TED 谢乐尔

TED 谢乐尔
TED 谢乐尔

TED 谢乐尔·桑德伯格Sheryl Sandberg:为什么女性领导那么少?

So for any of us in this room today, let's start out by admitting we're lucky. We don't live in the world our mothers lived in, our grandmothers lived in, where career choices for women were so limited. And if you're in this room today, most of us grew up in a world where we had basic civil rights, and amazingly, we still live in a world where some women don't have them. But all that aside, we still have a problem, and it's a real problem. And the problem is this: Women are not making it to the top of any profession anywhere in the world. The numbers tell the story quite clearly. 190 heads of state -- nine are women. Of all the people in parliament in the world, 13 percent are women. In the corporate sector, women at the top,C-level jobs, board seats -- tops out at 15, 16 percent. The numbers have not moved since 2002 and are going in the wrong direction. And even in the non-profit world, a world we sometimes think of as being led by more women, women at the top: 20 percent.

We also have another problem, which is that women face harder choices between professional success and personal fulfillment. A recent study in the U.S. showed that, of married senior managers, two-thirds of the married men had children and only one-third of the married women had children. A couple of years ago, I was in New York, and I was pitching a deal, and I was in one of those fancy New York private equity offices you can picture. And I'm in the meeting -- it's about a three-hour meeting -- and two hours in, there kind of needs to be that bio break, and everyone stands up, and the partner running the meeting starts looking really embarrassed. And I realized he doesn't know where the women's room is in his office. So I start looking around for moving boxes, figuring they just moved in, but I don't see any. And so I said, "Did you just move into this office?" And he said, "No, we've been here about a year." And I said, "Are you telling me that I am the only woman to have pitched a deal in this office in a year?" And he looked at me, and he said,"Yeah. Or maybe you're the only one who had to go to the bathroom." (Laughter)

So the question is, how are we going to fix this? How do we change these numbers at the top? How do we make this different? I want to start out by saying, I talk about this -- about keeping women in the workforce -- because I really think that's the answer. In the high-income part of our workforce, in the people who end up at the top -- Fortune 500 CEO jobs,or the equivalent in other industries -- the problem, I am convinced, is that women are dropping out. Now people talk about this a lot, and they talk about things like flextime and mentoring and programs companies should have to train women. I want to talk about none of that today, even though that's all really important. Today I want to focus on what we can do as individuals. What are the messages we need to tell ourselves? What are the messages we tell the women who work with and for us? What are the messages we tell our daughters?

Now, at the outset, I want to be very clear that this speech comes with no judgments. I don't have the right answer. I don't even have it for myself. I left San Francisco, where I live, on Monday, and I was getting on the plane for this conference. And my daughter, who's three, when I dropped her off at preschool, did that whole hugging-the-leg, crying, "Mommy, don't get on the plane" thing. This is hard. I feel guilty sometimes. I know no

women, whether they're at home or whether they're in the workforce, who don't feel that sometimes. So I'm not saying that staying in the workforce is the right thing for everyone. My talk today is about what the messages are if you do want to stay in the workforce, and I think there are three. One, sit at the table. Two, make your partner a real partner. And three, don't leave before you leave. Number one: sit at the table. Just a couple weeks ago at Facebook, we hosted a very senior government official, and he came in to meet with senior execs from around Silicon Valley. And everyone kind of sat at the table. And then he had these two women who were traveling with him who were pretty senior in his department, and I kind of said to them, "Sit at the table. Come on, sit at the table," and they sat on the side of the room. When I was in college my senior year, I took a course called European Intellectual History. Don't you love that kind of thing from college? I wish I could do that now.And I took it with my roommate, Carrie, who was then a brilliant literary student -- and went on to be a brilliant literary scholar -- and my brother -- smart guy, but a water-polo-playing pre-med, who was a sophomore.

The three of us take this class together. And then Carrie reads all the books in the original Greek and Latin, goes to all the lectures. I read all the books in English and go to most of the lectures. My brother is kind of busy. He reads one book of 12 and goes to a couple of lectures, marches himself up to our room a couple days before the exam to get himself tutored. The three of us go to the exam together, and we sit down. And we sit there for three hours -- and our little blue notebooks -- yes, I'm that old. And we walk out, and we look at each other, and we say, "How did you do?" And Carrie says, "Boy, I feel like I didn't really draw out the main point on the Hegelian dialectic." And I say, "God, I really wish I had really connected John Locke's theory of property with the philosophers who follow." And my brother says, "I got the top grade in the class." "You got the top grade in the class? You don't know anything."

