TPO20综合写作范文
托福作文真题+范文185篇之Topic20
Topic20：小孩在农村比在大城市成长好，你同意与否？Topic 20 It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.［托福TOEFL参看范文之一］Topic: 20With the development of the transportation system and some residence institution, the world is getting smaller and smaller, and people are not restricted in only one area. In addition to the convenient condition, because there are different places with different cultures, living standards, education environment and other disparity, they are inclined to transfer from one place to the other. Is it better to move around than stay in one place? I believe there are no uniform answers,but in my opinion, I do agree with the claim that to move around is better than to stay in one place.Most people’s growth comes with the transfers in their life. As for me, when I was young I lived in a small county. Because the school in there was not suitable to me, I transferred from my little county to a city to get a better education. As soon as I got to the city, I was amazed that the world here was so different here as my hometown .If I still lived in my hometown, it was impossible for meto make the wildest guess at what the real world looked like. The first transfer has made me toimagine my own life and spur on me to go further. With the confidence, I went into a university which I would never think of it before. The university is located in a different city so that I have to come into another world. Compared with my living city, the one is more complicated in which there are different people, more convenient transportation, more competitive environment. I love all of this very much. Communicating with different students and teachers, I have learned muchfrom them which will benefit me throughout my life and my lifestyle. Now I am in a graduate school also so beautiful that I will never regret my selection of leaving my hometown because the transfer has given me a splendid life.Also, like we students, there are many adults transferring their work place in order to grasp better opportunities. No matter in industry, in agriculture or in service, workers have rights to choose their work companies which leads them to work from place to place and then they accumulate precious experience and skills to get priorities to others.People not only transfer in their own country, but also go abroad to get education, work or live through the rest of their life inappropriate countries. We can see that many students including me want to go to the foreign countries to study further and forge ourselves, and that many parents send their little sons or daughters to foreign countries to study. After all, diverse circumstances give persons new experience and broaden their narrow sight, even help them get morecomprehensive understanding of the world, the society and our life itself.However, some people may say that if people move around, they will pay for much such as money, time and energy. It is right to say that it takes one person some time to get used to his or her new environment, new personal relationship which indeed influences the growth of children, the efficiency of our work and the stability of our society and family. And I have to admit that people should make considerate plans before changing their places and may not transfer aimlesslyand frequently. But I think sometimes it is just all the friction that has made the world wealthier and more beautiful. Therefore, I still think it is better to travel around than to live in one place.［托福TOEFL参看范文之二］There are advantages and disadvantages to a childhood in either the country or a city. It's hard to say which is better. Growing up inthe country means a certain amount of isolation. You're in a small town or on a farm and not with a lot of people. Even more important, the people you meet every day tend to be just like you. Most will be the same race as you, have the same background as you, and will have gone to the same schools as you. In the city, the people you meet are all different. There are different races and different cultures. You get a more interesting mix.City people tend to come from a lot of different places and move around a lot. So, there isn't the sense of community in the city that you have in the country. People in the city can live in the same apartment building for twenty years and never get to know their neighbors. In the country, everybody knows everybody. For a child, this means the country is more secure. A child can get lost or hurt in the city and have no one to turn to. In the country, everyone's a neighbor. People in the country feel connected to each other.A child growing up in the city has the advantage of a lot of interesting and exciting places to visit. He or she can go to the zoo, museums, art galleries and concerts. There are a lot of restaurants with different kinds of food. It's easy to see every new movie that comes out. Children in the country don't have a lot of these activities nearby.All in all, I think a childhood in the city is better because itprepares you more for what real life is like.