英语口语辩论话题及材料11
英语辩论赛辩题大全_辩论赛_
英语辩论赛辩题大全就要策划举办英语辩论赛的你想好辩题了吗?下面是小编搜集整理的英语辩论赛辩题大全，欢迎阅读。
更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!英语辩论赛辩题大全0. Campus Lifea. China abolish English as a compulsory subject inpostgraduate entrance examinations.b. China make military training compulsory for allcollege students.c. All major corporations operating in China shouldbe required to offer student internships.1. Culturea. THW require study of the traditional styleChinese writing.b. TH opposes the private ownership of artifactsdeemed to be national treasures.c. THBT Shanzhai culture is bad for China.2. Educationa. THW base teachers? pay on their students? performance.b. THW make community service compulsory for all college students.c. THBT Chinese compulsory education should be extended to 12 years3. Economya. TH supports a new international trading currency.b. THB that China should stop buying US debt.c. China should issue consumption vouchers to stimulate the economy.4. Global climate changea. Developed nations should accept global warming refugeesb. Those affected by global climate change should have the right to sue major carbon-emitting nations.c. China should cap its carbon emissions.5. East Asiaa. Immediate elections are in Thailand抯 best interest.b. ASEAN should expel Myanmarc. Direct negotiations between the US and North Korea are preferable to the Six-Party Talks.6. Family & Populationa. THBT women should be allowed to sell their eggsb. TH would require the father抯 consent for abortions.c. China should legalize marriage between homosexuals.7. Crime & Punishmenta. Criminals sentenced to life imprisonment without parole should be allowed to choose deathinstead.b. China should establish a national DNA database of all citizens for the purposes of criminalinvestigations.c. This house would make parents liable for their children抯crimes.8. Governing & Governmenta. THW make one-year military service a qualification for public servants.b. TH would require government officials to make full financial disclosure to the public.c. THW make all NPC representatives full-time, professional legislators.Octofinals: Medical servicea. China should ban hymen reconstruction surgeries.b. China should legalize physician-assisted suicide.c. The World Health Organization (WHO) should have theauthority to quarantine in times ofhealth crises.Quarterfinals: Judiciarya. China should apply capital punishment only to homicide cases.b. China should fully establish a jury-by-peers system.c. Judges should be elected.Semifinals: International IssuesSEMIFINAL #1a. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization should admit Iran as a full member.b. The United Nations should take control of Jerusalem.c. NATO should fully withdraw from Afghanistan before 2019.SEMIFINAL #2a. The USA should stop promoting democracy as part of their foreign policy.b. Pre-emptive strikes on Somalia to curb piracy are justified.c. This house supports Spain抯criminal prosecution of members of the Bushadministration.FinalsThe PRC should ban the production, sale and consumption of all tobacco products.英语辩论赛常用语A征求他人观点或意见的用语I would be glad to hear your opinion of … 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。
大学英语辩论话题范文英语辩论的话题简单而且有话可说的
大学英语辩论话题范文英语辩论的话题简单而且有话可说的老年人的经验不是世界上最大的财富1.Our world is developing quickly,quite a lot of old peaple's experiences are useless now. For example , you need to go to city A,and your grandpa ___ you immdiately that you can take bus B and some orther informationg that he thinks them as the best way to A.But he don't kown there is a new way can take you to A directly.And then which way you wound those ?So ,how can it bee the greatest world wealth.2.everybody is different from orthers.So everyone's life road is different from orthers'.So,old people's ways are different from ours.they get their esperiences from their life road.and how can we use their experience in our way?So how can it be the greatest wealth?3.Always obey experiences makes mistakes. this stops us from thinking of our own ways to solve problem.this make us stupid.1、时势造英雄，英雄造时势；2、志愿者热情比能力重要，志愿者能力比热情重要；3、男生、女生之间有纯洁的友谊，男生、女生之间没有纯洁的友谊；4、帮助同学影响自己的学业，帮助同学不影响自己的学业；5、世界文化遗产开发比保护重要，世界文化遗产保护比开发重要；6、人生中享受比拼搏重要，人生中拼搏比享受重要；7、子不成器主要是父母之过，子不成器主要是本身之过；8、好马不吃回头草，好马该吃回头草；9、大学生完善自我应以才为主，大学生完善自我应以德为主；10、拿起比放下重要，放下比拿起重要；11、成功路上对手比合作伙伴重要，成功路上合作伙伴比对手重要；12、青年人首先要立好志，青年人首先要择好业；13、逆境比顺境对人更重要，顺境比逆境对人更重要；14、读书无纸化利大于弊，读书无纸化弊大于利；15、网络用语利于文学进步，网络用语不利于文学进步。
英语辩论赛辩题和答案(3篇)
第1篇For the Motion:Opening Statement:Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and fellow debaters, today we stand before you to advocate for the motion that the government should provide free education to all students up to the age of 18. Education is the cornerstone of a prosperous society, and ensuring that every child has access to quality education is a moral imperative. We believe that the government has a responsibility to invest in its youth and provide them with the tools they need to succeed.Argument 1: Equal OpportunityThe first and most compelling reason to support free education for all students up to the age of 18 is the principle of equal opportunity. Education is the great equalizer, providing individuals from all backgrounds with the knowledge and skills necessary to compete in the global economy. By making education free, we eliminate the financial barriers that prevent many students from pursuing their dreams. This ensures that every child, regardless of their socioeconomic status, has an equal chance to succeed.Argument 2: Economic BenefitsInvesting in education is an investment in the future of our economy. Educated individuals are more likely to be employed, have higher earning potential, and contribute positively to society. By providing free education, the government can create a more skilled workforce, leading to increased productivity and economic growth. Studies have shown that the return on investment in education is significant, making it a sound economic decision for the government.Argument 3: Social StabilityEducation plays a crucial role in fostering social stability and reducing crime rates. By providing free education, we empower young people to develop critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities,and a sense of civic responsibility. Educated individuals are lesslikely to engage in criminal activities and more likely to be active, productive members of society. This investment in education can lead to a safer, more harmonious community.Argument 4: Moral ResponsibilityLastly, the government has a moral responsibility to ensure that all children have access to education. Education is a fundamental human right, and denying access to it based on financial constraints is a violation of that right. By providing free education, the government demonstrates its commitment to social justice and equity, ensuring that no child is left behind.Rebuttal:While the opposition may argue that free education is unaffordable or that it would lead to a decline in educational quality, these concerns can be addressed. First, the cost of providing free education can be offset by the economic benefits it generates. Second, ensuring quality education is not solely dependent on fees; it requires a comprehensive approach that includes well-trained teachers, modern facilities, and effective educational policies.Closing Statement:In conclusion, providing free education to all students up to the age of 18 is a necessary and beneficial policy. It ensures equal opportunity, fosters economic growth, promotes social stability, and fulfills the government's moral responsibility. We ask you to vote in favor of the motion and support the future of our children and our society.