2017考研英语阅读理解话题预测之为何夜猫子收入高
考研真题【答案解析】2017年考研英语二真题答案及解析

2017年考研英语二真题答案解析Section I Use of English一、文章总体分析及结构这是一篇议论文,选自2016年《大西洋月刊》,全文共352词。
文章围绕“没有了工作的未来会怎样”展开,首先说明工作的缺失可能会造成社会的不平等;接着指出另一种可能性,即没有了工作,生活就会没有意义;之后笔锋一转,提出在一个设计合理的社会中,没有工作未必会引起不安;最后举例对现实情况做出说明,指出现阶段工作劳累,使人们无暇专注与自己的爱好。
二、语篇精读People have speculated for centuries about a future without work.Today is no different,with academics,writers,and activists once again1that technology is replacing human workers.Some imagine that the coming work-free world will be defined by2.:A few wealthy people will own all the capital,and the masses will struggle in an impoverished wasteland.若干世纪以来,人们都在设想不用工作的未来。
如今也仍然如此,许多学术界人士、作家和激进分子再次警告说技术会代替工人。
一些人猜想,不工作的世界可以用“不平等”这个词来定义:一部分富人将拥有全部资本,而普通大众将在贫穷的荒原上挣扎。
词汇详解:speculate猜测,推测;投机the masses普通百姓academic学者impoverished贫困的be defined by...被···定义wasteland荒原;荒地长难句分析:Today is no different,with academics,writers,and activists once again warning that technology is replacing human workers.本句主干是主系结构Today is no different,with引导的成分属于独立主格结构,具体来讲是with+名词/代词+动词的-ing形式。
2017年考研英语(一)阅读真题及答案解析

2017年考研英语(一)阅读真题及答案解析2017年考研英语考试已经结束!店铺考研网在考后第一时间为大家提供2017年考研英语(一)阅读真题及答案解析,更多考研资讯请关注我们网站的更新!2017年考研英语(一)阅读真题及答案解析英语(一)阅读最后一篇文章有一点升华了,有一点小高潮,谈最高法院,在视频当中反复强调过,一定关注今年考试,一定会关注的重点话题,第三篇文章谈经济,第四篇谈法律题材。
不能仅仅背几个单词,一定要关注这些词、这些概念背后背景,以及词和词之间、概念和概念连接。
美国最高法院,想到谁了,历史惊人相似,2013年第四篇文章,我们最高法庭驳回了奥巴马政府,用一模一样的内容。
他说最高法庭推翻了对于这个人的受贿指控。
但是后面考了一个句子题,下划线句子怎么样,类似2004年这个人再也没有咬他的指甲,当时经济低迷咬指甲显示出他精神紧张。
后面出现了一个but,前面大方向是积极向上的。
这道题同样如此。
我们第一句话说我们驳回了,推翻了有罪,受贿判决。
后面说但是,大方向是向下的。
这道题选择的是对于这个人行为本身,感到了非常的可耻。
令人感到鄙视。
其他选项再比较选项的时候,干扰选项你明白考研命题思路,可以帮你更快更准更高效抓住正确答案。
第二题是细节题,到第四段怎么样,问你的是一个条件,只要什么样情况下我们才认为受贿罪是成立的呢。
其中A选项,给你送礼物的人那里得到非常具体的实在的回报。
这是我们的答案。
对原文做了同义改写。
第三题是目前我们整个法庭宣判,是基于什么样的假设。
我们公共部门的官员们,应该干吗?也是一道细节题。
这是我们说了解美国选举体制,我之所以给你投票唯一原因是干吗?上任以后带来我的好处。
这是非常合理的。
你和我们中国的一些传统文化当中一定有相冲突的地方,我们觉得做公务员干吗叫大公无私。
美国环境里不是这样的。
选民之所以选你因为你能够给我们带来好处。
他认为处理、满足我们的背后这些支持人的需求是理所当然的,是正当的。
2017考研英语一阅读理解Text-3真题及答案解析

Text 3Robert F. Kennedy once said that a country’s GDP measures “everything except that which makes life worthwhile.”With Britain voting to leave the European Union, and GDP already predicted to slow as a result, it is now a timely moment to assess what he was referring to.The question of GDP and its usefulness has annoyed policymakers for over half a century. Many argue that it is a flawed concept. It measures things that do not matter and misses things that do. By most recent measures, the UK’s GDP has been the envy of the Western world, with record low unemployment and high growth figures. If everything was going so well, then why did over 17 million people vote for Brexit, despite the warnings about what it could do to their country’s economic prospects?A recent annual study of countries and their ability to convert growth into well-being sheds some light on that question. Across the 163 countries measured, the UK is one of the poorest performers in ensuring that economic growth is translated into meaningful improvements for its citizens. Rather than just focusing on GDP, over 40 different sets of criteria from health, education and civil society engagement have been measured to get a more rounded assessment of how countries are performing.While all of these countries face their own challenges , there are a number of consistent themes . Yes , there has been a budding economic recovery since the 2008 global crash , but in key indicators in areas such as health and education , major economies have continued to decline . Yet this isn’t the case with all countries . Some relatively poor European countries have1 / 5seen huge improvements across measures including civil society , income equality and the environment.This is a lesson that rich countries can learn : When GDP is no longer regarded as the sole measure of a country’s success, the world looks very different .So, what Kennedy was referring to was that while GDP has been the most common method for measuring the economic activity of nations , as a measure , it is no longer enough . It does not include important factors such as environmental quality or education outcomes –all things that contribute to a person’s sense of well-being.The sharp hit to growth predicted around the world and in the UK could lead to a decline in the everyday services we depend on for our well-being and for growth . But policymakers who refocus efforts on improving well-being rather than simply worrying about GDP figures could avoid the forecasted doom and may even see progress .31.Robert F. Kennedy is cited because he ______.[A]praised the UK for its GDP.[B]identified GDP with happiness .[C]misinterpreted the role of GDP .[D]had a low opinion of GDP .【答案】D2 / 5【解析】答案为D。
