The Integrals of Motion for the Deformed W-Algebra Wqt(sl_N^)
Some further curiosities from the world of integrable lattice systems and their discretizat

arXiv:solv-int/9607005v1 19 Jul 1996
Yuri B. SURIS
Centre for Complex Systems and Visualization, University of Bremen, Kitzb¨ uhler Str. 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany e-mail: suris @ cevis.uni-bremen.de
In the open–end case, due to a0 = 0, we obtain from (2.5) the following finite continued fractions expressions for βk : β1 = 1 + hb1 ; βN = 1 + hbN − 1 + hbN −1 − β2 = 1 + hb2 − h2 a1 ; 1 + hb1 ... ; .
2
Simplest fl in this section the simplest flow of the Toda hierarchy. All the results here are not new but collected in the form convenient for our present purposes. For the relevant references see [7]. The simplest flow of the Toda hierarchy is: a ˙ k = ak (bk+1 − bk ), ˙ k = ak − ak−1 . b (2.1)
Deform培训教程课件

•Deform培训教程
•14
• Loading Object Geometry • Workpiece: IDS_GC_Billet.stl • Top Die: IDS_GC_Upset_Top.stl • Bottom Die: IDS_GC_Upset_Bot.stl • Workpiece is plastic, tools are rigid.
•Deform培训教程
•12
基本工艺
• Mechanical Press Forging
• Tooling and Billet Geometry given for 1/12 (300) section
• Billet: 31.5mm dia. x 67mm high • Material(材料): DIN C35 • Preheat(预热): 1230C • Tool Temperature(模具温度): 80C • Transfer from furnace: 7 seconds
• 在塑性加工的体积成形工艺中,变形体 产生了较大的塑性变形,而弹性变形相 对很小,可以忽略不计,此时可认为是 刚塑性问题,如锻造、挤压等;相应地 则可以用刚塑性有限元法分析。刚塑性 有限元法是在马尔可夫(Markov)变分 原理的基础上,引入体积不可压缩条件 后建立的。
•Deform培训教程
•4
体积成形模拟软件DEFORM
•Deform培训教程
•15
Defining Workpiece Mesh
• Set the Weighting factors to: • Surface Curvature 0.9 • Temperature 0.0 • Strain Distribution 0.1 • Strain Rate Distribution 0.1 • Mesh the billet using absolute mesh with a
工程力学常见专业英语词汇总结

空间变量spatial variations
直径diameter
半径radius
必要条件prerequisite
充分条件sufficient condition
质量守恒conservation of mass
动量守恒conservation of momentum
静定问题statically determinate problems
超静定问题statically indeterminate problem
轴向荷载axial load
均布荷载uniform distribution load
集中荷载concentrated load
冲击荷载shock loading
机械能守恒conservation of mechanical energy
能量守恒conservation of energy
守恒定律law of conservation
摩擦friction
内摩擦角friction angle
水平面horizontal plane
假想平面imaginary plane
相互垂直平面mutually perpendicular planes
平面外法向outward normal to the plane
前言preface
后记postscript
附录appendix
连续介质continuousmedium
非连续介质discontinuous medium
周围介质surroundingmedium
气体静力学aerostatics
气体动力学aerodynamics
变形量the amount of deformation
汽车后桥总成设计解放轻卡

摘要按照车桥可否传递驱动力,汽车车桥分为驱动桥和从动桥。
驱动桥的结构型式按齐整体布置来讲共有三种,即普通的非断开式驱动桥,带有摆动半轴的非断开式驱动桥和断开式驱动桥。
本设计对象是轻型低速载货汽车的后驱动桥。
本设计完成了轻型低速载货汽车的后驱动桥中主减速器、差速器、减震器、钢板弹簧及桥壳等部件的设计。
按照轻型低速载货汽车的后驱动桥的要求,通过选型,肯定了主减速器传动副类型,差速器类型,驱动桥半轴支承类型减震器类型和钢板弹簧类型。
通过设计计算,肯定了主减速比,主、从动锥齿轮、差速器、半轴、减震器、钢板弹簧和桥壳的主要参数和结构尺寸。
利用Pro/E软件画出所有零部件的三维视图及装配图和总装配图然后生成工程图,通过主要零部件的校核计算和利用CAD对主要零部件就行二维画图,肯定所设计的能够知足设计要求。
关键词:汽车后桥;主减速器;差速器;减震器;钢板弹簧AbstractAccording to the axle can transfer the driving force, the car axle is divided into a drive axle and a driven axle. Drive bridge structure according to the general layout, with a total of three species, namely ordinary non-break drive bridge, a swing axle non-break drive axle and a broken axle. The object of this design is light-duty low-speed truck drive axle.Completion of the design of light truck speed rear driving axle main reducer, differential, shock absorber, a leaf spring and the axle housing and other components of the design. In this paper, according to the light of low-speed truck drive axle requirements, through the selection, determination of main reducer transmission pair type, differential type, drive axle bearing type shock absorber type and the leaf spring type. Through design calculation, determine the main reduction ratio, main, the driven bevel gear, differential gear, axle, shock absorber, steel plate spring and axle housing main parameters and dimensions.Using Pro/E software to draw all the parts of the three-dimensional- view and assembly drawings and assembly drawings and then generate engineer- ing drawing, the main components of the calculation and use of CAD on the key parts on the line drawing, determine the design can meet the design requirements.Key Words: automobile rear axle ;main reducer;differential device ;shockabsorber; plate spring目录摘要 (Ⅰ)Abstract (Ⅱ)第1章绪论 (1)本课题的来源、大体前提条件和技术要求 (1)本课题要解决的主要问题和设计整体思路 (1)预期的功效 (2)国内外研究现状及发展趋势 (2)课题研究内容 (3)第2章汽车主参数的整体设计 (4)设计参数与设计目标 (4)汽车轴数及驱动形式的选择 (4)轴数 (4)驱动形式 (4)轻型载货汽车质量参数选择 (4)整车装备质量 (5)汽车的总质量 (5)汽车轴荷分派 (5)汽车轴距、后轮距及悬架长度设计 (6)轴距 (6)后轮距 (7)汽车后悬架长度 (8)第3章后桥主要零部件的设计计算 (9)悬架的的设计计算 (9)悬架的的结构形式分类 (9)悬架主要参数的肯定 (10)影响平顺性的参数 (10)影响操纵稳定性的参数 (11)钢板弹簧的设计计算 (11)钢板弹簧的布置方案 (11)钢板弹簧主要参数肯定 (11)减震器的设计计算 (19)减震器类型 (19)减震器的结构和工作原理 (19)减震器的结构设计及计算 (20)相对阻尼系数的肯定 (20)减振器阻尼系数的肯定 (21)最大卸荷力的肯定 (21)减振器工作缸直径的肯定 (22)工作缸壁厚的计算与校核 (23)活塞杆与活塞的设计 (24)活塞尺寸的计算 (24)底阀的设计 (25)减震器装配进程的三维视图 (27)差速器的设计计算 (30)差速器的结构形式的选择 (30)差速器齿轮的大体参数选择 (31)行星齿轮数量的选择 (31)行星齿轮球面半径的肯定 (31)行星齿轮和半轴齿轮齿数的计算 (31)行星齿轮和半轴齿轮的节锥角及模数的计算 (32)压力角的肯定 (32)行星齿轮轴直径及支承长度 (32)差速器直齿锥齿轮的强度校核 (35)主减速器的设计计算 (37)主减速比的肯定 (37)主减速齿轮计算载荷的计算 (38)主减速齿轮大体参数的选择 (39)第4章汽车后桥其它零部件的设计及后桥总装 (42)汽车驱动桥的设计 (42)汽车驱动桥盖的设计 (43)汽车差速器壳的设计 (44)汽车差速器轴承的选用 (44)汽车差速器轴承座的选型设计 (45)汽车半轴的选型设计 (45)U 型螺栓设计 (46)汽车后桥总装 (46)差速器与主减速器的装配 (46)后桥总装配 (48)后桥总装配剖视图 (51)结论 (52)致谢 (53)参考文献 (54)CONTENTSAbstract (Ⅰ)Contents (Ⅲ)Chapter1 Introduction (1)Topic source basic premise and technical requirement (1)This topic to solve the main problems of the design (1)The expected results (2)The domestic research situation and development trend (2)Subject research contents (3)Chapter 2 Car Lord of the overall design parameters (4)Design parameters and design targe (4)Car and driving shaft for the choice of the form (4)Shaft severa (4)Drive form (4)Light parts of autom obile quality parameter selection (4)Vehicle equipment quality (5)The total quality car (5)Car shaft charge distribution (5)Car wheelbase after the length design (6)Wheelbase (6)reartread (7)Automobile rear suspension length (8)Chapter 3 Major parts of the rear axle design calculation (9)Suspension design calculations (9)Suspension structure of the classification (9)Suspension of the main parameters of the set (10)Influence of the parameters of the smooth (10)Influences of the parameters of the steering stability (11)Leaf spring design calculations (11)Leaf spring arranging schemes (11)Steel spring main parameters (11)Shock absorber design calculation (19)Track of shock absorber type (19)Shock absorber structure and work principle (19)Shock absorber and structure design of calculation (20)Track to determine the relative damping coefficient (20)Shock absorber damping coefficient determinations (21)Biggest unloading the determination of force (21)Shock absorber work to determine the diameter (22)Work cylinder wall thickness calculation and checking (23)Piston rod and the piston design (24)Piston size calculation (24)Bottom