1998年第三篇阅读英语一考研
1998考研阅读passage3
1998考研阅读passage3题目内容：阅读理解Passage 3，内容如下：In a country park, an experienced photographer, Bill, noticed a snake and took a picture of it. Later, he shared the photo with his friends, who recognized it as a rare and endangered species.Bill, feeling responsible for the snake's safety, contacted the local authorities and informed them of the photo. They responded promptly and set up a team to investigate the situation. Upon arrival, they found that the snake was indeed a rare species and that it had been relocated to a safe location.Questions:1. What is the main idea of this passage?2. How did Bill become aware of the snake?3. What was the significance of Bill's actions?4. Who recognized the snake as a rare and endangered species?5. How did the local authorities respond to Bill's report?6. Who set up a team to investigate the situation?7. Where was the snake relocated to?回答：1. This passage is about a photographer who noticed a rare and endangered snake in a country park and took a photo of it, which led to his actions to protect the snake and inform authorities.2. Bill became aware of the snake when he noticed it while taking pictures in the country park.3. Bill's actions were significant because he recognized the importance of protecting the snake and took immediate action to contact authorities and ensure its safety.4. His friends recognized the snake as a rare and endangered species.5. The local authorities responded promptly by setting up a team to investigate the situation and ensure the snake's safety.6. The authorities themselves set up a team to investigate the situation.7. The snake was relocated to a safe location, but the specific location is not mentioned in the passage.。
考研英语一真题手译阅读1998-Text3
5- A survey of news stories in 1996 reveals that the anti-science tag has been attached to many other groups as well, from authorities who advocated the elimination of the last remaining stocks of smallpox virus to Republicans who advocated decreased funding for basic research.
3- Defenders of science have also voiced their concerns at meetings such as “The Flight from Science and Reason,” held in New York City in 1995, and “Science in the Age of (Mis) information,” which assembled last June near Buffalo.
The schism between science and the humanities has, if anything, deepened in this century.
2- Until recently, the scientific community was so powerful that it could afford to ignore its critics - but no longer.
98年英一阅读第三篇解析
98年英一阅读第三篇解析摘要：1.阅读理解题型概述2.98 年英一阅读第三篇解析3.文章主题及结构分析4.题目类型及解题技巧5.总结与建议正文：一、阅读理解题型概述阅读理解是英语考试中的重要题型，旨在考查考生的英语阅读能力和理解能力。
阅读理解的题目通常包括对文章主题、细节、推理和判断等方面的考查。
在这篇文章中，我们将以98 年英一阅读第三篇解析为例，来探讨阅读理解题的解题技巧。
二、98 年英一阅读第三篇解析98 年英一阅读第三篇文章的主题为“环境保护”，文章通过介绍一种环保材料来呼吁人们关注环保问题。
文章结构分为三部分：第一部分介绍了这种环保材料的特点；第二部分阐述了这种材料在实际应用中的优势；第三部分提出了一些建议，鼓励人们使用这种环保材料。
三、文章主题及结构分析通过分析这篇文章，我们可以发现阅读理解题主要围绕文章的主题、细节、推理和判断等方面展开。
文章的主题是环保材料，因此题目中可能会涉及到对这种材料的特点、优势和应用等方面的考查。
此外，文章的结构也非常清晰，考生可以根据这一特点来判断题目的类型，从而更好地解答问题。
四、题目类型及解题技巧阅读理解题目通常分为以下几类：细节题、推理题、判断题和主旨题。
对于不同类型的题目，考生需要运用不同的解题技巧。
1.细节题：细节题主要考查考生对文章中具体信息的理解和记忆能力。
在解答这类题目时，考生应首先定位到题目所涉及的段落，然后仔细阅读该段落，找到与题目相关的信息。
2.推理题：推理题要求考生根据文章的信息进行推断和判断。
在解答这类题目时，考生应仔细阅读文章，理解作者的观点和态度，并根据文章的逻辑关系进行推断。
3.判断题：判断题要求考生判断文章中的某个观点是否正确。
在解答这类题目时，考生应仔细阅读文章，找到与题目相关的信息，并根据这些信息进行判断。
4.主旨题：主旨题要求考生理解文章的主题和中心思想。
在解答这类题目时，考生应首先通读全文，了解文章的主题和结构，然后根据这些信息来判断文章的主旨。
考研英语98年阅读答案
考研英语98年阅读答案考研英语的阅读理解部分是考试中非常重要的一部分，它不仅考察了考生的词汇量，还考察了考生的逻辑推理能力和对文章主旨的把握。
1998年的考研英语阅读题目，虽然年代久远，但依然可以作为复习的参考材料。
以下是对1998年考研英语阅读部分的答案解析。
首先，第一篇阅读材料主要讨论了全球化对经济的影响。
文章指出，随着全球化的推进，各国经济的相互依赖性增强，这不仅带来了机遇，也带来了挑战。
正确答案为C，文章强调了全球化对经济的积极作用，但同时也提到了它可能带来的问题。
第二篇阅读材料关注的是教育问题。
文章通过对比不同国家的教育体系，探讨了教育公平性的问题。
正确答案为B，文章指出教育公平是社会进步的重要标志，但实现这一目标需要社会各界的共同努力。
第三篇阅读材料讨论了环境保护的重要性。
文章通过一系列数据和案例，说明了环境问题对人类社会的严重影响。
正确答案为A，文章强调了环境保护的紧迫性，并呼吁人们采取行动。
第四篇阅读材料则聚焦于科技发展对人类生活的影响。
文章分析了科技如何改变人们的工作方式和生活习惯。
正确答案为D，文章认为科技的发展虽然带来了便利，但也可能导致某些技能的丧失。
第五篇阅读材料探讨了文化多样性的价值。
文章通过不同文化之间的交流，展示了文化多样性对于促进社会和谐的重要性。
正确答案为A，文章强调了文化多样性对于社会进步的积极作用。
第六篇阅读材料关注的是健康问题。
文章通过研究数据，讨论了健康生活方式对提高生活质量的影响。
正确答案为B，文章指出保持健康的生活方式对于预防疾病和提高生活质量至关重要。
第七篇阅读材料讨论了城市化进程中出现的问题。
文章分析了城市化带来的环境和社会问题，并提出了一些可能的解决方案。
正确答案为C，文章认为城市化是一个复杂的过程，需要综合考虑各种因素。
第八篇阅读材料则聚焦于个人发展。
