Evaluation of short-term stability for sea-wall structure at Kobe Airport(2008)

合集下载

挡土墙设计规范

挡土墙设计规范

1总则
1.0.1 为适应水利水电工程建设需要,统一水工挡土墙的设计标准和技术要求,提高水工挡土墙设 计水平,做到安全可靠、经济合理,制定本规范。 1.0.2 本规范适用于 1~3 级水工建筑物中的挡土墙以及独立布置的 1~4 级水工挡土墙设计。4、5 级水工建筑物中的挡土墙以及独立布置的 5 级水工挡土墙设计可参照使用。本规范不适用于临时性 挡土墙设计。
利用板肋式、格构式或排桩式墙身结构挡土,依靠固定在岩石或可靠地基上的锚杆维持稳定的 挡土建筑物。 2.0.12 加筋式挡土墙 reinforced retaining wall
利用较薄的墙身结构挡土,依靠墙后布置的土工合成材料减少土压力以维持稳定的挡土建筑物。 2.0.13 前趾 foretoe
为调整挡土建筑物重心,其底板向墙前挑出一定长度的部分。
2.0.7 悬臂式挡土墙 cantilever retaining wall 由底板及固定在底板上的悬臂式直墙构成的,主要依靠底板上的填土重量维持稳定的挡土建筑
物。 2.0.8 扶壁式挡土墙(扶垛式挡土墙) counterfort retaining wall
由底板及固定在底板上的直墙和扶壁构成的,主要依靠底板上的填土重量维持稳定的挡土建筑 物。 2.0.9 空箱式挡土墙 chamber retaining wall
3 级别划分与设计标准
3.1 级别划分
3.1.1 水工建筑物中的挡土墙应根据所属水工建筑物级别,按表 3.1.1 确定。
所属水工建筑物级别
表 3.1.1 水工建筑物的挡土墙级别划分
主要建筑物中的挡土墙级别
次要建筑物中的挡土墙级别
1
1
3
2
2
3
3
3
4

BS 6349-7-1991 Guide to the design and construction of breakwaters

BS 6349-7-1991 Guide to the design and construction of breakwaters
The preparation of this British Standard was entrusted by the Civil Engineering and Building Standards Policy Committee (CSB/-) to Technical Committee CSB/17, upon which the following bodies were represented: Association of Consulting Engineers British Ports Federation and the National Association of Ports Employers British Steel Industry Concrete Society Department of the Environment (Property Services Agency) Department of Transport (Marine Directorate) Federation of Civil Engineering Contractors Health and Safety Executive Institution of Civil Engineers Institution of Structural Engineers Oil Companies International Marine Forum
BRITISH STANDARD
BS 6349-7: 1991
Maritime structures —
Part 7: Guide to the design and construction of breakwaters
BS 6349-7:1991

1001854773

1001854773

膜材料在大跨度结构中的应用崔琳琳潘宇鑫(四川大学建筑与环境学院,四川双流610207)工程技术脯要]随着经济和文化的迅猛发展,当代建筑新材料、新技术飞速进步,使得大跨度结构建筑成为发展最快的建筑形式。

人们对建筑欣赏品味的逐渐提高则使得大跨度结构称为备受欢迎的建筑结构形式之一。

其广泛应用于多功能体育场馆、会展中心、博览馆、候机厅、飞机库等建筑。

各种各样的新型材料尤其是膜材料在大跨度结构的发展中起到了无可替代的作用,使得大跨度建筑向着安全、美观、经济和高效发展。

睁撇]大跨度结构;材料;结构;发辰1大跨度空间结构形式大跨度空间结构具有三维受力特征,而其空间结构的灵感多数来自于大自然,如与蛋壳、海藻等等相似的薄壳结构,类似于蜂窝状的网状空间结构,来源于皂膜原理的充气膜结构以及模仿蜘蛛网形状的索网结构。

