Major Phenolics in Apple and Their Contribution to the Total Antioxidant Capacity
植物体内有机物的代谢(共27张PPT)

player in plant immune response
❖ Phytoalexins can be antimicrobial
terpenoids or phenolics (抗菌的萜或酚类)
❖ Synthesized in response to infection or
stored in surface glands表面腺细胞)
❖
Sesquiterpenes (C-15)
Herbivory deterБайду номын сангаасents威慑草食动物
(generalized)
❖ Bitterness
❖ Examples include
sagebrush山艾树 and
sunflower向日葵
其数目,可分为:
单萜(monoterpene)、倍半萜(sesquiterpene)、
双萜(diterpene)、
三萜(triterpene)、
四萜(tetraterpene)、 多萜(polyterpene)。
CH3
头
CH2 = C
CH = CH2
尾
Terpenoids: The largest group
合
Flavor deterrent威慑味道,如涩味
Tea, blackberry,grape, apple
Mode of action is via protein binding蛋白鞣质结
Examples of phenolic compounds
Monoterpenes (C-10)
Pyrethroid insecticides拟除虫菊脂
i0013-8746-094-06-0902

E COLOGY AND P OPULATION B IOLOGYEffects of Photoperiod and Light Intensity on the Genetics of Diapause in the Apple Maggot(Diptera:Tephritidae)KENNETH E.FILCHAK,1JOSEPH B.ROETHELE,AND JEFFREY L.FEDER Department of Biological Sciences,Galvin Life Science Building,University of Notre Dame,Notre Dame,IN46556Ann.Entomol.Soc.Am.94(6):902Ð908(2001)ABSTRACT Rhagoletis pomonella(Walsh)is an important pest of apples and has been at the centerof a long-standing debate concerning modes of speciation.Theßy has been proposed to speciatewithout geographic isolation(i.e.,in sympatry)in the process of shifting and adapting to new hostplants.Previous studies have shown that diapause-related traits play a key role in adapting apple-and hawthorn-infesting races of R.pomonella to a difference in the fruiting times(phenologies)oftheir respective host plants.These experiments indicated that prewinter temperature and itsduration affected the survivorship and genetics of over-wintering R.pomonella pupae.However,theearlier work did not test whether photoperiod and light intensity,two environmental factors thatalso differ between the host races,affect the genetics of diapause.Here,we report that variation inphotoperiod,but not light intensity,during the larval stage affects adult eclosion.Haw-origin larvaeexposed to longer photoperiods(18:6[L:D]h)eclosed signiÞcantly earlier that those experiencingshorter photoperiods(14:10and10:14[L:D]h).We also conÞrmed previously observed geneticrelationships between eclosion time and six allozyme loci displaying allele frequency differencesbetween the haw and apple host races.However,we did notÞnd a signiÞcant genetic response tophotoperiod for any allozyme.Our results suggest that,while photoperiod cues can regulate R.pomonella diapause,daylength is probably of secondary importance relative to temperature andseason length in genetically differentiating the host races.KEY WORDS Rhagoletis pomonella,host race,diapause,sympatric speciation,photoperiod,lightintensityD IAPAUSE IS A dynamic,hormonally mediated physio-logical state in insects characterized by low metabolic rates,limited behavioral activity,resistance to envi-ronmental extremes,and reduced morphogenesis. There are two general and interrelated reasons for insect diapause(Tauber et al.1986).First,to pass through a period unsuitable for survival(e.g.,winter), and second to coordinate an insectÕs life cycle to key resources or conditions conducive to growth and re-production(e.g.,host-plant availability).Insects use any of a number of different environmental cues, alone or in combination,as signals to initiate diapause, with photoperiod and temperature being the most common(Danilevsky1965,Morris and Fulton1970, Saunders1982,Tauber et al.1986).Diapause-related traits have been hypothesized to play a key role in sympatric speciation for phytoph-agous insects(Bush1969,1975;Smith1988;Wood and Keese1990;Abrahamson et al.1994;Feder and Filchak 1999).Speciation in sexually reproducing animals was traditionally thought to be predicated on complete geographic separation(i.e.,allopatry)of populations (Mayr1942,Futuyma and Meyer1980).But as early as the1860s,Walsh(1864)proposed that certain host-plant speciÞc phytophagous insects could speciate in the absence of geographic isolation(i.e.,in sympatry)in the process of shifting and adapting to new host pants.Subsequent studies have documented several examples of partially isolated“host races”(Feder et al. 1988,McPheron et al.1988,Wood and Keese1990, Carroll and Boyd1992,Abrahamson et al.1994)pos-sessing the hallmarks of incipient species.In several of these cases,diapause-related traits adapting the races to a seasonal difference in host availability(seasonal-ity)appears to be a primary aspect of differentiation (Smith1988,Wood and Keese1990,Abrahamson et al. 1994,Feder and Filchak1999).The apple maggotßy,Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh),is a major economic pest of apples and a model for sympatric speciation(Bush1966,1992). Hawthorn(Crataegus spp.L.)is the native host for the ßy(Bush1966).But in the mid-1800s,a new popula-tion was reported attacking domesticated apple(Ma-lus pumila,Mill.)(Walsh1867).Subsequent studies have conferred host race status on the apple-infesting population(Feder et al.1988,McPheron et al.1988). Apple and hawthornßies differ in allele frequencies for six allozyme loci(aspartate amino transferase-2 [Aat-2],NADH-diaphorase-2[Dia-2],malic enzyme [Me],aconitase-2[Acon-2],mannose phosphate isomerase[Mpi],and hydroxyacid dehydrogenase [Had])(Feder et al.1988,McPheron et al.1988,Feder and Bush1989,Feder et al.1990a,1990b).In addition, mark-release-recapture studies have shown that adult1E-mail:Filchak.1@0013-8746/01/0902Ð0908$02.00/0᭧2001Entomological Society of Americaßies tend to return to the same species of host plant (fruit)to mate and oviposit that they fed within as larvae,a condition known as“hostÞdelity”(Feder et al.1994).Because R.pomonellaßies mate exclusively on or near the fruit of their hosts(Prokopy et al.1971, Prokopy1972),hostÞdelity translates directly into premating isolation.Although hostÞdelity is strong in R.pomonella,it is not complete(Feder et al.1994).Some intermixing still occurs between the apple and hawthorn host races at a rate ofϷ6%per generation.Given this level of geneßow and R.pomonella being univoltine,pop-ulation genetic models predict that the host races would become genetically indistinguishable within15 generations or years(Dean and Chapman1973,Boller and Prokopy1976,Feder and Filchak1999).However, long-term allozyme surveys(11yr)of naturalßy pop-ulations indicate that the apple and haw races are not fusing(Feder and Filchak1999).Therefore,some form of host-dependent selection must be occurring each generation to counteract the homogenizing ef-fects of geneßow.Several lines of evidence point to diapause-related traits associated with a difference in the fruiting times of apples and hawthorns as being the key to divergent selection between host races.Rhagoletis pomonella overwinters in a facultative pupal diapause(Prokopy 1968,Dean and Chapman1973,Boller and Prokopy 1976).Flies exposed to permissive environmental con-ditions as larvae and pupae can forgo a pronounced diapause and rapidly initiate adult development (Prokopy1968).In nature,such“nondiapause”devel-opment has disastrousÞtness consequences.Nondia-pauseßies either eclose at inappropriate times in the fall when host fruit is no longer available or commit to, but do not complete,adult development before the onset of winter and freeze/starve to death.Fruit on apple tree varieties favored by R.pomonella generally ripen from3Ð4wk earlier than haws(Feder and Fil-chak1999).As a result,the life history of appleßies is shifted earlier in the season,such that appleßy larvae and pupae are exposed to higher temperatures for a greater period of time before winter than hawthorn ßies.We hypothesized that the earlier phenology of apples selects for a more recalcitrant developmental response(deeper diapause)in the apple than the hawthorn race.Results from a series of rearing experiments have supported this“diapause”hypothesis.First,alleles at all six allozyme loci displaying frequency differences between the host races were found to correlate with the timing of adult eclosion,an event dependent on the duration of the pupal diapause(Feder et al.1993, 1997a,1997b,).Moreover,ßies possessing alleles typ-ically found in higher frequencies in the apple race eclosed later than individuals possessing“haw race”genes(Feder et al.1997a,1997b;Filchak et al.1999), as predicted by the diapause hypothesis.Second,as discussed above,elevated temperature has been shown to affect the diapause characteristics ofßies (Prokopy1968,Filchak et al.2000).Third,and most importantly,varying rearing conditions elicited ge-netic responses in the races in predicted directions. Allozyme frequencies in surviving(successfully over-wintering)adults exposed to higher temperatures for longer periods of time before winter as larvae and pupae,or to longer overwintering periods as pupae, shifted to become more“apple-like”than controls (Feder et al.1997a,1997b;Filchak et al.2000). Temperature and season length may not be the only diapause-related cues involved in the genetic differ-entiation of the host races.Photoperiod is also a good candidate because the earlier phenology of apples means that developing appleßy larvae experience longer day lengths than hawthorn larvae.Indeed, Prokopy(1968)demonstrated that variation in pho-toperiod during the larval,but not the pupal,life-stage caused signiÞcant shifts in adult eclosion times for apple-originßies.However,Prokopy(1968)did not explore the effects of photoperiod variation on survi-vorship or the genetics of host races.In addition to photoperiod,host-associated varia-tion in light intensity may be important in differenti-ating the races.Apples are physically larger than haw-thorns(mean diameter of apples at a study site(near Grant,MI)ϭ5.2cm;mean diameter hawsϭ1.6cm) (Feder1995).Consequently,light intensity near the core of fruits,where larvae prefer to feed,will likely be lower in apples than hawthorn(Prokopy1968). Fruit dissections have indicated thatßy larvae feed at much greater average depths within apples than in haws(average feeding depth in applesϭ1.38cm, hawsϭ0.13cm)(Feder1995).Moreover,competi-tion from plum curculio and codling moth larvae may force many hawthorn,but not apple-infesting,mag-gots to feed right below the surface(skin)of fruits (Feder1995),where light penetrance is greatest.Al-though Prokopy(1968)showed a photoperiod re-sponse for R.pomonella even at very low light levels (300lux),this result does not,by itself,rule out the possibility that varying light levels affect diapause and the genetics of host races.Verifying an effect of light intensity on diapause is of particular interest because it could help explain a puzzling difference in the geographic pattern of allo-zyme variation for host races.As mentioned above,six allozyme loci show consistent allele frequency differ-ences between sympatric apple and hawthorn-ßy pop-ulations across eastern North