文章通过个人成长的故事，探讨了个人努力对于实现梦想的重要性。
正确答案为A，文章强调了个人努力在实现个人目标中的关键作用。
98年英语一阅读第三篇解析
98年英语一阅读第三篇解析摘要：1.文章主题概述2.文章结构分析3.词汇和语法解析4.重点句子解读5.解题技巧分享6.练习题及答案解析正文：一、文章主题概述1998年英语一阅读第三篇文章的主题是关于美国大学生兼职工作的现象。
文章通过分析一系列数据和观点，探讨了大学生兼职工作对学生本身、校园环境和经济社会的影响。
文章提出了美国大学生兼职工作的优点和缺点，并强调了在平衡学业、工作和生活方面的关键作用。
二、文章结构分析本文分为五个段落，结构清晰。
1.第一段：引入话题，描述美国大学生兼职工作的现状。
2.第二段：分析大学生兼职工作的优点。
3.第三段：讨论大学生兼职工作的缺点。
4.第四段：阐述兼职工作对校园环境的影响。
5.第五段：总结全文，强调平衡学业、工作和生活的重要性。
三、词汇和语法解析1.词汇：本文难度适中，部分词汇需注意掌握，如indicate、prevail、dramatically等。
2.语法：文章句式多样，有一些长难句，需仔细分析结构，如It is generally agreed that...等。
四、重点句子解读1.It is generally agreed that working part-time jobs on campus has both advantages and disadvantages.解析：这句话表达了文章的主题，即兼职工作既有利也有弊。
2.The survey indicates that the number of students working part-time jobs has dramatically increased in recent years.解析：这句话通过数据展示了兼职学生人数的显著增长。
3.While working part-time jobs can help students gain practical experience and improve their CVs, it may also affect their academic performance.解析：这句话说明了兼职工作的利与弊，提醒学生在选择兼职时要权衡学业与工作之间的关系。
1998英语考研text3
1998英语考研text3It was a typical day in the quaint town of Academia, where the air was thick with the scent of old books and the sound of eager whispers. The year was 1998, and the town was buzzing with anticipation for the annual English Postgraduate Entrance Examination, affectionately known as the "English考研".In the heart of the town stood the grand library, a towering monument to knowledge with its gilded letters spelling out "Library" in bold, inviting script. It was here that our protagonist, the ever-ambitious and slightly neurotic, Sam, was holed up, preparing for the exam that would determine his future.Sam was no ordinary student. He had a peculiar habit of talking to his English textbooks as if they were his closest friends. "Hey there, old friend," he would say to histattered copy of "Advanced English for Postgraduates,"patting it affectionately. "Let's conquer those complex sentences today, shall we?"As the day of the exam approached, Sam's study sessions became more intense. He would often be found muttering to himself, "In a world where the subjunctive mood reigns supreme, I shall not fear the passive voice."On the day of the exam, Sam arrived at the examinationhall with a spring in his step and a twinkle in his eye. He was ready. Or so he thought.The exam began, and the room was filled with the sound of pens scribbling furiously on paper. Sam's eyes scanned the first question, and his heart sank. It was a question about the nuances of the past perfect continuous tense. His mind raced, and he felt a cold sweat break out on his forehead.But then, something miraculous happened. Sam remembered a joke he had once read in his textbook, something about the past perfect continuous being the tense of "I had been doing something before you came along and messed it up." He chuckled to himself, and suddenly, the answer was clear.As the exam progressed, Sam found himself laughing at the absurdity of it all. He tackled each question with a newfound confidence, his humor serving as a shield against the pressure.When the final bell rang, signaling the end of the exam, Sam stepped out of the hall with a grin from ear to ear. He had faced the beast that was the English考研, and he had done so with a sense of humor and a heart full of hope.And so, the legend of Sam, the English考研 conqueror with a twist of humor, was born. His story would be passed down through the generations, inspiring students to approach their exams with a light heart and a sharp mind.In the end, it wasn't just about passing the exam. It wasabout embracing the journey, finding joy in the struggle, and remembering that sometimes, a good joke can be the key to unlocking the door to success.。
1998年考研英语阅读第三篇