薄壳结构:壳是一种曲面构件,主要承受各种作用产生的中面内的力。

壳体能充分利用材料强度,同时又能将承重与围护两种功能融合为一,薄壳结构能够承受很大的压力,所以建筑师们用它们做成大而薄的屋顶。

减轻了屋顶重量,节约了材料,而且内部可以空间很大又没有柱子,所以大型建筑如大厅、体育场馆很多首选薄壳结构。

这类建筑有许多优点:用料少,跨度大,坚固耐用,因此备受欢迎。

网状空间结构:网架结构是由许多连续的杆件按照一定规律组成的网状结构,在接触处加上球状以便加大链接。

其结构受力合理,空间刚度大,整体性强,稳定性好。

是利用较小规格的杆件建造大跨度结构,而且杆件类型统一。

悬索结构悬索结构是大跨度屋盖的一种理想结构形式。

悬索结构一般由钢索、边缘构件和下部支承结构组成。

2大跨度空间结构中的膜材料膜结构是现代空间结构中应用较为广泛的一种,它所采用的先进的建筑材料以及优美的外形可以满足大跨度建筑的建造要求。

2.1膜结构材料膜结构使用的膜材是一种强度高、柔韧性好的高分子材料,具有其它常规膜材所无法比拟的诸多优点:轻质、柔韧、耐久、防火、透光性好、不易被污染。

卿建业教授

卿建业教授

卿建业教授卿建業教授Jianye ChingProfessor學歷/ 美國加州大學柏克萊分校博士Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, U. C. Berkeley (UCB)專長/ 大地工程中不確定性量化分析期刊論文(Journal Paper)corresponding author1.Ching, J.?, Yang, Z.Y., Shiau, J.Q., and Chen, C.J. (2013). Estimation of rock pressure during an excavation/cut in sedimentary rocks with inclined bedding planes, Structural Safety, 41, 11-19. (SCI)2.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Mobilized shear strength of spatially variable soils under simple stress states, Structural Safety, 41, 20-28. (SCI)3.Jha, S.K. and Ching, J.? (2013). Simulating spatial averages of stationary random field using Fourier series method, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 139(5), 594-605. (SCI)4.Juang, C.H.?, Ching, J., and Luo, Z. (2013). Assessing SPT-based probabilistic models for liquefaction potential evaluation:a ten-year update, Georisk, 7(3), 137-150. (ESCI)5.Wu, S.H., Ching, J.?, and Ou, C.Y. (2013). Predicting wall displacements for excavations with cross walls in soft clay, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(6), 914-927. (SCI)6.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Quantile value method versus design value method for calibration of reliability-based geotechnical codes, Structural Safety, 44, 47-58. (SCI)7.Ching, J.? and Liao, H.-J. (2013). Re-analysis of Freeway-3dip slope failure case –a spatial variability view, Journal of GeoEngineering, 8(1), 1-10. (EI)8.Ching. J.?, Phoon, K.K., Chen, J.R., and Park, J.H. (2013). Robustness of constant LRFD factors for drilled shafts in multiple strata, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(7), 1104-1114. (SCI)9.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Effect of element sizes in random field finite element simulations of soil shear strength, Computers and Structures, 126, 120-134. (SCI)10.Phoon, K.K.?, Ching, J., and Chen, J.R. (2013). Performance of reliability-baseddesign code formats for foundations in layered soils, Computers and Structures, 126, 100-106. (SCI)11.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Probability distribution for mobilized shearstrengths of spatially variable soils under uniform stress states, Georisk, 7(3), 209-224. (ESCI)12.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Multivariate distribution for undrained shearstrengths under various test procedures, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50(9), 907-923. (SCI)13.Jha, S.K. and Ching, J.? (2013). Simplified method for reliability analysis andreliability-based design of spatially variable undrained slopes, Soils andFoundations, 53(5), 708-719. (SCI)14.Juang, C.H.?, Ching, J., Wang, L., Khoshnevisan, S., and Ku,C.S. (2013).Simplified procedure for estimation of liquefaction-inducedsettlement and site-specific probabilistic settlement hazard curve using CPT, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50, 1055-1066. (SCI)15.Tabarroki, M., Ahmad, F., Banaki, R., Jha, S.K., and Ching, J.? (2013).Determining safety factors of spatially variable slopes modeled by random fields, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(12), 2082-2095. (SCI)16.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Chen, C.H. (2014). Modeling CPTU parameters ofclays as a multivariate normal distribution, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51(1), 77-91. (SCI)17.Hu, Y.G. and Ching, J.? (2014). The critical scale of fluctuation for active lateralforces, Computers and Geotechnics, 57, 24-29. (SCI)18.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Kao, P.H. (2014). Mean and variance of themobilized shear strengths for spatially variable soils under uniform stress states, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140(3), 487-501. (SCI)19.Bahsan, E., Liao, H.J., and Ching, J.? (2014), Statistics for the calculated safetyfactors of undrained failure slopes, Engineering Geology, 172, 85-94. (SCI)20.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2014). Reply to the discussion by Mesri on“Multivariate distribution for undrained shear strengths under various testprocedures”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51(3), 348-351. (SCI)21.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Yu, J.W. (2014). Linking siteinvestigation efforts tofinal design savings with simplified reliability-based design methods, ASCEJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(3), 04013032.(SCI)22.Ching, J.? and Lin, C.J. (2014). Probability distribution for mobilized shearstrengths of saturated undrained clays modeled by 2-D stationary Gaussian random field - A 1-D stochastic process view, Journal of Mechanics, 30, 229-239. (SCI) 23.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2014). Transformations and correlations among some clay parameters –the global database, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51(6), 663-685. (SCI)24.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2014). Correlations among some clay parameters –the multivariate distribution, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51(6), 686-704. (SCI) 25.Wu, S.H., Ching, J.?, and Ou, C.Y. (2014). Probabilistic observational method forpredicting wall displacements in excavations, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51, 1111-1122. (SCI)26.Ching, J.? and Yang, J.J. (2014). Simplified reliability-based design for axialcapacity of footings in cohesionless soils – application of the quantile valuemethod, Journal of GeoEngineering, 9(3), 95-102. (EI)27.Wu, S.H., Ou, C.Y., Ching, J.? (2014), Calibration of model uncertainties forbasal heave stability of wide excavations in clay, Soils and Foundations, 54, 1159-1174. (SCI)28.Hu, Y.G. and Ching, J.? (2015). Impact of spatial variability in soil shear strengthon active lateral forces, Structural Safety, 52, 121-131. (SCI)29.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2015). Reducing the transformation uncertainty forthe mobilized undrained shear strength of clays, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 141(2), 04014103. (SCI)30.Wu, S.H., Ching, J.?, and Ou, C.Y. (2015). Simplified reliability-based design ofwall displacements for excavations in soft clay considering cross walls, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 141(3), 06014017.(SCI)31.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Yang, J.J. (2015). Role of redundancy in simplifiedgeotechnical reliability-based design - a quantile value method perspective,Structural Safety, 55, 37-48. (SCI)32.Hu, Y.G. and Ching, J.? (2015). A new procedure for simulating active lateralforce in spatially variable clay modeled by anisotropic random field, Journal of Mechanics, 31(4), 381-390. (SCI)33.Ching, J.?, Wang, J.S., Juang, C.H., and Ku, C.S. (2015). CPT-based stratigraphicprofiling using the wavelet transform modulus maxima, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52(12), 1993-2007. (SCI)34.Ching, J.? and Wang, J.S. (2016). Application of the transitional Markov chainMonte Carlo to probabilistic site characterization,Engineering Geology, 203, 151-167. (SCI)35.Ching, J.?, Wu, S.H., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). Statistical characterization ofrandom field parameters using frequentist and Bayesian approaches, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(2), 285-298. (SCI)36.Ching, J.?, Hu, Y.G., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). On characterizing spatially variablesoil shear strength using spatial average, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 45, 31-43. (SCI)37.Ching, J.?, Tong, X.W., and Hu, Y.G. (2016). Effective Young’s modulus for aspatially variable elementary soil mass subjected to a simple stress state, Georisk, 10(1), 11-26. (ESCI)38.Ching, J.?, Lee, S.W., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). Undrained strength for a 3Dspatially variable clay column subjected to compression or shear, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 45, 127-139. (SCI)39.Ching, J.? and S.P. Sung (2016). Simulating a curve average in a stationarynormal random field using Fourier series method, Journal of GeoEngineering, 11(1), 33-43. (EI)40.Gong, W.?, Juang, C.H., Martin, J.R., and Ching, J. (2016). New sampling methodand procedures for estimating failure probability, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 142(4), 04015107. (SCI)41.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Wu, S.H. (2016). Impact of statistical uncertainty ongeotechnical reliability estimation, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics,142(6), 04016027. (SCI)42.Phoon, K.K.?, Retief, J.V., Ching, J., Dithinde, M., Schweckendiek, T., Wang, Y.,and Zhang, L. (2016). Some observations on ISO2394:2015 Annex D (Reliability of Geotechnical Structures), Structural Safety, 62, 24-33. (SCI)43.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Li, D.Q. (2016). Robust estimation of correlationcoefficients among soil parameters under the multivariate normal framework,Structural Safety, 63, 21-32. (SCI)44.Ching, J.? and Hu, Y.G. (2016). Effect of element size in random field finiteelement simulation on ef fective Young’s modulus, Mathematical Problems inEngineering, Volume 2016, Article ID 8756271. (SCI)45.Chen, J.C.?, Yang, J., and Ching, J. (2016). Estimating peak flow-dischargeduring extreme rainfall events for the Gao-Ping river, Taiwan. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 6(3), 663-673. (EI)46.Ching, J.?, Wu, T.J., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). Spatial correlation fortransformation uncertainty and its applications, Georisk, 10(4), 294-311. (ESCI) 47.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Pan, Y.K. (2017). On characterizing spatiallyvariable soil Young’s modulus using spatial average, Structural Safety, 66, 106-117. (SCI)48.Ching, J.?, Lin, G.H., Chen, J.R., and Phoon, K.K. (2017). Transformation modelsfor effective friction angle and relative density calibratedbased on a multivariate database of coarse-grained soils, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54(4), 481-501.(SCI)49.Ching, J.? and Phoon, K.K. (2017). Characterizing uncertain site-specific trendfunction by sparse Bayesian learning, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 143(7), 04017028. (SCI)50.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Sung, S.P. (2017). Worst case scale of fluctuation inbasal heave analysis involving spatially variable clays, Structural Safety, 68, 28-42.(SCI)51.Ching, J.? and Wang, J.S. (2017). Discussion: Transitional Markov Chain MonteCarlo: Observations and Improvements, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 143(9), 07017001. (SCI)52.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., Beck, J.L., and Huang, Y. (2017). Identifiability ofgeotechnical site-specific trend functions, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk andUncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 3(4), 04017021.(ESCI)53.Ching, J.? and Wu, T.J. (2017). Probabilistic transformation model forpreconsolidation stress based on clay index properties, Engineering Geology, 226, 33-43. (SCI)54.Ching, J.?, Lin, G.H., Phoon, K.K., and Chen, J.R. (2017). Correlations amongsome parameters of coarse-grained soils – the multivariateprobability distribution model, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54(9), 1203-1220. (SCI)研討會論文(Conference Paper)1.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2013). Is site investigation an investment or expense – a reliability perspective. 18 SEAGC. (S. L. Lee Lecture paper)2.Ching, J. (2013). Preliminary study for the effective random dimension in geotechnical reliability. 18 SEAGC.3.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2013). Construction of virtual sites for reliability-based design. 18 ICSMGE.4.Ching, J. and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Construction of multivariate distribution of soil properties. 15th National Conference in Geotechnical Engineering, Taiwan.5.Ching, J. and Phoon, K.K. (2013). Cost-effective framework for simplified geotechnical reliability-based design. ISGSR 2013.6.Ching, J. and Phoon, K.K. (2014). Quantile value method for geotechnical reliability code calibration. ICVRAM 2014.7.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2014). Univariate to multivariate characterization of geotechnical variability. ISRERM 2014. (keynote paper)8.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2014). Characterization of geotechnical variability –a multivariate perspective. IACMAG 2014. (plenary speech paper)9.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2015). Is there anything better than LRFD for simplified geotechnical RBD? ISGSR 2015. (Wilson Tang Lecture)10.Ching, J., Wu, S.H., and Phoon, K.K. (2015). Quantifying statistical uncertainty insite investigation. ISGSR 2015.11.Hu, Y.G., Ching, J., and Phoon, K.K. (2015).Can the effect ofshear strengthspatial variability be summarized as the pure spatial average?15 ARC.12.Ching, J., Hu, Y.G., and Phoon, K.K. (2015). On the use of spatially averagedshear strength for the bearing capacity of a shallow foundation. ICASP 12.13.Ching, J. and Pan, Y.K. (2015). First two moments of effective Young’s modulusfor a three-dimensional spatially variable soil mass, 2015 SRES.14.Ching, J., Wang, J.S., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). Consistency of maximumlikelihood estimates for random field parameters. APSSRA 2016.15.Ching, J., Pan, Y.K., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). A unified spatial averaging modelfo r effective Young’s modulus of a three-dimensional spatially variable elementary soil mass. APSSRA 2016.16.Ching, J. and Hu, Y.G. (2017). Effective Young’s modulus for a footing on aspatially variable soil mass. Geo-Risk 2017/6th ISGSR.17.Ching, J. and Phoon, K.K. (2017). Characterizing unknown trend using sparseBayesian learning. Geo-Risk 2017/6th ISGSR.18.Ching, J., Hu, Y.G., and Tabarroki, M. (2017). Mobilization of spatially variableshear strength. ICOSSAR 2017.19.Ching, J. (2017). Construction of site-specific probabilistic transformation modelfor geotechnical design. Int. Symp. on Life-cycle Engineering and Sustainability Infrastructure. (keynote)20.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2017). Homogenization of shear strength and modulusin spatially variable soils. IACMAG 2017. (invited lecture)21.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2017). Better correlations for geotechnical design.GeoSS 10th Anniversary Conference. (State-of-the-Practice Lecture)專書及專書論文1.Ching, J.?, Phoon, K.K., and Lee, W.T. (2013). Second-moment characterization of undrained shear strengths from different test procedures, Foundation Engineering in the Face of Uncertainty, Geotechnical Special Publication honoring ProfessorF. H. Kulhawy, 308-320. (EI)2.Phoon, K.K.? and Ching, J. (2013). Multivariate model for soil parameters based on Johnson distributions, Foundation Engineering in the Face of Uncertainty, Geotechnical Special Publication honoring Professor F. H. Kulhawy, 337-353 (EI).3.Phoon, K.K.? and Ching, J. (2013). Can we do better than the constant partial factor design format? Modern Geotechnical Design Codes of Practice –Implementation, Application, and Development, IOS Press, 295-310.4.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2015). Risk and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering. Taylor & Francis.5.Ching, J. and K.K. Phoon (2015). Constructing multivariate distributions for soil parameters. Chap. 1 in Risk and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering (Eds.: K.K. Phoon and J. Ching). Taylor & Francis.6.Hu, Y.G., Ching, J.?, and K.K. Phoon (2016). Can a spatiallyvariable field be converted into a homogeneous spatial average over an influence zone? GSP in memory of the late Professor Wilson H. Tang.7.Phoon, K.K., Prakoso, W.A., Wang, Y., and Ching, J. (2016). Uncertainty representation of geotechnical design parameters. Chap 3 in Reliability of Geotechnical Structures in ISO2394, Eds. KK Phoon & JV Retief, CRCPress/Balkema.8.Ching, J., Li, D.Q., and Phoon, K.K. (2016). Statistical characterization of multivariate geotechnical data. Chap 4 in Reliability of Geotechnical Structures in ISO2394, Eds. KK Phoon & JV Retief, CRC Press/Balkema.9.Dithinde, M., Phoon, K.K., Ching, J., Zhang, L.M., and Retief, J.V. (2016). Statistical Characterisation of Model Uncertainty. Chap 5 in Reliability of Geotechnical Structures in ISO2394, Eds. KK Phoon & JV Retief, CRCPress/Balkema.10.Phoon, K.K. and Ching, J. (2016). Semi-probabilistic reliability-based design.Chap 6 in Reliability of Geotechnical Structures in ISO2394, Eds. KK Phoon & JV Retief, CRC Press/Balkema.。

