市场主流备份软件对比表
几种系统备份工具对比分析
几种系统备份工具对比分析第一节、概述最近由于工作需要对在linux系统下的备份工具进行了一些研究，初步选定以下三个工具。
这三个工具都有免费版本，并且操作简单支持多种操作系统，制作备份方便易用，下面分别进行说明。
第二节、Amanda Network Backup Amanda是高级马里兰自动网络磁盘归档 Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver网络备份软件的简称，是一个开源的服务器备份解决方案提供商。
Amanda Network backupOracle、MySQL、MSSQL等数据库备份任务；备份方式可以选择全量和增量；备份的介质可以选择磁带、本地磁盘或者基于NFS写的共享磁盘，是一个比较完善的备份解决方案。
Amanda分为两个版本Community 和Amanda Enterprise，即Community 的社区版和Enterprise企业版。
社区版是免费的，企业版收费。
从下图可以看到Amanda的功能非常强大。
以下是社区版和企业版功能对比图表：目前Amanda的最新稳定版本是3.3.6，支持云备份的是Zmanda版本。
版权信息：免费、收费。
平台：windows,linux,unix,mac第三节、G4L –Ghost for linuxG4L是Ghost for Linux的简称，是一个开源的备份软件。
Ghost是windows 系统下最好用的克隆工具，而G4L恰恰是Linux系统下最好用的克隆工具，支持分区、整盘、目录，且同样支持网络克隆功能。
下图是G4L的启动画面，需要说明的是G4L在sourceforge上面下载后是一个ISO文件，需要将这个ISO制作为启动光盘后作为启动盘进行操作。
版权信息：免费。
平台：linux第四节、Partition Image该软件易用性比G4L好一些，全图形界面，带向导。
采用它备份一台安装好的Linux系统，再将映象恢复到其他有着相同硬件配置的电脑上，则可以快速克隆一套一模一样的Linux系统。
主流备份软件功能对比表
主流备份软件对比表
时和业界绝大多数的软、硬件厂商有良好的合作伙伴关系。
软件必须全面支持主流的操作系统，数据库，磁带库，磁盘阵列，NAS引擎，光纤交换机等
要求在国内外的相似环境中有成熟的成功案例。
的管理手段，在应用系统不同的级别上支持集中、分布等各种灵活的管理方式。
各种业界领先的备份技术自动的、在线的完成数据备份任务。
同时，从数据安全的重要性出发，采用的技术不
为了恢复，要求备份软件能够在各种极端条件下保证数据恢复的成功，恢复的过程要简单、迅速，保证系统管理人员用最简单的手段，在规定的时间之内迅速、完全
口要求，同时能够应对系统未来的数据量膨胀。
有数据。
要求备份软件具备容灾功能，对于备份数据、磁带介质、备份设备能够进行容灾管理，在灾难发生之后能够准。
数据无价！7款文件同步备份软件推荐
数据无价！7款文件同步备份软件推荐说到数据备份有些人会选择各种网盘服务，主要也比较方便，但是也存在一定的风险，例如数据泄漏、网盘服务关停、甚至你的某些文件会被网盘判定违规不让你下载回来本地了。
在之前锋哥不少资料放在金山网盘，后来宣布关停，文件还没来得及下载回来，最后丢失了不少。
所以现在比较谨慎的用户都会考虑本地备份、NAS、私有云等，所以今天就给大家分享几款文件自动同步备份的软件。
GoodSync这款「GoodSync」是锋哥目前在用的数据同步备份软件，主要用它来自动备份电脑上一些重要的文件到移动硬盘/ 网络共享盘。
支持 '单项备份' 和 '双向同步' 以及多种规则模式。
软件支持多种同步方式，设置不同的触发同步方案，如检测文件夹、定期时间、系统注销时等等，以及高级设置功能，如同步复制后的操作、遇到同名文件的处理操作、同步加密、旧数据保留设定、NTFS压缩等，比较文件大小与修改时间、自己根据情况设置了。
另外它除了支持本地硬盘同步外，还支持MTP、谷歌网盘、OneDrive、Dropbox网盘、亚马逊服务器、微软服务器、FTP 等等同步。
总的来说「GoodSync」各种同步设置方案非常灵活，不过这款软件是需要付费的，没记错的话，这个软件每年都会有一次限免活动，大概在7 月份样子，感兴趣的到时候记得留意噢，当然你也考虑购买正版。
•官方下载：•https:///download/GoodSync-v11-Setup.exe•官方网站：•https://•相关文章：•使用「GoodSync」自动同步备份资料到「OneDrive」网盘FreeFileSync如果你不想购买付费的软件那么「FreeFileSync」可以说是「GoodSync」的免费代替品了，并且跨平台支持，拥有Windows、macOS、Linux 客户端。
同步模式支持同步、镜像、更新、自定义四种模式，这里根据自己的情况来选择了。
NetBackup产品优势及对比
赛门铁克NetBackup产品优势及对比（对比业内前5名备份软件包括：NetBackup、IBM TSM、HP DP、EMC Networker、CV）Symantec是全球第一大专业备份软件、存储软件和安全软件公司，也是全球第三大独立软件厂商。
在中国， 90%以上的金融机构采用NetBackup来构建其数据备份保护平台。
行业也拥有大量的用户。
Netbackup备份软件连续9向，为客户提高优质的数据保护服务。
强大的客户群充分验证了不同IT架构的技术特征，在备份系统的安全性、先进性、扩展性方面和开放性方面具有不可比拟的中国移动信息系统： 总部和其它27个省数据中心全部使用NetBackup 。
实施是由Symantec 和合作伙伴共同完成的。
中国移动还和Symantec 签订了全国32省的ERP 系统异地容灾合同，由Symantec 主导实施完成，目前成为国内最大规模的容灾项目。
中国新联通&中国电信：超过80%的省数据中心采用NetBackup 及Storage Foundation 保护数据。
中国工商银行：2008年与Symantec 签订了整个银行的数据备份合同，替代了使用4年之久的CA 备份方案。
实施覆盖工行南北数据中心、研究院、全国所有省分行数据中心，以及所有控股单位。
NetBackup 项目被工行领导称赞为多年来最好的项目。
中国建设银行：2008年与Symantec 签订了整个银行的数据备份合同，实施覆盖建行全国所有省分行数据中心、研究院、以及所有控股单位。
并逐步在南北数据中心替换使用了多年的EMC/Legato 。
中行、农行：总部数据中心和所有分行核心业务系统 中国平安、中国太保：全部业务系统 90%的中型商业银行全行业务系统铁道部：2009年与Symantec 签订了数据中心的数据备份合同，所有的火车运输调度、客服服务、货票管理等核心业务系统都采用NetBackup 实施数据保护，替换了原先使用的EMC/Legato 和IBM/Tivoli 。
服务器备份和恢复工具推荐保障数据安全
服务器备份和恢复工具推荐保障数据安全在如今信息化程度越来越高的社会环境下，数据的安全性成为了企业和个人用户非常关注的问题。
对于使用服务器存储大量数据的用户来说，服务器备份和恢复工具的选择尤其重要，因为这关系着数据的安全和可靠性。
在本文中，我将向大家推荐几款备份和恢复工具，帮助大家保护数据安全。
一、RsyncRsync是一种常见且广泛应用的备份工具，它具备快速和有效地传输文件的能力。
Rsync可通过增量备份的方式，只传输文件中发生了变化的部分，这样可以大幅度减少备份所需的时间和带宽消耗。
凭借着其高效可靠的特性，Rsync已成为了许多企业和个人用户的首选备份工具。
二、BaculaBacula是一种功能强大的开源备份和恢复工具，广泛应用于服务器备份领域。
Bacula提供了完整的备份方案，包括备份任务的调度、存储管理以及恢复功能。
该工具可以实现多台服务器之间的备份互通，同时也支持对备份数据进行加密，保证备份文件的安全性。
Bacula的灵活性和可扩展性使其成为了备份和恢复工具的佼佼者。
三、DuplicatiDuplicati是一种功能强大且易于使用的云备份工具，它提供了对各种云存储服务的支持，包括Google Drive、OneDrive、Dropbox等。
Duplicati可以对服务器上的数据进行自动备份，并进行高强度加密保护。
此外，Duplicati还支持增量备份和文件版本管理功能，方便用户进行数据恢复和文件比对。
四、Acronis True ImageAcronis True Image是一种功能全面的备份和恢复工具，适用于服务器和个人用户。
该工具支持完整备份和增量备份，并提供了快速的数据恢复功能。
Acronis True Image还内置了强大的磁盘克隆功能，可以帮助用户快速迁移或恢复整个服务器系统，极大地简化了数据迁移和恢复的流程。
五、BackblazeBackblaze是一种云备份工具，专为个人用户和小型企业设计。
6款Windows平台免费备份工具比较
