China's Legal Framework and Reform History of Land Administration System

合集下载

中国成立75周年英语作文

中国成立75周年英语作文

中国成立75周年英语作文The 75th Anniversary of the Founding of the People's Republic of ChinaThis year marks the significant 75th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Over these seven decades, China has undergone transformative changes, rising from a war-torn nation to become the second-largest economy in the world.1. The Founding MomentOn October 1, 1949, Chairman Mao Zedong proudly announced the establishment of the People's Republic of China, signaling the end of the tumultuous Chinese Civil War and ushering in a new era of hope and possibilities for the Chinese people.2. Early AchievementsPolitical and Diplomatic Advances: Shortly after its founding, China established formal diplomatic relations with a number of countries, including the Soviet Union on October 3, 1949. This helped break the isolation imposed by imperialist powers.Economic Stabilization: In 1950, the Chinese government implemented policies to stabilize the economy, leading to areduction in inflation and an increase in people's trust in the new regime.Legal Reform: In 1950, the government introduced the first major law of the new era, the Marriage Law, which advocated equality and freedom in marriage.Land Reform: By 1952, land reform had largely been completed, abolishing feudal land ownership and paving the way for agricultural development.3. Social and Economic ProgressIndustrialization: In 1953, China began its first Five-Year Plan, laying the foundations for industrialization. By the end of the plan in 1957, significant progress had been made.Foreign Policy: In 1954, China participated in the Geneva Conference, marking its emergence as an important player on the international stage.Constitutional Development: The same year, the First National People's Congress convened, formulating the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, which served as the country's fundamental law.4. Intellectual Property and InnovationIn recent decades, China has made significant strides inintellectual property protection, establishing a robust legal framework and enhancing enforcement mechanisms. This has fostered a culture of innovation and creativity, driving economic growth and societal progress.5. Looking ForwardAs China marks its 75th anniversary, it stands as a testament to the resilience and determination of its people. Looking ahead, China continues to embrace reform and innovation, working towards a future of prosperity and harmony for all its citizens.。

中国法制史英文

中国法制史英文

中国法制史英文【中英文实用版】Title: The History of Chinese Legal SystemThe history of Chinese legal system dates back to ancient times, encompassing a rich and diverse collection of laws, regulations, and judicial practices.It has undergone significant transformations over the centuries, reflecting the changing social, political, and cultural landscape of China.During the Shang and Zhou dynasties, the legal system was based on the concept of "heavenly mandate" and emphasized the importance of moral principles.The earliest known written laws were the "Xiahou Laws" of the Western Zhou Dynasty, which mainly focused on criminal punishment and rituals.The Qin Dynasty witnessed a significant development in the Chinese legal system.Emperor Qin Shi Huang unified China and established a comprehensive legal code, known as the "Qin Code." This code was based on the Legalist philosophy and emphasized strict laws, heavy punishments, and centralized authority.It laid the foundation for the subsequent legal systems in China.The Han Dynasty built upon the Qin Code and incorporated Confucian principles into the legal system.The "Han Code" emphasized the importance of moral values and the family as the basic unit ofsociety.It introduced the concept of leniency in punishment and allowed for more discretion in judicial decisions.The Tang Dynasty saw the creation of one of the most famous legal codes in Chinese history –the "Tang Code." It was a comprehensive legal system that covered both criminal and civil law.The Tang Code was characterized by its clarity, systematic structure, and the principle of equality before the law.It had a profound influence on the legal systems of neighboring countries in East Asia.The Song Dynasty continued the tradition of legal reform and established the "Song Code," which further expanded the scope of civil law and emphasized the protection of property rights.The Song Dynasty also saw the rise of Neo-Confucianism, which had a significant impact on the interpretation and application of laws.The Ming Dynasty witnessed the compilation of the "Ming Code," which was a comprehensive legal system that remained in effect for over 600 years.The Ming Code was notable for its strict regulations on social hierarchy and the strengthening of the imperial authority.The Qing Dynasty inherited the Ming Code and made some modifications, resulting in the "Qing Code." The Qing legal system was characterized by its complex procedures and the emphasis on evidence in criminal cases.However, it also faced criticism for its corruption and inefficiency.With the establishment of the Republic of China in 1912, the Chinese legal system underwent significant modernization.The new government adopted a constitution and introduced Western legal concepts, such as the separation of powers and rule of law.The legal system continued to evolve under the People"s Republic of China, established in 1949, with the adoption of a socialist legal framework.In conclusion, the history of Chinese legal system reflects a long and intricate journey of legal development.From ancient moral principles to modern legal reforms, China"s legal system has continuously adapted to the needs of society, leaving a lasting legacy in the annals of legal history.---标题:中国法制史中国法制史可追溯至远古时期,包含了丰富的法律、法规和司法实践。

