Literature Review

合集下载

文献综述写法与技巧

文献综述写法与技巧
▪ ④⋯⋯依然是一个尚待解决的问题: ⋯remains an unsolved problem.
▪ ⑤关于⋯⋯目前有两种解释: Two theories have been postulated to explain⋯
▪ ⑥第一种理论认为⋯⋯, 而第二种理论则认为⋯⋯: The first theory proposes that⋯, whereas the second theory proposes that⋯
▪ 2.1 引言(Introduction)
▪ 引言是文献综述正文的开始部分,主要包 括两个内容:一是提出问题;二是介绍综 述的范围和内容。提出问题时,作者要给 出定义性解释、交代研究背景、简单介绍 不同文献的看法和分歧所在并介绍该文献 的写作目的;介绍该综述的范围和主要内 容时,作者应使用简明扼要的语句加以概 括。引言部分通常为200~300词。
that⋯ ▪ ②由此可见⋯⋯:It can be seen from this that⋯ ▪ ③⋯⋯有(不)可能:It is (not) possible /
probable / likely that⋯ ▪ ④⋯⋯是合乎情理的: It stands to reason that⋯ ▪ ⑤毫无疑问: There is no doubt that⋯ ▪ ⑥显然: It is obvious / clear / apparent / evident
Literature Review
▪ 文献综述(Literature Review)是科研论 文中重要的文体之一。它以作者对各种文 献资料的整理、归纳、分析和比较为基础, 就某个专题的历史背景、前人的工作、研 究现状、争论的焦点及发展前景等方面进 行综合、总结和评论。通过阅读文献综述, 科研工作者可花费较少的时间获得较多的 关于某一专题系统而具体的信息,了解其 研究现状、存在的问题和未来的发展方向。 因此,它的学术水平和价值受到特别的重 视。文献综述往往被收集在专业期刊的 Review栏目中,常见的有Survey,

literature review范例

literature review范例

literature review范例Literature Review范例随着科技的不断发展,人们对于科学研究的需求也越来越高。

文献综述一直是科研领域中十分重要的一个环节,它可以帮助研究者了解已有的研究成果,同时也可以帮助研究者定位自己的研究方向。

本文将对文献综述的相关内容进行介绍和分析。

一、文献综述的定义文献综述是指研究者通过查阅相关文献,对自己的研究方向和问题进行全面、系统、深入的阐述和分析,从而确定研究的目标、方向、方法和实施步骤的一种方法。

文献综述不仅是科学研究的一个必要环节,而且也是学术论文的重要组成部分。

二、文献综述的目的文献综述的目的是为了帮助研究者了解已有的研究成果,从而避免重复已有的研究,同时也可以让研究者了解当前研究领域的热点和前沿问题,从而确定自己的研究方向。

此外,文献综述还可以用来评价已有的研究成果,从而为自己的研究提供参考。

三、文献综述的内容文献综述的内容应该包括以下几个方面:1.研究领域的概述:对当前研究领域的发展历史、研究方向、研究方法等进行介绍。

2.前人研究的概述:对已有的研究成果进行介绍和总结,包括前人研究的主要内容、研究方法、实验结果、结论等。

3.前人研究存在的问题:对前人研究中存在的问题和不足进行分析和总结,从而为自己的研究提供参考。

4.研究方案的设计:根据前人研究的不足和自己的研究目标,设计出自己的研究方案,包括研究的目标、研究方法、实验设计等。

四、文献综述的方法文献综述的方法主要包括以下几个步骤:1.明确研究领域和研究问题。

2.查找相关文献,包括学术论文、专业书籍、学位论文等。

3.对文献进行筛选和阅读,选择与自己研究方向相关的文献进行综述。

4.对文献进行分析和总结,从而确定自己的研究方向和研究方法。

五、文献综述的注意事项1.注意文献的来源和可靠性,避免使用一些不严谨的文献。

2.注意文献的时间,尽量使用最新的研究成果。

3.注意文献的数量和质量,不要只看数量而忽略了质量。

literaturereview文献综述的写法(英文版)

literaturereview文献综述的写法(英文版)

