SCI投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容(2013版)

SCI投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容

1 很好的博客链接 (2)

2 SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览 (2)

2.1 一、最初投稿Cover letter (2)

2.2 二、催稿信 (3)

2.3 三、修改稿Cover letter (3)

2.4 四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分） (3)

2.5 五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要） (5)

2.6 六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长） (5)

2.7 七、文章校稿信件 (5)

3 SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板zz (6)

3.1 一、投稿信 (6)

3.2 二、询问有无收到稿件 (6)

3.3 三、询问论文审查回音 (7)

3.4 四、关于论文的总体审查意见 (7)

3.5 五、给编辑的回信(很多方面的套话) (7)

4 SCI论文投稿常见句型和优美句子1000句 (9)

5 英文论文投稿前应该进行的28个细节检查 (9)

6 中科院博士谈SCI论文投稿步骤及经验总结 (11)

6.1 （一）投稿程序 (12)

6.2 （二）投稿经验总结 (13)

7 SCI论文写作实战技巧 (14)

8 SCI期刊稿件的准备与投送 (15)

8.1 稿件的准备 (16)

8.2 首页或投稿函(cover letter) (16)

8.2.1 著作权声明(authorship responsibility and con-tributions) (16)

8.2.2 版权转让许可(license for publication) (17)

8.2.3 文章类型/栏目(article type) (17)

8.2.4 基金和资金资助(funding disclosure) (17)

8.2.5 利益冲突(conflict of interest) (18)

8.3 电子文档的准备 (20)

9 一年三篇IF大于7的牛人告诉你怎么写SCI (20)

9.1 一、研究生必备四本 (20)

9.2 二、论文写作要点 (21)

9.3 三、如何撰写实验研究论文（唐朝枢） (21)

9.4 四、如何写好论文讨论部分：科学论文的讨论需要结构化 (22)

9.5 五、关于写英文文章的秘诀 (22)

9.6 六、写论文的技巧 (23)

9.6.1 优秀论文的要素 (23)

9.6.2 优秀论文的误区 (23)

9.6.3 写文章的条件 (23)

9.6.4 写论文的要点 (23)

9.6.5 Reviewer Check List (24)

9.6.6 IEEE Transactions on CSVT Review form (24)

9.7 七、论文写作技巧 (24)

9.8 八、优秀论文结构范例 (25)

9.9 处理被拒 (26)

9.10 常见问题 (26)

1很好的博客链接

https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,/?Uid-955-Action-Viewspace-Itemid-74015

（含多个连接，“SCI论文投稿常见句型和优美句子1000句”）

2SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览

2.1 一、最初投稿Cover letter

Dear Editors:

We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, whic h we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

In this work, we evaluated ……(简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable For “Journal Name”.

The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:

1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××

2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××

We deeply appreciate Your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

2.2 二、催稿信

Dear Prof. ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on t he reviewer’s comments.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Best regards!

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

2.3三、修改稿Cover letter

Dear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:

On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (I D: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

2.4 四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）

List of Responses

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

。。。。。。

逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...

We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……

We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.

We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion

As Reviewer suggested that……

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2:

同上述

Reviewer #3:

××××××

Other changes:

1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”

2. Line 107, “……” was added

3. Line 129, “……” was deleted

××××××

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work ear nestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

2.5 五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根

据需要）

Dear Prof. ××××××:

Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

2.6 六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）

Dear ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

2.7 七、文章校稿信件

Dear Mr. ×××:

Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below. Corrections:

1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)

2. In **** the “*****” should be “****” (Page ****, Right column, line****)

Answers for “author queries”:

1. *********************.

2. **********************

3. **********************

We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

3SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板zz

3.1 一、投稿信

1.Dear Dr. Defendi ML

I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .

Yours sincerely

2. Dear Dr. A:

Enclosed is a man uscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.

3. Dear Dr. A:

Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.

We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.

3.2 二、询问有无收到稿件

Dear Editors,

We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript. again. Thank you in advance for your help.

3.3 三、询问论文审查回音

Dear Editors，

It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.

3.4 四、关于论文的总体审查意见

1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.

2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.

3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –

4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.

5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .

6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see,

I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.

7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.

8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.

9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.

10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used? 3.5 五、给编辑的回信(很多方面的套话)

1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –

One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.

2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.

3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled ―‖. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.

4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our origi nal findings are confirmed.

5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.

6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful a nd have revised the manuscript.

7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.

8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.

9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.

10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.

11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.

12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.

13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.

14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.

15. The runnin g title has been changed to ―‖.

16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.

17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.

18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).

19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.

20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.

21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:

22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.

23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.

24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.

25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.

4SCI论文投稿常见句型和优美句子1000句

链接如下：

https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,/?uid-955-action-viewspace-itemid-74015

SCI论文投稿很重要一点就是用最专业的语言阐述自己的研究或发现，因此，平时的积累尤为重要。很多时候，我们在表述结果时，可能了自己的语言，但是不是很地道，积累并吸取英语为母语的学者的优美句子对论文的写作有着很好的借鉴作用。我收集了1000句优秀论文的常见句型和优美句子，希望对大家的英文投稿有所帮助。

SCI优美句型-1

SCI优美句型-2

5英文论文投稿前应该进行的28个细节检查

上一篇/ 下一篇 2010-03-11 10:51:38 / 个人分类：博士论文

查看( 36 ) / 评论( 0 ) / 评分( 0 / 0 )

文章来源

文章来源:转载

Have you ————–?

1 spell checked the whole paper?

2 rewritten your paper at least three times?

3 stopped working on your paper for a day?

To see and hear your words better when you look at it again.

4 put your main point into your title?

5 put your most significant findings first? Your gold first?

6 made it easy for readers to tell from your title and your abstract what is new and important about your work?

7 made sure all your verbs and subjects match?

Plural verbs have plural subjects? Singular verbs have singular subjects?

8 spelled the same name exactly the same way throughout your paper?

NOT ―Bragg. . . .Brag‖

BUT BRAGG every time!

9 asked a friend or a native English speaker to read your paper and tell you what’s confusing or unclear?

10 changed nouns to adjectives when necessary?

NOT ―three dimension ordered array‖

BUT ―three dimensional ordered array‖

11 used active verbs rather than passive verbs as much as possible?

NOT ―The effects were investigated. . .‖

BUT ―We investigated the effects‖

12 found a way to break a sentence that’s much too long (over 4 lines) into two sentences?

13 broken up a paragraph that is way too long into two paragraphs?

14 tried to reduce your paper to its skeleton by making a one page outline of it?

Might help you see if your paper is organized in the best possible way.

15 Made all equivalent items look the same?

NOT ―scheme 1 . . . .Scheme 2‖

BUT ―Scheme 1. . . Scheme 2‖

16 removed all contractions, such as ―can’t‖ or ―couldn’t‖? and changed them to ―cannot‖ or

―could not‖?

17 checked the columns of numbers in your Tables and made all the decimal points in the same column line up vertically?

18 put a noun right after ―this‖ or ―these‖ every time you use one of t hose words?

19 moved ―however‖ away from the beginning of sentences to a spot later in a sentence where it sounds better?

20 made all your abbreviations the same?

NOT 48 hrs 3 hours 2 h five h

BUT 48 h 3 h 2 h 5 h

21 used strong definite words?

NOT ―We have been interested in‖

BUT ―We have focused on‖

22 used parallel wording where you lead your readers to expect it?

NOT ―not only for fabricating. .but also for reduction‖

BUT ―not only for fabricating. . .but also for reducing. . .‖

OR ―not only for the formation of. . .but also for the elimination of. . ―

Don’t mix words ending in ―ing‖ with ―ion‖ words.

23 proofread your paper 3 times? At least!

24 read your paper aloud to yourself?

25 Did you use ―later‖ when you meant ―latter‖?

26 looked for fruit in your figure captions?

A fig is a fruit you can eat, but ―Fig.‖ is the correct abbreviation for ―Figure.‖ Don’t forget the period in the abbreviation.

27 proofread your references? Made sure that a journal title, no matter how often it occurs, is always spelled the same way?

28 followed the reference format for the journal you are submitting to?

Have fun!

