顾家北手把手教你写作范文全文-中文翻译(剑12版)

合集下载

顾家北手把手教你写作范文全文-中文翻译（剑12版）

顾家北⼿把⼿教你写作范⽂全⽂-中⽂翻译（剑12版）⽬录1. 遵守规则2英⽂全⽂22 ⽼年化4英⽂全⽂43 ⼉童看电视5英⽂全⽂54 即抛⽂化6英⽂全⽂65 城乡迁徙7英⽂全⽂76 廉价航空8英⽂全⽂87 规则法律9英⽂全⽂108 远程教育10英⽂全⽂119 税收11英⽂全⽂1210 学校道德教育13英⽂全⽂1311 艺术投资14英⽂全⽂1412 志愿⼯作15英⽂全⽂1613 刑罚17英⽂全⽂1714 离家居住18英⽂全⽂1915 快餐20英⽂全⽂2016 ⼤学知识21英⽂全⽂2117 ⼤学学费23英⽂全⽂2318 禁⽌⼴告24英⽂全⽂2419 商品进⼝25英⽂全⽂2620 全球语⾔26英⽂全⽂2721 政府指导健康⽣活28英⽂全⽂2822 换⼯作29英⽂全⽂291. 遵守规则全⽂翻译1：遵守规则论述类题⽬写作要点Some people think that children should obey the rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do. Other people think children controlled too much cannot deal with problem themselves in adulthood.Discuss both views and state your own opinion.孩⼦们要在家⾥或学校遵守不同的规定。

严格的纪律有时很重要，但我认为这会对孩⼦的问题解决能⼒产⽣不利的影响。

有些⼈坚决主张强加规则，因为规则可以让孩⼦对⾃⼰的⾏为负责，帮助他们从⼩就发展良好的⾏为模式。

与成年⼈不同，⼉童通常不了解不良⾏为的后果，制定规则可以帮助他们认识到如何以社会接受的⽅式⾏事。

例如，如果⼤⼈要求，他们可以学习如何打招呼，提出礼貌的请求，并表⽰礼貌。

另外，规则也可以禁⽌不当的⾏为，如欺凌，亵渎，考试作弊，在课堂上打断教师。

写作从4.5到6的过程——献给顾家北老师

写作从4.5到6的过程——献给顾家北⽼师关于雅思写作，是⼤部分学⽣是不太擅长的⼀项，也是⽐较难提⾼分数的⼀项，⾄于雅思写作的要求我就不做⼀⼀介绍了，我相信⼤部分烤鸭已经不只是⼀次两次的战⽃了。

那就直奔主题吧——认识顾家北⽼师从写作4.5到6的过程。

刚接触顾家北⽼师是微博上⽆意中看到的，看到这位⽼师教出来的学⽣基本都是写作在7分以上，这⼀点让我相信了顾⽼师⽼师，由于是⽹络授课（第⼀次接触）于是就揣着忐忑的⼼报了顾⽼师的⼩班，本⼈基础不好， 2013年2⽉23⽇参加雅思考试，写作考了4.5，⼝语也是4.5，可想⽽知，不管从我的词汇和语法是有多糟糕，所以⼩班给我带来的好处就是让我的语法有了突飞猛进的转变，2013年3⽉9⽇再⼀次参加考试写作到了6，⼝语也到了6。

这期间⼤概只有10多天的时间。

不管你信或者不信，以下我想声明⼏点：⾸先，我不是学霸，不会⼀天花上⼏个⼩时来看英语，最多也就2到3个⼩时，再加上基础不好，就从未想过要突破什么7分之类的，这10⼏天，也就是上了顾家北⽼师的⼩班+词伙班，且不说有多神奇，⾄少我只想⽤事实说话。

第⼆，我不是托，我不需要讨好什么⽼师来花这么长的时间来写这段话。

第三，不管你是有⼏分的基础，我相信只要按照顾家北⽼师的⽅法，就单单写作来讲，算得上是百尺竿头更近⼀步。

关于⼩班顾⽼师的⼩班⼤概在40多个⼈左右，每次课都有语法部分的安排，基础不太好的我，上课前会提前预习⽼师的课件，以⾄于上课时不会跟不上课程的节奏，毕竟这个不是⼀对⼀。

但是你若有任何问题，顾⽼师都会耐⼼的解答。

所以这点你不必担⼼你会跟不⾛。

截⽌到2⽉23⽇，我是已经上了⼩班3节课，明显感觉到⾃⼰的语法部分有了很⼤的提升，虽然可能有部分同学认为，雅思考试语法不重要，可我个⼈认为这是⼀个很重要的环节，不然我的⼝语也不会从4.5提升到6，这期间仅仅只有10多天（2013年3⽉9⽇，再⼀次参加雅思考试⼝语6），各位烤鸭不管你信或者不信语法这东西是否重要，语法这东西不是⽩学的，它的作⽤是助你从中端冲⼊⾼端，尽管在初级阶段的确看起来作⽤不⼤。