行政诉讼法英语

行政诉讼法英语

行政诉讼法英语Title: Administrative Litigation Law in China: A Reflection on Legal Protection and GovernanceThe Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China, enacted in 1989 and subsequently revised in 2014 and 2017, represents a significant stride in the legal landscape of China. This law establishes a framework for individuals and organizations to challenge administrative actions taken by government agencies, thereby safeguarding citizens' rights and promoting good governance.At its core, the Administrative Litigation Law aims to provide judicial remedies for those who believe that an administrative act has infringed upon their lawful rights or interests. It covers a wide range of administrative actions, including decisions made by government departments, local authorities, and other public institutions. The law ensures that such actions can be reviewed impartially by the judiciary, thus serving as a check on potential abuses of power.One of the key principles underpinning this law is the presumption of innocence for administrative acts until proven otherwise. This means that when a lawsuit is filed, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to demonstrate that theadministrative action was unlawful or inappropriate. This principle encourages accountability and transparency within the government sector while protecting the rights of individuals.The process begins when an aggrieved party files a petition with a people's court, outlining the grounds for their challenge. The court then reviews the case, which may involve examining evidence, hearing arguments from both sides, and assessing whether the administrative action complied with relevant laws and regulations. If the court finds in favor of the plaintiff, it can annul the contested action or order the defendant to retake the decision following proper procedures.In addition to individual cases, the Administrative Litigation Law also plays a crucial role in fostering a culture of rule-of-law within Chinese society. By enabling citizens to seek redress against perceived injustices, it reinforces the idea that no one –not even the state –is above the law. This not only enhances public trust in legal institutions but also contributes to a more stable and predictable social environment.However, challenges remain. Despite its progress, the implementation of the Administrative Litigation Law can be hampered by factors such as local protectionism, resourcelimitations, and varying degrees of judicial independence. These issues highlight the need for continuous reform and strengthening of the legal system to ensure that the law's intent is fully realized in practice.In conclusion, the Administrative Litigation Law stands as a testament to China's commitment to developing a comprehensive legal infrastructure that respects and upholds human rights. While there is still room for improvement, this law marks a critical step towards a more equitable and just society where the rule of law prevails.。

Transformations of China’s Legal System

Transformations of China’s Legal System
From Rule of Man to Building a Legal System
The first building block of the PRC’s legal construction was the establishment of the socialist legal system.
In September 1949, the Common Program of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), which bore the nature of a temporary constitution, was promulgated. Five years later, the first constitution of the PRC was adopted at the First National People’s Congress (NPC). It is thus often referred to as the 1954 Constitution.
In the following 20-plus years, China encountered
various setbacks in creating a legal system. At a meeting of the central leadership in November 1978, Deng Xiao-ping proposed that the legal system be enhanced in order to guarantee people’s democratic rights. At that time the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) was about to convene. China would soon enter a new stage of mind emancipation, reform and opening-up. The nation’s legal framework also breathed new life. People started to break restrictions and discuss issues that were previously considered taboo. “I think a new era dawned, one in which the science of law was awakening,” said Li Buyun, a researcher with the Institute of Law at the Chinese Academy of Social Science (CASS), when he recalled the events of over 30 years ago.

分析中国网络暴力的英语作文

分析中国网络暴力的英语作文

In the digital era where the internet has become an integral part of daily life, cyberbullying has emerged as a pervasive social issue that transcends geographical boundaries. This phenomenon, which involves the use of electronic communication to bully or harass others, is particularly alarming in China, a country with the world's largest online population. This essay aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of cyberbullying in China from multiple perspectives, examining its causes, manifestations, impacts, and potential solutions.Firstly, the roots of cyberbullying in China can be traced back to several factors. The anonymity provided by the internet often emboldens users to engage in aggressive behavior they might not exhibit offline. The lack of face-to-face interaction diminishes empathy and inhibitions, leading to increased instances of verbal abuse. Moreover, China's cultural context plays a role; societal pressures for conformity and achievement sometimes manifest in harsh criticism and bullying when individuals deviate from perceived norms. Additionally, the rapid development of the internet and insufficient regulation have resulted in a digital environment where cyberbullying can thrive unchecked.Cyberbullying in China manifests itself in various forms, ranging from personal attacks and hate speech to doxing (publicly releasing private information) and malicious trolling. Social media platforms, gaming sites, and online forums serve as hotbeds for such activities. Notably, female public figures, children, and teenagers are often primary targets, with their appearance, personal choices, and opinions frequently subject to scrutiny and ridicule.The impact of cyberbullying on individuals and society at large is profound and far-reaching. Victims often suffer from mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. It also disrupts their social lives, leading to isolation and academic or professional setbacks. On a societal level, cyberbullying erodes trust, fosters a hostile online environment, and impedes the healthy development of the internet community.China’s legal framework concerning cyberbullying is evolving. While lawslike the 'Criminal Law' and the 'Cybersecurity Law' contain provisions against online harassment, enforcement remains challenging due to the complex nature of the web and the difficulty in identifying perpetrators. Furthermore, there is a need for more proactive measures including education and awareness campaigns to teach netizens about responsible online behavior, respect for privacy, and the severe consequences of cyberbullying.Efforts to curb cyberbullying should involve multi-stakeholder participation. Educational institutions should integrate digital literacy into their curriculum, teaching students about the ethical use of technology. Parents too have a critical role to play in monitoring their children's online activities and educating them about online safety. Online platforms must enforce stricter community guidelines and invest in AI tools to detect and remove abusive content promptly. Lastly, law enforcement agencies should collaborate with tech companies to develop robust mechanisms for reporting, investigating, and punishing cyberbullying incidents.In conclusion, cyberbullying in China is a multifaceted problem that requires a holistic approach involving legislative reform, technological advancement, education, and social consciousness-raising. As the internet continues to shape Chinese society, addressing cyberbullying effectively will not only protect the rights and wellbeing of individuals but also contribute to the sustainable and healthy growth of China's digital ecosystem. It is crucial to remember that while the virtual world may seem detached from reality, the pain and harm caused by cyberbullying are all too real, necessitating urgent and concerted action from all sectors of society.Note: Due to the constraints of this platform, I've provided a concise version that exceeds 500 words but falls short of your specified requirement of 1407 words. A full-length essay would delve deeper into each aspect mentioned above, providing detailed case studies, statistical data, and more nuanced discussions on policy and societal responses to cyberbullying in China. However, this précis provides a solid foundation upon which you can expand your ownlengthy analysis.。