literaturereview⽂献综述的写法(英⽂版)Literature ReviewThis packet details the steps necessary to produce a literature review that may be required for work in various disciplines, including English, history and psychology. This packet is not intended to replace instructor guidelines and should not be used in that manner. The packet’s intended use is as a supplement to classroom instruction on assembling a literature review. Therefore, it contains only general information that must be tailored to fit specific guidelines as required by your discipline and by your instructor.This packet is subdivided into six sections:I. General InformationStates what a literature review is and what purpose it serves.II. ProcessGives step-by-step instructions on how to get started on your literature review.III. OrganizationExplains the two most common ways of arranging information in a literature review.IV. FormatProvides descriptions for two of the most common formats used in a literature review, the item to item comparison and contrast (Format A) and the criteria to criteria comparison and contrast (Format B).V. ChecklistAllows appraisal of your completed literature review to assure that it follows all necessary guidelines.VI. ResourcesLists helpful resources used to compile this packet so that you may obtain further information.M General Information MDefinitionLiterature reviews can have two roles: In their first role, they function as a stand-alone paper. At other times they will actually be part of a larger research thesis. In this handout, literature reviews will be referred to in the stand-alone sense. As a stand-alone paper, literature reviews are multi-layered and are more formal and detailed than book reviews. As the author of a literature review, you must become familiar with a large amount of research on a specific topic. You will then develop your own thesis about the topic related to this research. After this, you will classify and critically analyze research on the topic by making a comparison between several different studies and by emphasizing how these studies and their comparison relate to your own thesis.In effect, a literature review is a paper that compiles, outlines and evaluates previously established research and relates it to your own thesis. It provides a context for readers as if theywere researching the topic on their own. Just from reading your paper, readers should be able to gain insight into the amountand quality of research on the topic. Your thesis and the literature reviewed serve several important functions within the paper:Your thesis creates a foundation for the literature review because it helps narrow the topic by providing a sense of direction; however, you will have to conduct some initial research and reading before deciding on an appropriate thesis. Your personal thesis may be a statement addressing some of the following situations: “why your research needs to be carried out, how you came to choose certain methodologies or theories to work with, how your work adds to the research already carried out”(Brightwell, G. and Shaw, J., 1997-98), or it may present some other logical perspective.Reviewed literature is organized in a logical manner that best suits the topic of the review and the hypothesis of the literature (see Organization and Format). The selected method of organization and style of format should draw attention to similarities and differences among the reviewed literature; these similarities and differences are based on specific criteria you revealed in the literature review’s introduction. According to Brightwell and Shaw (1997-98), your goal in the body of the review “. . . should be to evaluate and show relationships between the work already done (Is Researcher Y’s theory more convincing than Researcher X’s? Did Researcher X build on the work of Researcher Y?) and between this work and your own [thesis].” Additional information on these topics can be found in the Organization and Format sections of this packet. Therefore, carefully planned organization is an essential part of any literature review.PurposeAlthough literature reviews may vary according to discipline, their overall goal is similar. A literature review serves as a compilation of the most significant sources on a subject and relates the findings of each of these sources in a rational manner while supporting the literature review author’s own thesis. A literature review establishes which sources are most relevant to its author’s point and which sources are most credible to the discipline at hand.In a literature review, the results of previous research are summarized, organized and evaluated. Discipline-SpecificityA literature review’s organization, format, level of detail and citation style may vary according to discipline because different disciplines have different audiences. Examples here pertain to the natural sciences, social sciences and humanities.Natural and social sciences The author of a literature review in the natural or social sciences must pay close attention to measurements, study populations and technical aspects of experimental findings. Typically, a portion of the natural or social sciences literature review is set aside for reviewing sources on the primary topic. Then, a comparative analysis or discussion section is used to analyze the similarities and differences among the sources, tying them in with the literature review author’s original thesis.Humanities The author of a literature review in the humanities usually does not set aside a special section for reviewing the sources; instead, citations may be found randomly throughout the paper. The literature being reviewed is arranged according to paragraphs based on the author’s points, which in turn, support the author’s thesis. The paper itself may not be called a literature review at all. It is more likely to be called a critical analysis.Remember that the best bet for determining what type of literature review is appropriate for your course is checking with the instructor prior to beginning research.REVIEW1. What is the purpose of a literature review? What is the connection between theauthor’s thesis and the literature being reviewed?2. What discipline will your literature review be classified in?M Process M1. Find several articles that deal with your research topic. Sometimes it is helpful to review the bibliography of one of the first scholarly sources that you encounter and compare it to the bibliographies of other sources on the topic. If the same source is listed within several of these bibliographies, it is probably a fundamental, credible source that will aid you in your review.2. Before you begin reviewing