财务报表分析研究外文翻译

合集下载

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译LNTU---Acc附录A财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值比率摘要关键词:财政杠杆;运营债务杠杆;股本回报率;值比率传统观点认为,杠杆效应是从金融活动中产生的:公司通过借贷来增加运营的资金。

杠杆作用的衡量标准是负债总额与股东权益。

然而,一些负债——如银行贷款和发行的债券,是由于资金筹措,其他一些负债——如贸易应付账款,预收收入和退休金负债,是由于在运营过程中与供应商的贸易,与顾客和雇佣者在结算过程中产生的负债。

融资负债通常交易运作良好的资本市场其中的发行者是随行就市的商人。

与此相反,在运营中公司能够实现高增值。

因为业务涉及的是与资本市场相比,不太完善的贸易的输入和输出的市场。

因此,考虑到股票估值,运营负债和融资负债的区别的产生有一些先验的原因。

我们研究在资产负债表上,运营负债中的一美元是否与融资中的一美元等值这个问题。

因为运营负债和融资负债是股票价值的组成部分,这个问题就相当于问是否股价与账面价值比率是否取决于账面净值的组成。

价格与账面比率是由预期回报率的账面价值决定的。

所以,如果部分的账面价值要求不同的溢价,他们必须显示出不同的账面价值的预期回报率。

因此,标准的财务报表分析的能够区分股东从运营中和借贷的融资业务中产生的利润。

因此,资产回报有别于股本回报率,这种差异是由于杠杆作用。

然而,在标准的分析中,经营负债不区别于融资负债。

因此,为了制定用于实证分析的规范,我们的研究结果是用于愿意分析预期公司的收益和账面收益率。

这些预测和估值依赖于负债的组成。

这篇文章结构如下。

第一部分概述并指出了了能够判别两种杠杆作用类型,连接杠杆作用和盈利的财务报表分析第二节将杠杆作用,股票价值和价格与账面比率联系在一起。

第三节中进行实证分析,第四节进行了概述与结论。

1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。

这个分析从实证的详细分析中得出了精确的杠杆效应等式普通股产权资本收益率=综合所得?普通股本(1) 杠杆影响到这个盈利等式的分子和分母。

关于财务报告分析的英语(3篇)

关于财务报告分析的英语(3篇)

第1篇Introduction:Financial reporting is a crucial aspect of any organization, providing stakeholders with vital information about its financial performance and position. Analyzing financial reports helps investors, creditors, and other interested parties make informed decisions. This article aims to provide a comprehensive guide to financial report analysis, covering various aspects such as balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements, and ratio analysis.I. Understanding Financial Reports1. Financial Statements:Financial statements are formal records of the financial activities of a company. They include the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.a. Balance Sheet:The balance sheet provides a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. It consists of assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity.b. Income Statement:The income statement shows a company's financial performance over a specific period. It includes revenues, expenses, and net income.c. Cash Flow Statement:The cash flow statement presents the inflow and outflow of cash within a company over a specific period. It consists of operating, investing, and financing activities.2. Notes to Financial Statements:Notes to financial statements provide additional information about the figures presented in the statements. They help users understand theaccounting policies, assumptions, and estimates used in preparing the financial statements.II. Analyzing Financial Reports1. Horizontal Analysis:Horizontal analysis, also known as trend analysis, compares financial data over multiple periods to identify trends and patterns. It helps in assessing the growth rate, profitability, and financial stability of a company.2. Vertical Analysis:Vertical analysis involves expressing each item in a financial statement as a percentage of a base figure, such as total assets or total sales. This analysis helps in understanding the relative importance of each item in the statement.3. Ratio Analysis:Ratio analysis involves calculating and interpreting various ratios to assess the financial health and performance of a company. Common ratios include liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, solvency ratios, and efficiency ratios.a. Liquidity Ratios:Liquidity ratios measure a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations. Common liquidity ratios include the current ratio and quick ratio.b. Profitability Ratios:Profitability ratios assess a company's ability to generate profits from its operations. Common profitability ratios include the gross profit margin, operating profit margin, and net profit margin.c. Solvency Ratios:Solvency ratios measure a company's ability to meet its long-term obligations. Common solvency ratios include the debt-to-equity ratio and interest coverage ratio.d. Efficiency Ratios:Efficiency ratios measure how effectively a company utilizes its assets and resources. Common efficiency ratios include the inventory turnover ratio and receivables turnover ratio.III. Key Aspects of Financial Report Analysis1. Earnings Per Share (EPS):EPS is a measure of a company's profitability. It is calculated by dividing net income by the number of outstanding shares. A higher EPS indicates higher profitability.2. Return on Equity (ROE):ROE measures how effectively a company utilizes its shareholders' equity to generate profits. It is calculated by dividing net income by shareholders' equity. A higher ROE indicates better profitability.3. Return on Assets (ROA):ROA measures how effectively a company utilizes its assets to generate profits. It is calculated by dividing net income by total assets. A higher ROA indicates better asset utilization.4. Debt-to-Equity Ratio:The debt-to-equity ratio compares a company's total debt to its shareholders' equity. A higher ratio indicates higher financial leverage and higher risk.5. Inventory Turnover Ratio:The inventory turnover ratio measures how quickly a company sells its inventory. A higher ratio indicates efficient inventory management.IV. ConclusionFinancial report analysis is a critical tool for understanding a company's financial performance and position. By analyzing various financial statements, ratios, and key aspects, stakeholders can make informed decisions about their investments, lending, and other business activities. It is important to consider both historical and current data while analyzing financial reports to gain a comprehensive understanding of a company's financial health.Remember, financial report analysis is not an exact science, and it requires a thorough understanding of accounting principles and industry-specific factors. By following the guidelines provided in this article, stakeholders can navigate the complexities of financial report analysis and make well-informed decisions.第2篇IntroductionFinancial reporting is a critical aspect of any business, providing stakeholders with vital information about the company's financial performance, position, and cash flows. This guide aims to delve into the intricacies of financial report analysis, offering insights into how to interpret financial statements, assess financial health, and make informed decisions. By the end of this article, readers should have a comprehensive understanding of the key components of financial report analysis and the tools required to perform it effectively.Understanding Financial StatementsFinancial statements are the primary source of information for financial report analysis. The main financial statements include the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. Each statement serves a different purpose and provides a unique perspective on the company's financial health.1. Balance SheetThe balance sheet provides a snapshot of the company's financialposition at a specific point in time. It consists of three main sections:assets, liabilities, and equity. The balance sheet follows the accounting equation, which states that assets equal liabilities plus equity.- Assets: These are the resources owned by the company, including cash, accounts receivable, inventory, property, and equipment.- Liabilities: These are the company's obligations, such as accounts payable, loans, and other debts.- Equity: This represents the ownership interest in the company, which includes retained earnings and common stock.2. Income StatementThe income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, shows the company's financial performance over a specific period. It consists of three main sections: revenue, expenses, and net income.- Revenue: This represents the income generated from the company's primary business activities.- Expenses: These are the costs incurred in generating revenue, including salaries, rent, utilities, and other operating expenses.- Net Income: This is the difference between revenue and expenses, representing the company's profit or loss for the period.3. Cash Flow StatementThe cash flow statement provides information about the company's cash inflows and outflows during a specific period. It consists of three main sections: operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities.- Operating Activities: These are the cash flows resulting from the company's primary business activities.- Investing Activities: These are the cash flows resulting from the company's investments in assets and other businesses.