《侏罗纪公园》英文影评

《侏罗纪公园》英文影评
《侏罗纪公园》英文影评

H11001016 Friedrich (Feng Xin) Essay 2 Draft 2

Just the Good Scene?

Jurassic Park is an eternal science fiction which was showed in theaters in 1993. This film is adapted by a Michael Crichton’s novel and its director is Steven Spielberg.

Jurassic Park was ranked within the top ten in the global box office chart until 2007. It achieved several Academy Awards, including Best Visual Effects, Best Sound Editing and Best Sound in 1994. What is more, BAFTA Film Award, People's Choice Award and some other famous film awards gave Jurassic Park lots of honors.

However, some people said that Jurassic Park could achieve success only because of its great scenes. They said Jurassic Park lacks of meaningful theme and its plot is boring. Mike Clark is one of the opponents for Jurassic Park. According to his review in USA Today, “Spielberg’s talent has run out, but his colorful lights are still moving; it may give this 90-minute film too much, and the roles are stuffy.” (Clark, An Unprepared Ending)

Mike Clark pointed out that the plot is boring and the structure of production does not have any creativity. First, the story is too simple. A group of rescue workers came to the island to rescue two men, unimportant characters had dead quickly, and important figures had a satisfactory ending in the Hollywood ways at the end. Second, usually, only the first episode of the film series will be fine; then the sequels would be worse and worse. This sentence is basic for the three-movie Jurassic Park series. If you say Jurassic Park I created several points audience were interested in, then

Jurassic Park III only replayed these points to treat audience perfunctorily with nothing else.

Despite the film being criticized by some people, more people thought highly of Jurassic Park. In Jay Karl’s review in New York Times, "Jurassic Park can completely be regarded as the best sci-fi movie that is able to combine art with entertainment so wonderfully.”(Karl, A Perfect Combination)

Being directly confronted with Mike Clark, Jay Karl said Jurassic Park is a meaningful film. This film makes a reflection of the development of society and science: laws of nature can not be violated, or human beings would be punished. In the film, some businessman and scientists copy the DNA of dinosaurs and create dinosaurs in order to earning money. Later, the dinosaurs escape and kill many people. Totally, the wonderful film contains technology alerts and dazzling special effects.

I agree with Jay Karl. At a glance, Jurassic Park is vulgar; in fact, I think Jurassic Park has deep meanings. Just as what Jay Karl said, being mixed with the fighting with dinosaurs, there is the awe of the laws of life. I think Jurassic Park is able to tell audience the truth and the enlightenment when enjoying magnificent scenes, which is a wonderful job.

The only drawback is the ending of Jurassic Park I. Mike Clark said the film stopped too hurriedly at the end. When the film is going to end, most audience thought there would be a climax, but it was wrong. Several pterosaurs beat their wings across the sea away, then to the end. I think Spielberg would better provide more pleasant surprise for audience here. I think it would be better if the pterosaurs hit the

main characters’ plane and then broken a fight.

In any case, Spielberg played the fusion of art and business to the extreme. In his film, dinosaurs are not monotonous and clumsy supporting roles any more, they become eye-catching protagonists. What is more, Spielberg made Jurassic Park a indelible mark in film history.

(638 words)

Works Cited

Mike Clark, USA Today: “Jurassic Park” with An Unprepared Ending, 1993, Print. Jay Karl, New York Times:“Jurassic Park”—A Perfect Combination of Arts and Entertainment, 1993, Print.

《侏罗纪公园1》观后感

《侏罗纪公园1》观后感 这部电影——《侏罗纪公园1》真的可以用“惊心动魄”这一个成语来概括。在看《侏罗纪公园》时,我的心都是揪得紧紧的,因为我很担心,因为我不知道剧情的下一个环节到底是什么。《侏罗纪公园》 主要说的是约翰·哈蒙德博士在进行恐龙研究过程中发现一只吸了恐龙血,藏在树脂化石中的蚊子。他从蚊子中恐龙的血提取出恐龙的DNA,复制出恐龙,并建成一个恐龙“侏罗纪公园”。没想到的是,公园发生意外事故后又遭恐龙破坏,造成灾难性局面。科学家艾伦和埃莉及来到公园的其他幸存者终于逃出险恶的侏罗纪公园的故事。恐龙,有素食、肉食和杂食之别,当它们是素食的时候,可以说是人类的朋友,但当他们是肉食或杂食时,对人类确实是一种莫大的威胁。恐龙那庞大的身躯,宽阔的嘴巴,锋利的牙齿,都会使我们这些平民感到极度的恐惧。从剧中的剧情我们完全可以感受得到。对于素食恐龙,人们可以把树枝递过去给它吃,还可以触摸它们的身体;但当人们

