MX3对比小米3硬件性能 跑分测试
小米笔记本air133评测_618热门游戏本对比评测买笔记本电脑到底应该注意哪些参数
小米笔记本air133评测_618热门游戏本对比评测买笔记本电脑到底应该注意哪些参数买电脑的时候详细很多人都会有选择困难症，比如：A好看、B配置高、C价格实惠等等；那么对于不懂电脑的朋友而言，我们到底怎么去选择一台笔记本电脑呢？今天简单跟大家分享两款主流游戏本（DELLG3对比机械师T90-T6C）的对比评测，评测内容就是从选购角度出发。
评测目录1、配置价格2、外观对比3、性能跑分4、游戏实测5、内部一览6、评测简结一、配置价格对比评测的两款机器配置跟价格，我做了一个简单的对比图表，方便大家对比观看；两款机器的配置相差不多，主要是显卡存在差异，下面简单跟大家介绍一下两款机器的配置。
1、处理器都是采用Intel最新移动端八代I7处理器：I7-8750H，六核十二线程。
2、独显方面DELLG3采用的是GT某1060MQ6G，机械师T90-T6C采用的是GT某10606G独显；GT某1060MQ可以简单理解为GT某1060的阉割版，功耗比GT某1060低，性能也要低一些；因为DELLG3系列没有GT某1060的显卡搭配，也想借这个机会跟大家分享一下GT某1060MQ跟GT某1060的一个性能差距，所以我们选择了DELLG3GT某1060MQ这个版本。
3、内存是现在笔记本中为数不多，可DIY升级的硬件之一；一般游戏本最少都会有两个内存插槽；随着硬件的更新，我们日常使用的软件对内存需求也越来越高，一般游戏本都会标配8G内存出厂；DELLG3是两条4G组合为8G内存，机械师T90-T6C是单条8G内存，同样都是DDR4；虽然都是搭载的8G内存，但是DELLG3的4+4组合明显有一些不合理；在游戏本8G内存为标配的时代，有很大一部分人其实8G内存是不够用的，不够用的情况下就得选择升级；而4+4的组合情况下，如果要升级就得舍弃一根4G内存，这对于消费者而言不是一个划算的选择。
4、硬盘搭配方式DELLG3是普通128G+1TB机械硬盘，这个搭配是一个很实惠的搭配，系统装入固态硬盘里面，可以让系统非常流畅，1TB机械也可以做一个大容量存储；机械师T90-T6C标配是一个PCI-e协议256G固态硬盘，在速度方面远远超过DELLG3搭载的硬盘，不过再容量方面略有不足。
小米红米Note 3技术评测说明书
TECHNICAL REVIEW OF XIAOMI’S NEW REDMI NOTE 3 SMARTPHONE FOR INDIAEXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe midrange smartphone market is experiencing huge growth, especially in China and India. The midrange has become a focal point for many smartphone vendors and the chipmakers that supply them. Companies like Xiaomi are launching devices with help from chip vendors like Qualcomm and MediaTek. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, featuring the new Snapdragon 650 SoC, is optimized for performance and energy efficiency.The original Redmi Note 3, launched in China in November 2015, had similar specifications to the new Redmi Note 3 for India announced in March 2016, but looks can be deceiving. The new Redmi Note 3 is different than its seemingly identical “brother”. The Redmi Note 3 packs more features than one would expect at its price. The new model uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 processor, rather than the MediaTek Helios X10 chips found in many phones in the sub Rs 15,000 price range. The new Redmi Note 3 falls in the midrange of the smartphone market. Given the changing market dynamics and phone capabilities, Moor Insights & Strategy (MI&S) tested the Redmi Note 3 with the Snapdragon 650 to provide a technical platform overview. This paper compares the new chip and phone against alternative platforms. The analysis focuses primarily on key silicon components and uses benchmarks to evaluate CPU, GPU, memory, and storage performance.PRODUCT OVERVIEWXiaomi is bringing this new version of the Redmi Note 3 to India to address the needs of the typical Indian phone enthusiast in the Rs 10,000 to 15,000 range. The Redmi Note 3 has a 6core processor, 5.5” 1080p screen, aluminum unibody, fingerprint sensor, 16MP camera, 802.11ac WiFi, 4G LTE, and a 4,000 mAh battery. These specs make the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 competitive in the targeted price range, and they offer another choice to Indian consumers for longer battery life and more performance.Xiaomi’s switch from the MediaTek Helios X10 to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 is an upgrade to a 6core CPU configuration with two A72 cores and four A53 cores. It also comes with a significant upgrade to the GPU, DSP, and modem. The Snapdragon 650 comes with an Adreno 510 GPU, which is the same family