顾家北写作全文翻译11

投资艺术是必要的；钱应该花在公共服务和设施上；讨论两种观点，给出自己的观点观点：艺术品具有赏心悦目或安慰人心的力量，投资艺术带来人们更多的审美享受。

钱应该投在公共服务上，因为这些基础设施是人们日常生活的基础，公共服务提高人民对社会和国家的满意程度和归属感。

艺术只有少部分人能欣赏，且对美的定义容易引起争论。

公共服务使大多数人获益。

支持主要投资公共设施，小范围投资大众接受度高的艺术。

People have different arguments about investigations of the arts, especially when a country faces a budget problem. I think that governments should give priority to the construction of infrastructures and facilities and invest the arts when budgets are sufficient.People have different views about government funding for the arts, especially when a country struggles with budget deficits. I reckon that we should give priority to essential services and infrastructures and then fund the arts when governments have a budget surplus.Many people support to invest in the arts because it can enable our cities more attractive. Some forms of arts, such as sculptures, paintings, and carving, make our public areas like libraries, subway stations, and public toilets even more scanning. If the art industry thrives well, architecture in cities will vary in many styles and the public can enjoy better city life. Furthermore, exposure to arts enables us to reduce stress and brighten our mood.Many people support the public funds for the arts, which can make our cities more visually attractive. It is true that artworks, including sculptures, paintings and states can decorate public facilities such as libraries, metro stations, or even toilets, and increase the artistic appeal of these places. If the art industry prospers, cities have a mix of different architectural styles and we are more likely to enjoy urban life. Exposure to artworks can reduce our pressure and put us in a good mood.Although arts are significant, some others argue that governments should spend money on public services rather than arts because ordinary people are more interested in public facilities, such as electricity and water supply, schools, libraries, and transports. For example, a clean environment and water can help improve people’s health and reduce illness, while schools and libraries can transform knowledge and increase people’s job skills. By contrast, most forms of arts are expensive to ordinary people without practical benefits.Although the funding for the arts is important, many people would argue that public facilities deserve more of public money. Ordinary people are more interested in public facilities (such as water and electricity supply networks, schools, libraries and roads), which have a direct impact on their living conditions. For example, good sanitation and clear water can improve people’s health and reduce diseases, while schools and libraries can disseminate knowledge and improve young people’s job prospects. In contrast, sculptures, paintings and operas are luxury items to most people and are not likely to bring tangible benefits to them.In my opinion, public facilities prompt economic development, which also enables governments to have more money to invest in the arts. For instance, the investment of the public transport system can make commuters less time to go work and improve productivity. Once our society has these facilities, cities can attract investments, become richer, and improve citizens living conditions.In my view, improvements in facilities can promote economy development so that the government can have enough money to invest in arts. For example, the investment in the transport system can improve the productivity of working people by making daily commuting easier, while the public spending on high-speed railway systems and airports can ensure that cargo can be delivered faster. Cities can attract and become wealthy, so people’s living standards can also be improved.In conclusion, as though the arts make our cities more beautiful, governments should focus on the development of public facilities.To sum up, I believe that the government should focus on services and facilities vital to the wellbing of the general public, even though artistic projects have made our cities spectacular.。