---Against the Motion:Opening Statement:Thank you, esteemed judges, and fellow debaters. We are here to argue against the motion that the government should provide free education toall students up to the age of 18. While the idea of free education may seem noble, it is impractical and fraught with consequences that could undermine the quality of education and the financial stability of the government.Argument 1: Financial BurdenThe primary concern with the motion is the financial burden it places on the government. Education is expensive, and providing free education to millions of students would require a significant allocation of resources. This could lead to cuts in other essential services, such as healthcare, infrastructure, and social welfare. The government must prioritize its spending to ensure that it can meet the needs of its citizens effectively.Argument 2: Quality of EducationAnother critical issue is the potential impact on the quality of education. When the government provides free education, it may be tempted to increase the number of students to maximize its investment. This could lead to overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools, and a decline in the overall quality of education. It is essential to maintain high standards to ensure that students receive a valuable education that prepares them for future challenges.Argument 3: Incentive for Personal ResponsibilityEducation should be seen as a personal responsibility, and charging fees can serve as an incentive for students to value their education. When students are financially invested in their education, they are morelikely to take it seriously and perform better. Removing this financial barrier may lead to a decrease in student motivation and a rise in dropout rates.Argument 4: Alternative SolutionsInstead of providing free education, the government can explore alternative solutions that address the issue of accessibility. Thiscould include targeted scholarships, student loans with favorable terms,or partnerships with private institutions. These approaches can ensure that students from low-income families receive the support they need without burdening the government's budget.Rebuttal:The proponents may claim that the economic benefits of education justify the financial investment, but this overlooks the long-term costs of maintaining a high-quality education system. Moreover, the governmenthas a duty to manage its resources responsibly, and free education could lead to unsustainable spending practices.Closing Statement:In conclusion, while the desire to provide free education is commendable, it is not a viable solution. The financial burden, potential decline in educational quality, lack of personal responsibility, and alternative solutions make it clear that the government should not adopt this policy. We ask you to reject the motion and consider the long-term implications of such a decision.---This debate provides a framework for discussing the complexities of providing free education to all students up to the age of 18. Both sides present compelling arguments, and the final decision would depend on the priorities and values of the society in question.第2篇Side A: In Favor of Standardized TestingArgument 1: Ensuring Academic Standards- Standardized tests provide a common benchmark for evaluating student performance across different schools and regions. This ensures that all students are held to the same high academic standards, regardless oftheir background or the resources available to their schools.- By requiring a standardized test before graduation, schools can ensure that students have achieved a minimum level of proficiency in coresubjects, which is essential for their future success in higher education and the workforce.Argument 2: Identifying Areas for Improvement- Standardized tests often reveal specific areas where students are struggling. This information can be used by teachers and administrators to tailor their instruction and interventions to address these weaknesses, thereby improving overall student performance.- The data from standardized tests can also help identify trends and patterns that may indicate broader educational issues, such as a lack of access to quality resources or a need for additional support services.Argument 3: Promoting Accountability- Requiring a standardized test before graduation holds schools accountable for their educational outcomes. It incentivizes schools to focus on student achievement and to provide the necessary support forall students to succeed.- Accountability can also extend to teachers, who may be more motivated to deliver effective instruction if they know their performance will be evaluated based on student test scores.Answer to Counterarguments:Counterargument 1: Standardized Tests Do Not Measure True Learning- While it is true that standardized tests may not capture the full breadth of a student's knowledge and skills, they do measure certain critical aspects of learning, such as basic comprehension and problem-solving abilities. These are essential skills that students need to succeed in the real world.- Additionally, schools can use a variety of assessment methods to complement standardized tests, providing a more comprehensive picture of student learning.Counterargument 2: Standardized Tests Create Stress and Pressure- It is important to recognize that standardized tests can indeed create stress and pressure for students. However, this can be mitigated by implementing appropriate test preparation strategies and by creating a supportive testing environment.- Moreover, the benefits of ensuring academic standards and promoting accountability outweigh the potential negative effects of test stress.Counterargument 3: Standardized Tests Can Be Subjective and Biased- It is true that standardized tests can be influenced by factors such as socioeconomic status and cultural background. However, efforts are continually being made to improve the fairness and objectivity of these tests.