The problem with these stories is that they show what the data shows: women systematically underestimate their own abilities. If you test men and women, and you ask them questions on totally objective criteria like GPAs, men get it wrong slightly high, and women get it wrong slightly low. Women do not negotiate for themselves in the workforce. A study in the last two years of people entering the workforce out of college showed that 57 percent of boys entering, or men, I guess, are negotiating their first salary, and only seven percent of women. And most importantly, men attribute their success to themselves, and women attribute it to other external factors. If you ask men why they did a good job, they'll say, "I'm awesome. Obviously. Why are you even asking?" If you ask women why they did a good job, what they'll say is someone helped them, they got lucky, they worked really hard. Why does this matter? Boy, it matters a lot because no one gets to the corner officeby sitting on the side, not at the table, and no one gets the promotion if they don't think they deserve their success, or they don't even understand their own success.

I wish the answer were easy. I wish I could just go tell all the young women I work for, all these fabulous women, "Believe in yourself and negotiate for yourself. Own your own success." I wish I could tell that to my daughter. But it's not that simple. Because what the data shows, above all else, is one thing, which is that success and likeability are positively

correlated for men and negatively correlated for women. And everyone's nodding, because we all know this to be true.

There's a really good study that shows this really well. There's a famous Harvard Business School study on a woman named Heidi Roizen. And she's an operator in a company in Silicon Valley, and she uses her contacts to become a very successful venture capitalist. In 2002 -- not so long ago -- a professor who was then at Columbia University took that case and made it Howard Roizen. And he gave the case out, both of them, to two groups of students. He changed exactly one word: "Heidi" to "Howard." But that one word made a really big difference. He then surveyed the students, and the good news was the students, both men and women, thought Heidi and Howard were equally competent, and that's good.The bad news was that everyone liked Howard. He's a great guy. You want to work for him.You want to spend the day fishing with him. But Heidi? Not so sure. She's a little out for herself. She's a little political. You're not sure you'd want to work for her. This is the complication. We have to tell our daughters and our colleagues, we have to tell ourselves to believe we got the A, to reach for the promotion, to sit at the table, and we have to do it in a world where, for them, there are sacrifices they will make for that, even though for their brothers, there are not.

The saddest thing about all of this is that it's really hard to remember this. And I'm about to tell a story which is truly embarrassing for me, but I think important. I gave this talk at Facebook not so long ago to about 100 employees, and a couple hours later, there was a young woman who works there sitting outside my little desk, and she wanted to talk to me.I said, okay, and she sat down, and we talked. And she said, "I learned something today. I learned that I need to keep my hand up." I said, "What do you mean?" She said, "Well, you're giving this talk, and you said you were going to take two more questions. And I had my hand up with lots of other people, and you took two more questions. And I put my hand down, and I noticed all the women put their hand down, and then you took more questions,only from the men." And I thought to myself, wow, if it's me -- who cares about this, obviously -- giving this talk -- and during this talk, I can't even notice that the men's hands are still raised, and the women's hands are still raised, how good are we as managers of our companies and our organizations at seeing that the men are reaching for opportunities more than women? We've got to get women to sit at the table.

Message number two: make your partner a real partner. I've become convinced that we've made more progress in the workforce than we have in the home. The data shows this very clearly. If a woman and a man work full-time and have a child, the woman does twice the amount of housework the man does, and the woman does three times the amount of childcare the man does. So she's got three jobs or two jobs, and he's got one. Who do you think drops out when someone needs to be home more? The causes of this are really complicated, and I don't have time to go into them. And I don't think Sunday football-watching and general laziness is the cause.

I think the cause is more complicated. I think, as a society, we put more pressure on our boys to succeed than we do on our girls. I know men that stay home and work in the home to support wives with careers, and it's hard. When I go to the Mommy-and-Me stuff and I see the father there, I notice that the other mommies don't play with him. And that's a