中国法律的英文作文

中国法律的英文作文

中国法律的英文作文Title: The Legal System of China: An Overview。

China's legal system, rooted in its rich history and influenced by various legal traditions, has undergone significant transformations in recent decades. This essay aims to provide an overview of China's legal system, focusing on its structure, key principles, and recent developments.Structure of the Legal System:China's legal system is based on a civil law tradition, with elements of socialist law and traditional Chineselegal principles. The highest organ of state power in China is the National People's Congress (NPC), which is responsible for enacting laws and overseeing the legal system. The NPC Standing Committee interprets laws and drafts legislation between sessions.At the core of China's legal system are the courts, which include the Supreme People's Court at the national level and various local people's courts at the provincial, municipal, and county levels. These courts adjudicate both criminal and civil cases, ensuring the rule of law is upheld across the country.Key Principles of Chinese Law:1. Rule of Law: China's Constitution asserts the principle of the rule of law, emphasizing that all individuals and organizations are equal before the law. This principle aims to ensure that laws are applied uniformly and impartially.2. Socialist Legal System: China's legal system is founded on socialist principles, with a focus on serving the people and promoting social justice. Laws and regulations are designed to protect the rights andinterests of the masses while maintaining social stability.3. Presumption of Innocence: In criminal cases, thepresumption of innocence is a fundamental principle. Defendants are considered innocent until proven guilty, and the burden of proof rests with the prosecution.4. Protection of Human Rights: China's legal system includes provisions for the protection of human rights, including the right to a fair trial, freedom of speech, and the right to work. However, the interpretation and implementation of these rights may vary.Recent Developments:In recent years, China has undertaken significant legal reforms aimed at strengthening the rule of law and improving judicial transparency. These reforms include:1. Judicial Reform: Efforts have been made to enhance the independence and professionalism of the judiciary, such as reforms to the appointment and promotion of judges and increased training opportunities for legal professionals.2. Anti-Corruption Campaign: China has launched anextensive anti-corruption campaign targeting both high-ranking officials and grassroots-level bureaucrats. This campaign aims to root out corruption within the legal system and ensure that justice is administered fairly.3. Legal Education: There has been a push to improve legal education and awareness among the general population. Legal literacy programs have been implemented to help citizens understand their rights and responsibilities under the law.4. International Cooperation: China has increasingly engaged in international legal cooperation, participating in bilateral and multilateral agreements and initiatives aimed at addressing transnational legal issues such as cross-border crime and intellectual property rights protection.Conclusion:China's legal system is a complex and evolving framework that reflects the country's unique political,social, and cultural context. While challenges remain, particularly regarding issues of transparency and judicial independence, the Chinese government is committed to strengthening the rule of law and promoting justice for all its citizens. By continuing to enact reforms and engage with the international community, China is poised tofurther develop its legal system in the years to come.。

中国的法律英文作文

中国的法律英文作文

中国的法律英文作文英文:As a Chinese citizen, I am familiar with the laws and regulations in China. The legal system in China is based on the civil law system, which means that laws are created by the government and enforced by the courts. The legal system is divided into four levels: the Supreme People's Court, the High People's Court, the Intermediate People's Court, and the Basic People's Court.The Chinese legal system covers a wide range of areas, including criminal law, civil law, commercial law, and administrative law. The laws are constantly updated and amended to reflect changes in society and to protect the rights and interests of citizens.One of the most important laws in China is the Constitution, which outlines the basic rights and freedoms of citizens. Other important laws include the Criminal Law,the Civil Law, and the Administrative Law. These laws cover a wide range of issues, including property rights, contract law, labor law, and environmental law.In China, the legal system is still developing and there are still many challenges to be overcome. One of the biggest challenges is ensuring that the laws are enforced fairly and impartially. There have been cases of corruption and abuse of power in the legal system, which have undermined public confidence in the system.Despite these challenges, I believe that the Chinese legal system is improving and becoming more effective. The government is taking steps to address the shortcomings in the system and to ensure that the laws are enforced fairly and impartially.中文:作为中国公民,我熟悉中国的法律法规。

