玩偶之家英语读后感
玩偶之家 读后感
Analyze “A Doll’s House”-----The truth often was hidden behind the appearance.The drama “A Doll’s House” was written by Henrik Ibsen, and it can be regarded as Ibsen’s masterpiece. In the three ACT, it has described the main protagonist Nora’s change process. In the early time, she cared for her husband Torvald, and she also trusted in her husband. But, in the later, their relationship was broken, and Nora ran away from her house. Finally, Nora got rid of her doll figure. The drama has three ACTs, the first ACT can be regarded as the introduction. The third ACT is the main plot in the drama, and it seems like the result. In the third ACT, people’s characteristic is exposed thorough. The second ACT can be regarded as a base function.I n the drama, Ibsen not only described Nora’s awakening. He written a few people, and these characters had their own personality, and these personality reflected the drama’s topic. With these person’s char acteristics, the author has revealed that some unknown truth were hidden behind the appearance. In the drama, behind the sweet happy relationship between Nora and Torvald, it hid some contradictions, and it led to a broken in the family. Next, I will analyze the characters and plot, and interpret why the truth often was hidden behind the appearance.In the beginning, Nora loved her husband, and she devoted herself to the family. She bought some gifts to other family members except her. When she was asked why she did not buy gifts to her, she said: “For me? Oh I don’t want anything.” (Ibsen 64).This showed that she loved the family. When her husband Torvald got a serious illness, in order to saving Torvald’s life, she saved money, and borrowed money from o ther people. She said: “So if Torvald gave me money for a new dress or something, I never spent more than half.” (Ibsen 422-424). This was an evidence that Nora loved her husband. However, she gradually realized that she liked a doll in the family, and she also realized her husband’s selfish and hypocrisy. Afterward, she resisted against the social fact, and ran away from house. In my opinion, although in the begging, it seemed that Torvalds loved his wife, this love only existed in the appearance because Nora’s action not affected with her husband’s right. Once his right was affected, after he read the letter, he changed attitude toward to his wife. Thus, this is reason why I state that in the drama, the truth often was hidden behind the appearance. Besides, this drama also reflected a social fact in that time: the relationship between women and men was not equal.After I interpreted the reason why the truth often was hidden behind the appearance in the drama. Next, I want to analyze the main person’s cha racteristic in the drama.NORAAt the beginning of the drama, the author described Nora: “She takes a bag of macaroons from her pocket, eat a couple, then crosses quietly to Torvald’s door and listens carefully.” From this sentence, I think that Nora is a lively, and even a little naughty woman. Afterwards, form the conversation between her and Mrs. Linde, Nora did not write a letter to Mrs. Linde many years, and she simply expressed regret. These plots indicated that she was a naïve, and self-centered woman because sherarely to consider other people’s feeling. However, in order to saving her husband, she borrowed