Prevalence, clinical predictors, and prognostic impact of chronic

合集下载

经前期综合征与双相障碍共病探讨

经前期综合征与双相障碍共病探讨

470综述新医学 2023年7月第54卷第7期经前期综合征与双相障碍共病探讨梁晓琳 甘照宇【摘要】 经前期综合征和双相障碍都是常见的精神障碍,两者在临床症状、病程等方面有相似之处,而且常常同时发生,严重影响患者的社会功能。

目前国内关于经前期综合征与双相障碍共病的研究较少,该文就两者共病的流行病学、可能的共病机制、诊断要点以及治疗方面进行综述。

【关键词】 经前期综合征;双相障碍;共病Comorbidity of premenstrual syndrome and bipolar disorder Liang Xiaolin , Gan Zhaoyu. Department of Psychiatry , the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat -sen University , Guangzhou 510630, China【Abstract 】 Both premenstrual syndrome (PMS ) and bipolar disorder are common mental disorders. They have similarities inclinical symptoms and course of disease , and often occur simultaneously , which seriously affect the social function of patients. At present , few studies on PMS and bipolar disorder comorbidity have been conducted in China. In this article , the epidemiological data ,possible comorbidity mechanism , diagnosis and treatment of PMS and bipolar disorder were reviewed.【Key words 】 Premenstrual syndrome ; Bipolar disorder ; Comorbidity作者单位:510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院精神心理科经前期综合征(PMS )主要表现为经期前反复出现情绪不稳定、易怒、烦躁和焦虑等症状,同时可能伴有行为和躯体症状,这些症状在经期时或经期后不久可自行缓解。

脑梗死急性期淡漠预测因素的研究

脑梗死急性期淡漠预测因素的研究

脑梗死急性期淡漠预测因素的研究王君;于治华;王正则;高连波;曹云鹏【摘要】Objective To explore the relationship between apathy and lesion location and serum homocysteine during the acute stage of ischemic stroke. Methods 152 patients with acute cerebral infarction were recruited. 152 volunteers from medical center were as control group. The Apathy Scale (AS) was used to assess poststroke apathy (PSA). National Institutesof Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to assess the severity of stroke. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was used to evaluate the lesion lo-cation. Modified Fazekas Scale was used to assess leukoaraiosis. The serum levels of homocysteine of patients were determined. Results The prevalence of PSA was significantly higher in the patients than in the control group (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demon-strated that frontal lesion (P=0.001), basal ganglia lesion (P=0.006), pons lesion (P=0.002) and higher homocysteine level(P<0.001) signifi-cantly related with PSA. Conclusion Frontal lesion, basal ganglia lesion, pons lesion and higher homocysteine level may be predictors for apathy in acute stage of ischemic stroke.%目的:探讨脑梗死急性期淡漠与梗死部位、血浆同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)是否相关,分析卒中后淡漠可能的预测因素。

Barrett食管的内镜介入治疗

Barrett食管的内镜介入治疗

Barrett食管的内镜介入治疗李小林;余倩;张学彦【摘要】Barrett食管(Barrett's esophagus,BE)是被公认的食管腺癌的癌前病变,食管腺癌的发生率呈快速上升趋势,因此,对癌前病变进行有效地干预是降低食管腺癌发病率和控制死亡率的关键.目前,BE的治疗方法主要有抑酸药物治疗、外科食管切除术、内镜介入治疗等.近年来多种内镜介入治疗技术应用于BE和食管腺癌的治疗,取得了较好的效果.本文就BE各种内镜介入治疗方法作一概述.【期刊名称】《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》【年(卷),期】2015(024)005【总页数】3页(P603-605)【关键词】Barrett食管;食管腺癌;重度异型增生;内镜介入治疗【作者】李小林;余倩;张学彦【作者单位】哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院消化内科,黑龙江哈尔滨150086;哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院地方病科,黑龙江哈尔滨150086;哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院消化内科,黑龙江哈尔滨150086【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R571Barrett 食管(Barrett's esophagus,BE)是指食管下段的鳞状上皮化生为柱状上皮[1]。

BE 可分为三类:(1)BE 不合并异型增生;(2)BE 合并轻度异型增生(low-grade dysplasia,LGD);(3)BE 合并重度异型增生(high-grade dysplasia,HGD)[2]。

BE 合并HGD被认为是食管腺癌(esophageal adenocarcinoma,EAC)的癌前病变,35% ~40% 的患者在5 年后发展为EAC[3]。

BE 在西方发达国家患病率较高,但近年来在亚洲国家发病率也明显升高。

BE 患者比普通患者EAC 发病率高出30 ~50 倍[4],对于BE 的诊断和治疗已成为临床的研究热点。

近年来内镜技术的发展取得了较为理想的效果,目前内镜介入治疗已成为BE 相关肿瘤的主要治疗方式[5]。

NAFLD的治疗策略

NAFLD的治疗策略

17
NASH已成为肝细胞癌 仅次于慢性病毒性肝炎的常见病因
在德国肝病和胃肠科进行的一项研究中, 肝细胞癌常见的病因
NASH 24%
研究方法: 入选2007年2月至2008年3月在肝病和胃肠 科就诊的成人肝细胞癌(HCC)患者 (n=162),评估肝癌的病因及代谢综合 征(MS)的流行和相关特征。
HCV 23.3%
Chun-Jen Liu. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2012;27 :1555–1560
13
非肥胖人群NAFLD的危险因素
Chun-Jen Liu. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2012;27 :1555–1560
Luisa Fernanda Santos, et al. Rev Col Gastroenterol 2010; 25 (4): 374-391 2
NAFLD的定义 非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是一种与胰 岛素抵抗( insulin resistance, IR)和遗传易感密 切相关的代谢应激性肝脏损伤。
≈15%1
2015年我国HBsAg携带
1. Jian-Gao Fan. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2013; 28 (Suppl. 1): 11–17 2. 庄辉.我国肝病防治的主要成果和最新进展. 医师报,2011-08-20 7
率有望降到6%以下2
8
近几年,NAFLD引起国际的持续重视
2009 2011 2012 2013 2014
9
关于NAFLD的关注热点
1. 非肥胖人群的NAFLD风险 2. NAFLD发展为肝癌的风险