中国刑法 英语

中国刑法 英语

中国刑法英语China's Criminal Law: An ExaminationChina's criminal justice system has undergone significant reforms in recent decades, reflecting the country's evolving social and economic landscape. The Chinese Criminal Law, first enacted in 1979 and subsequently revised several times, serves as the foundation of this system, outlining the principles, procedures, and penalties for criminal offenses. This comprehensive legal framework plays a crucial role in maintaining social stability, protecting individual rights, and promoting the rule of law in the world's most populous nation.At the core of China's Criminal Law is the principle of balancing the interests of the state, the collective, and the individual. The law aims to protect the socialist system, safeguard national security, and preserve social order, while also upholding the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens. This delicate balance is reflected in the range of criminal offenses and their corresponding punishments, which can vary from fines and imprisonment to more severe measures such as the death penalty.One of the defining features of China's Criminal Law is its emphasison the prevention of crime. The law emphasizes the importance of education, rehabilitation, and social reintegration as key components of the criminal justice system. This approach is exemplified in the use of suspended sentences, probation, and community-based corrections, which provide offenders with opportunities to reform and reintegrate into society.Another notable aspect of China's Criminal Law is its adaptability to the country's evolving social and economic conditions. The law has been revised and updated over the years to address emerging challenges, such as the rise of cybercrime, intellectual property infringement, and environmental degradation. These revisions have aimed to ensure that the law remains relevant and responsive to the changing needs of Chinese society.The enforcement of China's Criminal Law is carried out by a well-established system of law enforcement agencies, including the public security bureaus, procuratorates, and courts. These agencies work in coordination to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate criminal cases, ensuring the consistent and fair application of the law.Despite the progress made in the development of China's Criminal Law, the system is not without its challenges. Concerns have been raised about the potential for abuse of power, arbitrary detention, and the limited protections for individual rights, particularly in casesinvolving state security or political dissent. The Chinese government has acknowledged these concerns and has taken steps to strengthen the rule of law and protect individual rights, such as through the introduction of measures to ensure the right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence.In conclusion, China's Criminal Law is a complex and evolving system that reflects the country's unique social, political, and economic realities. While the law has played a crucial role in maintaining social stability and promoting the rule of law, it continues to face ongoing challenges and debates. As China continues to navigate the complexities of its development, the reform and refinement of its criminal justice system will remain a critical priority for policymakers and legal scholars alike.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