money form Krogstad, and under Krogstad’s threat, she did not give up her action. After Nora found that her husband was a hypocritical person, she made a decision to leave Torvald. These plots showed that Nora love her husband, but she did not like a doll in the family.TORV ALDIn the drama, Torvald called Nora as “little lark”, and “little songbird”, and “little squirrel”. He also appreciated Nora’s dance. These plots indicated that Torvald loved his wife. However, after he read the little, and after the truth was revealed, he worried about it, and he afraid the comments from other people. In the drama 2100 to 2130, the plots showed that Torvald was selfish, hypocritical man. Only in order to his private right, he blamed and belittled his wife Nora. Obliviously, compared with Nora’s love, Torvald’s ugly point was described thorough. When he was in front his wife and his reputation, he chose the latter one. Therefore, I think that Torvald’s love is not true, and these plots also reflect my topic: The truth often was hidden behind the appearance. Torvald thought that Krogstad had a worse behavior, and he fired Krogstad. But I think that this may not be the real reason why Torvald fires Krogstad because Torvald is a selfish and hypocritical man.KROGSTADIt seemed that Krogstad was a bad behavior person in the drama. Dr. Rank described Krogstad: “There is a man in there with Helmer who’s a moral cripple.” (Ibsen 506-507). He used Nora’s forged signature, and the purpose was that he wantedto keep his position in the bank. Just as his action, it made that Nora was blamed by her husband, and it also made Nora left his husband. However, because Mrs. Linde abandoned him, and he also had two children. This made that his life was casted in a shadow. But after conversation with Mrs. Linde, he gave up his threat thinking. In fact, he may be not an evil man. Maybe he was affected by the social environment, and it seemed like a bad behavior man.In the end of the drama, the appearance that the family had a happy life was not existence. No doubt, Torvald’s characteristic of selfi sh and hypocrisy was exposed. In his heart, Nora liked a doll in the family, and it seemed that she was not importance. Therefore, the author showed a real relationship in the family to us.After reading the drama “A Doll’s House”, in my opinion, no matte r what is the appearance or no matter what the truth is hidden behind the appearance. When reading a fiction or drama, we should understand the real meaning and truth other than only stay in the surface. Just as the life, in front of the love, people should seek for the real love with practice, and we should not be inducted by wonderful words.。
重读玩偶之家作文
重读玩偶之家作文I remember clearly the first time I read The Doll's House by Katherine Mansfield. Its vivid portrayal of the social hierarchy and childhood innocence left a deep impression on me. 我清楚地记得第一次读凯瑟琳·曼斯菲尔德的《玩偶之家》时，它对社会等级制度和童年无辜的生动描绘给我留下了深刻印象。
The story follows the Burnell family, particularly the three Burnell sisters, as they receive a doll's house as a gift. The intricately detailed doll's house becomes a symbol of wealth and privilege, highlighting the stark contrast between the Burnell girls and their less fortunate peers. 这个故事讲述了伯内尔家族，特别是三个伯内尔姐妹，当她们收到一个玩偶之家作为礼物时。
这个细致详尽的玩偶之家成为财富和特权的象征，凸显了伯内尔女孩和她们不那么幸运的同龄人之间的鲜明对比。