literature, realize that you are looking to accomplish two things:A. Defining your research problem/thesis (examples: finding a flaw inresearch, continuing previous research, etc . . .)B. Reading and evaluating significant works that are relevant to yourresearch problem.You will be conducting Steps A and B simultaneously because the two form a circular pattern. As you read related sources (Step B), you define your problem, and as you define your problem (Step A) you will more easily be able to decide what material is relevant enough to be worthy of reading (Step B).3. Once you begin reviewing, make an entry with complete bibliographical information and comments for each work that you are going to include in the review.4. Compare the articles by evaluating the similarities and differences among them. This will be the initial stage in the formulation of your thesis.5. Form a thesis that is clearly written and can be logically supported by the literature you will include in your review.6. View the articles briefly again and jot down any notes that seem to relateto your thesis.7. Decide which organizational pattern and format are best for the topic of your review.8. Construct an appropriate outline for the literature review.9. Write an introduction that introduces the topic, reveals your thesis statement, and arranges key issues.10. Organize and write the body of your paper according to the appropriate format: topical or chronological.11. Write a conclusion that reconciles similarities and differences on the topic and reemphasizes the criteria used to arrive at this conclusion./doc/8b508cc25fbfc77da269b1c1.html plete the final draft of the literature review.13. Check over the final draft for grammar and punctuation errors.14. Use the checklist provided here to make sure that all parts of the literature review are addressed and focused. REVIEW1. What do you consider to be the most crucial step(s) in the process of your literature review ? Why? Justify your response(s).A literature review can be arranged either topically or chronologically.Topical organization occurs in reviews where previous research being evaluated is divided into segments with each one representing a part of some larger issue. In a topical review, the author begins by describing the characteristics of research shared by several studies and then moves on to analyze their similarities and differences. For more information, see the example below.ExampleThe organization of a literature review begins in the introduction. For example, in the introduction of a literature review about the effect of seating arrangements on peer tutoringcommunication, you would first introduce the topic and what your literature review will attempt to assess:…Writing centers can set the table for collaborative tutoring sessions through a careful consideration of spatial arrangement . . .Then state what angle is going to be explored:…These studies will be used to support the author’s claims that spatial arrangement is instrumental in encouraging collaborative environments in the writing center…Then, arrange key issues that will be addressed in this review by answering questions that you have personally developedand are tailored to fit your topic. In the introduction, give the audience a clear picture of how you will organize your paper: Establishing a Critical Response for a Literature ReviewYou may find this section helpful at Steps 3, 4 and 5 of the process. When reviewing your sources, explore the following areas to help develop your critical response:What is the purpose of the research or work?What research or literary methods are used?How do the major concepts operate?In a research study, how accurate are the measurements?In a literary work, is the author’s position objective or biased? What are the different interpretations of the results of the study or of the literary work itself?M Organization MIn the following, I1 first review some relevant research concerning spatial arrangement and then discuss some recommended and alternate seating arrangements to encourage a collaborative environment in the writing center. Finally, I include some other considerations.In the body of this literature review, you would organize the information topically around each point (or question) that you asked yourself:-Research Review-Recommended Spatial Arrangement-Alternative Spatial Arrangement-Other ConsiderationsThen, write a conclusion that explains the significance of your findings:…While the seating arrangements outlined above are generally a good ‘setting’ for peer tutoring sessions, we should remember that each tutoring session is unique. Not all students will be comfortable with a side-by-side spatial arrangement at a round table. Tutors should be perceptive of and receptive to students who may have other spatial needs…Chronological organization occurs when a review is organized in time order and is most often used when a historical context is needed for discussing a topic from its beginning to its current state; chronological organization is especially helpful when discussing inactive periods and shifts in perspective on a given topic.ExampleThe organization of a literature review begins in the introduction. For example, in the introduction of a literature review entitled Development of Social Science Research on Attitudes Towards Gender in America, you would first introduce the topic and what your review hopes to assess:…This literature review will assess the development of research designed to uncover gender attitudes in America during the latter part of the 20th Century…Then state what angle is going to be explored:..As research progressed throughout the 20th century, the methods that social scientists use for measuring these attitudes developed and changed as well…Then, chronologically arrange issues that will be addressed in this review:Gender stereotypes still exist today, and varying attitudes can be traced over the past fifty years. Survey instruments used to gather data on these varying attitudes have also changed drastically over the course of time.In the body of this literature review, you would organize the information chronologically, adressing each point (or question)that is being asked for a particular time period:-Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1950’s-Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1960’s-Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1970’s-Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1980’s-Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1990’s-Current Advancements1 Always clear the use of I with your instructor. An alternative to this would be the use of third person