- Additionally, schools can use the results to identify and address disparities, rather than using them as the sole measure of student performance.Side B: Against Standardized TestingArgument 1: Restricting Personalized Learning- Standardized tests can limit the flexibility of teachers to tailor their instruction to the individual needs of their students. This can result in a one-size-fits-all approach that does not cater to the diverse learning styles and abilities of students.- By focusing on test preparation, schools may prioritize rote learning and memorization over critical thinking and creativity, which are essential skills for the 21st century.Argument 2: Overemphasizing Test Scores- An overemphasis on standardized test scores can lead to a narrow focus on academic performance at the expense of other important educational outcomes, such as social-emotional development, physical health, and the arts.- This narrow focus can also create a competitive and stressful environment for students, which may have long-term negative effects on their well-being.Argument 3: Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Students- Standardized tests can disproportionately impact marginalized students, who may face additional challenges such as language barriers, lack of access to resources, or discrimination.- The pressure to perform well on these tests can exacerbate existing inequalities and hinder the educational opportunities of these students.Answer to Counterarguments:Counterargument 1: Standardized Tests Provide a Consistent Measure of Student Performance- While standardized tests do provide a consistent measure of student performance, they should not be the sole measure. Schools should use a variety of assessment methods to ensure a well-rounded evaluation of student learning.- Moreover, standardized tests can be used as one tool among many to inform instruction and support students, rather than as the primary focus.Counterargument 2: Test Scores Do Not Reflect the Entire Educational Experience- It is true that test scores do not reflect the entire educational experience, but they do provide valuable information about certain aspects of student learning. This information can be used to identify strengths and weaknesses and to inform educational strategies.- The goal should be to use standardized test results as part of a larger, more holistic approach to student assessment.Counterargument 3: Efforts Can Be Made to Mitigate the Disproportionate Impact- While it is important to acknowledge the disproportionate impact of standardized tests on marginalized students, efforts can be made to mitigate this impact. This includes providing additional support and resources to these students, as well as using alternative assessment methods that are more equitable.In conclusion, while standardized testing has its drawbacks, thebenefits of ensuring academic standards, identifying areas for improvement, and promoting accountability make it a necessary component of the educational system. By using standardized tests as one tool among many and addressing the concerns of fairness and equity, schools can create a more balanced and effective approach to student assessment and support.第3篇Should governments around the world prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure?Answer for the Proposition (Pro):Introduction:The proposition argues that governments worldwide should prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossilfuel infrastructure. This stance is supported by the urgent need to combat climate change, enhance energy security, and foster sustainable economic growth.Argument 1: Climate Change MitigationThe primary reason for prioritizing renewable energy is the urgent need to mitigate climate change. Fossil fuels are the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, which are causing global temperatures to rise, leading to extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and the loss of biodiversity. By investing in renewable energy, governments can significantly reduce carbon emissions and slow down the pace of climate change.Answer 1.1: Renewable Energy's Emissions ProfileRenewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal, produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation. In contrast, fossil fuels release substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and other pollutants when burned. Prioritizing renewable energy will lead to a cleaner energy mix and a healthier planet.Answer 1.2: Technological AdvancementsAdvancements in renewable energy technology have made it more efficient and cost-effective. Solar panels are becoming cheaper and more efficient, wind turbines are producing more power at lower wind speeds, and battery storage is becoming more reliable. These advancements make renewable energy a viable alternative to fossil fuels.Argument 2: Energy SecurityAnother compelling reason to prioritize renewable energy is the enhancement of energy security. Countries that rely heavily on fossil fuels are vulnerable to price volatility and geopolitical tensions. By diversifying their energy sources and investing in renewable energy, governments can reduce their dependence on fossil fuels and stabilize energy prices.Answer 2.1: Diversification of Energy SourcesRenewable energy sources are typically abundant and widely distributed. Unlike fossil fuels, which are concentrated in certain regions, renewable energy can be harnessed almost anywhere in the world. This diversification reduces the risk of energy supply disruptions and enhances energy security.Answer 2.2: Economic ResilienceInvesting in renewable energy can create jobs and stimulate economic growth. The renewable energy sector is one of the fastest-growing job markets globally. By prioritizing renewable energy, governments can create new employment opportunities and build a more resilient economy.Argument 3: Long-term Economic BenefitsRenewable energy offers long-term economic benefits that outweigh the short-term costs of transitioning away from fossil fuels. While the initial investment in renewable energy infrastructure can be high, the long-term savings in energy costs and health care expenditures are significant.Answer 3.1: Lower Energy CostsRenewable energy is often more cost-effective in the long run. As technology improves and economies of scale are achieved, the cost of renewable energy will continue to decline. This will lead to lower energy bills for consumers and businesses.Answer 3.2: Health Care SavingsThe pollution associated with fossil fuels contributes to respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and other health issues. By reducing air pollution through the adoption of renewable energy, governments can save money on health care costs and improve public health.Conclusion:In conclusion, the proposition