Through the eyes of the Burnell children, Mansfield exposes the cruelty of social class distinctions and the impact they have on individual lives. The rejection faced by the Kelvey sisters, who come from a poor, lower-class background, is a poignant reminder of the injustices present in society. 透过伯内尔孩子的眼睛，曼斯菲尔德揭露了社会阶级差异的残酷性及其对个人生活的影响。
《玩偶之家》英文读后感
《玩偶之家》英文读后感"The Doll's House" is a beautiful and touching story written by Katherine Mansfield. The story is a depiction of the social hierarchy, class systems and the unfair treatment meted out to people on the lower rungs of the societal ladder. The story is set in a small village in England and follows the lives of the Burnell sisters, Isabel and Kezia, and their brothers Lottie and the youngest, who are all waiting for the arrival of a doll's house made especially for them by their dear aunt Beryl.The doll's house is a beautiful masterpiece, and the sight of it was enough to make the Burnell children squeal with excitement. As they explore every inch of the house, they are given a glimpse into the lives of the two dolls inhabiting the house. The dolls are a representation of the upper class in their society, and the children are enamored by them.However, not all is well in the Burnell children's world. Kezia, the youngest of the sisters, is full of compassion and kindness, and it is through her eyes that we see the unfair treatment meted out to the Kelveys, two sisters who live in poverty in the village. The Kelveys are shunned and looked down upon by everyone else. Kezia's heart goes out to the Kelveys, and she invites them to come and have a look at the doll's house.The Burnell sisters' mother, who is deeply entrenched in her beliefs about social class and hierarchy, is horrified by Kezia's invitation. She forbids the Kelveys from entering their house, and in doing so, shows her daughters that the social hierarchy is rigid and one cannot break out of their societal class.The story ends on a poignant note, with Kezia's realization that the world is not fair, and that the Kelveys will always be looked down upon by the rest of the society. The Burnell children are not innocent bystanders in this scenario, and their actions only serve to perpetuate the social hierarchy."The Doll's House" is a beautifully written story that highlights the unfair treatment of people based on their social class. Katherine Mansfield's prose is captivating and poetic, and she delicately weaves together the story of the Burnell children with the plight of the Kelveys. The story is a poignant reminder that the world is not fair, and at times, unjust. It also reminds us of the importance of showing compassion and kindness, irrespective of the societal class of others. The Doll's House is a story that resonates with readers across generations and is a testament to Mansfield's talent as a writer.。
xx玩偶之家英语读后感
xx精选玩偶之家英语读后感After finish see Ibsen's a doll's house, I think, the heroine, Nora is a strong and brave woman, in such a dark society, although she didn't have any position, but her husband in recognizing haier mau false face, chose to leave.Ibsen's entire writing career values in the 19th century. In his works, the European bourgeois image than in Shakespeare, moliere's rot appear more and more ugly, also hated more, it is very natural. His sharp pen full of enthusiasm, incitement skewers the bourgeoisie in morality, law, religion, education, and