valve of design (25)Shock absorber view of the assembly process (27)Differential design calculation (30)The choice of the form of the structure of the differentia (30)The differential gears basic parameter selection (31)Planetary gear number of the choice (31)Planetary gear sphere to determine the radius (31)Planetary gear and half shaft gear gear calculation (31)Planetary gear and half shaft section of gear (32)Pressure Angle sure (32)Planetary gear shaft diameter and length of supports (32)Spur bevel gear differential of intensity (35)The Lord the design of the speed reducer is calculated (37)The determination of the slowdown (37)Lord the reduction gear of the calculation (38)Lord the reduction gear basic parameters selection (39)Chapter 4 Cars driving axle other parts design (42)The design of the car drive axle (42)The design of the car drive axle of cover (43)The design of the car differential shells (44)The selection of car differential bearing (44)Car differential of the bearing type design (45)Car half shaft of the selection of the design (45)U bolt design (46)Car driving axle assembly (46)Differential and the assembly of the Lord reducer (46)Driving axle final assembly (48)Driving axle always assembly section (51)Conclusion (52)Thanks (53)References (54)第1章绪论本课题的来源、大体前提条件和技术要求a. 本课题的来源:轻型载货汽车在汽车生产中占有大的比重。
Deform3D操作手册中文翻译

Deform3D操作手册中文翻译Chapter 1 DEFORM概述1.5 幾何表現Deform可以在進行2D或者3D的模擬,,通常,2D的模型較小,更容易設置且計算較快.一般的,如果一個模型可以用2D來模擬就不需要使用3D來模擬,因為3D模型所增加的細節而耗費的運算時間是不必要的.在2D模擬中有兩種幾何形式:軸對稱和平面應變.軸對稱模型認為滿每一個面的幾何特征都是從同一個中心線發射出來的. 平面應變認為沒有材料在平面垂直方向,上流動,並且在每個平面的方向上的流動是一致的.圖2所示為軸對稱及平面應變的實例. 近似與軸對稱或平面應變的物體也可以通過忽略其微小的差異而使用2D進行模擬. 例如.一個頭部不是規則六邊型的螺栓可以通過將頭部近似為半徑為0.525*(頭部兩邊之間的距離)的圓柱來簡化為軸對稱模型; 一個不斷變薄的葉輪的葉片可以近似成幾個平面應變截面的組合.一個圓柱的buckling完全是一個3D的過程.如果需要預測就必須進行3D的建模.盡管模型的確是軸對稱的,但是軸對稱的模擬不能顯示buckling(圖三).這樣的模型不能將3D簡化為2D來模擬.1.6. Deform系統Deform系統包括以下3個主要組成部分:1.前處理器: 用來新建,組裝,修改分析模擬或者生成數據文件需要的數據.2.模擬求解器:用來進行數字計算和寫結果文件.求解器讀數據文件,然後進行求解計算,最後將相應的結果數據寫到結果數據文件中.同時,求解器也用來在運算過程中對需要重新劃分網格的工件進行無縫的重劃網格式而生成新的有限元網格.當計算進行時,其還將包括錯誤信息在內的狀態信息寫入信息文件(.msg)和日志(.log文件).3.後處理器:用來讀取和以圖形的方式顯示求解器計算出來的結果文件,同時可以用來提取數字資料.1.7.前處理器DEFOR 前處理器使用一個用戶圖形界面來整理模擬需要的數據,同時其也用來輸出數據.工件描述(Object description)與工件相關的所有數據,包括幾何形狀,網格,溫度,材料等等.材料參數描述材料在經歷合理變形過程中需要的各種數據。
Interactions of chiral two-forms

a rXiv:h ep-th/991119v221D ec1999ULB-TH-99-28/hep-th/9911109November 1999Interactions of chiral two-forms 1XAVIER BEKAERT Abstract Two issues regarding the interactions of the chiral two-forms are reviewed.First,the problem of constructing Lorentz-invariant self-couplings of a single chiral two-form is investigated in the light of the Dirac-Schwinger condition on the energy-momentum tensor commutation relations.We show how the Perry-Schwarz condition follows from the Dirac-Schwinger criterion and point out that consistency of the gravitational coupling is automatic.Secondly,we study the possible local deformations of chiral two-forms.This problem reduces to the study of the local BRST cohomological group at ghost number zero.We proof that the only consistent deformations of a system of free chiral two-forms are (up to redefinitions)deformations that do not modify the abelian gauge symmetries of the free theory.The consequence of this result for a system consisting of a number of parallel M5-branes is explained.Mathematics Subject Classification:81T30,83C99,81T70Keywords:Chiral p-forms,Poincar´e invariance,BRST Cohomology,M5-brane 1Introduction:the chiral two-form and the M5-brane In the limit where bulk gravity decouples,the M5-brane is described by a six-dimensional field theory.Its bosonic sector includes,besides the five scalar fields which describe the position of the brane in transverse space,a chiral two-form (i.e.a two-form the field strength of which is self dual).A single M5-brane with strong classical fields is well understood;its Lagrangian is described in [1].For a long time,the obstacle to get such an action was due to the presence of the chiral two-form.When one tries to tries to incorporate the self-duality condition into an action a problem arises with preserving Lorentz invariance.There is a simple non-manifestly Lorentz-invariant free Lagrangian which has been given in [2],and which generalizes the Lagrangian of [3]for chiral bosons (the couplings to gravitation are included).As a non linear generalization,a Born-Infeld-like action for for a self-interacting chiral two-form was proposed in [4].The couplings to gravitation were added in a second paper [5].A manifestly covariant formulation of chiral p -forms has been developed in an interesting series of papers [6].This formulation is characterized by the presence of an extra field and an extra gauge invariance.This extrafield occurs non-polynomially in the action,even for the free chiral p -forms.It has been shown to be equivalent to the non-manifestly covariant treatment of [2]in Minkowski space [6].The question of Lorentz-invariant self-couplings (as well as consistent self-couplings in an external gravitational background)for a single chiral 2-form is the subject of the section 2.We show that this question can be handled by means of the Dirac-Schwinger condition on the commutation relations of the components of the energy-momentum tensor [7].This condition leads directly to the differential equation obtained in [4]and implies automatically consistency of the gravitational coupling [8].When several,say n ,M5-branes coincide,little is known pactifying one dimension of M-theory on a circle yields type IIA string theory.If the branes are longitudinal to the compact direction,the M5-branes appear as a set of coinciding D4-branes which are quite well understood.Their dynamics is governed by a five-dimensional U (n )Born-Infeld theory which,ignoring higher derivative terms,isanordinary U(n)non-abelian gauge theory.Turning back to the eleven dimensional picture,this suggests that a non-abelian extension of the chiral two-form should exist.Deformations of a system of N free chiral two-forms in six dimensions are only considered(N is expected to grow like n3).We ignore the fermions and the scalarfields as we believe that they will not modify our conclusions3.The analysis,outlined in the section3,shows that all continuous and local deformations of the free chiral2-forms does not modify the gauge algebra which remains abelian[11]. As a consequence,no localfield theory continuously connected with the free theory can describe a system of n coinciding M5-branes.This does not exclude non-local deformations of the abelian theory or local lagrangians that cannot be continuously deformed to the free one.2Covariant self interactions of a single chiral two-formThe non manifestly covariant action for a chiral2-form in a gravitational background isS[A ij]= dx0d5xB ij∂0A ij− dx0H(i,j,...=1,...,5)(1)with1B ij=√ǫijmnk B ij B mn.