不可解的悲剧人生_浅析哈姆莱特悲剧命运的表现与原因
哈姆莱特的形象及其复仇行动延宕的原因分析
哈姆莱特的形象及其复仇行动延宕的原因分析作为“千分之一的哈姆雷特”的读者来浅析一下造成他复仇行为延宕的原因以及揭示了什么本质问题。
哈姆雷特从一个快乐王子变成一个精神忧郁,行动迟疑的延宕王子这是整个社会的悲剧。
以下是店铺为大家带来的哈姆莱特的形象及其复仇行动延宕的原因分析，希望大家喜欢。
哈姆莱特的形象及其复仇行动延宕的原因分析篇1哈姆莱特是莎翁四大悲剧之首。
一个典型的复仇悲剧。
丹麦王子哈姆莱特从大学回家,发现父王突然逝去,叔叔继承了王位并与他的母亲结了婚。
家庭和王国的重大变故使王子陷入了悲痛、迷惘和疑惑中。
父王鬼魂的显现,向他揭示了可怕的事实:他的叔叔以阴险的手段弑兄、篡位、娶嫂。
哈姆莱特必须报仇,面对强大的敌手--国王,哈姆莱特怎样实施自己的复仇计划呢?剖析剧情,他整个的复仇过程可以分为两个阶段。
第一阶段是父仇不共戴天、复仇决心弥坚;第二阶段是气馁消极甚至走向宿命,沦落到与雷欧提斯一般——仅仅为荣誉而复仇。
从第一阶段到第二阶段的变化,就是复仇行动的延宕,这也正是这部悲剧的生命力之所在,因为#一切戏剧都有延宕,没有了延宕也没有了戏文。
本文现从以下三方面来浅析哈姆莱特复仇延宕的原因。
从先前对父亲鬼魂的深信不疑、誓死复仇到怀疑父亲的鬼魂是魔鬼,在引诱他走向沉沦,表面上看是哈姆莱特在用理性控制感情,而实际上这是他在冷静之后深感复仇愿望难以实现而对复仇理想产生了动摇。
至少,他承认自己#柔弱忧郁,就是一种自暴自弃。
透过后面一段自白,我们可以猜度哈姆莱特内心的真实想法,他是多么希望那个鬼魂是一个魔鬼啊!如此自己就不会沉沦,因为血海深仇不复存在。
到后来,哈姆莱特甚至开始宽恕自己的仇人,他杀害了雷欧提斯的父亲波洛涅斯,雷欧提斯向他寻仇时,他是这么说的:#凡是我的所作所为,足以伤害你的感情和荣誉,挑起你的愤激来的,我现在声明都是我在疯狂中犯下的过失。
%%要是哈姆莱特在丧失他自己心神的时候,做了对不起雷欧提斯的事,那样的事不是哈姆雷特做的。
综合作品论述哈姆雷特悲剧实质与原因
综合作品论述哈姆雷特悲剧实质与原因
《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚最著名的戏剧之一，被普遍认为是世界文学的经典之作。
该剧探讨了复仇、爱情、家族关系以及个人认识和行动的道德困境等多个主题。
《哈姆雷特》的悲剧实质可以从以下几个方面进行论述：
1. 内心冲突与犹豫不决：主人公哈姆雷特面对父亲的死和母亲与叔父的婚姻，内心充满矛盾与痛苦。
他犹豫不决，无法迅速行动，这种矛盾与犹豫最终导致了悲剧的发生。
2. 外在干扰与阴谋：剧中有多个角色在进行复仇与权谋的计划，他们通过欺骗、暗杀等手段，不断向哈姆雷特施加压力。
这些外在干扰也加剧了哈姆雷特的困境。
3. 人性的弱点与缺陷：哈姆雷特身上显现了多个人性的弱点，如犹豫不决、怀疑、嫉妒等。
这些弱点使得他在面对复仇时陷入困境，无法做出明智的选择。
4. 命运与悲剧的注定：无论哈姆雷特的选择如何，似乎都注定了悲剧的发生。
剧中多次提到命运的力量与牵引，这也使得悲剧的产生显得不可避免。
总之，哈姆雷特悲剧的实质与原因是多方面的，既包括个人内心的困惑与犹豫，也包括外在的阴谋与干扰，以及人性的弱点与命运的力量。
这些因素交织在一起，最终导致了悲剧的发生。
悲剧与命运：对《哈姆雷特》的深度解析
悲剧与命运：对《哈姆雷特》的深度解析引言《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚最著名的戏剧之一，被誉为西方戏剧史上的巅峰之作。
本文将对该剧进行深度解析，重点探讨悲剧元素和命运主题在该剧中的体现。
悲剧的定义和特点悲剧是一种戏剧形式，通过描绘人物的不幸遭遇、命运之轮转动以及道德冲突等要素，引发读者或观众强烈的情感共鸣。
典型的悲剧具有以下几个特点：1.主角常常是一个英勇而高贵的人物，但由于某种错误判断或行为导致其境况逐渐恶化。
2.命运在悲剧中起着重要作用，主角往往被迫接受无法掌控的局面。
3.悲剧中经常存在道德冲突和矛盾，在抉择中揭示出人性的弱点和问题。
《哈姆雷特》中的悲剧元素主角哈姆雷特的境遇哈姆雷特作为主角，具备英勇而高贵的品质，但是却被父亲的死和母亲与叔父的婚姻背叛所困扰。
他陷入思考、犹豫和忧郁的状态中，最终导致其自我毁灭。
命运之轮在剧中转动命运在《哈姆雷特》中发挥着决定性的作用。
主角哈姆雷特从一开始就不断面临无法掌控的局面。
他必须承担起接受父亲鬼魂指示报仇的责任，以及与堪布里奇王国混乱政治斗争等压力。
道德冲突与人性弱点剧中出现了诸多道德冲突和人性弱点的展现。
例如，哈姆雷特在怀疑其父被谋杀后，陷入了道德困境：是否应该报仇？这种内外矛盾使得他陷入了广泛而深刻的思考。
命运主题在《哈姆雷特》中的反映环境对命运产生影响《哈姆雷特》中，堪布里奇王国的政治腐败和混乱直接影响了主角哈姆雷特的命运。
无论他如何努力，环境的不可预测性和腐败导致了他的悲剧结局。
命运与决定权之间的矛盾剧中表现出命运与决定权之间的矛盾。
虽然哈姆雷特通过抉择来展示自己对命运的努力，但最终却被命运所击败。
这种矛盾揭示了人类对于自身命运有限掌握能力的思考。
结论《哈姆雷特》是一部充满悲剧元素和命运主题的杰作。
通过刻画主角哈姆雷特及其境遇、揭示命运之轮转动以及探索人性弱点和道德冲突，该剧深入探讨了悲剧与命运关系，并引发读者或观众对生活意义等更深层次问题的思考。
（字数：371）。
《哈姆雷特》中的悲剧原因分析
摘要：《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚戏剧创作中最杰出的代表作，著名的四大悲剧之一，又是莎士比亚戏剧艺术成熟的标志。
该剧以丰富的时代内涵、生动的人物形象、复杂的矛盾冲突以及曲折多变的故事情节，给人们留下深刻的印象，吸引着他们对其不断的进行解读。
本篇文章旨在从情节、人物、矛盾冲突等多方面分析《哈姆雷特》戏剧中的悲剧色彩。
透过复杂的故事情节，该剧展示了十六世纪英国的动荡与混乱。
该剧中任务众多，不同的任务有不同的性格，也反映了当时不同层次、身份的任务的特征以及他们的人生观。
从而决定了他们最终的归宿。
剧中哈姆雷特与克劳狄斯的斗争是新兴资产阶级人文主义者与日趋反动的封建王权代表任务之间的斗争，反映了文艺复兴时期先进人物为实现美好理想向社会恶势力所进行的斗争。
作为文艺复兴的核心，人文主义在当时是一种新兴思潮，但却遭到失败。
作为人文主义者的典型代表，哈姆雷特对人类抱有美好的看法。
他相信人类的智慧、高雅和力量。
然而，面对罪恶的现实，他所有的人文主义理想都被彻底破灭。
因而只能以生命的代价换来精神上的胜利。
作为时代的缩影，《哈姆雷特》揭示了人文主义理想破灭的必然性。
关键词：人物悲情；矛盾冲突；人文主义；情节悲剧；王权斗争The Tragedy Aspects in HamletAbstract：As one of Shakespeare’s the four famous tragedies, Hamlet is the most remarkable one. It is also the sign of the maturation in the art of Shakespeare’s play. With abundant connotation of the time, vivid characters, complicated conflict and varied story, Hamlet gives people deep impression and moves them to appreciate it. This article aims to analyze the tragedy aspects in Hamlet from all the aspects of plot, character, conflict, and so on, according to which it reveals more information about England in the period of Renaissance. Based on the complicated plots, Hamlet reveals the confusion of England in 16th. In this play, there are many characters. With different character, each one reflects different feature of different stage and their social status, and also their value of life, which decide their final sufferance. The struggle between Hamlet and Claudius is about the conflict between the newly emerged capital humanists and the feudal evil force, which reflects the humanists’ h ardship for their dreams to come true. As the essence of Renaissance, humanism is a newly emerged thought at that time, but unfortunately, it failed. On behalf of humanists, Hamlet confirms human’s value and dignity, and also the wisdom and power, but in front of the evil reality, all his dreams are destroyed completely. He just gets the spiritual victory with the cost of his life. As the mitigation of the time, Hamlet shows that it is destined to fail for humanists.Key Words：Tragedy of Characters; conflict; humanism; tragedy of plots; fighting for throneIntroductionIt is known that Hamlet is the most