family relationships the mask of many sided, exposed the hypocrisy of the capitalist society and absurd. "A doll's house" is for marriage under the capitalist private ownership, of the bourgeois ideas of male a tacitly indictment. "A doll's house" is henrikIbsen's 1879 drama, and then the emerging of the disadvantage of capitalism, social conflicts intensified, the people in front of the money to selfishness, hypocrisy, ugly face. In order to rob money, regardless of friendship, affection, love, in their eyes, money is everything. These bourgeois ugly behavior on haier mau got plete interpretation, Nora from him just toys, a beautiful appearance, can amuse his toys. When that Nora's behavior would threaten their own interests, he immediately changed his face, said Nora is a hypocrite....... Is Nora do inorder to save him, all because of love him, but he didn't ungrateful, not grateful to calculate, also said Noradidn't qualification education child......, it's like in Nora heart put a knife, he was such a hypocrite, oneself when he doll so long but I do not know, for him, Nora is just a doll, she is nothing else, haier mau ignores Nora pay everything for this family, take care of the children, and so on. Maybe it should be said with the center of the patriarchal society at that time, women labor is that they have to do in the home, only pain no gain. Not qualified to talk about the remuneration and rewards. Haier mau is unlikely to care about her these pay, also were not considered in his consciousness, men work outside, wife have a duty to labor in the home, take care of the children don't even have a reason to ask what, have no reason to say no to his arrangement.Nora is a a bourgeois individuality to emancipate the mind of the rebellious women. Her betrayal of society and leave home, has been hailed as a "declaration of independence of the women's liberation. Nora is ostensibly a young women without sophisticated cutting has always been being called "birds", "little squirrel", actually she kind and strong personality, to her husband and family at humiliation, ready to sacrifice even his own reputation. Due to save her husband's life, used to hide from him toborrow a debt; At the same time want to give dying father save trouble, and impersonate signed a word. Is due to the reasonable behavior, the bourgeoisie's "not reasonable law" forced her desperate. More to her heart, the truth, most in need of her husband and her together, take risk moment, she found himself as the sacrifice of the husband turns out to be a false and despicable philistinism. She finally awakening, to realize their father before marriage is but a doll, but is the dolls of her husband after marriage, has never been an independent personality. So she hasdecisively abandoned her husband and children and family run away from the cage.I admire the courage of Nora, women should have the right to choose their own happiness, rather than rely on others. Women want to get their position in the family, should have an independent source of ine. Women should have independent thought, free-standing self-improvement, self-esteem, self-love. To better foothold in the society.看完易卜生的《玩偶之家》之后，我觉得女主人公娜拉是一个坚强、勇敢的女性，在如此黑暗的社会中，她虽然没有任何地位，可是她在认清丈夫海尔茂的虚伪的面目后，选择了离开。
玩偶之家英语读后感