America(Feder et al. 1988,McPheron et al.1988,Feder and Bush1989; Feder et al.1990a,1990b).However,these six allo-zymes also display latitudinal frequency clines within both host races.Alleles more common to the apple than hawthorn race at the Grant,MI,site were found at higher frequencies in both host races at more south-ern locales(Feder and Bush1989,Feder et al.1990a, Berlocher and McPheron1996).Furthermore,the slopes of the clines differ between the races,being steeper for the hawthorn race(i.e.,from north to south allozyme frequencies change more dramatically among hawthorn than apple-ßy populations).One possible explanation for the pattern is that the fruiting times of hawthorns are more strongly inßuenced by latitude-related factors than apples,resulting in theNovember2001F ILCHAK ET AL.:E FFECTS OF P HOTOPERIOD AND L IGHT ON A PPLE M AGGOT903hawthorn race experiencing more variable selection pressures than appleßies.ButÞeld observations in-dicate that theϷ3Ð4wk earlier phenology of prime apple varieties is consistent across the range of overlap of apple and hawthorn trees in the Midwest(J.L.F.,un-published data).However,if increased light levels ex-perienced by hawthorn-infesting larvae exacerbate the effects of elevated temperature and a longer growing season at more southern sites,then this could account for the clinal difference between the host races.The objective of this study was to test for genetic or developmental responses to variation in photoperiod and light intensity.Our a priori hypothesis was that higher photoperiods and/or lower light intensities would select against alleles more common to the haw-thorn host race.Materials and MethodsOverview of Experiments.The experimental design consisted of exposing collections of hawthorn-origin larvae within the host fruit to varying photoperiods and light conditions in controlled environmental chambers.After a simulated winter,over-wintering survivorship and eclosion times were recorded and compared amongßies in the various environmental treatments.Surviving adults were scored for the six allozyme loci displaying frequency differences be-tween the host races to test for genetic relationships with diapause/development and for genetic responses to varying photoperiod and light-intensity conditions. Only hawthorn(not apple)ßies were used in this experiment.Ideally both apple and hawthornßies would be used in such a manipulation.However,this method was not employed herein for several reasons. One,statistical sensitivity requires large numbers of individuals to detect a response to experimental ma-nipulation.Second,genetic variation exists between individuals on different trees.If mixed samples were used,it is likely that unequal numbers of larvae would result and thus the unrepresentative proportions of this variation would bias the result.It is therefore necessary to use individuals from a single tree,which also has sufÞcient larvae numbers to detect a response to our rearing conditions.In nature infested hawthorn trees tend to support larger populations that apples. Finally,each race contains all of the variation pos-sessed by the other,although at different frequencies. Therefore,usingßies from a single race and tree is a practicalÞrst step in the majority of our investigations and is the one employed herein.Infested fruit for these experiments was collected from a hawthorn tree at aÞeld site near Grant,MI,on 28August1998(see Feder et al.1990b for a map of the Grant site).Rhagoletis pomonellaßies used herein generally eclose in early summer and have one gen-eration per year(Dean and Chapman1973,Boller and Prokopy1976).Although a small,second generation of appleßies is sometimes observed eclosing in the fall, theseßies are inevitably doomed and do not repro-duce(Dean and Chapman1973).Sexually mature adults rendezvous on or near unabscised host fruit to court and mate(Prokopy et al.1971,Prokopy1972). Females deposit one egg per oviposition bout imme-diately below the surface of host fruit(Bush1992). Eggs hatch within a few days,with subsequent larval feeding conÞned to the fruit oviposited into by the larvaÕs mother.When fruit abscise from trees in late summer or early fall,larvae leave the fruit and burrow into the soil to an average depth ofϷ2.5cm(Dean and Chapman1973,Boller and Prokopy1976).Here,they form puparia and undergo a fourth larval instar before entering a facultative pupal diapause for winter(Dean and Chapman1973,Boller and Prokopy1976). Photoperiod rval-infested fruit was transported to the laboratory and placed on0.3by 0.6m wire mesh racks that were set within plastic collecting trays(0.3m by0.6m).The fruit was divided into three equal subsamples maintained at photope-riods of18:6,14:10and10:14(L:D)h in three different constant temperature(26Ϯ1ЊC)incubators.Fruit was positionedϷ0.6m below the light source(2Ð48Љßuorescent lamps,110W,General Electric F48T12/ CW/1500,GE part#10751)in the incubators.At this distance,fruit received8500lux of light on itÕs surface, as determined with a foot candle/lux light meter(cat-alog no.L524880,Extech Instruments,Stamford,CT). As larvae completed feeding they emerged from fruit and formed puparia in plastic trays.Puparia was placed in petri-dishes containing moist vermiculite and were returned to the incubators.After10d,the petri-dishes were taken from the incubators and placed in a refrigerator(0to5ЊC cycle)to simulate winter(Data from Grant,MI,indicate that this tem-perature range is typical for pupae over-wintering in the soil there)(Feder and Filchak1999,Filchak et al. 2000).Equal samples of petri-dishes(pupae)were removed from the refrigerator after15and30wk and put into an incubator maintained at23ЊC with a pho-toperiod of14:10(L:D)h(We have estimated that temperatures are below the developmental threshold for R.pomonella for an average ofϷ26wk at the Grant site)(Filchak et al.2000).Pupal sample sizes within the15and30wk winter length treatments were nϭ529,nϭ418,and nϭ558for the photoperiods18:6, 14:10,and10:14(L:D)h,respectively.Newly eclosing adults were collected from the petri dishes on a daily basis and immediately frozen atÐ80ЊC for later genetic analysis.Light Intensity Experiment.Fruit for this experi-ment was transported to the laboratory and placed on wire racks in plastic collection trays.These trays were housed in a single incubator maintained at22.5ЊC (Ϯ1ЊC)and a photoperiod of14:10(L:D)h.Light intensity was varied by covering the fruit with no,one, or two layers of mosquito netting(0.5mm mesh size, dark gray nylon material),resulting in high(8500lux), medium(1,500lux),and low(430lux)light treat-ments.We found that fruit within and beneath host trees at the Grant site in1998typically received from 1,000Ð10,000lux of light.(These light levels were recorded using a foot candle/lux light meter.Catalog #L524880,Extech Instruments,Stamford).However, fruit outside the canopy that is exposed to full sunlight904A NNALS OF THE E NTOMOLOGICAL S OCIETY OF A MERICA Vol.94,no.6can experience as much as150,000lux of light on their surface.Consequently,the range of light intensity conditions used in our study(430Ð8500lux)was a reasonable representation of what most fruit would receive on its surface in nature.But,of course,a subset of fruit not in,or under,the canopy will be exposed to much brighter daylight.Temperature readings taken using a HOBO external temperature data logger(H08-031-08,Onset Com-puter,Pocasset,MA)indicated that the mean surface temperature of fruit in the high light treatment (23.5ЊC)averagedϷ1ЊC above that in the medium (22.5ЊC)and low treatments(22.4ЊC).Our study was therefore confounded by slight temperature differ-ences among certain light treatments,pointing to the inherent difÞculty in experimentally disentangling the two factors,as increased light intensity will almost invariably lead to increased surface heating of fruit. However,as we show in the results section,eclosion times and allozyme frequencies did not differ among light intensity treatments,allowing us to discount its importance as a diapause cue.Puparia were collected and treated in the light-intensity experiment as described above for the pho-toperiod study,except that all three light intensity samples were over-wintered for just15wk.The total number of pupae in the high,medium,and low light treatments were nϭ204,237,and238,respectively. Adults were collected on a daily basis as they eclosed in petri-dishes and immediately frozen for later ge-netic analysis.Genetic Analysis.Standard horizontal starch gel electrophoresis techniques were used to scoreßies for the six allozymes(Aat-2,Dia-2,Me,Acon-2,Mpi,and Had)displaying allele frequency differences between host races(Berlocher and Smith1983,Feder et al. 1989).Isocitrate dehydrogenase(Idh)was also scored as a genetic control because it displays no frequency differences between the host races,as well as limited geographicvariationin R.pomonella(Federetal.1990a). Flies not used for genetic analysis were saved and stored atÐ80ЊC.Theseßies are available as voucher specimens and for subsequent genetic analysis.Statistical Analysis.Eclosion time differences among photoperiod and light intensity treatments were analyzed for signiÞcance using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests with tied ranks(Zar1996).Sub-sequent comparisons between pairs of treatments were conducted using the Nemenyi test(Zar1996),as modiÞed for unequal sample sizes and tied ranks by Dunn(1964).Survivorship differences among treat-ments were analyzed for signiÞcance using Fisher exact tests(Zar1996).G-heterogeneity tests were performed to test for signiÞcant genetic responses (i.e.,allozyme frequency differences)among photo-period and light intensity treatments(Zar1996).Re-lationships between eclosion time and single-locus allozyme genotypes forßies were analyzed by Spear-man rank correlation coefÞcients(r s)corrected for tied ranks(Zar1996).Flies were assigned to three different genotypic classes for each locus according to the number of Me100,Acon-295,Mpi37,Aat-2ϩ75,Dia-2100,Had100,or Idh100alleles each possessed (Note:ϩ75for Aat-2indicates the class of alleles withՆ75relative anodal mobility relative to the most common100electromorph).Correlation coefÞcients were z-transformed to test for signiÞcance(Hedges and Olkin1985).One-tailed tests were conducted for Me100,Acon-295,Mpi37,Aat-2ϩ75,Dia-2100,and Had100because of our a priori expectation from previous studies thatßies possessing these alleles should eclose earlier than others(Feder et al.1997a, 1997b,Filchak et al.1999).Two-tailed tests were done for the control locus Idh.We also conducted a meta-analysis combining correlation coefÞcients across winter length,photoperiod,and light intensity treat-ments using the methods of Hedges and Olkin(1985). These common correlation coefÞcients(known as“ef-fect magnitudes”and designated by the symbol r z)Fig.1.Mean days to eclosion versus(a)photoperiod (daylength in