- Financing Activities: These are the cash flows resulting from the company's financing activities, such as issuing or repurchasing stock and taking on or repaying debt.Key Financial RatiosFinancial ratios are tools used to analyze the financial statements and assess the company's performance and health. Here are some of the most common financial ratios:1. Liquidity RatiosLiquidity ratios measure the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations. The most common liquidity ratios include:- Current Ratio: This ratio compares current assets to current liabilities, indicating the company's ability to cover its short-term obligations.- Quick Ratio: This ratio is similar to the current ratio but excludes inventory, providing a more stringent measure of liquidity.- Cash Ratio: This ratio compares cash and cash equivalents to current liabilities, indicating the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations using only cash.2. Solvency RatiosSolvency ratios measure the company's ability to meet its long-term obligations. The most common solvency ratios include:- Debt-to-Equity Ratio: This ratio compares total debt to total equity, indicating the extent to which the company is using debt financing.- Interest Coverage Ratio: This ratio compares earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to interest expense, indicating the company's ability to cover its interest payments.- Times Interest Earned Ratio: This ratio compares EBIT to interest expense, indicating the number of times the company can cover its interest payments.3. Profitability RatiosProfitability ratios measure the company's ability to generate profits from its operations. The most common profitability ratios include:- Gross Margin Ratio: This ratio compares gross profit to revenue, indicating the company's ability to generate profits from its sales.- Net Margin Ratio: This ratio compares net income to revenue, indicating the company's overall profitability.- Return on Assets (ROA): This ratio compares net income to total assets, indicating the company's efficiency in using its assets to generate profits.- Return on Equity (ROE): This ratio compares net income to shareholders' equity, indicating the company's profitability from the perspective of its shareholders.4. Efficiency RatiosEfficiency ratios measure the company's ability to manage its assets and liabilities effectively. The most common efficiency ratios include:- Inventory Turnover Ratio: This ratio compares cost of goods sold to average inventory, indicating the company's ability to manage its inventory effectively.- Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio: This ratio compares net credit sales to average accounts receivable, indicating the company's ability to collect payments from its customers.- Total Asset Turnover Ratio: This ratio compares net sales to average total assets, indicating the company's ability to generate sales from its assets.Performing Financial Report AnalysisTo perform a comprehensive financial report analysis, follow these steps:1. Gather Financial Statements: Obtain the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.2. Calculate Financial Ratios: Calculate the relevant financial ratios using the data from the financial statements.3. Compare Ratios: Compare the company's financial ratios to industry averages and historical performance to identify strengths and weaknesses.4. Identify Trends: Analyze the company's financial ratios over time to identify trends and patterns in its financial performance.5. Perform Vertical and Horizontal Analysis: Perform vertical analysis (also known as common-size analysis) to compare different line items within a financial statement as a percentage of a base item. Perform horizontal analysis to compare financial statement items over different periods.6. Analyze Cash Flow: Analyze the cash flow statement to understand the company's cash inflows and outflows and its ability to generate cash.7. Assess Financial Health: Based on the analysis, assess the company's financial health and make informed decisions about its future prospects.ConclusionFinancial report analysis is a crucial tool for understanding a company's financial performance and health. By interpreting financial statements, calculating financial ratios, and analyzing trends, stakeholders can make informed decisions about their investments, business operations, and overall financial strategy. This guide has provided a comprehensive overview of financial report analysis, offering insights into the key components and tools required to perform it effectively.第3篇Introduction:Financial report analysis is a crucial process for businesses to evaluate their financial performance, make informed decisions, and identify areas for improvement. By thoroughly analyzing financial reports, businesses can gain insights into their profitability, liquidity, solvency, and overall financial health. This guide will provide an overview of financial report analysis, covering key components, techniques, and best practices.I. Understanding Financial Reports:1. Income Statement:The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, provides a summary of a company's revenues, expenses, gains, and losses over a specific period. It helps assess the company's profitability.2. Balance Sheet:The balance sheet presents a snapshot of a company's financial position at a particular point in time. It includes assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity, providing a clear picture of the company's financial structure.3. Cash Flow Statement:The cash flow statement tracks the inflow and outflow of cash within a company over a specific period. It helps evaluate the company'sliquidity and cash management capabilities.II. Key Components of Financial Report Analysis:1. Horizontal Analysis:Horizontal analysis compares financial data over multiple periods to identify trends, growth rates, and changes in performance. It involves calculating percentage changes and ratios.2. Vertical Analysis:Vertical analysis, also known as common-size analysis, expresses each item on the financial statements as a percentage of a base figure,typically total assets or total sales. This technique provides insights into the composition and structure of the financial statements.3. Ratio Analysis:Ratio analysis involves calculating and interpreting various financial ratios to assess a company's financial performance and position. Common ratios include liquidity ratios (current ratio, quick ratio), solvency ratios (debt-to-equity ratio, interest coverage ratio), profitability ratios (return on assets, return on equity), and efficiency ratios (inventory turnover, receivables turnover).III. Techniques for Financial Report Analysis:1. Trend Analysis:Trend analysis involves examining the historical data of a company to identify patterns, trends, and cyclicality. It helps predict future performance and assess the sustainability of past trends.2. Benchmarking:Benchmarking involves comparing a company's financial performance with industry averages or competitors. This technique helps identify areas of strength and weakness and provides a reference for improvement.3. DuPont Analysis:DuPont analysis breaks down the return on equity (ROE) into three components: net profit margin, asset turnover, and equity multiplier. This technique helps identify the factors driving ROE and assess the company's efficiency and profitability.IV. Best Practices for Financial Report Analysis:1. Data Accuracy and Consistency:Ensure that the financial data used for analysis is accurate, complete, and consistent. Inconsistencies or errors can lead to misleading conclusions.2. Contextual Analysis:Consider the broader economic, industry, and company-specific factors that may impact financial performance. Contextual analysis helps avoid making hasty conclusions based solely on financial data.3. Long-term Perspective:Focus on long-term trends and performance rather than short-term fluctuations. Financial report analysis should provide insights into the company's sustainable growth potential.4. Continuous Learning:Stay updated with the latest financial reporting standards, analysis techniques, and industry trends. Continuous learning ensures that the analysis remains relevant and effective.Conclusion:Financial report analysis is a vital tool for businesses to evaluate their financial performance, make informed decisions, and identify areas for improvement. By understanding the key components, techniques, and best practices, businesses can gain valuable insights from their financial reports and achieve long-term success.。

