学校是否应该对游客开放_英语四级作文
校园是否应多游客开放英语作文

校园是否应多游客开放英语作文Should Campuses Be Open to More Tourists?In recent years, there has been a growing trend of opening campuses to tourists. Some argue that this can bring various benefits to both the universities and the visitors, while others believe that it may have negative consequences. In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of opening campuses to more tourists and discuss whether it is a good idea.On one hand, opening campuses to tourists can provide financial benefits to universities. By charging entrance fees or offering guided tours, universities can generate additional revenue that can be used to improve facilities, support research, and enhance the overall educational experience for students. This extra income can also help universities offer more scholarships and financial aid to students who need it the most.Furthermore, allowing tourists to visit campuses can promote cultural exchange and understanding. Visitors from different backgrounds and countries can learn about the university's history, traditions, and academic achievements. This can foster a sense of global citizenship and promote diversity on campus. Additionally, tourists can interact with students and faculty, leading to valuable cross-cultural experiences and the exchange of ideas.Moreover, opening campuses to tourists can help universities showcase their academic programs and attract potential students. By allowing visitors to see the campus firsthand, universities can create a positive impression and demonstrate their commitment to excellence. This can be particularly beneficial for international students who may not have the opportunity to visit the campus before making a decision. It can also serve as a marketing tool, as satisfied tourists may recommend the university to others.On the other hand, there are concerns that opening campuses to tourists may disrupt the learning environment. Increased foot traffic and noise from tourists can be distracting for students and faculty, making it difficult to concentrate in classrooms and study areas.Moreover, the presence of tourists may limit students' access to certain facilities, such as libraries or laboratories, as these spaces may need to be reserved for visitors. This can negatively impact students' academic experience and hinder their ability to fully utilize the resources available to them.Additionally, there is a risk of vandalism or theft when campuses are open to the public. Visitors who are not affiliated with the university may not have the same respect for the campus and its property. This can result in damage to buildings, theft of equipment, or defacement of campus landmarks. Universities would need to invest in additional security measures to mitigate these risks, which can be costly and time-consuming.Furthermore, the influx of tourists may create congestion and overcrowding on campus. This can lead to logistical challenges, such as limited parking spaces and longer lines at campus facilities. Students may also feel like they are constantly being observed or that their privacy is being invaded. This can create a sense of discomfort and hinder their ability to fully engage in campus life.In conclusion, the question of whether campuses should be open to more tourists is a complex one. While there are potential benefits, such as financial gains, cultural exchange, and increased visibility, there are also drawbacks, including disruptions to the learning environment and potential security risks. Ultimately, universities must carefully consider the impact on students and the overall educational mission before deciding to open their campuses to tourists.。
大学校园是否应该对游客开放英语作文 要求

大学校园是否应该对游客开放英语作文要求全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1Should University Campuses Be Open to Visitors?IntroductionUniversity campuses are often seen as closed-off communities, reserved exclusively for students, faculty, and staff. However, there is a growing debate over whether universities should open their doors to visitors, including tourists and prospective students. In this essay, we will explore the pros and cons of opening university campuses to visitors, focusing on the impact this may have on the campus community, security, and the overall university experience.Pros of Opening University Campuses to Visitors1. Increased Visibility and ReputationAllowing visitors onto campus can increase the visibility of the university and its programs. This can attract prospective students and donors, helping to enhance the university's reputation and standing in the community. Additionally, visitorsmay spread the word about their positive experiences on campus, further enhancing the university's reputation.2. Educational OpportunitiesOpening university campuses to visitors can provide educational opportunities for the general public. Visitors may attend lectures, workshops, or other events, allowing them to learn more about a particular subject or field of study. This can help to promote lifelong learning and engage the community in the university's academic mission.3. Economic BenefitsVisitors to university campuses may spend money on campus tours, merchandise, and dining options, providing a source of revenue for the university. Additionally, local businesses near campus may benefit from an increase in foot