6款Windows平台免费备份工具比较Windows内建备份工具提供了基本的备份机制，但也有许多不足。
若欲取得更完整的功能，一些免费的备份工具软件可作为Windows基本备份工具外的另一种选择。
自Windows NT以来，微软便在操作系统中内建一套由Veritas 提供的NTBackup备份工具程序。
长期以来，Windows都是以这套程序作为内建备份工具。
NTBackup 实际上是Symantec著名的备份软件Veritas Backup Exec早期版本的精简版，就备份/还原操作来看，NTBackup功能算是非常中规中矩，拥有图形化、精灵引导的接口，提供基本的完整、差异与增量备份方式，也有日历式排程功能，以及日志报告、筛选档案类型与备份后确认等附加功能选项。
这样的功能对大多数个人用户已经相当足够，但对于有更高的信息安全与管理机制要求的用户，NTBackup就无法适用，如缺乏加密与远程状态通知等管理功能。
另外在备份操作上，由于NTBackup只能将数据备份到磁带，或是转成.bkf格式的备份文件储存在磁盘，用户必须透过NTBackup的还原功能才能取回数据，这虽然是正规程序，但对讲求作业灵活性的用户来说，仍有许多不便。
而到了Vista以后，情况开始有了改变。
微软在Vista的Business 与Ultimate版内建称为 Windows Backup and Restore Center的备份功能，可提供个别档案备份与磁盘映像类型的整机备份，操作便利性有所改善，支持的储存媒体也更多。
而在稍后推出的Windows Server 2008上，则提供一个称为「Windows Server Backup」的备份工具，采用扇区阴影复制服务（Volume Shadow Copy Service，VSS）作为备份机制，除了更快的备份速度与改良的接口外，还可利用snap-in让使用者切换到其它计算机上执行备份。
虽然Windows Server Backup较NTBackup有所进步，但一些老问题依旧存在，如缺乏加密、远程状态通知机制，以及只能透过还原程序取回数据等，另外还带来一些新问题。
系统备份软件大比拼
系统备份软件大比拼在如今数字化时代，我们依赖计算机系统来存储和管理大量的数据。
然而，系统故障、病毒攻击或者其他不可预测的问题都可能导致数据的丢失。
为了保护数据的安全性和完整性，系统备份软件成为了一个重要的选择。
然而，市面上有各种各样的系统备份软件，它们的功能、性能和易用性各不相同。
在这篇文章中，我们将对几款备受赞誉的系统备份软件进行比较，并评估它们的优劣。
1. 软件A软件A是一款备受好评的系统备份软件。
它具有直观的用户界面，使得即使对于没有太多计算机知识的用户来说也能轻松上手。
软件A提供了全盘备份和增量备份的功能，用户可以根据自己的需求选择备份方式。
此外，软件A还支持自动备份计划，可以按照预定的时间自动执行备份任务，确保数据的安全性。
2. 软件B与软件A相比，软件B在功能上更为强大。
它不仅支持全盘备份和增量备份，还提供了分区备份和文件备份的选项。
分区备份可以只备份系统所在的区域，而文件备份可以选择性地备份特定的文件和文件夹。
此外，软件B还具有快速恢复的功能，可以在系统崩溃后将备份的数据快速还原，节省了用户的宝贵时间。
3. 软件C软件C是一款功能强大且灵活多样的系统备份软件。
它提供了全盘备份、增量备份、差异备份等多种备份选项，用户可以根据数据的大小和变化情况选择合适的备份方式。
此外，软件C还支持网络备份，用户可以将数据备份到云存储或远程服务器上，确保数据的安全性和可靠性。
4. 软件D软件D在备份速度和效果方面表现出色。
它采用了增量备份和差异备份的技术，可以快速识别和备份仅发生变化的数据，大大缩短了备份时间。
此外，软件D还提供了备份日志功能，用户可以随时查看备份记录，确保备份任务的执行情况。
综合比较以上几款系统备份软件，每一款都有其独特的优势和适用场景。
根据个人的需求和偏好，我们可以选择最适合自己的软件来保护数据的安全性和完整性。
无论是简单易用的软件A，还是功能强大的软件B、C，亦或是备份速度惊人的软件D，它们都为我们提供了宝贵的保护和安全性，确保我们的数据不会因为意外事件而永远丢失。
备份软件对比
The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Backup And Recovery Software, Q2 2013by Rachel A. Dines, June 28, 2013For: Infrastructure & Operations ProfessionalsKey TaKeawaysPlagued By age-Old Backup and Recovery Problems, Firms Look To UpgradeThe enterprise backup and recovery software market is, as ever, in a state of flux as more and more I&O professionals grow tired of traditional backup methods. From missed backup windows to slow or failed recoveries, many firms are weary of the constant battle with their backup software and are looking for a change.Backup Isn’t Just about Backup anymore – It’s about Improved ResiliencyToday’s backup and recovery software suites are evolving beyond simple backup and restore. Today, many of the differentiating capabilities are focused on continuity, restore, replication, and automation, allowing I&O pros to integrate their backup suites into their business technology resiliency strategies in new ways.Cloud, Continuity, and app Integration are The Key DifferentiatorsAs organizations move from tape, to disk, to cloud technologies, and begin focusing on resiliency not recovery, they will require a new breed of backup and recoverysuites. Differentiating features include advanced application and hypervisor awareness; improved backup target integrations; and more recovery and continuity features.© 2013, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Information is based on best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester ®, T echnographics ®, Forrester Wave, RoleView, T echRadar , For InFrastructure & operatIons proFessIonals why ReaD ThIs RePORTIn Forrester’s 61-criteria evaluation of enterprise backup and recovery software vendors, we identified the six most significant software providers — ASG, CommVault, EMC, HP , IBM, and Symantec — in the category and researched, analyzed, and scored them. This report details our findings about how well each vendor fulfills our criteria and where they stand in relation to each other to help infrastructure