PH4 of Petunia Is an R2R3 MYB Protein That Activates Vacuolar Acidification
More than 80R2R3MYB regulatory genes in the genome of Arabidopsis

The Plant Journal (1998)14(3),273–284More than 80R2R3-MYB regulatory genes in the genome of Arabidopsis thalianaI.Romero 1,A.Fuertes 1,M.J.Benito 1,J.M.Malpica 2,A.Leyva 1and J.Paz-Ares 1,*1Centro Nacional de Biotecnologı´a-CSIC,Campus de Cantoblanco,28049-Madrid,Spain,and2Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias,ctra.de La Corun ˜a,Km.7,528040-Madrid,SpainSummaryTranscription factors belonging to the R2R3-MYB family contain the related helix-turn-helix repeats R2and R3.The authors isolated partial cDNA and/or genomic clones of 78R2R3-MYB genes from Arabidopsis thaliana and found accessions corresponding to 31Arabidopsis genes of this class in databanks,seven of which were not represented in the authors’collection.Therefore,there are at least 85,and probably more than 100,R2R3-MYB genes present in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome,representing the largest regulatory gene family currently known in plants.In contrast,no more than three R2R3-MYB genes have been reported in any organism from other phyla.DNA-binding studies showed that there are differences but also frequent overlaps in binding specificity among plant R2R3-MYB proteins,in line with the distinct but often related functions that are beginning to be recognized for these proteins.This large-sized gene family may contribute to the regulatory flexibility underlying the developmental and metabolic plasticity displayed by plants.IntroductionTranscription factors play a central role in the regulation of developmental and metabolic programs.Despite the large differences in these programs,existing among organisms from different eukaryotic phyla,their transcrip-tion factors are quite conserved and most of them can be grouped into a few families according to the structural features of the DNA-binding domain they contain.One of these families is that of the R2R3-MYB proteins,whose complexity in plants is addressed in this study.The prototype of this family is the product of the animal c-MYB proto-oncogene,whose DNA-binding domain consists of three related helix-turn-helix motifs of about 50amino acid residues,the so-called R1,R2andReceived 18August 1997;revised 26January 1998;accepted 28January 1998.*For correspondence (fax ϩ33415854506;e-mail jpazares@cnb.uam.es).©1998Blackwell Science Ltd273R3repeats.The repeat most proximal to the N-terminus(R1)does not affect DNA-binding specificity and is missing in oncogenic variants of c-MYB,such as v-MYB,and in the known plant R2R3-MYB proteins (Graf,1992;Lipsick,1996;Lu ¨scher and Eisenman,1990;Martin and Paz-Ares,1997;Thompson and Ramsay,1995).R2R3-MYB proteins belong to the MYB superfamily,which also includes proteins with two or three more distantly related repeats (e.g.of the R1/2type,the progenitor of the R1and R2repeats),and proteins with one repeat,either of the R1/2type (Feldbru ¨gge et al .,1997)or of the R3type (Bilaud et al .,1996;Kirik and Ba ¨umlein,1996).Genes of the MYB superfamily have been found in all eukaryotic organisms in which their presence has been investigated.However,the R2R3-type is not present in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and only 1–3copies of R2R3-MYB genes per haploid genome have been described in organisms from protists and animals (Graf,1992;Lipsick,1996;Lu ¨scher and Eisenman,1990;Thompson and Ramsay,1995).In contrast,preliminary evidence suggest that plants contain a much larger number of these genes (Avila et al .,1993;Jackson et al .,1991;Marocco et al .,1989;Oppenheimer et al .,1991).Little is known about the function of most plant R2R3-MYB genes although,in those few cases in which functions are known,these are different from those of their animal counterparts,which are mostly associated with the control of cell proliferation,prevention of apoptosis,and commit-ment to development (Graf,1992;Lipsick,1996;Lu ¨scher and Eisenman,1990;Martin and Paz-Ares,1997;Taylor et al .,1996;Thompson and Ramsay,1995;Toscani et al .,1997).Thus,most members of the plant R2R3-MYB family with known functions have been implicated in the regula-tion of the synthesis of different phenylpropanoids (Cone et al .,1993;Franken et al .,1994;Grotewold et al .,1994;Moyano et al .,1996;Paz-Ares et al .,1987;Quattrocchio et al .,1993;Quattrocchio,1994;Sablowski et al .,1994;Solano et al .,1995a).Phenylpropanoids are a large class of chemically different metabolites originating from phenylalanine,which includes flavonoids,coumarins and cinnamyl alcohols among others (Hahlbrock and Scheel,1989).Despite their chemical diversity,these compounds are biosynthetically related as their synthesis does include common enzymatic steps.Other functions associated with members of the plant R2R3-MYB gene family include the control of cell differentiation (Noda et al .,1994;Oppenheimer et al .,1991)and the mediation of responses to signalling molecules such as salicylic acid and the phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA)and giberellic acid274I.Romero et al.(GA)(Gubler et al .,1995;Urao et al .,1993;Yang and Klessig,1996).Sequence specific DNA-binding has been demonstrated for several R2R3-MYB proteins,in agreement with their role in transcriptional control (Biedenkapp et al .,1988;Grotewold et al .,1994;Gubler et al .,1995;Howe and Watson,1991;Li and Parish,1995;Moyano et al .,1996;Sablowski et al .,1994;Sainz et al .,1997;Solano et al .,1995a;Solano et al .,1997;Stober-Gra ¨sser et al .,1992;Urao et al .,1993;Watson et al .,1993;Yang and Klessig,1996).The information available indicates that these proteins bind to one or more of the following types of site:I,CNGTTR;II,GKTWGTTR;and IIG,GKTWGGTR (where N indicates A,G,C or T;K,G or T;R,A or G;W,A or T).For instance,animal R2R3-MYB proteins recognize type I sequences (Biedenkapp et al .,1988;Howe and Watson,1991;Stober-Gra ¨sser et al .,1992;Watson et al .,1993),the ZmMYBP (also known as P)proteins bind to type IIG sequences,the ZmMYBC1(also known as C1)and AmMYB305proteins bind to both type II and type IIG,and the PhMYB3protein can bind to types I and II (Grotewold et al .,1994;Sablowski et al .,1994;Sainz et al .,1997;Solano et al .,1995a;Solano et al .,1997).Recent studies with protein PhMYB3from Petunia,including molecular modelling based on the solved structure of the mouse c-MYB protein (MmMYB),have highlighted the importance of residues Lys67,Leu71,Lys121and Asn122in determining recognition specificity (Ogata et al .,1994;Solano et al .,1997).These residues are fully conserved in all known plant R2R3-MYB proteins.In contrast,protein AtMYBCDC5,which has two R1/2-type repeats and does not conserve these residues,has a completely different speci-ficity (CTCAGCG,Hirayama and Shinokazi,1996).To evaluate the number of R2R3-MYB genes in plants,and as a first step towards determining the full range of functions associated with these genes using a reverse genetic approach,we have carried out a PCR-based systematic search for R2R3-MYB genes in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana .We estimate that it contains at least 85,and probably more than 100R2R3-MYB genes,representing the largest gene family of regulatory genes described thus far in any plant species.In addition,we have investigated the DNA-binding specificity of representative R2R3-MYB proteins and have shown that there may be differences but also considerable similarities in binding specificitiy between R2R3-MYB proteins,particularly among members of the same phylogenetic group,which is in agreement with the recognizable functional relationships between the members of the R2R3-MYB family.ResultsIsolation of R2R3-MYB clonesAll known plant R2R3-MYB proteins contain highly con-served stretches of amino acid residues within the©Blackwell Science Ltd,The Plant Journal ,(1998),14,273–284Figure 1.Consensus amino acid sequence of the two repeats comprising the DNA binding domain of plant R2R3-MYB proteins as described by A´vila et al .(1993),and oligonucleotide mixtures used in the isolation of the R2R3-MYB genes (N1–6and C1–3).Upper case indicates residues fully conserved in all proteins used to derive the consensus.Lower case indicates residues identical in at least 80%of the proteins.Other symbols are:ϩ,basic amino acid;–,acidic amino acid;#,hydrophobic amino acid.New sequences (published since this alignment,see Figure 2)have not altered this consensus sequence in the regions from which the oligonucleotide sequences were derived,with the exception of PhMYBAn2which has a D/A substitution in the region corresponding to oligonucleotide mixtures C1-C3,although they have increased the variability of residues in variable positions.This variability was taken into account in the design of the oligonucleotide mixtures (R ϭA ϩG,Y ϭC ϩT,S ϭG ϩC,D ϭA ϩG ϩT,N ϭA ϩG ϩC ϩT)and so the oligonucleotide mixtures should have recognized all the more recent additions to the R2R3MYB gene family.recognition helices of the R2and R3repeats from which R2R3-MYB -specific mixtures of oligonucleotides can be derived (Avila et al .,1993;Figure 1).These oligonucleotide mixtures do not recognize the AtMYBCDC5gene encoding a MYB protein with two highly divergent repeats of the R1/2-type (Hirayama and Shinokazi,1996;Lipsick,1996).To search for R2R3-MYB genes,we first prepared cDNA and genomic DNA libraries (of 1000and 3000clones,respectively)enriched in these genes using PCR with R2R3-MYB -specific oligonucleotides.Sequencing of all the different clones present in each of these libraries (for details,see Experimental procedures),revealed that 36and 74different R2R3-MYB genes were represented in the cDNA and genomic DNA libraries,respectively,and that 32were represented in both libraries.A total of 78different R2R3-MYB genes