Speech Errors

合集下载

SpeechSounds剖析.

SpeechSounds剖析.
• Unrounded • Rounded 非圆唇 圆唇
• 圆唇元音都是后元音
The length of sound
• [i] [i:] • [u] [u:]
• Monophthong 单元音 • Diphthong 双元音
• Monophthong 单元音 • Diphthong 双元音
Phonology (音位学)
• For example, • pin/bin, pin /pen, pin/ping. • Sounds in contrastive distribution should be assigned to different phonemes.
符号•标记
• • • • + - 表示是否具有某一特征 〔+vocalic〕 〔-vocalic〕 # :双加号用来分隔词与语素,例如 telegraph,telegraphic,tele+graph # ic • Ф:表示零,即空位 • ()可有可无的符号放在该符号里。 • A(B) 表示或者A,或者AB。
• Matthews’ definition • • The smallest distinct sound unit in a given language: [tip]
• Technically speaking, a phoneme is defined as a minimal distinctive unit in the sound system of a language. In other words, a phoneme is the smallest unit that cannot be further divided into smaller parts at the level of sounds.

How to Make a Speech

How to Make a Speech

How to Make a SpeechFor each day, you may spend an average of 30 percent of your day in speaking. You have to communicate with your parents, classmates, teachers in your daily life. In the future, you must talk to the colleagues, superiors, and employees and customers. Still other times, you may be asked to make presentations in public, or to speak to other groups of people outside of your living surroundings. You may play different roles to speak in different situations. However, what really matters is how you speak,not much you speak. Now let's look at the ways for speech delivery.A.Before the speech, you should have a good preparation.I.Know your topic, make a good outline and write your speech.Before the speech,first, you should know what you will say, what is the point you want your audiences to know.Second, writing a speech is in many ways like writing a paper, except that there is no penalty for spelling and punctuation errors. Try not to use words you are not comfortable pronouncing or don't know the meaning of because it can lead to a less fluently delivered speech.Something you also should know is that assess how much time your speech should take. if you don't have a time limit, try to keep your speech brief yet informative. Also, think about your audience and let your perception of the audience shape the tone of your speech as you write it.A good speech never comes out of an aimless mind. Actually, it always has a specific objective. Speech objective is often decided by given position you are in, and by the special requirement from outside factors. The function for outline is to help the speaker to develop his purpose in a systematic way. For that reason, it's highly necessary to work out a good outline for the speech. Sometimes, you can write the outline on a note card acts as a reminder -in case you might forget some contain halfway through.II.The context should show up to give, not to take.Often people give presentations to sell products or ideas, to get people to follow them on social media, buy their books or even just to like them. These kinds of speakers “takers,” and audiences can see through these people right away. And, when they do, they disengage.“We are highly social animals,” says Sinek,a famous speaker. “Even at a distance on stage, we can tell if you’re a giver or a taker, and people are more likely to trust a giver —a speaker that gives them value, that teaches them something new, that inspires them — than a t aker.”III.Relax before you go on, turn nervousness into excitement.Have you noticed that reporters interviewing Olympic athletes before and after competing were all asking the same question? “Were you nervous?” And all of the athletes gave the same answer: “No, I was excited.” These competitors were taking the body’s signs of nervousness — clammy hands, pounding heart and tense nerves —and reinterpreting them as side effects of excitement and exhilaration.When you’re up on stage you will likely go through the same thing. That’s you should say to yourself out loud, “I’m not nervous, I’m excited!”IV.Take deep breath before the speechIn order to relieve your tension, you should arrive the place earlier where you are going to make the speech. Try to collect some information about your listeners and get familiar with your situation. Besides, taking some deep breaths which is a practical way to make you feel relaxed before you start your speaking.B.During the speech, be confident.I.Don’t talk right away.You should never talk as you walk out on stage. A lot of people start talking right away, and it’s out of nerves. That communicates a little bit of insecurity and fear. Instead, quietly walk out on stage. Then take a deep breath, find your place, wait a few seconds and begin. It sounds long and tedious and it feels excruciatingly awkward when you do it,but it shows the audience you’re totally confident and in c harge of the situation.II. Make eye contact with audience members one by one.Scanning and panning is your worst enemy, it looks like you’re looking at everyone, it actually disconnects you from your audience.It’s much ea sier and effective, if you directly look at specific audience members throughout your speech. If you can, give each person that you intently look at an entire sentence or thought, without breaking your gaze. When you finish a sentence, move on to another p erson and keep connecting with individual people until you’re done speaking.It’s like you’re having a conversation with your audience,You’re not speaking at them, you’re speaking with them.This tactic not only creates a deeper connection with individuals but the entire audience can feel it.Eye -contact is an important means to express your confidence. Physiologically and psychologically speaking, when a speaker reads out his speech he has to focus his eyes on what has been written on the paper, for fear of stumbling over some technical terms and expressions. For that reason, the speaker could barely spare any time to establish eye contact with his audience. However, this will disappoint his listeners, who have come not just to listen to the speaker, but to have a kind of non-verbal communication with him. A lack of eye contact on the speaker's part will certainly affect the listeners' comprehension and interest for the speech.III. Speak unusually slowly.When you get nervo us, it’s not just your heart beat that quickens. You’re words also tend to speed up. Luckily audiences are more patient and forgiving than we know.They want you to succeed up there, but the more you rush, the more you turn them off, If you just go quiet fo r a moment and take a long, deep breath, they’ll wait for you. It’s kind of amazing.It’s impossible to speak too slowly on stage. It’s incredible that you can stand on stage and speak so slowly that there are several seconds between each of your words and people… will… hang… on… your… every… word. It really works.IV.Have a pause in the right time.Pausing in a speech is beyond the notice of many speakers,even some business communication textbooks forget to mention that. In fact, pausing plays an important role which helps to generate the audience's attention when one speaks. Many inexperienced speakers are often too nervous to pause, which make their listeners feel tired, but affect their understanding of the points-listeners need time to digest what the speaker has said.Some authentic speeches with transcriptions can be used as listening materials to let students analyze the transcription's details after listening and to think about the prosody features that deserve attention. From the specific transcription, it is straight-forward to provide the stress patterns and useful expressions that students can benefit, rather than just let them listen to something and finish some comprehension questions as a method of testing whether students can comprehend the listening or not.V. Ignore the naysayers.Dismiss the people furrowing their brows, crossing their arms or shaking their heads “no.” Instead, focus only on your supporters — the people who are visibly engaged, enjoying your presentation and nodding “yes.” If you find the audience members who are positively interacting with you, you’ll be much more confident and relaxed than ifyou try to convince the naysayerVI.Say thank you when you’re done.Applause is a gift, and when you receive a gift, it’s only right to express how grateful you are for it. This is why Sinek always closes out his presentations with these two simple yet powerful words: thank you.They gave y ou their time, and they’re giving you their applause.That’s a gift, and you have to be grateful.。