面对着肉食恐龙或杂食恐龙时,有的只是无限的恐惧,在恐龙广阔的怀中搏斗,在恐龙巨大的口中逃生,害怕,甚至是浴血奋战……也许世界的和平,世界的稳定规定了恐龙必须要灭亡,也许,所有的对人类有威胁的动物都应消失,狮子,老虎,蟒蛇等等,它们都不该活在人类和平的时代,因为他们的存在会打乱人类安定的生活,会给人类带来种种的恐惧。但,如果没有这些动物,那么自然界的整条生物链就会断层,对人类同样不利!人类,确实充满着挑战!看完《侏罗纪公园》后,我的心久久无法安定,里面的搏斗,逃生,惊险的画面实在令我颤抖……不得不说的是,影片里面的电影特技是多么的棒!那逼真的恐龙形象,逼真的打斗场面,逼真的弱肉强食……至今仍然令我流连忘返。我看这部电影明白一个道理:和平与战争至始至终都是世界发展的主流,因为这种和平与战争不但体现在种族间,国家间,同样体现在人与动物,人与自然之间。同样,人的一生确确实实是充满着挑战和冒险的,我们也正是在这无穷无尽的挑战和冒险中奋斗。

最新侏罗纪公园1观后感(精选多篇)

侏罗纪公园1观后感(精选多篇) 第1篇第2篇第3篇第4篇第5篇更多顶部 目录 第一篇:电影侏罗纪公园观后感第二篇:侏罗纪公园第三篇:侏罗纪公园第四篇:侏罗纪公园影评第五篇:侏罗纪公园影评更多相关范文 正文第一篇:电影侏(来自w)罗纪公园观后感8月27日我和我的好朋友一起去看了侏罗纪公园这部电影。 我佩服这部电影的导演的想象力实在是太丰富了!把琥珀蚊子体内的恐龙血液dna合成为恐龙蛋,目的是制作疯狂的侏罗纪公园。 把几亿、几十亿、几千亿年前地球的霸主,凶残的统治者,脑袋只有梅子那么大的巨大笨瓜?恐龙复活?太荒谬了。我就是这样想的。的确,电影中讲的也是这样的:由于管理疏忽,导致恐龙攻击人类,最后荒唐逃离侏罗纪公园。 恐龙极富攻击性,力气大且跑的快。它若盯上你,只能与它斗智。暴龙只能看见活动的东西,电影中两个孩子因为忽略了这点而被恐龙压在车底下。而恐龙是从断了电的铁丝网处跑出来的,说明再密的网而且还带有电的网,都会有疏漏的一面。人类在统治地球,恐龙也曾统治地球,"一山不容二虎"。恐龙和人类在一起必将相争。

我觉得人类不可能创造出"侏罗纪公园"。人类掌握再多的知识,总会有意想不到的事情发生,第一,恐龙食量大,必定要和人类相争食物;第二,恐龙大量的繁殖也要和人类争抢居住地,人类将面临灾难。 虽然实现侏罗纪公园是不可能的,但是我们也不能停止对恐龙的探秘。已经过去的就让它沉淀在历史的长河中去吧!还是继续保护现在正存在的生物物种吧!生物给地球带来生机。醒悟吧!不要再让我们的生物朋友像恐龙一样从身边失去了! 生物链中虽然存在着强势者胜的道理,但每一种生物都得到自然均衡的生活,这个地球才会完美! 第二篇:侏罗纪公园《侏罗纪公园》观后感 资源勘查二班秦锦华1001103211 《侏罗纪公园》讲的是约翰·哈蒙德博士在进行恐龙研究过程中从恐龙血中提出dna,复制出恐龙,并建成一个恐龙“侏罗纪公园”。没想到的是,公园发生意外事故后又遭人破坏,造成灾难性局面。科学家及来到公园的其他幸存者终于逃出险恶的侏罗纪公园的故事。 《侏罗纪公园》这部电影再现恐龙被人类培养出来,同时又再现了恐龙的灭绝。提到恐龙的灭绝。许多人都想知道,也设想了