ASTM F1173

ASTM F1173

Designation:F1173–01An American National Standard Standard Specification forThermosetting Resin Fiberglass Pipe Systems to Be Usedfor Marine Applications1This standard is issued under thefixed designation F1173;the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or,in the case of revision,the year of last revision.A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.Asuperscript epsilon(e)indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1.Scope1.1This specification covers reinforced thermosetting resin pipe systems with nominal pipe sizes(NPS)1through48in. (25through1200mm)which are to be used for allfluids approved by the authority having jurisdiction in marine piping systems.1.2Values stated in inch-pound are to be regarded as the standard.Values given in parentheses are for information only.1.3The dimensionless designator NPS has been substituted for traditional terms as“nominal diameter,”“size,”and“nomi-nal size.”1.4The following safety hazards caveat pertains to the test methods which are included in this specification.This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns,if any, associated with its use.It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.2.Referenced Documents2.1ASTM Standards:D883Terminology Relating to Plastics2D1598Test Method for Time-To-Failure of Plastic Pipe Under Constant Internal Pressure3D1599Test Method for Resistance to Short-Time Hydrau-lic Failure Pressure of Plastic Pipe,Tubing,and Fittings3 D2105Test Method for Longitudinal Tensile Properties of “Fiberglass”(Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin)Pipe and Tube3D2310Classification for Machine-Made“Fiberglass”(Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin)Pipe3D2584Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Resins4D2924Test Method for External Pressure Resistance of “Fiberglass”(Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin)Pipe3D2992Practice for Obtaining Hydrostatic or Pressure De-sign Basis for“Fiberglass”(Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin)Pipe and Fittings3D3567Practice for Determining Dimensions of“Fiber-glass”(Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin)Pipe and Fittings3D5028Test Method for Curing Properties of Pultrusion Resins by Thermal Analysis5D5686Specification for“Fiberglass”(Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin)Pipe and Pipe Fittings, Adhesive Bonded Joint Type Epoxy Resin,for Condensate Return Lines3E1529Test Methods for Determining Effects of Large Hydrocarbon Pool Fires on Structural Members and As-semblies6F412Terminology Relating to Plastic Piping Systems3 2.2Other Documents:ANSI B16.1Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings7 ANSI B16.5Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings7IMO Resolution A.753(18)Guidelines for the Application of Plastic Pipes on Ships8NSF-619Code of Federal Regulations21CFR175.105, 21CFR177.2280,21CFR177.2410,and21CFR177.24208 Code of Federal Regulations Title46,Part56,for Piping Systems,and Subpart56.60-25for Nonmetallic Materials8 IMO Resolution A.653(16)Recommendation on Improved1This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F25on Ships and Marine Technology and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F25.13on Piping Systems.Current edition approved Dec.10,2001.Published April2002.Originally published as F1173–st previous edition F1173–95.2Annual Book of ASTM Standards,V ol08.01.3Annual Book of ASTM Standards,V ol08.04.4Annual Book of ASTM Standards,V ol08.02.5Annual Book of ASTM Standards,V ol08.03.6Annual Book of ASTM Standards,V ol04.07.7Available from American National Standards Institute,25W.43rd St.,4th Floor,New York,NY10036.8Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk,Bldg.4Section D,700 Robbins Ave.,Philadelphia,PA19111-5098,Attn:NPODS.9Available from the National Sanitation Foundation,P.O.Box130140,789N.Dixboro Rd.,Ann Arbor,MI48113-0140.1Copyright©ASTM International,100Barr Harbor Drive,PO Box C700,West Conshohocken,PA19428-2959,United States.Fire Test Procedures for Surface Flammability of Bulk-head,Ceiling,and Deck Finish Materials 8IMO Resolution MSC.61(67)International Code for Appli-cation of Fire Test Procedures 8OTI 95634Jet-Fire Resistance Test of Passive Fire Protec-tion Materials 102.3ISO Documents:900177573.Terminology3.1Definitions are in accordance with Terminologies D 883and F 412.3.2Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1continuously electrically conductive ,adv —pipe and fittings made conductive using discretely conductive materials or layers.3.2.2homogeneously electrically conductive ,adv —pipe and fittings made conductive using a resin additive so that conductivity is maintained between any two points on the pipe or fitting.3.2.2.1Discussion —For conveying nonconducting fluids (those having conductance less than 1000pico-Siemens per metre),pipe systems which are continuously or homoge-neously conductive or have conductivity from the inside surface to the outside surface are recommended.In accordance with IMO Resolution A.753(18),all pipe located in a hazard-ous area,regardless of the fluid being conveyed,must be electrically conductive.3.2.3maximum operating pressure ,n —the highest pressure that can exist in a system or subsystem under normal operating conditions.3.2.4representative piping system ,n —a system composed of a single manufacturer’s pipes,fittings,joints,and adhesives that would normally be used by a customer or installer.4.Classification4.1General —Pipe and fittings are to be classified using the following system which is similar to that of Classification D 2310for pipe.4.1.1Types :4.1.1.1Type I —Filament wound.4.1.1.2Type II —Centrifugally cast.4.1.1.3Type III —Molded (fittings only).4.1.2Resin :4.1.2.1Resin 1—Epoxy resin.4.1.2.2Resin 2—Vinylester resin.4.1.2.3Resin 3—Polyester resin.4.1.2.4Resin 4—Phenolic resin.4.1.2.5Resin 5—Customer-specified resin.4.1.3Class :4.1.3.1Class A —No liner.4.1.3.2Class B —Reinforced liner.4.1.3.3Class C —Nonreinforced liner.4.2Pressure Rating —Pipe and fittings shall be classified asto the method used to obtain their pressure rating (refer to Appendix X1).4.2.1Rating Method 1—Short-term test.4.2.2Rating Method 2—Medium-term (1000-h)test.4.2.3Rating Method 3—Long-term (10000-h)test.4.2.4Rating Method 4—Long-term (10000-h)regression test.4.3Fire Endurance —Piping systems are to be classified in accordance with the following cells if fire performance is to be specified (refer to Appendix X2).4.3.1Fluid :4.3.1.1Fluid E —Empty.4.3.1.2Fluid EF —Initially empty for 5min,followed by flowing water.Fluid velocity of 3-ft/s maximum during quali-fication test.)4.3.1.3Fluid S —Stagnant water.4.3.2Fire Type :4.3.2.1Fire Type JF —Jet fire with heat flux between 95100and 126800Btu/(h-ft 2)(300and 400kW/m 2).4.3.2.2Fire Type IF —Impinging flame with heat flux of 36011Btu/(h-ft 2)(113.6kW/m 2).4.3.2.3Fire Type HF —Hydrocarbon furnace test at 2012°F (1100°C).4.3.3Integrity/Duration :4.3.3.1Integrity A —No leakage during or after fire test.4.3.3.2Integrity B —No leakage during fire test,except a slight weeping is acceptable.Capable of maintaining rated pressure for a minimum of 15min with a leakage rate of 0.05gal/min (0.2L/min)after cooling.4.3.3.3Integrity C —Minimal or no leakage (0.13gal/min (0.5L/min))during fire test.Capable of maintaining rated pressure with a customer-specified leakage rate after cooling.4.3.3.4Duration —The duration of the test shall be specified in minutes and shall be specified or approved by the authority having jurisdiction.5.Ordering Information5.1When ordering pipe and fittings under this specification,the following should be specified (where applicable):5.1.1Service Conditions :5.1.1.1Fluid being transported.5.1.1.2Design temperature (reference6.6).5.1.1.3Internal design pressure.5.1.1.4External design pressure.5.1.2General Information :5.1.2.1Type (reference 4.1.1).5.1.2.2Resin (reference 4.1.2).5.1.2.3Class (reference 4.1.3).5.1.3Pressure Rating Method (Internal Only)(reference 4.2).5.1.4Fire Endurance :5.1.4.1Fluid (reference 4.3.1).5.1.4.2Fire type (reference 4.3.2).5.1.4.3Integrity (reference 4.3.3).5.1.4.4Flame spread rating (reference6.4).5.1.4.5Smoke and other toxic products of combustion (reference6.5).5.1.5NPS.10Offshore Technology Information (OTI)Report is available from Health and Safety Executive,HSE Information Centre,Broad Ln.,Sheffield,S37HQ,U.K.5.1.6Manufacturer’s Identification(part number,product name,and so forth).5.1.7Specific job requirements(that is,potable water usage, electrical conductivity).6.Performance Requirements6.1Internal Pressure—All components included in the piping system shall have pressure ratings suitable for the intended service.Pressure ratings shall be determined in accordance with Appendix X1using the method specified by the customer or a longer-term method,if available.If,for example,a Rating Method2—medium-term test is specified and data for Rating Method3—long-term test is available,then the long-term test data is acceptable.Note that for some components,particularly specialtyfittings,long-term testing is not practical and ratings for these items will typically be determined using Rating Test Method1.6.2External Pressure—All pipe included in the piping system shall have external pressure ratings suitable for the intended service.External pressure ratings shall be determined by dividing the results of Test Method D2924by a minimum safety factor of3.6.3Fire Endurance—The piping system shall have thefire endurance required by the authority having jurisdiction based on the intended location and service.Fire endurance shall be determined using the appropriate method in Appendix X2. 6.4Flame Spread—The authority having jurisdiction shall designate anyflame spread requirements based on the location of the piping.For ships,mobile offshore drilling units (MODU’s),andfloating oil production platforms subject to the requirements of SOLAS or Title46of the U.S.Code of Federal Regulations,performance shall be determined by test proce-dures given in IMO Resolution MSC.61(67),Annex1,Part 5—Test for Surface Flammability,as modified for pipes in Appendix3of IMO Resolution A.753(18).6.5Smoke and Other Toxic Products of Combustion—The authority having jurisdiction shall designate any smoke and toxicity requirements based on the location of the piping.For ships,MODUs,andfloating oil production platforms subject to the requirements of SOLAS or Title46of the U.S.Code of Federal Regulations,performance shall be determined by test procedures given in IMO Resolution MSC.61(67),Annex1, Part2—Smoke and Toxicity Test,as modified in B.9.0of Appendix B—Fire Performance Tests.6.6Temperature—The maximum working temperature shall be at least36°F(20°C)less than the minimum glass transition temperature(determined in accordance with Test Method D5028or equivalent)or heat distortion temperature (determined in accordance with ISO75Method A,or equiva-lent)of the resin or plastic material.The minimum glass transition temperature or heat distortion temperature,which-ever is less,shall not be less than176°F(80°C).N OTE1—Glass transition temperature shall be used for in-process quality control testing(reference9.1.4,9.2.4,and9.3.3).6.7Material Compatibility—The piping material shall be chemically compatible with thefluid being carried and any fluid in which it will be immersed.6.8Electrical Resistance—Conductive piping systems shall have a resistance per unit length not to exceed3.053104V/ft (13105V/m)when tested in accordance with Appendix X3. Resistance to earth at any location on an installed piping system required to be conductive shall be no greater than13 106V.6.9Static Charge Shielding—Conductive piping systems shall have a maximum resulting voltage not to exceed1%of the supply voltage induced on the exterior surface of the pipe when tested in accordance with Appendix X3.6.10Potable Water Usage—The material,including pipe,fittings,adhesive,and any elastomeric gaskets required shall have no adverse effect on the health of personnel when used for potable water service.Material shall conform to National Sanitation Standard61or meet the requirements of FDA Regulations21CFR175.105and21CFR177.2280,21CFR 177.2410,or21CFR177.2420.7.Other Requirements7.1Flanges—Standardflanges shall have bolt patterns in accordance with ANSI B16.5Class150for nominal pipe sizes 24-in.and smaller and in accordance with ANSI B16.1Class 125for largerflanges.Consult the manufacturer’s literature for bolt length,torque specifications,and tightening sequence. 7.2Military Usage—Piping andfittings used in military applications shall comply with the provisions of Appendix D, Supplementary Requirements to Specification F1173for U.S. Navy use.8.Workmanship and Appearance8.1All pipe,fittings,and spools shall be visually inspected for compliance with the requirements stated in Table1,and,if appropriate,either repaired or rejected.After all minor repairs, a pressure test in accordance with9.1.1,9.2.1,or9.3.1shall be performed on the component.9.Inspection and Sampling9.1Pipe:9.1.1Pressure Tests—A minimum of5%of pipe joints shall be tested at a pressure of not less than1.5times the pipe system pressure rating.9.1.2Lot Size—A lot of pipe shall consist of150joints,or fractions thereof,of one size,wall thickness,and grade in continuous production.9.1.3Short-Term Burst Tests—Short-term hydrostatic burst tests shall be conducted in accordance with Test Method D1599at a minimum frequency of one test per lot.If the measured value is less than85%of the published value,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.9.1.4Degree of Cure—The glass transition temperature (Tg)shall be determined at a minimum frequency of one test per production lot.If the measured value is more than10°F less than the value in the manufacturer’s specification,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.9.1.5Glass Content—The glass content(mass fraction ex-pressed as percentage)of at least one sample per production lot shall be determined in accordance with Test Method D2584.If the measured glass content is not within5%of the value in the manufacturer’s specification,the lot is rejected or subject toretest.9.1.6Wall Thickness —Total wall thickness and reinforced wall thickness shall be determined in accordance with Practice D 3567once per every production lot.Total and reinforced wall thickness shall be as specified in Table 2.Any out of tolerance components shall be rejected and the remainder of the lot be subject to retest.9.2Fittings :9.2.1Pressure Tests —A minimum of 5%of each fitting lot shall be tested at a pressure of not less than 1.5times the pipe system pressure rating.All samples shall hold the test pressure for a minimum of 2min.9.2.2Lot Size —A lot shall consist of 50fittings or one