China’s Legal Framework and Reform History of LandAdministration SystemI. China’s constitutional nature and political systemArticle I of China’s constitution says that “The People’s Republic of China is a socialist state under the people's democratic dictatorship led by the working class and based on the alliance of workers and peasants”. And article II says, “All powers in the People's Republic of China belong to the people. The National People’s Congress and the local people's congresses at various levels are the organs through which the people exercise state power”. These two articles clearly stated that China’s constitutional nature is the people's democratic dictatorship, and its political regime is founded upon the People's Congress system.II. China’s legal systemIn the existing legal system of China, the word “law” has broad and narrow definitions. The broad “law” covers the total of all behavior norms which have universal conforming powers and are guaranteed with compulsive enforcements by the state. From perspective view of legislatures, the broadly-defined laws include all of normative legal documents enacted by state organs in due process and in compliance with the legislation powers endowed by Constitution of People’s Republic of China and Legislation Law of People’s Republic of China. Whereas, the narrowly-defined “law” is confined to normative legal documents constituted by the National People’s Congress and its Standing committee, even not including the Constitution itself.(I)Legislation, law enforcement and Governmental Administration according to lawAccording to the existing Constitution and organizational laws, China’s legislative system is set up with a power configuration as followed:(1) Legislative power of the central government level. The National People's Congress and its StandingCommittee shall exercise the state legislative power. The State Council and ministries and commissions under the State Council are delegated legislative powers by NPC to enact administrative ordinances, regulations and codes.(2) Legislative power of local levels. The People's Congresses and the Standing Committees ofprovincial or municipal levels are endowed with powers to constitute local bylaws and regulations, and in autonomous regions, local legislatures have extra powers to constitute autonomous charters or other stand-alone ordinances.Law enforcement can also be broadly and narrowly defined. The scope of broad-sense law enforcement covers all judicial executions conducted by state organs, including administrative agencies and judiciary institutions, whereas the narrow-sense law enforcement refers to judicial actions undertaken by administrative bodies to govern the society. In China, governments of all levels and their affiliatedfunctional departments are administrative bodies with authorities and responsibilities to enforce laws. The so-called functional departments include governmental branches such as Public Security Agencies, Industrial and Commercial Business Administrations, Taxation Bureaus, Public Sanitation Departments, Education Departments and Social Affairs Service etc.. The judiciary organizations mainly consist of the Procuratorates (superintendent organs) and the People's Courts (justice organs). The Procuratorates focus on monitoring crimes and mainly take weapons of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. Their responsibilities range from conducting investigations of criminal cases to initiating public prosecution in accordance to criminal procedural law, and deciding whether to file the case and with what accusation to appeal the People’s Courts to rule. The People’s Courts will hear and rule litigations, make verdicts according to pertaining laws. If any party of the litigation refuses to accept the ruling, there will be two more optional appeal chances until the final ruling is made.Governmental administration according to law is one very important aspect in construction of China’s socialist legal system. Governmental agencies shall exercise their administrative powers in compliance with rules of laws, ordinances and regulations. Without legal powers vested by laws, ordinances and regulations, no governmental bodies shall make decisions that may impair the vested rights or interests of citizens, corporations and any other organizations, or may impose extra incumbencies on them. In administering social and public affairs, the governmental bodies are endowed by the state with a variety of powers relating to various social and public services, such as power of constituting administrative norms, power of issuing administrative licenses and approvals, power of administrative inspections and supervisions, power of administrative sanctions and punishments, power of administrative compulsive executions, power of administrative justices, and other administrative disposal powers. The outcome of excising these powers to administer social and public affairs may reflect the administrative performance of the governments and its staffs’ competences, and as a consequence, further bring about some impacts upon the public image and the legitimate authority of governments. Therefore, Adherence to governmental administration according to law will help push governmental decision-makings and behaviors developing in direction of further democratic, legal, scientific and normative.(II)Forms of Chinese LawThe forms of China’s laws include the constitution, laws, administrative ordinances, local bylaws, autonomous charters/stand-alone ordinances and regulations.The National People's Congress constitutes and amends criminal, civil, and state-organic laws and other basic laws.The Standing Committee of National People's Congress constitutes and amends laws other than those enacted by the National People's Congress;The State Council enacts administrative ordinances according to the Constitution and laws.The People's Congresses of provinces, autonomous regions, or municipalities directly under the central government and the Standing Committees thereof may enact local bylaws as needed provided that they shall not contravene any provisions of the Constitution, laws and national administrative ordinances.The People's Congresses of autonomous regions are empowered to constitute autonomous charters/stand-alone ordinances in light of their ethnic political, economic and cultural characteristics.All the ministries and commissions, the People's Bank of China, the Auditing Agency, and other affiliated administrative organs directly under the State Council, may enact regulations within the scope of their authority in accordance with laws as well as resolutions, decrees of the State Council.The legislature body is a state organ with legislative powers endowed by the Constitution and national laws. Typical legislative bodies and forms of law under their powers in China are listed as Table I.Table I China’s Legislative Bodies and Forms of LawLegislative Body Forms of Law1 The National People’s Congress The Constitution and basiclawsLaws other than basic laws2 The Standing Committee of National People’sCongress3 The State Council Administrative ordinancesLocal bylaws4 The People's Congresses of provinces, autonomousregions, municipalities and the standing committeesthereof5 The People's Congresses of autonomous regions Autonomous charters andstand-alone ordinancesRegulations6 Ministries, commissions, the People's Bank of China,the Auditing Agency, and other affiliatedadministrative organs directly under the State CouncilIII. China’s Existing Laws regarding land(I)Provisions regarding land in the ConstitutionIn China’s constitution, public ownership of land and land tenure regime are entrenched. Article 10 of Constitution says: “Land in the cities is owned by the state. Land in the rural and suburban areas is owned by collectives except for those portions which belong to the state in accordance with the law; house sites and privately farmed plots of cropland and hilly land are also owned by collectives. The state may, in the public interest and in accordance with the provisions of law, expropriate or requisition land for its use. No organization or individual may appropriate, buy, sell or otherwise engage in the transfer of land by unlawful means. The right to the use of land may be transferred according to law.” The land regime defined in the article has provided the land-regarding legislation with a constitutional basis.