strongly supports the idea that governments worldwide should prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. The need to mitigate climate change, enhance energy security, and foster sustainable economic growth makes renewable energy a compelling and necessary choice. By investing in renewable energy, governments can create a cleaner, more secure, and prosperous future for their citizens.Answer for the Opposing Proposition (Con):Introduction:The opposing proposition argues that governments worldwide should not prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. This stance is based on thebelief that fossil fuels are currently more reliable, affordable, and essential for meeting the world's energy demands.Argument 1: Reliability and AffordabilityFossil fuels are currently the most reliable and affordable energy sources available. They provide a consistent and predictable energy supply, which is crucial for economic stability and growth. Prioritizing renewable energy could lead to energy shortages and increased costs.Answer 1.1: Reliability of Fossil FuelsFossil fuel infrastructure is well-established and has been providing energy for centuries. This reliability is essential for industries, transportation, and other sectors that require a stable energy supply. Renewable energy sources, on the other hand, are intermittent and depend on weather conditions, which can lead to power outages and energy shortages.Answer 1.2: Affordability of Fossil FuelsFossil fuels are currently the cheapest form of energy available. This affordability makes them accessible to a wide range of consumers and businesses. Shifting to renewable energy could lead to higher energy costs, which could disproportionately affect low-income households and small businesses.Argument 2: Energy SecurityExpanding fossil fuel infrastructure can enhance energy security by reducing dependence on imported fuels and increasing domestic energy production. This is particularly important for countries that rely on energy imports, as it reduces their vulnerability to geopolitical tensions and price fluctuations.Answer 2.1: Geopolitical TensionsCountries that rely on fossil fuel imports are at the mercy of globaloil markets and geopolitical events. By developing domestic fossil fuelresources, governments can gain more control over their energy supply and reduce their exposure to these risks.Answer 2.2: Domestic Energy ProductionExpanding fossil fuel infrastructure can create jobs and stimulate economic growth in the energy sector. This domestic production can also provide a source of revenue for governments and contribute to national economic stability.Argument 3: Technological and Economic ChallengesThe transition to renewable energy faces significant technological and economic challenges. The intermittent nature of renewable energy requires substantial investment in energy storage and grid infrastructure. Additionally, the renewable energy sector is not yet as mature as the fossil fuel industry, which has decades of experience and a well-developed supply chain.Answer 3.1: Energy StorageRenewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, are intermittent and depend on weather conditions. Energy storage solutions, such as batteries, are necessary to ensure a stable energy supply. However, the current technology is still expensive and not yet fully scalable.Answer 3.2: Supply Chain and InfrastructureThe renewable energy sector lacks the well-established supply chain and infrastructure of the fossil fuel industry. This can lead to inefficiencies and higher costs, which may hinder the transition to renewable energy.Conclusion:In conclusion, the opposing proposition believes that governments worldwide should not prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. Fossil fuels are currently the most reliable and affordable energy sources, and expanding fossil fuel infrastructure can enhance energy security andeconomic stability. While the transition to renewable energy is important, it must be done in a manner that ensures reliability, affordability, and energy security.。
英语口语辩论
英语口语辩论1.High school student should go to college or go to work ？正方：go to college 反方：go to work正方一辩：As far as I am concerned，High school student should go to college because people with a college degree will have a wide range of option in career and they will earn significantly more over a lifetime than people without a degree，I’d be glad to hear your opinion on this point。
反方一辩：Yes，perhaps. However，we have to look at this from another perspective。
Not everyone who go to college can succeed getting a degree，In some fields，good job do require training but not a college degree。
What do you think ？正方二辩：Possibly，Nowdays，lots of companies need professional talent，In college，we can learn more professional knowage to make a place for ourselves in the society in future ，so we think that go to college is very necessary 。
大学英语口语考试辩论话题内容
14: Arguments for or against a ban on genetic engineeringA:forB:againstA: Our world has entered into a new biological and social existence that is shaped by computers, mass media, and biotechnology.for example , Genetic engineering help people solve many things ,in’t it?B：well,but humans should not be modifying the genetic makeup of other organisms。
We should keep them in nature .A: Genetic engineering reduces costs of production. This means that the poor can afford more food, and be more self sufficient. They're tasty and nutritious Some are easy to raise specifically for food, or are easy to catch.it’s pecfctB：Human beings are themselves part of nature, creatures within creation. Human discovery and invention can be thought of as resulting from the exercise of God-given powers of mind and reason.A: though it ,we can Design what people want or need , Improve or add desirable characteristics,even Remove undesirable characteristics.it‘s the big deal .B:ok,I like things those are natural ,but Genetic Engineering is unnatural,I can with you . 