财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献

财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献

文献信息文献标题: The Need Of Financial Statement Analysis In A Firm or0 rgnization(企业或机构财务报表分析的必要性)国外作者: Suneetha G 文献出处:《International Journal of Science Engineering and Advancel Technology (.JSEAT)) 2017, 5(6): 731-735字数统计:2541单词,15110字符;中文4377汉字外文文献:The Need Of Financial Statement AnalysisIn A Firm Or An Orgnization Abstract Financial statement analysis play a dominate role in setting the frame watt of managerial decisions through analysis and interpretation of financial statement This paper discusses about financial , strength and weakness of the company by properly establishing relationship between the items of balance shed and profit and loss account. In order to judge the profitability and financial soundness of the company horizontal, and vertical analyze or done. The various technique used in analyzing financial statement included 'comparative statement, common size statement, trend analysis and ratio analysis. The results suggest that the ratio approach is a highly useful tool in financial statement analysis, especially when a set of ratios is used to evaluate a firm's performanceKey words: Financial statement analysis, to evaluate a firm's performance Comparative statement. Common size statement, trend analysis and ratio analysis1 Introductionhe basis for financial analysis planning and decision making is financiainformation/a business firm has to prepares its financial accounts viz.. balance sheet profit and loss account which provides useful financial information for the purpose of decision making Financial information is needed to predict. Compare and evaluate the fin's earnings ability. The formers statements viz. profit and loss account shows that operating activities of the concern and the later balance sheet depicts the balance value of the acquired assets and of liabilities at a particular point of time. However these statements don't disclose all of the necessary for ascertaining the financial strengths and weaknesses of an enterprise. it is necessary to analyze the data depicted n the financial statements. The finance manager has certain analytical tools which helps is financial analysis and planning. [Doron nissim, stephen h. Penman, (2003) Financialstatement Analysis of Leverage and How it Informs About Profitability and Price-to-book Ratios. Survey of Accounting Studies. Kluwer Academic PublishersAs per examine by Dissim. StephePenman' on Financia proclamation investigation of Leverage and how it illuminates about gainfulness and cost to book proportions, money related explanation examination that recognizes use that emerges in financing exercises from use that emerges in operations. The examination yields two utilizing conditions. one for getting to back operations and one for obtaining over the span of operations. This examination demonstrates that the budgetary explanation investigation clarifies cross-sectional contrasts in present and future rates of return and additionally cost to-snare proportions, which depend onexpected rates of profit for value. This investigation helps in understandorkins influence contrasts in productivity in the cross-areas. changes in future productivity from current benefit and legally binding working liabilities from evaluated liabilities Yating Van, HW. Chuang, (2010) Financial Ratio Adjustment Process: Evidence from Taiwan and North America, ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 43 (2010)0 Euro Journa Publishing Inc. 20102. Financial statements analysisprocess of identifying the financial strengths and weaknesses of a firm from the available accounting data and financial statements. The analysis is done by properly establishing the relationship between the items of balance sheet and profitnd loss account. The first task of the financial analyst is to determine the information relevant the decision under consideration from the total information contained in financial statement. The second step is to arrange information in a way to highlightsignificant relationships. The final step is interpretation and drawing of infed conclusions. Thus financial analysis is the process of selection, relating and evaluation of the accounting data or informationPurpose of financial statements analysis Financial statements analysis is the meaningful interpretation of 'financial statements for panics demanding financial information. It is not necessary for the proprietors alone. In general, the purpose of financial statements analysis is to aidmaking between the users of accounts To evaluate past performance and financial position To predict future performance Tools and techniques of financial analysis Comparative balance sheet common size balance shee Trend analysis Ratio analysis Comparative balance sheet Comparative financial statements is a statement of the financial position of a business so designed as to facilitate comparison of different accounting variables for drawing useful inferences. Financial statements of two or more business enter prices may be compared over period of years. This is known as inter firm comparison Financial statements of the particular business enter pries may be compared over two periods of years. This is known inter period comparisonCommon size statements It facilities the comparison of two or more business entities with a commonbase .in case of balance sheet, total assets or liabilities or capital can be taken ascommon base. These statements are called common measurements or components percentage or 100 percent statements. Since each statement is representated as a %ofthe total of 100 which in variably serves as the baseIn this manner the announcements arranged to draw out the proportion of every benefit of risk to the aggregate of the monetary record and the proportion of every thing of cost or incomes to net deals known as the basic size articulationsPattern investigation Even examination of money related explanations can likewise be completed by figuring pattern rates. Pattern rate expresses quite a long while's budgetary formation as far as a base year. The base year rises to 100 % with every single other year expressed in some rate of this baseProportion investigation Proportion investigation is the technique or process by which the relationship of things or gatherings of things in the budgetary proclamations are registered. decided and introduced. Proportion investigation is an endeavor to determine quantitative measures or aides concerning the money related wellbeing and benefit of the business nture. Proportion investigation can be utilized both in pattern and static examinationhere are a few proportions at the examiner yet the gathering of proportions he wouincline toward relies upon the reason and the destinations of the investigationBookkeeping proportions are viable apparatuses of examination; they are pointers of administrative and over all operational productivity. Proportions, when appropriately utilized are fit for giving valuable data. proportion examination characterized as the deliberate utilization of proportions to decipher the money related explanations with the goal that the qualities and shortcomings of a firm and in addition its chronicled execution and current monetary condition can be resolved the term proportion alludes to the numerical or quantitative connection between things factors this relationship can be communicated as (Fraction (2)Percentages (3)Proportion of numbers These option strategies for communicating things which are identified with eacstigation,examination. It ought to be seen that processing the proportion does not include data in the figures of benefit or deals. What the proportions do is that they uncover the relationship in a more important manner in order to empower us to reach inferences from th As indicated by look into by the Yating yang and 11. W. Chuang. on 'Monetary Ratio Adjustment Process: Evidence from Taiwan and North America. measurable legitimacy of the proportion strategy in monetary articulation examination is researched. The outcomes hence recommend that the proportion approach is a valuable instrument in monetary explanation investigation, particularly when an arrangement of proportions is utilized to assess an association's execution. The straightforwardness of this strategy additionally underpins the utilization of proportions in money related basic leadership3.Money related proportions in perspective of GAAGAAP is the arrangement of standard systems for recording business exchanges and detailing accounting report passages. The components of GAAP incorporatethings onetaryd. and how to ascertain exceptional offer estimations. The models fused into (MAP give general consistency in assumes that are thusly used to ascertain imperative money related proportions that financial specialists and investigators use to assess the organization. Indeed, even agreeable monetary records can be trying to unravel, yet without a framework characterizing every class of section, corporate money related articulations would be basically dark and uselessThere are seven fundamental rule that guide the foundation of the Generall Accepted Accounting Principles. The standards of normality, consistency, perpetuality and genuineness go towardsurging organizations to utilize the legitimate bookkeeping hones quarter after quarter in a decent confidence push to demonstrate the genuine money related state of the organization. None remuneration judiciousness and progression build up rules for how to set up a monetary record, by and large to report the budgetary status of the organization as it is without treatin resources in irregular ways that distort the operations of the organization just to balance different sections. The rule of periodicity basic implies that salary to be gotten extra time ought to be recorded as it is booked to be gotten, not in a singular amountThe brought together arrangement of bookkeeping in this manner has various advantages. Not exclusively does it give a specific level of straightforwardness into an organization's funds. it likewise makes for generally simple examinations between organizations. Subsequently, GAAPempowers venture by helping financial specialists pick shrewdly. GAAP gives America organizations preference over remote ones where financial specialists, unless they have a cozy comprehension of the business may have a great deal more trouble figuring the potential dangers and prizes of a venture. GAAP applies to U.S.-based enterprises just, however every other real nation has bookkeeping measures set up for their local organizations. Now and again remote bookkeeping is genuinely like U.S. GAAP, changing in just minor and fectively represented ways. In different cases, the models change fundamentally aking direct examinations questionable, best case scenarioAdvantages and Limitations of Financial Ratio Analysis Financial ratio analysis is a useful tool for users of financial statement. It hasFocal pointselated proclamations It helps in contrasting organizations of various size and each other. It helps in drift examination which includes looking at a solitary organization over a period It highlights imperative data in basic frame rapidly. A client can judge an organization by simply taking a gander at few number as opposed to perusing of the entire monetary explanationsRestrictions Regardless of convenience, finance.ial proportion examination has a few burdens Some key faults of budgetary proportion examination areDifferent organizations work in various enterprises each having distinctive natural conditions, for example, control, showcase structure, and so on. Such factors curve so huge that a correlation of two organizations from various ventures may beecelvilFinancial bookkeeping data is influenced by assessments and presumptions Bookkeeping principles permit diverse bookkeeping arrangements, which disables likeness and subsequently proportion examination is less helpful in suchcircumstancesRatio investigation clarifies connections between past data while clients are more worried about present and future datThe investigation helps for breaking down the alteration procedure of moneelated proportionsmodel states three impacts which circular segment an association's interior impact, expansive impact, and key administration. It encourages(That a company's budgetary proportions reflect unforeseen changes in the business(2)Active endeavors to accomplish the coveted focus by administration and (3)An individual association's money related proportion developmentMonetary proclamations investigation is the way toward looking at connections among components of the organization's "bookkeeping articulations" or money related explanations (accounting report, salary articulation. proclamation of income and the announcement of held profit) and making correlations with pertinent data. It is a significant instrument utilized by financial specialists. leasers, monetary investigators proprietors. administrators and others in their basic leadership handle The most well known sorts of money related explanations examination curveHorizontal Analysis: monetary data are thought about for at least two years for a solitary organizationVertical anaery thing on a solitary monetary explanation is figured as a rate of an aggregate for a solitary organizationRatio Analysis: analyze things on a solitary budgetary articulation or look at the connections between things on two monetary proclamationsMoney related proportions examination is the most widely recognized type o budgetary explanations investigation. Monetary proportions delineate connections between various parts of an organization's operations and give relative measures of the company's conditions and execution. Monetary proportions may give intimationsand side effects of the money related condition and signs of potential issue regionsby and large holds no importance unless they are looked at against something else, as past execution, another organization/contender or industry normal. In this way, the proportions of firms in various enterprises, which confront distinctive conditions, are generally difficult to analyzeMoney related proportions can be a critical instrument for entrepreneurs and dministrators to gauge their advance toward achieving organization objectives, an toward contending with bigger organizations inside an industry; likewise, followin different proportions after some time is an intense approach to recognize patterns Proportion examination, when performed routinely after some time, can likewise give assistance independent ventures perceive and adjust to patterns influencing their operationsMoney related proportions are additionally utilized by financiers. Speculators and business experts to survey different traits of an organization's monetary quality or working outcomes, this is another motivation behind why entrepreneurs need to comprehend money related proportions in light of the fact that, all the time, a business' capacity to get financing or value financing will rely upon the organization's budgetary proportions. Money related proportions are ordered by the monetary part of he business which the proportion measures. Liquidity proportions look at the ccessibility of organization's money to pay obligation. Productivity proportions measure the organization's utilization of its benefits and control of its costs to create a satisfactory rate of return. Use proportions look at the organization's techniques for financing and measure its capacity to meet budgetary commitments. Productivity proportions measure how rapidly a firm changes over non-money resources for money resources. Market proportions measure financial specialist reaction to owning an organization's stock and furthermore the cost of issuing stockProportion Analysis is a type of Financial Statement Analysis that is utilized acquire a snappy sign of an association's money related execution in a few key territories. Proportion investigation is utilized to assess connections among money related proclamation things. The proportions are utilized to distinguish inclines after some time for one organization or to look at least two organizations at one point in ime. Money related explanation proportion investigation concentrates on three key parts of a business: liquidity, benefit, and dissolvability The proportions are sorted as Short-term Solvency Ratios, Debt MaRatios and Asset management Ratios. Productivity Ratios, and Market Value ratios Proportion Analysis as an instrument has a few vital elements. The information, which are given by budgetary proclamations. are promptly accessible. The calculation of proportions encourages the examination of firms which contrast in measure oportions can be utilized to contrast anassociation's money related execution and industry midpoints. What's more, proportions can be utilized as a part of a type of ttern investigation to recognize zones where execution has enhanced or crumbled after some time. Since Ratio Analysis depends on bookkeeping data, its adequacy is restricted by the bends which emerge in budgetary explanations because of such things as Historical Cost Accounting and swelling. Thusly, Ratio Analysis should just be utilized as an initial phase in money related examination, to get a snappy sign of an association's execution and to distinguish territories which should be explored further.中文译文:企业或机构财务报表分析的必要性摘要财务报表分析在制定管理决策框架方面起着主导作用,其方法是通过对财务报表进行分析和解释。

