C-Type Starch from High-Amylose Rice Resistant Starch Granules Modified by Antisense RNA Inhibition
英文淀粉

Functional Properties of Starchesby Morton SatinFAO Agricultural and Food Engineering Technologies ServiceIntroductionFew can deny that the indigenous starch crops of the tropics are true wonders of nature. With sun and rain, and little or no artificial inputs, they are able to grow in great abundance. Whether it be cassava, arrowroot, sago, taro, sweet potato or yam, for centuries tropical starches have served as staple foods for millions of people, throughout the hot and humid regions of the world. Indeed, these starch crops are so proficient at supplying essential calories to even the very poorest peoples of the world that they are considered to be the quintessential subsistence crop.But, what is considered to be a blessing in one situation, can turn out to be a burden under another set of circumstances. In the majority of tropical developing countries, the only foreseeable route to economic development is through agricultural development. The irony is that the very crops which have proven to be most suited for tropical agro-climatic conditions and upon which economic development will depend, have been relegated to the role of subsistence crops. Although these crops have been the subject of much investigation in the area of basic production, they have not benefitted from the kind of value-added research required for economic competitiveness on an international scale.It is extremely difficult to break out of this subsistence crop mode and compete with mainstream starch products such as corn, wheat or potato starches, particularly when it is not the commodities themselves that are the competition, but rather the functional characteristics of the value-added products. Consequently, for many indigenous tropical starch crops, the lack of competitive market access has become the major obstacle to their contribution to agricultural development. Efforts to improve production and yields often result in excess supplies of basic commodities for the existing market demand which, in turn, discourages future production. On the other hand, modern value-added products are generally very application-specific and are thus far less susceptible to the sort of market fluctuations that cause chaos to developing countries whose economies are built upon basic commodities.Until recently, the starch markets of the world were virtually closed to foreign countries. Import duties were so high that it was practically impossible to sell anything but the most basic commodities, at a price dictated by the buyer. All talk of value-addition to starches of developing countries was considered absurd. However, on April 12, 1994 the GATT Uruguay Round was signed in Marakesh, paving the way for new trade opportunities.As far as starch is concerned, what are some of the possible consequences of the Uruguay Round? There is tremendous potential for the profitable commercial use of tropical starches, but considerable research and product development of a new type is necessary to properly exploit these materials. The model for product quality and reliability has already been set by the international starch industry. That is who the competition is. If locally-produced tropical starches cannot reach an equivalent level of quality, functionality or reliability, then these products will never survive in the competitive market. There is only so much that a more equitable trade environment can offer.A review of the sort of research that has been done by both national and international institutes, shows that extensive work has been carried out on agronomic and phenotypic properties for most tropical crops, but relatively little study has been carried out on the sort of functional properties which are of direct technical and economic interest to competitive food and non-food industry. There is little purpose increasing the yield potential of crops that are unsuitable for processors or of limited acceptability to consumers. Far more work must be carried out on those characteristics which will result in products which are more convenient to distribute, easier to process, and have the physical, chemical and organoleptic properties required by the target markets. For those starches that do not have the native functional characteristics that are desired by the target market, an additional effort must be made to value-add or modify them so that they can compete internationally.The single most important influence to guide practical research is the marketplace. Just as it takes years of study andcontinuous inquiry to master the disciplines of science, the same can be said for the profession of marketing - it is not a job for amateurs. Ideally, scientists should be working in a team with professional marketers. If scientists are not able to have access to the services of a professional marketer, and wish to be directly involved in some aspects of marketing, then they must be prepared to spend the time and trouble to be as professional at this task as they are in their own scientific discipline.Most marketers will tell you that, aside from everything else, large markets require a consistent supply and a reliable price and quality. They do not like to be pioneers and it is extremely difficult to interest markets in new products unless these criteria can be assured with some confidence. Another factor which large markets require is time - time to test and re-test new products until they are absolutely certain that they are suitable. You can imagine the problems a large paper company would have if 5000 MT of white paper turns yellow after one year on the shelf because a new starch additive proves to be unstable.Once these basic factors are accounted for, the next most critical consideration is product performance which, in turn, depends upon the functional characteristics. In fact, that. s how starch should be viewed - as a set of functionalcharacteristics suited to a particular application. The functional characteristics we are after are the same ones that have firmly established other starches and natural polymers in specific markets. These functional characteristics follow on from the basic physico-chemical properties of the starch granules and can often be enhanced through value-addition of one type or another.The most basic of the physical properties of starch granules are their size as exemplified in Table 1.Table 1 - Granule Size Distribution of Various StarchesThe size of and distribution of starch granules can be very important for specific applications and even this very basic physical characteristic can be value-added. For example, the small granule size of rice starch makes it very suitable for applications laundry sizing of fine fabrics and for skin cosmetics. Carbonless paper requires the use of starch as a stilt material to protect ink capsule from premature rupturing, as can be seen in Figure 1.Starch SpeciesGranule Size Range (µm)(Coulter Counter)Average size µmWaxy Rice 2 - 13 5.5 High Amylose Corn 4 - 22 9.8 Corn 5 - 25 14.3 Cassava 3 - 28 14 Sorghum 3 - 27 16 Wheat 3 - 34 6.5, 19.5 Sweet Potato 4 - 40 18.5 Arrowroot 9 - 40 23 Sago 15 - 50 33 Potato 10 - 70 36 Canna (Aust. Arrowroot)22 - 8553Figure 1- Carbonless PaperFigure 2-Wheat Starch Granule Distribution µmThis application requires a starch that is of a particular size and uniformity and arrowroot was the product of choice for many years. A starch such as wheat could not be used because its bimodal distribution of starch granules made it unsuitable (Figure 2 and Figure 3).Figure 3- Air-Classified Wheat StarchHowever, the variation in supply and cost of arrowroot prompted one company to develop a process of separating the population of small granules from the large ones through centrifugation which resulted in an immediate take over of this market from arrowroot. It was a case of value addition to the very basic physical characteristic of the starch.Here is another interesting example of unique size, with all granules in the 1µm range.Figure 4- Cow Cockle StarchOther simple physical characteristics which have an impact on functionality are starch granule shape and surface. This is often a critical factor for applications requiring starch to be a surface carrier of materials such as colours, flavours, seasonings and even pesticides.Starch has two major components: amylose and amylopectin. These polymers are very different structurally, amylose being linear and amylopectin highly branched - each structure playing a critical role in the ultimate functionality of the native starch and its derivatives. The amylose/amylopectin ratios of starches can be genetically manipulated and offer a significant opportunity for the researcher with certain crops. Viscosity, shear resistance, gelatinization, textures, solubility, tackiness, gel stability, cold swelling and retrogradation are all functions of their amylose/amylopectin ratio.Table 2 - Amylose Content of Various StarchesStarch Source% AmyloseWaxy Rice0High Amylose Corn70Corn28Cassava17Waxy Sorghum0Wheat26Sweet Potato18Arrowroot21Sago26Potato20When aiming at functional properties in starch, most commercial companies examine the characteristics of competitive starches in particular applications. This sets the target to shoot for. For those characteristics which are unattainable with native starches, the only alternative is to look towards some form of value-addition to achieve the desired results. Value-addition can be as simple as sterilizing products required for the pharmaceutical industry to highly complex chemical modification to confer properties totally different from the native starch.Simple value-addition is represented by washing, air classification, centrifugation and pre-gelatinization. The latter process can be done in many from boiling in crude pots to drum dryers to modern multi-screw extruders, each method having its particular advantages and disadvantages. Complex value-addition is represented by the wide range of chemically modified starches found in the food, paper and textile industries.The most common non-food applications for native and value added starches are as follows:Non-Food Applications of StarchesAs can be seen, there is a great variety of value-added applications for starch in the non-food area, and each application requires very particular functional characteristics. Even in the most basic non-food applications of starch, a great deal of value-addition is employed. Adhesives starches are acid or alkali treated, they are modified with oxidizing agents, salts and different alcohols. Textile starches are esterified, oxidized and are subject to various cross-linking agents.The use of sophisticated, value added starches in paper products is even more noticeable, when one considers the wide range of applications in that industry. Starches are used to provide greater strength to tissues and paper towels, and they allow a greater use of recycled paper in liner board and cardboard. The growing demand for biodegradability promises to provide additional volumes as starch is used in plastic films and sheets as well as in natural fibre formulations that will eventually replace plastic foams The volume of starch going into non-food uses is enormous and it is all based upon the functional characteristics of the individual products.The non-food uses of starch are a prime indicator of a country. s economy. During recessions, the volume of starch going into non-food use drops considerably. On the other hand, an active economy needs construction materials for buildings, industrial plants and housing; it needs paper for the bureaucracy, for packaging and wrapping various products, for corrugated boxes and it need adhesives to stick all this economic activity together. As the economy booms, so does the volume of starches going into non-food uses. As countries develop, so does their demand for high quality, highly functional, value-added starches.Of course, functionality is the key to marketing starches in the wide range of food applications. No other ingredientAdhesivesz hot-melt gluesz stamps, bookbinding, envelopes z labels (regular and waterproof) z wood adhesives, laminations z automotive, engineering z pressure sensitive adhesives z corrugation zpaper sacksExplosives Industryz wide range binding agent zmatch-head binderPaper Industryz internal sizing z filler retention z surface sizingz paper coating (regular and colour) z carbonless paper stilt materialzdisposable diapers, feminine productsConstruction Industryz concrete block binderz asbestos, clay/limestone binder z fire-resistant wallboardz plywood/chipboard adhesive z gypsum board binder zpaint fillerMetals Industryz foundry core binder z sintered metal additive zsand casting binderTextiles Industryz warp sizing z fabric finishing zprintingCosmetic and Pharmaceutical Industryz dusting powder zmake-upz soap filler/extender zface creamsz pill coating, dusting agent ztablet binder/dispersing agentMining Industryz ore flotationzore sedimentation zoil well drilling mudsMiscellaneousz biodegradable plastic film z dry cell batteries z printed circuit boards zleather finishingprovides texture to as many foods as starch does. Whether it is a soup, stew, gravy, pie filling, sauce or custard, starchprovides a consistent shelf-stable product that consumers rely upon. The extent of specific functional properties of starches required by the food industry is almost unlimited and includes the following:Functional Properties of Starches in FoodsIt is of interest that a growing proportion of these characteristics are being sourced from genetically-modified nativestarches as a result of the growing demand for natural foods. This may provide an interesting opportunity for new starches from developing countries.The common applications for modified and native starches in the food industry are varied and numerous. The following Table demonstrates just a few:z specific viscosity (hot and cold)z thin boiling (faster canning heat transfer) z viscosity resistance acid/mechanical sheer z freeze-thaw stability (natural / modified) z gel texture, body at various temperatures z clarity, opacityz processing conditions tolerance z oil retention, high or lowz resistance to . setback. (gel formation) z high sheen z flow propertieszemulsion stabilizing capacityz mouthfeel, lubricity, palate-coating z suspension characteristics z adhesiveness z crystallinity z bland tastez long shelf-life stability z hygroscopicity z colour z anti-cakingz cold-water swelling or dispersibility z swelling and resistance to swelling zfilm-forming propertiesCanningz filling viscosity aidz suspension aid for particulates z opacity agentzbody or texture agent for soups, sauces, puddings and graviesz aseptically canned productszbeverages such as coffee, teas or chocolateCereals and Snacksz hot extruded snacks z chips, pretzels, etc.z extruded and fried foods zready-to-eat cerealsBakeryz pies, tartsz fillings, glazes z custards and icings z cakes, donuts, danish zicing sugarBatters and Breadingsz coated fried foodszfrozen battered vegetables, fish and meatFrozen Foodsz fruit fillings z meat pies z Oriental foods z soups, sauces z entreeszcream-based productsFlavours and Beverage Cloudszencapsulation of flavours, fats, oils vitamins, spices, clouding agents zspray dried flavours for dry beverage mixes, bartender mixes, z beverage emulsionszliquid and powdered non-dairy creamersConfectioneryz dusting powder z licorice z jelly gums z hard gums zpanned candies zconfectioners sugarDairy ProductsThe range of food products employing starch in one form or another is almost without limit. But the utility of these starches is almost entirely based upon the natural or synthesized functional characteristics. There can be little doubt that the particular physical and chemical properties of individual starches are the keys to their commercial success. I recently carried out a simple search on the Food Science and Technology Abstracts and the Foods Intelligence databases todetermine what has been published on the physical properties of various starches. The results of this short survey follows:It is clear that the information available on the physical properties of cassava, sorghum, millet and yams cannot compare with that from the four major starches. The situation appears even more pronounced on the next pie chart indicating that the combined starches from yam, millet, sorghum and cassava account for less than 12% of all publications :zdry mix coatingsDressings, Soups and Saucesz mayonnaise-typez pourable salad dressings (high shear) z spoonable dressingsz instant dry salad dressing mixes z low-fat dressingz canned gravies and sauces z frozen gravies and sauces zsoups and chowdersCooked Meat Binderz water binder for formed meat z smoked meats, low-fat meats zpet foods (dried and canned)z yoghurtzcheese and imitation cheese z chilled desserts z UHT Puddings zlow-fat productsMicrowavable Productsz cheese sauces zentreesThis is also reflected in the work on chemical properties as well as on the modification of starches. It is therefore clear that a significant amount of work remains to be done on the functional characteristics of native as well as modified tropical starches if they are ever to become competitive with corn, wheat or potato. While I do not wish to minimize the importance of agricultural research work on productive output, including yield enhancement and disease resistance, I do believe that a shift in emphasis is warranted if the goal of entering competitive world markets is to be realized. Work directed at product characteristics which make processing easier or more efficient, such as uniform-shaped roots or thin, easy to peel skins, make life much easier for the manufacturer. Slight changes in amylose/amylopectin ratios have tremendous effects on a wide range of functional characteristics. These are properties that the end-user requires and would be willing to pay for. Work on modifying starches to improve or broaden their functionality must continue aggressively, because the work on competitive starches never stops.Tropical countries have a tremendous capacity to produce agricultural products. Unfortunately, this wealth of resources has proven to be a double-edged sword. Historically, it has been relatively easy to export basic raw commodities to the developed world markets. Because so many tropical countries were involved in this trade, it was always a buyers market. Whole economies rose and fell with fluctuations in the basic commodities market. No strong tradition of value-added research and development was established. A majority of value-addition to tropical starches is not being carried out in the countries of origin, it is carried out in developed countries.This seems to be a fundamental defect in foreign trade strategies and it still continues today. When we examine the research work and the make-up of the professional staff of most national and international agricultural research institutions, this focus on production continues to be the typical pattern. This pattern must change if there is to be any hope of establishing a significant presence of value-added starches from developing countries on world markets.。
不同类型的谷类作物英文版

Sorghum
• Sorghum bicolor – tropical Africa. • Major food in India, and Africa where
leavened bread is not important • Very versatile crop • Black and brown sorghum has polyphenol
Sources of Sugar
• Sucrose is the major source of sweetening principle
• Artificial sweetener are introduced due to health problems, such as diabetes, obesity..