玩偶之家英语读后感The Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen is a thought-provoking and poignant play that delves into the complexities of societal norms, gender roles, and the struggles of individual autonomy. As I immersed myself in this captivating work, I was struck by the profound insights it offered into the human condition and the challenges faced by those who dare to defy the rigid expectations of their time.At the heart of the play lies Nora Helmer, a woman whose outward appearance of a dutiful and submissive wife conceals a deep-seated desire for self-discovery and liberation. Ibsen masterfully crafts a narrative that gradually peels away the layers of Nora's seemingly perfect life, revealing the stark realities of a patriarchal society that confines and constrains her.One of the most striking aspects of the play is the way it challenges the traditional gender roles and power dynamics within the household. Nora's husband, Torvald, is portrayed as the quintessential patriarch, a man who firmly believes in the naturalorder of things and the superiority of the male over the female. His condescending attitude towards Nora, his attempts to control her actions, and his inability to see her as an individual with her own aspirations and needs, serve as a powerful critique of the oppressive social structures that governed the lives of women during that era.In contrast, Nora's journey of self-discovery and her eventual rebellion against the constraints placed upon her are nothing short of inspiring. Her decision to forge her own path, to prioritize her personal growth and autonomy over the societal expectations thrust upon her, is a testament to the human spirit's resilience and the power of individual agency.One of the most poignant moments in the play is when Nora, in a climactic scene, confronts Torvald with the truth about her past actions. Her revelation that she had forged her father's signature to secure a loan, in order to save Torvald's life, shatters the illusion of their perfect marriage and forces Torvald to confront the reality of his own prejudices and the ways in which he has failed to truly see and appreciate his wife.The play's exploration of the theme of individual identity and the right to self-determination is particularly compelling. Nora's journey from a seemingly docile and obedient wife to a woman who boldly asserts her independence and refuses to be defined by theexpectations of others is a powerful testament to the human capacity for transformation and growth.Moreover, The Doll's House resonates with contemporary audiences, as it touches upon issues that continue to be relevant today. The play's examination of the challenges faced by women in a patriarchal society, the struggle for gender equality, and the importance of personal autonomy and self-actualization, all find echoes in the ongoing discussions and struggles for social justice and equality.As I reflect on my reading of The Doll's House, I am struck by the timelessness of its themes and the profound impact it has had on the literary and theatrical canon. Ibsen's masterful storytelling and his ability to craft complex and multifaceted characters have left an indelible mark on the world of literature.In conclusion, The Doll's House is a truly remarkable work of art that continues to captivate and challenge audiences across generations. It is a testament to the power of literature to illuminate the human experience, to question the status quo, and to inspire us to strive for a more just and equitable world. As I close the book, I am left with a deep sense of admiration for Ibsen's artistry and a renewed appreciation for the transformative power of literature.。
