项目风险评估报告【英文】
项目风险评估报告
项目风险评估报告一、引言项目风险评估报告是对项目进行全面评估和分析，旨在识别项目中存在的潜在风险，并提出相应的应对措施，以确保项目能够按计划顺利进行。
本报告将对项目的风险进行评估，并提供相应的风险管理建议。
二、项目概述本项目是一个新产品开发项目，旨在研发一款具有创新性和竞争力的产品，以满足市场需求。
项目计划周期为12个月，预计投入资金500万美元。
项目团队由技术专家、市场营销人员和项目经理组成。
三、风险评估1. 技术风险技术风险是指在项目开发过程中可能出现的技术难题和技术实施风险。
根据初步评估，本项目存在以下技术风险：- 技术难题：由于项目采用了新的技术方案，可能会面临技术难题，如硬件兼容性、软件开发等方面的问题。
- 技术实施风险：项目中可能需要与外部供应商合作，存在供应商交付延迟、技术能力不足等风险。
2. 市场风险市场风险是指项目在市场竞争中可能面临的不确定性和挑战。
根据市场调研结果，本项目存在以下市场风险：- 市场需求不确定：市场需求随时可能发生变化，可能导致产品无法满足市场需求。
- 竞争压力：市场上已有类似产品存在，竞争激烈，可能影响项目的市场份额和盈利能力。
3. 财务风险财务风险是指项目在资金运作和资金管理方面可能面临的风险。
根据财务分析，本项目存在以下财务风险：- 资金不足：项目预算500万美元，如果资金不足，可能导致项目无法按计划进行。
- 预算控制不力：如果项目在预算控制方面存在问题，可能导致项目超支或无法按时完成。
四、风险管理建议1. 技术风险管理建议- 成立专门的技术团队，负责解决项目中可能遇到的技术难题。
- 与供应商建立良好的合作关系，确保供应商的技术能力和交付能力满足项目需求。
2. 市场风险管理建议- 加强市场调研，及时了解市场需求变化，并根据市场需求调整产品设计和定价策略。
- 提高产品竞争力，通过技术创新和市场营销手段，提升产品在市场上的竞争力。
3. 财务风险管理建议- 建立严格的预算控制机制，确保项目按预算进行，并及时调整预算以应对可能出现的资金不足情况。
EAA项目招商引资风险评估报告
EAA项目招商引资风险评估报告目录概论 (4)一、建设规模 (4)(一)、产品规划 (4)(二)、建设规模 (5)二、EAA项目工程设计研究 (5)(一)、建筑工程设计原则 (5)(二)、EAA项目工程建设标准规范 (7)(三)、EAA项目总平面设计要求 (8)(四)、建筑设计规范和标准 (8)(五)、土建工程设计年限及安全等级 (9)(六)、建筑工程设计总体要求 (10)(七)、土建工程建设指标 (11)三、EAA项目概论 (12)(一)、EAA项目名称 (12)(二)、EAA项目选址 (12)(三)、EAA项目用地规模 (13)(四)、EAA项目用地控制指标 (13)(五)、土建工程指标 (16)(六)、设备选型方案 (17)(七)、节能分析 (17)(八)、环境保护 (17)(九)、EAA项目总投资及资本结构 (18)(十)、资金筹集 (18)(十一)、EAA项目预期经济效益规划目标 (19)(十二)、EAA项目进度计划 (20)(十三)、报告说明 (21)(十四)、EAA项目评价 (22)四、节能情况分析 (23)(一)、节能的重要性 (23)(二)、节能的法规与标准要求 (24)(三)、EAA项目地能源消耗与供应状况 (24)(四)、能源消耗类型与数量的深入分析 (25)(五)、节能综合评价 (26)(六)、设计节能方案 (26)(七)、实施节能措施 (27)五、EAA项目实施进度 (28)(一)、建设周期 (28)(二)、建设进展 (29)(三)、进度安排注意事项 (29)(四)、人力资源配置 (30)(五)、员工培训 (31)(六)、EAA项目实施保障 (32)六、经济效益分析 (33)(一)、经济评价综述 (33)(二)、经济评价财务测算 (34)(三)、EAA项目盈利能力分析 (36)七、风险性分析 (36)(一)、风险识别与评估 (36)(二)、风险类型及分类 (39)(三)、技术风险及应对措施 (42)(四)、市场风险及应对策略 (44)(五)、管理风险及规避方法 (46)(六)、财务风险及防范措施 (49)(七)、EAA项目建设风险及控制手段 (50)(八)、环境风险及安全防范 (52)(九)、风险综合评估与决策分析 (54)(十)、风险管理计划与控制方案 (56)八、生产安全保护 (57)(一)、生产安全管理制度 (57)(二)、安全生产责任制 (58)(三)、安全培训与教育 (58)(四)、安全检查与隐患排查 (58)(五)、安全防范措施 (59)(六)、应急救援与事故处理 (59)(七)、职业健康与安全管理体系 (59)(八)、劳动保护用品与设备 (59)(九)、危险源管理与控制 (60)(十)、安全生产标准化建设 (60)九、质量管理体系 (60)(一)、质量管理体系概述 (60)(二)、质量方针与目标 (62)(三)、质量管理责任 (64)(四)、质量管理程序 (65)(五)、质量监控与改进 (67)十、EAA项目招投标方案 (69)(一)、招标依据和范围 (69)(二)、招标组织方式 (70)(三)、招标委员会的组织设立 (71)(四)、EAA项目招投标要求 (72)(五)、EAA项目招标方式和招标程序 (73)(六)、招标费用及信息发布 (74)概论感谢您阅读本文档，介绍项目EAA的招商引资。
肯尼亚项目RiftEnergyi社会安全风险评估报告.doc
肯尼亚项目RiftEnergyi社会安全风险评估报告肯尼亚Rift Energy项目社会安全风险评估报告目录一、前言3 1.1 背景3 1.2 范围4 1.3 评估小组构成4 1.4 评估方法说明4 1.5 参考资料 5二、RIFT ENERGY项目基本概况4 2.1 国家概况5 2.2 经营活动所在区域Block L19区块概况5三、社会安全风险分析与评估7 3.1 Block L19区块区块社会安全形势分析7 3.2.风险评估11四、风险防控/降低措施12 4.1 组织机构与职责12 4.2 安保资源13 4.3 物防13 4.4 人防14 4.5 技防14 4.6 旅程安全管理15 4.7 社会安全能力、意识培训16 4.8 应急管理措施17五、结论18 5.1残余风险评估18 5.2 残余风险等级对比19 5.3 评估结果19六、附录20 肯尼亚RIFT ENERGY气井项目社会安全风险评估报告一、前言1.1 背景RIFT ENERGY公司是一家民营石油天然气勘探开发公司，总部设在美国德克萨斯州，该公司主要专注于在非洲勘探和开发机会，该公司有着国际石油和天然气项目启动成功的经验，公司主要职能是负责非洲油井的勘探、开发、评价、生产工作。
1.2 范围肯尼亚国内总体的政治经济环境，作业区周围主要的社会安全风险，周边安保力量的分布以及人防、物防、技防等配置情况。
1.3 评估方法说明评估方法采用初始风险评估与残余风险评估方法进行（见附件2）。
通过对各种渠道收集的数据、信息进行归类分析，对涉及社会安全方面的军事斗争（或打击）、恐怖袭击、绑架、持枪抢劫、警察敲诈勒索、入室盗窃、街头犯罪等方面在项目所在地发生的概率、危害程度和影响，得到每个方面的严重度和可能性及其后果的数值，再以评估矩阵表格形式体现出来，从而确定项目社会安全风险等级。
1.4 参考资料1. CONTROL RISK提供的安全分析与评估2. 中国驻肯尼亚大使馆安全风险提示3. 肯尼亚当地媒体报道4. 合作过甲方安全事件分享5. 当地社区和雇员提供的安全信息二、肯尼亚项目基本概况2.1 国家概况肯尼亚在中国石油集团公司发布的最新海外社会安全形势周报中的社会安全风险等级是高风险III级。
项目风险评估报告(模板)
项目风险评估报告(模板)
1. 引言
本报告为项目的风险评估报告，旨在对项目进行全面的风险分