problem, because we have to make it as important a job, because it's the hardest job in the world to work inside the home, for people of both genders, if we're going to even things out and let women stay in the workforce. (Applause) Studies show that households with equal earning and equal responsibility also have half the divorce rate. And if that wasn't good enough motivation for everyone out there, they also have more -- how shall I say this on this stage? -- they know each other more in the biblical sense as well. Message number three: don't leave before you leave. I think there's a really deep irony to the fact that actions women are taking -- and I see this all the time -- with the objective of staying in the workforce actually lead to their eventually leaving. Here's what happens: We're all busy. Everyone's busy. A woman's busy. And she starts thinking about having a child,and from the moment she starts thinking about having a child, she starts thinking about making room for that child. "How am I going to fit this into everything else I'm doing?" And literally from that moment, she doesn't raise her hand anymore, she doesn't look for a promotion, she doesn't take on the new project, she doesn't say, "Me. I want to do that."She starts leaning back. The problem is that -- let's say she got pregnant that day, that day -- nine months of pregnancy, three months of maternity leave, six months to catch your breath -- fast-forward two years, more often -- and as I've seen it -- women start thinking about this way earlier -- when they get engaged, when they get married, when they start thinking about trying to have a child, which can take a long time. One woman came to see me about this, and I kind of looked at her -- she looked a little young. And I said, "So are you and your husband thinking about having a baby?" And she said, "Oh no, I'm not married." She didn't even have a boyfriend. I said, "You're thinking about this just way too early."

But the point is that what happens once you start kind of quietly leaning back? Everyone who's been through this -- and I'm here to tell you, once you have a child at home, your job better be really good to go back, because it's hard to leave that kid at home -- your job needs to be challenging. It needs to be rewarding. You need to feel like you're making a difference. And if two years ago you didn't take a promotion and some guy next to you did, if three years ago you stopped looking for new opportunities, you're going to be boredbecause you should have kept your foot on the gas pedal. Don't leave before you leave. Stay in. Keep your foot on the gas pedal, until the very day you need to leave to take a break for a child -- and then make your decisions. Don't make decisions too far in advance,particularly ones you're not even conscious you're making.

My generation really, sadly, is not going to change the numbers at the top. They're just not moving. We are not going to get to where 50 percent of the population -- in my generation, there will not be 50 percent of [women] at the top of any industry. But I'm hopeful that future generations can. I think a world that was run where half of our countries and half of our companies were run by women, would be a better world. And it's not just because people would know where the women's bathrooms are, even though that would be very helpful. I think it would be a better world. I have two children. I have a five-year-old son and a two-year-old daughter. I want my son to have a choice to contribute fully in the workforce or at home, and I want my daughter to have the choice to not just succeed, but to be liked for her accomplishments.

Thank you.

从TED演讲里学到20种最实用的演讲技巧

当越来越多的听众沉迷于研究演讲的技巧时,其实有一些简单易行的方法可能直接影响你演讲的最终效果。以下是一些在准备演讲、练习演讲以及提升演讲技巧方面的小窍门。必须一提的是,每一个小技巧都出自一个精彩TED演讲内容。你不仅能从这些伟大的演讲者身上学到这些实用技巧,更可以拓宽你的思路。 本文原本于刊登于美国著名《INC.》主流商业报刊网站上,英锐君特意进行中文翻译以方便更多的人学习到这些极为有用演讲的技巧。 1别忘了给听众一些能带回家的话 Dan Ariely:别忘了时常给听众讲一些易于操作的方法。因为无论你的演讲信息 多么鼓舞人心,其实听众更关心的是能从中学到任何可实践的方法。有启发的演讲当然很棒,但远比不上一个实用的点子:请永远不用害怕去说“今晚,还在苦 苦挣扎的他们,明天这些观念和方法就会拯救他们”。 2回答问题时,不要迟疑 Malcolm Gladwell:如果在你正在演讲的过程中,突然有人打断你来问问题。那其实很棒,说明有人在听啊!请抓住这个时机。如果这个问题是你之后幻灯片里将提到的,可以先行跳过(如果你已经熟练应对这样的处境)。其实,最好的演讲就像在舒服的对话一般,即便看上去像是单向的。所以,不要放过任何可制造互动的机会,也绝不要试图脱离你的听众。 3问一个你也无法做到的问题 Nigel Marsh:当你问听众问题时,他们总显得很被动。相反,如果当你问一个你已经预设听众“做不到”的问题时,你同样也可自我回答“没关系,其实我也做不到”。接着就解释你为什么做不到以及哪些是你试图做到的。其实,大部分的演讲者总是看上去光鲜的,事实上他们同样在工作生活上也常常感到无能为力,只是他们愿不愿意承认罢了。适时地承认自己的“无能”不仅可以给人亲切感,听众也更愿意听你“有能”的地方。

