全球十大宜居城市排名

合集下载

中国宜居的城市有哪些地方(中国哪10座城市最适合宜居)

中国宜居的城市有哪些地方(中国哪10座城市最适合宜居)

中国宜居的城市有哪些地方(中国哪10座城市最适合宜居) 今天给各位分享中国宜居的城市有哪些地方的知识,其中也会对中国哪10座城市最适合宜居进行解释,如果能碰巧解决你现在面临的问题,别忘了关注本站,现在开始吧!本文目录我国最好居住的地方是哪里全国哪个城市适合居住和生活请问国内哪个城市四季都比较舒适,适合退休后长期居住中国的哪个省份最适合居住、生活在中国选一个一年四季都适宜生活的城市,你选哪一个厦门、珠海、海南、北海、西双版纳这几个城市哪里最宜居中国哪10座城市最适合宜居我国最好居住的地方是哪里全国最适合居住的地方是那里,为什么?一,有财有势全世界都有能力买房居住的人大都住到了那个国家,那么这国家就是最适合居住的地方。

二,很多有能力去国外居住,但不愿意屈居它国而居住在本国的某些城市,那就是中国最适合居住的城市(地方)。

三,对于普通工薪一族来说,能有住有工作,且能生活的比较好的地方,就是最适合自已居住的地方。

四,对农村出来打工的大部分人来说,最适合居住的地方是自已老家(小部分发了财的人已选枝另栖),农村才是自己最适合居住的地方。

鸟栖树技鱼居水,虎踞龙盘龟宿洞。

居住没有最好的地方,最适合自己的,就是你有这经济能力让自己的生活过的很有优越感的地方,就是你最适合居住的地方。

唉!天下难寻最好的男人,天下没有最好的女人,脑瓜中总想找到一个自已最好的另一半,结果啊,荒废了青春错过了时机。

光棍剩女就是这么来的。

其实啊,适合自己的,能和你同甘共苦一辈子的人,就是最适合你的人!全国哪个城市适合居住和生活江南好,最宜住杭州,西湖西子名天下,杭帮美味让人留,春品龙井拜灵隐,秋弄海潮观钱塘,古今多少骚墨客,指点江山入画中,真正赛天堂。

请问国内哪个城市四季都比较舒适,适合退休后长期居住我到过全国31个省市区的省会(首府),而且大多数都去过两次以上,住过十天半月的也不在少数。

依我看,昆明市是第一个最适宜人们居住的城市。

理由有四:首先,昆明是享誉世界的春城,冬无严寒,夏无酷暑。

世界十大最适宜居住的城市(转)

世界十大最适宜居住的城市(转)

世界十大最适宜居住的城市每年都会有全球最适宜人居的城市排行榜,今年也不例外。

只是不同的评价媒体和机构总会有自己的评价标准,不论以何种评价标准,能上榜单的城市总有自己独特之处,现将数个榜单城市进行整理推出(图片均来自于网络)。

通常来说,世界上最适宜居住的城市大都集中在北欧,加拿大和澳洲。

这些城市中有些城市已经去过,更多的城市留待将来环游世界再去看看。

世界十大最适宜居住的城市1:加大拿大温哥华:温哥华(Vancouver)位于加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省南端,三面环山,一面傍海。

