商业模式的相关外文文献

商业模式的相关外文文献
商业模式的相关外文文献

西安邮电大学

毕业设计(论文)

外文文献翻译

学院:经济与管理学院

专业:市场营销

班级:营销0802

学生姓名:薛春林

导师姓名:欧晓华职称:讲师

起止时间:2010年12月20日至2011年6月20日

英文原文

Overview of business model

A business mode l describes the rationale of how an organization creates, delivers, and captures value[1] (economic, social, or other forms of value). The process of business model construction is part of business strategy.

In theory and practice the term business model is used for a broad range of informal and formal descriptions to represent core aspects of a business, including purpose, offerings, strategies, infrastructure, organizational structures, trading practices, and operational processes and policies. The literature has provided very diverse interpretations and definitions of a business model. A systematic review and analysis of manager responses to a survey defines business models as the design of organizational structures to enact a commercial opportunity[2]. Further extensions to this design logic emphasize the use of narrative or coherence in business model descriptions as mechanisms by which entrepreneurs create extraordinarily successful growth firms [3].

Whenever a business is established, it either explicitly or implicitly employs a particular business model that describes the architecture of the value creation, delivery, and capture mechanisms employed by the business enterprise. The essence of a business model is that it defines the manner by which the business enterprise delivers value to customers, entices customers to pay for value, and converts those payments

to profit: it thus reflects managemen t’s hypothesis about what customers want, how they want it, and how an enterprise can organize to best meet those needs, get paid for doing so, and make a profit.[4]

Business models are used to describe and classify businesses (especially in an entrepreneurial setting), but they are also used by managers inside companies to explore possibilities for future development. Also, well known business models operate as recipes for creative managers.[5] Business models are also referred to in some instances within the context of accounting for purposes of public reporting.

Over the years, business models have become much more sophisticated. The bait and hook business model (also referred to as the "razor and blades business model" or the

"tied products business model") was introduced in the early 20th century. This involves offering a basic product at a very low cost, often at a loss (the "bait"), then charging compensatory recurring amounts for refills or associated products or services (the "hook"). Examples include: razor (bait) and blades (hook); cell phones (bait) and air time (hook); computer printers (bait) and ink cartridge refills (hook); and cameras (bait) and prints (hook). An interesting variant of this model is Adobe, a software developer that gives away its document reader free of charge but charges several hundred dollars for its document writer.

In the 1950s, new business models came from McDonald's Restaurants and Toyota. In the 1960s, the innovators were Wal-Mart and Hypermarkets. The 1970s saw new business models from FedEx and Toys R Us; the 1980s from Blockbuster, Home Depot, Intel, and Dell Computer; the 1990s from Southwest Airlines, Netflix, eBay, https://www.360docs.net/doc/e817394982.html,, and Starbucks.

Today, the type of business models might depend on how technology is used. For example, entrepreneurs on the internet have also created entirely new models that depend entirely on existing or emergent technology. Using technology, businesses can reach a large number of customers with minimal costs.

Business model frameworks

There are various ways to define and conceptualize business models. In the following some of these conceptualizations are introduced.

Business model canvas

Business Model Canvas: Nine business model building blocks, Osterwalder, Pigneur, & al. 2010[1]

Osterwalder's work [1][6] propose a single reference model, called Business Model Canvas based on the similarities of a wide range of business model conceptualizations. It is nowadays one of the most used frameworks for describing the elements of business models.

With this business model design template, an enterprise can easily describe their business model. Aspects of the template are Infrastructure, Offering, Customers, Finances, etc.

Other approaches

?Business reference model

Business reference model is a reference model, concentrating on the architectural aspects of the core business of an enterprise, service organization or government agency.

?Component business model

Technique developed by IBM to model and analyze an enterprise. It is a logical representation or map of business components or "building blocks" and can be depicted on a single page. It can be used to analyze the alignment of enterprise strategy with the organization's capabilities and investments, identify redundant or overlapping business capabilities, etc.

Although Webvan failed in its goal of disintermediating the North American supermarket industry, several supermarket chains (like Safeway Inc.) have launched their own delivery services to target the niche market to which Webvan catered.

?Industrialization of services business model

Business model used in strategic management and services marketing that treats service provision as an industrial process, subject to industrial optimization procedures

Business Modelling

Business Modelling is an important tool to capture, design, innovate and transform the business.[7] However, in order to transform ones organization and align them to ones business model, a business model should not be seen separately, but in connection with[8]:

A step-by-step roadmap that describes the synergy and context between Business

Model and alignment of Strategy Map, Scorecards, etc. into the organization.

?The main business goals of the organization, e.g. strategic business objectives, critical success factors and key performance indicators, which a holistic

business model approach should include.

?The main business Issues/pain points and thereby organizational weakness, which a holistic business model approach should include for they represent the threat to the company’s business model.

? A clear cause and effect linkages between the competencies, desired outcomes and performance measurements e.g. scorecards.

?An emphasis on business model management and thereby a continuous improvement and governance approach to the business model.

?The business maturity level, in order to develop the organization

representation of core differentiated and core competitive competencies

[linked to strategy], which is a basis for building a business model as they the

represent some of the most important sources of uniqueness. These are the

things that a company can do uniquely well, and that no-one else can copy

quickly enough to affect competition.

?Linkages among competences and competency development.

?The possible value creation and realization of the organization.

?The information flow, and thereby information need for effective and efficient decision making.

Such a holistic approach would help clarify both intent and sources of synergy and disconnect between business model, strategy, scorecards, information, innovation, processes and IT systems. This includes architectural alignment as well as business transformation and value and performance views. Such dialogues allow Executives to use the business model with their business alignment.

Theoretical and empirical insights to business models

Design Logic and Narrative Coherence

Design logic views the business model as an outcome of creating new organizational structures or changing existing structures to pursue a new opportunity. Gerry George and Adam Bock (2011) conducted a comprehensive literature review and surveyed

managers to understand how they perceived the components of a business model. In that analysis, these authors show that there is a design logic behind how entrepreneurs and managers perceive and explain their business model. In further extensions to the design logic, George and Bock (2012) use case studies and the IBM survey data on business models in large companies to describe how CEOs and entrepreneurs create narratives or stories in a coherent manner to move the business from one opportunity to another. They also show that when the narrative is incoherent or the components of the story are misaligned that these businesses tend to fail. They recommend ways in which the entrepreneur or CEO can create strong narratives for change.