15：Arguments for or against the view that women face unequal treatment in getting promoted：AagainstB:forA; In a modern society, one would think that sexual discrimination had long disappeared.But My mom didn't get the position she wanted again, they promoted some new guy to the job. I think it’s not fair for women.B: However, this is not the case. Although women are given more chances than they had before. if a couple was divorce women can get 70% of her man's money! IN UK,SOi think every country's Culture are diffenent.OR other reasons.A;wow,no . do you know that western women did not have the same rights like Muslim women ,for example: Muslim women have right to keep her family name after marriage.Muslim women have right to have independent budget with out inquiring of her husband.B: so this is why some country man are king but some country women are king. becuase their culture are different.A:but in country especially in a traditional country like China Some women are still expected to stay at home when they married.why man?B: well,they are equal but they don't have the same rights as men just as men don't have the same rights as women. each of them has a role and the rights are given accordingly.16: Arguments for or against divorce as the solution to a loveless marriageSupporter for divorce=A: if marriage has no love ，marriage just is an afflict[ ə'flikt ]折磨for the person need love.so I think divorce is a better solution to a loveless marriage.Against divorce =B:Divorce do many harms to a family. whats more, The loveless marriage will free people from some obligation[ ˌɒbli'gei∫n ]义务.so I think divorce is the worst r solution to a loveless marriage.A：if marriage has no love ，marriage just is an afflict[ ə'flikt ]折磨for the person need love. There is no care for each other and comfortable communication to make life significant. whats more, the neglect between them buries bomb which will break out somedayB: divorce is not a reasonable solution. Everything has two sides. The loveless marriage will free people from some obligation[ ˌɒbli'gei∫n ]义务.Besides ,the less you pay, the less emotional demands you have, which reduce disputeA: we marry not for the lifeless life. This also has harm to mental health of the coming generation.B: if one has no economic capability, divorce will destroy his life, so do their children and their old parents. Divorce hurt more people.A: the essential issue is loveless marriage having no happiness. Why not look for confident and wonderful life elsewhere?B: this is just personal interests, how can we don’t assume the responsibility for the marriage? Divorce will lead to more social problem.A;well,I still think the emotion is more important.but I accept you too.。
英语口语辩论话题
英语⼝语辩论话题 英语⼝语的辩论⽐较随和不像正式的辩论赛那么正规，那么英语⼝语常见的辩论主题有哪些呢?今天店铺给⼤家分享⼀些常见英语⼝语辩论话题，希望对⼤家有所帮助。
英语⼝语辩论话题 Staying in China or going aboard for education Is Education Losing Its Value better husband or better job Money and personality, which one is more imporant Five-day Work Week Better than Six-day Work? Students Need to Watch TV or not Philosophical debates： If there is no objective truth, then is the claim "there is no objective truth" also not an objective truth? Does History Matter? Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible? Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation? Can any man live without some code of morality? Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Stem Cells: Why or why not Debate:Why Reason? Funny, maybe? Are cats just useless dogs? Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour? Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina) Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve? Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs? Conservapedia:Is Rap music torture? Conservapedia:Should weed be legalized? Debate:What are the lessons that we should take away from the Milgram Experiment Conservapedia:Does the Theory of Evolution promote atheism? Discussion:Colorado Mall Shootings 给⼤家分享练习英语⼝语的⼗⼆个基本话题 话题⼀：个⼈情况(Personal information) 能够向他⼈介绍个⼈的基本情况(姓名、年龄、出⽣⽇期、家庭成员、电话号码、爱好、邮箱地址、外貌、特征和⾃⼰的⽣活情况等)，并能够写出⾃⼰简单的基本情况。
英语辩论 口语考试
英语辩论口语考试辩题：社交媒体对人际关系的影响第一篇：近年来，社交媒体的兴起给人们的生活带来了巨大的变革。
然而，社交媒体对人际关系的影响也备受争议。
本文将从正面和负面两个方面探讨社交媒体对人际关系的影响。
首先，社交媒体为人们提供了更强的联络和交流渠道。
传统的沟通方式限制了人们的交际范围，而社交媒体则打破了这种限制。
通过社交媒体，人们可以与世界各地的朋友、亲人和同事保持联系，并且可以随时了解对方的生活动态。
这种即时沟通的便利性有助于增进人际关系，促进不同群体之间的交流和理解。
其次，社交媒体极大地拓宽了人们获取信息的渠道。
通过社交媒体，人们可以快速浏览新闻、博客、研究论文等等，获取多样化的知识和观点。
这使得人们在交流时更有内容可供建立对话和互动，从而提升人际关系的质量。
然而，社交媒体也带来了一些负面影响。
首先，社交媒体可能导致人与人之间的距离感加大。
虽然社交媒体提供了联系和交流的机会，但是这种联系往往是虚拟的，无法完全代替面对面的交流。
人们在社交媒体上的互动可能仅限于点赞、评论等简单形式，难以建立真正的深入交流，这可能导致人际关系的淡化。
此外，社交媒体也容易导致人们的注意力分散。
社交媒体上的大量信息和娱乐内容常常让人们沉迷其中，从而忽视了与身边人的交流。
这种情况下，人际关系会变得淡薄，亲密度会降低。
综上所述，社交媒体对人际关系的影响是多方面的。
无疑，社交媒体为人们的交流提供了新的便利和机遇。
然而，过度依赖社交媒体也可能导致人与人之间的疏离和沟通不畅。
因此，我们应当在使用社交媒体时保持适度，注重与身边人的真实交流，才能更好地维系和提升人际关系。
第二篇：社交媒体对人际关系的影响社交媒体作为一种新型社交平台，对人际关系产生了深远的影响。
然而，这种影响既有正面的一面，也存在一些负面的因素。
本文将从促进交流、破除地理障碍和提供更多社交机会三个方面进行探讨。
首先，社交媒体促进了人与人之间的交流。
通过社交媒体平台，人们可以轻松地与他人分享自己的生活、想法和情感。
英语辩论赛话题(通用5篇)
英语辩论赛话题（通用5篇）英语辩论赛话题篇一Group 1, For Side: Advertisements should be controlled.Group 1, Against Side: Advertisements should be encouraged.Group 2, For Side: Junior students should go in for beauty contests.Group 2, Against Side: Junior students should not take part in beauty contests.Group 3, For Side: Mobile phones are necessary for middle school students.Group 3, Against Side: Mobile phones are not necessary for middle school students.Group 4, For Side: Middle school students should go abroad to study.Group 4, Against Side: Middle school students should not go abroad to study.Group 5, For Side: Interest is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.Group 5, Against Side: Progress is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.Group 6, For Side: People and nature are in harmony.Group 6, Against Side: People and nature are not in harmony.Group 7, For Side: Mor shubaoc.c ome money means more happiness.Group 7, Against Side: More money means more sadness.Group 8, For Side: Internet alienates the relationship among people.Group 8, Against Side: Internet doesn't alienate the relationshipamong people.Group 9, For Side: Quality is more important for students.Group 9, Against Side: Scores are more important for students. Group 10, For Side: Students should wear their school uniforms. Group 10, Against Side: Students should be allowed to choosetheir own clothes.Group 11, For Side: Students should learn more from books and their teachers.Group 11, Against Side: Students should learn more from their experience and daily life.Group 12, For Side: Computers are good for studying.Group 12, Against Side: Computers are not good for studying.Group 13, For Side: Opportunity is more important for success. Group 13, Against Side: Hard work is more important for success. Group 14, For Side: It is good for students to attend after-school training classes.Group 14, Against Side: It is bad for students to attend after-school training classes.