and operations (I&O) professionals select the right partner for their backup and recovery software suites.t able of contentsenterprises Continue T o struggle with Basic Backup Challengesenterprise Backup and Recovery software evaluation OverviewFour Leaders emerge In The Backup and Recovery software spaceVendor Profiles: asG, CommVault, eMC, hP , IBM, and symantec supplemental Materialnotes & resourcesForrester conducted product evaluations in March 2013 and interviewed 16 usercompanies and six vendor companies: asG, commVault, eMc, Hp , IBM, and symantec.related research DocumentsMaster the eight Disruptors that Willtransform Business technology resiliency In 2013February 15, 2013Market overview: Disk libraries, Q1 2012January 17, 2012Market overview: enterprise-class Backup and recovery software november 19, 2010The Forrester wave™: enterprise Backup and Recovery software, Q2 2013the six providers that Matter Most and How they stack upby rachel a. Dineswith stephanie Balaouras and Jessica McKee23479June 28, 2013enTeRPRIses COnTInUe TO sTRUGGLe wITh BasIC BaCKUP ChaLLenGes Many organizations view backup as one of the necessary evils of running IT — something that wemust do, even if it is painful, slow, and expensive, and seems to provide zero strategic business value. As a result, many I&O professionals let their backup and recovery software suites languish — either using out-of-date versions or letting maintenance run out. Worse, some I&O pros are giving upon backing up certain systems in a last-ditch effort to improve backup windows. While the latest and greatest technology isn’t the answer to every problem, today’s backup and recovery suites are evolving to solve many of these challenges and more.Today’s Backup and Recovery suites Offer More Than Operational Backup and RestoreThe backup and recovery suites we evaluated in this Forrester Wave evaluation strive to add value beyond simple operational backup and restore. While the future of backup software is still in flux, Forrester believes that it will involve more continuity and resiliency tools, additional endpoint functionality, and cloud-optimized infrastructures. Look for key differentiators in the market, including:■ Application and hypervisor awareness. The ability to back up key applications nondisruptively and then quickly restore the entire system or just individual objects is an area where existing backup solutions are still evolving. All of the evaluated vendors in this Forrester Waveevaluation have some application expertise, but most still require agents or multiple backups to achieve granular restore. Similarly, in the hypervisor arena, most vendors have strongcapabilities in the VMware suite, but they lack support for other hypervisors.■ Advanced backup target integrations. All of the evaluated solutions have the ability to target virtually any disk or tape target, but the ability to use the cloud as a backup target is an emerging feature. With interest and adoption of disk-to-disk-to-cloud (D2D2C) backup architectures starting to take off — 26% of enterprises have already adopted, with another 16% looking to adopt — this could be a significant differentiator in your decision-making process.1 Additionally, backup accelerators, which allow for more efficient backups with greater integration between hardware and software, are increasing in popularity.