英语辩论赛常用语及规则英国议会制

英语辩论赛常用语及规则英国议会制
英语辩论赛常用语及规则英国议会制

英语辩论赛常用语

A征求他人观点或意见的用语

I would be glad to hear your opinion of …我很乐意听听你对……的意见。

Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗?

I was wondering where you stood on the question of …我想知道你对……问题怎么看。

B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语

Another point is that …另一点是……

Another way of looking at it is …看这个问题的另一个看法是……

I forgot to say / tell you that…我忘记要讲…...

C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语

That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。

Do you agree? I’m sure you agree. 你赞同吗?我相信你是赞同的。

D就对方阐述的观点进行总结时的用语

As you said…像你所说的那样……

But didn’t you say that…?但是,难道你没说过……吗?、

If I understood you correctly, you said that…要是我理解正确的话,你说过…….

E如何礼貌地反对对方某一观点 I’m not sure really.

Do you think so?

Well, it depends.

I’m not so certain.

Well, I’m not so sure about that.

I’m inclined to disagree with that.

No, I don’t think so

. F如何强烈反对对方某一观点

I disagree.

I disagree with you entirely.

I’m afraid I don’t agree.

I’m afraid you are wrong there.

I wouldn’t accept that for one minute.

You can't really mean that.

You can’t be serious.

大学生英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程

1、主席致辞:宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料;介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等;介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段: 1)正方一辩发言(7分钟)

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示

2)反方一辩发言(8分钟)

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

3)正方二辩发言(8分钟)

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

4)反方二辩发言(8分钟)

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

5)反方一辩总结(4分钟)

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示

6)正方一辩总结(5分钟)

第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示注意事项:

1、在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分.

2、在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(point of information,简称为POI)提问者提出POI的注意事项: 1)POI要简短,切题,机智。严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题;

2)提出POI时要从座位上起立,并举手示意.提问者可以用类似on that point,Sir/Madam的话引起发言者的注意;

3)发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的POI:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受

提问(类似ok);

4)如果提出POI的要求被发言者接受,那么POI的陈述要以澄清事实或提出评论为形式,用一两句话在15秒内表达出来;如果被发言者拒绝,那么提问者坐回原位,准备下一次提问;

5)POI只能在前四个环节中提出,最后两个环节不能提出,前四个环节内第一分钟和最后一分钟内不可以提出POI;

6)发言者如果接受POI,那么就应针对提问并围绕自己的发言回答问题; 7)除非要提出POI,否则没有轮到发言的辩手不得在别人发言时起立。如果辩手违反规则提问或有扰乱正常比赛的行为,那么此选手将被主持人宣布犯规; 8)评价POI的提出是否得当,应该看它对正反两方接下来的辩论的影响如何; 9)发言者在发言时须至少接受2次POI,提问者至少要站起4次示意提POI。辩手若没有抓住机会提POI或者在发言中没有接受POI,评委可酌情扣分; 3、观众提问:观众可向正反方各提一个问题,由双方选派一名选手作答。该环节在正式比赛结束后进行,增加比赛观赏性,不影响比赛结果。

