环境会计方面的外文文献汇总
会计英文期刊目录
精品文档就在这里 -------------各类专业好文档，值得你下载，教育，管理，论文，制度，方案手册，应有尽有-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Journal of Finance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics. Journal of Financial Planning. Journal of Financial Research, Journal of Portfolio Management. MIT Sloan Management Review. Newsweek. (Domestic Ed.) Quantative Finance. Review of Accounting Studies. (Print and Online) Review of Derivatives Research. Review of Financial Studies, Time. (Domestic Ed.) The Journal of Derivativ and Analysis.
国内外环境会计研究现状分析
"# 财 苑 · 借 鉴 与 参 考
国内外环境会计研究现状分析
北京广播电视大学 薄雪萍
#" 关 于 环 境 会 计 要 素 确 认 与 计 量 的 研 究 。如 徐 泓 、朱 小 平
的《环 境 会 计 要 素 的 确 认 》（《财 务 与 会 计 》*--$年"$期 ），文 中 就环境资产 、环 境 费 用 、环 境 效 益 的 确 认 标 准 、方 法 及 各 要 素 的 特 征 、分 类 和 计 价 问 题 作 了 探 讨 ；再 如 徐 泓 、包 小 刚 、刘 铭 的 《环境会计 计 量 的 基 本 理 论 与 方 法 》（《经 济 理 论 与 经 济 管 理 》 *---年"!期 ），此 文 从 环 境 会 计 计 量 的 基 础 理 论 出 发 ，总 结 了 环 境 会 计 计 量 方 法 的 特 点 ：计 量 的 单 位 仍 然 采 用 货 币 单 位 ；计 量的基础可 以 采 用 机 会 成 本 、边 际 成 本 、替 代 成 本 等 ；采 用 模 糊 数 学 进 行 计 量 。提 出 环 境 会 计 的 计 量 方 法 有 ：费 用 效 益 分 析 法（包 括 边 际 成 本 法 、影 子 价 格 、机 会 成 本 法 ）和 数 学 模 型 法 （包 括 模 糊 数 学 模 型 、数 学 公 式 法 、皮 尔 数 学 模 型 、效 益 数 学 模 型 ）。可 见 这 些 文 献 分 别 从 不 同 角 度 对 环 境 会 计 的 确 认 和 计 量 的 原 则 、方 法 等 进 行 了 探 讨 。
外国重要财务会计文献和期刊
外国重要财务会计文献和期刊Abacus 《算盘》一个著名的会计理论刊物，1965年开始发行，由澳大利亚悉尼大学出版社出版，悉尼大学会计系主编。
每年两期，其内容侧重于会计理论研究，在2001年获得优秀期刊金奖，是世界上十大著名会计期刊之一。
网址：http：//.auABI Journal 《美国破产学会期刊》美国破产学会(American Bankruptcy institute)的出版物。
每年发行10期。
读者在互联网上可以查阅其中文章，以及《防范破产手册》。
网址：http//www.abiword/Accountancy Magazine 《会计杂志》英格兰和威尔士特许会计师协会(ICAEW)所发行的一种刊。
于1889年开始发行。
1938年开始由季刊改为月刊。
是英国最重要的会计期刊，会计师可以在互联网直接查阅其文章内容。
网址：http：//www.accountancy /Accountants Index 《会计师索引》美国注册公共会计师协会所出版的索引。
在这个索引中收集有会计著作的详细目录。
自1974年按季发行。
网址：http：///Accounting and Business Research 《会计和工商业研究》英格兰和威尔特许会计师协会(ICAEW)自1970年起发行的一种研究性会计刊物。
一年发行四期。
网址：http：//www.icaew /Accounting and the Public Interest 《会计和公众利益》美国会计学会(AAA)出版的一种学术性期刊。
其主要内容包括财务会计和审计，社会和环境会计、职业道德、信息技术、会计教育，以及会计机构的管理等内容。
网址：http：///Accounting Evolution to1900《1900年以前的会计发展演变》美国著名会计学家利特尔顿(A.C.Limeton)在1993年出版的一本著作。
其中详细地阐述了会计理论的历史发展过程。
企业环境信息披露中英文对照外文翻译文献
文献信息：文献标题：The impact of environmental information disclosures on shareholder returns in a company: An empirical study（企业环境信息披露对股东回报的影响：一项实证研究）国外作者：Ragothaman Srinivasan；Carr David文献出处：《International Journal of Management》,2008,25（4）, p613-620字数统计：英文 2030 单词，10523 字符；中文 3653 汉字外文文献：The impact of environmental information disclosures onshareholder returns in a company: An empirical studyThe Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (1986) has mandated Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) disclosures in the United States. This Act requires all manufacturing companies (SIC code 20-39) who employ more than 10 people to provide an annual report about the release of more than 300 specified toxic chemicals. Similar legislation exists in other countries as well. How is this information used by investors and corporations? We develop and test a regression model to answer this question. We also perform a few robustness tests. Our sample comes from TRI disclosures for “top 100” corporate polluters ba sed on COMPUSTAT data. Descriptive statistics and correlation measures are also provided. The higher the return on assets the higher is Tobin’s q (a proxy for firm value or shareholder wealth). The waste disposal variable (toxic air release) is a statistically significant predictor of Tobin’s q. As expected, the sign of the regression coefficientfor waste disposal is negative. In addition, firm size has a significant impact on Tobin’s q. A firm’s beta, P/E ratio, and the corporate governance variable are all statistically insignificant.1. IntroductionThe disastrous Union Carbide accident