of GPUs in the Snapdragon820 with an Adreno 530. The modem in the Redmi Note 3 is capable of 150 Mbps download and 50 Mbps upload speeds. Qualcomm’s embedded X8 LTE modem prepares the Redmi Note 3 for the growing LTE market within India, potentially futureproofing it for years to come.DESIGN & BUILD QUALITYAlthough this paper is a mostly technical review focused on performance and battery life, we noticed the Redmi Note 3 has a full aluminum body and smooth curved edges for a comfortable feel in the hand. This industrial design projects a more “premium” image. In addition, Xiaomi included a Fingerprints FPC1022 fingerprint sensor for easeofaccess and biometric security. We did not explore the design, security or responsiveness of the fingerprint sensor. Xiaomi opted for a microUSB 2.0 connector versus USB TypeC, which may draw ire from some enthusiasts. But a USB TypeC cable would add cost, and as a Google engineer has shown, several commercially available USB TypeC cables are not safe or do not support the claimed speeds. DISPLAY & CAMERASThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 features a 5.5” LCD display with 1080p resolution. This resolution and display size translate to about 403 ppi. Because the Redmi Note 3 is targeted at a more affordable segment, it does not feature a 1440p display or OLED display technology. Xiaomi reserves those features for highend phones, like the Mi Note Pro, which costs roughly twice as much as the Redmi Note 3. With a 1080p display, the Redmi Note 3 takes advantage of Qualcomm’s Adreno 510 GPU and allows for “bestinclass”, midrange GPU performance.The Redmi Note 3 has a decent camera, featuring a Samsung f/2.0 16MP primary camera and an f/2.0 5MP frontfacing camera. The camera itself is not unique compared to other cameras on phones at this price point, but it does launch fairly quickly and takes acceptable photos. It does not have the sophisticated manual camera capabilities more common on highend phones.PERFORMANCE & BENCHMARKSTo test the new Xiaomi Redmi Note 3’s performance, MI&S ran a series of technical benchmarks. Based on its specifications, the Redmi Note 3 should be one of the longest lasting phones on the market, if not in the world. Design, hardware integration, and software are important, but great specifications do not always equate to greatexperiences or performance. MI&S tested CPU, GPU, memory, and storage subsystem performance.Xiaomi supplied MI&S with an early sample of the new Redmi Note 3. Our testing looked at synthetic and real world applications, including some of the most popular apps in India on Google Play like Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Truecaller, MX Player, and WhatsApp. MI&S also ran some performance and efficiency benchmarks that an Indian enthusiast might expect to see. MI&S ran a combination of industry standard benchmarks like 3DMark (v1.5.3285), PCMark for Android (v1.3.3083), and Geekbench 3.0 (v3.4.1) as well as Basemark’s new Power Analysis Tool v1.0.Basemark’s Power Assessment Tool (PAT) measures how much power the entire device uses to the milliwatt and millisecond. It measures how long an application is running on the application processor and how much power it causes the phone to draw. PAT combines hardware and software and tests a device’s power consumption and time to process workloads. This review uses PAT to evaluate realworld