［托福TOEFL参看范文之三］Where is a better place for children to grow up, the countryside or the big city? The answer to this question differs from individual to individual. As far as I am concerned, it is better for children to grow up in a big city.Some people argue that the countryside is an ideal place for children to grow up. For one thing, it is less polluted than the city. The air is fresh in the countryside. The sky is bluer and the water is clearer. Living in such a place is good to the children’s health. For another, as children like playing, only the countryside can satisfy them well. They can run everywhere, play games in the field, swim in the river. On the contrary, the city cannot provide such places for children. Maybethey can only stay at home and watch TV.Although I do agree that growing up in the countryside has one or more advantages, I insist that it is far better to choose the city as the right place for children. To begin with, living in the city can broaden their horizons. They can meet a lot of people and hear a number of things that will never happen in the countryside.In addition, city means more chance to receive better education. In most countries, it is no doubt that the education level in the city ishigher than that of the country. As a result, children can meet better teachers and receive high quality of education in the city.Last but not least, children can also develop many hobbies in the city. They can learn to play the piano, draw and so on, which are impossible in the country.In conclusion, I believe that it is better for children to grow up in the city not only because it can broaden their horizons, but also because they can receive better education and have a chance to develop many hobbies there.。
TPO20-TASK3
听力部分：Conversation：Now listen to two students discussing the article.Woman: What on earth is the university thinking?Man: Huh? What do you mean?Woman: Well, those buildings aren’t just used for classes. That’s where my evening study group usually meets.Man: Oh, of course, that’s true. But you could go to the library instead. Woman: Yeah, but the library only has a few rooms that people can use for group meetings which is why classrooms are so convenient. But now, if it’s winter and cold, where can we go?Man: Right! In the middle of winter, forget it! Or even it’s just kind of cold o ut. Woman: It’d be pretty unpleasant.Man: Oh, but still, they obviously have to do something about the situation. Woman: Oh, I agree. They have to do something but they should find a solution that isn’t so disruptive, to academics no less.Man: Such as?Woman: Well, for one, if they replaced all those old windows, they are so drafty. They let the cold in. And if they insulated the buildings better, these are really old buildings. Charming, but,Man: But not at all energy-efficient, yeah, you’re probably ri ght.Woman: There’re some really basic improvements they can make that’ll make a huge difference in the long term that can solve the problem and still leave us somewhere to study.QuestionThe man expresses his opinion about the change described in the article. Briefly summarize the change then state his opinion about the change and explain the reasons he gives for holding that opinion.。
托福范文及赏析-TPO20独立写作-智课网
智课网TOEFL备考资料托福TPO独立写作TPO20Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.题目翻译成功人士尝试新事物并且冒险，而不是只去做他们擅长的事。
审题关键词New things, Take risks, Know how to do well论证分析正: Knowing what to do and what is going on next are the two basic principles in life.反： At the same time, taking risks in special situations ensures the success.范文We are all interested in finding out how successful people gain success. A majority of people claim that successful people tend to take risks and avoid only doing what they already know. This statement is somewhat reliable since successful people indeed do something unusual. However, their unusual behavior is based on things that have been known for a long time.Let us take Albert Einstein as the first example. As we all know, he invented the theory of Quantum Mechanics, which was so different from what people already knew in physics. This theory led to his personal success in the field of theoretical physics. However, almost all of us ignore the fact that he also did really well in traditional physics. He made his discovery based on his research on traditional physics. A more recent example is Steve Jobs, who was the chief executive officer of Apple. We usually oversee his achievement in the innovative Apple system and applications. In fact, without deep knowledge of basic computer system or electronic devices, he could not have put his innovation into use. Actually, successful people do take risks after they have done what they have known for sure.Basic things can provide proof for innovative actions. Before taking risks, we just need to evaluate the risks and its proof. Anything in the world should have solid proof, or it can never become reality. To become successful, we just need to learn better about basic things, or things we have already known well, in the first place. Just as Steve and Albert, suppose they had no background knowledge at all, how could they have taken risks that are challenging?Another importance of things we know is that they enlighten us on different aspects. By the time we do things that are quite familiar well, we can easily find out their limitations and come up with some methods of improvement. Einstein first did his research on lights, which was so familiar with people at that time, and found out some limitations of the characters of lights. Without background information, we just cannot see the little faults, let alone take risks doing something unusual.All in all, people who get final success actually do try things and take risks, but actually their risky behavior is based on what they have already known well. So the basic step for their success is to do familiar things well. This must be the philosophy of any successful people, and, should also be the philosophy of all of us as well.满分要素剖析语言表达本文长短句结合，错落有致，很有节奏感。
托福英语综合写作范文【原创】