心室电风暴心电图

心室电风暴心电图

心室电风暴心电图郜玲;卢喜烈【摘要】@@ 一、定义 rn心室电风暴又称室性心动过速风暴、交感风暴、儿茶酚胺风暴、植入型心律转复除颤器(ICD)电风暴.2004 年已有人提出电风暴这个概念,指由于心室电活动极度不稳定所导致的危重的恶性心律失常,是心源性猝死的重要机制[1].2006 年 ACC / AHA / ESC<室性心律失常的诊疗和心脏性猝死预防指南>首次对心室电风暴做出明确的定义:24 h 内自发逸2 次的伴血流动力学不稳定的室性心动过速和(或)心室颤动,间隔窦性心律,通常需要电转复和电除颤紧急治疗的临床证候群[2].【期刊名称】《心电与循环》【年(卷),期】2012(031)002【总页数】2页(P108-109)【作者】郜玲;卢喜烈【作者单位】100853,中国人民解放军总医院心脏无创检测中心;100853,中国人民解放军总医院心脏无创检测中心【正文语种】中文心室电风暴又称室性心动过速风暴、交感风暴、儿茶酚胺风暴、植入型心律转复除颤器(ICD)电风暴。

2004年已有人提出电风暴这个概念,指由于心室电活动极度不稳定所导致的危重的恶性心律失常,是心源性猝死的重要机制[1]。

2006年ACC/ AHA/ESC《室性心律失常的诊疗和心脏性猝死预防指南》首次对心室电风暴做出明确的定义:24 h内自发≥2次的伴血流动力学不稳定的室性心动过速和(或)心室颤动,间隔窦性心律,通常需要电转复和电除颤紧急治疗的临床证候群[2]。

1.预兆表现心室电风暴发作前常有窦性频率升高,出现单形、多形或多源性室性期前收缩增多,室性期前收缩呈单发、连发、频发,偶联间期多不固定。

心电图上可伴有呈“巨R型”或“墓碑型”ST段抬高,缺血性ST段可显著抬高或压低,T波电交替或T波极度缺血性改变,如T波异常宽大畸形或呈尼亚加拉瀑布样T波改变等。

2.发作时的心电图表现主要表现为自发、反复发生的室性心动过速或心室颤动,室性心动过速可以是尖端扭转性或多形性室性心动过速,也可能是快速的单形性室性心动过速或心室颤动。

小肠细菌过度增长病因、诊断、治疗及饮食健康教育-附示意图

小肠细菌过度增长病因、诊断、治疗及饮食健康教育-附示意图

小肠细菌过度增长病因、诊断、治疗及饮食健康教育肠道菌群是一个复杂的微生物系统,人体各部分肠道微生物的分布和数量都不相同。

与结肠中大量细菌定植不同,小肠液中的微生物数量<104/mL。

小肠细菌过度增长(small intestine bacterial overgrowth, SIBO)是肠道菌群失调的后果。

SIBO以营养吸收障碍为主要特点,发病率随年龄增长而上升,总人群发生率约为8~20%,在75岁以上人群中可达50%,女性多于男性,是一种可严重影响患者健康和生活质量的疾患。

本文将介绍小肠细菌过度生长的病因,症状、诊断、治疗和饮食干预。

病因正常情况下,由于肠粘膜屏障、胃酸、胰酶、小肠蠕动和回盲瓣的作用,小肠菌群保持稳定。

先天性消化道畸形、高龄、麻醉性止痛药、肝硬化、免疫力低下、慢性胰腺炎、胆囊疾病、胃肠道手术等均能影响上述保护性机制,小肠细菌数量增多或出现原先在定植结肠的细菌,发生SIBO。

肠易激综合征(IBS)、憩室病、乳糜泻、炎症性肠病患者常伴有SIBO,其中IBS患者中63~85%SIBO为阳性。

临床表现及对机体的影响SIBO多表现为肠易激综合征的症状,包括腹痛、腹胀、产气增多、腹泻、恶心、便秘等,长时间伴有体重减轻。

SIBO可导致碳水化合物、脂质及脂溶性维生素吸收不良、蛋白质丢失及产氨增多和维生素B12缺乏,造成营养不良。

诊断方法通过内镜抽取小肠液培养(small bowel aspirate culture)被认为是最准确的诊断方法。

微生物定量培养的阳性标准还无定论,临床上常以十二指肠液检出>103/mL或空肠液检出>105/mL视为SIBO阳性。

此法的缺点是价格昂贵,耗时长,可能污染样本,难以检测小肠远端SIBO的状况。

呼气试验(Breath testing, BT)是一种更为常用的诊断方法。

BT属于无创性检查,操作简单,但诊断准确性较差。

方法:给受检者口服一定量的糖类,通过检测呼出气中氢气(H2)、甲烷(CH4)等浓度。

癌症患者心理痛苦筛查工具评价的综述

进行测温,防止自伤等意外事故。

改变以往体温计从头发到尾,然后逐个收回的方法,改为以责任组为单位,一组发完,收回后再发另一组,缩短了收取体温计的时间。

发放和回收的体温计数量不符时,及时追查原因,防止老年或智力障碍者出现吞表等意外。

采取对策后,2010年各病区共打破体温计452支,无一例体温计咬破事件,与2009年各病区共打破体温计2405支相比,2010年体温计的损坏减少了81.2%。

但体温计划伤皮肤仍有1例,原因为患者测量腋温过程中去厕所,致使体温计滑到背部,卧床后折断,划伤了右侧背部皮肤。

2.3推广电子体温计的使用欧盟已决定从2005年起以后的4年里,使充汞式玻璃温计从欧洲市场上消失,并从2011年起禁止这种体温计出口。

电子体温计采用热敏电阻原理测量温度,无汞、安全、省时、省力、且为塑料材质,不易摔破,安全性方面明显优于充汞式玻璃体温计。

研究[6-7]发现,电子体温计具有准确、灵敏、测温时间短等优点,临床使用效果与充汞式玻璃体温计没有明显的差异,但在安全性方面高于充汞式玻璃体温计,具有广阔的临床应用前景。