traffic, further stimulating the local economy.Cons of Opening University Campuses to Visitors1. Disruption to the Campus CommunityOpening university campuses to visitors may disrupt the daily life of students, faculty, and staff. Increased foot traffic and noise can make it more difficult for members of the campus community to focus on their studies or work. Additionally,visitors may not always respect campus policies or rules, leading to conflicts with university officials.2. Security ConcernsAllowing visitors onto campus can raise security concerns, as it may be more difficult to monitor who is entering the university grounds. This can pose a risk to the safety of students, faculty, and staff, as well as the security of university property. Without proper security measures in place, opening university campuses to visitors may put the entire campus community at risk.3. Impact on the University ExperienceVisitors may alter the atmosphere of the university campus, leading to a loss of the sense of community that many students value. Additionally, the presence of visitors may make it more difficult for students to find quiet study spaces or access resources on campus. This can have a negative impact on the overall university experience for students, faculty, and staff.ConclusionIn conclusion, the decision to open university campuses to visitors is a complex one that requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks. While allowing visitors onto campus can increase visibility, provide educationalopportunities, and stimulate the local economy, it may also disrupt the campus community, raise security concerns, and impact the university experience for students, faculty, and staff. Ultimately, universities must strike a balance between openness and security to ensure the safety and well-being of the campus community while also maximizing the benefits of engaging with visitors.篇2Should College Campuses Be Open to Visitors?IntroductionCollege campuses are often seen as closed-off communities, only accessible to students, faculty, and staff. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether campuses should be open to visitors, especially tourists. In this essay, we will explore the pros and cons of allowing visitors onto college campuses and ultimately, consider whether colleges should open their doors to the public.Benefits of Allowing Visitors1. Cultural ExchangeBy allowing visitors onto college campuses, colleges can promote cultural exchange and broaden students’ perspectives. Visitors from different countries and backgrounds can bring new ideas and experiences to the campus, enriching the learning environment for students.2. Potential RevenueOpening college campuses to visitors could also generate revenue for the institution. Visitors may be willing to pay for guided tours, events, or merchandise, providing colleges with an additional source of income.3. Community EngagementAllowing visitors onto college campuses can help colleges build stronger ties with the local community. By hosting events and open days for the public, colleges can improve their reputation and foster positive relationships with local residents.Drawbacks of Allowing Visitors1. Disruption to Campus LifeOne of the main concerns about opening college campuses to visitors is the potential disruption to campus life. Tourists wandering around campus, attending classes, or using facilitiescould disturb students and faculty, affecting their learning and work environment.2. Safety and Security RisksOpening college campuses to visitors could also pose safety and security risks. Without proper vetting and monitoring, visitors may pose a threat to the campus community, leading to incidents of theft, vandalism, or even violence.3. Privacy ConcernsAllowing visitors onto college campuses may also raise privacy concerns for students and faculty. Visitors could take photos, record videos, or share sensitive information about the campus community on social media, compromising individuals’ privacy and safety.ConclusionIn conclusion, the question of whether college campuses should be open to visitors is a complex issue with both benefits and drawbacks. While allowing visitors can promote cultural exchange, generate revenue, and engage the community, it may also disrupt campus life, pose safety risks, and raise privacy concerns. Ultimately, colleges must carefully weigh these factors and consider implementing policies and regulations to ensurethat opening their doors to visitors benefits the campus community as a whole.篇3Should University Campuses Be Open to Visitors?As university campuses are considered hubs of intellectual activity and innovation, the question of whether they should be open to visitors is a topic of debate. Some argue that opening up campuses to visitors can foster a sense of community and collaboration, while others believe that it can compromise the safety and privacy of students and staff. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and provide my perspective on the matter.Those in favor of opening university campuses to visitors argue that it can promote a more inclusive and welcoming environment. Visitors, such as prospective students, parents, alumni, and members of the local community, can gain insight into the institution's culture, values, and academic programs. This can help build stronger ties between the university and the surrounding community, leading to an exchange of ideas and resources.Furthermore, opening campuses to visitors can enhance the university's reputation and attract potential students and donors. By showcasing the campus facilities, research projects, and student achievements, universities can demonstrate their commitment to excellence and innovation. This can be beneficial for recruitment efforts, as prospective students may be more likely to choose a university with a vibrant and engaging campus environment.On the other hand, opponents of opening university campuses to visitors raise concerns about security and privacy. Universities are responsible for ensuring the safety andwell-being of their students and staff, and allowing unrestricted access to outsiders can pose risks. Visitors may disrupt classes, invade private spaces, or engage in inappropriate behavior, leading to potential safety and security concerns.Moreover, opening campuses to visitors can also raise issues of privacy for students and staff. With the increasing use of surveillance technology on campus, such as security cameras and access control systems, allowing visitors to roam freely can compromise the privacy of individuals. Students may feel uncomfortable having strangers on campus, especially if they are trying to study, relax, or socialize in private spaces.In my opinion, there is a need to strike a balance between opening university campuses to visitors and ensuring the safety and privacy of students and staff. One way to achieve this is by implementing visitor guidelines and restrictions, such as designated visiting hours, visitor registration, and escort services. By establishing clear guidelines and expectations for visitors, universities can maintain a welcoming environment while upholding security and privacy standards.Additionally, universities can leverage technology to enhance the visitor experience and streamline access control. For example, universities can develop virtual campus tours, interactive maps, and online registration platforms to provide visitors with a more convenient and informative visit. This can help reduce physical foot traffic on campus and mitigate potential security risks associated with large crowds.In conclusion, the question of whether university campuses should be open to visitors is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and planning. While there are benefits to opening campuses to visitors, such as promoting community engagement and recruitment, it is important to prioritize the safety and privacy of students and staff. By implementing visitor guidelines, leveraging technology, and fostering a culture ofrespect and responsibility, universities can create a welcoming and secure environment for visitors while upholding their core values and mission.。
大学应该对游客开放英语作文180字吗

大学应该对游客开放英语作文180字吗全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1Should universities be open to visitors? This is a question that has sparked debate among students and faculty members at universities around the world. Some argue that opening universities to visitors can enhance the reputation of the institution, promote cultural exchange, and generate revenue. Others believe that it can disrupt the academic environment, compromise student safety, and distract from the primary mission of education.One of the main arguments in favor of opening universities to visitors is that it can enhance the reputation of the institution. By allowing visitors to see the campus, attend lectures, and interact with students and faculty members, universities can showcase their academic programs, research initiatives, and campus facilities. This can help attract prospective students, faculty members, and research partners, and ultimately elevate the university's standing in the academic community.cultural exchange and understanding. By welcoming visitors from different countries and backgrounds, universities can create opportunities for cross-cultural learning and collaboration. This can help foster a more diverse and inclusive campus community, and prepare students to thrive in an increasingly globalized world.Furthermore, allowing visitors on campus can generate revenue for the university. By offering guided tours, hosting conferences and events, and selling university merchandise, universities can capitalize on the interest of visitors and generate additional income. This can help support academic programs, student scholarships, and campus infrastructure, and reduce the financial burden on students and taxpayers.However, there are also valid concerns about opening universities to visitors. One of the main concerns is that it can disrupt the academic environment and compromise student safety. Visitors may disrupt classes, access restricted areas, and pose security risks to students and faculty members. This can create a distraction from the primary mission of education and undermine the overall quality of the academic experience.resources and attention away from serving the needs of students. University staff may need to spend time and energy catering to visitors, instead of focusing on supporting student learning and success. This can strain university resources and detract from the quality of education that students receive.In conclusion, the question of whether universities should be open to visitors is a complex and multifaceted issue. While there are valid arguments in favor of opening universities to visitors, there are also legitimate concerns that must be addressed. Ultimately, universities must strike a balance between promoting their reputation, fostering cultural exchange, and generating revenue, while also maintaining a safe and productive academic environment for students and faculty members.