– Germ yields glutelin while aleuron layer has zein – Zein – rich in leucine but lack lysine and tryptophan – Excess leucine prevent conversion of tryptophan to
• Lack lysine and theornine • Removing bran and germ removes thiamine - beriberi
Maize
• Zea mays • Domesticated in Central America; only cereal
used as vegetable; largest cereal • Ancestor – mexican teosinte • Flowers unisexual • 70% endosperm and 11% embryo • 11% protein in the aleuron layer
直接挤出制备米粉(线)工艺的优化

直接挤出制备米粉(线)工艺的优化安红周;范运乾;豆洪启;杨波涛;张瑞莉;李盘欣【摘要】为了获得直接挤压制备米粉(线)的最适工艺参数,采用响应面(RSM)方法设计试验方案,对挤压机挤压制作米粉的工艺参数进行优化分析.研究原料含水量、机筒温度、螺杆转速对米粉糊化度的影响.结果表明:3个因素对糊化度影响大小依次为机筒Ⅲ区温度>螺杆转速>原料含水量.通过响应面分析得出挤压米粉最佳工艺:原料含水量35.1%,Ⅲ区温度102℃,螺杆转速117r/min.在此条件下,米粉糊化度为92.1.与3种市售产品对比,自制米粉在硬度、糊化度、咀嚼性和感官品质方面达到了市售产品平均水平.%Optimized process for direct extruded rice noodles which designed by the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was studied by evaluate effect of extrusion process parameters (feed moisture content, barrel temperature, and screw speed) on gelatinization degree and sensory scoring of rice extrudate. The result indicated that the effect order of four factors on gelatinization degree was as follows: barrel temperature, screw speed, feed moisture content. The canonical analysis revealed that optimal conditions for processing of direct extruded rice noodles were: feed moisture content 35.1% ,barrel temperature102℃,screw speed 117r/min. Under optimal conditions, the gelatinization degree of rice noodles was 92. 1. Compared with 3 varieties of commercial products, trial product has the similar hardness, gelatinization, chewiness and sensory evaluation.【期刊名称】《中国粮油学报》【年(卷),期】2012(027)007【总页数】5页(P86-90)【关键词】米粉;挤压机;响应面法;工艺优化【作者】安红周;范运乾;豆洪启;杨波涛;张瑞莉;李盘欣【作者单位】河南工业大学国家粮食局粮油食品工程技术研究中心,郑州450001;河南工业大学粮油食品学院,郑州450052;河南工业大学粮油食品学院,郑州450052;河南工业大学粮油食品学院,郑州450052;河南工业大学粮油食品学院,郑州450052;河南省南街村(集团)有限公司,临颖462600【正文语种】中文【中图分类】TS213.3米粉起源于中国,距今有2 000多年历史,流行于中国南方和东南亚一带[1]。
米粉质构特性与稻米理化性状的关系

中国水稻科学(Chin J Rice Sci), 2024, 38(3): 316-323 316 DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.231108米粉质构特性与稻米理化性状的关系肖正午1方升亮2曹威3胡丽琴1黎星1解嘉鑫1廖成静1康玉灵1胡玉萍1张珂骞1曹放波1陈佳娜1黄敏1,*(1湖南农业大学作物生理与分子生物学教育部重点实验室,长沙 410128;2衡阳市农业科学院,湖南衡阳 421101;3浏阳市永安镇农业农村综合服务中心,湖南浏阳 410323;*通信联系人,email:****************.cn)Relationships Between Texture Profiles of Rice Noodles and Physicochemical Characteristics of Rice GrainsXIAO Zhengwu1, FANG Shengliang2, CAO Wei3, HU Liqin1, LI Xing1, XIE Jiaxin1, LIAO Chengjing1, KANG Yuling1, HU Yuping1, ZHANG Keqian1, CAO Fangbo1, CHEN Jiana1, HUANG Min1,*(1Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Crop Physiology and Molecular Biology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; 2 Hengyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hengyang 421101, China; 3Yong’an Agricultural and Rural Comprehensive Service Center, Liuyang 410323, China; *Correspondingauthor,email:****************.cn)Abstract:【Objective】The objective of this study was to investigate the key physicochemical characteristics that determine the texture profiles of rice noodles from different noodle rice cultivars. This research aims to lay a theoretical basis for the breeding of high-quality noodle rice cultivars.【Methods】Field experiments were conducted with five noodle rice cultivars (Guanglu’ai 4, Zhongjiazao 17, Xiangzaoxian 24, Zhongzao 39, Zhuliangyou 729) in Liuyang, Hunan Province, during both the early and late seasons from 2020 to 2022.【Results】Significant differences in texture profiles were observed among noodle rice grown in different years and seasons (P < 0.01). The hardness, springiness, chewiness, cohesiveness, and resilience of rice noodles ranged from 1651 to 4083 g, 0.860 to 0.922, 1295 to 2685 g, 0.760 to 0.858, and 0.532 to 0.633, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the hardness and chewiness of rice noodles showed no significant correlation with the physicochemical characteristics of rice (P > 0.05). However, the springiness of rice noodles was positively correlated with the total starch and amylose content (P < 0.01) and negatively correlated with the setback viscosity (P < 0.05).【Conclusion】Suitable climatic conditions exist for growing noodle rice. The total starch content, amylose content, and setback viscosity were identified as critical factors affecting the texture profiles of rice noodles. Increasing the total starch and amylose content while decreasing setback viscosity can lead to improved springiness in rice noodles.Key words: noodle rice; rice noodle quality; texture profile; amylose content; paste property摘 要:【目的】探明决定米粉稻品种米粉质构特性的关键稻米理化性状指标,为优质米粉专用稻品种的选育提供理论依据。
高直链淀粉小麦西农836淀粉理化性质及消化特性分析

麦类作物学报 2023,43(8):998-1004J o u r n a l o fT r i t i c e a eC r o ps d o i :10.7606/j.i s s n .1009-1041.2023.08.07网络出版时间:2023-07-07网络出版地址:h t t ps ://k n s .c n k i .n e t /k c m s 2/d e t a i l /61.1359.S .20230706.0914.002.h t m l 高直链淀粉小麦西农836淀粉理化性质及消化特性分析收稿日期:2022-11-20 修回日期:2022-12-16基金项目:陕西省农业协同创新与推广联盟重大科技项目(L M Z D 202104);杨凌种业创新中心重点研发项目(Y l z y-x m -03);大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S 202110712338);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2452022112)第一作者E -m a i l :w d 452@n w a f u .e d u .c n通讯作者:李学军(E -m a i l :x u e ju n @n w s u a f .e d u .c n )王鼎1,刘真真1,李旭1,李小鹏2,刘磊1,崔晓辉1,杨璞1,王冰心1,谢彦周1,李学军1(1.西北农林科技大学农学院,陕西杨凌712100;2.临渭区农资农产品质量检验检测中心(种子工作站),陕西渭南714000)摘 要:淀粉是人体摄入碳水化合物的主要来源,经消化后以葡萄糖的形式被人体吸收,其消化特性与人体健康密切相关㊂为探究小麦品种西农836淀粉理化性质与消化特性的关系,以商品粉金沙河㊁香雪㊁金龙鱼作为对照,测定其与西农836中直链淀粉含量㊁淀粉粒度和结晶度㊁糊化特性以及体外消化率的差异,并在小鼠体内模拟消化㊂结果表明,与金龙鱼㊁金沙河㊁香雪相比,西农836淀粉中直链淀粉含量和B 型淀粉粒含量最高,与前3者差异显著(P <0.05);西农836淀粉的峰值温度最高,峰值黏度和最终黏度最低;淀粉体外消化试验结果显示,西农836的快消化淀粉(R D S )㊁总消化淀粉(R D S +S D S )含量最低,抗性淀粉(R S )含量最高㊂小鼠体内消化试验结果表明,与金沙河相比,灌食西农836淀粉的小鼠血糖峰值较低,说明高直链淀粉小麦西农836有利于延缓消化和控制血糖升高㊂相关性分析结果显示,直链淀粉含量与抗性淀粉含量呈显著正相关(P <0.05)㊂关键词:小麦;西农836;直链淀粉;淀粉糊化;淀粉消化中图分类号:S 512.1;S 330 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1009-1041(2023)08-0998-07A n a l y s i s o f S t a r c hP h y s i c o c h e m i c a l a n dD i g e s t i v eP r o p e r t i e s o f H i g hA m y l o s eW h e a tX i n o n g 836W A N GD i n g 1,L I UZ h e n z h e n 1,L IX u 1,L IX i a o p e n g 2,L I UL e i 1,C U IX i a o h u i 1,Y A N GP u 1,W A N GB i n g x i n 1,X I EY a n z h o u 1,L IX u e ju n 1(1.C o l l e g e o fA g r i c u l t u r e ,N o r t h w e s tA&FU n i v e r s i t y ,Y a n g l i n g ,S h a a n x i 712100,C h i n a ;2.L i n w e iD i s t r i c tA gr i c u l t u r a l M e a n s a n dA g r i c u l t u r a l P r o d u c t sQ u a l i t y I n s pe c t i o na n dT e s tC e n t e r (S e e d W o r k s t a t i o n ),W e i n a n ,S h a a n x i 714000,C h i n a )A b s t r a c t :S t a r c h i s t h e m a i ns o u r c eof c a r b o h y d r a t e so fh u m a nb o d y ,w h i c hc o u l d i n c r e a s eg l yc e m i a f o l l o w i n g b y a s s i m i l a t i n g i n t h e f o r mo f g l u c o s e .T h e r e f o r e ,t h ed i ge s t i b i l i t y of s t a r c h i s c l o s e l y r e l a t -e d t o h u m a nh e a l t h .I n t h i s s t u d y ,t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p s b e t w e e n p h y s i c o c h e m i c a l a n d d ig e s t i b i l i t y p r o pe r -t i e s of s t a r c h i nw h e a tX i n o ng 836w e r e e x pl o r e dw i t h t h e c o n t r o l s o f t h r e e c o mm e r c i a l f l o u r s J i n s h a -h e ,X i a n g x u ea n dJ i n l o n g y u .T h ed i f f e r e n c e so fs t a r c ha m y l o s ec o n t e n t ,g r a n u l es i z ed i s t r i b u t i o n ,c r y s t a l l i n i t y ,g e l a t i n i z a t i o n p r o p e r t i e s a n dd i g e s t i b i l i t y i nv i t r o w e r e d e t e r m i n e d a sw e l l a s s i m u l a t i n g d i g e s t i o n i nm i c e .T h e r e s u l t s s h o w e d t h a tX i n o n g 836h a d t h e h i g h e s t c o n t e n t s o f a m y l o s e a n dB -t y pe s t a r c h g r a n u l e c o m p a r i n g w i t h J i n l o n g y u ,J i n s h a h e a n dX i a n g x u e a t 0.05l e v e l .M o r e o v e r ,i n t h e e x -p e r i m e n t s of s t a r c hg e l a t i n i z a t i o n ,X i n o n g 836sh o w e d t h e hi g h e s t p e a k t e m p e r a t u r e ,t h e l o w e s t p e a k v i s c o s i t y a n d f i n a l v i s c o s i t y .I nv i t r o d i g e s t i o ne x p e r i m e n t s i n d i c a t e d t h a tX i n o n g 836h a d t h e l o w e s t c o n t e n t s o f r a p i d l y d i g e s t i b l e s t a r c h (R D S )a n d t o t a l d i g e s t i b l e s t a r c h (R D S +S D S )b u t t h e h i gh e s t c o n -t e n t o f r e s i s t a n t s t a r c h (R S ).T h e g l y c e m i a i n t h em i c e f e dw i t hs t a r c ho fX i n o n g 836h a d l o w e r p e a k Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.v a l u e c o m p a r i n g w i t hJ i n s h a h e i nv i v o d i g e s t i o ne x p e r i m e n t s,i m p l y i n g t h a th i g ha m y l o s e i n w h e a t X i n o n g836i sb e n e f i c i a l f o rd e l a y i n g d i g e s t i o na n dc o n t r o l l i n g t h er i s eo f g l y c e m i a.F u r t h e r m o r e, t h e r ew e r e p o s i t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n s b e t w e e n t h e c o n t e n t s o f a m y l o s e a n d r e s i s t a n t s t a r c ha t0.05l e v e l. K e y w o r d s:W h e a t;X i n o n g836;A m y l o s e;S t a r c h p a s t i n g;S t a r c hd i g e s t i o n小麦是世界上广泛种植的农作物之一,淀粉是小麦籽粒的主要成分,约占籽粒面粉总量的70%~80%[1]㊂根据结构可将淀粉分为直链淀粉和支链淀粉,直链淀粉由D-葡萄糖基以α-(1,4)糖苷键连接,呈线状排列,支链淀粉分子主链由α-(1,4)糖苷键连接,侧链由α-(1,6)糖苷键连接,呈非线状排列[2]㊂普通小麦籽粒中直链淀粉和支链淀粉的比例为1ʒ3,由于两种淀粉分子结构的差异,其面制品所表现出的消化率㊁产品品质㊁餐后饱腹感和血糖应答都不同[3]㊂淀粉的消化特性与直链淀粉含量相关㊂研究发现,直链淀粉可以与脂质形成复合物,阻止淀粉与水分子的结合,从而阻止酶向淀粉颗粒的渗透,致使淀粉消化率下降[4]㊂在加工过程中,直链淀粉分子互相缠绕形成一种三维凝胶网络,这种凝胶网络结构也会提高淀粉对酶的抗性,延缓淀粉消化[5-6]㊂根据淀粉水解速率的快慢将其分为快消化淀粉(R D S)㊁慢消化淀粉(S D S)和抗性淀粉(R S)[7]㊂前人研究发现,R S具有类似膳食纤维的生理功能,可为人类结肠中短链脂肪酸(S C-F A s)的发酵提供底物,R S含量高的食物具有较低的消化率[8];R S可以增强饱腹感并降低餐后血糖浓度和胰岛素反应[9]㊂因此,对糖尿病患者而言,食用高直链淀粉小麦面制品对健康是有益的[10]㊂淀粉消化特性与淀粉颗粒㊁晶体结构及糊化性质相关㊂小麦淀粉颗粒按直径被分为A型和B型,A型淀粉呈透镜状,直径约10~40μm,B 型淀粉呈球形,直径小于10μm,二者在淀粉中分布不同,导致淀粉理化性质不同[11]㊂S n o w等[12]研究发现,淀粉粒径越小,越容易被酶解,因为其表面积较大,有利于酶的扩散和吸附㊂淀粉内部晶体结构发生变化或晶体特征存在差异也会影响淀粉的消化特性[13]㊂B a o等[14]研究表明,高温会破坏淀粉晶体结构,导致淀粉更容易被酶解㊂另外,淀粉糊化性质的差异也会对其消化特性产生影响[15]㊂为了解小麦新品种西农836淀粉的理化性质及消化特性,本研究以三种商品面粉金沙河㊁香雪㊁金龙鱼为对照,分析西农836的直链淀粉含量㊁淀粉结构特征㊁糊化性质和淀粉消化特性,以期为西农836面制品的加工利用及高直链淀粉含量小麦品种选育提供理论依据㊂1材料与方法1.1供试材料供试小麦品种为西农836,于2020年10月12日种植在西北农林科技大学农作一站(陕西杨凌,108ʎ4'E,34ʎ160'N)㊂种植10行,行长2m,行间距0.23m,3个重复㊂播种前基施600k g㊃h m-1复合肥(NʒP2O5ʒK2O=1ʒ0.5ʒ0.5),其余病虫害防治及灌溉等措施与当地大田生产相同㊂于2021年6月10日收获籽粒,经充分晾晒后在阴凉干燥处贮存30d,采用布勒辊式磨粉机磨粉,过80目筛㊂对照为市售商品面粉分别为金沙河面粉(河北金沙河面业集团有限责任公司)㊁香雪面粉(沈阳香雪面粉股份有限公司)和金龙鱼面粉(益海嘉里食品营销有限公司)㊂1.2测定项目与方法1.2.1淀粉提取取20g面粉,与12m L蒸馏水混合揉成面团,静置30m i n;加蒸馏水反复揉洗,使淀粉与面筋分离;过100目筛,获得淀粉乳,5000r㊃m i n-1离心10m i n,倒掉上清液,刮除附着在沉淀上方的杂质,收集沉淀并干燥,获得粗淀粉;将粗淀粉放入烧杯中,加入60m L碱性蛋白酶-N a O H 溶液,在42ħ水浴条件下搅拌1h;过100目筛后弃掉残渣,将滤液转入50m L离心管,4000r㊃m i n-1离心20m i n,弃上清液,并刮除淀粉表层黄色部分;用去离子水悬浮沉淀后3600r㊃m i n-1离心20m i n,重复3次,获得脱蛋白小麦淀粉㊂取0.5g脱蛋白淀粉置于脱脂袋中,将其放入预先装有150m L的85%甲醇的广口瓶中,45ħ超声振荡1h;自然晾干后得到纯净的小麦淀粉㊂1.2.2直链淀粉含量测定参照金玉红等[16]的方法,配置直链淀粉标准工作液㊁淀粉扫描液,吸取直链淀粉标准工作液㊃999㊃第8期王鼎等:高直链淀粉小麦西农836淀粉理化性质及消化特性分析Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.0.0㊁0.3㊁0.5㊁0.7㊁0.9㊁1.1㊁1.3m L于100m L 烧杯中,加蒸馏水25m L,即得到浓度0㊁6㊁10㊁14㊁18㊁22㊁26 g㊃m L-1的直链淀粉标准溶液;用0.1m o l㊃L-1的H C l调p H值至3.5,全部转移至50m L容量瓶,加0.5m L碘试剂并用蒸馏水定容;用U V-2100分光光度计在测定波长(623 n m)和参比波长(430n m)下测定吸光值,得到直链淀粉标准曲线㊂称取小麦淀粉0.1g于烧杯中,加入10m L 0.5m o l㊃L-1K O H,80ħ水浴25m i n并充分搅拌;冷却至室温后转移到50m L容量瓶中,用蒸馏水定容,摇匀后静置㊂取上清液2.5m L加入50m L烧杯中,加入25m L蒸馏水,用0.1m o l㊃L-1H C l调p H至3.5,搅拌均匀;转移至50m L 容量瓶,加0.5m L碘试剂并用蒸馏水定容,摇匀后在室温下静置30m i n;吸光值测定方法同标准液㊂1.2.3粒度分布测定称取0.1g淀粉,倒入激光衍射仪(S3500S I, M i c r o t r a c I n c,U S A)样品分散系统的进料口中,待进料口旋涡充分混匀后,测量其粒度分布状况㊂1.2.4结晶度测定利用X-射线衍射仪(D8-A d v a n c e,B r u k e r, G e r m a n y)测定,电流㊁电压为30m A㊁40k V,扫描范围2θ=4~40ʎ,步长0.02ʎ;利用软件M D I J a d e6.0分析,获得淀粉的结晶度㊂1.2.5黏度特性测定取3g淀粉和25m L蒸馏水于铝罐中,搅拌均匀,使用黏度分析仪(R V A4500,P e r t e n)测定面粉黏度㊂最初10s以960r㊃m i n-1搅拌,后以160r㊃m i n-1的速度至测试结束;起始温度为50ħ,保持1m i n,以12ħ㊃m i n-1的速度提高至95ħ,保持2.5m i n,再以12ħ㊃m i n-1的速度下降至50ħ,保持13m i n,获得参数峰值黏度(P V)㊁稀懈值(B D)㊁最终黏度(F V)㊁回生黏度(S B)和糊化温度(P T)㊂1.2.6热力学特性分析利用热差热重分析仪(S T A7200R V,H I T A-C H I,J a p a n)对淀粉热特性进行分析㊂称取5m g 淀粉样品于铝坩埚中,按1ʒ2(w/w)比例加入蒸馏水配成淀粉乳,密封后置于4ħ冰箱放置24h㊂测试参数设定为:从25ħ加热至120ħ,速度为10ħ㊃m i n-1㊂利用仪器自带软件分析扫描曲线,获得参数有起始温度T o㊁峰值温度T p㊁终点温度T c㊁热焓变值ΔH g e l㊂1.2.7淀粉体外消化特性测定参照G a r c i a等[17-18]的方法,取50m g淀粉用蒸馏水溶解并沸水浴30m i n使其糊化,冷却至室温后加入10m L醋酸钠缓冲液(0.1M,p H =5.2),放入25ħ恒温摇床中180r㊃m i n-1㊁30 m i n;加入已平衡温度的1m L猪胰α-淀粉酶和5 m L胃蛋白酶,放入25ħ恒温摇床180r㊃m i n-1酶解30m i n㊂分别在0m i n㊁20m i n和120m i n 吸取0.5m L溶液至离心管中,立即加入2m L乙醇(95%)终止反应;10000r㊃m i n-1离心5m i n,取1m L上清液加入D N S(3,5-二硝基水杨酸)2 m L;沸水浴5m i n后取出,冷却至室温,加入9 m L蒸馏水㊁混匀;用U V-2100分光光度计于540 n m处检测吸光值,换算成体系中的葡萄糖含量,从而得到淀粉样品的消化百分数㊂1.2.8小鼠血糖测定参照蒲瑞阳等[19-20]的方法,将30只4周龄体型一致的雄性小鼠随机分为A㊁B㊁C三组,每组10只,置于2个鼠笼(每笼5只)于鼠房饲养㊂实验前对小鼠进行适应性喂养,小鼠每日进食相同质量的饲料和饮用纯净水(2d更换一次),鼠笼垫料每3d更换一次㊂一周后,对三组小鼠禁食㊁禁水12h㊂A㊁B两组分别灌胃西农836和金沙河淀粉溶液0.3m L,C组灌胃0.3m L生理盐水㊂灌胃完毕后立即开始计时,分别于灌胃后0 m i n㊁30m i n㊁60m i n㊁90m i n㊁120m i n㊁180m i n对小鼠进行尾尖采血,用强生血糖试纸测定小白鼠的血糖值㊂鼠房条件:温度22~24ħ,湿度40%~ 70%,光照为12h昼夜交替㊂1.3数据分析数据采用E X C E L处理㊁制图,采用S P S S 21.0进行方差分析㊂2结果与分析2.1供试材料直链淀粉含量、粒度与结晶度分析4种面粉的直链淀粉含量从高到低依次为西农836(31.37%)㊁金龙鱼(25.75%)㊁金沙河(24.43%)和香雪(24.17%),西农836的直链淀粉含量显著高于其他三种商品面粉(P<0.05) (表1)㊂西农836淀粉的B型淀粉粒含量最高(76.32%),其他依次为金龙鱼(74.65%)㊁金沙河(74.65%)和香雪(72.36%)㊂四个供试材料的结㊃0001㊃麦类作物学报第43卷Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.