that occurred in India in 1984 and other smaller chemical accidents have caused anxiety in the public’s mind about the release of chemicals from factories. The Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (1986) has mandated Toxic Release Inventory TRI disclosures. This Act requires all manufacturing companies (SIC code 20-39) in the United States who employ more than 10 people to provide an annual report about release of more than 300 specified toxic chemicals. The TRI program offers environmental performance information to the public and is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). How is this information used by investors and corporations?EPA’s Environmental Economics Research Strategy (EPA, 2004) identifies measuring the benefits of environmental information disclosures as one of its high priority research areas. Some interesting research results have already been published. For example, Konar and Cohen (1997) report negative stock price reactions to TRI disclosures in 1989. These negative stock returns forced companies to change their behavior. Those firms with the largest negative stock market returns to TRI announcements in 1989 subsequently reduced their emissions more than other firms in their industry. The purpose this research project is to examine the association between the TRI disclosures and firm value as measured by Tobin’s q. The goal of examining the association between the TRI disclosures and firm value will be accomplished through the development and testing of a regression model. A few robustness tests are also conducted. Tobin’s q is a widely used proxy for firm value in the finance literature (Gompers, Ishii and Metrick,2003) and is used in this study as the dependent variable.Several researchers have conducted event studies and documented negative stock price reactions to TRI announcements (Hamilton 1995 and Khanna et al. 1998). Eventstudies examine the stock price reactions on one or two days when the environmental information is disclosed. Klassen and McLaughlin (1996) also reported significant negative stock price reactions to bad environmental news such as oil spills. These event studies do not analyze longer-term stock price trends. These studies have generally used smaller samples. Moreover, they have used data from 1989 which are eighteen years old. To overcome these difficulties, a new regression model is developed which uses more recent data from 2000 TRI disclosures. The TRI disclosure data is compiled from raw data reported to the EPA on a facility-by-facility basis and not on a company-bycompany basis. The difficulty of aggregating to company-level data makes the 2000 TRI disclosures the most recent data currently available.2. Prior ResearchKarpoff and Lott (1993) report that when corporate illegal activities and other fraudulent financial schemes are revealed, stock price declines have been the result. In order to estimate the value of intangible assets, we propose to include environmental performance information among the explanatory variables (see Konar and Cohen 2001). Good environmental performance can translate into a good reputation for the firm as an ecology-friendly company and this can increase investor trust (Ragothaman and Lau, 2000). Similarly, bad environmental performance can lead to stock price declines.This research builds on prior research and expands knowledge in several different and new ways. 1) Data used in this study are more recent (than 1989) and come from TRI disclosures for the year 2000; 2) Tobin’s q is measured in accordance with suggestions from finance scholars; 3) The regression model includes some new variables; and a cross-sectional regression model is used. Descriptive