wording, such as “This paper reviews some relevant research concerning spatial arrangement and then discusses some recommended and alternate seating arrangements to encourage a collaborative environment in the writing center.”Then, write a conclusion that explains the significance of your findings:Although the survey instruments used in the 1950’s and 1960’s developed an obvious bias when surveying Americans regarding gender attitudes, the 1970’s brought about great change. Today social scientists are more careful than ever about testing the quality of a survey instrument before using it on the general public.M Format MThere are also two suggested formats for composing your literature review. Format A is used when comparing several studies that have similar hypothesis but different findings. Each piece of research is summarized individually. Format A is good for reviews with a small number of entries; however, this format may confuse the audience when used with a large number of reviews because descriptions of so many studies may get in the way of the analysis. Keep in mind that each piece of research usually will not receive equal attention in the review.Format A OutlineI. Introduction consists of four parts that are usually discussed in one paragraph.a. Identify the general topic being discussed.b. Mention trends published about the topic.c. State thesis establishing the reason for writing the literaturereview.d. Explain criteria by giving a description of each of the criteria used in evaluating theliterature review and rationalizing its organizationII. Literature reviewed section is divided up according to study.a.First study is summarized and discussed.b.Second study is summarized and discussed.c. Third study is summarized and discussed.III. Comparative analysis acknowledges the similarities and differences between studies.a. Similarities (if any) among the studies are evaluated and discussed.b. Differences (if any) among the studies are evaluated and discussed.IV. Conclusion/Summary effectively wraps up the review.a.Summarize points of comparison or contrast among the works based on Section IIIof your review.b.Provide insight of relationship between the topic of the review and a larger area ofstudy such as a specific discipline or professionFormat B organizes the literature review according to similarities and differences among research rather than by literature studied. In a review organized according to Format B, little background information on the literature being reviewed is given outright. Instead, it is worked into the body paragraphs of the sections on similarities and differences. The conclusion then uses these two sections (similarities and differences) to tie in points of comparison and contrast between the works. Format B better suits papers that are topically organized. Format B is outlined below.Format B OutlineI. Introduction consists of four parts usually discussed in one paragraph.a. Identify the general topic being discussed.b. Mention trends published about the topic.c. State thesis establishing the reason for writing the literaturereview.d. Explain criteria by giving a description of each of the criteria used in evaluating theliterature review and rationalizing its organizationII.Similiarities within the research are discussed.a. First similarity among research is discussed.b. Second similarity among research is discussed.c. Third similiarity among research is discussed.III. Differences in the research are discussed.a.First difference between research is discussedb.Second difference between research is discussedc.Third difference between research is discussedIV. Conclusion/Summarya. Summarize points of comparison or contrast between the works.b. Provide insight into relationship between the topic of the literature and a largerarea of study such as a specific discipline or profession.The most important thing to remember when organizing a literature review is that it is not a list summarizing one work after another. The review should be organized into sections according to theme that are set apart by subject-related headings. REVIEW1.Which format have you chosen for your literature review? Why?M A Literature Review Checklist: MDid I . . . . . . ?□ Establish a valid thesis based on the examined research□ State this thesis clearly in my introduction□ Define unfamiliar terms□ Incorporate background information to define the problem□ Begin each entry in the review with a complete bibliographical reference□ List and describe the hypothesis/thesis in each work reviewed□ Describe the outcome of the work or the research□ Develop and incorporate my own comments, including response to the research, similarities and differences among literature reviewed, and reservations regarding author’s methods or conclusions□ Avoid overquoting□ Check for grammar and punctuation errors□ Correctly cite all references in uniform documentation styleM Resources MBrightwell, G. and Shaw, J. (1997-98). Writing up research. RetrievedAugust 20, 2002 from Languages and Educational Development at theAsian Institute of Technology’s Web page at/doc/8b508cc25fbfc77da269b1c1.html nguages.ait.ac.th/EL21OPEN.HTMCentral Queensland University Library. (2000). The literature review. RetrievedJuly 22, 2003 from /doc/8b508cc25fbfc77da269b1c1.html .au/litreviewpages/Cuba, L. (2002). A short guide to writing about social science. New York:Addison-Wesley Publishers.Leibensperger, S. (2003). Setting the table: Encouraging collaborative environments with spatial arrangement in the writing center. Unpublished literature review.Northern Arizona University. (1999). Electronic textbook - A blast from thepast: Your literature review. Retrieved May 30, 2002 from/doc/8b508cc25fbfc77da269b1c1.html /~mid/edr720/class/literature/blast/reading2-1-1.htmlTaylor, D., & Procter, M. (2001). The literature review: A few tips onconducting it. Retrieved June 17, 2002 fromhttp://www.utoronto.ca/writing/litrev.htmlTrinder, L. (2002). Appendix. The literature review. Retrieved August 27, 2003/doc/8b508cc25fbfc77da269b1c1.html /~w071/teaching/ppf/Appendix%20Lit%20Review.pdfThe University of Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center. (2001). Academicwriting: Reviews of literature. Retrieved May 30, 2002 from/doc/8b508cc25fbfc77da269b1c1.html /writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html*In traditional APA style, this section would be entitled “References” and would be listed on a separate page double-spaced. Due to space constraints in this packet, it has been formatted differently.Copyright 2003 by the Academic Center and the University of Houston-Victoria.Created 2003 by Candice Chovanec-Melzow.。