Journey to the Center of the Earth(地心游记)2008经典电影英文影评

Journey to the Center of the Earth(地心游记)2008 There is a part of me that will always have affection for a movie like "Journey to the Center of the Earth." It is a small part and steadily shrinking, but once I put on the 3-D glasses and settled in my seat, it started perking up. This is a fairly bad movie, and yet at the same time maybe about as good as it could be. There may not be an 8-year-old alive who would not love it. If I had seen it when I was 8, I would have remembered it with deep affection for all these years, until I saw it again and realized how little I really knew at that age. You are already familiar with the premise, that there is another land inside of our globe. You are familiar because the Jules Verne novel has inspired more than a dozen movies and countless TV productions, including a series, and has been ripped off by such as Edgar Rice Burroughs, who called it Pellucidar, and imagined that the Earth was hollow and there was another world on the inside surface. (You didn't ask, but yes, I own a copy of Tarzan at the Earth's Core with the original dust jacket.) In this version, Brendan Fraser stars as a geologist named Trevor, who defends the memory of his late brother, Max, who believed the center of the Earth could be reached through "volcanic tubes." Max disappeared on a mysterious expedition, which, if it involved volcanic tubes, should have been no surprise to him. Now Trevor has been asked to spend some time with his nephew, Max's son, who is named Sean (Josh Hutcherson). What with one thing and another, wouldn't you know they find themselves in Iceland, and peering down a volcanic tube. They are joined in this enterprise by Hannah (Anita Briem), who they find living in Max's former research headquarters near the volcano he was investigating. Now begins a series of adventures, in which the operative principle is: No matter how frequently or how far they fall, they will land without injury. They fall very frequently, and very far. The first drop lands them at the bottom of a deep cave, from which they cannot possibly climb, but they remain remarkably optimistic: "There must be a way out of here!" Sure enough, they find an abandoned mine shaft and climb aboard three cars of its miniature railway for a scene that will make you swear the filmmakers must have seen "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom." Just like in that movie, they hurtle down the tracks at breakneck speeds; they're in three cars, on three more or less parallel tracks, leading you to wonder why three parallel tracks were constructed at great expense and bother, but just when such questions are forming, they have to (1) leap a chasm, (2) jump from one car to another, and (3) crash. It's a funny thing about that little railway: After all these years, it still has lamps hanging over the rails, and the electricity is still on. The problem of lighting an unlit world is solved in the next cave they enter, which is inhabited by cute little birds that glow in the dark. One of them makes friends with Sean, and leads them on to the big attraction -- a world bounded by a great interior sea. This world must be a terrible place to inhabit; it has man-eating and man-strangling plants, its waters harbor giant-fanged fish and fearsome sea snakes that eat them, and on the further shore is a Tyrannosaurus rex. So do the characters despair? Would you despair, if you were trapped miles below the surface in a cave and being chased by its hungry inhabitants? Of course not. There isn't a moment in the movie when anyone seems frightened, not even during a fall straight down for thousands of feet, during which they link hands like sky-divers and carry on a conversation. Trevor gets the ball rolling: "We're still falling!" I mentioned 3-D glasses earlier in the review. Yes, the movie is available in 3-D in "selected theaters." Select those theaters to avoid. With a few exceptions (such as the authentic IMAX process), 3-D remains underwhelming to me -- a distraction, a disappointment and more often than not offering a dingy picture. I guess setting your story inside the Earth is one way to explain why it always seems to need more lighting. The movie is being shown in 2-D in most theaters, and that's how I wish I had seen it. Since there's that part of me with a certain weakness for movies like this, it's possible I would have liked it more. It would have looked brighter and clearer, and the photography wouldn't have been cluttered up with all the leaping and gnashing of teeth. Then I could have appreciated the work of the plucky actors, who do a lot of things right in this movie, of which the most heroic is keeping a straight face. 1