4、评判团评议裁决:由一名评委进行点评,向辩论赛主席递交比赛结果。附评分标准

5、评分标准

1)内容:观点陈述明确,有条理,论点和论据内容是否正确、充实,引用资料和实例是否恰

当。 30%

2)技巧:语言连贯,反应迅速,辩手语言是否流畅,说理、分析是否透彻,反驳和应变能力是否强,说服力和逻辑性是否强。 20%

3)各队在POI环节中的识辩能力、说明能力和逻辑性是否强,接句是否合适,回

答是否中肯,反驱是否有力、有理,反应是否机敏,用语是否得体。 20% 4)遵守比赛规则,准确把握时间。 10%

5)形象气质:仪表,着装整齐辩手的表情、动作是否恰当,是否有风度及幽默感。 10%

6)团队合作:全队各辩手的论点是否一致,结构是否完整,队员之间的配合、合作是否默契。 10%

“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛比赛细则

“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛比赛细则 一、报名方式 以团队为单位报名,每队由2名学生组成(即一个人扮演两个辩手的角色),填写详细准确的报名信息。内容包括: (1)队名(要求:积极向上,控制在10个字符之内,中英文不限),队名将作为该队在选拔赛对阵表中唯一标识; (2)2名辩手的姓名、所在院系及年级、手机号、常用邮箱; (注:赛前将由指导老师统一进行辩论指导) 二、参赛队伍构成: 每轮比赛由两支队伍构成,每队设两名辩手,正方一辩称为Leader of Proposition(正方领袖),二辩为Member of Proposition(正方成员);反方一辩称为Leader of Opposition(反方领袖), 二辩为Member of Opposition(反方成员)。 三、比赛规则: 为与省复赛及全国决赛接轨,本比赛采用目前国际流行的“议会式”辩论赛制(以下简称BP,即British Parliamentary Debating Format)。 比赛采用淘汰制,两个人组一队,参赛队伍通过抽签决定对手、辩论场地以及正方、反方。第一轮比赛结束,共有4支队伍晋级第二轮比赛。通过第二轮比赛选出2支队伍,最终产生PK选出一支队伍参加“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛福建省区复赛。(若参加比赛的队伍为单数,将通过抽签的方式选出一支队伍与第一轮比赛成绩最低的队伍PK,最终决定该队伍是否晋级第二轮复赛)四、辩论题目:This House Believes That Cooperation is better than Competition in promoting social advancement与竞争相比,合作更能使社会进步 五、比赛流程 (1)评分标准:每支辩论队两名辩手得分之和视为队伍得分,75分代表比赛选手的平均水平 (2)选手发言顺序: 每位选手都应按以下顺序进行发言:

英国议会制辩论常用语精华总结BPdebate

Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... LOGICAL & CLEARLY Ways to open a debate To set the framework for our opinion, we believe it is necessary to state…We would like to introduce our stand by giving the following definitions. …In order to effectively debate this topic, we would like to propose…. A number of key issues arise which merit (deserve) closer examination. In the first place we would like to make clear that…. The main argument focuses on…. 1.Giving Reasons and offering explanations: To start with…, The reason why..., That's why..., For this reason..., That's the reason why..., Many people think....,

Considering..., Allowing for the fact that..., When you consider that..., 2. Asking for an opinion from the other party I would be glad to hear your opinion of …我很乐意听听你对……的意见。 I was wondering where you stood on the question of …我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 well…what do you think (about What's your view on the matter 就这件事你的看法呢 how do you see it你怎么看它 do you think that…你认为…吗 3.Stating an opinion陈述观点 I think..., In my opinion..., I believe… I'd like to point out that我想指出的是… Speaking for myself站在自己的立场上说… I'd like to say this…我会这样说… I suppose...,

辩论英国议会制bp赛制介绍

英国议会制(B P)赛制介绍Introduction about British Parliamentary Style (一)辩论队 每轮英国议会制辩论比赛中有4支辩论队同场,每队2人。支持辩题的队伍称为”正方”,驳斥辩题的队伍称为”反方”。正、反两方分别由两支队伍构成,并分别发表开篇陈述和总结陈词。每一支队伍都需要与另3队进行竞争,最后决出1至4名。 (二)选手发言顺序 每位选手都应按以下顺序进行发言: (三)发言计时 每位辩手的发言的时间均为7分钟。辩手提出”质询”的时间应在第2到第6分钟之间。”质询”是指在对方发言时,针对发言者正在申述的论点提出的本方观点。 发言计时从辩手开始说话为始;所有必要内容(包括说明、介绍等)都在计时范围内。计时人员将在以下时间点向选手示意: ·第一分钟末响铃一次(允许开始提出”质询”)