(II)Laws regarding land administrationLaws concerning land administration are as followed:z General Rules of Civil Law, passed on April 12th, 1986z Criminal Law of The People's Republic of China, passed on July 1st, 1979z Land Administration Law of the People's Republic of China, passed in January of 1986, revised in December of 1988, and revised again in August of 1998z Law of the People's Republic of China on Land Contract in Rural Areas, passed on August 29th, 2002z The Law of The People's Republic of China on Urban Real Estate Administration, passed on July 5th, 1994(III)Administrative ordinances addressing land administrationz Ordinance of the People’s Republic of China on Farmland Occupation Tax, issued by the State Council on April 1st, 1987)z Ordinance of the People’s Republic of China on Urban Land Use Tax, issued by the State Council on September 27th, 1988z Regulations on Land Reclamation, issued by the State Council on November 8th, 1988z Interim Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Urban Land Use Right (usufruct) Assignment and Transfer, issued by the State Council on May 19th, 1990z Regulations for the Implementation of Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, issued by the State Council on December 27th, 1998z Ordinance on Basic Farmland Protection, issued by the State Council on December 27th, 1998(IV)Regulations of land administrationz Procedures for Application for review and Approval of Construction Lands, enacted on March 2nd, 1999z Measure for Idle Land Disposal, enacted on April 28th, 1999z Catalogue for Allocable Lands, enacted on October 18th, 2001z Regulations on Assignment of State-owned Land Use Rights by Invitation of Bids, Auction or Listing, enacted on May 9th, 2002z Regulations on Assignment of State-owned Land Use Rights by Private Agreement, enacted on June 11th, 2003z Regulations on Annual Land Use Quota, enacted on November 1st, 2004z Procedure for Pre-reviewing of Land for Construction Projects, enacted on November 1st, 2004(IV)Legal arrangements for land administrationThe principal legal arrangements regarding land administration in China can be categorized into three aspects:z Fundamentals for land administration.z Farmland protection policies–compulsory protection of basic farmlands.z Regulations on land use rights with regard to its assignment, transfer and gratis-allocation.First, Fundamentals for Land AdministrationBoth of the Constitution, the Land Administration Law and the Law of Land Contract in Rural Areas havestipulated provisions that constitute the legal base of land administration.1. Land ownership. China adopted public ownership of land, namely, land owned either by the wholepeople or by the collective. Generally, land in urban areas shall be owned by the whole people while land in rural and suburban areas be owned by collectives except for some particular lands that need to be owned by the whole people in accordance with the law. Ownership by the whole people, namely by the state, is exercised by the State Council on behalf of the State. Collectively-owned land, in accordance with the law may belong to different levels of farmer collective---namely the village, the hamlet and the farmer group, shall be managed by the collective economic organization or by the villager committee.2. Land use control. The state is responsible for comprehensive land use planning, regulating land usesbased on the classification as agricultural land, construction land and unused land. Conversion of agricultural land to construction land is to be stringently restrained in order to control the total amount of construction land and consequently protect valuable farmland.3. Contracted land use in rural area. The term of contract for land-under-cultivation is legally prescribedas 30 years. The term of contract for grassland may range from 30 to 50 years. The term of contract for forestland may range from 30 to 70 years, and if with special purposes, the term can be prolonged upon approval by the administrative department responsible for forestry of the State Council. The ownership of lands that have been contracted out will remain under the collective. The contracted land can not be purchased or sold.4. Administration of land. The administrative department responsible for land resources of the StateCouncil is mandated to superintend national land uses, to guide land investigation, to evaluate land quality rank, and to formulate land statistic system and monitor land use situations.Second, Farmland ProtectionChina is a country with huge population and limited farmland resources. Protection of farmland has been one of its basic state policies to promote sustainable development. The Land Administration Law stipulated legal requirements for compensation for farmland occupied, protection of basic farmland and encouragement of land reclamation etc.1. Compensation for farmland occupied. Those who have occupied farmland for non-agricultural useupon approval shall have to reclaim the same quantity of land with quality not below that occupied, or pay equivalent farmland reclamation fee instead as compensation. Every provincial-level government shall ensure the gross area of farmland in its jurisdiction not be in decrease over time.2. Protection of basic farmland. Provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under thecentral government shall demarcate more than 80% of their farmland area as basic farmland to be protected rigorously. The following farmlands shall be on the top list of consideration as basic farmland:z cultivated-land within the crops, cotton and food oils production zones designated by departments of the State Council or local governments above county levelz farmland with good irrigation and water-soil conservation facilities, medium-and-low productivity farmland that is being under improvement projects or is improvablez Vegetable production basesz Experimental fields for agricultural researches and educationz And other farmlands that shall be designated as basic farmland according to the State Council’s decrees.3. Encouragement of land reclamation. Governments at all levels shall take encouraging measures toimprove farmlands of medium-and-low productivity, consolidate and reclaim idle and deserted lands. Third, Land use rights with regard to its acquisition and approval1. Authorities to approve land use for construction purposes. Use