statistics and correlation measures are also provided. New insights are gained about the impact of environmental disclosure programs on stockholders’ wealth. Our formulation for Tobin’s q follows that of Chung and Pruitt (1994) and Hirschey and Connolly (2005), where q is measured as the market value of common shares outstanding plus the bookvalue of total assets minus common equity, all divided by the book value of total assets. Tobin’s q is viewed as a market-based measure of firm valuation. In this paper, the effect of environmental disclosures on the market valuation of firms, proxied by Tobin’s q, is examined.Beta is a measure of the risk associated with owning shares in a firm and is commonly used to measure market risk. Konar and Cohen (1997) utilize beta to control for the systematic risk in security returns. Beta is included in this study as a control variable. Various measures of firm size appear in the literature. Dowell, Hart, and Young (2000) use the logarithm of total assets with mixed results in examining whether corporate global standards create or destroy market value. Hamilton (1995) uses the number of employees as a proxy for firm size in examining the relationship between Toxic Release Inventory data and media and stock market reactions. The logarithm of the number of employees (LEMP) is used as a proxy for firm size, and is included in the model as another control variable.Waste (toxic air release) is measured as waste disposal in pounds per revenue- dollar. Waste should be negatively related to Tobin’s q, as it measures the extent to which firms are “dirty.” Konar and Cohen (1997) use toxic chemi cal releases and the number of lawsuits to proxy waste. Hamilton (1995) uses the number of superfund sites to proxy waste. Return on assets (ROA), defined as net income divided by total assets, is used as a measure of firm-level performance. It is a proxy for profitability. ROA should be positively related to Tobin’s q, since better performing firms should be more highly valued in the marketplace, ceteris paribus. Hirschey and Connolly (2005) use profit margin to measure profitability.Another control variable used in this study is the price-to-earnings ratio. The price-to-earnings (PE) ratio is measured as the market price of a firm’s common stock divided by the firm’s income-per-share of common stock. The PE ratio is included in the model as a control variable to pick up the effect of firm-level growth. Firms that are growing rapidly should have a higher market valuation, as measured by Tobin’s q. Yet another control variable used in this paper is “audit opinion” which is a proxy for the corporate governance mechanism. Li et al. (2005) found that firms with higherstock market return tended to receive more clean (unqualified) audit opinions. In other words, audit opinion is negatively related to market value of the firm. Hodge et al. (2004) conducted an experimental research project and concluded that investors reacted to audit qualifications as if it signaled that management was strategically understating financial results. It could be posited that management was concerned about future performance and consequently understated the current performance. According to Choi and Jeter (1992), audit qualifications indicate that uncertainties associated with future cash flows have increased and consequently, the future market value of the firm can be adversely affected.3. Methodology and data sourcesResearchers at the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) at the University of Massachusetts released, in 2004, the list of the top 100 corporate air polluters based on TRI data disclosed by companies in the year 2000. The toxic (air release) waste