applications in both how long processed takes (seconds) and how much power they drawn (watts), thus leading to total energy consumed by each application run and what affects battery life (mAh: milliwatt amp hours).We compared the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 to the LeEco Le 1s, which also sells in India. The LeEco Le 1s phone features the familiar MediaTek Helios X10 SoC and is a good basis for devicetodevice and SoCtoSoC comparisons. Prior to testing, we ensured that both devices were running the latest versions of their operating systems and that their displays were set to auto brightness, since these are the conditions under which most users will operate their devices. The only time the devices were taken off auto brightness was to run PCMark for Android’s battery life test. The Redmi Note was uptodate with Android 5.1.1, and the LeEco was uptodate to 5.0.2, both the latest Android versions for each device.CPU & SYSTEM PERFORMANCEGeekbench is one of the most commonly used benchmarks for comparing CPU performance. There are large differences between the Redmi Note 3’s Snapdragon 650 and the LeEco Le 1s’s Helios X10. Most notably, the A72 core in the Redmi Note 3 allows for a much higher single core performance, while the 8 total cores in the LeEco Le 1s allow it to perform better in Geekbench’s multicore test. However, the multicore test is less relevant than the single core, because many Android apps and most apps in general are singlethreaded.FIGURE 1: CPU PERFORMANCE Single CoreMultiCore 0100020003000400050006000152536759635082Geekbench 3(higher is better)Xiaomi Redmi Note 3LeEco Le 1s Next, MI&S tested a holistic system benchmark with Basemark OSII system benchmark. FIGURE 2: HOLISTIC SYSTEM BENCHMARK System Memory Graphics WebOverall 05001000150020002500212216431623929151417901186467793942Basemark OSII(higher is better)Xiaomi Redmi Note 3LeEco Le 1s The Redmi Note 3 with the Snapdragon 650 beats the LeEco Le 1s with the MediaTek X10. In the graphics test, the differences are several hundred percent. After all subtests, the new Snapdragon 650 in the Redmi Note 3 is at least 50% faster than the MediaTek X10 in the LeEco Le 1s.Snapdragon 650 performance is reinforced by the PCMark for Android benchmark: 5257 for the Redmi Note 3 versus 4445 for the LeEco Le 1s.FIGURE 3: PCMARK FOR ANDROID Xiaomi Redmi Note 3LeEco Le 1s 010002000300040005000600052574445PC Mark Work(points higher is better)GRAPHICSIn 3D graphics benchmarks, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 outperformed the LeEco Le 1s. FIGURE 4: 3D GRAPHICS Manhattan 3.1TRexALU 2Driver Overhead 205101520253035409.73420124.51615 5.2GFX BenchXiaomi Redmi Note 3LeEco Le 1sIn GFX Bench, the Redmi Note 3 dominates the tests, winning some by triple digitpercentages. This can be directly attributable to the Snapdragon 650’s Adreno 510 GPU which is designed for high performance compared to the Helios X10 and PowerVR G6200 GPU.MI&S also ran the industry standard 3DMark and Basemark X benchmarks. InBasemark X the Snapdragon 650’s Adreno 510 scored 15,037 points while the X10’s PowerVR G6200 scored 7,987, just a little over half the performance. We saw a similarresult in 3DMark with the Snapdragon 650’s Adreno 510 GPU scoring 867 points and the MediaTek X10’s PowerVR G6200 scoring only 453. These scores reinforce the Redmi Note 3’s superior GPU performance