虽处于和中国黑龙江省相近的高纬度,终年气候温和、湿润,环境宜人,多次被评选为全球最宜居城市,是加拿大著名的旅游胜地。

世界十大最适宜居住的城市2:丹麦哥本哈根.哥本哈根气候温和,城中没有太高的建筑,风景秀丽。

全市设置了低排放的城市生活标准。

城市结构以社区为重点,丹麦公民互相照顾、痴迷自行车等特点使它的排名居高不下。

在主办全球气候会议后,它以成为世界环保首都为目标。

世界十大最适宜居住的城市3:奥地利维也纳.维也纳位于奥地利东北部阿尔卑斯山北麓维也纳盆地之中,三面环山,波光粼粼的多瑙河穿城而过,四周环绕着著名的维也纳森林。

维也纳的名字始终是和音乐连在一起的。

许多音乐大师,如海顿、莫扎特、贝多芬、舒伯特、约翰·施特劳斯父子、格留克和勃拉姆斯都曾在此度过多年音乐生涯。

世界十大最适宜居住的城市4:德国慕尼黑.慕尼黑位于德国南部阿尔卑斯山北麓的伊萨尔河畔,是德国主要的经济、文化、科技和交通中心之一,也是欧洲最繁荣的城市之一。

慕尼黑同时又保留着原巴伐利亚王国都城的古朴风情,因此被人们称作“百万人的村庄”。

世界十大最适宜居住的城市5:澳大利亚墨尔本.墨尔本(Melbourne)是维多利亚州的首府和最大城市,澳大利亚的第二大城市,亦是世界上最知名的都市之一。

墨尔本的绿化覆盖率高达40%,维多利亚式的建筑物、有轨电车、歌剧院、画廊、博物馆以及绿树成荫的花园和街道构成了墨尔本市典雅的风格。

美国城市最宜居的排名

美国城市最宜居的排名

美国城市最宜居的排名导语:全美民众特别是千禧世代,认为生活品质最为重要,包括犯罪率、健保内容及普及性、教育品质、福利及通勤等项目。

将各项数据分为五大类指标,再依据访问全美数千民众的结果决定各项指标的权重,进而获得全美100大宜居城市排名。

第1名:丹佛,科罗拉多州 (Denver)第一名是丹佛!丹佛活跃的就业市场和较高的薪水让人们趋之若鹜。

这里的自然环境和居住环境也毫不逊色,成为了全美最受欢迎的宜居城市。

城市人口:2,651,392房屋价格中位数:$301,300年收入中位数:$53,060第2名:奥斯汀,德克萨斯州 (Austin)奥斯汀(Austin)是美国本土面积最大州得克萨斯州(State of T exas)的首府,始建于1835年,是得州第4大城市和全美第13大城市。

奥斯汀近几年发展十分快速,人口在过去五年间增长了9%。

除了越来越多科技公司和初创公司的入驻,奥斯汀还有着迷人的文化氛围和众多美食,对年轻人充满了吸引力。

城市人口:1,835,016房屋价格中位数:$240,000年收入中位数:$48,150第3名:费耶特维尔, 阿肯色州 (Fayetteville)费耶特维尔(Fayetteville, Arkansas)是美国阿肯色州第三大城市,相比于人均收入而言,Fayetteville是全美生活成本最低的城市。

此外这里的交通状况较好,节约了人们上班通勤的时间。

城市人口:483,396房屋价格中位数:$177,200年收入中位数:$42,410第4名:罗利市,北卡来罗纳州 (Raleigh-Durham)北卡罗来纳州的首府是罗利市(Raleigh)。

罗利市是北卡罗来纳州第二大城市。

罗利市到处是橡树,因此有橡树城之称。

受益于杜克大学闻名全国的医学研究,得哈姆有着全美最好的医疗系统之一。

此外,北卡州立大学,北卡大学分校和众多高等院校的落户,让整个城市被良好的教育环境所包围。

最近五年,得哈姆的人口增长数排名全美第二位。

中国目前十大最适合居住城市

中国目前十大最适合居住城市

中国目前十大最适合居住城市第一位:上海一项关于“宜居城市”的调查显示,在公众看来,“交通的方便性”、“城市是否干净整洁无污染”和“空气质量”是衡量一个城市是否适合生活的最重要指标。

上海是个适合生活的城市。

(创业环境好)第二位:大连在评价一个城市是否适合居住时,分别有47.9%、46.1%和43.9%的受访者认为“交通方便快捷”、“城市干净整洁无污染”和“空气质量好”是成为“宜居城市”的必要条件,明显高于“经济发展水平”、“社会治安状况”、“社会保障水平”等其他因素。

通过进一步分析发现,居民的文化层次越高,对于环境因素越为看重。

第三位:北京调查显示,“经济发达,经济发展迅速,经济实力强”是上海“宜居”的主要原因。

而北京的入选,很大程度上是由于“北京是中国的首都,在各方面都具有优势”。

(交通不方便,气候环境差)北京不一定宜居但它在各方面都是令人向往的。

第四位:威海“最适合人类居住和创业的城市”。

在两获联合国“改善人居环境最佳范例城市”奖、2003年10月又获得全球人居领域的最高奖项——“联合国人居奖”、使人居逐渐成为威海的城市品牌之后,威海的城市形象宣传广告词“最适合人类居住的城市”又多了“和创业”3个字!威海气候宜人。