但目前由于成本等原因,电子体温计在我国的普及尚有一定困难。

我院2009年始在烧伤科和产科试用电子体温计,反响很好,现准备全面推广使用。

参考文献[1]周明芳,舒勤,李巍.体温测量研究进展[J ].中华护理杂志,2005,40(11):863-864.[2]刘风青,杨海新.腋窝体温测量的研究进展[J ].中国实用护理杂志,2006,22(22):74-75.[3]陈煜林,罗志香.水银体温计毁损的危害及处理[J ].护理研究,2009,23(25):2264-2265.[4]徐培成,叶细标,许缃,等.低水平汞暴露对牙科专业人员健康的影响[J ].中国临床医学,2004,11(4):634-636.[5]黄秀芬,邹丽华,李灿,等.临床护士对水银体温计损坏危害认知的调查和分析[J ].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2005,11(6):523-525.[6]董秀丽,高晓雁.电子体温计与水银体温计在临床使用中的效果观察[J ].护士进修杂志,2008,23(21):2008-2009.[7]聂秋芸.电子体温计与水银体温计测温对比分析[J ].中国误诊学杂志,2010,10(17):4056.(本文编辑马云会)随着癌症诊治水平的进步,癌症的生存率随之提高,患者的社会心理问题日益引起肿瘤学界的关注。

房颤血栓栓塞的评分及应用进展

房颤血栓栓塞的评分及应用进展南京【期刊名称】《中国心血管病研究》【年(卷),期】2017(015)001【总页数】4页(P6-9)【关键词】心房颤动;栓塞;脑卒中;评分;进展【作者】南京【作者单位】100038北京市,首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院心血管内科【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R541.7心房颤动(以下简称房颤)是临床上最常见的快速性心律失常,65岁以上人群中,房颤的发病率可高达75%,因此房颤也被认为是“21世纪的流行病”[1]。

房颤引起血栓栓塞是房颤引起死亡、致残等的重要原因,据估计15%~20%的缺血性脑卒中是由房颤引起的,并且房颤引起的脑卒中临床预后不佳,每年的复发率更高达12%[2,3]。

因此,对房颤患者血栓栓塞风险的评估有着重要的临床意义。

目前临床上对房颤血栓栓塞评估的评分标准很多,本文就相关评分进行总结分析。

1.1 CHADS2评分由充血性心力衰竭(congestive heart failure,C)、高血压(hypertension,H)、年龄≥75岁(age,A)、糖尿病(diabetesmellitus,D)以及既往有脑卒中或者短暂性脑缺血发作(stroke,S2)所组成的CHADS2评分系统,是在2001年首先提出、在2004年开始应用于临床研究指导危险分层及抗栓治疗策略[4,5]。

该评分系统简单易用,迅速在临床广泛应用,并且获得了各国房颤指南的推荐。

Rietbrock等[6]的研究发现,该评分系统能够有效地预测卒中风险,但是仍需要进一步的修正提高,这其中包括对年龄的细化分层。

SPORTIF研究发现,根据CHADS2评分系统,大约60%的患者卒中风险为中危,甚至对既往有过脑卒中或者短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者,CHADS2评分系统提示为中危,但是很明显此类患者卒中风险极高,这也从侧面反映该评分系统临床应用的局限性[7]。

1.2 CHA2DS2-VASc评分系统 CHADS2评分为0的患者,其卒中的年发生率可高达2%[8],因此对于CHADS2评分低危患者的详细分层在临床上显得尤其重要。

规范化治疗

规范化治疗——风湿病领域永恒的话题栗占国近年来,“规范化治疗”的概念已在不少学科受到关注,并促进了临床治疗水平的提高。

风湿病学作为内科领域发展最快的学科之一,规范化治疗更是不容忽视。

临床上,因不正规用药导致病情迁延不愈、出现内脏损害甚至致残的风湿病患者绝不在少数。

最近又读到几篇国外关于“规范化”或“系统性”治疗类风湿关节炎( RA )和系统性红斑狼疮( SLE )等的文章,更促使我动笔将近几年国内外的临床研究以及自己的思考写成此文,供同道们参考。

1 规范化治疗是风湿病缓解的必由之路众所周知, RA 、 SLE 及干燥综合征( SS )等风湿病的发生和致病过程均与抗原的介导、自身抗体形成、致炎性因子的产生,以及细胞免疫异常等一系列免疫和炎症过程有关。

因此,临床上仅给予对症治疗、短期使用缓解病情抗风湿药( DMARDs )或免疫抑制剂很难控制这些疾病的发展。

大量的临床研究证明,规范化的系统用药是大多数风湿病患者病情缓解的关键。

比如,在 RA 的治疗中,尽早给予 DMARDs 已成为国际共识[ 1 , 2 ]。

而且, DMARDs 的给药是否及时与 RA 患者关节破坏的程度有直接关系[ 3 ]。

Panay i 等对 1975 — 2004 年 30 年来发表的 DMARDs 治疗 RA 的所有随机对照研究( RCT )进行了荟萃分析。

其结论十分明确,即对于多数 RA 患者应及早采用 DMARDs 联合治疗的方法[ 4 ]。

尽管有少数临床研究的设计存在不足,但联合治疗对患者显示出的明显优势得到了肯定。

不仅如此, Grigor 等在《柳叶刀》杂志发表的论文甚至提倡更为积极的方案治疗 RA [ 5 ]。

该文的研究者给 RA 患者以柳氮磺吡啶(40 mg · kg- 1· d- 1)及羟氯喹(6.5 mg · kg- 1· d- 1),并联用甲氨蝶呤(≤ 25 mg/ 周),必要时加用激素或改用来氟米特或金诺芬等三种药物联合治疗,研究者称之为“强化”( intensive )治疗方案。