at its price point.We also ran AnTuTu. While MI&S does not consider AnTuTu to be as well documented, tightly managed, or monitored for fraud like the benchmarks mentioned above, many Indian enthusiasts may still expect to see the results. AnTuTu has improved its benchmark’s tests and weighting over time, but it will need to continue to improve before we fully consider it on par with the others. Nonetheless, we are providing results to meet informational expectations. The Redmi Note 3 scored 76,140 points while the LeEco Le 1s scored 51,368 points, so according to AnTuTu, the Redmi Note 3 is 50% faster than the LeEco Le 1s.FIGURE 5: ANTUTUPOWERIn addition to the synthetic benchmarks above, MI&S also ran Basemark PAT to measure how long an application took to run, at what power level, and how much total energy it used. The Redmi Note 3 idled at 1.5 watts at the Android desktop, while the LeEco Le 1s idled at 1.7W. With the screen off, the Redmi Note 3 idled at 150 mW, while the LeEco Le 1s did the same at roughly 300 mW.The Redmi Note 3 took 6.0 seconds to load the Facebook application at an average power of 2.6W or 15.6 joules (J). The LeEco Le 1s accomplished the same task in 6.2 seconds at 2.9W or 17.98J—15% more energy and slightly slower.FIGURE 6: BASEMARK POWER ASSESSMENT TOOL PORTIONThe Redmi Note 3 loaded Facebook Messenger in 2 seconds with 3.1W average power (6.2J), while the LeEco Le 1s took 4 seconds at 2.6W (10.4J)—twice as long with 68% more energy. WhatsApp loaded on the Redmi Note 3 in 2 seconds at 2.4W average power (4.8J); the LeEco Le 1s also took 2 seconds but at 3.3W (6.6J)—a difference of 37%. The Redmi Note 3 sent a WhatsApp message in 4 seconds at an average of 1.2W (4.8J), while the LeEco Le 1s took 7 seconds with 3 watts (21J)—4 times more energy.FIGURE 7: POWER Facebook Messenger WhatsAppMessage Send 05101520256.2 4.8 4.810.4 6.621Basemark PAT(energy used Joules lower is better)Xiaomi Redmi Note 3LeEco Le 1s These benchmarks show the new Redmi Note 3 is a fast and longlasting phone using one of the fastest and most energyefficient SoCs on the planet. The Redmi Note 3 offers a lot of value at its price point.CONNECTIVITYAt the time of this review, MI&S was unable to test WiFi performance with an 802.11ac router or gain access to an Indian cellular network. We will update this document withthose results as we run them. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X8 LTE modem and 802.11ac WiFi, both fast technologies. But the Redmi Note 3 does not have CA (carrier aggregation), which prevents it from reaching the Snapdragon 650’s full Cat 7 LTE (300 Mbps) performance. Xiaomi also opted not to add MUMIMO WiFi in this device, likely due to cost constraints for this price segment. The Redmi Note 3’s LTE peak performance is expected to be around 150 Mbps download and 50 Mbps upload, similar to the LeEco Le 1s. There are still benefits to using a Qualcomm 4G LTE modem over others, as MI&S described in an earlier paper .BATTERY LIFE & THERMALSMI&S used Futuremark’s PCMark for Android benchmark. Both phones’ displays were calibrated to 200 nits brightness with a SpectraCal C3 colorimeter. This benchmark loops the PCMark Android benchmark suite until the phone reaches 20% battery and gives an approximate time the benchmark can be run. It does not give overall battery life, but it does give an idea of relative battery life