春冷、夏凉、秋暖、冬温,适宜旅游。

威海盛产小麦、玉米、花生、苹果、三季梨、海米、大是、海参和多种鱼类。

威海是中国北方重要的对外开放城市,市政建设日新月异,下朝向以轻工业为主的新型港口城市方向发展。

第五位:成都成都的悠闲,成为这个城市被公众青睐的主要原因。

其娱乐业非常发达,是富人包二奶,置金屋,颐养天年的好地方。

许多外地的游客到成都来的一个主要的旅游项目就是饱眼福,而饱眼福的内容有三,其一是欣赏成都周边的风景名胜,如峨眉山和九寨沟之类;其二是啖名小吃,如夫妻肺片、麻婆豆腐和担担面之类;其三便是看美女。

美景可以赏心悦目,美食不仅可餐可食,那色香味俱佳的造型也可以大饱眼福,但更使外地人眼球转不过来的是美女。

【经济学人】2012全球宜居城市排行榜

【经济学人】2012全球宜居城市排行榜

TMA Summary of the Liveability Ranking and OverviewAugust 2012The Economist Intelligence Unit’s liveability surveyHow the rating worksThe concept of liveability is simple: it assesses which locations around the world provide the best or the worst living conditions. Assessing liveability has a broad range of uses. The survey originated as a means of testing whether Human Resource Departments needed to assign a hardship allowance as part of expatriate relocation packages. While this function is still a central potential use of the survey, it has also evolved as a broad means of benchmarking cities. This means that liveability is increasingly used by city councils, organisations or corporate entities looking to test their locations against others to see general areas where liveability can differ.The findings of the surveyNo change among top citiesWith Vancouver slipping down the ranking slightly in 2011, Melbourne remains the most liveable location of the 140 cities surveyed, followed by the Austrian capital, Vienna. In fact, there has been no change among the top tier. The score and ranking of the top 65 cities remain identical to six months ago. This may primarily reflect renewed stability as some economies begin to recover from the global economic crisis of a few years ago, although the continuing crisis in the euro zone and tighter fiscal budgets may have also slowed planned improvements, meaning that scores have remained static rather than moving up or down.Certainly, infrastructural development has been a driver over the last few years, with improvements to infrastructure in key cities in Australia, where the federal government initiated an ambitious long-term road-building programme in 2010. Vancouver is also embarking on a series of high-profile projects. Work began on an “Evergreen” mass transit line in 2012 and the authorities are reported to be considering measures such as “scramble intersections” or road tolls to counteract congestion. For cities in general, these measures will no doubt have a long-term benefit, but in the short term they can be disruptive.Many of these schemes are working towards long-term goals and thus the overall impact on scores in the top tier of cities is marginal. This is particularly the case in most developed cities given their already high score in these areas. There remains little difference between any of the ten most liveable cities: only 1.8 percentage points separate Melbourne in first place and Auckland in tenth place.The general conditions required for a location to be awarded a high liveability score continueto be well reflected in Australian and Canadian cities. It may be argued that violent crime is on an upward trend in the top tier of cities, but these figures should be put into context. Melbourne and Vancouver recorded murder rates of 2.7 and 2.5 per 100,000 population respectively in the year 2010/11. In Vienna, a city of 1.7m people, only 18 murders were reported in 2010 (or about 1.06 per 100,000). These figures compare with a US average of 4.8 homicides per 100,000 people (2010), with New York City reporting a rate of almost 6.4 in the same year. (The average in New York State was much lower at 4.5.) In South Africa, the rate was 31.9 in 2010/11.The performance of the most liveable cities reflects minimal variation between the scores of the top locations. As mentioned previously, only 1.8 percentage points separate the top ten cities, and some 63 cities (down to Santiago in Chile) are considered to be in the very top tier of liveability, where few problems are encountered. Although 16.8 percentage points separate Melbourne in first place and Santiago in 63rd place, both cities can lay claim to being on an equal footing in terms of presenting few, if any, challenges to residents’ lifestyles.That said, there does appear to be a correlation between the types of cities that sit right at the very top of the ranking. Those that score best tend to be mid-sized cities in wealthier countries with a relatively low population density. This can foster a range of recreational activities without leading to high crime levels or overburdened infrastructure. Eight of the top ten scoring cities are in Australia and Canada, with population densities of 2.88 and 3.40 people per sq km respectively. Elsewhere in the top ten, Finland and New Zealand both have densities of 16 people per sq km. These compare with a global (land) average of 45.65 and a US average of 32. Austria bucks this trend with a density of 100 people per sq km. However, Vienna’s population of 1.7m people is relatively small compared with the urban centres of New York, London, Paris or Tokyo.Global business centres tend to be victims of their own success. The “big city buzz” they enjoy can overstretch infrastructure and cause higher crime rates. New York, London, Paris and Tokyo are all prestigious hubs with a wealth of recreational activity, but all suffer from higher levels of crime, congestion and public transport problems than would be deemed comfortable. The question is how much wages, the cost of living and personal taste for a location can offset liveability factors. Although global centres fare less well in the ranking than mid-sized cities, for example, they still sit within the highest tier of liveability, so should be considered broadly comparable especially when compared with the worst-scoring locations.Continuing fallout from