4840 全球的EHI :

模拟结果:0.4486 实际数据:0.4491

5.2社会因素测试

2003年,海湾战争爆发,我们以中国为测试对象。

模拟结果:0.4423 实际数据:0.4412

t

x Ai Ai Ai e

t

R

p m p p m B S B S βξπβ4)(024)}()({)()(--??-?++=

全球的EHI :

模拟结果:0.4521 实际数据:0.4505

5.3 测试结果分析:

1.所建模型可以准确反映实际情况,由此可以准确模拟未来一段时间内EHI

2.误差分析:

%

1000

Re Re ?-==+=al

Model

al A B B

A S S S u u u u u

u1L =0.08% u1G =0.09% u2L =0.26% u2G =0.27% 注:时间越长,误差越大

3.灵敏度

当时间较短时,误差很低,即便有突发状况发生,依然较为灵敏。

4.反馈环路

我们可以利用数据来计算EHI ,同时当因素发生变化时,我们可以测量EHI 的值。所得结果同时可以帮助我们改进完善这个模型。 5.政策制定

在制定政策之前,我们可以在一些地区进行模拟测试,由EHI 的测试结果向政府提供一些建设性意见。

数学建模美赛o奖论文

For office use only T1________________ T2________________ T3________________ T4________________ Team Control Number 55069 Problem Chosen A For office use only F1________________ F2________________ F3________________ F4________________ 2017 MCM/ICM Summary Sheet The Rehabilitation of the Kariba Dam Recently, the Institute of Risk Management of South Africa has just warned that the Kariba dam is in desperate need of rehabilitation, otherwise the whole dam would collapse, putting 3.5 million people at risk. Aimed to look for the best strategy with the three options listed to maintain the dam, we employ AHP model to filter factors and determine two most influential criteria, including potential costs and benefits. With the weight of each criterion worked out, our model demonstrates that option 3is the optimal choice. According to our choice, we are required to offer the recommendation as to the number and placement of the new dams. Regarding it as a set covering problem, we develop a multi-objective optimization model to minimize the number of smaller dams while improving the water resources management capacity. Applying TOPSIS evaluation method to get the demand of the electricity and water, we solve this problem with genetic algorithm and get an approximate optimal solution with 12 smaller dams and determine the location of them. Taking the strategy for modulating the water flow into account, we construct a joint operation of dam system to simulate the relationship among the smaller dams with genetic algorithm approach. We define four kinds of year based on the Kariba’s climate data of climate, namely, normal flow year, low flow year, high flow year and differential year. Finally, these statistics could help us simulate the water flow of each month in one year, then we obtain the water resources planning and modulating strategy. The sensitivity analysis of our model has pointed out that small alteration in our constraints (including removing an important city of the countries and changing the measurement of the economic development index etc.) affects the location of some of our dams slightly while the number of dams remains the same. Also we find that the output coefficient is not an important factor for joint operation of the dam system, for the reason that the discharge index and the capacity index would not change a lot with the output coefficient changing.

数学建模美赛2012MCM B论文

Camping along the Big Long River Summary In this paper, the problem that allows more parties entering recreation system is investigated. In order to let park managers have better arrangements on camping for parties, the problem is divided into four sections to consider. The first section is the description of the process for single-party's rafting. That is, formulating a Status Transfer Equation of a party based on the state of the arriving time at any campsite. Furthermore, we analyze the encounter situations between two parties. Next we build up a simulation model according to the analysis above. Setting that there are recreation sites though the river, count the encounter times when a new party enters this recreation system, and judge whether there exists campsites available for them to station. If the times of encounter between parties are small and the campsite is available, the managers give them a good schedule and permit their rafting, or else, putting off the small interval time t until the party satisfies the conditions. Then solve the problem by the method of computer simulation. We imitate the whole process of rafting for every party, and obtain different numbers of parties, every party's schedule arrangement, travelling time, numbers of every campsite's usage, ratio of these two kinds of rafting boats, and time intervals between two parties' starting time under various numbers of campsites after several times of simulation. Hence, explore the changing law between the numbers of parties (X) and the numbers of campsites (Y) that X ascends rapidly in the first period followed by Y's increasing and the curve tends to be steady and finally looks like a S curve. In the end of our paper, we make sensitive analysis by changing parameters of simulation and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of our model, and write a memo to river managers on the arrangements of rafting. Key words: Camping;Computer Simulation; Status Transfer Equation