hours)and(b)light intensity(Lux).Treat-ments showing a letter in common within winter treatments were not statistically signiÞcant at the PϽ0.05level as determined by DunnÕs test corrected for tied ranks.All three comparisons between15-and30-wk winters in a given pho-toperiod treatment were signiÞcant at the PϽ0.05level as determined by Fisher exact tests.November2001F ILCHAK ET AL.:E FFECTS OF P HOTOPERIOD AND L IGHT ON A PPLE M AGGOT905were tested for signiÞcance by z-transformation (Hedges and Olkin1985).ResultsEclosion Time.Both photoperiod and winter length signiÞcantly affected mean time to adult eclosion (MTE)(Fig.1a).Flies exposed to longer day lengths as larvae eclosed increasingly earlier(had decreasing MTEÕs)within both the15-and30-wk overwinter treatments(Kruskal-Wallis H tied ranks for15wkϭ66.3,dfϭ2,PϽ0.0001;H for30wkϭ65.6,dfϭ2,PϽ0.0001).In addition,ßies experiencing the same pho-toperiod eclosed signiÞcantly earlier the longer they were overwintered.There was no apparent interac-tion between photoperiod and winter length.MTE decreased in a linear and parallel manner with in-creasing photoperiod between the15-and30-wk win-ter treatments(Fig.1a).In contrast to the results for photoperiod and winter length,light intensity did not affect eclosion time(Hϭ2.1,dfϭ2,Pϭ0.40);MTEs were virtually identical between the low,medium and high light treatments (Fig.1b).Survivorship.Overwintering survivorship did not vary signiÞcantly with photoperiod within either the 15-or30-wk overwinter treatments(P for15wkϭ0.152,P for30wkϭ0.069,as determined by Fisher exact tests).Althoughßy viability tended to be lower in the14:10(L:D)h(44and45%for the15and30wk, respectively)than for the other photoperiods(50%, 51%18:6[L:D]h and47%,52%10:14[L:D]h for the 15and30wk,respectively),this trend was not signif-icant.Survivorship differed signiÞcantly among light intensity treatments(Pϭ0.0003,as determined Fisher exact test).Viability was higher in the medium(76%) than in the low(64%)or high(59%)light-intensity experiments(Pϭ0.005and0.0001,respectively,as determined by Fisher exact tests).Genetic Response.No allozyme locus showed a signiÞcant allele frequency difference related to pho-toperiod within either the15-or30-wk overwinter treatments(Table1).Allozyme frequencies also did not vary signiÞcantly among light intensity treatments (Table1).Consequently,the survivorship difference seen among light intensity treatments was not accom-panied by a corresponding genetic response at any of the six allozyme loci differentiating the host races. In contrast to the muted genetic responses seen to varying photoperiod and light intensity,highly signif-icant relationships were observed between eclosion time and allozyme genotypes within every environ-mental treatment performed in this study(Table2). The signs of these relationships were negative in all cases,indicating thatßies possessing alleles(geno-types)typically found in higher frequencies in the hawthorn race at Grant,MI,eclosed earlier than in-dividuals possessing“apple race”alleles.The control locus Idh,showed no relationship with photoperiod, light intensity,or eclosion time(Table2).DiscussionOur results indicate that photoperiod is an impor-tant environmental cue affecting developmental pe-riodism in rvae exposed to longer day lengths eclosed signiÞcantly earlier as adults than those receiving shorter photoperiods.TheseÞndings are not overly surprising given that many temperate zone insects use daylength as a prime cue to regulate diapause(Saunders1982,Tauber et al.1986).More-Table1.Results for G-heterogeneity tests for significant allele frequency differences among photoperiod(10:14,14:10,and 18:6[L:D])and light intensity(430,1500,and8500lux) treatmentsTreatment/Locus Me Acon-2Mpi Aat-2Dia-2Had IdhPhotoperiod (15-wk winter)0.20.4 5.1 4.1 1.0 2.40.1Photoperiod (30-wk winter)3.9 2.7 3.10.6 1.0 2.9 1.0Light intensity(15-wk winter)1.3 1.60.22.93.4 1.5 1.1No test was statistically signiÞcant at the PՅ0.05level with2df.Table2.Spearman rank correlations between eclosion time and allozyme genotypesTreatment/Locus Me Acon-2Mpi Aat-2Dia-2Had Idh Photoperiod18:6rϪ0.36****Ϫ0.23****Ϫ0.19***Ϫ0.24****Ϫ0.19***Ϫ0.14**0.02 df273273273272271273271 14:10rϪ0.36****Ϫ0.24***Ϫ0.16*Ϫ0.07Ϫ0.93Ϫ0.13*0.03 df177177177177171177176 10:14rϪ0.43****Ϫ0.19**Ϫ0.25***Ϫ0.17*Ϫ0.14*Ϫ0.28****0.01 df180180180174180180180 Light IntensityLow rϪ0.57****Ϫ0.46****Ϫ0.14Ϫ0.04Ϫ0.03Ϫ0.21*Ϫ0.05 df90909089869090 Med rϪ0.63****Ϫ0.68***Ϫ0.15Ϫ0.25**Ϫ0.25**Ϫ0.22*Ϫ0.11 df88888888868888 High rϪ0.36***Ϫ0.22*Ϫ0.49Ϫ0.22*Ϫ0.19*Ϫ0.27**Ϫ0.07 df84848483808483Photoperiod results represent common coefÞcients(effect magnitudes)calculated across the15and30week winter treatments by meta-analysis.Correlation coefÞcients were z-transformed to test for signiÞcance(*,PϽ0.05;**,PϽ0.01;***,PϽ0.001;****,PϽ0.0001). 906A NNALS OF THE E NTOMOLOGICAL S OCIETY OF A MERICA Vol.94,no.6over,our results are consistent with the previous work of Prokopy(1968)showing that apple maggots re-spond to variation in photoperiod even in dim light (300lux).There are reasons to suspect that photoperiod does not play a dominant role in genetically differentiating the host races.Although longer photoperiods resulted in earlier mean eclosion times in our experiment,this shift was not accompanied by an increase in over-wintering mortality or a genetic response at any of the allozyme loci.The latterÞnding was true despite the observation of highly signiÞcant relationships be-tween eclosion time and allozyme genotypesÑa result reinforcing the key tenet of the diapause hypothesis that the allozymes(or linked genes)displaying host-related differences regulate the timing of develop-ment.The photoperiod experiment contrasts with ear-lier studies in which increasing the prewintering period(26ЊC)or lengthening the duration of winter not only reduced mean eclosion time,but also mark-edly decreased pupal survivorship and induced strong genetic responses favoring apple race alleles(Feder et al.1997a,1997b;Filchak et al.2000).However,past experience suggests that the10-d prewinter period used in the photoperiod experiment represents a rel-atively benign rearing condition forßies.Conse-quently,we may have pushed pupae close to,but not beyond,the point of nondiapause development to induce genotype speciÞc mortality in our study.It is, therefore,premature to completely discount a role for photoperiod in contributing to the genetic differen-tiation of the host races.Field measurements taken from our Grant,MI, study site imply that the effect of photoperiod will nevertheless be of secondary importance relative to temperature and season length in differentiating the races.In1999,the mode time for larval infestation of apples at Grant,MI,was5August and for haws1 September(Filchak et al.2000).Civic daylength,as determined from National Weather Service(USA) data,was16h,21min on1August and15h,11min on 1September a difference of70min.However,in the laboratory we failed to elicit a genetic response to photoperiod differences as great as8h(10:14com-pared with18:6[L:D]h).Therefore,while the70min longer day experienced by apple-ßy larvae could ex-acerbate the known effects of higher temperatures of apple than haws,increasing selection pressures for more recalcitrant pupal(diapause)development, photoperiod itself is unlikely to be a prime factor driving host race system.The lack of any detectable effect of light intensity on diapause,while not unexpected,was disappointing. Reports of light intensity inßuencing diapause are sparse in the insect literature(Saunders1982).In addition,Prokopy(1968)showed that R.pomonella can respond to photoperiod differences from external light sources as low as300lux,suggesting thatßies are sensitive to even very dim light.Nevertheless,light levels are likely to differ substantially for developing apple and hawthorn-ßy larvae.Moreover,as we dis-cussed above,a light intensity effect would help to explain a puzzling difference in the pattern(slope)of latitudinal allozyme clines between host races.But our results clearly reject a role for light intensity in the genetics of diapause,at least for the allozyme loci we scored.Consequently,other hypotheses(e.g.,the in-volvement of additional,as yet unidentiÞed,diapause loci partially overriding the effects of the allozymes in the apple race)must be entertained to explain the clinal differences between races.We have now accumulated information concerning the effects of a number of different environmental factors on R.pomonella diapause.Temperature,the length of the growing season,and the duration of winter all exert strong,differential selection pressures on allozymes(or linked loci)between host races (Feder et al.1997a,1997b;Filchak et al.2000).Al-though photoperiod inßuences the setting of the dia-pause clock in R.pomonella,it appears to be of only secondary importance in differentiating sympatric ap-ple and hawthorn-ßy races.Whether photoperiod plays a greater role in differentiating Rhagoletis spe-cies infesting host plants whose fruiting phenologies differ by more than apples and hawthorns is a question that remains to be investigated.In addition,light in-tensity has no detectable effect on the genetics of diapause.Given our current understanding of the rel-ative importance of various environmental cues on R. pomonella diapause,we can now concentrate on how factors such as temperature and season length interact to maintain allozyme differences between host races. Moreover,the recent development of a molecular linkage map for R.pomonella(Roethele et al.1997), and evidence for synteny between the apple maggot and Drosophila melanogaster(Meigen),will permit theÞner genetic dissection of diapause-related phe-notypes in R.pomonellaßies.AcknowledgmentsWe thank Bill Perry,Uwe Stolz,Hattie Dambroski,Xie (Frank),Nikki Wilson,and Amir Tamassebi who gave help or moral support,and Dave Prokrym and the other staff at the USDA(Niles Michigan laboratory)who allowed us to use their incubators and helped signiÞcantly with insect rearing. Additional aid was given by David Lodge,Nora Besansky,and Guy Bush.This work was supported,in part by a National Science Foundation graduate research traineeship(Grant No.9452655)to K.E.F.References Cited Abrahamson,W.G.,W.M.Brown,S.K.Roth,D.V.Sumer-ford,J.D.Horner,M.D.Hess,S.T.How,T.P.Craig,R.A.Packer,and J.K.Itami.1994.Gallmaker speciation:an assessment of the roles of host-plant characters,phenol-ogy,gallmaker competition and natural enemies,pp.208Ð122.In P.Price,W.Mattson,and Y.Baranchilov[eds.], Gall-forming DA For.Serv.N.Central Exp.Stn.Gen.Tech.Rep.NC-174.Berlocher,S.H.,and D.C.Smith.1983.Segregation and mapping of allozymes of the apple maggotßy.J.Hered.74:337Ð340.November2001F ILCHAK ET AL.:E FFECTS OF P HOTOPERIOD AND L IGHT ON A PPLE M AGGOT907。
油茶籽油不同形态酚类化合物的抗氧化互作关系