(2021年整理)顾家北手把手写作范文1-11

passage 1：environmental problems are so big that they cannot be solved by any person or country alone. Instead, it should be solved at international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree.Environmental degradation has been recognized as one of the main challenges that we have to overcome in the 21st century. The rapid deterioration of environmental problems is believed to have posed a threat to our survival. To address this concern, countries worldwide should join forces, instead of working individually for their own targets.People support international cooperation for two reasons and the ﬁrst point is that the impact of environmental problems is normally on a global scale. It is common knowledge that we share the same biosphere, whose components are interrelated. For example, a stream in one country can be polluted by the sewage dumped by its neighboring country. In other words, one country’s effort to tackle pollution can be futile if other countries are not involved. It should be noted that some countries do not have adequate resources(including capital and technology) to reduce pollution, even though these countries realise the importance of environmental protection. These countries can cooperate with developed countries, introduce technology and draw on experience so as to implement environmentally friendly policies continuously.Despite the importance of international cooperation, countries should take the initiative to implement some changes. It is fair to say that countries are confronted with different environmental problems. For instance, greenhouse gas emissions in china are mainly created by the electricity generation industry while those in the United States are primarily attributed to the increase in car use. The technologies and methods that are globally applicable may not be effective in some countries. In addition, countries should enforce some environmental laws and raise citizens’ awareness so as to restore the environment. To summarize, countries should make a joint effort not only because the ecosystem is a uniﬁed mechanism but also because it can make optimal use of ﬁnancial and human resources. Countries’s resource commitment is also important at regional or national level. futile: 没有⽤用的In some countries, it is now possible for people to buy products made in other countries. To what extent do the beneﬁts of this development outweigh the problems?As the world is increasingly globalized, the exchange of commodities across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate. It has sparked the controversy over whether the increase in imports has adverse impacts. From my point of view, the practice’s advantage s outweigh its disadvantages.Importing goods can yield a number of beneﬁts. The ﬁrst beneﬁt is that despite the high cost of transportation, imports are competitively priced. The main reason is that the countries which export these goods normally have their technology and professional knowledge to ensure the goods’ quality and affordability. For example, China specializes in the production of textile products so china-made textile are cheaper than local counterparts in many parts of the world. Besides，imported goods have challenged domestic manufactures’ dominance and intensiﬁed competition, thereby prompting these manufacturers to lower product prices. It is beneﬁcial to domestic customers, because products are more affordable and the cost of living will decline.On the other hand, the downside of importing goods is that the excessive reliance on imports is likely to lead to the underdevelopment of some domestic industries. For instance, many countries import computers, resulting in domestic manufacturers’ bankruptcy. This is detrimental to the development of a self-contained economy, and also likely to trigger massive job cuts. Another problem is that transportation may create considerable pollution, especially when it involves air freight. It will degrade air quality and also lead to other environmental issues, such as global warning.It is therefore reasonable to think that the advantage of importing commodities should be accepted with caution. Although customers are able to acquire commodities at lower cost, countries also need to pay attention to the development of their respective industries.Some people believe that charities should give aid to whose who need the aid most, wherever they live. Some people believe that charity organisations would better concentrate on people in their own countries instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Concern about humanitarian assistance has been heightened in recent years. Although international aid illustrates the moral ideal of mankind, many people who hold opposing views think that the welfare of fellow citizens is the priority. International aid has its weaknesses, but its importance should not be denied.The main reason why international donation agencies should view international assistance from a global perspective is that their funds can help the citizens of those recipient countries to combat poverty, disease and inequality. We should recognize that citizens of developing countries are in desperate need of aid, because they are susceptible to natural or man-made disasters such as wars. In those war-torn or poverty-stricken countries, where resources are scanty, there is a high demand for food, medicine, tents and shelters. Despite the importance of helping those beyond our national borders, it is reasonable to lend a hand to our fellow citizens. Even in the richest countries, there are some disadvantaged/ deprived/ needy people whose needs for daily necessities are not met. If we can solve problems on our doorstep, low income people can have basic living standards and this is beneﬁcial to social stability.From my personal perspective, humanitarian action can restore some of their basic rights, such as the right to receive education, in recipient countries. This is consistent with the universal principle of supporting vulnerable populations. Those who cannot provide ﬁnancial support can work as aid workers and deliver services (e.g., training and medical service) to those needy people.To summarise, we should realise the implications of international aid to those who are affected by disasters, poverty and misfortunes. We can deliver aid to other countries to show compassion, although local beneﬁciaries is important.Societies beneﬁt from international tourism and business. To what extent do you agree or disagree?In recent years, tourism has become an important industry and brought unprecedented opportunities to these countries. However, the impact of tourism on these countries remains a source of constant debate. The essay will elaborate on both positive and negative effects fo tourism.The implications of tourism for some countries are two fold. First of all, it should be recognized that the development of tourism stimulates economic growth by generating enormous employment opportunities and increasing foreign exchange earning. The beneﬁt is particularly valuable to those impoverished countries, whose citizens are jobless, malnourished and ill-housed. Tourism provides a driving force for the development of various industries such as hospitality, transportation, communications, retail sales and manufacture, which require substantial capital investments. Without the revenues created by tourism, these industries are not likely to develop and the economic growth will be sluggish. Furthermore, tourism provides economic incentives for cultural preservation, because some places of cultural importance, e.g., historical sites, remain the most popular destinations. Those who express concerns about the negative effect of tourism should realise that tourism revenues can be used to protect cultural or historical heritage and also the local landscape.On the negative side, environmental destruction is one problem that