心理语言学名词解释_注释版

心理语言学名词解释_注释版

名词解释1. Mutual exclusivity bias相互排斥倾向A cognitive constraint in which children assume that an object is ordinarily not given two different names.2. Motherese 母式语言A form of adult-to-child speech characterized by relatively simple utterances,concrete referents指示物, exaggerated intonation patterns夸张的语调模式, and a high proportion of directive utterances指示话语.3. Critical period hypothesis临界期假设The view that there is a period early in life in which we are especially prepared to acquire a language.4. Language bioprogram hypothesis语言生物程序假设The hypothesis that children whose environmental exposure to language is limited use a backup linguistic system.5. Pidgin混杂语An auxiliary辅助的language that is created when speakers of mutually unintelligible 无法理解的languages are in close contact.6. Language transfer 语言迁移In second-language acquisition, the process in which the first language influences the acquisition of a subsequent后来的language.7. Overregularization规则泛化When a child a pplies a linguisitic rule to cases that ar e exceptions to the rule--for example, saying goed instead of went.8. Holophrase 表句词单词句A one-word utterance used by a child to express more than the meaning attributed to the word by adults.9. Idiomorph ?A sound or sound sequence音序used consistently by a child to refer to someone or something even though it is not the sound sequence conventionally used in the language for that purpose.10. Coalescence合并A phonological音位学的,音韵学的process in which phonemes音位,音素(the smallest unit of significant sound in a language)from different syllables音节are combined into a single syllable.11. Reduction减少cluster reduction音群删略A phonological process in child language in which one or more phonemes are deleted. Also called cluster reduction音群删略because consonant clusters辅音群,两个或两个以上的辅音连在一起are often reduced, such as saying take for steak.12. Assimilation 同化A phonological process in which one speech sound replaced by another that is similar sounds elsewhere in the utterance.13. Common ground共识The shared understanding of those involved in the conversation.14.Semantic bootstrapping语义引导She spent years bootstrapping herself through university.她靠自己多年奋斗念完大学The process of using semantics to acquire syntax.15. Accommodation顺应A phonological process in which elements that are shifted or deleted are adapted to their error-induced environments.20. Psycholinguistics心理语言学The study of the comprehension, production, and acquisition of language.21. Aphasia失语症A language or speech disorder caused by brain damage.A mental condition in which people are unable to remember simple words or communicate.22. Behaviorism行为主义The doctrine that states that the proper concern of psychology should be the objective study of behavior rather than the study of the mind.23. Distinctive features显著特征The specification详述of the differences between speech sounds in terms of individual contrasts.24. Observational adequacy观察充分性The extent to which a grammar can distinguish betw een acceptable and unacceptable strings of words.The grammar must specify what is and what is not acceptable sequence in the language.语法能对原始的语言材料做出正确的选择25.Descriptive adequacy描写充分性The grammar must specify the relationships between various sequences in the language. The extent to which a grammar can provide a structural description of a sentence.语法不仅应该能解释原始的语言材料,而且要正确解释说话人和听话人内在的语言能力。

