数据库系统教程(何玉洁 李宝安 编著)第2章习题答案
数据库系统基础教程(第二版)课后习题答案
Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 2Solutions for Section 2.1Exercise 2.1.1The E/R Diagram.Exercise 2.1.8(a)The E/R DiagramKobvxybzSolutions for Section 2.2Exercise 2.2.1The Addresses entity set is nothing but a single address, so we would prefer to make address an attribute of Customers. Were the bank to record several addresses for a customer, then it might make sense to have an Addresses entity set and make Lives-at a many-many relationship.The Acct-Sets entity set is useless. Each customer has a unique account set containing his or her accounts. However, relating customers directly to their accounts in a many-many relationship conveys the same information and eliminates the account-set concept altogether.Solutions for Section 2.3Exercise 2.3.1(a)Keys ssNo and number are appropriate for Customers and Accounts, respectively. Also, we think it does not make sense for an account to be related to zero customers, so we should round the edgeconnecting Owns to Customers. It does not seem inappropriate to have a customer with 0 accounts;they might be a borrower, for example, so we put no constraint on the connection from Owns to Accounts. Here is the The E/R Diagram，showing underlined keys and the numerocity constraint.Exercise 2.3.2(b)If R is many-one from E1 to E2, then two tuples (e1,e2) and (f1,f2) of the relationship set for R must be the same if they agree on the key attributes for E1. To see why, surely e1 and f1 are the same. Because R is many-one from E1 to E2, e2 and f2 must also be the same. Thus, the pairs are the same.Solutions for Section 2.4Exercise 2.4.1Here is the The E/R Diagram.We have omitted attributes other than our choice for the key attributes of Students and Courses. Also omitted are names for the relationships. Attribute grade is not part of the key for Enrollments. The key for Enrollements is studID from Students and dept and number from Courses.Exercise 2.4.4bHere is the The E/R Diagram Again, we have omitted relationship names and attributes other than our choice for the key attributes. The key for Leagues is its own name; this entity set is not weak. The key for Teams is its own name plus the name of the league of which the team is a part, e.g., (Rangers, MLB) or (Rangers, NHL). The key for Players consists of the player's number and the key for the team on which he or she plays. Since the latter key is itself a pair consisting of team and league names, the key for players is the triple (number, teamName, leagueName). e.g., JeffGarcia is (5, 49ers, NFL).Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 3Solutions for Section 3.1Exercise 3.1.2(a)We can order the three tuples in any of 3! = 6 ways. Also, the columns can be ordered in any of 3! = 6 ways. Thus, the number of presentations is 6*6 = 36.Solutions for Section 3.2Exercise 3.2.1Customers(ssNo, name, address, phone)Flights(number, day, aircraft)Bookings(ssNo, number, day, row, seat)Being a weak entity set, Bookings' relation has the keys for Customers and Flights and Bookings' own attributes.Notice that the relations obtained from the toCust and toFlt relationships are unnecessary. They are:toCust(ssNo, ssNo1, number, day)toFlt(ssNo, number, day, number1, day1)That is, for toCust, the key of Customers is paired with the key for Bookings. Since both include ssNo, this attribute is repeated with two different names, ssNo and ssNo1. A similar situation exists for toFlt.Exercise 3.2.3Ships(name, yearLaunched)SisterOf(name, sisterName)Solutions for Section 3.3Exercise 3.3.1Since Courses is weak, its key is number and the name of its department. We do not havearelation for GivenBy. In part (a), there is a relation for Courses and a relation for LabCourses that has only the key and the computer-allocation attribute. It looks like:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room)LabCourses(number, deptName, allocation)For part (b), LabCourses gets all the attributes of Courses, as:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room)LabCourses(number, deptName, room, allocation)And for (c), Courses and LabCourses are combined, as:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room, allocation)Exercise 3.3.4(a)There is one relation for each entity set, so the number of relations is e. The relation for the root entity set has a attributes, while the other relations, which must include the key attributes, have a+k attributes.Solutions for Section 3.4Exercise 3.4.2Surely ID is a key by itself. However, we think that the attributes x, y, and z together form another key. The reason is that at no time can two molecules occupy the same point.Exercise 3.4.4The key attributes are indicated by capitalization in the schema below:Customers(SSNO, name, address, phone)Flights(NUMBER, DAY, aircraft)Bookings(SSNO, NUMBER, DAY, row, seat)Exercise 3.4.6(a)The superkeys are any subset that contains A1. Thus, there are 2^{n-1} such subsets, since each of the n-1 attributes A2 through An may independently be chosen in or out.Solutions for Section 3.5Exercise 3.5.1(a)We could try inference rules to deduce new dependencies until we are satisfied we have them all.A more systematic way is to consider the closures of all 15 nonempty sets of attributes.For the single attributes we have A+ = A, B+ = B, C+ = ACD, and D+ = AD. Thus, the only new dependency we get with a single attribute on the left is C->A.Now consider pairs of attributes:AB+ = ABCD, so we get new dependency AB->D. AC+ = ACD, and AC->D is nontrivial. AD+ = AD, so nothing new. BC+ = ABCD, so we get BC->A, and BC->D. BD+ = ABCD, giving usBD->A and BD->C. CD+ = ACD, giving CD->A.For the triples of attributes, ACD+ = ACD, but the closures of the other sets are each ABCD. Thus, we get new dependencies ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.Since ABCD+ = ABCD, we get no new dependencies.The collection of 11 new dependencies mentioned above is: C->A, AB->D, AC->D, BC->A, BC->D, BD->A, BD->C, CD->A, ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.Exercise 3.5.1(b)From the analysis of closures above, we find that AB, BC, and BD are keys. All other sets either do not have ABCD as the closure or contain one of these three sets.Exercise 3.5.1(c)The superkeys are all those that contain one of those three keys. That is, a superkey that is not a key must contain B and more than one of A, C, and D. Thus, the (proper) superkeys are ABC, ABD, BCD, and ABCD.Exercise 3.5.3(a)We must compute the closure of A1A2...AnC. Since A1A2...An->B is a dependency, surely B is in this set, proving A1A2...AnC->B.Exercise 3.5.4(a)Consider the relationThis relation satisfies A->B but does not satisfy B->A.Exercise 3.5.8(a)If all sets of attributes are closed, then there cannot be any nontrivial functional dependencies. For suppose A1A2...An->B is a nontrivial dependency. Then A1A2...An+ contains B and thus A1A2...An is not closed.Exercise 3.5.10(a)We need to compute the closures of all subsets of {ABC}, although there is no need to think about the empty set or the set of all three attributes. Here are the calculations for the remaining six sets: A+ = AB+ = BC+ = ACEAB+ = ABCDEAC+ = ACEBC+ = ABCDEWe ignore D and E, so a basis for the resulting functional dependencies for ABC are: C->A and AB->C. Note that BC->A is true, but follows logically from C->A, and therefore may be omitted from our list.Solutions for Section 3.6Exercise 3.6.1(a)In the solution to Exercise 3.5.1 we found that there are 14 nontrivial dependencies, including the three given ones and 11 derived dependencies. These are: C->A, C->D, D->A, AB->D, AB-> C, AC->D, BC->A, BC->D, BD->A, BD->C, CD->A, ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.We also learned that the three keys were AB, BC, and BD. Thus, any dependency above that does not have one of these pairs on the left is a BCNF violation. These are: C->A, C->D, D->A, AC->D, and CD->A.One choice is to decompose using C->D. That gives us ABC and CD as decomposed relations. CD is surely in BCNF, since any two-attribute relation is. ABC is not in BCNF, since AB and BC are its only keys, but C->A is a dependency that holds in ABCD and therefore holds in ABC. We must further decompose ABC into AC and BC. Thus, the three relations of the decomposition are AC, BC, and CD.Since all attributes are in at least one key of ABCD, that relation is already in 3NF, and no decomposition is necessary.Exercise 3.6.1(b)(Revised 1/19/02) The only key is AB. Thus, B->C and B->D are both BCNF violations. The derived FD's BD->C and BC->D are also BCNF violations. However, any other nontrivial, derived FD will have A and B on the left, and therefore will contain a key.One possible BCNF decomposition is AB and BCD. It is obtained starting with any of the four violations mentioned above. AB is the only key for AB, and B is the only key for BCD.Since there is only one key for ABCD, the 3NF violations are the same, and so is the decomposition.Solutions for Section 3.7Exercise 3.7.1Since A->->B, and all the tuples have the same value for attribute A, we can pair the B-value from any tuple with the value of the remaining attribute C from any other tuple. Thus, we know that R must have at least the nine tuples of the form (a,b,c), where b is any of b1, b2, or b3, and c is any of c1, c2, or c3. That is, we can derive, using the definition of a multivalued dependency, that each of the tuples (a,b1,c2), (a,b1,c3), (a,b2,c1), (a,b2,c3), (a,b3,c1), and (a,b3,c2) are also in R.Exercise 3.7.2(a)First, people have unique Social Security numbers and unique birthdates. Thus, we expect the functional dependencies ssNo->name and ssNo->birthdate hold. The same applies to children, so we expect childSSNo->childname and childSSNo->childBirthdate. Finally, an automobile has a unique brand, so we expect autoSerialNo->autoMake.There are two multivalued dependencies that do not follow from these functional dependencies. First, the information about one child of a person is independent of other information about that person. That is, if a person with social security number s has a tuple with cn,cs,cb, then if there isany other tuple t for the same person, there will also be another tuple that agrees with t except that it has cn,cs,cb in its components for the child name, Social Security number, and birthdate. That is the multivalued dependencyssNo->->childSSNo childName childBirthdateSimilarly, an automobile serial number and make are independent of any of the other attributes, so we expect the multivalued dependencyssNo->->autoSerialNo autoMakeThe dependencies are summarized below:ssNo -> name birthdatechildSSNo -> childName childBirthdateautoSerialNo -> autoMakessNo ->-> childSSNo childName childBirthdatessNo ->-> autoSerialNo autoMakeExercise 3.7.2(b)We suggest the relation schemas{ssNo, name, birthdate}{ssNo, childSSNo}{childSSNo, childName childBirthdate}{ssNo, autoSerialNo}{autoSerialNo, autoMake}An initial decomposition based on the two multivalued dependencies would give us {ssNo, name, birthDate}{ssNo, childSSNo, childName, childBirthdate}{ssNo, autoSerialNo, autoMake}Functional dependencies force us to decompose the second and third of these.Exercise 3.7.3(a)Since there are no functional dependencies, the only key is all four attributes, ABCD. Thus, each of the nontrvial multivalued dependencies A->->B and A->->C violate 4NF. We must separate out the attributes of these dependencies, first decomposing into AB and ACD, and then decomposing the latter into AC and AD because A->->C is still a 4NF violation for ACD. The final set of relations are AB, AC, and AD.Exercise 3.7.7(a)Let W be the set of attributes not in X, Y, or Z. Consider two tuples xyzw and xy'z'w' in the relation R in question. Because X ->-> Y, we can swap the y's, so xy'zw and xyz'w' are in R. Because X ->-> Z, we can take the pair of tuples xyzw and xyz'w' and swap Z's to get xyz'w and xyzw'. Similarly, we can take the pair xy'z'w' and xy'zw and swap Z's to get xy'zw' and xy'z'w.In conclusion, we started with tuples xyzw and xy'z'w' and showed that xyzw' and xy'z'w must also be in the relation. That is exactly the statement of the MVD X ->-> Y-union-Z. Note that the above statements all make sense even if there are attributes in common among X, Y, and Z.Exercise 3.7.8(a)Consider a relation R with schema ABCD and the instance with four tuples abcd, abcd', ab'c'd, and ab'c'd'. This instance satisfies the MVD A ->-> BC. However, it does not satisfy A ->-> B. For example, if it did satisfy A ->-> B, then because the instance contains the tuples abcd and ab'c'd, we would expect it to contain abc'd and ab'cd, neither of which is in the instance.Solutions for Chapter 4Solutions for Section 4.2Exercise 4.2.1class Customer {attribute string name;attribute string addr;attribute string phone;attribute integer ssNo;relationship Set<Account> ownsAcctsinverse