arises from international tourism. The construction of infrastructure and tourism facilities(including airports, roads, hotels and resorts)will destroy environmental resources. Another problem associated with tourism is that it can threaten the local culture. The arrival of tourists can disrupt the life of local people, who abandon their traditional livelihoods and start to work in the tourism industry. It is true that in many places, local people do not embrace tourism with open arms. Due to a lack of understanding of local customs, tourists might display some impolite or even offensive behavior, which can lead to local people’s unhappiness or hostility.In the light of these facts, we can come to the conclusion that tourism can help some countries reap economic beneﬁts although these countries may have to accept social and environmental costs. These countries should promote culturally appropriate activities and require tourists to show respect for the local life, traditions and natural scenery.English has become a universal language. Do you think that the positive effects of this trend outweigh negative effects?Today, the role of english as a global language is indispensable/irreplaceable, but it is worth mentioning that the prevalence of english worldwide might has its negative effect. In my opinion, English’s dominance can be viewed in a positive light.It is unquestionable that the extensive use of english worldwide helps promote international cooperation, as language constitutes the biggest barrier to people’s communication in the global setting.For example, if a company’s financial statements are written in english, any investor who a good command of english ia able to read this company’s documents and understand this company’s operation, whether or not english is their first language. That’s why English has been identified／regarded/ recognised/acknowledged as the main language by many international conferences and academic groups and also by 80 per cent of websites in the world when presenting information. It would be no exaggeration to say that those who do not speak English find it difficult to survive in the global community. By contrast, people who have proficiency in two languages (English plus their native language) can easily find jobs, collect information and travel overseas.Despite the contribution of the language to globalisation, it is considered the culprit of the loss of language diversity. The idea lies in the fact that many english leaners, such as those who move to English-speaking countries, speak their native language less frequently. It should also be noted that English, as the favorite language for international media, conveys English-speaking countries’s lifestyles, values and beliefs to different parts of the world. It might affect the world’s cultural diversity. In spite of this, I am convinced that english is able to bridge the language gap and introduce minority cultures to the world, thereby protecting these cultures.In conclusion, English plays a vital role in communication and cooperation among people from different countries. Although some people suspect that english will endanger some minority languages, this claim is not supported with evidence. The reality is that english sometimes assists us protecting cultural heritage.Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent public services and facilities. discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Government sponsorship for arts is a controversial issue, especially when the state is confronted with budget problem. Those who object to public funds for arts believe that money should be diverted to the construction of public facilities. i am of the opinion that the government should take citizen’s beneﬁts into consideration and adjust the spending on art or infrastructures accordingly.It is important to realize that art is an essential component of cultural legacy, so the protection and development of art has important implications to cultural diversity. In terms of painting, for example, styles, genres, tools and materials differ from culture to culture. if not well protected, an art form is likely to disappear and we would like live in a mundane world.Despite the importance of art, public facilities deserve more of government spending than art. Citizens are interested in the availability of public facilities, such as water and electricity supply, schools, libraries and roads, which have a direct impact on their daily lives. By contrast, for most people, sculptures, paintings, or operas are luxury items, which cannot bring any tangible beneﬁt to them. Therefore, it is pointless to support the use of public funds for this purpose, if basic facilities are underfunded and ill-equipped to meet public needs.I personally think that the arts should get public money, because it boosts the appeal of the built environment, reﬂected in the diversity of architecture and landscaping. If we are exposed to visually attractive objects every day, we can enjoy peace of mind and feel an increased level of satisfaction with life. People will be less likely to commit violent or anti-social acts, and this is beneﬁcial to community cohesion.In the light of the facts outlined above, government investment in the arts is essential to cultural diversity and the visual appeal of the built environment. However, in those countries whose infrastructure is inadequate, spending cuts on the arts are justiﬁable.Instead of asking the government to bear the high cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?The government has long been the major funder of university education. Those people who support government spending on education think that some students do not enrol because of learning costs. My view is that students’ personal situations should be considered, before the government decides whether to offer free education.It is worth noting that university education is the key to closing/bridging the income gap. There are numerous students, especially those from low income families, who cannot afford educational expenses. For example, students who study law or medical science may spend years in the university, and in other words, university education is an expensive option for them. Because of ﬁnancial constraints, people of low socio-economic status are at a disadvantage in terms of educational opportunities and career development. If the government provides free access to education, children from disadvantaged backgrounds can get into the college and ﬁnd decent jobs in the future. this can close the social divide and create a prosperous country.Even though government sponsorship can inspire people to receive tertiary education, it can also cause the waste of public resources. Free education may be a reason why many students are reluctant to complete their courses and enter the workforce at the earliest date.It not only adds/imposes a burden on the country but also affects state funding for other sectors(e.g., primary and secondary education). Another problem is that, because of ﬁnancial pressures, universities cannot upgrade facilities and recruit well-qualiﬁed lecturers, which can have a negative impact on students’ academic achievement.To summarize, the government should provide ﬁnancial support according to students’ needs to ensure that they have access to education. However, tuition fees are applicable to most students, especially those from middle to high income families, as it helps maintain the quality of tertiary education.Some people say that the government should ensure that people lead a healthy life, while others believe that individuals should have their own choices. Discuss both views and give your opinion.Leading a healthy lifestyle is important because it is closely correlated with one’s dignity and wellbeing. It is suggested that people are unlikely to adopt healthy lifestyles, unless the government takes some actions. My view is that the