were therefore represented in our collec-tion.A computer search revealed that there were 31R2R3-MYB genes from Arabidopsis described in databanks,of which seven were not represented in the set of 78isolated in this study.There are,therefore,at least 85(78ϩ7),and probably more than 100(78ϫ31/24,see Experimental procedures)R2R3-MYB genes in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome.More than half of the R2R3-MYB genes identified in this study were characterized only at the genomic DNA level,raising the possibility that many of these R2R3-MYBThe R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis275genomic sequences might represent pseudogenes rather than active genes.However,in no case was the reading frame of the exonic sequences(represented in the genomic clones)prematurely terminated.In addition,the numberof fully conserved residues in plant R2R3-MYB proteins is the same independently of whether those protein sequences from the R2R3-MYB genes characterized onlyat the genomic DNA level are considered in the estimation. On the other hand,pseudogenes usually show higher rates of non-synonymous substitutions(Kns)relative to synonymous substitutions(Ks)than active genes(Satta, 1993).We calculated the Kns/Ks ratio for all possible pairsof R2R3-MYB genes in this population and these ratios were compared to those in the population of R2R3-MYB genes known to be expressed(i.e.those for which a cDNA clone was available),using the method of Nei and Gojobori (1986).The Kns/Ks values in the two populations(Kns/Ksin genomic DNA population:0.393Ϯ0.016;Kns/Ks in cDNA population:0.392Ϯ0.115)were not significantly differentin a t-test(Pϭ0.83ജ0.10).Collectively,these data are in agreement with the conclusion that most,if not all,plantR2R3-MYB sequences represent active genes.Phylogenetic analysis of R2R3-MYB proteinsA phylogram of R2R3-MYB proteins was constructed with the neighbor-joining method(Saitou and Nei,1987)using the sequences of the proteins in Figure2(except HvMYB33, LeMYB1,AtMYB67,AtMYB41and AtMYB45;Figure3). Three major groups were distinguished in the phylogram, A,B and C(Figure3).The bootstrap support for the node corresponding to groupC was not very high(30%),perhaps due to the short size of the sequences used.However, when the analysis was made using the whole R2R3-MYB domain from the proteins for which this sequence was available,the bootstrap support of this node was more than75%(see Figure3).In addition,the existence of the three groups was also supported by the tree constructed using parsimony(Eck and Dayhoff,1966)(not shown)andby the different intron/exon structure of the genes encoding the proteins of each group,with the exception of AtMYB67 (see Figure3).Group A(accounting for about10%of the A.thaliana proteins),which also includes the animal and protist R2R3-MYB proteins,represents genes with no intronin the region sequenced,with the exception of AtMYB1 which has an intron at position1.Group B(5%of the A. thaliana proteins)represents proteins encoded by genes with an intron at position3.Finally,group C(85%of A. thaliana proteins)contains genes with an intron at position 2.As shown below(see Discussion),this classification is also in agreement with the data on DNA-binding specificityof R2R3-MYB proteins,as similarities in this property were usually higher between proteins belonging to the same group than between proteins belonging to different groups.©Blackwell Science Ltd,The Plant Journal,(1998),14,273–284Each group,particularly group C,can be further subdivided into subgroups of more closely related members.Many of these subgroups contain R2R3-MYB proteins from other plant species(although the search for this type of MYB genes in these species has not been exhaustive),consistent with the high functional similarity of regulatory systems among plants(Benfey and Chua,1989).DNA-binding specificity of representative R2R3-MYB proteinsTo evaluate the degree of similarity in DNA binding specificity between different Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins,we isolated cDNA clones containing the entire coding region of four representative R2R3-MYB proteins, AtMYB15,AtMYB77,AtMYB84and AtMYBGl1(see Methods).Full length and deletion derivatives of these proteins were produced by in vitro transcription and translation.To determine their DNA-binding specificity, an EMSA(electrophoretic mobility shift assay)-based random-site selection procedure was used(Blackwell and Weintraub,1990;Solano et al.,1995a).Selection experi-ments were performed with two oligonucleotide mixtures, OI and OII,which had a partially random core sequence representing the three types of sites defined for R2R3-MYB proteins:OI,type I;OII,types II and IIG(Biedenkapp et al., 1988;Grotewold et al.,1994;Gubler et al.,1995;Howe and Watson,1991;Li and Parish,1995;Moyano et al.,1996; Sablowski et al.,1994;Sainz et al.,1997;Solano et al., 1995a;Solano et al.,1997;Stober-Gra¨sser et al.,1992;Urao et al.,1993;Watson et al.,1993;Yang and Klessig,1996; Figure4;see Introduction).In fact,the nucleotides(or their counterparts in the complementary strand)present in the non-randomized positions(–2,ϩ1andϩ3)are contacted by residues fully conserved in all plant R2R3-MYB proteins (Leu71,Lys121and Asn122,respectively,in PhMYB3;the G in the complementary strand of position–2in type I targets is contacted by another fully conserved residue, Lys67(Solano et al.,1997).AtMYB15and AtMYB84bound the partially randomized oligonucleotide mixture OII and,to a lesser extent,the OI oligonucleotide mixture,and the reciprocal was true with a carboxy-terminal deletion derivative of AtMYB77 (AtMYB77∆C1)which bound better to OI(data not shown). AtMYB77∆C1was used because the full size protein had lower binding affinity,as is the case with other R2R3-MYB proteins(PhMYB3and MmMYB)(Ramsay et al.,1992; Solano et al.,1995a).In contrast,neither AtMYBGl1nor its carboxy-terminal deletion derivatives showed detectable binding to either of these oligonucleotide mixtures(not shown).A similar result was obtained with an increased amount of probe and/or a decreased amount of non-specific competitor DNA,independently of the type of probe used,the partially randomized oligonucleotide276I.Romero et al.mixtures OI and OII,or a fully randomized mixture (O,data not shown).Protein phosphatase treatments,which have been shown to increase binding affinity of one R2R3-MYB protein (Moyano et al .,1996),were also ineffective (not shown).Collectively,these data suggest limited in vitro DNA-binding affinity for this protein.It is possible that low DNA-binding affinity is an intrinsic property of AtMYBGl1and that it might be increased in vivo after interaction(s)with other protein(s).For example,there is evidence that maize C1protein (ZmMYBC1),which also shows low bind-ing affinity in vitro (Sainz et al .,1997),requires an inter-action with a second protein (the MYC protein R,Goff et al .,1992)to activate flavonoid biosynthetic genes.A similar interaction is possibly necessary for the activity of AtMYBGl1in vivo (Lloyd et al .,1992).©Blackwell Science Ltd,The Plant Journal ,(1998),14,273–284After four cycles of enrichment,oligonucleotides selected by the R2R3-MYB proteins were cloned and sequenced.In all instances,despite using two target oligonucleotide mixtures,only one type of sequence was recovered for each protein,indicating strong preference for one of the types of sequences (Figure 4).For instance,in the case of protein AtMYB77∆C1,which preferred type I sequences,the sequences selected from oligonucleotide OII were also of type I (generated in variable positions of OII,not shown)and the reciprocal was true for proteins AtMYB15and AtMYB84(not shown).These results argue against a bias in the binding site selection experiments due to the use of partially degenerated oligonucleotide mixtures,although this possibility cannot be fully excluded.Next,we used oligonucleotides representing the definedThe R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis 277optimal target sites and mutants of these sites in binding experiments with each of the above Arabidopsis proteins and with carboxy-terminal deletion derivatives of PhMYB3(PhMYB3∆C1),AmMYB305(AmMYB305∆C1)and MmMYB (MmMYB ∆C2R1;Solano et al .,1997)as controls (Figure 5a).The results of these experiments agreed with those from site selection experiments,but revealed that AtMYB77∆C1also recognised certain type II sequences,although with reduced affinity compared to that for type I sequences.In addition,they also showed specific DNA binding affinity for AtMYBGl1,as it could weakly bind to oligonucleotide II-1.In an apparent discrepancy with binding site selection experiments,protein AtMYB77∆C1bound better to the oligonucleotide containing one of the optimal binding sites of PhMYB3(MBSI,oligonucleotide I-1;Solano et al .,1995a)than to that containing its deduced optimal binding sequence (oligonucleotide I-2).Discrepancies between a binding site selection derived sequence with the optimal binding site have also been reported for MADS box proteins (Riechmann et al .,1996).A difference between the two oligonucleotides (I-1and I-2)is that I-1is flanked by three extra As,which would increase its ability to bend,a property known to greatly influence binding by DNA-distorting/bending proteins,such as R2R3-MYB proteins and MADS proteins (Parvin et al .,1995;Riechmann et al .,1996;Solano et al .,1995b;Thanos and Maniatis,1992).To test whether this difference could be the cause of the preference of AtMYB77∆C1for oligonucleotide I-1versus I-2,DNA binding experiments were conducted with new oligonucleotides in which the three extra As of oligonucleo-tide I-1had been removed.The binding by AtMYB77∆C1to this deletion version of I-1(I-1∆)was similar to that obtained for the oligonucleotide derived from binding siteFigure 2.Deduced amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB proteins.For comparison,the sequences of R2R3-MYB proteins from other plant species and from representative organisms of other phyla are also given.The region shown is that flanked by the sequences used to derive the oligonucleotide mixtures shown in Figure 1.The clones corresponding to AtMYB41and to AtMYB45did not encode the carboxy-terminal part of their sequence due to mispriming events.For protein (and gene)names,a standardized nomenclature has been used (Martin and Paz-Ares,1997)whereby the name of each protein includes a two-letter prefix as species identifier,the term MYB,and then a term describing the particular family member.The codes for the species identifier are:Am,Antirrhinum majus ;At,Arabidopsis thaliana ;Cp,Craterostigma plantagineum ;Dd,Dictyostelium discoideum ;Dm,Drosophila melanogaster ;Gh,Gossypium hirsutum ;Hv,Hordeum vulgare ;Le,Lycopersicon esculentum ;Mm,Mus musculus ;Nt,Nicotiana tabacum ;Os,Oryza sativa ;Ph,Petunia hybrida ;Pm,Picea mariana ;Pp,Physcomitrella patens ;Ps,Pisum sativum ;Xl,Xenopus laevis ;Zm ,Zea mays.As family member identifier we have always used a number except where the previously given name was based on functional information,such as the phenotype of mutants (e.g.the Gl1(Glabrous1)protein from Arabidopsis is named AtMYBGl1).Thus,all the genes identified in this study have been given a standardized number independent of whether a different non-standardized name has been given by other authors.This has occurred in the following cases:AtMYB13,also named AtMYBlfgn (accession number Z50869);AtMYB15,also named Y19(X90384);AtMYB16,also named AtMIXTA (X99809);AtMYB23,also named AtMYBrtf (Z68158);AtMYB31,also named Y13(X90387);AtMYB44,also named AtMYBR1(Z54136);AtMYB77,also named AtMYBR2(Z54137).In addition,the following R2R3-MYB genes,which were not identified in this study,were renamed (with the agreement of the authors who first described them):AtMYB101(M1);AtMYB102(M4).AtMYB90is described in the EMBL databank as an anonymous EST (H76020).The column on the right of the amino acid sequence gives the accession number from which the sequences were derived.The accession numbers of the cDNAs encoding the full-size proteins AtMYB15,AtMYB77and AtMYB84are Y14207,Y14208and Y14209,respectively.In case of PhMYBAn2,the sequence was copied directly from Quattrochio (1994).The second column shows the position of the intron interrupting that part of coding sequence represented in the figure:–,unknown;0,no intron;the localization of introns 1,2and 3is shown relative to the consensus sequence.The third column shows the type of clone isolated in this study:a,cDNA clone;b,genomic clone.Other letters in this column indicate that the sequence shown in the figure was previously described in databanks or published (c)or that only part of the sequence shown was previously described (d).Two additional sequences (accession numbers H36793and T42245),each corresponding to a novel Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB gene,were found in the EST databank,but are not represented in the figure because they were incomplete.These sequences were,however,used for the estimation of the size of the R2R3-MYB gene family.Asterisks indicate proteins for which the sequence of the whole R2R3-MYB domain is known.Symbols in the consensus sequence are as in Figure 1.©Blackwell Science Ltd,The Plant Journal ,(1998),14,273–284selection experiments (Figure 5b).This result underscored the importance of DNA conformational properties in bind-ing by transcriptional factors.DiscussionGenes of the R2R3-MYB family are quite widespread in eukaryotes,with the exception of yeast,and in plants the number of these genes is especially high.Whereas no more than three R2R3-MYB genes have been described in any organisms from other eukaryotic phyla,here we isol-ated partial cDNA and/or genomic clones corresponding to 78different R2R3-MYB genes from Arabidopsis and estimated that there are probably more than 100R2R3-MYB genes in this species.The different size of regulatory gene families in different groups of eukaryotes,a situation which is not exclusive for R2R3-MYB genes (for instance,see the case of MADS box proteins;Theissen et al .,1996),might reflect major differences in developmental and meta-bolic programs generated during evolution of these groups,which largely involved a different use of pre-existing regu-latory systems rather than the generation of new systems (Martin and Paz-Ares,1997).According to recent estimates on the number of genes in Arabidopsis (16000–43000;Gibson and Sommerville,1993),members of the R2R3-MYB family would represent at least 0.2–0.6%of the total Arabidopsis genes,the largest proportion of genes thus far assigned to a single regulatory gene family (and even to a gene family encoding any type of protein)in plants.In other types of eukaryotes there are families of equal,or even larger,size;for instance,it is estimated that genes encoding zinc-finger proteins represent about 1%of the human genes (Hoovers278I.Romero et al.et al .,1992)and,in Caenorhabditis elegans ,about 0.4%of its genes contain homeoboxes (Bu ¨rglin,1995).However,in these families overall sequence conservation is very low and variability in DNA-binding specificity is high (Klug and Schwabe,1995;Treisman et al .,1992).In contrast,members of the plant R2R3-MYB family share higher amino acid sequence similarity,particularly in their recogni-tion helices (Figure 1)and display considerable DNA-recognition similarities (Figures 3and 5).These similarities in recognition specificity are par-ticularly noticeable between members of thesame ©Blackwell Science Ltd,The Plant Journal ,(1998),14,273–284phylogenetic group,although in some cases overlaps in binding specificity between members belonging to differ-ent groups have been observed (Figures 3and 5).Thus,in the cases studied here or elsewhere (Biedenkapp et al .,1988;Grotewold et al .,1994;Gubler et al .,1995;Howe and Watson,1991;Li and Parish,1995;Moyano et al .,1996;Sablowski et al .,1994;Sainz et al .,1997;Solano et al .,1995a,1997;Stober-Gra ¨sser et al .,1992;Urao et al .,1993;Watson et al .,1993;Yang and Klessig,1996)members from group A (including both those from plants and from organisms from other phyla)prefer (or bindThe R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis 279to)a type I sequence,members of group B bind equally well to both type I and type II,and most members of group C prefer (or bind to)a type IIG.Possible exceptions are the proteins from group C AtMYB2,reported to bind type I sequences (Urao et al .,1993),and GLABROUS1(AtMYBGl1),which only bound to a type II sequence (Figure 5)although,in the first case,binding to IIG sequences was not studied and,in the second case,binding site selection experiments failed to provide information on its optimal binding site (see Results).However,it is striking that the only sequence bound by AtMYBGl1(AAAGTTAGTTA)perfectly conforms to the sequence of gibberellic acid responsive elements,and gibberellic acid is known to affect the AtMYBGl1-controlled trait trichome formation (Oppenheimer et al .,1991;Telfer et al .,1997).In line with these similarities in binding specificity,and despite the fact that target selectivity is usually also influenced by interactions with other factors,most of the R2R3-MYB proteins studied so far,which are scattered throughout groups B and C,have been implicated in the control of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes (Cone et al .,1993;Franken et al .,1994;Grotewold et al .,1994;Moyano et al .,1996;Paz-Ares et al .,1987;Quattrocchio et al .,1993,1994;Sablowski et al .,1994;Solano et al .,1995a;Figure 3).Nevertheless,there are some R2R3-MYB proteins that have been implicated in other functions,including the control of cell differentiation and the mediation of plant responses to several signal molecules (Gubler et al .,1995;Noda et al .,1994;Oppenheimer et al .,1991;Urao et al .,1993;Yang and Klessig,1996).TargetFigure 3.Phylogenetic tree of the R2R3-MYB family using the neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei,1987).The phylogram shown was constructed with the sequences given in Figure 2,except HvMYB33,LeMYB1,AtMYB67,AtMYB41and AtMYB45.The first two were excluded because they were the only ones out of the 57known complete-MYB-domain sequences which grouped differently (with bootstrap support Ͼ50%)depending on whether the complete MYB domains or the portion characterized in this study was used in the calculations.Protein AtMYB67was the only one which was not grouped with the other proteins encoded by genes with the same intron/exon structure.Proteins AtMYB41and AtMYB45were not used because only partial sequence data were available,although their probable position in the phylogram,inferred from a tree constructed also using their incomplete sequences (not shown),is indicated in the tree with dashed lines.Exclusion of these five proteins increased the bootstrap support of the major nodes (not shown).Names of R2R3-MYB proteins from non-plant species are shown in red.The three major nodes,A,B and C,are denoted.Numbers (0,1,2or 3)in some branches indicate the type of intron in the cloned portion of the genes encoding proteins originating from the respective branch,as far as the genes for which this information is available are concerned (Figure 2).Nodes with high bootstrap support are indicated (empty symbols,bootstraps Ͼ50%;filled symbols,bootstraps Ͼ75%).Circles refer to bootstraps data corresponding to the represented tree.Squares refer to bootstraps data corresponding to the tree constructed with the sequence of the whole MYB domain of the proteins for which this information was available (Figure 2).The known functions associated with some plant R2R3-MYB proteins are