■ Continuity and recovery features. As backup strategies become tightly integrated into your business technology resiliency strategy, the advanced continuity and recovery features in backup solutions become more important. Today’s backup solutions offer capabilities such as the ability to boot virtual machines (VMs) directly out of a backup store or the ability to call array-based snapshots, which are then stored in native formats for quick recovery. These are in addition to host-based replication and continuous data protection capabilities that started appearing in backup software suites during the past five years.acquisitions and Megavendors shape The Backup software LandscapeMost of the IT giants have offerings in the backup software market — although integration with hardware offerings in the same space is still lacking. Beyond the megavendors (EMC, HP, IBM), there are also several independent software vendors that provide strong offerings in this space (ASG, CommVault, Symantec). Many of the vendors in this evaluation have made significant acquisitions in recent years to develop their backup and recovery capabilities: ASG (Atempo), EMC (Avamar), IBM (FilesX), and Symantec (DataCenter Technologies), to name a few. What we see today is a consolidated market with a half-dozen vendors providing solutions in the enterprise data center space, although many of the evaluated providers suffer from fragmented or loosely integrated software suites.enTeRPRIse BaCKUP anD ReCOVeRy sOFTwaRe eVaLUaTIOn OVeRVIewTo assess the state of the enterprise backup and recovery software market and see how the vendors stack up against each other, Forrester evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of top vendors.Criteria Focus On Key Features, Vision, ability T o execute and Global PresenceAfter examining past research, user need assessments, and vendor and expert interviews, we developed a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria. We evaluated vendors against 61 criteria, which we grouped into three high-level buckets:■ Current offering. We evaluated the current offering of the participating vendors by looking at their capabilities in the arenas of data reduction, primary deduplication, ability to support different backup targets from tape to cloud, advanced backup, restore and continuity capabilities, heterogeneous platform support, security and error-checking capabilities, manageability, and scalability. Forrester evaluated only software capabilities, regardless of whether the vendorprovides a hardware platform.■ Strategy. The strategy scores are based on the company’s vision for backup and recovery andits plans for product improvements. In addition, Forrester looked at R&D investments in theindividual products, strategic partnerships, and customer satisfaction (based on customer surveys).■ Market presence. To measure market presence, Forrester looked at the installed base, total company revenue and revenue growth, go-to-market partnerships, global customer service coverage,professional services and consulting capabilities, sales staff, and global geographic presence.Vendors have a scalable server Backup suite with Broad Platform support Forrester included six vendors in the assessment: ASG, CommVault, EMC, HP, IBM, and Symantec.Each of these vendors has (see Figure 1):■ An enterprise backup software solution designed for data center backups. In this evaluation, Forrester only looked at the software components of vendors’ offerings. Solutions that focused only on enterprise remote offices, branch offices, or endpoints were not considered in this report.■ Proven scale for the large enterprise. Vendors included in this evaluation must have more than 100 current customers with more than 1 petabyte (PB) of backup data under management and at least one customer with more than 10 PB of backup data under management.