Account::ownedBy;}class Account {attribute integer number;attribute string type;attribute real balance;relationship Set<Customer> ownedByinverse Customer::ownsAccts}Exercise 4.2.4class Person {attribute string name;relationship Person motherOfinverse Person::childrenOfFemalerelationship Person fatherOfinverse Person::childrenOfMalerelationship Set<Person> childreninverse Person::parentsOfrelationship Set<Person> childrenOfFemaleinverse Person::motherOfrelationship Set<Person> childrenOfMaleinverse Person::fatherOfrelationship Set<Person> parentsOfinverse Person::children}Notice that there are six different relationships here. For example, the inverse of the relationship that connects a person to their (unique) mother is a relationship that connects a mother (i.e., a female person) to the set of her children. That relationship, which we call childrenOfFemale, is different from the children relationship, which connects anyone -- male or female -- to their children.Exercise 4.2.7A relationship R is its own inverse if and only if for every pair (a,b) in R, the pair (b,a) is also in R. In the terminology of set theory, the relation R is ``symmetric.''Solutions for Section 4.3Exercise 4.3.1We think that Social Security number should me the key for Customer, and account number should be the key for Account. Here is the ODL solution with key and extent declarations.class Customer(extent Customers key ssNo){attribute string name;attribute string addr;attribute string phone;attribute integer ssNo;relationship Set<Account> ownsAcctsinverse Account::ownedBy;}class Account(extent Accounts key number){attribute integer number;attribute string type;attribute real balance;relationship Set<Customer> ownedByinverse Customer::ownsAccts}Solutions for Section 4.4Exercise 4.4.1(a)Since the relationship between customers and accounts is many-many, we should create a separate relation from that relationship-pair.Customers(ssNo, name, address, phone)Accounts(number, type, balance)CustAcct(ssNo, number)Exercise 4.4.1(d)Ther is only one attribute, but three pairs of relationships from Person to itself. Since motherOf and fatherOf are many-one, we can store their inverses in the relation for Person. That is, for each person, childrenOfMale and childrenOfFemale will indicate that persons's father and mother. The children relationship is many-many, and requires its own relation. This relation actually turns out to be redundant, in the sense that its tuples can be deduced from the relationships stored with Person. The schema:Persons(name, childrenOfFemale, childrenOfMale)Parent-Child(parent, child)Exercise 4.4.4You get a schema like:Studios(name, address, ownedMovie)Since name -> address is the only FD, the key is {name, ownedMovie}, and the FD has a left side that is not a superkey.Exercise 4.4.5(a,b,c)(a) Struct Card { string rank, string suit };(b) class Hand {attribute Set theHand;};For part (c) we have:Hands(handId, rank, suit)Notice that the class Hand has no key, so we need to create one: handID. Each hand has, in the relation Hands, one tuple for each card in the hand.Exercise 4.4.5(e)Struct PlayerHand { string Player, Hand theHand };class Deal {attribute Set theDeal;}Alternatively, PlayerHand can be defined directly within the declaration of attribute theDeal. Exercise 4.4.5(h)Since keys for Hand and Deal are lacking, a mechanical way to design the database schema is to have one relation connecting deals and player-hand pairs, and another to specify the contents of hands. That is:Deals(dealID, player, handID)Hands(handID, rank, suit)However, if we think about it, we can get rid of handID and connect the deal and the player directly to the player's cards, as:Deals(dealID, player, rank, suit)Exercise 4.4.5(i)First, card is really a pair consisting of a suit and a rank, so we need two attributes in a relation schema to represent cards. However, much more important is the fact that the proposed schema does not distinguish which card is in which hand. Thus, we need another attribute that indicates which hand within the deal a card belongs to, something like:Deals(dealID, handID, rank, suit)Exercise 4.4.6(c)Attribute b is really a bag of (f,g) pairs. Thus, associated with each a-value will be zero or more (f,g) pairs, each of which can occur several times. We shall use an attribute count to indicate the number of occurrences, although if relations allow duplicate tuples we could simply allow duplicate (a,f,g) triples in the relation. The proposed schema is:C(a, f, g, count)Solutions for Section 4.5Exercise 4.5.1(b)Studios(name, address, movies{(title, year, inColor, length,stars{(name, address, birthdate)})})Since the information about a star is repeated once for each of their movies, there is redundancy. To eliminate it, we have to use a separate relation for stars and use pointers from studios. That is: Stars(name, address, birthdate)Studios(name, address, movies{(title, year, inColor, length,stars{*Stars})})Since each movie is owned by one studio, the information about a movie appears in only one tuple of Studios, and there is no redundancy.Exercise 4.5.2Customers(name, address, phone, ssNo, accts{*Accounts})Accounts(number, type, balance, owners{*Customers})Solutions for Section 4.6Exercise 4.6.1(a)We need to add new nodes labeled George Lucas and Gary Kurtz. Then, from the node sw (which represents the movie Star Wars), we add arcs to these two new nodes, labeled directedBy and producedBy, respectively.Exercise 4.6.2Create nodes for each account and each customer. From each customer node is an arc to a node representing the attributes of the customer, e.g., an arc labeled name to the customer's name. Likewise, there is an arc from each account node to each attribute of that account, e.g., an arc labeled balance to the value of the balance.To represent ownership of accounts by customers, we place an arc labeled owns from each customer node to the node of each account that customer holds (possibly jointly). Also, we placean arc labeled ownedBy from each account node to the customer node for each owner of that account.Exercise 4.6.5In the semistructured model, nodes represent data elements, i.e., entities rather than entity sets. In the E/R model, nodes of all types represent schema elements, and the data is not represented at all. Solutions for Section 4.7Exercise 4.7.1(a)<STARS-MOVIES><STAR starId = "cf" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj"><NAME>Carrie Fisher</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>123 Maple St.</STREET><CITY>Hollywood</CITY></ADDRESS><ADDRESS><STREET>5 Locust Ln.</STREET><CITY>Malibu</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><STAR starId = "mh" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj"><NAME>Mark Hamill</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>456 Oak Rd.<STREET><CITY>Brentwood</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><STAR starId = "hf" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj, wit"><NAME>Harrison Ford</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>whatever</STREET><CITY>whatever</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><MOVIE movieId = "sw" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Star Wars</TITLE><YEAR>1977</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieId = "esb" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Empire Strikes Back</TITLE><YEAR>1980</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieId = "rj" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Return of the Jedi</TITLE><YEAR>1983</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieID = "wit" starsOf = "hf"><TITLE>Witness</TITLE><YEAR>1985</YEAR></MOVIE></STARS-MOVIES>Exercise 4.7.2<!DOCTYPE Bank [<!ELEMENT BANK (CUSTOMER* ACCOUNT*)><!ELEMENT CUSTOMER (NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE, SSNO)><!A TTLIST CUSTOMERcustId IDowns IDREFS><!ELEMENT NAME (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT ADDRESS (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT PHONE (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT SSNO (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT ACCOUNT (NUMBER, TYPE, BALANCE)><!A TTLIST ACCOUNTacctId IDownedBy IDREFS><!ELEMENT NUMBER (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT TYPE (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT BALANCE (#PCDATA)>]>BookSolutions for Chapter 5Solutions for Section 5.2Exercise 5.2.1(a)PI_model( SIGMA_{speed >= 1000} ) (PC)Exercise 5.2.1(f)The trick is to theta-join PC with itself on the condition that the hard disk sizes are equal. That gives us tuples that have two PC model numbers with the same value of hd. However, these two PC's could in fact be the same, so we must also require in the theta-join that the model numbers be unequal. Finally, we want the hard disk sizes, so we project onto hd.The expression is easiest to see if we write it using some temporary values. We start by renaming PC twice so we can talk about two occurrences of the same attributes.R1 = RHO_{PC1} (PC)R2 = RHO_{PC2} (PC)R3 = R1 JOIN_{PC1.hd = PC2.hd AND PC1.model <> PC2.model} R2R4 = PI_{PC1.hd} (R3)Exercise 5.2.1(h)First, we find R1, the model-speed pairs from both PC and Laptop. Then, we find from R1 those computers that are ``fast,'' at least 133Mh. At the same time, we join R1 with Product to connect model numbers to their manufacturers and we project out the speed to get R2. Then we join R2 with itself (after renaming) to find pairs of different models by the same maker. Finally, we get our answer, R5, by projecting onto one of the maker attributes. A sequence of steps giving the desired expression is: R1 = PI_{model,speed} (PC) UNION PI_{model,speed} (Laptop)R2 = PI_{maker,model} (SIGMA_{speed>=700} (R1) JOIN Product)R3 = RHO_{T(maker2, model2)} (R2)R4 = R2 JOIN_{maker = maker2 AND model <> model2} (R3)R5 = PI_{maker} (R4)Exercise 5.2.2Here are figures for the expression trees of Exercise 5.2.1 Part (a)Part (f)Part (h). Note that the third figure is not really a tree, since it uses a common subexpression. We could duplicate the nodes to make it a tree, but using common subexpressions is a valuable form of query optimization. One of the benefits one gets from constructing ``trees'' for queries is the ability to combine nodes that represent common subexpressions.Exercise 5.2.7The relation that results from the natural join has only one attribute from each pair of equated attributes. The theta-join has attributes for both, and their columns are identical.Exercise 5.2.9(a)If all the tuples of R and S are different, then the union has n+m tuples, and this number is the maximum possible.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs if every tuple of one relation also appears in the other. Surely the union has at least as many tuples as the larger of R and that is, max(n,m) tuples. However, it is possible for every tuple of the smaller to appear in the other, so it is possible that there are as few as max(n,m) tuples in the union.Exercise 5.2.10In the following we use the name of a relation both as its instance (set of tuples) and as its schema (set of attributes). The context determines uniquely which is meant.PI_R(R JOIN S) Note, however, that this expression works only for sets; it does not preserve the multipicity of tuples in R. The next two expressions work for bags.R JOIN DELTA(PI_{R INTERSECT S}(S)) In this expression, each projection of a tuple from S onto the attributes that are also in R appears exactly once in the second argument of the join, so it preserves multiplicity of tuples in R, except for those thatdo not join with S, which disappear. The DELTA operator removes duplicates, as described in Section 5.4.R - [R - PI_R(R JOIN S)] Here, the strategy is to find the dangling tuples of R and remove them.Solutions for Section 5.3Exercise 5.3.1As a bag, the value is {700, 1500, 866, 866, 1000, 1300, 1400, 700, 1200, 750, 1100, 350, 733}. The order is unimportant, of course. The average is 959.As a set, the value is {700, 1500, 866, 1000, 1300, 1400, 1200, 750, 1100, 350, 733}, and the average is 967. H3>Exercise 5.3.4(a)As sets, an element x is in the left-side expression(R UNION S) UNION Tif and only if it is in at least one of R, S, and T. Likewise, it is in the right-side expressionR UNION (S UNION T)under exactly the same conditions. Thus, the two expressions have exactly the same members, and the sets are equal.As bags, an element x is in the left-side expression as many times as the sum of the number of times it is in R, S, and T. The same holds for the right side. Thus, as bags the expressions also have the same value.Exercise 5.3.4(h)As sets, element x is in the left sideR UNION (S INTERSECT T)if and only if x is either in R or in both S and T. Element x is in the right side(R UNION S) INTERSECT (R UNION T)if and only if it is in both R UNION S and R UNION T. If x is in R, then it is in both unions. If x is in both S and T, then it is in both union. However, if x is neither in R nor in both of S and T, then it cannot be in both unions. For example, suppose x is not in R and not in S. Then x is not in R UNION S. Thus, the statement of when x is in the right side is exactly the same as when it is in the left side: x is either in R or in both of S and T.Now, consider the expression for bags. Element x is in the left side the sum of the number of times it is in R plus the smaller of the number of times x is in S and the number of times x is in T. Likewise, the number of times x is in the right side is the smaller ofThe sum of the number of times x is in R and in S.The sum of the number of times x is in R and in T.A moment's reflection tells us that this minimum is the sum of the number of times x is in R plus the smaller of the number of times x is in S and in T, exactly as for the left side.Exercise 5.3.5(a)For sets, we observe that element x is in the left side(R INTERSECT S) - T。