data are reported in pounds per revenue dollar. Data from COMPUSTAT were used to compute several operating and financial ratios for these 100 firms. The following independent variables were obtained from the COMPUSTAT database: market beta, return on assets, logarithm of number of employees, P/E ratio and audit opinion. Following Hirschey (2005), the following formula is used to estimate Tobin’s q: Tobin’s q = [Total assets + Total market value of equity –Book value of equity] / Total assets. Tobin’s q was also computed from the data obtained from the COMPUSTAT data base. Due to missing variables in the COMPUSTAT database, 9 companies were dropped. One more firm was deleted because of an extreme outlier. The final sample used in this study contains data from 90 companies.The multiple regression model used in this study is:Tobin’s q = f {market beta (risk), logarithm of number of employees, waste discharge per revenue dollar, return on assets, P/E ratio and audit opinion} The research questions are transformed into null hypotheses as given below:H1: Beta has no significant effect on Tobin’s q.H2: Size as measured by number of employees has no significant effect on Tobin’s q.H3: Waste discharge has no significant effect on Tobin’s q.H4: Return on assets has no significant effect on Tobin’s q.H5: Growth as measured by the P/E ratio has no significant effect on Tobin’s q.H6: Corporate governance as measured by audit opinion has no significant effect on Tobin’s q.4. Results and discussionThe descriptive statistics are reported in Table 1. The average Tobin’s q for the sample firms is 2.176. The average amount of toxic air release (waste discharge) is 0.0009 pounds per revenue dollar. The mean for return of assets is 4.648 percent. The average beta (risk measure) is 1.121.Q ratio = Tobin’s QBeta = Market beta (risk)LEMP = Logarithm of number of employeesWaste = Waste disposal per revenue-dollarROA = Return on assetsP/E ratio = Price Earnings ratioAUOP = Audit opinionA correlation analysis of these six explanatory variables with the Tobin’s q and other independent variables was performed. The correlation results are reported inTable 2.The correlation analysis results indicate that Tobin’s q is strongly related to return on assets. The higher the return on assets, the higher is Tobin’s q. Beta, firm size and waste discharge are all negatively related to Tobin’s q. Beta and return on assets have strong negative correlation. Firm size and waste discharge are negatively correlated.Multicollinearity among independent variables may be present in the data and can potentially lead to unstable regression coefficients. A rule of thumb is suggested by Judge et al. (1985) to assess the impact of multicollinearity. They argue that a serious multicollinearity problem arises only when correlations among the explanatory variables are higher than 0.8. In our dataset, the highest correlation is between return on assets and beta at -0.411. Hence, the degree of collinearity present appears to be too small to invalidate estimation results.An ordinary least-squares regression model was developed to investigate the relationship between Tobin’s q and toxic air release, beta, return on assets, growth and other independent variables. Regression methodology permits the testing of six null hypotheses simultaneously. Tobin’s q was the dependent variable and the six explanatory variables mentioned earlier were the independent variables. The regression coefficients, t-statistics (in parentheses), and significance levels are reported in Table 3, column I. The multiple regression model has a respectable adjusted R-squared of 31.3 percent.Thbk 3: Mnhlpie Regression Resultse CONSTANT 2.565 2.450 2.62I 