托福独立作文模板六篇另附一篇综合写作

1.Should university spend a lot of money funding the social activities to

attract good student?

When it comes the whether university should put a large amount of money into social activities

to attract good students, controversies arise among people with different backgrounds and perspectives. Some people say that the money can be a good investment for students because

social activities provide them relax, communication and social skills. On the other hand, people

claim this amount of money can be more beneficial for good students if applied into refinement

of library or academically equipment. Students would be attracted by better academy environment

since study is their optimal concern. Consequently, after pondering this problem on several

occasions, I believe it is essential for colleges to invest in social activities to attract good students.

First of all, "good student ” means more than just getting A in every exam. A good student should be a well-rounded person, who is not only good at studying, but also put stress on social activities. Nowadays, the requirement of the excellent graduates has changed from being good at academy

to having abundant social skills. Through the social activities in the campus, students have an easier access to the skills and qualities they are required, such as communication skill, leadership and an outgoing characteristic. With the assistant of university, the social activities will attract more students

and led to development of their social experience.

In addition, various social activities can add spice to the campus life. It is known to all that these

good students bury themselves to the books and researches. It is safe to say they are either already

in classroom or on their way. How can someone endure such a dull and hectic life! However, they

can get relax and refresh themselves by joining the social activities after studying. They can playing soccer, going to the bar, attending a gathering and so on. Only after experiencing every aspects of campus life, can students say they are really in college.

Finally, it is true that this amount of money can be applied to other field like dormitory, laboratory as

well as library to get the interest of good students. Nevertheless, none of these factors can prevent

us from concluding that social activities deserve the investment and putting a certain amount of

reliance on the notion that social activities not only provide student with social skill and build their leadership, but also show them the diversity of campus life.

Above all, I believe the investment in social activities is beneficial to students and will

definitely absorb students who are well-rounded.

2.In the busy and crowed world today, we should not expect people to

be polite to each other. Agree or disagree?

Today, politeness gets little attention as a traditional virtue. With the prosperity of society, there are increasing workload and pressure on people's shoulders. They become occupied by daily concerns, many see polite greetings as more dispensable than ever before. Admittedly,

avoiding the polite gestures can save time as well as energy. However, if taking into

consideration other factors, such as relationship between people and feeling of others, you may ask:" Is it really not necessary to be polite to others any more?" As far as I am concerned,

politeness is not outdated and that we should always show politeness to others.

First of all, people are paying less attention to polite greetings than in the past for various

reasons. Along with changing social and political attitudes, people are becoming busier; in these circumstances, good manners sometimes seem like a waste of time. Traditionally, Chinese people considered it friendly to talk while eating and to keep hands for a long time when

greeting. Although these behaviors still make individuals appear more hospitable, recently these conventions have been ignored because they take a long time to observe. In order to save time and energy , people have dispensed with several good but time-consuming manners.

Although one could argue that certain boring and intricate greeting manners should be

abandoned, basic politeness is not out of date. For instance, when we meet strangers at work or school, shaking hands for a long time wastes precious time; however, a simple and cheery hello is necessary to express friendship. Similarly, talking while eating sometimes prohibits people from concentrating; a simple gift may be equally effective at sending the same message.

Further, politeness is beneficial in many ways. Being polite is conducive to developing intimate friendships. A warm greeting upon meeting a friend, a heartfelt apology upon doing something wrong, and an expression of thanks when others offer help are all gestures that promote

friendship. In turn, receiving polite treatment from others can bring you a merry heart.

Meanwhile, the modern world stresses more and more on cooperation. Politeness is likely to promise you good cooperation with co-workers.

In conclusion, being polite can not only maintain relationship with others, but also led to

successful cooperation in the modern society. Above all, I believe although certain boring and complicated greetings have become outdated and should be abandoned, politeness is still

essential and offers numerous advantages.

3.The most important things people learn are from their families. Agree

or disagree?

When it comes to whether family members have the most important influence on individual, controversies arise among people with different perspectives and backgrounds. Some people say that families act as the first teacher and the companies through our life. They help us grow up to be rounded men and build our characteristics. On the other hand, some people claim that the development of individual depends largely on other factors, such as later life experience, friends and so on. Consequently, after pondering this problem on several occasions, I believe the most important thing people learn are from their families.

