Response to Reviewers
土木工程学报外审流程
土木工程学报外审流程英文回答：The review process for the Journal of Civil Engineering is designed to ensure the quality and rigor of the published papers. The journal follows a double-blind peer review process, in which the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential.The review process begins when a manuscript is submitted to the journal. The manuscript is then assigned to an editor, who selects two reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. The reviewers are asked to provide a written evaluation of the manuscript, including their assessment of the research methods, the results, and the overall significance of the paper.The reviewers' comments are then sent to the authors, who are given an opportunity to respond. The authors may revise the manuscript in light of the reviewers' comments,and they may also provide a point-by-point response to the reviewers' concerns.The editor then makes a final decision on whether to accept or reject the manuscript. The editor's decision is based on the reviewers' comments, the authors' response to the reviewers' comments, and the editor's own assessment of the manuscript.中文回答：土木工程学报的外审流程旨在确保发表论文的质量和严谨性。
SCI的coverletter+催稿信+修稿回复复习课程
SCI的coverletter+催稿信+修稿回复复习课程S C I的c o v e r l e t t e r+催稿信+修稿回复一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××Dear Editor, I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript which is submitted on Jun 24. The manuscript number is “SERREV-D- 14-00023” and title is “Prediction a nd Structural Analysis of Impact Factor for Journals Indexed in SCI: A Case Study of Nature”. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for me. With best regards Sincerely yoursSCI投稿---稿件状态咨询信四个范例范例一（推荐）：邮件标题：Inquire about the status of manuscript (No: XXXX) 正文：Dear Editor,Sorry for disturbing you.I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled "XXXX" (ID: XXXX) although the status of "QUEUED FOR REVIEW" for my manuscript have been lasting for XXXX months.I am just wondering that my manuscript has been send to reviewers or not?I am very pleased to hear from you. Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,XXXE-mail: xxx@xxxx范例二：Dear Editor,It has been 4 months since we submitted our manuscript(ID:je-2008-00649n)to the journal office. I write this email to ask whether our paper has been accepted. And if is still being reviewed, when can I get the information of the final result?I would very much appreciate you if you could afford a little time to answer these question.Thank a lot!XXXX范例三：Dear Editor,I'm the first author of the article (No. ********) submitted to your journal about 3 months ago. I'm sorry writing to you to askabout its review progress. Many thanks and looking forward for your reply!Best wishes!Yours sincerely,*******范例四：Dear editor,Paper No.: ***Paper Title: ***We submitted the paper three months ago. Could you give us update information on the current status of our submission? If there is anything that we can do, please let us know. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for your time.Yours sincerelyXXXX三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）: On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you andreviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
SCI的coverletter催稿信修稿回复
S C I的c o v e r l e t t e r催稿信修稿回复文档编制序号：[KKIDT-LLE0828-LLETD298-POI08]一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:？Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not？I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!？Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:？Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××Dear Editor, I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submit ted manuscript which is submitted on Jun 24. The manuscript number is “SERREV-D-14-00023” and title is “Prediction and Structural Analysis of Impact Factor for Journals Indexed in SCI: A Case Study of Nature”. I have not yet received a reply and am wonder ing whether you have reached a decision. I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for me. With best regards Sincerely yoursSCI投稿---稿件状态咨询信四个范例范例一（推荐）：邮件标题：Inquire about the status of manuscript (No: XXXX)正文：Dear Editor,Sorry for disturbing you.I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled "XXXX" (ID: XXXX) although the status of "QUEUED FOR REVIEW" for my manuscript have been lasting for XXXX months.I am just wondering that my manuscript has been send to reviewers or notI am very pleased to hear from you. Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,XXXE-mail: xxx@xxxx范例二：Dear Editor,It has been 4 months since we submitted our manuscript(ID:je-2008-00649n)to the journal office. I write this email to ask whether our paper has been accepted. And if is still being reviewed, when can I get the information of the final resultI would very much appreciate you if you could afford a little time to answer these question.Thank a lot!XXXX范例三：Dear Editor,I'm the first author of the article (No. ********) submitted to your journal about 3 months ago. I'm sorry writing to you to ask about its review progress. Many thanks and looking forward for your reply!Best wishes!Yours sincerely,*******范例四：Dear editor,Paper No.: ***Paper Title: ***We submitted the paper three months ago. Could you give us update information on the current status of our submission If there is anything that we can do, please let us know. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for your time.Yours sincerelyXXXX三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:？1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