remarkable works of Shakespeare in his dramas. It describes a story of a prince’s revenge for his father’s death in Denmark, during which, it reveals human-being different conflicts. With abundant connotation of the time, vivid characters, complicated conflict and varied story, Hamlet gives people deep impression and moves them to appreciate it. There are three simultaneous plots of revenge, from which, the tragedy of characters is described more complicated. There is also some description of characters: Hamlet represents the few number of the advanced person emerging in the feudal society; Claudius, who is the head of the reactionary force, is also a schemer, the model character of double-dealer. He is dissolute, insidious and sham. But finally, such unforgivable man bears what he should do; Ophelia, who is one of the loveliest girls Shakespeare has described, is also a tragedy character in this play. She is kind, but because of her innocent and tenderness, she became the tool which her father used topleasant the King.As one of the four famous tragedies, Hamlet is full of tragedy aspects: it described a disordered world, and also a world with strong self-consciousness, which reflected the modern main parts uncertainness and complication in the period of Renaissance. In such a special time, there are all the kinds of formation: Claudius’s schemes to seize the state power; the ethics between the ghost and his s on; the sincere feelings between Hamlet and Ophelia; friendship’s forsaking with old classmates; simultaneous revenge action; the failure of humanism, and so on. With all the formation organized, it forms Hamlet’s special artistic charm and literal achieve ment, which reveal human-being the tragedy aspects of Hamlet incisively and vividly.I. The General Introduction of the StoryIt is a story of a prince’s revenge for his father’s death in Denmark. The King of Denmark died, young prince Hamlet who was making further education abroad came back to his country. Out of his imagination, his mother married his uncle Claudius just after the old King’s death. A ghost who looked like the old King emerged one night, and told Hamlet that it was Claudius who killed him, so Hamlet vowed to revenge. He began to pretend to be mad, and left his lover Ophelia. To spy upon the reflection of Claudius, Hamlet arranged a play which was drawn by him. Claudius realized it, he sent Hamlet to England, and asked the man who kept watch on Hamlet to give letter to the king of England to have Hamlet died. But Claudius failed; Hamlet came back to his country again. Meanwhile Ophelia was drawn because of her father’s death and her lover Hamlet’s drifting apart of her. Her brother Leartes was very angry; he asked to fight with Hamlet. Then Claudius arranged a sword match for them, in which Hamlet was killed by the poison sword, Laertes was wounded to die. The Queen (Hamlet’s mother) died from the poison wine which was prepared for Hamlet by Claudius. Before death, Laertes told the truth. Finally Hamlet killed Claudius with the cost of his life.II. Three Simultaneous Plots of RevengeIn Hamlet, there are three simultaneous plots of revenge, which give more details to help us learn the tragedy aspects in it. There are three characters: Hamlet, Laertes andFortinbius,all of whose father are killed. Based on the concept of the time, all the three persons should revenge for their relatives. As the same task, because of their own character and outlook of life, there are three different ways. Of the three persons, thereare two groups of comparison: Laertes and Hamlet are both comparatively young men in a court dominated by the Middle Aged; both are described as being popular with the people in Denmark; their common love for Ophelia units them thematically in the fourth act; and the ensuing swordfight which result in both their death makes clear the extent to which they are each other’s opposites; both give themselves the task of revenging the death of a relative; both are spied on by their parents. Young Fortinblas, who has a few similarities to Hamlet: he too is the nephew of a King; he too is any enemy of Claudius; he too is seeking some sort of vengeance following the death of his father.A. Laertes’s Simple Idea to RevengeOf Laertes’s idea to revenge, it can be described as “simple”. He is noble and dignified in his appearance, while in fact there is nothing in is mind. He is impulsive, narrow minded. Though he realizes his error and reveals the evil plot of the King, he loses his life. As he learns the news that his