Business Model 2.0

Chen (2009) pointed out that the business model in the twenty-first century has to take into account the capabilities of Web 2.0, such as collective intelligence, network effects, user generated content, and the possibility of self-improving systems. He suggested that the service industry such as the airline, traffic, transportation, hotel, restaurant, Information and Communications Technology and Online gaming industries will be able to benefit in adopting business models that take into account the characteristics of Web 2.0. He also emphasized that Business Model 2.0 has to take into account not just the technology effect of Web 2.0 but also the networking effect. He gave the example of the success story of Amazon in making huge profits each year by developing a full blown open platform that supports a large and thriving community of companies that re-use Amazon’s On Demand commerce services.[9]

Complementarities of business models between partnering firms

Studying collaborative research and the accessing of external sources of technology, Hummel et al. (2010) found that in deciding on business partners, it is important to make sure that both parties’ business models are complementary[10]. For example, they found that it was important to identify the value drivers of potential partners by analyzing their business models, and that it is beneficial to find partner firms that understand key aspects of our own firm’s business model.[11]

Applications

Malone et al.[12] at MIT found that some business models, as defined by them, indeed performed better than others in a dataset consisting of the largest U.S. firms, in the period 1998 through 2002, while they did not prove whether the existence of a business model mattered.

The concept of a business model has been incorporated into certain accounting standards. For example, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) utilizes an "entity's business model for managing the financial assets" as a criterion for determining whether such assets should be measured at amortized cost or at fair value in its financial instruments accounting standard, IFRS 9.[13][14][15][16] At least two members of the U.S. based Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have expressed the position that the business model of an entity should be used as a criterion for the classification of financial liabilities.[17] The concept of business model has also been introduced into the accounting of deferred taxes under International Financial Reporting Standards with 2010 amendments to IAS 12 addressing deferred taxes related to investment property.[18][19][20]

Both IASB and FASB have proposed using the concept of business model in the context of reporting a lessor's lease income and lease expense within their joint project on accounting for leases.[21][22] The concept has also been proposed as an approach for determining the measurement and classification when accounting for insurance contracts.[23][24] As a result of the increasing prominence the concept of business model has received in the context of financial reporting, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which advises the European Union on endorsement of financial reporting standards, commenced a project on the "Role of the Business Model in Financial Reporting" in 2011.[25]

Examples of Business models

In the early history of business models it was very typical to define business model types such as bricks-and-mortar or e-broker. However, these types usually describe only one aspect of the business (most often revenue model). Therefore, more recent literature on business models concentrates on describing business model as a whole instead of one most visible aspect. Following examples provide an overview for various business model types that have been in discussion since the invent of term business model:

中文译文

商业模式概述

商业模式业务模型描述了如何创建组织的理由,提供和捕捉价值(经济,社会,或其他形式的价值)。商业模式建设的过程,是业务战略的一部分。

在理论和实践中商业模式是用于范围广泛的正式和非正式的描述,代表企业的核心业务,包括目的,产品,战略,基础设施,组织结构,贸易惯例,业务流程和政策。文献提供的商业模式有着不同的解释和定义。系统回顾和分析的一项调查显示,作为组织结构的设计,用制定一个商业机会来定义的商业模式。这种设计逻辑的进一步扩展,强调叙事的连贯性,或在业务模型描述的机制使用由企业家创造非常成功的增长企业。

每当一个企业成立的,明示或暗示了其采用的特殊商业模式,介绍了创造价值,交付,企业利润的捕获机制的架构。一个商业模式的本质是,它定义的商业企业,通过提供价值客户,诱使客户支付的价值,以及将这些款项转换获利的方式:它因此反映管理层的假设客户想要什么,如果他们想要它,一个企业如何组织,以更好地满足这些需求,怎样做支付,并赚取利润。

商业模式是用来描述和分类,企业(尤其是在创业的设置),但他们也由企业内部的管理人员使用,以探索未来发展的可能性。此外,众所周知的商业模式运作,创意商业模式也被称为在某些情况下,公开报告在会计方面。

多年来,商业模式变得更为复杂。20世纪初,出现了诱饵和钩的商业模式(也称为“剃刀和刀片商业模式”或“捆绑产品的商业模式”)。这涉及到在一个非常低的成本提供一个基本的产品,往往处于亏损状态(“诱饵”),然后充电笔芯或相关产品或服务(“钩子”)的补偿经常金额。例子包括:剃须刀(饵)和刀片(钩),手机(饵)和空气中的时间(钩);电脑打印机(饵)和墨盒笔芯(钩),相机(饵)和照片(钩)。这种模式的一个有趣的变种是Adobe,软件开发,其文档阅读器的费用,但其文档作家的收费几百元的免费赠送。在20世纪50年代,新的商业模式来自麦当劳和丰田。在20世纪60年代,创新是沃尔玛和大卖场。20世纪70年代从联邦快递公司和玩具反斗城看到新的商业模式; 20世纪80年代,20世纪90年代从西南航空公司,Netflix公司,易趣,亚马逊,星巴克一鸣惊人,家得宝,英特尔,戴尔电脑。

今天,商业模式的类型可能取决于如何运用技术。例如,在互联网上的企业家们也创造了全新的模式完全依赖于现有或新兴技术。利用技术,企业可以用最低的成本达到了大批客户。

商业模式框架。有各种不同的方式定义和概念的商业模式。在下面的这些概

念化的一些介绍。商业模式的分类:九个业务模型积木,Osterwalder,Pigneur,与人的。 2010osterwalder的工作提出一个单一的参考模型,被称为商业模式帆布基于广泛的业务模式概念化的相似之处。这是时下最常用的框架描述商业模式的元素之一。与这种商业模式的设计模板,企业可以很容易地描述他们的商业模式。模板方面的基础设施,发售,客户,财务等其他方法。