多维自我体像关系调查问卷(mbsrq)的初步修订及其与人格类型的相关性研究

13.Wilson JB.Arpey CJ Body dysmorphic disorder:suggestions for detection and treatment in a surgical dermatology practice 2004(11)
14.Thompson JK.van den Berg P.Roehrig M.Guarda AS,Heinberg LJ The sociocultural attitudes towards appearance scale-3(SATAQ-3):development and validation 2004(03)
27.Cash Thomas F An Investigation of Changes in Body Image Following Cosmetic Surgery 2002(01)
28.Dastle DJ.honigmon RJ.Phillips KA Does cosmetic suryery improve psychosocial wellbeing 2002(12)
11.Castle David J Discussion:Mental Reconstr Sury 2004(07)
12.Ferda Izgic.Gamze Akyuz Social Phobia Among University Students and Its Relation to Self-Esteem and Body 2004(09)
71.Byrne NM.Hills AP Should body-image scales designed for adults be used with adolescents? 1996(03)
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

ORIGINAL ARTICLEPrevalence,clinical predictors,and prognostic impact of chronic renal insufficiency in very old Chinese patients with coronary artery diseaseShihui Fu •Shuangyan Yi •Bing Zhu •Yuan Liu •Liang Wang •Yongyi Bai •Ping Ye •Leiming LuoReceived:12August 2012/Accepted:12February 2013/Published online:13June 2013ÓSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2013AbstractBackground and aims An aging population leads to the increased prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD)and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI).Nevertheless,the prev-alence,clinical predictors,and prognostic impact of CRI in very old Chinese patients with CAD are unclear.Methods Baseline characteristics were obtained from 1,050old patients with CAD.The endpoint was all-cause mortality during the mean follow-up period of 417days.Results The median age of the subjects was 86years (range 60–104years).CRI was present in 372patients (35.4%).Age [hazard ratio (HR)1.032,95%confidence interval (95%CI) 1.010–1.054],chronic heart failure (CHF)(HR 2.361,95%CI 1.747–3.191),hypertension (HR 1.878,95%CI 1.291–2.731),hemoglobin (HR 0.973,95%CI 0.965–0.981),serum albumin (HR 0.954,95%CI 0.912–0.995),HDL-C (HR 0.371,95%CI 0.238–0.580),and LDL-C levels (HR 0.795,95%CI 0.656–0.965)were independent predictors of CRI (all P \0.05).In addition,CRI was independently associated with mortality in patients with CAD (HR 1.366,95%CI 1.024–1.822,P =0.034).Age (HR 1.036,95%CI 1.015–1.059),acute myocardial infarction (AMI;HR 1.795,95%CI 1.239–2.602),CHF New York Heart Association class IV (HR 1.691,95%CI 1.187–2.410),heart rate (HR 1.019,95%CI 1.011–1.026),hemoglobin (HR 0.982,95%CI 0.975–0.990),and serum albumin levels (HR 0.905,95%CI 0.874–0.938)were also independently related to mor-tality in CAD patients (all P \0.05).Conclusions A high prevalence of CRI with a high associated mortality rate existed in very old Chinese patients with CAD.CRI was an independent risk factor of adverse prognosis for these patients,and multiple predic-tors could be used to identify CAD patients at increased risk for CRI or poor survival.Keywords Coronary disease ÁChronic renalinsufficiency ÁPrevalence ÁPredictive value of tests ÁPrognosisIntroductionOn a global scale,evolving changes in demographics have led to an aging population along with an increased preva-lence of chronic renal insufficiency (CRI)in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).A cross-sectional study using data from the China Heart Survey demonstrated that Chinese adults with CAD had a high prevalence of CRI (24.8%)[1];however,a higher prevalence of CRI may exist in very old Chinese with CAD,who were under-rep-resented in that study.Because CRI plays an important role in the progression and adverse outcome of cardiovascular disease [2–4],the co-occurrence of CAD and CRI may result in a higher mortality rate.Because the population becomes much more heterogeneous as age increases and co-morbidities develop (e.g.,CRI),the ability of traditional risk factors to predict mortality accurately in these patients has been a subject of debate,suggesting that a search for other risk factors should be undertaken.However,most related studies have been based on relatively young patients,and very few studies have focused on very oldS.Fu and S.Yi were the co-first authors.S.Fu ÁS.Yi ÁB.Zhu ÁY.Liu ÁL.Wang ÁY.Bai ÁP.Ye ÁL.Luo (&)Department of Geriatric Cardiology,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Haidian District,Beijing 100853,China e-mail:lleim@Aging Clin Exp Res (2013)25:385–391DOI 10.1007/s40520-013-0059-0patients[5].In addition,race and national conditions always have important influences on the prevalence,outcome,and risk factors of CRI in very old patients.Most of the studies that have reported the impact of CRI on mortality in CAD patients only included Caucasians and African-Americans, and such studies are limited in China[6].We conducted a survey which sought to determine the prevalence and mortality of CRI in very old Chinese patients with CAD,identify the clinical predictors of CRI, evaluate the impact of CRI on mortality,and screen risk factors for mortality in very old patients with co-existing CAD and CRI.MethodsStudy populationThis study included1,050Chinese patients(C60years of age)diagnosed with CAD.The diagnoses based on history, symptoms of typical angina,cardiac markers and specific cardiac tests,such as electrocardiogram(resting/exercise), echocardiogram,radionuclide imaging,computed tomog-raphy(CT)and coronary arteriography,were made by chief physicians or associate chief physicians according to the American College of Cardiology(ACC)/American Heart Association(AHA)/European Society of Cardiology(ESC) guidelines[7–9].Of the1,050CAD patients,741had stable CAD,238had unstable angina,and71had acute myocar-dial infarction(AMI).The exclusion criteria included severe aortic stenosis,anticipated cardiac transplantation, and use of a left ventricular assist device.Each participant provided written informed consent to be included in the study.Our