GRE作文范本

https://www.360docs.net/doc/677770268.html,ernments should focus onsolving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipatedproblems of the future.

https://www.360docs.net/doc/677770268.html,ernments shouldplace few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

3.A nation shouldrequire all of its students to study the same national curriculum until theyenter college.

4. In any field ofendeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without firstbeing strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.

https://www.360docs.net/doc/677770268.html,ernments shouldoffer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to auniversity but who cannot afford the tuition.

6.In any situation,progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.

7.Society shouldidentify those children who have special talents and provide training for themat an early age to develop their talents.

8.Students shouldalways question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.

9.All parents should berequired to volunteer time to their children's schools.

10.The primary goal oftechnological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so thatthey have more leisure time.

https://www.360docs.net/doc/677770268.html,ernments should focus onsolving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipatedproblems of the future.

Which problems should government be more concerned about: the immediate problems or the future problems? In my point of view, we should find a balance point between them, that is, we should focus on the immediate problems but without ignoring the anticipated problems.

On the one hand, facing such dilemma what government should do first is to make it clear what kind of problems are called immediate problems. In my opinion, immediate problems are those problems which has happened and has not been solved. Solving those problems is the basis of the society?s healthy and stable development, concerning poverty, unemployment, terrorism and environment. For example, poverty always goes along with crimes, which poses

threat on our d aily life. If people can?t find a job, the poverty may be raised and the whole society tends to be unstable. No more than terrorism, it threatens our lives most, making us live in scare. The environment problems are increasingly serious: the trees are cut; the area of desert is increasing; the sea level is rising. All of the problem mentioned above are menace to our livings. Thus, it is of great significance for government to solve instant problems.

On the other hand, the anticipated problems can be called those problem which we can see them but they have not happened yet. We can not neglect those problem because they can also bring great disaster to us. Besides, it is irresponsible for a government to ignored disasters that are preventable. When a snowstorm is about to come, the government should take action to make sure that all protective measures are enacted, in order to reduce the damages to the lowest level. Government should inform the public that the storm is coming so that the public will store food and water for living. In addition, measures should be takenby governmentto clean the snow on the roadin case of some traffic events from happening. Considered about all of its citizen, no matter how busy a government is, it can never ignore such problems.

However, it is absolutely difficult to solve the immediate problems and the anticipated problems at the same time, due to the fact that our intellectual resources and finance are limited. In other words, governments have to set priorities to solve the problems which have a direct and negative impact on the existence of human beings and well-being of the people. With consideration of the limited resources, it is advisable and wise to beforehand resolve some anticipated problems which will cost a fortune to settle in the future, while currently it does not consume so much money and brains.

In sum, governments ought to search for a balance between the two kinds of problems. In the final analysis, the existing social problems relating to human nature are not supposed to spend too much money and brains, while the existing social problems that will turn into a disaster to human beings should be taken seriously; a government should always take into consideration the possible effects on the future of the actions it takes today.

https://www.360docs.net/doc/677770268.html,ernments shouldplace few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

The stated opinion is that the development and research in science should be confined by government. I disagree somewhat with the speak er?s view point. For though the development of

science brings many treats to our human-beings, benefits it produces outweigh its negative effects.

To begin with, science research leads us to new era one after another. After Newton had released the laws of motion, we welcomed a new era in science. Many disciplines have sprung up, such as calculus, structural mechanics and fluid mechanics. As a result, the first Industrial Revolution happened, which was one giant leap in human history. The second new era resulted from the discovery and utilization of electricity. The car, plane and light emerged, enriching our life. Due to the invention of computers and Internet, we stepped up into the information era. Technology inventions diversify our life: chatting without seeing each other, shopping without going out and recording our life without writing. Thus, it can be seen that sharing the science discoveries plays an vital role not only in science itself but also in the flourish of human society. How can we restrict its development.

From the perspective of basis demands of human, we can?t continuously develop without science advance. Centuries ago, lack of scientific knowledge, smallpox prevailed like fire across the whole African and Asian continent, causing numerous deaths among children. However, as scientist publicizes its remedy and vaccine, the population infected with smallpox declines at an astounding speed. This attributes to medical research delivered to every corner of the world. It is also the same with the research to cure another disease, like cancer and HIV. Millions of human die from those illnesses. How can we ignore the lives of those people but restrict the research of science.

