【SCI秘籍经验】我的科研感悟II(共4部分)
【SCI秘籍经验】我的科研感悟II(共4部分).txt我的优点是：我很帅；但是我的缺点是：我帅的不明显。什么是幸福？幸福就是猫吃鱼，狗吃肉，奥特曼打小怪兽！令堂可是令尊表姐？我是胖人，不是粗人。 ■注册
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology - Account Created in Manuscript Central[/url]
发件人："ieeetcst" 加入通讯录
时 间：2006年5月17日(星期三) 下午13:21
收件人："XXX"
17-May-2006
Dear Mr. XXX:
Welcome to the IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology - Manuscript Central site for online submission and review.
Your USER ID and PASSWORD for your account at https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,/tcst is as follows:
USER ID: XXXXXXX@https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,
PASSWORD: XXXXXXXX
Please note that your PASSWORD is case-sensitive.
Thank you for your participation.
Sincerely,
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology Editorial Office
■投稿
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology - Paper ID TCST-2006-XXXX
发件人："ieeetcst" 加入通讯录
时 间：2006年6月9日(星期五) 下午13:14
收件人："XXX"
09-Jun-2006
Dear Mr. XXX:
Your paper entitled "XXXXXX" has been successfully submitted online and is presently being given full consideration for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.
Your Paper ID is TCST-2006-XXXX.
Please mention the above Paper ID in all future correspondence or when calling the office for questions. If there are any changes in your street address or e-mail address, please log in to Manuscript Central at https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,/tcst and edit your user information as appropriate.
You can also view the status of your submission at any time by checking your Author Center after logging in to https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,/tcst .
Thank you for submitting your paper to the IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.
Best Regards,
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology Editorial Office
■催稿
Re: Status of manuscript TCST-2006-XXXX
发件人："ieeetcst" 加入通讯录
时 间：2006年10月13日(星期五) 下午23:08
收件人："XXX"
XXX,
I am currently out of the office until October 19 and will respond to your
request when I return.
All best,
XXX
Editorial Assistant
On October 10, 11:06 pm "XXX" wrote:
>
> Dear Editors,
>
> Thank you for your previously handing our manuscript
> 'TCST-2006-XXXX XXXXXX'
> We would like to know its current status. Any Information
> will be greatly appreciated.
> Thank you!
>
> Best Regards,
> XXX
Re: Status of manuscript TCST-2006-XXXX
发件人："ieeetcst" 加入通讯录
时 间：2006年10月20日(星期五) 上午03:53
收件人："XXX"
Dear XXX,
Thank you for your email. I have looked at the status of your paper and it appears that it is currently out for review. The reviewers have until mid-November to return their reviews.
Thank you fo
r your patience.
All best,
XXX
XXX wrote:
Dear Editors,
Thank you for your previously handing our manuscript
'TCST-2006-XXXX XXXXXX'
We would like to know its current status. Any Information
will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Best Regards,
XXX
2006-10-11
Re: [Fwd: Status of manuscript TCST-2006-XXXX]
发件人："XXX"
时 间：2006年12月16日(星期六) 下午22:03
收件人："ieeetcst"
抄 送："XXX"
I have received only one review for this paper so far. I have sent a
reminder to the other two reviewers to send me their review as soon as
possible. I will make a decision as soon as I get their review.
Sorry for the delay.
-Dr. XXX-
Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
FAMU-FSU College of Engineering
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, IEEE/TCST Journal wrote:
> Dear Prof. XXX,
> I am forwarding this on to you from the author. Please reply and cc me with
> your reply
> Thank you,
>XXX
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Status of manuscript TCST-2006-XXXX
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:21:43 +0800
> From: XXX
> To: ieeetcst
>
>
>
> Dear Editors,
>
> Would you like to give us an update on the current status of our submission
> 'TCST-2006-XXXX XXXXXX',
> which was sent on Jun 9,2006? Any information will be greatly appreciated.