father Polonius was killed, without asking anyone about the reason, hurriedly he comes back to Denmark and arouses the asses to action. Thinking that the King is the sinner of his fathe r’s death,Laretes leads his masses rush into the court and fight with Claudius. We see Laretes does like that, but in fact, he does not love his father at all. He laughs at his father’s weakness, hates that his father asks someone to keep watch on him. Fo r the reason of his father’s death, he has no interest. Suppose Laertes is willing to learn the reason, he would know that the death of Polonius is caused by himself, for he is so positive to interfere the conflict between Hamlet and the King. What’s more, he supports the King. Hamlet is meaningless to kill Polonius, to which Laertes dose not care about, so he decides to revenge without any doubt. He understands the moral from the point of formalism, according to which he takes action. His principle is measure for measure. What Laertes revenges for is the reputation of his relevant and his family. In the face of such requirement, even the King’s order, it should be delayed. Besides, what Laertes revenges for is his ambitions. When he leads his masses to kill the King, he advocates them support him as the King. It is available that Laertes’s revenge is divorced from the essence, he has ulterior motives.B．Fortinblas’s Abandonment to RevengeFortinblas gives up to revenge. In this drama we do not see the Norway prince somany times. Just because of his uncle’s several words, he abandons to revenge for his father’s death. When the Denmark is frightened to wait for Fortinblas’s attack for his father’s death and the lost land, Fortinblas attacks Poland. No matter what causes Fortinblas to give up revenge, we can regard that his father once provoked to his enemy (the King of Denmark) and gave no choice to him. If the King of Denmark did not kill Fortinblas’s father, the person who would be in death now is himself. Fortinblas realizes that he has no ability to fight with Denmark, so he gives up. But what if he is willing to try his best? He abandons absolutely.Leartes and Fortinblas have their own attitude on revenge. One is to obey the requirement of revenge without any conditions, and the other one is to give upabsolutely. Either of them takes hasty action, and also lacks consideration.C. Hamlet’s Hesitation to RevengeSince the ghost of Hamlet’s father tells Hamlet the truth of his death, the task to revenge is en graved on Hamlet’s mind deeply, he vows to revenge. He loves his father so sincerely and deeply. In his mind, his father symbolizes the top of human virtue. What a base action to keep his father in death! Compared with Leartes and Fortinblas, his motive for revenge is stimulated by his love to his father. While it takes along time for him to complete his task, why? There are three main stages:First of all, he puts off all his action until he has positive proof of Claudius’s guilty, during his process, Haml et arranges a play to spy upon Claudius’s response to prove the truth of the ghost’s words. Secondly, he passes up the opportunity to stab Claudius in the back preferring to wait for chance to kill him in a way more fitting. Because of the religion and superstitious belief, killing the enemy who is repenting is to send the evil person to the heaven. It means that he returns good for evil. Thirdly, however, he gets side-tracked. Forced into confrontation with his mother, he kills the eavesdropping Polonius, thinking that it is Claudius he is stabbing. The fact that Hamlet misfires Polonius has two main effects: it makes Hamlet’s own homicidal campaign lose energy---as if some sort of blood lust had been sated. It also forces Hamlet finally out into the open. Rather than suspects, Hamlet is a threat to Claudius. On the excuse of Polonius’s death, Claudius has opportunity to move against Hamlet, which is sending him off to England to be put in death.III. The Tragedy of CharactersA. The Tragedy of Hamlet1. Thr ee Stages of Hamlet’s TragedyOf the character of Hamlet in this drama, it is not still, but changeable as the struggles go on. According to the development of the character, Shakespeare shows us the tragedy of Hamlet, which is described in three stages logically.The first stage is about his happiness time, during which he studies in Wittenberg. In that period, he has wonderful dream on humanism. To him the world is so bright, charming. In his mind, his father is on behalf perfect man. He also believes that the harmonious relationship between