高中组Group 1, For Side: Olympic Games are purely commercial operations.Group 1, Against Side: Olympic Games are not purely commercial operations.Group 2, For Side: Government should control the rising price of houses.Group 2, Against Side: Government should not control the rising price of houses.Group 3, For Side: Reading and writing are more important thanlistening and speaking in the English study.Group 3, Against Side: Listening and speaking are more important than reading and writing in the English study.Group 4, For Side: It's more crucial for students to earn knowledge.Group 4, Against Side: It's more crucial for students to mould character.Group 5, For Side: Blogging has more advantages than disadvantages.Group 5, Against Side: Blogging has more disadvantages than advantages.Group 6, For Side: Money is the source of happiness.Group 6, Against Side: Money is the root of all evil.Group 7, For Side: Shopping online is good.Group 7, Against Side: Shopping online is not good.Group 8, For Side: Going to college is the best future for students.Group 8, Against Side: Going to college is not the best futurefor students.Group 9, For Side: Students should do as many mock tests as possible.Group 9, Against Side: Students should not do so many mock tests. Group 10, For Side: Modesty is never out of date.Group 10, Against Side: Modesty is out of date now.Group 11, For Side: Senior students should take part in after-school activities.Group 11, Against Side: Senior students should not take part in after-school activities.Group 12, For Side: Fighting against terrorism brings peace to the world.Group 12, Against Side: Fighting against terrorism causes more disasters to the world.Group 13, For Side: Paper reading will be replaced by E-reading. Group 13, Against Side: Paper reading will not be replaced by E-reading.Group 14, For Side: "Golden-Weeks" should be canceled.Group 14, Against Side: "Golden-Weeks" should not be canceled. Group 15, For Side: Pressure is a motivation for students.Group 15, Against Side: Pressure is a killer for students 决赛篇二1、 Is it a right and smart way for Americans to take up the Wall Street and even Washington D.C2、 Foreign culture has great effect on Chinese culture. Does the advantage of such effect outweigh the disadvantage or does the disadvantage outweigh the advantage?3、 What does work mean to people? Work to live or live to work?英语辩论赛话题篇三Dressing well is important to one's Iife.着装在人们的生活中作用重大。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
(1) Arguments for or against sending aged parents to nursing homesFor:Parents can achieve more care it save time for young couples who go to work all day without energy to look after their parents it proves unemployed man to go to work as caregivers.What our parents need is not to have a comfortable environment. They just want to have a chat with you; they just want to exchange ideas with you; they just want to be with you…No matter how hard the life is!Since it is a society with a high speed, we may have so much time to take care of parents well enough. So it is a good choice to send our parents there to have the worker look after them.They may feel comforted to help relieve their children’s stress. And we should showrespect for their choice.The family is becoming smaller and smaller, which means the couple should take care of four parents and a child, and that is a big burden for the young generations. At the nursing home, the old may find a lot of things in common with the people there, and they can share their feelings.And it doesn’t mean that we desert them, we can often visit them and comfort them Aged parents will fell lonely if they stay at home by themselves. However, at the nursing homes, they will have many companions to talk with and to play with.. Some aged parents are in bad health, but their children are busy with their work.. On this condition,it’s a good idea to send them to nursing homes to get better care. For children, if they send their aged parents to nursing homes, they will worry less about their parents, so that they will wok much better.Against:1. Cause our parents have done a lot for us when we were still young, and now when we are grown up and have the ability to earn some money , we should try our best to do something for them and let them to live as they like ,enjoy some happy moments before their deaths.2. I think most aged people don't like the nursing home ,what they need at this time is not good food ,good nursing ,but love and care from their sons and daughters who they put their whole hopes on. We should give them love and look after them, as they did to us when we were young. What’s more, China is a country respect aged parents,we should follow the society's virtue. Young people leave eldersalone in nursing homes elderly may have the feeling of being abandoned.I think it is totally wrong to send our parents to the nursing home. Our parents spared no efforts to bring us up, now when they become old; it is our duty to care for them, instead of sending them away.3. We should not only provide our parents with economic resources,but also we should give them spiritual comfort. And this is the most important since elder people1are very much afraid of loneliness.4. Now the environment of the nursing home is not that satisfactory. It may be very dirty, noisy and unorderly in the old people’s house. And the food there might bevery bad, not to mention having balanced diets.5. In the nursing home, there are nearly no young people. Even the workers there are a little old. There is no vigor at all.6. The ability to adapt to the strange environment is weak. Maybe they have adapted to the familiar family and neighborhood. And they are not willing to change.7. Influenced by our traditional culture, it is rooted in our mind that it is the happiest thing to have a large family and have their sons and daughters and grandsons and granddaughters around. If we send them to the nursing home they may feel deserted.8.It is a regular law that the older we become, the more we feel the need to get together with our family.9. You may argue that we may have no time and energy to take care of our parents. But I believe as well as we spare no effort, we are sure to find time to accompany our parents and in turn we are relieved to have a wonderful time with them. And this is a perfect way to relax.10. since we are not so independent as the young in the West, our parents may become used to living with us, so we had better keep our parents with us.Have you remember the song sung in the Spring Festival Evening Show 常回家看看。
What our parents need is not to have a comfortable environment. They just want to have a chat with you; they just want to exchange ideas with you; they just want to be with you…No matter how hard the li fe is!11. Some children just send their aged parents to nursing homes, and later care little about their parents ,which makes their parents very sad.12. For some aged parents, they want to stay with their childrenevery day, then they will fell very happy and satisfied. Therefore,it’s against their will to send them tonursing homes.13. Some nursing homes are far from satisfactory, and they are notable to bring aged parents happinessArguments for or against asking pocket money from our parents(2)Arguments for or against asking pocket money from our parentsWith the development of our modern society, peoples livingconditions become much more comfortable. But along with intense competition, parents have less time to consider children needs in all-round. One method to solve this contradiction is to give children some pocket