析和评估。
通过对潜在风险的识别和评估，可以为项目决策提供参考，并采取相应的措施以降低风险和增加项目成功的可能性。
2. 项目概述
项目概述部分应简要介绍项目的背景、目标和关键要素，以便
更好地理解项目的上下文和关注重点。
3. 风险识别
在本部分中，我们对可能影响项目目标实现的各种风险进行了
归类和识别。
这些风险可能来源于内部因素（例如，管理、人力资源、技术等）或外部因素（例如，市场、竞争、法律法规等）。
我
们还对每个风险进行了简要的描述和评估，并为其分配了风险等级。
4. 风险评估
本部分对每个识别出的风险进行了更详细的评估。
我们对每个
风险的概率和影响进行了评估，并计算了其风险值。
通过这样的评
估，可以帮助项目团队更好地了解风险的严重程度，从而制定相应的应对策略。
5. 风险应对措施
本部分介绍了项目团队计划采取的具体风险应对措施。
对于每个高风险的风险事件，我们提出了一系列措施，包括风险避免、风险减轻和风险转移。
6. 结论
在本报告中，我们对项目的风险进行了评估和分析，并提出了相应的应对措施。
项目团队应根据报告中的评估结果，制定和执行风险管理计划，以最大程度地减少风险对项目成功的影响。
7. 参考文献
在编写本报告时，我们参考了下述文献和资料：
- [参考文献 1]
- [参考文献 2]
*注意：本报告仅供参考，实际项目应根据具体情况进行风险评估和管理。
*。
资产评估报告英文范文
资产评估报告英文资产评估报告英文范文Real Estate Evaluation ReportName of the appraisal Item: evaluation report of the house located at Room1, F5, Unit1, No.109,Client:Date of report:No. of the report:Real Estate Appraisal Office Co., Ltd.Real Estate Appraisal ReportMr./Lady,On your request, we made spot inspection for the real estate located at Room1, F5, Unit1, No.109.. After checking & collecting necessary data, we made appraisal and hereby submitted the opinion of public market value dated for your reference.I. Status of RightsProperty :( From Housing Ownership Certificate of)1.Location: Room1, F5, Unit1, No.109,2.Owner:3.Building4.Room No.:5.Building Coverage: 142.41 m26.Structure: Reinforced Concrete Structure7.Total floors of construction: 58.Living floor: 59.Design use: Residential10. Building time: around 2007II. Status in quo of real estateAccording to our spot inspection, the subject is used asresidence.III. Details of real estateA.Area Factors1.Area features and change trend:Appraisal object is located at Room1, F5, Unit1, No.109, y. This residential area is called Shangpinnanshan. The residential quarter is the first Class place fourth Category Area. The appraisal object approaches to. There are many high-grade residential areas around here, such as etc. Many department stores or service industry are also located at here, such as schools will provide perfect services for residents. In this densely populated area, ancillary facility of life services is complete. On the basis of general plan and zoning plan of, there is no doubt that this region will become a higher gathering residential area in future and its building scale will become higher and larger. Hence, we all think that this region which the house was located at have huge potential for increment.2.Traffic conditions:Appraisal object approaches to Street. The advantage of this region is convenient transportation. There are many bus lines around here such as No. 505, No. 501, No.407 etc. These bus lines could reach at each region of the city. We can say that the system of public traffic has a strong radiation.3.Living services facility:Near it, there are Supermarket; Monetary, living, medical facilities including banks, hospitals and schools can provide perfect services for residents. In this region also have many small and medium size restaurants, entertainment and relaxation places etc.cation facility:Near the appraisal object, there areB. Individual factor1.Location and use:The appraisal object is located at Room1, F5, Unit1, No.109, , now is used as of residence.2.Area and structure:The appraisal object’s building Coverage is 142.41 m2 with reinforced concrete structure.3.Decoration standard:The appraisal object is equipped with thief prevention entrance door, steel and plastic window. The structural system of house is north-south. The inside floor is covered with wood flooring, the wall is coated with whiting; the floor of kitchen is covered with floor tile, the wall is covered with ceramic tile; the floor of washroom is covered with non-slippery floor, the wall is covered with wall tile.。