晶度范围在20.37%~25.08%,金龙鱼㊁金沙河㊁西农836淀粉的相对结晶度较低㊂表1供试材料直链淀粉含量㊁淀粉体积粒度分布㊁相对结晶度T a b l e1A m y l o s e c o n t e n t,v o l u m e g r a n u l a r i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n,r e l a t i v e c r y s t a l l i n i t y o f s t a r c h%材料M a t e r i a l直链淀粉含量A m y l o s e c o n t e n t A-型淀粉含量A C B-型淀粉含量B C相对结晶度R C西农836X i n o n g83631.37ʃ0.19a23.17ʃ1.10c76.83ʃ1.10a21.38ʃ0.13b 金沙河J i n s h a h e24.43ʃ0.30c26.93ʃ0.51a b73.07ʃ0.51b c20.73ʃ0.28c香雪X i a n g x u e24.17ʃ0.65c27.77ʃ0.59a72.23ʃ0.59c25.08ʃ0.23a金龙鱼J i n l o n g y u25.75ʃ0.39b25.67ʃ0.40b74.33ʃ0.40b20.37ʃ0.18c数据是平均值ʃ标准差(n=3)㊂同列数据后不同字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)㊂下同㊂V a l u e s a r em e a nʃS D(n=3).A C:A-t y p e s t a r c h g r a n u l e c o n t e n t;B C:B-t y p e s t a r c h g r a n u l e c o n t e n t;R C:R e l a t i v e c r y s t a l l i n i t y.D i f f e r e n t l e t t e r s f o l l o w i n g d a t a i n t h e s a m e c o l u m n i n d i c a t e s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s(P<0.05).T h e s a m e i n t a b l e2.2.2淀粉糊化特性分析黏度特性是淀粉糊化过程中的重要参数㊂西农836淀粉的峰值黏度和最终黏度最低,金沙河淀粉的峰值黏度和最终黏度最高(图1)㊂从淀粉热特性测定结果(表2)看,西农836的峰值温度最高(64.67ħ),依次为金沙河(61.60ħ)㊁香雪(61.55ħ)和金龙鱼(60.37ħ)㊂金沙河的热焓变值最高,依次为西农836㊁金龙鱼㊁香雪㊂这表明四个测试材料的淀粉热稳定性从大到小依次为金沙河㊁西农836㊁金龙鱼和香雪㊂图1淀粉黏度特性F i g.1S t a r c hv i s c o s i t y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s表2淀粉热特性T a b l e2S t a r c h t h e r m a l p a r a m e t e r s材料M a t e r i a l起始温度T o/ħ峰值温度T p/ħ终点温度T c/ħ热焓变值ΔH g e l/(J㊃g-1)西农836X i n o n g83656.62ʃ2.23a64.67ʃ0.04a72.73ʃ0.20a12.68ʃ0.74b 金沙河J i n s h a h e56.84ʃ2.50a61.60ʃ0.72b65.22ʃ0.11b19.55ʃ1.63a 香雪X i a n g x u e58.10ʃ1.61a60.55ʃ0.83c76.02ʃ2.48a9.96ʃ0.55b 金龙鱼J i n l o n g y u55.08ʃ0.74a61.37ʃ0.42b73.08ʃ1.68a10.54ʃ1.34b T o:O n s e t t e m p e r a t u r e;T p:P e a ko f g e l a t i n i z a t i o n t e m p e r a t u r e;T c:C o n c l u s i o n t e m p e r a t u r e;ΔH g e l:E n t h a l p y o f t h e r m a l t r a n s i t i o n.㊃1001㊃第8期王鼎等:高直链淀粉小麦西农836淀粉理化性质及消化特性分析Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.2.3淀粉体外消化特性分析从图2可以看出,西农836的快消化淀粉(R D S)含量显著低于其他三个商品面粉,慢消化淀粉(S D S)含量显著高于三个商品面粉㊂与三个商品面粉相比,西农836的总消化淀粉含量(R D S+S D S)最低,表明西农836的消化程度低于其他商品面粉㊂R D S:快速消化淀粉;S D S:慢消化淀粉;R D S+S D S:总消化淀粉㊂图柱上不同字母表示不同种淀粉间差异显著(P<0.05)㊂R D S:R a p i d l y d i g e s t i b l e s t a r c h;S D S:S l o w l y d i g e s t i b l e s t a r c h;R D S+S D S:T o t a l d i g e s t e d s t a r c h.D i f f f e r e n t l e t t t e r s a b o v e c o l u m n s m e a ns i g h i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e a m o n g t h r e e e s t a r c hm a t e r i a l s(P<0.05).图2供试材料的淀粉体外消化特性F i g.2D i g e s t i v e p r o p e r t i e s o f s t a r c h f r o mt h e f o u r f l o u r s i n v i t r o.2.4小鼠血糖响应通过小鼠体内消化试验分析小麦淀粉的消化特性,结果(图3)表明,两组灌胃小鼠血糖峰值均出现在60m i n,在30㊁60和90m i n时,灌胃西农836组的血糖峰值明显低于金沙河组,并且灌胃西农836组小鼠的血糖上升和下降的趋势均比较缓慢,180m i n后血糖值大致回落到空腹水平,说明高直链淀粉小麦西农836有利于延缓消化和控制血糖升高㊂图3淀粉的小鼠体内消化特征F i g.3D i g e s t i v e p r o p e r t i e s o f s t a r c h i nm i c e.2.5淀粉理化指标间相关性分析相关性分析结果(表3)表明,直链淀粉含量与A型淀粉粒含量呈显著负相关(P<0.05),与B型淀粉粒和峰值黏度呈显著正相关㊂抗性淀粉含量与直链淀粉含量和峰值温度呈显著正相关㊂快消化淀粉(R D S)含量与直链淀粉含量㊁B型淀粉粒含量呈显著负相关,与A型淀粉粒含量显著正相关㊂总消化淀粉(R D S+S D S)含量与直链淀粉含量呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),与峰值温度和B型淀粉粒含量呈显著负相关,与A型淀粉粒呈显著正相关㊂3讨论淀粉由直链淀粉和支链淀粉组成,直链淀粉占小麦淀粉总含量的20%~26%㊂国外将直链淀粉含量超过30%的小麦品种,称为高直链淀粉小麦品种[21]㊂本研究中,小麦新品种西农836直链淀粉含量为31.37%,为高直链淀粉小麦㊂研究表明,B型淀粉粒含量与直链淀粉含量呈负相关关系[22]㊂本研究发现,小麦新品种西农836直链淀粉含量及B型淀粉粒含量均较高,其总消化淀粉(R D S+S D S)和快消化淀粉(R D S)与B型淀粉粒含量呈显著负相关,这与前人研究结果的B型淀粉粒含量高则消化速率高不同[23]㊂这可能与研究材料不同有关㊂本课题组研究发现,B型淀粉粒有助于填充到面筋网络结构中,形成更加致密的面团网络结构(未发表)㊂㊃2001㊃麦类作物学报第43卷Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.表3淀粉理化指标间相关性分析T a b l e3C o r r e l a t i o na n a l y s i s b e t w e e n p h y s i c o c h e m i c a l p r o p e r t i e s o f s t a r c h指标I n d e x直链淀粉含量AM A-型淀粉含量A G B-型淀粉含量B G相对结晶度R C峰值黏度P V最终黏度F V峰值温度T p 热焓值ΔH g e l直链淀粉含量AM1-0.969*0.969*-0.291-0.440-0.8170.971*-0.138抗性淀粉含量R S0.993*-0.9430.943-0.318-0.377-0.781*0.985*-0.147快消化淀粉R D S-0.952*0.991*-0.991*0.4720.4550.780-0.8970.216慢消化淀粉S D S0.845-0.9240.924-0.498-0.533-0.7570.751-0.366总消化淀粉R D S+S D S-0.992**0.983*-0.983*0.4020.3300.740-0.987*0.300 **:P<0.01;*:P<0.05.峰值黏度表示淀粉结合水的能力,淀粉与水结合能力越强,抗酶解能力越低[24]㊂本研究中,高直链淀粉含量小麦西农836淀粉的峰值黏度最低,表明其抗酶解能力最强㊂淀粉糊化会对阻止淀粉酶作用的结晶结构造成破坏,导致淀粉更容易被酶解[25]㊂峰值温度是表征淀粉糊化特性的重要指标㊂已有研究发现,淀粉糊化时的峰值温度越高,其糊化程度越低,越难被酶解[26]㊂本研究中,峰值温度与直链淀粉含量呈显著正相关,与总消化淀粉(R D S+S D S)呈显著负相关,说明直链淀粉含量影响淀粉的糊化特性,高直链淀粉含量可增强淀粉的抗酶解能力㊂热焓值是淀粉糊化过程中解开双螺旋所需要的能量,淀粉晶体结构遭到破坏会导致糊化程度升高并降低热焓值[27-28]㊂但也有人认为,淀粉结晶度等结构特征并不能单独控制消化率[29]㊂综上所述,淀粉结晶特性与淀粉内部其他结构特征可能共同作用于淀粉消化过程,并通过影响淀粉糊化过程进一步影响其消化特性㊂前人研究认为,直链淀粉比支链淀粉结构更紧密,并且直链淀粉在消化过程中会与脂质形成复合物,使其在短时间内难以被酶解[30-31]㊂本研究发现,直链淀粉含量与快消化淀粉(R D S)含量和总消化淀粉(R D S+S D S)含量分别呈显著和极显著负相关,随着直链淀粉含量升高,淀粉的消化率显著下降㊂小鼠体内消化试验结果表明,灌食西农836小麦淀粉小鼠的血糖峰值和血糖上升速率均较低,说明高直连淀粉含量在延缓消化和控制血糖升高方面具有显著优势㊂本研究结果为西农836面制品的加工利用及高直链淀粉小麦品种选育提供参考㊂4结论小麦新品种西农836为高直链淀粉小麦品种;其B型淀粉含量㊁淀粉糊化时峰值温度显著高于其他3个商品面粉;总消化淀粉(R D S+ S D S)含量和消化程度低于其他商品面粉;高直链淀粉含量有利于延缓消化及控制血糖升高㊂参考文献:[1]S H E V K A N IK,S I N G H N,B A J A JR,e t a l.W h e a t s t a r c h p r o-d u c t i o n,s t r u c t u r e,f u n c t i o n a l i t y a n d a p p l i c a t i o n s A re v i e w [J].I n t e r n a t i o n a lJ o u r n a lof F o o dS c i e n c e&T e c h n o l og y, 2017,52(1):38.[2]J A N EJ,C H E N Y Y,L E ELF,e t a l.E f f e c t so f a m y l o p e c t i nb r a nc h c h a i n l e n g t ha n da m y l o s e c o n t e n t o n t h e g e l a t i n i z a t i o n a nd p a s t i n gp r o pe r t i e s of s t a r c h[J].C e r e a lC h e m i s t r y,1999, 76(5):629.[3]A N D R E W C,HO G G MJ,G I R O U X.M i l l i n g a n d b a k i n g q u a l-i t y o f h e x a p l o i d s p r i n g w h e a t s t a r c h s y n t h a s e I I a(s s I I a)m u-t a n t sw i t he l e v a t e da m y l o s ec o n t e n t[J].C e r e a lC h e m i s t r y, 2019,96(3):533.[4]T E S T E RRF,K A R K A L A SJ,Q IX.S t a r c hs t r u c t u r e a n dd i-g e s t i b i l i t y e n z y m e-s u b s t r a t e r e l a t i o n s h i p[J].W o r l d'sP o u l t r y S c i e n c eJ o u r n a l,2004,60(2):193.[5]王月慧,丁文平.大米淀粉凝胶储藏过程中消化特性的变化[J].食品科学,2005(1):65.WA N G Y H,D I N G W P.C h a n g e s i n t h e d i g e s t i v e c h a r a c t e r i s-t i c s o f r i c e s t a r c h g e l d u r i n g s t o r a g e[J].C e r e a l&F e e dI n-d u s t r y,2005(1):65.[6]G O N GB,C H E N GLL,G I L B E R T R G,e t a l.D i s t r i b u t i o no f s h o r t t o m e d i u m a m y l o s ec h a i n sa r e m a j o rc o n t r o l l e r so f i n v i t r od i g e s t i o n o f r e t r o g r a d e d r i c e s t a r c h[J].F o o dH y d r o c o l-l o i d s,2019,96(C):640.[7]E N G L Y S T H N,K I N GMA NSM,C UMM I N G S JH.C l a s s i f i-c a t i o n a n dm e a s u r e m e n t o f n u t r i t i o n a l l y i m p o r t a n t s t a r c h f r a c-t i o n s[J].E u r o p e a nJ o u r n a lo f C l i n i c a lN u t r i t i o n,1992,46 (2):34.[8]B R O U N SF,K E T T L I T ZB,A R R I G O N IE.R e s i s t a n ts t a r c ha n d t h eb u t y r a t e r e v o l u t i o n [J].T r e n d s i nF o o dSc i e n c e& T e c h n o l o g y,2002,13(8):257.[9]G U OJY,T A N L B,K O N G L Y.M u l t i p l e l e v e l so fh e a l t hb e n e f i t s f r o m r e s i s t a n ts t a rc h[J].J o u r n a lo f A g r i c u l t u r e a n dF o o dR e s e a r c h,2022(10):100380.㊃3001㊃第8期王鼎等:高直链淀粉小麦西农836淀粉理化性质及消化特性分析Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.[10]A N T H O N Y RB,A HM E D R.H i g ha m y l o s ew h e a t:A p l a t-f o r mf o rd e l i v e r i ngh u m a nh e a l t hb e n e fi t s[J].J o u r n a lo fC e r e a l S c i e n c e,2018,82:101.[11]Z HA N GBJ,L IXX,L I UJ,e t a l.S u p r a m o l e c u l a r s t r u c t u r e o fA-a n dB-t y p e g r a n u l e s o fw h e a t s t a r c h[J].F o o d H y d r o-c o l l o id s,2013,31(1):70.[12]S N OW P,O'D E A K.F a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g t h e r a t eo fh y d r o l y s i s o f s t a r c h i n f o o d[J].T h eAm e r i c a nJ o u r n a l o f C l i n i c a lN u-t r i t i o n,1981,34(12):2723.[13]C H E N MF,HU A N GR M,P OW E R S JR,e t a l.P h y s i c a l a s-s o c i a t i o no f s t a r c hb i o s y n t h e t i c e n z y m e sw i t h s t a r c h g r a n u l e s o fm a i z e e n d o s p e r m.G r a n u l e-a s s o c i a t e d f o r m s o f s t a r c h s y n-t h a s e I a n d s t a r c hb r a n c h i n g e n z y m e I I[J].P l a n tP h y s i o l o-g y,1996,111(3):824.[14]B A O WJ,L IQ,WU Y W,e t a l.I n s i g h t s i n t o t h e c r y s t a l l i n i-t y a n d i n v i t r o d i g e s t i b i l i t y o f c h e s t n u t s t a r c h d u r i n g t h e r m a l p r o c e s s i n g[J].F o o dC h e m i s t r y,2018,269:249. [15]K O N G X R,Z HU Z Y,J I N G X,e ta l.E f f e c t so f c o r d y c e p s p o l y s a c c h a r i d e s o n p a s t i n gp r o p e r t i e sa n d i nv i t r os t a r c hd i-g e s t i b i l i t y o fw h e a ts t a r c h[J].F o o d H y d r o c o l l o i d s,2020, 102(C):105604.[16]金玉红,张开利,张兴春,等.双波长法测定小麦及小麦芽中直链㊁支链淀粉含量[J].中国粮油学报,2009,24(1):137. J I N H Y,Z H A N G K L,Z H A N G X C,e ta l.D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f a m y l o s e a n d a m y l o p e c t i n i nw h e a t a n dw h e a t b u db y d u a l w a v e l e n g t hm e t h o d[J].J o u r n a l o f t h eC h i n e s eC e r e a l s a n d O i l sA s s o c i a t i o n,2009,24(1):137.[17]G A R C I A-V A L L E D E,B E L L O-PÉR E Z L A,A G AMA-A C E V E D OE,e ta l.S t r u c t u r a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c sa n d i nv i t r os t a r c hd i g e s t i b i l i t y o f p a s t am a d ew i t h d u r u m w h e a t s e m o l i-n aa n dc h i c k p e af l o u r[J].F o o d S c i e n c e&T e c h n o l o g y, 2021,145:111347.[18]B E L L O-P E R E Z L A,A G AMA-A C E V E D O E,G A R C I A-V A L L EDE,e t a l.A m u l t i s c a l e k i n e t i c sm o d e l f o r t h e a n a l-y s i s o f s t a r c h a m y l o l y s i s[J].I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f B i o-l o g i c a lM a c r o m o l e c u l e s,2019,122:406.[19]蒲瑞阳,史典,刘莎,等.2型糖尿病小鼠模型血糖干预评价点的实验观察[J].中国实验动物学报,2020,28(2):225. P U R Y,S H ID,L I U S,e ta l.E x p e r i m e n t a lo b s e r v a t i o no f b l o o d g l u c o s e i n t e r v e n t i o n e v a l u a t i o n p o i n t s i nm o u s em o d e l s o f t y p e2d i a b e t e sm e l l i t u s[J].A c t aL a b o r a t o r i u mA n i m a l i s S c i e n t i aS i n i c a,2020,28(2):225.[20]谭军,谭传鑫,陈瑞钢,等.大鼠 体外延长尾静脉 采血法的构建与评价[J].黑龙江科学,2020,11(24):36.T A NJ,T A NCX,C H E N R G,e t a l.C o n s t r u c t i o na n d e v a l-u a t i o no f"i n v i t r o e l o n g a t i o nt a i lv e i n"b l o o d c o l l e c t i o n m e t h o d i n r a t s[J].H e i l o n g j i a n g S c i e n c e,2020,11(24):36.[21]I K E D A T M.E p i l o g u e:T h e m a i na c t i v i t i e so f t h e i n t e r n a-t i o n a l c o l l a b o r a t i o no fw h e a t q u a l i t y a n ds a f e t y[M].W h e a tQ u a l i t yf o rI m p r o v i n g P r o c e s s i n g a n d H u m a n H e a l t h, 2020:536.[22]闫素辉,李勇,李文阳,等.不同直链淀粉含量小麦品种的淀粉粒度分布特征[J].