数据库系统基础教程(第二版)课后习题答案2
Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 2Solutions for Section 2.1Exercise 2.1.1The E/R Diagram.Exercise 2.1.8(a)The E/R DiagramKobvxybzSolutions for Section 2.2Exercise 2.2.1The Addresses entity set is nothing but a single address, so we would prefer to make address an attribute of Customers. Were the bank to record several addresses for a customer, then it might make sense to have an Addresses entity set and make Lives-at a many-many relationship.The Acct-Sets entity set is useless. Each customer has a unique account set containing his or her accounts. However, relating customers directly to their accounts in a many-many relationship conveys the same information and eliminates the account-set concept altogether.Solutions for Section 2.3Exercise 2.3.1(a)Keys ssNo and number are appropriate for Customers and Accounts, respectively. Also, we think it does not make sense for an account to be related to zero customers, so we should round the edge connecting Owns to Customers. It does not seem inappropriate to have a customer with 0 accounts;they might be a borrower, for example, so we put no constraint on the connection from Owns to Accounts. Here is the The E/R Diagram，showing underlined keys andthe numerocity constraint.Exercise 2.3.2(b)If R is many-one from E1 to E2, then two tuples (e1,e2) and (f1,f2) of the relationship set for R must be the same if they agree on the key attributes for E1. To see why, surely e1 and f1 are the same. Because R is many-one from E1 to E2, e2 and f2 must also be the same. Thus, the pairs are the same.Solutions for Section 2.4Exercise 2.4.1Here is the The E/R Diagram.We have omitted attributes other than our choice for the key attributes of Students and Courses. Also omitted are names for the relationships. Attribute grade is not part of the key for Enrollments. The key for Enrollements is studID from Students and dept and number from Courses.Exercise 2.4.4bHere is the The E/R Diagram Again, we have omitted relationship names and attributes other than our choice for the key attributes. The key for Leagues is its own name; this entity set is not weak. The key for Teams is its own name plus the name of the league of which the team is a part, e.g., (Rangers, MLB) or (Rangers, NHL). The key for Players consists of the player's number and the key for the team on which he or she plays. Since the latter key is itself a pair consisting of team and league names, the key for players is the triple (number, teamName, leagueName). e.g., JeffGarcia is (5, 49ers, NFL).Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 3Solutions for Section 3.1Exercise 3.1.2(a)We can order the three tuples in any of 3! = 6 ways. Also, the columns can be ordered in any of 3! = 6 ways. Thus, the number of presentations is 6*6 = 36.Solutions for Section 3.2Exercise 3.2.1Customers(ssNo, name, address, phone)Flights(number, day, aircraft)Bookings(ssNo, number, day, row, seat)Being a weak entity set, Bookings' relation has the keys for Customers and Flights and Bookings' own attributes.Notice that the relations obtained from the toCust and toFlt relationships are unnecessary. They are:toCust(ssNo, ssNo1, number, day)toFlt(ssNo, number, day, number1, day1)That is, for toCust, the key of Customers is paired with the key for Bookings. Since both include ssNo, this attribute is repeated with two different names, ssNo and ssNo1. A similar situation exists for toFlt.Exercise 3.2.3Ships(name, yearLaunched)SisterOf(name, sisterName)Solutions for Section 3.3Exercise 3.3.1Since Courses is weak, its key is number and the name of its department. We do not have arelation for GivenBy. In part (a), there is a relation for Courses and a relation for LabCourses that has only the key and the computer-allocation attribute. It looks like:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room)LabCourses(number, deptName, allocation)For part (b), LabCourses gets all the attributes of Courses, as:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room)LabCourses(number, deptName, room, allocation)And for (c), Courses and LabCourses are combined, as:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room, allocation)Exercise 3.3.4(a)There is one relation for each entity set, so the number of relations is e. The relation for the root entity set has a attributes, while the other relations, which must include the key attributes, have a+k attributes.Solutions for Section 3.4Exercise 3.4.2Surely ID is a key by itself. However, we think that the attributes x, y, and z together form another key. The reason is that at no time can two molecules occupy the same point.Exercise 3.4.4The key attributes are indicated by capitalization in the schema below:Customers(SSNO, name, address, phone)Flights(NUMBER, DAY, aircraft)Bookings(SSNO, NUMBER, DAY, row, seat)Exercise 3.4.6(a)The superkeys are any subset that contains A1. Thus, there are 2^{n-1} such subsets, since each of the n-1 attributes A2 through An may independently be chosen in or out.Solutions for Section 3.5Exercise 3.5.1(a)We could try inference rules to deduce new dependencies until we are satisfied we have them all.A more systematic way is to consider the closures of all 15 nonempty sets of attributes.For the single attributes we have A+ = A, B+ = B, C+ = ACD, and D+ = AD. Thus, the only new dependency we get with a single attribute on the left is C->A.Now consider pairs of attributes:AB+ = ABCD, so we get new dependency AB->D. AC+ = ACD, and AC->D is nontrivial. AD+ = AD, so nothing new. BC+ = ABCD, so we get BC->A, and BC->D. BD+ = ABCD, giving usBD->A and BD->C. CD+ = ACD, giving CD->A.For the triples of attributes, ACD+ = ACD, but the closures of the other sets are each ABCD. Thus, we get new dependencies ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.Since ABCD+ = ABCD, we get no new dependencies.The collection of 11 new dependencies mentioned above is: C->A, AB->D, AC->D, BC->A, BC->D, BD->A, BD->C, CD->A, ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.Exercise 3.5.1(b)From the analysis of closures above, we find that AB, BC, and BD are keys. All other sets either do not have ABCD as the closure or contain one of these three sets.Exercise 3.5.1(c)The superkeys are all those that contain one of those three keys. That is, a superkey that is not a key must contain B and more than one of A, C, and D. Thus, the (proper) superkeys are ABC, ABD, BCD, and ABCD.Exercise 3.5.3(a)We must compute the closure of A1A2...AnC. Since A1A2...An->B is a dependency, surely B is in this set, proving A1A2...AnC->B.Exercise 3.5.4(a)Consider the relationThis relation satisfies A->B but does not satisfy B->A.Exercise 3.5.8(a)If all sets of attributes are closed, then there cannot be any nontrivial functional dependenc ies. For suppose A1A2...An->B is a nontrivial dependency. Then A1A2...An+ contains B and thus A1A2...An is not closed.Exercise 3.5.10(a)We need to compute the closures of all subsets of {ABC}, although there is no need to think about the empty set or the set of all three attributes. Here are the calculations for the remaining six sets: A+ = AB+ = BC+ = ACEAB+ = ABCDEAC+ = ACEBC+ = ABCDEWe ignore D and E, so a basis for the resulting functional dependencies for ABC are: C->A and AB->C. Note that BC->A is true, but follows logically from C->A, and therefore may be omitted from our list.Solutions for Section 3.6Exercise 3.6.1(a)In the solution to Exercise 3.5.1 we found that there are 14 nontrivial dependencies, including the three given ones and 11 derived dependencies. These are: C->A, C->D, D->A, AB->D, AB-> C, AC->D, BC->A, BC->D, BD->A, BD->C, CD->A, ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.We also learned that the three keys were AB, BC, and BD. Thus, any dependency above that does not have one of these pairs on the left is a BCNF violation. These are: C->A, C->D, D->A, AC->D, and CD->A.One choice is to decompose using C->D. That gives us ABC and CD as decomposed relations. CD is surely in BCNF, since any two-attribute relation is. ABC is not in BCNF, since AB and BC are its only keys, but C->A is a dependency that holds in ABCD and therefore holds in ABC. We must further decompose ABC into AC and BC. Thus, the three relations of the decomposition are AC, BC, and CD.Since all attributes are in at least one key of ABCD, that relation is already in 3NF, and no decomposition is necessary.Exercise 3.6.1(b)(Revised 1/19/02) The only key is AB. Thus, B->C and B->D are both BCNF violations. The derived FD's BD->C and BC->D are also BCNF violations. However, any other nontrivial, derived FD will have A and B on the left, and therefore will contain a key.One possible BCNF decomposition is AB and BCD. It is obtained starting with any of the four violations mentioned above. AB is the only key for AB, and B is the only key for BCD.Since there is only one key for ABCD, the 3NF violations are the same, and so is the decomposition.Solutions for Section 3.7Exercise 3.7.1Since A->->B, and all the tuples have the same value for attribute A, we can pair the B-value from any tuple with the value of the remaining attribute C from any other tuple. Thus, we know that R must have at least the nine tuples of the form (a,b,c), where b is any of b1, b2, or b3, and c is any of c1, c2, or c3. That is, we can derive, using the definition of a multivalued dependency, that each of the tuples (a,b1,c2), (a,b1,c3), (a,b2,c1), (a,b2,c3), (a,b3,c1), and (a,b3,c2) are also in R.Exercise 3.7.2(a)First, people have unique Social Security numbers and unique birthdates. Thus, we expect the functional dependencies ssNo->name and ssNo->birthdate hold. The same applies to children, so we expect childSSNo->childname and childSSNo->childBirthdate. Finally, an automobile has a unique brand, so we expect autoSerialNo->autoMake.There are two multivalued dependencies that do not follow from these functional dependencies. First, the information about one child of a person is independent of other information about that person. That is, if a person with social security number s has a tuple with cn,cs,cb, then if there isany other tuple t for the same person, there will also be another tuple that agrees with t except that it has cn,cs,cb in its components for the child name, Social Security number, and birthdate. That is the multivalued dependencyssNo->->childSSNo childName childBirthdateSimilarly, an automobile serial number and make are independent of any of the other attributes, so we expect the multivalued dependencyssNo->->autoSerialNo autoMakeThe dependencies are summarized below:ssNo -> name birthdatechildSSNo -> childName childBirthdateautoSerialNo -> autoMakessNo ->-> childSSNo childName childBirthdatessNo ->-> autoSerialNo autoMakeExercise 3.7.2(b)We suggest the relation schemas{ssNo, name, birthdate}{ssNo, childSSNo}{childSSNo, childName childBirthdate}{ssNo, autoSerialNo}{autoSerialNo, autoMake}An initial decomposition based on the two multivalued dependencies would give us {ssNo, name, birthDate}{ssNo, childSSNo, childName, childBirthdate}{ssNo, autoSerialNo, autoMake}Functional dependencies force us to decompose the second and third of these.Exercise 3.7.3(a)Since there are no functional dependencies, the only key is all four attributes, ABCD. Thus, each of the nontrvial multivalued dependencies A->->B and A->->C violate 4NF. We must separate out the attributes of these dependencies, first decomposing into AB and ACD, and then decomposing the latter into AC and AD because A->->C is still a 4NF violation for ACD. The final set of relations are AB, AC, and AD.Exercise 3.7.7(a)Let W be the set of attributes not in X, Y, or Z. Consider two tuples xyzw and xy'z'w' in the relation R in question. Because X ->-> Y, we can swap the y's, so xy'zw and xyz'w' are in R. Because X ->-> Z, we can take the pair of tuples xyzw and xyz'w' and swap Z's to get xyz'w and xyzw'. Similarly, we can take the pair xy'z'w' and xy'zw and swap Z's to get xy'zw' and xy'z'w.In conclusion, we started with tuples xyzw and xy'z'w' and showed that xyzw' and xy'z'w must also be in the relation. That is exactly the statement of the MVD X ->-> Y-union-Z. Note that the above statements all make sense even if there are attributes in common among X, Y, and Z.Exercise 3.7.8(a)Consider a relation R with schema ABCD and the instance with four tuples abcd, abcd', ab'c'd, and ab'c'd'. This instance satisfies the MVD A->-> BC. However, it does not satisfy A->-> B. For example, if it did satisfy A->-> B, then because the instance contains the tuples abcd and ab'c'd, we would expect it to contain abc'd and ab'cd, neither of which is in the instance.Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 4Solutions for Section 4.2Exercise 4.2.1class Customer {attribute string name;attribute string addr;attribute string phone;attribute integer ssNo;relationship Set<Account> ownsAcctsinverse Account::ownedBy;}class Account {attribute integer number;attribute string type;attribute real balance;relationship Set<Customer> ownedByinverse Customer::ownsAccts}Exercise 4.2.4class Person {attribute string name;relationship Person motherOfinverse Person::childrenOfFemalerelationship Person fatherOfinverse Person::childrenOfMalerelationship Set<Person> childreninverse Person::parentsOfrelationship Set<Person> childrenOfFemaleinverse Person::motherOfrelationship Set<Person> childrenOfMaleinverse Person::fatherOfrelationship Set<Person> parentsOfinverse Person::children}Notice that there are six different relationships here. For example, the inverse of the relationship that connects a person to their (unique) mother is a relationship that connects a mother (i.e., a female person) to the set of her children. That relationship, which we call childrenOfFemale, is different from the children relationship, which connects anyone -- male or female -- to their children.Exercise 4.2.7A relationship R is its own inverse if and only if for every pair (a,b) in R, the pair (b,a) is also in R. In the terminology of set theory, the relation R is ``symmetric.''Solutions for Section 4.3Exercise 4.3.1We think that Social Security number should me the key for Customer, and account number should be the key for Account. Here is the ODL solution with key and extent declarations.class Customer(extent Customers key ssNo){attribute string name;attribute string addr;attribute string phone;attribute integer ssNo;relationship Set<Account> ownsAcctsinverse Account::ownedBy;}class Account(extent Accounts key number){attribute integer number;attribute string type;attribute real balance;relationship Set<Customer> ownedByinverse Customer::ownsAccts}Solutions for Section 4.4Exercise 4.4.1(a)Since the relationship between customers and accounts is many-many, we should create a separate relation from that relationship-pair.Customers(ssNo, name, address, phone)Accounts(number, type, balance)CustAcct(ssNo, number)Exercise 4.4.1(d)Ther is only one attribute, but three pairs of relationships from Person to itself. Since motherOf and fatherOf are many-one, we can store their inverses in the relation for Person. That is, for each person, childrenOfMale and childrenOfFemale will indicate that persons's father and mother. The children relationship is many-many, and requires its own relation. This relation actually turns out to be redundant, in the sense that its tuples can be deduced from the relationships stored with Person. The schema:Persons(name, childrenOfFemale, childrenOfMale)Parent-Child(parent, child)Exercise 4.4.4Y ou get a schema like:Studios(name, address, ownedMovie)Since name -> address is the only FD, the key is {name, ownedMovie}, and the FD has a left side that is not a superkey.Exercise 4.4.5(a,b,c)(a) Struct Card { string rank, string suit };(b) class Hand {attribute Set theHand;};For part (c) we have:Hands(handId, rank, suit)Notice that the class Hand has no key, so we need to create one: handID. Each hand has, in the relation Hands, one tuple for each card in the hand.Exercise 4.4.5(e)Struct PlayerHand { string Player, Hand theHand };class Deal {attribute Set theDeal;}Alternatively, PlayerHand can be defined directly within the declaration of attribute theDeal. Exercise 4.4.5(h)Since keys for Hand and Deal are lacking, a mechanical way to design the database schema is to have one relation connecting deals and player-hand pairs, and another to specify the contents of hands. That is:Deals(dealID, player, handID)Hands(handID, rank, suit)However, if we think about it, we can get rid of handID and connect the deal and the player directly to the player's cards, as:Deals(dealID, player, rank, suit)Exercise 4.4.5(i)First, card is really a pair consisting of a suit and a rank, so we need two attributes in a relation schema to represent cards. However, much more important is the fact that the proposed schema does not distinguish which card is in which hand. Thus, we need another attribute that indicates which hand within the deal a card belongs to, something like:Deals(dealID, handID, rank, suit)Exercise 4.4.6(c)Attribute b is really a bag of (f,g) pairs. Thus, associated with each a-value will be zero or more (f,g) pairs, each of which can occur several times. We shall use an attribute count to indicate the number of occurrences, although if relations allow duplicate tuples we could simply allow duplicate (a,f,g) triples in the relation. The proposed schema is:C(a, f, g, count)Solutions for Section 4.5Exercise 4.5.1(b)Studios(name, address, movies{(title, year, inColor, length,stars{(name, address, birthdate)})})Since the information about a star is repeated once for each of their movies, there is redundancy. To eliminate it, we have to use a separate relation for stars and use pointers from studios. That is: Stars(name, address, birthdate)Studios(name, address, movies{(title, year, inColor, length,stars{*Stars})})Since each movie is owned by one studio, the information about a movie appears in only one tuple of Studios, and there is no redundancy.Exercise 4.5.2Customers(name, address, phone, ssNo, accts{*Accounts})Accounts(number, type, balance, owners{*Customers})Solutions for Section 4.6Exercise 4.6.1(a)We need to add new nodes labeled George Lucas and Gary Kurtz. Then, from the node sw (which represents the movie Star Wars), we add arcs to these two new nodes, labeled direc tedBy and producedBy, respectively.Exercise 4.6.2Create nodes for each account and each customer. From each customer node is an arc to a node representing the attributes of the customer, e.g., an arc labeled name to the customer's name. Likewise, there is an arc from each account node to each attribute of that account, e.g., an arc labeled balance to the value of the balance.To represent ownership of accounts by customers, we place an arc labeled owns from each customer node to the node of each account that customer holds (possibly jointly). Also, we placean arc labeled ownedBy from each account node to the customer node for each owner of that account.Exercise 4.6.5In the semistructured model, nodes represent data elements, i.e., entities rather than entity sets. In the E/R model, nodes of all types represent schema elements, and the data is not represented at all. Solutions for Section 4.7Exercise 4.7.1(a)<STARS-MOVIES><STAR starId = "cf" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj"><NAME>Carrie Fisher</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>123 Maple St.</STREET><CITY>Hollywood</CITY></ADDRESS><ADDRESS><STREET>5 Locust Ln.</STREET><CITY>Malibu</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><STAR starId = "mh" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj"><NAME>Mark Hamill</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>456 Oak Rd.<STREET><CITY>Brentwood</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><STAR starId = "hf" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj, wit"><NAME>Harrison Ford</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>whatever</STREET><CITY>whatever</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><MOVIE movieId = "sw" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Star Wars</TITLE><YEAR>1977</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieId = "esb" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Empire Strikes Back</TITLE><YEAR>1980</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieId = "rj" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Return of the Jedi</TITLE><YEAR>1983</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieID = "wit" starsOf = "hf"><TITLE>Witness</TITLE><YEAR>1985</YEAR></MOVIE></STARS-MOVIES>Exercise 4.7.2<!DOCTYPE Bank [<!ELEMENT BANK (CUSTOMER* ACCOUNT*)><!ELEMENT CUSTOMER (NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE, SSNO)> <!A TTLIST CUSTOMERcustId IDowns IDREFS><!ELEMENT NAME (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT ADDRESS (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT PHONE (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT SSNO (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT ACCOUNT (NUMBER, TYPE, BALANCE)><!A TTLIST ACCOUNTacctId IDownedBy IDREFS><!ELEMENT NUMBER (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT TYPE (#PCDA TA)><!ELEMENT BALANCE (#PCDA TA)>]>Database Systems: The CompleteBookSolutions for Chapter 5Solutions for Section 5.2Exercise 5.2.1(a)PI_model( SIGMA_{speed >= 1000} ) (PC)Exercise 5.2.1(f)The trick is to theta-join PC with itself on the condition that the hard disk sizes are equal. That gives us tuples that have two PC model numbers with the same value of hd. However, these two PC's could in fact be the same, so we must also require in the theta-join that the model numbers be unequal. Finally, we want the hard disk sizes, so we project onto hd.The expression is easiest to see if we write it using some temporary values. We start by renaming PC twice so we can talk about two occurrences of the same attributes.R1 = RHO_{PC1} (PC)R2 = RHO_{PC2} (PC)R3 = R1 JOIN_{PC1.hd = PC2.hd AND PC1.model <> PC2.model} R2R4 = PI_{PC1.hd} (R3)Exercise 5.2.1(h)First, we find R1, the model-speed pairs from both PC and Laptop. Then, we find from R1 those computers that are ``fast,'' at least 133Mh. At the same time, we join R1 with Product to connect model numbers to their manufacturers and we project out the speed to get R2. Then we join R2 with itself (after renaming) to find pairs of different models by the same maker. Finally, we get our answer, R5, by projecting onto one of the maker attributes. A sequence of steps giving the desired expression is: R1 = PI_{model,speed} (PC) UNION PI_{model,speed} (Laptop)R2 = PI_{maker,model} (SIGMA_{speed>=700} (R1) JOIN Product)R3 = RHO_{T(maker2, model2)} (R2)R4 = R2 JOIN_{maker = maker2 AND model <> model2} (R3)R5 = PI_{maker} (R4)Exercise 5.2.2Here are figures for the expression trees of Exercise 5.2.1 Part (a)Part (f)Part (h). Note that the third figure is not really a tree, since it uses a common subexpression. We could duplicate the nodes to make it a tree, but using common subexpressions is a valuable form of query optimization. One of the benefits one gets from constructing ``trees'' for queries is the ability to combine nodes that represent common subexpressions.Exercise 5.2.7The relation that results from the natural join has only one attribute from each pair of equated attributes. The theta-join has attributes for both, and their columns are identical.Exercise 5.2.9(a)If all the tuples of R and S are different, then the union has n+m tuples, and this number is the maximum possible.