study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army(PLA) General Hospital(Beijing,China)and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of1975(as revised in1983).The baseline characteristics were collected from all patients after admission to the Chinese PLA General Hospital(from October11th,2007to July2nd,2011);the patients were followed for an average of417days(median 319days;75%range185–557days).The baseline char-acteristics of subjects available for this study included demographics(age and gender),lifestyle(smoking),mea-surements obtained during physical examination[height, weight,heart rate,systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP)],laboratory measurements[hemoglobin, high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C),low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),triglyceride,and fasting plasma glucose(FPG)].After asking patients or their family members to describe their symptoms,the New York Heart Association(NYHA)functional classification system was used to assess the stage of chronic heart failure(CHF).In all1,050subjects(100%),glomerularfiltration rate (GFR)was calculated by the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease(MDRD)equation based on data from Chinese CRI patients,as follows:1759serum creatinine (mg/dl)-1.2349age(years)-0.17990.79(if female)[10].A standard echocardiogram was performed and several structural parameters were assessed.Left ventricular ejec-tion fraction was measured by Simpson’s method[11].Left ventricular mass was calculated as the formula described by Devereux et al.[12],and left ventricular mass index was obtained by dividing the left ventricular mass by the body surface area.Smoking status was categorized as current, former,and never.Subjects were considered to be current smokers if they smoked[1cigarette/day for the last year. Former smoking was defined as a history of cigarette consumption on a regular basis([1cigarette/day),but no current smoking.Body mass index(BMI)was defined as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.SBP and DBP were the average offive separate measurements.Determination of diseasesThe study defined CRI as a GFR\60ml/min/1.73m2, according to the Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI)working group definition[13].Atrialfibrillation (AF)and CHF were diagnosed by chief physicians or asso-ciate chief physicians on the basis of the ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for AF[14]and ESC guidelines for CHF[15]. Subjects with a SBP C140mmHg,a DBP C90mmHg,or receiving medication for treatment of hypertension were defined as having hypertension,and those with a FPG C7mmol/L or receiving an oral hypoglycemic agent/insulin were considered to have diabetes mellitus(DM).Data managementAll information was obtained and preserved by trained researchers.To verify the accuracy of the results,other independent researchers performed the logistical check and re-evaluation of the data.OutcomeGiven the priority of all-cause mortality in outcome stud-ies,as well as the obviously high incidence of multiple organ failure in very old patients,the endpoint chosen for the present analysis was all-cause mortality over the fol-low-up period.Follow-up data was obtained from medical records or telephone interviews.No patient was lost to follow-up.Death was ascertained from the death record,a legal document including time,site,and other information. The Chinese PLA General Hospital was the designatedhospital for these patients,and had their integrated long-term medical andfinal death records.Therefore,follow-up was carried out effectively,and endpoints could be judged accurately.Statistical analysisThe proportions of patients with CRI and other co-mor-bidities in the study population were expressed as a prev-alence rate.Continuous variables were described using the mean with standard deviation(SD)for those with a normal distribution and the median with a75%range for non-normally distributed variables.The bivariate associations between CRI and variables in Table1(excluding MDRD-eGFR)were assessed by Student’s t test for continuous variables(normal distribution),Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables(abnormal distribution),and v2anal-ysis for categorical variables.To identify independently clinical predictors of CRI,co-variates with a P\0.10were selected from the results of bivariate association analysis and applied to backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression(likelihood ratio test),which was used to avoid the interaction of variables.A multivariate logistic regression model(enter)was then developed with CRI as a dependent variable and variables from backward stepwise regression(P\0.10)as inde-pendent variables,and variables were kept in the last model at a significance level of two-tailed P\0.05[16].To screen risk factors for mortality,co-variates with a P\0.10 were selected by Cox regression univariate analysis and applied to the multivariate Cox regression models with death as the dependent variable,which were divided into two steps(stepwise and enter).The Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival for these patients with and without CRI was calculated.Receiver-operating characteristic(ROC)curves and areas under the curve(c-statistics)were used to assess the ability of the models to discriminate between patients with and without CRI/survival and death.After excluding variables missing from[15%of the study population,missing values of included variables were \2.7%(28patients),except BMI[113patients,(10.8%)]. To minimize bias,missing values were calculated by the multiple imputation method,and then the results were pooled[16].All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS17(SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,USA).ResultsPatient characteristicsThe median age of the study population was86years (100%range60–104years)and80.8%(848patients)of the cohort was[80years of age.The majority of the