(5)2In order to write the action(1),it is necessary to assume that spacetime has the product form T×Σwhere T is the manifold of the time variable(usually a line).Of course,a spatial coordinate could equivalently play the rˆo le of the time variable,as in[4].Since B ij is gauge-invariant and identically transverse(∂i B ij=0),the action(1)is manifestly invariant under the usual gauge transformationsδΛA ij=∂iΛj−∂jΛi.Inflat space,it is also invariant under Lorentz transformations,but these do not take the usual form[2].We define the exterior form B to be the(time-dependent)spatial2-form with components B ij/√(6)Nand where˜d is the spatial exterior derivative operator.In the case where the second Betti number b2(Σ) of the spatial sections vanishes,this equation implies N(E−B)=˜dm,where m is an arbitrary spatial 1-form.To bring this equation to a more familiar form,one sets m i=A0i.The equations of motion read then F=∗F,where F0ij=˙A ij−∂i A0j+∂j A0i.This is the standard self-duality condition.Alternatively, one may use the gauge freedom to set m=0,which yields the self-duality condition in the temporal gauge(E=B).The brackets of the gauge-invariant magneticfields B ij can be found by follow the Dirac method for constrained systems[12]but one may shortcut the whole procedure and directly read the brackets from the kinetic term of the action(1)[B ij(x),B mn(x′)]=12g B ij B ij,y2=1g,f1=∂1f,f2=∂2f.(10)Then,the condition(8)yields tof21+y1f1f2+(13!ǫijklm F Aklm,F A ijk=∂i A A jk+∂j A A ki+∂k A A ij.(13)The action S0is invariant under the following abelian gauge transformationsδΛA A ij=∂iΛA j−∂jΛA i.(14) This set of gauge transformations is reducible because ifΛA i=∂iǫA,the variation of A A ij is0.Our strategy for studying the possible local deformations of the action(12)is based on the observation that these are in bijective correpondence with the local BRST cohomological group H0,6(s|d)[15],where s is the BRST differential acting on thefields,the ghosts,and their conjugate antifields,d is the ordinary space-time exterior derivative and the upper indices refer to ghost number and form degree resp.By applying the standard method of the antifield formalism[16],one can introduce the ghosts C A i,the ghosts of ghostsηA,and the antifields A∗Aij,C∗Ai andη∗A.Their respective parity,ghost number, antighost number are listed in following tableantigh gh00C A i0102A∗Aij1-100η∗A3-31-δ-1111antifields,a=a0.These deformations contain only strictly gauge-invariant terms,i.e.,polynomials in the abelian curvatures and their derivatives(Born-Infeld terms are in this category)as well as Chern-Simons terms,which are(off-shell)gauge-invariant under the abelian gauge symmetry up to a total derivative. An example of a Chern-Simons term is given by the kinetic term of(12),which can be rewritten as F∧∂0A.5Second,one may deform the action and the gauge transformations while keeping their algebra invariant.In BRST terms,the corresponding cocycles involve(non trivially)the antifields A∗Aij but not C∗Ai orη∗A.Finally,one may deform everything,including the gauge algebra;the corresponding cocycles involve all the antifields.Reformulating the problem of deforming the free action(12)in terms of BRST cohomology enables one to use the powerful tools of homological algebra.Following the approach of[17],we have completely worked out the BRST cohomogical classes at ghost number zero.In particular,we have established that one can always get rid of the antifields by adding trivial solutions[11](The complete proof will be given in[18]).This result can be straightforwardly generalized for a system of chiral p-forms in 2p+2dimensions6.In other words,the only consistent local deformations of a system of free chiral p-forms are(up to redefinitions)deformations that do not modify the abelian gauge symmetries of the free theory.These involve the abelian curvatures or Chern-Simons terms.There are no other consistent, local,deformations(This completely justify the assumptions made for the dependence of H on the A ij through the B ij in the section2).4AcknowledgmentsI am grateful to the respective organizers of the meeting“Quantum aspects of gauge theories,supersym-metry and unification”and the“9th Midwest Geometry Conference”for their very enjoyable conferences.I would like to thank my collaborators on the works which were the sources of this talk,M.Henneaux and A.Sevrin.This work has been supported in part by the“Actions de Recherche Concert´e es”of the “Direction de la Recherche Scientifique-Communaut´e Fran¸c aise de Belgique”and by IISN-Belgium. The author is“Chercheur I.I.S.N.”(Belgium).References[1]P.Pasti,D.Sorokin and M.Tonin,Phys.Lett.B398(1997)41,hep-th/9701037;M.Aganagic,J.Park,C.Popescu,J.H.Schwarz,Nucl.Phys.B496(1997)191,hep-th/9701166;I.Bandos,K.Lechner,A.Nurmagambetov,P.Pasti,D.Sorokin and M.Tonin,Phys.Rev.Lett.78(1997)4332, hep-th/9701149[2]M.Henneaux and C.Teitelboim,Phys.Lett.B206(1988)650;M.Henneaux and C.Teitelboim,Consistent Quantum Mechanics of Chiral p-Forms,in Proc.Quantum Mechanics of Fundamental Systems2,Santiago1987,Plenum Press(New York1989).[3]R.Floreanini and R.Jackiw,Phys.Rev.Lett.59(1987)1873.[4]M.Perry and J.H.Schwarz,Nucl.Phys.B489(1997)47-64,hep-th/9611065[5]J.H.Schwarz,Phys.Lett.B395(1997)191,hep-th/9701008[6]P.Pasti,D.Sorokin and M.Tonin,Phys.Lett.B352(1995)59;Phys.Rev.D52(1995)427.[7]P.A.M.Dirac,Rev.Mod.Phys.34(1962)592;J.Schwinger,Phys.Rev.130(1963)406,800.[8]X.Bekaert and M.Henneaux,Int.J.Th.Phys.38(1999)1161,hep-th/9806062[9]I.R.Klebanov and A.A.Tseytlin,Nucl.Phys.B475(1996)164,hep-th/9604089;S.S.Gubser andI.R.Klebanov,Phys.Lett.B41341,hep-th/9708005[10]M.Henningson and K.Skenderis,JHEP9807(1998)023,hep-th/9806087[11]X.Bekaert,M.Henneaux and A.Sevrin,Phys.Lett.B468(1999)228,hep-th/9909094[12]P.A.M.Dirac,Lectures on Quantum Mechanics,Academic Press(New York:1964);M.Henneauxand C.Teitelboim,Quantization of Gauge Systems,Princeton University Press(Princeton:1992).[13]C.Teitelboim,Ann.Phys.(N.Y.)79(1973)542;The Hamiltonian Structure of Spacetime,in GeneralRelativity and Gravitation:One Hundred Years After the Birth of Albert Einstein(A.Held ed.), Plenum Press(New York:1980);C.Teitelboim,Ph.D Thesis(Princeton:1973).[14]M.Hatsuda,K.Kamimura and S.Sekiya,hep-th/9906103.[15]G.Barnich and M.Henneaux,Phys.Lett.B311(1993)123,hep-th/9304057[16]I.A.Batalin and G.A.Vilkovisky,Phys.Lett.B102(1981)27;Phys.Rev.D28(1983)2567;Phys.Rev.D30(1984)508[17]G.Barnich,F.Brandt and M.Henneaux,Comm.Math.Phys174(1995)93,hep-th/9405194;M.Henneaux,Phys.Lett.B368(1996)83,hep-th/9511145;M.Henneaux,B.Knaepen and C.Schomblond,Comm.Math.Phys.186(1997)137,hep-th/9606181;M.Henneaux and B.Knaepen, Phys.Rev.D56(1997)6076,hep-th/9706119;Nucl.Phys.B548(1999)491,hep-th/9812140;hep-th/9912052[18]X.Bekaert,M.Henneaux and A.Sevrin,in preparation[19]X.Bekaert,M.Henneaux and A.Sevrin,hep-th/9912077Adress:Physique Th´e orique et Math´e matique,Universit´e Libre de Bruxelles,Campus Plaine C.P.231B-1050Bruxelles,Belgiumxbekaert@ulb.ac.be6。