麦类作物学报,2016,36(3):388.Y A NSH,L IY,L IW Y,e t a l.S t a r c h s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n c h a r-a c t e r i s t i c s o fw h e a tv a r i e t i e sw i t hd i f f e r e n t a m y l o s ec o n t e n t [J].J o u r n a l o f T r i t i c e a eC r o p s,2016,36(3):388. [23]R O S A N AC,MA R I A N A DA,L U I ZCG e t a l.A-a n dB-t y p e s t a r c h g r a n u l e sf r o m w h e a te x h i b i t i n g w e a k,m e d i u m,a n d s t r o n gg l u t e n:A n i n v e s t i g a t i o no f p h y s i c o c h e m i c a l,m o r p h o-l o g i c a l,a n d i nv i t r od i g e s t i o n p r o p e r t i e s[J].C e r e a lC h e m i s-t r y,2021,98(3):10.[24]R E D D YCK,P R AM I L AS,H A R I P R I Y AS.P a s t i n g,t e x t u r-a l a n dt h e r m a l p r o p e r t i e so f r e s i s t a n ts t a r c h p r e p a r e df r o m p o t a t o(S o l a n u m t ub e r o s u m)s t a rc h u s i n g p u l l u l a n a s ee n-z y m e[J].J o u r n a l o f F o o dS c i e n c ea nd Te c h n o l o g y,2015, 52(3):1597.[25]张斌,罗发兴,黄强.不同直链含量玉米淀粉结晶结构及其消化性研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2010,36(8):29.Z HA N GB,L U O F X,HU A N G Q,e ta l.C r y s t a l l i n es t r u c-t u r e s a n d d i g e s t i b i l i t y o f c o r n s t a r c h e sw i t h d i f f e r e n t a m y l o s ec o n t e n t[J].F o od a n d Fe r m e n t a t i o nI n d u s t r i e s,2010,36(8):29[26]朱帆,徐广文,丁文平.D S C法研究小麦淀粉与面粉糊化和回生特性[J].食品科学,2007(4):281.Z HU F,X U G W,D I N G W P.S t u d y o n g e l a t i n i s a t i o na n d r e t r o g r a d a t i o n p r o p e r t i e so fw h e a t s t a r c ha n df l o u rb y D S C [J].F o o dS c i e n c e,2007(4):281.[27]C O O K ED,G I D L E Y M J.L o s so f c r y s t a l l i n ea n d m o l e c u l a r o r d e rd u r i n g s t a r c h g e l a t i n i s a t i o n:O r i g i n o ft h ee n t h a l p i c t r a n s i t i o n[J].C a r b o h y d r a t eR e s e a r c h,1992,227:108. [28]F A N Z.I m p a c to fu l t r a s o u n do ns t r u c t u r e,p h y s i c o c h e m i c a l p r o p e r t i e s,m o d i f i c a t i o n s,a n d a p p l i c a t i o n s o fs t a r c h[J]. T r e n d s i nF o o dS c i e n c e&T e c h n o l o g y,2015,43(1):7.[29]L IC,G O N GB,HU Y M,e t a l.C o m b i n e d c r y s t a l l i n e,l a m e l-l a ra n d g r a n u l a rs t r u c t u r a l i n s i g h t si n t o i nv i t r o d i g e s t i o n r a t e o f n a t i v es t a r c h e s[J].F o o d H y d r o c o l l o i d s,2020,105(C):105823.[30]K A U R B,R A N AWA N A V,H E N R YJ.T h e g l y c e m i c i n d e x o f r i c ea n dr i c e p r o d u c t s:A r e v i e w,a n dt a b l eo fG Iv a l u e s [J].C r i t i c a lR e v i e w s i nF o o dS c i e n c ea n d N u t r i t i o n,2016, 56(2):217.[31]黄承刚,李津源,徐任园,等.直链淀粉含量对淀粉-脂肪酸复合物形成及理化特性的影响[J].食品工业科技,2022,43 (13):53.HU A N GCG,L I JY,X U R Y,e t a l.E f f e c t o f a m y l o s e c o n-t e n to n t h ef o r m a t i o n a n d p h y s i c o c h e m i c a l p r o p e r t i e s o f s t a r c h-f a t t y a c i dc o m p l e x[J].S c i e n c ea n d T e c h n o l o g y o f F o o dI n d u s t r y,2022,43(13):53.㊃4001㊃麦类作物学报第43卷Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.。
保湿鲜面的老化及其抑制

保鲜湿面的老化及其抑制摘要:保鲜湿面作为非油炸的方便面,老化是其最主要的问题之一。
该文阐述了保鲜湿面的老化机理,和有关抑制LL面老化的研究进展,对LL面的开发有一定的参考意义。
关键词:保鲜湿面LL面淀粉老化The retrogradation and its Inhibition of long life noodle Abstract:One of the most critical problems of long life noodle is the retrogradation of its starch.This paper introduces the mechanism of retrogradation and the advanced retarding methods to inhibit.Key words: long life noodle retrogradation即食保鲜湿面(long life noodle,LL面)是方便面行业中的一颗新星,它的加工沿袭了手工挂面的制作方法,是不经油炸的蒸煮类面制食品,是高水分含量的即食鲜食品,外观晶莹,口感光滑,爽口有筋,食用方便,深受消费者欢迎。
同时,它也符合现代人们所追求的低脂肪、高营养、全天然的绿色食品要求,更快捷、更方便地满足人们的生活需要,是未来方便面的替代产品,有着广阔的发展前景。
但保鲜湿面作为典型的淀粉质食品,含水量高,已发生淀粉老化,老化后的面条韧性变差,口感变脆,易断裂[1]。
因此,延缓或抑制淀粉老化,进行LL面品质的研究从而较好的维持其贮存品质,对LL面的贮存性能有着重要作用。
保鲜湿面老化机理小麦面粉面团是一个多相体系,如果将面团在宏观基础上进行研究的话,我们可以将面团分出三个相:两个液相(一个为半固态,另一个为液态)和一个气相。
气相包括大量细小的空气泡,在揉合过程中被进一步分隔得更细小。
面团的液态液相在揉合过程中形成,连续地分布在整个面团内,它形成薄膜将面团中的空气泡包裹在其中,就象泡沫结构的液膜一样,这个液膜为发醉期间气泡沫的体积扩大提供了介质,其中所含的营养成分可提供给酵母,而且在面包制作过程中的其它反应也可在其中进行。
英文玉米淀粉的性质

Some properties of corn starches II:Physicochemical,gelatinization,retrogradation,pasting and gel textural propertiesKawaljit Singh Sandhu,Narpinder Singh*Department of Food Science and Technology,Guru Nanak Dev University,Amritsar,Punjab 143005,IndiaReceived 29August 2005;accepted 30January 2006AbstractThe physicochemical,thermal,pasting and gel textural properties of corn starches from different corn varieties (African Tall,Ageti,Early Composite,Girja,Navjot,Parbhat,Partap,Pb Sathi and Vijay)were studied.Amylose content and swelling power of corn starches ranged from 16.9%to 21.3%and 13.7to 20.7g/g,respectively.The enthalpy of gelatinization (D H gel )and percentage of retrogradation (%R )for various corn starches ranged from 11.2to 12.7J/g and 37.6%to 56.5%,respectively.The range for peak viscosity among dif-ferent varieties was between 804and 1252cP.The hardness of starch gels ranged from 21.5to 32.3g.African Tall and Early Composite showed higher swelling power,peak,trough,breakdown,final and setback viscosity,and lower D H gel and range of gelatinization.Pear-son correlations among various properties of starches were observed.Gelatinization onset temperature (T o )was negatively correlated to peak-,breakdown-,final-and setback viscosity (r =À0.809,À0.774,À0.721and À0.686,respectively,p <0.01)and positively correlated to pasting temperature (r =0.657,p <0.01).D H gel was observed to be positively correlated with T o ,peak gelatinization temperature and (T p )and gelatinization conclusion temperature T c (r =0.900,0.902and 0.828,respectively,p <0.01)whereas,it was negatively corre-lated to peak-and breakdown-(r =À0.743and À0.733,respectively,p <0.01),final-and setback viscosity (r =À0.623and À0.611,respectively,p <0.05).Amylose was positively correlated to hardness (r =0.511,p <0.05)and gumminess (r =0.792,p <0.01)of starch gels.Ó2006Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.Keywords:Corn starch;Physicochemical;Thermal;Pasting;Gel texture1.IntroductionCorn starch is a valuable ingredient to the food industry,being widely used as a thickener,gelling agent,bulking agent and water retention agent (Singh,Singh,Kaur,Sodhi,&Gill,2003).In India,corn has become the third most important food grain after wheat and rice.The demand for corn is increasing in India with the setting up of food processing units involved in the processing of corn.The production of corn in India was 14,000,000Mt against the total world production of 721,000,000Mt (FAO,2004).On the basis of amylose and amylopectin ratio,corn can be separated into normal,waxy and high amylose.In addi-tion,sugary type corn,with high sugar content,also exits (Singh,Sandhu,&Kaur,2005).Normal starch consists of about 75wt%branched amylopectin and about 25wt%amylose,that is linear or slightly branched.Starch granules swell when heated in excess water and their vol-ume fraction and morphology play important roles in the rheological behaviour of starch dispersions (Bagley &Christiansen,1982;Da Silva,Oliveira,&Rao,1997;Evans &Haisman,1979).Starch retrogradation has been defined as the process,which occurs when the molecular chains in gelatinized starches begin to reassociate in an ordered structure (Atwell,Hood,Lineback,Varriano Marston,&Zobel,1988).During retrogradation,amylose forms dou-ble-helical associations of 40–70glucose units (Jane &Robyt,1984)whereas amylopectin crystallization occurs by reassociation of the outermost short branches (Ring0308-8146/$-see front matter Ó2006Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.060*Corresponding author.Fax:+91183258820.E-mail address:narpinders@ (N.Singh)./locate/foodchemFood Chemistry 101(2007)1499–1507Food Chemistryet al.,1987).Although both amylose and amylopectin are capable of retrograding,the amylopectin component appears to be more responsible for long-term quality changes in foods(Miles,Morris,Orford,&Ring,1985; Ring et al.,1987).Several workers have characterized the pasting properties of starches from different corn types(Ji et al.,2003;Seetharaman et al.,2001;Yamin,Lee,Pollak, &White,1999)and observed considerable variability in these properties.The viscosity parameters during pasting are cooperatively controlled by the properties of the swol-len granules and the soluble materials leached out from the granules(Doublier,Llamas,&Meur,1987;Eliasson, 1986).Sandhu,Singh,and Kaur(2004)studied the effect of corn types on the physicochemical,thermal,morpholog-ical and rheological properties of corn starches.Textural properties of starch gels are very important criteria,used to evaluate the performance of starch in a food system.Ji et al.(2003)used a texture analyzer for studying the gel properties of starches from selected corn lines and found significant differences among them.Seetharaman et al. (2001)studied the textural properties of13selected Argen-tinian corn landraces and found significant variability in hardness between them after storage.The objective of this study was to characterize the corn varieties grown in India on the basis of the physicochemical,thermal,pasting and gel textural properties of their starch.This will be useful in selecting the appropriate variety for end use suitability.2.Materials and methods2.1.MaterialsSix improved corn varieties,viz.,Ageti,Navjot,Parb-hat,Partap,Pb Sathi and Vijay from the2003harvest were obtained from Punjab Agricultural University,Ludhiana, India.Three improved corn varieties,viz.,African Tall, Early Composite and Girja from the2003harvest were obtained from Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pra-desh Agricultural University,Palampur,India.2.2.Starch isolationStarch was isolated from corn grains following the method of Sandhu,Singh,and Malhi(2005).2.3.Physicochemical properties of starch2.3.1.Amylose content(%)Amylose content of the isolated starch was determined by using the method of Williams,Kuzina,and Hlynka (1970).A starch sample(20mg)was taken and10ml of 0.5N KOH was added to it.The suspension was thor-oughly mixed.The dispersed sample was transferred to a 100ml volumetricflask and diluted to the mark with dis-tilled water.An aliquot of test starch solution(10ml) was pipetted into a50ml volumetricflask and5ml of 0.1N HCL was added followed by0.5ml of iodine reagent.The volume was diluted to50ml and the absorbance was measured at625nm.The measurement of the amylose was determined from a standard curve developed using amylose and amylopectin blends.2.3.2.Swelling power(g/g)and solubility(%)Swelling power and solubility of starches were deter-mined in triplicate using the method of Leach,McCowen, and Schoch(1959).2.3.3.TurbidityTurbidity of starch pastes from different corn varieties was measured as described by Perera and Hoover(1999). A1%aqueous suspension of starch from each corn variety was heated in a water bath at90°C for1h with constant stirring.The starch paste was cooled for1h at30°C. The samples were stored for5days at4°C and turbidity was determined every24h by measuring absorbance at 640nm against a water blank with a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer(Shimadzu Corporation,Kyoto, Japan).2.3.4.Water binding capacity(WBC)WBC of the starches from the different corn varieties was determined using the method described by Yamazaki (1953),as modified by Medcalf and Gilles(1965).A sus-pension of5g starch(dry weight)in75ml distilled water was agitated for1h and centrifuged(3000g)for10min. The free water was removed from the wet starch,which was then drained for10min.The wet starch was then weighed.2.4.Thermal properties of starchesThe thermal characteristics of the isolated starches were studied by using a differential scanning calorimeter(DSC, model821e,Mettler Toledo,Switzerland),equipped with a thermal analysis data station.Starch(3.5mg,dry weight) was loaded into a40l l capacity aluminium pan(Mettler, ME-27331)and distilled water was added by Hamilton microsyringe,to achieve a starch-water suspension contain-ing70%water.Samples were hermetically sealed and allowed to stand for1h at room temperature before heat-ing in the DSC.The DSC analyzer was calibrated using indium and an empty aluminium pan was used as a refer-ence.Sample pans were heated at a rate of10°C/min from 20to100°C.Thermal transitions of starch samples were defined as T o(onset temperature),T p(peak of gelatiniza-tion temperature)and T