day’s production of a specific fitting,whichever is greater.By agreement between the manufacturer,the purchaser,and the authority having jurisdiction,the lot size shall be permitted to be altered.9.2.3Short-Term Burst Tests —Short-term hydrostatic burst tests shall be conducted in accordance with Test Method D 1599at a minimum frequency of one test per lot.If themeasured value is less than 85%of the published value,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.9.2.4Degree of Cure —The Tg shall be determined at a minimum frequency of one test per production lot.If the measured value is more than 10°F less than the value in the manufacturer’s specification,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.9.2.5Glass Content —The glass content (mass fraction ex-pressed as percentage)of at least one sample per production lot shall be determined in accordance with Test Method D 2584.If the measured glass content is not within 5%of the value in the manufacturer’s specification,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.9.2.6Wall Thickness —Total wall thickness and reinforced wall thickness shall be determined in accordance with Practice D 3567once per every production lot.Total and reinforced wall thickness shall be as specified in Table 2.Any out of tolerance components shall be rejected.9.3Flanges and Mitered Fittings :9.3.1Pressure Tests —One mitered fitting from each lot shall be tested to a pressure equal to or greater than 1.5times the pipe system rating.All samples shall hold the pressure for a minimum of 2min.9.3.2Lot Size —A lot shall consist of 20flanges or 10mitered fittings of any given configuration.9.3.3Degree of Cure —The Tg shall be determined at a minimum frequency of one test per production lot.If the measured value is more than 10°F less than the value in the manufacturer’s specification,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.TABLE 1Visual Acceptance CriteriaDefect Type DescriptionAcceptance CriteriaCorrective Action Burnthermal decomposition indicated by distortion or discoloration of the laminate surfacenone permitted reject Chip small piece broken from edge or surface—if reinforcement fibers are broken,the damage is considered a crack if there are undamaged fibers exposed over any area;or nofibers are exposed but an area greater than 0.4by 0.4in.(10by 10mm)lacks resinminor repairif no fibers are exposed,and the area lacking resin is less than 0.4by 0.4in.(10by 10mm)accept Crack actual separation of the laminate which is visible on opposite surfaces and often extends through the wall;reinforcement fibers are often visible/brokennone permittedrejectCrazing fine hairline cracks at or under the surface of the laminate;white areas are not visiblecrack lengths greater than 1.0in (25.4mm)minor repair crack lengths less than 1.0in (25.4mm)accept Dry spot area of incomplete surface film where the reinforcement has not been wetted by resinnone permittedreject Fracture rupture of the laminate with complete penetration;majority of fibers broken;visible as lighter colored area of interlaminar separationnone permittedrejectInclusion foreign matter wound into the laminate none permitted in structural wall (treat same as pit if located atthe surface)reject Pit (pinhole)small crater in the surface of the laminate;width is on the same order of magnitude as the depth diameter greater than 0.032in.(0.8mm)or depth greater than10%of wall thickness,or bothminor repair diameter less than 0.032in.(0.8mm)and depth less than 10%of wall thicknessacceptRestriction excessive resin,adhesive,or foreign matter on the internal wall of pipe/fittingsnone permittedremove by careful grinding Wear scratch shallow mark caused by improper handling,storage,or transportation,or combination thereof—if reinforcement fibers are broken,the damage is considered to be a crackundamaged fibers exposed over any area or no fibers are exposed but an area greater than 0.4by 0.4in (10by 10mm)lacks resinminor repairno fibers exposed and the area lacking resin is less than 0.4by 0.4in.(10by 10mm)acceptTABLE 2Wall Thickness TolerancesN OTE —Where measurement of the reinforced wall thickness would cause destruction or damage to the part,only the total wall thickness measurement need be taken.DimensionTolerance,%Total wall thickness +22.5A −0Reinforced wall thickness+22.5A −0AThe tolerance on total and reinforced wall thickness for fittings shall refer to the manufacturer’s designated location on the body of thefitting.9.3.4Glass Content—The glass content(mass fraction ex-pressed as percentage)of at least one sample per production lot shall be determined in accordance with Test Method D2584.If the measured glass content is not within5%of the value in the manufacturer’s specification,the lot is rejected or subject to retest.9.3.5Wall Thickness—Total wall thickness and reinforced wall thickness shall be determined in accordance with Practice D3567once per every production lot.Total and reinforced wall thickness shall be as specified in Table2.Any out-of-tolerance components shall be rejected and the remainder of the lot be subject to retest.9.4Retest—If any test result in9.1,9.2,or9.3,or combi-nation thereof,fails to conform to the specified requirements, the manufacturer shall be permitted to elect to reject the entire lot,or retest two additional samples from the same lot.If both of the retest specimens conform to the requirements,all items in the lot shall be accepted except the sample which initially failed.If one or both of the retest samples fail to conform to the specified requirements,the manufacturer shall reject the entire lot or test individually the remaining samples in the lot in accordance with9.1.1,9.2.1,or9.3.1,as applicable.Note that in thefinal case,all samples need only be subjected to the tests that the original samples failed.9.5Production Quality Documentation—The manufacturer shall have manufacturing procedures for each component to be supplied,raw material test certificates for each component to be used in manufacturing,and production quality control reports available for the procurement officer.10.Certification10.1The pipe manufacturer shall be registered by an ac-credited agency to meet the requirements of ISO9001.For purposes of this specification,the manufacture shall be con-sidered a“special process”as defined in ISO9001,Section4.9.11.Product Marking11.1Pipe andfittings shall be marked with the name,brand, or trademark of the manufacturer;NPS;manufacture date; pressure rating;pressure rating method;and other information upon agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser.12.Keywords12.1epoxy resinfittings;epoxy resin pipe;marine piping; nominal pipe size;thermoset epoxy resin pipeAPPENDIXES(Nonmandatory Information)X1.DETERMINATION OF INTERNAL PRESSURE RATING FOR PIPE,FITTINGS,AND JOINTSX1.1Internal pressure rating for a piping system shall be determined using one of four methods.The method used to determine this rating shall be clearly identified by the manu-facturer in published literature.X1.1.1Rating Method1—Short-Term Test Method—Two samples of each pipe,joint,fitting,or other component shall be tested in accordance with Test Method D1599at ambient temperature.The maximum rating for mitered(hand lay-up)fittings shall be determined by dividing the lesser result by a safety factor of5.0.The maximum rating for all other compo-nents shall be determined by dividing the lesser result by a safety factor of4.0.X1.1.2Rating Method2—Medium-Term(1000-h)Test—Two samples of each pipe,joint,fitting,or other component are to be tested in accordance with Test Method D1598for a period of1000h at the rated temperature.Both specimens must survive the exposure period without leakage.The maximum rating for mitered(hand lay-up)fittings shall be determined by dividing the test pressure by a safety factor of 2.5.The maximum rating for all other components shall be determined by dividing the test pressure by a safety factor of2.2.X1.1.3Rating Method3—Long-Term(10000-h)Test—Two samples of each pipe,joint,fitting or other component are to be tested in accordance with Test Method D1598for a period of 10000h at the rated temperature.Both specimens must survive the exposure period without leakage.The maximum rating for mitered(hand lay-up)fittings shall be determined by dividing the test pressure by a safety factor of2.0.The maximum rating for all other components shall be determined by dividing the test pressure by a safety factor of1.87.X1.1.4Rating Method4—Long-Term(10000-h)Regres-sion Test—Pipe,fittings,and joints shall be tested in accor-dance with Practice D2992Procedure B at the rated tempera-ture.The pressure rating for all components shall be determined in accordance with the hydrostatic design basis (HDB)and lower confidence limit(LCL)as calculated in the test method.Ratings shall be determined by dividing the LCL at20years by a factor of1.5.Scaling of the results is allowed for pipe bodies only in accordance with the ISO equation:S3SF5P~D2t r!/2t r(X1.1) where:S=hoop stress,psi(kPa),SF=service factor,D=mean reinforced diameter(OD−t)or(ID+t),in.(mm),P=internal pressure psig(kPa),andt r=minimum reinforced wall thickness,in.(mm).N OTE X1.1—Liner thickness is not to be used in determining inside diameter.N OTE X1.2—Coating thickness is not to be used in determining outsidediameter.X2.FIRE PERFORMANCE TESTSX2.1Fire performance tests shall be performed at an independent third-party laboratory to the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction.X2.2Piping Material Systems:X2.2.1Allfire endurance,flame spread,and smoke and toxicity testing,where required,shall be conducted on each piping material system.X2.2.2Changes in either the type,amount,or architecture, or combination thereof,of either the reinforcement materials, resin matrix,liners,coatings,or manufacturing processes shall require separate testing in accordance with the requirements of this specification.X2.3Fire-Protective Coatings:X2.3.1Where afire-protective coating is necessary for achieving thefire endurance,flame spread,or smoke and toxicity criteria,the following requirements apply:X2.3.1.1Pipes shall be delivered from the manufacturer with the protective coating on.On site application will be limited to what is physically necessary for installation(that is, joints).X2.3.1.2Thefire-protection properties(that is,fire endur-ance,flame spread,smoke production,and so forth)of the coating shall not be diminished when exposed to(1)salt water, oil,or bilge slops,(2)other environmental conditions such as high and low temperatures,high and low humidity,and ultraviolet rays,or(3)vibration.X2.3.1.3The adhesion qualities of the coating shall be such that the coating does notflake,chip,or powder,when subject to an adhesion test.X2.3.1.4Thefire-protective coating shall be resistant to impact and abrasion.It shall not be separated from the piping during normal handling.X2.4General Fire Endurance Test Requirements:X2.4.1All typical joints,including but not limited to pipe to pipe,fiberglassflange tofiberglassflange,andfiberglassflange to metallicflange intended to be used shall be tested.Elbows and tees need not be tested provided the same adhesive or method of joining utilized in straight piping tests will be used in the actual application.X2.4.2Qualification of piping systems of sizes different than those tested shall be allowed as provided for in Table X2.1.This applies to all pipe,fittings,system joints(including joints between metal andfiberglass pipes andfittings),methods of joining,and any internal or external liners,coverings,and coatings required to comply with the performance criteria.X2.4.3No alterations to couplings,fittings,joints,fasteners, insulation,or other components shall be made after the commencement of thefire endurance testing.Flange bolts shall not be retorqued after completion of thefire exposure testing, before hydrostatic testing.Postfire hydrostatic testing shall be conducted without altering the component in any way.X2.5Fire Type JF–Jet Fire—This test is based upon Health &Safety Executive document OTI95634,except that is modified so that actual pipe,joints,andfittings are exposed to theflame.X2.5.1Equipment:X2.5.1.1A propane vaporization and propulsion system capable of delivering0.6660.11lb/s(0.360.05kg/s)flow under controlled conditions into a backing“box”which has the test specimen mounted at the box’s front opening.The nozzle shall be a tapered,converging type,7.875in.(200mm)in length with an inlet diameter of2.0in.(52mm)and an outlet diameter of0.70in.(17.8mm).The nozzle is to be located 3.281ft(1.0m)from the front of the box,centered across the box,and mounted horizontally between15in.(375mm)and 30in.(750mm)from the bottom of the box.Theflow shall directly impinge on the test specimen.X2.5.1.2Water-handling and timing equipment suitable for delivering sufficient quantities of water to produce afluid velocity of3ft/s(0.91m/s)at the rated pressure of the piping system being tested.X2.5.1.3Instrumentation to record fuelflow rate,water flow rate,temperatures in the specimen and in various loca-tions in the backing panel,and water leakage rate from the pipe assembly or individual components.X2.5.2Test Specimen—The test specimen shall be prepared with the joints,fittings,andfire-protection coverings,if any, intended for use in the proposed application.It is up to the authority having jurisdiction to determine the number and size of test specimens,as well as requirements for the qualification of a range of pipe diameters.X2.5.3Test Conditions:X2.5.3.1Iffire-protective coatings or coverings contain or are liable to absorb moisture,the test specimen shall not be tested until the insulation has reached an air-dry condition.This condition is defined as equilibrium with an ambient tempera-ture at50%relative humidity of70610°F(2065°C).Where fire-protective coatings or coverings are required to enable a pipe system to pass afire endurance test,the coatings’or coverings’properties should not degrade over time or due to exposure to the environment as discussed in IMO FTP Code Res A.753(18)Paragraph2.2.6,or both.X2.5.3.2The test specimen shall be planar and shall be mountedflush to the opening of a5by5-ft(1.5by1.5-m) open-ended,steel box(closed back panel with a depth of1.64 ft(0.5m).Suitable auxiliary equipment shall be attached to the box to ensure the box’s structural stability and to prevent any transient ambient conditions from significantly affecting theTABLE X2.1Qualification of Piping Systems of Different SizesSize Tested[NPS],in.(mm)Minimum Size Approved,in.(mm)Maximum Size Approved,in.(mm)0to1.5(0to40)size tested size tested 2to4(50to100)size tested4(100)5to10(125to250)size tested10(250) 12to22(300to550)size tested22(550) 24to34(600to850)size tested34(850) 36to48(900to1200)size tested48(1200)。