Noncompact Heisenberg spin magnets from high-energy QCD II. Quantization conditions and ene

A(s, t) ∼ −is
(iα ¯ s )N
N =2
¯ s EN /4 s−α ξa,N (t)ξb,N (t) , (α ¯ s σN ln s)1/2
(1.1)
where α ¯ s = αs Nc /π is the QCD coupling constant and the sum goes over an arbitrary number of reggeized gluons exchanged in the t−channel, N = 2, 3, .... In the GLLA approximation, the reggeized gluons interact with each other elastically and form colour-singlet compound states [7]. These states can be defined as solutions to the Bartels-Kwiecinski-Praszalowicz (BKP) equation [3, 8] HN Ψ(z1 , z2 , ..., zN ) = EN Ψ(z1 , z2 , ..., zN ) . (1.2) The effective QCD Hamiltonian HN acts on the colour SU (Nc ) charges of N reggeized gluons and their two-dimensional transverse coordinates, zk (k = 1, ..., N ), which belong to the hyperplane orthogonal to the momenta of two scattered particles. The contribution to the scattering amplitude (1.1) of the compound states built from N reggeized gluons, Ψ(z1 , z2 , ..., zN ), has the ¯ s EN /4 standard Regge form ∼ s−α . It is dominated at large s by the contribution of the ground state EN for Eq. (1.2). Obviously, it increases (or decreases) with s if the energy of the ground state is negative (or positive). As we will show below, the spectrum of (1.2) is gapless (see Eq. (5.6) below) and, as a consequence, one has to retain in (1.1) the contribution of the excited states next to the ground state. This amounts to appearance of the additional factor (α ¯s σN ln s)−1/2 in the r.h.s. of (1.1). The residue factors ξa(b),N (t) measure the overlap of Ψ(z1 , z2 , ..., zN ) with the wave functions of the scattered particles and they depend, in general, on the momentum 2 transferred, t, and the colour factor, 1/Nc . Calculation of the spectrum of the compound states (1.2) for arbitrary number of reggeized gluons N and eventual resummation of their contribution to the scattering amplitude (1.1) is a longstanding problem in high-energy QCD [9, 10, 11, 12]. At N = 2, the solution to (1.2) has been found a long time ago – the well-known Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov (BFKL) Pomeron [7]. At N = 3 the solution to (1.2) – the Odderon state in QCD [13], was formulated only a few years ago by Janik and Wosiek [14] by making use of the remarkable integrability properties of the effective QCD Hamiltonian [1, 2]. Their solution has been later verified in Refs. [15, 16]. The methods employed at N = 3 in [14] can not be generalized, however, to higher (N ≥ 4) reggeized gluon compound states and very little is known about the solutions to (1.2) for N ≥ 4. Recently, a significant progress has been made in solving the Schr¨ odinger equation (1.2) for higher N in the multi-colour limit, Nc → ∞ and α ¯ s = fixed [5, 16]. The first results of the calculation of the ground state energy EN for higher reggeized gluon compound states in multi-colour QCD 2
Effective action for scalar fields in two-dimensional gravity

a rXiv:g r-qc/1133v27May22Effective action for scalar fields in two-dimensional gravity M.O.Katanaev ∗Steklov Mathematical Institute,Gubkin St.8,Moscow 117966,Russia 1October 2001Abstract We consider a general two-dimensional gravity model minimally or non-minimally coupled to a scalar field.The canonical form of the model is eluci-dated,and a general solution of the equations of motion in the massless case is reviewed.In the presence of a scalar field all geometric fields (zweibein and Lorentz connection)are excluded from the model by solving exactly their Hamiltonian equations of motion.In this way the effective equations of mo-tion and the corresponding effective action for a scalar field are obtained.It is written in a Minkowskian space-time and does not include any geometric vari-ables.The effective action arises as a boundary term and is nontrivial both for open and closed universes.The reason is that unphysical degrees of free-dom cannot be compactly supported because they must satisfy the constraint equation.As an example we consider spherically reduced gravity minimallycoupled to a massless scalar field.The effective action is used to reproduce the Fisher and Roberts solutions.1IntroductionIn recent years great attention has been paid to two-dimensional gravity models mainly for two reasons:a close relation to string theory and good laboratories to get deeper insights in classical and quantum properties of gravity models.The first and the simplest two-dimensional constant curvature gravity was proposed in [1].It attracted much interest after the papers [2,3].Constant curvature surfaces are described by the integrable Liouville equation,and the main concern was given to physical interpretation of the solutions and inclusion of matter fields.In the present paper we consider a wide class of two-dimensional gravity models with torsion and equivalent generalized dilaton models.A two-dimensional gravity model with torsion was proposed in [4,5,6]to provide dynamics for the metric ona string world sheet already at the classical level.Two-dimensional dilaton gravity [7,8]was proposed as an effective model coming from the string theory.Both models turned out to be integrable.A general solution to the equations of motion of two-dimensional gravity with torsion wasfirst given in the conformal gauge[9,10,11]. All solutions are divided into two classes:(i)constant curvature and zero torsion and(ii)nonconstant curvature and nonzero torsion.In this way constant curvature gravity models are included in two-dimensional gravity with torsion with a well defined purely geometric action and a natural way of introduction of matterfields. The equations of motions of two-dimensional gravity with torsion were integrated in the light-cone gauge[12]and without any gaugefixing[13,14,15].At that time the equivalence of two-dimensional gravity with torsion and dilaton gravity was unknown,and solution of the equations of motion for a generalized dilaton gravity was independently obtained in the light-cone gauge[16].Later it was realized that in fact the two-dimensional gravity models with torsion and dilaton gravity models are equivalent[17,18,19].From a geometric point of view the dilatonfield is the momentum canonically conjugate to the space component of the Lorentz connection.The equivalence of these models is nontrivial because they contain a different set offields.Throughout this paper we consider a general two-dimensional gravity model quadratic in torsion.The integrability of the model is connected to the existence of a Killing vectorfield in the absence of matter.It is worth noting that without