篇2Should universities be open to visitors? This question has been a topic of debate among members of the academic community for some time. While some argue that universities should be open to visitors as a way to promote transparency and cultivate public trust, others believe that universities should focus on their core mission of teaching and research and limit access to outsiders.One argument in favor of opening universities to visitors is that it promotes transparency and accountability. By allowing the public to visit their campuses and participate in activities such as lectures and tours, universities can demonstrate that they are responsible stewards of public resources and are committed to serving the needs of their communities. Additionally, open access can help universities build relationships with potential donors, partners, and supporters who may be more likely to contribute if they have a personal connection to the institution.On the other hand, some argue that universities should limit access to visitors in order to maintain a focused and distraction-free learning environment. Having too many outsiders on campus can disrupt the flow of daily activities and create security concerns. Additionally, some worry that allowing unrestricted access to visitors could result in the exploitation of university resources for commercial or political gain.In my opinion, universities should strike a balance between being open to visitors and maintaining a secure and productive learning environment. While it is important for universities to engage with the public and foster connections with external stakeholders, they should also ensure that their primary mission of education and research is not compromised. By carefullycontrolling access to campus facilities and events, universities can both promote transparency and accountability and protect the privacy and safety of their students and staff.In conclusion, the issue of whether universities should be open to visitors is a complex one that requires careful consideration of the benefits and drawbacks of opening access. While there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that universities can find a middle ground that allows them to engage with the public while still fulfilling their primary mission of education and research. By fostering partnerships and relationships with visitors in a controlled and intentional manner, universities can both enhance their public image and protect their core values.篇3Should Universities be open to tourists?Universities are often considered exclusive institutions, reserved for students and faculty members. However, the debate over whether universities should be open to tourists has been ongoing. Some argue that opening universities to tourists can bring in revenue, promote the institution, and foster a culture of openness. On the other hand, opponents believe thatuniversities should prioritize the needs of students and faculty over those of tourists.Proponents of opening universities to tourists argue that it can bring in additional revenue. Tourists who visit a university campus may be willing to pay for guided tours, attend lectures or cultural events, and purchase university merchandise. This additional income can help support university initiatives, such as scholarships, research projects, and campus improvements. Furthermore, opening universities to tourists can also promote the institution and attract potential students and faculty members.In addition to financial benefits, opening universities to tourists can also foster a culture of openness and engagement. By welcoming tourists onto campus, universities can showcase their academic and cultural offerings, engage with the local community, and promote interaction between students, faculty, and visitors. This can lead to a more vibrant and diverse campus environment, enrich the educational experience for students, and enhance the reputation of the university.However, opponents of opening universities to tourists argue that universities should prioritize the needs of students and faculty. They believe that universities exist primarily foracademic and research purposes, and that opening campus to tourists may disrupt these activities. Additionally, opponents argue that universities should maintain a sense of exclusivity and academic excellence, which may be compromised by opening the campus to tourists.In conclusion, the debate over whether universities should be open to tourists is complex and multifaceted. While there are potential benefits to opening universities to tourists, such as additional revenue and promoting the institution, it is important to carefully consider the impact on students, faculty, and the university's academic mission. Ultimately, universities must strike a balance between welcoming tourists and maintaining their academic integrity.。