> Thank you for your handling our manuscript.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> XXX
>
> 2006-12-15
Re:Request for Status TCST-2006-XXXX
发件人："ieeetcst" 加入通讯录
时 间：2007年2月2日(星期五) 上午02:20
收件人："XXX"
抄 送："XXX"
Dear XXX,
Thank you for your message. I have forwarded it to your paper’s Associate
Editor, XXX and asked him to contact you as soon as possible.
If you do not hear from him, within a few days, please feel free to contact
him directly at XXX@https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,.
Thank you,
XXX
Editorial Assistant
IEEE TCST
ph: 805-893-XXXX
fax:805-893-XXXX
ieeetcst@https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,
On February 1, 1:02 am "XXX" wrote:
>
> Dear Editors,
>
> …… draws researcher attention only in recent years. We have
> successfully control the real unit using the …… approach. We hope more
> readers can see our research achievement as soon as possible and give
> us any advice for further improvement.
> Would you like to give us an update on the current status of our
> submission 'TCST-2006-XXXX XXXXXX',
> which was sent on Jun 9,2006? Any information will be greatly
> appreciated. Thank you for your handling our manuscript. >
>
>
> Best Regards,
> XXX
>
>
> 2006-12-15
■ 第一次Decision-Reject & Resubmit
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology - Decision on Manuscript ID TCST-2006-XXXX
发件人："XXX"
时 间：2007年3月4日(星期日) 下午23:22
收件人："XXX"
抄 送："ieeetcst"
04-Mar-2007
Dear Mr.XXX:
The paper "XXXXXX" reference TCST-2006-XXXX which you submitted for publicat
ion to the IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, has been reviewed. Copies of the Associate Editor Report and of the reviews are included at the bottom of this letter.
After consideration of the paper and of the reviews, it is our decision that the paper cannot be accepted for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. It is possible, however, that it could be published as a Brief Paper after significant revision. Suggestions for changes that would increase the likelihood of acceptance are discussed in the Associate Editor Report and in the reviews.
Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered. The revision should adhere to the requirements for a brief paper, currently 16 double-spaced pages including figures.
To submit your revised manuscript, log into [url=https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,/tcst]https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,/tcst and enter your Author Center. Click on Submit a New Manuscript. In Section 5, Details and Comments of the Submission Process, answer "Yes" to "Has this document been previously submitted?" Add the original paper number in "Manuscipt ID of Previous Submission".
Follow the procedure and upload the revised paper.
When submitting your revised manuscript, include a detailed statement describing the changes made to the paper and refer to the paper number in your letter. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).
Sincerely,
Prof. XXX
Associate Editor, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
XXX@https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,
Editor-in-Chief's address:
Professor Francis J. Doyle III
Editor-in-Chief
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
University of California, Santa Barbara
Chemical Engineering Department
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5080
ieeetcst@https://www.360docs.net/doc/4812427838.html,Associate Editors Comments to the Author:
The following issues raised by the reviewers need to be addressed:
1. The issue of observability of the …….
2. Justifiction for estimating …….
3. Tuning of …… parameters.
4. Justification for using …… for this problem.
5. Clearer description of overall control strategy.
6. Stability of identified ……….
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
This paper presents an interesting application of ……. With revision
this paper could be of similar quality to other papers published in TCST. Following two
issues need to be addressed while revising the manuscript.
…….
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
The authors have provided little motivation for the publication of this paper. …… has been successful because of its ability to handle multivariable systems with constraints. The problem, as presented by the authors, has neither problem. For some reason, …… is applied
in a SISO loop to regulate ……, while PI control is used to regulate …….
The paper is poorly written, with many misspellings and a seemingly random placement of content. I see no need to compare … with …. Also, all of the hardware and software details for the implementation of the controller are largely irrelevant. The readers will not care what microprocessor was used, for example.
The … strategy is poorly presented. The classical additive output disturbance assumption is presented in equation (25), yet the point of the paper is to use …….
The overall control strategy is also not clear. The authors use ……, but …… is not shown in any plots.
If the ……, then what is manipulated to handle ……?
How do the authors even guarantee that the ……?