Project Risk Assessment (项目风险评估英文版)
XXXXXX ProjectHSEC Risk Assessment DocumentVersion HistoryContentsSection 1 -Introduction (4)Section 2 -Purpose (4)Section 3 -Scope (4)Section 4 -High Level Finding (4)Section 5 -Definitions (5)Section 6 -Assumptions (5)6.1Basic project details (6)6.2Assessment assumptions (6)Section 7 -Process (7)Section 1 - IntroductionThis Execution Risk Assessment document provides the construction team with a detailed assessment of potential risks/hazards associated with the construction work to be performed during the course of the XXXXXX Project (SRWCP).It is a living document and shall be regularly updated as new risks/hazards are determined and mitigation factors resolved.The content of the Execution Risk Assessment shall be employed in the development of site-specific risk control measures, which shall be formally utilized in the field to ensure that all work is undertaken in the safest manner possible.Section 2 - PurposeThe following has been developed to outline the identified Risks strategy within the various phases of the SRWCP.The overall purpose of the document is to outline risks or threats to which the organisation, project and personnel are exposed. This includes, but is not limited to the design and execution phases of the Project.When assessing the risks to the organization the following impact or consequences shall be considered:- The risks to the health and safety of employees to which they are exposed whilst at work;- The risks to others not in his employment and those potentially affected by his acts and omissions;- Subsequent risks to the environment.- Subsequent loss to the organization.Section 3 - ScopeThe scope of the Risk Management Programme is identified below and simply stated addresses:- FEED Contract stage- Execution Phase (EPC)The process of risk identification and mitigation is required throughout each phase of the SRWCP, until completion.To assist in this process it is imperative that all disciplines focus on the identification of hazards prior to the commencement of any work activity and take appropriate action to remove, modify or protect personnel, plant, environment and equipment from such hazards.To support the hazard identification and risk potential this document shall be read in conjunction to the project HSE procedures and in particular the procedure – Hazard identification and Risk Management.Section 4 - High Level FindingDuring this primary risk assessment of the project, there were over 200 initial risks identified, and of thesematrix because of their initial perceived impact levels. Of these 99 were identified as critical or high risks prior to any risk management actions. After reassessing with the effect of the risk management actions, this reduced to 47 (see appendix 1 and 2). A point of note on this is that the majority of the remaining (38) are in the rare and unlikely frequency probability bands (see appendix 3 PID). Further controls