28个最精彩的TED演讲

I've watched more than 800 TED talks in the last 7 years. Last night, I went through all 1400 TED talks and picked out the talks that left long-lasting impressions. Educati on Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity (Part 1) "Creativity expert Sir Ken Robinson challe nges the way we're educati ng our childre n. He champi ons a radical reth ink of our school systems, to cultivate creativity and ack no wledge multiple types of i ntellige nee." explores the world of ants and other tiny creatures, and writes movin gly about the way all creatures in terdepe ndent. “ Life Less ons "Tim Ferriss is author of bestseller The 4-Hour Workweek , a Sir Ken Robinson: Bring on the learning revolution! (Part 2) great and small are Ben Dunlap is a true polymath, whose tale nts spa n literature and adm ini strati on. He is the preside nt of South Caroli na poetry, opera, ballet, 's Wofford College. E.O. Wils on: Advice to you ng scie ntists Biologist E.O. Wilson Ben Dun lap: The life-l ong lear ner Tim Ferriss: Smash fear, lear n an yth ing

TED演讲--如何掌控你的自由时间

How to Man age Your Free Time Which is true. That's like finding an extra hour in the day. But rm sure if you had asked her at the start of the week, "Could you find seve n hours to train for a triathl on?" And so the key to time man ageme nt is treat ing our priorities as the equivale nt of that broke n water heater. To get at this, I like to use Ian guage from one of the busiest people I ever in terviewed. By busy, I mean she was running a small bus in ess with 12 people on the payroll, she had six childre n in her spare time. I was gett ing in touch with her to set up an in terview on how she "had it all"…that phrase. I remember it was a Thursday morning, and she was not available to speak with me. Of course, right? But the reas on she was un available to speak with me is that she was out for a hike, because it was a beautiful spri ng morning, and she wan ted to go for a hike. So of course this makes me eve n more in trigued, and whe n I fin ally do catch up with her, she expla ins it like this. She says, "Liste n Laura, everyth ing I do, every mi nute I spe nd, is my choice." And rather tha n say, "I don't have time to do x, y or z, "she'd say, "I don't do x, y or z because it's not a priority." "I don't have time, "ofte n means " It's n ot a priority." If you thi nk about it, that's really more accurate Ian guage. I could tell you I don't have time to dust to dust my bli nds, but that's not true. If you offered to pay me $100,000 to dust my bli nds, I would get to it pretty quickly. Since that is not going to happe n, I can ack no wledge this is not a matter of lacki ng time, it's that I don't want to do it. Using this Ian guage reminds us that time is a choice. And gra nted, there may be horrible con seque nces for maki ng differe nt choices, I will give you that. But we are smart people, and certai nly over the long run, we have the power to fill our lives with the things that deserve to be there. So how do we do that? How do we treat our priorities as the equivale nt of that broke n water heater? But you can write it.

TED演讲内容(中英)

张彤禾 HI,So I'd like to talk little bit about the people 嗨,今天我想来探讨一下 Who make the things we use every day; 这些为我们制造日常用品的人们: Our shoes,our handbags,our computers and cell phones, 例如我们的鞋子,手提包,电脑,还有手机。 Now, this is a conversatuon that often calls up a lot of guilt. 这个话题时常让我们觉得很内疚。 Imagine the teenage farm girl who makes less than 想象一下,一个年轻的农村女孩给你缝制跑步鞋 a dollar an hour stitching your running shoes, 可每个小时还赚不到一美金, Or the young Chinese man who jumps off a rooftop 又或者是那个加班为你组装ipad的中国小伙子 after working overtime assembling your ipad 在加班之后从楼上跳了下来。 We,the beneficiaries of globalization,seem to exploit 我们,是全球化的受益者, These victims with every purchase we make, 可每笔交易却似乎都是在剥削那些受害者, and the injustice 而这种不公平 Feels embedded in the products themselves. 似乎也深深烙印在这些产品之中。 After all, what’s wrong with the world in which a worker 总而言之,这个世界到底怎么了? On an iphone assembly line can’t even afford to buy one? 一个在组装iphone 生产线上的员工却买不起一台iphone?It's taken for granted that chinese factories are oppressive, 人们理所当然地认为,中国的工厂就是应该被压榨的,And that it’s our desire for cheap goods 因为我们渴求便宜的产品 That makes them so。 造成了这样的局面。 So,this simple narrative equating Weatern demand 很显然,西方社会的需求 And Chinese suffering is appealing, 和中国人对他们遭遇的申诉被连接在一起, especially at a time when many of us already feel guilty 尤其是当我们中的很多人已经因为我们对世界影响 About our impact on the world, 而感到了内疚, But it's also inaccurate and disrespectful.

