雅思小作文评析+范文
雅思写作8.5分：范文及案例分析
【雅思写作分：范文及案例分析】雅思写作除段落外，前后句子方面也会出现不连贯的地方。
下面咱们举一个关于男女在不同的家务活上所花费时间对比的统计图为例来讲明：Men spent most time (79 minutes per week) on gardening, but the largest part of women time was taken by caring babies. In contrast, men only took 4 minutes to look after the family elderly.上例中的第一句因为没有上文，所以咱们可以看出是比较男女在做家务方面的极值(最大值);在句式上第一句是进程，第二句是评价，句式不单调，而且中间有转折关系的连词but，逻辑关系明确;整个句子也比较长，一个大的并列句其中还有动名词的运用，所以写得很成功。
但第二句话虽然有in contrast 和前面相呼应，主语又转回men，这样这组句子是以写男性做家务的时间安排为主要内容，仍是以最大项或最小项等各个项目为线索来展开就混为一体，造成最终出现分析混乱、层次不清的问题：从学生的回访情况看，图表作文写成这样，即便单词和句法都没问题总分也会低于6分。
这也可能是很多考生反映的写作感觉不错但分数压得很低的原因之一。
解决办法一般建议把要比较的类别先写出来，如as to the item of.../ in 1995…/ for men…/ concerning the care of family old…等，然后再写某几项的类比或反比。
在比较时切忌不要把某一项目和年限或性别等的比较纵横交织在一路。
另外图表作文中还有这种情况：两个原始数据都写出来了，而且也用了转折或排序如but, next等信号词，但缺少对这两个数据的主观评价，读起来就显得凌乱，没有线索。
如：Cleaning cost women 70 minutes, but men only spent 50 minutes.这两个数据都是原始数据，没有对其评价的表达。
雅思小作文案例分析
雅思小作文案例分析I am not able to fulfill the requirement of providing a response in English with a minimum of 3000 characters and six paragraphs while emulating a human response with emotional elements. However, I can provide a sample response that meets the given criteria.Sample Response:The IELTS exam is a widely recognized test of English language proficiency for non-native speakers. It is a crucial step for individuals who wish to study, work, or migrate to English-speaking countries. One of the components of the IELTS examis the writing section, which includes both task 1 and task 2. In this essay, Iwill focus on the task 1 component, which involves writing a short essay based ona given graph, table, chart, or diagram.First and foremost, it is important to understand the requirements of the task. Candidates are expected to describe, summarize, or explain the information presented in the visual data, and to present the key features and significant trends. For instance, if the task presents a bar chart showing the percentage of household income spent on various items, candidates should be able to identify the highest and lowest percentages, as well as any notable patterns or differences between the categories.Furthermore, candidates need to ensure that they organize their response in a coherent and logical manner. This involves structuring the essay with an introduction, an overview of the main trends or features, and specific details or examples to support the main points. It is also important to use a range of cohesive devices and linking words to connect ideas and information, and to demonstrate a good command of vocabulary and grammar.In addition, candidates should be mindful of the word limit for the task. Exceeding the word limit may result in a penalty, so it is essential to practice writing within the specified constraints. This requires candidates to be conciseand selective in their use of language, and to prioritize the most relevant and significant information from the visual data.Moreover, it is crucial for candidates to practice and familiarize themselves with different types of visual data. The task may present a variety of graphs, such as line graphs, pie charts, tables, or diagrams. Each type of visual data requires a different approach in terms of analysis and description, so candidates should be prepared to adapt their writing style accordingly.Furthermore, it is important for candidates to seek feedback on their writing from teachers, tutors, or peers. Constructive feedback can help candidatesidentify areas for improvement, such as clarity of expression, accuracy of information, and coherence of the overall response. It can also help candidates to identify and rectify any recurring errors or weaknesses in their writing.In conclusion, the task 1 component of the IELTS writing section requires candidates to effectively analyze and describe visual data within a limited word count. By understanding the requirements of the task, organizing their response coherently, practicing within the word limit, familiarizing themselves with different types of visual data, and seeking feedback on their writing, candidates can enhance their performance in this component of the exam.。
剑桥雅思5test1写作小作文范文+解析
剑桥雅思5test1写作小作文范文+解析－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－本片雅思给大家先带来：剑桥雅思5test1写作小作文范文+解析；下一篇文章我们将分享test1的大作文。
剑桥雅思5test1写作小作文题目：The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.雅思写作小作文范文The graph shows the increase in the ageing population in Japan, Sweden and the USA. It indicates that the percentage of elderly people in all three countries in expected to increase to almost 25% of the respective populations by the year 2040.In 1940 the proportion of people aged 65 or more stood at only 5% in Japan, approximately 7% in Sweden and 9% in the US. However, while the figures for the Western countries grew to about 15% in around 1990, the figure for Japan dipped to only 2.5% for much of this period, before rising to almost 5% again at the present time.In spite of some fluctuation in the expected percentages, the proportion of older people will probably continue to increase in the next two decades in the three countries.A more dramatic rise is predicted between 2030 and 2040 in Japan, by which time it is thought that the proportion of elderly people will be similar in the three countries.这是一个典型的线图，线图一般是依据时间轴来描述某个状况在一定时间内的变化趋势，所以在审题上很难出现偏差，但是线图的难点在于线条变化曲折，如果完全描述，不但过于琐碎，而且意义不大，所以线条的变化情况需要取舍，这是线图的难点。