matterfields the two-dimensional gravity models do not describe any propagating degree of freedom.This suggests a generalization of the models by addition of matter fields to attack the problems arising in black hole formation and quantum gravity. Unfortunately,addition of matter destroys integrability.Some exact solutions of two-dimensional gravity with torsion coupled to scalarfields were found[20,21,22]. We mention also nontrivial solutions for dilaton gravity coupled to scalarfields found in[16,23,24].In Section7.2we consider a Lagrangian with arbitrary dependence on scalar curvature and torsion.There we clarify the statement that this general model yields integrable equations of motion made in the literature[14,25,26].Let us note that the two-dimensional gravity model nonminimally coupled to a scalarfield is important for general relativists working in four dimensions.It is well known that spherically reduced general relativity minimally coupled to a scalarfield is equivalent to the dilaton gravity model nonminimally coupled to a scalarfield in two-dimensional space-time[27].This model may be the simplest one to describe the dynamics of a black hole formation by spherical scalar waves.Recently it attracted much interest due to the discovery of critical phenomena in the black hole formation [28](for review see[29])found in numerical simulations.A satisfactory analytical calculation of the critical exponent and scaling period of discrete self-similarity has been missing up to now,and hence our understanding of critical phenomena should be considered incomplete.In the present paper we consider the two-dimensional gravity model with torsion or the equivalent dilaton gravity coupled to a scalarfield.We admit nonminimal coupling to be sufficiently general to include spherically reduced gravity.After de-scribing the Lagrangian we elucidate the Hamiltonian formulation of the model in full detail.The canonical form is essential for our approach and I am not aware how to write down the effective action in the Lagrangian formulation.Afterwards a gen-2eral solution of the equations of motion in the matterless case and the equivalence with the dilaton model are briefly reviewed.In the presence of a scalarfield the equations of motion are not integrable.Nevertheless they may be partly integrated. We solve the geometric part of the equations of motion with respect to the zweibein and Lorentz connection assuming the scalarfield to be arbitrary.Then the solution is substituted into the equations of motion for a scalarfield.In this way we obtain the effective equations of motion only for a scalarfield and its conjugate momentum. Next we show that the effective action yielding these equations arises as a boundary term.It appears because unphysical variables cannot be compactly supported func-tions as the consequence of constraint equations.The effective equations of motion are written in a Minkowskian space-time and provide a general solution to the whole problem because the metric can be easily reconstructed for a given solution to the effective equations of motion.The effective action for spherically reduced gravity in a special case wasfirst derived in[30].Here we generalize this action by considering the more general two-dimensional gravity part and arbitrary coupling to scalars. For spherically reduced gravity we give a more general effective action depending on one arbitrary function on time to befixed by boundary conditions on the metric.The reduction of the whole system of the equations of motion to the equations for a scalarfield and its conjugate momentum does not provide a general solution of the model because the effective equations are integro-differential and complicated. As an example I considered spherically reduced gravity.The effective action has clear limiting cases and for a small scalarfield reduces to an ordinary action for spherical waves on a Minkowskian or Schwarzschild background.In the static case the equations may be integrated in elementary functions and yield the same solution as found by Fisher[31].As an example we consider also the Roberts solution[32] which provides a self-similar solution to the effective equations of motion.2The actionLet us consider a Lorentzian surface with coordinates xα={τ,σ},α=0,1.We assume that it is equipped with a Riemann–Cartan geometry defined by a zweibein eαa(x)and a Lorentz connectionωα(x).A general type action for a scalarfield coupled to two-dimensional gravity has the formS= dx2(L G+L X),(1) where the Lagrangian for a scalarfield X(x)of mass m=const is1L X=−geometric part of the Lagrangian is given by a two-dimensional gravity with torsion written in thefirst order formL G=−12p a p a U+V ,(3)where the densities of two-dimensional scalar curvature and the pseudotrace of tor-sion are given byR=eR=2ˆεαβ∂αωβ,(4)T∗a=eT∗a=2ˆεαβ(∂αeβa−ωαεa b eβb).(5)Hereˆεαβ=eεαβ=eεab eαa eβb is the totally antisymmetric tensor density,ˆε01=−ˆε10=−1,πand p a are considered as independent variables,and U=U(π) and V=V(π)are arbitrary functions ofπ.In the second order form,when it exists,this Lagrangian is quadratic in torsion and arbitrarily depends on the scalar curvature.A hat over a symbol means that it is a tensor density of weight−1.For the nonminimally coupled scalarfield we haveρ=ρ(π).The case U=0and V=0describes surfaces of zero torsion and curvature and is not interesting from the geometric point of view.Therefore we assume that at least one of the functions differs from zero.The Lagrangian(3)is quite general. If U=0then one has the gravity model with zero torsion,and the Lagrangian in the second order form is an arbitrary function of the scalar curvature defined by V. For U=1and V=π2+const one immediately recovers two-dimensional gravity with torsion quadratic in curvature and torsion[4,5,6].It is essentially a unique purely geometric invariant model yielding second order equations of motion for the zweibein and Lorentz connection.In this caseπand p a are proportional to the scalar curvature and the pseudotrace of torsion provided equations of motion are fulfilled.For arbitrary functions U(π)and V(π)when matterfields do not interact with the Lorentz connectionωαthe latter can be excluded from the model by the use of its algebraic equations of motion(Section6).This leads to a generalized two-dimensional dilaton gravity,the functionπ(x)being the dilatonfield.Then the matter Lagrangian(2)describes scalars minimally,ρ=const,or nonminimally,ρ=ρ(π),coupled to dilaton gravity.Among these models of particular interest is the spherically reduced gravity(see Section11)for whichU=1κ,ρ=π3Equations of motionEquations of motion following from the action(1)can be written in the form1δπ:−12p a p a U′+V′ −1e δS2T∗a−p a U=0,(8)ˆεβαδSδeβa:∇αp a+εαa 1eδS2gαβ(∂X2−m2X2)(12)is the energy-momentum tensor of the scalarfield.Primes on functions U,V,andρalways mean derivatives with respect to the argumentπ.Transformation of Greek indices into Latin ones and vice versa is everywhere performed using the zweibein field and its inverse,and ∇denotes the covariant derivative with Christoffel’s sym-bols.The action(1)is invariant under local Lorentz rotations and general coordinate transformations which produce linear relations between the equations.Local Lorentz rotations by the angleω(x)δeαa=−eαbεb aω,δωα=∂αω,δp a=εa b p bω,δπ=0,(13)δX=0lead to the following dependence between equations of motion∇αδSδeαa eαbεb a−δStogether with the identity(14)produce two linear relations between equations of motione αa ∇βδS δe βa T αβa +1δωβεαβR −δSδp a ∇αp a −δS∂(∂0ω0)=0,(17)π1=∂(L G +L X )∂(∂0e 0a )=0,(19)p 1a =∂(L G +L X )∂(∂0X )=ρg 11e ∂1X.