《玩偶之家》读后感英文
《玩偶之家》读后感英文，500字The Dollhouse, by Fiona Davis, is a captivating novel that follows the lives of two women across two different eras, taking readers on a journey of discovery and exploration. The narrative is framed by the iconic Barbizon Hotel for women in New York City, a hotel which has been almost forgotten by time. Across the chapters, we are introduced to Esme, an aspiring young actress living in the 1950s, and Rose, an up-and-coming journalist in the 1980s. Both women experience unexpected adventures, grief and romance as they explore the hotel, its inhabitants and its secrets.The Dollhouse is an uplifting story, both heartwarming and heartbreaking. Through Esme and Rose’s stories, we learn about sisterhood, ambition and courage in the face of adversity. Although both women live in quite different time periods, their experiences parallel each other and offer insight into how history has impacted the lives of many women. We also discover unique stories of some of the women who have lived in the Barbizon Hotel over the years, such as a female aviator, a female photographer and an African-American dancer.Overall, I found The Dollhouse to be a fascinating read. It was wonderful to observe the compelling characters as they face formidable circumstances and find strength and courage within themselves. As the novel unfolded, I found myself feeling connected to Esme and Rose’s journeys, and I was riveted by the secrets of the Barbizon Hotel as each new layer was revealed. This book provides a vivid glimpse into the past and is sure to leave readers feeling inspired.。
玩偶之家观后感结尾
玩偶之家观后感结尾英文回答：After watching "A Doll's House," I was left with a mixof emotions and thoughts. The play, written by Henrik Ibsen, explores themes of gender roles, societal expectations, and the pursuit of personal freedom. The ending of the play, in particular, left a deep impact on me.In the final scene, Nora, the protagonist, decides to leave her husband and children in order to find her true self. This decision is a powerful statement against the constraints placed on women during that time period. It made me reflect on the importance of individuality and the need to break free from societal norms.The ending also made me question the nature of relationships and the sacrifices we make for the sake of others. Nora's departure from her family is a bold move,but it is also a necessary one for her own personal growth.It made me think about the balance between self-fulfillment and responsibilities towards others.Furthermore, the ending of "A Doll's House" reminded me of the saying, "You can't pour from an empty cup." Nora's decision to leave was an act of self-care and self-preservation. It served as a reminder that we mustprioritize our own well-being in order to be able to care for others effectively.Overall, the ending of "A Doll's House" left me with a sense of empowerment and a desire to challenge societal expectations. It made me question the roles and expectations placed on individuals, particularly women, and the importance of personal freedom and self-discovery.中文回答：看完《玩偶之家》后，我内心充满了各种情绪和思考。