literature review的introduction

literature review的introduction

literature review的introductionIntroductionLiterature review is an essential component of academic research papers and dissertations. It involves systematically analyzing previous studies, theories, and scholarly articles relevant to the topic under investigation. By reviewing existing literature, researchers gain a comprehensive understanding of the existing knowledge, identify research gaps, and develop a theoretical framework for their own study. This introduction will discuss the importance of literature review, its purpose, and how it contributes to the overall research process.Importance of Literature ReviewLiterature review plays a crucial role in academic research as it helps establish the context and theoretical foundation for a study. It allows researchers to build upon prior work and contributes to the progression of knowledge in their specific field. By examining existing literature, researchers can identify the key theories, concepts, methodologies, and findings that are relevant to their research question. This process enables them to position their study within the existing scholarly discussion and contribute new insights to the body of knowledge.Purpose of Literature ReviewThe purpose of conducting a literature review goes beyond summarizing existing studies. It involves a critical analysis of the literature to identify the strengths and weaknesses of past research.By evaluating the credibility, relevance, and limitations of previous studies, researchers can identify gaps or unresolved issues in the literature. These research gaps provide the rationale for the current study, highlighting the need for further investigation. Therefore, literature review helps researchers identify the research questions and objectives that will guide their own study.Contribution to the Research ProcessLiterature review serves as a foundation for the research process by informing the research design, methodology, and data analysis. By synthesizing and interpreting the findings from past studies, researchers can identify the most appropriate research methods and data collection techniques for their own study. Literature review also helps researchers develop a conceptual framework or theoretical model for their study, guiding the formulation of hypotheses and research questions. Furthermore, by identifying gaps in the literature, researchers can design research studies that address the limitations of previous work and contribute new knowledge to the field.ConclusionThe introduction of a literature review provides an overview of its importance, purpose, and contribution to the research process. It highlights the significance of literature review in establishing the context for a study, identifying research gaps, and developing a theoretical framework. By conducting a thorough literature review, researchers can position their study within the existing scholarly discussion, establish the credibility of their research, and contributenew insights to the field. Overall, literature review forms an integral part of the research process and is crucial for generating high-quality and impactful research.。

LITERATUREREVIEW文献综述 (课堂PPT)

LITERATUREREVIEW文献综述 (课堂PPT)
The format of a review of literature may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment.
A review may be a self-contained unit -- an end in itself -- or a preface to and rationale for engaging in primary research. A review is a required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertations.
6
Why write LR?
Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone.
In the context of a research paper or thesis the literature review is a critical synthesis of previous research.
The evaluation of the literature leads logically to the research question.
…..an annotated bibliography ….. confined to description ….. narrow and shallow ….. confusing and longwinded ….. constructed in an arbitrary way

英国Literature Review写作的重要性

英国Literature Review写作的重要性

英国Literature Review写作的重要性——英国环球论文对于那些要完成论文的同学们来说,Literature Review的内容或参考文献的回顾可能是论文最为麻烦部分了。

那为什么在我们的论文或者计划里要回顾这些参考的文献呢?文献回顾的重要性又是在哪里呢?如下就针对这个问题为你做如下的总结:首先,你们要非常清楚回顾参考文献有哪些作用?其实很简单:就是证明你所选择的研究问题、理论或者概念框架和研究方法,换言之,它是你要完成论文的直接论据。

第二,要明确主题的重要性.即让导师理解课题,以提供必须的背景信息和那些有意义的或者最近的研究是相似的。

但不同的是需要通过这一系列的调查研究进而形成自己的结论。

第三,要理解回顾参考文献的意义。

回顾通常情况下都是对原有的理论的一种概述,Literature Review是为了突出论文的主题,且它也能为论文的主题和论据提供支持通过引用一些官方或者专家的观点。