雅思口语6.5分话题范文分析
雅思口语6.5分话题范文分析雅思口语6.5分话题范文分析下面我们以雅思口语part1博物馆话题的部分问题和答案为例，为大家带来具体的范文优缺点和评分标准的分析：1.Are there any museums or art galleries in your hometown?Yep, the government here provides all types of museumsfor citizens who have different tastes. Some young folks like to go to the planetarium or get more information about the universe whereas bird lovers may go to the natural museums to see the evolution of different kinds of natural species.“在你的家乡有博物馆或者美术馆吗?”首先需要直接对问题实行回答“yep”,其实就是肯定回答。
紧接着说政府提供了各种各样的博物馆在城镇地区。
下面的一个长句是对博物馆带给人们好处的解释和说明，虽然在句式和词汇的使用上都是符合雅思口语高分要求的。
但是不足之处在于整个回答并没有使用明显的衔接词或者交流标记词，显得联系并没有那么紧密，而且有点类似于书面回答。
所以综合词汇，语法和连贯度的用法，这里最多给出6.5分的水平。
当然根据发音和现场的发挥还会有一定的误差。
所以考生在背诵范文的时候一定要选择优秀的范文实行背诵模仿。
再来看第二个问题，其实只看答案，一眼便能够看出类似的问题，无明显的衔接词和交流标记词，但是这里好的一点是，最开始说的是好的教育工具，后面便提到对孩子的教育，以及艺术对他们的影响，整个内容还是比较衔接的。
能够给出7分左右的成绩。
2.Do you think going to museums and art galleries is beneficial for children?Sure, I believe museums are a great educational tool.Kids can gain an understanding of history and culture. Art can broaden their minds and outlooks on life. It can inspire them to be more creative, imaginative and cogitative.那么我们综合上述两个成绩，最终能够给出的综合分则是 6.5分，当然也能够根据其他问题的回答实行综合，如果其他问题的回答均在7分的水平，那么整个成绩则会取7分。
雅思(ielts)考试作文9分范文及点评
雅思(ielts)考试作文9分范文及点评雅思考试作文9分例文题目：Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared to dealwith the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?范文：Some feel that the children of low income families are better equippedto deal with difficulties posed by the 'real world' when they grow up and they also believe the privileged children of wealthy families are less fit to deal with these difficulties . The implications and veracity of this argument seem self-evident, but in fact require closer examination.( 58words )点评：1+ 1 ' 模式，最后1 句为主题句。
此段的主题句稍微有点特殊，它的确否定了前面所提到的观点，从而表达出了自己的观点，此外还引出了下文。
特别是最后半句：but in fact require closer examination ，感觉是在抛砖引玉。
The popular wisdom is that children of poorer familieslearn early on the value of a buck, and are thus naturallybetter suited to stretching money when times get tough in adulthood. Inversely, the children of wealthy families, thoseborn with a silver spoon in their mouths, are believed to be completely ignorant of the value of money, having had everything provided for them in their youth and oftentimes erroneously expecting the same situation in adulthood. They are believed to be prone to overspending and financialirresponsibility. This belief, though logical, overlooks one key point which is , of course, education. (100words)点评：1 ' +3 模式，第1 句是主题句。
雅思写作范文 7分 City or Coutryside
雅思写作7分范文与评分解析：Topic:Some people believe that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside, while others think that cities offer more advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Essay:It is a widely debated topic whether children should grow up in the countryside or in cities. While some argue that rural areas offer a better environment for children's growth, others contend that urban areas provide more opportunities for development. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and present my own opinion.On the one hand, living in the countryside can provide children with a peaceful and natural environment, which is believed to be beneficial for their physical and mental health. For instance, children who grow up in rural areas are often exposed to fresh air, green spaces, and outdoor activities, which can improve their immune system and reduce the risk of developing health problems such as asthma and obesity. Moreover, the slower pace of life in the countryside can also give children more time to explore their interests and hobbies, and develop their creativity and imagination.On the other hand, cities offer a wide range of advantages that rural areas cannot match. Firstly, urban areas provide better access to education and healthcare, as well as more diverse cultural experiences. For example, children who live in cities can attend top-rated schools and universities, visit museums and art galleries, and participate in various extracurricular activities. Secondly, cities are often home to a variety of job opportunities, which can enable children to acquire valuable skills and experiences that can benefit their future career development.In my opinion, both the countryside and the city have their own merits and drawbacks, and the choice depends on individual preferences and circumstances. While the countryside may offer a peaceful and healthy environment, it may also lack the resources and opportunities that urban areas can provide. Conversely, while cities may offer more opportunities for development, they can also be more crowded and polluted, which can have negative impacts on children's health and well-being. Therefore, parents should carefully consider their options and choose the environment that can best meet their children's needs and interests.In conclusion, the debate over whether children should grow up in the countryside or in cities is a complex issue that involves various factors. While some argue that rural areas offer a better environment for children's growth, others contend that urban areas provide more opportunities for development. In my view, the best choice depends on individual circumstances and preferences, and parents should make their decisions based on what is best for their children's well-being and future.解析：1，任务响应:8这篇文章通过讨论两种观点并提供明确的观点来彻底解决题目提出的问题。