(完整word版)英文回复信范例 Response Letter
Dear Editors and Reviewers,Thank you for your letter and comments on our manuscript titled “Temporal variability in soil moisture after thinning in semi—arid Picea crassifolia plantations in northwestern China” (FORECO_2017_459)。
These comments helped us improve our manuscript, and provided important guidance for future research。
We have addressed the editor’s and the reviewers’comments to the best of our abilities, and revised text to meet the Forest Ecology and Management style requirements。
We hope this meets your requirements for a publication.We marked the revised portions in red and highlighted them yellow in the manuscript。
The main comments and our specific responses are detailed below:Editor：Please explain how the results in this paper are significantly different from those in Zhu, X., He， Z。
B。
文章修改稿Cover Letter 模版
Dear *****,The review of your manuscript, Thermal Decomposition and Kinetics Studies on 1, 4-dinitropiperazine (DNP), submitted to Journal of Hazardous Materials has been completed. The reviewers recommend the need for minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript according to the reviewers' comments attached, and re-submit tome your revised version of the manuscript including an itemized response to each reviewer's comments.Please submit your revised submission before Jul 11, 2007. I will then begin the re-review process.Please note that revised manuscripts will be sent for review because revising a manuscript does not automatically mean it will be accepted for publication.For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.Please ensure that the article conforms to the format of the Journal. In particular make sure that all the articles in your references have titles included. The Journal Guide for Authors is available on the Journal homepage /locate/hazmatWhen submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.Once again, thank you for your interest in Journal of Hazardous Materials.Yours sincerely,Merv Fingas, PhDEditor Journal of Hazardous MaterialsReviewers' comments:Reviewer #1: The paper reports on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of DNP. It is a welcome addition to the literature and acceptable for publication after some revision:(i) Please provide large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP.(ii) Please assign ALL IR bands of Fig. 5Reviewer #2: authors have carried out work on the thermal analysis of the dinitropiperazine. The new information reported in the paper is scanty. The large amount of data has been already reported by the several researchers on the thermal analysis of dinitropiperazine (See the reference section of the paper and also reviewer has done thescopussearch). The only new information reported in this paper is of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. There is not much novelty in the reported work. The Table 1 and figure 1 need to be deleted from the paper since it isalready well reported in the literature.Table2 and figure 3 gives the same information. Authors are requested to delete Table 2 and the same information may be explained in the results and discussion part of the paper. May i also kindly request authors to update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper using Chemical abstracts on disk (CA on CD)data base. The quality and clarity of the figures in the paper need to be improved. English need to be improved. The paper is recommended for short communication after the minor revision.Reviewer #3: The paper is okay in terms of contents. However, since it has been written by a Chinese, the English is very poor and as such requires a lot of corrections and editing by your team. The authors have used ozawa and Kissenger methods to find out activation energy. However, they have given data for activation energy by ozawa methodonly under 3.4 thermal decomposition kinetics).The data for Eo by Kissenger methods should also be included in the paper. Also, captions of Figs1,3 &5 are missing.Reviewer #4: This paper is promising but could be improved by better kinetic analysis.1. Kissinger's method is OK as a first approximation, but Friedman's method is the best isoconversional method. Even Ozawa has abandoned his method in favor ofFriedman's.2. The method of comparing a large number of kinetic modelsagainst data at a single heating rate (page 5) is invalid, discredited, and should not be published. This issue has been discussed in several papers by Vyzovkin and in ainternational kinetic study published by Brown et al, Thermochemica Acta 355, 125-143, 2000, and following papers. Consequently, there is no real evidence presented that the equation is first-order. In fact, from my studies of energetic materials, including RDX and HMX, I would have thought that nucleation-growth kinetics would be mostappropriate. However, I