英文电影观后感100字(多篇)【精品】

第一篇:100部英文电影 100 部超级好看的英文电影 1,魔法灰姑娘〔超级推荐〕(安妮海瑟薇主演) 2,贱女孩〔超级推荐〕(林赛罗汉主演) 3,灰姑娘的玻璃手机〔超级推荐〕 4,美人鱼〔超级推荐〕(里面音乐也很好听) 5,舞出我人生〔超级推荐〕(励志的!刚出了第二部) 6,录取通知书 7,水瓶座女孩 8,倒霉爱神(林赛罗汉主演) 9,儿女一箩筐 10,冰雪公主〔超级推荐〕 11,我的朋友是明星〔超级推荐〕 12,辣妈辣妹〔超级推荐〕(林赛罗汉主演) 13,物质女孩〔超级推荐〕 14,疯狂金龟车(林赛罗汉主演) 15,平民天后〔超级推荐〕 16,公主日记(不用说勒)〔超级推荐〕(还有第二部哟!) 17,歌舞青春〔超级推荐〕[很热的电影!(ⅰ和ⅱ都喜欢) 18,律政俏佳人 19,麻辣宝贝〔超级推荐〕 20,恋爱刺客 21,美少女啦啦队〔超级推荐〕 22,12月男孩〔超级推荐〕(哈利波特演的哟)

23,足球尤物 24,魔法双星 25,超完美男人〔超级推荐〕 25,劲歌飞扬〔超级推荐〕 26,纽约时刻 27,奶牛美女 28,穿prada的恶魔〔超级推荐〕 29,天生一对 30,高校天后〔超级推荐〕 31,像乔丹一样 32,牛仔裤的夏天〔超级推荐超感人~〕 33,初恋的回忆〔超级推荐欣慰~〕 34,甜心辣舞〔超级推荐〕 35,花豹美眉 36,女兵报道 37,女生向前翻〔超级推荐很立志!〕 38,小姐好辣 39,欧洲任我行 40,留级之王 41,风云才女(希尔顿酒店继承人之一尼克?希尔顿首部主打影片!这是一部有关大学女生校园生活的喜剧,影片描述大学校园里一群正处于青春叛逆期、蠢蠢欲动的特权阶层少男少女平日里生活的点点滴滴……有点点sex)〔超级推荐i love hilton sisters〕 42,谁领风骚〔超级推荐女生的可怕和可爱〕

侏罗纪公园3 观后感

侏罗纪公园3 观后感 2. 為何說去那都行就是不去有恐龍的島的山姆尼爾,看到好幾個00的支票,就上了飛機,他是古生物學家耶 3. 蘿拉鄧的戲份很少,蒂亞李歐妮整部戲令人討厭只會尖叫 4. 劇情只有珍珠港的一半,是不是沒什麼好掰的,不過可以節省好多時間去看別部,但是票價好貴 5. 一開始全部的演員胡里胡塗就去有恐龍的島,最後就在一聲叫聲就結束,這是搞什麼 6. 特效相當棒,恐龍有夠炫 7. JP1—A+,JP2—B-,JP3—C+ 8. 為何不直接丟一顆炸彈到島不就解決恐龍了,還一堆人去送死 9. 這是一部倉促的電影,以後如果不是史匹柏導的,我決不去看 也许,恐龙的灭绝是对的。 在看《侏罗纪公园》时,我的心都是揪得紧紧的,因为我很担心,因为我不知道剧情的下一个环节是什么。《侏罗纪公园》主要说的是约翰·哈蒙德博士在进行恐龙研究过程中发现一只吸了恐龙血,藏在树脂化石中的蚊子。他从恐龙血中提出DNA,复制出恐龙,并建成一个恐龙“侏罗纪公园”。没想到的是,公园发生意外事故后又遭人破坏,造成