TED演讲语段精华整理

TED 1 It's one thing to work up (激发)the confidence to write honestly about your experiences with love, but it is another thing to discover that your love life has made international news . 2 The moment you admit to loving someone, you admit to having a lot to lose. 3 So rather than that question, I would propose we ask some more difficult questions, questions like:How do you decide who deserves your love and who does not? How do you stay in love when things get difficult, and how do you know when to just cut and run? How do you live with the doubt that inevitably creeps into every relationship, or even harder, how do you live with your partner's doubt? I don't necessarily know the answers to these questions, but I think they're an important start at having a more thoughtful conversation about what it means to love someone. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1What struck (strike使震惊,使迷住)me was that I.Q. was not the only difference Grit is passion and perseverance for very long-term goals.Grit is having stamina(恒心).Grit is sticking with your future, day in, day out,not just for the week, not just for the month,but for years, and working really hard to make that future a reality.Grit is living life like it's a marathon, not a sprint(短跑). (表达)In fact, in our data, grit is usually unrelated or even inversely related to measures of talent. 毅力通常与其他因素无关,甚至与才华的衡量标准背道而驰。 growth mindset We need to take our best ideas, our strongest intuition, and we need to test them. We need to measure whether we have been successful, and we have to be willing to fail, to be wrong, just start over again with the lesson learned.In other words, we need to be gritty about getting our kids grittier. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stage fright 怯场 cerebral palsy 脑瘫C.P. our obstacles can only do two things:one, stop us in our tracks or two, force us to get creative. they forced me to rely on my imagination and to believe in the possibilities, and that's why i believe that our imaginations can be used as tools for breaking through borders.because in our minds,we can do anything and we can be anything .it's believing in those dreams can facing our fears head on that allows us to live our lives beyond our limits borders are where the actual ends but also where the imagination and

一分钟英语演讲TED

我知道你们在想什么,你们觉得我迷路了,马上就会有人走上台温和地把我带回我的座位上。(掌声)。我在迪拜总会遇上这种事。“来这里度假的吗,亲爱的?”(笑声)“来探望孩子的吗?这次要待多久呢? 恩,事实上,我希望能再待久一点。我在波斯湾这边生活和教书已经超过30年了。(掌声)这段时间里,我看到了很多变化。现在这份数据是挺吓人的,而我今天要和你们说的是有关语言的消失和英语的全球化。我想和你们谈谈我的朋友,她在阿布达比教成人英语。在一个晴朗的日子里,她决定带她的学生到花园去教他们一些大自然的词汇。但最后却变成是她在学习所有当地植物在阿拉伯语中是怎么说的。还有这些植物是如何被用作药材,化妆品,烹饪,香草。这些学生是怎么得到这些知识的呢?当然是从他们的祖父母,甚至曾祖父母那里得来的。不需要我来告诉你们能够跨代沟通是多么重要。 but sadly, today, languages are dying at an unprecedented rate. a language dies every 14 days. now, at the same time, english is the undisputed global language. could there be a connection? well i dont know. but i do know that ive seen a lot of changes. when i first came out to the gulf, i came to kuwait in the days when it was still a hardship post. actually, not that long ago. that is a little bit too early. but nevertheless, i was recruited by the british council along with about 25 other teachers. and we were the first non-muslims to teach in the state schools there in kuwait. we were brought to teach english because the government wanted to modernize the country and empower the citizens through education. and of course, the u.k. benefited from some of that lovely oil wealth. 但遗憾的是,今天很多语言正在以前所未有的速度消失。每14天就有一种语言消失,而与此同时,英语却无庸置疑地成为全球性的语言。这其中有关联吗?我不知道。但我知道的是,我见证过许多改变。初次来到海湾地区时,我去了科威特。当时教英文仍然是个困难的工作。其实,没有那么久啦,这有点太久以前了。总之,我和其他25位老师一起被英国文化协会聘用。我们是第一批非穆斯林的老师,在科威特的国立学校任教。我们被派到那里教英语,是因为当地政府希望国家可以现代化并透过教育提升公民的水平。当然,英国也能得到些好处,产油国可是很有钱的。 okay. now this is the major change that ive seen -- how teaching english has morphed from being a mutually english-speaking nation on earth. and why not? after all, the best education -- according to the latest world university rankings -- is to be found in the universities of the u.k. and the u.s. so everybody wants to have an english education, naturally. but if youre not a native speaker, you have to pass a test. 言归正传,我见过最大的改变,就是英语教学的蜕变如何从一个互惠互利的行为变成今天这种大规模的国际产业。英语不再是学校课程里的外语学科,也不再只是英国的专利。英语(教学)已经成为所有英语系国家追逐的潮流。何乐而不为呢?毕竟,最好的教育来自于最好的大学,而根据最新的世界大学排名,那些名列前茅的都是英国和美国的大学。所以自然每个人都想接受英语教育,但如果你不是以英文为母语,你就要通过考试。 now can it be right to reject a student on linguistic ability well, i dont think so. we english teachers reject them all the time. we put a stop sign, and we stop them in their tracks. they cant pursue their dream any longer, till they get english. now let me put it this way, if i met a dutch speaker who had the cure for cancer, would i stop him from entering my british university? i dont think so. but indeed, that is exactly what we do. we english