would have to do a more rigorous kinetic analysis of the data to know for sure.3. The best way to judge a kinetic model is how it compares with data at multiple heating rates (using a single set of parameters). Such a comparison is not present in this paper, so it is difficult to judge the validity of the kineticparameters.4. The author's discussion of HMX kinetics is good in some respects but out of date in others. More recent papers by multiple institutions place the activation energy for HMX closer to 150 kJ/mol. A commonly cited paper on this is by Wight and Vyazovkin, Ann Rev Phys Chem 48, 119, 1997. A more recent but harder paper toget is by Burnham and Weese in the proceedings of the 2005 ICT conference. Henson has published a correlation in the detonation symposium showing that explosiontimes scalewith an activation energy of about 150 kJ/mol. Active workers in energetic materials should have access to these materials. 看完了这个,是不是会觉得很头疼,是的老外就是这么认真.要求很具体仔细,审稿细致深入.下面就是看你怎么样回复这篇审稿意见了.我回复后的第三天就收到论文录用通知,估计他们没有再次送给审稿专家重审.因为我的Cover Letter他很满意,我是这样写的:Dear ***,My manuscript, *********************（论文题目）, was revised according to there viewers' comments, and the itemized response to each reviewer’s comments is attached. Many thanks for your suggestion. I am so sorry to bring you so much trouble because of our careless. Correspondence and phone calls about this paper should be directed to ****（作者）at the following address，phone and e-mail：Address:*********Tel.: ********Fax:*******E-mail: ********** Thanks very much again for your attention to our paper．Once again, thank you for your help to our paper processing. Yours sincerely，******For your guidance, itemized response to each reviewer’s comments is appended below.Dear reviewer #1:(i) Suhithi M. Peiris, Richard, etc. (J. Phys. Chem. A, 104 (39), 8898 -8907, 2000.10.1021) had already reported large basis-set DFT calculations to support theassignmentof the IR bands of DNP.(ii) We assigned all IR bands of Fig.5 (now change to fig.8).(iii) Because of the IR study had been reported, the IR spectra (fig.1) wasdeleted form the paper. Anyway, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.? Dear reviewer #2:(i) G. V. Sitonina, etc. (Russian Chemical Bulletin, V ol.28, 284-288) A study has been made of the kinetics of thermal decomposition of dinitropiperazine, in melts and insolution. As you said, the only new information reported in this paperis of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to theexisting scientific data base. Nevertheless, the kinetics study in our paper isa supplement which is with multi-heating rate method.(ii) The Table 1 and figure 1 was deleted from the paper and the correlative references were put forward.(iii) Table 2was deleted and the same information was explained in the results and discussion part of the paper.(iv) We had update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper and enriched the introduction of the paper.(v) The figures were drawn again and the quality and clarity of them were improved.(vi) English expression was improved a littl e and it’s my great honor to ask your help on the language aspect.Dear reviewer #3:(i) As a Chinese, our English is very poor and a few of corrections and editing had done by our team.(ii) Now we only used Ozawa method to find out activation energy and you can check it in our paper again. According to reviewer #4, Kissinger method is invalid,discredited, and should not be published.(iii) Figures and captions of them are changed.(iv) At last, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.Dear reviewer #4:(i) This paper was improved by a better kinetic analysis. The kinetic parameters were established by Ozawa's isoconversional method because there is no Friedman's calculation program in our institute.(ii) As you just said, the method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at asingle heating rate is invalid. After the kinetic study by isoconversional method with data at multiple heating rates, we found that nucleation-growth kinetics is moreappropriate. You are seasoned in these aspects and it’s my great honor to ask your advice on these sorts of aspects.(iii) In order to judge a kinetic model, we did acomparison a single heating rate method with multi-heating method, and at last the kinetic parameters were judged. iv. You are right; the discussion of HMX kinetics is reall yout of date. The activation energy for HMX is closer to 150 kJ/mol. We had done the improvements in our paper. v. From your c omments, it’s obvious that you are an expertin thermo analysis, and there is lots of shortage in our study which need your instruction. At last, I want to thank you sincerely for your suggestions and I feel so sorry that so much of your precious time was wasted on our paper revision.认真对待修改意见.一般论文投到国外,如果满足期刊内容要求的前提下,一般会给你一个修改意见,不会直接拒绝.即使拒绝也是在第一次修改不满足要求的情况下拒绝的.他们想的是你改都改不好,还有什么话说.最后,我希望大家多多发表高质量的科技论文,多到国外投稿,这样不是为了多几篇SCI,是多增加国际交流,给自身的发展创造条件.特别是对于想出国深造的研究学者们.谨以此和大家共勉!本文多有论述不当之处,望大家批评指正!谢谢!。
（完整word版）一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
（完整word版）一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
14--SCI-论文写作与投稿步骤和要领
修改稿 Cover letter
• Dear Dr/ Prof.. : • On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an
opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration. • We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you. • Thank you and best regards. • Yours sincerely, • Corresponding author:Name: ××× • E-mail: ××××@××××
SCI的coverletter催稿信修稿回复
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated ……简要介绍一下论文的创新性. I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1 Name A E-mail: ××××××××2 Name B E-mail: ××××××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. ID: 文章稿号, although the status of “With Editor”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or notI would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regardsYours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××Dear Editor, I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript which is submitted on Jun 24. The manuscript number is “SERREV-D-14-00023” and title is “Prediction and Structural Analysis of Impact Factor for Journ als Indexed in SCI: A Case Study of Nature”. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for me. With best regards Sincerely yoursSCI投稿---稿件状态咨询信四个范例范例一推荐：邮件标题：Inquire about the status of manuscript No: XXXX正文：Dear Editor,Sorry for disturbing you.I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled "XXXX" ID: XXXX although the status of "QUEUED FOR REVIEW" for my manuscript have been lasting for XXXX months.I am just wondering that my manuscript has been send to reviewers or notI am very pleased to hear from you. Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,XXXE-mail: xxxxxxx范例二：Dear Editor,It has been 4 months since we submitted our manuscriptID:je-2008-00649nto the journal office.I write this email to ask whether our paper has been accepted. And if is still being reviewed, when can I get the information of the final resultI would very much appreciate you if you could afford a little time to answer these question. Thank a lotXXXX范例三：Dear Editor,I'm the first author of the article No. submitted to your journal about 3 months ago. I'm sorry writing to you to ask about its review progress. Many thanks and looking forward for your replyBest wishesYours sincerely,范例四：Dear editor,Paper No.:Paper Title:We submitted the paper three months ago. Could you give us update information on the current status of our submission If there is anything that we can do, please let us know. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for your time.Yours sincerelyXXXX三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..写上负责你文章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能用通用的Editors:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructivecomments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. ID: 文章稿号.We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××四、修改稿回答人的意见最重要的部分List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”ID: 文章稿号. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer 1:1. Response to comment: ……简要列出意见……Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: ……简要列出意见……Response: ××××××;;;;;;逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your good comments.Reviewer 2:同上述Reviewer 3:××××××Other changes:1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……”were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……”was added3. Line 129, “……”was deleted××××××We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript.These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编根据需要Dear Prof. ××××××:Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××六、询问校稿信件如果文章接受后时间较长Dear ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title”ID: 文章稿号, since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from youI would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××七、文章校稿信件Dear Mr. ×××:Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title”ID: 文章稿号for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.Corrections:1. In should be Page , Right column, line2. In the “”should be “”Page , Right column, lineAnswers for “author queries”:1. .2.3.We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××。
(完整版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar， spelling，and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader。
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study。
Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided。
3、对于研究设计的rationale：Also， there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design。
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated。
For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
催稿信模板
Dear editor：I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript. My manuscript, 。
.....。
.。
(。
..。
..），has been submitted to your journal on MAR. 25 2010. The status of ” under review ” for my manus cript has been lasting for approximately five monthes. I would be grateful if you could let me know any further information about my manuscript at your earliest convenience.With best regards！Yours sincerelyDear Prof。
×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号）, although the status of “With Editor" has been lasting for more than two months，since submitted to journal three months ago。
I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not？I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments。