毒品

毒品
毒品

PROFILE?-II / PROFILE?-IIA / VERDICT?-II

PRODUCT INSERT

The PROFILE?-II /PROFILE?-IIA /VERDICT?-II products are one-step qualitative screening assays for the detection of one or more of the following: Cannabinoids (THC), Opiates, Amphetamines, Cocaine, Phencyclidine, Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone, Benzodiazepines, Propoxyphene, and Methamphetamine/ 3,4 Methylenedioxymethamphetamine or their metabolites in human urine. All PROFILE-II/PROFILE II-A/VERDICT-II product(s)are covered by this insert. Refer to product labeling for the actual drugs assayed by the kit or system configuration.

The Lateral Flow (LatFlo?) Adulterant Strip (LFAS) is a one-step qualitative screening assay for the detection of Oxidants and Nitrites and the Determination of Specific Gravity and pH Values in human urine. It is used to evaluate specimens for adulteration prior to Drugs of Abuse urine (DAU) testing. The LFAS strip is only for Forensic/Toxicology use and not for in vitro diagnostic applications.The LFAS test strip is only contained in products labeled PROFILE-IIA or VERDICT-II with “LFAS” on the label.

1. INTENDED USE

The PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test is a one-step immunochromatographic test for the rapid, qualitative detection of one or more of the following: Cannabinoids (THC), Opiates, Amphetamines, Cocaine, Phencyclidine, Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone, Benzodiazepines, Propoxyphene, and Methamphetamine/ 3,4 Methylenedioxymethamphetamine in human urine. It is not for over-the-counter sale. The test detects drug classes at the following cutoff concentrations:

THC Cannabinoids (11-nor-9-carboxy-9-THC) 50 ng/mL BAR Barbiturates (Butalbital) 200 ng/mL

OPI2 Opiates (Codeine/Morphine) 2000 ng/mL MTD Methadone (Methadone) 300 ng/mL

ng/mL

(Nordiazepam) 300

OPI3 Opiates (Codeine/Morphine) 300 ng/mL BZO Benzodiazepines

AMP Amphetamine (d-Amphetamine) 1000 ng/mL PPX Propoxyphene (Norpropoxyphene) 300 ng/mL

COC Cocaine (Benzoylecgonine) 300 ng/mL MAMP Methamphetamine (d-Methamphetamine) 1000 ng/mL

PCP Phencyclidine (Phencylidine) 25 ng/mL MDMA 3,4 Methylenedioxymethamphetamine1500 ng/mL

TCA Tricyclic Antidepressants (Desipramine) 300 ng/mL

THE PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II DRUGS OF ABUSE TEST PROVIDES ONLY A PRELIMINARY ANALYTICAL TEST RESULT. A MORE SPECIFIC ALTERNATE CHEMICAL METHOD MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A CONFIRMED ANALYTICAL RESULT. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/ MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC/MS) OR HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC) IS THE PREFERRED CONFIRMATORY METHOD. CLINICAL CONSIDERATION AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ANY DRUG OF ABUSE TEST RESULT, PARTICULARLY WHEN PRELIMINARY POSITIVE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED.

2. SUMMARY AND EXPLANATION OF THE TEST

Qualitative PROFILE-II / VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse screens utilize a one-step, solid-phase immunoassay technology to provide a very rapid test requiring no instrumentation. This test may be used to screen urine samples for one or more of the following drug classes prior to confirmatory testing:

Marijuana (THC) is a hallucinogenic drug derived from the hemp plant. Marijuana contains a number of active ingredients collectively known as Cannabinoids.

Opiates (OPI) are a class of natural and semi-synthetic sedative narcotic drugs that include morphine, codeine and heroin.

The “Amphetamines” are a group of drugs that are central nervous system stimulants. This group includes ‘amphetamine’ and ‘methamphetamine’, and related designer drugs like ‘3,4 Methylenedioxymethamphetamine’, (better known as Ecstasy or MDMA a psychoactive drug with hallucinogenic effects). The drug ‘Amphetamine’ (d-amphetamine) is detected on the device only at the

(AMP) position. Both the drug ‘Methylenedioxymethamphetamine’ (d-methamphetamine) and the designer drug Ecstasy are detected on the device only at the (MAMP) position. The (MAMP) antibody does not differentiate between methamphetamine and ecstasy. Cocaine (COC) is a central nervous system stimulant. Its primary metabolite is benzoylecgonine.

Phencyclidine (PCP) is a hallucinogenic drug.

Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCA) are a group of structurally related prescription drugs that are used to manage depression. Barbiturates (BAR) are a group of structurally related prescription drugs that are used to reduce restlessness and emotional tension, induce sleep and to treat certain convulsive disorders.

Methadone (MTD) is a synthetic opioid used clinically as a maintenance drug for opiate abusers and for pain management. Benzodiazepines (BZO), a group of structurally related central nervous system depressants, are primarily used to reduce anxiety and induce sleep.

Propoxyphene (PPX) is a narcotic analgesic. It’s primary metabolite is norpropoxyphene.6

Many factors influence the length of time required for drugs to be metabolized and excreted in the urine. A variety of factors influence the time period during which drug metabolites are detected in urine; the rate of urine production, the volume of fluid consumption, the amount of drug taken, the urine pH, and the length of time over which drug was consumed. Drinking large volumes of liquid or using diuretics to increase urine volume will lower the drug concentration in the urine and may decrease the detection period. Although the detection period for these drugs varies widely depending upon the compound taken, dose and route of administration and individual rates of metabolism, some general times have been established and are listed below.1-4

Drug Detection Period Drug Detection Period

THC Tricyclic Antidepressants 1-7 days

Single Use 1-3 days

Chronic, Light Use 3-29 days Barbiturates

Chronic, Heavy Use Up to 12 weeks Short-Acting up to 6 days

days

16

Long-Acting

up

to

Opiates

Heroin 1 day Methadone 1-3 days

days

Morphine 1-3

Codeine 1-3 days Benzodiazepines 1-12 days

Amphetamine Methamphetamine/MDMA

Acid Conditions 1-3 days Acid Conditions 1-3 days

Alkaline Conditions 3-10 days Alkaline Conditions 3-10 days

Cocaine 1-3 days Propoxyphene up to 1 week

PCP

Single Use 7-8 days

Chronic Use 2-4 weeks

The LFAS is a lateral flow strip with impregnated reagent test pads that detect specific analytes in human urine. The analytes detected are Oxidants and Nitrites.The strip also approximates the pH and specific gravity values. Urine samples with ‘abnormal’ values should be submitted to a reference laboratory for additional testing.

Oxidants The detection is based on the oxidative activity of compounds (e.g. chromate salts and/or Bleach) that catalyze the oxidation of an indicator by an organic hydroperoxide producing a blue/orange color. The color intensity is directly proportional to the concentration of Oxidants present in the sample and is observed visually and compared to the color comparator chart to obtain a result.

Nitrites The test is based on the principles of the Griess reaction for the detection of Nitrites. The test pad contains an amine and a coupling component. A red/orange colored azo compound is obtained by diazotization and subsequent coupling. The color intensity is directly proportional to the concentration of Nitrites present in the sample and is observed visually and compared to the color comparator chart to obtain a result.

pH The test paper contains indicators that change colors between pH 2 and pH 11. The color scale gives an approximate indication for pH values between those levels.

Specific Gravity The test pad reacts with ions in urine to indicate concentrations from 1.000 to 1.020. The color changes range from dark green with low ionic concentrations through green to yellow/orange in urines with high ionic concentrations. The color is observed visually and compared to the color comparator chart to obtain an approximate result.

3. PRINCIPLES OF THE PROCEDURE

The PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test is a one-step, competitive, membrane-based immunochromatographic assay. A single urine sample can be evaluated for the presence of each of the specified classes of drug(s) in a single device. The device consists of antibody-colloidal gold, drug-conjugates and a control line.

1. ANTIBODY-COLLOIDAL GOLD Mouse monoclonal drug antibodies were developed. Each antibody only binds drug(s) from the drug class tested. Antibody-colloidal gold solutions were prepared by absorbing each of the individual monoclonal antibodies to colloidal gold. The colloidal gold solutions were applied to the sample well pad in the drugs of abuse test.

2. DRUG-CONJUGATES Drug from the class tested was individually conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA) or IgG. Each drug conjugate was immobilized as a line at a labeled location on the membrane strip.

3. CONTROL LINE Each test strip has anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody immobilized as a line on the membrane at the CTRL location on the device window. The anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody can bind to any of the mouse antibodies coated on the colloidal gold.

The device can be used to detect specific class(es) of drug(s) in urine because drug(s) in the urine and the drug(s) conjugated to the protein compete to bind to the antibody-colloidal gold in a highly specific reaction. When the urine sample is placed in the sample well(s), the dried antibody-colloidal gold on the sample pad(s) dissolves and the urine wicks up the white strips carrying the reddish-purple antibody-colloidal gold as a solution with it.

Negative Samples

When no drug(s) is present in the urine sample, the reddish purple antibody-colloidal gold solutions migrate along the strip then binds to the appropriate drug conjugate immobilized on the membrane. The binding of the antibody-colloidal gold to the drug conjugate generates an easily visible reddish-purple line at each of the labeled locations in the result window. Negative results can be reported as soon as the drug and control lines are visible.

Positive Samples

When drug(s) is present in the urine sample the antibody-colloidal gold binds to the drug(s) before it migrates along the strip. However, when the antibody-colloidal gold binds to the drug(s) in the urine, the antibody colloidal gold cannot bind to the drug conjugate immobilized on the membrane. When the drug concentration is at or above the cutoff concentration, the majority of the antibody-colloidal gold is bound to the drug from the urine. Therefore, as the drug bound antibody-colloidal gold migrates along the strip(s), it is unable to bind to the appropriate drug conjugate immobilized on the membrane. Therefore no line is generated at the drug-specific location in the result window for a positive sample. Read positive results at 5 minutes. The control line should be present for the test to be valid. The test must be read within 15 minutes of the sample application. The test result after 15 minutes may not be consistent with the original reading.

CTRL Line

Each test strip has an internal procedural control. A line must form at the Control (CTRL) position in the result window to indicate that the proper sample volume was used and that the reagents are migrating properly. If a Control line does not form, the test is considered invalid. A Control line forms when the antibody-colloidal gold binds to the anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody immobilized on the membrane at the CTRL location(s) near the top of the device window.

4. MATERIALS PROVIDED/STORAGE CONDITIONS

Each PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test contains all the reagents necessary to test one urine sample simultaneously for one or more drugs.

1. The test device contains one or more test strips composed of a membrane strip coated with drug conjugate and a pad coated with

antibody dye complexes in a protein matrix.

2. The test device may contain a membrane strip laminated with Adulterant test pads for testing the presence of Oxidants and

Nitrites, as well as determining approximate values of Specific Gravity and pH in human urine. The LFAS test strip is not contained in every PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II product.

3. One disposable 100 μl sample pipette.

Kit Contents-Device Only

1. Twenty-five (25) test devices in individual foil packages containing a sample pipette.

2. One instructional package insert.

3. For LFAS products only, five color comparator charts.

Kit Contents Test System

1. One (1) test device in a foil package containing a sample pipette.

2. One instructional package insert.

3. For LFAS products only, one color comparator chart.

4. Split Specimen Kit containing the following:

One (1) calibrated collection container with temperature strip.

Two (2) specimen bottles.

One (1) specimen transport (Bio-Hazard) bag.

5. On-Site Screening and Laboratory Confirmation Form.

Storage Conditions

The kit, in its original packaging, should be stored at 2-25°C (36-77°F) until the expiration date on the label.

5. PRECAUTIONS

1. Urine specimens and all materials coming in contact with them should be handled and disposed of as if infectious and capable of

transmitting infection. Never pipette by mouth and avoid contact with broken skin.

2. Avoid cross-contamination of urine samples by using a new urine specimen container and pipette for each urine sample.

3. The device should remain in its original sealed foil pouch until ready to use. If the pouch is damaged, do not use the test.

4. Do not store the test kit at temperatures above 25°C (77°F).

5. If devices have been stored refrigerated, bring to ambient temperature (18-25°C/ 64-77°F) prior to opening foil pouch.

6. Do not use tests after the expiration date printed on the package label.

7. For in vitro diagnostic use only.

8. If any of the lines formed are outside the arrow indicated by the drug name, the test is invalid.

6. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PREPARATION

The urine sample should be collected in a clean glass or plastic container. Approximately 100 μL is required for each sample well. Collection of 45 mL of urine is more than sufficient for initial and subsequent testing. No preservatives should be added. Urine may be tested immediately following collection. The specimen may be refrigerated if testing is going to be delayed for more than a day. Urine may be frozen for longer storage. Stored urine must be brought to ambient temperature (18 to 25°C/64 to 77°F) and mixed well to assure a homogeneous sample prior to testing.