TED演讲中文翻译

TED演讲记录1 中文翻译 田铠玮 早上好,还好吗? 很好吧,对不对? 我已经飘飘然了! 我要飘走了。(笑声) 这次会议有三个主题这三个主题贯穿会议始终,并且和我要 谈的内容有关其中之一就是人类创造力的伟大例证这些例证已经体 现在之前的演讲当中以及在座各位的身上。从这些例证中我们看到了创新的多样化和多领域。第二点-- 这些创新也让我们意识到我们不 知道未来会发生什么完全不知道未来会如何 我对教育感兴趣事实上,我发现每个人都对教育感兴趣难道不是吗? 我发现这很有趣如果你参加一个晚宴,你说你在教育部门工作坦白 的讲,如果你在教育部门工作,事实上你不会经常参加晚宴, (笑声) 所以你不会被问及你是做哪行的。你永远不会被问到,很奇怪。但是如果你被问及,他们问:"你从事什么行业?" 你说你在教育部门工作 你会发现他们涨红了脸,那意思好像是“我的天啊,”“为什么让我碰上?整整一周我才出来一次” (笑声) 但如果你要他们谈谈他们的受教育经历,他们会把你“钉到墙上”。因为这些事情都涉及个人的隐私,对吗? 比如宗教信仰,薪水等我对教育特别感兴趣,我认为我们都是如此我们对此有巨大的既得利益部分因为教育旨在将我们带入我们无法掌 握的未来大家想想,今年入学的小孩 2065将退休。没人知道会怎样-- 虽然过去四天会议进程里都是关于这方面的专业讨论-- 但我们还是 无法预知这个世界五年后的样子。这就是为何我们要让这些孩子接 受教育。我认为正是未来的不确定性决定其非同寻常。 第三点就是我们都认同一个观点-- 这些孩子的特别之处正是他们的 创新能力。我觉得昨晚 Sirena 的表现令人惊奇,对吗?她很出色,但是我认为她在孩提时代时没显得与众不同。现在的教育提倡的是 一个有奉献精神的老师能发现一个天才学生。但我认为所有孩子都是

TED演讲集-八个成功秘笈(视频)《今日听力精华》-中英文双语

Richard St.John在Ted 英语演讲:成功的八个秘诀(中英双语) 2014-09-08 激情,刻苦,精通,专注,强迫,服务,点子,坚持,这就是成功的秘诀 This is really a two-hour presentation I give to high school students, cut down to three minutes. And it all started one day on a plane, on my way to TED, seven years ago. And in the seat next to me was a

high school student, a teenager, and she came from a really poor family. 这真的是一个我给高中学生做的2个小时的演讲现在缩到了3分钟所有的一切都是从7年前的一天开始,我坐在飞往TED会议的飞机上。在我邻座坐的是一个高中生,一个十几岁的年轻人。她生于一个贫穷的家庭而且她的愿望是成就一番事业所以她问了我一个简单的小问题。 And she wanted to make something of her life, and she asked me a simple little question. She said, "What leads to success?" And I felt

really badly, because I couldn't give her a good answer. So I get off the plane, and I come to TED. And I think, jeez, I'm in the middle of a room of successful people! So why don't I ask them what helped them succeed, and pass it on to kids? So here we are, seven years, 500 interviews later, and I'm gonna tell you what really leads to success and makes TED-sters tick. 她说:“怎样做才能成功呢?”我当时觉得糟透了因为我不能给她一个满意的答案后来我下了飞机,来到TED 忽然间我想到,天啊,我置身于一屋子成功人士之中!