美赛数学建模比赛论文模板

The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule Summary As for the first question, it provides a traffic rule of keep right except to pass, requiring us to verify its effectiveness. Firstly, we define one kind of traffic rule different from the rule of the keep right in order to solve the problem clearly; then, we build a Cellular automaton model and a Nasch model by collecting massive data; next, we make full use of the numerical simulation according to several influence factors of traffic flow; At last, by lots of analysis of graph we obtain, we indicate a conclusion as follow: when vehicle density is lower than 0.15, the rule of lane speed control is more effective in terms of the factor of safe in the light traffic; when vehicle density is greater than 0.15, so the rule of keep right except passing is more effective In the heavy traffic. As for the second question, it requires us to testify that whether the conclusion we obtain in the first question is the same apply to the keep left rule. First of all, we build a stochastic multi-lane traffic model; from the view of the vehicle flow stress, we propose that the probability of moving to the right is 0.7and to the left otherwise by making full use of the Bernoulli process from the view of the ping-pong effect, the conclusion is that the choice of the changing lane is random. On the whole, the fundamental reason is the formation of the driving habit, so the conclusion is effective under the rule of keep left. As for the third question, it requires us to demonstrate the effectiveness of the result advised in the first question under the intelligent vehicle control system. Firstly, taking the speed limits into consideration, we build a microscopic traffic simulator model for traffic simulation purposes. Then, we implement a METANET model for prediction state with the use of the MPC traffic controller. Afterwards, we certify that the dynamic speed control measure can improve the traffic flow . Lastly neglecting the safe factor, combining the rule of keep right with the rule of dynamical speed control is the best solution to accelerate the traffic flow overall. Key words:Cellular automaton model Bernoulli process Microscopic traffic simulator model The MPC traffic control

美赛:13215---数模英文论文

Team Control Number For office use only 13215 For office use only T1 ________________ F1 ________________ T2 ________________ F2 ________________ T3 ________________ Problem Chosen F3 ________________ T4 ________________ F4 ________________ C 2012 Mathematical Contest in Modeling (MCM) Summary Sheet (Attach a copy of this page to each copy of your solution paper.) Type a summary of your results on this page. Do not include the name of your school, advisor, or team members on this page. Message Network Modeling for Crime Busting Abstract A particularly popular and challenging problem in crime analysis is to identify the conspirators through analysis of message networks. In this paper, using the data of message traffic, we model to prioritize the likelihood of one’s being conspirator, and nominate the probable conspiracy leaders. We note a fact that any conspirator has at least one message communication with other conspirators, and assume that sending or receiving a message has the same effect, and then develop Model 1, 2 and 3 to make a priority list respectively and Model 4 to nominate the conspiracy leader. In Model 1, we take the amount of one’s suspicious messages and one’s all messages with known conspirators into account, and define a simple composite index to measure the likelihood of one’s being conspirator. Then, considering probability relevance of all nodes, we develop Model 2 based on Law of Total Probability . In this model, probability of one’s being conspirator is the weight sum of probabilities of others directly linking to it. And we develop Algorithm 1 to calculate probabilities of all the network nodes as direct calculation is infeasible. Besides, in order to better quantify one’s relationship to the known conspirators, we develop Model 3, which brings in the concept “shortest path” of graph theory to create an indicator evaluating the likelihood of one’s being conspirator which can be calculated through Algorithm 2. As a result, we compare three priority lists and conclude that the overall rankings are similar but quite changes appear in some nodes. Additionally, when altering the given information, we find that the priority list just changes slightly except for a few nodes, so that we validate the models’ stability. Afterwards, by using Freeman’s centrality method, we develop Model 4 to nominate three most probable leaders: Paul, Elsie, Dolores (senior manager). What’s more, we make some remarks about the models and discuss what could be done to enhance them in the future work. In addition, we further explain Investigation EZ through text and semantic network analysis, so to illustrate the models’ capacity of applying to more complicated cases. Finally, we briefly state the application of our models in other disciplines.

2014年数学建模美赛题目原文及翻译

2014年数学建模美赛题目原文及翻译 作者:Ternence Zhang 转载注明出处:https://www.360docs.net/doc/015740497.html,/zhangtengyuan23 MCM原题PDF: https://www.360docs.net/doc/015740497.html,/detail/zhangty0223/6901271 PROBLEM A: The Keep-Right-Except-To-Pass Rule In countries where driving automobiles on the right is the rule (that is, USA, China and most other countries except for Great Britain, Australia, and some former British colonies), multi-lane freeways often employ a rule that requires drivers to drive in the right-most lane unless they are passing another vehicle, in which case they move one lane to the left, pass, and return to their former travel lane. Build and analyze a mathematical model to analyze the performance of this rule in light and heavy traffic. You may wish to examine tradeoffs between traffic flow and safety, the role of under- or over-posted speed limits (that is, speed limits that are too low or too high), and/or other factors that may not be