linguistic competence and performence

linguistic competence and performence

Linguistic competence refers to the knowledge of a language system. The term first emerged in the work of Noam Chomsky, where it referred specifically to syntactic competence, and was specifically opposed to linguistic performance. The term was used more broadly by Dell Hymes in formulating the concept of communicative competence. Like communicative competence, language competence is often divided into various subcompetences, such as syntactic competence and lexical competence.According to Chomsky, competence is the ideal speaker /hearer, i.e. an idealized but not a real person who would have a complete knowledge of language. This means a person’s ability to create and understand sentences, including sentences they have never heard before.Performance is the actual use of the language by individuals in speech and writing.Speakers’ linguistic knowledge permits them to form longer and longer sentences by joining sentences and phases together or adding modifiers to a noun. whether you stop at three, five or eighteen adjectives, it is impossible to limit the number you could add if desired. Very long sentences are theoretically possible, but they are highly improbable.Evidently, there is a difference between having the knowledge necessary to produce sentences of a language, and applying this knowledge. It is a difference between what you know, which is your linguistic competence, and how you use this knowledge in actual speech production and comprehension, which is your linguistic performance.When we speak, we usually wish to convey some message. At some stage in the act of producing speech, we must organize our thoughts into strings of words. Sometimes the message is garbled. We may stammer, or pause, or produce slips of the tongue. We may even sound like the baby, who illustrates the difference between linguistic knowledge and the way we use that knowledge in performance.Linguistic competence is the system of linguistic knowledge possessed by native speakers of a language, it is in contrast to the concept of Linguistic performance, the way the language system is used in communication. The concept was first introduced by Noam Chomsky[1] as part of the foundations for his Generative grammar, but it has since been adopted and developed by other linguists, particularly those working in the generativist tradition. In the generativist tradition competence is the only level of language that is studied, because this level gives insights into the Universal Grammar, that generativists see as underlying all human language systems. Functional theories of grammar tend to dismiss the sharp distinction between competence and performance, and particularly the primacy given to the study of competence.According to Chomsky, competence is the 'ideal' language system that makes it possible for speakers to produce and understand an infinite number [nb 1] of sentences in their language, and to distinguish grammatical sentences from ungrammatical sentences. This is unaffected by "grammatically irrelevant conditions" such as speech errors.[1]Competence versus performance"Linguistic theory is concerned primarily with an ideal speaker-listener, in a completely homogeneous speech-community, who knows its (the speech community's) language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatically irrelevant conditions as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors (random or characteristic) in applying his knowledge of this language in actual performance."~Chomsky,1965[1]Chomsky differentiates competence, which is an idealized capacity, from performance being the production of actual utterances. According to him, competence is the ideal speaker-hearer's knowledge of his or her language and it is the 'mental reality' which is responsible for all those aspects of language use which can be characterized as 'linguistic'.[2] Chomsky argues that only under an idealized situation whereby the speaker-hearer is unaffected by grammatically irrelevant conditions such as memory limitations and distractions will performance be a direct reflection of competence. A sample of natural speech consisting of numerous false starts and other deviations will not provide such data. Therefore, he claims that a fundamental distinction has to be made between the competence and performance.[1] Chomsky dismissed criticisms of delimiting the study of performance in favor of the study of underlying competence, as unwarranted and completely misdirected. He claims that the descriptivist limitation-in-principle to classification and organizationof data, the "extracting patterns" from a corpus of observed speech and the describing "speech habits" etc. are the core factors that precludes the development of a theory of actual performance.Competence and components of grammarOne's competence is defined by the grammar,[nb 2][3] or set of language rules, that is represented mentally and manifested based on his or her own understanding of acceptable usage in a given linguistic idiom. Therefore, grammatical competence defines an innate knowledge of rules rather than knowledge of items or relations. According to Chomsky, it is regarded to be innate because one does not have to be trained to develop it and will still be able to apply it in an infinite number of unheard examples.[4]The core components of the grammar are included in the speaker's linguistic competence and these components corresponds to five of the major subfields of linguistics:Phonetics: Phonology: Morphology: Syntax: Semantics:Linguictic performanceIn linguistics, performance has two senses:[1](1) A technique used in phonetics whereby aspiring practitioners of the subjectare trained to control the use of their vocal organs(2) A term used in the linguistic theory of transformational generativegrammar, referring to language being seen as a set of specific utterancesproduced by native speakersIt is also one of the two elements in Chomsky's performance-competence distinction, which relates to Language production(parole), with an emphasis upon how this is different from Competence, or the mental knowledge of language itself. Linguistic performance does not simply reflect the intrinsic sound-meaning connections established by the system of linguistic rules. It involves many other factors, such as extra-linguistic beliefs concerning the speaker and the situation play a fundamental role in determining how speech is produced, identified and understood. Furthermore, it is governed by principles of cognitive structure such as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors (random or characteristic) that are technically not considered to be aspects of language.Communicative competenceCommunicative competence is a term in linguistics which refers to a language user's grammatical knowledge of syntax, morphology, phonology and the like, as well as social knowledge about how and when to use utterances appropriately.The term was coined by Dell Hymes in 1966,[1] reacting against the perceived inadequacy of Noam Chomsky's (1965) distinction between competence and performance.