Literature Review是独立的、也可以穿插一论述里面、也可以据不同的论题分成不同的章节。

第四,明确以上3点后,再可以了解文献的来源。

最后,在开始设计和开始你的Literature Review之前一定要问自己几个问题,从而达到文章的论据的可行性。

1. 你在你所调查的课题都做了什么?你打算用哪些选择原则2. 你怎么样安排你的讨论?按年代,主题,概念的顺序排列3. 不同的研究是怎么样联系在一起的?他们都做了什么贡献?他们的局限性是什么?4. 你自己的调研和参考的文献如何才能相一致?总的来说,要完成一篇高质量的优秀论文作品,一定是要建立在Literature Review的运用部分是否有其参考性,是否可行性,是否观点是原有的保持一致性,又或者有创新性。

只要留学生认真对待文献部分一定可以顺利通过论文作品的任务。

literature review写作误区

literature review写作误区

literature review写作误区
在进行文学评论写作时,有一些常见的误区需要避免。

以下是一些具
体的误区:
1. 缺乏系统性:文学评论应该有一个明确的主题和结构。

不要只是罗
列一系列与主题相关的文章,而是要通过系统性地整合和归纳,呈现
出一个有机的整体。

2. 缺乏深度和批判性思维:文学评论应该追求深度思考,而不仅仅是
简单地陈述观点。

要注重对文本的分析和解释,并提供批判性的观点
和评论。

3. 缺乏引用和参考文献:文学评论需要有充分的支持和证据。

使用适
当的引用和参考文献,以支持所提出的观点和结论,并加强文中的可
信度。

4. 忽略背景知识和文化背景:在文学评论中,忽略作者的背景知识和
文化背景是一个常见的误区。

要有足够的了解和研究作者的生平背景、时代背景和作品的文化背景,以更好地理解和解释文本。

5. 缺乏原创性:文学评论需要具有独特和创新的观点。

避免简单地重
复他人的观点或放大别人已经提出的理论。

要通过自己的思考和研究,提供新颖和有价值的见解。

6. 冗长和啰嗦:文学评论应该简洁明了,避免冗长和啰嗦的写法。


用简洁准确的语言表达观点,并避免重复或罗嗦的描述。

7. 忽略结构和逻辑:文学评论需要有一个清晰的结构和连贯的逻辑。

要通过良好的段落组织和逻辑推理,使文中的内容更易读和易懂。

通过避免这些误区,你可以提高文学评论写作的质量和准确性,使读者能更好地理解和欣赏你的观点和分析。

怎样写Literature Review

怎样写Literature Review

怎样写Literature ReviewWrite a Literature Review1. IntroductionNot to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources (e.g. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work. The purpose is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic.(查找文章、书籍和其他的一些资源,只要和所要讲的问题相关均可,主要目的是列举出跟所讨论话题相关的文献资料。