TPO 3The authenticity of the portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet attributed to Rembrandt was doubted in the reading. However, the lecture believes that this painting was indeed a masterpiece by Rembrandt.The reading argues that Rembrandt, as one of the most prominent painters in the world, is known for his attention to details, is unlikely make a mistake of inconsistence between the lavish fur and the servile white linen cap. However, the lecturer points out that the fur was later added on by other people for commercial purposes. When the fur is removed, the actual painting underneath matches with the rest of this portrait.Another controversy is the discordance of light and shadow in this painting. According to the reading, the dark color of the fur collar should leave a shadow rather than lighting up servants face. However, the lecturer mentioned that a whitish cloth revealed upon the removal of the dark fur collar. Therefore, in the original painting, the collar would have reflected the light and then illuminated her face.Finally, the author suspects the genuineness of this painting due to glued wood panel, a style that has never been observed in Rembrand t’s other paintings. Nevertheless, the lecture explained that it was also added by the others. In addition, when all the wood pieces near the margin are removed, the remaining central part is made from the wood coming from the same tree as that of his self-portrait, providing a strong evidence for the authenticity of this painting.TPO 15Cane toads, firstly introduced from America, proliferated in Australia and thus posed a threat to some local animals. The reading listed three measures to control the spread of cane toads, but the lecturer points out limitations to these solutions.First, the reading suggests that building national fence would prevent cane toads’ spread, which has been proved successful for the case of rabbits in early twentieth century. On the contrary, the lecturer thinks this method would be unsuccessful in that young toads and toads’ eggs will be carried by the water stream through the gaps between the fence to the other side. And It takes only a few young toads or toad eggs for this species to thrive in a new area.As for the second way mentioned in the reading-capturing and destroying toads near water by volunteers-the lecturer believes that it comes with a severe side effect. Without/Lacking in training, most volunteer will fail to distinguish between cane toads and native frogs especially when they are young, and thus they might accidentally kill the endangered native frogs.Finally, according to the reading, a special virus can be designed to specifically hurt cane toads will effectively curb their population increase without harming other creatures. The professor admits that this virus can reduce cane toad’s population in Australia. However, chances are that this virus will be transported to Central and South America through researchers or pet collectors. As a result, it will damage the whole ecosystem because cane toads are native species there.TPO 16The reading passage addresses the concern that the archaeology industry in the United Kingdom encountered many limitations and problems. However, in the lecture, the professor says that new rules and guidelines introduced in 1990s actually solved these problems.To start with, the reading claims that many artifacts were lost or destroyed due to the increasing construction work. On the contrary, the professor says that the new rules required examinations before the construction, which were conducted by professional archaeologists of the site, to see if the site was of archaeological interest. The company would either excavate the artifacts or build around the site once it is considered to be archaeologically valuable.Secondly, the reading states that previous funds provided by the government to support the archaeological research are insufficient. The new rules demanded that the construction company, rather than the government, should pay all the cost incurred during the whole process, including the initial examination as well as the extra work carried out throughout the preservation plan. This new source of funding allowed archaeologists to study a greater range of projects than they could in the past.Finally, according to the reading, there are only few positions in archaeology before andmany archaeology-related talents have to find other jobs instead. However, according to the new rules, all stages of the preservation plan were hiring archaeologists to do all kinds of work, ranging from examining the site, processing data to writing reports. As a result, the rules have created many job opportunities in the archaeological field.TPO 20The “let it burn”policy was questioned after the fire in Yellowstone. However, the professor stood by the policy by mentioning positive changes happening in Yellowstone after the fire.According to the reading, a variety of trees were heavily scorched from the fire, let alone many small plants in the forest. However, the listening points out that the fire has actually diversified the vegetation in Yellowstone afterwards. This is because some plants now have an open unshaded space to thrive and heat from the fire also caused some seeds to successfully germinate.Second, while the reading believes that the fire has either killed or permanently driven away animals, the listening mentioned a stronger food chain, and a more vibrant ecosystem formed later. Accompanying diversification of vegetation, seared area became an ideal living place for small animals