In the first place, family members are the first and primary teachers in our life. Parents give us birth and devote themselves into us. They guide us to learn to stand up, walk, and speak step by step. Also, they teach us the knowledge of the world and build and modify our personality. It is their selfless love that led us to the higher level and become a better man. I still remember the lesson my dad taught me when I was in high school. I had great difficulty

in studying that time and almost gave up myself. But one night, my dad came back home after work and talked to me:" Kid, you are very smart and I can always see the brilliant light inside you. I am proud of you. Remember, you should never say never." From that day on, dad spent

a plenty of his spare time guiding my subjects and gradually I had the confidence back to me.

Finally, I succeeded in the College Entrance Examination and was admitted by my ideal

university. I would always keep in the mind the words my dad said, which are "Never say never".

In the second place, family members are our invaluable life partners. Imagine life as long

journey and it will be dull and boring if traveling alone and having no one to share feelings.

Families are the most intimate and trustful companies in our life and they are exerting an

invisible and formative influence on us. They would give you comfort when you are in deep

sorrow, send you a hand when you are trapped in trouble and applause for you when achieve your success. Maybe sometimes you would not feel their company, but they actually are always by your side and give you the courage to move forward.

It is true that friends and life experience can contribute to the development of individual.

Nevertheless, none of these factors can prevent us from concluding that families not only build up people's personality at the early stage of life but also offer selfless love and company to us and putting a certain amount of reliance on the notion that families have the most important influence on people's life.

4.The most important goal of education is to teach people how to

educate themselves. Agree or disagree.

When it comes to the problem about what the most important goal of education is, controversies arise among people with different perspectives and backgrounds. Some people say it is primary for school teach students the most useful and practical skills which they can directly put into use.

On the other hand, some people state that basic skills should not be the optimal goal of

education. They think education serves as building people's moral characteristics and enriching their knowledge. Yet, after pondering this problem on several occasions, I believe that the most important goal for education is to teach people how to educate themselves. My reasons are listed as follows.

With the rapid development of society and technology, the requirements on people's ability has changed sharply and so dose those on education. Education now means more than just a sorts of basic skills or various of facts and knowledge of theoretical nature. These skills and

knowledge can also be acquired by oneself. The real target of education should be making

every individual a well-rounded person. In other word, he/she is supposed to not only be able to learn well, but also to know how to learn by himself and even explore further.

In the first place, people knowing how to educate themselves are more likely to acquire more

knowledge and go further in academy. If you want to get great achievement in school, it is

not enough to merely listen to the teachers' instructions and finish the homework they assign.

To reach a higher level, you need to use your spare time efficiently to educate yourself. For

instance, suppose you are a chemistry major students and want to write a paper on the topic of the recently discovered graphen, you must look through the Internet and books to collect

information about it; you also need to find the way to laboratory to perform some experiments, which could give you a better understanding of the new material. All these knowledge can not be acquired unless you find it by yourself. So it is very important for education to provide you with the methods about how to learn as well as how to get the answer by yourself.

In the second place, these well-rounded people have a much easier access to success in

their future work field. They could quickly adapt to the new requirements exposed by the rapid changing world. Because they can learn by themselves and acquire any skills and knowledge in front of them. It is obvious that they are more likely to be promoted and achieve success in

a company.

Finally, it is true that education can also serve as providing practical skills, elevating one's

emotion and so on. Nevertheless, it can not prevent us from concluding that knowing how to educate oneself can not only help you to get more knowledge and success in academy, but also promise you future success in work field and putting reliance on the notion that teaching people how to educate themselves should be the most important goal of education.

5.Parents should give school-age children money as reward for

getting high mark in school. Agree or disagree?

When it comes to that whether students should be given money as reward for getting a high mark in school, controversies arise among people with different perspectives and backgrounds.

Some people say the money reward can function as a motivator for the children to keep working hard. While other people disagree with that because they think the reward will have bad effect in the long run. Once the parents stop offering the reward, the students may get depressed and lost the motive to study. After pondering this problem on several occasions, I believe the

disadvantages of giving children money reward outweigh its advantages. My reasons are listed as follows.

First of all, the aim of learning is to gain knowledge about the world rather than get money

reward. In the years of school, students are in their golden age for studying. It is essential for them to hold a proper attitude toward study and grasp every minute to enrich themselves.

However, the action of parents to give children money reward can have negative influence on their attitude toward studying. They may view study merely as a way to attain money and only focus on gaining high grade in exam. Here I am not that high grade is a bad thing. What I

means is that children may ignore the knowledge they need to be well-rounded person. Also, they may learn to cope with the exam without having a deep understanding of the knowledge they learn. If so, what they learn is no more than ideas and facts of theoretical nature and has no benefit for their future.