商业银行财务报表分析外文文献翻译

商业银行财务报表分析外文文献翻译

文献信息标题:The Research of Commercial Banking Financial Statement Analysis作者:Jimmy H期刊:Global Journal of Management and Business Research,第1卷,第2期,页码:32-41.年份:2016原文The Study on the Financial Statement Analysis of Commercial BankingJimmy H1 IntroductionIn the economic globalization, the earth is becoming a global village today, accounting as a business analysis system of a "language of business" in the economic and social status has been more and more obvious, the world is more and more attention to it all the more powerful function. Because of financial statements can record the economic business of the enterprises and institutions, so as the international accounting financial statements of general carrier of the "language of business", has become the focus of the enterprise information users rushed to. World investment guru warren buffet once said: "to invest in a company, I basically see the financial statements of the enterprise. “In addition, more information on the financial statements of the user, such as creditors, government and the public when making decisions, and basically to must carry on the analysis of financial statements, and then make a relevant conclusion. The current society, the analysis of financial statements, there are many analysis perspective, and enterprise value perspective is just one of them. Itself in the global market economy condition, enterprises can be treated as a commodity trading, the enterprise itself can be treated as a kind of commodities can be traded in the property market, for the goods from the various stakeholders, if interested in this product of the enterprise, will want to know the value of the enterprise. Therefore, the enterprise's financial statements will be regarded as a kind of to each relevant information users interested in enterprise's help, help them to make economic decisions related tools, i.e., the financial statements of the enterprise can beseen as reflecting a kind of carrier of enterprise value, at the same time is to analysis enterprise's financial statements can be thought of as a tool of enterprise value.2 Literature reviewWatkins (2009) proposed to focus on an analysis of the financial information and financial measures to consolidate the traditional hospital, used to reveal the relationship between hospital of non-financial information, to enhance the comprehensive analysis of the company, should focus on the analysis of non-financial information; Miguel (2010) pointed out that if is analyzed from the perspective of the creditors, just use the financial data index in the financial statements to calculate, to predict the strength enterprise's solvency, it is not accurate, need use credit risk at the same time the calculation result is analyzed, so as to effectively help the oblige. Isabel (2013) pointed out that when it comes to analyze the Banks and other creditors, if the financial statement analysis, to predict the solvency of the company, credit risk and so on to provide reliable reference; David (2014) pointed out that the current accounting information, if it can't completely and fully meet your analysis all the needs of the decisions, then you should be facing the other analysis to the company, with additional information analysis; Eustachio (2010) pointed out that can use the method of data mining to analyze the financial statements of the enterprise, make false statements to disclose to the company. In addition, Jose (2013) put forward from the perspective of financial statement analysis, should be to analyze the structure of financial ratio analysis, to analysis the company's financial statements; Drancy (2014) for the analysis of enterprise financial report is never should not is the ratio of single mechanical calculation, should be a combination of qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis to the integrated system., he argues, can be analyzed from the perspective of accounting policy choice, also can be done from the perspective of enterprise financial strategic analysis, of course not to say that may not be the Angle of financial ratios, even from the perspective of revenue and the enterprise developmental enterprises can analyze financial statements of the enterprise; Marcus (2014) pointed out that the future of the enterprise business process may encounter unforeseen various types of pressure and risk, through the scientific framework shouldarrange, analysis of the financial statements of the original, find in the financial statements have been able to significantly prompt inadaptability of enterprise, to build a new financial analysis framework, the value creation, strategy, value chain, such as ecological into the new system of financial analysis. Should expand new analysis framework for the development of later with the analysis of the enterprise value objectives, with the starting point of the analysis of the strategic analysis, value driving factors analysis as the main body, which is forms a new analysis framework.3 Commercial Banks, financial statement analysisThe upgrade of a financial statement is a kind of contract, as investors make investment decisions, Banks credit decisions, acquisition decisions of enterprise, evaluation of audit risk of certified public accountants, use financial statement analysis, is a kind of important carrier transmission of accounting information. Financial statements are to the enterprise in a certain period of the financial position and operating results in writing of the relevant information such as the summary of the documents. Its main function has the following two points: first of all, is the enterprise's revenue, cost structure, the size of the profits and dividends to investors, the daily operating results of an enterprise. The second is the enterprise capital chain information, enterprise's financing situation, enterprise's solvency and the future development potential and other relevant information, these can all be statements reflect the enterprise's financial position of the enterprise. Is the analysis of financial statements, financial statements and the related information as a starting point of the enterprise, in some special way, to the enterprise's operating results, financial condition, and so on and so forth were analyzed, and the purpose is to understand the past, the evaluation now, predict the future, to help enterprises to make decisions related to the interests of body. And under the condition of market economy, the enterprise itself is a kind of commodities can be traded in the property market, as the goods from the stakeholders, such as investors, creditors, managers, etc., it is necessary to evaluate the value of the enterprise, the most common is oriented to the way the world is the analysis of financial statements, but due to the accounting standards of commercial Banks and general manufacturing enterprises is not the same,want to evaluate the value of commercial Banks, if still use the original analysis method, the conclusion must be inaccurate. In financial statement analysis is needed to adopt to the financial statements of the general analysis method for analysis, but also to specific issues specific analysis, different from the general enterprise's financial statement analysis method. But no matter what kind of financial statement analysis method, the ultimate goal is to provide the interests of enterprises related body helps them to make economic decision-making information, namely the financial statement analysis itself can be regarded as an effective way to reflect the enterprise value of commercial bank.4 The enterprise value analysis theory and methodValues and price theory is a classical economics and modern economics have to mention a theory, is both ancient and modern, both basic theory and reality. Historically, there have been many famous economist, has carried on the thorough positive exploration on this issue. In this article, the use of enterprise value is a broad sense and narrow sense. Generalized enterprise value refers to the enterprise's own business value, analysis and evaluation on the enterprise itself, using all the collected information on the market, based on the analysis of independent cognitive level of the above analysis platform, the management circumstance of the enterprise to carry on the summary, and hope to the future of the enterprise a certain period of production and business operation activities of predict cash flows, and thus to calculate how much business can create in the fixed number of year of the expected value. In the narrow sense definition of enterprise value, Copeland and others in the 1998 book "evaluation" pointed out: the shareholders value by the value of the value of enterprises is focused on the profitability and development potential; investors can for existing shareholders want companies or is to provide a better profitability potential investment. Shareholder value is how much of a future can obtain benefits, if the future can get more profits, shareholders will now give up capital liquidity, namely shareholders if they could get more value-added part of the future capital, the shareholders will only be for the current liquidity of sacrifice in his hands. So, investors will be investment is valued enterprise future profitability, investors want togain more cash flow from investment returns, not only is the enterprise current assets generate future cash flows and excess profit ability to bring the cash flow to investors.5 The financial statement analysis can reveal the enterprise valueEnterprise financial statements, financial statement analysis to the enterprise can be regarded as a kind of can reveal an effective means of enterprise value. Financial statement is a reflection of the daily business activities of the enterprise; reflect the statements of the enterprise value. Usually when an enterprise is analyzed using three statements, respectively, the balance sheet, income statement and statement of cash flows. The balance sheet can be seen as points on a particular day accounting personnel to the enterprise value taken a snapshot, use at a specific date financial status to reflect the enterprise value. The income statement is to measure performance of enterprise in a certain period of time, is through reflect the performance of enterprises in a certain period to reflect the enterprise value of the report. The cash flow statement reflects through the inflows and outflows of cash flow of the enterprise actual situation reveal the enterprise value. Thus, analysis of financial statements of the enterprise value can be revealed, namely the enterprise financial statements reflect the enterprise value of the carrier, financial statement analysis is an effective tool of enterprise value.译文商业银行财务报表分析研究Jimmy H1 引言当今世界,正逐步经济全球化,会计作为商业分析体系中的一门“商业语言”在经济社会中的地位已经越来越明显了,世人对它越发强大的功能越来越关注。