c(conclusion temperature)and D H gel referred to the enthalpy of gelatinization.Enthalpies were calculated on a starch dry weight basis.These were calculated automatically.The gelatinization temperature range(R)and peak height index(PHI),was calculated as 2(T pÀT o)and D H/(T pÀT o),as described by Krueger, Knutson,Inglett,and Walker(1987).After conducting thermal analysis,the samples were stored at4°C for7days, for retrogradation studies.The sample pans containing1500K.S.Sandhu,N.Singh/Food Chemistry101(2007)1499–1507the starches were reheated at the rate of10°C/min from25 to100°C after7days to measure retrogradation.The enthalpies of retrogradation(D H gel)were evaluated auto-matically and percentage of retrogradation(%R)was cal-culated as%R¼enthalpy of retrogradation enthalpy of gelatinizationÂ100:2.5.Pasting properties of starchesThe pasting properties of the starches were evaluated with the Rapid Visco Analyzer(RAV-4,Newport Scien-tific,Warriewood,Australia).Viscosity profiles of starches from different corn varieties were recorded using starch suspensions(6%,w/w;28g total weight).A programmed heating and cooling cycle was used,where the samples were held at50°C for1min,heated to95°C at6°C/min,held at95°C for2.7min,before cooling from95to50°C at 6°C/min and holding at50°C for2min.Parameters recorded were pasting temperature,peak viscosity,trough viscosity(minimum viscosity at95°C),final viscosity(vis-cosity at50°C),breakdown viscosity(peak-trough viscos-ity)and setback viscosity(final-trough viscosity).All measurements were replicated thrice.2.6.Textural properties of starch gelsThe starch prepared in the RVA were poured into small aluminum canisters and stored at4°C to cause gelation. The gel formed in the canisters was evaluated for their tex-tural properties by texture profile analysis(TPA)using the TA/XT2texture analyzer(Stable MicroSystems,Surrey, England).Each canister was placed upright on the metal plate and the gel was compressed at a speed of0.5mm/s to a distance of10mm with a cylindrical plunger(diame-ter=5mm).The compression was repeated twice to gener-ate a force–time curve from which hardness(height offirst peak)and springiness(ratio between recovered height after thefirst compression and the original gel height)was deter-mined.The negative area of the curve during retraction of the probe was termed adhesiveness.Cohesiveness was cal-culated as the ratio between the area under the second peak and the area under thefirst peak(Bourne,1968;Friedman,Whitney,&Szczesniak,1968).Gumminess was determined by multiplying hardness and cohesiveness.Chewiness was derived from gumminess and springiness and was obtained by multiplying these two.Five repeated measurements were performed for each sample and their average was taken.2.7.Statistical analysisThe data reported in all of the tables are an average of triplicate observations and were subjected to one-way anal-ysis of variance(ANOVA).Pearson correlation coefficients (r)for the relationships between all properties were also calculated using Minitab Statistical Software version13 (Minitab Inc.,USA).3.Results and discussion3.1.Physicochemical properties of starchesAmylose content of starches from different corn varieties differed significantly(Table1).Amylose content of various corn starches ranged between16.9%and21.3%,the lowest was observed for African tall and the highest for Vijay. Seetharaman et al.(2001)reported amylose content in the range of16.1–23.3%for35corn landraces.The ability of starches to swell in excess water and their solubility also differed significantly(Table1).Swelling power(SP)and solubility can be used to assess the extent of interaction between starch chains,within the amorphous and crystal-line domains of the starch granule(Ratnayake,Hoover, &Warkentin,2002).SP was observed to be the highest for Early Composite(20.7g/g)and the lowest for Parbhat starch(13.7g/g).Starch swelling occurs concomitantly with loss of birefringence and precedes solubilization (Singh,Sandhu,&Kaur,2004).Solubility of various corn starches ranged from9.7%to15.0%(Table1).Water bind-ing capacity(WBC)of starches from different corn varieties ranged from82.1%to97.7%(Table1).WBC of starches from Parbhat and Partap were similar(91.1%).The differ-ence in the degree of availability of water binding sites among the starches may have contributed to the variation in WBC among different starches(Wotton&Bamunu-arachchi,1978).The turbidity values of gelatinized starch suspensions from different corn varieties are depicted inTable1Physicochemical properties of starches from different corn varietiesVariety Amylose content(%)Swelling power(g/g)Solubility(%)WBC(%) African Tall16.9a19.4d13.5c84.9ab Ageti19.4c16.8bc15.0d82.3a Early Composite17.9b20.7e12.6bc90.5c Girja16.9a17.8c11.3b82.1a Navjot19.6c14.9ab11.6b97.7d Parbhat19.5c13.7a10.1a91.1c Partab18.5b13.8a9.7a91.1c PbSathi20.9d15.9b12.0bc86.0b Vijay21.3d16.8bc13.9c83.0ab Values with similar letters in the same column do not differ significantly(p<0.05).K.S.Sandhu,N.Singh/Food Chemistry101(2007)1499–15071501Fig.1.Turbidity values of all starch suspensions increased progressively during storage of starch gels at 4°C.Early Composite starch showed the lowest turbidity whereas Parbhat starch showed the highest.Turbidity development in starches during storage has been attributed to the inter-action of several factors,such as granule swelling,granule remnants,leached amylose and amylopectin,amylose and amylopectin chain length,intra or interbonding,lipid and cross-linking substitution (Jacobson,Obanni,&BeMiller,1997).3.2.Gelatinization properties of starchesThe gelatinization temperatures (onset,T o ;peak,T p ;and conclusion,T c ),enthalpy of gelatinization (D H gel ),peak height index (PHI)and gelatinization temperature range (R )for starches from different corn starches,mea-sured using DSC are presented in Table 2.Significant dif-ference was observed in T o ,T p and T c among starches from different corn varieties.The lowest T o ,T p and T c of 65.6,69.9and 75.1°C,respectively,were observed for Girja starch,whereas Parbhat starch showed the highest value for the same (Fig.2).These values are in agreementwith those observed for normal corn starches (Ng,Duvick,&White,1997;Seetharaman et al.,2001).The higher gela-tinization temperatures for Parbhat starch indicated that more energy is required to initiate starch gelatinization.D H gel for various corn starches ranged between 11.2and 12.7J/g (Table 2).Li,Berke,and Glover (1994)reported D H gel in the range from 8.2to 12.3J/g for starches from tropical maize germplasm.The difference in D H gel reflects melting of amylopectin crystallites.The variations in D H gel could represent differences in bonding forces between the double helices that form the amylopectin crystallites,which,resulted in different alignment of hydrogen bonds within starch molecules (McPherson &Jane,1999).PHI,a measure of uniformity in gelatinization,was found to be the lowest for Partap (2.34)starch,whereas it was found to be the highest for Pb Sathi (2.98).The R value wasfoundFig.1.Effect of storage duration on the turbidity of starch pastes from different corn varieties.Table 2Gelatinization properties of starches from different corn varieties VarietyT o (°C)T p (°C)T c (°C)D H gel (J/g)PHI R African Tall 67.5c 71.5b 76.5b 11.6ab 2.90b 8.0a Ageti68.3d 73.1cd 79.3d 12.2b 2.54ab 9.6b Early Composite 66.3b 70.6a 75.9b 11.2a 2.60ab 8.6a Girja 65.6a 69.9a 75.1a 11.3a 2.63ab 8.6a Navjot 68.9e 73.8de 79.2d 12.4b 2.53ab 9.8b Parbhat 69.0e 74.0e 79.7d 12.7c 2.54ab 10.0b Partap 68.3d 73.3d 79.3d 11.7ab 2.34a 10.0b Pb Sathi 68.6de 72.7c 77.8c 12.2b 2.98b 8.2a Vijay67.0c71.9b77.9c11.7ab2.39a9.8bT o ,onset temperature;T p ,peak temperature;T c ,conclusion temperature;D H gel ,enthalpy of gelatinization (dwb,based on starch weight);R ,gelatinization range 2(T p ÀT o );PHI,peak height index D H gel /(T p ÀT o ).Values with similar letters in the same column do not differ significantly (p <0.05).Fig.2.DSC endotherms of gelatinization of starches from different corn varieties:(A)African Tall;(B)Ageti;(C)Early Composite;(D)Girja;(E)Navjot;(F)Partap;(G)Parbhat;(H)Pb Sathi;(I)Vijay.1502K.S.Sandhu,N.Singh /Food Chemistry 101(2007)1499–1507to be the lowest for African Tall and the highest for Parb-hat and Partap starches.The high R values of Parbhat and Partap corn starches suggests the presence of crystallites of varying stability within the crystalline domains of its gran-ule (Hoover,Li,Hynes,&Senanayake,1997).3.3.Retrogradation properties of starchesThe molecular interactions (hydrogen bonding between starch chains)that occur after cooling of the gelatinized starch paste are known as retrogradation (Hoover,2000).The retrogradation properties of various corn starches are presented in Table 3.Retrogradation (%)of starches from different corn varieties were %40–60%(Fig.3).Yamin,Svendsen,and White (1997)reported retrograda-tion (%)values between 50%and 60%,for Oh 43normal corn starches inbreds.Retrograded corn starches showed lower enthalpy than their native counterparts.This may be due to the weaker starch crystallinity of retrograded starch (Sasaki,Yasui,&Matsuki,2000).D H ret for corn starches ranged from 4.4to 6.9J/g,the lowest for Vijay and the highest for Ageti starch.D H ret of 4.6–6.9J/g has been reported in selected corn lines by Ji et al.(2003).The difference in D H ret among various corn starches sug-gested differences in their tendency towards retrogradation.The transition temperatures of retrogradation were found to be lower than the gelatinization temperatures.This might be due to the fact that recrystallization of amylopec-tin branched chains occurred in a less ordered manner in stored gels,as it is present in native form.T o for retrogra-dation ranged between 41.5and 43.1°C,the lowest for Ageti and the highest for Partap starch was observed.T o values of retrogradation in the range between 42.9and 48.1°C for exotic corn inbred lines have been reported by Pollak and White (1997).Girja starch showed the lowest value for T p of retrogradation whereas Partap had the highest value.The range for retrogradation temperature was found to be greater than the gelatinization temperature range.Similar observations have been reported earlier (Karim,Norziah,&Seow,2000).African Tall and Early Composite starches showed the lowest R of retrogradation,whereas Partap and Ageti had the highest values.3.4.Pasting properties of starchesPasting properties of various corn starches have been summarized in Table 4.Significant difference in the pasting properties among different corn varieties was observed.All corn starches showed gradual increase in viscosity with increase in temperature (Fig.4).The increase in viscosity with temperature may be attributed to the removal of water from the exuded amylose by the granules as they swell (Ghiasi,Varriano-Marston,&Hoseney,1982).Peak vis-cosity (PV)for various corn starches ranged between 804and 1252cP,the lowest for Partap and the highest for Afri-can Tall and Early Composite starches.Ji et al.(2003)reported PV in the range between 152and 222RVU for selected corn lines.Trough viscosity (TV)was found to be the lowest for Pb Sathi (594cP)and the highest for Parbhat (727cP).Breakdown viscosity (BV)(measure ofTable 3Retrogradation properties of starches from different corn varieties VarietyT o (°C)T p (°C)T c (°C)D H ret (J/g)R %R African Tall 42.5b 52.4a 62.3ab 5.0ab 19.8a 43.1c Ageti41.5a 52.9ab 63.6bc 6.9c 22.8c 56.5e Early Composite 42.7bc 52.6a 62.0a 4.9ab 19.8a 43.7c Girja 42.4b 52.4a 62.1a 5.0ab 20.0a 44.2cd Navjot 42.5b 53.6bc 63.1b 5.4b 22.2bc 43.5c Parbhat 43.0c 53.6bc 63.4bc 5.2b 21.2b 40.9b Partap 43.1c 54.5c 64.3c 4.9ab 22.8c 41.9bc Pb Sathi 42.5b 53.3b 62.9b 5.7bc 21.6b 46.7d Vijay43.0c53.1b62.4ab4.4a20.2a37.6aT o ,onset temperature;T p ,peak temperature;T c ,conclusion temperature;D H ret ,enthalpy of retrogradation (dwb,based on starch weight);R ,retro-gradation range 2(T p ÀT o );%R ,ratio of enthalpy of retrogradation to enthalpy of gelatinization ·100.Values with similar letters in the same column do not differ significantly (p <0.05).Fig.3.DSC endotherms of retrogradation of starches from different corn varieties:(A)African Tall;(B)Ageti;(C)Early Composite;(D)Girja;(E)Navjot;(F)Partap;(G)Parbhat;(H)Pb Sathi;(I)Vijay.K.S.Sandhu,N.Singh /Food Chemistry 101(2007)1499–15071503the cooked starch to disintegration)was found to be the lowest for Parbhat and the highest for African Tall starch. Final viscosity(FV)(indicates the ability of the starch to form a viscous paste)for different corn starches ranged from824to1388cP,the lowest shown by Partap and the highest by African es et al.