2019数学建模美赛论文

2019 MCM/ICM Summary Sheet (Your team's summary should be included as the first page of your electronic submission.) Type a summary of your results on this page. Do not include the name of your school, advisor , or team members on this page. Ecosystems provide many natural processes to maintain a healthy and sustainable environment after human life. However, over the past decades, rapid industrial development and other anthropogenic activities have been limiting or removing ecosystem services. It is necessary to access the impact of human activities on biodiversity and environmental degradation. The main purpose of this work is to understand the true economic costs of land use projects when ecosystem services are considered. To this end, we propose an ecological service assessment model to perform a cost benefit analysis of land use development projects of varying sites, from small-scale community projects to large national projects. We mainly focus on the treatment cost of environmental pollution in land use from three aspects: air pollution, solid waste and water pollution. We collect pollution data nationwide from 2010 to 2015 to estimate economic costs. We visually analyze the change in economic costs over time via some charts. We also analyze how the economic cost changes with time by using linear regression method. We divide the data into small community projects data (living pollution data) and large natural data (industrial pollution data). Our results indicate that the economic costs of restoring economical services for different scales of land use are different. For small-scale land, according to our analysis, the treatment cost of living pollution is about 30 million every year in China. With the rapid development of technology, the cost is lower than past years. For large-scale land, according to our analysis, the treatment cost of industrial pollution is about 8 million, which is lower than cost of living pollution. Meanwhile the cost is trending down due to technology development. The theory developed here provides a sound foundation for effective decision making policies on land use projects. Key words: economic cost , ecosystem service, ecological service assesment model, pollution. Team Control Number For office use only For office use only T1 ________________ F1 ________________ T2 ________________ F2 ________________ T3 ________________ Problem Chosen F3 ________________ T4 ________________ F4 ________________ E

数学建模美赛论文格式中文版

你的论文需要从此开始 请居中 使用Arial14字体 第一作者,第二作者和其他(使用Arial14字体) 1.第一作者的详细地址,包括国籍和email(使用Arial11) 2.第二作者的详细地址,包括国籍和email(使用Arial11) 3.将所有的详细信息标记为相同格式 关键词 列出文章的关键词。这些关键词会被出版方用作关键词索引(使用Arial11字体) 论文正文使用Times New Roman12字体 摘要 这一部分阐述说明了如何为TransTechPublications.准备手稿。最好阅读这些用法说明并且整篇论文都是遵照这个提纲。手稿的正文部分应该是17cm*25cm(宽*高)的格式(或者是6.7*9.8英尺)。请不要在这个区域以外书写。请使用21*29厘米或8*11英尺的质量较好的白纸。你的手稿可能会被出版商缩减20%。在制图和绘表格时候请特别注意这些准则。 引言 所有的语言都应该是英语。请备份你的手稿(以防在邮寄过程中丢失)我们收到手稿即默认为原作者允许我们在期刊和书报出版。如果作者在论文中使用了其他刊物中的图表,他们需要联系原作者,获取使用权。将单词或词组倾斜以示强调。除了每一部分的标题(标记部分的标题),不要加粗正文或大写首字母。使用激光打印机,而不是点阵打印机 正文的组织: 小标题 小标题应该加粗并注意字母的大小写。第二等级的小标题被视为后面段落的一部分(就像这一大段的一小部分的开头) 页码 不要打印页码。请用淡蓝色铅笔在每一张纸的左下角(在打印区域以外)标注数字。 脚注 脚注应该单独放置并且和正文分开理想地情况下,脚注应该出现在参考文献页,并且放在文章的末尾,和正文用分割线分开。 表格 表格(如表一,表二,...)应该放在正文当中,是正文的一部分,但是,要避免文本混乱。一个描述性的表格标题要放在图表的下方。标题应该独立的放在表格的下方或旁边。 表中的单位应放在中括号中[兆伏]如果中括号不可用,需使用大括号{兆}或小括号(兆)。1.这就是脚注