7. MATERIALS REQUIRED BUT NOT PROVIDED

1. Urine collection container.

NOTE: Specimen containers, disposable gloves and urine temperature strips are available from MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc.

8. TEST PROCEDURE

1. Open one pouch for each sample to be tested and label the device with the patient or sample identification (ID).

(You may notice a reddish-purple color in the sample well. This is normal, do not discard the test).

2. Apply 100 μl of urine to sample well as follows:

? Hold the 100 μl sample pipette by the upper bulb.

? Lower the pipette stem into the urine sample.

? Squeeze the upper bulb then release it. This motion will draw 100 μl of urine into the stem. The urine sample should reach the top of the stem, and a drop or two should overflow into the middle bulb, if not, repeat this process.

? Dispense the urine into the sample well by squeezing the upper bulb. This will empty the stem delivering 100 μL of sample.

Excess urine in the middle bulb should remain in the bulb.

3. Repeat Step 2 for each additional sample well (for multi-strip devices).

4. Read the results at 5 minutes after application.

9. READING THE TEST RESULTS

Negative: The appearance of both a reddish-purple Control (CTRL) line and a specific drug line indicates a negative test result. The color intensities of the Control line and a specific drug line may not be equal; any reddish-purple line visible at 5 minutes indicates a negative test result. Line intensity will vary from test to test.

Non-Negative: The appearance of both a reddish-purple Control (CTRL) line and the absence of a line next to a specific drug name at 5 minutes indicates a preliminary positive test result for that drug. Occasionally a white line (line lighter than the background of the strip) may appear next to a specific drug name. This indicates a preliminary positive test result for that drug.

Invalid: The absence of a reddish-purple Control (CTRL) line indicates the test is invalid. The urine sample should be retested on a new device. If the second test is also invalid, send the urine sample to a reference laboratory for additional testing.

10. INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS

A NEGATIVE test result for a specific drug indicates that the sample does not contain the drug/drug metabolite above the cutoff level.

A NON-NEGATIVE test result for a specific drug indicates that the sample may contain drug/drug metabolite near or above the cutoff level. It does not indicate the level of intoxication or the specific concentration of drug in the urine sample. Examples of Negative and Non-Negative results are shown below.

There are other possible results depending on the drug or combination of drugs present in the urine sample.

11. QUALITY CONTROL

An internal procedural control is included on each device. A line must form at the Control (CTRL) position in the result window to indicate that the proper sample volume was used and that the reagents are migrating properly. If a Control line does not form, the test is considered invalid. The Control line consists of immobilized anti-mouse antibody that reacts with the antibody-colloidal gold as it passes this region of the membrane. Formation of a visible line verifies the Control line antibody antigen reaction occurred. This line may be considered an internal negative procedural control. In addition, if the test has been performed correctly and the device is working properly, the background will clear such that result lines are distinct.The cleared background may be considered an internal positive procedural control.The visible Control line (CTRL) should always be present regardless of whether drug is absent or present in the sample.

The purpose of quality control in laboratory testing is to ensure accuracy, reliability of results and to detect errors. Because the devices are self-contained, single use tests, traditional quality control programs do not apply.The Quality Control program MEDTOX recommends for these non-instrumented test devices includes a combination of the internal device controls and external controls to ensure accuracy, reliability and to detect possible errors.The on-board reactive device controls may be one aspect of the quality program utilized by a laboratory to satisfy the daily quality control requirement established by the Laboratory Director. Another aspect of a quality control program includes an external negative control containing no drug and a positive drug control challenging to the assay cutoff concentration. These controls may be used to initially test each shipment of product received by the laboratory or to verify appropriate storage conditions and long-term stability of the test reagent. To follow good laboratory practices, we recommend that the user document the receipt of each new lot number of devices, the results of external controls performed initially and periodically thereafter, and the results of the internal controls within each device.

It is the responsibility of each Laboratory Director to demonstrate and document the validity of the alternate QC procedure they choose to use in their laboratory. For additional information or forensic and workplace testing requirements, users should contact and follow the appropriate federal, state, and local guidelines. Quality control materials are available from MEDTOX and commercial sources. Contact MEDTOX for further information.

12. LIMITATIONS OF THE PROCEDURE

1. The PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test is only for use with unadulterated human urine samples. Urine samples

which are either extremely acidic (below pH 4.0) or basic (above pH 9.0) may produce erroneous results.

2. A positive result for any drug(s) does not indicate or measure intoxication. It only indicates the presence of specific drug(s) in the

urine specimen.

3. Test results interpreted after 15 minutes may not be consistent with the original result obtained at 5 minutes.

4. The PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test was not evaluated in point-of-care settings.

5. There is a possibility that other substances and/or factors, e.g. technical or procedural errors, may interfere with the test and cause

false results.

LFAS Strip

The purpose of the adulteration strip is to screen for abnormal conditions in human urine samples, such as dilution or the addition of drug-test interfering substances. Occasionally medications may discolor the urine, and make it difficult to read the result. When in doubt send the urine sample to a reference laboratory for additional testing.

Oxidant

Nitrites, acting as oxidizing agents in solution, will produce a blue/green color change on the Oxidant pad.

Nitrite

Abnormal results can be caused by the presence of diagnostic or therapeutic dyes in the urine. Very high concentrations of oxidant such as 80% bleach will produce a brown color change on the Nitrite pad.

13. EXPECTED VALUES

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) recommends the following

screening test cutoffs:

THC 11-nor-9-carboxy-?9-THC 50

ng/mL

OPI Morphine and Codeine 2000 ng/mL

ng/mL

AMP Amphetamine 1000

COC Benzoylecgonine 300

ng/mL

ng/mL

PCP Phencyclidine 25

ng/mL

MAMP Methamphetamine 1000

There are no SAMHSA recommended screening levels for tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, methadone, barbiturates, MDMA and propoxyphene and/or their metabolites.

The PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test qualitatively detects THC, opiates, amphetamines, cocaine, phencyclidine, tricyclic antidepressants, barbiturates, methadone, benzodiazepines, propoxyphene and methamphetamine/MDMA and/or their metabolites as listed (See Specificity).

LFAS Test:

Urines that produce an abnormal result on the LFAS adulteration strip should be sent to a reference laboratory for more definitive testing to determine if the urine may be dilute, substituted, invalid and/or adulterated.

14. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

Sensitivity

The PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test detects one or more of the following drugs at cutoff levels listed below. Cutoffs for cannabinoids (THC), opiates (OPI2), amphetamines, cocaine metabolite, phencyclidine,and methamphetamines are based on SAMHSA recommendations for screening of these drugs in human urine3. The opiate (OPI3) test, if present, detects opiates below the SAMHSA recommendations for screening of opiates in human urine5. There are no SAMHSA recommended screening cutoff levels for Propoxyphene, norpropoxyphene, MDMA, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, methadone, and tricyclic antidepressants.

THC 11-nor-9-carboxy-?9-THC 50 ng/mL

OPI2 Morphine and Codeine 2000 ng/mL

OPI3 Morphine and Codeine 300 ng/mL

ng/mL

AMP Amphetamine 1000

COC Benzoylecgonine 300

ng/mL

ng/mL

PCP Phencyclidine 25

TCA Tricyclic Antidepressants (Desipramine) 300 ng/mL

BAR Barbiturates (Butalbital) 200 ng/mL

MTD Methadone (Methadone) 300 ng/mL

ng/mL

(Nordiazepine) 300

BZO Benzodiazepines

PPX Propoxyphene (Norpropoxyphene) 300 ng/mL

ng/mL

MAMP Methamphetamine 1000

ng/mL

MDMA Methylenedioxymethamphetamine 1500

Accuracy

A panel of naturally metabolized urine samples for the following drug(s) was analyzed using the PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Drugs of Abuse Test and the Boehringer Mannheim qualitative CEDIA? assay or the ROCHE ABUSCREEN ONLINE? for each drug and the results were compared. Results are shown in the following tables.

ACCURACY COMPARED TO THE BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM QUALITATIVE CEDIA? or

THE ROCHE ABUSCREEN ONLINE? II ASSAYS

CEDIA MULTI-LEVEL THC (50 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

THC (50 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 194 3 197

477

487

10

Negative

684

480

204

TOTAL

Overall agreement: 98% (671/684). Samples having discrepant results were analyzed by GC/MS. The three false positive samples were found to contain 16, 28, and 32 ng/mL while the ten false negative samples contained 32, 35, 41, 42, 46, 46, 49, 50, 50, and 90 ng/mL.

ROCHE ABUSCREEN ONLINE?-II OPIATE (2000 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

OPI (2000 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 68 0 68

89

89

Negative

89

157

68

TOTAL

Overall agreement: 100% (157/157)

CEDIA OPIATE (300 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

OPI (300 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 133 1 134

Negative 0 550 550

551

684

133

TOTAL

Overall agreement: >99% (683/684). The discrepant sample was analyzed by GC/MS. The one false positive sample did not contain morphine or codeine detectable at the GC/MS cutoff of 300 ng/mL.

CEDIA AMPHETAMINE (1000 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

AMP(1000 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 64 0 64

618

620

2

Negative

618

684

66

TOTAL

Overall agreement: >99% (682/684). Samples having discrepant results were analyzed by GC/MS. The two false negative samples contained amphetamine at 2353 and 3569 ng/mL.

CEDIA COCAINE (300 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

COC (300 ng/mL) Positive 96 8 104

Negative

2 578 580

TOTAL 98 586 684

Overall agreement: 99% (674/684). Samples having discrepant results were analyzed by GC/MS. Of the eight false positive samples one contained 151 ng/mL while seven did not contain cocaine metabolite detectable at the GC/MS cutoff of 150 ng/mL. The two false negative samples contained cocaine metabolite at 688 and 666 ng/mL.

CEDIA PHENCYCLIDINE (25 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

PCP (25 ng/mL) Positive 56 2 58

625

626

1

Negative

684

627

TOTAL

57

Overall agreement: >99% (681/684). Samples having discrepant results were analyzed by GC/MS. The two false positive samples did not contain phencyclidine detectable at the GC/MS cutoff of 25ng/mL. The one false negative sample contained phencyclidine at 28 ng/mL.

RELATIVE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY COMPARED TO THE BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM QUALITATIVE CEDIA? or THE ROCHE ABUSCREEN ONLINE? II ASSAYS

(THC, Opiates, Amphetamines, Cocaine, and PCP)

Sensitivity Relative

Relative

Specificity

THC 95% (94/204) 99% (477/480)

OPI2 100% (68/68) 100% (89/89)

OPI3 100% (133/133) >99% (550/551)

AMP 97% (64/66) 100% (618/618)

COC 98% (96/98) 99% (578/586)

PCP 98% (56/57) >99% (625/627)

ACCURACY COMPARED to GC/MS

Values for Discrepant PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II GC/MS

(ng/mL)

Samples THC Positive 48 50

46

and

Negative 52 50 35

OPI2 Positive 47 47

Discrepants

Negative 0 0 No

OPI3 Positive 50 50

Negative 50 50 No Discrepants

AMP Positive 48 50

Negative 52 50 2353 and 3569

COC Positive 49 50

Negative 51 50 666

PCP Positive 49 50

Negative 51 50 28

Precision (THC, Opiates, Amphetamines, Cocaine, and PCP)

Performance around the specific cutoff for each drug was measured by testing standard drug solutions diluted in drug-free urine in replicates of 20 each on 3 different days by 3 operators. Twenty replicates of drug-free urine were also tested on each day. At 25% above the cutoff, the precision of each assay was as follows: THC=95%, OPI2= 96.7%, OPI3=100%, AMP=100%, COC=100%, and PCP=100%.

Reproducibility (THC, Opiates 300, Amphetamines, Cocaine, and PCP)

A panel of 55 naturally metabolized human urine samples was prepared. All samples in the panel had been screened for the presence or absence of THC, OPI, AMP, COC, and PCP. In addition, each of the 55 samples had also been quantitated by GC/MS conducted at SAMHSA cutoffs for positive samples or at limit of quantitation for negative samples to determine the concentration of a specific drug. Five of the 55 samples were drug-free negatives and 50 of the samples were positive for one or more of the five drugs. The concentration of primary metabolite in the positive samples was between 66 and 198 ng/mL for THC; 464 and 2000 ng/mL for OPI3; 1056 and 4622 ng/mL for AMP; 487 and 1342 ng/mL for COC; and 32 and 109 ng/mL for PCP. The panel was used to evaluate the lot-to-lot and lab-to-lab reproducibility.

Lot-to-Lot Reproducibility (THC, Opiates 300, Amphetamines, Cocaine, and PCP)

Three aliquots of each of the 55 samples were prepared and each of the three sets of aliquots was coded and used to evaluate the performance of one of three lots of drug tests for the five drugs above. There was one incorrect result (a false negative on an amphetamine low positive sample) on the 825 tests for a reproducibility of >99%.