(1985)reported that increase infinal viscosity might be due to the aggregation of the amylose molecules.Setback viscosity(SV)(measure of synaeresis of starch upon cooling of the cooked starch pastes)for various corn starches differed significantly.Par-tap exhibited the lowest setback of141cP,whereas it was found to be the highest for African Tall(726cP).The low PV,BV,FV and SV of Navjot,Parbhat and Partap starches correlate well with their low SP in water.Pasting properties are dependent on the rigidity of starch granules, which in turn affect the granule swelling potential(Sandhya Rani&Bhattacharaya,1989)and amount of amylose leaching out in the solution(Morris,1990).Pasting temper-ature(PT)(temperature at the onset of rise in viscosity)for various corn starches ranged between75.9and83.8°C,the lowest shown by African Tall and Early Composite and the highest by Parbhat starch.The high pasting temperature of Parbhat and Partap starch indicated their higher resistance towards swelling.Seetharaman et al.(2001)reported past-ing temperatures in the range of74.9–84.7°C for Argentin-ian corn landraces.3.5.Gel texture properties of starch gelsThe textural properties of gels from different corn starches determined using the texture analyzer are shown in Table5.The textural parameters of corn starch gels from different corn varieties varied significantly.StarchTable4Pasting properties of starches from different corn varietiesVariety PV(cP)TV(cP)BV(cP)FV(cP)SV(cP)P Temp(°C) African Tall1252f662bc590f1388e726f75.9a Ageti1000c652b348c1222c570c77.4b Early Composite1250f671c579f1321d650de75.9a Girja1196e647b549e1324d677e77.4b Nayjot839b697d142b877b180b80.6d Parbhat840b727e113a868b141a83.8e Partap804a676c128ab824a148a83.1ePb Sathi1012c594a418d1214c629d78.3c Vijay1063d686cd377c1345de659de77.5b PV,peak viscosity;TV,trough viscosity;BV,breakdown viscosity;FV,final viscosity;SV,setback viscosity;P Temp,pasting temperature.Values with similar letters in the same column do not differ significantly(p<0.05).Table5Textural properties of starch gels from different corn varietiesVariety Hardness(g)Cohesiveness Gumminess Springiness Chewiness Adhesiveness(gs) African Tall21.5a0.418c8.9a0.805d7.2b38.6eAgeti28.0d0.392b10.9bc0.623b 6.8ab15.6aEarly Composite26.0c0.398bc10.3b0.590ab 6.1a32.4dGirja24.1b0.3859.30.716c 6.6ab20.6bNavjot27.5d0.431d11.8c0.626b7.4b32.6dParbhat31.1e0.437d13.6d0.518a7.0b22.9cPartap32.3f0.370a11.9c0.902e10.8c20.6bPb Sathi27.5d0.576e15.8e0.708c11.2c40.6fVijay27.5d0.434d11.9c0.614b7.3b40.3fValues with similar letters in the same column do not differ significantly(p<0.05).1504K.S.Sandhu,N.Singh/Food Chemistry101(2007)1499–1507gel from Partap showed the highest hardness (32.3g),whereas African Tall starch gel showed the lowest (21.5g).Seetharaman et al.(2001)reported the hardness of 13selected Argentinian corn landraces in the range between 16.7and 35g.The gel firmness is mainly caused by retrogradation of starch gels,which is associated with the synaeresis of water and crystallization of amylopectin,leading to harder gels (Miles et al.,1985).Starches that exhibit harder gels tend to have higher amylose content and longer amylopectin chains (Mua &Jackson,1997).Gumminess was found to be the highest for Pb Sathi (15.8)and the lowest for African Tall (8.9)starch gels.Chewiness was found to be the highest for Pb Sathi and the lowest for Early Composite starch gel.The mechanical properties of starch gels depend upon various factors,including the rheological characteristics of the amylose matrix,the volume fraction and the rigidity of the gelati-nized starch granules,as well as the interactions between dispersed and continuous phases of the gel (Biliaderis,1998).These factors are in turn dependent on the amylose content and the structure of the amylopectin (Yamin et al.,1999).The values for hardness,cohesiveness,springiness and adhesiveness of starch gels observed in the present study were comparable to those observed earlier for nor-mal corn starches by Liu,Ramsden,and Corke (1999).3.6.Pearson correlations among various properties of corn starchesSeveral significant correlations between the physico-chemical,gelatinization,retrogradation,pasting and gel texture properties of the corn starches were observed (Table 6).SP was positively correlated to solubility (r =0.582,p <0.05).Interrelationships between the gelatinization parameters were observed.T o was positively correlated to T p and T c (r =0.970and 0.890,respectively,p <0.01).Ji et al.(2003)showed positive correlations between T o and T p for advanced generations of corn lines.D H gel was observed to be positively correlated with T o ,T p and T c (r =0.900,0.902and 0.828,respectively,p <0.01).Singh,Kaur,Sandhu,Kaur,and Nishinari (2006)observed signif-icant positive correlation between T o ,T p and T c with D H gel for rice starches.PHI was negatively correlated to R (r =À0.869,p <0.01).Relationship between the gelatiniza-tion and retrogradation properties was observed.D H gel was positively correlated to the R of retrogradation.The thermal and pasting properties were observed to be related to each other.T o ,T p and T c of gelatinization were negatively correlated to PV (r =À0.809,À0.898and À0.902,respec-tively,p <0.01),BV (r =À0.774,À0.886and À0.900,respectively,p <0.01),FV (r =À0.721,À0.795and À0.765,respectively,p <0.01)and SV (r =À0.686,À0.779and 0.762,respectively,p <0.01)whereas they were positively correlated to PT (r =0.657,0.750and 0.731,respectively,p <0.01).D H gel was negatively correlated to PV and BV (r =À0.743,À0.733,respectively,p <0.01),FV and SV (r =À0.623and À0.611,respectively,T a b l e 6P e a r s o n c o r r e l a t i o n c o e ffic i e n t s b e t w e e n v a r i o u s p r o p e r t i e s o f s t a r c h e s f r o m d i ffe r e n t c o r n v a r i e t i e sA M Y aS P aS O L aT o aT p aT c aD H g e l aP H I aR aR (1)aP V aB V aF V aS V aP T aH D aS P aÀ0.498S O L a0.1360.582bT o a0.519bÀ0.742cÀ0.227T p a0.560bÀ0.827cÀ0.2580.970cT c a0.584bÀ0.814cÀ0.1740.890c0.968cD H g e l a0.576bÀ0.731cÀ0.1680.900c0.902c0.828cP H I aÀ0.1740.4160.1790.001À0.236À0.432À0.023R a0.444À0.730cÀ0.2420.4540.657c0.788c0.513bÀ0.869cR (1)a0.354À0.717cÀ0.1790.720c0.763c0.805c0.580bÀ0.3230.565bP V aÀ0.5060.956c0.524bÀ0.809cÀ0.898cÀ0.902cÀ0.743c0.475À0.782cÀ0.815cB V aÀ0.4570.933c0.533bÀ0.774cÀ0.886cÀ0.900À0.733c0.558À0.846cÀ0.745c0.985cF V aÀ0.2100.859c0.725cÀ0.721cÀ0.795cÀ0.765cÀ0.623b0.426À0.675cÀ0.703c0.925c0.938cS v aÀ0.1840.832c0.706cÀ0.686cÀ0.779cÀ0.762cÀ0.611b0.495À0.727cÀ0.645c0.904c0.940c0.991cP T a0.251À0.914cÀ0.781c0.657c0.750c0.731c0.620bÀ0.4640.714c0.578bÀ0.903cÀ0.922c0.945cÀ0.943cH D a0.511bÀ0.811c0.516b0.590b0.713c0.787c0.518bÀ0.601b0.781c0.680cÀ0.865cÀ0.856cÀ0.799cÀ0.784c0.838cG M a0.792cÀ0.623bÀ0.3020.663c0.621c0.542b0.660c0.1370.2220.396À0.591À0.505À0.431À0.3600.4900.609baA M ,a m y l o s e c o n t e n t ;S P ,s w e l l i n g p o w e r ;S O L ,s o l u b i l i t y ;T o ,o n s e t t e m p e r a t u r e ;T p ,p e a k t e m p e r a t u r e ;T c ,c o n c l u s i o n t e m p e r a t u r e ;D H g e l ,e n t h a l p y o f g e l a t i n i z a t i o n ;P H I ,p e a k h e i g h t i n d e x ;R ,r a n g e o f g e l a t i n i z a t i o n ;R (1),r a n g e o f r e t r o g r a d a t i o n ;P V ,p e a k v i s c o s i t y ;B D ,b r e a k d o w n v i s c o s i t y ;F V ,fin a l v i s c o s i t y ;S B ,s e t b a c k v i s c o s i t y ;P T ,p a s t i n g t e m p e r a t u r e ;H D ,h a r d n e s s ;G M ,g u m m i n e s s .bC o r r e l a t i o n i s s i g n i fic a n t (p <0.05).c C o r r e l a t i o n i s s i g n i fic a n t (p <0.01).K.S.Sandhu,N.Singh /Food Chemistry 101(2007)1499–15071505。
抗性淀粉

抗性淀粉概述 抗性淀粉的分类 抗性淀粉与健康 在食品工业中的应用
抗性淀粉概述
抗性淀粉的定义为:在小肠中不能被酶解,但在人的肠胃道结肠 中可以与挥发性脂肪酸起发酵反应的一类淀粉结构。淀粉不能被吸收 并且能够进入结肠具有重要的生理功效。
抗性淀粉存在于某些天然食品中,如马铃薯、香蕉、大米等都含 有抗性淀粉,特别是高直链淀粉(high amylosecorn starch)的玉米 淀粉含抗性淀粉高达60%。
抗性淀粉比膳食纤维有更为广泛的保健意义目前成为欧美国家食品与营养研究的重点西方居民食谱中抗性淀粉正增加至10以上但抗性淀粉不易被消化酶所消化消化能力差的人应当少吃或不作为一种新型健康食品添加剂抗性淀粉既不会显著的影响食品流变学性质又可形成具有不同特色的功能食品和风味食品
新型健康食品添加剂 —抗性淀物
糖原(Glycogen):又称动物淀粉,是多聚D-葡萄糖,几乎全部存 在于动物组织中,结构与支链淀粉相似,分支多,支链比较短,分子量 大。
抗性淀粉(Resistant Starch,RS):又称抗酶解淀粉及难消化淀 粉,这种淀粉较其他淀粉难降解,在体内消化缓慢,吸收和进入血液都 较缓慢。抗性淀粉本身仍然是淀粉,其化学结构不同于纤维,但其性质 类似溶解性纤维。
抗性淀粉比膳食纤维有更为广泛的保健意义,目前成为欧美国家 食品与营养研究的重点,西方居民食谱中,抗性淀粉正增加至10%以 上,但抗性淀粉不易被消化酶所消化,消化能力差的人应当少吃或不 吃。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
J.Agric.Food Chem.2010,58,7383–73887383DOI:10.1021/jf100385m C-Type Starch from High-Amylose Rice Resistant StarchGranules Modified by Antisense RNA Inhibition of StarchBranching EnzymeC UNXU W EI,†,‡B IN X U,§F ENGLING Q IN,‡H UAGUANG Y U,§C HONG C HEN,§X IANGLEN M ENG,†L IJIA Z HU,†Y OUPING W ANG,‡M INGHONG G U,*,†ANDQ IAOQUAN L IU*,††Key Laboratories of Crop Genetics and Physiology of the Jiangsu Province and PlantFunctional Genomics of the Ministry of Education,‡College of Bioscience and Biotechnology,and§Testing Center,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou225009,ChinaHigh-amylose starch is a source of resistant starch(RS)which has a great benefit on human health.A transgenic rice line(TRS)enriched amylose and RS had been developed by antisense RNAinhibition of starch branching enzymes.In this study,the native starch granules were isolated fromTRS grains as well as the wild type,and their crystalline type was carefully investigated before andafter acid hydrolysis.In high-amylose TRS rice,the C-type starch,which might result from the com-bination of both A-type and B-type starch,was observed and subsequently confirmed by multiplephysical techniques,including X-ray powder diffraction,solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance,andFourier transform infrared.Moreover,the change of starch crystalline structure from C-to B-typeduring acid hydrolysis was also observed in this RS-rich rice.These data could add to our under-standing of not only the polymorph structure of cereal starch but also why high-amylose starch is moreresistant to digestion.KEYWORDS:Rice(Oryza sativa L.);high-amylose resistant starch granule;C-type starch;X-raypowder diffraction;solid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceINTRODUCTIONStarch,the most important reserve component in higher plants, especially in cereal endosperm,is usually synthesized as a semi-crystalline granule containing densely packed polysaccharides with a small amount of water included.Up to now,the crystal-linity of native starches has been well studied and their poly-morphism has been recognized under X-ray powder diffraction (XRD)(1-3).Typically,there are three types of starch crystal-linity reported,known as A-,B-,and C-type(1-3).The A-type starch mainly exists in cereal endosperm,and their crystalline structure is mostly favored by the amylopectin with short lateral chains and closed branching points(1).The crystal-line structure of B-type starch,contrary to that of A-type,is usually formed by the amylopectin with long side chains and distant branching points and can be observed in tuber crops such as potato.But there are limited reports for the C-type starch, except in smooth-seeded peas and beans(4).Usually,the C-type crystalline structure is a mixture of both A-and B-type.For example,in peas containing C-type starch,starch in the center of the granule adopts a B-type crystalline structure while the periphery is composed of the A-type crystalline structure(4).Normally,the normal cereal starches show A-type crystalline structures as mentioned above(1),but the B-type crystalline structure is also observed,especially in high-amylose cereal star-ches.For example,Yano et al.