名校校园是否应对游客开放英语作文

名校校园是否应对游客开放英语作文Should Famous Schools Open Their Campuses to Visitors?Famous schools around the world attract a lot of attention not only from students and parents, but also from tourists and visitors who are curious to see the campuses for themselves. Some famous schools have policies that restrict or limit access to their campuses, while others are more open to visitors. This has sparked a debate over whether or not famous schools should open their campuses to tourists and visitors.On one hand, opening the campuses of famous schools to visitors can provide a great opportunity for people to learn more about the school and its history, culture, and traditions. It can also help promote the school and attract prospective students who may be inspired by what they see. Additionally, allowing visitors can generate revenue through guided tours, souvenirs, and other visitor-related activities.On the other hand, there are concerns about opening the campuses of famous schools to visitors. Some argue that it can disrupt the learning environment and privacy of the students and staff. Visitors may disrupt classes, events, and activities, and some may even pose a security risk. There is also the risk of theft,vandalism, and other unwanted behaviors by visitors who do not respect the rules and regulations of the school.In my opinion, famous schools should find a balance between opening their campuses to visitors and protecting the privacy and security of their students and staff. Here are some possible solutions:- Limited Access: Famous schools can limit access to certain areas of the campus, such as classrooms, dormitories, and offices, while allowing visitors to explore other areas like the library, sports facilities, and historical buildings.- Guided Tours: Schools can offer guided tours led by trained staff or student ambassadors to ensure that visitors follow the rules and regulations of the school. This can help control the flow of visitors and provide an educational and entertaining experience for them.- Visitor Policies: Schools can implement visitor policies that outline the rules and regulations for visitors, including behavior expectations, areas of access, and security protocols. Visitors should be required to register in advance and follow the guidelines during their visit.- Virtual Tours: Schools can also provide virtual tours of their campuses online for those who are unable to visit in person. This can be a convenient and safe alternative for people who want to learn more about the school from a distance.Overall, opening the campuses of famous schools to visitors can be a positive experience if done in a responsible and controlled manner. It can help promote the school, educate the public, and enhance the overall reputation of the institution. By finding a balance between openness and security, famous schools can benefit from welcoming visitors while still protecting the integrity of their campus.。
校园是否应该对游客开放英语作文优秀范文

校园是否应该对游客开放英语作文优秀范文English: While there may be benefits to opening campus to visitors, there are also significant drawbacks to consider. Allowing visitors access to the campus can promote a sense of transparency and community engagement, potentially enhancing the reputation of the institution. It could also provide an opportunity for potential students to explore the campus and get a feel for the atmosphere before making a decision. However, there are also concerns about security and privacy. Opening the campus to the public could increase the risk of unauthorized individuals entering sensitive areas or disrupting the normal functioning of the school. It may also raise issues regarding the protection of students' personal information and safety. Therefore, it is important for universities to carefully weigh the pros and cons before deciding to open their campus to visitors.Translated content: 尽管向游客开放校园可能会带来一些好处,但也有重要的缺点需要考虑。
校园是应该对游客开放英语作文

Campus Accessibility to Tourists: ANecessary DebateIn recent years, the question of whether campusesshould be open to tourists has garnered significant attention. This debate is not without merit, as it raises important considerations about the role of universities in society, the safety of students and faculty, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of increased public access. **Arguments for Campus Accessibility**Firstly, opening campuses to tourists promotes cultural exchange and understanding. Universities are repositoriesof knowledge and culture, and by allowing visitors to explore their facilities and spaces, they can gain a deeper understanding of the academic and social life of students. This can foster a greater appreciation for the value of education and research, and contribute to the creation of a more informed and engaged citizenry.Secondly, campus tourism can bring economic benefits to universities and surrounding communities. Tourism generates revenue through ticket sales, increased spending in localbusinesses, and the creation of jobs. Universities can leverage their unique resources and attractions to attract visitors, who in turn become ambassadors for theinstitution and its community, drawing even more attention and support.Lastly, campus accessibility can foster a sense of community and pride among students and faculty. When university campuses are open to the public, they become extensions of the local community, inviting neighbors and visitors to share in their academic and cultural pursuits. This can enhance the sense of belonging and community engagement among students and faculty, who feel more connected to their institution and its role in society.