like rabbits. In turn, their predators also arrived in this land.Lastly, the reading says that the 1988 fire shortened the tourist season of Yellowstone park, and had subsequently inflicted huge damage on local economy. The listening points out that low rainfall, strong wind and other extreme weather conditions caused the fire to be massive. Such combination of bad weather has never happened afterwards; Yellowstone has not witness a fire of such magnitude after 1988. It is now still one of the most popular places to visit in America.TPO 23The reading mainly raised three hypotheses that explain the decline in numbers of yellow cedars. However, the listening points out the weaknesses of these hypotheses respectively.First, the reading believes that insect parasites, specifically cedar bark beetles, are responsible for the population decline since record shows that beetles attacks have killed yellow cedars. However, the listening points out that those trees that died from beetles’ attack was already sick and was going to die anyway. In fact, yellow cedars are much more resistant to bug infection as their bark and leaves contain chemical substances that is poisonous to insects.Second, the reading says brown bears usually claw at yellow cedars for bark as their food resource. As a result, trees weaken and then drop in numbers. However, according to the listening, yellow cedars grown on both mainland and islands across northwestern coast. Islands are not habit for brown bears, yet yellow cedars there are also disappearing. Thus, the aggressive feeding habit of brown bears is not an adequate explanation.The third hypothesis mentioned by reading concerns with climate change. The alteration of temperature patterns has rendered the roots of yellow cedar so sensitive that they are easily damaged by freeze of winter, which in turn undermines their health and causes their death. The listening, however, accuses the reading of neglecting the fact that more trees are dying at lower elevation, which is warmer, than at higher elevation. This is completely opposite to what the reading has suggested. Even though yellow cedar roots did become sensitive, it is not the reason for population decline.TPO 26The reading claims that Zebra Mussel’s invasion into North America is unstoppable and will subsequently become a menace to native fish populations there. The lecturer, however, believes that there are indeed ways to curb the spread of Zebra Mussels, and even if they manage to invade North America, they will not necessarily harm all the fish population.First, according to the reading, these mussels, originating from Eastern Europe, get a free ride to North America in the fresh water named ballast water at the bottom of the ships. However, the listening points out that mussels cannot live in salt water. Therefore, if all the ships are required to empty its ballast water and then fill in with salt water during thetrip, all Zebra mussels cannot possibly survive their journey to North America, let alone settling down there.Second, the reading says that once the mussels arrive in North America, their hardy nature and lack of predators will help them dominate the whole area, but the lecturer finds this unconvincing. He said that in Europe, there were no predators for Zebra mussels at first, either. However, they did not thrive because local aquatic birds gradually recognized them as a new source of food, and started to consume majority of them. The lecturer is confident that the same situation will occur in North America again.Lastly, the reading expresses its concerns over the detriment mussels will bring to overall fish population by explaining that they will fight many fish for plankton, a major food resource for both sides. While the lecturer admits this disadvantage of mussel colonization, he also suggests that the advent of mussels will be a blessing for some fish living at the bottom of the lake as these fish feed on nutrients generated by Zebra mussels.TPO 30The author in the passage suspects the burning mirror theory in Greek’s defense against Roman navy. However, the lecturer thinks that the points made in the reading are unconvincing.First, the reading believes Greeks did not possess the technology to produce a mirror large enough to ignite ships. The listening points out that the burning mirror did not have to be a single piece of glass. It can be accomplished by arranging dozens of polished copper into a parabolic curve, whose properties were known to Greek at that time. Second, according to the reading, experiments showed that burning mirror would have taken ten minutes to set unmoving wood on fire, and Roman ships would not stay static for that long. However, the listening mentions that Greeks did not have to aim at wood on the ship. A sticky substance called pitch used to seal gaps between woods can catch fire within seconds with burning mirror, and the fire will quickly spread to the wood, and then finally the whole ship.Third, the reading states that there was no reason for ancient Greeks to develop anotherweapon since they had already possessed the flaming arrow, which was more efficient to set fire than the burning mirror. However, the listening argues that Roman soldiers were every familiar with those flaming arrow, so they would be prepared to tackle fires caused by them. In contrast, burning mirror could set fire anywhere possible on the ship and thus baffle the soldiers.TPO 43The reading proposes three hypotheses on the living style of the agnostids, and the speaker has pointed out the weaknesses of them