the Arab SpringElsewhere in the current survey, the impact of civil unrest on the position of cities in the ranking continues to be felt. In recent surveys, the Arab Spring, civil war in Libya and unrest in Greece andLondon had an impact on these cities’ scores. This has continued, with Athens, Amman (Muscat), Bandar Seri Begawan (Brunei), Douala (Cameroon) and Tripoli (Libya) seeing slight down¬ward revisions in their scores because of the impact of unrest.Of the poorer-scoring cities, 13 cities now occupy the very bottom tier of liveability, where ratings fall below 50% and most aspects of living are severely restricted. The relatively small number of cities in this tier partly reflects the intended scope of the ranking—the survey is designed to address a range of cities or business centres that people might want to live in or visit. For example, the survey does not include locations such as Kabul in Afghanistan and Baghdad in Iraq. It also reflects a degree of convergence, where levels of liveability generally improve more quickly in developing economies, over time. This is particularly noticeable among Chinese cities, with rising liveability scores for Suzhou, Guangzhou and Qingdao all pushing these locations up the ranking.Conflict is responsible for many of the lowest scores. This is not only because stability indicators have the highest single scores, but also because factors defining stability spread to have an adverse effect on other categories. For example, the threat of armed conflict will not just cause disruption in its own right, it will also damage infrastructure, overburden hospitals, and undermine the availability of goods, services and recreational activities. Africa (North and Sub-Saharan) and Asia account for all 13 cities, with violence, whether through crime, civil insurgency, terrorism or war, playing a strong role.Dhaka in Bangladesh is the least liveable city in our ranking with a score that is unchanged from last year.A note on methodologyThe Economist Intelligence Unit’s liveability rating quantifies the challenges that might be presented to an individual’s lifestyle in any given location, and allows for direct comparison between locations.Every city is assigned a rating of relative comfort for over 30 qualitative and quantitative factors across five broad categories: stability; healthcare; culture and environment; education; and infrastructure. Each factor in a city is rated as acceptable, tolerable, uncomfortable, undesirable or intolerable. For quali¬tative indicators, a rating is awarded based on the judgment of in-house analysts and in-city contributors. For quantitative indicators, a rating is calcul¬ated based on the relative performance of a number of external data points.The scores are then compiled and weighted to provide a score of 1–100, where 1 is considered intolerable and 100 is considered ideal. The liveability rating is provided both as an overall score and as a score for each category. To provide points of reference, the score is also given for each category relative to New York and an overall position in the ranking of 140 cities is provided.The suggested liveability scaleCompanies pay a premium (usually a percentage of a salary) to employees who move to cities where living conditions are particularly difficult, and there is excessive physical hardship or a notably unhealthy environment.The Economist Intelligence Unit has given a suggested allowance to correspond with the rating. However, the actual level of the allowance is often a matter of company policy. It is not uncommon, for example, for companies to pay higher allowances—perhaps up to double the Economist Intelligence Unit’s suggested level.Rating Description SuggestedHow the rating is calculatedThe liveability score is reached through category weights, which are equally divided into relevant subcategories to ensure that the score covers as many indicators as possible. Indicators are scored as acceptable, tolerable, uncomfortable, undesirable or intolerable. These are then weighted to produce a rating, where 100 means that liveability in a city is ideal and 1 means that it is intolerable.For qualitative variables, an “EIU rating” is awarded based on the judgment of in–house expert country analysts and a field correspondent based in each city. For quantitative variables, a rating is calculated based on the relative performance of a location using external data sources. Category 1: Stability (weight: 25% of total)Indicator SourceCategory 2: Healthcare (weight: 20% of total)Indicator SourceCategory 3: Culture & Environment (weight: 25% of total) Indicator SourceCategory 4: Education (weight: 10% of total)Indicator SourceCategory 5: Infrastructure (weight: 20% of total) Indicator SourceThe top ten cities(100=ideal; 0=intolerable)Country City Rank Overall Rating Stability Healthcare Culture & Education InfrastructureThe bottom ten cities(100=ideal; 0=intolerable)Country City Rank Overall Rating Stability Healthcare Culture & Education InfrastructureLiveability profile: Melbourne How the best city scoresLiveability profile: Dhaka How the worst city scoresPurchase the full reports at the EIU store Ranking & overview - Key findings of the survey and the global city rankingGlobal liveability survey - All scores broken down and available by cityGlobal liveability matrix - A premium interactive Excel workbook of all scores Worldwide Cost of Living serviceTo calculate equivalent salaries and compare the cost of living between different cities, please see our Worldwide Cost of Living service.T he analysis and content in our reports is derived from our extensive economic, financial, political and business risk analysis of over 203 countries worldwide.You may gain access to this information by signing