human would come true sooner or later. The second stage of Hamlet is about his dejection and hesitation. Hamlet is so puzzled by the conflict between humanism idea and the gloom reality. When we firstly see the prince, Hamlet appears as a dejected person. He is shrouded by sadness; he does not know where to look for happiness of life. When he realizes all the crimes in the court of Denmark, all his wishes of life have been changed. He decides to change the society, but in action he hesitates. The third stage is about his decision to take activities, which is after the play arranged by Hamlet himself. He can not bear the crime of reality any more. In his own words, he would fill his mind with bloody thoughts. Althoug h Hamlet revenges for his father’s death in the end, he does not achieve the purpose to remove the evil force thoroughly, even he loses his life.2. Hamlet’s DeathHamlet’s death is also his tragedy. It is destined for Hamlet to end with his death, which i s caused by both internal and external course; it is not comprehensive to emphasize either of them. As one of his challengeable enemy, Claudius is on behalf of the evil force; his crime is collected with all the society’s darkness. Hamlet is eager to wipe out such evil force and revenge for his father’s death. But it can not be solved only by having Claudius died, of course to achieve which is not easy. To remove the evil force which is commonly existed in the society and reverses the situation is more diff icult. What Hamlet is hesitating “is not what he should do, but how to do it.” Judging from the objective aspect, Hamlet’s enemy is not only Claudius, and also some villains. As a new style of thought of a newly emerging capitalist class, humanism just exists as a power of thought at that time, which is far away to match with the feudal evil force. The bourgeoisie revolution in England happened in 17th century, judging from the feature of the time, Hamlet’s death is destined. Judging from the character of him, Hamlet has the most weakness which dominates his action. Because of his prince social position, there is no communication with people. Although he has sympathy to them, he also learns people are angry to the evil force, and they also keep hope on him, he is unwilling to corporate with people. What he believes is his own ability; what’s more, in his mind he is the only person who can complete such hard task, which is the root of Hamlet’s social tragedy. So Hamlet’s tragedy is of an advanced humanist’s fa ilure to struggle with powerful evil force of him, of the time, which has strong classic meaning.B．he Tragedy of ClaudiusClaudius, who is the head of the reactionary force, is also a schemer, the model character of double-dealer. He is on behalf of the feudal evil force. He kills his older brother, becomes the new King of Denmark, and marries his sister-in-law. What a dissolute gay! He indulges in creature comforts. Although he is so pleased with himself, when he meets Hamlet, who is in mourning apparel, he is frightened, even it is in his new wedding banquet, he can not conceal the fear which is from his inner heart.Claudius lies that the old King (Hamlet’s father) died of a poisonous snake, and then he takes the place of Hamlet’s succeeding to the thro ne. While on the surface, he pretends to care Hamlet very much, treats Hamlet as his own son. He also promises Hamlet that he would let him inherit in the future. In the reply to Hamlet’s outburst, Claudius uses language which seems to be calculated to tak e into account both sides of a question. On one hand, He tells Hamlet that it is ‘sweet and commendable’ of him to be so obviously affected by his father’s death. On the other hand, he continues mourning must end sooner or later, and life must go on. Thus, Claudius’s answer to Hamlet appears at first sight to be the epitome of reasonableness, a balanced combination of sensitivity and down-to-earth common sense.