美赛一等奖经验总结

当我谈数学建模时我谈些什么——美赛一等奖经验总结 作者:彭子未 前言:2012 年3月28号晚,我知道了美赛成绩,一等奖(Meritorus Winner),没有太多的喜悦,只是感觉释怀,一年以来的努力总算有了回报。从国赛遗憾丢掉国奖,到美赛一等,这一路走来太多的不易,感谢我的家人、队友以及朋友的支持,没有你们,我无以为继。 这篇文章在美赛结束后就已经写好了,算是对自己建模心得体会的一个总结。现在成绩尘埃落定,我也有足够的自信把它贴出来,希望能够帮到各位对数模感兴趣的同学。 欢迎大家批评指正,欢迎与我交流,这样我们才都能进步。 个人背景:我2010年入学,所在的学校是广东省一所普通大学,今年大二,学工商管理专业,没学过编程。 学校组织参加过几届美赛,之前唯一的一个一等奖是三年前拿到的,那一队的主力师兄凭借这一奖项去了北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校,学运筹学。今年再次拿到一等奖,我创了两个校记录:一是第一个在大二拿到数模美赛一等奖,二是第一个在文科专业拿数模美赛一等奖。我的数模历程如下: 2011.4 校内赛三等奖 2011.8 通过选拔参加暑期国赛培训(学校之前不允许大一学生参加) 2011.9 国赛广东省二等奖 2011.11 电工杯三等奖 2012.2 美赛一等奖(Meritorious Winner) 动机:我参加数学建模的动机比较单纯,完全是出于兴趣。我的专业是工商管理,没有学过编程,觉得没必要学。我所感兴趣的是模型本身,它的思想,它的内涵,它的发展过程、它的适用问题等等。我希望通过学习模型,能够更好的去理解一些现象,了解其中蕴含的数学机理。数学模型中包含着一种简洁的哲学,深刻而迷人。 当然获得荣誉方面的动机可定也有,谁不想拿奖呢? 模型:数学模型的功能大致有三种:评价、优化、预测。几乎所有模型都是围绕这三种功能来做的。比如,今年美赛A题树叶分类属于评价模型,B题漂流露营安排则属于优化模型。 对于不同功能的模型有不同的方法,例如评价模型方法有层次分析、模糊综合评价、熵值法等;优化模型方法有启发式算法(模拟退火、遗传算法等)、仿真方法(蒙特卡洛、元胞自动机等);预测模型方法有灰色预测、神经网络、马尔科夫链等。在数学中国网站上有许多关于这些方法的相关介绍与文献。

数学建模美赛论文中可以用到的短语

MCM论文写作常用句型(长文,建议收藏) The expression of ... can be expanded as: ... ...的表达式可扩展为... A is exponentially smaller than B, so it can be neglected. A对B来说呈指数级减小,所以可以忽略不计。 Equation (1) is reduced to: 方程(1)化简为: Substitute the values into equation (3), we get... 把这些值代入方程3,我们得到... According to our first assumption on Page 1, 根据我们第一页的第一个假设, Thus we arrive at the conclusion: 因此我们得到结论: From the model of ..., we find that theoretically, it is almost true that ... 由...模型,我们从理论上证明了... 是真实可信的。 That is the theoretical basis for ... in many application areas. 这是...在很多领域应用的理论基础。 To quantitatively analyze the different requirements of the two applications, we intro duce two measures: 为了定量的分析这两种应用的不同要求,我们介绍来两个量度标准。 We give the criterion that... 我们给出了...的判别标准 According to the criterion of... 根据...的标准 So its expression can be derived from equation (3) with small change. 所以它的表达式可以由方程3做微小改动而推出。 Suppose that ...refers to... 假设...指的是...

数模美赛论文常用词汇

exclusively专门 undobtedly毫无疑问的 notable 值得注意的 tremedous/significant极大的 notion概念 definition定义——define Interpret……as…… 理解……为 invoke(+模型援引,引用 equation方程式,等式 function 因变量——提示符号的含义 matrix矩阵,模型 constant 常数,常量It requires I t o be a constant for …to be true algorithm演算方法——a general algorithm 通用算法simplify the algorithm 简化算法we have produced a general algrrithm to solve this tpye of problems. derivative微分,倒数antiderivative 不定积分 optimal results 最优结果 invesgate the problem from different point of view调查问题——investgation调查 survey 调查 subproblem 子问题,次要问题——major problem 主要问题 metric 度量标准,指标 digit 数字delete some digits element /component 元素 解题思路seek/explore—— explore different ideas探索不同的想法 we seek to device a new model for solving the problem by exploring the new direction suggested by their investigations. 解决方案design/device ——develop/establish/conduct Based on our analysis, we design a model for the problem using integral linear programming(线性积分). We then devise a polynominal-time apprximation algorithm to produce near optimal https://www.360docs.net/doc/015740497.html,ing integral linear programming.We then device a polynominal-time approximation to We conduct sensitivity analysis on…to find…xxx analysis is also performed. 解决结果tackle/solve We tackle the problem using the new technique we developed in the previous section.While it is difficult to solve the problem completely, we are able to solve a major subproblem. 计划与打算approach/propose We approach the problem using the proposed method. We propose a new approach to tackling the problem.