桥梁术语英语词汇_xls

桥梁术语英语词汇_xls

abrupt changing rhyme scheme突变韵律absolute type vibration transducer绝对式测振传感器abutment桥台abutment anchor bar桥台锚固栓钉abutment capping台帽abutment shaft台身accidental action偶然作用acid proof cement耐酸水泥acid rain酸雨acoustoelasticity声弹性法actions on bridge桥梁上的作用additional pile method加桩法additional strut beam method加撑梁法adjusting shaft校正井aerial remote sensing航空遥感aerodynamic model气流模型aerogeophysical prospecting航空物探aerophotography航空摄影aerophotography航片aesthetical ability审美能力aesthetical affection审美感受aesthetical appreciation审美评价aesthetical order审美序列aesthetical standard审美标准aesthetical taste审美趣味aesthetical treatment of bridge details桥梁细部美学处理aesthetical viewpoint审美观点age龄期aggregate interlock骨料咬合作用aggregate interlock集料aging of cold drawn bar冷拉时效air compressor空气压缩机air entraining agent加气剂air jet out let on outside wall of caisson井壁气龛air jetting method to reduce skin friction壁后压气法air spinning method空中纺缆法air vent排气孔air-entraining silicification method加气硅化法air-entrapping cement加气水泥air-lift dredger空气吸泥机airlock气闸Akashi Kaikyo Bridge明石海峡大桥Alcantara Bridge阿尔坎塔拉桥alkali liquid stabilization method碱液加固法allowable bearing capacity of foundation soil地基容许承载力allowable eccentricity of foundation base of bridge桥基底容许偏心alluvial deposit冲积层alluvium movement泥沙运动ALRT Bridge埃尔特桥alternate rhyme scheme交叉韵律alternatives比较方案aluminium-thermal spraying coating热喷铝涂层aluminum alloy steel bridge铝合金钢桥Alzette Bridge阿尔泽特桥ambient random vibration test环境随机激励振动试验Amizada Bridge埃米塞得桥analogy association类比联想analogy method比拟法anchor barge定位船anchor beam平衡梁anchor bearing plate锚垫板anchor bearing ring锚垫圈anchor by bond粘结锚anchor pile锚碇桩anchor plate锚碇板anchor span锚跨anchor span组合跨anchorage锚碇anchorage锚具anchorage for CCL prestressing system CCL体系锚具anchorage length锚固长度anchorage of rail线路锁定anchorage pier锚墩anchorage with ring plug环销锚anchorage with tapered plug锥销锚anchorage with wedges片销锚anchorage zone design锚下端块设计anchored bulkhead abutment锚锭板桥台anchored in rock piles嵌岩桩anchored pier锚固墩anchoring box锚箱angle steel角钢angular displacement of pier top墩顶转角angular transducer倾角仪Anlan Bridge安澜桥Annacis Island Bridge安纳西斯岛桥annual maximum instantaneous discharge年瞬时最大流量Anping Bridge安平桥antecedent rainfall前期降雨anti-creeper防爬器anticreeping angle防爬角钢antifreezing agent 防冻剂antirust welded steel bearing防锈焊接钢支座appraisal of rock section岩石薄片鉴定appreciation of beauty审美approach slab used at bridge end 桥头渡板approach span引桥appropriate reinforcement design适筋设计aqueduct bridge水渠桥arc hinge弧形铰arc plate bearing弧形钢板支座arch axis拱轴线arch bridge拱桥arch bridge with arch ring laid by cantilever method悬砌拱桥arch bridge with suspended road, through arch bridge下承式拱桥arch bridge with thrusts at supports有推力拱桥arch bridge with truss rib桁架肋拱桥arch bridge without thrusts at supports无推力拱桥arch centering拱架arch covering拱板arch crown拱顶arch culvert拱形涵洞arch disc bridge拱片桥arch hinge拱铰arch protection护拱arch rib拱肋arch ring拱圈arch seat拱座arch stone拱石arch tile拱波arch truss拱形桁架arched abutment拱形桥台areal rainfall面雨量Arrabida Bridge阿拉比德桥arrangement of culvert elevation涵洞的立面布置arrangement of piles in rank form桩的行列式排列artificial ground人工地基artificial loading method假载法artificial upper limit of frozen soil冻土人为上限assemblable truss拆装梁assembling bolt拼装螺栓assembling of member 杆件组装assembling pin冲钉assembling steel truss from members钢梁杆件拼装assembling steel truss on falsework脚手架上拼装钢梁association联想Astoria Bridge阿斯托里亚桥attribute of beauty美的属性Aue Bridge奥埃桥automatic welding自动焊auxiliary bridge for construction施工便桥auxiliary functions of bridge桥梁附加功能auxiliary pier辅助墩auxiliary pier method辅助墩法average discharge rate平均流量average discharge velocity平均流速axial bearing capacity of drilled caisson embedded in bedrock嵌岩管柱轴向承载力axial bearing capacity of piles桩轴向承载力axial compression strength of concrete混凝土轴心抗压强度Ba Bridge灞桥back of arch拱背back stayed abutment背撑式桥台Bailey bridge贝雷桥Baimianshi Bridge over Wushui River白面石武水大桥Baishatuo Changjiang (Yangtze) River Bridge at Chongqing重庆白沙砣长江大桥Baitashan Iron Bridge over Yellow River白塔山黄河铁桥balance weight abutment衡重式桥台balanced cantileuer construction均衡悬臂施工法balanced cantilever erecting crane for bridge spans双悬臂式架桥机balanced design平衡设计balanced failure界限破坏ballasted deck碎石铺装桥面ballasted deck bridge道碴桥面桥bamboo cable bridge笮桥bamboo cable bridge竹索桥bamboo reinforced concrete open caisson竹筋混凝土沉井band suspension displacement meter张线式位移计bank bar边滩Baodai Bridge宝带桥Baoding Bridge at Dukou渡口宝鼎桥barge驳船barrel arch bridge板拱桥Barrios de luna Bridge巴里奥斯·卢纳桥bascule bridge立转桥base-line survey基线测量basic rib基肋basic variable基本变量basic variable load基本可变荷载basic wind pressure基本风压basic wind speed基本风速basin流域Bauschinger effect of steel钢筋包辛格效应bay bridge海湾桥Bayonne Bridge贝永桥Bazi Bridge八字桥BBRV anchorage BBRV镦头锚BBRV wire posttensioning system BBRV体系beam bridge梁式桥beam bridge with wavy cross-section波形截面梁桥beam bridge without ballast无碴梁桥beam lowering落梁beam on elastic foundation analogy弹性地基梁比拟法beam-frame system rigid frame bridge梁-框体系刚架桥bearing支座bearing in butt joint正接抵承bearing member承重构件bearing of the hole-side钉孔承压bearing stiffener, end stiffener端加劲肋bearing stratum 持力层bearing stress of timber木材承压应力bearing structure承重结构bearing template, bed block支承垫石beauty of bridge body主体美beauty of bridge configuration桥梁造型美beauty of bridge decoration装饰美beauty of content内涵美beauty of form形式美bed for structure test结构试验台座bed load推移质bed material 河床质bed rock基岩bed shear河底切力bed-load transport推移质输沙率bedrock mark基岩标behavior test of prestressing anchorage预应力锚具性能试验Beida Friendship Bridge at Dalian大连市北大友谊桥Beipei Chaoyang Bridge at Chongqing重庆市北碚朝阳桥belt conveyor带式输送机benchland stage平滩水位benchmark (B.M.)水准点benchmark leveling基平bend test of bars钢筋冷弯试验bending plasticity of timber木材的弯曲塑性bending-up of flexural reinforcement钢筋的弯起Bendorf Bridge 本道夫桥bent cap. Capping盖梁bent structure排架结构bent-up bar弯起钢筋biaxial stress behavior of concrete混凝土双轴应力性能bidding, enter a bid投标bi-prestressing system concrete bridge双预应力体系混凝土桥bituminous deck pavement沥青铺装桥面bituminous surface treatment沥青表面处置blade bit刮刀钻头bleeding of concrete泌水blind ditch盲沟blind drain behind abutment, blind ditch behind abutment桥台后排水盲沟blind peariform anchorage暗藏梨状锚block砌块block for seismic protection防震挡块boat bridge舟桥bolt and nail connection栓钉结合bolt and weld connection栓焊连接bolt connection普通螺栓连接bolt tension calibrator螺栓轴力计bolted and welded steel truss bridge栓焊钢桁架桥bond failure mechanism粘结破坏机理bond stress粘结应力bond test for reinforcing bars钢筋握裹力试验Bonhomme Bridge博诺姆桥bored cast-in-situ pile钻孔灌注桩bored cast-in-situ pile with casing带套管钻孔灌注桩bored-inserting method钻孔插入法boring and grouting method钻孔灌浆法boring machine for cast-in-place piles灌注桩钻机Bosporus Bridge博斯普鲁斯桥Bosporus-Ⅱ Bridge博斯普鲁斯二桥boundary layer wind tunnel 大气边界层风洞boundary line of bridge construction, clearance of bridge constru桥梁建筑限界bowstring arch bridge, tied-arch bridge系杆拱桥box abutment箱形桥台box culvert箱形涵洞box frame bridge箱形桥box girder箱梁box girder bridge箱形梁桥box girder bridge with inclinedweb plate斜腹板箱梁桥box girder bridge with steel deck slab钢桥面板箱梁桥box girder with multiple cells多室箱梁box-ribbed arch bridge箱形拱桥brace拉条bracket牛腿bracket against a pier墩旁托架braided river游荡型河流braking bracing, braking frame制动撑架braking force and tractive force制动力和牵引力braking pier, abutment pier制动墩Brazo Largo Bridge布拉佐·拉戈桥break joint错缝brick culvert砖涵bridge桥梁bridge aerodynamic shape桥梁气动外形bridge aerodynamics桥梁空气动力学bridge aesthetics桥梁美学bridge and culvert桥涵bridge axis profile桥轴断面图bridge buffeting桥梁抖振bridge covering桥屋bridge crane桥式起重机bridge crossing structure over river桥渡bridge deck桥面bridge decoration桥上装饰bridge design procedure (program)桥梁设计程序bridge erecting crane架桥机bridge flutter桥梁颤振bridge foundation桥梁基础bridge layout in plan桥梁平面布置bridge lighting桥上照明bridge loadings, load on bridge桥梁荷载bridge maintenance gang养桥工区bridge member桥梁构件bridge planning design桥梁规划设计bridge project桥梁建设项目bridge project construction depth of bridge桥梁建筑高度bridge railing桥栏bridge rehabilitation桥梁修复bridge site桥位bridge site engineering survey桥位工程测量bridge site hydrographic plan桥渡水文平面图bridge site profile桥址纵断面图bridge site reconnaissance and topographic survey桥址勘测bridge site topographic map桥址地形图bridge sleeper桥忱bridge sleeper grooving桥枕刻槽bridge staircase桥梯bridge structure design method桥梁结构设计方法bridge tower桥塔bridge vortex-excited resonance桥梁涡激共振bridge with open floor明桥面桥Briesle Mass Bridge布里斯勒·玛斯桥Brinell hardness布林奈尔硬度brittle fracture of steel钢的脆断brittle-coating method脆性涂层法broken joint断缝Brooklyn Bridge布鲁克林桥Brotonne Bridge布鲁东纳桥Bubiyan Bridge布比延桥bucket elevator斗式提升机buckling coefficient of plate翘曲系数buckling load of column, buckling load压屈荷载buckling of plate钢板翘曲budget of working-drawings of a project施工图预算budget quota of bridge construction桥梁工程预算定额buildings at ends of bridge proper桥头建筑built-up formwork组合模板built-up section member组合杆件bulk cement truck散装水泥车bunched rails轨束梁bundle of I-beams工字梁束bundled girder束合大梁buoyancy of water水浮力buoyant box浮箱buried abutment埋置式桥台buried framed abutment框架埋置式桥台buried pile-column abutment桩柱埋置式桥强buried rib abutment肋形埋置式桥台buried river地下暗河burlap cofferdam麻袋围堰burring 除剌butt joint对接接头butt weld对接焊缝butt welder for reinforcing steel钢筋对焊机butt welding对接焊buttonhead anchorage镦头锚bybrid overflow pavement混合式过水路面c critical gradient临界坡度cable clamp索夹cable compaction紧缆cable crane缆索起重机cable net bridge索网桥cable protection斜缆防护cable saddle索鞍cable stayed bridge斜拉桥cable stayed bridge of multi-cable system密索体系斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with a single central cable plane单索面斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with continuous girder连续梁式斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with continuous rigid frame连续刚构式斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with double inclined cable planes双斜索面斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with double vertical cable planes双铅垂索面斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with rigid stays刚性索斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with single-cantilever girders单悬臂梁式斜拉桥cable stayed bridge with T-shaped rigid frames T形刚构式斜拉桥cable supported bridge缆索承重桥cable system being stable of the first order一阶稳定缆索体系cable system being stable of the second order二阶稳定缆索体系cable tower索塔cable with stranded wires钢绞线索cable wrapping缰丝cable-stayed bridge with composite girder钢结合梁斜拉桥caisson disease沉箱病caisson pile沉井型桩calcium silicate cement. Portland cement硅酸盐水泥calculated rise计算矢高calculating width of pile桩的计算宽度calculation of distortion by influence line用影响线计算畸变calling for tenders招标calm impression of force力的镇静camber上拱度camber预拱度canal bridge运河桥cantilever arch悬壁拱cantilever beam bridge悬臂梁桥cantilever concreting悬臂浇筑法cantilever construction method悬臂施工法cantilever erection悬臂拼装法cantilever method for assembling steel truss钢梁悬臂拼装法cantilever span悬臂跨cantilever truss bridge悬臂桁架梁桥cantilever truss construction method悬臂桁架法cantilever trussed arch bridge悬臂桁架拱桥cantilevered pier悬臂式桥墩cantilevered slab悬壁板cantilevered slab of deck trough confiing ballast道碴槽悬臂板cap of open caisson沉井顶盖capacitance type displacement transducer电容式位移传感器carbon equivalent [Ceq]碳当量carbon steel wire碳素钢丝cardborad drain method纸板排水法carriageway行车道carriageway beam行车道梁casing boring machine套管钻机casing method箍套法casing pipe护筒cast iron bridge铸铁桥cast steel bearing铸钢支座cast-in-place pile with variable cross-section变截面灌注桩cast-in-place reinforced concrete beam bridge就地浇筑钢筋混凝土梁桥cast-in-situ pile就地灌注桩catastrophic flood特大洪水catastrophic flood特大洪水处理catchment gutter聚水槽catenarian arch axis悬链线拱轴catenary arch bridge悬链线拱桥cathodic protection (cp) of steel bar钢筋阴极防腐法catwalk猫道cause and effect association因果联想cellular cofferdam of steel sheet pile构体式钢板桩围堰cement grouting method水泥灌浆法cement mortar mixer水泥砂浆搅拌机cement mortar pump水泥砂浆输送泵cement stabilized soil method水泥加固土法center of rainstorm暴雨中心center-hole jack穿心式千斤顶central span中孔centrifugal compacting process for reinforced concrete pipe-pile混凝土管桩离心法成型centrifugal force离心力centrifugal pump离心泵chain block链条滑车Changjiang (Yangtze) River Bridge at Nanjing南京长江大桥Changjiang (Yangtze) River Bridge at Wuhan武汉长江大桥Changjiang (Yangtze) River Bridge at Zhicheng枝城长江大桥Changjinag (Yangtze) River Bridge at Jiujiang九江长江大桥channel bottom slope河底经降channel bridge河渠桥channel section槽钢Chao Phraya River Bridge湄南河桥character association性质联想characteristic crack width特征裂缝宽度characteristic load特征荷载characteristic value of an action作用特征值charge amplifier电荷放大器chassification of prestressed concrete预应力混凝土的分类check消力槛check dam. Mud avalanche retaining dyke谷坊check load验算荷载chemical analysis of water水样分析chemical churning process单管旋喷注浆法chemical consolidation化学防护chemical method of derusting化学除锈chemical stabilization method化学加固法Chezy coefficient谢基系数Chezy formula谢基公式chipped stone arch bridge料石拱桥Choisy-le-Roi Bridge舒瓦西-勒-鲁瓦桥chute滑道chute急流槽circular arch bridge圆弧拱桥circular load cell环箍式测力计circulation current环流clasp nail马钉class A partially prestressed concrete bridge A类部分预应力混凝土桥class B partially prestressed concrete bridge B类部分预应力混凝土桥cleaning borehole of cast-in-situ bored pile钻孔灌注桩清孔clear lane width行车道净宽clear span of bridge桥梁净跨clearance above bridge deck桥面净空clearance above highway bridge deck公路桥面净空限界clearance testing car限界检查车clearance widening on curve曲线上净空加宽client, proprietor建设单位climber爬升器climbing form爬模closed drainage system封闭式排水系统closed end pipe pile闭口端管桩Coalbrookdale Bridge煤溪谷桥coefficient of arch axis拱轴系数coefficient of buckling for reinforced concrete