up, free of charge, at .Click on the country name to go straight to the latest analysis of that country:Further reports are available from Economist Intelligence Unit and can be downloaded at .Should you wish to speak to a sales representative please telephone us:Americas: +1 212 698 9717Asia: +852 2585 3888Europe, Middle East & Africa: +44 (0)20 7576 8181l Canada l France l Germany l Italy G8 Countriesl Japan l Russia l United Kingdoml United States of America BRIC Countriesl India l Russia l ChinaCIVETS Countriesl Turkeyl South Africal Vietnam l Egypt l Colombia l Indonesia Or view the list of all the countries .Access analysis on over 200 countriesworldwide with the Economist Intelligence UnitMeet your specific research needs with our Custom Research serviceS uccessful strategies leave nothing to chance. That is why business leaders throughout the world commission custom research from the Economist Intelligence Unit to enrich their insight for sharper business decisions.EIU Custom Research was established in 2004 to provide a superior level of knowledge to clients who need a more thorough understanding of current markets and growth opportunities at a strategic or operational level. This specialist service delivers bespoke business intelligence that is deeper and broader than the published reports and subscription-based services for which we are renowned. BenchmarkingWe can provide a detailed evaluation of competitors operating in a market you are considering for expansion, evaluate local human capital, the overseas talent market, labour market conditions and how local regulations will affect your organisation—positively or negatively—to help you to prioritise markets for expansion and pinpoint hidden opportunities for growth and profitability.Find out more by reading this case study.Country analysisWe can provide you with an in-depth understanding of specific political and economics issues and forecasts including scenario analysis.You may be interested in business environment analysis or cross-country benchmarking—our global reach and ability to focus on your business needs within a cross-country framework is unparalleled.Find out more by reading this case study.ForecastingWe are able to help you to understand where you are most likely to find the greatest demand for your products or services—now, and over time. Our unrivalled database of over 200 countries, combined with our ability to offer more granular research, allows us to do this effectively.Find out more by reading this case study.IndexingOur expertise is not limited to business or government applications. We can combine our analysis and modelling capabilities with access to global academic experts to develop highly customised indexes that highlight particular factors that your organisation needs to be aware of.Find out more by reading this case study.Market sizingWe can help you to determine the best markets in which to expand, how to expand effectively, and what your organisation needs to be ready to manage this expansion. We do this by drawing from our peerless databases of macroeconomic and demographic analysis and forecasting, combined with sophisticated econometric modelling services.Find out more by reading this case study.Meet your specific research needs with our Custom Research serviceProduct demandWe can identify where the greatest demand for your product—and the greatest opportunity for expansion—may lie through our access to industry leaders, combined with our expert forecasting and analysis capabilities.Find out more by reading this case study.Risk analysisWe can identify obstacles your company may face from exposure to new markets and new opportunities in a comparative framework that sets unfamiliar markets and situations alongside places and activities you already know. We can provide country-specific, operational and financial risk ratings to helpyou to make informed decisions on a number of different indicators, including early warning of possible market and industry threats in areas such as security, tax policy, supply chain, regulatory, creditworthiness and labour markets.Find out more by reading this case study.Visit our website at /researchOrShould you wish to speak to a sales representative please telephone us:Americas: +1 212 698 9717Asia: +852 2585 3888Europe, Middle East & Africa: +44 (0)20 7576 8181Media Enquiries for theEconomist Intelligence Unit Europe, Middle East & Africa Tommy AllezTel: +44 (0)20 7592 7926Felicity McKaneTel: +44 (0)20 7932 1833Mobile: +44 (0) 7808 643 021Liam JacklinTel: +44 (0)207 932 1838Mobile: +44 (0)783 432 8661Email: allgraylingukeiu@AmericasGrayling New YorkRavi SunnakTel: + 1 (646) 359-2173Email: allgraylingukeiu@Kevin MaloneyTel: + 1 (646) 284-9417 Asia The Consultancy Tom Engel +852 3114 6337 / +852 9577 7106tengel@ Ian Fok +852 3114 6335 / +852 9348 4484ifok@ Rhonda Taylor +852 3114 6335rtaylor@ Australia and New Zealand Cape Public Relations Telephone: (02) 8218 2190 Sara Crowe M: 0437 161916sara@Luke RobertsM: 0422 855 930luke@While every effort has been taken to verify the accuracy of this information, The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. cannot accept any responsibility or liabilityfor reliance by any person on this report or any ofthe information, opinions or conclusions set outin this report.TM LONDON26 Red Lion Square LondonWC1R 4HQUnited KingdomTel: (44.20) 7576 8000 Fax: (44.20) 7576 8500E-mail: london@ NEW YORK750 Third Avenue5th FloorNew York, NY 10017United StatesTel: (1.212) 554 0600 Fax: (1.212) 586 1181/2E-mail: newyork@ HONG KONG6001, Central Plaza18 Harbour Road WanchaiHong KongTel: (852) 2585 3888 Fax: (852) 2802 7638E-mail: hongkong@ GENEVABoulevard des Tranchées 16 1206 Geneva SwitzerlandTel: (41) 22 566 2470 Fax: (41) 22 346 93 47。