?业务参考模型是一个参考模型,专注于核心业务的企业,服务组织或政府机构的建筑方面。

?组件的商业模式由IBM开发的技术进行建模和分析企业。这是一个合乎逻辑的陈述或业务组件或“积木”的地图,并可以在一个页面上描绘。它可以用来对准企业战略与组织的能力和投资分析,找出重复或重叠的业务能力,等等。北美超市行业disintermediating目标虽然Webvan的失败,一些连锁超市(如Safeway的公司)纷纷推出自己的送货服务Webvan的照顾瞄准利基市场。

?产业化服务的业务模式在战略管理和服务营销提供服务当作一个工业过程中使用的商业模式,产业优化程序商业模型商业模型是一个重要的工具,捕捉,设计,创新和改造业务。然而,为了改造的组织和调整他们的商业模式,商业模式不应该被视为分开,但在与一步一步的路线图,描述商业模式和战略地图,记分卡等调整到组织之间的协同和上下文。

?该组织的主要业务目标,例如:业务战略目标,关键成功因素和关键绩效指标,其中一个全面的商业模式的方法应包括,主营业务问题、痛点和弱点,从而组织,一个整体的商业模式的方法应包括为他们所代表的公司的商业模式的威胁、明确病因的能力,预期成果和业绩测量与效果之间的联系,例如记分卡。强调业务管理模式,从而连续的改善和治理方法的商业模式。

?业务的成熟程度,以发展核心的差异化和核心竞争能力的组织表示策略,这是为建立一个业务模型的基础上,作为他们的代表的一些独特的最重要来源。这些公司可以做的唯一的事情,并没有其他人可以迅速复制到足以影响竞争。能力和能力发展之间的联系。该组织可能创造价值和实现。信息流,从而为有效和高效的决策信息需求。这种整体性的办法,将有助于澄清意图和协同来源和断开之间的商业模式,战略,记分卡,信息,创新,流程和IT系统。这包括建筑对齐,以及业务转型和价值和性能的意见。这样的话,允许管理人员使用的业务模式与业务对齐的。

商业模式的理论和实证,我们通过商业模式来见解设计逻辑和叙事的连贯性设计逻辑视为创造新的组织结构,或改变现有结构,以追求一个新的机会。乔治·格里和亚当·博克(2011)进行了全面的文献回顾和调查的经理,以了解他们认为一种商业模式的组成部分。在分析,这些表明,有一个背后的企业家和管

理者如何看待和解释他们的商业模式的设计逻辑。在设计逻辑的进一步扩展,乔治和Bock(2012)利用案例研究和对IBM的业务模式在大型企业的调查数据来描述的CEO和企业家如何建立在一个连贯的方式叙述或故事,从一个机会移动业务另一个。他们还表明,当是不连贯的叙述或故事的组成部分是错位,这些企业往往要失败的。他们建议在企业家或CEO的变化可以创建强大的叙事方式。

商业模式2.0,在二十一世纪的商业模式考虑到了Web 2.0的功能,如集体智慧,网络效应,用户生成的内容,和自我提高的系统的可能性。他认为,服务行业,如航空,交通,运输,酒店,餐饮,信息和通信技术和网络游戏产业将能够受益于采用的商业模式,考虑到Web 2.0的特点。他还强调,商业模式2.0

考虑到不只是Web 2.0技术的效果,但也是网络效应。每年由开发一个完全成熟的开放式平台,支持大公司重新使用亚马逊的按需电子商务服务,例如亚马逊的成功故事。

合作公司的商业模式之间的互补性学习合作研究和技术,赫梅尔等外部来源的资料存取发现,在决定业务合作伙伴,重要的是,以确保双方的商业模式是相辅相成的。例如,他们发现,重要的是,以确定潜在的合作伙伴,通过分析其业务模式的价值驱动因素,并寻找合作伙伴公司,了解我们自己公司的商业模式的关键环节,它是有益的。马龙等人发现,在麻省理工学院的一些商业模式,他们的定义,确实表现比别人更好的在最大的美国公司组成的数据集,在1998年期间,到2002年,而他们并不能证明是否存在重要的商业模式。

一种商业模式的概念已被纳入一定的会计准则。例如,在国际会计准则委员会(IASB)的利用作为标准确定是否这些资产应该可以在摊销成本或以公允价值计量的金融工具的会计标准“的实体的金融资产管理业务模式”,国际财务报告准则第9号、美国财务会计准则委员会(FASB)至少有两名成员所表达的立场,应作为金融分类标准的业务实体模型负债。商业模式的概念也被引入递延税项的会计根据国际财务报告准则,2010修订处理有关投资物业递延税项国际会计准则第12。无论国际会计准则委员会和财务会计准则委员会已提出报告他们对会计的联合项目内的租赁1出租人的租赁收入和租赁费用的情况下使用的商业模式的概念已经也被提议作为一种确定方法占保险合同时,测量和分类作为一个日益突出的商业模式的概念已在财务报告中,欧洲财务报告咨询组(EFRAG),收到的意见欧洲联盟,通过财务报告准则“的经营模式,在财务报告中的作用”在2011年开始的一个项目。在早期历史中这是非常典型的定义,如砖和砂浆或电子经纪业务模式类型。然而,这些类型通常是描述业务的一个方面(最常见的收入模型)。因此,最近的文献集中在商业模式描述为一个最明显的方面,而不是整个商业模式。

零售企业营销策略中英文对照外文翻译文献

零售企业营销策略中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)