In addition, it is true that reward can intrigue the interest of children of study at the beginning, but the children' grade may get affected in the long term. Children may mistake

the aim of studying as earning money. Once parents stop offering the money reward, it is likely that children will feel disrupted and lose their interests in studying. So students may eventually have a poor performance at school in the end.

Finally, what parents should do is to help their children build a correct attitude toward study

and develop inner interest in it. At their early stage, children have not formed a mature personality and can easily be affected by outside world. So it is important for parents to guide them with patience and edify them to hold a positive and proper attitude to study. After all, parents are the very first teachers in everyone's life.

The lecturer casts several contradictory views on the critical comments of the passage. She is convinced that fine lines found in the fossil strongly support the idea that the dinosaur had

feathers.

First of all, the fine lines could not be formed by decomposition of skin. According to the lecturer, other fossils found at the same site didn't show any sign of fine lines. So it is not likely that only the skin of the Sinosauropteryx decomposed and left these fine lines behind. Also, clear

examination of the lines reveals that they could have some sort of function.

In addition, it is easy to tell the difference between frill and feather. Because their chemical

compositions differ greatly from each other: there is a kind of unique protein only found in

feather. After careful analysis, scientists have detected this protein in these fine lines. Then it is safe to say that these lines are more possible to be feathers rather than frills.

Finally, it is true that feathers are mostly utilized to fly and keep warm. However, feathers of different part of body can also serve as different functions. It is found that some birds develop long colorful feathers, which are potential to attract mates. The speaker says that scientists have reconstructed the model of the feathers, discovering they are colorful. It seems that these feathers just functioned as attracting mates.

6. Should students in university take a part-time job? State your opinion.

When it comes to the problem that whether students should take part-time jobs while they

are in university, controversies arise among people with different perspectives and backgrounds.

Some people say that students should be give the chance to take a part-time job, which will provide them social experience as well as financial independence. While other people argue that the primary goal for college students is to learn knowledge and the part-time job would distract them from focusing on study. As far as I am concerned, college students are definitely should try to get a part-time job. Because as a student myself, I think it will bring us plenty of benefits.

First of all, through a part-time job, students in university will gain great amount of social experience. With the prosperity of society, the requirement on college graduates has changed rapidly. In the past, graduates with specific skills and knowledge would be welcomed by companies. But now besides degrees, students are also required to obtain some social knowledge, such as how to corporate with co-workers, how to be a leader, how

to speak in front of public and so on. These knowledge formally can not be acquired in the

campus. Actually, what students learn in university is idea and fact of only theoretical nature, which are likely to be of no use in the future. So it is essential for students to find a proper

part-time job to learn these social knowledge.

In addition, students are able to manage their own money and gain some sorts of financial independence. Usually, college students get their money directly from their parents. They would take it for granted, spending money to buy some stuff without practical use. There is

no idea of managing money in their minds at all. However, by taking a part-time job in spare time, they can earn an amount of money. They would spend this amount of money thriftily

and carefully manage it since it is earned by themselves. What's more, if students could earn enough money to afford daily expense, they would not need the money from parents and develop the sense of independence at the early stage, which will benefit their entire life.

Finally, it is true that the part-time job would occupy some spare time of the students and

they could use the time to delve further into the academy. Nevertheless, these factors can

not prevent us from concluding that the part-time job can not only bring college students invaluable social experience, but also be conducive to developing the financial independence and put a certain amount of reliance on the notion that it is beneficial for students in university to pick up a part-time job that is worth their time.

另附一篇综合写作模板

The lecturer cast several contradictory views on the statements of the passage. She is convinced that the "let it burn" policy does more advantages than damages to the environment.

First of all, the speaker holds that the fire is a natural part of the ecological system. The fire

not only deteriorate the trees and other vegetation, but also creates opportunity to new plants, such as smaller plants that need open area and access to sunlight. Fires actually add to the diversity of the forest.

Also, the wildlife in the national park was promoted rather than being damaged. It is stated in the passage that the habitats and food chains were destroyed after the big fire. However, the speaker says that the seeds of some plants disperse only under high heat. Meanwhile, thanks

to the replacement of new plants in the forest, animal feeding on them had more opportunities

to survive and thrive, thus leading to the formation of new food chains.

Finally, the tourist industry was not affected at all in the coming years after the big fire. According to the speaker, the big fire happened in a dry and rainless year, which was very

rare in the park. So fire as big as this one never occurred again since then and the local

tourist and economy recovered soon.

From the three points the professor discussed, we can clearly learned that?..