respectively.First, the reading states that agnostids, like many other arthropods, may be free-swimming predators that feed on small animals. The speaker challenges this statement by saying that free-swimming predators usually have large developed eyes enabling them to find food. However, agnostids are nearly blind and also do not have special sensory organs to locate their food. Therefore, it is impossible for them to prey on small organisms in ancient oceans.Second, according to the reading, agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor where dead organisms and bacteria can serve as their food resources. The listening mentions that the fact that agnostids inhabited multiple geographic areas that scatter across large distances indicated their ability to move fast. This is uncharacteristic for seafloor dwellers who usually move slowly and stay localized. Thus, agnostids might not be seafloor dwellers. Last, the speaker says that a great quantity of parasites would have easily kills the hosts they live on. Thus, in order for the hosts to survive, the number of agnostids must be within certain limits, contradictory to the discovery that many species contain great amount of fossilized agnostids. In other words, agnostids could not have existed as parasites as they would have easily killed their hosts.TPO 44Quite opposite to what is said in the reading, the listening holds the opinion that many archaeologists believe the silver coin was originated in European and brought to North America by the Norse, a European explorer, by providing three pieces of evidenceFirst, the reading material states that the distance between the discovery site of the coin and Norse settlement was more than a thousand kilometers, indicating a small chance that the coin belonged to them. However, the lecture opposes it by saying that native Americans were interested in collecting things from other places, so it is possible that they reached Norse settlements during long distance travels and brought the coin back to Maine.Second, the reading claims that the absence of other coins denied the ownership of the found silver coin to the Norse. However, the Norse only stayed in America temporarily, and the listening suggests a possibility that they might have packed all their valuable possessions when returning to Europe. Thus, it makes perfect sense that only one coin was left behind and discovered later.Third, the lecturer agrees with the reading in that native Americans may fail to recognize silver coins as currency, but it also points out that the Norse surmised native Americans liked beautiful things. Silver coins might be appealing to native Americans as they could have been used in necklaces or other type of jewelry. In other words, in contrast to the reading, the Norse could have traded with native Americans with these coins.。
tpo综合作文范文
tpo综合作文范文导语：ETS推出的TPO系列是各位考生在备战新托福考试时非常重要的资料之一，下面是新托福名师推荐的TPO综合写作中的满分范文，希望能帮助许多刚刚接触新托福的朋友们了解和熟悉综合写作的方式和套路，拿到新托福综合写作的高分。
tpo综合作文范文一The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving————来源网络搜集整理，仅供个人学习查参考money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people.Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created.Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.tpo综合作文范文二Does modern technology help students learn more information and learn it more quickly?Marvelous as it looks at first sight, modern technology does not help students learn information at a greater speed and with higher efficiency in most cases; or it could work towards the opposite direction which led students to lose their initiative to learn and explore.First of all, one property of modern technology is latentlyharmful to any learning mind –it distracts. One thing we feel about when we are searching for information online is that the internet, as an outstanding example of modern technology and even regarded as the innovator of education, provides us with not only relevant results to make use of, but also external links to click. More than once I turned on my computer to check school library for resources, but ended up watching YB videos. In this case, computer as a representative of modern technology plays a negative role in learning information. We do acquire more information with the convenient tool, yet most of them are irrelevant and in the end procrastinating would lower our learning.Also, students would easily become disoriented in the huge sea of information. Although modern technology could equip us with easy access to information, the huge amount of resources would actually leave us discombobulated. Therefore, it is only we possess information more quickly rather than we learn it more quickly. An illustrating example is my experience with a HK digital library which stores almost all the books I desire. At first I enjoyed downloading them from the database, however, one month later I ended up with hundreds of books stored in my hardware yet none of them finished or ever clicked.Furthermore, modern technology gives students an illusionthat information and real knowledge is easy to learn –just by clicking mouse or watching videos. But in fact this forms only the first step towards useful information and effective learning, as learning of any kind requires full concentration and interactive thinking, which are almost absent in the pocess of popular e-learning experience.To summarize, modern technology does not help students learn more information and learn it more quickly, though it does make access to information and resources much more easily. The popular e-learning still lacks the concentration, depth, and interaction that are the hallmark of traditional ways of educating and learning.。