全球十大最幸福国家和城市

全球十大最幸福国家和城市

全球十大最幸福国家根据收入水平、生活水平、就业率、居民心理健康和家庭稳定度,联合国发布的全球幸福报告评选了全球十大最幸福的国家。

现在,就跟着英国《每日电讯报》的报道,去领略这十个国家的风采,一起去寻找幸福吧。

第一名:丹麦,这个人口数仅有550万的国家排在全球最幸福的国家首位,这一点都不令人奇怪。

自1973年起,丹麦在欧洲委员会欧洲晴雨表的调查中位列第一,它是针对成员国市民的健康和幸福的一项调查。

第二名:挪威,今年年初,挪威也在列格坦研究所的全球繁荣指数中,被认为是全球最幸福的国家。

在95%的调查中,他们都为自己能够有选择生活方向的自由而感到高兴。

挪威的人均国内生产总值每年高达36088英镑(人民币约35万),居民的生活满意度也排在全球第二位。

第三名:瑞士,瑞士在最幸福国家中排名第三。

而根据最新的世界经济论坛报告,瑞士连续五年蝉联最具竞争力国家的榜首。

其获奖理由为:教育的出色、市场的活力以及创新的实力。

第四名:荷兰,荷兰在去年的全球幸福报告中同样排名第四。

它因其自由的政策和美味的啤酒而闻名。

第五名:瑞典,在经济合作与发展组织的调查中,瑞典人对自己的生活有着平均7.6的满意度,这是调查中的高分之一。

第六名:加拿大,因其高收入水平和平均寿命,加拿大在今年的全球幸福报告中是排名第六。

根据经济合作与发展组织的幸福指数,94%的加拿大人认为他们认识在需要的时候可以依靠的人,而82%的民众认为他们平时能积极的面对消极的体验。

第七名:芬兰,根据列格坦研究所的全球繁荣指数,芬兰是全球生活质量最高的国家,而根据全球和平指数,它也是世界上最和平的国家之一。

第八名:奥地利,这个多山的陆地国家仅有人口847万人,以丰富的音乐和艺术场景而闻名。

根据今年国际货币基金组织发布的数据,奥地利也是全球最富有的国家之一。

第九名:冰岛,冰岛是一个位于北欧的岛国。

它不仅给居民提供相对较低的所得税,还有免费的医疗保健和直至中学的义务教育。

美国宜居城市揭秘原来这10个州最适合有钱人居住

美国宜居城市揭秘原来这10个州最适合有钱人居住

美国宜居城市揭秘原来这10个州最适合有钱人居住对于之前的观念“人怕出名猪怕壮”,有了财富绝对是不愿意被别人知道,但是现在人们的观念已经他有所改变,显示自己通过自己努力获得财富是一种社会积极现象,甚至被当做成功的典范。