Lab-to-Lab Reproducibility (THC, Opiates 300, Amphetamines, Cocaine, and PCP)

Three aliquots of each of the 55 samples were prepared and each of the three sets of aliquots was tested by one of three study participants using one lot of the five drug test panel above. There was >99% agreement between the three participants. Overall, there were three incorrect results, two incorrect results for OPI3 (one false negative on an opiate low positive sample and one false negative on an opiate high positive sample) and one incorrect result for PCP (one false negative a low positive sample), on the 825 tests. Reproducibility (Opiates 2000)

A panel of 25 naturally metabolized human urine samples was prepared. All samples in the panel had been screened for the presence or absence of opiates. In addition, each of the positive samples had also been quantitated by GC/MS conducted at SAMHSA cutoff for positive samples to determine the concentration of morphine and codeine. The concentration of morphine and/or codeine in the positive samples was between 2000 and 6000 ng/mL. The panel was used to evaluate Opiates 2000 for lot-to-lot and lab-to-lab reproducibility. There were no incorrect results on the 75 tests (25 samples x 3 lots) for a lot-to-lot reproducibility of 100%. There were no incorrect results on the 75 tests (25 samples x 3 study participants) for a lab-to-lab reproducibility of 100%.

Accuracy (Propoxyphene)

One-hundred forty one (141) clinical samples were evaluated by the Roche Abuscreen OnLine Propoxyphene assay, using a 300 ng/mL cut off. Sixty (60) samples were found to be negative and eighty-one (81) samples were found to be positive by the Roche method. Three aliquots of each sample were prepared, and assayed by three operators in a masked manner. There was no significant difference in the results obtained by the three operators, therefore the results of all three operators are included in the table. Results of this comparison are as follows:

OnLine Positive OnLine

Negative

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II 238 0

PPX (300 ng/mL cutoff) 5 180

* GC/MS results are 390, 441, 499, 536 and 679 ng/mL

In addition to the 141 clinical samples, eight additional clinical samples containing only norpropoxyphene were diluted with drug-free urine in order to obtain an adequate number of samples that had concentrations of drug that were challenging to the cutoff. These eight diluted samples, and the 141 clinical samples described above were analyzed by GC/MS for propoxyphene and norpropoxyphene. The level of quantitation of the GC/MS was 30 ng/mL. Only ten of the samples contained propoxyphene, and each of these samples had norpropoxyphene levels greater than 1,647 ng/mL. As in the study above, three aliquots of the 149 samples were prepared, coded, and assayed by three operators in a masked manner. There was no significant difference in the results obtained by the three operators, therefore the results of all three operators are included in the comparison table.

GC/MS Range (ng/mL) None detected 150-265 339-450 >472

Number of samples 60 8 (Diluted samples) 7 74

Positive 0 12 19 219

Negative 180 12 2 3

Sensitivity/Precision/Distribution of Random Error (Propoxyphene)

Performance around the specific cut-off of 300 ng/ml for norpropoxyphene was evaluated by testing standard drug solutions diluted in drug-free urine in triplicate on 5 different days by 3 operators. Drug-free urine was also tested on each day. There was no significant difference in the results of the three operators so the results were combined and are shown in the following table.

Norpropoxyphene – Cut-off = 300 ng/mL

(ng/mL) Number

Conc.

Agreement

Tested Positive Negative %

0 45 0 45 100

30 45 0 45 100

75 45 1 44 98

150 45 9 36 80

225 45 16 29 64

300 45 37 8 82

375 45 42 3 93

450 45 44 1 98

600 45 45 0 100

Accuracy (Methamphetamine and MDMA)

A panel of naturally metabolized urine samples was analyzed using the PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II PPX/MAMP-MDMA and the GC/MS assay for methamphetamine and MDMA. The results obtained in the two procedures are shown in the following tables.

GC/MS Methamphetamine (limit of quantitation 50 ng/mL)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

MAMP (1000 ng/mL cut-off) Positive 56 0 56

Negative 2 56 58

114

56

TOTAL

58

Overall agreement: >98% (112/114). Samples having discrepant results were analyzed by GC/MS. The false negative samples contained methamphetamine at 1056 ng/mL and at 1136 ng/mL.

GC/MS MDMA (limit of quantitation 50 ng/mL)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative TOTAL

MDMA (1500 ng/mL cut-off) Positive 19 1 20

Negative 4 57 61

TOTAL 23 58 81

Percent Agreement of MAMP-MDMA Compared to GC/MS

POSITIVE NEGATIVE

100%

(56/56)

97%

(56/58)

MAMP

(19/23)

(57/58)

98%

MDMA

83%

Sensitivity/Precision MAMP-MDMA

Performance for methamphetamine and MDMA was evaluated by testing standard drug solutions diluted in drug-free urine in duplicates of 8 drug concentrations on 5 different days by 3 operators. Drug-free urine was also tested on each day.The complete results for both drugs are shown in the tables below.

Methamphetamine Cut-off = 1000 ng/mL MDMA Cut-off= 1500 ng/mL

Tested (+) (-) %

Agreement Conc(ng/mL) No.

Agreement Tested (+) (-) %

Conc. (ng/mL) No.

0 30 0 30 100 0 30 0 30 100

100 30 0 30 100 500 30 0 30 100

250 30 0 30 100 750 30 0 30 100

500 30 26 4 87 1000 30 12 18 60

750 30 27 3 90 1250 30 23 7 77

1000 30 28 2 93 1500 30 25 5 83

1250 30 29 1 97 2000 30 30 0 100

1500 30 30 0 100 2500 30 30 0 100

2000 30 30 0 100 3000 30 30 0 100

Reproducibility (MAMP-MDMA)

A panel of 18 spiked human urine samples, comprised of drug-free and drug standard samples, was prepared. The panel was examined by 3 operators, once a day for 5 days. The concentration of methamphetamine and MDMA had been quantitated by GC/MS in each of the 18 samples. There was 100% agreement between the three operators over the 5 day period at 0 ng/mL, 1500 ng/mL (cut-off + 50%) and 2000 ng/mL (cut-off + 100%) for methamphetamine. There was also 100% agreement between the three operators over the 5 day period for 0 ng/ml, 2000 ng/mL (cut-off +33%), 2500 ng/mL (cut-off + 67%) and 3000 ng/mL (cut-off + 100%) for MDMA.

Accuracy (Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone and Benzodiazepines)

The accuracy was evaluated by assaying a coded panel of clinical urine samples containing varying concentrations of drugs and comparing the results to validated methods. A validated HPLC assay measured tricyclic antidepressant levels. Validated GC/MS assays measured barbiturates, methadone and benzodiazepines levels. Results are shown in the following tables.

ACCURACY COMPARED TO GC/MS OR HPLC

(Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone and Benzodiazepines)

DRUG CLASS Concentration Range Number PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II

Samples

Results

(ng/mL) of

Tricyclic

Antidepressants 305 – 19224 50 49/50 Positive

228, 235, 238, 238, 246 5 5/5 Negative

Only one tricyclic antidepressant positive sample containing a combination of nortriptyline and amitriptyline for a combined tricyclic antidepressant concentration of 519 ng/mL tested negative.

Barbiturates

Phenobarbital 201 – 27776 36 36/36 Positive

155, 155, 156, 158, 161 5 5/5 Negative

Butalbital 240 - 3814 27 27/27 Positive

109, 151, 194 3 3/3 Positive

Positive

Pentobarbital 264 1 1/1

Methadone 306 – 70560 57 57/57 Positive

224, 226, 227, 230, 232 5 5/5 Negative

Benzodiazepines 303 – 30813 57 57/57 Positive

234, 236, 238, 250, 283 5 5/5 Negative

Additionally, the accuracy was evaluated in comparison to a validated HPLC assay for tricyclic antidepressants and to the Roche Diagnostics Sytems, Inc, ABUSCREEN ONLINE? assays for barbiturates, methadone and benzodiazepines. A panel of clinical urine samples was analyzed and the results obtained in the procedures were compared. Results are shown in the following tables.

ACCURACY COMPARED TO THE ROCHE ABUSCREEN ONLINE? II OR HPLC ASSAYS

(Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone and Benzodiazepines)

HPLC Tricyclic Antidepressants (25 ng/mL limit of quantitation)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative Total

TCA (300 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 49 0 49

Desipramine Test Negative

1 45 46

95

45

Total

50

Overall agreement: 99% (94/95). Only one tricyclic antidepressant positive sample containing a combination of nortriptyline (499 ng/mL) and amitriptyline (20 ng/mL) for a combined tricyclic antidepressant concentration of 519 ng/mL tested negative.

ABUSCREEN ONLINE? II Barbiturates Result (Secobarbital)

(300 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative Total

BAR (200 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 62 0 62

46

45

Butalbital Test Negative

107

45

62

Total

Overall agreement: 100% (107/107).

ABUSCREEN ONLINE? II Methadone Result

(300 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative Total

MTD (300 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 55 0 55

45

45

Methadone Test Negative

100

45

55

Total

Overall agreement: 100% (100/100).

ABUSCREEN ONLINE? II Benzodiazepines Result

(300 ng/mL cutoff)

PROFILE-II/VERDICT-II Positive Negative Total

BZO (300 ng/mL cutoff) Positive 57 0 57

Nordiazepam Test Negative

0 45 45

102

45

57

Total

Overall agreement: 100% (102/102).

PERCENT AGREEMENT COMPARED TO ROCHE ABUSCREEN

ONLINE ASSAYS OR HPLC

(Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone and Benzodiazepines)

POSITIVE NEGATIVE

Tricyclic Antidepressants 98% (49/50) 100% (45/45)

Barbiturates 100% (62/62) 100% (45/45)

Methadone 100% (55/55) 100% (45/45)

Benzodiazepines 100% (57/57) 100% (45/45)

Sensitivity/ Precision/ Distribution of Random Error (Tricyclic Antidepressants, Barbiturates, Methadone and Benzodiazepines) Performance around the specific cutoff for each drug was evaluated by testing standard drug solutions diluted in drug-free urine in triplicate on 5 different days by 3 operators. Drug-free urine was also tested on each day. Operator-to-operator agrteement was excellent, therefore, the data were combined and summarized in the following tables.

Tricyclic Antidepressants (Desipramine) Cutoff = 300 ng/mL (ng/mL) Number

Conc.

Tested Positive Negative %Agreement Negative 45 0 45 100

30 45 2 43 96

75 45 17 28 62

150 45 33 12 73

225 45 34 11 76 300 45 40 5 89

375 45 41 4 91

450 45 44 1 98

600 45 45 0 100

Barbiturates (Butalbital) Cutoff = 200 ng/mL

(ng/mL) Number

Conc.

Agreement

Tested Positive Negative % Negative 45 0 45 100

50 45 0 45 100

100 45 0 45 100

150 45 12 33 73 200 45 43 2 96

250 45 45 0 100

300 45 45 0 100

Methadone (Methadone) Cutoff = 300 ng/mL

(ng/mL) Number

Conc.

Tested Positive Negative % Agreement Negative 45 0 45 100

30 45 3 42 93

75 45 28 17 62

150 45 35 10 78 225 45 43 2 96

300 45 45 0 100

375 45 45 0 100 450 45 43 2 96

600 45 44 1 98

Benzodiazepines (Nordiazepam) Cutoff = 300 ng/mL

Conc.

(ng/mL) Number

Agreement

Tested Positive Negative % Negative 45 0 45 100

30 45 0 45 100

75 45 6 39 87

150 45 27 18 60 225 45 41 4 91

300 45 42 3 93

375 45 43 2 96

450 45 45 0 100

600 45 45 0 100

Unrelated Compounds, Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medications

The following compounds were tested for reactivity. Listed compounds were dissolved in appropriate solvents and then added to drug-free urine for testing. Unless otherwise noted, all of the listed compounds were negative in each of the tests at 100 μg/mL. If a drug name is followed by an abbreviation such as “AMP” or “BAR” etc., check the “Related Compounds and Cross Reactants” listing for the drug in question under the appropriate heading (AMP, BAR, etc.) The drug may not cause a presumptive positive drug screen for that drug class.