lifestyle should be decided by people themselves, despite the importance of the government guidance and intervention. It is reasonable to think argue that if people can choose their lifestyles freely, it reﬂects the respect for basic human rights. People who are obsessed with how to comply with government regulations will live under tremendous pressure. Although people are encouraged to eat vegetables and adopt a balanced diet, it does not mean that laws should specify the proportion of vegetables in diet. It not only poses a threat to their health, but also causes their resentment against the government.On the other hand, it is important for the government to impose restrictions on some habits, especially those that are wildly believed to be damaging. This is due to the fact that most people have difﬁculty in disciplining themselves and cannot refrain from some unhealthy habits. For example, it is common knowledge smoking is harmful to people’s health but many people have problems ceasing smoking. The consequence is that their behavior not only damages their own health but also has an adverse effect on others. Their reliance on medical care leads to overconsumption of resources and a higher demand for the use of tax payer’s money; this is unfair to those who follow healthy habits. Overall, i believe that one’s freedom to choose lifestyles should be protected provided that is does not interfere with other people.The primary role of the government is to provide information rather than to regulare citizens’ behavior.The society is based on rules and laws. The society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want. To want extend do you agree or disagree?Laws refer to the rules imposed on human beings. Although the law is important in regulating people’s behavior, many people argue that it restricts individual’s freedom. I think that it is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the functions of law in society and its demerits.It is an undeniable fact that the law informs citizens of the rules that are recognized by the whole society. The essential point of formulating laws is that laws can prevent one from engaging in actions that are harmful to other people. Anybody who fails to comply with laws will be punished, so the law helps establish a harmonious society. For example, people may commit robberies and murders because of jealousy, greed and hatred. If these actions were accepted/permitted on the grounds of personal choice, it would be detrimental to other people’s interest. It is also true that many ethical standards, such as those standards that emphasize honesty, loyalty, and compassion, enhance/ improve/ increase social cohesion.Nevertheless, laws sometimes inevitably infringe upon human’s freedom and even hamper/hinder/obstruct social development. For instance，if one country has many restrictions on the business world, the business activity will not be active/brisk. High income earners who subject to high income tax rates may lack motivation to maker greater efforts to increase their income. It is also true that in a society where personal freedoms, such as the freedom of speech, are limited, it is impossible to have different voices heard and solve problems efﬁciently.It is reasonable to conclude that the society cannot operate well without laws and rules. Even though the law does not allow people to act at will, the main purpose is to create a society where people can live in harmony.Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country, while some people think that there are other factors. What other factors should be considered? Among these factors, do you think that any factor is more important than the others?The rapid growth of emerging economies has fueled the controversy over how to deﬁne successful countries. Regarding the distinguishing features of successful countries, people might have some shared opinions but they do not reach any agreement. I think that besides economic development, other factors should be taken into consideration. Firstly, social welfare is a signiﬁcant factor, which has relevance to people’s satisfaction with life. There is ample evidence that in many in many countries, poor people do not beneﬁt from economic growth,which is reﬂected in the widening gap between haves and have-nots. National wealth is not distributed evenly, and the health service and the education are underfunded. Because of the ever-increase cost of living, people are not satisﬁed with their living standards, while the escalating class conﬂict can threaten social cohesion. It is also important to realise that the economic progress of some countries is achieved at environment’s expense. Industrialization leads to the exploitation of natural resources, destroying the environment and causing severe pollution.Considering these factors, economic growth should not be regarded as the main criterion for measuring a country’s success. There is a growing recognition that a successful country should ensure the fair distribution of wealth so citizens’ needs can be satisﬁed. People are able to acquire necessities such as food, housing, education, medical care and so forth at affordable prices. In deciding whether a country is liveable, it is also important to consider air quality, access to clean water, waste disposal, sewage management and transport infrastructures. In addition, we must take into account the issue of whether or not the economic development is sustainable, namely, whether the country can conserve resources for future generations.In brief, it is premature to equate wealth with success. Living standards and sustainable development are among those factors that can be taken into consideration when a country’s success is evaluated.Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay any tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Tax has long been a disputable issue, especially when people struggle with economic uncertainties and higher costs of living. Some people might complain that tax is a heavy burden especially when it undermines their buying power signiﬁcantly. I am of the opinion that we are beneﬁciaries rather than victimes of taxation.The reasons for levying tax are manifold. With tax revenues, the government can pump money in public facilities, including roads, dams, ports, bridges and airports, which are essential to the public well-being. The public sector, which is normally state-funded, also plays an integral role in services such as waste management, sewage treatment and public transport while private enterprises are not likely to deliver thees services at low cost.Public security is another beneﬁt that people can obtain from tax-paying. The expenses of law enforcement, ﬁre department and national defence all have been paid by the taxes imposed on taxpayers. We should also recognise that the government can achieve the gaol of income redistribution and bridge the gap between rich and poor by taxation. For example, in many countries, the high income group needs to pay high tax, while the low income group can get assistance from the government.Taxation is also one of the important approaches to intervene in the economy.For instance, when one country’s economy experiences a downturn, the government needs to reduce the tax to encourage public consumption and business investment. In contrast, the government may levy higher taxes to curb consumption in order to avoid economic overheating.Another function of tax collection is to regulate citizens’ behavior. One example is that the heavy tax on cigarette and alcohol discourages people from spending on these items and from developing unhealthy habits.I am convinced that nobody would perceive tax as a burden which does not create any beneﬁt, if he or she has a comprehensive understanding of taxation. The truth is that without tax revenues, the country would not function well while many public services are no longer widely available.。