based on continuous usage; idle usage can vary, and this test does not take into account connectivity.The LeEco Le 1s reported a PCMark battery life of 4:31 hours, while the Redmi Note 3 reported 11:01 hours, almost twoandahalf times the battery life. This difference can be attributed to the 4,000 mAh battery (30% bigger than the LeEco Le 1s) and theSnapdragon 650 SoC supplemented by deep hardware and software optimizations. The Redmi Note 3 with the Snapdragon 650 can claim “allday” battery life, possibly multiday depending on usage.FIGURE 8: BATTERY LIFE Xiaomi Redmi Note 3LeEco Le 1s0:001:122:243:364:486:007:128:249:3610:4812:0011:014:31PCMark Work Battery(hours higher is better)MI&S tested both phones thermally after multiple benchmark runs. The Redmi Note 3 never exceeded 29C, and the LeEco Le 1s never exceeded 32C. Neither phone exhibited significant heating nor throttling due to heat. While running battery tests for many hours, both phones were cool to the touch. This illustrates how having efficient, but high performance, SoCs can make a big difference. The LeEco Le 1s also kept temperatures under control due to having many low power A53 cores that are harder to overheat. We also measured the different thermals across the SoC using CPUZ and never saw an increase of more than 10C.CONCLUSIONTesting results for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 650 impressed us with the amount of performance and battery life for the price. If Xiaomi can execute its sales and marketing plans, we believe the Redmi Note 3 could be one of the most soughtafter phones in the Indian market at this price point. The favorable testing figures are attributable to the CPU, GPU, silicon integration, software integration, and large battery. It will be interesting to see how the Redmi Note 3 stacks up against MediaTek Helios X20based devices coming later this year, considering its performance against the X10. The Redmi Note 3’s overall capabilities should also be a plus for consumers looking for the best feature support in this price segment, because right now nothing comes as close to the performance and battery life for the money.IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PAPERAUTHORSPatrick Moorhead, Founder, President, & Principal Analyst at Moor Insights & StrategyAnshel Sag, Technical Writer at Moor Insights & StrategyEDITOR / DESIGNScott McCutcheon, Director of Research at Moor Insights & StrategyINQUIRIESContact us if you would like to discuss this report, and Moor Insights & Strategy will respond promptly. CITATIONSThis paper can be cited by accredited press and analysts but must be cited incontext, displaying author’s name, author’s title, and “Moor Insights & Strategy”. Nonpress and nonanalysts must receive prior written permission by Moor Insights & Strategy for any citations.LICENSINGThis document, including any supporting materials, is owned by Moor Insights & Strategy. This publication may not be reproduced, distributed, or shared in any form without Moor Insights & Strategy's prior written permission.DISCLOSURESMoor Insights & Strategy provides research, analysis, advising, and consulting to many hightech companies mentioned in this paper. No employees at the firm hold any equity positions with any companies cited in this document.DISCLAIMERThe information presented in this document is for informational purposes only and may contain technical inaccuracies, omissions, and typographical errors. Moor Insights & Strategy disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information. This document consists of the opinions of Moor Insights & Strategy and should not be construed as statements of fact. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.Moor Insights & Strategy provides forecasts and forwardlooking statements as directional indicators and not as precise predictions of future events. While our forecasts and forwardlooking statements represent our current judgment on what the future holds, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forecasts and forwardlooking statements, which reflect our opinions only as of the date of publication for this document. Please keep in mind that we are not obligating ourselves to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forecasts and forwardlooking statements in light of new information or future events.©2016 Moor Insights & Strategy. Company and product names are used for informational purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective owners.。
天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3哪个好(天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3哪个好用)
天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3哪个好(天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3哪个好用)随着智能电视的普及，智能盒子也成为了人们家庭娱乐中的必备设备。
目前市面上最受欢迎的智能盒子品牌当属天猫魔盒和小米盒子。
那么，天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3哪个好用呢？首先，从外观上看，天猫魔盒m13采用了磨砂黑的外观设计，简约而不失沉稳。
小米盒子3则采用了铝合金外壳，外观更加时尚。
不过，外观只是表面上的东西，真正决定盒子好不好用的是内部配置和功能。
从配置上看，天猫魔盒m13搭载了4核64位ARM Cortex-A53处理器和Mali-450图形处理器，性能强劲。
小米盒子3则搭载了4核Amlogic Cortex-A53处理器和Mali-450图形处理器，性能也非常不错。
两者的硬件配置略有差异，但都能够满足大部分用户的需求。
在系统上，天猫魔盒m13采用了基于Android 9.0的深度定制系统，界面简洁，操作流畅。
小米盒子3则采用了基于Android 5.0的MIUI TV系统，界面也很美观，操作也很流畅。
不过，天猫魔盒m13的深度定制系统更加贴合用户的需求，使用起来更加顺手。
在功能上，天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3都支持4K超清视频播放和智能语音搜索功能。
但是，天猫魔盒m13还支持了全新的天猫魔盒大屏应用，可以方便地观看电影、电视剧、综艺等各种视频内容。
同时，天猫魔盒m13还支持了全屏爆笑表情，让用户在观看视频时可以更加快乐。
综上所述，天猫魔盒m13和小米盒子3都是非常不错的智能盒子，两者在硬件配置、系统、功能等方面都有所不同。
如果你注重系统定制和全新的大屏应用，那么天猫魔盒m13是你的不二选择；如果你注重外观和性价比，那么小米盒子3也是不错的选择。
最终，选择哪个还需根据自己的喜好和需求来进行选择。
小米笔记本Air详细评测：你们关注的问题都有了答案
小米笔记本Air详细评测：你们关注的问题都有了答案新浪科技图/王迪文/于泽最近PC圈有两件大事，一件是上周传闻已久的小米笔记本终于发布，另一件就是围绕小米笔记本的“口水战”。
除了苹果、微软以及先行一步的华为MateBook，鲜有PC产品能有如此高的关注度。
目前来看针对小米笔记本的质疑主要集中在性价比不足、外观设计无新意，还有就是宣传过于夸大。
小米笔记本Air在新浪数码拿到真机后，我们的视频直播栏目《后厂村10号院》第一时间对产品进行了直播评测，在直播过程中网友最关心的问题主要集中在散热、续航以及游戏性能如何。
这些问题也是本次评测中重点关注的问题。
在进入评测之前我们先来了解一些小米笔记本的基本情况，小米笔记本命名为小米笔记本Air，是由小米生态链企业北京田米科技有限公司参与研发和设计的，代工厂是伟创和英业达，共分为13.3英寸和12.5英寸两款，13.3英寸版主打轻薄和高性能配有独立显卡，而12.5英寸的定位轻薄便携，配备了酷睿M处理器，机身更加轻薄。
新浪数码拿到的是13.3英寸版本，目前只有一种配置，具体为，13.3英寸1920X1080分辨率的IPS屏幕，英特尔酷睿i5-6200U处理器、8GB内存、256GB固态硬盘、NVIDIA GeForce 940MX独立显卡，预装Windows 10操作系统，售价为4999元。
（注：本次测试产品为工程机，与零售版会有差异）A面无LOGO设计小米笔记本Air采用了铝合金的全金属机身，有金色和银色两种颜色可选，同时，铝合金机身中还加入了金属喷砂工艺，在这个价位中使用铝合金材质的产品并不多见，喷砂工艺处理的好处不仅是能够提升握持手感，整机看起来也更加有质感。
激光镭射雕上新浪科技的logo一向发烧的小米在笔记本的A面居然采用了无LOGO设计，雷军在发布会开玩笑称，这是怕用户用笔记本感到“丢人”，虽然光秃秃的A面怎么看起来都很别扭，但小米的设计初衷确实是让用户更加方便涂鸦。
2019年魅族mx3和小米3何个好.doc
2019年魅族mx3和小米3何个好篇一：魅族MX3与小米3主要参数比较魅族MX3:2500￥20XX年09月：直板，前黑后白，5.1英寸,触摸电容屏，多点触控主屏分辨率：1800x1080像素，手机尺寸：139x71.9x9.1mm，手机重量：143g，操作系统：Flyme3.0，核心数：八核，RAM容量：2GB，ROM容量：16GB双摄像头（前后）前：200万像素,后：800万像素，闪光灯：LED闪光灯,自动对焦,20张/秒连拍，最大支持3264×2448像素照片拍摄，电池容量：锂电池，2400mAh，不可拆卸式电池，小米3：2500￥20XX年09月，直板，黑色、银色，5英寸，触摸电容屏，多点触控主屏分辨率：1920x1080像素，手机尺寸：144x73.6x8.1mm，手机重量：145g操作系统：MIUIV5（基于AndroidOS4.2）核心数：四核RAM容量：2GB，ROM容量：16GB/64GB双摄像头（前后）前：200万像素，后：1300万像素，闪光灯：LED补光灯（双），自动对焦，10张/秒连拍，最大支持4128×3096像素照片拍摄电池容量：3050mAh不可更换,小米手机3(16GB/移动版)参考价格：￥1999篇二：我对于魅族和小米手机的使用感受我对于魅族和小米手机的使用感受魅族和小米手机作为国产机的典型代表，一直在市场中占据着主要的地位，而两家分别以自己的风格赢得自己的用户，小米自从成立以来，便一直风靡中国，销量领先，而魅族也不甘落后，凭借着侪寂美学的设计风格，也一直在手机市场中占领一席之位。