译文: 零售企业的营销策略 Philip Kotlor 今天的零售商为了招徕和挽留顾客,急欲寻找新的营销策略。过去,他们挽留顾客的方法是销售特别的或独特的花色品种,提供比竞争对手更多更好的服务提供商店信用卡是顾客能赊购商品。可是,现在这一切都已变得面目全非了。现在,诸如卡尔文·克连,依佐和李维等全国性品牌,不仅在大多数百货公司及其专营店可以看到,并且也可以在大型综合商场和折扣商店可以买到。全国性品牌的生产商为全力扩大销售量,它们将贴有品牌的商品到处销售。结果是零售商店的面貌越来越相似。 在服务项目上的分工差异在逐渐缩小。许多百货公司削减了服务项目,而许多折扣商店却增加了服务项目。顾客变成了精明的采购员,对价格更加敏感。他们看不出有什么道理要为相同的品牌付出更多的钱,特别是当服务的差别不大或微不足道时。由于银行信用卡越来越被所有的商家接受,他们觉得不必从每个商店赊购商品。 百货商店面对着日益增加的价格的折扣店和专业商店的竞争,准备东山再起。历史上居于市中心的许多商店在郊区购物中心开设分店,那里有宽敞的停车场,购买者来自人口增长较快并且有较高收入的地区。其他一些则对其商店形式进行改变,有些则试用邮购盒电话订货的方法。超级市场面对的是超级商店的竞争,它们开始扩大店面,经营大量的品种繁多的商品和提高设备等级,超级市场还增加了它们的促销预算,大量转向私人品牌,从而增加盈利。 现在,我们讨论零售商在目标市场、产品品种和采办、服务以及商店气氛、定价、促销和销售地点等方面的营销策略。 一、目标市场 零售商最重要的决策时确定目标市场。当确定目标市场并且勾勒出轮廓时,零售商才能对产品分配、商店装饰、广告词和广告媒体、价格水平等作出一致的决定。如沃尔玛的目标市场相当明确:

商业模式变革文献综述

商业模式变文献综述 1.商业模式的概念 彼得德鲁克说:“当今企业之间的竞争,不是产品之间的竞争,而是商业模式之间的竞争”。伴随着经济全球化的浪潮,商业模式的重要作用已得到各界的高度认可与重视。众多企业在有效利用商业模式的情况下,获得了巨大的收益。但对于商业模式的研究还是不够系统、完善。一般定义:为实现客户价值最大化,把能使企业运行的内外各要素整合起来,形成一个完整的高效率的具有独特核心竞争力的运行系统,并通过最优实现形式满足客户需求、实现客户价值,同时使系统达成持续赢利目标的整体解决方案。对于商业模式的真正含义,理论界没有形成统一的权威解释。笔者将对商业模式的四个角度对其概念进行综述。 经济(盈利)角度:经济类的定义仅仅将商业模式描述为企业的经济模式,其本质内涵为企业获取利润的逻辑。与此相关的变量包括收入来源、定价方法、成本结构、最优产量等。许多研究者都从这个角度对商业模式进行了概念界定和本质阐述。Stewart 等 ( 2000 ) 认为,商业模式是企业能够获得并且保持其收益流的逻辑陈述。Rappa ( 2000 ) 则认为商业模式的最根本内涵是企业为了自我维持,也就是赚取利润而经营商业的方法,从而清楚地说明企业如何在价值链 ( 价值系统) 上进行定位,从而获取利润。Hawkins ( 2001) 把商业模式看作是企业与其产品/ 服务之间的商务关系,一种构造各种成本和收入流的方式,通过创造收入来使企业得以生存。Af uah 等 ( 2001 ) 把商业模式定义为企业获取并使用资源,为顾客创造比竞争对手更多的价值以赚取利润的方法。商业模式详细说明了企业目前的利润获取方式、未来的长期获利规划,以及能够持续优于竞争对手和获得竞争优势的途径。 运营角度:运营类定义把商业模式描述为企业的运营结构,重点在于说明企业通过何种内部流程和基本构造设计来创造价值。与此相关的变量包括产品/ 服务的交付方式、管理流程、资源流、知识管理和后勤流等。也有许多研究者从这个角度对商业模式进行了概念界定和本质阐述。Timmers 将商业模式定义为表示产品、服务和信息流的架构,内容包含对不同商业参与主体(business actors) 及其作用、潜在利益和获利来源的描述。Mahadevan 认为,商业模式是企业与商业伙伴及买方之间价值流(value stream) 、收入流(revenuestream) 和物流(logistic stream) 的特定组合。Applegate 把商业模式说成是对复杂商业现实的简化。通过这种简化,商业模式可用来分析商业活动的结构、结构元素之间的关系以及商业活动响应现实世界的方式。Amit 等把商业模式看作是一种利用商业机会创造价值的交易内容、结构和治理架构。他们描述了由公司、供应商、候补者和客户组成的网络运作方式。 战略角度:战略类定义把商业模式描述为对不同企业战略方向的总体考察,涉及市场主张、组织行为、增长机会、竞争优势和可持续性等。与此相关的变量包括利益相关者识别、价值创造、差异化、愿景、价值、网络和联盟等。目前来看,国外对商业模式的定义大部分属于这个范畴。KMLab 顾问公司(2000) 将商业模式定义为关于企业如何在市场上创造价值的描述,内容包括企业的产品、服务、形象与配销的特定组合,还包括用以完成工作的人员与作业基础建设的基本组织。Linder 等(2000) 认为商业模式是组织或者商业系统创造价值的逻