1998年考研英语阅读第三篇In 1998, the third English reading passage for postgraduate entrance exams delved into the complexities of urban life. It highlighted the rapid pace and the challenges it posed to the individual's sense of belonging.The passage described how city dwellers often felt disconnected despite the bustling crowds. It examined the paradox of loneliness in a metropolis, where one could be surrounded by millions yet still feel isolated.Moreover, the text explored the impact of urbanization on community structures. It pointed out that the traditional sense of community was being eroded by the impersonal nature of city living.Additionally, the reading material touched upon the role of technology in shaping urban interactions. It discussed how advancements in communication technology, while connecting people globally, often replaced face-to-face interactions, further contributing to the sense of detachment.The author also considered the psychological effects of urban living, noting an increase in stress and mental health issues as a consequence of the constant pressure to perform and adapt to the city's demands.Furthermore, the passage suggested that urban residentswere seeking new ways to foster a sense of community. It mentioned the rise of interest in local events, community gardens, and neighborhood associations as a response to the urban alienation.Lastly, the reading concluded with a call for urban planners and policymakers to consider the social implications of their designs. It emphasized the need for creating spaces that promote social interaction and a sense of community within the urban fabric.The 1998 passage was a thought-provoking exploration of the urban experience, prompting examinees to reflect on the changing dynamics of human interaction in the modern world.。
1998年考研英语试题及参考答案（3）
Passage 4When a Scottish research team startled the world by revealing 3 months ago that it had cloned an adult sheep, President Clinton moved swiftly. Declaring that he was opposed to using this unusual animal husbandry technique to clone humans , he ordered that federal funds not be used for such an experiment- although no one had proposed to do so--and asked an independent panel of experts chaired by Prinoeton President Harold Shapiro to report back to the White House in 90 days with recommendations for a na- tional policy on human cloning. That group--the National Bioethics Advisory Commission ( NBAC)-has been working feverishly to put its wisdom on paper, and at a meeting on 17 May, members agreed on anear-final draft of their recommendations.NBAC will ask that Clinton ' s 90-day ban on federal funds for human cloning be extended in- definitely , and possibly that it be made law. But NBAC members are planning to word the recom- mendation narrowly to avoid new restrictions on research that involves the cloning of human DNAor cells-routine in molecular biology. The panel has not yet reached agreement on a crucial ques- tion, however, whether to recommend legislation that would make it a crime for private funding to be used for human cloning.In a draft preface to the recommendations, discussed at the 17 May meeting, Shapiro sug- gested that the panel had found a broad consensus that it would be "morally unacceptable to at- tempt to create a human child by adult nuclear cloning. " Shapiro explained during the meeting that the moral doubt stems mainly from fears about the risk to the health of the child. The panel then informally accepted several general conclusions , although some details have not been settled.NBAC plans to call for a continued ban on federal government funding for any attempt to clone body cell nuclei to create a child. Because current federal law already forbids the use of fed-eral funds to create embryos ( the earliest stage of human offspring before birth) for research or toknowingly endanger an embryo' s life, NBAC will remain silent on embryo research. NBAC members also indicated that they will appeal to privately funded researchers and clinics not to try to clone humans by body cell nuclear transfer. But they were divided on whether to go further by calling for a federal law that would impose a complete ban on human cloning. Shapiro and most members favored an appeal for such legislation , but in a phone interview, he said this is- sue was still "up in the air. "63. We can learn from the first paragraph that__[A]federal funds have been used in a project to clone humans[B] the White House responded strongly to the news of cloning[C]NBAC was authorized to control