6中科院博士谈SCI论文投稿步骤及经验总结

上一篇/ 下一篇 2010-03-12 12:08:02 / 个人分类：管理文献资料

https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,/?uid-11241-action-viewspace-itemid-58542

查看( 154 ) / 评论( 0 ) / 评分( 0 / 0 )

文章来源

文章来源:转载

SCI论文投稿步骤及其经验总结

6.1 （一）投稿程序

1、选择合适的SCI期刊-Choose a journal。结合专业知识、2008或2007年度影响因子表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊，并进入该期刊查询系统查询近年来的文章走向。

2、下载Introduction for submission。只要到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper一栏，点击Introduction查看或下载即可。

3、稿件及其相关材料准备-Preparation：Manuscript.doc、Tables.doc、Figures.tiff（jpg等）、Cover letter，有时还有Title page、Copyright agreement、Conflicts of interest等。

4、网上投稿-Submit a manuscript：先到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper一栏，先以通讯作者的身份register一个账号，然后以author login身份登录，按照提示依次完成：Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files，最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

5、不定期关注稿件状态-Status：Submit New Manuscript、Submissions Sent Back to Author、Icomplete Submissions、Sbmissions Waiting for Author's Approval、Submissions Being Processed、Submissions Needing Revision、Rvisions Sent Back to Author、Icomplete Submissions Being Revised、Risions Waiting for Author's Approval、Revisions Being Processed、Declined Revisions。

6、修回稿的投递-Submitted the revised manuscript：主要修改revised manuscript、response to the reviewers、cover letter，还有其他修改的相关材料。程序是进入投稿主页main menu，点击revise，仍然按照原先程序投递（近似于4），切记把修改的标题、摘要和回复信等内容要修改。最后上传附件时，先把留下来且未修改的材料前打钩（表示留下不变），然后点击next，再上传已经修改的材料（主要包括revised manuscript、response to the reviewers、cover letter等），最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

7、校样-Correct the proof：一般编辑部先寄出三个电子文档，包括Query、Proofs、p-annotate，有时也可能伴有纸质文档校样，如一次J pineal research。校样后通过E-mail寄出即可。8、版权协议-Copyright agreement和利益冲突-Conflicts of interest：一般首次投稿时就需要提供，但也有少数杂志是Accepted之后才需要提供。

6.2 （二）投稿经验总结

1、正确选择对口的SCI期刊。原则上是先投递高影响因子的杂志，然后不断降低IF，但是大家都知道没改投一种杂志，我们可能光改变格式可能很长时间，除非你采用了文献管理软件。我认为也不能盲目投递杂志，应该要结合专业知识、2008或2007年度影响因子表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊，然后再进入该期刊文章查询系统查询近年来的文章走向，包括专业内容、种属等。

2、不能进行一稿两投。这种投机取巧之事最好不要做，因为许多杂志之间的编委是相同的，一旦同一篇文章两次发到同一个编委或审稿人手中，那后果就不堪设想，尤其那些投递手稿时就需要转移协议的，切记主要版权问题。

3、如何正确选择必需推荐的审稿人？一般编辑不会选择你推荐的审稿人，但你还是尽量选择同行中的小专家。但这也与你的投稿目的有关，若十分自信文章的创新性和中肯意见，你可以从参考文献中挑选大专家。

4、如何礼貌地向编辑咨询稿件状态？我曾经在Toxicological Science上投一篇文章，2个月时我―很不礼貌‖地向编辑咨询稿件状态，其实不是有意的，只是写英文信的口气完全按照中文语气，不委婉。后来次日编辑就回信说reject the paper，不知道这是巧合还是带着性格。但与人相处时，是存在感情因素的，尤其是可以accept或者也可以reject时，很有用。

5、如何提高一次投稿的成功率？文章本身的创新性是第一位因素，对口期刊选择、文章格式完美、语句通顺（尤其符合英文习惯）等也很重要。

6、版权协议和利益冲突表格要谨慎填写。签名时尽量不要代签，以免被编辑发现时的尴尬。

7、尽可能参照投稿说明，认真修改手稿格式。这一点是衡量一位科研工作者的严谨程度，建议大家认真阅读Introduction for submission，逐条地改正，以防延误同行评审时间。