Acecainide (N-Acetylprocainamide)

Acetaminophen Acetylsalicyclic Acid Allobarbital-BAR Alphenal-BAR Alprazolam-BZO Alprazolam, 1-Hydroxy-BZO p-Aminobenzoic Acid

7-Aminoclonazepam-BZO 7-Aminoflunitrazepam-BZO Aminoglutethimide-BAR l-Aminopyrine (4-(dimethylamino) antipyrine)

Amitriptyline-TCA Amobarbital-BAR Amoxapine Amoxicillin d-Amphetamine-AMP, MAMP l- Amphetamine-AMP, MAMP Ampicillin

Apomorphine-OPI l-Ascorbic Acid Aspartame Atenolol Atomoxetine Atropine Sulfate

Barbital-BAR Barbituric Acid-BAR Benzilic Acid Benzoic Acid Benzocaine (ethyl-4-aminobenzoate)

Benzoylecgonine-COC Benzphetamine Benztropine Brompheniramine Buprenorphine (Methadone replacement)

Bupropion Butabarbital-BAR Butalbital-BAR Caffeine

Cannabidiol-THC Cannabinol-THC Captopril Carisoprodol (Meprobamate) Cephalexin Chloral Hydrate

Chloramphenicol Chlordiazepoxide-BZO Chloroquine Chlorothiazide Chlorpheniramine

Chlorpromazine-TCA Chlorprothixene-TCA Clobazam-BZO Clomipramine-TCA Clonazepam-BZO

Clonidine Clorazepate-BZO Clozapine

Cocaine-COC Codeine-OPI Cortisone Cotinine Cyclobenzaprine-TCA Cyclopentobarbital-BAR Deoxycorticosterone

Desalkylflurazepam-BZO Desipramine-TCA Desmethylchlordiazepoxide (Norchlordiazepoxide)-BZO

Desmethylflunitrazepam-BZO Desmethylvenlafaxine Dexamethasone Dextromethorphan Diacetylmorphine-OPI Diazepam-BZO Diclofenac

Diethylpropion Diflunisal Digoxin Dihydrocodeine-OPI Dimenhydrinate (Dramamine)

1,3-Dimethylbarbituric acid-BAR Diphenhydramine Diphenylhydantoin (Phenytoin)-BAR

Domperidone Dopamine Doxepin-TCA Doxylamine Ecgonine-COC Ecgonine Methyl Ester-COC EDDP-

(Primary metabolite of methadone)-MTD Efavirenz (Sustiva) EMDP- (Secondary metabolite of methadone)-MTD

Ephedrine-AMP, MAMP Equilin Erythromycin Estrone Ethanol

Ethylmorphine-OPI Fenfluramine-MAMP Fenoprofen Fentanyl (Synthetic opiate) Flunitrazepam-BZO Fluoxetine (Prozac)

Flurazepam-BZO Furosemide Fuvoxamine Gentisic Acid (2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid)

Glutethimide-BAR Guaiacol Glyceryl Ether Haloperidol Hexobarbital-BAR Hippuric acid Hydralazine

Hydrochlorothiazide Hydrocodone-OPI Hydrocortisone Hydromorphone-OPI Hydroxybupropion

l-11-Hydroxy-?9-THC-THC

p-Hydroxyphenobarbital-BAR 4-Hydroxyphencyclidine-PCP 3-Hydroxytyramine Hydroxyzine Ibuprofen Imipramine -TCA Iproniazid (R)-Isoproterenol

Isoxsuprine-COC Ketamine Ketoprofen Labetalol Levorphanol-OPI Lidocaine

Lithium carbonate Loperamide Lorazepam-BZO Lorazepam glucuronide-BZO Loxapine

Lysergic Acid Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD)

Maprotiline-TCA MDA-AMP, MAMP MDE (MDEA)-AMP, MAMP MDMA-AMP Melanin Meperidine Mephobarbital-BAR Mepivacaine

Mesoridazine Methadone-MTD d-Methamphetamine-AMP, MAMP

l-Methamphetamine- AMP, MAMP Methaqualone Methcathinone Methocarbamol Methoxyphenamine Methylphenidate Methylprylon

Metoprolol Midazolam-BZO Mirtazapine

6-Monoacetylmorphine-OPI Morphine-OPI Morphine 3-β-D-Glucuronide-OPI Morphine 6-β-D-Glucuronide-OPI

Nalidixic Acid Naltrexone-OPI Nalorphine-OPI Naloxone-OPI Naproxen Niacinamide Nicotine Nifedipine Nitrazepam-BZO Nitrofurantoin

Norclomipramine-TCA Norcodeine-OPI Nordiazepam-BZO Nordoxepin-TCA Norethindrone Norlysergic Acid Normeperidine

Norpropoxyphene-PPX l-Norpseudoephedrine Nortriptyline-TCA Noscapine Nylidrin Octopamine

Ofloxacin Omeprazole Orphenadrine Oxalic Acid Oxaprosin Oxazepam-BZO Oxazepam glucuronide-BZO Oxolinic Acid Oxycodone-OPI Oxymetazoline

Oxymorphone-OPI Papaverine hydrochloride Penicillin G Pentazocine

Pentobarbital-BAR Perphenazine-TCA Phenacetin (Acetophenetidin) Phencyclidine-PCP Phendimetrazine Phenelzine Phenethylamine-AMP, MAMP Pheniramine Phenmetrazine

Phenobarbital-BAR Phenothiazine-TCA Phentermine-AMP, MAMP Phenytoin (Diphenylhydantoin)-BAR

Phenylbutazone Phenylephrine Phenylpropanolamine Piroxicam Prazosin Prednisolone Prednisone

Procaine-OPI Procainamide Prochlorperazine Promazine-TCA Promethazine

Propoxyphene-PPX Propranolol Protriptyline-TCA Pseudoephedrine-MAMP Pyrilamine

Quetiapine (Seroquel)-TCA Ranitidine Riboflavin Rifampin Salicylic Acid

Secobarbital-BAR Selegiline (Deprenyl) Serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine) Sertraline (Zoloft) Sidenafil (Viagra) Sulfamethazine

Sulindac Talbutal-BAR Temazepam-BZO Temazepam glucuronide-BZO Tetracycline

?9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-THC ?8-Tetrahydrocannabinol-THC

Tetrahydrozoline Thebaine-OPI Theopyline Thiamine Thiopental Thioridazine Thiothixene-TCA Tolbutamide

Tolmetin (Tolectin) Trazodone Triamterene

Triazolam-BZO Triazolam, 1-hydroxy-BZO Trifluoperazine Trimethoprim Trimipramine-TCA Tripelennamine Tryptamine

Tryptophan Tyramine-AMP,MAMP Tyrosine Valproic Acid Venlafaxine

Verapamil Zomepirac

N on Crossreactive Endogenous Compounds

Fifteen compounds were dissolved in appropriate solvents at a concentration of at least 1.0 mg/mL. Each compound was further diluted to 100 μg/mL except for albumin (20 mg/mL) and bilirubin (200 μg/mL). None of these compounds showed cross-reactivity at the listed concentrations.

Human

Acetaldehyde

Creatinine Hemoglobin,

Chloride

Acetone Epinephrine Sodium

Human

β-Estradiol Tetrahydrocortisone

Albumin,

Bilirubin Estriol d,1-Thyroxine

Cholesterol Glucose Std. Solution Uric Acid

Related Compounds and Cross Reactants

The following metabolites and compounds were tested. Reference standards for the various metabolites and compounds were prepared in negative urine samples. None of the compounds reacted with the remaining tests in the panel. Results are expressed as the minimum concentration required to produce a positive result in the indicated assay. Cannabinoids-(THC) (11-nor-9-carboxy-?9-THC) 50 ng/mL

Result

Cannabidiol Negative at 100 μg/mL

Cannabinol Negative at 100 μg/mL

l-11 Hydroxy-?9-THC Negative at 50 μg/mL

?8 –Tetrahydrocannabinol Negative at 100 μg/mL

?9 –Tetrahydrocannabinol Negative at 100 μg/mL

Opiates(2000)-(OPI) (Codeine and Morphine) 2000ng/mL

Result

at

100μg/mL

Apomorphine Negative

Diacetylmorphine Positive at 2.0 μg/mL

Dihydrocodeine Positive at 3 μg/mL

Ethylmorphine Positive at 400 ng/mL

Hydrocodone Positive at 2.0 μg/mL

Hydromorphone Positive at 3 μg/mL

Levorphanol Positive at 12.5 μg/mL

6-Monoacetyl Morphine Positive at 3 μg/mL

Morphine 3-β-D-Glucuronide Positive at 3 μg/mL

Morphine 6-β-D-Glucuronide Positive at 25 μg/mL

Nalorphine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Naloxone Negative at 100 μg/mL

Naltrexone Negative at 100 ug/mL

Nor c odeine Positive at 25 μg/mL

Oxycodone Negative at 100 μg/mL

Oxymorphone Negative at 100 μg/mL

Procaine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Thebaine Positive at 50 μg/mL

Opiates(300)-(OPI) (Codeine and Morphine) 300ng/mL

Result

Apomorphine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Diacetylmorphine Positive at 200 ng/mL

Dihydrocodeine Positive at 400 ng/mL

Ethylmorphine Positive at 200 ng/mL

Hydrocodone Positive at 800 ng/mL

Hydromorphone Positive at 800 ng/mL

Levorphanol Negative at 100 μg/mL

6-Monoacetylmorphine Positive at 200 ng/mL

Morphine 3--D-Glucuronide Positive at 200 ng/mL

Morphine 6--D-Glucuronide Positive at 12.5 μg/mL

Nalorphine Positive at 75 μg/mL

Naloxone Negative at 100 μg/mL

μg/mL

100 Naltrexone Negative Norcodeine Positive at 12.5 μg/mL

Oxycodone Negative at 100 μg/mL

Oxymorphone Negative at 100 μg/mL

Procaine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Thebaine Positive at 12.5 μg/mL

Amphetamines- (AMP)(d-Amphetamine) 1000 ng/mL

Result

l-Amphetamine Positive at 100 μg/mL

Ephedrine Negative at 100 μg/mL

MDA Positive at 400 ng/mL

MDMA Negative at 100 μg/mL

MDE (MDEA) Negative at 100 μg/mL

l-Methamphetamine Negative at 100 μg/mL

d-Methamphetamine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Phenethylamine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Phentermine Positive at 10 μg/mL

Tyramine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Cocaine-(COC) (Benzoylecgonine) 300 ng/mL

Result

Cocaine Positive at 800 ng/mL

Ecgonine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Ecgonine Methyl Ester Negative at 100 μg/mL

Isoxsuprine Positive at 6 μg/mL

Phencyclidine-(PCP) (Phencyclidine) 25 ng/mL

Result

4-Hydroxyphencyclidine Positive at 5 μg/mL

Tricyclic Antidepressant-(TCA) (Desipramine) 300 ng/mL

Result

Amitriptyline Positive at 500 ng/mL

Chlorpromazine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Chlorprothixine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Clomipramine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Cyclobenzaprine Positive at 5 μg/mL

Doxepin Positive at 2.5 μg/mL

Imipramine Positive at 125 ng/mL

Maprotiline Positive at 500 ng/mL

Norclomipramine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Nordoxepin Positive at 750 ng/mL

Nortriptyline Positive at 500 ng/mL

Perphenazine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Phenothiazine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Promazine Positive at 250 ng/mL

Protriptyline Negative at 100 μg/mL

Thiothixene Negative at 100 μg/mL

Trimipramine Positive at 5 μg/mL

Quetiapine (Seroquel) To be determined

Barbiturate-(BAR) (Butalbital) 200 ng/mL

Result

Allobarbital Positive at 250 ng/mL

Alphenal Positive at 100 ng/mL

Aminoglutethimide Negative at 100,000 ng/mL

Amobarbital Positive at 2500 ng/mL

Barbital Positive at 2500 ng/mL

Barbituric Acid Negative at 100,000 ng/mL

Butabarbital Positive at 1,000 ng/mL

Cyclopentobarbital Positive at 250 ng/mL

1,3 Dimethylbarbituric Acid Negative at 100,000 ng/mL Diphenylhydantoin (Phenytoin) Positive at 2500 ng/mL

Glutethimide Negative at 100,000 ng/mL

Hexobarbital Negative at 100,000 ng/mL

p-Hydroxyphenobarbital Positive at 500 ng/mL

Mephobarbital Negative at 100,000 ng/mL

Pentobarbital Positive at 500 ng/mL

Phenobarbital Positive at 800 ng/mL

Secobarbital Positive at 50 ng/mL

Talbutal Positive at 75 ng/mL

Methadone-(MTD) (Methadone) 300 ng/mL

Result

Primary metabolite (EDDP) Negative at 100 μg/mL

Secondary metabolite (EMDP) Negative at 100 μg/mL

Benzodiazepine-(BZO) (Nordiazepam) 300ng/mL

Result

ng/mL

Alprazolam Positive

250

at

Alprazolam, 1-OH Positive at 25 μg/mL

7-Aminoclonazepam Negative at 100 μg/mL

7-Aminoflunitrazepam Negative at 100 μg/mL

Chlordiazepoxide Negative at 100 μg/mL

Clobazam Positive at 50 ng/mL

Clonazepam Positive at 250 ng/mL

Clorazepate Positive at 250 ng/mL

Desalkylflurazepam Positive at 250 ng/mL Desmethylchlordiazepoxide Positive at 500 ng/mL Desmethylflunitrazepam Positive at 75 ng/mL

Diazepam Positive at 50 ng/mL

Flunitrazepam Positive at 75 ng/mL

Flurazepam Negative at 100 μg/mL

Lorazepam Positive at 2.5 μg/mL

Lorazepam glucuronide Positive at 1 μg/mL

Midazolam Positive at 5 μg/mL

Nitrazepam Positive at 50 ng/mL

Oxazepam Positive at 500 ng/mL

Oxazepam glucuronide Positive at 2.5 μg/mL

Temazepam Positive at 50 ng/mL

Temazepam glucuronide Positive at 750 ng/mL

Triazolam Positive at 750 ng/mL

Triazolam, 1-OH Negative at 10 μg/mL

Propoxyphene-(PPX)(Norpropoxyphene) 300 ng/mL

Result

Propoxyphene Positive at 50 ng/mL

Methamphetamine-(MAMP) (d-Methamphetamine) 1000 ng/mL,

(MDMA) 1500 ng/mL

Result

d-Amphetamine Negative at 100 μg/mL

l-Amphetamine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Ephedrine Positive at 2.5 μg/mL

Fenfluramine Positive at 25 μg/mL

MDA Negative at 100 μg/mL

MDE (MDEA) Positive at 5 μg/mL

l-Methamphetamine Positive at 7.5 μg/mL

Phenethylamine Positive at 2.5 μg/mL

Phentermine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Pseudoephedrine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Tyramine Negative at 100 μg/mL

Interference Propoxyphene/Methamphetamine Only

Following the study of M.L Smith, et. al.7 the following drugs were tested to determine the degree of interference they may have on the test. Commercial negative urine was spiked with 100 μg/mL of each of these drugs and with either 75 ng/mL or 600 ng/mL of norpropoxyphene or methamphetamine. Each spiked sample was tested in triplicate on the test. None of these drugs affected the expected negative or positive results with either the 75 ng/mL or 600 ng/mL fortified samples. The drugs are listed below.