12月20日托福写作真题答案及解析
12月20日托福写作真题答案及解析12月20日托福综合写作Integrated Writing:READNINGLISTENINGAlaska whales 和Iceberg属于两种不同的种类1两种动物的颜色不太一样1 由于海藻本身有色差，加之在不同的季节颜色不一样，所以被其覆盖的whale 看起来会darker一些；同时观察时节不一样，也影响了观察的结果。
2 生存的水域不一样2 两种动物的饮食习惯不一样：一种喜欢吃mammals, 故原地不同；另一种喜欢吃fish，故被Russia海域的鱼吸引走了。
3 年龄不一样3 用fin测年龄不靠谱。
在20岁之后，fin就停止生长了。
所以，实际年龄会比估计的年龄大一些。
12月20日托福独立写作题目Independent Writing:Out of the following three things, which one would you prefer to regulate in order to improve your health? 2012.1.13NA/2012.11.2ML1. The kind of food you eat2. The amount of exercise3. The amount of stress in your lifeModern society has turned humans into curious creatures. Our ancestors were highly active thanks to their hunter-gatherer lifestyle; they ate fairly balanced diets due to the limited availability of fats and simple carbohydrates; and they relied on stress as a survival mechanism that kept them alert during intermittent periods of danger. Now, many of us spend upwards of 8 hours a day sedentary at our jobs; we eat unbalance diets of pre-prepared foods in order to save time; and we are constantly stressed due to a never-ending bombardment of stressors coming from our contemporary lifestyle. Managing all three things--diet, exercise, and stress--would be a daunting task for anyone, so if I had to pick one thing to improve my health, it would probably be exercise.To begin with, exercise is much easier to manage than both your diet and your stress. In order to manage your diet effectively, need to reduce or eliminate certain foods you enjoy eating, as well as create a comprehensive plan that balances your intake of different nutrients like proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. This is too much for most people, which explains the prevalence of “fad diets” that involve, for example, only eating a single type of food; these diets rarely ever work, and can even be dangerous. Managing stress is similarly difficult, because there are so many potential stressors to account for (work, kids, bills, etc.) and it may not be plausible to try and manage all ofthem. Exercise, on the other hand, can be effective even when simple. Take running: This exercise requires no forethought and can be done pretty much everywhere by pretty much everyone, yet carries a laundry list of health benefits ranging from boosting the immune system to lower the risk of breast cancer.Also, exercise has the scientifically measurable benefit of improving mood. When we perform physically demanding activities such as running, the brain releases a rush of endorphins that produces feelings of euphoria. From an evolutionary perspective, this is a neurological reward that encourages us to run and be healthy--we’r e basically built to be runners. If you can incorporate running (or some similar form of exercise) into your weekly routine, you’ll notice your mood improve almost immediately. And there’s also another, indirect way exercise improves mood: When you’re fit, you feel much better about yourself. I don’t just mean in the narcissistic way, either-- knowing that you’re exercising is just a good feeling.Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, exercise can lead to both better eating habits as well as lower overall stress. Exercise is in fact an excellent way to manage stress, and is recommended by medical authorities as a way to strengthen the brain’s buffers against it. It is even recommended by doctors for treating depression. This stress reduction from exercise can in turn lead to better food choices, since stress is an major contributor to poor eating habits, and eating healthy is much easier when you’re feeling good about yourself. Anyone who’s reached for junk-food during a stressful situation can tell you that.Obviously, diet, exercise, and stress management are all important for living a healthy life. However, if you had to choose only one, I’d say that exercise wins out when it comes to getting the most bang for your buck.。
托福TPO20口语Task4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文
托福TPO20口语Task4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文为了帮助大家高效备考托福，为大家带来托福TPO20口语T ask4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文，希望对大家备考有所帮助。
托福TPO20口语Task4阅读文本：FranchisingMany popular and well-known business chains, such as fast food restaurants, use a practice known as franchising. In franchising, someone who wants to open a store or restaurant pays an established company for the right to use the company’s name and sell the company’s products. Selling an established, in-demand product that has immediate name recognition benefits the new business by reducing the risk that the business will fail. In exchange, the new business agrees to follow all of the standard practices of the company with the name it wants to use.托福TPO20口语Task4听力文本：Now listen to part of a lecture on this topic in a business management class.(male professor) OK, so we've been talking about starting a business. Let's say I want to open up a pizza restaurant. Well, I know how tough it is to make a new business succeed. And I want a sure thing, so I contact the big company that owns a chain of pizza places. Let's say it's called, “Pizza Town.” And I pay for the rights to call my restaurant Pizza Town and to sell Pizza Town's special, one of a kind, pizza.Now, since everyone has heard of Pizza Town, it's really popular, I don't have to worry about whether people would want to eat my pizza or not, I already know this pizza will sell well because it's a known thing. And that means there's a better chance my business will succeed.Now, in exchange for being able to call my restaurant Pizza Town, I haveto agree to run the business the Pizza Town way. And Pizza Town trains me to do this. They show me how to do everything, how to make my pizzas taste like Pizza Town pizzas, how to advertise, even how to make my store look like a Pizza Town. Now, this means that I don’t have a lot of freedom or choice in the way I run my business. But in a lot of ways, this is great for me. After all, Pizza Town’s way generally works. They sel l a lot of pizza.