ajg2004141a
American Journal of Gastroenterology ISSN0002-9270 C 2004by Am.Coll.of Gastroenterology
Published by Blackwell Publishing
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Does the Addition of Methane Determinations Increase the Yield
of Hydrogen Breath Tests for
Sugar Malabsorption?
TO THE EDITOR:In their recent paper on the hydrogen
breath test Di Stefano et al.(1)comment on the need for ad-
ditional information regarding the role of methane in sugar
malabsorption.They also made reference to a1994article by
Corazza et al.(2)which documented that out of13healthy
subjects with a false negative hydrogen breath response to
lactose,11had a greater than100%CH4increase over the
fasting baseline,their criterion for malabsorption.While a
prospective evaluation will be needed,this prompted us to re-
view our data base on breath testing(3).Ten percent solution
challenges of lactose(25g),fructose(25g),and sorbitol(5g)
were administered in321patients with functional dyspepsia
and subsequent methane and hydrogen evaluations were per-
formed.Malabsorption of lactose was based on a>20ppm
rise or a>10ppm(either H2or CH4)rise for fructose or sor-
bitol,respectively.Retrospective evaluation showed that147
patients(46.1%)had baseline CH4values on all3tests to be >10ppm.We de?ned this group as“methane formers.”In this group,if hydrogen breath tests were administered without
methane evaluations then it would have missed11lactose,39
fructose,and30sorbitol malabsorbing patients.In the other
group,174patients did not have CH4levels of>10ppm on all
3tests,and the additional CH4measurements only identi?ed
2individuals with sorbitol malabsorption.
It would appear that the availability of CH4determina-
tions in addition to H2will increase the accuracy of breath
testing for sugar malabsorption,especially in certain sub-
jects.Clearly,these investigations will be most cost effective
in patients identi?ed to be“methane formers”based on one
or more screening determinations.Bjorneklett and Jenssen
claim that a single midday sample1–2h after lunch would
be suf?cient as long as the subject had not smoked for>10
min and room air CH4was subtracted(4).In their Norwegian
population,a similar percentage of patients(44%)evaluated
by their criteria would be considered to be methane produc-
ers.In view of the fact that methanogenic bacteria remove four moles of hydrogen per mole of CO2reduced(5),theo-retically it may be clinically relevant to compare the degree of discomfort after equivalent H2and CH4responses(ppm) in order to recommend appropriate dietary adjustments.
Daniel S.Mishkin,M.D.C.M.,F.R.C.P(C)
Seymour Mishkin,M.D.C.M.,F.R.C.P(C)
David Blank,M.D.C.M.,F.R.C.P.(C)
Morty Yalovsky,Ph.D.
Gastroenterology Fellow PGY-6
Monte?ore Medical Center
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bronx,New York
Division of Gastroenterology
Division of Clinical Biochemistry
McGill University Health Center
and Department of Management
McGill University,Montreal
Quebec,Canada
REFERENCES
1.Di Stefano M,Miceli E,Malservisi S,et al.Mixing of the
intestinal content and variations of fermentation capacity do not affect the results of hydrogen breath test.Am J Gastroen-terol2003;98:1584–7.
2.Corazza GR,Benati G,Strocchi A,et al.The possible role
of breath methane measurement in detecting carbohydrate malabsorption.J Lab Clin Med1994;124:695–700.
3.Mishkin D,Sablauskas L,Y alovsky M,et al.Fructose and
sorbitol malabsorption in ambulatory patients with func-tional dyspepsia:Comparison with lactose maldigestion/ malabsorption.Dig Dis Sci1997;42:2591–8.
4.Bjorneklett A,Jenssen E.Relationships between hydro-
gen(H2)and methane(CH4)production in man.Scand J Gas-troenterol1982;17:985–92.
5.Gibson GR,Cummings JH,Macfarlane GT,et al.Alterna-
tive pathways for hydrogen disposal during fermentation in the human colon.Gut1990;31:679–83.
Reprint requests and correspondence:Daniel S.Mishkin, M.D.C.M.,Gastroenterology Fellow PGY-6,Monte?ore Medical Center,Albert Einstein College of Medicine,Bronx,New Y ork. Received September14,2003;accepted October28,2003