Acid Chlorpheniramine Ibuprofen

Acetylsalicylic

Morphine

Acetaminophen Cocaine

maleate Dextromethorphan Phenobarbital

Brompheniramine

Diphenylhydantoin

d-Pseudoephedrine

Caffeine 5,5

Acid

Carbamazepine Doxylamine

Salicyclic

15. BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Blum, K. Handbook of Abusable Drugs. Gardener Press, Inc. New York, New York, 1984. pp. 305-349.

2. DeCresce, R.P., Lifshitz, M.S., Mazura, A.C. and Tilson, J.E. Drug Testing in the Workplace. ASCP Press. American Society of

Clinical Pathologists. Chicago, Illinois. 1989. pp. 105-109.

3. Federal Register: Volume 59:2998. June 9, 199

4.

4. Baselt, R.C. and Cravey, R.H. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man. Chemical Toxicology Institute. Foster City,

California.1995. pp. 22-761.

5. Federal Register: Volume 62:51118. September 30, 1997.

6. Baselt, R.C. and Cravey, R.H. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man. Chemical Toxicology Institute. Foster City,

California.1995. pp. 657-661.

7. Smith, M.L., Shimomura, E.T., Summers, J., Paul, B.D., Nichols, D.,Shippee, R., Jenkins, A.J., Darwin, W.D., and Cone, E.J.

Dectection Times and Analytical Performance of Commercial Urine Opiate Immunoassays Following Heroin Administration, Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Volume 24:7. October 2000, pages 522-529.

8. NIDA INFOFAX. Ecstasy # 13547. May 17, 2000.

辩护词(贩卖毒品罪改判非法持有毒品罪)

辩护词 审判长、审判员: XX律师事务所依法接受被告人张某父亲张某某的委托,指派我们担任其辩护人,出席法庭参加诉讼。为履行辩护人的法定职责,维护被告人的合法权益,现依据本案事实和相关法律,发表如下辩护意见,供合议庭评议时斟酌并敬请采纳: 一、起诉书指控被告人张某贩卖毒品罪定性错误,被告人张某的行为只构成并应当认定为非法持有毒品罪。 《最高人民法院关于适用<全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于禁毒的决定>的若干问题的解释》的规定,“贩卖毒品,是指明知是毒品而非法销售或者以贩卖为目的而非法收买毒品的行为。”;“非法持有毒品罪,是指明知是鸦片、海洛因或者其他毒品,而非法持有且数量较大的行为。”两者的区别在于:前者的本质在于非法贩卖,行为人的目的明确,具有营利性;后者的本质在于单纯持有,行为人目的模糊,具有不可求证性。 (一)被告人张某主观方面没有贩卖毒品的故意,不具备“贩卖毒品罪”的主观构成要件。 贩卖毒品罪在主观方面表现为故意,且是直接故意,即明知是毒品而贩卖。因此其主观方面有两个要素构成,其一,行为人明知是毒品而买进或卖出的;其二,行为人买进毒品的目的是出卖,具有意图关联性。 本案证据证实张某确实是在明知是毒品的情况下,向李某买进了该毒品,之后将其放在自己家的垃圾篓里,但是并没有证据证明张某购买毒品的主观意图是为了出卖给他人获取非法利润。相反,张某的行为目的具有潜在的多种可能性和不可求证性,而张某本人则一再供述,“他本人是吸毒者,看到这批毒品价格便宜,就想买回来自己吸食。”因此,被告人张某主观方面没有贩卖毒品的故意,其行为与非法持有毒品罪的特征相一致。 (二)本案定“非法持有毒品罪”,符合该罪的立法精神。 1990年12月28日,第七届全国人大常委会颁布《关于禁毒的决定》,设立了"非法持有毒品罪"的罪名,这一规定在1997年《刑法》中得到体现,法律之

吸毒现状

当前我国吸毒人员情况分析 2007-7-8 21:05:36 杜新忠戒毒、禁毒专业网阅读733次 受国际国内毒品形势的影响,目前我国的毒品问题仍然十分严峻,鸦片、海洛因等传统毒品问题还没有得到有效解决,冰毒、摇头丸、氯胺酮等新型毒品迅速蔓延。在这种情况下,国内吸毒人员数量仍然处于持续增长的态势,青少年吸毒问题突出,因吸毒造成的社会危害日益严重。 一、目前,我国吸毒人员数量仍然在持续增长,但增长的幅度有所下降,35岁以下青少年吸毒人员比例逐年下降。2004年全国共有登记在册吸毒人员114.04万人,比2003年上升8.28%。登记在册吸毒人员仍然呈现男性多、35岁以下青少年多和社会闲散人员多等特点,上述人员分别占登记在册吸毒人员总数的84%、70.4%和53.6%。在登记在册吸毒人员中,除死亡、戒断毒瘾巩固三年以上、出国三年以上、劳动教养三年和服刑三年以上以及下落不明四年以上人员外,全国现有吸毒人员79.1万人。从地域分布上看,我国西南和东南沿海地区吸毒人员相对集中。云南、贵州、四川三省现有吸毒人员数量占全国总数的25.9%,广东、广西两省、区占25.7%。其中广东省现有吸毒人员数量占全国的15.6%,居全国首位。 2004年全国共新滋生吸毒人员22256人,同比下降19.7%。从总体上看,2001年以来,全国每年新滋生吸毒人员数量出现稳中趋降的态势,2001至2003年,全国新滋生吸毒人数分别为25935人、22472人、27732人。统计数据显示,2001年以来,登记在册吸毒人员中,35岁以下青少年所占的比例逐年下降。2001至2004年,35岁以下青少年所占比例分别为77.0%、75.2%、72.2%和70.4%。这充分说明近年来开展的以青少年为重点的禁毒预防教育,对遏制新吸毒人员特别是青少年吸毒人员的滋生发挥了非常重要的作用。 二、海洛因仍然是绝大多数现有吸毒人员的首选毒品。吸食鸦片的人员数量保持稳定,吸食“摇头丸”、冰毒、氯胺酮等新型毒品人员数量上升。现有吸毒人员中,81.1%吸食海洛因,其次是新型毒品(摇头丸、冰毒和氯胺酮)、鸦片和杜冷丁,吸食人员数量分别占现有吸毒人员总数的9.5%、2.2%和2.0%。 现有吸毒人员吸食毒品种类,从近年来的统计数字看,国内吸食鸦片的人员数量基本保持稳定,吸食“摇头丸”、冰毒和氯胺酮等新型毒品的人员数量持续上升,2001至2004年,吸食上述新型毒品人员数量分别占现有吸毒人员总量的比例分别为2.5%、4.96%、8.5%、9.5%。 三、与传统毒品的消费群体相比,冰毒、摇头丸、氯胺酮等新型毒品的消费群体有其突出特点:女性所占比例高、平均年龄低、平均消费支出较低、吸食行为多发生于公共娱乐场所。根据2004年《药物滥用监测报告》显示,吸食冰毒、摇头丸、氯胺酮等新型毒品的群体中,女性占36.7%,明显高于吸食海洛因人群中女性的比例(18.1%)。吸食新型毒品群体的平均年龄为24.9±5.7岁,明显低于海洛因消费群体的平均年龄,32.2±6.8岁。分析认为,平均消费支出较低也是推动新型毒品在青少年中蔓延的重要因素。2004年,吸食冰毒、摇头丸、氯胺酮等毒品的月均耗费为1887.8元,远远低于海洛因的耗费(5831.7元)。连续几年的监测报告显示,公共娱乐场所是青少年吸食新型毒品的主要地点,占90.6%,这明显区别于吸食海洛因的人员,81.1%的海洛因吸食者在家中吸食。 四、青少年是新滋生吸毒人员的主体,抵御毒品的能力较低是导致青少年吸毒的主要原因,社会和家庭因素也起了非常重要的作用。国家药物滥用监测中心2004年《药物滥用监测报告》显示,30岁以下青少年占

毒品种类及危害

毒品种类及危害 目前世界上作为毒品而滥用的主要物质有阿片类、古柯类、大麻类、兴奋剂、致幻剂等。 1、阿片类:自罂粟中提取的阿片、吗啡、海洛因及人工合成的杜冷丁、可待因、二氢埃托啡等。 2、古柯类:从古柯中提取可卡因、克赖克等。 3、大麻类:大麻饼、大麻烟、以及由大麻提取的大麻脂、大麻晶、四氢大麻酚等。 4、中枢兴奋剂:如苯丙胺、甲基苯丙胺(冰毒)等。 5、致幻剂:如麦角酰二乙胺、麦司卡林、裸盖菇素等。 毒品有如下危害: 对人体的危害 1.对泌尿系统的伤害。吸食K粉、海洛因的患者普遍有尿急、尿频、尿痛、排尿困难等症状,部分还出现血尿,造成肾功能严重损害。有些患者一天排尿间隔时间仅约几分钟。因为吸食毒品,一方面膀胱严重挛缩,容量缩小到几十毫升,而正常人是几百毫升,膀胱中的尿液超过几十毫升就会产生强烈的尿意,严重的每天要跑几十趟厕所。另一方面,膀胱肌肉松弛,括约肌无法通过收缩将尿液排出,排尿功能受到严重影响。所以你看很多吸毒的人不喜欢喝水,即使口渴得不行也很少喝,怕水喝多了排尿困难,从而选择不喝。 2.对神经系统的伤害。吸毒成瘾是一种脑病,一种反复发作的脑病。吸毒尤其对中枢神经系统和周围神经系统有很大的损害,出现一系列神经、精神症状。吸食者大多嗜睡、反应迟钝,出现幻觉、被害妄想、失眠、烦躁、惊厥、麻痹、记忆力下降、主动性降低、性格孤僻、意志消沉、周围神经炎等。之前媒体报道过多起因为吸毒产生幻觉而引发的治安刑事案件,如吸毒后产生幻觉,将身边亲人看成魔鬼,挥刀砍去;产生被害妄想,总感觉有人要害自己,跑到派出所报警;以及吸毒致幻跳楼等等。 3.对免疫系统的伤害。各种各样的感染是吸毒者发病和死亡的主要原因。各类毒品不同程度地削弱人体的免疫功能,使免疫功能受到抑制。免疫功能降低后,人体对外界病原抵抗力降低,极易感染各类疾病。那些采用静脉注射方式吸毒的人,毒瘾一上来就什么也不顾,和他人公用针具,这样很容易将外界的病原、尤其是肝炎病毒甚至艾滋病毒带入体内,其危险性不言而喻。 对家庭的危害 1、吸毒给家庭成员造成巨大的精神摧残。 2、吸毒导致倾家荡产,家破人亡。 3、吸毒贻害后代。 对社会的危害。 1、吸毒诱发犯罪,破坏正常的社会和经济秩序,影响社会稳定。吸毒者在耗尽个人和家庭钱财后就会铤而走险,走上违法犯罪的道路,进行以贩养吸、贪污、诈骗、盗窃、抢劫、凶杀等犯罪活动。美国吸毒者用于购买毒品的毒资约94%来自刑事犯罪活动。 2、吸毒吞噬社会巨额财富。 3、吸毒败坏社会风气,腐蚀人的灵魂,催毁民族精神,这已成为全世界普遍的问题。目前,我国80%的女吸毒人员靠卖淫维持消费。 4、吸毒影响国民素质,吸毒者都丧失正常的饿劳动能力。