·第六分钟末响铃一次(提出”质询”的时间结束) ·第七分钟末(7’00’’) 连续响铃两次(发言时间结束) ·超时15’后(7’15’’) 连续响铃(发言缓冲时间结束) 在连续两次响铃结束后辩手有15秒“缓冲”时间,在这段时间内允许选手总结已出具论点。“缓冲”时间内不允许出具新论据,在“缓冲”时间内提出的新论据可以被裁判判为无效。在”缓冲”时间后仍继续发言的辩手将被裁判团扣分。 (四)辩手角色分配 每个选手都有一个定位,每一个发言都有其特殊目的。下面列出的辩手角色描述具有借鉴作用,并非必须完全遵循。根据不同的辩论形式,辩手有时需要在完成本角色需要说明的部分之外,还要表述其它方面的观点,在正方支持辩题、反方驳斥辩题的基础上,发言结构仍需满足其它论证的需要。 除了辩论双方的第四辩手,其它所有辩手都需要提出自己的论点。除了”首相”,所有辩手都要反驳对方辩友的辩论。

英国议会制辩论(BP)一辩稿

Thank you chairman! Honorable judges, ladies and gentlemen, good morning! I’m very gland to be the prime minister. Our side firmly believes that The advantages of mobile devices outweigh the disadvantages over interpersonal distance. 定义: Mobile device, in this case, means the mobile phone. It’s a kind of intelligent and multiple mobile equipment which covers information, communication, entertainment,internet and so on. There is no doubt that mobile phone is an important tool and plays an indispensable role in our life. Now let’s have a look at the definition of interpersonal distance. Distance, we must admit that it includes the aspects of time, space and emotion. So our group will demonstrate the impact of mobile phones on narrowing the distance between people from these three aspects. 观点: (一)情感距离 First of all, the mobile phone makes communication between people easier, convenient and fast, directly narrow the

Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate 英国议会制辩论赛简介

Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate British Parliamentary Debate is very widespread,and has gained major support in the United Kingdom,Ireland,Europe,Africa,and United States.It has also been adopted as the official style of the World Universities Debating Championship and the European Universities Debating Championship. The Motion Every debate has a motion;this is the issue for discussion. A good motion has clear arguments in favour of it and against it. The motions used in most debating competition will be controversial issues,and a young person who frequently reads newspaper and thinks about what they are reading will be well equipped to win in debate. The motion is expressed“This House…”:this is a convention and“The House”is all the people present at the debate. Team Constitution (Two sides and Four factions) 1.Opening Government(first faction): Prime Minister Deputy Prime Minister 2.Opening Opposition(second faction): Leader of the Opposition Deputy Leader of the Opposition 3.Closing Government(third faction): Member for the Government Government Whip 4.Closing Opposition(fourth faction): Member for the Opposition Opposition Whip Team Rules Each team is allocated whether they will propose or oppose the motion. The teams are allocated whether they will speak first or second on their side of the motion. You must not contradict the other team on your side,but you are competing against them. You must show the judges that you can debate more persuasively that the teams on

英国议会制辩论赛介绍

1、BP制是British Parliamentary(英国议会制)的简称,是仿照英国议会开会议事模式而设计的一系列辩论赛规则的总称,是全世界范围内使用最广泛的辩论规则,世界大学生辩论赛WUDC(The World Universitie s Debating Championships)及中国辩论公开赛China Open均使用此规则。 2、常见的BP制是四队议会制辩论,每场比赛分正反双方,设“正方上院”、“正方下院”、“反方上院”、“反方下院”四队,每队两人,故可概括为“两方、四队、八人”。 3、胜负评判为排序制,即根据各队表现在四队中排出1、2、3、4名,胜负不以正反方而论,即完全可以出现正方上院第一名而正方下院第四名的情况。 4、BP制的竞赛程序可简单描述为“角色扮演”+“交替演讲”,每位辩手均拥有一个议员角色,均拥有7分钟左右(不同赛事时长不一)发言时长,正反方从上到下交替发言,没有自由辩论等任何快速交替发言环节。 5、BP制有一种特殊的“质询”规则:Point of Information (“PoI”)。Po I允许对方辩手在“非保护时间”(每人发言时间中除开第一分钟和最后一分钟之外的所有时间)示意要求提问,经发言者允许后向发言者提问质询。质询者提问时间计入发言者时长,故针对PoI,发言者有权决定是否接受、何时接受、如何回答等事宜。