(21)The last momentum has dimension [P ]=1.(For definition of dimensions of the fields see Appendix.)We see that the gravity Lagrangian (3)is already written in the canonical form.The Hamiltonian for the whole system is given byH = dσ(ω0G +e 0a G a ),(22)whereG =−∂1π+p a εa b e 1b ,(23)G a =−∂1p a −ω1p b εb a +e 1b εab12m 2X 2(24)+e 1b εab2ρP 2+ρg 11P ∂1X.The functions G and G a are a Lorentz scalar and vector,respectively.Note that Hamiltonian (22)for polynomial U (π)and V (π)is polynomial in the fields in the absence of scalars.Addition of a scalar field makes these functions nonpolynomial because of the denominator g 11and possible nonminimal coupling ρ(π).6The equal time Poisson brackets are defined as usual{e1a,p′b}=δa bδ(σ−σ′),{ω1,π′}=δ(σ−σ′),{X,P′}=δ(σ−σ′),(25)where a prime over a function means that it is taken at a pointσ′.Computing the evolution of primary constraints(17)and(19)one gets the secondary constraints∂0π0={p0,H}=−G=0,(26)∂0p0a={p0a,H}=−G a=0.(27) Thus the Hamiltonian(22)is given by a linear combination of secondary constraints. The secondary constraints form a closed algebra{G a,G′b}=εab Up c G c+ 1eρL X G δ,(28){G a,G′}=εa b G bδ,(29){G,G′}=0,(30) where U′,V′,andρ′denote derivatives with respect to the argumentπ,δ=δ(σ−σ′), and L X is the Lagrangian for scalars(2)expressed through canonical variablesL X=−1ρg11P2+ρHere for brevity we introduced a light-like vectork a=e1a+e1bεbag11.Straightforward calculations yield{ G a, G′b}=εab(Up c+ω1k c) G cδ,(33){ G a,G′}=εa b G bδ−k a Gδ′.(34) The algebra of G a is related to the conformal algebra generated by two scalar(with respect to Lorentz rotations)constraintsH0=−e1aεa b G b=−e1aεa b G b+ω1G,(35)H1=e1a G a=e1a G a+ω1G.(36) The constraints H1and H0are Lorentz invariant projections of the vector con-straint G a on the directions parallel and perpendicular to the vector e1a,respec-tively.Straightforward calculations show that the new set of constraints satisfy the following algebra[35]{H0,H′0}=−(H1+H′1)δ′,(37){H0,H′1}=−(H0+H′0)δ′,(38){H1,H′1}=−(H1+H′1)δ′,(39){H0,G′}={H1,G′}=−Gδ′,(40){G,G′}=0,(41) whereδ′=∂g11 −e11(H0−ω1G)+e10(H1−ω1G) ,(42) G1=12p a p a U+V−ρ2ρP2−ρ5The canonical transformationAt the classical level two models related by a canonical transformation are equiva-lent.At the quantum level this property is not valid in general:There are canonical transformations resulting in different quantum models.Special care must be given to nonlinear canonical transformations.This means that in the canonical quanti-zation the correct choice of canonical variables is of primary importance.Nobody knows the correct choice of variables because gravity is not yet quantized.Therefore one is free to choose any set of canonical variables if it leads to a simpler quantum model.Although we do not consider quantization of the model in the present paper the canonical variables introduced in this section are essential for the solution of the constraints in Section8already at the classical level.In this section we make the canonical transformation e1a,p a→q,q⊥,p,p⊥which explicitly separates the Lorentz angle and simplifies many formulas[35].Consider a generating functional depending on old coordinates and new momentaF=1e10−e11.(46)Varying it with respect to the old coordinates one obtains the relation between old and new momentap a=p e1ag11.(47)It shows thatp=e1a p a,p⊥=p aεa b e1b,that is,p and p⊥are projections of the momentum p a on the vector e1a and the perpendicular direction.Variation of the generating functional(46)with respect to the momenta yields the relation between the coordinatese10=e q sh q⊥,e11=e q ch q⊥.(48) To drop the modulus signs in Eq.(46)we assume for definiteness thate11>0and e11>e10.(49) The space component of the metric equals tog11=−e2qand is always negative.We see that the coordinate q⊥coincides with the Lorentz angle while q parame-terizes the length of the vector e1a.The square of the momentum isp a p a=(p2⊥−p2)e−2q.(50)9The constraints in new variables have the formH0=−∂1p⊥+p∂1q⊥+p⊥∂1q−ω1p+ω1(−∂1π+p⊥)+12m2X2 −12∂1X2,(51)H1=−∂1p−ω1∂1π+p∂1q+p⊥∂1q⊥+P∂1X,(52)G=−∂1π+p⊥.(53) For U=const the quadratic part in the momenta12eπ R+12p a T∗a−e 12T∗a−εβγ∂βeγa .(56)Therefore instead of the Lorentz connection one can choose the torsion components T∗a as independent variables.Solving their algebraic equations of motion one arrives at the generalized dilaton modelL D=−12e∂π2U−eV,(57) 10depending on two arbitrary functions U(π)and V(π).Here we used the obvious abbreviation∂π2=gαβ∂απ∂βπ.Thus,if the matter Lagrangian does not contain the Lorentz connection then the dilaton model is equivalent to the two-dimensional gravity with torsion.In fact,we have proved that if the original variables eαa,ωα, p a,π,and X satisfy equations of motion(7)–(11),then the variables gαβ,π,and X satisfy equations of motion following from the Lagrangian L D+L X.The inverse statement is as follows.Let gαβ,π,and X satisfy equations of motion for L D+L X. Solve the algebraic equation eαa eβbηab=gαβfor zweibein(a solution is unique up to a local Lorentz rotations),construct p a using Equation(9),and solve equations (8)and(56)for T∗a andωα,respectively.Then the original equations of motion (7)–(11)will be satisfied.The equivalence is a global one because the transformation of variables is non-degenerate(56)as far as nondegenerate is the zweibein.This equivalence yields the geometric meaning for the dilatonfield:It is the momentum conjugate to the space component of the Lorentz connectionω1.Variation of the action for the Lagrangian(57)with respect to the metric and the dilatonfield yields the equations of motion1δgαβ:−12 ∇απ ∇βπU+12∂π2U−V=0,(58)1δπ:−12∂π2U′−V′=0,(59)where =gαβ ∇α ∇βis the Laplace–Beltrami operator.This system of equations was solved in the conformal gauge in[16],but we are not aware how to solve directly this system of nonlinear equations of motion for arbitrary functions U and V without gaugefixing.In the next