市场营销_外文翻译_外文文献_英文文献_顾客满意策略与顾客满意

顾客满意策略与顾客满意营销 原文来源:《Marketing Customer Satisfaction 》自20世纪八十年代末以来, 顾客满意战略已日益成为各国企业占有更多的顾客份额, 获得竞争优势的整体经营手段。 一、顾客满意策略是现代企业获得顾客“货币选票”的法宝随着时代的变迁, 社会物质财富的极大充裕, 顾客中的主体———消费者的需求也先后跨越了物质缺乏的时代、追求数量的时代、追求品质的时代, 到了20世纪八十年代末进入了情感消费时代。在我国, 随着经济的高速发展,我们也已迅速跨越了物质缺乏时代、追求数量的时代乃至追求品质的时代, 到今天也逐步迈进情感消费时代。在情感消费时代, 各企业的同类产品早已达到同时、同质、同能、同价, 消费者追求的已不再是质量、功能和价格, 而是舒适、便利、安全、安心、速度、跃动、环保、清洁、愉快、有趣等,消费者日益关注的是产品能否为自己的生活带来活力、充实、舒适、美感和精神文化品位, 以及超越消费者期望值的售前、售中、售后服务和咨询。也就是说, 今天人们所追求的是具有“心的满足感和充实感”的商品, 是高附加值的商品和服务,追求价值观和意识多元化、个性化和无形的满足感的时代已经来临。 与消费者价值追求变化相适应的企业间的竞争, 也由产品竞争、价格竞争、技术竞争、广告竞争、品牌竞争发展到现今的形象竞争、信誉竞争、文化竞争和服务竞争, 即顾客满意竞争。这种竞争是企业在广角度、宽领域的时空范围内展开的高层次、体现综合实力的竞争。它包括组织创新力、技术创新力、管理创新力、产业预见力、产品研发力、员工向心力、服务顾客力、顾客亲和力、同行认同力、社会贡献力、公关传播沟通力、企业文化推动力、环境适应力等等。这些综合形象力和如何合成综合持久的竞争力, 这就是CSft略所要解决的问题。CS寸代,企业不再以“自己为中心”,而是以“顾客为中心”;“顾客为尊”、“顾客满意”不再是流于形式的口号, 而是以实实在在的行动为基础的企业经营的一门新哲学。企业不再以质量达标, 自己满意为经营理念, 而是以顾客满意, 赢得顾客高忠诚度为经营理念。企业经营策略的焦点不再以争取或保持市场占有率为主, 而是以争取顾客满意为经营理念。因此, 营销策略的重心不再放在竞争对手身上而是放在顾客身上, 放在顾客现实的、潜在的需求上。当企业提供的产品和服务达到了顾客事先的期望值, 顾客就基本满意;如果远远超越顾客的期望值, 且远远高于其他同行, 顾客才真正满意;如果企业能不断地或长久地令顾客满意, 顾客就会忠诚。忠诚的顾客不仅会经常性地重复购买, 还会购买企业其它相关的产品或服务;忠诚的顾客不仅会积极向别人推荐他所买的产品, 而且对企业竞争者的促销活动具有免疫能力一个不满意的顾客会将不满意告诉16-20个人, 而每一个被告知者会再传播给12-15个人。这样, 一个不满意者会影响到二、三百人。在互联网普及的今天, 其影响则更大。据美国汽车业的调查, 一个满意者会引发8笔潜在的生意, 其中至少有一笔会成交。而另一项调查表明, 企业每增加5%的忠诚顾客, 利润就会增长25%-95%。一个企业的80%的利润来自20%的忠诚顾客;而获取一个新顾客的成本是维持一个老顾客成本的6倍。所以,美国著名学者唐?佩 珀斯指出: 决定一个企业成功与否的关键不是市场份额, 而是在于顾客份额。 于是, 企业纷纷通过广泛细致的市场调研、与消费者直接接触、顾客信息反馈等方式来了解顾客在各方面的现实需求和潜在需求。依靠对企业满意忠诚的销售、服务人员, 定期、定量地对顾客满意度进行综合测定, 以便准确地把握企业经营中与“顾客满意” 目标的差距及其重点领域, 从而进一步改善企业的经营活动。依靠高亲和力的企业文化、高效率的人文管理和全员共同努力, 不断地向顾客提供高附加值的产品, 高水准的亲情般的服

商业模式、共生体与商业生态:案例与理论

商业模式、共生体与商业生态:案例与理论 魏炜朱武祥林桂平 摘要:商业模式是利益相关者的交易结构。以往研究主要关注只包括核心利益相关者、微观视角的商业模式或包括所有宽泛利益相关者、宏观视角的商业生态。本文在商业模式和商业生态之间建立起中观视角的新概念——共生体,为同个商业生态中不同商业模式的企业建立起同一个坐标系,使不同商业模式的企业之间进行比较成为可能;也为企业创新、重构商业模式提供更为广阔但又不过于宽泛的利益相关者视角。为更好阐述理论,本文采取DG公司的商业模式重构过程作为共生体概念导入、逻辑解释和理论体系建构的单案例研究样本。关键词:商业模式共生体商业生态利益相关者 Abstract: The essence of a business model defines a transaction structure that involves stakeholders. In this article, we examine the transaction structure, including transaction relationship, forms and so on, among these stakeholders, and introduce a new concept of “symbiont”, the aggregation of the business model of the focal firm as well as the business models of its stakeholders. By proposing this innovative concept, we bridge the gap between macro (Business Ecosystem) and micro (Business Model) views and therefore broaden our thinking of business model. The concept of “symbionts” in business model that we create provides a share coordinate system for different business models in the same business ecosystem, making it possible to compare different business models directly. What’s more, it allows us to analyze a focal firm's business model in a micro viewpoint, which may suggests how to restructure or reform the focal firm in a surgical way based on the anatomic picture of the company. We focus on the Business Model Innovation of an old-lined agriculture firm in China to better explain our theory. Key Words:Business Model, Symbionts, Business Ecosystem, Stakeholders 一、问题的提出 传统管理学科,研究对象为企业组织及其内部各部门、人员等之间的关系和业务活动、管理活动。视角从微观到宏观分别为人员、组织和产业。评价标准则为运营的业绩指标——如何更好地发挥既定资源禀赋的最大能力。 商业模式研究对象为焦点企业(商业模式研究的对象)及其利益相关者,考察他们之间的交易关系、交易方式等组成的交易结构总和。视角进一步拓展,微观至焦点企业内部利益相关者(处于企业内部、具备独立投入产出、独立利益诉求、独立权利配置,如物流、信息平台、支付平台等),宏观至整个商业生态,包括焦点企业的外部利益相关者,如企业的供应商、合作伙伴、客户、竞争对手,甚至焦点企业的利益相关者的利益相关者,如供应商的供应商、客户的客户、竞争对手的合作伙伴等等。评价标准则是价值的创造、传递效率。观察价值如何在利益相关者之间创造和传递,焦点企业从中获得多大的价值等。 这种视角的拓展,具备三方面意义:第一,从商业生态等宏观结构定位焦点企业的价值