我于20XX年9月10日入手魅族MX2，今天（20XX年7月5日）刚拿到小米3。
我觉得魅族的很多应用有自己的风格，这就是这个企业的侪寂风格，追求一种独特的美，以蓝色为主色调，搭配白和灰，整体上觉得简约大方，但不易使用，包括手机自身软件的使用，自带软件不支持收音机，手电筒，这些最基本的应用都没有，会带给用户不便，然后在网上下载的收音机有很多都是要收流量的，手电筒软件也要收费。
小米3的cpu是多少
小米3的cpu是多少你知道小米3的cpu是多少吗?下面是店铺带来的关于小米3的cpu是多少的内容，欢迎阅读!小米3的cpu是多少：小米3的移动版用的是Nvdia的CPU，主频1.8GHz小米3的联通/电信版用的是高通的骁龙CPU，主频2GHz，它们的性能基本一致。
1、小米手机3采用了全球首发的NVIDIA Tegra 4和高通骁龙800最新版。
2、小米3的外观设计很是惊艳，它采用了全新硬朗设计，外形酷似诺基亚920，背面很像联想K900，而且小米3手机还有多种颜色后壳可供选择，可以满足不同用户的需求。
3、小米3的外观设计颇为方正，棱角分明，有些Lumia 920的感觉。
小米3尽管屏幕尺寸达到了5英寸，但还是能够轻松进行单手操作的。
而小米手机2S与此前的小米手机2相比，没有丝毫的变化。
整体外观做工依旧显得比较扎实，4寸的屏幕与小米3相比显然看上去小了一圈，且圆润了很多。
骁龙(xiāolóng)800系列处理器是美国高通公司旗下骁龙移动处理器系列的产品，是截至2013年11月(骁龙805发布)前骁龙家族中的高端产品，主要针对高端智能手机、智能电视、数字媒体适配器和平板电脑。
2013年1月7日，美国高通技术公司(QTI)宣布在2013年为骁龙处理器引入全新命名方式和层级——包括骁龙800系列、600系列、400系列和200系列处理器，在此之前，骁龙处理器分为S1，S2，S3，S4四个层级，以区分不同的四代产品。
在2013年国际消费电子展(CES)期间，美国高通公司推出了最新的骁龙800系列和600系列处理器。
骁龙800系列处理器配备全新异步四核Krait 400 CPU(每核心速度最高达2骁龙800.3GHz)、升级的Adreno 330 GPU、HexagonQDSP6 V5DSP以及最新的4G LTE Cat 4调制解调器，可提供更高的系统性能和平台升级，从而进一步提升用户体验。
截止2013年1月底，已经有超过55款搭载该处理器的终端正在设计中，预计商用终端将于2013年年中上市。
原点手机vs小米3 谁更“发烧”
原点手机PK米3谁更“发烧”从MIUI时代开始，小米就一直在宣扬自己“为发烧而生”的观念。
而“发烧”究竟是什么？一个跑分数字？一个CPU频数？还是一种营销方式？相比小米的铺天盖地，13年9月发布的原点手机带来的却是一种清流般的文艺风。
作为唯一一部设计师品牌的手机，对美和工业设计的追求又是另一种“发烧”般的癫狂。
浮躁和炒作过后，我们是不是也应该先“退烧”，看看手机作为一部手持设备，真正应该追求的是什么，发烧于什么。
先从原点手机和小米3的对比说起：一．工业设计1.正面设计虽然米3重新捡起了“设计”的概念，但也未能掩盖起浓浓的“城乡结合部”气质。
虽然两者都采用了5寸屏幕，但米3高达4.9mm的屏幕边框导致其屏占比只有可怜的65%。
而原点的屏幕整体宽度只有2.45mm，几乎是米3的一半。
由此一来，同为5寸屏，亮屏时的效果却产生了很大差距。
2.侧边设计米3在侧面直接使用塑料包裹屏幕，在屏幕和机身侧面的交接处违和感较强。
原点手机侧面则是内部一体成型新金属机身的延伸，并采用钻石切割工艺C角，更贴和亚洲人手掌比例，握持更舒适。
3.整体设计同为5寸屏手机，米3的整体宽度为73.6mm，原点则有所有5寸屏手机中最窄的宽度67.6mm。
米3在厚度方面有了较大进步，但仍是比只有7.76mm原点手机更厚。
另外，145g净重的米3对比原点也重了12g左右，对于手机来说差值不小。
4.触控设计在触控方面小米继续沿用了标准的安卓三键设计，原点则在触控设计上大费周折。
采用全新的呼吸灯触控方案专利，定制打造了可以灵动呼吸的“原色”触控区，配合用户的操作，共有13种等效展示形式，可谓手机界首创。
二．屏幕&成像1.相机成像后置摄像头两者都达到了1300万像素。
相对原点来说，米3只有200万像素的前置摄像头略嫌寒酸。
另外，原点500万像素的前置摄像头经过调试达到了800万的插值，实属不易，效果堪比国内各大“自拍神器”。
2.屏幕显示两者都采用了1080P FHD的屏幕配置，由于屏幕的标准规格问题，ppi数据原点以微弱优势胜出。
四核小米3对比全球首款真八核小黑2
当四核小米3邂逅全球首款真八核小黑2虽然智能手机四核之争的硝烟还未消散，八核的战役却已悄然打响，随着联发科MT6592真八核芯片的发布，前不久卓普手机便正式召开新品发布会，推出采用联发科八核处理器的卓普小黑2。
这款“小黑2”的发布不禁使人想到今年9月份发布的“小米3”。
硬件配置两款手机区别明显这两款手机的配置区别很明显。
小米3采用的处理器有两个版本，移动版采用Nvidia Tegra4四核处理器，主频为1.8GHz，这款处理器的特点是具备72个GeForce GPU核心，处理性能是Tegra 3的六倍，可实现更加逼真的游戏体验和更高分辨率的屏幕显示效果。
联通版和电信版，采用的是高通骁龙800的8974AB四核处理器，主频为2.3GHz ，采用28nm 工艺，综合性能和图像处理能力都比较强。
而卓普小黑2采用的是发布不久的联发科MT6592八核处理器，1.7GHz主频，提供超手机运算，与市面上存在的一次只能使用四核的“伪八核”不同，MT6592真正实现了一次可以使用八核的“真八核”，可基于不同的应用和任务，智能地为其分配所需要的处理能力，并大大改善了现有的应用程序体验：先进的网页浏览功能、更流畅的用户界面、超级游戏体验、更高效的视频播放。
值得注意的是外观方面，5英寸的小米3整体外形与诺基亚Lumia神似，而5.5英寸的卓普小黑2则有点像vivo Xplay。
特色功能小黑2智能体验功能更丰富两款同为1080P分辨率的屏幕都采用了超灵敏技术，支持手套操作以及湿手操作。
摄像方面，卓普小黑2采用了后置400万像素背照式CMOS以及500万前置像素，具备80°广角，且配置外设快拍键，省却了普通手机亮屏、解锁、相机、拍照繁琐的四个步骤，只需按一个键即可完成拍照，实现一键快拍，更配有特有的蓝牙拍摄套件，实现“遥控拍摄”。
在这方面，小米3的表现略差一些，采用的是1300万后置摄像头以及200万前置摄像头，亮点是其添加的美颜功能。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
MX3对比小米3硬件性能跑分测试
小米3拥有两个版本，移动TD版本搭载英伟达Tegra4处理器，联通和电信版本则采用四核2.3GHz的高通骁龙800处理器，除了处理器外，其他配置与骁龙800处理器版相同，此次对比评测的是移动Tegra4版本。
魅族MX3搭载CPU采用了三星Exynos 5410智能4+4核核处理器，四个1.6GHz A15及四个1.2GHz A7处理器，和小米3一样的2GB RAM系统内存。
下面我们就通过几款测试软件感受一下小米3和魅族MX3的差距究竟在哪里吧?