money. Pocket money is useful to children. But whether thechildren are considerable enough to make correct use of these money. For: Someone believe that giving children pocket money really has many advantages. With pocket money, children can buy their daily necessities such as pencils, little toys, and snack food they like. It will givechildren a certain freedom to select what they want, make them aware rules of the equivalent exchange.Since time to parents is very precious, giving pocket money to children help them to2save time spent in shopping, but used in busy working and earning money. It can enable children to gain the ability to manage money earlier, which is good for their development.Children will be happy if they often get pocket money, and they can buy what they love, which contributes to a happy childhood.We can guide children to use their pocket money properly to make good use of it. Sometimes, children will be happy to do something if they can get pocket money. To them , it’s a good encouragement.We are too young to support ourselves on our own.It is very convenient outside home if we have some packet money with us. It can enable children to gain the ability to manage money earlier, which is good for their development.Children will be happy if they often get pocket money, and they can buy what they love, which contributes to a happy childhood.We can guide children to use their pocket money properly to make good use of it. Sometimes, children will be happy to do something if they can get pocket money. To them ,it’s a good encouragement.Against:Young children do not know how to use pocket money appropriately, they possibly consume all the money to buy expensive merchandise that they like, and then ask for extra money from their parents.Some parents cosset(溺爱) their children, and always give them a large amount of pocket money. Such conditions will make children become more and more prodigal. Since adults do not supervise the procedure of shopping, children could probably buy something that is not suitable for their age, such as adult magazines. Our parents make money by working day and night, we should help them to support the family and not just want to ask money for our parents.If we can always get money from our parents , it is easy to develop the bad habit of spending money randomly.We are old enough to support ourselves by getting a part-time job. We should have a proper conception of money.1,Children are too youny to know how to spend their pocket money. Often, they use the money wrongly, which leads to a big waste.2 Some children develop a bad habit of comparing themselves with others concerning pocket money, and that’s harmful to the m.3.Some children do a lot of harmful things with pocket money ,suchas playing computer games, drinking and so on, which is bad.3Arguments for or against requiring high school students to wear school uniformsFor:(1)The school uniform is a symbol of students. Dressing uniform will help to shape the school's overall image.what’s more, it can enhance the students’ identity of3the school.(2) It is important that students pay more attention to their school work than to their clothes. Caring too much about how they dress shouldn't be a big concern for students. If they wear uniforms, they don't have to worry about what they wear. (3) School uniforms helps to eliminate socio-economical barriers. Many students come from diverse backgrounds; however, inside the walls of the school, economic advantages and disadvantages are no longer obvious.(4) If students wear uniforms, they will remember that they are students and they will always be reminded of what students should or shouldn't do.(5) One of the chief benefits of school uniforms is their ability to make schools safer. Studies have shown that they help to reduce gang influences.Against:(1)School uniforms inhibit students?? individuality. Young people often express theirfeelings through the clothing that they wear. Uniforms will take away this form of expression. Why should school districts try to make everyone look the same?(2) . A school uniform policy inhibits a student's freedom of choice. Schools teach students that our country is a free one. But when school boards make students wear what they tell them too-- it curtails the students' freedom.(3)There is the issue of cost. Many parents shop for theirchildren's clothes at used and discount stores. Uniforms can cost more money than these families might be able to afford. Also, these students would need to buy additional clothing to wear after school and on the weekends. That's double the amount of money a family would spend than they would without the uniforms.(4)The another reason I do not enjoy the thought of school uniformsis comfort. Students enjoy wearing comfortable clothing to school. Uniforms are not necessarily comfortable. Also, wearing a uniform might make the student uncomfortable around people outside the school whodon't have to wear a uniform.(5)Students should wear the uniforms for almost a week.It’s easyfor the uniform to get dirty and not conducive to personal hygiene.4Arguments for or against the view that one’s fate is adecisive factor in one’s life :Reasons fo r “Yes”Unfortunate fate decides unfortunate life . Such as disabled people , whose starting line is lower than others , may suffer discrimination everywhere . If two persons of the same level apply for one position , it’s no doubt that most bosses prefer the abledperson.Poverty is of vital importance to one’s fate which can decideone’s life . For example ,if one doesn’t have money to go to school , how can he change his life byknowledge ?4Where you are born can decide what life you will own . Students of Beijing and Shanghai can be admitted to famous universities by a lower score while students from Shandong must have a very very high score if you want to go to a key college . People always say that college entrance examination is equal , but from the minute you are born , it has been decided unequal .In ancient times , the children of royalty and high-class officials have higher social positions than average men’s kids . They can escape from the hard life from theirbirth .In addition ,some people can become millionaires because of alottery ticket (彩票) ，while some people can suffer from a traffic accident . Aren’t these fates?Reasons for “No”The disabled can also master their fate , such as Zhang Haidi , Tai Lihua , Sang Lan . As long as one decides to challenge the present situation , he can create a beautiful life .Many wealthy men aren’t bound to have a brilliant background when they werechildren . However , they create wealth using there own hands .Even though you aren’t born in Beijing or Shanghai , you aren’t admitted to Peking orTinghua University , you can study hard to earn a better life . Not every person who has a great