6、BP制区别于常见华语辩论赛制的最大特点在于“角色扮演”,如下表: 正方上院第一位发言 者首相(Prime Minister) 正方一辩 反方上院第一位发言 者反对党领袖(Leader of the Opposition) 反方一辩 正方上院第二位发言 者副首相(Deputy Prime Minister) 正方二辩 反方上院第二位发言者反对党副领袖(Deputy Leader of the Oppositio n) 反方二辩 正方下院第一位发言 者政府阁员(Member of Government) 正方三辩 反方下院第一位发言 者反对党阁员(Member of the Opposition) 反方三辩

英国议会制辩论规则

世界大专辩论赛(WUDC)的规则(英国议会制辩论赛) “辩题”,即辩论所围绕展开的议题。辩题将辩手分为正反两方,且双方均有合理辩论的余地。 通常,辩题于各轮比赛开始前十五或三十分钟公布;每轮辩题均不相同。有时,辩题围(如“环境问题”,“国际关系”等)甚至辩题本身也会在大赛开始前公布。 辩题将在一个中央地点向所有辩手公布。准备时间为十五至三十分钟,由大赛主办方规定。通常,辩手在准备时间可以与自己的搭档讨论。某些情况下,主办方也允许辩手与教练或带队老师讨论。此间,辩手可以参阅任何纸质资料。世界大专辩论赛允许辩手在辩论过程中使用任何纸质材料;而其他比赛仅允许辩手在准备时间使用事前准备好的资料。准备期间,通常可以使用电子词典,但禁止使用其它一切电子设备。 辩论模式 每场辩论由四队参加:正方两队,反方两队。各队独立准备。每队两名辩手,每位辩手按如下顺序词,不超过7分钟。 辩论模式简要 辩手辩手名称时间 正方一队,一辩首相"Prime Minister" 7 分钟 反方一队,一辩反对党领袖"Leader of the Opposition" 7 分钟 正方一队,二辩副首相"Deputy Prime Minister" 7 分钟 反方一队,二辩反对党副领袖"Deputy Leader of the Opposition"7 分钟 正方二队,一辩阁成员"Member for the Government" 7 分钟 反方二队,一辩反对党成员"Member for the Opposition" 7 分钟 正方二队,二辩阁党鞭词"Government Whip" 7 分钟 反方二队,二辩反对党党鞭词"Opposition Whip" 7 分钟 议会制辩论质询 在所有词中,除第一分钟及最后一分钟外,辩手都可以口头示意或直接起立提出质询。正在发言的辩手可以接受或拒绝该质询。一旦质询被接受,质询者有15秒的时间述自己的意见。质询时间将被计算在词时间。 如质询被接受,质询者可以提问、提出一个简要论点或者对某一观点进行简要反驳。正在发言的辩手应该立即对质询作出回应。 议会制辩论中只允许质询这一种干预形式。 辩手职责以及词目的 每位辩手在辩论中各司其职,每一次词也各有其目的。下表列出了辩手职责和词目的,但无法穷尽,也非硬性规定。根据每场辩论的具体情况,辩手可能需要履行下表未提及的职责,词目的也可能有所变化,但只要遵循“正方维护辩题、反方攻击辩题”的规则即可。裁判将根据各队论点的有力程度为各辩手评分,而不是简单地根据其完成自己职责的程度评分。以下列出的职责仅供参考。 . .