patients(89.2%)were male,and all of the patients were Chinese(100%).Among the1,050old CAD patients, there were327(31.1%)with CHF,839(79.9%)with hypertension,219(20.9%)with AF,and417(39.7%) with DM.The baseline characteristics of all patients or of patients grouped according to whether or not they had CRI are listed in Table1.Prevalence of CRICRI was present in a total of372patients(35.4%),including 168(51.4%)with CHF,323(38.5%)with hypertension,88 (40.2%)with AF,and160(38.4%)with DM.The preva-lence of CRI among patients with stable CAD,unstable angina,and AMI were34.8%(258/741),32.8%(78/238), and50.7%(36/71),respectively.There was no significant distinction in the prevalence of CRI between patients with stable CAD and those with unstable angina(P=0.563).A significant difference in CRI prevalence was observed between patients with stable CAD/unstable angina and patients with AMI[P=0.008,hazard ratio(HR)1.926, 95%confidence interval(CI)1.181–3.141;P=0.006,HR 2.110,95%CI1.232–3.614].Among patients in the60–75, 75–90,and90–105years age groups,there were26(21.1%, 123patients),260(35.8%,726patients),and86patients (42.8%,201patients)with CRI,respectively.The differ-ence in prevalence of CRI was evident between patients 60–75and75–90years of age(P=0.001,HR2.082,95% CI1.316–3.293);however,there was only a marginal,but not statistically significant difference in the prevalence of CRI for patients75–90versus90–104years of age(P=0.070, HR1.34,95%CI0.975–1.842).Clinical predictors of CRIOn univariate analysis,CRI was associated with many factors as shown in Table1.The participants with CRI were older,less likely to be male,and more likely to have AMI,hypertension,and CHF.The participants with CRI tended to have a lower left ventricular ejection fraction,a thicker interventricular septum,a larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,and a lower left ventricular mass index.Lower levels of hemoglobin,serum albumin,HDL-C,LDL-C,and higher levels of triglyceride were more commonly reported among those with CRI than those without CRI.On multivariate analysis,age,CHF,hyper-tension,hemoglobin,serum albumin,HDL-C,and LDL-C levels were independently associated with CRI(Table2). The area under the ROC curve for the multivariate model, equivalent to the c-statistic,was0.740,suggesting good discrimination between those who did and did not develop CRI.Table1Patients characteristics at baseline,by chronic renal insufficiencyCharacteristics Total CRI absent CRI present P valueDemographicsAge(year)a86.0(81.0–89.0)85.0(80.0–89.0)87.0(83.0–90.0)\0.001 Males(%)937(89.2)617(91.0)320(86.0)0.013 History of smoking0.674 Current(%)61(5.8)42(6.2)19(5.1)Former(%)337(32.1)213(31.4)124(33.3)Never(%)652(62.1)423(62.4)229(61.6)BMI(kg/m2)mean(SD)23.9(3.5)23.9(3.5)23.9(3.5)0.601 ComorbidityAMI(%)71(6.8)35(5.2)36(9.7)0.005 CHF(%)327(31.1)159(23.5)168(45.2)\0.001 NYHA class II(%)98(9.3)63(9.3)35(9.4)NYHA class III(%)147(14.0)68(10.0)79(21.2)NYHA class IV(%)82(7.8)28(4.1)54(14.5)Hypertension(%)839(79.9)516(76.1)323(86.8)\0.001 DM(%)417(39.7)257(37.9)160(43.0)0.106 AF(%)219(20.9)131(19.3)88(23.7)0.098 Clinical presentationHR(bpm)a72.0(64.0–80.0)72.0(64.8–80.0)72.0(64.0–80.0)0.723 MSBP(mmHg)a132.4(123.8–142.0)131.8(123.0–141.6)133.4(125.4–143.0)0.053 MDBP(mmHg)a69.0(63.7–74.3)69.2(64.3–74.3)68.8(63.0–74.3)0.294 LVEF(%)a60.0(56.0–63.0)60.0(57.0–63.0)59.0(53.8–62.0)\0.001 IVS(mm)a11.0(10.0–11.0)11.0(10.0–11.0)11.0(10.0–12.0)0.030 LVPW(mm)a10.0(10.0–11.0)10.0(10.0–11.0)10.0(10.0–11.0)0.211 LVEDD(mm)a49.0(46.0–51.0)48.1(46.0–51.0)49.0(46.2–52.0)0.004 LVMI(g/m2)a32.0(29.1–34.0)32.0(30.0–34.0)31.0(28.1–34.0)\0.001 Laboratory resultsMDRD-eGFR(ml/min/1.73m2)a69.2(53.3–82.3)78.6(70.4–89.0)47.2(35.0–54.4)Hemoglobin(g/L)a124.0(109.0–137.0)128.0(114.8–140.0)113.0(101.0–128.0)\0.001 Serum albumin(g/L)a38.3(35.3–40.8)38.8(35.9–41.2)37.7(34.6–39.9)\0.001 Glucose(mmol/L)a 5.4(4.8–6.2) 5.3(4.8–6.1) 5.4(4.8–6.3)0.357 Triglyceride(mmol/L)a 1.2(0.9–1.8) 1.2(0.9–1.6) 1.4(1.0–2.0)\0.001 HDL-C(mmol/L)a 1.1(0.9–1.3) 1.1(0.9–1.3) 1.0(0.8–1.2)\0.001 LDL-C(mmol/L)a 2.1(1.7–2.6) 2.2(1.8–2.7) 2.0(1.6–2.5)0.001 TherapyAspirin(%)537(51.1)355(52.4)182(48.9)0.287 Clopidogrel(%)622(59.2)409(60.3)213(57.3)0.333 b-Blockers(%)705(67.1)445(65.6)260(69.9)0.160 ACEI/ARB(%)530(50.5)346(51.0)184(49.5)0.626 Statins(%)693(66.0)453(66.8)240(64.5)0.452 PCI(%)134(12.8)93(13.7)41(11.0)0.211CRI chronic renal insufficiency,BMI body mass index,AMI acute myocardial infarction,CHF chronic heart failure,NYHA New York Heart Association,DM diabetes mellitus,AF atrialfibrillation,HR heart rate,MSBP mean systolic blood pressure,MDBP mean diastolic blood pressure,LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction,IVS interventricular septum,LVPW left ventricular posterior wall,LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVMI left ventricular mass index,MDRD-eGFR estimated glomerularfiltration rate calculated by a modifying Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation,HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol,ACEI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,ARB angiotensin receptor blockers,PCI percutaneous coronary interventiona Median(75%range)Mortality for the entire cohort and association with CRI During the follow-up period,the mortality was 20.8%(218patients)for the CAD patients.The MDRD-eGFR differed markedly between the survivors and those who had died [71.3(56.5–82.3)versus 58.7(38.4–82.3)ml/min/1.73m 2,P \0.001].There was a significant difference (P \0.001)in survival time between patients with CRI (median 206days;75%range 100–355days)and without CRI (median 245days;75%range 136–420days).The Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival for these patients with and without CRI is shown in Fig.1.Patients with CRI experienced a significantly higher mortality rate (30.1%,112patients)than those without CRI (15.6%,106patients)(P \0.001,HR 2.325,95%CI 1.716–3.148).Moreover,CRI was an independent predictor