顾家北写作全文翻译17

There are arguments that the government should take responsibility for the university fee rather than students enrolled in a college bear this cost. I think there will be many problems if governments do this.Receiving a university education is crucial for the young generation these days, with the benefit that they can find a job easily. Some people support that governments should increase the investment of college education because some students are able to attend university due to the high tuition fee. My personal view is that most students should bear the cost on their own, and those who come from underdeveloped areas can receive financial assistance from our governments.One problem is that other social services like health care and transport will be underfunded if governments pour more money into university education. Although it is essential to support higher education, other public services also need to develop, especially those that can not depend on personal efforts to improve. By contrast, the cost of high education can be affordable for most families.Students will emphasize education opportunity if they need to pay for the costs of it, and they will be more hardworking. They know the costs of education are so high that they will complete all assignments, do their best to pass exams and gain the qualification on time. If governments take over this responsibility, some students may not value it and will not pass exams.Another problem is that students may not put emphasis on their studies if they don’t realize what they need to pay for this opportunity. With the pressure from the education fee, they may work hard and be very grateful for their parents. If they can afford this expenditure very easily, they may not value it.On the other hand, the government should bear the cost of higher education for those students who come from underdeveloped regions. For these students, they and their families have not abilities to afford the fee of higher education, even though they are very hardworking and passionate about studying. In this case, those people who get funded by governments will be very grateful for our society and return it.To sum up, there is no need for governments to bear the cost of university fees for students, except for some individual cases.To sum up, the government should provide financial support according to st udents’ ne ed to ensure that they have access to education. Students from deprived backgrounds should be exempt from tuition fees, while the abolition of tuition for all students is not realistic.。

顾家北写作全文翻译12

中学组织志愿活动利大于弊。

同意多少这个观点观点：同意志愿活动可以丰富学生的课余生活，增进同学之间感情。

培养他们的责任意识。

过多的志愿活动会占用学习时间，可能会影响学生的成绩。

志愿活动为下一代培养更好的社会责任心和共情能力，但应该限制时间，不要过多。

Volunteer work has been promoted in many middle schools, and even been regarded as a requirement for graduation. However, no matter schools or students involved should fully consider its advantages and backward when practice volunteer work.There is no doubt that students can improve their qualities by participating in volunteer work. They may be confronted with many problems and challenges that are rare in school life when they provide communities with free services. For instance, students should figure out how to communicate with donators, organize events, and cooperate with peers if they help charity companies raise money. All these challenging could boost their confidence and improve their problem-solving abilities.At the same time, young generations can also increase their responsibility for societies and find enjoyment in serving the community. They may know how their work can help others who struggle with some difficulties and gain a sense of achievement, which enables them to get a deep understanding of some social values like justify and fair. Furthermore, people who gain help from volunteer work may return to society.Although volunteer work has many visible benefits, we cannot rule out the possibility that unpaid work can lead to a wasteful use of volunteers’ time and energy if not well-organised. When this happens, volunteer work may become bored and hard rather than interesting and educational, and volunteers may lose their interest due to that they cannot discover the meaning of their volunteer work. Furthermore, intensive volunteer work may reduce students’ academic time and may influence their academic performance.To sum up, my view is that volunteer work is important to improve students’ abilities and job prospects. However, workloads of volunteering need to be carefully determined.。