section we write down a general solution to the equivalent two-dimensional gravity with torsion we started with in an arbitrary coordinate system.The latter model turns out to be simpler,and a general solution will be written even without gaugefixing.7A general solution without matterThe important feature of two-dimensional gravity with torsion described by the Lagrangian(3)alone is its integrability.It has a long history.First the quadratic model was solved in the conformal[9,10]and light-cone[12]gauge.In[13,14, 15]a solution for the quadratic model was in fact obtained without gaugefixing. Afterwards this solution was clarified and generalized in the papers[37,19].In this section we summarize all approaches and write a general local solution of the equations of motion for arbitrary functions U and V in the absence of matterfields. It is naturally written in the canonical formulation.This solution has one Killing vectorfield,and using the conformal blocks technique one is able to construct easily all global(maximally extended along extremals)solutions of two-dimensional gravity with torsion or,equivalently,dilaton gravity for arbitrary given functions U and V. In this section we set X=0.7.1Local solutionThe integration of the equations of motion is most easily performed for the light cone components of the vectors in the tangent spacep ±=12(p 0±p 1),e 1±=12(e 10±e 11).(60)The Lorentz metric and antisymmetric tensor for the tangent space indices a ={+,−}become η±±= 0110 ,ε±±= 0−110.(61)The raising and lowering of the light cone indices is performed according to the rules p +=p −and p −=p +.Then equations of motion(7)–(10)taketheform −12T ∗+−p +U =0,(63)−12(p 2⊥−p 2)e −2q −Q −W =const ,(71)where Q and W are primitivesQ(π)= πdsU(s),W(π)= πdsV(s)e−Q(s).(72)They have dimensions[Q]=1,[W]=[A]=l−2,as the consequence of(285)and(284).The constants of integration in Equations (72)do not matter because A by itself is a constant on the equations of motion∂αA=0.This equality is proved by direct calculations using equations of motion(65)–(67). Note that this integral of motion depends only on the momenta and its conservation is the consequence of eqs.(65)–(67)only.Its existence will be clarified in the next section.This integral of motion was independently found in dilaton gravity[38,39].The second important observation is that the formdxαfα=√p−e Q(73)is closed on the equations of motion.Here we introduced a dimensionfull gravita-tional constant[κ]=l−2in order for fαto be dimensionless[fα]=1.To prove the closedness of the form(73)one has to verify that the expressionˆεαβ∂αfβ=0vanishes identically when equations of motion(63),(65),and(67)are satisfied.It means that at least locally the one form(73)may be written as the gradient of some scalar functionfα=∂αf.(74) Afterwards a general solution to the equations of motion(62)–(67)is written imme-diatelyeα+=1κp−e−Q∂αf,(75)eα−=1√p−−1κ (A+W)U+e−Q V ∂αf,(77)p+=1is the consequence of the linear dependence of the equations of motion given by (14)and(16).Note that the solution(75)–(78)was obtained without any gauge fixing and contains three arbitrary functions f,πand p−.Thefirst two functions correspond to the invariance of the model under general coordinate transformations. They must satisfy the restrictiondπ∧d f=0orεαβ∂απ∂βf=0.(79) The third function p−corresponds to a Lorentz rotation and must be strictly positive p−>0or negative p−<0.The second class of solutions describes surfaces with nonzero torsion and noncon-stant scalar curvature which are most easily calculated using Equations(62)–(64). The corresponding metric isds2=2eα+eβ−dxαdxβ=2e−Q 1√√∂f.(81) Its square isK2=2√κ∂1f[√√κdxαeα−is closed on the equations of motion (64),(65),and (66).A similar procedure results in a general solution to the equations of motione α−=1κp +e −Q ∂αf,(87)e α+=1√p +−1κ (A +W )U +e −Q V ∂αf,(89)p −=1κ(A +W )d f 2+1κd fdπ .(91)This difference may be eliminated by the redefinition f →−f .At the end of this section we make a short comment on the conserved quantity A (71).For the Schwarzschild solution it equals a mass of the black hole up to a constant factor (see Section 11).The equationA =const (92)is a first class constraint of the model.One may check that its space derivative is expressed in terms of the secondary constraints∂1A =e −Q −p a G a +12p c p c U +V k a e −Q Gδ,{A, G ′0}={A, G ′1}= (p ⊥−p )e −2q ω1+1g 11H 0−e 1a εa b p b 2p a p a U +V G e −Q δ,= pe −2q H 0−p ⊥e −2q H 1+ (p ⊥−p )e −2q ω1+1g 11H 0+e 1a p a 2p a p a U +V G e −Q δ= p⊥e−2q H0−pe−2q H1+ −(p⊥−p)e−2qω1+1(π R+p a T∗a)−e U,(94)2where U(℘,π)is an arbitrary function of two scalar functions℘=p a p a andπ.For the linear function U=℘U/2+V in℘we recover the original gravity model(3). In addition we clarify the statement that equations of motion are integrable in this more general case[14,25,26].Equations of motion for the Lagrangian(94)in light-cone coordinates take the formδS:−ˆεαβ(∂αeβ+−ωαeβ++2p−U,℘eα+eβ−)=0,(96)δp+δS:∂απ−p+eα++p−eα−=0,(98)δωβδSˆεβα:∂αp−−ωαp−−eα+U=0,(100)δeβ−whereU,℘=∂U∂π.We have nine equations for nine independent variablesπ,p±,ωα,eα±.There are three linear relations between equations of motion(14),(16)due to the symmetry under general coordinate transformations and local Lorentz rotations.It means that tofind a general solution to the equations of motion one has to solve only six independent equations.Equations(95)–(97)may be written in the form−1T⋆±−2p±U,℘=0.(102)2where the scalar curvature and torsion are defined by equations(4),(5).If these equations have a unique solution with respect toπand p±then the Lagrangian(94) is nothing else then the Legendre transform of some function=eF(R,T2)(103)L(2)Gdepending on the scalar curvature R and the torsion squared term T2=T∗a T∗a with respect to three variables−R/2and−T∗a/2.The Lagrangian written in thefirst order form(94)is more general because we do not assume that a function U(℘,π) admits the Legendre transformation.Let us try tofind the six unknownsωα,eα±in terms of the conjugate momenta considered as arbitrary functions.Forfixed indexαEquations(98)–(100)constitute a set of three linear algebraic inhomogeneous equations forωα,eα±.Its determinant vanishes identically,and hence for any nontrivial solution there must exist a rela-tion between the momenta.Tofind it one may take the linear combination of the equations(99)p−+(100)p+and using equation(98)find∂α℘−2∂απU=0.It means that momenta must satisfy the following ordinary differential equationd℘(−∂απ+p+eα+),(105)p−1ωα=(p+eβ+) =0.(107)℘Without loss of generality we setp+eα+=℘e−Q fα,where fαis a one form and Q(℘,π)is some unknown scalar function of two variables to be specified later.Then Equation(107)takes the form℘e−Qˆεαβ[∂αfβ−∂απfβ(2U Q,℘+Q,π−2U,℘)]=0.