and actions will be investigated to manage these as a priority through the FEED phase.The remaining lower risk level risk will be brought into the overall risk register and also will be assessed, and risk management plans put in place, along with any further risks identified.As more information becomes available the overall risk register will be updated and reported as and when requiredSection 5 - DefinitionsSection 6 - AssumptionsDue to the early nature of design and construction methodology, assumptions have been made to allow initial hazard identification to begin. These assumptions will change as more detailed information becomes available, and will then impact on the risk identification already conducted.6.1 Basic project details- 670 to 700 km of new rail line- 670 km of new rail sub grade- 67 rail bridges (over 70km total)- 2119 Culverts- 4 tunnels – 3 drill and blast, 1 TBM- 25 rail stations- 30 man camps- 7 explosive magazines- 9 fuel dumps- 24 concrete batch plants- 7 medical facilities- 60km of new construction road- 7 Workshop areas- Several quarry areas- Approx. 40,000 persons- Assume project $10 Billon USD costing (for impact levels).- Work area divided into 9 sections6.2 Assessment assumptionsAfter award of FEED contract, the risk identification process will be continue through a series of workshops with the various teams, the objective of this is to refine the information gathered so far, and to provide assurance that the control measures are incorporated into the design and work execution planning.Risk and Hazard inform ation and HSEC incidents for the project will be recorded in the software “Active Risk Manager - ARM”. This will be purchased at contract award.Categories, coding and other reporting elements of the risks identified, will change over time, to encompass R io Tinto’s reporting requirements as they become known and further information is known about structure of the project etc,.At this early stage, the main assessment of risk minimisation techniques will be based around existing administrative and engineering controls.Risks identified have been compiled from sources within the Company.Actual ownership of individual risks and its methods of treatment will be determined during the on-going review process.Section 7 - ProcessProject management will adopt a life cycle approach. This structured approach identifies, analyses, and manages areas of risk or hazard. In addition, other specific risk assessments and reviews may be used to analyse specific areas of risk or hazard.The Company has a commitment to achieve the highest possible level of hazard and risk identification. Consistent with this commitment, the company will strive to exceed the minimum standard of local legislation, standards, and codes of practice.As a summary to the various parts of Risk Analysis and Hazard Identification, please see diagram (from ISO 31000):As indicated, the risk analysis and hazard identification process is a reiterative process and will continue for the life of the project.Project management will verify that their HSE&S management systems address as a minimum the hazards identified. The risks associated with each of these hazards are to be addressed through the means of a HSE&S work procedure.Particular attention will be paid to the tasks that are complex in nature