安兔兔跑分
安兔兔评测AnTuTu Benchmark是一个专门给Android设备的手机、平板电脑硬件跑分的娱乐软件，它能一键运行完整测试项目，通过“内存性能”、“CPU 整数性能”，“CPU浮点性能”、“2D、3D绘图性能”、“数据库IO”、“SD卡读、写速度” 8项性能测试对手机的硬体性能做出评分。
同样是AnTuTu3.4版本的测试平台，魅族MX3安兔兔测试成绩为28702分，而搭载Tegra4芯片的小米3跑分成绩则为35704分，在RAM性能，CPU性能、绘图性能等多方面都处于领先。
小米3/魅族MX3安兔兔测试成绩
Nenamark2
Nenamark2是一款测试手机3D性能的软件，该软件主要着重测试手机GPU性能。
小米3在Nenamark2上得到了59.9fps的分数，基本上处于满分的成绩。
也就是说绝大部分
游戏在Tegra4版的小米3上可以完美运行。
魅族MX3的NenaMark2测试成绩为59.4fps，两者差距并不大。
小米3/魅族MX3的NenaMark2测试成绩
Vellamo网页测试
Vellamo 作为一种手机网页测试工具，如今已扩展至包括两个主要模块。
HTML5模块可用来评估移动网页浏览器性能，而Metal模块可对移动处理器的CPU子系统性能进行测量。
测试套件点击即用，方便快捷，分模块进行管理，Vellamo可对滚动缩放，3D图形，视频性能，内存读写，带宽峰值性能等诸多方面进行评估。
在Vellamo 的测试中小米3的成绩依旧领先，尤其是对HTML5网页的处理时，分数比魅族MX3高了近1000分。
小米3/魅族MX3 Vellamo测试结果
小米手机3播放1080P视频
魅族MX3播放1080P视频
而在实际使用中是否可以感受到这种差别呢？我们播放1080P视频感受一下。
小米3用自带播放器播放了四段视频，格式分别为MP4、MOV、MKV、RMVB，除了RMVB格式无法用自带播放器播放以外，其他格式的1080P视频播放毫无压力，并且对进度条拖动也没有卡顿现象。
在魅族MX3上播放同样格式的四段视频，自带播放器依旧无法支持RMVB 格式，不过其他格式的视频都可以顺畅播放，与小米3相比，使用体验丝毫不差。
小结：通过跑分软件的测试结果来看，魅族MX3的处理器性能要明显弱于小米3的Tegra 4处理器，特别是在Vellamo网页测试中更是与小米3差距明显。
不过在实际的使用过程中，魅族MX3并没有给用户带来卡、顿等不流畅的感觉，使用体验颇为不错。
小米3比MX3更热
尽管英伟达Tegra 4处理器和三星Exynos 5410处理器之前都因散热问题有过不良记录，但是从小米3和MX3的实际评测效果来看，并没有想象中那么严重，即便是经过了长时间的续航测试和高强度的性能测试，魅族MX3只是有一定温度而已，远远称不上烫手。
而且魅族MX3在测试时的最热局部温度要比之前三星S4测试时温度低了不少，估计这和其处理器降到1.6GHz有关。
看样子在小小的牺牲了一些性能的情况下，MX3获得了更佳的使用体验。
不过，不知道是因为工程样机的原因，还是因为处理器性能过高散热不及时的原因，小米3手机在测试的过程中机身对发热量的控制不是很好，还有待近一步改善。