灾难性局面。科学家艾伦和埃莉及来到公园的其他幸存者终于逃出险恶的侏罗纪公园的故事。 恐龙,有素食、肉食和杂食之别,当它们是素食的时候,可以说是人类的朋友,但当他们是肉食或杂食时,对人类确实是一种莫大的威胁。恐龙那庞大的身躯,宽阔的嘴巴,锋利的牙齿,都会使我们这些平民感到极度的恐惧。从剧中的剧情我们完全可以感受得到。对于素食恐龙,人们可以把树枝递过去给它吃,还可以触摸它们的身体;但当人们面对着肉食恐龙或杂食恐龙时,有的只是无限的恐惧,在恐龙广阔的怀中搏斗,在恐龙巨大的口中逃生,害怕,战栗,甚至是浴血奋战…… 也许世界的和平,世界的稳定规定了恐龙必须要灭亡,也许,所有的对人类有威胁的动物都应消失,狮子,老虎,蟒蛇等等,它们都不该活在人类和平的时代,因为他们的存在会打乱人类安定的生活,会给人类带来种种的恐惧。但,如果没有这些动物,那么自然界的整条生物链就会断层,对人类同样不利!人类,确实充满着挑战!看完《侏罗纪公园》后,我的心久久无法安定,因为只要一想起剧中的情景我就会害怕得连洗手间都不敢去,里面的搏斗,逃生,惊险的画面实在令我震颤…… 我现在忽然明白一个道理:和平与战争至始至终都是世界发展的主流,因为这种和平与战争不但体现在种族间,国

Seven(七宗罪)1995经典电影英文影评

Seven(七宗罪)1995 David Fincher's classic tale of inventive serial killing and urban degredation, with Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman on excellent form Who'd have thought? An absurd-sounding tale of a serial killer basing his crimes around the seven deadly sins, directed by the man behind the mess that was Alien3, turning out to be one of the most chilling and original thrillers of the 1990s. From the outset, through the film's brilliantly designed deliberate under-lighting - we see very little blood and guts - and muffled sound, the audience is encouraged to lean towards the screen, immerse itself in the film's unbearably grim world. Pitt is in career-making form as Mills, a simple cop moving with his sweet young wife (Paltrow) to a grim, anonymous city, determined to make a difference, to do some good. He is assigned to track down a vengeful killer, and works alongside Somerset (Freeman), a jaded, wise policeman on the verge of retirement. The two are that modern movie cliché -the mismatched pair thrown together by circumstance, who gradually learn mutual respect. But Fincher and Walker take these hackneyed ingredients, play with them in the context of a brilliantly cohesive plot, and present something consistently fresh - the police finding themselves with too much evidence, the premature unmasking of the killer - and very, very dark. 1

小王子电影观后感英文版

小王子电影观后感英文版 本文为小王子电影观后感英文版范文,让我们通过以下的文章来了解。 Recently, I read a fairy story book, Little Prince. This book tells the adventurous experiences of little prince from his planet to the earth. Little prince comes from the outer space and he is hurt by a rose. So he leaves there and travels into space. He comes to the earth and be the friend of a fox. The fox tells his secret to little prince and he helps a pilot in the desert. In the end, he dies under the help of a snake and his soul goes back to his planet. This book is very interesting and teaches me a lot. I like little price adventures. He teaches me to be honest and love others. All of us should never loss the pureness of childhood. This is a fairytale whose distribution volume is only second to The Bible. It’s been translated to versions of many other languages. And I gather there must be something special, something really great about it. It’s this conviction that drove me to read it at the first beginning. Well, with due respect to the author, I failed to see how this fairytale be worthy

侏罗纪公园英语观后感

侏罗纪公园英语观后感 Based on the Michael Crichton book, the stars of “Jurassic Park” are definitely the dinosaurs. There’s a lot of people who deserve credit for bringing these extinct animals to brilliant on screen life, but the main four are Stan Winston, Michael Lantieri, Dennis Muren, and Phil Tippett. Mixed with some unbelievably great sound effects, these dinosaurs are some of the most stunning visual effects I’ve ever seen and rightfully earned an Academy Award Michael Crichton, in his novel, tells us how it is possible for us to have dinosaurs walking along side us in today’s time. Steven Spielberg ambitiously takes it on himself to showcase the idea of dinosaurs walking and running along with us. And my God, what a wonderful job he does! Jurassic Park is simply an amazing movie that makes us drop our jaws and look in amazement and bewilderment at the dinosaurs as they walk on the silver screen. No encyclopedia and no book can be as effective as this movie is when it comes to showing what dinosaurs were and how grand they were when they ruled the earth. The photography in the movie is outstanding. There