2017年全国硕士研究生招生考试英语二试题和答案

2017年全国硕士研究生招生考试英语二试题Directions:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B,C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1。
(10 points)People have speculated for centuries about a future without work .Today is no different,with academics,writers, and activists once again 1 that technology be replacing human workers。
Some imagine that the coming work—free world will be defined by 2 。
A few wealthy people will own all the capital, and the masses will struggle in an impoverished wasteland.A different and not mutually exclusive 3 holds that the future will be a wasteland of a different sort, one 4 by purposelessness: Without jobs to give their lives 5 ,people will simply become lazy and depressed。
6 ,today’s unemployed don’t see m to be having a great time。
One Gallup poll found that 20 percent of Americans who have been unemployed for at least a year report having depression,double the rate for 7 Americans. Also, some research suggests that the 8 for rising rates of mortality,mental—health problems,and addicting 9 poorly-educated middle—aged people is shortage of well-paid jobs. Perhaps this is why many 10 the agonizing dullness of a jobless future.But it doesn’t11 follow from findings like these that a world without work would be filled with unease。
2017考研英语一阅读text2

2017年考研英语一阅读text21. 文章简介在2017年的考研英语一卷中,阅读部分的text2是一个关于美国心理学家亨利·赫斯特创立的现象学心理学理论的文章。
本文将通过分析该文章的主要内容、观点和结构,为大家提供一个详细的解读和分析。
2. 主要内容本篇阅读文章主要介绍了亨利·赫斯特的现象学心理学理论。
在文章中,作者首先介绍了赫斯特对心理学的贡献,指出他是美国心理学界的重要人物,其现象学心理学理论对当代心理学产生了深远的影响。
随后,文章对赫斯特的理论进行了详细的阐述,包括其主要观点和基本原理。
文章还对赫斯特的理论进行了评价和展望,指出了其理论的优点和前景。
3. 观点分析在该文章中,作者对赫斯特的现象学心理学理论持肯定的态度。
他认为赫斯特的理论具有重要的理论和实践价值,对当代心理学的发展产生了深远的影响。
作者也对赫斯特的理论进行了客观的分析和评价,指出了其理论的局限性和争议性。
4. 结构分析该文章的结构清晰,层次分明。
作者首先介绍了赫斯特的贡献和影响,然后对其理论进行了详细的阐述,包括主要观点和基本原理。
文章对赫斯特的理论进行了评价和展望。
整体结构合理,逻辑清晰。
5. 总结通过本文的解读和分析,我们可以了解到赫斯特的现象学心理学理论对当代心理学的重要性和影响。
我们也可以看到该理论的优点和局限性。
在学习和应用赫斯特的理论时,我们需要客观地对待,充分发挥其优点,同时注意其局限性。
希望本文的分析能对大家的学习和研究有所帮助。
5. 思想核心赫斯特的现象学心理学理论的核心思想在于强调个体的主观体验和感知,在心理学研究中,他提倡将研究对象的主体性和主体经验纳入到研究范畴之中。
他认为人类的心理活动是通过主体性的感知和“现象”的方式来展现的,他提出的心理学研究方法也应该注重个体的主观感受和体验。
赫斯特的现象学心理学理论对心理学领域产生了深刻的影响和启发,它促进了心理学领域的多元化发展和研究方法的革新。
2017年考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案(三)

2017年考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案(三)店铺考研网为大家提供2017年考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案(三),更多考研资讯请关注我们网站的更新!2017年考研英语阅读理解练习题及答案(三)RichardBurton probably knew nothing of the small South African town of Cullinan whenhe bought yet another chunky diamond for Elizabeth Taylor in 1969. Now theCullinan mine itself, like so many of the diamonds unearthed there, is about tochange hands. On November 22nd De Beers, the diamond giant that has owned themine since 1930, said it was selling it to a consortium led by Petra Diamonds,one of South Africa’s emerging diamond producers, for 1 billion rand in cash. Providedregulators approve the deal, the transfer should take place by the middle ofnext year.De Beers isselling because the mine is no longer profitable, despite attempts to turn itaround. But Petra reckons the mine still has another 20 years of production init and plans to extract at least 1m carats a year. The unexploited"Centenary Cut" deposit, which lies under the existing mine, couldyield a lot more. This is good news for the mine’s 1,000 or so employees and forthe town, which has depended on the diamond business since Sir Thomas Cullinandiscovered a prospect there in 1898 that contained kimberlite, a rock that canbe rich in diamonds. The mine, established in 1903, is one of 30 or sokimberlite diamond mines in the world, and is believed to be still the world’s second-most-valuable diamondresourcePetra is arelatively small outfit, listed on London’s Alternative Investment Market,that specialises in buying mines that bigger companies see as marginal. Itstrick is to extract better returns by rationalising production and processing,and keepingoperating costs and overheads down. Petra has already bought two