‘Tis sweet and commendable in your nature, Hamlet,To give this mourning duties to your fatherBut you must know your father lost a father,That father lost, lost his-and the survivor boundIn filial obligation for some temTo do obsequious sorrow. But to persevereIn obstinate condolement is a courseOf impious stubbornness, ‘tis unmanly gr ief,It shows a will most incorrect to heaven,A heart unfortified, a mind impatient,An understanding simple and unschool’d,For what we know must be, and is as commonAs any the most vulgar thing to sense---Why should we in our peevish oppositionTake it to heart? Fie, ‘tis a fault to heaven,A fault against the dead, a fault to nature,To reason most absurd, whose common themeIs death of fathers, and who still hath cried?From the first cores till he that died today,‘This must be so’. (Hamlet, 87-106)When people actually look at the different weight which Claudius gives to the two opposite parts of his argument as his speech develops, it can be realized that Claudius’s ‘balance’ is actually nothing of kind. It is just because that he is under a great deal of strain, and that he is far less in control of the situation than he wants his audience to believe. In another words, Claudius, because he is in a public situation, needs to be a little tactful towards Hamlet, and thus compliments him on his swee t and commendable nature, and assures him that he regards him ‘with no less nobility of love/Then that which the dearest father bears his son’. (Hamlet, II, 110,-II). But Claudius is, after all, King, and his power is absolute. He tries all the ways to eliminate Hamlet, who is regarded to treat him very much. Because Hamlet is deeply loved by people, even pirate is willing to help him, Claudius could not kill him by any reason, he should be very careful. To spy whether Hamlet is mad or not, Claudius asks tw o of Hamlet’s classmates to keep watch on him. Meanwhile, as bait, Ophelia is used to spy upon Hamlet’s inner secrets. After the play, which is arranged by Hamlet, Claudius exposes his guilty conscience thoroughly. Then he plans to murder with a borrowed knife to remove Hamlet for another try. On the excuse of Hamlet’s safety, Claudius sends him toEngland, in secret he asks the man who keeps watch on Hamlet to convey his requirement of having Hamlet died to the King of England. But finally he failed. Then he incited Laertes to revenge for his father’s death, because of which, Hamlet dies from the poison sword.Claudius is dissolute, insidious and sham, while on surface he pretends so kind. Of his character, Shakespeare shows us all the kinds of hideous features of feudal tyrant and the careerist of capitalist class during the time of original accomplishment. But finally, such unforgivable man bears what he should do.C. The Tragedy of OpheliaOphelia, who is one of the loveliest girls Shakespeare has described, is also a tragedy character in this play. She is kind, but because of her innocent and her tenderness, she became the tool which her father used to pleasant the King. She is the victim of feudalism. Her thoughts is tightly bounded it. She believes truth, beauty and kindness, she really loves Hamlet, but she also becomes the tool of Claudius to spy uponthe inner secret of Hamlet when Hamlet is mad. When her father tells her to left Hamlet,she promises him without words. Ophelia is drawn at the end of this drama. It is eventually Ophelia whose madness leads to her actual suicide. But it is clearly that the person who caused Ophelia’s death is the King and her father. Ophelia is also the v ictim of the political. Is there any other reason? Of course that is the feudalism. Ophelia’s death stimulates people to detest the hateful power, and also evokes people’s sympathy for good things, which people have destroyed. IV. The Failure of HumanismA. The Conflict between Humanism and RealityThe Renaissance reached its high tide in 16th century, so did the Humanism. As the fundamental key of Renaissance, the essence of humanism is that human have the right to seek for freedom to advocate the rationa lism and to gain people’s position and development in the world. The elements of humanism are to establish the central status, of human beings, their dignity value, to advocate the spirit of rationalism and science, to protest the super role of God admired during the Middle Ages. In the literature of 16th in England, it was play got the best achievement, so there are so many good works. To some extent, a play is the reflection of the society. The history of 16th century is filled with struggle and conflict, which between the capitalism and feudalism.Hamlet is a humanist, a man who is free from the medieval prejudices and super station. He has an unbounded love for the world instead of the Heaven. As one of humanists, Hamlet cherishes a profound reverence fo r man, and he believes in human’s power and destiny:What a piece of work is human; how noble in reason;How infinite in faculty, in form and movingHow express and admirable; in action how like an angel;In apprehension how like a god! (Hamlet,85-96)From such ebullient words, vivid figure of speech, it is clear that Hamlet