(5)found that several rice mutants with high amylose content(AC,35.4%vs29.4%of wild type) contain starch with B-type XRD patterns.The rice line Goami2 (previously known as Suweon464),containing33%of AC and about twice as much as wild type Ilpumbeyo,also presents a B-type starch structure(6).In maize,the B-type starch is also re-ported in the high amylose varieties(2),but not all the high-amylose cereal starches are B-type.Some rice and barley mutants with high amylose are identified to contain a typical A-type XRD pattern(7,8).Besides the typical A-and B-types,the C-type cereal starches are also presented,although in rare cases.Cheetham and Tao reported that the crystal type of maize starch could be varied from A-to B-via C-type when AC increased,and the transition occurred at about40%(2).Recently,we have developed several high-amylose transgenic rice lines by antisense RNA inhibition of the starch branching enzymes(SBEs)(9,10).These transgenic rice grains are rich in resistant starch(RS)and have been proven to show a significant potential to improve the large bowel health in rats(11).Our results from microstructure and ultrastructure studies revealed that these high-amylose starch granules consist of semicompound starch,much different from the compound starch in the starch granules from wild type rice(9).*To whom correspondence should be addressed.Phone,þ86-514-87997217;E-mail,yzuwcx@(C.Wei).Phone,þ86-514-87996648;E-mail,qqliu@(Q.Liu);E-mail,gumh@(M.Gu)./JAFCPublished on Web05/25/2010©2010American Chemical Society7384J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.58,No.12,2010Wei et al. In this study,the native starch granules were further isolatedfrom the high-amylose grains as well as their wild type,and theircrystalline type was carefully investigated before and after acidhydrolysis.Interestingly,in high-amylose rice,the C-type starchstructure was presented and confirmed by multiple physicaltechniques,including XRD,13C cross-polarization magic-anglespinning nuclear magnetic resonance(13C CP/MAS NMR),andattenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared(ATR-FTIR).Moreover,the change of starch crystallinity from C-toB-type during acid hydrolysis was also observed in the RS-richtransgenic rice.MATERIALS AND METHODSPlant Materials.An indica rice cultivar Te-qing(TQ)and its trans-genic line(TRS)with high AC and RS were used in this study.TRS wasgenerated from TQ after transgenic inhibition of two SBEs(SBEI andSBEIIb)through antisense RNA technique and held the homozygoustransgene(9,10).TRS(in T8generation)and TQ were simultaneouslycultivated in the experiment field of Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,China,in2009,and their mature grains were used to isolate starchgranules.Smooth pea(Pisum sativum L.)and potato(Solanum tuberosumL.)were obtained from a local natural food market.Isolation of Native Starch Granules.Native starch granules wereisolated as previously described(9)except that the samples and starchgranules were not treated with NaOH.The apparent AC was determinedby using a colorimetric method with iodine-potassium iodide(12).Preparation of Acid-Modified Starch.The acid-modified starch wasprepared according to the method of Wang et al.(13)with a slight modi-fication.Two grams of isolated native starch were suspended in100mL of2.2M HCl solution in a sealed container.The containers were placed in anoven at35°C for a period from0to20days and gently shaken3times byhand every day in order to resuspend the sedimented granules.After thecertain time of hydrolysis,the solvent was centrifuged(10min,3000g)andthe supernatant was used for measurement of the solubilized carbohyd-rates to quantify the degree of hydrolysis by the anthrone-H2SO4method(14).The undissolved residues were subsequently washed threetimes with ddH2O and two times with acetone and then dried at25°C.Thedried starches were ground into powders and passed through a100-meshsieve for further use.The recovery yield(wt%)of the starch after acid hydrolysis was calculated based on the change of dried starch after and before hydrolysis.Hydrolysis of Native Starch Granules by r-Amylase.The R-amylase degraded starch granules were prepared according to the method desc-ribed by Li et al.(15)with a slight modification.Isolated native starches (50mg)were suspended in5mL of0.1M phosphate sodium buffer(pH6.9) containing0.006M NaCl.Bacillus licheniformis R-amylase(Sigma-Aldrich)was added,with a final concentration of0.01%(w/v).The amy-lolysis was carried out in an oven at37°C for a period.After the desired time of hydrolysis,undissolved residues were isolated by centrifugation (10min,3000g),and the supernatant was measured for solubilized carbo-hydrates.The residues were dried and the recovery yield after enzyme hydrolysis calculated as above.XRD Analysis.XRD analysis of isolated native and acid modified starch granules was carried out on an XRD(D8,Bruker,Germany) according to the published method(16).The samples were exposed to the X-ray beam at200mA and40kV.The scanning region of the diffraction angle(2θ)was from3°to40°with a step size of0.02°and a count time of 0.8s.All the specimens were stored in a desiccator,where a saturated solution of NaCl maintained a constant humidity atmosphere(relative humidity(RH)=75%)for1week at25°C before measurements.ATR-FTIR Measurement.ATR-FTIR measurement was carried out according to the method(17)with a slight modification.The spectra were obtained using a Varian7000FTIR spectrometer with a DTGS dete-ctor equipped with a ATR single reflectance cell containing a germanium crystal(45°incidence-angle)(PIKE Technologies,USA).For each mea-surement,64scans with a4cm-1resolution were coadded before Fourier transformation.The spectrum of water recorded in the same condition was subtracted from the sample spectra.Spectra were corrected by a baseline in the region from1200to800cm-1before deconvolution was applied using Resolutions Pro.The assumed line shape was Lorentzian with a half-width of26cm-1and a resolution enhancement factor of2.0.IR absorbance values at1047,1022,and995cm-1were extracted from the spectra after water subtraction,baseline correction,and deconvolution.Solid-State13C CP/MAS NMR Analysis.High-resolution solid-state13C CP/MAS NMR experiments were carried out at B0=9.4T on a Bruker AVANCE III400WB spectrometer.The corresponding13C resonance frequencies were100.6MHz.Samples were packed in a7mm ZrO2rotor and spun at the magic angle(54.7°)with6kHz of spin rate. 1H-13C CP/MAS spectra were recorded with a contact time of1.2ms anda recycle delay of2s.The chemical shifts were referenced to tetramethyl-silane(TMS)at0ppm.Typically,8000-12000transients were accumu-lated for the13C spectra.All the specimens were stored in a desiccator, where a saturated solution of NaCl maintained a constant humidity atmo-sphere(RH=75%)atmosphere for1week at25°C before measurements.RESULTSHigh AC in Isolated TRS Native Starch.To avoid the effect of enzyme or alkaline treatment on starch crystalline structure during starch isolation,we isolated the native starch from mature rice grains without enzyme and alkaline treatment in which the samples and starch granules were only treated with water.The isolated native starches were identified to have no damage on granules(data not shown).In TRS rice,theλmax(maximum abso-rption wavelength)and blue value of iodine-starch complex were significantly higher than those of wild type TQ,and as expected, the AC of TRS native starch was nearly twice(58.32%vs29.98%) as much as that of the isolated native starch from wild type rice grains.High Resistance to Acid and Enzyme Hydrolysis of TRS Native Starch.Figure1shows the recovery yield of native starchafterArticle J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.58,No.12,20107385different times of acid or enzyme hydrolysis.For either TRS or TQ native starch,the residual starch was gradually decreased with the passage of hydrolysis time,but after 20days of acid hydro-lysis,the recovery yield of TRS starch (33.5%)was significantly higher than that (6.9%)of normal TQ starch (Figure 1a ).The high recovery of residual starch in TRS rice was also observed after R -amylase hydrolysis (Figure 1b ).During the time course of hydrolysis,TQ starch was more readily hydrolyzed than TRS starch.After 72h,only about 52%of the TRS native starch was hydrolyzed,whereas nearly 89%of the TQ normal starch was digested.These results suggested that TRS starch had a much higher resistance to either acid or enzyme hydrolysis than TQ starch.The XRD Pattern of TRS Native Starch Similar to That of Pea C-Type Starch.The XRD patterns of native starches of TQ,TRS,pea,and potato are presented in Figure 2.These XRD patterns were carefully compared with known diffraction patterns of A-,B-,and C-type crystallinity (1,2).The normal native starch from TQ rice grain showed strong reflection at 2θabout 15°and 23°and an unresolved doublet at 17°,18°2θ,which was very close to the typical A-type XRD pattern in most ordinary cereal star-ches (1,2).The potato starch presented the strongest diffraction peak at around 17°2θand a few small peaks at around 2θvalues of 24°,22°,and 15°.An additional peak also appeared at about 5°2θ.These spectra were typical characteristics of B-type starch from tuber crops (1,2).The pea starch had been reported to be a typical C-type crystallinity revealed by XRD (1,2).On the pea starch XRD spectra,only one peak appeared at 23°2θ,which was indicative of the A-type pattern,while the peak at around 5°2θwas the characteristic of B-type pattern (1,2).When compared with the above three type crystallinity,the XRD pattern of TRS native starch was basically the same as that of pea starch.TRS starch generally showed the presence of a B-type pattern.How-ever,the presence of some additional A-type peaks indicated that it was a mixture of A-and B-type patterns.Thus TRS starch was classed as a C-type crystallinity.It was noteworthy that the sca-ttering intensities for 15°and 23°2θdiffraction peaks decreased,whereas a sharp reflection peak at angles of 20°2θwas observed in TRS starch.The peak of 20°2θwas a typical amylose -lipid complex diffraction peak (1,2),which was in agreement with the result of high AC in TRS starch.ATR-FTIR Spectra of TRS Native Starch.The development of sampling devices like ATR-FTIR combined with procedures for spectrum deconvolution provided opportunities for the study ofstarch external region structure (17).The original and deconvo-luted ATR-FTIR spectra in the region 1200-900cm -1of four native starch samples are given in Figure 3.The bands at 1045and 1022cm -1had been linked with order/crystalline and amorphous regions in starch,respectively (17).The ratio of absorbance 1045/1022cm -1was used to quantify the degree of order in starch samples.Intensity ratios of 1045/1022and 1022/995cm -1might therefore be useful as a convenient index of FTIR data in com-parisons with other measures of starch conformation (18).The relative intensities of FTIR bands at 1045,1022,and 995cm -1were recorded from the baseline to peak height,and the ratios for 1045/1022and 1022/995were calculated as shown in Table 1.On the basis of both the spectra and calculated data,the ATR-FTIR characteristics of TRS starch was much close to those of pea or potato starch,especially on the IR ratio of 1045/1022or 1022/995cm -1.In TRS starch spectra,the band at 1022cm -1was less pronounced than in TQ and pea,which was similar to that in potato (Figure 3).These results also implied that TRS starch was a C-type starch,a mixture of A-type and B-type starches,which was in qualitative agreement with the data from XRD analysis.Solid-State NMR Spectra of Native Starch.The solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR patterns for native TQ and TRS starches are presented in Figure 4.Substantial similarities were observed in the spectra with high resolved resonances.The resonances at 61.8ppm was assigned to C-6,and the large signal around 68-78ppmwasFigure 2.XRD spectra of nativestarches.Table 1.IR Ratio of the Absorbances 1045/1022and 1022/995cm -1for Native StarchesIR ratio 1045/1022(cm -1)IR ratio 1022/995(cm -1)TQ 0.69 1.67TRS 0.890.60pea 