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

财务报表分析外⽂⽂献及翻译Review of accounting studies,2003,16(8):531-560 Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Protability and Price-to-Book RatiosDoron Nissim, Stephen. PenmanAbstractThis paper presents a ?nancial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage that arises in ?nancing activities from leverage that arises in operations. The analysis yields two leveraging equations, one for borrowing to ?nance operations and one for borrowing in the course of operations. These leveraging equations describe how the two types of leverage affect book rates of return on equity. An empirical analysis shows that the ?nancial statement analysis explains cross-sectional differences in current and future rates of return as well as price-to-book ratios, which are based on expected rates of return on equity. The paper therefore concludes that balance sheet line items for operating liabilities are priced differently than those dealing with ? nancing liabilities. Accordingly, ?nancial statement analysis that distinguis hes the two types of liabilities informs on future pro?tability and aids in the evaluation of appropriate price-to-book ratios.Keywords: financing leverage; operating liability leverage; rate of return on equity; price-to-book ratioLeverage is traditiona lly viewed as arising from ?nancing activities: Firms borrow to raise cash for operations. This paper shows that, for the purposes of analyzing pro?tability and valuing ?rms, two types of leverage are relevant, one indeed arising from ?nancing activities b ut another from operating activities. The paper supplies a ?nancial statement analysis of the two types of leveragethat explains differences in shareholder pro?tability and price-to-book ratios.The standard measure of leverage is total liabilities to equity. However, while some liabilities—like bank loans and bonds issued—are due to ?nancing, other liabilities—like trade payables, deferred revenues, and pension liabilities—result from transactions with suppliers, customers and employees in conducting operations. Financing liabilities are typically traded in well-functioning capital markets where issuers are price takers. In contrast, ?rms are able to add value in operations because operations involve trading in input and output markets that are less perfect than capital markets. So, with equity valuation in mind, there are a priori reasons for viewing operating liabilities differently from liabilities that arise in ?nancing.Our research asks whether a dollar of operating liabilities on the balance sheet is priced differently from a dollar of ?nancing liabilities. As operating and ?nancing liabilities are components of the book value of equity, the question is equivalent to asking whether price-to-book ratios depend on the composition of book values. The price-to-book ratio is determined by the expected rate of return on the book value so, if components of book value command different price premiums, they must imply different expected rates of return on book value. Accordingly, the paper also investigates whether the two types of liabilities are associated with differences in future book rates of return.Standard ?nancial statement analysis distinguishes shareholder pro?tability that arises from operations from that which arises from borrowing to ?nance opera tions. So, return on assets is distinguished from return on equity, with the difference attributed to leverage. However, in the standard analysis, operating liabilities are not distinguished from ?nancing liabilities. Therefore, to develop the speci?cation s for the empirical analysis, the paper presents a ?nancial statement analysis that identi?es the effects of operating and ?nancing liabilities on rates of return on book value—andso on price-to-book ratios—with explicit leveraging equations that explain when leverage from each type of liability is favorable or unfavorable.The empirical results in the paper show that ?nancial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage in operations from leverage in ?nancing also distinguishes differences in contemporaneous and future pro?tability among ?rms. Leverage from operating liabilities typically levers pro?tability more than ?nancing leverage and has a higher frequency of favorable effects.Accordingly, for a given total leverage from both sources, ?rms with hig her leverage from operations have higher price-to-book ratios, on average. Additionally, distinction between contractual and estimated operating liabilities explains further differences in ?rms’ pro?tability and their price-to-book ratios.Our results are of consequence to an analyst who wishes to forecast earnings and book rates of return to value ?rms. Those forecasts—and valuations derived from them—depend, we show, on the composition of liabilities. The ?nancial statement analysis of the paper, supported by the empirical results, shows how to exploit information in the balance sheet for forecasting and valuation.The paper proceeds as follows. Section 1 outlines the ?nancial statements analysis that identi?es the two types of leverage and lays out expres sions that tie leverage measures to pro?tability. Section 2 links leverage to equity value and price-to-bookratios. The empirical analysis is in Section 3, with conclusions summarized in Section 4.1. Financial Statement Analysis of LeverageThe following ?nancial statement analysis separates the effects of ?nancing liabilities and operating liabilities on the pro? tability of shareholders’ equity. The analysis yields explicit leveraging equations from which the speci?cations for the empirical analysis are developed.Shareholder pro?tability, return on common equity, is measured asReturn on common equity (ROCE) = comprehensive net income ÷common equity (1) Leverage affects both the numerator and denominator of this pro?tability measure. Appropriate ?nancial statement analysis disentangles the effects of leverage. The analysis below, which elaborates on parts of Nissim and Penman (2001), begins by identifying components of the balance sheet and income statement that involve operating and ?nancing activities. The pro?tability due to each activity is then calculated and two types of leverage are introduced to explain both operating and ?nancing pro?tability and overall shareholder pro?tability.1.1 Distinguishing the Protability of Operations from the Protability of Financing ActivitiesWith a focus on common equity (so that preferred equity is viewed as a ?nancial liability), the balance sheet equation can be restated as follows:Common equity =operating assets+financial assets-operating liabilities-Financial liabilities (2)The distinction here between operating assets (like trade receivables, inventory and property,plant and equipment) and ? nancial assets (the deposits and marketable securities that absorb excess cash) is made in other contexts. However, on the liability side, ?nancing liabilities are also distinguished here from operating liabilities. Rather than treating all liabilities as ? nancing debt, only liabilities that raise cash for operations—like bank loans, short-term commercial paper and bonds—are classi?ed as such. Other liabilities—such as accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, restructuring liabilities and pension liabilities—arise from operations. The distinction is not as simple as current versus long-term liabilities; pension liabilities, for example, are usually long-term, and short-term borrowing is a current liability.Rearranging terms in equation (2),Common equity = (operating assets-operating liabilities)-(financial liabilities-financial assets)Or,Common equity = net operating assets-net financing debt (3) This equation regroups assets and liabilities into operating and nancing activities. Net operating assets are operating assets less operating liabilities. So a rm might invest in inventories, but to the extent to which the suppliers of those inventories grant credit, the net investment in inventories is reduced. Firms pay wages, but to the extent to which the payment of wages is deferred in pension liabilities, the net investment required to run the business is reduced. Net ?nancing debt is ?nancing debt (including preferred stock) minus?nancial assets. So, a ?rm may issue bonds to raise cash for operations but may also buy bonds with excess cash from operations. Its net indebtedness is its net position in bonds. Indeed a ?rm may be a net creditor (with more ?nancial assets than ?nancial liabilities) rather than a net debtor.The income statement can be reformulated to distinguish income that comes from operating and ?nancing activities: Comprehensive net income = operating income-net financing expense (4) Operating income is produced in operations and net ?nancial expense is incurred in the ?nancing of operations. Interest income on ?nancial assets is netted against interest expense on ?nancial liabilities (including preferred dividends) in net ?nancial expense. If interest i ncome is greater than interest expense, ?nancing activities produce net ?nancial income rather than net ?nancial expense. Both operating income and net ?nancial expense (or income) are after tax.3Equations (3) and (4) produce clean measures of after-tax o perating pro?tability and the borrowing rate:Return on net operating assets (RNOA) = operating income ÷net operating assets (5) andNet borrowing rate (NBR) = net financing expense ÷net financing debt (6) RNOA recognizes that pro?tabilit y must be based on the net assets invested in operations. So ?rms can increase their operating pro?tability by convincing suppliers, in the course of business, to grant or extend credit terms; credit reduces the investment that shareholders would otherwise have to put in the business. Correspondingly, the net borrowing rate, by excluding non-interest bearing liabilities from the denominator, gives the appropriate borrowing rate for the ?nancing activities.Note that RNOA differs from the more common return on assets (ROA), usually de?ned as income before after-tax interestexpense to total assets. ROA does not distinguish operating and ?nancing activities appropriately. Unlike ROA, RNOA excludes ?nancial assets in the denominator and subtracts operating liabilities. Nissim and Penman (2001) report a median ROA for NYSE and AMEX ?rms from 1963–1999 of only 6.8%, but a median RNOA of 10.0%—much closer to what one would expect as a return to business operations.1.2 Financial Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder ProtabilityFrom expressions (3) through (6), it is straightforward to demonstrate that ROCE is a weighted average of RNOA and the net borrowing rate, with weights derived from equation (3): ROCE= [net operating assets ÷common equity× RNOA]-[net financ ing debt÷common equity ×net borrowing rate (7) Additional algebra leads to the following leveraging equation:ROCE = RNOA+[FLEV× ( RNOA-net borrowing rate )] (8) where FLEV, the measure of leverage from ?nancing activities, isFinancing leverage (FLEV) =net financing debt ÷common equity (9) The FLEV measure excludes operating liabilities but includes (as a net against ?nancing debt) ?nancial assets. If ?nancial assets are greater than ?nancial liabilities, FLEV is negative. The leveraging equation (8) works for negative FLEV (in which case the net borrowing rate is the return on net ? nancial assets).This analysis breaks shareholder pro?tability, ROCE, down into that which i s due to operations and that which is due to ? nancing. Financial leverage levers the ROCE over RNOA, with the leverage effect determined by the amount of ?nancial leverage (FLEV) and the spread between RNOA and the borrowing rate. The spread can be positive (favorable) or negative (unfavorable). 1.3 Operating Liability Leverage and its Effect on Operating ProtabilityWhile ?nancing debt levers ROCE, operating liabilities lever the pro?tability of operations, RNOA. RNOA is operating income relative to net operating assets, and net operating assets are operating assets minus operating liabilities. So, the more operating liabilities a ?rm has relative to operating assets, the higher its RNOA, assuming no effect on operating income in the numerator. The intensity of the use of operating liabilities in the investment base is operating liability leverage: Operating liability leverage (OLLEV) =operating liabilities ÷net operating assets (10) Using operating liabilities to lever the rate of return from operations may not come for free, however; there may be a numerator effect on operating income. Suppliers provide what nominally may be interest-free credit, but presumably charge for that credit with higher prices for the goods and services supplied. This is the reason why operating liabilities are inextricably a part of operationsrather than the ?nancing of operations. The amount that suppliers actually charge for this credit is dif?cult to identify. But the market borrowing rate is observable. The amount that suppliers would implicitly charge in prices for the credit at this borrowing rate can be estimated as a benchmark: Market interest on operating liabilities= operating liabilities×market borrowing ratewhere the market borrowing rate, given that most credit is short term, can be approximated by the after-tax short-term borrowing rate. This implicit cost is benchmark, for it is the cost that makes suppliers indifferent in supplying cred suppliers are fully compensated if they charge implicit interest at the cost borrowing to supply the credit. Or, alternatively, the ?rm buying the goods o r services is indifferent between trade credit and ?nancing purchases at the borrowin rate.To analyze the effect of operating liability leverage on operating pro?tability, w e d e?ne:Return on operating assets (ROOA) =(operating income+market interest on operating liabilities)÷operating assets(11)The numerator of ROOA adjusts operating income for the full implicit cost of trad credit. If suppliers fully charge the implicit cost of credit, ROOA is the return of operating assets that would be earned had the ?rm no operating liability leverage. suppliers do not fully charge for the credit, ROOA measures the return fro operations that includes the favorable implicit credit terms from suppliers.Similar to the leveraging equation (8) for ROCE, RNOA can be expressed as:RNOA = ROOA+[ OLLEV ×(ROOA-market borrowing rate )] (12) where the borrowing rate is the after-tax short-term interest rate.Given ROOA, the effect ofleverage on pro?tability is