or that have a higher than normal level of risk (e.g., vehicles and transport, aviation work, working at height, blasting, tunnelling etc).Risks shall be managed by adhering to the ‘As Low As Reasonable Possible’ (ALARP) prin ciple.Appendix A - Risk List with risk ranking at ‘ClassIII’ or ‘Class IV’ (Critical and High risklevel)Current as at 3 Jan 2012Risk Register- Criticaland High Level Risk Only.In order to open this file, please refer to the attachment [1.Risk Register- Critical and High risk levels only.xls] of this PDF File.Appendix B - Register List –with risk ranking at‘Class III’ or ‘Class IV’ (Critical andHigh risk level), with controls Current as at 3 Jan 2012Risk List WithResponses - Critical andIn order to open this file, please refer to the attachment [2.Risk Register-Critical and High risk levels only with controls.xls] of this PDF File.Appendix C - Over-all Risk Matrix Summary(Probability Impact Diagram-PID) Table: PID (risk count per level)Table: Overall score change by risk level:Printed copies are UncontrolledLast Reviewed: [10 January 2012]Appendix D -Risk cross analysis (Source and Category)Table - Risk cross analysis (Source and Category)CountryDelivery ofOreEnvironmentalLogisticalQualityRail InfrastructureSafety and Health of Persons UndefinedWeatherWorkforce UnrestCompliance 8011201122011Design/Engineering 1012111819020Materials and Substances00200020000Method of Work 20411230001Operational 212411015000Other Hazards 0010003000Place of Work 40400124110Plant and Equipment 00200222000Stakeholders 3001000001Strategic 4004000001Undefined00300141510Work Organisation 50220016002Working Environment80401137112Total Count1211641205516320270554134494130243604136026Category4602560221421Risk CountSourceCommunity UnrestTotal CountAppendix E - General total risk metrics Table: Count by Category:Table: Count by Source:Appendix F - Assessment information andcriteriaTable: Probability Impact Diagram (PID). (To determine risk level)Table: Likelihood (Probability/Frequency) levels and descriptionsTable: Impact Levels and descriptions- Economic (Cost and Time)Table: Impact Levels and descriptions- Non-Economic (Social and Environmental)Last Reviewed: [10 January 2012] Printed copies are UncontrolledLast Reviewed: [10 January 2012] Printed copies are Uncontrolled。
英文版风险评估模板27p
【经典资料，ＷＯＲＤ文档，可编辑修改】【经典考试资料，答案附后，看后必过，ＷＯＲＤ文档，可修改】RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT TEMPLATEInformation Technology Risk Assessment ForRisk Assessment Annual Document Review HistoryT ABLE OF C ONTENTS1INTRODUCTION (1)2IT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION (2)3RISK IDENTIFICATION (6)4CONTROL ANALYSIS (8)5RISK LIKELIHOOD DETERMINATION (12)6IMPACT ANALYSIS (14)7RISK DETERMINATION (16)8RECOMMENDATIONS (18)9RESULTS DOCUMENTATION (20)L IST OF E XHIBITSE XHIBIT 1:R ISK A SSESSMENT M ATRIX (20)L IST OF F IGURESF IGURE 1–IT S YSTEM B OUNDARY D IAGRAM (4)F IGURE 2–I NFORMATION F LOW D IAGRAM (5)L IST OF T ABLEST ABLE A: R ISK C LASSIFICATIONS (1)T ABLE B: IT S YSTEM I NVENTORY AND D EFINITION (2)T ABLE C: T HREATS I DENTIFIED (4)T ABLE D: V ULNERABILITIES,T HREATS, AND R ISKS (5)T ABLE E:S ECURITY C ONTROLS (6)T ABLE F:R ISKS-C ONTROLS-F ACTORS C ORRELATION (8)T ABLE G:R ISK L IKELIHOOD D EFINITIONS (9)T ABLE H:R ISK L IKELIHOOD R ATINGS (9)T ABLE I:R ISK I MPACT R