毒品犯罪

关于毒品犯罪问题的研究 被世人称为“社会毒瘤”的毒品,严重危害着人类健康和社会安宁,毒品问题已成为困扰社会的严重问题之一。在审理毒品犯罪案件的司法实践中,对毒品犯罪形态的判定常出现认识不一的情况。针对毒品犯罪现状进行分析、研究,探讨打击毒品犯罪中的问题,提出有针对性的打击毒品犯罪对策,可以更加有效地打击毒品犯罪。 一、毒品犯罪概述 (一)毒品犯罪概念 毒品犯罪作为犯罪学上的一个概念,它与刑法学上的毒品犯罪概念相似相近但不完全相同。一般地说,它是指与毒品有关的一系列犯罪的总称。毒品犯罪既是国际公约规定的一种国际犯罪,也是各国国内法规定的犯罪。但是当我们考查世界上大多数国家的刑法和有关禁毒立法时,均未有毒品犯罪概念的界定,而只是对毒品犯罪的种类作了具体规定,同样我国1997年《刑法》第347条虽然规定了走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪,但也没有对毒品犯罪下定义。 目前,关于毒品犯罪定义有着5种不同观点:第一种观点认为,毒品犯罪通常是一种跨国性的犯罪,对国际上的毒品犯罪定义,主张援用1988年《联合国禁止非法贩运麻醉药品和精神药物公约》第3条的规定,认为,在中国毒品犯罪是指违反国家关于毒品管制法规,从事与毒品有关的危害社会秩序和公民身心健康的活动,依法应当受到刑罚处罚的行为。[1]第二种观点认为,毒品犯罪是指违反国家禁毒法规走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品以及从事与上述毒品犯罪直接相关的或者与毒品有关的应受刑罚处罚的犯罪行为,论者还认为毒品犯罪也是国际公约规定的国际犯罪。[2]第三种观点认为,毒品犯罪是指违反麻醉药品、精神药品管理法规,非法走私、贩卖、运输、制造、使用毒品以及与非法走私、贩卖、运输、制造、使用毒品直接相关的破坏国家禁毒活动的行为。[3]第四种观点认为,毒品犯罪是触犯《决定》,妨害国家机关的正常管理活动,破坏社会秩序,危害人民的身心健康,甚至危害生命,应当受到刑罚处罚的行为。[4]第五种观点认为,所谓毒品犯罪,就是指违反毒品管理法规,非法走私、贩卖、制造、使用毒品,种植毒品原植物以及与此直接有关的破坏国家禁毒活动、危害公民身心艰苦和社会治安秩序,依法应受刑罚处罚的行为。[5]纵观上述五种观点,第一种观点将毒品犯罪划分为国际上的毒品犯罪和中国的毒品犯罪,并将毒品犯罪的定义关键强调在与毒品有关的危害社会秩序和公民身心健康的活动上,其不足之处在于,它没有概括出毒品犯罪的全部。第二种观点将毒品犯罪分为三类,即走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,与其直接相关的犯罪,以及其他与毒品有关的应受刑罚处罚的犯罪行为。这种界定,从表面上外延涵盖了所有毒品犯罪,但实际上没有周全外延,对于走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品直接相关以及其他与毒品有关的犯罪行为,其范围和犯罪种类仍不能确定。例如,盗窃毒品,抢劫、抢夺毒品的犯罪,非法持有毒品是否是属于直接相关的犯罪或者与毒品有关的犯罪?以毒品犯罪行为方式出发概括毒品犯罪定义,无法周延所有毒品犯罪。第三种观点认为毒品犯罪是违反麻醉药品、精神药品管理法规,并同样可以成为犯罪嫌疑人行为是否具有刑事犯罪违法性的依据,其局限在于,毒品犯罪是违反了《刑法》及有关禁毒法规的刑事违法性,在定义的表述上,以列举毒品犯罪方式界定毒品犯罪显得冗长且无法包容所有毒品犯罪。第四种观点的根本缺陷在于其反复强调所有毒品犯罪都必须触犯《关于禁毒的决定》(1990年12月)(以下简称《决定》),这将导致我国所缔结或参加的国际公约所规定的,我国有义务予以管辖而《决定》未予规定的国际毒品犯罪被排除在毒品犯罪的范围之外。第五种观点在界定毒品犯罪时出现了一个表述失误,即“非法走私、贩卖、制造、使用毒品,种植毒品原植物”中,“非法走私、贩卖、运输、制造使用毒品”是毒品犯罪的一种,显然是不妥当的。综上所述,我认为,毒品犯罪可以定义如下:毒品犯罪,是指违反禁毒法规,破坏禁毒管制活动,应受刑罚处罚的行为。 (二)当前毒品犯罪的特点 1、毒品犯罪的集团化、职业化趋势明显 世界上凡大批量的贩毒活动,几乎均系职业性的犯罪集团所为。从我国已破获的毒品犯罪案件看,集团化、职业化趋势非常明显。犯罪分子结成集团、团伙,或境内外勾结,或跨省区勾结,他们长期经营,形成产、供、销一条龙的职业性犯罪体系。他们有秘密联络点存储毒品,用现代通讯手段相互联系,有专车运输毒

贩卖毒品罪量刑标准

贩卖毒品罪量刑标准 第四条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺二百克以上不满四百克或者其他数量相当毒品的,一般判处无期徒刑或死刑(缓期二年执行),并处没收个人财产五万元以上或没收个人全部财产。 具有法定从轻情节或者有本指南第二十六条规定情形之一的,一般判处十五年有期徒刑或无期徒刑,并处没收个人财产三万元以上或五万元以上。 第五条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺五十克以上不满二百克或者其他数量相当毒品的,一般判处十五年有期徒刑,并处没收个人财产三万元以上。 具有法定从重处罚情节的,可以判处无期徒刑,并处没收个人财产五万元以上。 第六条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满二十五克或者其他数量相当毒品的,一般判处七年以上十年以下有期徒刑。 第七条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺二十五克以上不满四十克或者其他数量相当毒品的,一般判处十年以上十三年以下有期徒刑。 第八条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺四十克以上不满五十克或者其他数量相当毒品的,一般判处十三年以上十五年以下有期徒刑。 第九条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺三点五克以上不满七克或者其他数量相当毒品的,一般判处一年六个月以上三年以下有期徒刑。 第十条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺一克以上不满三点五克或者其他少量毒品的,一般判处六个月以上一年六个月以下有期徒刑或者管制。 第十一条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺不满一克或者其他少量毒品的,一般判处拘役或者管制。 第十二条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺不满零点一克或者其他微量毒品的,比照第十一条规定从轻处罚。 第十三条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺或者其他毒品,情节严重的标准,适用司法解释第三条规定,一般判处三年以上五年以下有期徒刑;具有下列情形之一的,一般判处五年以上七年以下有期徒刑:

工作报告之2017中国毒品形势报告

2017中国毒品形势报告 【篇一:2017中国毒品形势报告】 2017骞?鏈?6鏃?- 2016骞?鍦ㄥ厷涓?ぎ銆佸浗鍔¢櫌鍧氬己棰嗗?涓?鍥藉?绂佹瘨濮斿憳浼氱粍缁囧 悇鍦板尯鍚勬湁鍏抽儴闂ㄦ繁鍏ヨ疮褰昏惤瀹炰腑澶?叧浜庣?姣掑伐浣滅郴鍒楀喅绛栭儴缃?浠ュ紑灞曠?姣掍汉姘戞垬浜変负涓荤嚎,浠ヨ惤瀹炵?姣掑伐浣滆矗浠讳负鏍?.. 【篇二:2017中国毒品形势报告】 编辑:悄缘中国官方最新发布的一份毒品形势表示,外国籍人员在华贩毒活动呈增多趋势,非洲裔、南亚裔等国际贩毒集团向中国贩运 金新月海洛因突出。贩毒活动的暴力性特点突出。 3月27日上午,中国国家禁毒委员会发布《2016年中国毒品形势 报告》。这份报告包括毒品滥用、毒品来源、毒品贩运等内容。 报告表示,中国毒情形势保持稳定,毒品蔓延势头总体可控。但是,中国面临的国际国内毒品形势仍然严峻。在毒品问题全球化背景下,世界范围毒品泛滥对中国构成重大威胁和影响。特别是金三角、金 新月等境外毒源地向中国毒品渗透不断加剧,毒品贩运活动持续高 发多发,毒品社会危害依然严重,总体上毒品问题仍呈快速蔓延的 趋势。 这其中,金三角地区毒品产量增长,仍是中国海洛因和冰片剂主要 来源。根据中国国家禁毒委员会办公室与缅甸中央肃毒委员会、老 挝禁毒委员会合作开展卫星遥感监测数据显示,2015年至2016年 生长季,缅甸北部地区罂粟种植面积66.5万亩,与上一季同比增长3.7%,可产600多吨鸦片或制成60多吨海洛因;同时,该地区冰毒 片剂年均产量远大于海洛因产量。老挝北部地区罂粟种植面积为8 万亩,与上一季同比增长13.7%。根据中国国家毒品实验室检验数 据分析,全国禁毒执法部门在批发环节缴获的金三角海洛因、冰毒 片剂分别占同期国内缴获海洛因、冰毒片剂总量的95.2%和87%。 金新月仍是全球最大的鸦片和海洛因产地,向中国渗透入境时有发生。根据联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室、阿富汗禁毒部联合发布的 显示,2016年,阿富汗罂粟种植面积301.5万亩,同比增长10%, 鸦片总产量约为4800吨,可制成海洛因近500吨。2016年中国破 获金新月海洛因走私入境案件22起,缴获金新月海洛因24公斤。此外,南美可卡因贩运案件仍有发生,主要流入中国广东和香港。

刑法对毒品犯罪的规定

刑法修正案九于8月29日三审通过并于11月1日正式实行,刑法修正案九对毒品犯罪的修订不大,毒品犯罪的类型主要分为走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪;非法持有毒品罪;走私制毒物品罪;非法买卖制毒物品罪和包庇毒品犯罪分子罪;窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品、毒赃罪等,下面就由法律快车小编在本文整理介绍。 第三百四十六条【走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪】走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,无论数量多少,都应当追究刑事责任,予以刑事处罚。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,有下列情形之一的,处十五年有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑,并处没收财产: (一)走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片一千克以上、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺五十克以上或者其他毒品数量大的; (二)走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品集团的首要分子; (三)武装掩护走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的; (四)以暴力抗拒检查、拘留、逮捕,情节严重的; (五)参与有组织的国际贩毒活动的。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片二百克以上不满一千克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满五十克或者其他毒品数量较大的,处七年以上有期徒刑,并处罚金。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片不满二百克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺不满十克或者其他少量毒品的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处罚金;情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处罚金。 单位犯第二款、第三款、第四款罪的,对单位判处罚金,并对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员,依照各该款的规定处罚。 利用、教唆未成年人走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,或者向未成年人出售毒品的,从重处罚。

对多次走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,未经处理的,毒品数量累计计算。 第三百四十七条【非法持有毒品罪】非法持有鸦片一千克以上、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺五十克以上或者其他毒品数量大的,处七年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑,并处罚金;非法持有鸦片二百克以上不满一千克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满五十克或者其他毒品数量较大的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处罚金;情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处罚金。 第三百四十八条【包庇毒品犯罪分子罪;窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品、毒赃罪】包庇走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的犯罪分子的,为犯罪分子窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品或者犯罪所得的财物的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制;情节严重的,处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑。 缉毒人员或者其他国家机关工作人员掩护、包庇走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的犯罪分子的,依照前款的规定从重处罚。 犯前两款罪,事先通谋的,以走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪的共犯论处。 第三百四十九条【走私制毒物品罪;非法买卖制毒物品罪】违反国家规定,非法生产、买卖、运输醋酸酐、乙醚、三氯甲烷或者其他用于制造毒品的原料、配剂,或者携带上述物品进出境,情节较重的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处罚金;情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处罚金;情节特别严重的,处七年以上有期徒刑,并处罚金或者没收财产。 明知他人制造毒品而为其生产、买卖、运输前款规定的物品的,以制造毒品罪的共犯论处。 单位犯前两款罪的,对单位判处罚金,并对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员,依照前两款的规定处罚。 第三百五十条【非法种植毒品原植物罪】非法种植罂粟、大麻等毒品原植物的,一律强制铲除。有下列情形之一的,处五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处罚金: (一)种植罂粟五百株以上不满三千株或者其他毒品原植物数量较大的;