TED经典 之 西蒙·斯涅克--伟大的领导者如何激励行动

西蒙·斯涅克--伟大的领导者如何激励行动 In 2009, Simon Sinek released the book "Start With Why" -- a synopsis of the theory he has begun using to teach others how to become effective leaders and inspire change. 西蒙·斯涅克用一个简单但是震撼的模型来阐释激励人心的领袖力,这个模型的核心是一个“黄金”圆圈,意思是领袖素质的根本来源是回答“为什么?”。他列举了苹果公司、马丁?路德?金还有莱特兄弟成功的例子,同时以Tivo 数码录像机为失败的典型。 下面是演讲全文: 当事情的发展出乎意料之外的时候,你怎么解释?换句话说,当别人似乎出乎意料地取得成功的时候,你怎么解释?比如说,为什么苹果公司创新能力这么强?这么多年来,年复一年,他们比所有竞争对手都更加具有创新性。而其实他们只是一家电脑公司。他们跟其他公司没有任何分别,有同样的途径,接触到同样的人才,同样的代理商,顾问,和媒体。那为什么他们就似乎有那么一点不同寻常呢?同样的,为什么是由马丁?路德?金来领导民权运动?那个时候在美国,民权运动之前,不仅仅只有他一个人饱受歧视。他也决不是那个时代唯一的伟大演说家。为什么会是他?又为什么怀特兄弟能够造出动力控制的载人飞机,跟他们相比,当时的其他团队似乎更有能力,更有资金,他们却没能制造出载人飞机,怀特兄弟打败了他们。一定还 有一些什么别的因素在起作用。 大概三年半之前,我有了个新发现,这个发现 完全改变了我对这个世界如何运作的看法。甚至从 根本上改变了我的工作生活方式。那就是我发现了 一种模式,我发现世界上所有伟大的令人振奋的领 袖和组织,无论是苹果公司、马丁?路德?金还是怀特 兄弟,他们思考、行动、交流沟通的方式都完全一 样,但是跟所有其他人的方式完全相反。我所做的 仅仅是把它整理出来。这可能是世上最简单的概念。 我称它为黄金圆环。

Ted中英对照演讲稿

Ted中英对照演讲稿 大人能从小孩身上学到什么 Now, I want to start with a question: When was the last time you were called childish? For kids like me, being called childish can be a frequent occurrence. Every time we make irrational demands, exhibit irresponsible behavior, or display any other signs of being normal American citizens, we are called childish, which really bothers me. After all, take a look at these events: Imperialism and colonization, world wars, George W. Bush. Ask yourself: Who's responsible? Adults. 首先我要问大家一个问题:上一回别人说你幼稚是什么时候?像我这样的小孩,可能经常会被人说成是幼稚。每一次我们提出不合理的要求,做出不负责任的行为,或者展现出有别于普通美国公民的惯常行为之时,我们就被说成是幼稚。这让我很不服气。首先,让我们来回顾下这些事件:帝国主义和殖民主义,世界大战,小布什。请你们扪心自问下:这些该归咎于谁?是大人。 Now, what have kids done? Well, Anne Frank touched millions with her powerful account of the Holocaust, Ruby Bridges helped end segregation in the United States, and, most recently, Charlie Simpson helped to raise 120,000 pounds for Haiti on his little bike. So, as you can see evidenced by such examples, age has absolutely nothing to do with it. The traits the word childish addresses are seen so often in adults that we should abolish this age-discriminatory word when it comes to criticizing behavior associated with irresponsibility and irrational thinking. 而小孩呢,做了些什么?安妮·弗兰克(Anne Frank)对大屠杀强有力的叙述打动了数百万人的心。鲁比·布里奇斯为美国种族隔离的终结作出了贡献。另外,最近还有一个例子,查理·辛普森(Charlie Simpson)骑自行车为海地募得12万英镑。所以,这些例子证明了年龄与行为完全没有关系。"幼稚"这个词所对应的特点是常常可以从大人身上看到,由此我们在批评不负责和非理性的相关行为时,应停止使用这个年龄歧视的词。 (Applause) Thank you. Then again, who's to say that certain types of irrational thinking aren't exactly what the world needs? Maybe you've had grand plans before, but stopped yourself, thinking: That's impossible or that costs too much or that won't benefit me. For better or worse, we kids aren't hampered as much when it comes to thinking about reasons why not to do things. Kids can be full of inspiring aspirations and hopeful thinking, like my wish that no one went hungry or that everything were free kind of utopia. How many of you still dream like that and believe in the

TED演讲集:八个成功秘笈《今日听力精华》-中英文双语

Richard 在Ted 英语演讲:成功的八个秘诀(中英双语) 2014-09-08 激情,刻苦,精通,专注,强迫,服务,点子,坚持,这就是成功的秘诀 This is really a two-hour presentation I give to high school students, cut down to three minutes. And it all started one day on a plane, on my way to TED, seven years ago. And in the seat next to me was a high school student, a teenager, and she came from a really poor family.