ofDe Beers’s loss-making South African mines-both of which are now profitable-and isfinalising the 78.5m rand acquisition of the group’s underground operation in Kimberley,which stopped working in 2005.It alreadyoperates four mines in South Africa and has promising exploration in Angola (ajoint-venture with BHP Billiton), Sierra Leone and Botswana. Petra expects toproduce over 1m carats by 2010-quite a jump from 180,474 carats in the year toJune. The company has yet to make a profit, but expects to be making money bythe middle of next year.In the 1990sDe Beers decided that it was no longer a good idea to try to monopolise thediamond market. It started focusing on higher returns rather than market share,and has been revamping its mine portfolio, selling off mines that are no longerprofitable and investing in more enticing operations, such as its mine off thewest coast of South Africa, its Voorspoed operation in the Free State province,and two new mines in Canada.This hasopened the way for a new class of diamond firm that operates in the vast middleground between the world’s handful of large producers and a multitude of much smaller explorationfirms. The Cullinan deal should entrench Petra in this middle tier, alongsidefirms such as Kimberley Diamond and Trans Hex. But even if it does reach itstarget of 1m carats a year, Petra will still not be able to match the sparkleof the giants. Last year De Beers produced 51m carats from its mines inBotswana, Namibia, South Africa and Tanzania, which amounted to 40% of theworld’s diamonds by va lue.1. TheCullinan mine was named after_____.[A] theoriginal name of the town[B] the nameof its first owner[C] the nameof its discoverer[D] the nameof the town’s first colonist2. Whichone of the following statements is TRUE of the Cullinan mine?[A] The mineis the only business of the town which employs most of the local residents[B] It can bemined for another 20 years given Petra’s advanced technology[C] It is theworld’s second largest diamond mine with a yearly capacity of 1m carats[D] Whetherthe mine will maintain its profitability is yet to know.3. Petra’s opearting philosophy can be said as _____.[A] to makeprofits by reducing the costs[B] toexploit the surrounding areas of an existing mine[C] tointegrate the resources of all the money-losing small mines[D] torestructure the mine portfolio and to optimize the process management4. De Beershas made changes on its development stratege because_____.[A] it plansto shrink its market share and ends its long-term monopoly[B] it wantsto open the way for the middle tier of diamond market[C] itswitches its attention to making larger profits[D] it wantsto turn around the loss-making mines by cooperating with companies of smallersize.5. Thefuture of the new class of diamond firm is _____.[A] promising[B] dim[C] unknown[D]frustrating文章剖析:文章从Petra公司收购矿产为契因,介绍了钻石矿业新兴的一个中间阶层。
2017考研英语真题解析之阅读题
2017考研英语真题解析之阅读题跨考教育英语教研室—项硕考试一结束,就有学生留言告诉我,好高兴呀,今年的英语阅读依然很简单呢。
然而,我们跨考陪考的英语老师说今年的阅读题目出得蛮有心机的呢。
学生说简单,老师说不简单,因缺思厅。
那真相只有一个,文章不难,但是题目不简单。
考后跟我打听英语答案的同学很多,因为某道题不确定答案来跟我讨论的同学更多。
其中有一道题可以说是独得众位同学的恩宠,就是阅读第二篇文章的第30题,也就是最后一题——问作者对于choosing Mauna Kea as the TMT site 选址Mauna Kea建TMT天文望远镜的态度是怎样。
毋庸置疑,这是一道态度题,文章里头的attitude明明白白地说明了这一点,四个选项里的老熟人,什么criticism,approval更是进一步佐证了我们的判断。
其实我们在课堂上讲态度题的解题思路时,往往第一步就是先判断题型,套路那么多,不用对怎么可以。
那态度题的特征之一就是题干中的attitude,另外一个更显著的特征是选项中的表示态度的词汇,好比optimistic,skeptical等等。
确定了题型后,重点到了,怎么做?态度题的解题关键有两个,第一点是主旨,有时候文章的主旨句就直接能看出作者的态度,是支持还是反对,要是不明显,那就有可能是中性。
当然,也可能还要用到第二个关键,也就是情感色彩。
一般表达情感色彩的词都是形容词和副词,所以多关注形容词和副词你就能看出作者态度了,也就是所谓的察言观色,比方说什么unfortunately,regrettable等等。
如果以上你还觉得不够解渴,担心范围太大,找不到,那我再友情赠送一个圣诞大礼包:全文态度题往往在最后一段都能找到线索,嘘,小声点。
办法肯定是管用的,要是不管用,那肯定是你没用对,我们不妨以2017年英语阅读第二篇的最后一题来试一试。
这道全文态度题咱们可以通过情感色彩来找到线索,有人问为什么不用主旨句找?很简单,因为很多人找不着主旨句,而这篇文章的主旨句也没有明显到长眼睛就能发现。
2017考研英语二阅读真题及答案【2】
2017考研英语二阅读真题及答案【2】Part ADirections:Read the following four texts。
Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D。
Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET。
(40 points)Text 1Every Saturday morning,at 9 am,more than 50,000 runners set off to run 5km around their local park。
The Parkrun phenomenon began with a dozen friends and has inspired 400 events in the UK and more abroad。
Events are free, staffed by thousands of volunteers。
Runners range from four years old to grandparents; their times range from Andrew Baddeley’s world record 13 minutes 48 seconds up to an hour。