8、修回后投稿一定要核对初稿中改正的地方：标题、摘要、cover letter等。

9、要了解此刊是否需要审稿费和版面费？大家都知道版面费一般都是用美元衡量的，建议最好选择不需要版面费的（不用彩图也收版面费的）。但是有些杂志，如Endocrinology等杂志就需要版面费，多数杂志若有彩图印刷都要版面费的，大家谨慎选择。

10、一般外文SCI杂志的审稿周期是1-3月。大家一方面耐心等待，若2月左右没有消息，可以通过e-mail咨询一下稿件状态。我的感觉是好一点杂志审稿周期短一点，而往往是差一点的杂志却老是拖，曾经遇到一个IF2.5的杂志3个多月后咨询：原因是找不到审稿人，多少审稿人推脱最近很忙

7SCI论文写作实战技巧

https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,/?uid-33467-action-viewspace-itemid-60273

上一篇/ 下一篇 2010-04-02 13:52:04 / 个人分类：投稿经历

查看( 23 ) / 评论( 0 ) / 评分( 0 / 0 )文章来源

文章来源:转载

SCI论文已经成职称评估，博士毕业所不可缺少的一部分了呀！针对于国内的种种需求，SCI 论文变得越来越受到重视。那么该论文的写作到底有什技巧呢？我个人针对于写作经验及其各位老师的写作手法进行了概要，具体如下：

1. 在针对自己的要写论文的内容，进行文献检索，查到所有相关的论文；检索论文分为可以网站上搜到全文的，再有就是需要找到杂志复印的；其实，还有一部分就Online的，也就说还没有出版，但是马上要出版的呀！

2. 论文写作无外乎就那么几个部分：

2.1 题目-要全面概况论文的内容；

2.2 摘要尽量简练，这里需要模仿相关论文的摘要；

2.3 前言，不怎么好写，一般分为四段法，第一段总括，第二段具体研究概况，第三段你论文的研究对象研究现状，第四段你为什么做这个东西。

2.4 材料与方法，这个就是简单修改其他人写过的就可以了，因为都是大同小异，但要注意细节。

2.5 结果，写论文第一件事就是处理结果，定位一下你论文的能否写成英文，能投到什么刊物上，结果的处理很重要，既要说明问题，又要简练。

2.6 讨论，比较难写，针对于本文的主要2-4个问题展开讨论，不要面面俱到，什么都写，SCI论文不想中文讨论很多。这里需要大量的文献作支撑。

2.7 致谢，把帮过你的人没能成为作者的致谢一下子就OK了，这个部分很容易。

2.8 参考文献，这个部分说容易很容易，说难了也不简单，需要完全按照要投的刊物来修

订，决定不要这个刊物的标准用在哪个刊物上，这样会造成给主编不尊重的感觉，一定要小心。

2.9 附加材料，有的时候论文需要附加材料比如分子测序等，这个部分作为很小的部分单列。

3. 语言写作，这里的语言尽量用别人的话，你不要自己乱说话，除非没办法，否则就会受到这样的审稿意见，作者不是Native 语言之类的话；参照了别人，很容易被接受。

4. 论文新意，一篇论文一定有自己的画龙点睛的部分，重点突出这部分。尤其在结论部分就是要讨论的最后一段上，说上那么3句话左右来强调你的最新成果。

5. 写作程序，可以每天写一部分，或者写上一段，每天都写，每天都看，一般一篇论文的写作也就是15-30天。

6. 写作精神，这年头什么事情就怕坚持，只要你坚持住就一定会成功。祝各位博友SCI论文写作顺利，投稿成功。

8SCI期刊稿件的准备与投送

上一篇/ 下一篇 2010-03-26 11:53:37 / 个人分类：SCL

查看( 37 ) / 评论( 0 ) / 评分( 0 / 0 )