indicated:Ph,regulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes (proteins ZmMYBC1,ZmMYBPl,ZmMYBP ,ZmMYB38,ZmMYB1,AmMYB305,AmMYB340,PhMYBAn2;PhMYB3,Cone et al .,1993;Franken et al .,1994;Grotewold et al .,1994;Moyano et al .,1996;Paz-Ares et al .,1987;Quattrocchio et al .,1993;Quattrocchio,1994;Sablowski et al .,1994;Solano et al .,1995a);CD,control of cell differentiation (proteins AtMYBGl1and AmMYBMx,Noda et al .,1994;Oppenheimer et al .,1991);SA,GA and ABA,involved in signal transduction pathway,respectively,salicylic acid (gene NtMYB1;Yang and Klessig,1996),gibberellic acid (proteins HvMYBGa,Gubler et al .,1995)and abscisic acid (proteins AtMYB2and ZmMYBC1;Hattori et al .,1992;Urao et al .,1993).Capital letters are used when the functions associated are based on genetic evidence (i.e.analysis of mutants).Also indicated is the available information on DNA-binding specificity of some of the R2R3-MYB proteins,(arrowheads indicate the proteins examined in this study):I,CNGTTR (proteins MmMYB,MmMYBA,MmMYBB,DdMYB,AtMYB1,AtMYB2,AtMYB77,PhMYB3,HvMYBGa,NtMYB1;Biedenkapp et al .,1988;Howe and Watson,1991;Solano et al .,1995a;Stober-Gra ¨sser et al .,1992;Urao et al .,1993;Watson et al .,1993);II,GTTWGTTR (proteins PhMYB3,HvMYBGa,AmMYB305,ZmMYBC1,AtMYBGl1;Gubler et al .,1995;Sainz et al .,1997;Solano et al .,1995a;Solano et al .,1997);IIG,GKTWGGTR (proteins AmMYB305,AmMYB340,ZmMYBP ,ZmMYBC1,AtMYB6,AtMYB7,AtMYB15,AtMYB84,NtMYB1;Grotewold et al .,1994;Li and Parish,1995;Moyano et al .,1996;Sablowski et al .,1994;Sainz et al .,1997;Solano et al .,1995a;Yang and Klessig,1996)(where N indicates A or G or C or T;K,G or T;R,A or G;W,A or T).Capital letters are used in those cases in which the sequences are known to be the optimal binding site.When a given protein is able to bind to more than one type of site,the size of the letter reflects the relative binding affinity for these sites.©Blackwell Science Ltd,The Plant Journal ,(1998),14,273–284genes of these latter R2R3-MYB genes are mostly unknown,thus precluding definite conclusions about whether they are functionally related between themselves or indeed with the R2R3-MYB genes regulating phenyl-propanoid biosynthetic genes.However,the signal molecules salicylic acid,ABA and GA influence,among others,the expression of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes,in several instances through cis -acting elements resembling R2R3-MYB binding sites (Dixon and Paiva,1995;Hahlbrock and Scheel,1989;Hattori et al .,1992;Sablowski et al .,1994;Shirasu et al .,1997;Weiss et al .,1990,1992).In addition,GA also affects trichome forma-tion,another trait under the control of an R2R3-MYB gene,AtMYBGl1(Telfer et al .,1997).Moreover,the MIXTA gene (AmMYBMx )controls the specialized shape of inner epidermal petal cells of Antirrhinum flowers,and these changes in cell shape correlate with changes in the cell wall,a structure containing phenylpropanoid derivatives (Noda et al .,1994).The number of R2R3-MYB genes with distinct but related functions might therefore be extraordinarily high,particularly with regard to the regulation of different phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes,although some of these genes could also (or alternatively)act on other types of targets (e.g.the barley gibberellic acid induced α-amy gene is a likely target of HvMYBGa,Gubler et al .,1995).In any case,the broad (phylogenetic)distribution of the R2R3-MYB genes for which there is evidence of their involvement in the regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism,suggests that a very early plant-specific R2R3-MYB ancestor already had this function,and that。
蓉生静注人免疫球蛋白(pH4)质量稳定性考察

【 关键词 】 静注人免疫球蛋 白; ; 质量 稳定性
我公 司生产 的蓉生 静 注人免 疫球蛋 白( H ) p 4 的 液体 剂型 于 19 9 9年获得 生产 文号 , 批准 的有效期 为 2年 。为观察 有 效 期 内存 放 条 件对 其 质量 影 响 , 本 文分别对 2—8C和 2 2 ' 件下 放 置 的产 品进  ̄ 0— 5 E条 行 了质量稳 定性 检 测 , 同时 比较 了用 进 口和 国产 模 制瓶 灌装对 该 产品质 量 的影响 。
在 2 2' 0— 5 E条件 下存放 2年 后 , 0月 结 果 比 与 较 , 观 、 H值 、 外 p 白喉抗 体效 价均 无 明显 变 化 , 而抗 一
Hs B 水平 有所 下 降 , 2 12I/ IG降 至 196 从 3. U g・g 0 . I/ IG, 幅为 116I/ IG, U g・g 降 2 . g・ g 但仍 远高 于 国 U
变化。
15 免疫 球蛋 白国家参考 品 : 国药 品生物 制 . 中
品检定 所提供 。 16 白喉抗体 诊断 试剂 : . 中国药 品生 物制 品检 定所提 供 。 17 高 压 液 相 色谱 ( L 检 测 系 统 : t s . HP C) Wa r e 5 5型 泵 ; 谱 分 离 柱 : S 0 0 W ( 径 7 5 1 色 T K G 30 S 直 . m 长 6 m 或 3 m) 粒 度 为 1 x 监 测 器 : m, 0 c 0c , 0I m;
批注本地保存成功开通会员云端永久保存去开通
维普资讯
中国生物制品学杂志 2 0 0 6年 9月第 1 9卷第 5期
C i Booia etm e 2 0 ,V 11 o5 hnJ il cl Spe br 0 6 o .9N . g s
植物MYB类转录因子研究进展

综 述Review2002 01 15收到,2002 01 28接受。
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(973项目G1999011604)资助。
*联系人,E mai l:zywang @,Tel:021 ******** 4423。
植物MYB 类转录因子研究进展陈 俊 王宗阳*(中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海200032)摘要:植物M Y B 转录因子以含有保守的M YB 结构域为共同特征,广泛参与植物发育和代谢的调节。
含单一M YB 结构域的M Y B 转录因子在维持染色体结构和转录调节上发挥着重要作用,是M YB 转录因子家族中较为特殊的一类。
含两个M YB 结构域的MY B 转录因子成员众多,在植物体内主要参与次生代谢的调节和控制细胞的形态发生。
含3个M Y B 结构域的M YB 蛋白与c M YB 蛋白高度同源,可能在调节细胞周期中起作用。
关键词:M YB 结构域,M Y B 转录因子,组合调控学科分类号:Q 74随着多种模式生物基因组计划的完成,如何从这些浩如烟海的DNA 序列中揭示基因的功能以及它们有序的时空表达,已成为后基因组时代的重要课题。
人类基因组计划的完成显示人类只有30000~50000个基因,生命体是如何以如此少的基因完成如此复杂的生命活动的呢?很重要的一点在于基因的表达调控,使得每一个基因能适时、适地、适量地表达,并且使得某些基因可以产生多种功能各异的蛋白质。
真核基因的表达随细胞内外环境的改变而在不同层次上受到精确调控,如染色体DNA 水平、转录水平及转录后水平的调控等。
而转录水平的调控发生在基因表达的初期阶段,是很多基因表达调控的主要方式。
转录水平的调控指一类称为转录因子(有时又称反式作用因子)的蛋白质特异结合到靶基因调控区的顺式作用元件上,或调节基因表达的强度,或应答激素刺激和外界环境胁迫,或控制靶基因的时空特异性表达。
转录因子通常是一种模块化的蛋白,一般由几个独立的功能域组成,包括DNA 结合功能域,转录激活功能域,蛋白 蛋白相互作用功能域,信号分子结合功能域,核定位信号区等。
伴花生球蛋白Ⅱ的纯化和免疫调节作用研究的开题报告

伴花生球蛋白Ⅱ的纯化和免疫调节作用研究的开题报告一、研究背景球蛋白是一种富含精氨酸、天门冬氨酸等多种氨基酸的蛋白质,具有多种生物活性,能够参与免疫调节、细胞信号传导、酶活性等生物过程。
花生球蛋白是一种具有生物活性的植物蛋白质,广泛应用于食品、药品等领域。
近年来,研究发现花生球蛋白具有潜在的免疫调节作用,能够调节免疫细胞的功能,缓解炎症反应,对于炎症性疾病的预防和治疗具有一定的潜力。
二、研究目的本研究旨在通过纯化花生球蛋白Ⅱ,探究其对免疫功能的调节作用,为开发新型免疫调节剂提供理论依据。
具体研究内容包括:(1)花生球蛋白Ⅱ的纯化方法和纯度分析;(2)花生球蛋白Ⅱ对免疫细胞的影响;(3)花生球蛋白Ⅱ对炎症反应的调节作用;(4)研究其在体内的免疫调节作用。
三、研究方法1. 花生球蛋白Ⅱ的纯化采用离子交换、凝胶过滤等技术对花生球蛋白Ⅱ进行纯化,通过SDS-PAGE、Western blot等方法检测纯化后的样品的纯度和结构特征。
2. 血细胞免疫功能的分析分离人外周血中的淋巴细胞、单核细胞、中性粒细胞等细胞类型,将细胞与花生球蛋白Ⅱ共同培养,通过细胞增殖、细胞因子分泌、细胞凋亡等指标对其免疫功能进行分析。
3. 炎症反应的调节作用研究采用大鼠模型,通过注射炎症诱导剂激发炎症反应,探究花生球蛋白Ⅱ对炎症反应的调节作用,通过体液学指标、组织学观察等方法对其效果进行评价。
4. 在体内的免疫调节作用研究通过大鼠模型,将花生球蛋白Ⅱ经口服后,对其体内免疫功能的影响进行研究,采用杀伤试验、细胞因子分析等方法确定其免疫调节作用。
四、研究意义本研究将为深入了解花生球蛋白Ⅱ的免疫调节作用提供依据,有助于探索新型免疫调节剂的研发,对于改善人体免疫功能、预防和治疗炎症性疾病等方面具有重要的临床应用前景。
丙种球蛋白对大白鼠四氯化碳中毒的預防作用

丙种球蛋白对大白鼠四氯化碳中毒的預防作用
張启元;汪堃仁
【期刊名称】《北京师范大学学报:自然科学版》
【年(卷),期】1965(0)2
【摘要】許多学者如Barondess,Gellis,Ashley,Hsia,Hevens,Wade等均报导,丙种球蛋白可以預防传染性肝炎,并得到一定的效果,但对其作用机制街缺乏全面的实驗与分析。
为了探討丙种球蛋白对肝病变的預防作用,我們在前項工作”的基础上观察厂丙种球蛋白对叫氯化碳中毒的大白鼠血清轉氨酶活力变化以及其对肝的組織学与組織化学影响,并对其机制进行厂初步分析。
【总页数】12页(P73-84)
【关键词】四氯化碳中毒;作用机制;传染性肝炎;酶活力;肝病变;碱性磷酸酶;肝脂肪酶;肝阴;阳性反应;中央静脉
【作者】張启元;汪堃仁
【作者单位】北京师范大学生物系
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】R28
【相关文献】
1.慢肝Ⅰ号方对大白鼠四氯化碳慢性肝损伤保护作用的观察 [J], 许兴国;魏玉琦;郝泗城
2.談談鉛中毒及其預防措施 [J], 孔祥懃
3.力爭二年消灭鉛中毒——武汉召开預防鉛中毒現場会議 [J], 楊信堂
4.大白鼠实验性肝病变的组织化学和生物化学研究——Ⅱ.大白鼠四氯化碳中毒后,在恢复过程中,血清转氨酶活力的恢复和肝内脂肪、脂肪酶、核糖核酸和硷性磷酸酶的组织化学变化。
[J], 张启元;汪堃仁
5.大白鼠实验性肝病变的组织化学和生物化学研究Ⅰ.四氯化碳中毒后肝内脂肪、脂肪酶、核糖核酸和硷性磷酸酶的观察及血、肝内转氨酶活力的变化 [J], 張启元;許宜匀;汪堃仁
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。
百潘加

百潘加V AC—PAC PLUS美国新一代家禽饮水免疫疫苗稳定保护剂,全球最领先的第三代疫苗保护剂取代脱脂奶粉和泡腾片,中和水中强氧化剂如氯离子等有害物质,自动调节水的酸碱度和渗透压,延长疫苗存活时间稳定疫苗效价饮水免疫介绍1水线的清洁a 水线中的水垢和有机物会降低疫苗的效价,必须完成常规的水线清洁工作,才能对疫苗提供充分的保护b 可以使用氯制剂对水进行清洁和消毒2 饮用疫苗前足够的停水时间(根据环境温度而定时间长短)3 在自来水或其他水中加入带有“百潘加”保护的疫苗成功的饮水接种疫苗计划应能向足量的家禽提供至少最小保护剂量的活疫苗,同时使疫苗得到最佳的保护,以保证疫苗性能的最大化影响疫苗饮水免疫的因素家禽疫苗饮水接种疫苗方法免疫能力病毒在水中的稳定性疫苗量耗水量疫苗病毒的侧向扩散断水时间母体抗体水平疫苗的免疫原性水质饮水位疫苗免疫接种时间饮水器类型环境温度饮用水中病毒浓度投放疫苗方法社会等级水质也是影响饮水免疫成功与否的重要方面百潘加确保安全饮水免疫1.百潘加快速易溶,没有脱脂奶粉溶解时所形成的泡沫,缩短混合疫苗的时间。
2.百潘加在水中迅速均匀分布无需过多搅拌。
3.所含蓝色染料为是否均匀混合提供视觉指示4.溶解后立即中和水中的氯离子等有害物质保护疫苗不需等待5.特别为维持疫苗的存活、更长时间地维持疫苗的效力而设计6.高能缩特殊配方消除动物源性成分方便携带使用7.不会堵塞饮水器8.改善水质,自动调节水的ph到疫苗所需要的最佳ph疫苗溶解前按照以下方法往水中添加百潘加1 先将每袋18克的百潘加溶解于1.8公斤的水中2 将溶解的百潘加溶液直接加入饮水免疫用的水中18克的百潘加可用于180公斤的水3 蓝色指示剂在水中均匀分布后即可加入疫苗4 按照疫苗厂家的要求合理加入饮水免疫疫苗鸡群饮水免疫推荐用水量白羽肉鸡每100只肉鸡饮水免疫推荐用水量(公斤)周龄 1 2 3 4 5常温 2 4 6 8 10白羽肉种鸡每100只肉种鸡饮水免疫推荐用水量(公斤)周龄 1 2 3 4 10 20 30常温 1 2 3 3-4 3.5-5.0 3.5-5.0 3.5-5.0蛋鸡和肉种鸡一样黄鸡,青脚鸡,小白鸡(817)根据不同周龄的每日饮水量结合以上蛋鸡和肉鸡的推荐用水量来推算注意以上推荐饮水免疫用水量仅供参考具体饮水免疫的水量应根据鸡群限水2小时左右、且鸡群在1.5-2.0 小时时间内能均匀喝道疫苗水的总水量而定。
静注人免疫球蛋白(pH4)对人补体系统的体外影响

国家药监局重点实验室专栏[重点实验室简介]国家药品监督管理局血液制品质量控制重点实验室于2019年4月通过国家药监局评审ꎬ成为首批正式挂牌运行的药物质量控制重点实验室ꎮ实验室依托湖北省药品监督检验研究院联合武汉生物技术研究院筹建而成ꎬ现任实验室主任姜红教授ꎬ学术委员会主任邓子新院士ꎮ重点实验室拥有实验场地1.5万平方米ꎬ配置各类质谱仪㊁各类液相色谱仪等总价值2亿元的设备ꎮ配套设施齐全ꎬ拥有生物技术基础仪器平台㊁分析检测平台㊁药理药效评价平台㊁实验动物中心等多个技术平台ꎮ重点实验室面向科学前沿ꎬ面向国家重大需求ꎬ面向药品监管需求ꎬ主攻国产血液制品基础研究不够㊁血浆利用率低㊁重组产品开发不够㊁质量控制方法研究不足等问题ꎬ以血浆病毒㊁蛋白组分及活性㊁微生物污染追溯控制为研究对象ꎬ聚焦蛋白分离鉴定技术开发㊁病毒残留检测技术研究㊁环境微生物鉴定技术研究㊁血液制品风险评价及控制研究㊁重组血浆蛋白质控技术研究ꎬ为提高我国血液制品及原料血浆的全程质量控制㊁应用开发㊁监督管理提供关键理论㊁技术与基础信息支撑ꎮ实验室主任:姜红ꎬ女ꎬ湖北省药品监督检验研究院院长ꎬ二级教授ꎬ享受国务院特殊津贴ꎬ华中科技大学㊁湖北中医药大学硕士生导师ꎬ主要从事血液制品批签发及质量研究工作ꎬ为国家生物制品批签发授权签字人ꎬ第九㊁十㊁十一届国家药典委员会委员ꎮ目前兼任中国药学会药物分析专业委员会委员ꎬ担任«药物分析»«医药导报»«中国医院用药评价与分析»等杂志常务编委或编委ꎮ为湖北省突出贡献中青年专家ꎬ中国药学发展奖食品药品质量检测技术突出成就奖获得者ꎬ获湖北省科技进步奖2项ꎬ撰写专业论著12部ꎬ发表各类论文40篇ꎮ㊀基金项目:湖北省科技厅自然科学基金科研课题(No.2022CFB521)作者简介:柯兵兵ꎬ男ꎬ硕士ꎬ工程师ꎬ研究方向:血液制品质量控制ꎬE-mail:bknifdc@163.com通信作者:郭江红ꎬ女ꎬ硕士ꎬ正高级工程师ꎬ研究方向:血液制品质量控制ꎬTel:027-87705366ꎬE-mail:guojh26@hotmail.com静注人免疫球蛋白(pH4)对人补体系统的体外影响柯兵兵ꎬ王德蓉ꎬ李世兴ꎬ程梦兰ꎬ郭江红(湖北省药品监督检验研究院ꎬ湖北省药品质量检测与控制工程技术研究中心ꎬ国家药品监督管理局血液制品质量控制重点实验室ꎬ湖北武汉430075)摘要:目的㊀采用体外补体孵育实验评价静注人免疫球蛋白是否能激活补体系统ꎬ探讨本品给药过程中补体系统与类过敏反应之间的关联性ꎮ方法㊀分别选取4家企业产品ꎬ另加热制备多聚体升高的样品ꎬ在体外与人血清共同孵育1h后ꎬ采用ELISA试剂盒测定补体系统激活代表性中间产物及终末复合物Sc5b-9的含量ꎮ结果㊀与生理盐水对照组相比ꎬ实验组中补体分子C3a㊁C4a㊁C5a㊁Bb㊁Sc5b-9基本呈下降趋势ꎻ制剂经加热处理后ꎬ上述补体分子并未出现显著性升高现象ꎮ结论㊀静注人免疫球蛋白不能通过激活补体系统进而引发类过敏反应ꎬ相反ꎬ对补体系统存在一定程度抑制ꎮ关键词:静注人免疫球蛋白ꎻ多聚体ꎻ补体系统ꎻ抑制ꎻ类过敏反应中图分类号:R979.5㊀文献标志码:A㊀文章编号:2095-5375(2024)01-0040-005doi:10.13506/j.cnki.jpr.2024.01.008EffectofHumanImmunoglobulin(pH4)forIntravenousInjectiononcomplementsysteminvitroKEBingbingꎬWANGDerongꎬLIShixingꎬCHENGMenglanꎬGUOJianghong(HubeiEngineeringResearchCenterforDrugQualityControlꎬNMPAKeyLaboratoryofQualityControlofBloodProductsꎬHubeiInstituteforDrugControlꎬWuhan430075ꎬChina)Abstract:Objective㊀ToevaluatewhetherHumanImmunoglobulinforIntravenousInjectioncanactivatethecomple ̄mentsystembycomplementincubationexperimentsinvitroandtostudythecorrelationbetweenthecomplementsystemandanaphylactoidreactionsduringtheadministrationofthisproduct.Methods㊀Productsfromfourenterpriseswereselectedꎬandalsowereheatedtoobtainsampleswithelevatedlevelsofpolymers.Afterincubatingthesampleswithhumanserumfor1hourinvitroꎬthecontentsoftherepresentativeintermediateproductsofthecomplementsystemactivationꎬandtheterminalcomplexSc5b-9weredeterminedbyELISAkits.Results㊀Comparedwiththenormalsalinecontrolꎬthecomplementmole ̄culesC3aꎬC4aꎬC5aꎬBbꎬandSc5b-9intheexperimentalgroupbasicallyshowedadownwardtrendꎻAfterheatingtheprod ̄uctsꎬtherewasnosignificantincreaseinthecomplementmoleculesdescribedabove.Conclusion㊀HumanImmunoglobulinforIntravenousInjectioncannotcauseanaphylactoidreactionsbyactivatingthecomplementsystem.Onthecontraryꎬitinhib ̄itedthecomplementsystemtoacertainextent.Keywords:HumanImmunoglobulinforIntravenousInjectionꎻPolymerꎻComplementsystemꎻInhibitionꎻAnaphylactoidreactions㊀㊀静注人免疫球蛋白是一种临床上常用于治疗免疫缺陷㊁重症感染以及器官移植排斥等疾病的血液制剂ꎬ临床需求量极大ꎮ然而ꎬ据临床用药经验显示ꎬ本品的不良反应发生率较高[1-4]ꎬ因此ꎬ阐释本品可能引起不良反应的发生机制ꎬ对于安全用药及患者生命健康具有重要的意义ꎮ在前期小鼠耳郭蓝染试验中ꎬ动物实验结果显示不同企业之间的产品引发小鼠发生类过敏反应的潜力有明显差异ꎬ且多聚体含量高的产品ꎬ耳郭蓝染发生率以及耳郭蓝染面积越高ꎬ初步提示静注人免疫球蛋白制品中的多聚体与本品的类过敏反应有一定的关联性ꎮ多聚体是一种由球蛋白聚集而成的聚合物ꎬ这种高分子聚合物含有多个IgG分子ꎬ理论上具有多个Fc端补体结合位点ꎬ可以与补体分子结合ꎬ进而对补体系统产生重要影响ꎮ本研究旨在探讨ꎬ静注人免疫球蛋白中的IgG聚合物是否可能模拟免疫复合物ꎬ与补体分子结合ꎬ激活补体系统ꎬ产生具有过敏效应的过敏毒素分子C3a㊁C5aꎬ进而引发类过敏反应症状ꎬ考察补体系统是否与本品的不良反应存在关联性ꎮ1㊀仪器与材料1.1㊀实验仪器㊀5804R型高速冷冻离心机(Eppendorf公司)ꎻTW20型恒温水浴锅[优博莱技术(北京)有限公司]ꎻPURA22型振摇恒温水浴锅(优博莱)ꎻXP205型电子天平(梅特勒-托利多仪器有限公司)ꎻGHP-9080型隔水式恒温培养箱(上海一恒科学仪器厂)ꎻXmark型多通道酶标仪(BioRad公司)ꎮ1.2㊀试剂与耗材㊀静注人免疫球蛋白(企业A㊁B㊁C㊁Dꎻ规格均为5%ꎬ批号分别为20221223㊁202302004㊁20230631㊁202212034)ꎻ多聚体含量升高的静注人免疫球蛋白:各企业产品50ħ恒温水浴分别加热10min㊁30minꎻ氯化钙㊁氯化镁㊁氯化钠㊁巴比妥钠㊁盐酸㊁四乙酸乙二胺二钠(EDTA-2Na)均为国产分析纯ꎮ0.9%氯化钠溶液(批号:220807K01ꎬ武汉滨湖双鹤药业有限责任公司)ꎻ人补体分子C3aELISA试剂盒(批号:ml1980523Vꎬ上海酶联生物科技有限公司)ꎻ人补体分子C5aELISA试剂盒(批号:ml1999253Vꎬ上海酶联生物科技有限公司)ꎻ人补体分子Sc5b~9ELISA试剂盒(批号:ml062554Vꎬ上海酶联生物科技有限公司)ꎻ人补体分子BbELISA试剂盒(批号:ml038432Vꎬ上海酶联生物科技有限公司)ꎻ人补体分子C4aELISA试剂盒(批号:ml935026Vꎬ上海酶联生物科技有限公司)ꎮ1.3㊀试剂溶液的配制㊀冰PBS溶液:称取700mgEDTA-2Na粉末ꎬ加PBS溶液(pH=7.4)20mL使溶解ꎬ制成EDTA-2Na浓度为100mmoL L-1的溶液ꎬ4ħ冰箱冷藏ꎮ镁-钙贮备液:称取氯化钙1.103g㊁氯化镁(MgCl2 6H2O)5.083gꎬ加水溶解并稀释至25mLꎮVBS缓冲液:称取氯化钠41.5g㊁巴比妥钠5.1gꎬ加水800mL溶解ꎮ用1moL L-1盐酸溶液调pH值至7.3ꎬ加镁-钙贮备液2.5mLꎬ加水稀释至1000mLꎬ用0.45μm膜滤过ꎬ4ħ保存ꎮ临用前ꎬ加水5倍稀释ꎮ2㊀实验方法2.1㊀人血清制备㊀使用一次性采血针ꎬ从20位健康志愿者左前臂静脉采血4~6mLꎬ室温下静置30minꎬ3000r min-14ħ离心15minꎬ分离血清ꎬ1.5mL离心管进行分装ꎬ1mL/管ꎬ-80ħ冰箱保存备用ꎮ健康志愿者纳入标准:18~55岁ꎬ性别不限ꎬ无重大疾病及近期急慢性感染病史ꎮ2.2㊀体外补体孵育试验㊀量取40μL静注人免疫球蛋白制剂ꎬ加60μLVBS缓冲液ꎬ再加入200μL人血清ꎬ混匀ꎬ置于37ħ80r min-1振荡孵育1hꎬ孵育结束后ꎬ加30μL冰PBS溶液终止反应ꎬ按人C3a㊁C4a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁BbELISA试剂盒说明书测定孵育后各反应体系中各相应补体分子的含量ꎮ另取40μL的生理盐水ꎬ同法操作ꎬ作为阴性对照ꎮ2.2.1㊀不同供试品浓度下C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9的变化趋势㊀为考察供试品浓度对补体系统的影响ꎬ设置了不同的供试品浓度ꎬ用VBS溶液将静注人免疫球蛋白制剂稀释至浓度为50㊁25㊁12.5㊁5㊁2.5mg mL-1的溶液ꎮ取上述各溶液100μLꎬ加入200μL人血清ꎬ置于37ħ振荡孵育1hꎮ孵育结束后ꎬ分别测定450nm波长处C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9的变化趋势ꎮ2.2.2㊀不同反应比例对C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb含量的影响㊀为考察供试品-人血清体积比对补体系统的影响ꎬ设置了不同的反应体积比(供试品/血清比例为1/1㊁1/2㊁2/1)ꎬ置于37ħ振荡孵育1小时ꎮ孵育结束后ꎬ分别测定C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb的含量ꎬ操作同 2.2 项下ꎮ2.2.3㊀不同企业产品对C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb含量的影响㊀为考察不同企业产品对补体系统的影响ꎬ分别选取4家企业产品以及加热处理的产品与人血清反应ꎬ置于37ħ振荡孵育1hꎬ孵育结束后ꎬ分别测定C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb的含量ꎬ操作同 2.2 项下ꎮ2.3㊀数据处理㊀使用SPSS统计软件进行分析ꎬ实验数据均以(xʃs)表示ꎬ采用单因素方差分析比较各组之间补体分子变化是否有差异ꎬPɤ0.05时认为差异有统计学意义ꎮ3㊀结果3.1㊀不同供试品浓度下C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9的变化趋势㊀与生理盐水组相比ꎬ随着供试品浓度增加ꎬ补体分子C3a和Sc5b-9的吸光度值几乎无变化ꎬ呈一条直线ꎬ而补体分子C5a随着供试品浓度增加ꎬ吸光度值呈缓慢下降趋势ꎬ结果见图1ꎮ结果初步表明ꎬ不同浓度下供试品溶液对补体系统无激活作用ꎬ相反ꎬ可能存在抑制作用ꎮ图1㊀不同供试品浓度下补体分子C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9的吸光度变化(n=2)3.2㊀不同反应比例条件下C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb的变化趋势㊀供试品与人血清在体外共同孵育时ꎬ当两者体积比分别为1ʒ2㊁1ʒ1㊁2ʒ1时ꎬ与相应体积比的阴性对照相比ꎬ所有组中C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb的含量均出现下降(除2ʒ1体积比组中Bb略有上升外)ꎬ结果见表1ꎮ表明在上述3种体积比条件下ꎬ供试品均不能激活补体系统ꎬ且呈现出一定程度抑制ꎮ表1㊀不同反应体积比条件下补体分子C3a㊁C5a㊁Sc5b-9㊁C4a㊁Bb的变化趋势(xʃsꎬn=3)组别C3a/ng mL-1C5a/pg mL-1Sc5b-9/ng mL-1C4a/μg mL-1Bb/ng mL-1阴性对照(1ʒ1)4.64ʃ0.258646.904ʃ14.53116.127ʃ5.94694.935ʃ3.7877.365ʃ0.596实验组(1ʒ1)3.829ʃ0.128533.686ʃ10.065∗∗10.253ʃ3.05385.565ʃ1.9495.914ʃ0.329阴性对照(1ʒ2)6.032ʃ0.408851.780ʃ72.47125.667ʃ1.123123.404ʃ3.8138.633ʃ0.959实验组(1ʒ2)5.238ʃ0.199658.234ʃ18.320∗∗20.009ʃ1.629113.494ʃ2.4526.398ʃ0.555阴性对照(2ʒ1)3.52ʃ0.062437.069ʃ20.406-∗56.826ʃ0.7804.967ʃ0.602实验组(2ʒ1)3.354ʃ0.168394.640ʃ8.395∗∗-∗55.384ʃ3.9385.756ʃ0.353㊀注:∗吸光度低于标准曲线最低浓度点的吸光度ꎬ未计算ꎻ与相应的阴性对照组相比ꎬ∗∗P<0.01ꎮ3.3㊀不同企业产品对补体系统的影响㊀4家企业的静注人免疫球蛋白制剂与人血清体外孵育时ꎬ相比于生理盐水对照组ꎬ补体分子C3a(3/4组)㊁C5a(4/4组)㊁C4a(4/4组)㊁Bb(4/4组)㊁Sc5b-9(2/4组)出现下降ꎬ仅A企业产品组中C3a㊁Sc5b-9以及B企业产品组中Sc5b-9有一定程度上升ꎬ但差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)ꎮ4家企业的静注人免疫球蛋白制剂经50ħ加热处理后ꎬ与人血清体外孵育ꎬ相比于生理盐水对照组ꎬ补体分子C3a(3/4组)㊁C5a(4/4组)㊁C4a(2/4组)㊁Bb(4/4组)㊁Sc5b-9(3/4组)出现下降ꎬ仅部分企业产品组中C3a㊁C4a以及Sc5b-9有一定程度上升ꎮ与相应的未加热产品组相比ꎬ在经过加热的产品组中ꎬ上述补体分子并未出现统计学意义变化ꎮ图2㊀不同企业产品与人血清孵育后补体分子的变化(n=3)㊀注:与阴性对照组相比ꎬ∗P<0.05ꎬ∗∗P<0.01ꎮ4㊀讨论静注人免疫球蛋白是一种在临床上广泛应用的血液制品ꎬ需求量较大ꎬ临床用药过程中ꎬ绝大部分不良反应报告发生在给药后30min内ꎮ与补体系统激活相关的类过敏反应(complementactivation-relatedpseudoallergyꎬCARPA)被认为是速发型药物过敏反应的重要类别之一[5-6]ꎬ其机制是补体系统激活后ꎬ产生了诸如C3a㊁C5a等过敏毒素ꎬ与相应的细胞受体结合后ꎬ继而引发一系列的类过敏反应症状[7-8]ꎮ体外补体孵育试验是一种快速评价药物类过敏反应的非临床研究方法[9-13]ꎬ通过将供试品与正常人血清按一定比例混合ꎬ在37ħ孵育一段时间后ꎬ采用ELISA试剂盒检测血清中补体分子及补体终末产物的变化ꎬ由此判断供试品是否具有激活补体系统进而引发类过敏反应的能力ꎮ在本研究中检测了补体系统激活及效应阶段的多个补体分子ꎮC3a/C5a是补体系统激活的中间代表性产物ꎬ具有强烈的过敏效应ꎮSc5b-9是补体激活的最终产物ꎬ反映补体系统最终激活程度ꎮC4a是经典激活途径㊁甘露糖凝集素途径的特征性中间产物ꎬBb是旁路途径的特征性中间产物ꎮ孵育后ꎬ通过分析各指标的变化趋势ꎬ可进一步确定供试品是通过何种途径激活补体以及激活程度ꎮ本研究通过考察供试品浓度㊁供试品/血浆比例㊁孵育时间(1h和4hꎬ结果未显示)对上述补体分子的影响ꎮ发现在所考察的影响因素范围内ꎬ与相应的生理盐水对照组相比ꎬ补体分子浓度基本呈降低趋势ꎬ未出现显著升高现象ꎬ表明供试品与补体体外孵育后ꎬ并未激活补体ꎮ本研究中的体外补体孵育评价实验包括两个关键影响因素:一是供试品与血浆比例ꎬ二是补体系统激活所需的钙镁离子ꎮ研究显示ꎬ不同供试品/血浆比例条件下ꎬ与生理盐水对照组相比ꎬ绝大部分补体分子均呈下降趋势(2ʒ1比例时Bb分子除外)ꎮ为最大程度模拟体内给药比例ꎬ根据药品说明书ꎬ70kg体重成人的剂量为400mg kg-1ꎬ人体血浆体积约为2.75Lꎬ折合给药比例为10mgʒ1mL血浆ꎮ同时考虑到钙镁离子是补体系统激活所必需的离子ꎬ因此采用VBS稀释液稀释供试品ꎬ使供试品与血浆接近临床用药比例ꎮ保障血液制品用药安全ꎬ降低用药过程中的不良反应发生率是临床用药安全的关注重点ꎮ本研究以静注人免疫球蛋白为研究对象ꎬ考察产品对补体系统的影响ꎬ并验证所提出的假设 IgG聚合物可能通过激活补体系统引发类过敏反应 ꎮ结果提示ꎬ静注人免疫球蛋白不能激活补体系统ꎬ同时IgG聚合物增加后ꎬ补体系统并未出现激活增加现象ꎮ结合免疫球蛋白浓度增加ꎬC5a浓度随之出现下降ꎬ提示存在剂量依赖性抑制作用ꎮ至于静注人免疫球蛋白是否与补体系统结合但不激活ꎬ值得进一步深入探讨ꎮ(下转第49页)的生物等效性研究提供了数据参考ꎬ适用于阿普斯特的血药浓度检测及其药代动力学研究ꎬ为阿普斯特制剂一致性评价提供依据ꎮ研究结果表明ꎬ空腹和餐后口服阿普斯特片受试制剂和参比制剂的Cmax㊁AUC0~t㊁AUC0~ɕ几何均值比的90%CI均在80.00%~125.00%等效区间内(包括边界值)ꎬ符合生物等效性评价标准ꎮ此外ꎬ本试验中空腹和餐后给药后阿普斯特Cmax㊁AUC0~t㊁AUC0~ɕ的个体内变异CV均小于30%ꎬ不属于高变异药物ꎮCmax㊁AUC0~t㊁AUC0~ɕ经对数转换后的多因素方差分析结果显示给药周期㊁给药序列㊁个体间㊁制剂间的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)ꎮ研究结果表明两种制剂在空腹和餐后条件下口服给药符合生物等效ꎮ另外ꎬ由药动学参数AUC0-t可知阿普斯特餐后条件下口服给药生物利用度较空腹条件下高ꎬ为临床提供更合理的用药指导ꎬ为患者提供更好的治疗效果ꎮ参考文献:[1]㊀中华医学会皮肤性病分会银屑病学组.中国银屑病治疗专家共识(2014版)[J].中华皮肤科杂志ꎬ2014ꎬ47(3):213-215.[2]王丽玮ꎬ杨莹ꎬ崔盘根.抗白细胞介素17生物制剂治疗银屑病的疗效和安全性[J].国际皮肤性病学杂志ꎬ2016ꎬ42(3):149-152.[3]中华医学会皮肤性病学分会银屑病专业委员会.国银屑病诊疗指南(2018简版)[J].中华皮肤科杂ꎬ2019ꎬ52(4):223-230.[4]BLAUVELTA.Ixekizumab:anewanti-IL-17Amonoclonalantibodytherapyformoderate-tosevereplaquepsoriasis[J].ExpertOpinBiolTherꎬ2016ꎬ16(2):255-263.[5]陈茜茜ꎬ李军霞ꎬ扶晓兰ꎬ等.白塞病遗传学研究进展[J].中华风湿病学杂志ꎬ2017ꎬ21(1):63-66. [6]SCHAFERPHꎬPARTONAꎬGANDHIAKꎬetal.Aprem ̄ilastꎬacAMPphosphodiesterase-4inhibitorꎬdemonstratesanti-inflammatoryactivityinvitroandinamodelofpso ̄riasis[J].BrJPharmacolꎬ2010ꎬ159(4):842-855. [7]SCHETTGꎬSLOANVSꎬSTEVENSRMꎬetal.Apremilast:anovelPDE4inhibitorinthetreatmentofau ̄toimmuneandinflammatorydiseases[J].TherAdvMus ̄culoskeletDisꎬ2010ꎬ2(5):271-278.[8]POOLERMꎬBALLANTYNEAD.Apremilast:FirstGlobalApproval[J].Drugsꎬ2014ꎬ74(7):825-837. [9]ANIꎬHARMANMꎬIBILOGLUI.CaseReportBullousHemorrhagicDermatosisInducedbyEnoxaparin[J].IndianDermatolOnlineJꎬ2017ꎬ8(5):347-350.[10]KULKARNIPꎬDESHPANDEA.AnalyticalMethodsforDeterminationofApremilastfromBulkꎬDosageFormandBiologicalFluids:ACriticalReview[J].CritRevAnalChemꎬ2021ꎬ51(3):258-268.[11]国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典2020年版(四部)[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社ꎬ2020:466-472.(收稿日期:2022-03-24)(上接第43页)参考文献:[1]㊀GUOYꎬTIANXꎬWANGXFꎬetal.AdverseEffectsofImmu ̄noglobulinTherapy[J].FrontImmunolꎬ2018(9):1299. [2]STIEHMER.Adverseeffectsofhumanimmunoglobulintherapy[J].TransfusMedRevꎬ2013ꎬ27(3):171-178. [3]SUTOVAIꎬCHOVANCOVAZꎬLITZMANJ.Adverseeffectsofimmunoglobulintherapy[J].VnitrLekꎬ2019ꎬ65(2):131-132.[4]AZIZIGꎬABOLHASSANIHꎬASGARDOONMHꎬetal.Managingpatientswithsideeffectsandadverseeventstoimmunoglobulintherapy[J].ExpertRevClinPharmacolꎬ2016ꎬ9(1):91-102.[5]SZEBENIJ.Complementactivation-relatedpseudoallergy:anewclassofdrug-inducedacuteimmunetoxicity[J].Toxi ̄cologyꎬ2005ꎬ216(2/3):106-121.[6]ZHANGBꎬLIQꎬSHICYꎬetal.Drug-InducedPseudoal ̄lergy:AReviewoftheCausesandMechanisms[J].Phar ̄macologyꎬ2018ꎬ101(1/2):104-110.[7]SZEBENIJꎬALVINGCRꎬMUGGIAFM.ComplementActivationbyCremophorELasaPossibleContributortoHypersensitivitytoPaclitaxel:anInVitroStudy[J].JNatlCancerInstꎬ1998ꎬ90(4):300.[8]MOGHIMISMꎬSIMBERGDꎬPAPINIEꎬetal.Complementactivationbydrugcarriersandparticulatepharmaceuticals:Principlesꎬchallengesandopportunities[J].AdvDrugDelivRevꎬ2020(157):83-95. [9]冯彩霞ꎬ修宪ꎬ田伟ꎬ等.补体活化的体外评价模型建立及应用[J].药学学报ꎬ2017ꎬ52(5):722-728.[10]张嘉ꎬ李贻奎ꎬ李连达ꎬ等.补体系统激活在吐温80导致类过敏反应中的作用[J].毒理学杂志ꎬ2009ꎬ23(6):457-459.[11]刘春琰ꎬ窦德强.血塞通注射液对人血清补体系统影响的体外研究[J].辽宁中医杂志ꎬ2015ꎬ42(4):808-810. [12]王珏ꎬ江颖ꎬ肖新月ꎬ等.生物制品用辅料蔗糖中颗粒杂质体外补体激活研究[J].药学研究ꎬ2022ꎬ41(3):149-152. [13]陈莉婧ꎬ廖国平ꎬ汪艳ꎬ等.清开灵注射液对人血清补体和RBL-2H3细胞影响的体外研究[J].中国中药杂志ꎬ2011ꎬ36(14):1884-1888.(收稿日期:2023-08-23)。
植物Myb转录因子的研究进展

s铂O量e嘲noml警cs与an擘dA乏p嵩pl跫edBm—lo—gywww.genoappibi01.orgIX)I:10.3969/gab.028.000365有超过80个M),b转录因子(gabinowiczeta1..1999),而棉花中发现大约有200个Myb转录因子(Cedronieta1.,2003)。
功能研究表明,M如参与了植物次生代谢(UimariandStrommer,1997;杜海等,2008),激素和环境因子应答(Chenetal。
2003;Hoerenetal.,1998;Leaetal.,2007),并对细胞分化、细胞周期(Payneeta1.,2000;Suoeta1.。
2003)以及叶片等器官形态建成(LeeandSchiefelbein,2002;Legayeta1.,2007;Yangeta1.,2007)具有重要的调节作用。
最近的研究发现,Myb转录因子参与了植物积累花色素过程,对果皮、果肉、叶片和花器官等各种颜色的形成具有重要作用(Azumaeta1..2008;Baneta1..2007;Esp.1eyeta1.,2007;Takoseta1.,2006)。
本文就Myb转录因子的特点和最新功能研究进展进行了综述,以期为该因子的研究和利用提供参考。
1Myb类转录因子的发现Myb基因序列早在1941年便从引起禽急性成髓细胞白血病病毒AMV和E26中成功鉴定出来(Graf,1992)。
Klempnauer等(1982)又从禽成髓细胞瘤病毒(avianmyeloblastosisvhats)中鉴定出一个corn.mantransforming基因,称为影一myb癌基因。