column钢筋混凝土柱的纵向弯曲系数coefficient of dynamic response动力响应系数coefficient of live-load increment活载发展系数coefficient of rivets or bolts铆钉或螺栓系数coefficient of runoff径流系数coefficient of secondary stress in section截面次应力系数coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete混凝土热膨胀系数coefficient of variation of arch thickness拱厚变换系数coefficient of working live load运行活载系数cofferdam围堰cofferdam on the top of open caisson井顶围堰coherent coefficient of pier (T)墩的相干系数Tcohesive soil foundation粘性土地基coincide ratio of rivet hole钉孔通过率cold bending冷弯cold drawing machine for reinforcing steel钢筋冷拉机cold extruding machine for reinforcing steel and wire钢筋冷拔机cold flow of timber木材的冷流cold upsetting machine for rein-forcing steel and wire钢筋冷镦机cold-drawn low-carbon steel wire冷拔低碳钢丝cold-drawn rebar冷拉钢筋cold-drawn steel wire冷拔钢丝cold-rolled threadend anchorage轧丝锚cold-twisted rebar冷扭钢筋cold-worked bar冷作钢筋collapse崩塌colonnade foundation embedded in bedrock嵌岩管柱基础colour色彩column bent pier排柱式桥墩columnar pier柱式桥墩combination beam bridge with flat curved slab微弯板组合梁桥combination of load荷载组合combined beam bridge组合式梁桥combined braced system组合式撑架体系combined bridge, highway and railway bridge公路铁路两用桥combined end-bearing and friction pile中间型桩combined erecting equipment for bridge spans联合架桥机combined estimate index综合概算指标combined suspension and cable stayed bridge悬拉桥combined-system arch bridge组合体系拱桥combining value of actions作用组合值commercial function of bridge商业性桥梁Commodore J. Barry Bridge考莫多尔桥common compensated strain gauge公共补偿片compatibility相容性compatibility calculation相容性计算compatibility torsion协调扭转competitive tender of design scheme设计方案竞标complete correlation, function correlation完全相关completely probabilistic method全概率法complex type section of stream bed河床复式断面composite abutment组合式桥台composite beam bridge结合梁桥composite beam bridge组合式板桥composite box girder bridge组合箱梁桥composite expansion joint组合式伸缩缝composite girder复合大梁composite pile混合桩comprehensive unit price综合单价compressed-air floating caissons气筒浮式沉井compression failure of an over-reinforced member超筋破坏compression field theory压力场理论compression of soil土的压缩性compressive plasticity of timber木材压缩塑性compressive strength inclined to grain斜纹抗压强度compressive strength of concrete混凝土抗压强度compressive strength of reinforced concrete column钢筋混凝土柱的抗压强度compressive strength parallel to grain顺纹抗压强度compressive strength perpendicular to grain横纹抗压强度computation of temperature difference温差计算concealed pin暗销concealed work隐蔽工程concordant tendon吻合索concrete arch bridge混凝土拱桥concrete bridge混凝土桥concrete foundation of pier and abutment混凝土墩台基础concrete grades混凝土强度等级concrete hinged bearing混凝土铰支座concrete mixer混凝土搅拌机concrete mobile unit汽车式混凝土搅拌设备concrete open caisson混凝土沉井concrete placing boom混凝土布料杆concrete placing bucket混凝土吊斗concrete plant混凝土工厂concrete protective covering for rive bed混凝土护底concrete pump混凝土泵concrete slump cone混凝土坍落度简concrete truck mixer混凝土搅拌输送车concrete vibrator混凝土振捣器conductor for assembling组装胎型cone exploration锥探cone penetration test触探cone-anchorage jack锥式千斤顶confined concrete约束混凝土confined water承压水conic pitching of abutment桥台护锥conical pitching, conical revetment锥体护坡connecting line bridge across the strait跨海联络桥connection for built-up sections缀连性连接connection of steel bridge钢桥连接constant cross-section pier等截面桥墩construction budget, construction estimate施工预算construction cost, construction expenses工程费construction details施工详图construction error施工误差construction joint of concrete混凝土施工缝construction of bridge piers and abutments桥梁墩台施工construction specification施工规范constructional bar构造钢筋constructional loading施工荷载constuction with travelling formwork移动模架法contact stress beneath foundation基础接触应力contact type displacement measurement接触式位移测量continental river内陆河流continuity equation of constant flow (stationary flow)恒定流连续方程continuity stresses外约束应力continuous arch analysis连拱计算continuous arch bridge连续拱桥continuous beam bridge连续梁桥continuous conveyor连续输送机continuous deck method连续桥面法continuous pad built-up section member连续垫板组合杆件continuous rail无缝线路continuous rhyme scheme连续韵律continuous rigid frame bridge连续刚构桥continuous slab bridge连续板桥continuous-hinged rigid frame bridge连续铰接刚构桥contract of construction施工承包contraction coefficient收缩系数contractor, construction unit施工单位Contrasting method对比法conversion stress, equivalent stress换算应力coping, pier capping墩帽corner connection角接头corner joint隅节点corner stiffener隅加劲corner stiffening plate肱板correction for temperature effect温度修正correlation analysis相关分析correlation coefficient相关系数correlation of zero零相关corridor bridge廊桥corrosion-resistant steel bridge耐蚀钢桥corrugated metal pipe culvert波纹铁管涵cost of construction management施工管理费counter weight平衡重counterfort abutment扶壁式桥台coupler for tendons预应力筋连接器crack chart of structure结构裂缝图crack control裂缝控制cracking moment开裂弯矩crawler crane履带起重机creep camber徐变拱creep coefficient of concrete混凝土徐变系数creep limit of timber木材蠕变极限creep of concrete混凝土徐变creep of timber木材的蠕变creep of track轨道爬行criterion of similarty相似判据critical buckling load for reinforced concrete column钢筋混凝土柱的临界压力critical depth of flow临界水深critical flow临界流critical load of steel column钢压杆临界荷载critical relative compression depth界限相对受压区高度critical section临界断面critical speed临界速度critical velocity极限速度critical velocity of flow临界流速cross beam, floor beam横梁cross bracing 交叉撑架Cross Form Bridge鱼沼飞梁cross-section of stream河流横断面cross-sectional profile横断面图cross-wind galloping横风驰振crushing strength at elastic limit of timber木材弹性极限压碎强度crystallographic symmetry结晶对称cubic compressive strength of concrete混凝土立方体抗压强度culvert涵洞culvert abutment涵台culvert body涵洞洞身culvert foundation涵洞基础culvert grade涵底坡度culvert inlet and outlet涵洞洞口culvert inlet with flared wing wall八字翼墙洞口culvert location涵位culvert outlet erosion protection洞口冲刷防护culvert with steep grade陡坡涵洞culvert with top-fill暗涵culvert without top-fill明涵curb缘石curing by ponding围水养护curing of concrete混凝土养护current meter流速仪curve sign曲线标志curved bridge弯桥cut-off flow dike 截水坝cut-off wall截水墙cutting切割cutting edge of open caisson沉井刃脚cycle of incremental launching顶推循环dam bridge, gate bridge水闸桥Dames-Point Bridge达姆岬桥data logging system数据采集和处理系统datum level of elevation高程基准面Dazi Bridge over Lasa River, Xizang西藏拉萨河达孜桥dead load恒载debris flow泥石流deck bridge上承式桥deck construction桥面构造deck drainage桥面排水deck elevation桥面标高deck pavement桥面铺装deck slab桥面板deck slab行车道板deck truss girder bridge上承式桁架梁桥deck type arch bridge上承式拱桥decompression moment消压弯矩deduct losses扣损deep diving equipment深潜水设备deep foundation深基础deep mixing method深层搅拌法deep-reach深槽defective rivets不良铆钉defensive function of bridge防御性桥梁deflection theory挠度理论deflector导流板deformation joint 变形缝deformed bar变形钢筋degradation and sedimentation at meander reach of river河弯冲淤degree of prestressign, degree of prestress预应力度delivery with idler car游车发运depression detention填洼depth of matural flow天然水深derailment force掉道荷载derrick crane桅杆起重机derusting machine for reinforcing steel钢筋除锈机derusting of steel girder钢梁除锈derusting with steel wire brush钢刷除锈design approximate estimate设计概算design criteria设计准则design department, design section设计单位design discharge rate设计流量design discharge velocity设计流速design flood设计洪水design flood frequency设计洪水频率design life, designed service life设计寿命design load设计荷载design load spectrum设计荷载谱design of bridge cross-section桥梁横断面设计design of bridge opening孔径设计design of bridge profile桥梁纵断面设计design of loading products up-on a wagon成品装车设计design rainstorm设计暴雨design reference period设计基准期design stages, design phases设计阶段design stress spectrum 设计应力谱design stress-strain curve设计应力-应变曲线design water level设计水位design wind speed设计风速destructive test of structures结构破坏性试验detachable bridge for highway装配式公路钢桥detachable pneumatic caisson可撤式沉箱detachable truss for railway铁路拆装式桁梁deterministic design method定值设计法detour bridge便桥deviated flow斜流deviation coefficient C v变差系数 C vdiagonal斜杆diagonal crack, diagonal tension crack斜裂缝diagonal strut斜撑dial gauge百分表dial gauge千分表dial gauge with strain gauge transducer机电百分表diaphragm横隔板diaphragm wall equipment地下墙钻机diaphragm-wall bridge foundation地下连续墙桥基diesel hammer柴油锤differential transformer type displacement transducer差动变压器式位移传感器differential-acting steam hammer差动汽锤differentio-integral amplifier微积分放大器dimension量纲dimensional analysis量纲分析direct charges, direct cost直接费direct solar radiation太阳直接辐射direct-circulation drill正循环钻机discharge流量discharge at benchland stage平滩流量discharge for unit width单宽流量discharge velocity流速displacement at the top of pier or abutment墩(台)顶位移displacement of pier and abutment墩台变位displacement of pier head under the effect of sunshine日照作用下的墩顶位移displacement restriction equipment位移限制装置distorted model变态模型distortion畸变distribution of stream velocity in profile断面流速分布distribution of temperature difference温差分布distribution reinforcement分布钢筋dive drilling method潜水钻孔法diverging lane分车道diving appliances and equipment潜水设备Dizful Bridge提斯孚尔桥dominant discharge, formative discharge造床流量double cantilever beam bridge双悬臂梁桥double -columns pier双柱式桥墩double deck双层桥面double deck box-girder bridge双层箱梁桥double modulus theory双模量理论double pylon cable stayed bridge双塔式斜拉桥double shear双剪double-acting steam hammer双动汽锤double-hinged rigid frame bridge双铰刚架桥double-wall cofferdam of steel sheet pile双层钢板桩围堰double-wall cofferdam of timber sheet pile双层木板桩围堰double-webbed box girder bridge双腹板箱梁桥doubly reinforced section双筋截面doule-action jack双作用千斤顶dowel action销栓作用down hand welding俯焊drainage and waterproof system排水防水系统drainage channel排水槽drainage opening泄水孔drainage opening泄水口drainage pipe泄水管drainage pipe-line排水管道drainage pipe-line泄水管道drainage slope on pier-top墩顶排水坡dredging well沉井取土井dredging with hydraulic equipment in pneumatic caisson沉箱水力机械挖泥drill bit钻头drilled caisson管柱drilling钻探drilling after hand marking号孔钻孔drilling after welding后孔法drilling auger螺旋钻机drilling bucket回转斗钻机drilling mud钻孔泥浆dripping nose滴水driveway slab车道板drop dam跌水坝drop hammer落锤dry bridge旱桥dry joint干接缝duct孔道ductility of steel钢材的韧性Düisbrig-Neuenkamp Bridge杜伊斯堡-诺因坎普桥duplicate rhyme scheme重复韵律durability耐久性duration of flow concentration汇流历时dush jet mixing method粉体喷射搅拌法Dusseldorf-flehe Bridge杜塞多尔夫-弗勒埃桥Dusseldorf-Neuss Bridge杜塞尔多夫·诺依斯桥dynamic动态对称dynamic action动态作用dynamic balance动态平衡dynamic beauty动态美dynamic consolidation强夯法dynamic factor动力系数dynamic ice pressure动态冰压力dynamic modulus of elasticity of timber木材的动弹性模量dynamic photoelasticity动态光弹性法dynamic pile test桩动力试验dynamic resistance strain gauge动态电阻应变仪dynamic response动力响应dynamic response动力效应dynamic signal analyzer动态信号分析仪dynamic test of pile桩基动力试验dynamic test of structures 结构动载(力)试验Dywidag anchorage迪维达克锚具Dywidag threadbar posttensioning system迪维达克体系Eads Bridge伊兹桥early strength component早强剂earth pressure静止土压力earth pressure due to live load活载产生的土压力earthquake地震earthquake focus震源earthquake intensity地震烈度earthquake load, seismic action地震荷载earthquake magnitude地震震级earthquake simulation地震模拟振动台earthquake wave地震波East-Huntington Bridge东享廷顿桥eccentric compression method偏心受压法eccentrically loaded columns偏心受压柱eccentricity magnification factor for reinforced concrete column钢筋混凝土柱的偏心距增大系数economical span length经济跨径economy of bridge widening桥梁加宽经济性economy-technique index经济技术指标eddy-current type displacement transducer电涡流式位移传感器edge milling铣边edge planing刨边edge processing边缘加工effect due to change of temperature温度变化影响effect due to differential settlement of foundation基础不均匀沉降影响effect of concrete creep on thermal response混凝土徐变对热效应的影响effect of cracking on thermal response裂缝对热效应的影响effect of tension stiffening拉区强化效应effective coefficient of cost费用有效系数effective flange width有效翼缘宽度effective length at the end of nail钉端钳制长度effective prestress有效预应力effective slenderness ratio换算长细比effective span length有效跨径effects of actions作用效应elastic after-effect of timber木材弹性后效elastic buckling弹性屈曲elastic buckling of plate弹性翘曲elastic compliance of timber木材弹性柔量elastic constant of pier墩的弹性常数elasto-plastic bucking弹塑性屈曲elasto-plastic bucking of plate弹塑性翘曲electric hoist电动滑车electric impact method电力冲击法electric oil pump电动油泵electric winch电动卷扬机electrical measurement of non-electric quantities非电量电测技术electrical prospecting电法勘探electro silicification method电动硅化法electrodynamical vibration exciter电动式激振器electrodynamical vibration table电动式振动台electro-hydraulic servo fatigue test machine电液伺服式疲劳试验机electro-hydraulic vibration exciter电液式激振器electro-hydraulic vibration table电动液压式振动台electro-osmotic consolidation method电渗固结法elevated line bridge高架线路桥elevated monorail bridge高架单轨铁路桥elevating jack提升千斤顶elevation of base of foundation基底标高elevation of culvert涵底标高elevation of rail base轨底标高elevation of springing拱趾标高eluvium残积层embedded steel预埋钢筋emergency bridge紧急抢险桥empirical frequency经验频率empirical frequency curve经验频率曲线empty and real虚实end bearing colonnade foundation端承式管柱基础end bearing pile, point bearing pile支承桩end diagonal端斜杆end resistance of pile桩端阻力end zone splitting锚下端块劈裂endurance limit持久极限endurance strength of timber 木材持久强度energy input线能量energy rate of section断面比能engineering barge工程船舶engineering geology工程地质enlarged culvert inlet流线型洞口entrance of bridge桥梁入口epicenter震中epicentral distance震中距epoxy resin joint环氧树脂水泥胶接缝equal strength beam等强度梁equiamplitude fatigue tester等幅疲劳试验机equilibrium bifurcation平衡分叉equilibrium torsion平衡扭转equiponderant coefficient for live-load increment活载发展均衡系数equivalent length for bridge maintenance桥梁换算长度equivalent loading of highway公路等代荷载equivalent uniformly distributed live load换算均布活载。