文章来源

文章来源:转载

SCI(science citation index，科学引文索引)是美国ISI(institute for scientific information，科技信息所)使用的对科技期刊和论文进行评价的一种工具。收录约3600种核心刊物，其中1000余种为生命学科杂志。目前已有很多高等院校和科研单位都以被SCI收录的论文作为评价研究人员水平的一个重要指标。国内核心刊物版面有限，投稿人多，国内刊物SCI收录杂志论文发表相对更为困难，且国内刊物影响因子都较低。而大多数国际刊物没有版面费，国际刊物从送审到发表时间周期短，因此向国外投稿不失为明智之举。

无论是临床医生还是进行基础研究的生物医学专业人员，中文医学科技论文的写作投稿也许并非难事，但对于如何向国外期刊投英文医学论文，对不少人来说都比较陌生，更不用说有经验和体会。因此，本文将系统地介绍文稿在准备投寄英文医学期刊时，中文期刊较少涉及、而国外期刊较为注重的内容。这些内容也是国内作者比较陌生的部分。

稿件的写作是稿件发表的第一个环节，之后作者应慎重选择合适的目标期刊和选择适合刊物投稿。然后仔细阅读目标期刊的投稿须知(Instructions for authors)和近期的杂志，以便了解该刊的报道范围、读者对象、栏目设置、文体格式、版权声明、稿件要求、审稿流程等重要信息。根据目标期刊投稿须知的要求，有针对性的对文章做进一步的修改和润色。对于文体格式上的要求，英文生物医学期刊一般遵循温哥华格式(Uniform. Requirements for Manuscripts Submitting to Biomedical Journal by ICMJE)，作者可以登录国际生物医学编辑委员会的网站(https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,)获取更详细的规范要求。

8.1 稿件的准备

国外期刊要求提供的文稿内容与国内的期刊的要求大同小异，普遍需要提供的内容包括:首页、投稿函(cover letter);文题页(title page);文摘和关键词(abstract and keywords);正文;前言(introduction);材料/对象和方法[materials(or patients)and methods];结果(results);讨论(discussion);致谢(acknowledgements);参考文献(references);表(tables);图(figures)。

各部分内容按以上顺序在文档中另起页书写(正文各部分内容可在一起)，图表可置文后也可另存为附件。最好在文稿前附一目次页，以便于编辑快速了解文稿的内容安排。其中文题页、文摘和关键词、正文的写作与国内期刊的规范基本一致，不再赘述。

8.2 首页或投稿函(cover letter)

这是编辑部收到稿件最先看到的部分，作用是推荐稿件，说明稿件的真实性和介绍稿件的有关情况。一般投稿函中包括下述内容(有些内容不是必须的，有些内容可能在网上投寄过程中就输入了，不需在首页中体现)。

8.2.1著作权声明(authorship responsibility and con-tributions)

在首页上要列出本文的作者和通讯作者，以及他们的详细联系方式(Email、地址、国家、邮编、电话、传真等)。声明每个作者都有对该文的部分或全部贡献，所有作者保证本文的立题和内容资料真实可靠并未在其他媒体上全文发表过，在必要时可以提供相关内容给编辑部作为参考，也未涉及到保密的内容。参考英文表述如下:

The manuscript. represents valid work and that neither this manuscript. nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship has been published or is being con- ?228?sidered for publication elsewhere，except as described in an attachment;and if requested，I will provide the data or agree to allow the corresponding author to obtain and pro-vide the data on which the manuscript. is based examination by the editors or their assignees.I have participated suf-ficiently in the research(or review)and its writing to take public responsibility for part of(or whole)the content.

几乎所有期刊都要求有至少一名通讯作者，并授予该作者代表全体作者行使与编辑部沟通，签署相关协议和完成稿件处理流程的权力。团体作者的时候尤其要注明这项信息。所以通讯作者的资料要详尽，一般推荐文稿的英文撰写人或有一定英文交流能力的作者。参考英文表述如下:

The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all au-thors，an exclusive license(or non exclusive for govern-ment employees)on a worldwide basis to your journal to permit this article(if accepted)to be published and any other products and sublicenses such use and exploit all subsidiary rights.