■ Heterogeneous platform support. The product must support backups of all major versions of Windows, Unix, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V, and Citrix Systems.Figure 1 Evaluated Vendors: Product Information And Selection CriteriaSource: Forrester Research, Inc.FOUR LeaDeRs eMeRGe In The BaCKUP anD ReCOVeRy sOFTwaRe sPaCe The evaluation uncovered a market in which there are several Leaders, which is unsurprising in arelatively mature market segment (see Figure 2):■ CommVault, EMC, IBM, and Symantec lead the pack. It’s a tight four-horse race for thetop honors — CommVault, EMC, IBM, and Symantec all scored high on strategy and current offerings. However, each of these solutions is very different and each presents its own set of strengths and weaknesses. CommVault touts its simplicity and unified platform, while EMC has strong integration with its hardware portfolio. IBM excels in extremely large and complex environments, and Symantec focuses on data and cost reduction.■ HP offers a competitive alternative. HP trails just behind the lead pack with Data Protector,a solid solution that just hasn’t seen the focus or investment that it deserves. Under newmanagement and with a renewed focus on the customer, HP could catch up in the near future.■ ASG needs to play catch-up. ASG is brand new to the backup market and it shows — thecompany is still working to position ASG-Time Navigator in its greater portfolio. While Atempo has had solutions in the market since 1992, lack of investment in developing the product during the past several years has resulted in several key features missing in the solution set.This evaluation of the enterprise backup and recovery software market is intended to be a starting point only. We encourage clients to view detailed product evaluations and adapt criteria weightings to fit their individual needs through the Forrester Wave Excel-based vendor comparison tool.Figure 2 Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Backup And Recovery Software, Q2 ’13Source: Forrester Research, Inc.RiskyStrong StrategyWeakStrongWeakStrongFigure 2 Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Backup And Recovery Software, Q2 ’13 (Cont.)Source: Forrester Research, Inc.A S GF o r r e s t e r ’s W e i g h t i n gC o m m V a u l tE M CH PI B MS y m a n t e c All scores are based on a scale of 0 (weak) to 5 (strong).VenDOR PROFILes: asG, COMMVaUL T , eMC, hP , IBM, anD syManTeC Leaders: CommVault, eMC, symantec, and IBM Vie For T op honors■ CommVault excels with an integrated platform. CommVault’s primary strategy centerson providing a single platform for backup, recovery, continuity, archive, and other data management and protection strategies. The 17-year-old company uses its relative youth toits advantage, touting a modern approach to data protection. CommVault scored high in the current offering section and is in a virtual tie for top honors with competitor EMC. Areas of strength for CommVault include its deduplication capabilities and cloud-target integrations, as well as hypervisor and application capabilities. The company also received high marks in the professional services and consulting area, which is a newly expanded offering for CommVault. While its market share is still considerably smaller than the other giants in the Leaders category, CommVault continues to see rapid growth, nearly doubling its customer base during the past four years.■ EMC focuses on hardware and software integration. The storage giant focuses its backup software strategy on storage protection across many different silos, architectures, and applications. While the EMC Backup Portfolio is actually composed of four fairly independent products — NetWorker, Avamar, Data Protection Advisor, and Data Domain — the company now licenses the three software solutions together in a capacity-based bundle and has an objective of eliminating backup silos. There is still additional work ahead for EMC to integrate these solutions in a tighter fashion. EMC scored high in deduplication capabilities, platform support, and scalability. It also leads the pack in the strategy section, where it scored very high in corporate and product strategy and R&D investment.