玩偶之家观后感1000字
玩偶之家观后感1000字英文回答：After watching the movie "Doll's House", I was deeply moved by the story and the characters. The film tells the story of Nora, a seemingly happy wife and mother who is living a life of deception and confinement. Throughout the movie, we see Nora's transformation from a naive and submissive woman to a strong and independent individual.One of the things that struck me the most about the movie was the theme of societal expectations and the pressure to conform. Nora is initially portrayed as the perfect wife and mother, always obedient and willing to please her husband. However, as the story unfolds, we see that Nora has been living a lie and has been sacrificing her own happiness for the sake of others. This theme resonated with me because it reminded me of the importance of staying true to oneself and not letting societal expectations dictate our lives.Another aspect of the movie that I found intriguing was the complex relationship between Nora and her husband Torvald. At first, Torvald appears to be a loving and caring husband, but as the story progresses, we see his true colors. He treats Nora as a possession, constantly belittling her and expecting her to fulfill his every whim. This dynamic between the two characters highlights the power imbalances that exist in many relationships and the importance of equality and mutual respect.The movie also explores the theme of self-discovery and empowerment. As Nora begins to realize the truth about her marriage and her own identity, she makes the bold decision to leave her husband and children in search of her own happiness. This act of defiance and self-assertion is both inspiring and thought-provoking. It made me reflect on the importance of self-care and pursuing one's own dreams and desires, even if it means going against societal norms.Overall, "Doll's House" is a thought-provoking and emotionally charged film that delves into important themessuch as societal expectations, gender roles, and self-discovery. The compelling performances and powerful storytelling make it a must-watch for anyone interested in exploring these complex issues.中文回答：看完电影《玩偶之家》后，我对故事和角色深感触动。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
玩偶之家英语读后感导语：易卜生在展现生活和揭示人物命运的过程中，能够以发自内心的力量，把他所思索的人生问题深深地打入观众或读者的心里，让人们在回味中咀嚼其中的含义，思考和探索这些问题。
下面是玩偶之家读后感，欢迎阅读！篇一：《玩偶之家》读后感寒假中读了自己一直想读的一部作品，易卜生的戏剧《玩偶之家》。
《玩偶之家》中的女主人娜拉表面上是一个未经世故开凿的青年妇女，一贯被人唤作“小鸟儿”、“小松鼠儿”，实际上上她性格善良而坚强，为了丈夫和家庭不惜忍辱负重，甚至准备牺牲自己的名誉。
她因挽救丈夫的生命，曾经瞒着他向人借了一笔债；同时想给垂危的父亲省却烦恼，又冒名签了一个字。
就是由于这件合情合理的行为，资产阶级的"不讲理的法律"却逼得她走投无路。
更令她痛心的是，真相大白之后，最需要丈夫和她同舟共济、承担危局的时刻，她却发现自己为之作出牺牲的丈夫竟是一个虚伪而卑劣的市侩之人。
可当敲诈之人寄回借据后，丈夫又假装大度原谅她。
这一刻，她终于觉醒过来，认识到自己婚前不过是父亲的玩偶，婚后不过是丈夫的玩偶，从来就没有独立的人格。
于是，她毅然决然抛弃丈夫和孩子，从囚笼似的家庭出走了。
是啊，娜拉走了，离开了那个玩偶一般的家。
话剧落幕了，可人们的思索并未停止。
娜拉走后又该怎样呢？无数的人思考着这个问题，讨论过这个问题。
鲁迅先生在一篇文章中谈了他的想法。
“但从事理上推想起来，娜拉或者也实在只有两条路：不是堕落，就是回来。
因为如果是一匹小鸟，则笼子里固然不自由，而一出笼门，外面便又有鹰，有猫，以及别的什么东西之类；倘使已经关得麻痹了翅子，忘却了飞翔，也诚然是无路可以走。
还有一条，就是饿死了，但饿死已经离开了生活，更无所谓问题，所以也不是什么路。
”篇二：《玩偶之家》读后感正如这本的名字一样，女主人公像个玩偶一样，摆布在父亲，此后是丈夫的手中。
她一心一意的做着丈夫的小鸟，喜欢丈夫喜欢的一切，甚至冒着败坏名声的危险为丈夫借了一笔钱好给丈夫治病。
而当事件败露时，身为丈夫的海尔茂却毅然的指责妻子。
本是同甘共苦的时刻，而演变成为故事的高潮——女主人公娜拉决定离开她的丈夫和孩子，去过自己的生活。
整个故事在事件败露以及男女主人公摊牌的时刻到达了高潮，作者在最后用娜拉的出走，似乎宣誓着女性主义的奋起。
在我看来，娜拉的出走来的有些突兀，仿佛一个沉睡了千年的人，突然惊醒一样。
恩格斯在《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》中一语中的地指出："妇女解放的第一个先决条件就是一切女性重新回到公共的劳动中去"。
而娜拉只是有些孩子气的宣布出走，并且不再相信奇迹。