Parkrun is succeeding where London’s Olympic “legacy” is failing。
Ten years ago on Monday, it was announced that the Games of the 30th Olympiad would be in London。
Planning documents pledged that the great legacy of the Games would be to level a nation of sport lovers away from their couches。
考研英语阅读理解习题及答案
考研英语阅读理解习题及答案2017年考研英语阅读理解习题及答案阅读理解一People do not analyze every problem they meet. Sometimes they try to remember a solution from the last time they had a similar problem. They often accept the opinions or ideas of other people. Other times they begin to act without thinking; they try to find a solution by trial and error. However, when all these methods fail, the person with a problem has to start analyzing. There are six stages in analyzing a problem.First the person must recognize that there is a problem. For example, Sam's bicycle is broken, and he cannot read it to class as he usually does. Sam must see that there is a problem with his bicycle.Next the thinker must define the problem. Before Sam can repair his bicycle. he must find the reason why it does not work. For instance, he must determine if the problem is with the gears, the brakes, or the frame. He must make his problem more specific.Now the person must look for information that will make the problem clearer and lead to possible solutions. For instance, suppose Sam decided that his bike does not work because there is something wrong with the gear wheels. At this time. he can look in his bicycle repair book and read about gears. He can talk to his friends at the bike shop. He can look at his gears carefully. after studying the problem, the person should have several suggestions for a possible solution. Take Sam as an illustration. His suggestions might be: put oil on the gear wheels; buy new gear wheels and replace the old ones; tighten or loosen the gear wheels.Eventually one suggestion seems to be the solution to the problem. Sometimes the final idea comes very suddenly because the thinker suddenly sees something new or sees something in a new way. Sam, for example, suddenly sees that there is a piece of chewing gum(口香糖)between the gear wheels. He immediately realizes the solution to his problem: he must clean the gear wheels.Finally the solution is tested. Sam cleans the gear wheels and finds that afterwards his bicycle works perfectly. In short, he has solved the problem.1. What is the best title for this passage?A) Six Stages for Repairing Sam's BicycleB) Possible Ways to Problem-solvingC) Necessities of Problem AnalysisD) Suggestions for Analyzing a Problem2. In analyzing a problem we should do all the following except .A) recognize and define the problemB) look for information to make the problem clearerC) have suggestions for a possible solutionD) find a solution by trial or mistake3. By referring to Sam's broken bicycle, the author intends to .A) illustrate the ways to repair his bicycleB) discuss the problems of his bicycleC) tell us how to solve a problemD) show us how to analyses a problem4. Which of the following is NOT true?A) People do not analyze the problem they meet.B) People often accept the opinions or ideas of other people.C) People may learn from their past experienceD) People can not solve some problems they meet.5. As used in the last sentence, the phrase in short means .A) in the long runB) in detailC) in a wordD) in the end1.B2.D3.C4.A5.C阅读理解二The poverty line is the minimum income that people need for an acceptable standard of living. People with incomes below the poverty line are considered poor. Economists study the causes of poverty in order to find solutions to the problem.As the general standard of living in the country rises, the poverty line does, too. Therefore, even with today's relatively high standard of living, about 10 percent of the people in the United States are below the poverty line. However, if these people had stable jobs, they could have an acceptable standard of living. Economists suggest several reasons why poor people do not have jobs.For one thing, more than half of the poor people in the United States are not qualified to work. Over 40 percent of the poor people are children. By law, children less than 16 years old cannot work in many industries. A large number of poor people are old. Many