镇江环球雅思第二讲 全新高分论证结构

第四讲 通常所使用的论证结构PART IIntroductionBody 1：AdvantagesBody 2: DisadvantagesConclusionIntroductionBody 1 驳斥对方观点Body 2 继续驳斥Body 3 提出自己的见解并论证ConclusionIntroduction Body 1 倾向观点和看法或者提议 Body 2 继续论证倾向观点和提议 Body 3 指出倾向观点可能存在的问题和防范 Conclusion 融合众家所长，法无定法，只存心中意念，水到渠成，不拘章法。

PART II 破立法7分及以上范文实战Some people think international tourism brings more problems than benefits. To what extent do you agree or disagree? （旅游类主题，注意如何辩驳和句型，连接词）International tourism has been booming since the end of the Cold War era. Yet more negative comments can be heard about it now.Complaints about this industry are mostly concerned with the ecological damage it may cause such as trash on the streets and in the parks. However, promotion of ecotourism seems to have made international tourists increasingly aware of irresponsible, eco-unfriendly acts such as littering. This has relieved the ecological side-effects of international tourism.As for the claim that tourism may result in travelers ’ disrespect for the local culture, I seriously question its legitimacy/justification. As we all probably know, international travel is always a major investment --- that is, the money, time and energy spent during an overseas trip amount to very high costs. I doubt that many people would like to pay such high costs for travelling to a place whose culture they dislike or even despise.(International trip is far from a cheap means of entertainment and relaxation. Usually, it may cost individuals thousands of dollars and the tourists may have to make plans several months beforehand.)On the other hand, the benefits that international tourism can yield are trulyoverwhelming. Cultural communication between countries has been strengthened as tourists can learn about the local culture and spread their own culture by interacting with the local residents during their trips, which surely promotes mutual understanding and friendship. In addition, international tourism can be economically beneficial as well because it contributes to local people’s incomes and the government revenue. Part of this money can then be used by the locals to protect the culture heritage such as ancient structures.In conclusion, it seems to me that the negative effects of international tourism can be reduced if the international tourists are better prepared for their overseas trips culturally.Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.（旅游和现代科技）观点架构：到国外去旅行，可以直接深刻理解国外的文化等，但是不能否定因特网了解世界的意义，因为因特网虽然不是直接去了解，但是更及时，更廉价，可以满足更多人的需求。

Body 1: It is claimed that / it is assumed that travelling abroad turns out to be a large sum of investment which is beyond some people’s affordability, in particular those underpaid. Internet seems to be a better alternative and cheaply accessible for these individuals. However, the past decade has witnessed the acceleration of economy and people’s living standards have been substantially improved. For most people,what really matters is not the lack of money, but whether they are willing to go out.Body 2: Some people maintain that travelling abroad in person is time-consuming and, what’s worse, not flexible in one’s schedule. They think surfing the internet is comparatively convenient and people can ‘travel’ whenever and wherever the internet service is available. But that is an incomplete part of the picture. In reality, for most people, they can make use of their annual vacation to travel. Time tends to be an excuse for some people, and attitude is the motive for travelling.Body 3:traditional means of travel can enhance the mutual communication between different cultures. This can ultimately promote understanding and friendship. In addition, this practice can boost the economy of those target places. For some people, it is a better way for them to get exposed to fresh air and natural beauty.In conclusion, internet offers a choice for modern people under greater pressure and those with little affordability. But for most people, travelling abroad in person is irreplaceable at least in the near future.Many people believe that countries should produce food for all population to eat and import food as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?（注意破立法常用句型，连接词）Food industry has been booming due to the revolutionized farming methods. People’s choice of food is no longer restricted to the local ones; import food has become an alternative for modern consumers. But, some people advocate that countries should produce food for all population.Body 1: it is claimed that / it is once assumed that imported commodities including food tend to be much expensive and are beyond average people’s affordability. I seriously question its legitimacy. / I think that’s only part of the picture. / I doubt whether this statement can hold water tight.Of course there is a phenomenon that the imported goods shelved in the supermarkets are more often than not more expensive than local ones. But the high price is to a large degree associated with the heavy taxes levied on these products. Also, most imported food is affordable due to the improvement of people’s living standards.Boyd 2: There is some concern about the imported goods’ damage to local industry. Some one maintains that imported food may destroy local food industry. This view, I think, is largely oversimplified.Of course, the introduction of foreign food industry will make the market much more competitive and some factories will perish due to their lack of technologies and efficiency. But those healthy enterprises will surely survive and this will be beneficial for customers.Body 3:By contrast, the advantages of imported food are manifest. At first, exotic food will immensely enrich our recipe and customers will no longer make do with the second best due to the poor selection in the supermarket shelves. That is to say, the variety of food commodities will be surprisingly enhanced. In the meantime, the introduction of foreign food will surely pull down the price, which, naturally, is beneficial for consumers.In conclusion, the opponents fail to recognize the advantages of import food and exaggerate some side-effects. Definitely, it does not mean foreign food is of no disadvantages, but it should never occur that we spill out the baby with the water.一个部分使用了破立法的7分太极高手：In some countries, traditional arts are going extinct. Some people think that we should try to keep them. To what extent you agree?Today, many types of traditional arts and crafts are struggling on the brink of extinction. People have different attitudes toward this trend. As for me, I believe that traditional arts should still be cherished by us.（注意本段的超级厉害的太极推手技法）Traditional arts are national treasureshanded down from our ancestors; therefore, it is our responsibility as inheritors to keep them alive. A nation without abundant traditional arts such as folk music, ethnic drawings or painting would feel rootless. Consequently, should those brilliant traditional arts die out, the nation’s sense of belonging would be seriously eroded. Even worse, once a form of traditional art disappears in history, it could never be truly revived. Only until then will the people realize that is a great loss, which at best would only result in nostalgia and regrets.（本段体现了破立法的精华）Those who object to preserving the traditional arts may think that it would lay a heavy burden on the government’s budgets. These people fail to recognize the economic value of the traditional arts. Since some arts symbolize the local or national culture, they can be used to boost the local tourism and economy. A good example illustrating this point is the native arts in Australia where many aboriginal people make a living by selling traditional-style handicrafts.As far as I can see, lying at the heart of this issue is not even whether we should rescue traditional arts from the brink of extinction, but how we can make the efforts to keep them alive more efficient and more effective.再来看破立法的衍生体：（高三学生作品）People in the same family are not as close as before. Some people think we should return to traditional family values but others think this would lead to many problems. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.Most of us are busy with our own pursuits every day. As a result, we are not as closely connected with our family members as before. Are traditional family values the right solution to this problem? It is a well-known fact that society should develop to a more progressive level, which means returning to traditional values may not be the right direction.To start with, many concepts of the traditional family values are no longer compatible with the modern lifestyle. In traditional families, people tend to obey rules blindly and lack individuality. However, individuality is regarded as the basic requirement for survival in the age of change. Consequently, they may find themselves incompetent when they look for jobs as no employers want robots without an active mind today.More importantly, they may live more stressful lives than others because they do not dare to say no to their elders. The real ideas hidden at their heart may even leave them depressed and increase their risk of developing mental problems. An equally important factor involved is the cultural change today. We surely do not want to live in a family that is just replica of a family centuries ago.Admittedly, traditional family values give us stronger family bonds, which are like a safe haven for life. Children living in such families would know how to behaveproperly. However,I find it hard to imagine members can enjoy the family bonds between each other when they cannot even freely express how they feel.To conclude, we should uphold some traditional concepts such as the respect between family members. Meanwhile, we should also appreciate family members’individuality.。