油茶籽油不同形态酚类化合物的抗氧化互作关系刘国艳,李思童,梁丽,朱雯绮,周婉丽,徐鑫*(扬州大学食品科学与工程学院,江苏扬州 225009)摘 要:本研究首先对油茶籽油中游离酚(free phenolics,FP)、酯化酚(esterified phenolics,EP)及不溶性结合酚(insoluble-bound phenolics,ISP)含量及主要物质组成进行分析,并通过测定铁离子还原能力、2,2’-联氮双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)阳离子自由基清除能力、1,1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼自由基清除能力及β-胡萝卜素漂白能力对其中FP、EP及ISP的抗氧化活性及互作关系进行研究。
结果表明,油茶籽油总酚含量为(137.97±5.14)mg/kg,其中ISP含量显著高于FP及EP(P<0.05),占油茶籽油总酚的47.74%。
另外,FP中以苯甲酸衍生物含量较高(主要为异香兰素及甲基香兰素),EP中主要为水杨酸,ISP中主要为3,4-二羟基扁桃酸。
3 种形态酚类化合物在不同机制下的抗氧化能力不同,且呈现质量浓度依赖效应。
FP+ISP组合及EP+ISP组合在抗氧化互作方面表现出一定的协同或相加作用,且后者复配组合的抗氧化活性更强;而FP+EP组合和FP+EP+ISP组合则表现出拮抗或相加作用。
关键词:油茶籽油;游离酚;酯化酚;不溶性结合酚;抗氧化;互作关系Antioxidant Interaction of Different Forms of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Camellia Seed OilLIU Guoyan, LI Sitong, LIANG Li, ZHU Wenqi, ZHOU Wanli, XU Xin*(School of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China) Abstract: The contents and major compositions of free phenolics (FP), esterified phenolics (EP) and insoluble-bound phenolics (ISP) from camellia seed oil were analyzed. The ferric ion reducing antioxidant power, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) (ABTS) cation radical scavenging capacity, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity and β-carotene bleaching capacity were used to study the antioxidant activity of the three phenolic compounds and their interactions. The results showed that the content of total phenols in camellia seed oil was (137.97 ± 5.14) mg/kg. ISP was significantly more abundant than FP and EP (P < 0.05), which accounted for 47.74% of the total phenols in the oil. In addition, benzoic acid derivatives (mostly isovanillin and methyl vanillin) were the dominant component in FP, salicylic acid was the dominant component in EP, and 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid was the dominant component in ISP. The three forms of phenolic compounds showed different antioxidant capacities with different mechanisms in a concentration-dependent manner. FP + ISP and EP + ISP showed a synergistic and additive interaction in the antioxidant tests, the antioxidant activity of the latter combination being stronger than that of the former. However, FP + EP and FP + EP + ISP showed an antagonistic or additive effect.Keywords: camellia seed oil; free phenolics; esterified phenolics; insoluble-bound phenolics; antioxidant; interactionDOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210111-113中图分类号:TS225.1 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1002-6630(2021)11-0034-06引文格式:刘国艳, 李思童, 梁丽, 等. 油茶籽油不同形态酚类化合物的抗氧化互作关系[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(11): 34-39.DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210111-113. LIU Guoyan, LI Sitong, LIANG Li, et al. Antioxidant interaction of different forms of phenolic compounds extracted from camellia seed oil[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42(11): 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210111-113. 收稿日期:2021-01-11基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(31671785)第一作者简介:刘国艳(1979—)(ORCID: 0000-0001-6639-360X),女,副教授,博士,研究方向为油脂营养、安全检测、深加工及微量伴随物结构鉴定与生理活性。
鲜切荸荠酶促褐变及褐变控制研究

鲜切荸荠酶促褐变及褐变控制研究
活性分别为67%、53%、47%和30%。
在天然化学抑制剂中,作为竞争性抑制剂的4一已
基矧苯二酚当浓度为0.3mmol/L的就能够抑制70%的PPO酚氧化活性,显示出了很强的抑制效果。
柠檬酸虽然有较弱的PPO抑制特性,但是由于其方便使用和廉价特性,决定了它在果蔬组织防褐变方面有广泛的应用,如蒋跃明(2004)等人用0.1M柠檬酸对鲜切荸荠进行防褐变处理取得了较好的效果’‘。
2.6
PPO分子量测定结果
15.9KDa14,2KOa
A
B
97.4KDa66.2KDa
43KDa
3lKDa
20.1
KDa
图2-5.SDS-PAGE蛋自质电泳图谱
Fig.2-5SDS—PAGEprofileofPPOprotein
(A:纯化酶液
B:标准蛋白质)
经过SephadexG-100柱层析纯化后的酶作为SDS—PAGE电泳样品t由图2—5可以看出,该样品含有两条蛋白质谱带,其分子量分别为14.2kDa和15.9kDa。
该实验结果与大多数文献报道的PPO分子量相差较多,如咖啡豆中提取的PPO分子量为45
kDa和64kDa…,然而却与PLAMER。
”从香蕉中分离提取的PPO的分子量(12Kda)
十分相近。
3讨论
3.1
PPO部分酶学特性
在氧存在的条件下PPO氧化某种酚类化合物为醌,而醌类物质很容易自我聚合或
40
TillsfofMaster’t
D%rn。
不同苹果果实发育过程中酚类物质含量及抗氧化能力变化研究

ShandongAgriculturalSciences
不同苹果果实发育过程中酚类物质含量
及抗氧化能力变化研究
郭子微1,侯文赫1,付鸿博2,张建英1,王鹏飞1,穆霄鹏1,张建成1
关键词:苹果;果实发育;酚类物质;抗氧化能力 中图分类号:S661.101 文献标识号:A 文章编号:1001-4942(2021)11-0035-10
ChangesofPhenolicSubstancesandAntioxidantCapacityduring FruitDevelopmentofDifferentAppleVarieties
水果和蔬 菜 的 天 然 抗 氧 化 作 用 与 三 大 类 物 质———维 生 素、类 胡 萝 卜 素 以 及 酚 类 物 质 有 关[7],其中,起主要作用的是酚类物质,维生素 C 和类胡萝卜素在抗氧化过程中起的作用远不如酚 类化合物[8]。如在苹果中,多酚等物质被证明是 抗氧 化 的 主 要 来 源,而 维 生 素 C仅 贡 献 不 到 0.4%[9,10]。酚类化 合 物 具 有 极 强 的 抗 氧 化 活 性, 有助于改善植物的颜色、风味并保护其免受一定 程度的生物胁迫和非生物胁迫;对癌症和心脑血 管疾病等具有治疗作用[11],可通过各种机制影响 与癌症相关的基本细胞的功能,可能通过诱导细 胞周期停滞和凋亡来抑制肿瘤的形成和生长[12]。 苹果是人类摄取酚类化合物的重要来源之一,王 思新等[13]对我国 9个常见苹 果 栽 培 种 秦 冠、嘎 拉、富士、华帅等的多酚物质含量及其在发育过程 中的变化动态进行了研究;另外,研究人员也已对
英语复习

1.a special interview 专访2.cut both ways 各有利弊3.correct one’s former errors 纠正自己以往的过失4.retain one’s self-confidence 保持自信5.newly appointed office head 新任命的部门经理6.to rely on external factors 依靠外在因素7.to preserve this facade 保全这种门面(表面形象)8.to respond to life’s challenges 回应生活的挑战9.a fine way to keep in touch with a friend 与朋友保持联系的好办法10.have the virtue of being inexpensive and convenient 具有价廉、便利的优点11.stay grounded in one’s feeling 保持现实、理智、头脑清醒12.be rated as the most loyal friend 被认为是最忠实的朋友13.open a new bank account 新开一个银行账户14.a digital camera 数码相机15.drive sb. Mad 把某人逼疯16.make an effort to arrive on time 尽力按时到达17.the informalities that we practice 我们不拘礼节的做法18.solace for the “sting of poverty”“贫困的痛苦”中的慰藉19.gain admittance to the homes of the rich 获准进入富人家庭20.do the kindest thing in the kindest way 以友善的方式做最友善的事21.remain mentally alert 保持思维敏捷22.the frailty and immaturity of human nature 人类脆弱而幼稚的本性23.education of the whole person 全面素质教育24.full and active cooperation between the teacher 教师与学生之间充分而积极的合作25.once a week 每周一次26.skim over a new chapter 浏览/略读新的一章27.turn titles and headings into questions 将题目和标题作为问题28.get good grades 取得好成绩29.adopt a different method 采用一种不同的方法30.preserve meat by smoking and salting it 通过烟熏和腌制来保存肉类31.the masses of people in Europe 大批的欧洲人32.modern standardized measures 现代标准化方法33.最早的厨具the earliest kitchen utensils34.冷却下来cool off35.在中世纪的动荡年代in the troubled times of Middle Ages36.防止食物变质keep the food from spoiling37.增强对所学内容的记忆promote retention of what has been read/learned38.默诵要点recite the key points to oneself39.在大多数情况下in most cases40.编造一个有趣的故事make up an interesting story41.个人魅力personal charm42.个性品质personal qualities43.装模作样;帮作姿态put on an act44.长处与不足strengths and limitations45.过时的礼议outdated eqiquette46.受欢迎的社会成员popular members of society47.热情和善意的体现an indication of one’s warm heart and kindness48.意识到礼貌的重要be conscious of the importance of (good) manners49.外科开心手术an open-heart surgery50.粗鲁之极the height of rudeness51.跳伞时发生意外a parachuting accident52.被恶臭熏死be intoxicated by the fumes53.放弃不重要的朋友关系let go of less important friends54.利用写信来维系友谊take advantage of letter-writing to keep a friendship alive55.培养友情nature friendships56.真正的忠诚real loyalty57.具备入会资格be qualified for membership58.经历严酷考验be through some severe tests59.与他人建立良好关系build good relations with other people60.着手解决一个共同问题address a common question61.一片刚刚落满白雪的土地a filed of newly fallen snow62.个人的伦理道德标准a personal standard of morality ethics63.见风使舵to sell out to expediency64.底线bottom line65.眼下,跨国的旅游已成为世界上最大的产业之一。
新视野大学英语(第三版)读写教程Book2-unit8-textA课文翻译

Unit 8 Section A Animals or children?—A scientist's choice动物还是孩子?——一位科学家的选择1 I am the enemy! I am one of those cursed, cruel physician scientists involved in animal research. These rumors sting, for I have never thought of myself as an evil person. I became a children's doctor because of my love for children and my supreme desire to keep them healthy. During medical school and residency, I saw many children die of cancer and bloodshed from injury —circumstances against which medicine has made great progress but still has a long way to go. More importantly, I also saw children healthy thanks to advances in medical science such as infant breathing support, powerful new medicines and surgical techniques and the entire field of organ transplantation. My desire to tip the scales in favor of healthy, happy children drew me to medical research.1 我就是那个敌人!我就是那些被人诅咒的、残忍的、搞动物实验的医生科学家之一。
食品工艺学课件

⾷品⼯艺学课件Processing of fruitsInstructor: mingfeng zheng(郑明锋) phd.Email:vanheng@/doc/bca037d13186bceb19e8bb68.htmlCell: 138********注意:课件全部根据⽼师提供的ppt整理,在编号上可能会有些问题,所以⼤家将就着看,祝⼤家考试顺利。
Chapter one:introductionFruit quality and preprocessingObjectsThrough the introduction, the students knowThe relationship between quality of fruit and the processed product,The relationship between composition of fruit and the processed product,Quality attributes of fresh fruits, and quality measurementspreprocessing methods and technologies1.1 classification of fruitsFruits are commonly classified by growing region as follows. Temperate zone, subtropical, and tropical. Growing region and environmental conditions specific to each regionsignificantly affect fruit quality. Examples of fruit grown in each region are listed below:1) temperate zone fruits2) subtropical fruits3) tropical fruits(1) temperate zone fruitsPome fruits(仁果类): apple, asian pear (nashi), european pear, quince榅桲果Stone fruits: apricot杏, cherry, nectarine, peach, plumSmall fruits and berries: grape (european and american types), strawberry, raspberry, blueberry, blackberry, cranberry (2) subtropical fruitsCitrus fruits: grapefruit, lemon, lime, orange, pummelo, tangerine, and mandarinNoncitrus fruits: avocado, cherimaya, fig, kiwifruit, olive, pomegranate(3) tropical fruitsMajor tropical fruits: banana, mango, papaya, pineappleMinor tropical fruits: carambola, cashew apple, durian, guava,longan, lychee, mangosteen, passion fruit, rambutan1.2 quality of raw materialsThe quality of processed fruit products depends on their quality at the start of processing; How maturity at harvest, Harvesting methods,Post harvest handling proceduresMaintenance in fresh fruits between harvest and process initiation.Quality attributes of fresh fruitsAppearance、exture factors、flavor components、nutritional quality、safety factorsAppearance factorsSize、shape、color、freedom from defects and decay.Texture factorsFirmness, crispness, juiciness.Flavor componentsSweetness, sourness (acidity), astringency, (收敛),bitterness, aroma, off-flavors,Nutritional qualityFruit's content of vitamins (a and c are the most important in fruits), minerals, dietary fiber, carbohydrates, proteins. Safety factorsResidues of pesticides, presence of heavy metals, mycotoxins produced by certain species of fungi, microbial contamination.1.3 losses in fresh fruits after harvastWater loss,Physical injuries,physiological breakdown, decayLoss of acidity, flavor, color, and nutritive valueFactors influence fruit qualityIn the orchard,During transportation,Throughout the handling system (sorting, sizing, ripening, and storage).The total time between harvesting and processingMinimizing the delays throughout the post harvest handling system greatly reduces finality loss, especially in highly perishable fruits such as strawberries, blackberries, apricots, and cherries.1.4 contribution of fruits to human nutritionEnergy (calories)VitaminsMineralsDietary fiberThe us. Department of agriculture and other organizations currently encourage consumers to participate in the "five a day" program which focuses on consumption of five servings of either fruit or vegetables each day.Energy (calories)(1) carbohydrates: banana, breadfruit, raisin葡萄⼲(2) proteins & amino acids: nuts, dried apricot and fig(3) fats. Avocado, olive, nutsFruits typically contain between 10% and 25% carbohydrates, a small amount (less than1.0%) of proteins, and a very small amount (less than 0.5 %) of fat. Carbohydrates, sugars,and starches are broken down to co2, water, and energy during metabolism. Carbohydrates and fats provide most of the calories the body requires for heat and energy.Vitamins(1) fresh fruits and vegetables contribute about 91% of vitamin c, 48% of vitamin a, 27% of vitamin b6, 17% of thiamin硫胺(维⽣素b1) to diet.