confirms human’s value and dignity, and also the wisdom and power, wherever exists humanism. He believes that human is valuable, energetic. He regards that the relationship between human being should be equal, and everyone should be respected. He takes “love” to instead of people’s loyalty to him, and the principle of equality and love to the relationship of feudal grade. According to his thought, character, appearance and expression, either of which shows us that he is the model of a perfect humanist. In his mind, his father (the old Hamlet) is a model of human. To love, friendship and life, Hamlet has his own humanism view. And he himself, just as Ophelia’s description, is a youngprinc e of humanism, such a lovely prince, there’s no doubt that anyone would not love him. Even Claudius, his enemy, has to admit that he is loved by the “silly” people, and the ordinary people would have good opinion to him. While at the beginning of the play, Hamlet is covered by the misfortune of his family. He adores and loves his father very much, but he died; he also loves his mother, while very quickly (“A little month, or ere those shoes were old, with which she follow’d my poor father’s body,”) she marr ies his uncle (the new King). The faithful love, friendship, and all a humanist’s valuable dreams began to be destroyed. He laments: “Fraity, thy name is woman!” To find out the reason of his father’s death, Hamlet pretends to be mad. Out of his imaginatio n, his old classmates and friends, even his lover, Ophelia, become Claudius’s accessories. In front of the evil reality, his humanism dream is destroyed completely. He even thinks about “to be or not to be”:To be, or not to be, that is the question:Whet her ‘tis nobler in the mind to sufferThe slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,Or to take arms against a sea of troublesAnd by opposing end them. To die---to sleep,No more; and by a sleep to say we endThe heartache and the thousand natural shocksTh at flesh is heir to: ‘tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep;To sleep, perchance to dream---ay, there’s the rub……(Hamlet, 152-180)B. The Failure of Hamlet’s TaskWhat Hamlet is able to do is to reveal the reality that the society is not reasonable and it must be changed, not how to solve such fundamental question; to move the crime existing in the world, not how to wipe out it. Because of the limitation of time and class, humanist does not have the ability which is needed to change the society, wipe out the social crime. It is one of the reasons that the reactionary force is powerful, because of which Hamlet fails to complete his task. Hamlet represents the few number of the advanced person emerging in the feudal society. The struggle between Hamlet and Claudius represents that between the newly emerged capital humanist and feudal reactionary force, which reflects the conflict between the advanced people and evil force in Renaissance. However, it is a complicated time, with the social crime of feudal force and the capital accumulation, it is a gloom time, and it is destined to fail for the advanced people.ConclusionWith abundant and vivid plots, Hamlet reveals an important thought: in the later of Renaissance, the central state power was stable, the system of government was charged by the King. The King abandoned the capitalist class, arbitrarily and dictatorially, he forcibly occupied all the benefit; in political, he went against the progressive measure, then the feudal force had the chance to state a comeback, all the country was filled with foul, and each trying to cheat the other. Under such background, the capital humanists were angry with it. All the ordinary people even could not bear the exploitation coming from the feudal and original accumulation, but they could do nothing to help themselves. Such phenomenon was just about which happened before the bourgeoisie revolutionary in 1645. Humanists had the thought to remove the unforgivable King and reverse the situation, but they fell into hesitation, because the responsibility for them was hard to complete.Taking the court of Denmark in the Middle Ages for the background, according to the story of Hamlet’s revenge for his father’s death, Hamlet describes the truth England and th e Europe society in the later Renaissance. It reveals the author’s self-questioning on Renaissance movement and his carelessness on people’s life and future. The Renaissance promotes Europe into the time human beings awakening. People’s belief to God began to shake, under the flag of “personality liberation”; it was the custom to do what you like to. For one side, people’s thought liberated, which promoted the development of the social civilization. In the other side, especially in the later of Renaissance, it was full of overflow of selfish desire and social’s confusion. Encountering such an enthusiasm and confused time, instead of the optimistic and romantic brought by the humanism, Shakespeare shows us the hidden danger which hided in the ideal and progress. It is destined to fail for humanists. Hamlet is the reflection of such social phenomena.AcknowledgementsI would like to take this opportunity to thank my tutor—Chen Shunjiang, who offers me academic and constructive advices on composing this paper. His encouragement and help are worthy of high acknowledgement. During the learning of my paper, Mr. Chen gives me much good and valuable advice on my course, and provides me many opportunities to do practice. Because of those opportunities, I can accumulate much practical experience and precious theories for this paper. In the process of composing this paper, he helps me correct this paper and make it more perfect.I would like to express my thanks to those who spend their time in reading my paper, and I will be grateful if you could give me your advice, and I will appreciate them very well. Because I know that will be beneficial and helpful in my life. Meanwhile, I’d like to say thanks to my dear friends, Tang Xuejin, Li Jiangtao, Shu Qing, and so on, who give my ideas in my work, so that I can complete my paper on time.I hope I can apply my knowledge to my practical job in the future, and make some achievements during my career.Bibliography[1] Bradley. A C. Lecture IV: Hamlet. London: Macmillan, 1922.[2] Cartwright Kent. Remembering Hamlet, University Park, Penn: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.[3] Michael Mangan. A Preface to Shakespeare’s Tragedy. Peking University Press, 2001.[4] William Shakespeare. Hamle, Prince of Denmar.. The Oxford Standard Authors Edition. 1601.[5] Zhang Longxi. Reading Shakespeare: Hamlet. Room G07, Lee Wai Chun Building, CUHK, 2003.[6] 黄源．外国文学史新编[M] ．浙江文艺出版社，1987．[7] 基托．哈姆雷特[M] ．北京：中国社会科学出版社，1981，P427-450．[8] 孟宪强．外国文学[M] ．河南：河南教育出版社，1988．[9] 施咸荣．借鉴与探讨——外国文学部分[M] ．北京：北京十月文艺出版社，1986．[10] 王守仁．英国文学选读（第二版）[M] ．北京：高等教育出版社，2005．[11] 王佐良等．欧洲文化入门[M] ．北京：外语教学与研究出版社，2005．[12] 杨周翰．莎士比亚评论汇篇[M] ．北京：中社会科学出版社，1981．[13] 张泗洋等．莎士比亚引论[M] ．北京：中国戏剧出版社，1989．[14] 朱维之等．外国文学简编第四版[M] ．中人民大学出版社，1999．[15] 朱生豪．莎士比亚全集[M] ．北京：人民文学出版社，1981．。
哈姆雷特人性的复杂与命运的挣扎
哈姆雷特人性的复杂与命运的挣扎哈姆雷特是莎士比亚的经典悲剧作品，它深刻地探讨了人性的复杂性以及人们在命运挣扎中面临的困境。
本文将从不同角度来探讨哈姆雷特这个角色所反映的人性的复杂性以及他在命运挣扎中的体验。
一、人性的复杂性哈姆雷特这个角色展现了人性的多面性和复杂性。
首先，哈姆雷特是一个有思想深度的人，他对人生和死亡、真理和虚伪等哲学问题进行了深入的思考。
他的内心充满了矛盾和疑问，他对一切事物都有着敏锐的洞察力和批判精神。
其次，哈姆雷特是一个痛苦的人。
在母亲和兄弟之间的背叛以及父亲的离世之后，他陷入了巨大的悲伤和内心的痛苦之中。
他经历了情感上的剧烈波动，并陷入了对父亲死亡真相的追问和对复仇的思考之中。
此外，哈姆雷特还展现了人性的矛盾性。
他一方面渴望正义和复仇，另一方面又犹豫不决，陷入了对自己行动后果的担忧中。
他在行动和犹豫之间摇摆不定，他的内心承受着痛苦和挣扎。
二、命运的挣扎哈姆雷特的命运也是他挣扎的原因之一。
他被困在了复仇的命运之中，他的父亲被谋杀，他被迫承担起复仇的责任。
然而，复仇并不是他内心真正感受到的解脱，他不断思考复仇是否有意义，他担心自己行动的后果以及复仇所带来的更多的痛苦和牺牲。
命运对哈姆雷特来说是一种不可逃避的束缚，他在复仇道路上感受到了命运的残酷和无情。
他知道自己已经陷入了无法逃离的命运漩涡中，而他与命运的抗争成为了戏剧的核心。
三、哈姆雷特的命运挣扎对现实的启示哈姆雷特是一个被命运所困扰的人，然而他的命运挣扎也反映了现实社会中的一些问题。
人们常常面临着道义、责任和利益之间的抉择，他们受到外界环境和社会压力的影响，往往难以做出准确的决策。
哈姆雷特在一系列的挣扎和犹豫中体现了内心的纠结和迷茫，这与现实社会中的人们所经历的类似。
他通过思考复仇与正义的关系、真相与虚假的界限等问题，引发了观众对于人性和命运的深思。
结论：总而言之，哈姆雷特是一个复杂的角色，他展现了人性的多面性和复杂性。
他通过对复仇命运的挣扎，深刻地揭示了人们在现实社会中面临的道德和命运困境。
莎士比亚《哈姆雷特》中主人公性格悲剧解读
莎士比亚《哈姆雷特》中主人公性格悲剧解读莎士比亚的戏剧作品《哈姆雷特》是世界文学史上的经典之作，被誉为莎士比亚的杰作之一。
在这部戏剧中，主人公哈姆雷特是一个备受赞誉的角色，其性格与命运均备受人们的关注。
哈姆雷特是一个富有复杂性和多面性的角色，他的性格特点对整部戏剧的情节和发展起着至关重要的作用。
本文将对莎士比亚《哈姆雷特》中主人公性格悲剧进行解读，分析哈姆雷特的性格特点、悲剧命运及其原因，并对其性格给我们的启示进行探讨。
我们来分析一下哈姆雷特的性格特点。
哈姆雷特是一个充满矛盾的人物，他同时具有勇敢和犹豫、激进和犹豫的两面性。
在戏剧的开头，哈姆雷特展现出了令人钦佩的勇敢和果断。
他对父亲的死感到极度悲痛，但当鬼魂出现告诉他父亲是被毒杀而不是自然死亡时，他立即决定要为父亲报仇。
他表现出了极大的勇气和决心，但很快又陷入了犹豫和迟疑之中。
他开始怀疑鬼魂的真实性，对自己的行动不确定，因此陷入了一系列的思想斗争和内心挣扎之中。
这种犹豫和矛盾的性格特点，使得他的行为变得不可预测和复杂，也正是这一特点给整部戏剧的情节发展带来了许多曲折和转折。
我们来探讨一下哈姆雷特的悲剧命运及其原因。
哈姆雷特的悲剧命运从他的性格特点中得到了深刻的阐释。
他的犹豫和矛盾不仅影响了他自己的命运，也影响了他周围的人。
他无法坚定地执行自己的复仇计划，导致了一系列的灾难性结果。
他对奥菲利娅的感情与行为模式也是充满矛盾的，他既深爱着奥菲利亚，又采取了冷漠和冷淡的态度，使得奥菲利亚心灵受到了极大的伤害。
在与拉谢尔的决斗中，他虽然杀死了克劳狄斯，但也因误食了被毒的杯子水而丧生。
这一系列的悲剧事件均源于他性格中的犹豫不决和矛盾状态。
我们来思考一下哈姆雷特的性格给我们的启示。
哈姆雷特的性格特点展现了人性的复杂性和多面性，他同时具有了勇敢和犹豫、激进和犹豫的两面性。
他的悲剧命运也告诉我们，在做出决定时不要犹豫不决、变化无常，要有坚定的信念和果断的行动。
哈姆雷特也提醒我们要对自己的行为负责，不要让内心的挣扎和矛盾影响到他人的命运。
哈姆雷特复仇与疯狂的悲剧
哈姆雷特复仇与疯狂的悲剧哈姆雷特是莎士比亚最具代表性的悲剧之一，讲述了一个继位王的复仇故事。
剧中通过描绘主人公哈姆雷特的心理疯狂，反映了复仇所带来的摧毁和破坏。
本文将从复仇的动因、疯狂的表现以及悲剧的意义三个方面进行论述。
一、复仇的动因哈姆雷特的父亲被其叔叔克劳迪斯谋杀，克劳迪斯篡位成为新国王并娶了哈姆雷特的母亲。
哈姆雷特得知真相后，决定为父亲复仇。
这个动因使得哈姆雷特的人生陷入了复杂而黑暗的泥沼。
复仇是人类内心的一种强大冲动，特别是当正义感受到侵犯时。
哈姆雷特意识到自己是复仇的工具，他陷入了矛盾与挣扎之中。