市场营销策略外文文献及翻译

市场营销策略外文文献及翻译 Marketing Strategy Market Segmentation and Target Strategy A market consists of people or organizations with wants,money to spend,and the willingness to spend it.However,within most markets the buyer' needs are not identical.Therefore,a single marketing program starts with identifying the differences that exist within a market,a process called market segmentation, and deciding which segments will be pursued ads target markets. Marketing segmentation enables a company to make more efficient use of its marketing resources.Also,it allows a small company to compete effectively by concentrating on one or two segments.The apparent drawback of market segmentation is that it will result in higher production and marketing costs than a one-product,mass-market strategy.However, if the market is correctly segmented,the better fit with customers' needs will actually result in greater efficiency. The three alternative strategies for selecting a target market are market aggregation,single segment,and multiple segment.Market-aggregation strategy involves using one marketing mix to reach a mass,undifferentiated market.With a single-segment strategy, a company still uses only one marketing mix,but it is directed at only one segment of the total market.A multiple-segment strategy entails

外文文献(市场营销策略)

Marketing Strategy Market Segmentation and Target Strategy A market consists of people or organizations with wants,money to spend,and the willingness to spend it.However,within most markets the buyer' needs are not identical.Therefore,a single marketing program starts with identifying the differences that exist within a market,a process called market segmentation, and deciding which segments will be pursued ads target markets. Marketing segmentation enables a company to make more efficient use of its marketing resources.Also,it allows a small company to compete effectively by concentrating on one or two segments.The apparent drawback of market segmentation is that it will result in higher production and marketing costs than a one-product,mass-market strategy.However, if the market is correctly segmented,the better fit with customers' needs will actually result in greater efficiency. The three alternative strategies for selecting a target market are market aggregation,single segment,and multiple segment.Market-aggregation strategy involves using one marketing mix to reach a mass,undifferentiated market.With a single-segment strategy, a company still uses only one marketing mix,but it is directed at only one segment of the total market.A multiple-segment strategy entails selecting two or more segments and developing a separate marketing mix to reach segment. Positioning the Product Management's ability to bring attention to a product and to differentiate it in a favorable way from similar products goes a long way toward determining that product's revenues.Thus management needs to engage in positioning,which means developing the image that a product projects in relation to competitive products and to the firm's other products. Marketing executives can choose from a variety of positioning strategies.Sometimes they decide to use more than one for a particular product.Here are several major positioning strategies:

商业模式与战略转型的文献综述 ——国内外文献对比研究

商业模式与战略转型的文献综述 【摘要】动态复杂的外部环境下,企业的需不断调整自身以适应市场的发展趋势,商业模和战略的动态变化成为企业获取持续竞争优势的重要源泉。而在商业模式与战略转型方面国内外的研究现状如何,这是本文的关注重点。本文从商业模式与战略转型纷繁复杂的研究框架中选取了现阶段更受关注的四点——管理者认知在战略中的作用、商业模式转型、战略转型的驱动因素以及多元化经营与企业绩效之间的关系作为论述重点,对国内外的研究做出梳理 【关键词】管理者认知商业模式战略转型多元化 一.管理者认知在战略中的作用 尚航标、李卫宁和蓝海林(2013)给管理认知做出了如下定义:管理认知是企业战略决策者在进行战略决策时所用到的一种知识结构。管理认知通过提供信息搜寻功能、信息解释功能和行动逻辑功能来影响企业战略决策,进而影响企业绩效并决定企业是否具有竞争优势。 在过去的20年中,管理者和组织认知(MOC,managerial and organizational cognition)在战略管理研究中获得了越来越多的重视和发展(Walsh,1995;Huff,2005;杨迤等,2007;Kaplan,2011)。SuchetaNadkarni and Pamelas.Barr(2008)将管理认知划分为注意焦点(attention focus)和环境—战略因果逻辑(environment-strategy casual logics)。其中注意焦点是指高层管理者对他们所处的外部环境的主观认知程度,这些认知受一个(或多个)领域的观念的支配,而忽视其他领域。Daft and Weick (1984)认为关于环境与战略之间因果关系有两种不同的逻辑方式,一种是环境驱动模式(environment-driven)所代表的确定逻辑(deterministic logics),一种是解释驱动模式(interpretation-driven)所代表的前摄逻辑(proactive logics)。在环境驱动模式中,高管认为环境决定战略,因为高管所感知的环境是确定的、剧烈的、可测量以及有决定因素的,他们先了解那个环境的需要继而提出反应战略。在解释驱动模型中,高管根据战略来确定环境,因为高管所面对的环境是更不确定和更难分析的。武亚军(2013)将MOC的研究领域归纳为三个:一是行为决策理论研究,它关注认知偏见、简化原则等在战略决策中的应用及调整;二是认知地图和认知结构研究,它主要关注管理者的认知方法;三是认知结构与战略管理过程的联系,包括战略形成和实施过程。武亚军运用认知地图和扎根方法对华为公司领导人任正非进行分析,发现了“战略框架式思考”和“悖论整合”两个典型认知模式,在中国转型发展的复杂动态环境下,任正非的这种思维模式具有有价值、稀缺、难模仿、难替代等特征,是华为可持续竞争优势的一种重要来源。 管理者认知在企业战略形成、推进及转型等过程中的决定性作用在国内外学者的研究中达成了一致。Tushman & Romanelli (1985)指出,高管的变革与继任是克服转型障碍的重要机制。Tushman等(1985)的研究发现公司绩效的下滑并不能直接推动战略转型的实施,而是否存在新任管理者是关键的调节因素。Loasby(2002)认为,企业成长阶段演进及相应的组织变革,都与企业管理者对未来变革和成长机会的认知变化发生直接关系。Yokota & Mitsuhashi(2008)的研究发现,新任管理者是否可以推动战略转型的实施取决于其是否可以改变战略决策的过程;高管的变更与继任并不是触发战略转型的充分条件,只有当高管变更后管理者价值观和利益偏好发生改变时,战略转型才会实施。在国内,薛有志等也认为管理者的认知过程是形成战略的组织因素中必不可少的动态要素;中国企业家调查系统将优化高管团队构成和改善经营者战略思维作为提升企业战略决策能力的关键;尚航标黄培伦(2010)在对万和集团的案例研究中提出了有限理性视角下企业管理者认知对企业竞争优势