(2) the following fruits are important contributors (based on their vitamin content and the amount consumed) to the supply of indicated vitamins in the u.s. Diet:*vitamin a: apricot, peach, cherry, orange, watermelon, cantaloupe*vitamin c: strawberry, orange, grapefruit, banana, apple, cantaloupe* niacin烟酸: peach, banana, orange, apricot"*riboflavin核黄素: banana, peach, orange, apple* thiamin: orange, banana, grapefruit, appleMinerals(1) fresh fruits and vegetables contribute about 26% of the magnesium镁and 19% of the iron to the u.s. Diet.(2) the following fruits are important contributors to the supply of indicated minerals in the us. Diet:* potassium钾: banana, peach, orange, apple* phosphorus磷: banana, orange, peach, raisin, fig*calcium: tangerine, grapefruit, orange* iron: strawberry, banana, apple, orangeDietary fiber(1) all fruits and nuts contribute to the dietary fiber in the diet. Dietary fiber consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin⽊质素, and pectic substances, which are derived primarily from fruit cell walls and skin.(2) the dietary fiber content of fruits ranges from 0.5-1.5% (fresh weight basis).(3) dietary fiber plays an important role in relieving constipation by increasing water-holding capacity of feces. Its consumption is also linked to decreased incidence of cardiovascular disease, diverticulosis, and colon cancer.factors influefncing composition and quality of fruitsPreharvest factors(1) genetic: selection of cultivars, differences in raw fruit composition, durability, and response to processing. Fruit cultivars grown for fresh market sale will not be the optimal cultivars for processing.(2) climatic: temperature, light, wind--climatic factors may have a strong influence on nutritional quality of fruits. Light intensity significantly affects vitamin concentration, and temperature influences transpiration rate, which will affect mineral uptake and metabolism. ?(3) cultural practices: soil type, soil nutrient and water supply, pruning修剪, thinning, pest control-fertilizer addition may significantly affect the mineral content of fruit.1. 5 maturity at harvest and harvesting methodMaturity at harvest is one of the primary factors affecting fruit composition, quality, and storage life. Although most fruits reach peak eating quality when harvested fully ripe, they are usually picked mature, but not ripe, to decrease mechanical damage during postharvest handling. Harvesting may also mechanically damage fruit; therefore, choice of harvest methodshould allow for maintenance of quality.Postharvest factors1) environmental,2) handling methods,3) time period between harvesting and consumption(1) environmentalTemperature, relative humidity, atmospheric composition,(2) handling methodsPostharvest handling systems involve the channels through which harvested fruit reaches the processing facility or consumer. Handling methods should be chosen such that they maintain fruit quality and avoid delays.(3) time period between harvesting and consumptionDelays between harvesting and cooling or processing may result in direct losses (due to water loss and decay) and indirect losses (decrease in flavor and nutritional quality).Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationshipsMaturity at harvest is the most important factor that determines storage life and final fruit quality. Immature fruits are of inferior quality when ripened. Overripe fruits are likely to become soft and with insipid flavor soon after harvest. Fruits picked either too early or too late in the season are more susceptible to physiological disorders and have a shorter storage life than those picked at mid-season.Maturity and ripeningIn general, fruits become sweeter, more colorful, and softer as they mature.Some fruits are usually picked mature but unripe so that they can withstand the postharvest handling system when shipped long distances. Most currently used maturity indices are based on a compromise between those indices that would ensure the best eating quality to the consumer and those that provide the needed flexibility in transportation and marketing.Carbohydrates(碳⽔化合物)Carbohydrates : fresh fruits vary greatly in their carbohydrate content, with a general range being between 10% and 25%;. The texture, taste, and food value of a fresh fruit is related to its carbohydrate content. Sucrose, glucose, and fructose are the primary sugars found in fruits.Fructose is sweeter than sucrose, and sucrose is sweeter than glucose.Starch is converted to sugar as the fruits mature and ripen.Proteins(蛋⽩质)Fruits contain less than 1% protein (as opposed to 9-20% protein in nuts such as almond, and walnut). Changes in the level and activity of proteins resulting from permeability changes in cell membranes may be involved in chilling injury. Enzymes, which catalyze metabolic processes in fruits, are proteins that are important in the reactions involved in fruit ripening and senescence.Enzymes in fruits:(Organic acids(有机酸)Organic acids are important intermediate products of metabolism. The krebs (tca) cycle is the main channel for the oxidation of organic acids in living cells, and it provides the energy required for maintenance of cell integrity. Organic acids aremetabolized into manyconstituents, including amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins.Citric acid、malic acid、tartaric acid、oxalic acidPigments(⾊素)Pigments undergo many changes during the maturation and ripening of fruits.(1) loss of chlorophyll (green color), which is influenced by ph changes, oxidative conditions, and chlorophyllase action(2) synthesis and/or revelation of carotenoids (yellow and orange colors)(3) development of anthocyanins (red, blue, and purple colors.Beta-carotene is a precursor to vitamin a. Carotenoids are very stable and remain intact in fruit tissues, even when extensive senescence has occurred.Phenolic compounds(酚类化合物)Total phenolic content is higher in immature fruits than in mature fruits and is the main substrate involved in enzymatic browning of cut, or otherwise damaged, fruit tissues when exposed to air.Enzymatic browning(酶促褐变)Enzymatic browning occurs due to the oxidation of phenolic compounds and is mediated, in the presence of o2, by the enzyme polyphenoloxidase (ppo). The initial product of oxidation is usually o-quinone, which is highly unstable and undergoes polymerization to yield brown pigments of higher molecular weight. Polyphenoloxidase catalyzes the following tworeactions:Volatiles(挥发性)Volatiles are responsible for the characteristic aroma of fruits. They are present in extremely small quantities (c <100µg/g fresh wt.).Volatile compounds are largely esters(酯), alcohols, acids, aldehydes(醛), an d ketones (low-molecular weight compounds).VitaminsThe water-soluble vitamins includeVitamin c,Thiamin硫胺(维⽣素b1),Riboflavin核黄素,Niacin烟酸, vitamin b6,Folacin叶酸, vitamin b12, biotin维⽣素h. Fat soluble vitamins include vitamins a, d, e, and k.Fat-soluble vitamins are less susceptible to postharvest losses.Vitamin cAscorbic acid is most sensitive to destruction when the commodity is subjected to adverse handling and storage conditions. Losses are enhanced by extended storage, highertemperatures, low relative humidity, physical damage, and chilling injury. Postharvest losses in vitamins a and b are usually much smaller than losses in vitamin c.1.7 biological factors involved in postharvest deterioration (变坏) of fruits ?Respiration (呼吸作⽤)Ethylene productionTranspiration (蒸腾作⽤)Physiological disordersPhysical damagePathological breakdownRespirationStored organic materials (carbohydrates, proteins, fats) are broken down into simple end products with a release of energy. Oxygen (o2) is used in this process, and carbon dioxide (co2) is produced.The loss of stored food reserves in the commodity during respiration hastens senescence as the reserves that provide energy to maintain the commodity's living status are exhausted. ?Food value (energy value) for the consumer is lost; it has reduced flavor quality, with sweetness especially being lost; and salable dry weight is lost (especially important for commodities destined for dehydration). The energy released as heat.Ethylene productionEthylene, the simplest of the organic compounds affecting the physiological processes of plants, is produced by all tissues of higher plants. As a plant hormone, ethylene regulates many aspects of growth development, and senescence and is physiologically active in traceamounts (less than 0.1 ppm).Transpiration or water lossWater loss is the main cause of deterioration because it results not only direct quantitative.Losses (loss of salable weight) hut also in loss of its appearance, loss of cripsness, andjuiciness), and nutritional quality.The dermal system (outer protective coverings) governs the regulation of water loss by the commodity.Physiological disorders(1) freezing injury :usually results in immediate collapse of the tissues and total loss.(2) chilling injury when fruits (mainly those of tropical and subtropical origin) are held at temperatures above their freezing point and below 5-15℃, depending on the commodity. ?(3) heat injury results from exposure to direct sunlight or to excessively high temperatures.Symptoms include surface scalding, uneven ripening, excessive softening, and desiccation. ?