不久后发现,在正常动物细胞中也存在相应的原癌基因c—myb,而且具有调控细胞增值和分化作用的c.myb等位基因A一,扎伯和曰—m伯已从人类肿瘤细胞中被成功鉴定出来(Golayetal.,1996)。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
PH4of Petunia Is an R2R3MYB Protein That Activates Vacuolar Acidification through Interactions withBasic-Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors of the Anthocyanin Pathway WFrancesca Quattrocchio,1Walter Verweij,1Arthur Kroon,Cornelis Spelt,Joseph Mol,and Ronald Koes2Institute for Molecular and Cellular Biology,Vrije Universiteit,1081HV Amsterdam,The NetherlandsThe Petunia hybrida genes ANTHOCYANIN1(AN1)and AN2encode transcription factors with a basic-helix-loop-helix (BHLH)and a MYB domain,respectively,that are required for anthocyanin synthesis and acidification of the vacuole in petal cells.Mutation of PH4results in a bluerflower color,increased pH of petal extracts,and,in certain genetic backgrounds,the disappearance of anthocyanins and fading of theflower color.PH4encodes a MYB domain protein that is expressed in the petal epidermis and that can interact,like AN2,with AN1and the related BHLH protein JAF13in yeast two-hybrid assays. Mutation of PH4has little or no effect on the expression of structural anthocyanin genes but strongly downregulates the expression of CAC16.5,encoding a protease-like protein of unknown biological function.Constitutive expression of PH4 and AN1in transgenic plants is sufficient to activate CAC16.5ectopically.Together with the previousfinding that AN1 domains required for anthocyanin synthesis and vacuolar acidification can be partially separated,this suggests that AN1 activates different pathways through interactions with distinct MYB proteins.INTRODUCTIONIn plants,the vacuole occupies a large part(up to90%)of the cell volume and is important for a variety of physiological processes, such as pH homeostasis,osmoregulation,ion transport,and stor-age of metabolites.Moreover,it plays an important role in cell growth,because the enlargement of a cell is mostly attributable to an increase in the volume of the vacuole rather than of the cytoplasm(reviewed in Taiz,1992;Maeshima,2001;Gaxiola et al., 2002).The lumen of vacuoles is acidic compared with the cytoplasm, and in some cells(e.g.,in lemon[Citrus limon]fruit)it can reach pH values as low as1.Among the most abundant proteins on the vacuolar membrane are vacuolar ATPase(v-ATPase)and pyrophosphatase proton pumps(Szponarski et al.,2004)that transport protons from the cytoplasm into the vacuole,thereby contributing to the acidification of the vacuolar lumen.The resulting electrochemical gradient across the vacuolar mem-brane is the driving force for the transport of a variety of compounds(ions,sugars)via secondary symport and antiport transporters and channels(reviewed in Taiz,1992;Maeshima, 2001;Gaxiola et al.,2002).In most species,the coloration offlowers and fruits results from the accumulation offlavonoid pigments(anthocyanins)in the vacuoles of(sub)epidermal cells.Because the absorption spectrum of anthocyanins depends on the pH of their environ-ment(de Vlaming et al.,1983),the color of a tissue depends in part on the pH of the vacuolar lumen,thus makingflower color a convenient and reliable reporter to monitor alterations in vacuolar pH(Yoshida et al.,1995,2003)In morning glory(Ipomoea tricolor)petals,the vacuolar pH is relatively low when theflower bud opens,resulting in a red color, but upon further maturation,the vacuolar pH increases and the petals acquire a strong blue color(Yoshida et al.,1995).This color change and the increase of vacuolar pH require a putative Naþ/Hþexchanger encoded by the PURPLE gene(Fukada-Tanaka et al.,2000).Most likely,PURPLE transports sodium ions into and protons out of the vacuole,resulting in a less acidic vacuole and a bluer color.Petunia hybridaflowers normally have a lower pH than Ipo-moeaflowers,and the color of wild-typeflowers stays on the reddish(low pH)side of the color spectrum.By genetic analyses, seven loci(named PH1to PH7)have been identified that,when mutated,cause a more bluishflower color and an increase in the pH of crude petal extracts(Wiering,1974;de Vlaming et al.,1983; van Houwelingen et al.,1998),suggesting that these genes are required for acidification of the vacuole(de Vlaming et al.,1983). Mutations in the genes ANTHOCYANIN1(AN1),AN2,and AN11 cause,besides the loss of anthocyanin pigments,an increased pH of petal extracts.That this pH shift is at least in part attributable to an increased pH of the vacuolar lumen was evident from the bluishflower color specified by particular an1 alleles(formerly known as ph6)that lost the capacity to activate the vacuolar acidification function but could still drive anthocy-anin synthesis(Spelt et al.,2002).1These authors contributed equally to this work.2To whom correspondence should be addressed.E-mail ronald.koes@falw.vu.nl;fax31-20-5987155.The authors responsible for distribution of materials integral to thefindings presented in this article in accordance with the policy describedin the Instructions for Authors()are:FrancescaQuattrocchio(francesca.quattrocchio@falw.vu.nl)and Ronald Koes(ronald.koes@falw.vu.nl).W Online version contains Web-only data.Article,publication date,and citation information can be found at/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.105.034041.The Plant Cell,Vol.18,1274–1291,May2006,ª2006American Society of Plant BiologistsAN1and AN11are required for transcriptional activation of a subset of structural anthocyanin genes,encoding the enzymes of the pathway,in all pigmented tissues(Quattrocchio et al., 1993)and encode a basic-helix-loop-helix(BHLH)transcription factor and a WD40protein,respectively(de Vetten et al.,1997; Spelt et al.,2000).AN2encodes a MYB-type transcription factor whose function appears to be(partially)redundant,because it is expressed only in petals and not in other pigmented tissues (Quattrocchio et al.,1999).Moreover,even in the an2null mutant, pigmentation of the petals is reduced,but not fully blocked,and the pH shift in an2petal homogenates is smaller than that in an1 or an11petals(Quattrocchio et al.,1993;Spelt et al.,2002).In addition,AN1and AN11play a role in the development of epidermal cells in the seed coat(Spelt et al.,2002).The anthocyanin pathway has been shown to be activated by similar MYB,BHLH,and WD40proteins in a wide variety of species,indicating that this function is well conserved(reviewed in Winkel-Shirley,2001;Koes et al.,2005).Several studies revealed that these MYB,BHLH,and WD40proteins could interact physically,indicating that they may operate in one transcription activation pathway and may activate their target genes as a(ternary)complex(Goff et al.,1992;Zhang et al.,2003; Baudry et al.,2004;Kroon,2004;Zimmermann et al.,2004). Besides petunia,Arabidopsis thaliana is the only other species in which these activators are known to control multiple processes. In Arabidopsis,the WD40protein TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1(TTG1)(Walker et al.,1999)is required for the syn-thesis of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin pigments,the pro-duction of seed mucilage,and the development of trichomes on stems and leaves(Koornneef,1981),whereas in roots it sup-presses the formation of root hairs in certain cells(Galway et al., 1994).During the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis,trichome development,and nonhair development in the root,TTG1coop-erates with two functionally equivalent BHLH proteins encoded by GLABRA3(GL3)and ENHANCER OF GLABRA3(EGL3) (Payne et al.,2000;Bernhardt et al.,2003;Ramsay et al.,2003; Zhang et al.,2003),whereas synthesis of proanthocyanidins in the seed coat depends on a distinct BHLH protein encoded by TRANSPARENT TESTA8(TT8)(Nesi et al.,2000).TTG1and GL3/ EGL3or TT8activate these distinct processes by associating with distinct MYB partners.During trichome development,they interact with R2R3MYBs encoded by GLABROUS1(GL1)or MYB23(Oppenheimer et al.,1991;Kirik et al.,2001,2005),and for the development of nonhair cells in the root they interact with a functionally equivalent MYB encoded by WEREWOLF(WER) (Lee and Schiefelbein,2001),whereas for anthocyanin synthesis, their MYB partner is probably PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYA-NIN PIGMENT1(PAP1)or PAP2(Borevitz et al.,2000;Baudry et al.,2004;Zimmermann et al.,2004).The involvement of anthocyanin regulators in trichome and root hair development is seen only in Arabidopsis and not in other species for which regulatory anthocyanin mutants have been isolated,such as Antirrhinum majus,maize(Zea mays),or petunia. Nevertheless,RED(R)(BHLH)and PALE ALEURONE COLOR (PAC1)(WD40)from maize can restore the hair defects in Arabi-dopsis ttg1mutants(Lloyd et al.,1992;Carey et al.,2004), indicating that the functional diversification did not depend on alterations in these WD40and BHLH proteins but on the diver-gence of their MYB partners and/or their downstream target genes.Whether these MYB,BHLH,and WD40proteins also activate vacuolar acidification in species other than petunia is unclear.To unravel the mechanisms and the biochemical pathways by which AN1,AN11,and AN2control vacuolar pH,we set out to isolate the genetically defined PH loci by transposon-tagging strategies and the downstream structural genes by RNA profiling methods.Here,we describe the isolation and molecular char-acterization of PH4.We show that PH4is a member of the MYB family of transcription factors that is expressed in the petal epidermis and that can interact physically with AN1and JAF13,a functionally related BHLH protein that can also drive anthocyanin synthesis(Quattrocchio et al.,1998).Because PH4plays no apparent role in anthocyanin synthesis,we propose that AN1 activates anthocyanin synthesis and vacuolar acidification through interactions with distinct MYB proteins.RESULTSMutations That Alter pH in PetalsThe petunia line