Tess(苔丝)1979经典电影英文影评

Tess(苔丝)1979 Thomas Hardy's Tess of the D'Urbervilles, which Roman Polanski has turned into a lovely, lyrical, unexpectedly delicate movie, might at first seem to be the wrong project for Mr. Polanski in every way. As a new biography of the director reports, when Tess was shown at the Cannes Film Festival, the press pointed nastily and repeatedly to the coincidence of Mr. Polanski's having made a film about a young girl's seduction by an older man, while he himself faced criminal charges for a similar offense. This would certainly seem to cast a pall over the project. So would the fact that Hardy's novel is so very deeply rooted in English landscapes, geographical and sociological, while Mr. Polanski was brought up in Poland. Finally, Tess of the D'Urbervilles is so quintessentially Victorian a story that a believable version might seem well out of any contemporary director's reach. But if an elegant, plausible, affecting Tess sounds like more than might have been expected of Mr. Polanski, let's just say he has achieved the impossible. In fact, in the process of adapting his style to suit such a sweeping and vivid novel, he has achieved something very unlike his other work. Without Mr. Polanski's name in the credits, this lush and scenic Tess could even be mistaken for the work of David Lean. In a preface to the later editions of Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Mr. Hardy described the work as "an impression, not an argument." Mr. Polanski has taken a similar approach, removing the sting from both the story's morality and its melodrama. Tess Durbeyfield, the hearty country lass whose downfall begins when her father learns he had noble forebears, is sent to charm her rich D'Urberville relations. She learns that they aren't D'Urbervilles after all; instead, they have used their new money to purchase an old name. Tess charms them anyhow, so much that Alec D'Urberville, her imposter cousin, seduces and impregnates her. The seduction, like many of the film's key scenes, is presented in a manner both earthy and discreet. In this case, the action is set in a forest, where a gentle mist arises from the ground and envelops Tess just around the time when she is enveloped by Alec. Alec, as played by Leigh Lawson, is a slightly wooden character, unlike Angel Clare, Tess's later and truer lover, played with supreme radiance by Peter Firth. Long after Tess has borne and buried her illegitimate child, she finds and falls in love with this spirited soul mate. But when she marries Angel Clare and is at last ready to reveal the secret of her past, the story begins hurtling toward its final tragedy. When Tess becomes a murderer, the film offers its one distinctly Polanski-like moment—but even that scene has its fidelity to the novel. A housemaid listening at a door hears a "drip, drip, drip" sound, according to Hardy. Mr. Polanski has simply interpreted this with a typically mischievous flourish. Of all the unlikely strong points of Tess, which opens today for a weeklong engagement at the Baronet and which will reopen next year, the unlikeliest is Nastassja Kinski, who plays the title role. Miss Kinski powerfully resembles the young Ingrid Bergman, and she is altogether ravishing. But she's an odd choice for Tess: not quite vigorous enough, and maybe even too beautiful. She's an actress who can lose her magnetism and mystery if she's given a great deal to do (that was the case in an earlier film called Stay As You Are). But here, Mr. Polanski makes perfect use of her. Instead of a driving force, she becomes an echo of the land and the society around her, more passive than Hardy's Tess but linked just as unmistakably with natural forces. Miss Kinski's Tess has no inner life to speak of. But Mr. Polanski makes her surroundings so expressive that her placidity and reserve work very beautifully. Even at its nearly three-hour running time, Mr. Polanski's Tess cannot hope for anything approaching the range of the novel. But the deletions have been made wisely, and though the story loses some of its resonance it maintains its momentum. There are episodes—like one involving Tess's shabby boots and Mercy Chant, the more respectable girl who expects to marry Angel—that don't make the sense they should, and the action is fragmented at times. That's a small price to pay for the movie's essential rightness, for its congruence with the mood and manner of the novel. Mr. Polanski had to go to Normandy and rebuild Stonehenge to stage his last scene, according to this same biography. As is the case throughout his Tess, the results were worth the trouble. 1