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs if every tuple of one relation also appears in the other. Surely the union has at least as many tuples as the larger of R and that is, max(n,m) tuples. However, it is possible for every tuple of the smaller to appear in the other, so it is possible that there are as few as max(n,m) tuples in the union.Exercise 5.2.10In the following we use the name of a relation both as its instance (set of tuples) and as its schema (set of attributes). The context determines uniquely which is meant.PI_R(R JOIN S) Note, however, that this expression works only for sets; it does not preserve the multipicity of tuples in R. The next two expressions work for bags.R JOIN DELTA(PI_{R INTERSECT S}(S)) In this expression, each projection of a tuple from S onto the attributes that are also in R appears exactly once in the second argument of the join, so it preserves multiplicity of tuples in R, except for those thatdo not join with S, which disappear. The DELTA operator removes duplicates, as described in Section 5.4.R - [R - PI_R(R JOIN S)] Here, the strategy is to find the dangling tuples of R and remove them.Solutions for Section 5.3Exercise 5.3.1As a bag, the value is {700, 1500, 866, 866, 1000, 1300, 1400, 700, 1200, 750, 1100, 350, 733}. The order is unimportant, of course. The average is 959.As a set, the value is {700, 1500, 866, 1000, 1300, 1400, 1200, 750, 1100, 350, 733}, and the average is 967. H3>Exercise 5.3.4(a)As sets, an element x is in the left-side expression(R UNION S) UNION Tif and only if it is in at least one of R, S, and T. Likewise, it is in the right-side expressionR UNION (S UNION T)under exactly the same conditions. Thus, the two expressions have exactly the same members, and the sets are equal.As bags, an element x is in the left-side expression as many times as the sum of the number of times it is in R, S, and T. The same holds for the right side. Thus, as bags the expressions also have the same value.Exercise 5.3.4(h)As sets, element x is in the left sideR UNION (S INTERSECT T)if and only if x is either in R or in both S and T. Element x is in the right side(R UNION S) INTERSECT (R UNION T)if and only if it is in both R UNION S and R UNION T. If x is in R, then it is in both unions. If x is in both S and T, then it is in both union. However, if x is neither in R nor in both of S and T, then it cannot be in both unions. For example, suppose x is not in R and not in S. Then x is not in R UNION S. Thus, the statement of when x is in the right side is exactly the same as when it is in the left side: x is either in R or in both of S and T.Now, consider the expression for bags. Element x is in the left side the sum of the number of times it is in R plus the smaller of the number of times x is in S and the number of times x is in T. Likewise, the number of times x is in the right side is the smaller ofThe sum of the number of times x is in R and in S.The sum of the number of times x is in R and in T.A moment's reflection tells us that this minimum is the sum of the number of times x is in R plus the smaller of the number of times x is in S and in T, exactly as for the left side.Exercise 5.3.5(a)For sets, we observe that element x is in the left side(R INTERSECT S) - T。
(完整版)数据库系统基础教程第二章答案解析
For relation Accounts, the attributes are:acctNo, type, balanceFor relation Customers, the attributes are:firstName, lastName, idNo, accountExercise 2.2.1bFor relation Accounts, the tuples are:(12345, savings, 12000),(23456, checking, 1000),(34567, savings, 25)For relation Customers, the tuples are:(Robbie, Banks, 901-222, 12345),(Lena, Hand, 805-333, 12345),(Lena, Hand, 805-333, 23456)Exercise 2.2.1cFor relation Accounts and the first tuple, the components are:123456 → acctNosavings → type12000 → balanceFor relation Customers and the first tuple, the components are:Robbie → firstNameBanks → lastName901-222 → idNo12345 → accountExercise 2.2.1dFor relation Accounts, a relation schema is:Accounts(acctNo, type, balance)For relation Customers, a relation schema is:Customers(firstName, lastName, idNo, account) Exercise 2.2.1eAn example database schema is:Accounts (acctNo,type,balance)Customers (firstName,lastName,idNo,account)A suitable domain for each attribute:acctNo → Integertype → Stringbalance → IntegerfirstName → StringlastName → StringidNo → String (because there is a hyphen we cannot use Integer)account → IntegerExercise 2.2.1gAnother equivalent way to present the Account relation:Another equivalent way to present the Customers relation:Exercise 2.2.2Examples of attributes that are created for primarily serving as keys in a relation:Universal Product Code (UPC) used widely in United States and Canada to track products in stores.Serial Numbers on a wide variety of products to allow the manufacturer to individually track each product.Vehicle Identification Numbers (VIN), a unique serial number used by the automotive industry to identify vehicles.Exercise 2.2.3aWe can order the three tuples in any of 3! = 6 ways. Also, the columns can be ordered in any of 3! = 6 ways. Thus, the number of presentations is 6*6 = 36.Exercise 2.2.3bWe can order the three tuples in any of 5! = 120 ways. Also, the columns can be ordered in any of 4! = 24 ways. Thus, the number of presentations is 120*24 = 2880Exercise 2.2.3cWe can order the three tuples in any of m! ways. Also, the columns can be ordered in any of n! ways. Thus, the number of presentations is n!m!Exercise 2.3.1aCREATE TABLE Product (maker CHAR(30),model CHAR(10) PRIMARY KEY,type CHAR(15));CREATE TABLE PC (model CHAR(30),speed DECIMAL(4,2),ram INTEGER,hd INTEGER,price DECIMAL(7,2));Exercise 2.3.1cCREATE TABLE Laptop (model CHAR(30),speed DECIMAL(4,2),ram INTEGER,hd INTEGER,screen DECIMAL(3,1),price DECIMAL(7,2));Exercise 2.3.1dCREATE TABLE Printer (model CHAR(30),color BOOLEAN,type CHAR (10),price DECIMAL(7,2));Exercise 2.3.1eALTER TABLE Printer DROP color;Exercise 2.3.1fALTER TABLE Laptop ADD od CHAR (10) DEFAULT ‘none’; Exercise 2.3.2aCREATE TABLE Classes (class CHAR(20),type CHAR(5),country CHAR(20),numGuns INTEGER,bore DECIMAL(3,1),displacement INTEGER);Exercise 2.3.2bCREATE TABLE Ships (name CHAR(30),class CHAR(20),launched INTEGER);Exercise 2.3.2cCREATE TABLE Battles (name CHAR(30),date DATE);Exercise 2.3.2dCREATE TABLE Outcomes (ship CHAR(30),battle CHAR(30),result CHAR(10));Exercise 2.3.2eALTER TABLE Classes DROP bore;Exercise 2.3.2fALTER TABLE Ships ADD yard CHAR(30); Exercise 2.4.1aR1 := σspeed ≥ 3.00 (PC)R2 := πmodel(R1)model100510061013Exercise 2.4.1bR1 := σhd ≥ 100 (Laptop)R2 := Product (R1)R3 := πmaker (R2)makerEABFGExercise 2.4.1cR1 := σmaker=B (Product PC)R2 := σmaker=B (Product Laptop)R3 := σmaker=B (Product Printer)R4 := πmodel,price (R1)R5 := πmodel,price (R2)R6: = πmodel,price (R3)R7 := R4 R5 R6model price1004 6491005 6301006 10492007 1429Exercise 2.4.1dR1 := σcolor = true AND type = laser (Printer)R2 := πmodel (R1)model30033007Exercise 2.4.1eR1 := σtype=laptop (Product)R2 := σtype=PC(Product)R3 := πmaker(R1)R4 := πmaker(R2)R5 := R3 – R4Exercise 2.4.1fR1 := ρPC1(PC)R2 := ρPC2(PC)R3 := R1 (PC1.hd = PC2.hd AND PC1.model <> PC2.model) R2R4 := πhd(R3)Exercise 2.4.1gR1 := ρPC1(PC)R2 := ρPC2(PC)R3 := R1 (PC1.speed = PC2.speed AND PC1.ram = PC2.ram AND PC1.model < PC2.model) R2R4 := πPC1.model,PC2.model(R3)Exercise 2.4.1hR1 := πmodel(σspeed ≥ 2.80(PC)) πmodel(σspeed ≥ 2.80(Laptop))R2 := πmaker,model(R1 Product)R3 := ρR3(maker2,model2)(R2)R4 := R2 (maker = maker2 AND model <> model2) R3R5 := πmaker(R4)Exercise 2.4.1iR1 := πmodel,speed(PC)R2 := πmodel,speed(Laptop)R3 := R1 R2R4 := ρR4(model2,speed2)(R3)R5 := πmodel,speed (R3 (speed < speed2 ) R4)R6 := R3 – R5makerBExercise 2.4.1jR1 := πmaker,speed(Product PC)R2 := ρR2(maker2,speed2)(R1)R3 := ρR3(maker3,speed3)(R1)R4 := R1 (maker = maker2 AND speed <> speed2) R2R5 := R4 (maker3 = maker AND speed3 <> speed2 AND speed3 <> speed) R3R6 := πmaker(R5)makerFGhd25080160PC1.model PC2.model1004 1012makerBEmakerADEExercise 2.4.1kR1 := πmaker,model(Product PC)R2 := ρR2(maker2,model2)(R1)R3 := ρR3(maker3,model3)(R1)R4 := ρR4(maker4,model4)(R1)R5 := R1 (maker = maker2 AND model <> model2) R2R6 := R3 (maker3 = maker AND model3 <> model2 AND model3 <> model) R5R7 := R4 (maker4 = maker AND (model4=model OR model4=model2 OR model4=model3)) R6R8 := πmaker(R7)makerABDEExercise 2.4.2aπmodelσspeed≥3.00PCExercise 2.4.2bπmakerσhd ≥ 100 ProductLaptopExercise 2.4.2cσmaker=B πmodel,priceσmaker=B πmodel,price σmaker=Bπmodel,priceProduct PC Laptop Printer ProductProductExercise 2.4.2dPrinter σcolor = true AND type = laserπmodelExercise 2.4.2e σtype=laptop σtype=PC πmakerπmaker –Product ProductExercise 2.4.2fρPC1ρPC2 (PC1.hd = PC2.hd AND PC1.model <> PC2.model)πhdPC PCExercise 2.4.2gρPC1ρPC2PC PC(PC1.speed = PC2.speed AND PC1.ram = PC2.ram AND PC1.model < PC2.model)πPC1.model,PC2.modelExercise 2.4.2hPC Laptop σspeed ≥ 2.80σspeed ≥ 2.80πmodelπmodel πmaker,modelρR3(maker2,model2)(maker = maker2 AND model <> model2)makerExercise 2.4.2iPCLaptopProductπmodel,speed πmodel,speed ρR4(model2,speed2)πmodel,speed(speed < speed2 )–makerExercise 2.4.2jProduct PC πmaker,speed ρR3(maker3,speed3)ρR2(maker2,speed2)(maker = maker2 AND speed <> speed2)(maker3 = maker AND speed3 <> speed2 AND speed3 <> speed)πmakerExercise 2.4.2kπmaker(maker4 = maker AND (model4=model OR model4=model2 OR model4=model3)) (maker3 = maker AND model3 <> model2 AND model3 <> model)(maker = maker2 AND model <> model2)ρR2(maker2,model2)ρR3(maker3,model3)ρR4(maker4,model4)πmaker,modelProduct PCExercise 2.4.3aR1 := σbore ≥ 16 (Classes)R2 := πclass,country (R1)Exercise 2.4.3bR1 := σlaunched < 1921 (Ships)R2 := πname (R1)KirishimaKongoRamilliesRenownRepulseResolutionRevengeRoyal OakRoyal SovereignTennesseeExercise 2.4.3cR1 := σbattle=Denmark Strait AND result=sunk(Outcomes)R2 := πship (R1)shipBismarckHoodExercise 2.4.3dR1 := Classes ShipsR2 := σlaunched > 1921 AND displacement > 35000 (R1)R3 := πname (R2)nameIowaMissouriMusashiNew JerseyNorth CarolinaWashingtonWisconsinYamatoExercise 2.4.3eR1 := σbattle=Guadalcanal(Outcomes)R2 := Ships (ship=name) R1R3 := Classes R2R4 := πname,displacement,numGuns(R3)name displacement numGuns Kirishima 32000 8Washington 37000 9Exercise 2.4.3fR1 := πname(Ships)R2 := πship(Outcomes)R3 := ρR3(name)(R2)R4 := R1 R3nameCaliforniaHarunaHieiIowaKirishimaKongoMissouriMusashiNew JerseyExercise 2.4.3gFrom 2.3.2, assuming that every class has one ship named after the class.R1 := πclass (Classes) R2 := πclass (σname <> class (Ships)) R3 := R1 – R2Exercise 2.4.3hR1 := πcountry (σtype=bb (Classes)) R2 := πcountry (σtype=bc (Classes)) R3 := R1 ∩ R2Exercise 2.4.3iR1 := πship,result,date (Battles (battle=name) Outcomes)R2 := ρR2(ship2,result2,date2)(R1)R3 := R1 (ship=ship2 AND result=damaged AND date < date2) R2R4 := πship (R3)No results from sample data.Exercise 2.4.4aσbore ≥ 16πclass,countryClassesExercise 2.4.4bNorth Carolina Ramillies Renown Repulse Resolution Revenge Royal Oak Royal Sovereign Tennessee Washington Wisconsin Yamato Arizona Bismarck Duke of York Fuso Hood King George V Prince of Wales Rodney Scharnhorst South Dakota West Virginia Yamashiro class Bismarck country Japan Gt. Britainπnameσlaunched < 1921ShipsExercise 2.4.4cπshipσbattle=Denmark Strait AND result=sunkOutcomesExercise 2.4.4dπnameσlaunched > 1921 AND displacement > 35000Classes Ships Exercise 2.4.4eσbattle=Guadalcanal Outcomes Ships(ship=name)πname,displacement,numGunsExercise 2.4.4f Ships Outcomesπnameπship ρR3(name)Exercise 2.4.4g Classes Shipsπclass σname <> class πclass–Exercise 2.4.4hClasses Classesσtype=bb σtype=bcπcountry πcountry∩Exercise 2.4.4iBattles Outcomes (battle=name)πship,result,dateρR2(ship2,result2,date2)(ship=ship2 AND result=damaged AND date < date2)πshipExercise 2.4.5The result of the natural join has only one attribute from each pair of equated attributes. On the other hand, the result of the theta-join has both columns of the attributes and their values are identical.Exercise 2.4.6UnionIf we add a tuple to the arguments of the union operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and maybe the added tuple. If the added tuple is a duplicate tuple, then the set behavior will eliminate that tuple.Thus the union operator is monotone.IntersectionIf we add a tuple to the arguments of the intersection operator, we will get all of the tuples of the originalresult and maybe the added tuple. If the added tuple does not exist in the relation that it is added but does exist in the other relation, then the result set will include the added tuple. Thus the intersection operator is monotone.DifferenceIf we add a tuple to the arguments of the difference operator, we may not get all of the tuples of the originalresult. Suppose we have relations R and S and we are computing R – S. Suppose also that tuple t is in R but not in S. The result of R – S would include tuple t. However, if we add tuple t to S, then the new result will not have tuple t. Thus the difference operator is not monotone.ProjectionIf we add a tuple to the arguments of the projection operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and the projection of the added tuple. The projection operator only selects columns from the relation and does not affect the rows that are selected. Thus the projection operator is monotone.SelectionIf we add a tuple to the arguments of the selection operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and maybe the added tuple. If the added tuple satisfies the select condition, then it will be added to the newresult. The original tuples are included in the new result because they still satisfy the select condition. Thusthe selection operator is monotone.Cartesian ProductIf we add a tuple to the arguments of the Cartesian product operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and possibly additional tuples. The Cartesian product pairs the tuples of one relation with the tuples ofanother relation. Suppose that we are calculating R x S where R has m tuples and S has n tuples. If we add a tuple to R that is not already in R, then we expect the result of R x S to have (m + 1) * n tuples. Thus the Cartesianproduct operator is monotone.Natural JoinsIf we add a tuple to the arguments of a natural join operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and possibly additional tuples. The new tuple can only create additional successful joins, not less. If, however, the added tuple cannot successfully join with any of the existing tuples, then we will have zero additionalsuccessful joins. Thus the natural join operator is monotone.Theta JoinsIf we add a tuple to the arguments of a theta join operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and possibly additional tuples. The theta join can be modeled by a Cartesian product followed by a selection onsome condition. The new tuple can only create additional tuples in the result, not less. If, however, the addedtuple does not satisfy the select condition, then no additional tuples will be added to the result. Thus the theta join operator is monotone.RenamingIf we add a tuple to the arguments of a renaming operator, we will get all of the tuples of the original result and the added tuple. The renaming operator does not have any effect on whether a tuple is selected or not. In fact, the renaming operator will always return as many tuples as its argument. Thus the renaming operator is monotone.Exercise 2.4.7aIf all the tuples of R and S are different, then the union has n + m tuples, and this number is the maximum possible.