网络营销策略外文文献翻译

文献出处:Guzzo T, D’Andrea A, Ferri F, et al. Evolution of Marketing Strategies: From Internet Marketing to M-Marketing[C]//On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 Workshops. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 627-636. 原文 Evolution of Marketing Strategies:From Internet Marketing to M-Marketing Tiziana Guzzo, Alessia D’Andrea, Fernando Ferri, and Patrizia Grifoni 1 Introduction Marketing is “the process which creates, communicates, delivers the value to the consumers, and maintains the relationship with consumers. It generates the strategy that underlies sales techniques, business communication, and business developments. It is “an integrated process through which companies build strong consumers relationships and create value for their consumers and for themselves” Marketing strategies have a long history and mainly interested economists and sociologists. The wide use of Internet, pervasiveness of social networks and the evolution of mobile devise are implying a wider involvement of interdisciplinary competences enlarging the interest toward ICT competences. This paper is to describe the evolution of marketing strategies from the advent of the Web (Internet Marketing) - through the advent of Social Networks (Marketing 2.0) - to the evolution of Mobile Social Networks (M-marketing). In particular, the paper analyses the use that Italian people make of mobile devices and the user perception and acceptance of M-marketing.

差异化营销策略外文文献翻译

文献出处: Dalman, M. Deniz, and Junhong Min. "Marketing Strategy for Unusual Brand Differentiation: Trivial Attribute Effect." International Journal of Marketing Studies 6.5 (2014): 63-72. 原文 Marketing Strategy for Unusual Brand Differentiation: Trivial Attribute Effect Dalman, M. Deniz & Junhong Min Abstract This research investigates that brand differentiation creating superior values can be achieved not only by adding meaningful attributes but also meaningless attributes, which is called "trivial attribute effect." Two studies provided empirical evidences as following; first, trivial attribute effect creates a strong brand differentiation even after subjects realize that trivial attribute has no value. Second, trivial attribute effect is more pronounced in hedonic service category compared to the utilitarian category. Last, the amount of willingness to pay is higher when trivial attribute is presented and evaluated in joint evaluation mode than separate evaluation mode. Finally, we conclude with discussion and provide suggestions for further research. Keywords: brand differentiation, evaluation mode, service industry, trivial attribute Introduction Problem Definition Perhaps the most important factor for new product success is to create the meaningful brand differentiation that provides customers with superior values beyond what the competitors can offer in the same industry (Porter, 1985). Not surprisingly, more than 50 percent of annual sales in consumer product industries including automobiles, biotechnology, computer software, and pharmaceuticals are attributed to such meaningful brand differentiation by including new or noble attributes (Schilling &Hill, 1998). However, the brand differentiation that increases consumer preference is not only by introducing meaningful attributes but also meaningless attributes. For

赢利模式文献综述

硕士研究生文献综述报告 一、引言 一个企业能否寻找到一套优秀、成熟的赢利模式,往往是这个企业能否走向成功的关键所在。因此,赢利模式是企业生存和发展的决定性因素。现代企业的生存和发展在短缺经济时代和市场经济初期经历了要素驱动、能力驱动之后,到了充分竞争的经济全球化时代,企业的生存和发展便要由赢利模式来决定。实际上,当今成功企业的战略,其根本已经不再是公司本身,甚至不再是整个行业,而是企业的整个价值创造系统,也就是企业的赢利模式。 二、国外研究文献综述 国外对于商业模式的研究以2003年为界限大致可以分为两个阶段:2003之前的这个阶段称其为开创性阶段;之后的阶段为综合性阶段。在开创性阶段,人们普遍以概念研究为重点,采用归纳逻辑思维方法从大量案例研究中总结规律,归纳出商业模式的构成要素、分类方法、变革路径、评估方法。在综合性阶段,人们对于概念的研究普遍采用“博采众长”的方法,对前人的研究成果按照主客观要求进行整合,得出自己的概念定义;对赢利模式的构成、表述、演化、评估多数采取演绎的逻辑思维方式进行研究,在人们比较普遍接受的研究成果基础上针对特定领域或特定现象得出特定的结论。本文的阶段划分当然不是绝对的,只是为了研究的方便给出的一个大概的描述。 1、代表性学者著作简介 表1:企业设计要素

资料来源:亚德里安J斯莱沃斯基等著,凌晓东等译,发现利润区【M】.北京:中心出版社,2003.13.页 表2 :赢利模式构成要素代表性观点[10,11] 3、赢利模式的分类研究综述 分类研究是赢利模式研究的一个重要方面,大多数文献中关于赢利模式分类的描述是非结构性的,这使得很难准确识别和区分具体的商业模式,也很难评价每个商业模式所需要的资源和基础设施。并且,这些赢利模式分类研究一般都没有提供一个框架使得