determined by the level of operating liability leverage and the spread between ROOA and the short-term after-tax interest rate. Like ?nancing l everage, the effect can be favorable or unfavorable: Firms can reduce their operating pro?tability through operating liability leverage if their ROOA is less than the market borrowing rate. However, ROOA will also be affected if the implicit borrowing cost on operating liabilities is different from the market borrowing rate. 1.4 Total Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder ProtabilityOperating liabilities and net ?nancing debt combine into a total leverage measure:Total leverage (TLEV) = ( net financing debt+operating liabilities)÷common equityThe borrowing rate for total liabilities is:Total borrowing rate = (net financing expense+market interest on operating liabilities) ÷net financing debt+operating liabilitiesROCE equals the weighted average of ROOA and the total borrowing rate, where the weights are proportional to the amount of total operating assets and the sum of net ?nancing debt and operating liabilities (with a negative sign), respectively. So, similar to the leveraging equations (8) and (12):ROCE = ROOA +[TLEV×(ROOA -total borrowing rate)](13)In summary, ?nancial statement analysis of operating and ?nancing activities yields three leveraging equations, (8), (12), and (13). These equations are based on ?xed accounting re lations and are therefore deterministic: They must hold for a given ? rm at a given point in time. The only requirement in identifying the sources of pro?tability appropriately is a clean separation betweenoperating and ?nancing components in the ?nancial statements.2. Leverage, Equity Value and Price-to-Book RatiosThe leverage effects above are described as effects on shareholder pro?tability. Our interest is not only in the effects on shareholder pro?tability, ROCE, but also in the effects on shareholder value, which is tied to ROCE in a straightforward way by the residual income valuation model. As a restatement of the dividend discount model, the residual income model expresses the value of equity at date 0 (P0) as:B is the book value of common shar eholders’ equity, X is comprehensive income to common shareholders, and r is the required return for equity investment. The price premium over book value is determined by forecasting residual income, Xt –rBt-1. Residual income is determined in part by income relative to book value, that is, by the forecasted ROCE. Accordingly, leverage effects on forecasted ROCE (net of effects on the required equity return) affect equity value relative to book value: The price paid for the book value depends on the expect ed pro?tability of the book value, and leverage affects pro?tability. So our empirical analysis investigates the effect of leverage on both pro?tability and price-to-book ratios. Or, stated differently, nancing and operating liabilities are distinguishable components of book value, so the question is whether the pricing of book values depends on the composition of book values. If this is the case, the different components of book value must imply different pro?tability. Indeed, the two analyses (of pro?tab ility and price-to-book ratios) are complementary.Financing liabilities are contractual obligations for repayment of funds loaned. Operatingliabilities include contractual obligations (such as accounts payable), but also include accrual liabilities (such as deferred revenues and accrued expenses). Accrual liabilities may be based on contractual terms, but typically involve estimates. We consider the real effects of contracting and the effects of accounting estimates in turn. Appendix A provides some examples of contractual and estimated liabilities and their effect on pro?tability and value.2.1 Effects of Contractual liabilitiesThe ex post effects of ?nancing and operating liabilities on pro?tability are clear from leveraging equations (8), (12) and (13). These expressions always hold ex post, so there is no issue regarding ex post effects. But valuation concerns ex ante effects. The extensive research on the effects of ?nancial leverage takes, as its point of departure, the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) (1958) ?nancing irrelevance proposition: With perfect capital markets and no taxes or information asymmetry, debt ?nancing has no effect on value. In terms of the residual income valuation model, an increase in ?nancial leverage due to a substitution of debt for equity may increase expected ROCE according to expression (8), but that increase is offset in the valuation (14) by the reduction in the book value of equity that earns the excess pro?tability and the increase in the required equity return, leaving total value (i.e., the value of equity and debt) unaffected. The required equity return increases because of increased ? nancing risk: Leverage may be expected to be favorable but, the higher the leverage, the greater the loss to shareholders should the leverage turn unfavorable ex post, with RNOA less than the borrowing rate.In the face of the M&M proposition, research on the value effects of ?nancial leverage has proceeded to relax the conditions for the proposition to hold. Modigliani and Miller (1963) hyp othesized that the tax bene?ts of debt increase after-tax returns to equity and so increase equityvalue. Recent empirical evidence provides support for the hypothesis (e.g., Kemsley and Nissim, 2002), although the issue remains controversial. In any case, since the implicit cost of operating liabilities, like interest on ?nancing debt, is tax deductible, the composition of leverage should have no tax implications.Debt has been depicted in many studies as affecting value by reducing transaction and contracting costs. While debt increases expected bankruptcy costs and introduces agency costs between shareholders and debtholders, it reduces the costs that shareholders must bear in monitoring management, and may have lower issuing costs relative to equity. One might expect these considerations to apply to operating debt as well as ?nancing debt, with the effects differing only by degree. Indeed papers have explained the use of trade debt rather than ?nancing debt by transaction costs (Ferris, 1981), differentia l access of suppliers and buyers to ?nancing (Schwartz,1974), and informational advantages and comparative costs of monitoring (Smith, 1987; Mian and Smith, 1992; Biais and Gollier, 1997). Petersen and Rajan (1997) provide some tests of these explanations.In addition to tax, transaction costs and agency costs explanations for leverage, research has also conjectured an informational role. Ross (1977) and Leland and Pyle (1977) characterized ?nancing choice as a signal of pro?tability and value, and subseque nt papers (for example, Myers and Majluf, 1984) have carried the idea further. Other studies have ascribed an informational role also for operating liabilities. Biais and Gollier (1997) and Petersen and Rajan (1997), for example, see suppliers as having mo re information about ?rms than banks and the bond market, so more operating debt might indicate higher value. Alternatively, high trade payables might indicate dif?culti es in paying suppliers and declining fortunes.Additional insights come from further relaxing the perfect frictionless capital markets assumptions underlying the original M&M nancing irrelevance proposition. When it comes to operations, the product and input markets in which rms trade are typically less competitive than capital markets. In deed, ?rms are viewed as adding value primarily in operations rather than in nancing activities because of less than purely competitive product and input markets. So, whereas it is difficult to ‘‘make money off the debtholders,’’ ?rms can be seen as ‘‘mak ing money off the trade creditors.’’ In operations, ?rms can exert monopsony power, extracting value from suppliers and employees. Suppliers may provide cheap implicit ?nancing in exchange for information about products and markets in which the ?rm operates. They may also bene?t from ef?ciencies in the ?rm’s supply and distribution chain, and may grant credit to capture future business.2.2 Effects of Accrual Accounting EstimatesAccrual liabilities may be based on contractual terms, but typically involve estimates. Pension liabilities, for example, are based on employment contracts but involve actuarial estimates. Deferred revenues may involve obligations to service customers, but also involve estimates that allocate revenues to periods. While contractual liabilities are typically carried on the balance sheet as an unbiased indication of the cash to be paid, accrual accounting estimates are not necessarily unbiased. Conservative accounting, for example, might overstate pension liabilities or defer more revenue than required by contracts with customers.Such biases presumably do not affect value, but they affect accounting rates of return and the pricing of the liabilities relative to their carrying value (the price-to-book ratio). The effect of accounting estimates on operating liability leverage is clear: Higher carrying values for operatingliabilities result in higher leverage for a given level of operating assets. But the effect on pro?tability is also clear from leveraging equation (12): While conservative accounting for operating assets increases the ROOA, as modeled in Feltham and Ohlson (1995) and Zhang (2000), higher book values of operating liabilities lever up RNOA over ROOA. Indeed, conservative accounting for operating liabilities amounts to leverage of book rates of return. By leveraging equation (13), that leverage effect ?ows through to shareholder pro?tability, ROCE.And higher anticipated ROCE implies a higher price-to-book ratio.The potential bias in estimated operating liabilities has opposite effects on current and future pro?tability. For example, if a ? rm books higher deferred revenues, accrued expenses or other operating liabilities, and so increases its operating liability leverage, it reduces its current pro?tability: Current revenues must be lower or expenses higher. And, if a ?rm reports lower operating assets (by a write down of receivables, inventories or other assets, for example), and so increases operating liability leverage, it also reduces current pro?tability: Current expense s must be higher. But this application of accrual accounting affects future operating income: All else constant, lower current income implies higher future income. Moreover, higher operating liabilities and lower operating assets amount to lower book value of equity. The lower book value is the base for the rate of return for the higher future income. So the analysis of operating liabilities potentially identi?es part of the accrual reversal phenomenon documented by Sloan (1996) and interprets it as affecting leverage, forecasts of pro?tability, and price-to-book ratios.3. Empirical AnalysisThe analysis covers all ?rm-year observations on the combined COMPUSTAT (Industry and Research) ?les for any of the 39 years from 1963 to 2001 that satisfy the following requirements: (1)the company was listed on the NYSE or AMEX; (2) the company was not a ?nancial institution (SIC codes 6000–6999), thereby omitting ?rms where most ?nancial assets and liabilities are used in operations; (3) the book value of common equity is at least $10 million in 2001 dollars; and (4) the averages of the beginning and ending balance of operating assets, net operating assets and common equity are positive (as balance sheet variables are measured in the analysis using annual averages). T hese criteria resulted in a sample of 63,527 ?rm-year observations.Appendix B describes how variables used in the analysis are measured. One measurement issue that deserves discussion is the estimation of the borrowing cost for operating liabilities. As most operating liabilities are short term, we approximate the borrowing rate by the after-tax risk-free one-year interest rate. This measure may understate the borrowing cost if the risk associated with operating liabilities is not trivial. The effect of such measurement error is to induce a negative correlation between ROOA and OLLEV. As we show below, however, even with this potential negative bias we document a strong positive relation between OLLEV and ROOA.4. ConclusionTo ?nance operations, ?rms borrow in the ?nancial markets, creating ?nancing leverage. In running their operations, ?rms also borrow, but from customers, employees and suppliers, creating operating liability leverage. Because they involve trading in different types of markets, the two types of leverage may have different value implications. In particular, operating liabilities may re?ect contractual terms that add value in different ways than ?nancing liabilities, and so they may be priced differently. Operating liabilities also involve accrual accounting estimates that may further affect their pricing. This study has investigated the implications of the two types of leverage for pro?tability and equity value.The paper has laid out explicit leveraging equations that show how shareholder p ro?tability is related to ?nancing leverage and operating liability leverage. For operating liability leverage, the leveraging equation incorporates both real contractual effects and accounting effects. As price-to-book ratios are based on expected pro?tab ility, this analysis also explains how price-to-book ratios are affected by the two types of leverage. The empirical analysis in the paper demonstrates that operating and ?nancing liabilities imply different pro?tability and are priced differently in the stock market.Further analysis shows that operating liability leverage not only explains differences in pro?tability in the cross-section but also informs on changes in future pro?tability from current pro?tability. Operating liability leverage and changes in operating liability leverage are indicators of the quality of current reported pro?tability as a predictor of future pro?tability.Our analysis distinguishes contractual operating liabilities from estimated liabilities, but further research might examine operating liabilities in more detail, focusing on line items such as accrued expenses and deferred revenues. Further research might also investigate the pricing of operating liabilities under differing circumstances; for example, where ?rms have ‘‘market power’’ over their suppliers.会计研究综述,2003,16(8):531-560财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值⽐率摘要本⽂提供了区分⾦融活动和业务运营中杠杆作⽤的财务报表分析。