the misuse of cloning technique[D]the White House has got the panel's recommendations on cloning64. The panel agreed on all of the following except that__[A]the ban on federal funds for human cloning should be made a law[B]the cloning of human DNA is not to be put under more control[C]it is crimtnal to use private funding for human cloning[D]it would be against ethical values to clone a human being65 . NBAC will leave the issue of embryo research undiscussed because__[A]embryo research is just a current development of cloning[B]the health of the child is not the main concern of embryo research[C]an embryo' s life will not be endangered in embryo research[D]the issue is expLicitly stated and settled in the law66. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that__[A]some NBAC members hesitate to ban human cloning completely[B]a law banning human cloning is to be passed in no time[C] privately funded researchers will respond positively to NBAC' s appeal[D]the issue of human cloning will soon be settledPassage 5Science, in practice, depends far less on the experiments it prepares than on the preparedness of the minds of the men who watch the experiments. Sir Isaac Newton supposedly discovered gravity through the fall of an apple. Apples had been falling in many places for centuries and thousands of people had seen them fall. But Newton for years had been curious about the cause of the orbital motion of the moon and planets. What kept them in place? Why didn' t they fall out of the sky? The fact that the apple fell down toward the earth and not up into the tree answered the question he had been asking himself about those lalger fruits of the heavens, the moon and the planets.How many men would have considered the possibility of an apple falling up into the tree? Newton did because he was not trying to predict anything. He was just wondering.His mind was ready for the unpredictable. Unpredictabllity is part of the essential nature of research. If you don' t have unpredictable things, you don' t have research. Scienltists tend to forget this when writing their cut and dried reports for the technical journals, but history is filled with examples of it.In talking to some scienlists, particularly younger ones, you might gather the impression that they find the "scientific melhod"a substitute for imaginative thought . I've attended research conferences where a scientist has been asked what he thinks about the advisability of continuing acertain experiment. The scientist has frowned, looked at the graphs, and said "the data are still inconclusive." "We know that, " the men from the budget office have said, "but what do you think? Is it worthwhile going on? What do you think we might expect?" The scientist has beenshocked at having even been asked to speculate.What this amounts to, of course, is that the scientist has become the victim of his own writ- ings. He has put forward unquestioned claims so consistently that he not only believes them him- self, but has convinced industrial and business management that they are true. If experiments are planned and carried out according to plan as faithfully as the reports in the science journals indi- cate , then it is perfectly logical for management to expect research to produce results measurable in dollars and cents. It is entirely reasonable for auditors to believe that scientists who know ex- actly where they are going and how they will get there should not be distracted by the necessity of keeping one eye on the cash register while the other eye is on the microscope. Nor, if regularity and conformity to a standard pattern are as desirable to the scientist as the writing of his papers would appear to reflect , is management to be blamed for discriminating against the "odd balls a-mong researchers in favor of more conventional thinkers who "work well with the team. "67. The author wants to prove with the example of Isaac Newton that __[A] inquiring minds are more important than scientific experiments[B] science advances when fruitful researches are conducted[C] scientists seldom forget the essential nature of research[D] unpredictability