顾家北手把手小作文句子翻译

1.这些图表展示了关于是什么影响了英国学生选择大学的发现。

2.在两个年份，合适的课程和学位的有效性是最重要的考虑因素，尽管选择这个因素的学生比例从40%下降到了34%。

3.他们也很关注学校的名誉，对比1982年仅有的5%，2002年有剩下部分的三分一学生都对此高度评价。

4.重视便利设施和运动设备的使用的学生比例从5%到2002年大于三倍的18%，同年这个因素也成为了选择大学第三常见的原因。

5.地址也是一个重要的考虑因素，关注这个因素的学生比例并没有太大的变化，1982年是19%，2002年是16%。

6.对比之下，关注教育费用的学生比例，从28%到5%，有极大的下降。

7.录取标准这个最少频率提到的因素，在这些年分别仅仅被2%到3%的学生选到。

8.总的来说，对英国的学生而言，名誉和设施变为越来越重要的考虑因素，而费用则很少被关注。

1.这些图表比较了这两个国家在1980年和2000年不同能源产生的电力数量。

2.煤炭，澳大利亚主要的能源资源，单位产电在2000年翻倍有多到了130。

但这种能源在法国少很多进口/使用，在这两个年份都生产只有25的单位电力。

3.核能是突出的能源资源在法国，它的数据在2000年上升了8倍多至126个单位，但澳大利亚并没有这种能源。

4.澳大利亚水能产生电力的数量也明显地上升了，从20到36个单位。

但这种燃料在法国也不怎么重要，在2000年只是生产2个单位的电力。

5.在两个国家中，天然气的数据都下降到了2个单位。

6.石油产电的比例在两个国家中同样也可看出不一样的趋势：在法国轻微地上升到25个单位但在澳大利亚大幅地下降到2个单位。

7.总的来说，澳大利亚和法国依赖于不同的燃料。

虽然煤炭和水能在澳大利亚很重要，核能却占据了法国的能源部门。

1.这个饼图展示了关于世界土地退化的原因的信息，表格显示了世界的3个地区是如何被这个问题影响的。

2.过度放牧是世界土地退化的首要原因，大约世界上35%的土地因此退化。

顾家北写作全文翻译18

Some people argue that those advertisements aimed at children should be removed from screen because children intend to mimic behaviors and performances without careful thinking if there is no supervision from parents. However, I'm not at all convinced that all advertisements aimed at our next generations should be prohibited, although the risk of adverse impacts can not be totally gotten rid.Many children are exposed to a large number of advertisements in the modern world. These advertisements have encouraged them to buy many snacks, toys and video games.One reason is that lots of advertisements aimed at children can be very useful for our parents to determine what kind of items to buy. Those advertisements provide parents more information for learning effects, functions, and prices of different branches. Then, they may be able to make well-informed decisions. If there are no advertisements aimed at children, they will be confused when they want to buy something for their children, such as milk powder.It is understandable why some citizens propose to ban advertisements aimed at children. People at their early ages are inquisitive about everything that they watched on TV. Without logical thinking, some information from advertisements will be misunderstood, and children may simulate some dangerous but attractive behaviors and hurt themselves.For this concern, those commercial advertisements which may misguide children should be restricted with no hesitation, while other advertisements which can be useful and educational should not be banned. That means our governments have to pay more attention to regulate and control the content of advertisements aimed at children rather than restrict all access to them. To sum up, advertisements should not be banned without careful considerations and selections, although some of them may have an adverse impact on children.。

1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。

目录1. 遵守规则2英文全文22 老年化4英文全文43 儿童看电视5英文全文54 即抛文化6英文全文65 城乡迁徙7英文全文76 廉价航空8英文全文87 规则法律9英文全文108 远程教育10英文全文119 税收11英文全文1210 学校道德教育13英文全文1311 艺术投资14英文全文1412 志愿工作15英文全文1613 刑罚17英文全文1714 离家居住18英文全文1915 快餐20英文全文2016 大学知识21英文全文2117 大学学费23英文全文2318 禁止广告24英文全文2419 商品进口25英文全文2620 全球语言26英文全文2721 政府指导健康生活28英文全文2822 换工作29英文全文291. 遵守规则全文翻译1：遵守规则论述类题目写作要点Some people think that children should obey the rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do. Other people think children controlled too much cannot deal with problem themselves in adulthood.Discuss both views and state your own opinion.孩子们要在家里或学校遵守不同的规定。