ATING D EFINITIONS (14)T ABLE J:R ISK I MPACT A NALYSIS (14)T ABLE K:O VERALL R ISK R ATING M ATRIX (16)T ABLE L: O VERALL R ISK R ATINGS T ABLE (16)T ABLE M: R ECOMMENDATIONS (18)1 INTRODUCTIONRisk assessment participants:Participant roles in the risk assessment in relation assigned agency responsibilities: Risk assessment techniques used:2 IT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION2 IT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATIONSensitivity Rating and ClassificationH IGHM ODERATEL OWIT System ClassificationMust be “Sensitive” if overall sensitivity is “high”; consider as “Sensitive” if overallsensitivity is “moderate”S ENSITIVEN ON-S ENSITIVEDescription or diagram of the system and network architecture, including all components of the system and communications links connecting the components of the system, associated data communications and networks:Figure 1 – IT System Boundary DiagramDescription or a diagram depicting the flow of information to and from the IT system, including inputs and outputs to the IT system and any other interfaces that exist to the system:Figure 2 – Information Flow Diagram3 RISK IDENTIFICATIONIdentification of VulnerabilitiesVulnerabilities were identified by:Identification of ThreatsThreats were identified by:Identification of RisksRisks were identified by:The way vulnerabilities combine with credible threats to create risks is identified Table D.4 CONTROL ANALYSISTable E correlates the risks identified in Table C with relevant IT security controls documented in Table D and with other mitigating or exacerbating factors.Risk No.Risk SummaryCorrelation of Relevant Controls & OtherFactors1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112131415161718192021222324255 RISK LIKELIHOOD DETERMINATIONTable G defines the risk likelihood ratings.Table G , evaluates the effectiveness of controls and the probability or motivation and capability of each threat to BFS and assigns a likelihood, as defined in Table F, to each risk documented in Table C. Risk No. Risk SummaryRisk Likelihood EvaluationRisk LikelihoodRating1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Risk No.Risk Summary Risk Likelihood EvaluationRisk LikelihoodRating13141516171819Risk No.Risk Summary Risk Likelihood EvaluationRisk LikelihoodRating2021222324256 IMPACT ANALYSISTable I documents the ratings used to evaluate the impact of risks.Table J documents the results of the impact analysis, including the estimated impact forDescription of process used in determining impact ratings:7 RISK DETERMINATIONTable K documents the criteria used in determining overall risk ratings.Risk Scale: Low (1 to 10); Moderate (>10 to 50); High (>50 to 100) Table L assigns an overall risk rating, as defined in Table K, to each of the risks documented in Table D.Description of process used in determining overall risk ratings:8 RECOMMENDATIONSTable M documents recommendations for the risks identified in Table D.9 RESULTS DOCUMENTATIONExhibit 1: Risk Assessment Matrix。
项目风险评估报告
项目风险评估报告一、引言项目风险评估报告旨在对项目进行全面的风险分析和评估，以帮助项目团队了解项目面临的潜在风险，并提供相应的风险管理措施和建议。
本报告基于对项目的详细研究和分析，通过收集和整理相关数据和信息，对项目可能面临的风险进行了全面的评估。
二、项目概述本项目是一家电子科技公司开发的新产品项目，旨在推出一款创新的智能家居设备。
项目计划在12个月内完成，总预算为1000万美元。
项目团队由跨部门的专业人员组成，包括研发、市场、生产和财务等方面的专家。
三、风险识别在项目风险评估的初期，我们对项目进行了全面的风险识别。
通过头脑风暴、专家访谈和文献研究等方法，我们识别出以下主要风险：1. 技术风险：由于项目采用了新的技术和设计，存在技术上的不确定性和挑战。