R27contains functional alleles for all of the regulatory anthocyanin genes that color the petal(AN1,AN2,and AN11)but contains mutations in the structural genes HYDROX-YLATION AT FIVE(HF1)and HF2,both encoding FLAVONOID 3959HYDROXYLASE(Holton et al.,1993),and RHAMNOSYLA-TION AT THREE(RT),encoding ANTHOCYANIN RHAMNOSYL-TRANSFERASE(Kroon et al.,1994);consequently,the major anthocyanins synthesized are cyanidin derivatives(de Vlaming et al.,1984;Wiering and de Vlaming,1984)(Figure1).In addition, R27is mutant for FLAVONOL(FL),which strongly reduces flavonol synthesis(Figure1)and increases the accumulation of cyanidin derivatives(de Vlaming et al.,1984;Wiering and de Vlaming,1984)(Figure1).Consequently,theflowers of R27have a bright red color(Figure2A).The lines W138and W137derive from R27by dTPH1insertions in AN1and AN11,respectively (alleles an1-W138and an11-W137),and,consequently,bear whiteflowers with red or pink revertant spots(Doodeman et al., 1984a,1984b)(Figure2B).Among progeny of W138and W137,we found several new mutations affectingflower color(van Houwelingen et al.,1998; Spelt et al.,2002).In one class of mutants,the color of the AN1or AN11revertant spots(in an an1-W138or an11-W137back-ground)(Figure2C)or of the whole corolla(in an AN1or AN11 germinal revertant)had changed from red to purplish(Figures2D and2E).Subsequent complementation analyses showed that these mutations represented new alleles of PH2(allele ph2-A2414),PH3(allele ph3-V2068),and PH4(alleles ph4-V2166, ph4-B3021,ph4-X2052,and ph4-V2153)(see Supplemental Table1online).Yet another unstable ph4allele(ph4-X2377)was recovered from the Syngenta breeding program in a family segregating3:1for wild types with red petals and mutants with purplish petals with an occasional revertant red spot.The alleles ph4-V2166,ph4-V2153,an1-W138,an1-W225, and an11-W134all cause a similar increase in petal extract pH (Figure2F)(Spelt et al.,2002).To determine at which stage AN1,The PH4Gene of Petunia1275AN11,PH3,and PH4are active,we analyzed flowers of different developmental stages.Figure 2G shows that wild-type petals start to acidify around developmental stage 4,when the bud is about to open.In an1,ph3,and ph4mutants,this acidification is reduced but not blocked completely.This finding suggests that multiple vacuolar acidification pathways operate in petals,some of which are independent of AN1,AN11,PH4,and PH3.Analysis of double mutant flowers showed that the pH of an1ph4or an11ph4petal homogenates is not significantly different from that of any of the single mutants,suggesting that these genes operate in the same vacuolar acidification pathway (Figure 2F).To test whether alterations in pigment synthesis also contrib-uted to the color change in ph4petals,we analyzed anthocyanins in wild-type (R27)and ph4-V2153petals of closed buds (stage 4)by HPLC.Figure 2H shows that both genotypes accumulate a nearly identical mixture of anthocyanins.R27petals synthesize only small amounts of flavonol copigments (quercetin deriva-tives)as a result of its fl/flgenotype,and HPLC analysis did not reveal clear differences in the accumulation of these compounds in ph4petals (see Supplemental Figure 1online).Thus,the ph4mutation has,at least in the R27genetic background,little or no effect on the synthesis and modification of anthocyanins.Early genetic work had shown that a mutation in PH4or a closely linked gene triggers the complete fading of flower colorand the disappearance of anthocyanins after opening of the flower bud,if combined with a dominant allele at the FADING locus (Wiering,1974;de Vlaming et al.,1982).Anthocyanins with a 3RGac5G substitution pattern are particularly sensitive to fading,whereas the 3-glucosides (as in rt mutants like R27and derived lines)and the 3-rutinosides show little or no fading (de Vlaming et al.,1982).When we crossed the unstable ph4-V2166allele into a genetic background that allows the synthesis of 3RGac5G-substituted anthocyanins,the flowers displayed upon opening a blue-violet color and were dotted with red-violet spots and sectors resulting from reversions of ph4(Figure 2H).In the next days,the color of the blue-violet (ph4)cells faded to nearly white,whereas the red-violet (PH4)revertant sectors retained their color.Control crosses with isogenic PH4plants (lines R27and W138)yielded only progeny with evenly red-colored,nonfading corollas,whereas crosses with a stable reces-sive ph4-V2153parent gave only progeny with evenly colored blue-violet,fading corollas (ph4).This finding demonstrates that it is the mutation of PH4,and not that of a linked gene,that triggers fading.The an1-G621allele expresses a truncated AN1protein that can drive anthocyanin synthesis but not vacuolar acidification (Spelt et al.,2002).When crossed into a background that allows the synthesis of 3RGac5G-substituted anthocyanins,the an1-G621allele also triggered fading (Figure 2I),and similar results were obtained with the an1-B3196allele in distinct crosses.Strikingly,the unstable ph2-A2414(Figure 2J)and ph5(data not shown)alleles did not induce fading when crossed into an FA background synthesizing 3RGAac5G-substituted anthocyanins,suggesting that fading in an1and ph4petals is not triggered by the upregulation of vacuolar pH alone and may depend on some other vacuolar defect.Isolation of PH4Using Transposon-Tagged AllelesBecause most mutant alleles that arose in W138were attribut-able to insertions of a 284-bp dTPH1transposon (Souer et al.,1996;de Vetten et al.,1997;van Houwelingen et al.,1998;Quattrocchio et al.,1999;Spelt et al.,2000;Toben˜a-Santamaria et al.,2002;Vandenbussche et al.,2003),we anticipated that the unstable alleles ph4-V2166,ph4-X2052,and ph4-B3021might also harbor insertions of dTPH1.To identify the dTPH1copy in ph4-B3021,we analyzed dTPH1flanking sequences in mutant and wild-type plants by transpo-son display (van den Broek et al.,1998)and found a 98-bp fragment that was amplified from the three ph4-B3021plants analyzed but not from the two wild-type plants homozygous for the parental PH4allele (Figure 3A).Subsequent isolation,clon-ing,and sequencing of this fragment showed that it contained 66bp of dTPH1sequence and 32bp of flanking sequence that was identical to a cDNA clone (MYBa )that had been isolated inde-pendently by yeast two-hybrid screen using an AN1bait (see below).PCR experiments with gene-specific primers showed that in ph4-B3021and ph4-V2166plants,MYBa was disrupted by a 284-bp dTPH1insertion in the 59and 39ends of the protein-coding region,respectively (Figure 3B).Analysis of PH4progeny plants that originated from germinal reversions ofph4-B3021Figure 1.Genetic Control of the Anthocyanin Pathway in Petunia Petals.The main anthocyanins and flavonols (gray boxes)are synthesized via a branched pathway.Genes that control distinct steps are indicated in boldface italics.Malonyl-CoA and p -coumaroyl-CoA are converted by the enzymes CHALCONE SYNTHASE (expressed from two distinct genes,CHSa and CHSj ),CHALCONE ISOMERASE (encoded by CHIa ),and FLAVONOID 3HYDROXYLASE (encoded by AN3)into dihydro-kaempferol (dHK).Hydroxylation of dHK on the 39or the 39plus 59position is controlled by HT (for HYDROXYLATION AT THREE )and the homologs HF1and HF2(for HYDROXYLATION AT FIVE )to yield dihydroquercitin (dHQ)and dihydromyricitin (dHM),respectively.The simplest anthocyanins in petunia flowers are 3-glucosides (3G).Through the action of RT (for RHAMNOSYLATION AT FIVE )and AAT (for ANTHOCYANIN-RUTINOSIDE ACYLTRANSFERASE )and others,antho-cyanins with a 3-rutinoside p -coumaroyl-5-glucoside (3RGac5G)substi-tution pattern are generated.The colors displayed by the various anthocyanins (in a flPH background)are shown in parentheses.1276The Plant CellFigure 2.Phenotypic Analysis of Flower Pigmentation Mutants.(A)Flower of the wild-type line R27(AN1,AN11,PH4).(B)Flower of the line W137(an11-W137,PH4)showing AN11-R revertant sectors,resulting from excisions of dTPH1,on a white (an11-W137)background.(C)Flower homozygous for the unstable alleles an11-W137and ph4-B3021.Reversion of an11-W137results in spots with a purplish color rather than red,as a result of the ph4-B3021mutation.Somatic reversions of ph4-B3021can be seen occasionally as red (PH4-R )spots within the purplish ph4-B3021sectors (inset).(D)Flower of line R154harboring the unstable ph4-V2166allele in an AN1-R AN11-R background.Note the red PH4revertant sectors on the purplish ph4background.