companies do not hire people over 65 years old, the normal retirement age.Some poor adults do not look for jobs for a variety of personal reasons: they are sick, they do not have any motivation(动力). they have family problems, or they donotbelieve that they can find a job.Other poor people look for a job but cannot find one. Many poor adults never went to high school. Therefore, when they look for jobs, they have few skills that they can offer.At the present time, the government thinks it can reduce poverty in the country in the following ways.First, if the national economy grows, businesses and industries hire more workers. Some of the poor who are qualified to look for jobs may find employment. Then they will no longer be below the poverty line.Second, if society invests in the poor, the poor will become more productive. If the government spends money on social programs, education, and training for poor people, the poor will have the skills to offer. Then it is more likely that they can find jobs.Finally, if the government distributes society's income differently, it raises some poor people above the poverty line. The government collects taxes from the non-poor and gives money to the poor. These payments to the poor are called welfare. In 1975 over 18 million people in the United States received welfare.Some economists are looking for better solutions to the poverty problem. However, at the present time, many people depend on welfare for a minimally acceptable standard of living.1. The author's main purpose to write this article is .A) to define what the poverty line isB) to explain why some people live the poverty lineC) to find solutions to the problem of povertyD) to show sympathy for those poor people2. Which of the following is NOT true?A) Ten percent of the Americans live a poor life.B) Poor people are those who love below the poverty line.C) The poverty line rises as the general standard of living rises.D) The poverty line tends to be at the same level.3. More than 40 percent of the poor people are children. This is mainly because .A) they do not have enough motivationB) they are so young that they are deprived of chances to workC) they fail to get enough educationD) they are very poor in health4. Most of the American poor people are not qualified for employment because .A) they to not have any motivation to workB) they are not very self-confidentC) they are too young or too old to workD) they have physical and family problems5. We may conclude from the passage that .A) better solutions to the poverty problem are not yet foundB) welfare will enable people to be richC) poor people are bound to go out of the poverty line if they have chances to do businessD) employment is the best solution to the poverty problem1.C2.D3.B4.C5.A。
2017考研英语二:-阅读理解C节(划线句子翻译)
2017考研英语二:-阅读理解C 节(划线句子翻译)章节分类:◆社会生活类(TEST 1-2)◆科普知识类(TEST 3-4)◆文化教育类(TEST 5-7)◆人物传记类(TEST 9)◆经济管理类(TEST 9-10)◆医疗卫生类(TEST 11-12)◆社会生活类TEST 1Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. 71) Actually, it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 72) Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore, animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd, for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by nomeans an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it, how do you reply to somebody who says “I don’t like this contract”?The point is this: without agreement on the rights of people, arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless. 73) It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?Many deny it. 74) Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seenas a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.This view which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely “logical.” In fact it is simply shallow: the confused center is right to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning—the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others’ interests against one’s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. 75) When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.71. 【答案】事实并非如此,因为这种问法是以人们对人的权利有共同认识为基础的,而这种共同认识并不存在。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2017考研英语阅读理解话题预测之为何
夜猫子收入高
在考研英语中,阅读分数可谓是占到了总分的半壁江山,正所谓“得阅读者得考研”。
对于备考考研的同学们,在平时的复习中一定要拓展阅读思路,各类话题都要关注,这样才能在整体上提升考研英语阅读水平!一起来学习吧!