可能面临技术难题、研发延迟和技术可行性等风险。
2. 市场风险：市场需求和竞争环境的变化可能影响产品的销售和市场份额。
可能面临市场需求下降、竞争加剧和市场推广困难等风险。
3. 成本风险：项目预算和成本控制是项目成功的关键因素。
可能面临成本超支、物料价格波动和人力资源成本增加等风险。
4. 时间风险：项目进度的延误可能导致产品推出时间的推迟，影响市场竞争力和盈利能力。
可能面临任务延期、资源调配不足和项目进度冲突等风险。
5. 法律风险：项目需要遵守相关法律法规和知识产权保护，违反法律法规可能导致法律纠纷和经济损失。
可能面临知识产权侵权、合规风险和法律合同纠纷等风险。
四、风险评估在风险识别的基础上，我们对各个风险进行了详细的评估。
评估标准包括风险发生概率、风险影响程度和风险优先级等。
以下是对每个风险的评估结果：1. 技术风险：- 风险发生概率：中- 风险影响程度：高- 风险优先级：高- 风险管理措施：加强技术研发团队的协作和沟通，提前解决技术难题，进行技术验证和测试。
2. 市场风险：- 风险发生概率：高- 风险影响程度：中- 风险优先级：中- 风险管理措施：进行市场调研和竞争分析，制定灵活的市场推广策略，提高产品的竞争力。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Project Milestones
LPA Adopted FTA Approval to Enter PE ROD Received FTA Approval to Enter FD 65%icles Award Vehicle Contract Submit FFGA Application Construction Begins Receive FFGA 100% Design Complete Start of Service February 2000 September 2000 May 2003 August 2003 February 2004 February 2004 February 2004 June 2004 September 2004 Nov.\Dec. 2004 December 2004 October 2006
Project Overview Background Risk Assessment Workshop Risk Assessment Report Risk Mitigation Current Activities Lessons Learned
South Corridor Characteristics
Risk Categories Low Risk Most Optimistic Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic High Risk Most Pessimistic 10% impact is <= consequence 25% impact is <= consequence 50% impact is <= consequence 75% impact is <= consequence 90% impact is <= consequence
Background
FTA requires conduct of Project Risk Assessment (RA) as condition of Final Design approval (August 2003) Prepare for RA Workshop (Sept. 2003)
– Use statistical analysis to determine likelihood
Forecast required contingency Share results with CATS before FTA
Risk Assessment Report
Results 32% likelihood that Project could be completed at or below budget Real Estate was highest risk with most likely value of $10.8 M, 32% of PCU base cost Initial assessment send to FTA before CATS CATS provided justification to reduce Most Likely value of Real Estate risk to $1.2 M FTA directed PMOC to prepare new assessment
Risk Assessment Report
New assessment found 86% likelihood that Project could be completed at or below budget Risk Mitigation workshop conducted in December 2003 December 2003 Monthly Real Estate Status Report budget was $2.4 M higher than June 2002 budget Third statistical analysis prepared 65% likelihood that Project could be completed at or below budget
Risk Assessment Workshop
Purpose
– Review plans and cost estimate back-up – Identify risk impacts – cost or schedule – Reach consensus on value of impact/opportunity across 5 categories
Risk Assessment Report
Prepared by PMOC (November 2003) Assessment based on 30% plans and cost estimate (circa June 2002) Assess likelihood that Project can be completed at or below budget
– PMOC creates 41 Project Cost Units (PCU) – PMOC creates Risk Register – CATS distributes cost to 41 PCUs – CATS identifies risks by PCU
Risk Register
Uptown Charlotte to I-485 9.6 miles Trolley – South End to Uptown 15 stations (7 park-n-rides) Operate seven days a week Operate from 5:00 am to 1:00 am daily Service frequency – Rush hour: 7.5 minutes – Non-rush hour: 15 minutes Project Budget – $398.7 M
South Corridor Light Rail Project Project Risk Assessment
FTA Construction Roundtable May 2004
Presented by Manager of Construction
Presentation Outline