当我谈数学建模时我谈些什么——美赛一等奖经验总结

前言:2012年3月28号晚,我知道了美赛成绩,一等奖(Meritorious Winner),没有太多的喜悦,只是感觉释怀,一年以来的努力总算有了回报。从国赛遗憾丢掉国奖,到美赛一等,这一路走来太多的不易,感谢我的家人、队友以及朋友的支持,没有你们,我无以为继。 个人背景:我2010年入学,所在的学校是广东省一所普通大学,今年大二,学工商管理专业,没学过编程。 学校组织参加过几届美赛,之前唯一的一个一等奖是三年前拿到的,那一队的主力师兄凭借这一奖项去了北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校,学运筹学。今年再次拿到一等奖,我创了两个校记录:一是第一个在大二拿到数模美赛一等奖,二是第一个在文科专业拿数模美赛一等奖。我的数模历程如下: 2011.4 校内赛三等奖 2011.8 通过选拔参加暑期国赛培训(学校之前不允许大一学生参加) 2011.9 国赛广东省二等奖 2011.11 电工杯三等奖 2012.2 美赛一等奖(Meritorious Winner) 动机:我参加数学建模的动机比较单纯,完全是出于兴趣。我的专业是工商管理,没有学过编程,觉得没必要学。我所感兴趣的是模型本身,它的思想,它的内涵,它的发展过程、它的适用问题等等。我希望通过学习模型,能够更好的去理解一些现象,了解其中蕴含的数学机理。数学模型中包含着一种简洁的哲学,深刻而迷人。 当然获得荣誉方面的动机可定也有,谁不想拿奖呢? 模型:数学模型的功能大致有三种:评价、优化、预测。几乎所有模型都是围绕这三种功能来做的。比如,今年美赛A题树叶分类属于评价模型,B题漂流露营安排则属于优化模型。 对于不同功能的模型有不同的方法,例如评价模型方法有层次分析、模糊综合评价、熵值法等;优化模型方法有启发式算法(模拟退火、遗传算法等)、仿真方法(蒙特卡洛、元胞自动机等);预测模型方法有灰色预测、神经网络、马尔科夫链等。在数学中国网站上有许多关于这些方法的相关介绍与文献。 关于模型软件与书籍,这方面的文章很多,这里只做简单介绍。关于软件这三款已经足够:Matlab、SPSS、Lingo,学好一个即可(我只会用SPSS,另外两个队友会)。书籍方面,

数学建模美赛论文摘要的写法

Abstract 第一段:写论文解决什么问题 1.问题的重述 a. 介绍重点词开头: 例1:“Hand move” irrigation, a cheap but labor-intensive system used on small farms, consists of a movable pipe with sprinkler on top that can be attached to a stationary main. 例2:……is a real-life common phenomenon with many complexities. 例3:An (effective plan) is crucial to……… b. 直接指出问题: 例1:We find the optimal number of tollbooths in a highway toll-plaza for a given number of highway lanes: the number of tollbooths that minimizes average delay experienced by cars. 例2:A brand-new university needs to balance the cost of information technology security measures with the potential cost of attacks on its systems. 例3:We determine the number of sprinklers to use by analyzing the energy and motion of water in the pipe and examining the engineering parameters of sprinklers available in the market. 例4: After mathematically analyzing the ……problem, our modeling group would like to present our conclusions, strategies, (and recommendations )to the ……. 例5:Our goal is... that (minimizes the time )………. 2.解决这个问题的伟大意义 反面说明。如果没有…… Without implementing defensive measure, the university is exposed to an expected loss of $8.9 million per year. 3.总的解决概述 a.通过什么方法解决什么问题 例:We address the problem of optimizing amusement park enjoyment through distributing Quick Passes (QP), reservation slips that ideally allow an individual to spend less time waiting in line. b.实际问题转化为数学模型 例1 We formulate the problem as a network flow in which vertices are the locations of escorts and wheelchair passengers. 例2 : A na?ve strategy would be to employ the minimum number of escorts to guarantee that all passengers reach their gates on time. c.将问题分阶段考虑 例3:We divide the jump into three phases: flying through the air, punching through the stack, and landing on the ground. 第二、三段:具体分析 1.在什么模型中/ 建立了什么模型 a. 主流模型

相关文档
最新文档