**Arguments Against Campus Accessibility**However, there are also valid arguments against opening campuses to tourists. Firstly, the safety of students and faculty must be paramount. With increased public access, there is a potential for increased crime and security issues. Universities must ensure that their campuses are well-monitored and secured, and that any potential risks to the safety of their community are mitigated.Secondly, campus tourism can disrupt the academic and research environment. Large numbers of visitors can create noise and congestion, interrupting classes, lab work, and other academic activities. Universities must carefully manage the flow of visitors to ensure that they do not interfere with the normal operations of the institution. Lastly, there are concerns about the potential for damage to campus facilities and resources. With increased foot traffic and use of university facilities, there is a greater risk of wear and tear, vandalism, and even theft. Universities must invest in additional resources to maintain their facilities and ensure that they are protected from any potential harm.**Conclusion**The debate over whether campuses should be open to tourists is complex and multifaceted. While there are significant benefits to increased public access, including cultural exchange, economic benefits, and community engagement, there are also important considerations about safety, academic disruption, and resource protection. Universities must carefully consider these factors whendeciding whether to open their campuses to tourists, and ensure that any decisions are made with the best interests of their community and mission in mind.**校园对游客开放:一场必要的辩论**近年来,关于校园是否应对游客开放的问题引起了广泛关注。
学校是否应该对游客开放英语作

学校是否应该对游客开放英语作文【英语作文】nowadays, there has been a heated discussion (a sensational debate) on the issue of sth. on whether or not we should …people who prefer to treat college as destination of tourists have their reasons: the first reason for their choice is, they maintain, that (this will provide university an etra sum of money, will can help solve the university financial problem). besides, this practice, they go on to point out, can help college students have contact with the outside world. what is more important,. they also claim that colleges can be soils for teenage tourists to cultivate their love for knowledge and truth.but others may not agree. they would argue that this will inevitably distract college students from their study;what is worse, they emphasize, tourists might leave some rubbish on the campus, which will ruin the beauty of campus.who is right? of course both sides have their reasons. were i to offer my choice, i would not hesitate a moment to say that i favor (the former side. after all, colleges and universities are public places as long as tourists take care not to cause trouble for colleges.。
大学应不应该对游客开放写一篇英语作文

Should Universities Be Open to Tourists?The debate on whether universities should be open to tourists is a complex one, involving considerations of security, campus culture, and public engagement. While there are arguments for both sides, I believe universities should, to a certain extent, be accessible to tourists.Firstly, allowing tourists on campus can foster a sense of community and engagement. Universities are not just institutions of learning; they are also vibrant communities with unique histories, cultures, and landscapes. By opening their gates to tourists, universities provide an opportunity for the public to appreciate the beauty and diversity of these institutions, fostering a sense of belonging and pride.Secondly, tourist visits can generate revenue for universities. While the primary function of universities is education, they also need to consider financial sustainability. By allowing tourists to visit, universities can generate income through tickets, guided tours, and on-campus shopping, which can be used to support academic programs and research.However, there are also valid concerns about the negative impacts of tourist visits. Security is a prime concern, as increased footfall can pose a threat to the safety of students, faculty, and visitors. To address this, universities can implement strict security measures, such as visitor registration and controlled access to sensitive areas.Moreover, the influx of tourists can disrupt the academic and cultural environment of the campus. To mitigate this, universities can limit the number of tourists allowed on campus at any given time and designate specific areas for tourist activities, ensuring that the academic and residential areas are not unduly disturbed.In conclusion, universities should be open to tourists, but within certain limits and with strict security measures. By doing so, they can balance the need for financial sustainability, public engagement, and the preservation of their academic and cultural environments.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