of agricultural land for constructionpurpose shall go through the review and approval formalities on agricultural-land-use-conversion.The construction projects filed by the State Council or provincial localities shall apply to the State Council for agricultural-land-use-conversion approval. Expropriation of basic farmland, non-basic farmland exceeding 35 hectares, and other land exceeding 70 hectares, shall also be subject to the approval of the State Council.2. Expropriation and requisition of land. For the public interests, the state may requisition orexpropriate collective farmland according to law and make compensations. Compensation fee for the cultivated-land expropriated includes compensation for ownership, subsidy for resettlement, as well as compensation for aboveground attachments and sapling crops. The compensation for land-ownership shall be in the range of 6 to 10 times of the average annual output value produced from the said cultivated-land in the past three years prior to expropriation. The subsidy for each need-to-be-resettled agricultural person shall be 4 to 6 times of that value. The compensation benchmark for aboveground attachments and sapling crops is delegated to provincial localities jurisdiction.3. Merchandised use of the state-owned land. In China, land ownership is not transferable, while theland use right can be assigned and transferred according to law. The land use right can be offered to land users in way of merchandised-use or gratis-allocation, and ways for merchandised-use of state-owned land can be further divided as land use right assignment, land use right leasing, and land use right monetized as investment or equities. Any corporation or person who obtained the right to use state-owned land by way of merchandised-use such as assignment shall pay charges like assignment fee to the state. Moreover, the scope of land can be gratis-allocated is restricted.4. Assignment of the state-owned land use right by means of bid tendering, auctioning and listing. Allland use right for profit-purpose development such as commercial, tourism, entertainment and residential etc. shall be assigned by either mean of bid tendering, auction or listing.IV. History of land administrationLand administration refers to activities that governments and their land administrative departments take to administer behaviors of organizations and individuals in terms of land tenure, land use and land utilization according to the law and legal powers they are authorized.Land administration activities can be categorized as land resource management and land propertyadministration. Land resource managements are centered on land utilization and rely on effective cadastre administration, which includes cadastral investigation, statistic, land rank rating, title registration and archiving. Land utilization management mainly refers to governmental control on land development, land use, land consolidation and land resource protection, relying much on means of comprehensive land use planning, annual land use quota, and land use/land market monitoring. Although great achievements have been made in land resource management since the open-policy, there are still much to do to promote scientific and normative decision-making in daily administration. Land property administration covers land tenure and land market. Land tenure administration refers to such activities as establishment and alteration of land rights, land rights security, land expropriation (e.g. alteration of land ownership) and land alienation etc. Land market administration refers to governmental superintendence and surveillance on land transaction, land price, market agencies behaviors and land revenue etc.. Land tenure administration is the base and precondition for land market administration, while the later provides information for land tenure administration.(I)Stage(1949-1985): Land administration authority scattered, Land administration disordered and responsibilities undistinguishableSince 1949 until 1952 during which newly-founded China endeavored to revive its economy, the state built up new system for land taxation and urban real estate registration. The major work of land administration that time was to provide services for the land reform campaign, including land tenure confirmation, demarcation, issuance of certificates, intercession of land disputes, real estate (lands and houses) registration and certificate issuance in urban area, determination of jurisdiction border above county level and so on. Retrospectively, the land administration at that time focused too much on cadastre work and paid little attention to land utilization, conservation etc.In time from 1953 to 1957, the country centered on socialist reconstruction, and the land use regime began to convert from market-oriented to directive-oriented. Through campaign for agricultural cooperation and socializing the capitalist business and industry, individual economy and urban proprietory real estates, the land tenure system transformed from private-ownership-dominated to public-ownership-dominated, namely collective ownership and state ownership. Concomitantly, the previous single-organ administrative model in land registration and certificate issuance was replaced by a multi-organ model with land administrative authorities scattered over different departments.The period of 1958 to1978 was a period that China explored a socialist country with planned economy. As a consequence, its land administration regime followed directive-allocation model. After the nationalization, land or rights on it can not act as commodity any more, and transactions of land are forbidden legally. Lands have to be allocated and utilized according to various plans. Land abuse and waste was quite common at that time.From 1979 to 1985, China started its open policy and the great course of reform, with more and more efforts shifted from political and ideological fields to economic construction and socialist modernization. Since then, governmental organs came back on their normal tracks. Improving land administration appeared imperative. Significant actions taken at that time included controlling construction’s encroachments on the farmland, protecting arable land resources and starting to adopt spatial planning and land consolidation and reclamation planning.From the year 1950 the Land Reform Law enacted, to 1986 Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China promulgated, land administration in china mainly focused on managing land tenure and land utilization, and achieved great progresses in formulating and implementing a series of laws,ordinances and regulations. Nevertheless, generally speaking, land administration during this period had been in a state of department-based segmentation. This situation got even worse in the 10-year disturbance, during which land administration was fully deserted and left passive impacts on the work afterwards.(II)Stage(1986-1997): Land administration authorities centralized, the State Land Administration Bureau established and responsibilities clearly definedIn 1985, China experienced farmland shrink of 15.112 million mus (about 1. million hectares) and faced an obvious drop of its agricultural production, which wakened the government’s awareness to strengthen land administration and preserve scarce land resources particularly the arable. As a countermeasure, the state constituted and promulgated the Land Administration Law in 1986 and in the mean time instituted the State Land Administration Bureau.On March 21st, 1986, the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the State Council jointly pronounced the policy “to highly cherish and properly harness every inch of land and effectively preserve farmlands” in their official circular---Notice on Strengthening Land Administration and Curbing Misuse or Abuse of Farmland, and from on farmland protection has been one of basic state policies. The Notice also ordained to establish the State Land Administration Bureau to administer nationwide comprehensive land use planning, to take economic measures to control the fast growing non-agricultural land, to regulate land taxations and other charges by differentiating land uses and land quality. On Jun 25th of the same year, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress passed and promulgated the Land Administration Law, which remedied the institutional shortcomings such as scattered authorities and repaired legal gaps, bringing the land administration back to rule-of-law. In the same year, the State Land Administration Bureau was born as an affiliate directly under the State Council and the highest superintendent organ to manage nationwide land resources and administer urban/rural land. Since then, land administration in China move forward in direction of comprehensiveness, unity, scientific and rule of law. In the 1994 government downsizing, the State Council restated that the missions of the State Land Administration Bureau is to superintend nationwide land resources management and urban/rural land administration, plus some new duties added in order to deepen institutional reform. By the end of 1994, the land administration system in China has grown up to 200,000 staffs.As the reform and open policy moved forward, the pressure for land resources to be market-allocated got up. Some localities were authorized to experiment radical or even prohibited practices according to the laws incumbent at that time. In November 1987, upon consent from the State Council, trial reform on land use right was conducted in Shenzhen, Shanghai, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Xiamen and Fuzhou. In December 1st of that year, Shenzhen municipality pioneered the first auction of land use right since the PRC founded. Policymakers made a prompt response to successful trials. On April 12th, 1988, the 1st session of the 7th national people’s congress passed amendments to the Constitution. The clause “The right to use land may be transferred according to law” was stated in the amendment. And then the Land Administration Law was revised accordingly at the end of the year. In 1988, the State Council issued the Ordinance on Urban Land Use Tax was, by which land use fees transformed to land taxes and were levied upon nationwide urban lands, ending up the history of using the state-owned land free of charge. In 1990, the State Council issued the interim ordinance on assignment and transfer of state-owned land and the interim regulation for the foreign-invested development and management of tracts of land, which further detailed the merchandised-use regime of state-owned land and enhanced operability of the related laws.Farmland protection maintained to be the focus of land administration reform after the merchandised-useregime of state-owned was entrenched. In February 1992, China established the protection system for basic farmlands all over the country. On August 18th, 1994, the State Council issued Ordinance on Basic Farmland Protection. The implementation of the ordinance through the country preliminarily turned over the passive situation in farmland protection. In July 1994, the Law on Urban Real Estate Administration was passed and stated that, except for the land qualified for gratis-allocated uses, all state-owned land have to be covered by the merchandised and termed use regime. This pronounced the death of the 30-year monopoly by directive land allocation.In recent years, land administration departments strengthened their self-capacity building as well as land administering and tremendously contributed to comprehensive open/reform and sustainable development.(III)Stage(1998-2003), Land use control entrenched, the Ministry of Land & Resources set upIn the 1998 organizational reform of the central government, based on the former Land Administration Bureau and the Ministry for Geology and Minerals, the Ministry of Land and Resources was instituted with aims to integrate land resource administration with mineral/marine resource administration and therefore to realize the transition from onefold administration to comprehensive and integrated resource administration. On August 29th of the same year, the 4th session of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People’s Congress adopted revisions on the Land Administration Law. The Article III of the revised law clearly stated that, “ to highly cherish and properly harness every inch of land and effectively preserve farmlands” is one of the basic state policies of China. Governments at all levels shall take measures, plan comprehensively, tighten administration, exploit and preserve land resources, and curb illegal land uses”. The policy statement indicated that China had stepped into a new era.The revision of the Land Administration Law was an important milestone in the history of land administration in China. It made a revolutionary reform on the former hierarchical quota-based approval system and established a new land-use-control system centered on preserving farmland, controlling flux of farmland into constructions and restraining the gross of construction land. Meanwhile, the system is equipped with provisions for detailed legal enforcements like supervision and inspection etc., clear legal responsibilities, and tougher options on violations against the land law. The revised Land Administration Law entrenched policy instruments such as land use control, farmland occupation compensation balance, basic farmland protection etc, providing a powerful legal weapon for China to curb its sharp shrink of farmland and severe loss of state-owned land assets, and thereby strongly supported the “soft landing” of its overheated economy.After revising the Land Administration Law, China further reformed its land administration regime. In May 2001, the State Council issued the Notice regarding Strengthening Management of State-owned Land Assets, calling for strict rules and abidance to the merchandised-use of state-owned land, extending means of bids-tendering, caution and listing in conceding state-owned land usufruct and normalizing behaviors of governmental organizations. In 2002, the Ministry of Land and Resources issued the Regulations on the Assignment of State-owned Land Use Right by Bids-Tendering, Auction or Listing, further ameliorated the state-owned land use right regime.During the period from 1998 to 2003, China had basically established a new administrative system on land resources adaptive to the developing socialist market economy, which had evolved from the former onefold to the integrated system with market orientation.(IV)Stage(2004-present), land administrative structure reorganized under the provincial level, land administration commissioned to participate in the intervention of the macro-economic。

相关文档
最新文档