英国议会制辩论优秀辩题

The International Olympic Committee should remove any age requirements for children to compete in the Olympics. All money currently spent on Confucius Institutes abroad should be spent instead on alleviating domestic poverty. China should hold the passengers of cars driven by drunk drivers criminally liable. China should require students to learn "red songs" (Hong Ge) at all levels of education. 。 China should allow international adoption to homosexual couples whose union is legally recognized in their home jurisdiction. China should require all foreign direct investment projects in Africa to hire least 50% of their workforce locally. Contestants who have undergone cosmetic surgery should be prohibited from competing in beauty pageant. China should establish an inheritance tax on the rich intended to prevent the transference of wealth between generations. China should criminalize academic dishonesty. THW arm the workers of charitable organizations working in unstable areas.

英国议会制辩论赛规则史上全

英国议会制辩论赛规则史上全

————————————————————————————————作者:————————————————————————————————日期: 2

IDEA Four-Team Parliamentary Debate Rules IDEA议会制四队辩论赛规则 The rules of IDEA Four-Team Parliamentary Debate are intended to closely follow those of the Worlds Universities Debating Championships (WUDC). They differ in some places to provide tournament directors options of deviating from the WUDC rules when they need to do so. IDEA议会制四队辩论赛谨遵循世界大专辩论赛(WUDC)的规则。两者略有不同之处,以便比赛主办方根据需要灵活操作。 The Teams and Motions The teams supporting the motion in the IDEA Four-Team Parliamentary Debate are referred to as the "Proposition." The teams arguing against the motion are known as the "Opposition" teams. A “motion” is the statement around which the debate takes place. The motion divides the ground in the debate between the Proposition and Opposition teams and should allow for reasonable arguments both for and against. Ordinarily, motions are announced shortly before each debate begins. A different motion will be used for each debate and will be presented to the debaters at a specified time, usually fifteen to thirty minutes prior to the debate. In some situations general topic areas (for example “environment” or “international relations”) or even specific motions themselves may be announced prior to the tournament. 参赛队伍及辩题 在IDEA议会制四队辩论赛中,支持辩题的队伍为“正方”,反对辩题的队伍为“反方”。 “辩题”,即辩论所围绕展开的议题。辩题将辩手分为正反两方,且双方均有合理辩论的余地。 通常,辩题于各轮比赛开始前十五或三十分钟公布;每轮辩题均不相同。有时,辩题范围(如“环境问题”,“国际关系”等)甚至辩题本身也会在大赛开始前公布。 The motion will be announced to all debaters simultaneously in a central location. Preparation time will be between fifteen and thirty minutes, at the discretion of the tournament director. In general, debaters may confer with their debate partner during preparation time. In some cases, a Tournament Director may allow debaters to confer with their coach or tutor. During this time the debaters may consult any written materials. The rules of the World Universities Debating Championships permit debaters to access any written material during the debate; other tournaments permit the debaters to access only the notes they made in preparation time. Electronic retrieval devices typically are not allowed during preparation, though electronic dictionaries typically are permitted for second-language speakers. 辩题将在一个中央地点向所有辩手公布。准备时间为十五至三十分钟,由大赛主办方规定。通常,辩手在准备时间内可以与自己的搭档讨论。某些情况下,主办方也允许辩手与教练或带队老师讨论。此间,辩手可以参阅任何纸质资料。世界大专辩论赛允许辩手在辩论过程中使用任何纸质材料;而其他比赛仅允许辩手在准备时间内使用事前准备好的资料。准备期间,通常可以使用电子词典,但禁止使用其它一切电子设备。