托福TPO20口语Task4题目：Using the example given by the professor, explain how franchising works.托福TPO20口语Task4满分范文：Franchising is a business practice in which someone pays an established company to buy the right to use the company's name and sell its product. For example, the professor wants to open a pizza restaurant, so he pays some money to an established company called Pizza Town for the right to run a Pizza Town restaurant. Since Pizza T own is already very famous and popular, the professor doesn't have to worry whether there will be customers. So he'll have a better chance of success. And also, his restaurant has to follow all the standardized practice of Pizza Town restaurant, like the decoration of the restaurant and the ad, and his staffs have to be trained by the company to produce the very same Pizza Town pizza. Therefore, even though he doesn't have much freedom, the professor can still make the business succeed through the practice of franchising. (127 words) 以上是给大家整理的托福TPO20口语T ask4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文，希望对你有所帮助!。
TPO20综合写作范文
TPO20综合写作范文The reading passage explores the topic of the “Let it burn” policy. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the “Let it burn”policy is fundamental positive policy, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.First, the professor argues in the lecture that the fire enhanced the diversity of vegetation in Yellowstone Park, even though the reading passage suggests that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. This is because that the fire has created a opportunity for some new plants to grow, for instance, the small plants which needed open un-shaded area and the seeds which demanded high levels of heat to germinate, which means that the small vegetations would had a better environment after the large trees had been destroyed. Obviously, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the park wildlife was affected, and there was also concern that the destruction of habitats and food chains, the professor states that the fire also created new opportunities for s ome animals’ thriving that the population could recover and strengthened certain food chains. Then he supports this point with the fact that, for example, the new plants offered perfect habitats for some animals like rabbits and hares, and promote their pr edators’ booming thesurvived animals would be stronger after fire.Finally, the professor asserts that the fire did not influence tourism negatively since it would not happen every year, whereasthe author of the reading claim that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that it was very unusual combination of several factors, such as low rainfall, strong winds and accumulation of dry undergrowth, that caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988 , and visitors came back to park next year and each year after that.In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading about that the fire is a disaster for Yellowstone is incorrect.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The reading passage explores the topic of the “Let it burn” policy. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the “Let it burn”policy is fundamental positive policy, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.
First, the professor argues in the lecture that the fire enhanced the diversity of vegetation in Yellowstone Park, even though the reading passage suggests that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. This is because that the fire has created a opportunity for some new plants to grow, for instance, the small plants which needed open un-shaded area and the seeds which demanded high levels of heat to germinate, which means that the small vegetations would had a better environment after the large trees had been destroyed. Obviously, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the park wildlife was affected, and there was also concern that the destruction of habitats and food chains, the professor states that the fire also created new opportunities for some animals’ thriving that the population could recover and strengthened certain food chains. Then he supports this point with the fact that, for example, the new plants offered perfect habitats for some animals like rabbits and hares, and promote their predators’ booming the
survived animals would be stronger after fire.
Finally, the professor asserts that the fire did not influence tourism negatively since it would not happen every year, whereas the author of the reading claim that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that it was very unusual combination of several factors, such as low rainfall, strong winds and accumulation of dry undergrowth, that caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988 , and visitors came back to park next year and each year after that.
In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading about that the fire is a disaster for Yellowstone is incorrect.。