for mortality after adjusting for other factors in Table 1(P =0.034,HR 1.366,95%CI 1.024–1.822).In addition,the associations between age,AMI,CHF NYHA class IV,heart rate,hemoglobin,serum albumin level,and mortality in CAD patients remained significant after the same adjustment (Table 3).Mortality of patients with co-existing CAD and CRI and relative risk factorsIn 372patients with co-existing CRI and CAD,there were 112deaths (30.1%)during the follow-up period.In this population,risk factors,such as AMI,CHF NYHA class IV,AF,MDRD-eGFR,heart rate,and serum albumin level showed independent associations with mortality after adjusting for the factors in Table 1(Table 3).DiscussionAn important cross-sectional study using data from the China Heart Survey (CHS)showed that the prevalence of CRI among the participants with CAD and a mean age of 69years (100%range 56–67years)was 24.8%[1].In comparison with that trial,our study showed a higher prevalence of CRI (35.4%)in patients with CAD due to inclusion of many very old patients C 80years of age (80.8%).This study also demonstrated that CAD patients with or without CRI had important differences in many aspects,and several factors were independent clinical predictors for the occurrence of CRI.Not only was the prevalence of CRI increased in proportion to age,but the patients with CKD were also likely to have CHF,hyper-tension,and low levels of hemoglobin,serum albumin,and lipoproteins.Therefore,it may be necessary to pay more attention to the role of these factors in the generation and progression of CRI.Several previous studies have shown that the risk of mortality is significantly increased in CAD subjects with CRI when compared to those without CRI [2–4];however,this risk has not been clearly defined in old patients with CAD,especially in the Chinese population.In the current study,CRI was shown to be an independent risk factor for death in CAD patients,as well as age,AMI,CHF NYHA class IV,heart rate,hemoglobin,and serum albumin.A combination of functional glomerulopenia and structural glomerulosclerosis leads to progressive reduction in GFR with age.However,this study demonstrated that the age-related changes in the kidneys may be further complicated by co-morbidities (e.g.,CRI)common in older patients.Excluding the influence of age and other risk factors,CRI itself was independently associated with the death of old patients with CAD.Although the exact mechanisms by which CRI leads to higher mortality for patients with CAD remain unclear,the activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system,sympathetic nervous system,Table 2Correlates of chronic renal insufficiency on multivariable analysis Characteristics a Adjusted HR 95%CI P value Age 1.032[1.010–1.054]0.004CHF 2.361[1.747–3.191]\0.001Hypertension 1.878[1.291–2.731]0.001Hemoglobin (g/L)0.973[0.965–0.981]\0.001Serum albumin (g/L)0.954[0.912–0.995]0.027HDL-C (mmol/L)0.371[0.238–0.580]\0.001LDL-C (mmol/L)0.795[0.656–0.965]0.021HR hazard ratio,CI confidence interval,CHF chronic heart failure,HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterolac-statistic for this model was0.740Fig.1Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival for CAD patients.Very old CAD patients with CRI experienced a significantly higher mortality rate than those without CRI (P \0.001).CAD coronary artery disease,CRI chronic renal insufficiencyinflammatory processes,and oxidative stress caused by kidney function impairment may play important roles[17].In addition,this study identified several risk factors for mortality in a specific group of old patients with co-exist-ing CAD and CRI.In subjects with CRI,mortality was significantly higher than those without CRI as mentioned above,was markedly affected by CHF NYHA class IV and AMI,and tended to increase as the MDRD-eGFR declined. Because age is a variable in the MDRD-eGFR formula,its prognostic value for mortality in patients with co-existing CAD and CRI was not independent after adjusting for the MDRD-eGFR.The MDRD-eGFR of old CAD patients with CRI still had an independent effect on mortality, which emphasizes the need for caution not only for the occurrence of CRI,but also the level of the MDRD-eGFR itself.In some studies involving patients with CAD,AF and elevated heart rate have been demonstrated to have important prognostic implications for mortality[18,19]. Moreover,patients with CRI may experience increased mortality in association with AF and elevated heart rate [20].A relationship was observed in the current study between elevated heart rate and higher mortality for old patients with CAD,with or without CRI,but AF was an independent risk factor only in old patients with co-existing CAD and CRI.Several epidemiologic studies in different populations have revealed an association between low serum albumin level and mortality in patients with CAD [21,22].Low serum albumin level is also an indicator of poor prognosis,not only for patients with end-stage renal disease,but also patients with pre-dialysis CRI[23,24].Ourfinding was consistent with prior studies reporting that low serum albumin level has a deleterious impact on mortality for old patients with CAD,with or without CRI, which given its numerous associated factors,may reflect the combined influence of malnutrition,increased catabolic activity,inflammation,vascular injury,proteinuria,and fluid retention.The current study had several limitations.A limitation was a few important prognostic factors in old patients with CAD,such as mental status,were not tested in our analysis. In addition,our follow-up period was relatively short. Finally,the exact mechanisms by which the risk factors led to higher mortality were not involved in our study and were in need of further study.ConclusionsA high prevalence(35.4%)of CRI with a high associated mortality rate(30.1%)existed in very old Chinese patients with CAD,and patients with co-existing CAD and CRI should be considered a high-risk group