英国议会制辩论

英国议会制辩论——绅士的博弈 古人云:君子爱财,取之有道。倘若如此,那么英国议会制辩论可谓是:智者善辩,赢之在理了。 不同于美式辩论的唇枪舌剑,步步紧逼,英式议会制辩论更看重辩手本身对辩题的理解程度和自身逻辑思维的清晰度,强调不论在何时双方都应在平等的平台上竞争,并且评价的标准在于双方的参与度以及对辩题的贡献度,远非是否一方将另一方置之死地。因此,整个英式辩论的过程也更加和谐一些。但这绝不意味着其精彩程度会减少一分一毫。相反,去掉那些浮华的小伎俩之后,其思想的碰撞显得更加的激烈和纯粹。 纵观整场辩论,正反双方各四人有且仅有一次正式发言机会,时长7分钟,正反两方交替进行。在这短短7分钟之中,辩手要完成从反驳到立论,接受POI(point of information)及回答等一系列在其他形式辩论中可以用一整场时间完成的任务。这就要求选手需要具备: 1. 清晰的逻辑思维。 赛前从辩题下发到上场时间只有30分钟,这就要求选手必须快速形成思路并且确保及时在接受POI是还能保证思路的连贯性。

2. 较好的语言驾驭能力。 要确保7分钟内表达己方的思想选手必须能够恰当的遣词造句清楚,完整的让评委和对方辩友了解自己的思路。 3. 快速随机应变以及危机处理的能力 在完成演讲的同时,对方辩友极有可能提出质询,很多情况还会出现好几个人同时提出质询的情况。这就要求选手能够在组织思路的同时还能衡量时机是否合适接收质询以及接受谁的质询,从而达到最有利于传递己方思想的效果。 除此之外,演讲时间的分配也尤为重要。一般来说,前2-3分钟用于反驳对方观点,剩下的时间用来建立己方立场以及接受POI。这样做既能保证与对方的互动又能确保有足够的时间阐述清楚己方观点。 英式议会制辩论另一个重要特色就是POI。怎样提出以及接受POI都是选手需要审慎思考的地方。一般来说,每个辩手以接受1-3个POI为宜。过多不利于己方观点阐述,过少则有失互动之嫌。接受的时间一般选在一个论点完成之后,这样有利于保持思路的完整性和连贯性,使得评委和对方辩友更易听懂,切忌在发展一个论点的中途接受POI。而对于提出POI而言,理论上来说是越多越好。一旦发现对方逻辑错误或者论证不合理的地方,应马上起立提出POI。好的POI能够有效的捍卫你的立场同时让对方招架不及。因此,选手应当

英国议会制辩论赛规则(BP-Debate)

IDEA Four-Team Parliamentary Debate Rules IDEA议会制四队辩论赛规则 The rules of IDEA Four-Team Parliamentary Debate are intended to closely follow those of the Worlds Universities Debating Championships (WUDC). They differ in some places to provide tournament directors options of deviating from the WUDC rules when they need to do so. IDEA议会制四队辩论赛谨遵循世界大专辩论赛(WUDC)的规则。两者略有不同之处,以便比赛主办方根据需要灵活操作。 The Teams and Motions The teams supporting the motion in the IDEA Four-Team Parliamentary Debate are referred to as the "Proposition." The teams arguing against the motion are known as the "Opposition" teams. A “motion” is the statement around which the debate takes place. The motion divides the ground in the debate between the Proposition and Opposition teams and should allow for reasonable arguments both for and against. Ordinarily, motions are announced shortly before each debate begins. A different motion will be used for each debate and will be presented to the debaters at a specified time, usually fifteen to thirty minutes prior to the debate. In some situations general topic areas (for example “environment” or “international relations”) or even specific motions themselves may be announced prior to the tournament. 参赛队伍及辩题 在IDEA议会制四队辩论赛中,支持辩题的队伍为“正方”,反对辩题的队伍为“反方”。 “辩题”,即辩论所围绕展开的议题。辩题将辩手分为正反两方,且双方均有合理辩论的余地。 通常,辩题于各轮比赛开始前十五或三十分钟公布;每轮辩题均不相同。有时,辩题范围(如“环境问题”,“国际关系”等)甚至辩题本身也会在大赛开始前公布。 The motion will be announced to all debaters simultaneously in a central location. Preparation time will be between fifteen and thirty minutes, at the discretion of the tournament director. In general, debaters may confer with their debate partner during preparation time. In some cases, a Tournament Director may allow debaters to confer with their coach or tutor. During this time the debaters may consult any written materials. The rules of the World Universities Debating Championships permit debaters to access any written material during the debate; other tournaments permit the debaters to access only the notes they made in preparation time. Electronic retrieval devices typically are not allowed during preparation, though electronic dictionaries typically are permitted for second-language speakers. 辩题将在一个中央地点向所有辩手公布。准备时间为十五至三十分钟,由大赛主办方规定。通常,辩手在准备时间内可以和自己的搭档讨论。某些情况下,主办方也允许辩手和教练或带队老师讨论。此间,辩手可以参阅任何纸质资料。世界大专辩论赛允许辩手在辩论过程中使用任何纸质材料;而其他比赛仅允许辩手在准备时间内使用事前准备好的资料。准备期间,通常可以使用电子词典,但禁止使用其它一切电子设备。 The Debate Format Four teams participate in each debate: two on the Proposition and two on the Opposition. Each team works independently to either support or oppose the motion. Each team is made up of two speakers; each speaker will present a speech not to exceed 7 minutes in the order prescribed below. 辩论模式 每场辩论由四队参加:正方两队,反方两队。各队独立准备。每队两名辩手,每位辩手按如下顺序陈词,不超过7分钟。 Summary of the Debate Format 辩论模式简要