■ Symantec reinvents itself and refines focus. Symantec’s focus is on backup transformation and allowing its customers to spend less time, money, and resources on the backup process. Thus, it is focusing investments on improved management and self-service, automation, and application integration. While the software vendor has hit some road bumps as a corporate entity, if the organization can execute on its vision, the new “Symantec 4.0” holds promise for the backup and recovery division. In this evaluation, Symantec scored high in the platform support categories, which is consistent with its strategy, as well as continuity and restore features and R&D investment. Despite Symantec being primarily a software company, NetBackup boasts some of the most robust hardware integrations, including the ability to control snapshots and replication on the primary storage and the support of several different backup accelerators.■ IBM simplifies management, focuses on cloud. IBM’s strategy in the backup and recovery space is to bring scalable, high-quality, and simple products to market in order to store, analyze, and protect data. Recently, the company has also placed increased focus on cloud — both providing capabilities for cloud service providers to use its platform for service offerings and integrating with cloud storage. One continued weakness for IBM is its lack of integrationwith its hardware and services portfolio. While the company has made some improvements during the past few years, there is still a significant gap between the lines of business. It has, however, successfully integrated the FastBack and Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) capabilities into a unified offering. IBM scored well in its current offering, with strengths in deduplication, manageability (due to significant improvements in TSM Operations Center), continuity, and restore features.strong Performers: hP Trails Close Behind The Leader Group■ HP aims to provide analytics from its backup platform. Now under the HP Autonomydivision’s management, HP’s backup and recovery group focuses on reducing data footprints, gaining analytics from backup data, and converging multiple platforms. In the coming year, it will focus on converging and integrating multiple assets throughout the Autonomy andlegacy Iron Mountain Digital portfolio in server backup, endpoint backup, and archive using Autonomy Intelligent Data Operating Layer (IDOL) as a backbone. Like Symantec, HP has recently seen some tumultuous times, but it appears to be heading in the right direction witha focus on transparency, customer satisfaction, and delivering “HP on HP.” While HP felljust short of the Leaders group, it scored well in platform support and scalability, with strong hypervisor and application capabilities (although it was unable to demonstrate all of theseadvanced capabilities during its product demo).Contenders: asG works T o Integrate The acquisition Of atempo■ ASG integrates acquisition and focuses on IT service continuity management. ASG’s focus is in the world of IT service management (ITSM), which may be why some industry veterans were surprised to see it acquire a backup and recovery software company. To ASG, however, Atempo fills a key portion of the ITSM life cycle: IT service continuity management and availability management. With the acquisition of Atempo now more than a year old, ASG has worked hard to bring the company into the fold, and it’s made significant progress. ASG integrated Atempo organizationally, and it has also taken steps to integrate existing ASG products like ASG-TrackBird and Enterprise Automation Management Suite into ASG-Live Navigator. While ASG is missing many of the advanced backup and data reduction capabilities of its competitors, it scored well in platform support and aspects of scalability. And while ASG’s