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs if every tuple of one relation also appears in the other. Then the union has max(m , n) tuples.Exercise 2.4.7bIf all the tuples in one relation can pair successfully with all the tuples in the other relation, then the natural join has n * m tuples. This number would be the maximum possible.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs if none of the tuples of one relation can pairsuccessfully with all the tuples in the other relation. Then the natural join has zero tuples.Exercise 2.4.7cIf the condition C brings back all the tuples of R, then the cross product will contain n * m tuples. This number would be the maximum possible.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs if the condition C brings back none of the tuples of R. Then the cross product has zero tuples.Exercise 2.4.7dAssuming that the list of attributes L makes the resulting relation πL(R) and relation S schema compatible, then the maximum possible tuples is n. This happens when all of the tuples of πL(R) are not in S.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs when all of the tuples in πL(R) appear in S. Then the difference has max(n–m , 0) tuples.Exercise 2.4.8Defining r as the schema of R and s as the schema of S:1.πr(R S)2.R δ(πr∩s(S)) where δ is the duplicate-elimination operator in Section 5.2 pg. 2133.R – (R –πr(R S))Exercise 2.4.9Defining r as the schema of R1.R - πr(R S)Exercise 2.4.10πA1,A2…An(R S)Exercise 2.5.1aσspeed < 2.00 AND price > 500(PC) = øModel 1011 violates this constraint.Exercise 2.5.1bσscreen < 15.4 AND hd < 100 AND price ≥ 1000(Laptop) = øModel 2004 violates the constraint.Exercise 2.5.1cπmaker(σtype = laptop(Product)) ∩ πmaker(σtype = pc(Product)) = øManufacturers A,B,E violate the constraint.Exercise 2.5.1dThis complex expression is best seen as a sequence of steps in which we define temporary relations R1 through R4 that stand for nodes of expression trees. Here is the sequence:R1(maker, model, speed) := πmaker,model,speed(Product PC)R2(maker, speed) := πmaker,speed(Product Laptop)R3(model) := πmodel(R1 R1.maker = R2.maker AND R1.speed ≤ R2.speed R2)R4(model) := πmodel(PC)The constraint is R4 ⊆ R3Manufacturers B,C,D violate the constraint.Exercise 2.5.1eπmodel(σLaptop.ram > PC.ram AND Laptop.price ≤ PC.price(PC × Laptop)) = øModels 2002,2006,2008 violate the constraint.Exercise 2.5.2aπclass(σbore > 16(Classes)) = øThe Yamato class violates the constraint.Exercise 2.5.2bπclass(σnumGuns > 9 AND bore > 14(Classes)) = øNo violations to the constraint.Exercise 2.5.2cThis complex expression is best seen as a sequence of steps in which we define temporary relations R1 through R5 that stand for nodes of expression trees. Here is the sequence:R1(class,name) := πclass,name(Classes Ships)R2(class2,name2) := ρR2(class2,name2)(R1)R3(class3,name3) := ρR3(class3,name3)(R1)R4(class,name,class2,name2) := R1 (class = class2 AND name <> name2) R2R5(class,name,class2,name2,class3,name3) := R4 (class=class3 AND name <> name3 AND name2 <> name3) R3The constraint is R5 = øThe Kongo, Iowa and Revenge classes violate the constraint.Exercise 2.5.2dπcountry(σtype = bb(Classes)) ∩ πcountry(σtype = bc(Classes)) = øJapan and Gt. Britain violate the constraint.Exercise 2.5.2eThis complex expression is best seen as a sequence of steps in which we define temporary relations R1 through R5 that stand for nodes of expression trees. Here is the sequence:R1(ship,bat tle,result,class) := πship,battle,result,class(Outcomes (ship = name) Ships)R2(ship,battle,result,numGuns) := πship,battle,result,numGuns(R1 Classes)R3(ship,battle) := πship,battle(σnumGuns < 9 AND result = sunk (R2))R4(ship2,battle2) := ρR4(ship2,battle2)(πship,battle(σnumGuns > 9(R2)))R5(ship2) := πship2(R3 (battle = battle2) R4)The constraint is R5 = øNo violations to the constraint. Since there are some ships in the Outcomes table that are not in the Ships table, we are unable to determine the number of guns on that ship.Exercise 2.5.3Defining r as the schema A1,A2,…,A n and s as the schema B1,B2,…,B n:πr(R) πs(S) = øwhere is the antisemijoinExercise 2.5.4The form of a constraint as E1 = E2 can be expressed as the other two constraints.Using the “equating an expression to the empty set” method, we can simply say:E1– E2 = øAs a containment, we can simply say:E1⊆ E2 AND E2⊆ E1Thus, the form E1 = E2 of a constraint cannot express more than the two other forms discussed in this section.。
数据库系统教程课后答案
数据库系统教程课后答案数据库系统是一种用于管理和组织大量数据的软件系统，它通过数据模型、数据结构和数据操作等方式来实现数据的存储、访问、更新和管理等功能。
数据库系统广泛应用于各个领域，如企业管理、电子商务、科学研究等。
在数据库系统的学习过程中，会出现一些练习题目和问题，需要我们进行思考和解答。
下面我将结合一些常见的课后答案，对数据库系统进行详细的解析。
首先，我们需要了解数据库的基本概念和组成部分。
数据库是按照一定的数据模型组织、存储和管理数据的集合，它由数据库管理系统(DBMS)、数据库、数据库模式(或称为数据库结构)、数据库实例(或称为数据系统)等组成。
其中，数据库管理系统是进行数据库管理的软件系统，它负责数据库的创建、维护和管理等操作。
接着，我们需要了解数据库的设计和规范化。
数据库设计是指根据用户的需求和系统的要求，将现实世界的数据和关系转化为数据库模式的过程。
在设计数据库时，要符合一定的规范化原则，如第一范式、第二范式和第三范式等。
规范化可以提高数据库的性能、减少数据冗余，同时也方便数据库的操作和维护。
然后，我们需要了解数据库的查询和操作。
数据库查询是指根据用户的需求，从数据库中检索出符合条件的数据的过程。
查询语言是进行数据库查询的工具，如结构化查询语言(SQL)。
SQL语言包括数据定义语言(DDL)、数据操纵语言(DML)和数据控制语言(DCL)等。
DDL用于定义和管理数据库的结构，如创建表、定义键等；DML用于对数据库中的数据进行操作，如插入、更新和删除等；DCL用于控制数据库的安全性和权限，如授权和回收权限。
此外，我们还需要了解数据库的事务和并发控制。
事务是指一组对数据库的操作，要么全部执行成功，要么全部放弃。
事务具备ACID特性，即原子性、一致性、隔离性和持久性。
并发控制是指多个事务同时对数据库进行操作时，保证数据库的一致性和完整性的措施。
并发控制可以通过加锁、多版本并发控制(MVCC)、时间戳等方式来实现。
数据库系统教程课后习题答案(部分)--何玉洁 李宝安
第一部分基础理论第1章数据库概述1．试说明数据、数据库、数据库管理系统和数据库系统的概念。
数据：描述事务的符号记录数据库：存储数据的仓库数据库管理系统：用于管理和维护数据的系统软件数据库系统：计算机中引入数据库后的系统，包括数据库，数据库管理系统，应用程序，数据库管理员2．数据管理技术的发展主要经历了哪几个阶段？两个阶段，文件管理和数据库管理9．数据独立性指的是什么？应用程序不因数据的物理表示方式和访问技术改变而改变，分为逻辑独立性和物理独立性。
物理独立性是指当数据的存储结构或存储位置发生变化时，不影响应用程序的特性；逻辑独立性是指当表达现实世界的信息内容发生变化时，不影响应用程序的特性。
10．数据库系统由哪几部分组成？由数据库、数据库管理系统、应用程序、数据库管理员组成。
第2章数据模型与数据库系统的结构4．说明实体一联系模型中的实体、属性和联系的概念。
实体是具有公共性质的并可相互区分的现实世界对象的集合。
属性是实体所具有的特征或性质。
联系是实体之间的关联关系。
6．数据库系统包含哪三级模式？试分别说明每一级模式的作用。
外模式、模式和内模式。
外模式：是对现实系统中用户感兴趣的整体数据结构的局部描述，用于满足不同用户对数据的需求，保证数据安全。
模式：是数据库中全体数据的逻辑结构和特征的描述，它满足所有用户对数据的需求。
内模式：是对整个数据库的底层表示，它描述了数据的存储结构。
7．数据库管理系统提供的两级映像的作用是什么？它带来了哪些功能？两级映像是外模式/模式映像和模式/内模式映像。
外模式/模式映像保证了当模式发生变化时可以保证外模式不变，从而使用户的应用程序不需要修改，保证了程序与数据的逻辑独立性。
模式/内模式映像保证了当内模式发生变化，比如存储位置或存储文件名改变，可以保持模式不变，保证了程序与数据的物理独立性。
两级印象保证了应用程序的稳定性。
第3章关系数据库1．试述关系模型的三个组成部分。
数据结构、关系操作集合、关系完整性约束2．解释下列术语的含义：(3)候选码当一个属性或属性集的值能够唯一标识一个关系的元组，而又不包含多余的元素，则称该属性或属性集为候选码。
数据库原理教程习题答案(全)
0000000000第1章数据库系统概述习题参考答案税务局使用数据库存储纳税人（个人或公司）信息、纳税人缴纳税款信息等。
典型的数据处理包括纳税、退税处理、统计各类纳税人纳税情况等。
银行使用数据库存储客户基本信息、客户存贷款信息等。
典型的数据处理包括处理客户存取款等。
超市使用数据库存储商品的基本信息、会员客户基本信息、客户每次购物的详细清单。
典型的数据处理包括收银台记录客户每次购物的清单并计算应交货款。
1.2 DBMS是数据库管理系统的简称，是一种重要的程序设计系统。
它由一个相互关联的数据集合和一组访问这些数据的程序组成。
数据库是持久储存在计算机中、有组织的、可共享的大量数据的集合。
数据库中的数据按一定的数据模型组织、描述和存储，可以被各种用户共享，具有较小的冗余度、较高的数据独立性，并且易于扩展。
数据库系统由数据库、DBMS（及其开发工具）、应用系统和数据库管理员组成。
数据模型是一种形式机制，用于数据建模，描述数据、数据之间的联系、数据的语义、数据上的操作和数据的完整性约束条件。
数据库模式是数据库中使用数据模型对数据建模所产生设计结果。
对于关系数据库而言，数据库模式由一组关系模式构成。
数据字典是DBMS维护的一系列内部表，用来存放元数据。
所谓元数据是关于数据的数据。
1.3 DBMS提供如下功能：（1）数据定义：提供数据定义语言DDL，用于定义数据库中的数据对象和它们的结构。
（2）数据操纵：提供数据操纵语言DML，用于操纵数据，实现对数据库的基本操作（查询、插入、删除和修改）。
（3）事务管理和运行管理：统一管理数据、控制对数据的并发访问，保证数据的安全性、完整性，确保故障时数据库中数据不被破坏，并且能够恢复到一致状态。
（4）数据存储和查询处理：确定数据的物理组织和存取方式，提供数据的持久存储和有效访问；确定查询处理方法，优化查询处理过程。
（5）数据库的建立和维护：提供实用程序，完成数据库数据批量装载、数据库转储、介质故障恢复、数据库的重组和性能监测等。
数据库原理教程习题答案(全)
0000000000第1章数据库系统概述习题参考答案税务局使用数据库存储纳税人（个人或公司）信息、纳税人缴纳税款信息等。
典型的数据处理包括纳税、退税处理、统计各类纳税人纳税情况等。
银行使用数据库存储客户基本信息、客户存贷款信息等。
典型的数据处理包括处理客户存取款等。
超市使用数据库存储商品的基本信息、会员客户基本信息、客户每次购物的详细清单。
典型的数据处理包括收银台记录客户每次购物的清单并计算应交货款。
DBMS是数据库管理系统的简称，是一种重要的程序设计系统。
它由一个相互关联的数据集合和一组访问这些数据的程序组成。
数据库是持久储存在计算机中、有组织的、可共享的大量数据的集合。
数据库中的数据按一定的数据模型组织、描述和存储，可以被各种用户共享，具有较小的冗余度、较高的数据独立性，并且易于扩展。
数据库系统由数据库、DBMS（及其开发工具）、应用系统和数据库管理员组成。
数据模型是一种形式机制，用于数据建模，描述数据、数据之间的联系、数据的语义、数据上的操作和数据的完整性约束条件。
数据库模式是数据库中使用数据模型对数据建模所产生设计结果。
对于关系数据库而言，数据库模式由一组关系模式构成。
数据字典是DBMS维护的一系列内部表，用来存放元数据。
所谓元数据是关于数据的数据。
DBMS提供如下功能：（1）数据定义：提供数据定义语言DDL，用于定义数据库中的数据对象和它们的结构。
（2）数据操纵：提供数据操纵语言DML，用于操纵数据，实现对数据库的基本操作（查询、插入、删除和修改）。
（3）事务管理和运行管理：统一管理数据、控制对数据的并发访问，保证数据的安全性、完整性，确保故障时数据库中数据不被破坏，并且能够恢复到一致状态。
（4）数据存储和查询处理：确定数据的物理组织和存取方式，提供数据的持久存储和有效访问；确定查询处理方法，优化查询处理过程。
（5）数据库的建立和维护：提供实用程序，完成数据库数据批量装载、数据库转储、介质故障恢复、数据库的重组和性能监测等。
数据库系统基础教程(第二版)课后习题答案
Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 2Solutions for Section 2.1Exercise 2.1.1The E/R Diagram.Exercise 2.1.8(a)The E/R DiagramKobvxybzSolutions for Section 2.2Exercise 2.2.1The Addresses entity set is nothing but a single address, so we would prefer to make address an attribute of Customers. Were the bank to record several addresses for a customer, then it might make sense to have an Addresses entity set and make Lives-at a many-many relationship.The Acct-Sets entity set is useless. Each customer has a unique account set containing his or her accounts. However, relating customers directly to their accounts in a many-many relationship conveys the same information and eliminates the account-set concept altogether.Solutions for Section 2.3Exercise 2.3.1(a)Keys ssNo and number are appropriate for Customers and Accounts, respectively.Also, we think it does not make sense for an account to be related to zero customers, so we should round the edge connecting Owns to Customers. It does not seem inappropriate to have a customer with 0 accounts; they might be a borrower, for example, so we put no constraint on the connection from Owns to Accounts. Here is the The E/R Diagram，showing underlined keys and the numerocity constraint.Exercise 2.3.2(b)If R is many-one from E1 to E2, then two tuples (e1,e2) and (f1,f2) of the relationship set for R must be the same if they agree on the key attributes for E1. To see why, surely e1 and f1 are the same. Because R is many-one from E1 to E2, e2 and f2 must also be the same. Thus, the pairs are the same. Solutions for Section 2.4Exercise 2.4.1Here is the The E/R Diagram.We have omitted attributes other than our choice for the key attributes of Students and Courses. Also omitted are names for the relationships. Attribute grade is not part of the key for Enrollments. The key for Enrollements is studID from Students and dept and number from Courses.Exercise 2.4.4bHere is the The E/R Diagram Again, we have omitted relationship names and attributes other than our choice for the key attributes. The key for Leagues is itsown name; this entity set is not weak. The key for Teams is its own name plus the name of the league of which the team is a part, e.g., (Rangers, MLB) or (Rangers, NHL). The key for Players consists of the player's number and the key for the team on which he or she plays. Since the latter key is itself a pair consisting of team and league names, the key for players is the triple (number, teamName, leagueName).e.g., Jeff Garcia is (5, 49ers, NFL).Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 3Solutions for Section 3.1Exercise 3.1.2(a)We can order the three tuples in any of 3! = 6 ways. Also, the columns can be ordered in any of 3! = 6 ways. Thus, the number of presentations is 6*6 = 36. Solutions for Section 3.2Exercise 3.2.1Customers(ssNo, name, address, phone)Flights(number, day, aircraft)Bookings(ssNo, number, day, row, seat)Being a weak entity set, Bookings' relation has the keys for Customers and Flights and Bookings' own attributes.Notice that the relations obtained from the toCust and toFlt relationships are unnecessary. They are:toCust(ssNo, ssNo1, number, day)toFlt(ssNo, number, day, number1, day1)That is, for toCust, the key of Customers is paired with the key for Bookings. Since both include ssNo, this attribute is repeated with two different names, ssNo and ssNo1. A similar situation exists for toFlt.Exercise 3.2.3Ships(name, yearLaunched)SisterOf(name, sisterName)Solutions for Section 3.3Exercise 3.3.1Since Courses is weak, its key is number and the name of its department. We do not have a relation for GivenBy. In part (a), there is a relation for Courses and a relation for LabCourses that has only the key and the computer-allocation attribute. It looks like:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room)LabCourses(number, deptName, allocation)For part (b), LabCourses gets all the attributes of Courses, as:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room)LabCourses(number, deptName, room, allocation)And for (c), Courses and LabCourses are combined, as:Depts(name, chair)Courses(number, deptName, room, allocation)Exercise 3.3.4(a)There is one relation for each entity set, so the number of relations is e. The relation for the root entity set has a attributes, while the other relations, which must include the key attributes, have a+k attributes.Solutions for Section 3.4Exercise 3.4.2Surely ID is a key by itself. However, we think that the attributes x, y, and z together form another key. The reason is that at no time can two molecules occupy the same point.Exercise 3.4.4The key attributes are indicated by capitalization in the schema below: Customers(SSNO, name, address, phone)Flights(NUMBER, DAY, aircraft)Bookings(SSNO, NUMBER, DAY, row, seat)Exercise 3.4.6(a)The superkeys are any subset that contains A1. Thus, there are 2^{n-1} such subsets, since each of the n-1 attributes A2 through An may independently be chosen in or out.Solutions for Section 3.5Exercise 3.5.1(a)We could try inference rules to deduce new dependencies until we are satisfied we have them all. A more systematic way is to consider the closures of all 15 nonempty sets of attributes.For the single attributes we have A+ = A, B+ = B, C+ = ACD, and D+ = AD. Thus, the only new dependency we get with a single attribute on the left is C->A.Now consider pairs of attributes:AB+ = ABCD, so we get new dependency AB->D. AC+ = ACD, and AC->D is nontrivial. AD+ = AD, so nothing new. BC+ = ABCD, so we get BC->A, and BC->D. BD+ = ABCD, giving us BD->A and BD->C. CD+ = ACD, giving CD->A.For the triples of attributes, ACD+ = ACD, but the closures of the other sets are each ABCD. Thus, we get new dependencies ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A. Since ABCD+ = ABCD, we get no new dependencies.The collection of 11 new dependencies mentioned above is: C->A, AB->D, AC->D, BC->A, BC->D, BD->A, BD->C, CD->A, ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A. Exercise 3.5.1(b)From the analysis of closures above, we find that AB, BC, and BD are keys. All other sets either do not have ABCD as the closure or contain one of these three sets.Exercise 3.5.1(c)The superkeys are all those that contain one of those three keys. That is, a superkey that is not a key must contain B and more than one of A, C, and D. Thus, the (proper) superkeys are ABC, ABD, BCD, and ABCD.Exercise 3.5.3(a)We must compute the closure of A1A2...AnC. Since A1A2...An->B is a dependency, surely B is in this set, proving A1A2...AnC->B.Exercise 3.5.4(a)Consider the relationExercise 3.5.8(a)If all sets of attributes are closed, then there cannot be any nontrivial functional dependencies. For suppose A1A2...An->B is a nontrivial dependency. Then A1A2...An+ contains B and thus A1A2...An is not closed.Exercise 3.5.10(a)We need to compute the closures of all subsets of {ABC}, although there is no need to think about the empty set or the set of all three attributes. Here are thecalculations for the remaining six sets:A+ = AB+ = BC+ = ACEAB+ = ABCDEAC+ = ACEBC+ = ABCDEWe ignore D and E, so a basis for the resulting functional dependencies for ABC are: C->A and AB->C. Note that BC->A is true, but follows logically from C->A, and therefore may be omitted from our list.Solutions for Section 3.6Exercise 3.6.1(a)In the solution to Exercise 3.5.1 we found that there are 14 nontrivial dependencies, including the three given ones and 11 derived dependencies. These are: C->A, C->D, D->A, AB->D, AB-> C, AC->D, BC->A, BC->D, BD->A, BD->C, CD->A, ABC->D, ABD->C, and BCD->A.We also learned that the three keys were AB, BC, and BD. Thus, any dependency above that does not have one of these pairs on the left is a BCNF violation. These are: C->A, C->D, D->A, AC->D, and CD->A.One choice is to decompose using C->D. That gives us ABC and CD as decomposed relations. CD is surely in BCNF, since any two-attribute relation is. ABC is not in BCNF, since AB and BC are its only keys, but C->A is a dependency that holds in ABCD and therefore holds in ABC. We must further decompose ABC into AC and BC. Thus, the three relations of the decomposition are AC, BC, and CD.Since all attributes are in at least one key of ABCD, that relation is already in 3NF, and no decomposition is necessary.Exercise 3.6.1(b)(Revised 1/19/02) The only key is AB. Thus, B->C and B->D are both BCNF violations. The derived FD's BD->C and BC->D are also BCNF violations. However, any other nontrivial, derived FD will have A and B on the left, and therefore will contain a key.One possible BCNF decomposition is AB and BCD. It is obtained starting with any of the four violations mentioned above. AB is the only key for AB, and B is the only key for BCD.Since there is only one key for ABCD, the 3NF violations are the same, and so is the decomposition.Solutions for Section 3.7Exercise 3.7.1Since A->->B, and all the tuples have the same value for attribute A, we can pair the B-value from any tuple with the value of the remaining attribute C from any other tuple. Thus, we know that R must have at least the nine tuples of the form (a,b,c), where b is any of b1, b2, or b3, and c is any of c1, c2, or c3. That is, we can derive, using the definition of a multivalued dependency, that each of the tuples (a,b1,c2), (a,b1,c3), (a,b2,c1), (a,b2,c3), (a,b3,c1), and (a,b3,c2) are also in R. Exercise 3.7.2(a)First, people have unique Social Security numbers and unique birthdates. Thus, we expect the functional dependencies ssNo->name and ssNo->birthdate hold. The same applies to children, so we expect childSSNo->childname and childSSNo->childBirthdate. Finally, an automobile has a unique brand, so we expect autoSerialNo->autoMake.There are two multivalued dependencies that do not follow from these functional dependencies. First, the information about one child of a person is independent of other information about that person. That is, if a person with social security number s has a tuple with,cs,cb, then if there is any other tuple t for the same person, there will also be another tuple that agrees with t except that it has,cs,cb in its components for the child name, Social Security number, and birthdate. That is the multivalued dependencyssNo->->childSSNo childName childBirthdateSimilarly, an automobile serial number and make are independent of any of the other attributes, so we expect the multivalued dependencyssNo->->autoSerialNo autoMakeThe dependencies are summarized below:ssNo -> name birthdatechildSSNo -> childName childBirthdateautoSerialNo -> autoMakessNo ->-> childSSNo childName childBirthdatessNo ->-> autoSerialNo autoMakeExercise 3.7.2(b)We suggest the relation schemas{ssNo, name, birthdate}{ssNo, childSSNo}{childSSNo, childName childBirthdate}{ssNo, autoSerialNo}{autoSerialNo, autoMake}An initial decomposition based on the two multivalued dependencies would give us{ssNo, name, birthDate}{ssNo, childSSNo, childName, childBirthdate}{ssNo, autoSerialNo, autoMake}Functional dependencies force us to decompose the second and third of these.Exercise 3.7.3(a)Since there are no functional dependencies, the only key is all four attributes, ABCD. Thus, each of the nontrvial multivalued dependencies A->->B and A->->C violate 4NF. We must separate out the attributes of these dependencies, first decomposing into AB and ACD, and then decomposing the latter into AC and AD because A->->C is still a 4NF violation for ACD. The final set of relations are AB, AC, and AD.Exercise 3.7.7(a)Let W be the set of attributes not in X, Y, or Z. Consider two tuples xyzw and xy'z'w' in the relation R in question. Because X ->-> Y, we can swap the y's, so xy'zw and xyz'w' are in R. Because X ->-> Z, we can take the pair of tuples xyzw and xyz'w' and swap Z's to get xyz'w and xyzw'. Similarly, we can take the pair xy'z'w' and xy'zw and swap Z's to get xy'zw' and xy'z'w.In conclusion, we started with tuples xyzw and xy'z'w' and showed that xyzw' and xy'z'w must also be in the relation. That is exactly the statement of the MVD X ->-> Y-union-Z. Note that the above statements all make sense even if there are attributes in common among X, Y, and Z.Exercise 3.7.8(a)Consider a relation R with schema ABCD and the instance with four tuples abcd, abcd', ab'c'd, and ab'c'd'. This instance satisfies the MVD A ->-> BC. However, it does not satisfy A ->-> B. For example, if it did satisfy A ->-> B, then because the instance contains the tuples abcd and ab'c'd, we would expect it to contain abc'd and ab'cd, neither of which is in the instance.Database Systems: The Complete BookSolutions for Chapter 4Solutions for Section 4.2Exercise 4.2.1class Customer {attribute string name;attribute string addr;attribute string phone;attribute integer ssNo;relationship Set<Account> ownsAcctsinverse Account::ownedBy;}class Account {attribute integer number;attribute string type;attribute real balance;relationship Set<Customer> ownedByinverse Customer::ownsAccts}Exercise 4.2.4class Person {attribute string name;relationship Person motherOfinverse Person::childrenOfFemalerelationship Person fatherOfinverse Person::childrenOfMalerelationship Set<Person> childreninverse Person::parentsOfrelationship Set<Person> childrenOfFemaleinverse Person::motherOfrelationship Set<Person> childrenOfMaleinverse Person::fatherOfrelationship Set<Person> parentsOfinverse Person::children}Notice that there are six different relationships here. For example, the inverse of the relationship that connects a person to their (unique) mother is a relationship that connects a mother (i.e., a female person) to the set of her children. That relationship, which we call childrenOfFemale, is different from the children relationship, which connects anyone -- male or female -- to their children. Exercise 4.2.7A relationship R is its own inverse if and only if for every pair (a,b) in R, the pair (b,a) is also in R. In the terminology of set theory, the relation R is ``symmetric.'' Solutions for Section 4.3Exercise 4.3.1We think that Social Security number should me the key for Customer, and account number should be the key for Account. Here is the ODL solution with key and extent declarations.class Customer(extent Customers key ssNo){attribute string name;attribute string addr;attribute string phone;attribute integer ssNo;relationship Set<Account> ownsAcctsinverse Account::ownedBy;}class Account(extent Accounts key number){attribute integer number;attribute string type;attribute real balance;relationship Set<Customer> ownedByinverse Customer::ownsAccts}Solutions for Section 4.4Exercise 4.4.1(a)Since the relationship between customers and accounts is many-many, we should create a separate relation from that relationship-pair.Customers(ssNo, name, address, phone)Accounts(number, type, balance)CustAcct(ssNo, number)Exercise 4.4.1(d)Ther is only one attribute, but three pairs of relationships from Person to itself. Since motherOf and fatherOf are many-one, we can store their inverses in the relation for Person. That is, for each person, childrenOfMale and childrenOfFemale will indicate that persons's father and mother. The children relationship is many-many, and requires its own relation. This relation actually turns out to be redundant, in the sense that its tuples can be deduced from the relationships stored with Person. The schema:Persons(name, childrenOfFemale, childrenOfMale)Parent-Child(parent, child)Exercise 4.4.4You get a schema like:Studios(name, address, ownedMovie)Since name -> address is the only FD, the key is {name, ownedMovie}, and the FD has a left side that is not a superkey.Exercise 4.4.5(a,b,c)(a) Struct Card { string rank, string suit };(b) class Hand {attribute Set theHand;};For part (c) we have:Hands(handId, rank, suit)Notice that the class Hand has no key, so we need to create one: handID. Each hand has, in the relation Hands, one tuple for each card in the hand. Exercise 4.4.5(e)Struct PlayerHand { string Player, Hand theHand };class Deal {attribute Set theDeal;}Alternatively, PlayerHand can be defined directly within the declaration of attribute theDeal.Exercise 4.4.5(h)Since keys for Hand and Deal are lacking, a mechanical way to design the database schema is to have one relation connecting deals and player-hand pairs, and another to