Admittedly, almost every scientific research has both positive and negative results. The pros and cons should be exactly assessed and weighed by government in that government intervenes and restricts a scientific research can probably minimize the risk and harm of it, while maximizing the benefits. As we all know, clone technic can replicate creatures quickly so that it has been taken advantage in producing plants, which achieves a great success. However, thanks to government restriction, clone technicwith enormous benefitsis not developing strongly because it may shake our social morals and values. The confine to the nuclear power is similar to the clone technic. Though it stopped the the Second World War, compelling Japan to surrender, its devastating ability makes all people scared of it, so it is reasonable for government to limit the research on it.

Nowadays, it is almost a common sense that if a country has no advanced science and technology means, it has no power to be strong to stand on the modern stage. Even we are in a peace illusory, there are more and more conflicts beneath. One the one hand, to most scientific researches and development, they accord with the interests of all mankind so that government should not constrain them to strict and even give them freedom to advance. On the other hand, government constrains should be reasonable, which requires exactly assessment mechanism in evaluating the potential and values and harms, whatever for nature or human society. And this is a responsible government to serve all its people.

3.A nation shouldrequire all of its students to study the same national curriculum until theyenter college.

When it comes to whether a nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, it is difficult to give a judgment, for the students all have the right to receive the same quality of education, but still have the right to benefit from the special merits of their local tradition or custom. Therefore, I would argue that the best way is the central government can decide Central Curriculum for whole country, but to allow the provincial government to decide how to teach it and design the courses that are about the local culture to keep the cultural diversity and to broaden the horizon of students.

To begin with, Central Curriculum is more economical than provincial curriculum. For making an entire course, a lot of money and time are spent. Also, experts related to education participate in this process. In central curriculum, only one making procedure goes through. In addition, for preparing a class of the curriculum, teachers coming from everywhere can share many parts of the curriculum and get some help from another teacher with professional knowledge. However, if provincial curriculum is made respectively, each government should carry out an educational policy. A large amount of economic losses are produced as a results. Meanwhile, policy makers coming from the same place may cause the course setting narrow-minded and one-sided, which may hinder a student to become an international talent.

Additionally, central curriculum provides wider view than provincial curriculum. The course before college is important in education system because students learn basic knowledge of whole life including individual growth and socialization. Comprehensive central curriculum,

in addition, lets students select objectively their majors in college. In more technical terms, if they don't fully consider all subjects, they tend to select their college majors according to just interests or bias. Consequently, they may have views of narrow academic fields. Besides, with a central curriculum, it is easy for a college to set a standard for talents selection. If every province insists on its own opinion, a qualified person is difficult to be selected. Many people will feel unfair. Even worse, those insistence may lead the central educational administration to lose its authority. Then, the education circle will become a mess.

However, cultural diversity is the inheritance for a country and its people. If forcing students to study the same national curriculum will no doubt be undermined its diversity seriously. For the sake of respect the local residents and culture, the local government have the right to further adjust the central curriculum with local features. Besides, schools have the right to decide how to teach students. Therefore, the educational quality can be reserved, but also the cultural diversity can be prosperous. For example, Tibet, a autonomous region in China, is allowed to teach national courses in their own language by central government. In addition, the students there are also encouraged to study their folk dance and songs. Therefore, local education can?t be ignored.

To sum up, the basis of education is taught the skill to live. Thus, the schools should not only provide curriculum to let the students know how to survive, but also the curriculum to let them know how to live better. Therefore, a compulsory curriculum with discretionary class education system is needed.

4. In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.

Development in all kinds of fields always raise a debate that whether it is possible to make remarkable progress in a certain field without any influence exerted by former achievements. From my perspective, the previous achievements are necessary for later contributions. The factors which support my position are as follow.

First of all, previous achievement plays an irreplaceable role in any field, it serves as bricks of foundation for further development. Without bricks or bases, no superstructure could be constructed. Similarly, without those achievements and experiences from earlier time, it will

become almost impossible for any further development to progress. For example, one feature of modern life is omnipresent software, such as applications on the cell phones and programs in computers, without which our living quality will be tremendously undermined. The development of software is based on the foundation of computer science, which is one of the most remarkable achievement in last century. If the computer was not invented or at least was not accessible for ordinary, few opportunity will be left for software to develop.