(108) Solution of this equation always exists for reasonable functionsπ,U,and Q,but a solution cannot be written explicitly in a general case.It can be exactly integrated in a particular case.If we choose the function Q satisfying the partial differential equation2U Q,℘+Q,π−2U,℘=0,(109) then a one form fαmust be closed.It means that locally this one form is exact(74). Hence we get a general solutioneα+=2p−e−Q∂αf,(110) where f is an arbitrary function,and Q is a solution of the partial differential Equation(109).The rest of the equations of motion are satisfied as the consequence of their linear dependence.Equations for characteristics℘(π),Q(℘(π),π)for Equation(109)ared℘dπ=2∂Uone has to extend the solution along extremals (geodesics).This can be done using the constructive conformal block method developed for the Lorentzian [42,43,44]and Euclidean [45]signaturemetric.An equivalent set of rules in the Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates may be found in [46,47].To apply the conformal blocks technique one has to rewrite local solutions obtained in the previous section in the conformal form.This should be done in every domain where the solution is defined because a global solution is obtained by gluing all patches together.Before doing this we write the metric (80)in the diagonal gauge for comparison with the metric in the matterfull case.In a domain with A +W >0we leave the coordinate πas it is and transform the coordinate f onlyf =1κ2e −Q 1A +W .(114)For A +W >0coordinates τand πare timelike and spacelike,respectively.This metric can be easily rewritten in the conformal gauge suitable for the global analysis.Introducing the space coordinate σdefined by the equationdπ√2κe −Q (A +W )(dτ2−dσ2),A +W >0.(115)Introducing the invariant variable ˆq related to πby ordinary differential equationd ˆq √dσ=N (ˆq ),(118)and the conformal factor isN(ˆq)=12σ+g(π),where g(π)is defined by the same Equation(113).Then solution(80)takes adiagonal formds2=−1A+W−1dτ=±A+Wκ,the metric takes a conformallyflat formds2=−1dτ=−N(ˆq).Solutions in domains A+W>0and A+W<0may be united in the wayds2=|N(ˆq)|(dτ2−dσ2),dˆqfunctions.This will be done in two steps.First,we solve three constraints(51)–(53),which are equivalent to the variational derivatives of the action with respect to the time components of the zweibein and Lorentz connectionδS/δe0a andδS/δω0. Afterwards we solve the rest of the geometric part of the equations of motion.The constraints G and G a in the light cone coordinates areG=−∂1π+e1+p+−e1−p−,(121) G±=−∂1p±∓ω1p±∓e1∓ p+p−U+V−ρ4e1±P2∓,(122) where we introduced a shorthand notation1P±=。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
du (cl) T (u), (k = 1, 2, · · ·), 2π 2k 1 = U 3 (u) − (U ′ (u))2 . 2
(1.5)
where the first few densities are written by T2
(cl)
=u), T6
2π
I2k−1 =
0
du T2k (u), 2π
∞ n=−∞
(k = 1, 2, · · ·). L−n e
√ −1nu
(1.1)
Here the densities T2k (u) are differential polynomials of the energy momentum tensor of
α γ
ndau Institute for Theoretical Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow 142432, RUSSIA
β
Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0062, JAPAN
equation. The Local Integrals of Motion I2k−1 tend to I2k−1 . I2k−1 =
(cl) 2π 0
The Poisson bracket structure {, } gives the second Hamiltonian structure of the KdV
+ e−2π
F2 (u1 )F1 (u2 )F2 (u3 )F1 (u4 ) · · · F1 (u2k ))du1du2 · · · du2k ,
where P is zero-mode operator. Because of the commutativity of the transfer matrix T(z ), the integtrals of motion commute with each other : [I2k−1 , I2l−1 ] = [I2k−1 , Gl ] = [Gk , Gl ] = 0. V.Bazhanov, A.Hibberd and S.Khoroshkin [2] considered the W -algebra W (sl3 ) version of [1]. V.Bazhanov, S.Lukyanov and Al. Zamolodchikov’s theory [1] can be regarded as the quantum version of the KdV problem, as it reduces to the classical KdV problem in classical limit CCF T → −∞, under the substitution T (u ) → − 6π CCF T { , }. U (u ), [ , ] → √ 6 −1CCF T 2 (1.4)
1
1
Introduction
V.Bazhanov, S.Lukyanov and Al.Zamolodchikov [1] constructed field theoretical analogue of the commuting transfer matrix T(z ) as the trace of the free field realization of the monodromy matrix associated with the quantum affine symmetry Uq (sl2 ). They call the coefficients of the asymptotic expansion of the operator logT(z ) at z → ∞, the Local Integrals of Motioin for the Virasoro algebra. The Local Integrals of Motion In have the form
√ √
1, 2, · · ·). They call the coefficients of the Taylor expnsion of the operator T(z ) at z = 0,
(e2π
−1P 2π ≧u1 ≧u2 ≧···≧u2k ≧0
−1 P
F1 (u1 )F2 (u2 )F1 (u3 )F2 (u4 ) · · · F2 (u2k ) (1.3)
N i=1
We
Zǫ ¯i the weight lattice. Let us set αi = ǫ ¯i − ¯ ǫi+1 ∈ P . 3
Here the symbol [a] stands for satisfy
j Let βm be the oscillators (1 ≦ j ≦ N, m ∈ Z − {0}) with the commutation relations 1)m] [(s−1)m] m [(r[− δn+m,0 (1 ≦ i = j ≦ N ) rm] [sm] i j (2.1) [βm , βn ]= −m [(r−1)m] [m] xsm sgn(i−j ) δn+m,0 (1 ≦ i = j ≦ N ) [rm] [sm] x a − x −a . x − x −1
(cl)
(1.6)
The KdV hierarchy are given by ∂t2k−1 U = {I2k−1 , U }, (k = 1, 2, · · ·).
(cl)
(1.7)
The purpose of this paper is to construct the elliptic version of the Integrals of Motion Ik and Gk given by V.Bazhanov, S.Lukyanov and Al.Zamolodchikov [1] and V.Bazhanov, A.Hibberd and S.Khoroshkin [2]. Our method of construction is completely different from those of [1, 2]. Instead of considering the transfer matrix T(z ), we directly give explicit for the deformed W -algebra Wq,t (slN ). formulae of both Local Integrals of Motion In and the Nonlocal Integrals of Motion Gm , [Im , In ] = 0, [Gm , Gn ] = 0, [Im , Gn ] = 0, (m, n = 1, 2, · · ·). (1.8)
T the Virasoro algebra T (u) = − CCF + 24
, where the operators Ln satisfies (n3 − n)δn+m,0 . The first few (1.2)
the commutation relation, [Ln , Lm ] = (n − m)Ln+m + densities T2k (u) are written by
γ
Graduate School of Mathematical Science, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8914, JAPAN
Abstract We review the deformed W -algebra Wq,t (slN ) and its screening currents. We explicitly construct the Local Integrals of Motion In (n = 1, 2, · · ·) for this deformed W -algebra. We explicitly construct the Nonlocal Integrals of Motion Gn (n = 1, 2, · · ·) by means of the screening currents. Our Integrals of Motion commute with each other, and give the elliptic version of those for the Virasoro algebra and the W -algebra W (sl3 ) [1, 2].
The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we give basic definition, including bosons, screening currents. In Section 3, we review the deformed W -algebra Wq,t (slN ). In Section 4, we construct explicit formulae for the Local Integrals of Motion explicit formulae for the Nonlocal Integrals of Motion Gm , (m = 1, 2, · · ·). In , (n = 1, 2, · · ·) for the deformed W -algebra Wq,t (slN ). In Section 5, we construct
CCF T 12
T2 (u) = T (u), T4 (u) =: T 2 (u) :, T6 (u) =: T 3 (u) : +