market share is quite small compared with most of the other vendors in this Forrester Wave evaluation, it has many large implementations and has a healthy investment in R&D for its products.sUPPLeMenTaL MaTeRIaLOnline ResourceThe online version of Figure 2 is an Excel-based vendor comparison tool that provides detailed product evaluations and customizable rankings.Data sources Used In This Forrester waveForrester used a combination of three data sources to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each solution:For InFrastructure & operatIons proFessIonalsthe Forrester Wave™: enterprise Backup and recovery software, Q2 201310© 2013, Forrester Research, Inc. Reproduction Prohibited June 28, 2013■ Vendor surveys. Forrester surveyed vendors on their capabilities as they relate to the evaluation criteria. Once we analyzed the completed vendor surveys, we conducted vendor calls where necessary to gather details of vendor qualifications.■ Product demos. We asked vendors to conduct demonstrations of their product’s functionality. We used findings from these product demos to validate details of each vendor’s product capabilities.■ Customer reference surveys. To validate product and vendor qualifications, Forrester also conducted online surveys with at least two of each vendor’s current customers.The Forrester wave MethodologyWe conduct primary research to develop a list of vendors that meet our criteria to be evaluated in this market. From that initial pool of vendors, we then narrow our final list. We choose these vendors based on: 1) product fit; 2) customer success; and 3) Forrester client demand. We eliminate vendors that have limited customer references and products that don’t fit the scope of our evaluation.After examining past research, user need assessments, and vendor and expert interviews, we develop the initial evaluation criteria. To evaluate the vendors and their products against our set of criteria, we gather details of product qualifications through a combination of lab evaluations, questionnaires, demos, and/or discussions with client references. We send evaluations to the vendors for their review, and we adjust the evaluations to provide the most accurate view of vendor offerings and strategies.We set default weightings to reflect our analysis of the needs of large user companies — and/or other scenarios as outlined in the Forrester Wave document — and then score the vendors based on a clearly defined scale. These default weightings are intended only as a starting point, and we encourage readers to adapt the weightings to fit their individual needs through the Excel-based tool. The final scores generate the graphical depiction of the market based on current offering, strategy, and market presence. Forrester intends to update vendor evaluations regularly as product capabilities and vendor strategies evolve.Integrity PolicyAll of Forrester’s research, including Forrester Wave evaluations, is conducted according to our Integrity Policy. For more information, go to /marketing/policies/integrity-policy.html.enDnOTes1 Source: Forrsights Hardware Survey, Q3 2012.Forrester Research, Inc. (Nasdaq: FORR) is an independent research company that provides pragmatic and forward-thinking advice to global leaders in business and technology. Forrester works with professionals in 13 key roles at major companies providing proprietary research, customer insight, consulting, events, and peer-to-peer executive programs. For more than 29 years, Forrester has been making IT, marketing, and technology industry leaders successful every day. For more information, visit . 