财务报表与财务分析中英文

财务报表与财务分析中英文
n In finance, the most important item that can be extracted from financial statements is the actual cash flow of the firm.
n The cash flow received from the firm’s assets (CF(A)) must equal the cash flows to the firm’s creditors (CF(B)) and stockholders (CF(S)).
• Thus, income is reported when it is earned, even though no cash flow may have occurred.
2. Non-Cash Items 3. Time and Costs
财务报表与财务分析中英文
Non-Cash Items
the “bottom line.”
•Taxes
• 84
•(3) • Current: $71
• Deferred: $13
•Net income
•$86
• Retained earnings:
$43
• Dividends:
$43
财务报表与财务分析中英文
Income Statement Analysis
财务报表与财务分析中 英文
2020/12/22
财务报表与财务分析中英文
The Stockholders’ Report
n The guidelines used to prepare and maintain financial records and reports are generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)(用於準備

财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑

财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑

财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑Introduction:Financial statement analysis is an essential tool used by businesses and investors to evaluate the financial performance and position of a company. It involves the examination of financial statements such as the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement to assess the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. In this document, we will provide a detailed analysis and translation of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis.1. Importance of Financial Statement Analysis:Financial statement analysis provides valuable insights into a company's financial health and helps stakeholders make informed decisions. It enables investors to assess the profitability and growth potential of a company before making investment decisions. Additionally, it helps creditors evaluate the creditworthiness and repayment capacity of a company before extending credit. Furthermore, financial statement analysis assists management in identifying areas of improvement and making strategic decisions to enhance the company's performance.2. Key Elements of Financial Statement Analysis:a) Balance Sheet Analysis:The balance sheet provides a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. It presents the company's assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity. By analyzing the balance sheet, stakeholders can assess the company's liquidity, solvency, and financial stability.b) Income Statement Analysis:The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, presents the company's revenues, expenses, and net income over a specific period. It helps stakeholders evaluate the company's profitability, revenue growth, and cost management.c) Cash Flow Statement Analysis:The cash flow statement details the inflows and outflows of cash during a specific period. It provides insights into the company's operating, investing, and financing activities. By analyzing the cash flow statement, stakeholders can assess the company's ability to generate cash, meet its financial obligations, and fund its growth.3. Financial Ratios for Analysis:Financial ratios are essential tools used in financial statement analysis to assess a company's performance and compare it with industry benchmarks. Some commonly used financial ratios include:a) Liquidity Ratios:- Current Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations.- Quick Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory.b) Solvency Ratios:- Debt-to-Equity Ratio: Measures the proportion of debt to equity in a company's capital structure.- Interest Coverage Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet interest payments on its debt.c) Profitability Ratios:- Gross Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company's core operations.- Net Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company after all expenses, including taxes.d) Efficiency Ratios:- Inventory Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company sells its inventory.- Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company collects cash from its customers.4. Translation of Foreign Literature:In this section, we will provide a translation of key points from foreign literature related to financial statement analysis. The literature emphasizes the importance of accurate financial reporting, the use of financial ratios for analysis, and the interpretation of financial statements to make informed decisions.Conclusion:Financial statement analysis is a crucial process for evaluating a company's financial performance and position. It provides valuable insights into a company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. By analyzing financial statements and using financial ratios, stakeholders can make informed decisions regarding investments, credit extension, and strategic planning. Accurate translation and understanding of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis can further enhance the effectiveness of this process.。

财务报表分析的外文文献

财务报表分析的外文文献

Does International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption Matter?The Effects on Financial TransparencyandEarnings ManagementYen Tze—YUNational Chung Cheng University,Chiayi,TaiwanChang Ming—LeiYuan Ze University,Taoyuan,TaiwanYeh Hsiao—ChianNational Chung Cheng University,Chiayi,TaiwanThis paper aims to examine whether or not the adoption of fair value accounting(FVA)has an effect on the level ofinformation transparency and the degree of earnings management,to identify whether the legal institutions havepowers to explain those effects of the adoption of FVA,and to explore the relationship between the effects of theadoption of FVA and several specific characteristics of the banking industry.By investigating the banking sectorsof four Asian countries/regions including China,Hong Kong,the Philippines,and Singapore which have adoptedIntemational Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS),this paper finds that after the application of FVA,the estimatedcost of equity of the sampled banks significantly decreases and the relationship between banks’loan loss provisions(LLP)and earnings before provisions and tax(EBPT)becomes irrelevant.The evidence suppo~s the effects ofFVA adoption on the enhancement of accounting quali~.In addition,sound legal/extra-legal systems are closelylinked to the degree of accounting quality and still have a strong influence on FVA.Keywords."earnings management,fair value accounting(FVA),information transparency,legal institutionsIntroductionWith the globalization of capital markets,multinational enterprises have rapidly grown in recent years.Togain the confidence of internationalinvestors and access capital from overseas funds,it is necessary for theseenterprises’financial statements to confo·rm to intemational standards.However,the workinvolved to meetthese standards is obviously costly,and the delays that result from preparing various versions of the statementsfor international enterprises affect the firms’eficiency.As a result,the harmonization of local withinternational accounting standards has been duly noted and discussed for many years.Most legislators,regulators,and researchers agree that efforts to standardize financial statements will directly help the firms,shareholders,analysts,accountants,auditors,and SO on(Tarca,2004;Barth,Landsman,&Lang,2008;Cai,Rahman.&Courtenay,2008;Wang,2009).THE EFFECTS ON FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT 757Not only for the above considerations but also in order to have relevant and reliable corporate reportinginformation,the two accounting standards bodies,namely,the International Accounting Standards Board(IASB)and the Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB),have committed themselves to developing a setof high—quality financ ial reporting standards based on a“performance—style reporting system’’instead of thetraditional financial reporting system.As a consequence,following the full adoption of International FinancialReporting Standards(IFRS)in the European Union(EU)since 2005,there are now more than 1 1 5 countries,including Australia,New Zealand,Hong Kong,and South Africa requiring that their own businesses acceptIFRS as their accounting standards.Other countries,such as Canada,Korea,Brazil,and India,have drawn upschedules and are expected to gradually adopt IFRS by 20 1 2.Currently,among the global top 1 0 capitalmarkets,only Japan and the United States(US)have not yet made a final decision to adopt IFRS.Bothcountries are,however,inclined to work on a plan to converge their own existing accounting standards with theIFRS standards.It is predictable that IFRS will soon become the most important and common language inglobal capital markets.The fundamental scheme of IFRS is the introduction of fair value accounting(FVA).FVA,also referred toas“mark.to—market”.is a financial reporting approach in which companies are required or permited to measureand report,on an ongoing basis,certain assets and liabilities at estimates of the prices they would receive ifthey were to sell the assets or would pay if they were to be relieved of the liabilities.Most prior studies pointout that the mark.to。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