这真的是一个我给高中学生做的2个小时的演讲现在缩到了3分钟所有的一切都是从7年前的一天开始,我坐在飞往TED会议的飞机上。在我邻座坐的是一个高中生,一个十几岁的年轻人。她生于一个贫穷的家庭而且她的愿望是成就一番 事业所以她问了我一个简单的小问题。 And she wanted to make something of her life, and she asked me a simple little question. She said, "What leads to success" And I felt really badly, because I couldn't give her a good answer. So I get off the plane, and I come to TED. And I think, jeez, I'm in

ted演讲

CARL AZUZ, CNN ANCHOR: Hello and welcome to the September 19th edition of - come on, Friday`s are awesome. You wanted to hear it, I wanted to say it. It`s good to have you watching CNN STUDENT NEWS. First up, Scotland, home to more than 5 million people, about the size of South Carolina. Scots have contributed world-changing inventions related to bicycle tires, penicillin, television. Yesterday, they decided on a potentially nation altering question: should Scotland be an independent country? The polls were closed when we produced this show, the vote was over. But it was expected to be very close, and we don`t have results for you yet. For the latest, teachers please visit https://www.360docs.net/doc/9e8843433.html,. We do have an excellent fact-filled look at how Scotland came to be the division of the United Kingdom that it has been for the past 307 years. BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What we know as modern Scotland was formed in the 13 century when England and Scotland signed the treaty of York. Mapping out Scotland southern border. 60 years later, the countries were at war, with the legendary Scottish rebel William Wallace helping to lead the charge. Wallace`s fight for freedom was a subject of Hollywood blockbuster, Brave Heart. Years of war paid off for Scotland. IN 1328, England recognized Scottish independence in the treaty of North Hampton. In 1603, Queen Elizabeth, the last of the Tudors, died at the age of 69. And that cleared the way for King James VI of Scotland, son of Mary, Queen of Scotts, to become England`s king, too. It was known as the union of the crowns. Just over 100 years later, parliaments of England and Scotland passed the Acts of Union. It joined the two separate states into one. The Kingdom of Great Britain, one parliament, one monarch. (END VIDEOTAPE)

TED经典句子背诵

oil For the next few minutes, we're going to talk about energy. And it's going to be a bit of a varied talk. I'll try to spin a story about energy, and oil's a convenient starting place. The talk will be broadly about energy, but oil's a good place to start. And one of the reasons is, this is remarkable stuff. You take about eight or so carbon atoms, about 20 hydrogen atoms, you put them together in exactly the right way and you get this marvelous liquid, very energy-dense and very easy to refine into a number of very useful products and fuels. It's great stuff. Now, as far as it goes, there's a lot of oil out there in the world. Here's my little pocket map of where it's all located. A bigger one for you to look at. But this is it. This is the oil in the world. Geologists have a pretty good idea of where the oil is. This is about 100 trillion gallons of crude oil still to be developed and produced in the world today. Now, that's just one story about oil, and we could end it there and say, "Well, oil's going to last forever because, well, there's just a lot of it." But there's actually more to the story than that. Oh, by the way, if you think you're very far from some of this oil, 1000 meters below where you're all sitting is one of the largest producing oil fields in the world. Come talk to me about it. I'll fill in some of the details if you want. So that's one of the stories of oil. There's just a lot of it. But what about oil? Where is it in the energy system? Here's a little snapshot of 150 years of oil. And it's been a dominant part of our energy system for most of those 150 years. Now, here's another little secret I'm going to tell you about. For the last 25 years, oil has been playing less and less of a role in global energy systems. There was one kind of peak oil in 1985, when oil represented 50 percent of global energy supply. Now, it's about 35 percent. It's been declining, and I believe it will continue to decline. Gasoline consumption in the U.S. probably peaked in 2007 and is declining. So oil is playing a less significant role every year. And so, 25 years ago, there was a peak oil just like, in the 1920s, there was a peak coal, and a hundred years before that, there was a peak wood. This is a very important picture of the evolution of energy systems. And what's been taking up the slack in the last few decades? Well, a lot of natural gas and a little bit of nuclear, for starters. And what goes on in the future? Well, I think out ahead of us a few decades is peak gas, and beyond that, peak renewables. Now, I'll tell you another little very important story about this picture. Now, I'm not pretending that energy use in total isn't increasing, it is. That's another part of the story. Come talk to me about it. We'll fill in some of the details. But there's a very important message here. This is 200 years of history. And for 200 years, we've been systematically decarbonizing our energy system. Energy systems of the world becoming progressively, year on year, decade on decade, century on century, becoming less carbon intense. And that continues into the future with the renewables that we're developing today, reaching maybe 30 percent of primary energy by mid century. Now that might be

相关文档
最新文档