8.2.2版权转让许可(license for publication)

许多国外期刊的版权转让声明比国内的期刊要求更严。作者承认将论文的所有版权[汇编权(文章的部分或全部)、发行权、印刷版和电子版的复制权、翻译权、信息网络传播权及代理许可国内外文献检索系统或数据库收录权等]独家授予所投期刊社。未经该期刊社书面许可，不再授权他人以任何形式汇编、转载、出版本文的任何部分。通常国外的杂志提供了电子版的版权转让许可证的下载，所有作者在认真阅读该许可后签署自己的名字。由于篇幅有限，版权转让许可的文本又多，如有需要的读者请参看英国医学杂志(BMJ)关于版权转让的许可说明(https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,/advice/copyright.shtml)。

值得注意的是，近年来随着OA(open access)出版模式的出现，以这种模式运营的期刊对版权要求不是那么严格，作者可以保留文稿的所有或部分版权，进行适量的非商业性质的拷贝、转发和保存。这给作者提供了更宽泛的版权占有方式，也加快了科技信息的快速流通。

8.2.3文章类型/栏目(article type)

表明论文投向哪(几)个栏目的。通常在网上投寄过程中编辑部的投稿系统需要作者选择要投的栏目。如需在文稿中体现，参考英文表述如下:

This article is for Original Article for next year's theme issue.

8.2.4基金和资金资助(funding disclosure)

说明本论文是否受政府、机构、公司或个人的基金资助。政府和机构的资助对提升文章在编辑的印象上有一定的影响，但不是决定文章质量的决定性因素。公司或个人的资助的说明有助于编辑和读者判断文章结论是否真实。该信息是必须如实提供的，参考的英文表述如下:

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Development Project Foundation (No.98754444)and part by National Youth Nature Science Foundation of

China(No.302000284).

8.2.5利益冲突(conflict of interest)

对利益冲突的声明有助于读者判断该文章是否有倾向性，国外期刊一般对原始论著、综述和研究进展之类的文章有利益冲突声明要求。声明的内容通常包括以下内容，各编辑部要求声明的内容和层次不尽相同，但多是非常重要的信息:

(1)学术纷争和作者知情:学术纷争指作者内部就某个研究课题存在不同的学术理解;作者知情是指在论文发表过程中部分作者没有获悉文章的受理消息，或者多位作者合作完成，但互相之间缺乏交流。这些冲突可能不会导致文章的失实和偏颇。

(2)资金:说明文章的发表与否是否会对作者造成从某些机构获取薪水、设备、供给、参会旅游费用等的影响。

(3)个人经济利益:说明文章的发表与否是否会导致个人的股票和分红的增加和损失，以及对专利保护和专利申请的影响。

(4)工作:说明文章的发表与否会造成作者现在、近期或预期工作的影响。

如果没有以上利益冲突或情节不重要，可在致谢中写上如下参考英文表述:

All authors have no competing interestto declare.或I have no relevant financial interests to disclose.如有的话，按上述情况进行说明，下面提供一份参考的英文表述:I certify that all my(and immediate family's)affilia-tions with or financial involvement(eg，employment，con-sultancies，honoraria，stock ownership or options，grants，contracts，patents received or pending，or royalties)with any organization or entity having a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials dis-cussed in the manuscript. are disclosed completely here.For purposes of disclosure，financial involvement is defined as having occurredwithin the last3years and being an amount greater than or equal to10，000RMB per year or having the potential to generate that amount per year in the future.

(5)出版声明(publishing statement)

如果文献中涉及到的结果、数据、图表已在其他媒体上出版，编辑部要求作者事先获取原作者的手写认可证明，证明原作者知晓并认可其在该刊上引用其内容。同时作者应在文中的相应位置注明其来源。

(6)版面费减免声明(publishing fee)

大部分作者都有能力支付编辑部要求的审稿费、版面费、修改费，彩图制作费和数字化加工费等。如作者确实有资金方面的问题可在投稿函中向期刊申请减免全部或部分费用，同时附上必要的证明。编辑部在接收申请后将对作者的经济状况进行调查，如情节属实，编辑部会考虑作者减免出版费用的申请。

(7)推荐审稿专家(suggested reviewers)

有些编辑部允许读者推荐合适的审稿专家，推荐时尽量提供详尽的专家信息，比如名(first name)、中名(middle name)、姓(last name)、头衔、研究机构、Email、电话、传真、地址等。推荐的原则是专业对口，地域相异，人数2～3名。