[2]To address Chomsky's abstract notion of competence, Hymes undertook ethnographic exploration of communicative competence that included "communicative form and function in integral relation to each other".[3] The approach pioneered by Hymes is now known as the ethnography of communication.Debate has occurred regarding linguistic competence and communicative competence in the second and foreign language teaching literature, and scholars have found communicative competence as a superior model of language following Hymes' opposition to Chomsky's linguistic competence. This opposition has been adopted by those who seek new directions toward a communicative era by taking for granted the basic motives and the appropriateness of this opposition behind the development of communicative competence.communicative competenceAnother functionalist theory advances the notion of communicative competence, which focuses on socially-situated performance, was developed by Dell Hymes in response to the abstract nature of linguistic competence.[22][23]Communicative competence is also sometimes referred to as pragmatic or sociolinguistic competence, especially when the emphasis is on how to interpret the speaker's intended meaning in a particular utterance, apart from the literal meaning.The major criticism towards Chomsky's notion of linguistic competence by Hymes is the inadequate distinction of competence and performance. Furthermore, he commented that it is unreal and that no significant progress in linguistics is possible without studying forms along with the ways in which they are used. As such, linguistic competence should fall under the domain of communicative competence since it comprises four competence areas, namely, linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse and strategic.[25]Use in educationThe notion of communicative competence is one of the theories that underlies the communicative approach to foreign language teaching.[3]Canale and Swain (1980) defined communicative competence in terms of three components:1.grammatical competence: words and rules2.sociolinguistic competence: appropriateness3.strategic competence: appropriate use of communication strategiesCanale (1983) refined the above model, adding discourse competence: cohesion and coherenceA more recent survey of communicative competence by Bachman (1990) divides it into the broad headings of "organizational competence," which includes both grammatical and discourse (or textual) competence, and "pragmatic competence," which includes both sociolinguistic and "illocutionary" competence.[6] Strategic Competence is associated with the interlocutors' ability in using communication strategies (Faerch & Kasper, 1983; Lin, 2009).Through the influence of communicative language teaching, it has become widely accepted that communicative competence should be the goal of language education, central to good classroom practice.[7] This is in contrast to previous views in which grammatical competence was commonly given top priority. The understanding of communicative competence has been influenced by the field of pragmatics and the philosophy of language concerning speech acts as described in large part by John Searle and J.L. Austin.Competence vs. PerformanceLinguistic theory is concerned primarily with an ideal speaker-listener, in a completely homogeneous speech-communication, who know its (the speech community's) language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatically irrelevant conditions as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors (random or characteristic) in applying his knowledge of this language in actual performance. (Chomsky, 1965, p. 3)In this definition, Chomsky separates 'competence,' an idealized capacity, from the production of actual utterances, 'performance.' Additionally, competence, being an ideal, is located as a psychological or mental property or function (Lyons, 1996). This is in contrast to performance, which refers to an actual event.This definition of linguistic competence has come to be associated with a rigid and narrowly defined concept of grammatical competence. Therefore, Hymes (1974)introduced the idea of 'communicative competence." This has become generally defined as 'the socially appropriate use of language" (Paulston, 1992, p. xiv). Linguistic competence and performanceAccording to Chomsky, competence refers to a language user’s underlying knowledge about the linguistic system of the rules. When we talk about it, the speaker is an ideal speaker. It is someone who has a complete knowledge of the language, has the ability to create and understand sentences, even the sentence they had never heard before. One’s competence is insensible and is an abstract conception.Performance refers to the actual use of language in concrete situations. It is sensible and is the actual use of the language by individuals in speech and writing. It is sensible, in other words, others can see and know how the person act or express.In my opinion, competence and performance, they are all linguistic abilities. However, they are much different from each other. Competence is the ability to use the language, while performance is how people use language. With linguistic competence, we can form sentences by joining sentences and phases together or adding modifiers to a noun, as long as we can. We have the ability to speak due to competence. While performance requires people make their speech or writings more attractive, they should have different methods to speak and express. When they are in different situations, they will perform differently. In addition, they shall pay attention to how they perform, it depends on the roles they play in conversations.As a teacher, it is quite important to have both competence and performance. For many of the teachers, they are equipped with abundant professional knowledge. As speakers of the language, they are professional and have great linguistic competence. While in the class, they are not just speakers, the most important role for them is: teacher. Then they should act as teachers and impart knowledge in a proper manner, but not just tell the knowledge. The act of telling can be done by everyone who majors in the language or studies it, a translator, an interpreter or just a language learner, etc.I do think it will be much easier for a teacher to develop linguistic rather than try it for level of performance. But we need to pay attention to it. E.g. when we are having linguistic class, the teacher doesn’t only tell us the deep knowledge, but also gives us a lot of examples to get us understand it. Another example, when I learnt the word” Christmas” in middle school. The teacher told us a story about Christmas and taught us some more words. She wouldn’t just tell us how to spell and write the words, she thought of ways to make the word impressive for us. This is linguistic performance for a teacher in teaching.。