Research shows as night owls are linked to high income earners
研究:夜猫子收入更高
导读:老话说,早睡早起使人健康、富裕、聪慧。
但研究人员揭示,夜猫子一般比早起的人更聪明,也更富有。
They are most likely to be healthy, wealthy and wise, according to the old adage.
老话说,早睡早起使人健康、富裕、聪慧。
But those who are early to bed and early to rise do not always have the upper hand, researchers say.
但研究者称,那些早睡早起的人并不是总能占上风。
They have revealed that night owls are generally brighter and wealthier than those able to get up early in the morning.
研究人员揭示,夜猫子一般比早起的人更聪明,也更富有。
Experts from the University of Madrid carried out tests on around 1,000 teenagers and found that those who preferred to stay up late demonstrated the kind of intelligence associated with prestigious jobs and higher incomes.
马德里大学的专家在约1000名青少年当中开展了测试,发现那些喜欢熬夜的青少年表现出与显赫工作和高收入相关的才智。
Larks or ‘morning people’, however, often secured better exam results, possibly because lessons are held at the wrong time of day for night owls.
然而,早起的人通常能取得更好的考试成绩,这可能是因为上课的时间不适合夜猫子。
The researchers examined the habits and body clocks of the youngsters to determine whether they liked to stay up late and sleep in later in the morning, or preferred to go to bed early and were at their peak in the morning.
研究人员观察了这些青少年的习惯和生物钟,以确定他们是喜欢晚睡晚起,还是喜欢早睡早起。
School performance and inductive intelligence, or problem solving, were measured and academic grades in the major subjects were also taken into account.
研究人员还衡量了他们的学校表现、归纳或解决问题的能力,主要学科的学习成绩也被考虑在内。
The results showed that evening types scored higher than morning types on inductive reasoning, which has been shown to be a good estimate of general intelligence and a strong indicator of academic performance.
研究结果显示,夜猫子的归纳推理能力得分要高于早起的人,而归纳推理能力已被证明是估测综合智力和学习成绩的一个重要标准。
They also had a greater capacity to think conceptually as well as analytically. Such abilities
have been linked to innovative thinking, more prestigious occupations and better incomes.
夜猫子概念性思维能力和分析性思维能力也更强。
这些能力都与创新思维、更显赫的职业和更高的收入相关联。
Famous night owls include President Obama, Charles Darwin, Winston Churchill, Keith Richards and Elvis Presley.
著名的夜猫子包括奥巴马总统、查尔斯•达尔文、温斯顿•丘吉尔、滚石乐队吉他手基斯•理查德和猫王埃尔维斯•普雷斯利。
George W Bush, who is regularly in bed by 10pm, Thomas Edison, Napoleon, Condoleezza Rice, who wakes at 4.30am, and Ernest Hemingway are among those known as larks.
习惯早起的名人有小布什总统(通常晚上10点前上床睡觉)、托马斯•爱迪生、拿破仑、美国前国务卿康多莉扎•赖斯(早上四点半起床)和欧内斯特•海明威。
Jim Horne, professor of psychophysiology at Loughborough University, said: ‘Evening types tend to be the more extrovert creative types, the poets, artists and inventors, while the morning types are the deducers, as often seen with civil servants and accountants.’拉夫堡大学心理生理学教授吉姆•霍恩说:“夜猫子通常是更外向、更具创造力的人,如诗人、艺术家和发明家,而早起的人则是善于推断的人,多见于公务员和会计师。
”
A previous study of US Air Force recruits found evening types were much better at thinking laterally to solve problems than larks.
先前的一项对美国空军新兵的研究发现,夜猫子利用横向思维来解决问题的能力比早起的人强得多。