(8)回避审稿专家(avoided reviewers)

回避的审稿专家包括二个因素。一方面是由于某些专家在与作者存在学术上、经济上或政治上的分歧和冲突。另一方面是由于某些专家与作者存在利益交织的情况。为避免上述原因造成文章在审理过程的偏颇和失实，可在首页上标明哪些专家不适合本文的审查工作。

(9)知情同意和伦理学声明(informed consent and ethical approval)

以人作为研究对象时，应征得受试者(或其父母或监护人)书面的知情同意(informed consent)。同时在论文的材料与方法部分说明。

另外，未经同意，不得侵犯病人的隐私权，如不公布受试者的姓名、住院号等。在刊登受试者的照片等资料，应征得受试者的同意，并采取适当措施(如遮住患者的眼睛等)进行加密。为此目的，应让病人过目即将发表的稿件。

如有涉及到医学伦理学的问题，要慎重考虑目标期刊是否允许发表带有伦理学异议的稿件。比如涉及到人类胚胎干细胞的敏感伦理学问题，要详细了解该国的医学伦理方面的相关法规和该刊的伦理学尺度。对于一般的人体研究要提供道德伦理委员会的许可证明。

如涉及上述问题，应在文后附上相关文件，也可在投稿函上声明本文已获得病人的知情同意书、道德伦理委员会的许可证明，相关文件见附件。

We obtained all informed consent from subjects and a license from ethical committee(see attached files).

(10)CONSORT声明(CONSORT statement)

随机对照试验的统一报告格式(CONSORT)声明发表于1996年，对规范RCT报告格式、提高RCT报告质量发挥了重要作用。该声明现已得到国际上著名的14个组织机构和120余家医学期刊的认可，并签约使用，作为RCT报告的作者、审稿人和编者撰写、评价及发表的重要指南。作者可登录https://www.360docs.net/doc/b39692767.html,下载CONSORT文档，填写后作为

附件附在文后。

其他类似的声明还有QUOROM声明，STARD声明等。

(11)文稿评述(summary points)

投稿函上还可附上简短的的内容描述，以便于编辑第一时间了解文章的内容。

8.3 电子文档的准备

可以上传的电子文档的类型比较多样，以txt、gif、htm、doc、jpg、swf、xls、pdf、mov、ppt、wav等为后缀的文件都可以作为附件进行上传，但作者在上传前要认真阅读上传的要求，一般的编辑部推荐用Word(2000或以上版本的为佳)和PDF的文档格式进行上传。文件在保证内容的完备条件下，要尽可能的小，不至于造成网络的拥堵，Nature要求文档的大小不要超过3M。

有些图表可以与文稿放在一个Word文档中，注明序号和名称，并配上图例和表注，同时在正文中指明图表的位置。如有大图片，尽量以附件形式上传，附件的命名要规范。

为便于印刷，通常编辑部要求彩图的像素为300dpi，黑白图的像素为600dpi，线图的像素为1200dpi。半栏图控制在8cm以内，通栏图控制在17cm以内。如提供了原照，需在照片的背后注上图片的序号和图例。

9一年三篇IF大于7的牛人告诉你怎么写SCI

上一篇/ 下一篇 2010-05-04 15:02:30 / 个人分类：论文资料

查看( 56 ) / 评论( 0 ) / 评分( 0 / 0 )

文章来源

9.1 一、研究生必备四本

俗话说好记性不如烂笔头，所以一定要首先养成做笔记的好习惯！

作为研究生下面这几个本子是必不可少的

1．实验记录本（包括试验准备本），这当然首当其冲必不可少，我就不多说了；

2．Idea记录本，每次看文献对自己有用的东西先记下，由此产生的idea更不能放过，这可是做研究的本钱，好记性不如烂笔头，以后翻翻会更有想法的；

3．专业概念以及理论进展记录本，每个人不可能对自己领域的概念都了如指掌，初入门者更是如此，这时候小小一个本子的作用就大了；

4．讲座记录本，这本本子可能有些零杂，记录听到的内容，更要记录瞬间的灵感，以及不懂的地方，不可小视！