life is graduated from Peking and Tinghua University , many of them even haven’t gone to college . As the old saying goes: Every road leads to Rome . Not every dynasty could exist for a long time . The farmer can rise up to reverse the government , such as Zhu Yuanzhang . From a monk to a king , is it determined byfate ? It’s created by his own effort .Lottery tickets aren’t only decided by fate , it also need your own knowledge , such as football lottery tickets . On the other hand , how many big prizes are got by only one try but not memberous failures ?5Arguments for or against requiring high school students to wear school uniformsFOR*Time saving. I didn't have to THINK about what I was going to wear to school. This took the fashion element out of my experience, yes, but it also made the morning less hectic. It completely eliminates fightsbetween children and parents over clothing choices. More importantly, it puts clothing in perspective. It shouldn't be the most important decision a child or teen has to make in the morning.*Money Saving Parents have a lot of financial decision to make. One of them shouldn't be about how much money they are willing to spend to keep their child up to date with what others are wearing. There's a place for fashion clothing, but is it important to make a fashion statement every day at school? Having a uniform allows children to keep their best clothes for going out, making them appreciate them more; and it allows parents to save money for things that are more important to their child's life.5*Equality. Clothing is just one of the many areas in which students are harshly judged by their peers. I was already last to be chosen in gym because of my size. I can't imagine how bad it would be if I was also judged because my parents couldn't afford to buy me designer jeans. Uniforms even the playing field, at least in one aspect of school life.*Focus. I didn't wear my uniform anywhere else but school, soputting it on put my mind in the frame of school. You know how different you feel when you dress up. You sit differently at home when you are in your grungy clothes than when you are wearing your work clothes. You associate different activities with clothes. I remember the first time I saw a parent buying "school clothes" for her child. I couldn't tell the difference between "school clothes" and "play clothes", since the parentwas buying a variety of shorts and T-shirts. If I couldn't tell the difference, I'm sure the child couldn't. While children should have fun in school, uniforms provide a subtle reminder that there is something different happening at school than at home or at the park.*Setting Priorities. What do we tell our children when we start them in Kindergarten with designer clothes and shoes? I know that all parents don't fall into the "label" trap, but many do. And, as I've mentioned previously, those who can't afford the "labels" are harshly judged by those who can't. When wearing a "label" becomes a priority, it sets priorities out of whack. What's more important making a fashion statement or getting a good education? I'm not saying that wearing fashion clothing eliminates the possibility of a good education. I'mjust saying that putting more time and money into fashion clothing tells children that it is more important than education. What surprises me most with this issue is the number of people who are against uniforms. There is nothing about them that will harm a student - yet students and parents have a lot to gain from them if they only take a moment to consider the benefits.AGAINSTI don't believe that public school students should be required to wear uniforms. There are many problems with enforcing a uniform inpublic schools, but for the sake of not turning this into a book, I will only name a few.1. Individuality- With most schools cutting most arts out of their budgets and writing assignments being mostly research papers and reports, how else do students have to express themselves but with their clothing and hair styles? Most school uniforms require students to only wear certain colors, styles, and some even limit hair styles! How is astudent supposed to show his or her uniqueness?2. Concentration- I have found that students required to wearuniforms are more focused on what they can or can't wear that they start "slipping up" when it comes to academic work. Most students come tothink negatively about the school and even begin to hate attending classes.3. Safety- Most schools are enforcing a uniform because they are worried about gangs, other violence, popularity negatively affectingtheir students. I believe that they fail to realize that students will adjust and learn to "represent" their "status" regardless of what they are required to wear. Popularity will still be an issue surrounding students6no matter what any school tries to do. It is just a fact of life. Some people are more popular to others and there are always gong to be cruel people in existence. 4.School uniforms have placed on extra burden on lower-middle class parents, and there are many discrimination among the different uniforms in different school. Schools need to seriously attempt to enforce their current dress codes before instating a uniformpolicy. At my old high school, there was a dress code, but they adopted a uniform because, "...a majority of students aren't adhering to the dress code. Therefore, we believe a uniform is the best action to take..." Students weren't adhering to the dress code because there was NO punishment for it. Teachers were supposed to write two warnings and after that, they were to suspend the student. The teachers felt that it took too much of their time to write the warnings and depended on the administrators to issue them.Schools need to consider their students and the negative andpositive outcomes of having a uniform. Nine times out of ten, the negatives far out weigh the positives 6Arguments for or against volunteering for the 2009 National Games to be held in Jinan Opinions for Yes1. It is a good chance for one to develop his socialization and application skills.2. The volunteers can make more friends from different provinces and expand his knowledge.3. The volunteers can put into practice what they have learned in the college and deeply understand it.4. They can learn some special knowledge such as Social poise and Grace(社交礼仪)，knowledge for rescue, and some other common sense.5. It can add to their social practice experience which can help them find jobs6. The volunteer can make some practical contribution tothe 2009 National Games. 7. Their enthusiastic service can help to build the perfect image for Jinan, and the development of the Jinan city.8. It can also show the romeo (风采) of modern college students.7Opinions for No1. It will take two months to work at the gymnasium and you have to cut school(旷课)。