fanyi

6、Tensile strength and abutment relaxation as failure control mechanisms in underground excavationsAbstract:Classical assessment of instability potential in underground excavations are normally based on yield and rupture criteria for stress driven failure and on limit equilibrium analysis of structurally controlled failure. While it is true that ultimate failure and falls of ground can be an eventual consequence of stress fracturing and unfavourable structure within the rock mass, the timing of such failure is often controlled by the presence of residual tensile capacity, in the form of rock bridges separating joint segments and fractures and by the mechanisms of clamping and relaxation. Using crack and rock-bridge analogues in conjunction with an updated voussoir beam model, this paper explores the in¯uence of residual tensile strength and boundary parallel relaxation on the failure process. The impact on support design is also examined. In underground hard rock mines with complex geometries and interacting openings, relaxation is identi®ed as a key controlling factor in groundfall occurrence. Empirical stability assessment techniques for underground tunnels and for mining stopes are updated to account for relaxation.IntroductionStability assessment of underground excavations is classically divided into two procedural domains. These two domains are based on a distinction between struc-turally controlled and stress driven modes of instabil-ity. It is the premise of this paper, however, that in non-squeezing and non-bursting ground, structure and stress serve merely as ground conditioning mechan-isms. Gravity loading is ultimately responsible for large scale groundfalls or for signi®cant loading of support. When the rock mass jointing is non-persist-ent, the rock bridges contribute to the stability of an excavation through the rock mass residual tensile strength or load bearing capacity. The failure to con-sider the rock mass self-supporting capacity and the e.ects of abutment con®nement or abutment relax-ation can lead to erroneous predictions of failure or ofsupport load.Gravity induced groundfalls are common occur-rences in underground excavations of all depths. Numerous techniques can be applied to assess the po-tential for such groundfalls provided that an appropri-ate failure mode is assumed. Typical failure modes which can be analyzed include wedge fallout, slab or plug failure, gravity driven caving and beam failure.Models taking these failure modes into account are generally usually utilized for associated with stability assessments in low stress or near surface excavations. The underlying assumption of most of these models is that through-going joints or discontinuities are fully persistent and that stability is controlled by structural geometry and by friction (with or without dilation). The inherent tensile or cohesive strength of moderately jointed rock masses is often assumed to be negligible in these models.Alternatively, for excavations at depth or for shal-lower excavations in weaker rockmasses, linear elastic stress analysis can be used to determine the location and extent of problematic stress concentrations around the openings. Failure criteria such as Mohr±Coulomb and Hoek±Brown [1, 2] based on combined cohesive and frictional strength components can be applied suc- cessfully if the rock mass yields with signi®cant plastic deformation. These criteria, however, meet with only limited success [3, 4] for failure prediction around exca-vations in hard rock environments due to their insensi-tivity to low con®nement behaviour. In brittle ground, it has been shown [5±9] that under low con®nement (such as that which exists adjacent to an opening), tan-gential compressive stress above a de®ned threshold in-itiates and propagates boundary parallel cracks or fractures.Such rock mass damage can be responsible for observed seismicity [9] and stress redistribution [10] and was found to correlate well with a constant critical deviator criteria for damage initiation, both in intact and in moderately jointed rock [9, 11]. This initial cracking or fracturing is generally parallel to the exca-vation surface and therefore parallel to the major com-pressive stress. This crack damage is strain dependant and may be exacerbated by preferential de¯ection and dilation into an opening and by existing planes of weakness such as foliation or meta-bedding resulting eventually in moderately persistent planar laminations in otherwise massive or moderately jointed rock(Fig. 1).Nevertheless, a prediction of rock mass stress in excess of yield limits, based on elastic models, does not inevitably correspond to actual catastrophic failure of the underground opening. This is fortunate given the depths encountered in modern mining, where much of the ground above mining openings has reached a damage or yield stress threshold at some point in the mining sequence and yet, with the exception of highly stressed ground experiencing rockbursting, shearing or stress buckling, generally remains in place in the short term. This is due to the rock mass' residual tensile load bearing capacity normal to the excavation bound-ary and due to arching to the abutments.Paradoxically, ultimate failure of this damaged ground is often induced by changes in mine geometry which reduce [12±16] rather than increase the stresses across the back or walls as might have been the case in Fig. 1. It is the premise of this paper that the key to this discrepancy between modeled or predicted failure and the actual observed occurrence of failure in under-ground excavations in hard rock is due to the domi-nance of the rock mass's tensile load bearing capacity.However, if combined with abutment relaxation, thein¯uence of gravity can exceed the tensile load bearing capacity of naturally jointed or stress fractured rock masses leading to the type of failure illustrated in Fig. 1. This paper will not attempt to explain the gen-esis of natural fractures and associated rock bridges, Fi nor will it examine the mechanics of formation for boundary parallel stress cracks. The foregoing discus-sion assumes that such damage is omni-present in underground excavations and explains the possible impact on ultimate stability.In this paper we will discuss the nature of residual tensile capacity in jointed or fractured rock masses comparing its capacity to that of economical engin-eered support systems. The e.ect of abutment relax-ation on rock wedge and blocky slabstability is demonstrated. Di.erent mining scenarios are described which may lead to destabilizing relaxation. The vous-soir arch analogue is used to further demonstrate the importance of boundary normal tensile capacity and abutment relaxation. The voussoir analogue is then calibrated to correspond with empirical stability guide-lines for rock mass stability. The e.ect of relaxation is further demonstrated in this context. Conclusions:The presence of geometrically unfavourable jointing or rock mass damage due to elastic predictions of overstress does not, in itself, dictate that failure will take place. Neglecting the possibility of dynamic pro-cesses such as compression-induced buckling, degra-dation of residual tensile strength or abutment relaxation is often required before failure can take place.Rock masses are inherently discontinuous due to natural jointing or induced fracturing. It is often erro-neous to assume that this fracturing is fully persistent. In massive to moderately jointed rock residual tensile load bearing strength arising from incomplete fractur-ing or from rock bridges separating non-persistent joining is a key factor in the control of ultimate grav-ity driven failure of jointed or stress damaged ground.Very little rock bridge cross-sectional area (less than 1% in most cases) is required in hard rocks to replace most arti®cial support systems. The time dependency of this residual tensile strength due to stress corrosion and atmospherically induced crack growth controls stand-up time and mandates the use of support sys-tems in most underground excavations. Sti. Support such as grouted rebar can suppress dilation strains and preserve some of this internal tensile strength, contri-buting to a reduction in both short term and long term support requirements. There is great economic advantage to selecting, as part of a multi-component support system, sti. elements which can preserve the rock mass internal tensile capacity. Careful blast damage control is also an obvious advantage. Early installation of shotcrete or spray-on linings in a dry rock mass at depth can reduce the impact of atmos-pheric e.ects and time dependent stress corrosion on stressed rock bridges.Boundary parallel relaxation is another dominating factor in delayed mining induced failure of spans in underground excavations, signi®cantly shifting conven-tional no-support limits so that smaller spans or ad-ditional support are required. Dangerous abutment relaxation can occur even at depth, driven by un-favourable stress ratios, complex mine geometries, abutment damage, intersection development and undercutting. Abutment relaxation increases support demands by reducing the natural ability of the rock mass to transfer loads to the abutments through arch-ing. In addition, boundary normal stress relaxation has been shown to reduce the capacity of frictional support systems, exacerbating ground control pro-blems.A voussoir beam analogue was used to illustrate the importance of internal boundary normal tensile strength and of abutment relaxation in controlling the stability of spans in laminated rock masses. The results of the voussoir simulation were used to modify empiri-cal stope design limits, accounting for abutment relax-ation. A few millimetres of hangingwall or back abutment relaxation can signi®cantly shift the no-sup-port limit, inducing failure in previously stable spans. It is therefore important to sequence development and stope extraction properly to minimize this relaxation and tominimize the size of secondary stopes. The creation of high relaxation geometries, such as hanging-wall undercutting, must be avoided.6.在地下挖掘机制拉伸强度和桥墩松弛的失效控制摘要:地下洞室群的不稳定可能是典型的评估通常基于屈服应力驱动的失败和破裂准则和极限平衡分析构造控制失败。