1.416(4.295)*°°(2.273)”(4. t40)*°’(1.320) BETA-0.029 -0.025 -0.025 •0.600(-0.186) (-0. I58) (-0. IG2) (-0.353)LOCi EMPLOYEES -0.363(-3.319)***-0.371(-2.919)**•-0.354(-3.219)***-0.506(-2.880)***WAS SALES -163.186(-2.244)*^-166.038(-2.172)**-137.856(- l.785)•-522.126(-l,846)•RETURH ON 0.1S6 0.157 0.149 0.138 ASSETS (4.343)*••(4.285)*••(4.049)**^ (3.407)**•PPE RATIO 0.013 0.013 0.015 0.010(1.574) (1.569) (1.787)* (1.158)0.030 0.029 0.023 0.I70(0.290) (0.278) (0,213) (1.329)0.016 0. I99(0.129) (1.323) CAPITAL-EXPEN/ -1.413SALES (-0.770)R&D £XP/SALES L236‹i.x8)â7610313 0.3W0.294 0.342 ‘The dependent verieble is Tobin’s O•Sintistically e igaificant at Um l evel**Statistically significant at 5& level***Statistically significant at IN level中文译文：企业环境信息披露对股东回报的影响：一项实证研究在美国，应急计划和社区知情权法案（1986）被授权披露企业有毒排放清单。
《上市公司环境信息披露研究的国内外文献综述3600字》
上市公司环境信息披露研究的国内外文献综述1.1环境信息披露现状（1）信息披露内容关于环境会计披露的目标：通过孟凡利教授（1999）1的研究可以得知，环境信息披露的基本目标就是让企业自觉利用报告等方式对除了企业管理者和员工以外的人员披露同环境有关的财务信息，让外界了解企业不仅仅是在生产经营方面，更多的是在环境保护方面做出的贡献。
朱丹（2001）2提出了绿色会计的学说结构系统，阐述了绿色会计革命的基本假想、一般原则、确认和比量，以及最终的信息披露。
张英（2005）3论述了环境会计的总体目标是促成未来可持续发展战略，落实经济，社会和生态共同利益的提高。
Patrick de Beer和Francois Friend（2005）4在研究中探讨了在环境会计上以EEGECOST为模型，为企业评估替代项目和过程提供了框架，并评估了当前特别是未来的经济和环境绩效。
关于环境会计披露的基本内容分析，汤亚莉、陈自力（2006）5在他们所著的研究论文的实证研究过程中采取了事件分析法，货币信息披露，非货币信息披露以及没有披露等等一些基本章程，而最终通过各项实证得出，对于公司来说，他们的规模与财务绩效跟环境信息披露水平之间呈现出正相关的关系就是环境信息披露水平能够对企业的发展与规模建筑一定的积极效应。
金阳、褚阳（2008）6构建环境会计理论体系，将绿色会计纳入业绩考核中去。
李文彦、田治威（2008）7提出了环境会计理论相关新的理论基础，也就是和谐社会理论，对“和谐发展系数”进行界定，基于此理论对环境会计基本假设和目标对基础理论产生的影响开展分析研究。
袁广达（2010）8基于可持续发展战略的理论，把现代企业的环1孟凡利.论环境信息披露及其相关的理论问题[J].会计研究，1999，000（004）：16-25.2朱丹.论绿色会计的理论结构体系[J].上海会计，2001，000（006）：20-21.3张英.司法会计鉴定的方法与意义[J].财会通讯，2005（09）：49.4Beer P D，Friend F.Environmental accounting：A management tool for enhancing corporate environmental and economic performance[J].Ecological Economics，2006，58（3）：p.548-560. 5汤亚莉，陈自力，刘星，等.我国上市公司环境信息披露状况及影响因素的实证研究[J].管理世界，2006，000（001）：158-159.6金阳，褚阳.构建环境会计理论体系[J].合作经济与科技，2008（14）：107-108.7李文彦，田治威.和谐社会背景下环境会计理论基础探讨[J].北京林业大学学报：社会科学版，2008（04）：67-70.8袁广达.高校人才培养成本的会计学分析[J].阅江学刊，2010（05）：46-52.境经济活动与环境管理活动当做研究对象，把生态环境的有关信息引进会计信息系统，着重叙述了环境风险控制、环境会计的成本核计，探索了有关企业实现维护环境与可持续发展的目标的途径。
2024年财务管理论文英文参考文献
[10]Atkin, C. K. Instrumental utilities and information seeking. New models for mass communication research, Oxford,England: Sage,1973.
[8]Bass, B., Granke, R. Societal influences on student perceptions of how to succeed in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972,56(4)，312-318.
[4Casson, M. The economics of family firms [J]. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 1999' 47(1)：10 - 23.
[5]Alchian,A.,Demsetz, H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review [J]. 1972,62(5)： 777-795.
[4]Aragon-Comea, J. A. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal,1998,41(5)，556-567.
环境会计信息披露研究【文献综述】
环境会计信息披露研究【⽂献综述】毕业论⽂（设计）⽂献综述题⽬：环境会计信息披露研究专业：会计学⼀、前⾔部分（⼀）写作⽬的我国作为世界上经济发展最快的国家之⼀，环境的破坏⽇益成为经济发展的瓶颈，严重阻碍了我国经济的发展。
学者们在环境会计信息披露的必要性⽅⾯都有着⼀致的看法。
如耿建新(2002)等学者认为应不断规范我国企业有关环境会计信息的披露，以满⾜不同利益相关者的需要。
但环境会计信息披露⽬前存在着理论研究滞后、对企业环境信息披露的⽐例不⾼、内容不全⾯、信息披露⽅式不⾜、披露不对称或不充分等等问题，使其⽆法满⾜社会公众、政府等利益相关者的需要。
因此需要进⼀步地进⾏研究探讨。
（⼆）相关概念环境会计指以货币为主要计量单位，以有关的环境法律、法规为依据，研究经济发展与环境资源之间的联系，确认、计量、记录、报告环境资产与负债，以及环境污染、防治、开发和利⽤的成本与费⽤，分析环境绩效与环境活动对企业财务成果影响的⼀门新兴学科。
环境信息披露是指将与环境保护有关的各种显性和隐性的信息加以收集整理，并在⼀定范围内以适当形式公开，⽤以提供各种刺激与激励机制，从⽽改进环境⾏为，改善环境质量。
环境会计信息披露就是指以⼀定的信息载体公开企业环境会计⽅⾯的信息。
（三）综述范围通过收集2005－2010年间发表于《财会研究》、《中国会计评论》、《财经理论与实践》等学术杂志中的研究论⽂，借鉴西北⼤学、青岛⼤学等⼤学学报⽂章及部分硕博⼠论⽂，通过分析与总结这些⽂章，对环境会计信息披露和国内外研究现状进⾏总体把握。
（四）相关主题及争论焦点我国环境会计信息披露还处于起步阶段，研究内容缺乏系统性，研究成果尚⽋实践指导性。
在环境会计信息披露的内容⽅⾯基本上达成了⼀致意见，但在环境信息披露的形式⽅⾯却仍有差异。
⼆、主题部分（⼀）国外研究综述从九⼗年代开始，由于国际社会对环境会计问题的重视，⼀些重要的国际会计组织和国家对于环境会计信息的披露在理论上和实践上进⾏了初步的尝试和探索。
环境会计信息披露论参考文献
环境会计信息披露论参考文献
1. 马明.环境会计信息披露:现实困境与政策选择[J].财经研究,2006,(8):70-76.