90861«Forrester Focuses On Infrastructure & Operations ProfessionalsY ou are responsible for identifying — and justifying — which technologiesand process changes will help you transform and industrialize yourcompany’s infrastructure and create a more productive, resilient, andeffective It organization. Forrester’s subject-matter expertise anddeep understanding of your role will help you create forward-thinkingstrategies; weigh opportunity against risk; justify decisions; and optimizeyour individual, team, and corporate performance.Ian OlIver, client persona representing Infrastructure & Operations ProfessionalsAbout Forrestera global research and advisory firm, Forrester inspires leaders,informs better decisions, and helps the world’s top companies turnthe complexity of change into business advantage. our research-based insight and objective advice enable It professionals tolead more successfully within It and extend their impact beyondthe traditional It organization. tailored to your individual role, ourresources allow you to focus on important business issues —margin, speed, growth — first, technology second.fOr mOre InfOrmatIOnTo find out how Forrester Research can help you be successful every day, pleasecontact the office nearest you, or visit us at . For a complete listof worldwide locations, visit /about .ClIent suppOrtFor information on hard-copy or electronic reprints, please contact Client Supportat +1 866.367.7378, +1 617.613.5730, or clientsupport@ . We offer quantity discounts and special pricing for academic and nonprofit institutions.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
不支持MacOS作为备份服务器
不支持MacOS作为备份服务器
备份服务器仅支持Windows
备份客户端所支持的操作系统类型
所有主流的Windows、Linux、Unix、MacOS、SGI IRIX、SCO Unixware及AS400系统
否，部分功能需写脚本
否，支持写脚本
部分图形化，部分须脚本方式
备份介质图形化管理界面
是
否
否
否
否
否
否
块级重复数据删除
有
有
有
无
有
有
无
基于WEB的检索工具和搜索引擎
有
有
有
无
无
无
有
报表分析工具
完全
是
一般
一般
完全
完全
完全
性能分析工具
完全
是
一般
一般
完全
完全
是
审计工具
是
无
无
是
是
无
是
系统状态对比功能
是
否
否
否
否
否
否
镜像恢复能力
有
无
无
无
无
无
无
VM ware官方认证
是
是
是
是
是
是
是
断点续传功能
是
是
是
是
是
是
无
软件操作界面图形化管理界面
完全图形化
部分图形化界面
部分图形化界面
部分图形化界面
部分图形化界面
部分图形化界面
部分图形化
数据库及应用图形化备份管理界面
是，所有操作支持图形化方式，同时支持脚本方式
否，支持写脚本
否，支持写脚本
否，支持写脚本
VMware、Hyper-V、Citrix XEN
不支持Citrix XEN
VMware、Hyper-V、Citrix XEN
VMware、Hyper-V、Citrix XEN
对多种备份策略的支持
支持
支持
支持
支持
支持
支持
支持
基于快照的备份功能
有
有
无
无
有
有
无
时间导航恢复技术
有
无
无
无
无
无
无
不同时间点文件系统对比
存储设备支持
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
支持各种磁盘和磁带设备
虚拟机支持
VMware、Hyper-V、Citrix XEN
VMware、Hyper-V、Citrix XEN
不支持Citrix XEN
不支持Autostart、Trucluster
数据库和应用的热备份
所有主流商用数据库和应用，包括MySQL、MaxDB、PostgreSQL等数据库
不支持MaxDB、PostgreSQL等数据库
不支持MySQL、MaxDB、PostgreSQL等数据库
不支持MySQL、MaxDB、PostgreSQL等数据库
市场主流备份软件对比表
功能模块\品牌
Atempo安腾普
赛门铁克NBU
赛门铁克BE
惠普
EMC
IBM
Commvault
中文操作界面
是
是
是
目前只有英文版及汉化补丁
是
是
是
备份服务器所支持操作系统类型
支持所有主流系统Windows、Linux、Unix、MacOS作为备份服务器
不支持MacOS作为备份服务器
仅支持Windows Server系统作为备份服务器；
主流操作系统，不支持AS400系统
主流操作系统，不支持AS400系统，不支持SGI IRIX和SCO UnixWare
主流操作系统，不支持、MAC OS、AS400系统
主流操作系统，不支持AS400系统
主流操作系统，不支ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱAS400系统
主流操作系统，不支持AS400、FreeBSD、MAC OS、SGI IRIX和SCO UnixWare，
支持MSCS、HP MC Service Guard、IBM HACMP、Sun Cluster、VCS等各种群集系统，不支持Autostart
支持MSCS、HP MC Service Guard、IBM HACMP、Sun Cluster、VCS等各种群集系统
支持MSCS、HP MC Service Guard、IBM HACMP、Sun Cluster、VCS等各种群集系统，不支持Autostart
是
是
是
否
是
是
否
裸机恢复能力
是
是
是
是
是
是
否
虚拟带库功能
是，基于文件系统，可将任意本地或阵列上的存储空间变成虚拟带库
无
无
无
无
无
无
数据归档模块
自带
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
有
复制模块
自带
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
无，须额外产品
有
宏多路技术
不支MaxDB、PostgreSQL等数据库
不支持MaxDB、PostgreSQL等数据库
不支持MySQL、MaxDB、PostgreSQL等开源数据库
Oracle备份方式
图形化方式
和
RMAN方式两种
仅RMAN脚本方式
仅RMAN脚本方式
仅RMAN脚本方式
仅RMAN脚本方式
仅RMAN脚本方式
仅RMAN脚本方式
对群集系统的支持
全面支持MSCS、HP MC Service Guard、IBM HACMP、Sun Cluster、VCS、Autostart、Trucluster等各种群集系统
支持MSCS、HP MC Service Guard、IBM HACMP、Sun Cluster、VCS等群集系统
其vault只支持MSCS
模块化
模块化，限制主机型号、CPU数量
模块化
具有，独特宏多路技术，允许最大256M的数据块
普通宏多路技术
普通宏多路技术
普通宏多路技术
普通宏多路技术
普通宏多路技术
普通宏多路技术
防火墙端口要求
1个
15个以上
15个以上
1个
4个
2个
10个左右
产品许可管理
模块化，不限制CPU、不限主机型号
模块化，限制主机的型号
模块化，限制主机的型号
不限客户端数量，限制槽位、Open File备份需要单独付费