口述英语作文转化文字的方法

口述英语作文转化文字的方法

口述英语作文转化文字的方法Methods to Transcribe Spoken English to Written Text.1. Speech Recognition Software:Utilize advanced AI-powered software designed to translate spoken words into written text.Options include Dragon NaturallySpeaking, Google Speech-to-Text, and IBM Watson Speech to Text.These tools require minimal setup and offer customizable features for optimal accuracy.2. Online Transcription Services:Outsource your transcription needs to professional services that specialize in converting audio recordings into text.Platforms such as Rev, Temi, and TranscribeMe provide accurate and efficient transcriptions.Choose services that offer flexible pricing models and the option to customize your transcripts.3. Manual Transcription:Transcribe the audio recording manually by listening and typing out the words.This method is time-consuming but offers complete control over the accuracy and formatting of the transcript.Utilize headphones and a quiet environment to enhance clarity and focus.4. Speech-to-Text Apps:Utilize smartphone applications that convert spoken words into text in real-time.Apps like Otter.ai, Speechnotes, and Google Recorder offer convenient transcription capabilities.These apps are ideal for capturing notes, lectures, or interviews on the go.5. Hybrid Approach:Combine speech recognition software with manual transcription for optimal results.Use software to generate an initial draft, then proofread and correct errors manually.This approach balances efficiency and accuracy, ensuring a comprehensive and polished transcript.Additional Tips for Accurate Transcription:Use clear audio recordings: Ensure the audio is free from background noise and distortions.Speak slowly and distinctly: Enunciate words clearly to improve recognition accuracy.Use a microphone: Connect a microphone to your device to enhance sound quality.Break down large files: Transcribe audio files in smaller segments for easier management.Proofread carefully: Review the transcript thoroughly to eliminate errors and ensure clarity.Remember, the choice of transcription method depends on factors such as the audio quality, deadline, and budget. By selecting the most appropriate technique and implementing these tips, you can effectively convert spoken English into written text with accuracy and efficiency.。