汽车营销类外文文献翻译、英文翻译汽车行业渠道的转变复习过程

原文 Changing Channels In The Automotive Industry: The Future of Automotive Marketing and Distribution Who will be the winners and losers in the revolution that is radically reshaping the marketing, distribution and selling of automobiles? Will the vehicle manufacturers and their franchised-dealer networks be able to overcome years of inertia and complacency to pioneer and execute new concepts that will strengthen and extend the value of their brands? Or will nimbler, more imaginative retailers or software companies get there first? The transformation of the business of selling cars and trucks is happening before our eyes at an incredible pace -- promising to change forever an industry that has long been noted for its high costs, poor service and extremely unpleasant selling process. Auto manufacturers have competed fiercely among themselves to drive out cost and meet consumer needs for cheaper and better cars and trucks. Now the survivors face new threats from outside the industry that might thwart their renewed interest in building strong, lasting relationships with their customers. Entrepreneurs have dissected the cost-value equation and come up with new retail concepts. Their stories have been persuasive enough to attract hundreds of millions of dollars in public equity investment and persuade dozens of fiercely independent car dealers to sell out. Internet technology has lowered entry barriers for other entrepreneurs with new ideas about helping customers find, evaluate and buy new vehicles. These patterns are consistent with revolutions in other consumer durables markets that effectively transferred market power from manufacturers to retailers. Consumers are the only clear winners in this battle. While we are not sure which vehicle manufacturers will survive, we are confident that winning will require a better understanding of the life-cycle value equations of both cars and buyers, and the development of innovative strategies to capture that value. FORCES OF CHANGE From the days of Henry Ford's production line, the automobile industry has been based on a "supply-push" philosophy -- a strong bias toward "filling the factories" to cover high fixed costs. Dealer networks were created as logical extensions of the "supply-push" model. The networks were designed to hold inventory, leverage private capital (without threatening the manufacturers' control) and service and support what was then a less reliable and more maintenance-intensive product. Those networks generally were built around entrepreneurs focused on a defined geographic area, selling one or at most two brands. Despite its longevity, the traditional dealer channel leaves many people unhappy.

电子商务前沿【文献综述】

湖北工程学院 2017—2018学年度第1学期期末考核答卷 考核课程: 电子商务前沿讲座 考核类型:考查 考核形式:开卷(文献综述) 学生所在院系:经济与管理学院电子商务专业 班 级: 0153005441 试 卷 A 大学生网络营销能力秀始于2009年,是高校竞赛式网络营销教学实践平台,锻炼和培养大学生的网络营销核心能力,每个学期各举办一期,到2016年下半年已进行16期,超过7000个大中专院校的20万师生参加过网络营销能力秀。能力秀——网络营销开始的地方。 移动电子商务商业模式及模式创新文献综述 前言 研究背景:我国互联网络信息中心的数据显示,截到 2015年 12月底,我国网民 规模已达到 6.88 亿,全国的互联网普及率已达到 50.3%。其中,手机用户规模达到了 6.20亿,并继续保持稳定增长的态势。而且 2016 年,全国的网上购物、网络团购等类似业务再创新高。据统计数据显示,在2016年6 月底,我国网民达7.10亿,其中手机网民达6.56亿,在这种环境下,以互联网、信息技术为核心的电子商务企业的蓬勃发展,而传统零售企业的经营发展受到了电子商务的重创,生意惨淡,面对这样的局势,就要求线上线下相结合,发展移动电子商务,以求实体经济和网络经济平衡发展。 研究目的:通过搜集大量文献和其他网络资源,研究不同学者对电子商务的商业模 式的概念理解、商业模式的创新,最后对现有商业模式存在的部分问题提出一些建议,希望能引起更多的学者关注这一问题,并为研究商业模式的学者提供参考价值。

研究意义:理论意义:第一,推动移动电子商务事业理性发展。一个企业的商业模式好坏影响着移动电子商务顺利进展。本文所研究的商业模式将给移动电子商务产业带来更好的发展,提供了一个理性全面的发展空间。 第二,本文借助移动网络技术,探索了移动电子商务的商业模式,将商业模式的各个组成部分细分,促使研究的理论方法更加全面。 第三,有利于进行学术交流。对移动电商的商业模式进行相关理论的探索,可以促进学者之间学术交流,同时也为今后从事这一领域研究学者提供参考。 实践意义:第一,在移动互联网背景下研究移动电子商务商业模式,使其更好地发展,给 用户提供服务带来便利,企业明确自身的责任,维护自身的利益。促进企业与企业间合作,达成利益共享。 第二,促进国家社会经济的发展。分析移动电商的商业模式,对促进社会经济产业发展,具有极其重要的现实意义。电子商务活动的进展是为了社会经济的发展,电子商务商业模式是电子商务发展方向及成败的重要指标,现阶段我国对商业模式的探索还处于初级阶段,本文对移动电子商务商业模式的研究,有利于传统企业选择正确的商业模式,推动移动电子商务在新时代的发展。 一、商业模式、特点及评价 (一)核心概念 1.商业模式概念 刘丽侠[1]商业模式是一个企业生存的模式,能够为企业创造利益的模式,它最基本的核心内容就是创造与实现价值。它也是由一系列生产、销售、运营等经济实体之间的商业活动,能够为用户提供服务,创造企业的价值,以及建立良好的协作网络关系,节约大量的成本,创造属于自己本企业的模式。宋娜[2]商业模式的基本含义就是指企业价值创造的基本逻辑,即企业在一定的价值链或价值网络中如何向客户提供产品和服务并获取利润。李沂濛[3]商业模式是一个企业的大方向的布局,从一个产品被生产出来,到交付运营部门进行包装和宣传,包括管理部门在内部各部门间的协调,直到产品走向市场,最终收回资金流,是一个具有详细规划和规定的运作流程,企业关注的不仅仅是盈利,而是如何保持持续盈利,即站在客户的角度在满足客户的要求同时,为自己创造商誉等无形资本,让企业可以在激烈的市场竞争中立于不败之地。 虽然研究的角度不同,但他们都肯定了顾客价值,顾客要求,企业的所有活动、所有目标的实现都以客户创造价值展开,商业模式是一种体系,它能给企业带来很好的生存和发展途径,它能够使企业保持持续盈利的活力。 2.移动电子商务商业模式概念 移动电子商务的商业模式是指在移动网络技术的研究背景下,进行商务活动的参与主体之间开展商业活动,并能使其企业创造价值,最终获得利润。移动电子商务商业模式是在智能终端上开展商业活动,需要移动运营商的移动网络支持,平台提供商搭建一个平台供内容服务商将服务呈现给用户,在整个流程进展中,双方互赢互利共同创造企业的价值。在整个商务过程中,商业模式贯穿每一个环节,是由企业的内部资源,盈利模式,外部协作模式,支付模式,商家信用等级等部分组成,借助移动网络技术和物联

相关文档
最新文档