(4) very low (<1%) oxygen and/or elevated (>20%) carbon dioxide concentration can result in physiological breakdown of all fruits.Physical damageVarious types of physical damage (surface injuries, impact bruising, vibration bruising, etc.) Are major contributors to deterioration. Mechanical injuries are not only unsightly, but also accelerate water loss, stimulate higher respiration and ethylene production rates, and favor decay incidence.Pathological breakdownDecay is one of the most common or apparent causes of deterioration; however, attack by many microorganisms usually follows mechanical injury or physiological breakdown, which allows entry to the microorganism. Pathogens can infect healthy tissues and become the primary cause of deterioration.Environmental factors influencing deterioration of fruits(影响⽔果变坏的环境因素)Temperature,Relative humidity,Air movement,Atmospheric composition,Ethylene,Harvesting procedures Postharvest handling proceduresDumping、Sorting、Sizing、Cooling、Storage、RipeningDumping:Fresh fruits should be handled with care throughout the postharvest handling system in order to minimize mechanical injuries. Dumping in water or in flotation tanks should be used for fruits. If dry dumping systems are used, they should be well padded bruising. Sorting:Manual sorting is usually carried out to eliminate fruit exhibiting defects or decay. For some fruits, it may also be necessary to sort the fruit into two or more classes of maturity or ripeness.Mechanical sorters, which operate on the basis of color, soluble solids, moisture, or fat content, are being implemented and may greatly reduce time and labor requirements. Sizing:In some cases, sizing the fruits into two or more size categories may be required before processing. Sizing can be done mechanically on the basis of fruit dimension or by weight.Mechanical sizing can be a major source of physical damage to the fruit if the machines are not adequately padded and adjusted to the minimum possible fruit drop heights Ripening:Ripening before processing may be required for certain fruits (banana, kiwifruit, mango, papaya, peach, pear, plum, melon) that are picked mature but unripe. Ethylene treatment can be used to obtain faster and more uniform ripening. The optimum temperature range for ripening is 15-25℃and, within this range, the higher the temperature, the faster the ripening. Relative humidity should be maintained between 90% and 95 % during ripening. Cooling:Cooling is utilized to remove field heat and lower the fresh fruit's temperature to near its optimum storage temperature. Cooling can be done using cold water (hydrocooling) or cold air (forced-air cooling or "pressure cooling"). Highly perishable fruits, such as strawberries, bush berries, and apricots, should be cooled to near 4℃within six hours of harvest. Other fruits should be cooled to their optimum temperature within twelve hours of harvest. Storage:Short-term or long-term storage of fresh fruits may be needed before processing to regulate the product flow and extend the processing season. The relative humidity in the storage facility should be kept between 90% and 95%.To reduce decay, elevated c02 (15-20%) may be added to the atmosphere within pallet covers for strawberries, bush berries, and cherries, and sulfur dioxide (200 ppm) fumigation may be used on grapes.1.8 quality measurementsMany quality measurements can be made before a fruit crop is picked in order to determine if proper maturity or degree of ripeness has developed.ColourColour may be measured with instruments or by comparing the colour of fruit on the tree with standard picture charts. TextureTexture may be measured by compression by hand or by simple type of plungers.Soluble solidsAs fruit mature on the tree its concentration of juice solids, which are mostly sugars, changes. The concentration of soluble solids in the juice can be estimated with arefractometer or a hydrometer液体⽐重计.Acid contentThe acid content of fruit changes with maturity and affects flavour. Acid concentration can be measured by a simple chemical titration on the fruit juice. But for many fruits the tartness and flavour are really affected by the ratio of sugar to acid. Sugar to acid ratioIn describing the taste of tartness of several fruits and fruit juices, the term "sugar to acid ratio" or "brix to acid ratio" are commonly used. The higher the brix the greater the sugar concentration in the juice; the higher the "brix to acid ratio" the sweeter and lees tart is the juice.1.9 preprocessing1.9.1 harvestingThe above and other measurements, plus experience, indicate when fruit is ready for harvesting and subsequent processing.1.9.2 reception - quality and quantity1.9.3 temporary storage before processing1.9.4 washingHarvested fruit is washed to remove soil, micro-organisms and pesticide residues.Fruit washing is a mandatory processing step; it would be wise to eliminate spoiled fruit before washing in order to avoid the pollution of washing tools and/or equipment and the contamination of fruit during washing.1.9.5 sortingFruit sorting covers two main separate processing operations:Removal of damaged fruit and any foreign bodies (which might have been left behind after washing);Qualitative sorting based on organoleptic criteria and maturity stage.Mechanical sorting for size is usually not done at the preliminary stage. The most important initial sorting is for variety and maturity.1.9.6 trimming and peeling (skin removal)This processing step aims at removing the parts of the fruit which are either not edible or difficult to digest especially the skin.Up to now the industrial peeling of fruit and vegetables was performed by three procedures: Mechanically;By using water steam;Chemically; this method consists in treating fruit and vegetables by dipping them in a caustic soda solution at a temperature of 90 to 100°c; the concentration of this solution as well asthe dipping or immersion time varying according to each specific case.1.9.7 cuttingThis step is performed according to the specific requirements of the fruit processing technology.1.9.8 blanchingA brief heat treatment to vegetables some fruits to inactivate oxidative enzyme systems such as catalase, peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase, ascorbic acid oxidase, and lipoxygenase. ?When the unblanched tissue is disrupted or bruised and exposed to air, these enzymes come in contact with substrates causing softening, discoloration, and the production of off flavors. ?It is most often standard practice to blanch fruits in order to prevent quality deterioration. ?Although the primary purpose of blanching is enzyme inactivation.There are several other benefits blanching initially cleanses the product;Decreases the microbial load,Preheats the product before processing.Softens the fruit, facilitates compact packing in the can.Expell intercellular gases in the raw fruitImproved heat transfer during heat processing.Water blanching is generally of the immersion type or spray type as the product moves on a conveyor.Steam blanching often involves belt or chain conveyors upon which the product moves through a tunnel containing live steam.adequacy of blanching is usually based on inactivation of one of the heat resistant enzymes (peroxidase or polyphenol oxidase).During the blanching process, it is imperative that certain enzymes that have the potential to cause flavour and textural changes be inactiviated. The process involves a brief heattreatment applied to most vegetables and also to some fruits in order to inactivate oxidative enzyme system such as catalase, peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase,ascorbic acid oxidase, and lipoxygenase.When unblanched tissue is disrupted or bruised and exposed to air,these enzymes come in contact with substrate causing softening,discoloration, and the production of off-flavours.Since this action can potentially occur during the period prior to heat processing, it is most often standard practice to blanch fruits in order to prevent quality deterioration.1.9.9 ascorbic/citric acid dipAscorbic acid or vitamin c minimises fruit oxidation primarily by acting as an antioxidant and itself becoming oxidised in preference to catechol⼉茶酚-tannin compounds.It has been found that increased acidity also helps retard oxidative colour changes and so ascorbic acid plus citric acid may be used together. Citric acid further reacts with (chelates) metal ions thus removing these catalysts of oxidation from the system.1.9.10 sulphur dioxide treatmentSulphur dioxide may function in several ways:Sulphur dioxide is an enzyme poison against common oxidising enzymes;It also has antioxidant properties; i.e., it is an oxygen acceptor (as is ascorbic acid);Further so2 minimises non enzymatic maillard type browning by reacting with aldehyde醛groups of sugars so that they are no longer free to combine with amino acids;Sulphur dioxide also interferes with microbial growth.In many fruit processing pre-treatments two factors must be considered:Sulphur dioxide must be given time to penetrate the fruit tissues;So2 must not be used in excess because it has a characteristic unpleasant taste and odour, and international food laws limit the so2 content of fruit products, especially of those which are consumer oriented (e.g. Except semi-processed products oriented to further industrial utilisation).5.2.11 sugar syrupSugar syrup addition is one of the oldest methods of minimising oxidation.Sugar syrup minimises oxidation by coating the fruit and thereby preventing contact withatmospheric oxygen.Sugar syrup also offers some protection against loss of volatile 挥发性的fruit esters 酯and itcontributes sweet taste to otherwise tart fruits.It is common today to dissolve ascorbic acid and citric acid in the sugar syrup for addedeffect or to include sugar syrup after an so 2 treatment.QuestionsWhat factors influence the quality of fruits after harvest?How to maintain the fruit in good quality before the processing begin?第⼀节果蔬原料特性新鲜果蔬原料的特点 ? 果蔬原料的化学成分原料的化学成分与加⼯的关系1.新鲜果蔬原料的特点易腐性、季节性、区域性2.果蔬中的化学成分(chemical composition in fruits and vegetables )3.化学成分与加⼯的关系(relation between chemical composition and processing )3.1 ⽔分(water)果蔬中⽔的含量:⼤多数在80%以上,含⽔量⾼的如冬⽠(wax gourd)可达96%以上。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Major Phenolics in Apple and Their Contribution to the TotalAntioxidant CapacityK I W ON L EE,†Y OUNG J UN K IM,§D AE-O K K IM,#H YONG J OO L EE,†ANDC HANG Y ONG L EE*,#Department of Food Science and Technology,Cornell University,Geneva,New York14456;Department of Food Science and Technology,Seoul National University,Seoul151-742,South Korea;and Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics,Cornell University,Ithaca,New York14853The contribution of each phytochemical to the total antioxidant capacity of apples was determined. Major phenolic phytochemicals of six apple cultivars were identified and quantified,and their contributions to total antioxidant activity of apples were determined using a2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)radical scavenging assay and expressed as vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity(VCEAC).Average concentrations of major phenolics and vitamin C in six apple cultivars were as follows(mg/100g of fresh weight of apples):quercetin glycosides,13.20;procyanidin B2,9.35;chlorogenic acid,9.02;epicatechin,8.65;phloretin glycosides,5.59;vitamin C,12.80.A highly linear relationship(r2>0.97)was attained between concentrations and total antioxidant capacity of phenolics and vitamin C.Relative VCEAC values of these compounds were in the order quercetin (3.06)>epicatechin(2.67)>procyanidin B2(2.36)>phloretin(1.63)>vitamin C(1.00)>chlorogenic acid(0.97).Therefore,the estimated contribution of major phenolics and vitamin C to the total antioxidant capacity of100g of fresh apples is as follows:quercetin(40.39VCEAC)>epicatechin (23.10)>procyanidin B2(22.07)>vitamin C(12.80)>phloretin(9.11)>chlorogenic acid(8.75). These results indicate that flavonoids such as quercetin,epicatechin,and procyanidin B2rather than vitamin C contribute significantly to the total antioxidant activity of apples.KEYWORDS:Apples;free radical;phenolics;vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity(VCEAC)INTRODUCTIONFree radicals are major molecules that cause human diseases such as cancer,heart disease,cerebrovascular disease,and aging through diverse cellular processes(1-3).Naturally occurring antioxidants have been reported to play a major role in ameliorating oxidative damage induced by free radicals.Re-cently,natural foods and food-derived components,such as antioxidative vitamins and phenolic phytochemicals,have received a great deal of attention because they are safe and not perceived as“medicine”;some of these are known to function as chemopreventive agents against oxidative damage.Vitamin C has been considered to be one of the most prevalent antioxidative components of fruits and vegetables and exerts substantial chemopreventive effects without apparent toxicity at a relatively high level(4).However,the contribution of vitamin C to the total activity of fruits was determined to be generally<15%(5).On the other hand,the importance of contributions of phytochemicals to the total antioxidant capacity of fruits,vegetables,grains,and tea has been suggested(5,6). Much attention has recently been paid to the possible health benefits of dietary phenolics that have antioxidant activities stronger than that of vitamin C.The nutritional value and health-related biological activity of fruits depend not only on the concentration but also on the amount of such foods consumed daily.Apples are one of the major fruits frequently consumed by Americans.Among fresh fruits consumed in1996,apples(8.76kg/person/year)ranked second to bananas(12.7kg).However,when fresh and processed products are combined,the estimated per capita consumption of apples(21.3kg)exceeds that of bananas. Therefore,apple phenolics as antioxidant sources in the American diet may provide major protection against free radical damages in the human body(7).Our previous studies showed that the antioxidative and antiproliferative activities of apples are the consequence of synergistic activities of phenolics rather than vitamin C(6).In particular,phenolics in apple skin showed a much higher degree of contribution to the total antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of whole apple than those in apple flesh(6,8). Furthermore,quercetin,one of the major antioxidative fla-vonoids in apple,exerted much stronger antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activities than vitamin C(4,9).Thus,the importance of contributions of phenolics to the total antioxidant capacity of apples has been suggested(4-6,9).Apples contain various antioxidative phenolics such as chlorogenic acid,*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed[telephone(315)787-2271;fax(315)787-2284;e-mail CYL1@].†Seoul National University.§Cornell University,Ithaca,NY.#Cornell University,Geneva,NY.6516J.Agric.Food Chem.2003,51,6516−652010.1021/jf034475w CCC:$25.00©2003American Chemical SocietyPublished on Web09/30/2003epicatechin,procyanidin B2,phloretin,and quercetin as well as vitamin C(10,11).In the mixture of such bioactive compounds, however,the relative contribution of each antioxidant to the total antioxidant capacity has not been clearly demonstrated. Because the contents of total phenolics or flavonoids in fruits often do not directly reflect the total antioxidant capacity,the accurate measurement of the antioxidant capacity of each bioactive compound should be warranted.In the present study, we identify major phenolics in various apple cultivars and investigate their contributions to the antioxidant activity of apples compared with that of vitamin C.MATERIALS AND METHODSChemicals.Ammonium hydroxide,2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothia-zoline-6-sulfonic acid)(ABTS)as diammonium salt,ammonium phosphate monobasic(NH4H2PO4),quercetin,epicatechin,phloretin, and chlorogenic acid were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co.(St. Louis,MO).2,2′-Azobis(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride(AAPH) was obtained from Wako Chemicals USA,Inc.(Richmond,VA). Procyanidin B2was obtained from Shimazu Co.(Kyoto,Japan). Quercetin glycosides(arabinoside,gulcoside,galactoside,and rham-noside)and phloretin glucoside were obtained from Extrasynthese (Genay,France).Vitamin C was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh,PA).All other chemicals used were of analytical or HPLC grade.Apple Cultivars.Six apple cultivars,Golden Delicious,Cortland, Monroe,Rhode Island Greening,Empire,and NY674,were picked at commercial maturity during the2001harvest season at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station orchard in Geneva,NY.Apples were stored in a2-5°C cold room.They were carefully cut into slices, the pits were removed,and the freeze-dried samples were ground to powder using a laboratory mill(Thomas-Willey)and then stored at-20°C until analyzed.Extraction of Phenolics.The phenolics were extracted by using the ultrasound-assisted method(12).Briefly,phenolics were extracted from10g of ground freeze-dried sample using100mL of80%aqueous methanol.The mixture was sonicated for20min with a continual stream of nitrogen gas purging to prevent possible degradation of phenolics, filtered through Whatman no.2filter paper(Whatman International Limited,Kent,U.K.)using a chilled Bu¨chner funnel,and rinsed with 50mL of100%methanol.Extraction of the residue was repeated under the same conditions.The two filtrates were combined and transferred into a1L evaporating flask with an additional50mL of80%aqueous methanol.The solvent was evaporated using a rotary evaporator at40°C.The remaining phenolic concentrate was first dissolved in50mL of100%methanol and diluted to a final volume of100mL using distilled deionized water(ddH2O).The mixture was centrifuged at refrigerated temperature(4°C)for20min and stored at-4°C until analyses.The total extraction process was done in duplicate.Identification of Phenolics.HPLC analysis was performed accord-ing to the method described in our previous paper(13).Extracted samples were filtered through a0.45µm poly(tetrafluoroethylene) syringe-tip filter,using a20µL sample loop,and were analyzed using an HPLC system(Hewlett-Packard model1100,Palo Alto,CA) equipped with a photodiode array detector,a quaternary pump,and a vacuum degasser.A C18reversed-phase Symmetry Analytical column (5µm×250mm×4.6mm)was used with a Symmetry Sentry guard column of the same packing material as the analytical column(Waters Corp.,Milford,MA).Three mobile phases were used:solvent A,50 mM ammonium phosphate monobasic(NH4H2PO4),pH 2.6(pH adjusted with phosphoric acid);solvent B,80:20(v/v)acetonitrile/50 mM NH4H2PO4,pH2.6;and solvent C,200mM phosphoric acid(H3-PO4),pH1.5(pH adjusted with ammonium hydroxide).The gradient for HPLC analysis was linearly changed as follows(total60min): 100%A at0min,92%A/8%B at4min,14%B/86%C at10min,16.5%B/83.5%C at22.5min,25%B/75%C at27.5min,80%B/20%C at50min,100%A at55min,100%A at60min.Flow rate was1.0 mL/min at constant room temperature(23°C).Phenolic standards were used to generate characteristic UV-vis spectra and calibration curves. Individual phenolics in the sample were tentatively identified by comparison of their UV-vis spectra and retention times with spiked input of polyphenolic standard.Three replicated HPLC analyses were performed for each apple cultivar.Quantification of Vitamin C.Ascorbic acid was determined by using the2,6-dichloroindophenol titrimetic method,according to AOAC method967.21(14).Reference material was an ascorbic acid solution (1mg/mL)prepared from L-ascorbic acid.ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity.The ABTS method described earlier was used with slight modification(9).Briefly,1.0mM AAPH was mixed with2.5mM ABTS in phosphate-buffered saline(PBS) solution(100mM potassium phosphate buffer containing150mM NaCl).The mixture was heated in a68°C water bath.The resulting blue-green ABTS radical solution was adjusted to an absorbance of 0.30(0.02at734nm.Various doses of antioxidants(each10µL) were added to190µL of the resulting blue-green ABTS radical solution in a96well plate.The control consisted of10µL of99%ethanol and 190µL of ABTS radical solution.The decrease in absorbance,which resulted from the addition of test compounds,was measured at734 nm using an ELISA reader(Emax,Molecular Devices Co.,Sunnyvale, CA).ABTS radical scavenging activities of the test compounds were expressed as percent remaining ABTS radicals at each time point.The radical stock solution was prepared fresh daily.Quantification of Total Antioxidant Capacity.A method devel-oped by Winston et al.(15)was applied with slight modifications for the quantification of antioxidant value of each compound tested.The area under the kinetic curve was calculated by integration.The total antioxidant capacity(TAC)of each tested compound was then quantified according to eq1.Percent increase in integrated area was measured to compare each phenolic and vitamin C.Here,∫SA and ∫CA are the integrated areas from the curve defining the sample and control reactions,respectively.The median effective dose(EC50)of all samples tested was calculated from the dose-response curve.TAC of each phenolic was expressed as vitamin C equivalents(VCEAC). All tested samples were replicated six times and presented as mean value(standard deviation.