specify the contents of hands. That is:Deals(dealID, player, handID)Hands(handID, rank, suit)However, if we think about it, we can get rid of handID and connect the deal and the player directly to the player's cards, as:Deals(dealID, player, rank, suit)Exercise 4.4.5(i)First, card is really a pair consisting of a suit and a rank, so we need two attributes in a relation schema to represent cards. However, much more important is the fact that the proposed schema does not distinguish which card is in which hand. Thus, we need another attribute that indicates which hand within the deal a card belongs to, something like:Deals(dealID, handID, rank, suit)Exercise 4.4.6(c)Attribute b is really a bag of (f,g) pairs. Thus, associated with each a-value will be zero or more (f,g) pairs, each of which can occur several times. We shall use an attribute count to indicate the number of occurrences, although if relations allow duplicate tuples we could simply allow duplicate (a,f,g) triples in the relation. The proposed schema is:C(a, f, g, count)Solutions for Section 4.5Exercise 4.5.1(b)Studios(name, address, movies{(title, year, inColor, length,stars{(name, address, birthdate)})})Since the information about a star is repeated once for each of their movies, there is redundancy. To eliminate it, we have to use a separate relation for stars and use pointers from studios. That is:Stars(name, address, birthdate)Studios(name, address, movies{(title, year, inColor, length,stars{*Stars})})Since each movie is owned by one studio, the information about a movie appears in only one tuple of Studios, and there is no redundancy.Exercise 4.5.2Customers(name, address, phone, ssNo, accts{*Accounts})Accounts(number, type, balance, owners{*Customers})Solutions for Section 4.6Exercise 4.6.1(a)We need to add new nodes labeled George Lucas and Gary Kurtz. Then, from the node sw (which represents the movie Star Wars), we add arcs to these two new nodes, labeled directedBy and producedBy, respectively.Exercise 4.6.2Create nodes for each account and each customer. From each customer node is an arc to a node representing the attributes of the customer, e.g., an arc labeled name to the customer's name. Likewise, there is an arc from each account node to each attribute of that account, e.g., an arc labeled balance to the value of the balance.To represent ownership of accounts by customers, we place an arc labeled owns from each customer node to the node of each account that customer holds (possibly jointly). Also, we place an arc labeled ownedBy from each account node to the customer node for each owner of that account.Exercise 4.6.5In the semistructured model, nodes represent data elements, i.e., entities rather than entity sets. In the E/R model, nodes of all types represent schema elements, and the data is not represented at all.Solutions for Section 4.7Exercise 4.7.1(a)<STARS-MOVIES><STAR starId = "cf" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj"><NAME>Carrie Fisher</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>123 Maple St.</STREET><CITY>Hollywood</CITY></ADDRESS><ADDRESS><STREET>5 Locust Ln.</STREET><CITY>Malibu</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><STAR starId = "mh" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj"><NAME>Mark Hamill</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>456 Oak Rd.<STREET><CITY>Brentwood</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><STAR starId = "hf" starredIn = "sw, esb, rj, wit"><NAME>Harrison Ford</NAME><ADDRESS><STREET>whatever</STREET><CITY>whatever</CITY></ADDRESS></STAR><MOVIE movieId = "sw" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Star Wars</TITLE><YEAR>1977</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieId = "esb" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Empire Strikes Back</TITLE><YEAR>1980</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieId = "rj" starsOf = "cf, mh"><TITLE>Return of the Jedi</TITLE><YEAR>1983</YEAR></MOVIE><MOVIE movieID = "wit" starsOf = "hf"><TITLE>Witness</TITLE><YEAR>1985</YEAR></MOVIE></STARS-MOVIES>Exercise 4.7.2<!DOCTYPE Bank [<!ELEMENT BANK (CUSTOMER* ACCOUNT*)><!ELEMENT CUSTOMER (NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE, SSNO)> <!ATTLIST CUSTOMERcustId IDowns IDREFS><!ELEMENT NAME (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT ADDRESS (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT PHONE (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT SSNO (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT ACCOUNT (NUMBER, TYPE, BALANCE)><!ATTLIST ACCOUNTacctId IDownedBy IDREFS><!ELEMENT NUMBER (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT TYPE (#PCDATA)><!ELEMENT BALANCE (#PCDATA)>]>Database Systems: TheComplete BookSolutions for Chapter 5Solutions for Section 5.2Exercise 5.2.1(a)PI_model( SIGMA_{speed >= 1000} ) (PC)Exercise 5.2.1(f)The trick is to theta-join PC with itself on the condition that the hard disk sizes are equal. That gives us tuples that have two PC model numbers with the same value of hd. However, these two PC's could in fact be the same, so we must also require in the theta-join that the model numbers be unequal. Finally, we want the hard disk sizes, so we project onto hd.The expression is easiest to see if we write it using some temporary values. We start by renaming PC twice so we can talk about two occurrences of the same attributes.R1 = RHO_{PC1} (PC)R2 = RHO_{PC2} (PC)R3 = R1 JOIN_{PC1.hd = PC2.hd AND PC1.model <> PC2.model} R2R4 = PI_{PC1.hd} (R3)Exercise 5.2.1(h)First, we find R1, the model-speed pairs from both PC and Laptop. Then, we find from R1 those computers that are ``fast,'' at least 133Mh. At the same time, we join R1 with Product to connect model numbers to their manufacturers and we project out the speed to get R2. Then we join R2 with itself (after renaming) to find pairs of different models by the same maker. Finally, we get our answer, R5, by projecting onto one of the maker attributes. A sequence of steps giving the desired expression is: R1 = PI_{model,speed} (PC) UNION PI_{model,speed} (Laptop)R2 = PI_{maker,model} (SIGMA_{speed>=700} (R1) JOIN Product)R3 = RHO_{T(maker2, model2)} (R2)R4 = R2 JOIN_{maker = maker2 AND model <> model2} (R3)R5 = PI_{maker} (R4)Exercise 5.2.2Here are figures for the expression trees of Exercise 5.2.1 Part (a)Part (f) Part (h). Note that the third figure is not really a tree, since it uses a common subexpression. We could duplicate the nodes to make it a tree, but using common subexpressions is a valuable form of queryoptimization. One of the benefits one gets from constructing ``trees'' for queries is the ability to combine nodes that represent common subexpressions.Exercise 5.2.7The relation that results from the natural join has only one attributefrom each pair of equated attributes. The theta-join has attributes for both, and their columns are identical.Exercise 5.2.9(a)If all the tuples of R and S are different, then the union has n+m tuples, and this number is the maximum possible.The minimum number of tuples that can appear in the result occurs if every tuple of one relation also appears in the other. Surely the union has at least as many tuples as the larger of R and that is, max(n,m) tuples. However, it is possible for every tuple of the smaller to appear in the other, so it is possible that there are as few as max(n,m) tuples in the union.Exercise 5.2.10In the following we use the name of a relation both as its instance (set of tuples) and as its schema (set of attributes). The context determines uniquely which is meant.PI_R(R JOIN S) Note, however, that this expression works only for sets; it does not preserve the multipicity of tuples in R. The next two expressions work for bags.R JOIN DELTA(PI_{R INTERSECT S}(S)) In this expression, each projection of a tuple from S onto the attributes that are also in R appears exactly once in the second argument of the join, so it preserves multiplicity of tuples in R, except for those that do not join with S,which disappear. The DELTA operator removes duplicates, as described in Section 5.4.R - [R - PI_R(R JOIN S)] Here, the strategy is to find the dangling tuples of R and remove them.Solutions for Section 5.3Exercise 5.3.1As a bag, the value is {700, 1500, 866, 866, 1000, 1300, 1400, 700, 1200, 750, 1100, 350, 733}. The order is unimportant, of course. The average is 959.As a set, the value is {700, 1500, 866, 1000, 1300, 1400, 1200, 750, 1100, 350, 733}, and the average is 967. H3>Exercise 5.3.4(a)As sets, an element x is in the left-side expression(R UNION S) UNION Tif and only if it is in at least one of R, S, and T. Likewise, it is in the right-side expressionR UNION (S UNION T)under exactly the same conditions. Thus, the two expressions have exactly the same members, and the sets are equal.As bags, an element x is in the left-side expression as many times as the sum of the number of times it is in R, S, and T. The same holds for the right side. Thus, as bags the expressions also have the same value. Exercise 5.3.4(h)As sets, element x is in the left sideR UNION (S INTERSECT T)if and only if x is either in R or in both S and T. Element x is in the right side(R UNION S) INTERSECT (R UNION T)if and only if it is in both R UNION S and R UNION T. If x is in R, then it is in both unions. If x is in both S and T, then it is in both union. However, if x is neither in R nor in both of S and T, then it cannot be in both unions. For example, suppose x is not in R and not in S. Then x is not in R UNION S. Thus, the statement of when x is in the right side is exactly the same as when it is in the left side: x is either in R or in both of S and T.Now, consider the expression for bags. Element x is in the left side the sum of the number of times it is in R plus the smaller of the number of times x is in S and the number of times x is in T. Likewise, the number of times x is in the right side is the smaller ofThe sum of the number of times x is in R and in S.The sum of the number of times x is in R and in T.A moment's reflection tells us that this minimum is the sum of the number of times x is in R plus the smaller of the number of times x is in S and in T, exactly as for the left side.Exercise 5.3.5(a)。
数据库系统原理教程课后习题答案
第1章绪论1 ．试述数据、数据库、数据库系统、数据库管理系统的概念。
答：( l ）数据（ Data ) ：描述事物的符号记录称为数据。
数据的种类有数字、文字、图形、图像、声音、正文等。
数据与其语义是不可分的。
解析在现代计算机系统中数据的概念是广义的。
早期的计算机系统主要用于科学计算，处理的数据是整数、实数、浮点数等传统数学中的数据。
现代计算机能存储和处理的对象十分广泛，表示这些对象的数据也越来越复杂。
数据与其语义是不可分的。
500 这个数字可以表示一件物品的价格是 500 元，也可以表示一个学术会议参加的人数有 500 人，还可以表示一袋奶粉重 500 克。
( 2 ）数据库（ DataBase ，简称 DB ) ：数据库是长期储存在计算机内的、有组织的、可共享的数据集合。
数据库中的数据按一定的数据模型组织、描述和储存，具有较小的冗余度、较高的数据独立性和易扩展性，并可为各种用户共享。
( 3 ）数据库系统（ DataBas 。
Sytem ，简称 DBS ) ：数据库系统是指在计算机系统中引入数据库后的系统构成，一般由数据库、数据库管理系统（及其开发工具）、应用系统、数据库管理员构成。
解析数据库系统和数据库是两个概念。
数据库系统是一个人一机系统，数据库是数据库系统的一个组成部分。
但是在日常工作中人们常常把数据库系统简称为数据库。
希望读者能够从人们讲话或文章的上下文中区分“数据库系统”和“数据库”，不要引起混淆。
( 4 ）数据库管理系统（ DataBase Management sytem ，简称 DBMs ) ：数据库管理系统是位于用户与操作系统之间的一层数据管理软件，用于科学地组织和存储数据、高效地获取和维护数据。
DBMS 的主要功能包括数据定义功能、数据操纵功能、数据库的运行管理功能、数据库的建立和维护功能。
解析 DBMS 是一个大型的复杂的软件系统，是计算机中的基础软件。
目前，专门研制 DBMS的厂商及其研制的 DBMS 产品很多。
数据库原理教程习题答案(全)
数据库原理教程习题答案(全)0000000000第1章数据库系统概述习题参考答案税务局使用数据库存储纳税人（个人或公司）信息、纳税人缴纳税款信息等。
典型的数据处理包括纳税、退税处理、统计各类纳税人纳税情况等。
银行使用数据库存储客户基本信息、客户存贷款信息等。
典型的数据处理包括处理客户存取款等。
超市使用数据库存储商品的基本信息、会员客户基本信息、客户每次购物的详细清单。
典型的数据处理包括收银台记录客户每次购物的清单并计算应交货款。
1.2 DBMS是数据库管理系统的简称，是一种重要的程序设计系统。
它由一个相互关联的数据集合和一组访问这些数据的程序组成。
数据库是持久储存在计算机中、有组织的、可共享的大量数据的集合。
数据库中的数据按一定的数据模型组织、描述和存储，可以被各种用户共享，具有较小的冗余度、较高的数据独立性，并且易于扩展。
数据库系统由数据库、DBMS（及其开发工具）、应用系统和数据库管理员组成。
数据模型是一种形式机制，用于数据建模，描述数据、数据之间的联系、数据的语义、数据上的操作和数据的完整性约束条件。
数据库模式是数据库中使用数据模型对数据建模所产生设计结果。
对于关系数据库而言，数据库模式由一组关系模式构成。
数据字典是DBMS维护的一系列内部表，用来存放元数据。
所谓元数据是关于数据的数据。
1.3 DBMS提供如下功能：（1）数据定义：提供数据定义语言DDL，用于定义数据库中的数据对象和它们的结构。
（2）数据操纵：提供数据操纵语言DML，用于操纵数据，实现对数据库的基本操作（查询、插入、删除和修改）。
（3）事务管理和运行管理：统一管理数据、控制对数据的并发访问，保证数据的安全性、完整性，确保故障时数据库中数据不被破坏，并且能够恢复到一致状态。
（4）数据存储和查询处理：确定数据的物理组织和存取方式，提供数据的持久存储和有效访问；确定查询处理方法，优化查询处理过程。
（5）数据库的建立和维护：提供实用程序，完成数据库数据批量装载、数据库转储、介质故障恢复、数据库的重组和性能监测等。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
第2章数据模型与数据库结构习题答案
1.解释数据模型的概念，为什么要将数据模型分成两个层次？
数据模型（Data Model）是对现实世界数据特征的抽象。
根据模型应用的不同目的，分为两大类。
2.概念层数据模型和组织层数据模型分别是面对什么的数据模型？
概念层数据模型面对现实世界，组织层数据模型面对信息世界。
3.实体之间的联系有哪几种，请为每一种联系举出一个例子。
一对一联系（1：1），例：部门和经理
一对多联系（1：m），例：公司和员工
多对多联系（m：m），例：学生和课程
4.说明实体-联系模型中的实体、属性和联系的概念。
实体是具有公共性质并可相互区分的现实世界对象的集合。
属性是描述实体或联系的性质或特征的数据项。
联系是数据间的关联关系，是客观存在的应用语义链。
5.指明下列实体间联系的种类：
教研室和教师（假设一个教师只属于一个教研室，一个教研室可有多名教师）1：m
商店和顾客m：m 国家和首都1：1
飞机（座位）和乘客1：m
6.数据库包含哪三级模式，试分别说明每一级模式的作用。
内模式描述数据的存储结构。
外模式对现实系统中用户感兴趣的整体数据的局部描述，以满足数据库不同用户对数据的需求。
模式描述数据库中全体数据的逻辑结构和特征，是所有用户的公共数据视图。
7.数据库管理系统提供的两级映像的作用是什么，它带来了哪些功能？
作用：在数据库内部实现对数据库三级模式的联系和转换。
功能：保证了数据库中的数据能够具有较高的逻辑独立性和物理独立性，使数据库应用程序不随数据库数据的逻辑或存储结构的变动而变动。
8.数据库三级模式划分的优点是什么，它能带来哪些数据独立性？
数据库三级模式是对数据的三个抽象级别，它把数据的具体组织留给DBMS管理，使用户能逻辑、抽象地处理数据，而不必关心数据在计算机中的具体表示方式与存储方式。
外模式/模式映像保证了程序与数据的逻辑独立性，模式/内模式映像保证了数据与程序的物理独立性。
*以上内容仅供参考。