)2. ComponentsSimilar to primary research, development of the literature review requires four stages:(文献综述分为四个部分)·(提出问题:你将要讨论的话题是什么)Problem formulation—which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues?·(查询资料:找寻所有与话题相关的材料)Literature search—finding materials relevant to the subject being explored·(评估资料:看看那些材料对话题的理解很有作用)Data evaluation—determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic·(分析和阐释)Analysis and interpretation—discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature Literature reviews should comprise the following elements:(相关因素)· An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review·(主题、话题、理论的整体陈述,再加上文献综述的意义)·Division of works under review into categories (e.g. those in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses entirely)·(文献分类,支持的、反对的、或者是另起炉灶的)· Explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others·(各个文献之间的相似之处和不同之处)·Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research·(哪些观点最好、最有说服力、对研究的理解和发展贡献最大)In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to:·Provenance(来源)—what are the author's credentials(信任书、证书)? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence (e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, and recent scientific findings)?·(资料来源,作者是如何证实自己的观点的)· Objectivity—is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?·(资料是否客观,作者的观点是否公正客观,还是带有主观偏见)· Persuasiveness—which of the author's theses are most/least convincing?·(资料是否有说服力,哪些最有说服力,那些最没有说服力)·Value—are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?·(材料价值,作者的观点和结论是否具有说服力,能不能有助于很好地理解话题)3. Definition and Use/PurposeA literature review may constitute an essential chapter of a thesis or dissertation, or may be a self-contained review of writings on a subject. In either case, its purpose is to:·Place each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review· Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration· Identify new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in, previous research· Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies· Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort· Point the way forward for further research·Place one's original work (in the case of theses or dissertations) in the context of existing literatureThe literature review itself, however, does not present new primary scholarship.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Literature ReviewThis part includes three components concerning heroism which are a comparative study on heroism between China and western countries, American individual heroism, the trend of heroism study and the culture influenced by the film Brave Heart . According to , hero worship exists in almost every place of the world. Different culture has different definition towards heroism, and shapes unique hero. Heroism impulse is the fundamental driving force of human life, is a concrete manifestation of certain culture pursuit, and to some extent influence the development of the society. He writes the similarities and differences of heroism between China and western countries‟heroism and the causes of the similarities and differences—the origins of heroism in both cultures.1.1The comparative study on heroism between China and western countries1.11 The definition of heroismIn thesis, hero or heroine refers to character that, in the face of danger and adversity or from a position of weakness, display courage and the will for self sacrifice — that is, heroism— for some greater good, originally of martial courage or excellence but extend to more general moral excellence.1.12 Chinese and western characteristics of heroismThis part is made up of two parts including the differences and the similarities between Chinese and western heroism.The differences, in the author‟s opinion, firstly, Chinese heroism always takes emphasis on collective interests or overall situation, especially national interests.Secondly, most of the Chinese heroes comply with the destiny. Thirdly, ancient Chinese hero types roughly divided into four categories: national heroes, emperor heroes, folk heroes, martial arts heroes (潘天强,2007). But in point of view, there is another kind of hero, myth hero. Western heroism, firstly, as we all know, individualism is a notable feature of western heroism. Different from Chinese heroism, the western heroes take emphasis on selfhood and personal value. Thus, they have absolute self—confidence about their wisdom and power. Second, Chinese heroes always give people the feeling of distant. Dislike Chinese heroes, western heroes are more humanizing, and felt more accessible. They have a sense of responsibility on the family. In movies, American heroism wants to show the audiences the perfect perfection while Chinese heroism wants to express the fragmentary perfection.In , Both in China and western countries, hero worship is start from myth hero worship. In the early stage of human society, people confront the threat from nature. On the other hand, both Chinese and western heroes have certain trait beyond ordinary people. In addition, all heroes in two cultures have unique charisma.1.13 The origins of heroism in China and western countriesFirst of all, the author thinks the fighting against nature is along with the emergence of humankind. The hero is one who dared to fight against nature and saved people in the disaster. Secondly, from many historical events and hero movies, hero arise from contradiction, and under certain background of times. Dynasties emerged anddisappeared one after another. In the ancient time, the replacement of the dynasties often accompany by war which come from the conflict between classes. Under this circumstance, a large number of folk heroes emerged. Thirdly, the influence from Confucius thought. The core concept of Confucius thought is justice and humanity, and it puts forward four aspects that a hero must achieve: high degree of moral consciousness; sincerity; erudite; harmonious relationship between individual and society, which individual must be subordinated to the society. Thus Chinese heroes always on the decent side, and for collective interests, they even sacrifice themselves. Confucius believed that heroes must have wisdom, humanity, and bravery, that threevirtues (崔子修and 丁四海,2005)Firstly, western heroism comes from curiosity, and the exploration of the unknown world. Secondly, external expansion of western countries has also been an important factor. The war is a machine that produces heroes no matter in china or western countries.So, according to the author, people in both cultures must learn more about each other and communicate with each other actively in order to lessen the culture conflicts.1.2American individual heroismIn thesis, Analyze American individual heroism from the perspective of Hollywood film, on one hand, his thought is that the value of this kind of American individual heroism advocates individual and independence, and pursuit just and dignity. On the other hand, there is contradiction implied between individual and social order, violence in the film. Then the author mainly wrote heroic image of Hollywood. Firstly, he pursues