linguistic competence and performence

linguistic competence and performence

Linguistic competence refers to the knowledge of a language system. The term first emerged in the work of Noam Chomsky, where it referred specifically to syntactic competence, and was specifically opposed to linguistic performance. The term was used more broadly by Dell Hymes in formulating the concept of communicative competence. Like communicative competence, language competence is often divided into various subcompetences, such as syntactic competence and lexical competence.According to Chomsky, competence is the ideal speaker /hearer, i.e. an idealized but not a real person who would have a complete knowledge of language. This means a person’s ability to create and understand sentences, including sentences they have never heard before.Performance is the actual use of the language by individuals in speech and writing.Speakers’ linguistic knowledge permits them to form longer and longer sentences by joining sentences and phases together or adding modifiers to a noun. whether you stop at three, five or eighteen adjectives, it is impossible to limit the number you could add if desired. Very long sentences are theoretically possible, but they are highly improbable.Evidently, there is a difference between having the knowledge necessary to produce sentences of a language, and applying this knowledge. It is a difference between what you know, which is your linguistic competence, and how you use this knowledge in actual speech production and comprehension, which is your linguistic performance.When we speak, we usually wish to convey some message. At some stage in the act of producing speech, we must organize our thoughts into strings of words. Sometimes the message is garbled. We may stammer, or pause, or produce slips of the tongue. We may even sound like the baby, who illustrates the difference between linguistic knowledge and the way we use that knowledge in performance.Linguistic competence is the system of linguistic knowledge possessed by native speakers of a language, it is in contrast to the concept of Linguistic performance, the way the language system is used in communication. The concept was first introduced by Noam Chomsky[1] as part of the foundations for his Generative grammar, but it has since been adopted and developed by other linguists, particularly those working in the generativist tradition. In the generativist tradition competence is the only level of language that is studied, because this level gives insights into the Universal Grammar, that generativists see as underlying all human language systems. Functional theories of grammar tend to dismiss the sharp distinction between competence and performance, and particularly the primacy given to the study of competence.According to Chomsky, competence is the 'ideal' language system that makes it possible for speakers to produce and understand an infinite number [nb 1] of sentences in their language, and to distinguish grammatical sentences from ungrammatical sentences. This is unaffected by "grammatically irrelevant conditions" such as speech errors.[1]Competence versus performance"Linguistic theory is concerned primarily with an ideal speaker-listener, in a completely homogeneous speech-community, who knows its (the speech community's) language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatically irrelevant conditions as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors (random or characteristic) in applying his knowledge of this language in actual performance."~Chomsky,1965[1]Chomsky differentiates competence, which is an idealized capacity, from performance being the production of actual utterances. According to him, competence is the ideal speaker-hearer's knowledge of his or her language and it is the 'mental reality' which is responsible for all those aspects of language use which can be characterized as 'linguistic'.[2] Chomsky argues that only under an idealized situation whereby the speaker-hearer is unaffected by grammatically irrelevant conditions such as memory limitations and distractions will performance be a direct reflection of competence. A sample of natural speech consisting of numerous false starts and other deviations will not provide such data. Therefore, he claims that a fundamental distinction has to be made between the competence and performance.[1] Chomsky dismissed criticisms of delimiting the study of performance in favor of the study of underlying competence, as unwarranted and completely misdirected. He claims that the descriptivist limitation-in-principle to classification and organizationof data, the "extracting patterns" from a corpus of observed speech and the describing "speech habits" etc. are the core factors that precludes the development of a theory of actual performance.Competence and components of grammarOne's competence is defined by the grammar,[nb 2][3] or set of language rules, that is represented mentally and manifested based on his or her own understanding of acceptable usage in a given linguistic idiom. Therefore, grammatical competence defines an innate knowledge of rules rather than knowledge of items or relations. According to Chomsky, it is regarded to be innate because one does not have to be trained to develop it and will still be able to apply it in an infinite number of unheard examples.[4]The core components of the grammar are included in the speaker's linguistic competence and these components corresponds to five of the major subfields of linguistics:Phonetics: Phonology: Morphology: Syntax: Semantics:Linguictic performanceIn linguistics, performance has two senses:[1](1) A technique used in phonetics whereby aspiring practitioners of the subjectare trained to control the use of their vocal organs(2) A term used in the linguistic theory of transformational generativegrammar, referring to language being seen as a set of specific utterancesproduced by native speakersIt is also one of the two elements in Chomsky's performance-competence distinction, which relates to Language production(parole), with an emphasis upon how this is different from Competence, or the mental knowledge of language itself. Linguistic performance does not simply reflect the intrinsic sound-meaning connections established by the system of linguistic rules. It involves many other factors, such as extra-linguistic beliefs concerning the speaker and the situation play a fundamental role in determining how speech is produced, identified and understood. Furthermore, it is governed by principles of cognitive structure such as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors (random or characteristic) that are technically not considered to be aspects of language.Communicative competenceCommunicative competence is a term in linguistics which refers to a language user's grammatical knowledge of syntax, morphology, phonology and the like, as well as social knowledge about how and when to use utterances appropriately.The term was coined by Dell Hymes in 1966,[1] reacting against the perceived inadequacy of Noam Chomsky's (1965) distinction between competence and performance.