英式辩论赛

英国议会制辩论及其对高校英语教学的启示 2009-11-04 23:36:05 作者:任亮娥绍兴文理学院外国语学院来源:绍兴文理学院学报浏览次数:217 网 友评论0 条 英国议会制辩论是英国和世界大学生辩论赛通用的一种辩论模式。通过介绍其来源、特点、形式、程序、要求及规则,说明对高校英语教学的启示。合理有效地采用辩论式 教学方法,对提高大学生的英语语言综合能力和良好的个人素质有促进作用。 中图分类号:G642.41 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1008-293X(2008)11- 0062- 04 1.引言 ^ 20世纪80年代中期,北京大学代表中国高校参加了新加坡创办的亚洲大专辩论赛后,大学生辩论赛开始风靡全国,各种形式的国内国际辩论赛开始层出不穷,许多高校成立.了辩论协会,为大学生搭建了展现自我、交流思想、追求真理、探索问题、关注社会热点的平台.成为大学校园中一项学生乐于参加的校园文化活动。在普遍开展的辩论活动中,英语辩论赛也越来越受3高等院校的重视。目前国家级与国际级英语辩论赛有"外研社杯"全国英语辩论赛(FLTRP Cup Nat ional Debate Tournamsnt)、亚洲大专英语辩论赛(Asian University Debate Championshi ps)、全亚校际辩论锦标赛(All-Asians Intervarsity Debate Championships)、世界大学英语辩论赛(Wetld Uni versity Debate Cham p ionships)、国际辩论教育协会英语辩论赛(International Debate Education Associat ion简禾尔IDEA)。 "外研社"杯英语辩论赛创办于1997年,现已成功举办了十届,是目前全国规模最大、水平最高的英语辩论赛。这一活动的开展促进了我国高校的外语教学,也激发了广大高校学生的外语学习兴趣,加强了校际间的广泛交流与合作,对于培养大学生的良好素质具有许多积极的意义。近年来,外研社组织优胜选手参加了三届世界大学生辩论赛(WUDC),这标志着我国高校与国际间高校的交流和合作拉开了序幕,而且在2007年1月加拿大温哥华第27届世界大学英语辩论赛中,第十届"外研社"杯全国英语辩论赛亚军身份参赛的清华大学代表队经过几轮鏖战,一举夺得组(英语作为一种外语)冠

英语辩论赛常用语及规则(英国议会制)