Additionally, the deficits of former achievements could also spur further development. Since no theory or achievement will be correct without qualification,the previous achievements may turn out to be incorrect when the field of study expended. Thus, previous theories provide flaws for researchers to improve them. New theories and achievements, as a result, are created. In the field of physics, until the puzzle of black-body was proposed, it was the classical physics ruling the whole field. Once the unsolvable problem appeared, scientists realized that the classical still has some flaws. Those flaws spurred scientists to commence new research, thus new contributions such as the quantum theory and relativity theory have been made, and the field of physics embraces its greatest development ever in the history.

However, some people may argue that some development in particular fields have not been patently influenced by previous achievement, such as Steven Jobs and his Apple company. They may claim that Jobs have reinvented cell phone because iPhone is equipped with such a large screen that people have never seen before. What?s more, it has so many unique devices on iPhone that it seems other professional mobile phone companies don?t influence the iPhone?s design. Innovative as it is, the iPhone is nevertheless more like an assembly of technology in mobile phone field and other field. And why it is so excellent is because it adjusts the flaws presented by the former products. Therefore, the necessity of former achievement cannot be overlooked.

In conclusion, previous achievements could provide foundations or opportunities for further contribution, and the role which the former achievements play is irreplaceable. We could draw the conclusion that without influence of the past ones, new contributions were unlikely to be made.

https://www.360docs.net/doc/677770268.html,ernments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to

a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Development in economy and education has raised a debate that whether any university students should be offered a free tuition. From my perspective, this policy is associated with more factors when offering students with free education opportunities, like the financial ability of the government, development of the society and the responsibility of the students, so I disagree to totally support this policy but approve to develop a well-rounded view to it.

Admittedly, university education makes a great difference in social development and it is the government?s duty to offer equal opportunities for all admitted students. The generalization of college education will allow more people to engage in high level industries, thus increasing the national GDPs. Also, free education will increase the equality between the poor and the rich, which makes the society more harmonious. However, on the other hand, some students may be indolent to study because they don?t pay for the tuition fees and what they really want is to get a diploma in the university but not to study well. Therefore, it seems too good to be true for government to afford all poor students to study in university.

Moreover, it is practically beyond even the most development country?s financial budgets to provide overall poor student university education, let alone those countries with large number of population such as China and India. Governments should intend to protect the benefit of the whole societies and a lot of other problems are still unsolved: poverty in rural regions, environmental pollution and other affairs related to general welfare. Providing free education will make the load of revenue on everyone more burdened. As far as i?m concerned, each tax payer doesn?t want to see their money wasted, so it is the government?s duty that is to spend proper funds on education.

In addition, we have other approaches to solve the high fees for college entrance fees, which have produced positive effects on problem with the education of poor students. Some non-profitable organizations and companies have provided a lot of funds, scholarships for those students in difficulty. Besides, students themselves can do part- time jobs to afford part of their fees. What?s more, Chinese government has already forms myriads of institutions for poor students, like interest-free loans for college education.

To sum up, when it comes to providing poor students with free fees, i consider it to be unrealistic and unnecessary. Government can offer kinds of assistance for students who are

totally not able to get enough money for their further education. And everyone can raise their hands to help those in need to create a harmonious society.

6.In any situation,progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.

The speaker suggests that people can gain progress when they discuss problem with people who have contrast points of views in any situations. However, this claim is problematic because only when people are ready to accept the contrast views, can they make progress. Moreover, it is easy for us to understand that not only can contrast points of view lead to progress, but also homogeneous ones can do it.

Admittedly, progress can be made when people discuss with those who have different opinions, since no theory or achievement will be correct without qualification and discussion. With the voice of disagreement, the previous achievements may turn out to be incorrect when the field of study expended. In the field of physics, until the puzzle of black-body was proposed, it was the classical physics that ruled the whole field. Once this unsolvable problem appeared, scientists realized that the classical physics still has some flaws. Those flaws spurred scientists to commence new research, but there were still many scientists supporting the old theory. Then, after the collision of ideas, new contributions such as the quantum theory and relativity theory have been made. As a result, the field of physics embraces its greatest development ever in the history.