(E)Flower of line R149harboring the stable recessive ph4-V2153allele in an AN1-R AN11-R genetic background.The PH4Gene of Petunia 1277(Figure3C)and ph4-V2166(Figure3D)showed that reversion of the ph4phenotype correlated with excision of dTPH1from MYBa.DNA analyses of plants containing ph4-X2052or ph4-C3540, either in homozygous or heterozygous condition,showed that these mutants also contained dTPH1insertions in MYBa, whereas the stable recessive ph4-V2153mutants contained an ;4-kb TPH6insertion that is nearly identical to the TPH6 element found in the alleles an1-W17and an1-W219(Spelt et al.,2002)(Figure3B).Plants harboring the weakly unstable ph4-X2377allele contained a177-bp insertion29bp down-stream from the translation start site.The insertion isflanked by an8-bp target site duplication and has a12-bp terminal inverted repeat with similarity to the terminal inverted repeats of hAT family transposons,including dTPH1and Activator from maize. Because the internal sequences of the insertion show no simi-larity to other transposons and are too short to encode a transposase,it apparently represents a new(sub)family of non-autonomous petunia transposons that we named dTPH7.The ph4lines V64and M60both contain a dTPH1insertion in MYBa in exactly the same position(Figure3B).In summary,these data show that mutations in the isolated gene(MYBa)fully correlate with the phenotype conferred by the ph4mutant,implying that PH4is identical to MYBa.Below,we refer to this gene as PH4.PH4Encodes a MYB Domain ProteinSequence analysis of a full-size PH4cDNA and the correspond-ing genomic region showed that the PH4mRNA is encoded by two exons separated by a715-bp intron(Figure3B).The cDNA contains a single large open reading frame encoding a291–amino acid protein.Database searches showed that a103–amino acid domain,located near the N terminus,is conserved in a large number of plant and animal proteins all belonging to the MYB family of transcription factors(Figures4A and4B).The MYB domain consists of one,two,or three helix-helix-turn-helix motifs that potentially bind DNA.PH4,like the majority of plant MYBs(Stracke et al.,2001),contains only the repeats R2and R3 (Figure4B).R2R3MYB genes constitute a large family of;125genes in Arabidopsis and>85genes in rice(Oryza sativa)and have been categorized into42subgroups based on similarities in the encoded proteins and intron–exon structures(Stracke et al., 2001;Jiang et al.,2004).Generally,sequence similarity between MYB proteins is restricted to the N-terminal MYB domain,but19 subgroups of R2R3MYBs share some conserved motifs in their C-terminal domains that may indicate similarities in function (Stracke et al.,2001;Jiang et al.,2004).PH4is most similar to the R2R3MYB proteins BNLGHi233 from upland cotton(Gossypium hirsutum),MYBCS1and MYB5 from grape(Vitis vinifera),MYB5from Arabidopsis,and MYB4from rice(Figure4A).The clustering of R2R3MYBs in Figure4is in good agreement with previous analyses based on a much larger set of MYBs(Stracke et al.,2001;Jiang et al.,2004) and extends the data at some points.For example,grape MYBA1and tomato(Solanum lycopersicum)ANT1,recently identified regulators of the anthocyanin pathway in grape (Kobayashi et al.,2004)and tomato(Mathews et al.,2003), respectively,cluster with known members(AN2of petunia,PAP1 and PAP2of Arabidopsis)of subgroups6and N9as defined by Stracke et al.(2001)and Jiang et al.(2004),respectively.Curi-ously,C1and Pl,regulators of the anthocyanin pathway in maize, cluster in a distinct group(5/N8)together with TT2,a regulator of proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin synthesis in Arabidopsis (Shirley et al.,1995),again consistent with previous results. ODO1,an activator of the synthesis of phenylpropanoid vol-atiles in petuniaflowers,clusters with Arabidopsis MYB42and MYB85,similar to previous results(Verdonk et al.,2005),but it does not contain the conserved motif found in the C termini of MYB42and MYB85(Jiang et al.,2004).Figure4B shows that PH4,Arabidopsis MYB5,grape MYBCS1 and MYB5,cotton BNLGHi233,and rice MYB4share two con-served motifs in their C-terminal domains.Such motifs have been used as signatures for the classification of subgroups(Stracke et al.,2001;Jiang et al.,2004).Given that these C-terminal motifs in PH4and related R2R3MYBs are much better conserved than those in proteins of subgroup N9,we propose that these MYBs form a new subgroup that we tentatively named G20,in accor-dance with the numbering of Jiang et al.(2004).This classificationFigure2.(continued).(F)pH values(means6SD;n¼7)of petal homogenates of different genotypes in the R27genetic background.Note that the absolute pH values that are measured show some variation in time,possibly in response to variable environmental conditions in the greenhouse,although the differences between mutants and the wild type are virtually constant.(G)Petal homogenate pH(means6SD;n¼5)duringflower development in wild-type,an1,ph3,and ph4petals.Developmental stages were defined as follows:stage2,30-to35-mm buds;stage3,35-to45-mm buds;stage4,buds of maximum size(45to50mm);stage5,unfoldingflowers;stage6,fully openflowers around anthesis.(H)HPLC analysis of methanol-extractable anthocyanins in petals of stage4flower buds from lines R27(PH4)and R149(ph4-V2153).The arrows denote the retention time of cyanidin3-glucoside.(I)Phenotype of ph4-V2166/ph4-V64flowers in a background that allows the synthesis of3RGac5G-substituted anthocyanins,resulting from the cross R1493V64,showing subsequent stages(from left to right)offlower color fading.Note that the blue-violet ph4cells fade,whereas the red-violet PH4 revertant sectors(white arrows)do not.(J)Phenotype of an1-G621/an1-W138flowers in a background that synthesizes3RGac5G-substituted anthocyanins,showing subsequent stages(from left to right)offlower color fading.Note that mutant(an1-G621)tissues fade,whereas full AN1revertant sectors(mostly originating from excisions of dTPH1from an1-W138)do not fade.(K)Phenotype of a mature ph2-A2414flower(comparable to the rightmostflowers in[I]and[J])in a background(R1603V26)that synthesizes 3RGac5G-substituted anthocyanins.Note that neither the PH2tissue(red-violet sectors)nor the ph2tissue(blue-violet background)displays fading. 1278The Plant Cellis supported by the finding that both Arabidopsis MYB5and PH4contain only one intron (Li et al.,1996)(Figure 3),whereas the majority of R2R3MYBs contain two (Jiang et al.,2004).Yeast two-hybrid assays showed that Arabidopsis MYB5(Zimmermann et al.,2004)and PH4(see below)can interact physically with functionally similar BHLH proteins,consistent with the idea that they have similar functions.However,the expression pattern of MYB5(Li et al.,1996)seems quite differentfrom that of PH4(see below).Rice MYB4induces freezing and chilling tolerance when constitutively expressed in Arabidopsis (Vannini et al.,2004),and grape MYB5induces the synthesis of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins when overexpressed in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum )(Deluc et al.,2006).Definite proof for functional equivalence and/or orthology will require the swapping of genes between species and/or the identification of (direct)target genes (see Discussion).Expression of PH4and Mutant AllelesTo determine the expression pattern of PH4,we measured the amount of PH4mRNAs in different tissues of the wild-type line V30by RT-PCR.We used line V30because it contains functional alleles of all regulatory pigmentation genes (Koes et al.,1986),whereas R27is mutant for an4,a regulator of anthocyanin synthesis and AN1expression in anthers (Quattrocchio et al.,1993;Spelt et al.,2000).Figure 5A shows that PH4is relatively strongly expressed in the limb of the petal,whereas in the tube only weak PH4expression is detected.Possibly,the low amount of transcripts in the tube sample originated from cells near the border of the limb and the tube.The expression in the limb reaches a maximum at developmental stages 5to 6(Figure 5A),when the bud is opening,which correlates with the moment that pH differences were first seen between wild-type and ph4petal limb extracts (Figure 2E).Ovaries are the only other tissue besides petals in which we detected clear PH4expression.This organ also expresses AN1(Figure 5A)(Spelt et al.,2000),which directs the activation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic gene DFR ,but for unknown reasons this does not result in the accumulation of anthocyanin pigments (Huits et al.,1994).Anthers of V30are pigmented by anthocyanins and express AN1mRNA during early stages of development (stages 1to 3).However,no PH4transcripts were detected in this tissue.The same holds for the stigma and style.AN1is weakly expressed in sepals,leaves,and stems of V30,which correlates with the synthesis of low amounts of anthocyanin;PH4,however,is not expressed in these tissues.Roots are normally not pigmented and do not express PH4or AN1.To examine to what extent the transposon insertions affected the expression of PH4,we analyzed ph4mRNAs in petal limbs of different mutants by RNA gel blot analysis,RT-PCR (data not shown),and rapid amplification of 39cDNA ends (39RACE).Figure 5B shows that the amount of PH4transcripts in petal limbs homozygous for the ph4alleles X2052,B3021,C3540,and V2166is strongly reduced compared with that of the isogenic wild-type line R27.The same holds for PH4transcripts ex-pressed from the X2377allele compared with an isogenic rever-tant (ph4-X2377R ).Presumably,the dTPH1insertions in these alleles result in highly unstable mRNAs that are rapidly degraded.The small amount of wild-type-size PH4transcripts in these corollas presumably originates from cells in which dTPH1was excised from PH4.The insertions in ph4-V64and ph4-V2153cause the accumu-lation of short ph4transcripts.Cloning and sequencing of these products revealed that they resulted from polyadenylation within the dTPH1and TPH6sequences,respectively,andencodeFigure 3.Molecular Analysis of PH4.(A)Transposon display analysis of plants homozygous for the parental wild type (þ/þ)or the mutable ph4-B3021allele (m/m).The rightmost lane contains a radiolabeled 123-bp size marker.The arrow indicates a fragment derived from PH4.(B)Map of the PH4gene and mutant alleles.Boxes represent exons,and the thin line represents an intron.Protein-coding regions are indicated by double height,and the region encoding the R2and R3repeats of the MYB domain is filled in black.The open and closed circles represent the start and stop codons,respectively.The triangles indicate transposon insertions in the indicated alleles:the large open triangle represents TPH6,the mid-size closed triangles represent dTPH1,and the small open triangle represents dTPH7.(C)PCR analysis of plants harboring ph4-B3021and derived stabl e ph4alleles.þindicates the parental wild-type allele,m indicates the mutable ph4-B3021allele,R1indicates a derived revertant allele,and –indicates a stable recessive ph4allele.The primers used were 583and 1060(Table 1).(D)PCR analysis of plants harboring ph4-V2166and derived germinal revertant alleles.m represents the mutable ph4-V2166allele,and R1,R2,and R3represent three independently isolated revertant alleles.The primers used were 690and 582.The PH4Gene of Petunia 1279。