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONComposition and concentrations of the major phenolics of six apple cultivars studied are shown in Table1.Among the apple cultivars studied,Rhode Island Greening showed the highest content in all phenolic phytochemicals analyzed.Aver-age concentrations of the major phenolics were as follows(mg/ 100g of fresh weight):quercetin glycosides,13.20;procyanidin B2,9.35;chlorogenic acid,9.02;epicatechin,8.65;and phloretin glycosides,5.59.Chlorogenic acid and phloretin glycosides presented lower contents compared to quercetin glycosides and procyanidin B2.Several phenolics in apples were present as glycosides.In particular,a wide variety of quercetin glycosides were present in the apple cultivars.Galactoside was the most abundant form among the glycosides identified in most of the tested cultivars except NY674,in which rhamnoside was most abundant.In addition,xyloglucoside was an abundant form of phloretin glycoside.There is increasing evidence that flavonoids can be absorbed into the human body in amounts that are,in principle,sufficient to exert antioxidant or other biological activities in vivo(16-18).Chlorogenic acid is absorbed with no structural change in the small intestine(19),whereas both epicatechin and procya-nidin B2are absorbed as epicatechin(20).In general,derivatives of flavonoids and isoflavones were found to have lower biological activities in free forms compared with their parent aglycons in vitro.However,gastrointestinal hydrolase removes TAC)100-(∫SA/∫CA×100)(1)Major Phenolics in Apple J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.51,No.22,20036517the sugar moiety from flavonoid glycosides,and their aglycons are released to be absorbed in the gut (16).Intestinal conjugation seemed to be an important process for the absorption because only conjugated forms were detected in the mesenteric vein blood (17).Furthermore,when quercetin glycosides and genistin were fed to rats or humans,quercetin and genistein,their only respective aglycon forms,were detected in the urine (17,18).Therefore,we measured herein the antioxidant activity of quercetin and phloretin instead of that of quercetin and phloretin glycosides.Scavenging rates of each tested major antioxidants in apples against the ABTS radical at different concentrations and times are shown in Figure 1.Vitamin C and phenolics exerted ABTS radical scavenging activity in dose-and time-dependent manners.Strong correlations (r 2>0.97)were observed between the concentrations and the TAC of vitamin C (Figure 2)and phenolics (Figure 3)in apple.The relative TAC of phenolics evaluated by the ABTS assay compared to vitamin C was as follows:quercetin (3.06)>epicatechin (2.67)>procyanidin B 2(2.36)>phloretin (1.63)>vitamin C (1.00)>chlorogenic acid (0.97)(Table 2).The data show that quercetin has the lowest EC 50value among the major phenolics in the apple.Although most of the phenolics are reported to have anti-oxidant activity,quercetin has been reported to have structural advantages as an antioxidant because the o -dihydroxy moiety in the B ring confers stability to the resulting free radical form (21).Because quercetin is mainly present in apple peel (10),it was suggested that consumption of apples with skins is highly desirable in order to maximize apple antioxidant activity (22).In parallel,quercetin showed the highest antioxidant capacity in the ABTS radical scavenging assay.Considering the amount of each compound,the estimated contribution ofquercetinFigure 1.Kinetics of ABTS radical reactions with vitamin C,chlorogenic acid,epicatechin,phloretin,procyanidin B 2,and quercetin.Each test compoundat 0,0.5,1,2,3,and 4µg/mL was reacted with 2.5mM ABTS radicals.Error bars represent standard deviations of each data point (n )3).6518J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.51,No.22,2003Lee et al.(40.39VCEAC)to the total antioxidant capacity of apples is the highest among major phytochemicals,which was followed by epicatechin(23.10)and procyanidin B2(22.07),whereas chlorogenic acid(8.75)and phloretin(9.11)provide minimal contribution(Table2).Moreover,vitamin C contributes only 11%of the total antioxidant capacity of apple.These results clearly indicate that flavonoids such as quercetin,epicatechin, and procyanidin B2rather than vitamin C contribute significantly to total antioxidant activity of apples.Sun et al.(23)reported that phytochemicals in fruits including apple showed a high correlation with antioxidant capacity (r2)0.97).On the other hand,Imeh et al.(24)observed a weak correlation(r2)0.58)between the phenolic content of the fruits and the total antioxidant activity measured by ferric reducing antioxidant power assay.This was probably due to the other unquantified phenolics and/or synergism among these compounds and major phenolics.Apples,like other fruits,vary in chemical composition,even within the same variety,depend-ing on maturity,location produced,and agricultural practices, as well as numerous other environmental factors.Indeed, significant variations in phenolic content and antioxidant activity were observed among cultivars and even among different fruits in the same cultivar(24).In this study,various apple cultivars showed different levels of phenolic content and various phenolics showed different antioxidant activities.Some active phenolics such as chlorogenic acids,phloretins,epicatechins,quercetins,and procyanidin B2 have been identified as major antioxidants in apples.The evidence shown herein in terms of the content and the capacity of antioxidants suggests that quercetin may have the highestposition and Quantification of Major Antioxidants of Six Apple Cultivarsfresh apples with skins(mg/100g)antioxidantGoldenDelicious Cortland MonroeRhode IslandGreening Empire NY674avvitamin C16.6012.179.0014.2213.2211.6212.80 chlorogenic acid8.48 5.3610.0814.2811.52 4.409.02 epicatechin7.128.3210.7219.16 2.28 4.328.65 phloretin glycosidesglucoside 1.80 1.44 2.40 2.08 2.80 1.84 5.59 xyloglucoside 1.92 3.20 4.92 5.88 1.72 3.56 procyanidin B2 6.2811.328.3221.68 3.44 5.049.35 quercetin glycosidesarabinoside 2.16 2.40 4.44 2.88 2.76 1.5613.20 xyloside 1.68 1.08 2.28 1.92 2.16 1.20glucoside 2.40 1.56 2.40 1.20 2.400.36galactoside 4.20 3.36 4.80 4.32 4.20 1.92rhamnoside 3.84 2.28 3.12 4.08 3.84 2.40 total56.4852.4962.4891.7050.3438.2258.61Table2.Contributions of Major Antioxidants to the Total Antioxidant Activity of Applesphytochemicalconcn(mg/100g of fresh wt)EC50relative VCEACvalue atotal antioxidant activity(mg of VCEAC/100g)relativecontribution(%)quercetin glycosides13.200.56 3.0640.3934.7 epicatechin8.650.64 2.6723.1019.9 procyanidin B29.350.72 2.3622.0719.0 vitamin C12.80 1.71 1.0012.8011.0 phloretin glycosides 5.59 1.05 1.639.117.8 chlorogenic acid9.02 1.760.978.757.6 total58.61116.22100.0a Relative VCEAC value)VCEAC of each compound/antioxidant capacity of vitaminC.Figure2.Total antioxidant capacity(TAC)of vitaminC.Figure3.Total antioxidant capacity(TAC)of major phenolics in apples.Major Phenolics in Apple J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.51,No.22,20036519contribution as an antioxidant in apples.We suggest that the contribution of each nutrient or antioxidant in the daily diet should be carefully considered on the basis of its biological activity and quantitative consumption data.We also need to study the interactions among active food components and their diverse bioactivities to determine the total biological activities of the food.At present,we are studying anti-tumor promoting activities of major phenolics in apples. ACKNOWLEDGMENTWe thank Nancy Smith,a research support specialist at Cornell, for technical assistance.ABBREVIATIONS USEDAAPH,2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride;ABTS, 2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid);VCEAC, vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity;TAC,total antioxi-dant capacity.LITERATURE CITED(1)Sinclair,A.J.;Bayer,A.J.;Johnston,J.;Warner,C.;Maxwell,S.R.J.Altered plasma antioxidant status in subjects with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia.Int.J.Geriatr.Psychiatry1998,13,840-845.(2)Halliwell,B.The role of oxygen radicals in human disease,withparticular reference to the vascular system.Haemostasis1993, 23(Suppl.1),118-126.(3)Ames,B.N.Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens.Oxygenradicals and degenerative diseases.Science1983,221,1256-1264.(4)Lee,K.W.;Lee,H.J.;Kang,K.S.;Lee,C.Y.Preventive effectsof vitamin C on ncet2002,359,172. (5)Wang,H.;Cao,G.;Prior,R.L.Total antioxidant capacity offruits.J.Agric.Food Chem.1996,44,701-705.(6)Eberhardt,M.V.;Lee,C.Y.;Liu,R.H.Antioxidant activity offresh apples.Nature2000,405,903-904.(7)Putnam,J.J.;Allshouse,J.E.Food Consumption,Prices,andExpenditures;U.S.Department of Agriculture:Washington,DC, 1968.(8)Wolfe,K.;Wu,X.;Liu,R.H.Antioxidant activity of apple peels.J.Agric.Food Chem.2003,51,609-614.(9)Kim,D.-O.;Lee,K.W.;Lee,H.J.;Lee,C.Y.Vitamin Cequivalent antioxidant capacity(VCEAC)of phenolic phy-tochemicals.J.Agric.Food Chem.2002,50,3713-3717. (10)Burda,S.;Oleszek,W.;Lee,C.Y.Phenolic compounds andtheir changes in apples during maturation and cold storage.J.Agric.Food Chem.1990,38,945-948.(11)Mayr,U.;Treutter,D.;Santos-Buelga,C.;Bauer,H.;Feucht,W.Developmental changes in the phenol concentrations of ‘Golden Delicious’apple fruits and leaves.Phytochemistry1995, 38,1151-1155.(12)Kim,D.-O.;Lee,C.Y.Extraction and isolation of polyphenolics.In Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry;Wrolstad, R.E.,Ed.;Wiley:New York,2002;pp I1.2.1-I1.2.12.(13)Kim,D.-O.;Lee,C.Y.HPLC separation of polyphenolics.InCurrent Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry;Wrolstad,R.E.,Ed.;Wiley:New York,2002;pp I1.3.1-I1.3.16.(14)AOAC.Official Methods and Recommended Practices of theAmerican Oil Chemists’Society,4th ed.;Firestone,D.,Ed.;American Oil Chemists’Society:Champaign,IL,1990. (15)Winston,G.W.;Regoli,F.;Dugas,A.J.;Fong,J.H.,Jr.;Blanchard,K. A.A rapid gas chromatographic assay for determining oxyradical scavenging capacity of antioxidants and biological fluids.Free Radical Biol.Med.1998,24,480-493.(16)Day,A.J.;Gee,J.M.;DuPont,M.S.;Johnson,I.T.;Williamson,G.Absorption of quercetin-3-glucoside and quercetin-4′-gluco-side in the rat small intestine:the role of lactase phlorizin hydrolase and the sodium-dependent glucose transporter.Bio-chem.Pharmacol.2003,65,1199-1206.(17)Crespy,V.;Morand,C.;Besson,C.;Manach,C.;Demigne,C.;Remesy,parison of the intestinal absorption of quercetin, phloretin and their glucosides in rats.J.Nutr.2001,131,2109-2114.(18)Lu,L.J.;Grady,J.J.;Marshall,M.V.;Ramanujam,V.M.;Anderson,K.E.Altered time course of urinary daidzein and genistein excretion during chronic soya diet in healthy male subjects.Nutr.Cancer1995,243,311-323.(19)Azuma,K.;Ippoushi.K.;Nakayama,M.;Ito,H.;Higashio,H.;Terao,J.Absorption of chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid in rats after oral administration.J.Agric.Food Chem.2000,48,5496-500.(20)Spencer,J.P.;Schroeter,H.;Shenoy,B.;Srai,S.K.;Debnam,E.S.;Rice-Evans,C.Epicatechin is the primary bioavailableform of the procyanidin dimers B2and B5after transfer across the small mun.2001,285, 588-593.(21)Salah,N.;Miller,N.J.;Paganga,G.;Tijburg,L.;Bolwell,G.P.;Rice-Evans,C.Polyphenolic flavanols as scavengers of aqueous phase radicals and as chain-breaking antioxidants.Arch.Biochem.Biophys.1995,322,339-346.(22)Lattanzio,V.;Di Venere,D.;Linsalata,V.;Bertolini,P.;Ippolito,A.;Salerno,M.Low-temperature metabolism of apple phenolicsand quiescence of Phlyctaena V agabunda.J.Agric.Food Chem.2001,49,5817-5821.(23)Sun,J.;Chu,Y. F.;Wu,X.;Liu,R.H.Antioxidant andantiproliferative activities of common fruits.J.Agric.Food Chem.2002,50,7449-7454.(24)Imeh,U.;Khokhar,S.Distribution of conjugated and free phenolsin fruits:antioxidant activity and cultivar variations.J.Agric.Food Chem.2002,50,6301-6306.Received for review May7,2003.Revised manuscript received August 18,2003.Accepted August22,2003.This work was supported in part by a grant from the New York State Apple Research and Development Program and from the BioGreen21Program,Rural Development Administration,Republic of Korea.JF034475W6520J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.51,No.22,2003Lee et al.。