他觉得复仇是正当的，但却担心将自己陷入罪恶的深渊。
这种内心的冲突导致了哈姆雷特的疯狂展现。
二、疯狂的表现在整个剧中，哈姆雷特不断表现出疯狂的行为和言语。
他穿着不整齐，满脸痛苦地咆哮和吼叫。
他的言语也变得不连贯，时而讽刺，时而怀疑。
这种疯狂的表现让人不禁怀疑哈姆雷特的理智。
然而，哈姆雷特的疯狂并非没有依据。
他处于极度的精神压力之下，不仅需要面对父亲的死亡和复仇的责任，还需要应对自己深爱的女人奥菲莉娅的死亡。
这些打击使得哈姆雷特的心理无法承受，最终导致了他的疯狂。
三、悲剧的意义哈姆雷特的悲剧并非仅仅是个人命运的悲惨，更是对于人性的深刻思考和对社会现实的警示。
哈姆雷特原本是一个理智、善良的年轻人，但在复仇的过程中他逐渐被黑暗侵蚀。
他陷入了一个迷局，无法脱身。
这种无助和挣扎，反映了人性的弱点和人们在面对复杂事物时的矛盾和无奈。
另一方面，哈姆雷特所处的世界也充满了虚伪和权谋。
他的父亲被谋杀，国家被篡夺，宫廷中充斥着谎言和欺骗。
这种社会现实使得哈姆雷特深陷其中，不知道如何面对。
正是这种社会背景对哈姆雷特产生了重大影响，使得他的复仇之路变得更加艰难。
总的来说，哈姆雷特是一个兼具复仇与疯狂的悲剧。
通过哈姆雷特的故事，我们可以深刻地理解复仇的摧毁性和疯狂的危害。
悲剧的意义不仅在于让我们反思人性的弱点和社会的虚伪，更在于警示我们要远离复仇的陷阱，寻求和平与宽容。
哈姆雷特命运与宿命的悲剧
哈姆雷特命运与宿命的悲剧哈姆雷特是威廉·莎士比亚的一部经典悲剧戏剧作品，通过主角哈姆雷特的故事，展现了命运与宿命的主题。
在剧中，哈姆雷特感受到了命运的无情和宿命的限制，这最终导致了他的悲剧结局。
一、命运的无情在哈姆雷特的故事中，我们可以看到命运的无情。
哈姆雷特作为丹麦王子，本应继承王位，过上幸福快乐的生活。
然而，他却被卷入了一系列的悲剧事件，命运对他进行了无情的考验。
首先，哈姆雷特的父亲遭到谋杀，而他的叔叔克劳狄斯篡夺了王位。
这个不公正的局面使得哈姆雷特深陷困境，他不仅要处理家庭矛盾，还要承受被剥夺权利的痛苦。
其次，哈姆雷特的母亲忽视了父亲的死亡，很快就和克劳狄斯结婚。
这对哈姆雷特来说无疑是一个沉重的打击，他对母亲的背叛感到绝望和愤怒。
命运让他在家庭关系中承受了巨大的痛苦。
最后，哈姆雷特遇到了奥菲莉亚的悲剧。
奥菲莉亚是他的心上人，但她却因为父亲的死亡和她自身的精神崩溃而自杀。
哈姆雷特无法接受这一事实，他在命运的捉弄下失去了摯愛，進一步陷入了绝望。
二、宿命的限制除了命运的无情，宿命的限制也是哈姆雷特悲剧的重要元素。
在剧中，哈姆雷特觉得自己被宿命束缚，无法逃脱。
首先，哈姆雷特被揭示了一个来自鬼魂的真相，他的父亲被克劳狄斯谋杀。
在这个瞬间，哈姆雷特被宿命的厄运所笼罩，他感觉自己被推到了复仇的道路上，无法违背宿命的安排。
其次，哈姆雷特面临着复仇之路上的重重考验和困境。
他必须找到证据，揭露克劳狄斯的罪行。
然而，他的行动和思绪却受到宿命的限制，他不断陷入迟疑和焦虑的状态。
最后，哈姆雷特在戏剧结局中面临了他自己的悲惨命运。
在最后决斗中，他与克劳狄斯同时中剧毒，成为致命的牺牲品。
宿命注定了哈姆雷特的悲剧命运，无论他如何努力，都无法改变自己的命运。
结论通过对哈姆雷特的命运与宿命的探讨，我们可以看到命运和宿命在悲剧中的力量。
哈姆雷特的故事告诉我们，命运是无情的，宿命是限制的。
尽管哈姆雷特试图抗争，但最终还是无法改变自己的命运。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
大 众 文 艺
69
是首带有回旋因素的三部曲式，而有人则认为应该为插部领先的回旋曲式。
无论是那种说法，这首乐曲都是由三个主题形象构成的。
第一个主题开始便是流露着一丝忧伤的第一段主旋律，仍然具有肖邦那轻柔 、飘逸的性格特征，可见作者对美好生活仍有一线憧憬。
中间段落则采用色彩明朗的降D大调与前后形成对比，伴奏声部与旋律形成交错的切分节奏,圆舞曲的强拍再一次的被细分,仿佛作曲家又回到了波兰。
将这两个主题形象串联起来，虽然不似华丽圆舞曲的灿烂，却能让人听到“滚珠落玉”般晶莹剔透的声音效果。
不过梦幻终究会醒来，并承受着无奈和衰伤而渐渐消失，最后全曲在焦躁不安中终了。
抒情类的圆舞曲要更慢于流行的舞曲伴奏的圆舞曲，是作者诗意的集中体现。
这类圆舞曲与其说像维也纳的生活圆舞曲，还不如说更贴近肖邦所创作的夜曲的风格。
通过上面对肖邦几首代表性圆舞曲的分析，可以总结出肖邦圆舞曲的一些基本的艺术特征：华丽或典雅的钢琴织体；昂扬奋发的情绪或沁人肮脏的诗意；肖邦的两类圆舞曲都突破了圆舞曲自身的节律，而将波兰民间音乐的节律植入其中，赋予了圆舞曲以浓郁的民族色彩；肖邦的圆舞曲都不是为舞会伴奏而写的，它或是把实际舞蹈理想化的作品或是借用圆舞曲的形式而写成的抒
情音诗，但无论怎样的变化，肖邦都将圆舞曲写成了适合在音乐会欣赏的钢琴作品；还有就是旋律的声乐性和器乐性的交错融合等。
从肖邦创作的圆舞曲中，可以感受到它们所蕴含的作曲家的丰富情感与生活经历。
虽然，至今仍有许多的音乐评论家认为肖邦的圆舞曲是他爱国思想性较弱的一类作品，但是从对肖邦的两类圆舞曲的艺术特征的分析总结上看，他对祖的热爱，对波兰生活的怀念，成为肖邦的两类圆舞曲创作，乃至他的音乐创作的灵感的源泉，因为肖邦的圆舞曲的特点就是自觉的将波兰民间舞曲形式的波洛涅兹舞曲与玛祖卡舞曲融入到圆舞曲的创作中来，而波洛涅兹舞曲和玛祖卡舞曲正是肖邦的爱国性所在。
因此，研究肖邦的圆舞曲的艺术特征也是帮助我们研究肖邦音乐中的爱国性和民族性的一个重要的依据。
参考文献
1《钢琴艺术博览》第347页
2 《肖邦的创作》第168页（A.索洛甫磋 著）
3 《世界著名通俗钢琴欣赏》第114页（孙维权 巢志珏 著）
4 《西方音乐同史》第240页（于润阳著）
摘要：作为一部凝聚着一代社会人生的严肃悲剧，《哈姆莱特》凝结着古希腊罗马文化、《圣经》文化及民间文化三重艺术的精华，是世界戏剧的典范。
这部 “反映人生，显示善恶的本来面目，给它的时代看一看自己演变发展的模型”的作品（1），是欧洲文艺复兴时期的时代缩影。
本文将分析哈姆莱特悲剧命运的表现及原因，解读他的悲剧人生。
关键词：悲剧命运；时代；自觉
哈姆莱特的悲剧是时代的悲剧，他的思想和言行都打上了文艺复兴的深刻烙印。
他是时代的巨人，人文主义的思潮、先进的时代精神启发、发展了他；宫廷中卑鄙的争权夺利，国家间冷酷的战争较量，社会现实的阴暗又打击、压制了他。
启发与扼制的两个方面在他的内心冲突挣扎。
哈姆莱特又是一个有思想、有追求的青年，有着“即使把我关在一个果壳里，我也会把自己当作一个拥有无限空间的君王”的浪漫理想，然而理想与现实的矛盾如噩梦一般囚牢了他，终让他迷茫而疲惫。
一、时代的悲剧人生
这个时代错乱而无常。
当他从鬼魂那得知天神般的父王被阴险诡诈的叔父谋杀，他要担负起复仇责任时，抑郁的心境使他觉得“负载万物的大地，只是一个不毛的荒岬，只是一大堆污浊的瘴气的集合”，安宁有序已不是宇宙万物的代名词。
他又把矛头指向了人，“人类是一件多么了不得的杰作！可在我看来，这泥土塑成的生命算得了什么？”在对人类的称颂戛然而止的质疑声中，人不过是“为造化所玩弄的愚人”。
哈姆莱特的厌世是一种无奈的选择。
他对社会的厌恶不是对社会无所求的超越现实，也不是厌恶人类而与人类为敌，具体表现为对人类的否定。
他心中想做的事与想做什么就可以做什么的愿望不能实现，因而说了自相矛盾的话，做了自相对立的事，这是他不情愿的无奈选择。
自我定位的茫然也是导致哈姆莱特厌世的原因。
文艺复兴强调人的解放，然而当事物发展超过了应有限度时就会呈现出相反方面，蒙田为代表的“自我否定”意识席卷了当时的欧洲。
一部分人文主义者承袭了朴素的二元论思想，认为人的灵魂有理、欲两部分且二者统一，人性无论从哪种意义讲都不作为第一性存在。
这种思想在很大程度上动摇了原有的人类中心说。
依皮亚杰的说法，人类的自我认识是一个自我中心化——去自我中心化——重新自我中心化的过程。
当前一“自我中心化”没有完全废止，后一“去自我中心化”没有完全建立，这一过程的转折点就会产生断层与分裂。
这种断层与分裂表现为自我认识的迷惑，也就是自我定位的茫然。
哈姆莱特就是人类认识自我过程中产生的断层与分裂的产物。
二、自觉与清醒的痛苦
哈姆莱特的痛苦在于他自觉而清醒地认识了社会的阴暗与自我的可悲。
这里要强调哈姆莱特自觉与清醒的状态，如果一个人所谓的认知是被动、糊涂的，也许就不会感到痛苦，即使感受到也不会是哈姆莱特式的痛彻心扉。
他从叔父克劳狄斯看到人性的卑鄙，从大臣波洛涅斯看到人性的庸俗，从王后葛特露看到人性的脆弱。
这位理想的王室女性，在丈夫去世短短两个月后“那流着虚伪之泪的眼睛还没有消去红肿，她就嫁了人了”。
哈姆莱特感叹：“脆弱啊，你的名字就是女人！”（统治者依靠的政治力量都是跟波洛涅斯一丘之貉的粗俗之徒，人民的幸福、社会的未来掌握在这些人手中，统治阶层的人性堕落势必会导致社会的解体与国家的衰败。
更为不幸的是哈姆莱特清醒地认识了自己——一个不幸的人。
他对霍拉旭人格的赞美实际上寄托了自我的人格理想，成为一个“能够把感情和理智调整得那么适当，命运不能把他玩弄于指掌之间”（的人，这是斯多葛哲人式的人格（“明智的人应当不带任何激情和情绪波动”（2））。
是超越有限生命，在命运的汹涌波涛中做到“不以物喜，不以己悲”（3），成为一个自由无束的人。
然而现实的地位与责任注定哈姆莱特的意志不属于个人。
王子的血统和世俗的舆论限制了他的言行自由，使他不得不隐藏真实的本性，但他内心中又有一个成为无拘无束的人的理想追求。
哈姆莱特就有了对立的双重身份，他的命运发生了分裂。
他觉得人生应有所作为，但又向往果壳里的无限空间；想要有所抱负却又不放弃追逐内心的自由。
他陷在两种命运选择之间不知所措，终成为一个不幸的人，这就是哈姆莱特的人生悲剧。
帕斯卡尔说：“认识自己可悲乃是可悲的”（4），哈姆莱特就是一个清醒的自觉者，他意识到自己是一个倒霉的人，意识到自己的能力微弱，意识到可怜的哈姆莱特的敌人就是自己的疯狂。
他的悲剧命运很大程度上就是因为他看到了自己的不幸。
然而对于命运的不幸他却没有办法给出合理解释，也不能做出坚定的人生选择，他悲剧的命运就成了不可解的人生难题。
这个悲剧是心灵的悲剧，也是时代的悲剧。
参考文献：
（1）《哈姆莱特》，莎士比亚著，朱生豪译 上海文艺出版社2007年（2）（英）罗伯特•伯顿：《忧郁的解剖》（3）（宋）范仲淹：《岳阳楼记》
（4）帕斯卡尔：《思想录》，何兆武译，商务印书馆1985年
作者简介：
王嵩：女，1989-10,汉族，籍贯：陕西安康市；研究方向：汉语语文文学；学位：本科。
不可解的悲剧人生
——浅析哈姆莱特悲剧命运的表现与原因
王嵩 （湖南省中南大学文学院 410012）
文艺评论。