学校是否应该对游客开放_英语四级作文Nowadays (recently/these days/currently), there has been a heated discussion (a sensational debate) on the issue of sth.( on whether or not we should …) People who prefer (to treat college as destination of tourists)have their reasons: The first reason for their choice is, they maintain, that (this will provide university an extra sum of money, will can help solve the university financial problem). Besides, (this practice), they go on to point out, (can help college students have contact with the outside world). What is more important,. they also claim that colleges can be soils for teenage tourists to cultivate their love for knowledge and truth.But others may not agree. They would argue that (this will inevitably distract college students from their study);What is worse, they emphasize, (tourists might leave some rubbish on the campus, which will ruin the beauty of campus).Who is right? Of course both sides have their reasons. Were I to offer my choice, I would not hesitate a moment to say that I favor (the former side). After all, (colleges and universities are public places as long as tourists take care not to cause trouble for colleges).How to Use the LibraryA library is a building for a collection of books, magazines, periodicals and newspapers. The books are kept on the shelves in the stack room whereas rihe magazines,journals,etc. in the reading rooms. Modern libraries also have xerox rooms, and computer rooms.If you want to borrow books, you can go to the loan desk, look over the correct call numbers in the card catalog and ask the librarian to take them out for you. Or you’re allowed to enter the stack room to find books for yourself, you can look up the bound volume of index for the articles relative to the subject, on which you are going to write a thesis. If the library doesn’t subscribe to the magazine which carries the article you want, you can borrow the magazine from other libraries by means of interlibrary loan service. Don’t forget to show your libr ary card or I.D. card to the librarian before you go into the reading room, where you can read magazines or newspapers. If you find a good article and want to keep it, you can have it duplicated in the xerox room. Besides, if you want to watch films or slides, you can ask the projectionist to play the videotape for you in theaudio-visual room, where you can.also listen to language tapes and music tapes.World PopulationAccording to a recent report from the United Nations, the world population continues to grow. It is over 5 billion now. It could reach 8.4 billion in the year 2025.But during the past 10 years or so, a large and rapid drop in the world’s birth rate has taken place.Families generally are smaller now than they were a few years ago. It is happening in both developing and developed countries.China is such a country that has already cut its rate of population growth by about one half since ! 970. Each Chinese family has no more than one child. And the hope is to reach a zero population growth rate by 2010.Several countries in Europe already have a negative growth rate. Experts say that these countries could face a serious shortage of workers in the future. And the persons who are working could face much higher taxes to help support the growing number of retirees.世界人口根据联合国最近的报告:世界人口正持续增长。
现已超过50亿。
到2025年,这个数字会达到84之多,但是在过去的大约10年中,世界范围的出生率有了大量、迅速的下降。
与几年前相比,家庭成员越来越少,,发达国家和发展中国家都是如此。
中国正是一个这样的国家,197()年至今。
人口的增长率已经大约减少为过去的二分之一。
每个中国家庭只有一个孩子。
到2010年的时候,有希望达到人口增长率为零很多欧洲国家已经出现人口负增长。
专家预测,这些国家将会在未来遭遇严重的劳动力不足。
而工作的人们将面临比现在高得多的税收以负担日益增长的退休人口。
题目:Customs on eating(字数:400-500字词汇:用中级词汇即大学四六级词汇即可。
)开头:中西方饮食文化以及饮食习惯存在着很大差别(从几方面列举)★Food between China and Western countries列举中国人与Western people各自吃的食物种类和烹饪方式有什么不同★Eating behaviors between China and Western countries1 中国人聚餐时总是争着付款,而Western people则选择AA制2 在餐桌上中国人喜欢给客人夹菜,而Western people则对这种行为很反感3Western people在餐厅用餐总要给tips,而中国人除了一些有钱人或者在特定的场合则很少给tips★Eating tools between China and Western countries中国人用筷子吃饭,而Western people则用刀,叉子等用餐★介绍一下西方的下午茶★结尾:概括一下文章主要内容。
Customs on eatingFood between China and Western countries are totally different styles. China has 5000 years history. We probably spend half of time on food. Chinese people choice food very carefully. They only use fresh material to make food. For example they only eat fresh fish. Chinese have a lot of ideas and techniques for cooking. We can cook a chicken in over ten ways. That’s why Chinese food is so popular in the world. Western country like English or American, they don’t have fresh food because they buy their food from supermarket which only sells stored materials. Western people would also prefer fast food like burgers and chips. They are unhealthy to human body. Western people do not have many skills for cooking, mostly they only boil, steam and bake the food. By the way, western people are very good at making desert and chocolate. They can make very good cake and chocolate. They are very sweet but it’s sort of food which make you become fat quickly.In china if you invite people for meal, the person who invited other people would pay for the meal but it’s not the way in Western country. In western country people will think you only invited me but it’s not your responsibility to pay for me. I can afford it. They won’t be happy if you pay for them. People in China would always put dishes into customer’s plate to show their hospitality, but they will think it’s not healthy because your chopsticks have[1] [2] 下一页。