for adverse out-comes.In addition,several clinical predictors available were shown to identify CAD patients at increased risk for CRI or poor survival,thus providing information to facil-itate more dynamic monitoring,improved care,and aggressive therapy for these high-risk patients. Acknowledgments The study was supported by the Central Health Special Foundation(Beijing,China).Table3Risk factors for mortality on multivariable analysisPatients Risk factors Adjusted HR95%CI P valueCAD a(1,050patients/model A)Age 1.036[1.015–1.059]0.001 AMI 1.795[1.239–2.602]0.002 CHF NYHA class IV 1.691[1.187–2.410]0.004 CRI 1.366[1.024–1.822]0.034 Heart rate(bpm) 1.019[1.011–1.026]\0.001 Hemoglobin(g/L)0.982[0.975–0.990]\0.001 Serum albumin(g/L)0.905[0.874–0.938]\0.001Coexistent CAD and CRI b (372patients/model B)AMI 1.986[1.260–3.130]0.003 CHF NYHA class IV 1.940[1.269–2.965]0.002 AF 1.822[1.217–2.729]0.004 MDRD-eGFR(ml/min/1.73m2)0.982[0.970–0.993]0.003 Heart rate(bpm) 1.017[1.005–1.028]0.004 Serum albumin(g/L)0.869[0.830–0.909]\0.001HR hazard ratio,CI confidence interval,CAD coronary artery disease,AMI acute myocardial infarction,CHF chronic heart failure,NYHA New York Heart Association,CRI chronic renal insufficiency,AF atrialfibrillation,MDRD-eGFR estimated glomerularfiltration rate calculated by a modifying Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equationa c-statistic for model A was0.852b c-statistic for model B was0.858Conflict of interest None.References1.Liu H,Yu J,Chen F,Li J et al(2007)Inpatients with coronaryheart disease have a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease based on estimated glomerularfiltration rate(eGFR)in China.Heart Vessels22:223–2282.Moe SM,Chen NX(2008)Mechanisms of vascular calcificationin chronic kidney disease.J Am Soc Nephrol19:213–2163.Anavekar NS,McMurray JJ,Velazquez EJ et al(2004)Relationbetween renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med351:1285–12954.Manjunath G,Tighiouart H,Coresh J(2003)Level of kidneyfunction as a risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly.Kidney Int63:1121–11295.O’Hare AM,Choi AI,Bertenthal D et al(2007)Age affectsoutcomes in chronic kidney disease.J Am Soc Nephrol 18:2758–27656.Barbour SJ,Er L,Djurdjev O,Karim M,Levin A(2010)Dif-ferences in progression of CKD and mortality amongst Cauca-sian,Oriental Asian and South Asian CKD patients.Nephrol Dial Transpl25:3663–36727.Fox K,Garcia MA,Ardissino D et al(2006)Guidelines on themanagement of stable angina pectoris:executive summary:the task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the European society of cardiology.Eur Heart J27:1341–13818.Anderson JL,Adams CD,Antman EM et al(2007)ACC/AHA2007guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Asso-ciation of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.J Am Coll Cardiol 50:e1–e1579.Thygesen K,Alpert JS,White HD et al(2007)Joint ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF task force for the redefinition of myocardial infarc-tion universal definition of myocardial infarction.Circulation 116:2634–265310.Ma Y-C,Zuo L,Chen J-H(2006)Modified glomerularfiltrationrate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.J Am Soc Nephrol17:2937–294411.Schiller NB,Shah PM,Crawford M et al(1989)Recommenda-tions for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography.American Society of Echocardiography Committee on standards,subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms.J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358–36712.Devereux RB,Alonso DR,Lutas EM et al(1986)Echocardio-graphic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy:comparison to necropsyfindings.Am J Cardiol57:450–45813.National Kidney Foundation(2002)K/DOQI clinical practiceguidelines for chronic kidney disease:evaluation,classification, and stratification.Am J Kidney Dis39:S1–S26614.Fuster V,Ryde´n LE,Cannom DS et al(2006)ACC/AHA/ESC2006guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation:a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for practice guidelines(writing committee to revise the2001guidelines for the management of patients with atrialfibrillation):developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society.Circulation114:e257–e35415.Dickstein K,Cohen-Solal A,Filippatos G et al(2008)ESCguidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure2008:the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treat-ment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure2008of the European Society of Cardiology.Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC(HFA)and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine(ESICM).Eur Heart J29:2388–244216.SPSS Inc.(2007)SPSS missing values TM17.0.SPSS Inc.doc-umentation,Chicago17.Ronco C,McCullough P,Anker SD et al(2010)Cardio-renalsyndromes:report from the consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative.Eur Heart J31:703–711u DH,Huynh LT,Chew DP et al(2009)Prognostic impact oftypes of atrialfibrillation in acute coronary syndromes.Am J Cardiol104:1317–132319.Goliasch G,Kleber ME,Richter B(2012)Routinely availablebiomarkers improve prediction of long-term mortality in stable coronary artery disease:the Vienna and Ludwigshafen Coronary Artery Disease(VILCAD)risk score.Eur Heart J33:2282–2289 20.Roberts PR,Green D(2011)Arrhythmias in chronic kidneydisease.Heart97:766–77321.Hartopo AB,Gharini PP,Setianto BY(2010)Low serum albuminlevels and in-hospital adverse outcomes in acute coronary syn-drome.Int Heart J51:221–22622.Weijenberg MP,Feskens EJ,Souverijn JH et al(1997)Serumalbumin,coronary heart disease,and mortality in an elderly cohort.Epidemiology8(1):87–9223.Mimura I,Nishi H,Nishi T et al(2011)Malnutrition andinflammation determine prognosis of patients with CRS type4.Blood Purif31:276–28024.Leinig CE,Moraes T,Ribeiro S(2011)Predictive value ofmalnutrition markers for mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.J Ren Nutr21:176–183。

相关文档
最新文档