[2]To address Chomsky's abstract notion of competence, Hymes undertook ethnographic exploration of communicative competence that included "communicative form and function in integral relation to each other".[3] The approach pioneered by Hymes is now known as the ethnography of communication.Debate has occurred regarding linguistic competence and communicative competence in the second and foreign language teaching literature, and scholars have found communicative competence as a superior model of language following Hymes' opposition to Chomsky's linguistic competence. This opposition has been adopted by those who seek new directions toward a communicative era by taking for granted the basic motives and the appropriateness of this opposition behind the development of communicative competence.communicative competenceAnother functionalist theory advances the notion of communicative competence, which focuses on socially-situated performance, was developed by Dell Hymes in response to the abstract nature of linguistic competence.[22][23]Communicative competence is also sometimes referred to as pragmatic or sociolinguistic competence, especially when the emphasis is on how to interpret the speaker's intended meaning in a particular utterance, apart from the literal meaning.The major criticism towards Chomsky's notion of linguistic competence by Hymes is the inadequate distinction of competence and performance. Furthermore, he commented that it is unreal and that no significant progress in linguistics is possible without studying forms along with the ways in which they are used. As such, linguistic competence should fall under the domain of communicative competence since it comprises four competence areas, namely, linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse and strategic.[25]Use in educationThe notion of communicative competence is one of the theories that underlies the communicative approach to foreign language teaching.[3]Canale and Swain (1980) defined communicative competence in terms of three components:1.grammatical competence: words and rules2.sociolinguistic competence: appropriateness3.strategic competence: appropriate use of communication strategiesCanale (1983) refined the above model, adding discourse competence: cohesion and coherenceA more recent survey of communicative competence by Bachman (1990) divides it into the broad headings of "organizational competence," which includes both grammatical and discourse (or textual) competence, and "pragmatic competence," which includes both sociolinguistic and "illocutionary" competence.[6] Strategic Competence is associated with the interlocutors' ability in using communication strategies (Faerch & Kasper, 1983; Lin, 2009).Through the influence of communicative language teaching, it has become widely accepted that communicative competence should be the goal of language education, central to good classroom practice.[7] This is in contrast to previous views in which grammatical competence was commonly given top priority. The understanding of communicative competence has been influenced by the field of pragmatics and the philosophy of language concerning speech acts as described in large part by John Searle and J.L. Austin.Competence vs. PerformanceLinguistic theory is concerned primarily with an ideal speaker-listener, in a completely homogeneous speech-communication, who know its (the speech community's) language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatically irrelevant conditions as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors (random or characteristic) in applying his knowledge of this language in actual performance. (Chomsky, 1965, p. 3)In this definition, Chomsky separates 'competence,' an idealized capacity, from the production of actual utterances, 'performance.' Additionally, competence, being an ideal, is located as a psychological or mental property or function (Lyons, 1996). This is in contrast to performance, which refers to an actual event.This definition of linguistic competence has come to be associated with a rigid and narrowly defined concept of grammatical competence. Therefore, Hymes (1974)introduced the idea of 'communicative competence." This has become generally defined as 'the socially appropriate use of language" (Paulston, 1992, p. xiv). Linguistic competence and performanceAccording to Chomsky, competence refers to a language user’s underlying knowledge about the linguistic system of the rules. When we talk about it, the speaker is an ideal speaker. It is someone who has a complete knowledge of the language, has the ability to create and understand sentences, even the sentence they had never heard before. One’s competence is insensible and is an abstract conception.Performance refers to the actual use of language in concrete situations. It is sensible and is the actual use of the language by individuals in speech and writing. It is sensible, in other words, others can see and know how the person act or express.In my opinion, competence and performance, they are all linguistic abilities. However, they are much different from each other. Competence is the ability to use the language, while performance is how people use language. With linguistic competence, we can form sentences by joining sentences and phases together or adding modifiers to a noun, as long as we can. We have the ability to speak due to competence. While performance requires people make their speech or writings more attractive, they should have different methods to speak and express. When they are in different situations, they will perform differently. In addition, they shall pay attention to how they perform, it depends on the roles they play in conversations.As a teacher, it is quite important to have both competence and performance. For many of the teachers, they are equipped with abundant professional knowledge. As speakers of the language, they are professional and have great linguistic competence. While in the class, they are not just speakers, the most important role for them is: teacher. Then they should act as teachers and impart knowledge in a proper manner, but not just tell the knowledge. The act of telling can be done by everyone who majors in the language or studies it, a translator, an interpreter or just a language learner, etc.I do think it will be much easier for a teacher to develop linguistic rather than try it for level of performance. But we need to pay attention to it. E.g. when we are having linguistic class, the teacher doesn’t only tell us the deep knowledge, but also gives us a lot of examples to get us understand it. Another example, when I learnt the word” Christmas” in middle school. The teacher told us a story about Christmas and taught us some more words. She wouldn’t just tell us how to spell and write the words, she thought of ways to make the word impressive for us. This is linguistic performance for a teacher in teaching.。