0.800.78potato1.090.757386J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.58,No.12,2010Wei et al.collectively associated with C2,C3,and C5sites.The resonance at 81.8ppm was associated with C4site,and the resonance at around 100-103ppm was associated with C1site.Except the above peaks,the weak peak appeared at 94.3ppm could arise from the amorphous areas for C1.These assignments of the resonances were based on the literature reports (19,20).Two remarkable differences were observed between the 13C CP/MAS NMR patterns for native TQ and TRS starches.First,the C1resonances of TQ starch occurred as triplets,which was a typical A-type characteristic (19,20).The C1resonances of TRS starch also occurred as inconspicuous triplets,especially weak peak at 101.4ppm,which showed that TRS starch was a C-type crystal with dominant A-type crystalline structure.The second difference was the intensity of the resonance at 102.9ppm.The peak at 102.9ppm appeared only as a shoulder on the downfield C-1resonance in TQ starch,however,that in TRS appeared as a strong peak,which showed that the content of amylose -lipid complex was higher in TRS than that in TQ.Change of Crystal Type of TRS Starch during Acid Hydrolysis.The XRD patterns of acid-modified TRS starches and their native counterpart are shown in Figure 5.One striking difference was observed for the peak at around 2θvalue of 23°among the XRD spectra of TRS starch after different time of acid hydrolysis.Native C-type starch from TRS grain showed only one broad peak at 23°2θ.The peak became broad from 2to 6days of hydro-lysis and then split into two peaks at 22°and 24°,which were the typical B-type characteristics (1,2).The disappearance of the cha-racteristic A-type diffraction peak and the development of typical B-type diffraction peak showed that the crystal type of native TRS starch might change from typical C-type to B-type during acid hydrolysis.DISCUSSIONThe crystallinity of native starch can be classified to A-,B-,and C-types (1,2).The C-type starch is usually a combination of A-and B-types,especially in maize,with about 40%of amylose (2).Up to now,in most of the reported high-amylose rice mutants,endosperm starches are characterized as a B-type pattern revealed by XRD analysis (5,6).In this study,the starch from our deve-loped high-amylose rice TRS was demonstrated as the C-type not only by XRD analysis but also confirmed by the 13C CP/MAS NMR and ATR-FTIR techniques.13C solid-state NMR has been employed in examining the structure of different type starches.In the spectra,most of the resonances cannot be distinguished or have not been assigned among the A-,B-,and C-type starches,but the C-1carbon atoms have chemical shifts characteristic for each type starch.For the A-type starch,which has three nonidentical sugar residues,the C-1peak region is a cluster of three peaks at ∼102,101,and 100ppm,respectively.For the B-type starch,which has two nonidentical sugar residues,the C-1peak signal is a cluster of two peaks at ∼101and 100ppm,respectively.Because C-type starch has the characteristics of both A-and B-type crystalline structure,C-1spectra of the C-type starch always shows a mixed pattern of both A-and B-types.The resonances in the spectra of C-type starch mainly depend on the relative proportions of A-or B-type crystallinity in the sam-ple (20).In general,the C-type starch shows triplets C-1spectra if the A-type crystalline structure is predominant in the sample,and two-peak C-1spectra if the B-type crystalline structure is predominant (19,20).In present study,the TRS starch showed inconspicuous triplets C-1spectra (Figure 5),which implied that TRS starch existed a C-type crystallinity with dominant A-type crystalline structure.The crystalline property of starch can be changed by acid treatment,which is very helpful to understand the fine structure of starch granules (13).In the present study,during or after acid treatment of TRS native starch,the XRD characteristic at A-type diffraction peak disappeared while the typical B-type diffraction peak came out.These phenomena indicate that the crystal type of TRS starch changed from typical C-type to B-type after acid modification.Our result was quite different from other reports (13,16,21).For example,the acid-modified corn starches exhibit the same crystalline type as that of its native starch (21),while the crystal type of pea and Chinese yam starches changes from C-type to A-type after acid hydrolysis (13,16).This structure change of our TRS starch during acid treatment might be due to the degradation of A-type crystalline starch first or faster than that of B-type starch.Resistant starch refers to the portion of starch and/or starch products that are difficult to digest when they pass through the gastrointestinal tract (22).The proportion of RS will be increased when the diet starch carries more granular structure naturally resistant to digestion (23).In our TRS grains,there is not only high level of amylose but also of RS (9,10).As expected,the TRS starch showed a higher resistance to either acid or enzyme hydrolysis than that of its wild type starch (Figure 1).ThismightFigure 4.13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of nativestarches.Article J.Agric.Food Chem.,Vol.58,No.12,20107387be attributed to not only the high amylose but also the special granular structure of TRS starch.Our previous experiments showed that the starch granules from the regular rice TQ were organized as compound starches and dissociated to separate individual starches during starch isolation,while starch granules from TRS were organized as semicompound starches with a thick continuous band encircling the entire circumference of the gra-nules(9).The sizes of TRS semicompound starches are larger than that of TQ individual starches,so TRS starches had a lower rate of acid hydrolysis than TQ starches,presumably due to their smaller surface area per unit weight.Also,high amylose starch was reported to be less susceptible to acid hydrolysis than normal and waxy starches.It was suggested that the highly compact amorphous regions in high amylose starch granules,resulting from extensive interchain associations of amylose polymers,pre-vented penetration of acid into the granules(24).TRS starch had high concentration of amylose in both the hilum and encircling band(9),which might partly explain why it was highly resistant to acid hydrolysis.It is reported that the amount of native starch hydrolysis by amylase is inversely related to the amylose content(15). Moreover,the double helices in starch granules always prefer to form a crystalline structure that resists to enzyme hydrolysis(25-27).Both crystalline regions and double helices themselves can increase the resistance to amylase hydrolysis.This probably explains,at least in part,why high amylose starch resists amylase digestion more than native or waxy starches even though they were less crystalline (25-27).Otherwise,the A-,B-and C-types of starches show different susceptibilities to R-amylase hydrolysis.Generally, the B-or C-type starch shows more resisance to enzyme hydrolysis than that of A-type(25,28).This might be why the TRS C-type starch in the present study had a high resistant ability to R-amylase digestion.In conclusion,the high-amylose TRS starch was investigated by using XRD,13C CP/MAS NMR,and ATR-FTIR techniques and subsequently confirmed to be C-type crystalline structure, which resulted from the combination of both A-type and B-type starch.During acid hydrolysis,the crystal type of TRS starch could be changed from C-to B-type.These data could add to our understanding of not only the polymorph structure of rice starch, especially of high amylose starch,but also why high amylose starch more resistant to digestion.ABBREVIATIONS USEDAC,amylose content;ATR-FTIR,attenuated total reflec-tance-Fourier transform infrared;13C CP/MAS NMR,13C cross-polarization magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic reso-nance;RS,resistant starch;SBE,starch branching enzyme;TQ, Te-qing(wild type rice cultivar);TRS,transgenic RS rice line; XRD,X-ray powder diffraction.ACKNOWLEDGMENTWe are very grateful to Prof.Yong-Cheng Shi from Kansas State University for helpful discussions,and to the reviewers for valuable comments and corrections.LITERATURE CITED(1)Bule on,A.;Colomna,P.;Planchot,V.;Ball,S.Starch granules:structure and biosynthesis.Int.J.Biol.Macromol.1998,23,85–112.(2)Cheetham,N.W.H.;Tao,L.Variation in crystalline type withamylose content in maize starch granules:an X-ray powder diffrac-tion study.Carbohydr.Polym.1998,36,277–284.(3)Imberty,A.;Buleon,A.;Vinh,T.;Perez,S.Recent advancesin knowledge of starch structure.Starch/St€a rke1991,43,375–384.(4)Bogracheva,T.Y.;Morris,V.J;Ring,S.G.;Hedley,C.L.Thegranular structure of C-type pea starch and its role in gelatinization.Biopolymers1998,45,323–332.(5)Yano,M.;Okuno,K.;Kawakami,J.;Satoh,H.;Omura,T.Highamylose mutants of rice,Oryza sativa L.Theor.Appl.Genet.1985, 69,253–257.(6)Kang,H.J.;Hwang,I.K.;Kim,K.S.;Choi,parativestructure and physicochemical properties of IIpumbyeo,a high-quality japonica rice,and its mutant,Suweon464.J.Agric.Food Chem.2003, 51,6598–6603.(7)Yang,C.Z.;Shu,X.L.;Zhang,L.L.;Wang,X.Y.;Zhao,H.J.;Ma,C.X.;Wu,D.X.Starch properties of mutant rice high in resistantstarch.J.Agric.Food Chem.2006,54,523–528.(8)Song,Y.;Jane,J.Characterization of barley starches of waxy,normal,and high amylose varieties.Carbohydr.Polym.2000,41, 365–377.(9)Wei,C.X.;Qin,F.L.;Zhu,L.J.;Zhou,W.D.;Chen,Y.F.;Wang,Y.P.;Gu,M.H.;Liu,Q.Q.Microstructure and ultrastructure of high-amylose rice resistant starch granules modified by antisense RNA inhibition of starch branching enzyme.J.Agric.Food Chem.2010,58,1224–1232.(10)Zhu,L.J.Studies on starch structure and functional properties ofhigh-amylose transgenic rice and different waxy rice varieties.Ph.D.dissertation.Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,China,2009. (11)Li,M.;Piao,J.h.;Liu,Q.Q.;Yang,X.G.Effects of the geneticallymodified rice enriched with resistant starch on large bowel health in rats.Acta Nutr.Sin.2008,30,588–591.(12)Juliano,B.O.A simplified assay for milled-rice amylose.Cereal Sci.Today1971,16,334–340.(13)Wang,S.J.;Yu,J.L.;Yu,J.G.The semi-crystalline growth rings ofC-type pea starch granule revealed by SEM and HR-TEM during acid hydrolysis.Carbohydr.Polym.2008,74,731–739.(14)Viles,F.J.;Silverman,L.Determination of starch and cellulose withanthrone.Anal.Chem.1949,21,950–953.(15)Li,J.H.;Vasanthan,T.;Hoover,R.;Rossnagel,B.G.Starch fromhull-less barley:V.In-vitro susceptibility of waxy,normal,and high-amylose starches towards hydrolysis by R-amylases and amyloglu-cosidase.Food Chem.2004,84,621–632.(16)Wang,S.J.;Yu,J.L.;Zhu,Q.H.;Yu,J.G.;Jin,F.M.Granularstructure and allomorph position in C-type Chinese yam starch granule revealed by SEM,13C CP/MAS NMR and XRD.Food Hydrocolloids2009,23,426–433.(17)Sevenou,O.;Hill,S.E.;Farhat,I.A.;Mitchell,anisation ofthe external region of the starch granule as determined by infrared spectroscopy.Int.J.Biol.Macromol.2002,31,79–85.(18)Htoon,A.;Shrestha,A.K.;Flanagan,B.M.;Lopez-Rubio,A.;Bird,A.R.;Gilbert,E.P.;Gidley,M.J.Effects of processing high amylose maize starches under controlled conditions on structural organization and amylase digestibility.Carbohydr.Polym.2009,75, 236–245.(19)Cheetham,N.W.H.;Tao,L.Solid state NMR studies on thestructural and conformational properties of natural maize starches.Carbohydr.Polym.1998,36,285–292.(20)Bogracheva,T.Y.;Wang,Y L.;Hedley,C.L.The effect of watercontent on the ordered/disordered structures in starches.Biopoly-mers2001,58,247–259.(21)Wang,Y.J.;Truong,V.D.;Wang,L.F.Structures and rheologicalproperties of corn starch as affected by acid hydrolysis.Carbohydr.Polym.2003,52,327–333.(22)Nugent,A.P.Health properties of resistant starch.Nutr.Bull.2005,30,27–54.(23)Rahman,S.;Bird,A.;Regina,A.;Li,Z.;Ral,J.P.;McMaugh,S.;Topping,D.;Morell,M.Resistant starch in cereals:exploiting genetic engineering and genetic variation.J.Cereal Sci.2007,46,251–260.(24)Li,J.H.;Vasanthan,T.;Rossnagel,B.;Hoover,R.Starch from hull-less barley:II.Thermal,rheological and acid hydrolysis character-istics.Food Chem.2001,74,407–415.。