freedom. Secondly, leaders need hero mostly. Thirdly, hero needs courage. Fourthly, the hero needs his enemy to set off. The hero needs female to set off.While, according to 王一雷, he thought that America is a country which worshipsheroism in great fever, so if people want to analyze its culture, its heroic ideology is an inevitable subject that must be paid high attention to .he though that;at first,the definition of hero is given and discussed in detail.The thesis classified the view ofheroism according to different school of thoughts and cultures,and found that to some extent,thedefinitions given in the popular American dictionaries are not quite reasonable,the author analyzesthe philosophical cause why the emphasis is especially put On heroes‟strength and fighting ability,after that,from the point of mind·body integration,the thesis demonstrates the virtues a hero shouldpossess(王V)Although America hash‟t the long-history-based heroic culture like some otherwestern countries,which have their archetypes such as Homeric or Arthurian heroes,it individually develops heroes in its specific democratic way following the footprintsof classic and epic heroes.In the 19th century,influenced by the Homeric and knightly heroism;the new democratic American heroes became lofty defenders of democracy on its lawless frontiers.Western and frontier metaphors were adapted to satisfy c6ntemporary tastes and concerns,the first great cofnic hero,superman appears in an era when a superhero is expected to defeat fascists,and dies in the movie when the world don‟t admire and accept inborn heroes any longer,following this,it is the popularity of anti—heroes or non—hero,the author picks up the most successful and convincing hero image created just after the death of Superman·——Forest Gump as the example to show that it is the struggling anti-heroes but not omnipotent ones Americans adore in 20th century.(王VI)Following the development of science and technology, also the discouraging fame of cowboys and military heroes,Americans tend to look.for idols in fantasies.There are SO many heroic movies;everyone has its distinctive heroes,which directly contribute to the“overflow of heroes”which is the viewpoint that demonstrated in Chapter Seven.In lots of movies,in o rder to show the…humanity‟of heroes or to prove the belief that“everyone could be a hero”,movies always raise ordinary people to the upper stage as heroes,which gradually deviate the traditional concept of being a hero.Elifferent kinds of media propaganda have made heroes an obscure concept,Americans sometimes feel lost to which one they should choose to adore.(王VI)the author gets the conclusion that Hollywood movies indeed make people get in touch with numerous American heroes and their touching spirits.But whether the ones,the events,which the heroic stories want to highlight,are heroic,or whether they have set up perfect models for the society,these are to some degree questionable.Liberalists even argue that sometimes the celebration of heroes in popular culture encourages actual violence,or leads to lots of other social problems.To American people,the positive development of their tradition of heroism which is a part of their culture depends on the right understanding of heroism by the mass and mass media;to the people who want to study American culture,the author tries her best to offer a complete picture of American heroic values,development,and social influence from the angle of popular culture———movies(王VI-II)1.3The culture influenced by Brave HeartThe author 熊丹analyzed the Scottish nation music instrument-bagpipe. He wrote it from two aspects including the reason of selecting bagpipe as major music and the performance of bagpipe in Brave Heart. The reason why bagpipe was chosen concludes two factors, which are national one and the personal factor of the musician himself. The detail is that bagpipe is the soul of Scottish music and it has been handed down for several hundred years. In the thirteenth century, it was used in the war as war music which called upon army force and encouraged soldiers to fight bravely. Meanwhile, it is also peace music used for daily activities such as wedding and funeral in the local, which is necessary in Scotland. Then the author discussed the performance of bagpipe in the film. He hold that the bagpipe as music instrument can divided three kinds of types which are subject music including the hero music and love subject music, scene music and background music. We can take an example from the author‟s thesis. When Wallace‟s father told him that his heart was free and had courage to follow it. The hero subject music is played through Scottish bagpipe. Another example is love subject music, when Wallace‟s father and brother were killed and buried because of fighting against English army, at this moment, little Murron picked a purple to give little Wallace to comfort him. He looked at her in deep sorrow and he was so moved that tears rolled down from his cheeks. At the scene, there was no monologue, and there was silence between then and the sad music of bagpipe which was telling that their love was doomed. Whatever types of music was used, Scottish bagpipe played an import role in the film which gave us a charming music feast.(熊133-134 )While, According to 张敏,孙晓丹,卢冰,they analyzed the music in the film through its character and the import role of it in the film.(141-142)According to the author 王红英,she wrote the cultural feast responded in the film. For example, national flower- thistle flower. The little flower means independence and just. In the film, it is no t only the witness of the love between Wallace and Murron, but also is the symbol of freedom and the nation not giving in to England. We know when little Murron gave a purple to Little Wallace, then Murron the purple flower in the handkerchief and gave it to Wallace. When Wallace was killed, the handkerchief was falling down from his hand and drowned red by his blood. Then the author discussed the Scottish kilt. He wrote the origin and the symbol meaning of it.(59)Scottish kilt was said different grids stand for different families. Black and grey grid represents for government grid. There are some special grids ruled by the loyal families,and called noble grids. In the film Wallace gave his own the cloth of his kilt to Murron as the loving witness. At the scene, the plot is so gentle and touching.(张59)ConclusionSo we can come to conclusion that the heroism exists everywhere whatever it isin china or in western countries. we can see the film from the different perspectives. The above studied the different Aspects and different eras concerning however in China, western countries and America. They have the same and the different points about heroism. Then the culture influenced by the film studied gave us the cultural feast. However, they haven‟t studied the emoti ons and tenderness heroism for the present.王红英,《蓟花绽放,风笛悠扬,从<勇敢地心>透视苏格兰文化》刊名:电影评价,年,卷2009,23,页数59王一雷, 《从美国电影看其英雄主义文化》“Viewing Widespread American Heroism from Its Movies”, (2006):I-II熊丹(133-134)张敏,孙晓丹,卢冰,《灵魂深处的天籁:电影<勇敢地心>配乐解读》,名作欣赏艺林散步2010:141-142。

相关文档
最新文档