贩卖毒品罪的立案标准是什么

贩卖毒品罪的立案标准是什么 一、贩毒罪立案标准是怎么规定的 我国《刑法》第三百四十七条,走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,无论数量多少,都应当追究刑事责任,予以刑事处罚。 二、贩毒罪一般怎么处罚 (一)三年以下: 1、走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片不满200克; 2、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺不满10克; 3、其他少量毒品的。 (二)三年至七年: 1、走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片140克至200克; 2、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺7克至10克; 3、其他数量相当毒品的; 4、国家工作人员走私、制造、运输、贩卖毒品; 5、在戒毒监管场所贩卖毒品的; 6、向多人贩毒或者多次贩毒的; 7、其他情节严重的行为。 (三)七年至十五年: 1、走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片200克至1000克; 2、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺10克至50克;

3、者其他毒品数量较大的。 (1)苯丙胺类毒品(甲基苯丙胺除外)二十克以上不满一百克; (2)大麻油一千克以上不满五千克,大麻脂二千克以上不满十千克,大麻叶及大麻烟三十千克以上不满一百五十千克; (3)可卡因十克以上不满五十克; (4)吗啡二十克以上不满一百克; (5)度冷丁(杜冷丁)五十克以上不满二百五十克(针剂100mg/支规格的五百支以上不满二千五百支,50mg/支规格的一千支以上不满五千支;片剂25mg/片规格的二千片以上不满一万片,50mg/片规格的一千片以上不满五千片); (6)盐酸二氢埃托啡二毫克以上不满十毫克(针剂或者片剂 20μg/支、片规格的一百支、片以上不满五百支、片); (7)咖啡因五十千克以上不满二百千克; (8)罂粟壳五十千克以上不满二百千克; (9)上述毒品以外的其他毒品数量较大的。 (四)十五年、无期、死刑: 1、走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片1000克以上; 2、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺50克以上; 3、其他毒品数量大的; (1)苯丙胺类毒品(甲基苯丙胺除外)一百克以上; (2)大麻油五千克、大麻脂十千克、大麻叶及大麻烟一百五十千克以上; (3)可卡因五十克以上; (4)吗啡一百克以上;

最新贩卖毒品罪量刑标准(规定标准含量折合

贩卖毒品罪量刑标准(规定标准含量折合) 简述:贩卖毒品罪量刑,又称贩卖毒品刑罚裁量,是指根据刑法规定,在认定贩卖毒品罪的 基础上,对犯罪人是否判处刑罚,判处何种刑罚以及判处多重刑罚的确定与裁量。 贩卖毒品罪量刑,又称贩卖毒品刑罚裁量,是指根据刑法规定,在认定贩卖毒品罪的基础上,对犯罪人是否判处刑罚,判处何种刑罚以及判处多重刑罚的确定与裁量。 第四条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺二百克以上不满四百克或者其他数量 相当毒品的,一般判处无期徒刑或死刑(缓期二年执行),并处没收个人财产五万元以上或没 收个人全部财产。 具有法定从轻情节或者有本指南第二十六条规定情形之一的,一般判处十五年有期徒刑或无 期徒刑,并处没收个人财产三万元以上或五万元以上。 第五条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺五十克以上不满二百克或者其他数量 相当毒品的,一般判处十五年有期徒刑,并处没收个人财产三万元以上。 具有法定从重处罚情节的,可以判处无期徒刑,并处没收个人财产五万元以上。 第六条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满二十五克或者其他数量 相当毒品的,一般判处七年以上十年以下有期徒刑。 第七条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺二十五克以上不满四十克或者其他数 量相当毒品的,一般判处十年以上十三年以下有期徒刑。 第八条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺四十克以上不满五十克或者其他数量 相当毒品的,一般判处十三年以上十五年以下有期徒刑。 第九条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺三点五克以上不满七克或者其他数量 相当毒品的,一般判处一年六个月以上三年以下有期徒刑。 第十条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺一克以上不满三点五克或者其他少量 毒品的,一般判处六个月以上一年六个月以下有期徒刑或者管制。 第十一条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺不满一克或者其他少量毒品的,一 般判处拘役或者管制。 第十二条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺不满零点一克或者其他微量毒品的, 比照第十一条规定从轻处罚。 第十三条走私、贩卖、运输、制造海洛因或甲基苯丙胺或者其他毒品,情节严重的标准, 适用司法解释第三条规定,一般判处三年以上五年以下有期徒刑;具有下列情形之一的,一

青少年吸毒情况现状调查

青少年吸毒情况现状调查 沈阳工业大学建筑工程学院土木工程0805 0 石峰 调查主题:青少年吸毒 调查对象:本市部分中学学生、社会人员中的青少年、干警、法律工作者 调查时间:2011年7月底 调查地点:沈阳市 调查方式:电话、网聊、面谈、填写调查表 样本量:90 报告内容: 近年来受国际毒潮泛滥的影响,国内毒品问题不断发展蔓延,青少年已成为毒品的主要受害者,同时,毒品问题也已经成为青少年违法犯罪的直接诱因之一。为了进一步了解我省青少年吸毒的现状、特点和规律,探求其在社会主义市场经济体制下的新趋势及深层次原因,笔者主要针对目前青少年犯罪情况进行了一次社会调查。现将调查情况报告如下: 一、特点和趋势 1、吸毒人数不断增加。 近年来,沈阳市青年人吸毒情况呈递增和蔓延趋势。吸毒人员中大部分是无职业、辍学或社会上的一些闲散人员。据统计,吸毒者中青少年占到了70%,其中,吸食传统毒品的多为34岁以下,吸食新型毒品的多为29岁以下。如果根据惯例按“每发现1例显性吸毒者,实际上就有10例隐形吸毒者”计算,数量更加惊人。 2、吸毒者文化程度普遍偏低。 从各区登记在册的吸毒人员情况和我们对戒毒学员的调查看,文化水平普遍偏低。以初中、小学文化程度为最多,部分为文盲。如2001年全省强制戒毒2961人中,小学438人占14.8% 初中2405人占81.2%,文盲67人占2.26%,且通过测试实际上有50%的文化水平与统计的文化水平相差甚远。 3、具有结伙吸毒特征。 青少年吸毒人员已由过去单独隐蔽吸毒逐渐发展到结伙吸毒,并且选择一定的固定场所。郑州市在二七区某招待所一次抓获了正在吸毒的30多名青少年男女。结伙吸毒与个人吸毒相比,相互影响,危害性更大。 4、以贩养吸者较多。 由于吸食毒品需要花费较大的资金,一部分青少年通过以贩毒养吸毒,由单纯的吸毒者变为贩毒者,由毒品的被害者变为害人者,走上了毒品犯罪的道路。在调查中我们发现,在毒品犯罪人员中,有近半数以上是既贩毒又吸毒,相互交织,形成恶性循环。 5、复吸率居高不下。 据调查,吸毒的青少年,几乎每个人都想戒毒,并尝试戒毒,但由于毒品对吸毒者生理和心理的极大影响,一旦沾染,毒瘾便难以戒掉,极易形成吸毒——戒毒——复吸——劳教戒毒的现象。据强制戒毒所统计,我市吸毒人员戒毒后的综合复吸率为80%左右,其中一年复吸率为70%,两年复吸率为80%以上,三年复吸率为90%以上。 二、造成的危害

毒品犯罪量刑标准

毒品犯罪量刑标准 量刑标准:一、走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,无论数量多少,都应当追究刑事责任,予以刑事处罚。二、走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,有下列情形之一的,处十五年有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑,并处没收财产。 毒品犯罪历来是我国法律严厉打击的行为,因此,法律对此罪的处罚也较为严重。我国对毒品犯罪如何量刑的呢?包括哪些量刑标准?为您解答。 一、关于毒品犯罪的定罪量刑标准 根据刑法第三百四十七条走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,无论数量多少,都应当追究刑事责任,予以刑事处罚。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,有下列情形之一的,处十五年有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑,并处没收财产: (一)走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片一千克以上、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺五十克以上或者其他毒品数量大的; (二)走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品集团的首要分子;

(三)武装掩护走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的; (四)以暴力抗拒检查、拘留、逮捕,情节严重的; (五)参与有组织的国际贩毒活动的。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片二百克以上不满一千克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满五十克或者其他毒品数量较大的,处七年以上有期徒刑,并处罚金。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片不满二百克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺不满十克或者其他少量毒品的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处罚金;情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处罚金。 单位犯第二款、第三款、第四款罪的,对单位判处罚金,并对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员,依照各该款的规定处罚。 利用、教唆未成年人走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,或者向未成年人出售毒品的,从重处罚。 对多次走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,未经处理的,毒品数量累计计算。 上述规定可以看出,毒品犯罪指实施了走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的行为,并且无论数额多少,均达到毒品犯罪的量刑标

禁毒史

★毒品的来源,可分为天然毒品、半合成毒品和合成毒品三大类。天然毒品是直接从毒品原植物中提取的毒品,如鸦片。半合成毒品是由天然毒品与化学物质合成而得,如海洛因。合成毒品是完全用有机合成的方法制造,如冰毒。 鸦片属初级毒品,因产地不同,或呈黑海,或呈褐色。其气味强烈,有氨味或陈旧尿味,令人作呕。味芳,一般经烧煮和发酵,便成了可供人吸食的熟鸦片,并被制成了条块状或饼状,此时它呈棕色或金黄色,吸时会有香甜气味。罂粟作为一种被考古学家认为是超然的权力象征性植物,是在新石器时代人们在地中海东岸的群山中游历时偶然发现的;罂粟的种植则是从小亚细亚开始,经过漫长的岁月才在这个古老的世界传播开来。从罂粟植物中获得鸦片也有6000多年的历史。吗啡被称为睡眠之神。 海洛因1874年,任职伦敦圣玛莉医院的化学家伟特(C.R Wright)最先利用吗啡加上双乙酰,在炉上燃煮,增强效力,合成出海洛因。该化合物之后送到英国曼城奥云士学院(Owens College)研究。该学院把海洛因注射到犬只及白兔体内,它们当时有惊恐、渴睡、瞳孔放大、流大量口水、有欲吐的迹象、呼吸最先加速然后纾缓,心跳减弱而不正常等。海洛因发明后,最初原用作强效止痛药。1897年,德国拜尔药厂化学家荷夫曼(Felix Hoffmann)在德国将海洛因制成药物,止痛效力远高于吗啡(11日前,他刚成功将阿斯匹林制成药物)。海洛因(Heroin)的名字由拜尔药厂注册,该字或源自德文heroisch一字,意指英雄。大麻桑科一年生草本植物,分为有毒大麻和无毒大麻。无毒大麻的茎、杆可制成纤维,籽可榨油。有毒大麻主要指矮小、多分枝的印度大麻。大麻类毒品主要包括大麻烟、大麻脂和大麻油,主要活性成分是四氢大麻酚。大麻对中枢神经系统有抑制、麻醉作用,吸食后产生欣快感,有时会出现幻觉和妄想,长期吸食会引起精神障碍、思维迟钝,并破坏人体的免疫系统。主要分布在亚洲。5,杜冷丁即盐酸哌替啶,是一种临床应用的合成镇痛药,为白色结晶性粉末,味微苦,无臭,其作用和机理与吗啡相似,但镇静、麻醉作用较小,仅相当于吗啡的1/10—1/8。长期使用会产生依赖性,被列为严格管制的麻醉药品。 古柯此植物原产于南美洲的安第斯山脉,在5000多年前就已知道了古柯。在15世纪时,西班牙殖民者去美洲大陆,印第安人的逃生者躲入深山老林中,这些人发现了古柯叶使人可以抗寒、提精神,且可暂时忘记痛苦。当时只是嚼食古柯叶而已,后来此习惯传遍了美洲大陆,就连西班牙移民也食,今天更是风行,几乎人人知道古柯叶。现秘鲁一国有100万人嚼古柯叶。在玻利维亚,人们还喝古柯茶,极为普遍,此茶不苦不涩,而且还有香味。玻利维亚种植古柯面积占全国面积的40%。 从古柯叶中可分离出一种最主要的生物碱——可卡因。可卡因可卡因是从古柯叶中提取的一种白色晶状的生物碱,是强效的中枢神经兴奋剂和局部麻醉剂。能阻断人体神经传导,产生局部麻醉作用,并可通过加强人体内化学物质的活性刺激大脑皮层,兴奋中枢神经,表现出情绪高涨、好动、健谈,有时还有攻击倾向,具有很强的成瘾性。 ★毒品演变历史 早在新石器时代,人们就在小亚细亚及地中海东部山区发现了野生罂粟,青铜时代后期(约公元前1500年)传入埃及,公元初传入印度,6、7世纪传入中国。从很早时候开始,人们就把罂粟视为一种治疗疾病的药品,具有一定的麻醉、积蓄毒素乃至造成依赖、病魔的作用,因而便有意识地进行少量的种植与生产。人们不仅种植、吸食鸦片,而且从仙人掌、天仙子、柳木、大麻、蘑菇中提取汁液,不过它们不是作为毒品,而是作为麻醉剂或宗教祭祀用品被奉为“快乐植物”。 麻醉品的历史记载可追溯到古代。据记载,在公元前5世纪斯基泰部落就已经开始利用大麻种子,虽然我们不清楚斯基泰人当时到底是将大麻种子洒在烧热的石片上还是直接洒到火堆上,但有一点是清楚的,部落成员是围坐在火堆边闻着大麻种子燃烧时产生的烟雾,慢慢进入迷幻状态开始唱歌、跳舞。秘鲁境内的古人大约在4200年前就开始咀嚼古柯叶。古代的萨满法师就用麻醉品“驱邪治病”。 住在两河流域、距今5000多年的苏美尔人就曾用楔形文字的表意符号记载过罂粟,后来考古学家将其翻译为“快乐植物”。而鸦片最早可以追溯到公元前15世纪,地点在埃及的底比斯,在古希腊的文明和宗教中,鸦片也扮演过极其重要的角色,它被赋予神奇的魔力,拥有“神药”的美称。在荷马史诗当中,罂粟被称为“忘忧草”;罗马人则把罂粟作为睡眠和死亡的象征,维吉尔在《埃涅阿德纪》中称鸦片为催眠药。1560年,方济各会(由意大利传教士方济各创建,与多明我会一起主持宗教裁判所事务)的一名修士贝尔