严格的纪律有时很重要，但我认为这会对孩子的问题解决能力产生不利的影响。

有些人坚决主张强加规则，因为规则可以让孩子对自己的行为负责，帮助他们从小就发展良好的行为模式。

与成年人不同，儿童通常不了解不良行为的后果，制定规则可以帮助他们认识到如何以社会接受的方式行事。

例如，如果大人要求，他们可以学习如何打招呼，提出礼貌的请求，并表示礼貌。

另外，规则也可以禁止不当的行为，如欺凌，亵渎，考试作弊，在课堂上打断教师。

然而反对者认为，规则可以限制问题解决技能的发展，如果那些建立严格规则的父母优先考虑孩子的服从。

孩子将严重依赖规则，可能无法独立解决问题。

例如，一些规则可能决定孩子每天应该做什么，但是当孩子进入劳动力队伍时，他们可能不知道如何在没有父母指示的情况下管理时间，也不能应付自己的工作要求。

他们不可能在事业上取得成功。

我认为严格的规定会扼杀孩子的创造力，不能以不同的方式解决问题。

他们不敢将自己的想法付诸实践，怕违背规则就受到惩罚。

例如，一些教师要求学生遵守严格的散文写作规则，其结果是孩子不会以其他方式表达自己想法的结果。

现实世界中的问题是复杂的，不能用想象力去解决这些问题。

英文全文Children are expected to obey different rules either at home or at school. Strict discipline is sometimes important, but I would argue that it would have an adverse impact on children's problem-solving abilities.age. Unlike adults, children are normally not aware of the consequences of bad behaviour, and setting rules can help them realise how to behave in a socially acceptable way. For example, they can learn how to greet others, make polite request s and show table manners,if they are required by adults to do so. In addition, rules can also forbidinappropriate behaviours, such as bullying, using profanity, cheating in exams and interrupting teachers during a lesson.Oppon e nts, however, argue that rules can limit the development of problem-solving skills, if those parents who establish strict rulesgive priority to children's obedience. Children will rely heavily on rules and may not be able to solve problems independently. For instance, some rules may dictate what children should do every day, but when children enter the workforce, they may not know how to manage timewithoutthe instruction s of their parents and cope with the demand s of work themselves. They are unlikely to achieve success in their career s.In my view, strict rules can stifle children's creativity and they are not able to solve problems in different ways. They dare not put their ideas into practice, since they are afraid of being punished if they disobey rules. Some teachers, for example, require students to abide by strict essay writing rules, and the consequence is that children will not the outcome of expressing their ideas in other ways. The problems in the real world are complex and they cannot tackle these problems without using imagination.2 老年化全文翻译2：老龄化社会+观点类（advantage/disadvantage）+段落的数量In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing.Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society?人们的预期寿命在很多社会都有所改善，可能是因为技术的进步和个人财富的增加。

虽然老年人能够为社会做出非凡的贡献，但我认为这种人口变化会带来一些问题。

与人口老化有关的一个问题是医疗保健费用将会增加，给纳税人造成负担。

众所周知，大多数医疗需求和成本都发生在生命的最后几年。

这意味着政府必须投入更多的资金来照顾老人和医疗服务。

这通常要求劳动者缴纳较高的所得税，并为教育等其他基本服务节省资金。

随着高级工人数量的增加，工作速度缓慢是另一个问题。

吸收信息和完成工作的能力通常随着年龄而下降。

许多老年人对技术保守态度较差，很难学习如何在工作中使用高科技设备和最新的软件。

如果选择延迟退休，他们在劳动力队伍中的存在会影响企业的生产力，危及整个经济。

另一方面，老年人的经验和智慧可以成为社会的宝贵财富。

今天的人们可以更健康长寿，因为他们更关注健康的饮食和运动。

即使离开工作岗位，他们也可以担任顾问，并将他们的知识和技能传授给年轻一代。

例如，一些高级管理人员可以教授年轻人如何管理公司，以及如何为客户提供服务。

我们的社会可以借鉴这些老年人的专业知识。

总之，预期寿命的大幅度延长给医疗带来了压力，使劳动力的生产力下降。

尽管我们可以善用年老的工作者的智慧，但这会影响一个国家的经济发展。

英文全文People's life expectancy has improved in many societies, possibly because ofimprovements in technology and increase in personal wealth. Although senior citizens can contribute extraordinar i ly to society, I would argue that this demographic change can bring about some problems.One problem associated with an ageing population is that health care costs will increase, imposing a burden on taxpayers. It is widely known that most medical needs and costsoccur in the last years of life. This means that governments have to pour more money in caring for the elderly and in medical service s. This in normally achieved by requiring working people to pay higher income tax and cutting funds for other essential services like education.The slow pace of work is another problem, as the number of senior workers increases. The ability to absorb information and complete work normallydecline with age. Many elderly people have a conservative attitude towards technology and struggle to learn how to use high-tech devices and the latest software at work. If they choose to delay retirement, their presence in the workforce can influence companies' productivity and endanger the whole economy.On the other hand, the experience and wisdom of senior citizens can be a valuable asset to society. People today can live healthier and longer lives, as they pay closer attention to healthy eating and sports. They can work as consultant even after leaving the workforce, and impart their knowledge and skills to the younger generation. For example, some senior managers can teach young people how to manage a company, and how to provide services for clients. Our society can draw upon the expertise of these older people.In conclusion, the considerable extension of life expectancy has put strain on health care and made the workforce less productive. It will influence the economic development of a country, although we can make good use of senior workers' wisdom.3 儿童看电视全文翻译3：看电视学习+观点类（agree/disagree）+写作要点Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?看电视（特别是提供有用信息的电视）被认为是一种有效的学习方法，因为视听信息可以吸引学生的注意力并吸引他们的兴趣。

顾家北手把手教你写作范文全文-中文翻译(剑12版)