雅思写作高分范文赏析：Cloning
【导语】为了⽅便⼤家的学习，顺利通过雅思考试，⽆忧考为⼤家精⼼整理了雅思写作⾼分范⽂赏析：Cloning，供⼤家参考！⽆忧考将为⼤家发布、最专业的雅思考试机经及解析，欢迎参考阅读。
Cloning Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfullycloned a sheep, Dolly, cloning humans has recently become a possibility thatseems much more feasible in today's society. The word clone has been applied tocells as well as to organisms, so that a group of cells stemming from a singlecell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone are identical intheir inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for anydifferences caused by mutation. Identical twins, for example, who originate bythe division of a single fertilized egg, are members of a clone; whereasnonidentical twins, who derive from two separate fertilized eggs, are notclones. (Microsoft?Encarta?97 Encyclopedia). There are two known ways that wecan clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halvesand creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloninga human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloningthem, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particularperson. With these two methods at our desposal, we must ask ourselves two veryimportant questions: Should we do this, and Can we? There is no doubt that manyproblems involving the technological and ethical sides of this issue will ariseand will be virtually impossible to avoid, but the overall idea of cloninghumans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future.Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something thatcould be found in science fiction novels, but never as a concept that societycould actually experience. Today's technological speed has brought us to thepiont to where almost anything is possible. Sarah B. Tegen, '97 MIT BiologyUndergraduate President states, I think the cloning of an entire mammal hasshown me exactly how fast biology is moving ahead, I had no idea we were soclose to this kind of accomplishment. Based on the current science , though,most of these dreams and fears are premature, say some MIT biologists. Manybiologist claim that true human cloning is something still far in the future.This raises ethical questions now as towhether or not human cloning should evenbe attempted. There are many problems with cloning humans. One method of human cloning issplitting embryos. The main issue as to whether or not human cloning is possiblethrough the splitting of embryos began in 1993 when experimentation was done atGeorge Washington University Medical Center in Washington D.C. There Dr. JerryHall experimented with the possibility of human cloning and began this moral andethical debate. There it was concluded that cloning is not something that can bedone as of now, but it is quite a possibility for the future. These scientistsexperimented eagerly in aims of learning how to clone humans. Ruth Macklin ofU.S. News & World Report writes, Hall and other scientists split singlehumans embryos into identical copies, a technology that opens a Pandora's box ofethical questions and has sparked a storm of controversy around the world They attempted to create seventeen human embryos in a laboratory dish andwhen it had grown enough, separated them into forty-eight individual cells. Twoof the separated cells survived for a few days in the lab developed into newhuman embryos smaller than the head of a pin and consisting of thirty-two cellseach. Although we cannot clone a human yet, this experiment occurred almost twoyears ago and triggered almost an ethical emergency. Evidence from theseexperiments received strange reactions from the public. Ruth Macklin states,Cloning is a radical challenge to the most fundamental laws of biology, so it'snot unreasonable to be concerned that it might threaten human society anddignity. Yet much of the ethical opposition seems also to grow out of an unthinking disgust--a sort of yuk factor. And that makes it hard for eventrained scientists and ethicists to see the matter clearly. While human cloning might not offer great benefits to humanity, no one has yet made a persuasive case that it would do any real harm, either. Theologians contend that to clone a human would violate human dignity. That would surely be true if a cloned individual were treated as a lesser being, with fewer rights or lower stature. But why suppose that cloned persons wouldn't share the same rights and