2020年看英语电影观后感英文版

看英语电影观后感英文版 电影大家看过许多了,观后感大家也写过许多,那么偶尔看一 看写一写英语的观后感也是不错的。下面是的关于英语电影观后感, 希望对您有所帮助 ! Avatar is directed by James Cameron.The two main characters are Jake Sully,played by Sam Worthington,and Neytiri,played by Zoe Saldana. Clones named Avatars are sent to Pandora Pla to persuade people there to leave the pla so that human beings can exploit a rare mineral.Jake is sent there to control his Avatar.However,he es across Neytiri and they fall in love with each other.Jake begins to see that nature and the pla should be protected.At last he and the people there work together to defeat human beings and send them back to the earth. 3D technology and the beautiful natural scenery are the two highlights of the film.The message of the film is simple — human beings should protect nature and live in harmony with it. am honored today watched the United States , 3D cartoon animated film The story is the old manCarl and his wife Eliza has always been thought of children in South America

侏罗纪公园1电影观后感

侏罗纪公园1电影观后感 侏罗纪是一个地质年代,介于三叠纪与白垩纪之间,这个时期大多处于温暖和潮湿,同时也是每个人内心深处的好奇——恐龙世界。下面是为大家整理的关于侏罗世纪电影1观后感,希望对您有所帮助。欢迎大家阅读参考学习! 侏罗世纪电影1观后感1 端午的小假期里,《侏罗纪世界1》正在热映,我坐在舒适的座位上,戴着3D眼镜,那种感觉真是身临其境。影片主要讲述了在侏罗纪世界主题公园及豪华度假村被失控的恐龙们摧毁四年后,纳布拉尔岛已经被人类遗弃,在这座岛上幸存的恐龙自给自足。当年饲养人员,恐龙爱好者与非法分子拍卖者在得知岛上休眠火山开始活跃时,一部分人一心想转移恐龙,另一部分人一心想借着保护的借口去拍卖恐龙来满足自己的经济需求。当然,消息传开后又是一场争论——恐龙是否与人类一起生活?或着恐龙是留还是灭亡。在现代社会中,许许多多的科学研究激发着人们。非法分子将恐龙作为战场的杀敌工具,正如影片中说的:“古人可以用马,现代人类为什么不能用恐龙?”也许,人类可以,他们用善良驯服恐龙,或是将恐龙进一步研究克隆。 但是,就像《题记》中的,我们要尊重与遵循这个世界上的生存法则与它自身的本质。《动物世界》中:一个阳光充足的地域,几十只鹿在享受过程中,狮子或老虎就会争抢,而一群却比不过一只。恐

龙的存在是不是就像《动物世界》中那争抢的一幕呢? 恐龙爱好者内心深处的善良,往往永远无法触碰到这个世界,他们的抱怨,他们的沉默,他们的无能无力,恰恰与人死不能复生是一个道理,我们抱怨老天的不公,但抱怨过后还是遵循这个世界的生存法则。 《侏罗纪世界1》带给我们的启发太多太多,而那些所谓的正义必定战胜恶魔;所谓的钱正经挣,不要不劳而获;所谓的人类善良、孩童内心的`淳朴,也都太多太多,而这些所谓只不过都太过普遍。我想,启发真正的意义是这个世界的需要与世界的本质。如果爱你有个期限,我愿意是一万年 侏罗世纪电影1观后感1 “人类已经打破这个自然世界的根本法则,真的好吗?” “既然已经打破,那就学会去爱它,保护它一万年。” 这是我珍藏于我心中的两句话,对此感悟很深。尤其是看完《侏罗纪世界1》后,更加深了我的理解,我被震惊着,也被其中的情节深深感动着,同时我也陷入了沉思。影片描述的是人类在了基因密码后,又幸运的找到了一只封存在琥珀中的恐龙时期的蚊子,经过科学家的不解努力,恐龙被培育出来了,并且建成了一座巨大的恐龙公园,但人们仅仅不满足这些。又通过基因改造造出了一只凶残的冷血动物——暴虐霸王龙与暴虐伶盗龙。为了更吸引游客来赚钱,人类的狂妄与贪婪最终爆发了。恐龙从牢笼里逃出,破坏了一座公园,终于人们放弃了这座岛上的公园。然而,这座岛是一座活火山,即将开始喷发,

相关文档
最新文档