她并未明白自己究竟要的是什么，出走并不能解决问题。
作为一位母亲，她放弃了对家庭的责任，或许我们可以说是当时的资本主义制度下，让娜拉在得知丈夫的真面目时，毅然作出的无可奈何的决定。
看完整个剧本，从爱情观的角度来看，海尔茂全心的爱着这位妻子，8年来，都像孩子一样的宠爱她。
其中很多的对白，显示了一种大男子主义情结。
或许像中国古代一样，封建制度造就了男尊女卑的地位，但是一个男性，能够如宠爱一个孩子般的宠爱自己的妻子是很不容易的。
再者就是名誉的问题，一个男人把名誉看的比生命还要重要，海尔茂说：“娜拉，我愿意为你日夜工作，我愿意为你受穷受苦。
可是男人不能为他爱的女人牺牲自己的名誉。
”这多少与中国或日本的传统有些相似，我想这并不能归责于资本主义的劣根性吧。
娜拉没有任何社会经验，只是用孩子般的心态与海尔茂相处，而海尔茂也乐意充当父亲的角色，替她安排一切。
而故事的结局是娜拉指责海尔茂从未与她进行一场认真的交谈，任何事物都是相互的，一个心态不成熟的主人公，在故事的结局，作者也并没有交待她的结局。
用出走来对抗资本主义的法律制度的无情，似乎有些力不从心。
剧本的林丹太太似乎是唯一能看清现实的人，她一在的劝娜拉告诉海尔茂事情的真相，她利用尼尔·柯洛克斯泰来满足自己空虚的意愿，她们作为悲剧生活下的牺牲品，都是为名利所累。
林丹太太利用她的爱情去挽救娜拉的名誉，而在最重要的关头，她却突然醒悟，真正的夫妻应该是没有所谓的秘密的。
作为一个独立的个体，每个人都应该有属于自己内心的东西，即使是夫妻，有些东西毕竟还是自己去消化。
毕竟每一段婚姻都不是没有瑕疵的，或者我猜想，如果尼尔·柯洛克斯泰把信拿走了，娜拉夫妇之间还藏着这个秘密，她们也许能像以前那样快乐的生活，继续欢乐的歌唱。
那娜拉也不会觉醒，而继续做他的泥娃娃。
当然，这并不符合作者的原意，也揭露不了资本主义制度下的法律的无情。
娜拉一直在指责法律的无情，而就算在中国社会，一个儒家思想统治了几千年的中国，法律一样是冷酷无情的。
或许我们会探讨到底娜拉伪造签字应不应该，当然从理性的角度来说，她当然是错了，而她的错在一开始就注定了悲剧，她的悲剧在于她那懦弱的性格，在经济上失去了独立性，她必须依赖于他的丈夫，同时来自丈夫的呵护，也让她一直处于远离社会的边缘。
我并不如同作者那样为娜拉的出走而欢呼，剧本一开始，我就不喜欢娜拉，这位孩子似的母亲，沉浸在欢乐的海洋中，沉浸在丈夫的宠爱当中，而没有认清伪签字的法律责任。
而故事的另一个主人公阮克医生深深地爱着她，娜拉享受着这种被爱的感觉，而阮克医生就在她身旁，默默地爱着她，并且在快要临死的时候，表白了自己的心情。
而娜拉早已知道了他的秘密而装作全然不知，并且要求他像以前一样与他们相处。
我想这是残忍的，深爱的女人在眼前，只是从来不落到自己的身上，我想娜拉是利用了阮克的爱情来满足自己的虚荣而已。
每个人都是爱情生活下的悲剧，爱人的如同被爱一样，都是生活在别人塑造的影子中生活而怡然自乐。
当阳光照进这个阴暗的角落，一切都改变了原样，于是童话世界开始瓦解，仙女也终归要落进现实。
篇三：《玩偶之家》读后感十九世纪后期在欧洲戏剧舞台上，新女性形象的大辩论的发起者是挪威著名剧作家亨利克·易卜生(1828—1906)。
易卜生是现实主义戏剧大师，以社会问题剧而闻名于世，被誉为“欧洲现代戏剧之父”。
面向社会，面向现实的人生是他的剧作的最大特点。
《玩偶之家》写于1879年，它通过海尔茂与娜拉夫妻之间的矛盾冲突，描写了女主人公娜拉从信赖丈夫到与丈夫决裂，最后终于脱离“玩偶”家庭的自我觉醒的过程，深刻揭露了资本主义社会的丑恶，热情歌颂了妇女的解放。
作品从家庭夫妇之间的矛盾冲突来揭示社会矛盾，对娜拉和海尔茂的不同性格，可淋漓尽致地体现在作品之中。
娜拉是个具有资产阶级民主思想倾向的妇女形象。
她出身在一个中小资产阶级家庭里，她的父亲并不富裕“钱一到手，不知怎么又从手指缝里漏出去了”。
按海尔茂的话说，娜拉的父亲是个“不信宗教，不讲道德，没有责任心”的人，实际上是个比较讲究实际，忙于谋生的人。
这种家庭环境，无疑对娜拉的成长有一定的影响。
娜拉受过资产阶级学校的教育，善歌善舞，天真烂漫，容易满足于个人小天地里的幸福生活，有许多不切实际的幻想。
她不同于大资产阶级的妇人、小姐，追求不劳而获的靡烂生活，她不希望过寄生虫的生活，为了补贴家庭费用，她做针织、绣花以及抄写之类的工作；虽然有时“累得不得了”，但她“心里很痛快”。
娜拉的这种不厌工作，乐观知足，热爱生活的性格，同她的家庭出身是有密切关系的，她同情社会上的受害者、不幸者。
对阮克医生的不幸，娜拉伸出友谊之手，表示深切的同情。
娜拉身上更为可贵的品质，就是倔强，不肯向恶势力屈服。
从外表看，人们以为她是个无忧无虑的人，其实这是误会。
她对林丹太太说：“你们都以为在这烦恼世界里，我没经过什么烦恼事？”实际不是这样，她也有“烦恼事”，如家庭经济困难，要借钱为丈夫治病，借了钱要想尽办法还债等等，但她从不垂头丧气。
还是很积极、乐观。
债主柯洛克斯太利用她的借据上的假签字，对她进行威胁、恐吓，她没有丝毫软弱的表现。
为了救丈夫的命去借债，债主威逼她，她仍然不把事情告诉丈夫，自己坚定地准备承担一切责任，为了保全丈夫的名誉，甚至决定自杀，所有这些都是娜拉倔强性格的表现。
娜拉这种坚强不屈的精神是她最终同海尔茂决裂，脱离“玩偶家庭”的性格基础。
如果是一个软弱的女人，即使认识了丈夫的恶劣品质，要采取与丈夫断绝关系的行动，往往也是不可能的。
娜拉毅然决然地同海尔茂决裂，更主要的是有她的思想基础。
现实生活教育了她，使她不仅认清了海尔茂的丑恶灵魂，而且也认识了现实社会的不合理。
娜拉对资本主义社会的教育、道德、宗教、法律等问题的看法，跟一般资产阶级庸人如海尔茂之流的见解是不相同的。
“醒悟”后的娜拉，对资本主义社会持敌视态度。
当海尔茂说她“你不了解咱们的社会”时，她激昂地回答说：“究竟是社会正确还是我正确！”“我知道大多数人赞成你的话，并且书本里也这么说。
可是从今以后我不能相信大多数人的话，也不能一味相信书本里的话。
”对于麻痹人民的精神毒药———宗教，娜拉更不会把它放在眼里，她宣称：“我真不知道宗教是什么。
”对于资本主义社会的法律，娜拉深受其害，更是深恶痛绝。
“国家的法律跟我心里想的不一样。
我不信世界上有这种不讲理的法律。
”娜拉的言语显示了她是一个具有民主思想倾向的妇女。
她同海尔茂决裂的行动是她用民主思想进行反抗的必然结果，尽管娜拉不是一个完美无缺的人。
作者通过塑造娜拉这一鲜明的妇女形象，表达了中小资产阶级妇女要求自由独立，维护人格尊严等思想愿望，并对现存的资本主义制度表现了某种程度的怀疑、否定和批判。
易卜生通过海尔茂这个反面形象，批判了资本主义社会里婚姻、家庭的虚伪，以及伦理道德和法律宗教的不合理性，揭露了资产阶级的丑恶。
在他的《社会支柱》一剧中有一句名言：“道德衬衣有一股霉味———好像死人穿的寿衣。
”妇女向来是受压迫的，在封建社会里，她们是丈夫的奴隶，受尽种种虐待，在资本主义社会里，妇女没有得到真正的解放，她们做为丈夫玩乐消遣的工具，仍然没有自由独立的人格。
妇女反对做玩偶，要求做个自由独立的人，在资本主义社会，这是个极其平常也极其严肃的社会问题。
飘然而去，也只是要“救出自己”。
《玩偶之家》的深刻意义远远超出了对海尔茂这样个别资产阶级庸人的揭露和批判，它使资本主义社会的辩护士们大为惊悚。
他们认为娜拉出走是大逆不道，并对易卜生进行恶毒的人身攻击。
他们辱骂易卜生破坏了欧洲“善良的家庭秩序”，是一个败坏道德的作家，并要求禁演《玩偶之家》。
在此情况下，易卜生愤笔疾书写出了另一社会问题剧《群鬼》，通过阿尔文太太沦为旧礼教、旧观念牺牲的过程，有力地驳斥了资产阶级社会对他的无耻诽谤。
因而，从这里我们可以更加清楚地看出，易卜生《玩偶之家》的社会效果是多么的强大，他在剧中所提出的社会问题又是多么的尖锐和深刻。
娜拉的出走，具有重大的历史进步意义。
但是，在当时特定的社会历史条件下，她的这一行动又是不可能取得真正的成功。