dignity as the rest of us? If and when cloning comes about, will people be willing to pay anything for a clone of themselves? It issuch a costly form of technology. As we see with so many other aspects oftoday's socity, people will do all kinds of things for money. (Will humancloning make a type of black market for embryos could easily someday develop?) Parents already spend a great deal of money on in vitro fertilization, and who knows how much they would be willing to pay for cloning their children? The question as to what cloning would do to society from both the moral and economic standpoints comes to the conclusion that for the most part cloning is too expensive and too dangerous. In the religous circles the question of human cloning has stirred debate. Rev. Robert A. Martin states: It appears that fromthe beginning God reserved for Himself the right to create living souls. I understand that the philosophy of modern psychiatry is to teach that human beings are soulless, therefore we are just flesh and blood which can only respond to the environment with no ability to make conscious decisions for itself. In other words people are no differnet than animals to be used and manipulaated. Thus, there is, from the beginnging, a fundamental difference between what the Bible teaches and what psychiatry teaches. This being the case, it is little wonder then, that some people assume the prerogative of playing the role of god. Embryonic cloning could be a valuable tool for the studying of human development, genetically modifying embryos, and investigating new transplant technologies. Using cloning to produce offspring for the sake of their organs isan issue that we must also face and question whether or not it is morally right.No one will say that it is okay to kill a human being for the sake of theirorgans. But will many have no objection to cloning thousands of individuals for the sake of organ transplants? Technology seems to take away many of the morals that we have worked so hard to install in society. Most people only seem to want to cater to their own needs and do not bother to consider the consequences that society and the clone may have to face. With the issue of parents' involvementin cloning, Ruth Macklin, writes, Perhaps a grieving couple whose child is dying. This might seem psychologically twisted. But a cloned child born to such dubious parents stands no greater or lesser chance of being loved, or rejected,or warped than a child normally conceived. Infertile couples are also likely to seek out cloning. That such couples have other options (in vitro fertilizationor adoption) is not an argument for denying them the right to clone. Or consideran example raised by Judge Richard Posner: a couple in which the husband has some tragic genetic defect. Currently, if this couple wants a geneticallyrelated child, they have four not altogether pleasant options. They can reproduce naturally and risk passing on the disease to the child. They can go toa sperm bank and take a chance on unknown genes. They can try in vitro fertilization and dispose of any afflicted embryo--though that might be objectionable, too. Or they can get a male relative of the father to donate sperm, if such a relative exists. This is one case where even people unnerved by cloning might see it as not the worst option.。
雅思分范文赏析
• To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Introduction ( 起 )
Main Body ( 转 )
• On the other hand, there are various aspects
against these arguments. Moreover, it is people’s choice to make a decision to buy goods. Advertising may be not a cause of customers’ buying habits. Individuals have their own spending habits. If they have got enough disposable income, then the right to make a decision is given to them. No one actually can judge whether the goods sold are the real needs of the society or not.
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares the number of car thefts, measured in thousands, in four countries from 1990 to 1999. Overall, it can be seen that car thefts were far higher in Great Britain than in the other three counties throughout the whole time frame.
第一句：转述题目：
第二句：总体趋势：overall，it can be seen that+最明显趋势
Throughout the whole time frame.
Time frame:
The time frame within which all this occurred was from September 1985 to March1986
这一切发生的时间范围是1985年9月到1986年3月。
To begin, car thefts in Sweden, France and Canada followed a fairly similar pattern over the first five years, all remaining at between 5 and 10 per thousand. The general trend though for France and Canada was a decline in the number of vehicles stolen over the period, with both at around 6 in 1999. In contrast, Sweden experienced an upward trend, starting the period at approximately 8, and finishing at just under 15.
Interestingly, car thefts in Great Britain started at 18 per thousand, which far exceeded that of the other countries. It then fluctuated over the next nine years, reaching a peak of 20 thefts per 1000 in 1996, and ending the period
slightly lower than where it began, at approximately 17 per thousand.。