English Speech and English Thesis

English Speech and English Thesis

要点一
Create an outline
Develop a clear structure for the speech, including an introduction, body, and conclusion Each section should have a specific purpose and flow logically from one to the next
03
Citation Style
Follow a specific citation
style guide, such as APA,
MLA,
or
Chicago,
depending
on
the
requirements of your
institution or field
04
Accuracy
Ensure that all citations and references are accurate and complete, including author names, titles, publication dates, and page numbers
Conclusion
Summarize the main findings and implications of the paper
References
List all sources used in the paper in a standardized format, such as APA or MLA
Table of Contents
List the main sections and subsections of the paper with corresponding page numbers

如何避免发音错误英语作文

如何避免发音错误英语作文

如何避免发音错误英语作文How to Avoid Pronunciation Errors。

Pronunciation is an essential part of learning English. It is the way we speak the words and sounds of the language. However, many English learners face challenges in their pronunciation, which can lead to misunderstandings and difficulties in communication. In this article, we will discuss some tips on how to avoid pronunciation errors.1. Listen carefully。

The first step in improving your pronunciation is to listen carefully to native speakers. Pay attention to the way they pronounce words and sounds. You can do this by watching English movies or TV shows, listening to English music, or even chatting with native speakers online. The more you listen, the more you will be able to understandand mimic the correct pronunciation.2. Practice regularly。

Practice makes perfect, so it is important to practice your pronunciation regularly. You can do this by reading aloud, repeating phrases, or even singing along to English songs. The key is to practice consistently and to focus on the sounds that you find most challenging.3. Use online resources。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Speech Errors
Most of us make similar errors from time to time. Although some errors are not common, all speakers seem to make them occasionally. Some people are prone to speech errors than others. The scientific analysis of speech errors is called “slips of the tongue”. Researchers use speech errors to examine the role of linguistic units in the production of speech.
Although speech errors cover a wide range of semantic content, there seems to be only a small number of basic types. Those types of errors occur with a number of linguistic units. In some cases, a single phoneme is added, deleted or moved, but sometimes it may be sequence of phonemes, morphemic affixes and roofs, whole words or even phrases. As a general rule, errors tend to occur at only one linguistic level per utterance. That is, when a person clearly says the wrong word, the sentence is syntactically and phonologically intact.
Speech errors appear with four generalizations. First., elements that interact with one another tend to come from similar linguistic environments. For example, sentence (1) “You are pig and fat (or tig and fab ).(big and fat)” and sentence (2) “Don’t interfere with my nife lite. (night life)” We notice that the phonetic segments in the beginn ing of a word tend to be exchanged with initial segments. The same is true for middle and final segments. Moreover, exchanges of segments are more common when the segments that precede them are similar. The exchange of |f| and |t| in sentence (2) follows this principle.
Second, elements that interact with one another tend to be similar to one another. In particular, consonants are invariably exchanged or shifted with other consonants but not with vowels, such as in sentence (1). Errors involving similar sounds often have little relation to meaning but relate to phonetic similarity, such as in this sentence “Sesame Street
crackers” (sesame seed crackers). (Fromkin, 1973)
Third, when slips produce novel linguistic items, they are usually consistent with the phonological rules of the language. For example, an error like “slickery” (for slick and slippery) occurs, while other phonologically similar forms, such as “slickppery” and “ slipkery” do not occur.
Finally, there are consistent stress patterns in speech errors. Segments that are exchanged for one another both receive major stress in the word or phrase in which reside, or both receive minor stress.
Therefore, speech errors are hardly random. Actually they occur in highly regular patterns. However, why will they occur? Anecdotal evidence indicates that speech errors are more common when we are nervous or under stress, as when performers appear on live television and radio shows. Errors are more likely to occur when we are tired, anxious or drunk. According to the theory of Freud, “slips of the tongue” is important, because like dreams, they help to reveal the unconscious mind. Errors occur because we have more than a single plan for production and that one such plan competes with and dominates the other. Although a Freudian type of explanation may apply to some speech errors, more recent thinking has focused on the psycholinguistic process underlying speech errors. That is, the insight can be gained in understanding language mechanism from the study of speech errors.
Generally we produce speech through a series of separate stages, each devoted to a single level of linguistic analysis. Errors occur at one level, but not others, during the production process.
References:
(1) Psycholinguistics, Thomas Scovel , 上海外语教育出版社
(2) Psychology of language, Third edition, David W. Carroll, 外语教学与研究出版社。

相关文档
最新文档