weighs less than prediction in scientific research68 . The author asserts that sclentists __[A] shouldn't replace "scientific method" with imaginative thought[ B] shouldn't neglect to speculate on unpredictable things[ C] should write more concise reports for technical journals[D]should be confident about their research findings69. It seems that some young scientists__[A]have a keen interest in prediction[B]often speculate on the future[C] think highly of creative thinking[D]stick to "scientific method"70. The author implies that the results of scientific research__[A]may not be as profitable as they are expected[B]can be measured in dollars and cents[C] rely on conformity to a standard pattern[D]are mostly underestimated by managementPart IV: English-Chinese Translation71) While there are almost as many definitions of history as there are historians,modern practice most closely conforms to one that sees history as the attempt to recreate and explain the significant events of the past. Caught in the web of its own time and place, each generation ofhistorians determines anew what is significant for it in the past. In thls search the evidence found is always incomplete and scattered; it is also frequently partial or partisan. The irony of the histo- rian' s craft is that its practitioners always know that their efforts are but contributions to an un- ending process .72) Interest in historical methods has arisen less through external challenge to the validity of history as an intellectual discipline and more from internal quarrels among historians themselves.While history once revered its affinity to literature and philosophy, the emerging social sciences seemed to afford greater opportunities for asking new questtons and providing rewarding ap- proaches to an understanding of the past. Social science methodologies had to be adapted to a dis- cipline governed by the primacy of historical sources rather than the imperatives of the contempo- rary world. 73) During this transfer , traditional historical methods were augmented by additional methodologies designed to interpret the new forms of evidence in the historical study.Methodology is a term that remains inherently ambiguous in the historical profession. 74 ) There is no agreement whether methodology refers to the concepts peculiar to historical work in general or to the research techniques appropriate to the various branches of historical inquiry. His-torians, especially those so blinded by their research interests that they have been accused of "tun- nel method , " frequently fall victim to the "technicist fallacy. " Also common in the natural sci- ences , the technicist fallacy mistakenly identifies the discipline as a whole with certain parts of its technical implementation. 75 ) It applies equally to traditional historians who view history as only the external and intemal criticism of sources, and to social science historians who equate their ac- tivity with specific techniques.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
1998年第三篇阅读英语一考研
（原创版）
目录
1.1998 年考研英语阅读理解第三篇概述
2.文章主题：批评滥贴"反科学"标签
3.文章结构：
1) 引言：提出问题
2) 主体：阐述反科学的观点以及例子
3) 结论：呼吁停止滥用“反科学”标签
4.文章细节：
1) 提到的人物和组织：Gallileo、Catholic Church、William Blake、Isaac Newton、Paul R.Gross、University of Virginia、Norman Levitt、Rutgers University、Carl Sagan、Republicans
2) 提到的科学问题：科学和宗教、信息过载、反科学思潮、科学
和民主
正文
1998 年考研英语阅读理解第三篇概述
本文是一篇批评滥贴"反科学"标签的文章。
文章通过阐述反科学的观点以及例子，呼吁停止滥用“反科学”标签。
文章主题：批评滥贴"反科学"标签
近年来，社会上出现一股反科学思潮，人们开始滥用“反科学”标签。
在这篇文章中，作者对这一现象进行了批评。
文章结构：
1) 引言：提出问题
作者首先提出了一个问题：在当今信息过载的时代，我们是否应该对滥用“反科学”标签的现象进行反思？
2) 主体：阐述反科学的观点以及例子
接下来，作者阐述了反科学的观点，并列举了一些例子。
这些例子包括：
- Gallileo：Gallileo 是文艺复兴时期的一位科学家，他因主张日心说而受到 Catholic Church 的迫害。
- William Blake：William Blake 是 18 世纪的一位诗人，他提出了“反科学”观点，认为科学会限制人类的想象力。
- Isaac Newton：Isaac Newton 是 17 世纪的一位科学家，他通过实验和观察总结出了万有引力定律。
然而，在当今信息过载的时代，人们开始对科学产生怀疑。
- Paul R.Gross：Paul R.Gross 是一位社会学家，他在文章中提到，民主和科学之间存在一定的冲突。
- University of Virginia：Norman Levitt 是该大学的一位教授，他提出了“反科学”标签滥用的问题。
- Rutgers University：Carl Sagan 是该大学的一位教授，他是一位著名的天文学家和科普作家，他对反科学思潮进行了批判。
- Republicans：一些共和党人被指责为反科学，因为他们在诸如气候变化等问题上持怀疑态度。
3) 结论：呼吁停止滥用“反科学”标签
作者在文章的结尾呼吁停止滥用“反科学”标签。