2. 王炳章.环境会计信息披露的原则与方法探析[J].国际会计,2011,(6):25-28.
3. 金宏.环境会计信息披露对公司绩效的影响研究[J].财经问题研究,2014,(6):72-77.
4. 周杰.环境会计信息披露对投资者财务决策的影响研究[J].经济管理,2015,(1):34-39.
5. 荣华.环境会计信息披露的财务分析[J].会计研
究,2016,(2):45-49.
6. 陈希.环境会计信息披露对企业社会责任的影响研究[J].社会科学,2017,(1):64-69.
7. 李德明.环境会计信息披露的国际比较研究[J].财会研
究,2018,(3):26-31.
8. 赵凯.环境会计信息披露与环境治理的关系研究[J].环境保护,2019,(4):52-57.
9. 王铭.环境会计信息披露的重要性与现状分析[J].财贸研究,2020,(1):45-50.
10. 吴云.环境会计信息披露的法律规制及其改进思路[J].法学研究,2021,(2):62-68.。
- 1 -。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
EVOLUTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT PROGRAM
J. H. Maday T. L. Kuusinen
October 1991 Presented at the Environmental Auditing Conference October 22-23, 1991 Seattle, Washington
Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-76RLO 1830
Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States。Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Evolution of an Environmental Audit Program
Joseph H. Maday, Jr. (ASQC-CQA) Technical Group Leader - Quality Verification Department and Tapio Kuusinen Senior Research Scientist Environmental Policy and Compliance Group Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This document was prepared under the direction of the U.S. Environment Protection Agency’s (EPA) Small Business Division. There were numerous reviewers from government and private organizations. Additionally, the following provided important advice and/or reference materials: * Small Business Ombudsman, Maine Department of Environmental Protection * Tennessee Small Business Assistance Program * New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection * Massachusetts Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction (OTA) * Iowa Waste Reduction Center, University of Northern Iowa * Florida Small Business Assistance Program The products and services included in this document were contributed for review by commercial and government sources. The project team is thankful for their timely cooperation. ABSTRACT International and national standards, and in some cases corporate policies require that planned and scheduled audits be performed to verify all aspects of environmental compliance and to determine effective implementation of the environmental management program. An example of this can be found in the definition of auditing as provided by U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Policy Statement on Environmental Auditing. It defines environmental auditing as follows:
"Environmental auditing is a systematic, documented, periodic and objective review by regulated entities of facility operations and practices related to meeting environmental requirements. Audits can be designed to accomplish any or all of the following: verify compliance with environmental requirements, evaluate the effectiveness of environmental management systems already in place, or assess risks from regulated and unregulated materials and practices.
Auditing serves as a quality assurance check to help improve the effectiveness of basic environmental management by verifying that management practices are in place, functioning and adequate. ''
Many specifications further emphasize that the audit be performed to written procedures or checklists (to provide later documentation) by personnel who do not have direct responsibility for performing the activities being audited. The results of such audits are generally required to be documented, reported to, and reviewed by, responsible management. Follow-up action will be taken where indicated. The responsible organization can then take follow-up action as needed.
An effective auditing program is a useful tool for improving environmental compliance. If developed properly, the program will point out areas of weakness and areas of potential problems. An auditing program will also identify environmental compliance activities that meet or exceed expectations.