本科毕业设计(论文)外文翻译题目双汇企业财务报表分析研究姓名宋孟姣专业 2010级财务管理本科1班学号 *********指导教师董玥玥郑州科技学院工商管理学院二〇一四年三月FINANCIAL STA TEMENT ANALYSIS OF EVERAGE AND HOW IT INFORMS ABOUT PORABLIITY ANDPRICE-TO-BOOK RA TIOS1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF EVERAGEThe following inimical statement analysis separates the effects of enhancing liabilities and operating liabilities on the portability o f shareholders’ equity. The analysis yields explicit leveraging equations from which the specifications for the empirical analysis are developed. Shareholder portability, return on common equity, is measured asReturn on common equity (ROCE) = comprehensive net income ÷common equity (1) Appropriate inimical statement analysis disentangles the effects of leverage. The analysis below, which elaborates on parts of Nazism and Penman (2001), begins by identifying components of the balance sheet and income statement that involve operating and enhancing activities. The portability due to each activity is then calculated and two types of leverage are introduced to explain both operating and enhancing portability and overall shareholder portability.1.1 Distinguishing the Portability of Operations from the Portability of Financing ActivitiesCommon equity =operating assets+financial assets-operating liabilities-Financial liabilities (2)The distinction here between operating assets (like trade receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment) and inimical assets (the deposits and marketable securities that absorb excess cash) is made in other contexts. However, on the liability side, enhancing liabilities are also distinguished here from operating liabilities. Rather than treating all liabilities as enhancing debt, only liabilities that raise cash for operations—like bank loans, short-term commercial paper and bonds—are classier as such. Other liabilities—such as accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, restructuring liabilities and pension liabilities—arise from operations. The distinction is not as simple as current versus long-termliabilities; pension liabilities, for example, are usually long-term, and short-term borrowing is a current liability.Rearranging terms in equation (2), Common equity = (operating assets-operating liabilities)-(financial liabilities-financial assets) Or Common equity = net operating assets-net financing debt(3)This equation regroups assets and liabilities into operating and enhancing activities. Net operating assets are operating assets less operating liabilities. So a arm might invest in inventories, but to the extent to which the suppliers of those inventories grant credit, the net investment in inventories is reduced.Firms pay wages, but to the extent to which the payment of wages is deferred in pension liabilities, the net investment required to run the business is reduced. Net enhancing debt is enhancing debt (including preferred stock) minus inimical assets. So, a arm may issue bonds to raise cash for operations but may also buy bonds with excess cash from operations. Its net indebtedness is its net position in bonds. Indeed a arm may be a net creditor (with more inimical assets than inimical liabilities) rather than a net debtor.The income statement can be reformulated to distinguish income that comes from operating and enhancing activities:Comprehensive net income = operating income-net financing expense(4)Operating income is produced in operations and net inimical expense is incurred in the enhancing of operations. Interest income on inimical assets is netted against interest expense on inimical liabilities (including preferred dividends) in net inimical expense. If interest income is greater than interest expense, enhancing activities produce net inimical income rather than net inimical expense. Both operating income and net inimical expense (or income) is after tax.3Equations (3) and (4) produce clean measures of after-tax operating portability and the borrowing rate:Return on net operating assets (RNOA) = operating income ÷net operating assets(5) And Net borrowing rate (NBR) = net financing expense ÷net financing debt(6)RNOA recognizes that portability must be based on the net assets invested inoperations. So arms can increase their operating portability by convincing suppliers, in the course of business, to grant or extend credit terms; credit reduces the investment that shareholders would otherwise have to put in the business. Correspondingly, the net borrowing rate, by excluding non-interest bearing liabilities from the denominator, gives the appropriate borrowing rate for the enhancing activities.Note that RNOA differs from the more common return on assets (ROA), usually denned as income before after-tax interest expense to total assets. ROA does not distinguish operating and enhancing activities appropriately. Unlike ROA, RNOA excludes inimical assets in the denominator and subtracts operating liabilities. Nissan and Penman (2001) report a median ROA for NYSE and AMEX arms from 1963–1999 of only 6.8%, but a median RNOA of 10.0%—much closer to what one would expect as a return to business operations.1.2 Financial Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder PortabilityFrom expressions (3) through (6), it is straightforward to demonstrate that ROCE is a weighted average of RNOA and the net borrowing rate, with weights derived from equation (3):ROCE= [net operating assets ÷common equity× RNOA]-[net financing debt÷Common equity ×net borrowing rate] (7) Additional algebra leads to the following leveraging equation:ROCE= RNOA+[FLEV×(RNOA-net borrowing rate)] (8) Where FLEV, the measure of leverage from enhancing activities, isFinancing leverage (FLEV) = net financing debt common equity(9) The FLEV measure excludes operating liabilities but includes (as a net against enhancing debt) inimical assets. If inimical assets are greater than inimical liabilities, FLEV is negative. The leveraging equation (8) works for negative FLEV (in which case the net borrowing rate is the return on net inimical assets).This analysis breaks shareholder portability, ROCE, down into that which is due to operations and that which is due to enhancing. Financial leverage levers the ROCE over RNOA, with the leverage effect determined by the amount of inimical leverage(FLEV) and the spread between RNOA and the borrowing rate. The spread can be positive (favorable) or negative (unfavorable).1.3 Operating Liability Leverage and its Effect on Operating PortabilityWhile enhancing debt levers ROCE, operating liabilities lever the portability of operations, RNOA. RNOA is operating income relative to net operating assets, and net operating assets are operating assets minus operating liabilities. So, the more operating liabilities a arm has relative to operating assets, the higher its RNOA, assuming no effect on operating income in the numerator. The intensity of the use of operating liabilities in the investment base is operating liability leverage: Operating liability leverage (OLLEV) =operating liabilities ÷net operating assets(10)Using operating liabilities to lever the rate of return from operations may not come for free, however; there may be a numerator effect on operating income. Suppliers provide what nominally may be interest-free credit, but presumably charge for that credit with higher prices for the goods and services supplied. This is the reason why operating liabilities are inextricably a part of operations rather than the enhancing of operations. The amount that suppliers actually charge for this credit is difficult to identify. But the market borrowing rate is observable. The amount that suppliers would implicitly charge in prices for the credit at this borrowing rate can be estimated as a benchmark:Market interest on operating liabilities= operating liabilitie s×market borrowing rate Where the market borrowing rate, given that most credit is short term, can be approximated by the after-tax short-term borrowing rate. This implicit cost is benchmark, for it is the cost that makes suppliers indifferent in supplying creed suppliers are fully compensated if they charge implicit interest at the cost borrowing to supply the credit. Or, alternatively, the arm buying the goods or services is indifferent between trade credit and enhancing purchases at the borrowing rate.To analyze the effect of operating liability leverage on operating portability, wedine:Return on operating assets (ROOA) =(operating income+market interest on operating liabilities)÷operating assets (11) The numerator of ROOA adjusts operating income for the full implicit cost of trade credit. If suppliers fully charge the implicit cost of credit, ROOA is the return of operating assets that would be earned had the arm no operating liability leverage. suppliers do not fully charge for the credit, ROOA measures the return fro operations that includes the favorable implicit credit terms from suppliers.Similar to the leveraging equation (8) for ROCE, RNOA can be expressed as: RNOA= ROOA+[OLLEV×(ROO A-market borrowing rate)] (12) Where the borrowing rate is the after-tax short-term interest rate. Given ROOA, the effect of leverage on portability is determined by the level of operating liability leverage and the spread between ROOA and the short-term after-tax interest rate. Like enhancing leverage, the effect can be favorable or unfavorable: Firms can reduce their operating portability through operating liability leverage if their ROOA is less than the market borrowing rate. However, ROOA will also be affected if the implicit borrowing cost on operating liabilities is different from the market borrowing rate.1.4 Total Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder Portability Operating liabilities and net enhancing debt combine into a total leverage measure: Total leverage (TLEV) = ( net financing deb t+operating liabilities)÷common equityThe borrowing rate for total liabilities is:Total borrowing rate = (net financing expense+market interest on operating liabilities) ÷(net financing debt+operating liabilities)ROCE equals the weighted average of ROOA and the total borrowing rate, where the weights are proportional to the amount of total operating assets and the sum of net enhancing debt and operating liabilities (with a negative sign), respectively. So, similar to the leveraging equations (8) and (12):ROCE = ROOA +[TLEV×(ROOA -total borrowing rate)] (13) In summary, inimical statement analysis of operating and enhancing activities yields three leveraging equations, (8), (12), and (13). These equations are based on axed accounting relations and are therefore deterministic: They must hold for a given arm at a given point in time. The only requirement in identifying the sources of portability appropriately is a clean separ ation between operating and financing components in the inimical statements.2 CONCLUSIONThe paper has laid out explicit leveraging equations that show how shareholder portability is related to enhancing leverage and operating liability leverage. For operating liability leverage, the leveraging equation incorporates both real contractual effects and accounting effects. As price-to-book ratios are based on expected portability, this analysis also explains how price-to-book ratios are affected by the two types of leverage. The empirical analysis in the paper demonstrates that operating and enhancing liabilities imply different portability and are priced differently in the stock market.Further analysis shows that operating liability leverage not only explains differences in portability in the cross-section but also informs on changes in future portability from current portability. Operating liability leverage and changes in operating liability leverage are indicators of the quality of current reported portability as a predictor of future portability.Our analysis distinguishes contractual operating liabilities from estimated liabilities, but further research might examine operating liabilities in more detail, focusing on line items such as accrued expenses and deferred revenues. Further research might also investigate the pricing of operating liabilities under differing circumstances; for example, where arms have ‘‘market power’’ over thei r suppliers.财务报表杠杆的分析以及如何体现盈利性和价格与账面价值的价值比率1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。

相关文档
最新文档