很多富人都会将自己的子女送到国外留学,进而引发中国今年来的留学热!因为留学热带来另外一个风尚或者热潮——移民热潮!除了要考虑到自己子女就读院校所在地进行购买房屋之外,更多的是根据各个州的宜居程度进行购房等等事宜的考虑!今天点课台君就带着大家一起来看看全美最适合有有钱人居住的TOP州!要知道为有钱人选择合适的居住的地方并不是很容哟!以下的TOP10最适宜州是由美国的理财网站GoBankingRate进行调查评估而得出来的!该排名综合考虑5大类12项因素:工作及收入:家庭收入中位数、州失业率住房:房屋售价中值、有效州财产税生活方式:法定税率、年度育儿费、杂物费、学区级别医疗健康:平均家庭健康保险费、雇主对雇员健康保险的贡献比例安全性:暴力犯罪发生率、财产犯罪率PS:每一类因素都按照标准化形式从0到100打分,0分为最差,100分为最好。

每类因素的美国全国平均分数分别为:(1)工作及收入,46;(2)住房,68;(3)生活方式,57;(4)医疗健康,55;(5)安全性,60以下便是评分最高的TOP10州:10. 科罗拉多州工作及收入指数:66住房指数:66生活方式指数:60医疗健康指数:54安全指数:61排在美国最宜富人居住的第十位城市是科罗拉多。

科罗拉多州是美国西部的一州,首府兼最大城为丹佛。

之所以能够上榜,归功于它较高的家中收入中位数,相对较低的消费税和失业率。

科罗拉多州的失业率为3.7%,是全国失业率最低的城市之一。

此外,科罗拉多的家庭收入中位数也高于很多州。

9. 爱达荷工作及收入指数:49住房指数:78生活方式指数:53医疗健康指数:56安全指数:70与科罗拉多州一样,爱达荷州也有着3.7%的失业率,但它的房价低于科罗拉多州,因此在住房指数上得分更高。

中国最适合居住的20座城市排名

中国最适合居住的20座城市排名

中国最适合居住的20座城市排名第二十名厦门厦门是一座风姿绰约的“海上花园”。

被海水环绕的城市,环境十分干净整洁,气候宜人,一年四季花木繁盛。

由于生态环境好吸引了大量白鹭来此栖息,又被称做“鹭岛”。

第十九名青岛青岛这座满城啤酒飘香的城市,“红瓦绿树,碧海蓝天”就是它的真是写照,成群的海鸥,大片经典的欧式老建筑是这里最独特的风景。

明显的海洋性气候特点,四季分明,空气特别湿润,一年四季都可以吃上不同的海味。

第十八名秦皇岛秦皇岛是中国唯一因皇帝名号而得名的城市,这里山水相依,气候宜人,夏无酷暑,冬无严寒。

环境是它最大的优势,金沙碧海、天蓝水清、空气洁净,森林覆盖率非常高,成了400多种鸟类的乐园。

第十七名丽江丽江没有严寒酷暑,只有温凉更迭,这里的纳西文明、自然环境吸引着大批的人前来,它是中国游客重游率最高的城市,客栈文化堪称全国之最,来了这里,随便找个地方坐下来发发呆、喝喝茶、晒晒太阳,都是一种享受。

第十六名昆明昆明四季如春,享有“春城”的美誉,这里的鲜花即使是冬天都开的娇艳,滇池和翠湖每年都有越冬的海鸥如约而来。

这里的物价相对较低,能保持较高的生活水准,而且作为云南的省会城市,它还享有相当大的优势,简直是一块生活的乐土。

第十五名嘉兴嘉兴自古就是富庶繁华之地,“丝绸之府”、“鱼米之乡”,四季分明,气温适中,没有大幅度的温差。

有众多的河流和星星点点的湖泊,极其丰富的水产品,而且嘉兴物价稳定,治安也特别好。

第十四名天津中国第三大城市,位于环渤海经济圈的中心,是中国北方最大的沿海开放城市、近代北方最早对外开放的沿海城市之一。

天津是中国近代工业的发源地,曾有9国租界,而天津的五大道素有“万国建筑博览会”之称,滨海新区被誉为“中国经济第三增长极”。

第十三名杭州杭州这座“人间天堂”城市,拥有了秀美的西湖,湖光山色,好不令人向往。

但它的美不仅仅止于这一潭湖水,上千年的历史积淀,孕育出大量人文古迹,既有江南水乡的古典雅致,又有国际化时尚的潮位。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