However, if people with different views want to reach an agreement, there are some prerequisites for contrasting views to promote progress, such as the same mathematics methods, the same value of the world and so on. Just take the sense of the world, the basic principles of our recognition, for example. In philosophy area, people can?t agree on the issue that whether idealism or materialism is right. So the discussion between this topic may never end up and make nonsense. Further more, the contrasts may bring no progress but harm. The relation between Palestine and Israel serves a good instance. The contradiction between them is not only the problem of politics, but involves the conflicts of religion and nation. The contrasts bring them no happiness but deterioration and destruction. Therefore, if the public don?t shar e with a common sense, it may hard for them to make a progress.

Judging from the situations we discuss above, whether a progress can be made depends on the situation we are faced with. If you share the same ideas, consensus can be done quickly. If you have different views but want to make a consensus, truth or tolerance you must own. As the saying goes, there is a thousand Hamlets in a thousand people's eyes. In many aspects, problems may never be solved, but it is always the best way to solve the conflicts by weakening the problems and to understanding each other, just like Germany apologizing for its crimes in the second world war and getting forgiving from the world.

To sum up, the goal we pursue is the development of the society. If the contrasts led to a higher level of thinking which we never concern, they would be welcomed; if the contrasts brought the conflicts which do not have a right answer, they should be abandoned. This question depends on various situations.

7.Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.

Development of society and education has raised a debate that whether talented children should be offered special training by the society to cultivate their talents. Someone might may tempt to disagree with the speaker because there is no a concrete and mature standard to justify whether or not a child is a talent. However, with far more compelling arguments, I strong agree with the statement. My reason is as follows.

To begin with, if a man, no matter how intellectual he is, wants to become a success people, talent and afterward education should be combined together. What?s more, a gifted children seems to have more chance to become a success person and than other ordinary children. However, if we did not seize the chance to cultivate them, their talents would be buried. In ancient China, the story of Zhong Yong, a child prodigy, is widely known by Chinese people. He was greatly gifted in creating poems so everyone believed that maybe he would become a scholar after educating, but his foolish father took advantage of his genius to make a living, left him no further education. Finally, he lost his writing ability and became an ordinary child. Our country has recognized the importance of education so that the education administration has started to establish a talent class for those children with great potential, hoping them to make contribution to our society. Thus, it can be seen that receiving the afterward education would be

the best way to make a prodigy turn to truly great person.

Moreover, there are countless facts proving that captivating talented children benefit a lot for our society. In sports field, Sun Yang, a famous swimming athlete in the world, has won numerous championship prizes during his career. His achievements represent the spirit of sports and spur a lot of people to love swimming, bringing a lot of contribution to the sport development of China. In music field, Taylor Swift and Lang Lang not only make good use of their songs to help people to get rid of their bad mood, but also contribute a lot to charity. All of those famous celebrities were geniuses in their field and received corrective education in their childhood, so we can?t deny the s ignificant role of child education but to ruin the their opportunity to make contribution to society in the future.

However, if we really want to lead those children to devote to our society, we must take some actions in advance. First, set a proper standard before finding a child with talent. Second, design a series of courses which can maximize their talents. Third, teach them the moral standard in case of them going astray. Only in this way, can our society identify a talented child and provide the right guidance for him/her.

To sum up, a talented child also need education to become a man who can benefit society a lot, so society should establish proper way to education them but not to waste their talents.

8.Students shouldalways question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.

The statement claims that students should keep suspicious about what their teachers were saying. From my perspective, I incline to agree this idea because absolute obedience is more detrimental than challenging contrasting opinion. Though it seems a waste of time if students always question what they are taught, I still believe that a skeptical mind can improve the ability of critical thinking.

To begin with, skepticism plays a crucial role in throughout human history, especially in science. progress can be made when people discuss with those who have different opinions, since no theory or achievement will be correct without suspicion and qualification. With the voice of doubt, the previous achievements may turn out to be incorrect when the field of study expended. In the field of physics, until the puzzle of black-body was proposed, it was the