英语辩论赛常用语 A征求他人观点或意见的用语 I would be glad to hear your opinion of …我很乐意听听你对……的意见。 Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗? I was wondering where you stood on the question of …我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语 Another point is that …另一点是…… Another way of looking at it is …看这个问题的另一个看法是…… I forgot to say / tell you that…我忘记要讲…... C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。 Do you agree? I’m sure you agree. 你赞同吗?我相信你是赞同的。 D就对方阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 As you said…像你所说的那样…… But didn’t you say that…?但是,难道你没说过……吗?、 If I understood you correctly, you said that…要是我理解正确的话,你说过……. E如何礼貌地反对对方某一观点 I’m not sure really. Do you think so? Well, it depends. I’m not so certain. Well, I’m not so sure about that. I’m inclined to disagree with that. No, I don’t think so . F如何强烈反对对方某一观点 I disagree. I disagree with you entirely. I’m afraid I don’t agree. I’m afraid you are wrong there. I wouldn’t accept that for one minute. You can't really mean that. You can’t be serious. 大学生英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程 1、主席致辞:宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料;介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等;介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段: 1)正方一辩发言(7分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示 2)反方一辩发言(8分钟) 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示

英国议会制辩论

英国议会制辩论

二.英国议会制辩论 1. 辩论队 每轮英国议会制辩论比赛中有4支辩论队同场,每队2人。支持辩题的队伍称为"正方",驳斥辩题的队伍称为"反方"。代表正方的两支队伍是正方上院和正方下院,代表反方的两支队伍是反方上院和反方下院。每支队伍都需要与另3队进行竞争,最后决出1至4名。 2.选手发言顺序 所有辩手须按照以此顺序进行发言。

3.发言计时 每位辩手的发言的时间均为7分钟,辩手提出“质询”的时间应在发言人讲话的第2到第6分钟之间。 发言计时从辩手开始说话为始,所有发言内容(包括致謝、开场白等)都在计时范围内。计时人员将在以下时间点向选手示意: 1’00”响铃一次(允许开始提出“质询”)6’00”响铃一次(提出“质询”的时间结束)

7' 00”连续响铃两次(发言时间结束) 7' 15”连续响铃(发言“缓冲”时间结束) 在连续两次响铃结束后,辩手有15秒“缓冲”间,在这段时间内允许选手进行总结。“缓冲”时间内不应提出新观点,且裁判可能会判此时间段内提出的新观点与论据为无效。在“缓冲”时间后仍继续发言的辩手将被裁判扣分。 4.辩手角色分配 每个辩手都有特定角色且每段发言都须有明确具体的目的。下面列出的辩手角色及职责可提供借鉴,但比赛中的辩手角色既不仅限于此,也并非皆须面面俱到。由于具体辩论情况不一,在正方支持辩题、反方驳斥辩题的前提下,辩手可能会完成设定角色以外的任务,其发言也可能不仅限于以下陈列的目的。 除了两方最后一位辩手(正方和反方党鞭),其他所有辩手都应引入新的论据和材料(但并不须是新观点)。除了首相,所有辩手都应反驳对方辩手的观点。辩手的职位分为“首相”或“正方领袖”“反方领袖”“副首相”“反方副领袖”

英国议会制辩论常用语精华总结Bdebate精编WORD版

英国议会制辩论常用语精华总结B d e b a t e精 编W O R D版 IBM system office room 【A0816H-A0912AAAHH-GX8Q8-GNTHHJ8】

Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... LOGICAL & CLEARLY Ways to open a debate To set the framework for our opinion, we believe it is necessary to state…We would like to introduce our stand by giving the following definitions. …In order to effectively debate this topic, we would like to propose…. A number of key issues arise which merit (deserve) closer examination. In the first place we would like to make clear that…. The main argument focuses on…. 1.Giving Reasons and offering explanations: To start with…, The reason why..., That's why..., For this reason..., That's the reason why...,

相关文档
最新文档