音乐:普罗旺斯的色彩
【环球网综合报道】8月28日,英国经济学
人智库(EIU)发布了最新一期全球宜居城市排名。

这份排名根据多项标准对全世界140个
城市适宜居住的程度加以评估,评选出全球
最适宜居住的城市。

今年墨尔本连续第三年
排名位居全球宜居城市榜首,维也纳排名第二,温哥华排名第三。

澳大利亚共有四个城
市进入该榜单前十名,其他三个城市依次是
排名第七的悉尼、排名第八的阿德莱德和排
名第九的珀斯;加拿大有三个城市入围该榜单,分别为排名第三的温哥华、排名第四的多伦
多和排名第五的卡尔加里。

其他两名分别是:芬兰(第六);奥克兰(第十)。

墨尔本——澳大利亚
墨尔本是澳式足球的发源地,1956年奥运会的举办地,澳大利亚网球公开赛和一级方程式赛车澳大利亚大奖赛的主办地。

拥有众多头衔的墨尔本无疑是澳大利亚最有体育精神的城市。

墨尔本也是一个时尚之都,在服饰、艺术、音乐、电视制作、电影、舞蹈等潮流文化领域引领全澳,甚至在全球某些领域具备影响力。

维也纳——奥地利
维也纳不仅是新艺术装饰风格爱好者们的麦加,也是古典音乐迷心中不可替代的圣地。

众多宫殿宅第和博物馆,把辉煌的传统和现代的生活紧密联系在一起。

在这里曾造就了海顿、莫扎特、贝多芬、舒伯特、施特劳斯等享誉世界的音乐大师和名家。

温哥华曾荣登榜首,今年位居第三。

从十年前的一个小城镇发展到今天的大都市,温哥华的成长令人咂舌。

如今,温哥华以开放的心态迎接来自世界各地的移民(主要是亚洲)。

从温哥华街头餐馆菜单里丰富多样的菜肴中,你就能窥见这座城市民族融合之一般了。

多伦多是北美第四大城市,来自世界各地的年轻移民让这座城市焕发出前所未有的生机。

才华横溢的时尚设计师、艺术家、建筑师和音乐家齐聚多伦多,让这所城市越发富有创造力。

卡尔加里——加拿大
卡尔加里是加拿大的第一个城市,也是世界上最干净的城市之一,同时,它又保留着老西部的精髓,在这里,可以观看”世界上最精彩的户外表演”,领略到真正的西部精神。

策马奔腾、激情四射的牛仔热情会让人热血沸腾,而落基山脉的绝美风光和朴实的牛仔生活又让人内心宁静。

李安就是在这里拍摄了他的《断背山》。

赫尔辛基——芬兰
在2012年荣膺“世界设计之都”的赫尔辛基,作为欧洲最繁荣的国家之一的首都,今年又入围了“全球宜居10大城市”名单。

悉尼——澳大利亚
悉尼是一座完美的旅游城市,这里有游客们渴望看到的一切:冲浪海滩、世界级的美味、丰富的夜生活、高档的购物中心、美术馆、博物馆、美丽的维多利亚公园,还有一定不能错过的悉尼歌剧院。

这座白色的贝壳式建筑被誉为20世界最伟大的建筑物之一。

阿德莱德---澳大利亚
-
树影婆娑的林荫大道和维多利亚时代的绿地成就了阿德莱德“澳大利亚最优雅城市”的美名。

在其他“非南方”澳大利亚人心中,阿德莱德最有影响力的两张名片是唐•布拉德曼爵士和唐•邓斯坦,前者是澳大利亚最伟大的板球运动员,逝世后也葬在了阿德莱德;后者是一位风风火火的州长,20世界60年代曾穿一条粉红色的短裤去议会议事。

珀斯——澳大利亚
有“黑天鹅之城”美誉的珀斯正在渐渐褪去少年般的青涩,绽放成熟的魅力。

当地经济正在蓬勃发展,吸引着世界各地的人才和投资商。

而珀斯人地中海式自由悠闲的生活方式让这座城市显得更加迷人。

奥克兰——新西兰
奥克兰是新西兰在北岛最大的城市,有“帆之都”的美誉。

现今的奥克兰为新西兰最发达的地区之一,城市环绕着怀特玛塔港(Waitemata Harbour)和豪拉基湾(Hauraki Gulf)两岸建设,也因而造就了新西兰海岸都市的独特风格。

2013-09-03网络图
片资料。

相关文档
最新文档