毒品犯罪案件的基本特点

遇到刑法问题?赢了网律师为你免费解惑!访问>> https://www.360docs.net/doc/de10593431.html, 毒品犯罪案件的基本特点 【毒品犯罪的特点】毒品犯罪案件的基本特点 1、犯罪主体的职业结构、学历结构、性别结构、年龄结构都各有特点 从已生效的268件327人毒品案件中,可以看出犯罪人员职业结构仍以无业人员为主,无业人员为202人,占61.8%。学历层次普遍偏低,以初中及以下文化为主,初中文化205人,小学、文盲或半文盲96人,两者占92%。受金融危机快速蔓延和经济增长速度放缓的影响,加上一些外来人员好逸恶劳、游手好闲,更是因为贪图毒品犯罪的高额利润,外来务工人员(指具有相对固定工作的外来人员)贩毒数量急剧上升,人数达71人,占21.7%,同比上升近10个百分点。犯罪分子呈现明显区域特点,以四川、贵州、江西、湖北为主,其中四川、贵州两地为188人,占57.5%。浙江省内74人,占22.6%,其中瑞安本地34人,占10.4%(详见图三)。 从犯罪人员年龄结构来看,以中、青年为主,占88.17%,未成

年贩毒也不少。生效判决中,未成年犯52人,占15.9%。从犯罪人员性别结构来看,毒品犯罪中女性犯罪已不容忽视,女性逐渐由毒品犯罪的受害者变成实施者。生效判决中,女性19人,占6.98%,高于全部犯罪案件女性比例的3.4%。 2、毒品种类不断翻新,呈现多样化趋势,但仍以海洛因为主 新型毒品隐蔽性强、携带方便、易服食,更便于小量贩售,给侦查机关的调查取证带来了困难,而且较高的科技含量对侦查机关也提出更高的技术要求。原来人们所熟知的毒品主要有鸦片、海洛因,但近年来,在法院审理的各类毒品案件中又涉及到许多其他类型的毒品,如:大麻、冰毒(甲基苯丙胺)、K粉(氯胺酮)、麻古、摇头丸、甲基苯丙暗胺、三唑仑、吗啡等应有尽有,但海洛因仍占据“大壁江山”。 图四:生效判决案件中毒品种类分析 海洛因冰毒(甲基苯丙胺)K粉(氯胺酮)其他合计 不满10克10克以上不满50克50克以上不满10克10克以上不满50克50克以上不满10克10克以上不满50克

毒品

毒品 我木格是毒品重灾区,目前造册在案的有187人,近几年就木格桥头附近的居民就有6人因为吸食毒品死亡的,并且年龄都在21-22周岁。经了解,这些青年有几年的吸毒史。 案例一:2015年十字街叶某(化名),在木格镇木格桥头甘蔗地,因为吸食毒品过量引起中毒身亡,年龄仅仅23岁。 案例二:我村的邻居,三个人吸食毒品,有两个已经因吸食毒品死亡,剩下一个由于吸食毒品,被折磨得半死不活。三个家庭破裂,孩子由于没有管教好,目前都因打架斗殴在广东监狱服刑。一个6年,一个8年。 什么是毒品? 所谓毒品,就是指鸦片、海洛因、冰毒、吗啡、大麻、可卡因等能够使人形成瘾癖的麻醉药品和精神药品。联合国麻醉药品委员会将毒品分为六大类:1.吗啡型药物,包括鸦片、吗啡、可卡因、海洛因和罂粟植物等最危险的毒品;2.可卡因和可卡叶;3.大麻;4.安非他明等人工合成兴奋剂;5.安眠镇静剂,包括巴比妥药物和安眠酮;6.精神药物,即安定类药物。 毒品是一个比较广阔的概念,其分类和品种也非常多。单从毒品流行的时间和发展的顺序来看,有传统毒品和新型毒品之分。传统毒品一般指鸦片、海洛因等阿片类流行较早的毒品。新型毒品是相对传统毒品而言,主要指冰毒、摇头丸等人工化学合成的致幻剂、兴奋剂

类毒品,在我国主要从上世纪末、本世纪初开始在歌舞娱乐场所中流行。“2015中国禁毒论坛”在京举行,今年的主题是“合成毒品防治”。据国家禁毒委副主任、公安部部长助理刘跃进透露,2014年,全国共新发现吸毒人员46.3万名,其中近八成都是滥用合成毒品人员。据刘跃进介绍,目前国内登记在册的滥用合成毒品人员数量已达到145.9万名,超过了传统毒品的登记人数,是2008年同期的6.5倍,年均增长速度超过40%。而且合成毒品滥用极易引发交通肇事、自杀自残、伤害他人、暴力抗法等事件,严重危害公共安全。另据统计,全国登记在册滥用合成毒品人员中35岁以下青少年占比在79.2%,平均年龄仅为28岁。 截至去年年底,我国累计登记吸毒人员295.5万名,估计实际人数超过1400万名。据了解,登记在册的只是显性吸毒人员,按照国际通行比例,显性与隐性呈1:5的比例。 九成毒品来自“金三角”形成网络贩毒新模式 公安部禁毒局局长胡明朗介绍,受国际毒潮持续泛滥和国内多种因素的影响,当前我国毒情形势依然严峻复杂,已进入毒品问题加速蔓延期、毒品犯罪多发高发期和毒品治理集中攻坚期。金三角的罂粟种植面积仍处于增长中,目前可产700吨以上鸦片或70吨以上海洛因。目前我国查获的毒品中,九成以上均来自“金三角”地区,另外“金新月”地区仍是全球最大的海洛因产地,潜在威胁和现实危害增大,而来自南美的可卡因也零星向我国走私渗透。 国内制毒活动正逐步从东南沿海向内地蔓延,制造新精神活

通常贩毒多少克判处死刑

通常贩毒多少克判处死刑 结合《刑法》第347条第二款中的规定,在贩毒构成犯罪的情况下,根据行为人贩卖毒品的种类不同,那么在判处死刑的时候,对毒品的克数要求也是不一样的。一般贩卖鸦片1000克以上、海洛因或甲基苯丙胺50克以上或者是贩卖其他毒品数量大的,则可以依法对行为人判处死刑。 一、贩毒多少克判处死刑 贩毒如何量刑,必须要结合具体的犯罪情节,不能单纯仅以克数为考量标准; 根据我国《刑法》第三百四十七条第二款,有下列情形之一的,处十五年有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑,并处没收财产: (一) 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片一千克以上、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺五十克以上或者其他毒品数量大的; (二) 走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品集团的首要分子; (三) 武装掩护走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的;

(四) 以暴力抗拒检查、拘留、逮捕,情节严重的; (五) 参与有组织的国际贩毒活动的。 另外,各省有更为具体的量刑标准,不能一概而论。如遇到此类情形,建议将具体的情况向律师咨询,才能作出准确的判断。 二、贩毒构成犯罪有可能判缓刑吗 《刑法》规定缓刑的适用条件: 1、缓刑适用的对象必须是被判处拘役或者3年以下有期徒刑的犯罪分子,被判处超过3年有期徒刑的犯罪分子,由于他们的罪行较重,社会危害性较大,不适宜放在社会上执行,所以不能适用缓刑。 2、适用缓刑的犯罪分子必须是犯罪情节比较轻微,悔罪表现比较好,放在社会上确实不致再危害社会的。 3、根据我国刑法的规定,对于累犯不能适用缓刑。 由此可见,情节一般没有严重情节可以判处缓刑。 三、教唆未成年人贩毒怎么处理 近年来,一些毒品犯罪分子为了逃避打击,雇佣孕妇、哺乳期妇女、急性传染病人、残疾人或者未成年人等特定人员进行毒品犯罪活动,成为影响我国禁毒工作成效的突出问题。对利用、

毒品的种类

毒品的种类 毒品种类繁多,但一般来说,毒品都有四个共同的特征:不可抗力,强制性地使吸食者连续使用该药,并且不择手段地去获得它;连续使用有不断加大剂量的趋势;对该药产生精神依赖性及躯体依赖性,断药后产生戒断症状(脱瘾症状);对个人、家庭和社会都会产生危害后果。 各类毒品,根据不同的标准有不同的划分方法。联合国麻醉药品委员会将毒品分为六大类:吗啡型药物(包括鸦片、吗啡、可卡因、海洛因和罂粟植物等)是最危险的毒品;可卡因、可卡叶;大麻;安非它明等人工合成兴奋剂;安眠镇静剂(包括巴比妥药物和安眠酮);精神药物,即安定类药物。 世界卫生组织(WHO)将当成毒品使用的物质分成8大类:吗啡类、巴比妥类、酒精类、可卡因类、印度大麻类、苯丙胺类、柯特(KHAT)类和致幻剂类。其他还有烟碱、挥发性溶液等。目前毒品种类已达到200多种。从近年来广州所查获的吸毒人员所吸毒品来看,主要有海洛因,其次是苯丙胺类即"冰"毒等种类。 下面对这些常见的主要毒品作一简单介绍: 1、鸦片

鸦片(opium),俗称"阿片""大烟""烟土""阿片烟""阿芙蓉"等。鸦片系草本类植物罂粟未成熟的果实用刀割后流出的汁液,经风干后浓缩加工处理而成的褐色膏状物。这就是生鸦片。生鸦片经加热煎制便成熟鸦片,是一种棕色的粘稠液体,俗称烟膏。鸦片是一种初级毒品。生鸦片可直接加工成吗啡。鸦片主要含有鸦片生物碱,已知的有25种以上,其中最主要的是吗啡、可待因等,含量可达10%一20%。 2、吗啡 吗啡是鸦片的主要有效成分,是从鸦片中经过提炼出来的主要生物碱,呈白色结晶粉末状闻上去有点酸味。吗啡成瘾者常用针剂皮下注射或静脉注射。起初它被作为镇痛剂应用于临床,但由于它对呼吸中枢有极强的抑制作用,如同吸食邪片一样,过量吸食吗啡后出现昏迷、瞳孔极度缩小、呼吸受到抑制,甚至于出现呼吸麻痹、停止而死亡。 3、海洛因

《中华人民共和国刑法》对毒品犯罪的规定

《中华人民共和国刑法》对毒品犯罪的规定 第六章妨碍社会管理秩序罪 第七节走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪 第三百四十七条走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,无论数量多少,都应当追究刑事责任,予以刑事处罚。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,有下列情形之一的,处十五年有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑,并处没收财产; (一)走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片一千克以上的、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺五十克以上或者其他毒品数量大的; (二)走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品集团的首要分子; (三)武装掩护走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的; (四)以暴力抗拒检查、挽留、逮捕,情节严重的; (五)参与有组织的国际贩毒活动的。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片二百克以上不满一千克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满五十克或者其他毒品数量较大的,处七年以上有期徒刑,并处罚金。 走私、贩卖、运输、制造鸦片不满二百克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺不满十克或者其他少量毒品的,处三年以下有期行刑、拘役或管制,并处罚金;情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处罚金。 单位犯第二款、第三款、第四款罪的,对单位判处罚金,并对其直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员,依照各该款的规定处罚。 利用、教唆未成年人走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品,或者向未成年人出售毒品的,从重处罚。 对多次走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的,未经处理的,毒品数量累计计算。 第三百四十八条非法持有鸦片一千克以上、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺五十克以上或者其他毒品数量大的,处七年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑,并处罚金;非法持有鸦片二百克以上不满一千克、海洛因或者甲基苯丙胺十克以上不满五十克或者其他毒品数量较大,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处罚金;情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处罚金。

相关文档
最新文档