正交异性桥面板

正交异性桥面板目录第 4 章虎门大桥正交异性钢桥面板疲劳问题研究 ..................................................................... .. 2 4.1 绪论 ..................................................................... (2)4.1.1 正交异性钢桥面板的发展概况 ..................................................................... (2)4.1.2 正交异性钢桥面板的疲劳细节 ..................................................................... ............... 9 4.2 虎门大桥疲劳裂纹现状及成因 ..................................................................... .. (18)4.2.1 虎门大桥疲劳裂纹现状 ..................................................................... .. (18)4.2.2 虎门大桥疲劳裂纹的成因分析 ..................................................................... ............. 22 4.3 正交异性钢桥面板局部应力分析 ..................................................................... .. (28)4.3.1 有限元分析模型 ..................................................................... . (28)4.3.2 单轮荷载作用下桥面板应力分布 ..................................................................... (30)4.3.3 跨中加载时横隔板处应力分析 ..................................................................... . (33)4.3.4 轮压荷载接触面积的影响分析 ..................................................................... . (33)4.3.5 双轴作用下桥面板应力分布...................................................................... .. (34)4.3.6 结论 ..................................................................... ................................................... 35 4.4 正交异性钢桥面疲劳裂纹加固方法研究 ..................................................................... (36)4.4.1 桥面疲劳裂缝的位置和形式 ..................................................................... . (36)4.4.2桥面疲劳裂纹加固的方法...................................................................... .. (37)4.4.3实际加固案例 ..................................................................... .. (39)4.4.4结论 ..................................................................... .................................................... 43 4.5 正交异性钢桥面板构造细节疲劳强度的研究 ..................................................................... .. (44)4.5.1 概述 ..................................................................... (44)4.5.2 焊接连接的疲劳评估 ..................................................................... (45)5.5.3 欧洲规范3有关疲劳强度规定 ..................................................................... . (47)4.5.4 肋板与桥面板的焊接连接的疲劳试验研究 (52)4.5.5 肋板与桥面板的焊接连接的试验数据统计分析 (61)4.5.6 结论 ..................................................................... ................................................... 65 4.6 小结 ..................................................................... .. (65)参考文献 ..................................................................... . (66)第 4 章虎门大桥正交异性钢桥面板疲劳问题研究 4.1 绪论4.1.1 正交异性钢桥面板的发展概况由于二战以后,德国钢材短缺,为节省材料,德国工程师建桥时采用了正交异性钢桥面板。

浅水航道对标准船模kcs的影响研究

第20卷 第2期 中 国 水 运 Vol.20 No.2 2020年 2月 China Water Transport February 2020收稿日期:2019-09-17作者简介:梁光琪(1998-),男,广东海洋大学海洋工程学院。

通讯作者:黄 技(1988-),男,广东海洋大学海洋工程学院讲师,硕士。

基金项目:广东海洋大学大学生创新训练项目(CXXL2019073);广东海洋大学2018年“海之帆—起航计划”大学生科技创新项目(qhjhzr201808)。

浅水航道对标准船模KCS 的影响研究梁光琪,黄 技,钟一鸣,郑雪韵,邓小叠(广东海洋大学 海洋工程学院,广东 湛江 524088)摘 要:基于流体软件STAR-CCM+,应用欧拉多相流、VOF 波、6-DOF 等物理模型和K-Epsilon 湍流模型,分析了不同水深条件下KCS 船模的阻力及粘性绕流场的特性。

通过改变数值水池水深,比较了深水状态与浅水状态下的阻力差异;分析了浅水中船舶周围的粘性绕流场分布情况。

研究发现:随着水深减小,浅水效应对船体阻力的影响显著,流速增大,压力降低,船体下沉,吃水增加,阻力增大;船体兴波波幅增加明显,作用面扩大,兴波阻力增大。

关键词:浅水航道;KCS 船模;阻力;粘性绕流场中图分类号:U611 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1006-7973(2020)02-0015-03一、引言当货船由深水区域航行至港口、内河、浅海等浅水区域时,货船将处于限制航道状态而遭受浅水效应,进而影响其水动力性能。

针对这一问题,展开浅水区域船舶的阻力及流场特性研究,对船舶的性能预报、浅水效应定量分析有着重大的现实意义。

限制水域航行船舶的各项性能研究主要有船模实验、势流理论以及CFD 方法。

李一兵等通过分析计算实船和船模试验实测资料,对不同内河河流船舶航行阻力计算方法的区别以及船舶航行阻力的计算方法进行了探讨,并提出了相应的计算公式;张伟等针对浅水效应的下沉和阻力增加,介绍比较常用的经验公式估算法,以便对浅水效应进行定量分析,并且根据该经验估算方法,可使船舶遭受浅水效应时做出快速反应,从而保证船舶安全航行。

建筑施工模板安全技术规范JGJ 162-2008

面板与楞梁的连接、面板自身的拼接、支架结构自身的连接和其中二者相互间连接 所用的零配件。包括卡销、螺栓、扣件、卡具、拉杆等。 2.1.4 模板体系(简称模板) shuttering
由面板、支架、和连接件三部分系统组成的体系,也可统称为“模板”。 2.1.5 小梁 minor beam
直接支承面板的小型楞梁,又称次楞或次梁。 2.1.6 主梁 main beam
所列树种中选用。主要承重构件应选用针叶材;重要的木制连接件应采用细密、直纹、
无节和无其它缺陷的耐腐蚀的硬质阔叶材。
3.3.5 当采用不常用树种木材作模板体系中的主梁、次梁、支架立柱等的承重结构或构
件时,可按现行国家标准《木结构设计规范》(GB50005)的要求进行设计。对速生林材,
应进行防腐、防虫处理。
3.3.6 在建筑施工模板工程中使用进口木材时,应遵守下列规定:
-9-
1. 选择天然缺陷和干燥缺陷少、耐腐朽性较好的树种木材; 2. 每根木材上应有经过认可的认证标识,认证等级应附有说明,并应符合商检规定, 进口的热带木材,还应附有无活虫虫孔的证书; 3. 进口木材应有中文标识,并应按国别、等级、规格分批堆放,不得混淆,储存期 间应防止木材霉变、腐朽和虫蛀; 4. 对首次采用的树种,必须先进行试验,达到要求后方可使用。 3.3.7 当需要对模板结构或构件木材的强度进行测试验证时,应按现行国家标准《木结 构设计规范》(GB50005)的检验标准进行。 3.3.8 施工现场制作的木构件,其木材含水率应符合下列规定: 1. 制作的原木、方木结构,不应大于 25%; 2. 板材和规格材,不应大于 20%; 3. 受拉构件的连接板,不应大于 18%; 4. 连接件,不应大于 15%。
ws ───风荷载设计值。 λ ───长细比;
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (2008) 12(3):155-163DOI 10.1007/s12205-008-0155-4www.springer.com/12205

Geotechnical Engineering

󰀂155󰀂*Professor, Graduate School of Civil Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan (Corresponding Author, E-mail: sshibuya@kobe-u.ac.jp)**Doctoral Student, Graduate School of Natural Science, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan (E-mail: jungmica@yahoo.co.jp)***Research Associate, Graduate School of Civil Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan (E-mail: chaie1976@yahoo.co.jp)****Doctoral Student, Graduate School of Natural Science, Kobe University, Geo-research Institute, Kobe 657-8501, Japan (E-mail: geor5@diary.ocn.ne.jp)

Evaluation of Short-term Stability for Sea-wall Structure at Kobe AirportSatoru Shibuya*, Minsu Jung**, Jonggil Chae***, and Teruyuki Fujiwara****Received January 23, 2008/Accepted March 12, 2008··································································································································································································································· Abstract

Prior to the huge reclamation work for constructing Kobe Airport, the sea-wall structure resting on a 30m-thick soft Holocene claylayer in the 16m-deep sea was constructed at stages over the period of three years. Regarding the design of short-term stability of thesea-wall structure, the ratio of undrained shear strength of the normally-consolidated seabed clay to in-situ yield stress was estimatedto take the value of 0.35 in order to satisfy the factor of safety in excess of 1.3. This design strength in the clay foundation waschecked with the unconfined compression strength of the fresh clay samples retrieved from boreholes during the construction. In thispaper, the short-term stability of the embankment in this well-documented case history was re-evaluated after-the-event with theresults of comprehensive series of constant-volume direct shear box tests in which the effects of strength anisotropy as well as theshearing rate on undrained shear strength were both examined. Discussion is made how to estimate the short-term stability of theembankment by considering the effects of strength anisotropy and shearing speed on undrained shear strength and how it is linkedwith the current design method in Japan in which a half of the undrained compression from unconfined compression test isemployed.Keywords: embankment, foundation, clay, reclamation, stability analysis, laboratory test

···································································································································································································································

1. IntroductionKobe airport welcomed the first flight in February 2006. Theoffshore airport was constructed by means of land reclamation overa relatively short period of seven years. Prior to the reclamationwork, the sea-wall structure, i.e., an embankment with a concretewall, resting on a 30m-thick soft Holocene clay layer in the 16m-deep sea was constructed at three stages over the period of threeyears (refer to Hasegawa et al., 2007). In the original design, theratio of undrained shear strength of the normally-consolidatedseabed clay, Su, to in-situ yield stress Vvy was considered the valueof 0.35 in order to satisfy the factor of safety, Fs, in excess of 1.3throughout the stage construction. This design strength fromunconfined compression test (UCT) was also checked against theunconfined compression strength, qu, of the fresh clay samplesretrieved from three boreholes in the foundation clay.Embankment on soft ground is a classical problem in geotechnicalengineering. Several engineering approaches have been proposed toestimate the short-term stability of the embankment. Bjerrum(1972), for example, proposed an empirical method to correlatethe vane shear strength to in-situ strength by considering theanisotropy as well as the rate effect on Su. The SHANSEPmethod proposed by Ladd and Foott (1974) postulates the claystrength that can fully be normalized by the over-consolidationratio (OCR). Hanzawa (1979) proposed so-called modifiedBjerrum method utilizing the direct shear box (DSB) test.Conversely in Japan, the design is based on the unconfinedcompression strength, i.e., Su=qu/2.In this paper, the short-term stability of the embankment in thiswell-documented case history was re-evaluated after-the-event. Inso doing, the strength anisotropy of the foundation clay wasmanifested by performing a series of DSB test in which thespecimens prepared by trimming them at different angles relativeto the horizontal bedding plane were all sheared under constant-volume (i.e., undrained) conditions. The shearing rate effects on Su

相关文档
最新文档