death penalty
赞成死刑的正方一辩陈词

正方一辩稿:自意大利著名刑法学家贝卡利亚(Beccaria)提出死刑废除论以来,死刑的存废问题一直被广泛讨论,至今仍无定论。
在此问题上,我方观点是The death penalty is acceptable in some cases.死刑是什么?死刑即生命刑,指行刑者基于法律所赋予的权力,结束一个犯了严重罪行的犯人的生命。
我们认为严重罪行是指那些给社会公众的安全带来了严重危害的行为。
包括杀人、间接造成大量人员伤亡的严重经济犯罪等等。
我们将从社会公平与正义、人们对于死刑的看法等角度来阐述。
首先,我方认为严重罪行情境下,对犯罪人员采用死刑是正义、公平的最高体现,那些用残忍手段给他人带来严重伤害的人理应受到相称的处罚,尤其是剥夺无辜者生命的人。
另一方面,中国近十年来对死刑存废问题的调查显示,50%以上的人都反对废除死刑,在2010年的调查中,高达92%的人反对废除死刑。
因此,我方认为为了维持社会秩序的稳定,死刑在特定情景下是可接受的,而在中国,保留死刑也是大多数民众所持的观点。
Since Beccaria ,a famous jurist from Italy put forward the abolition of death penalty theory, whether to abolish the death penalty has been widely discussed. Our view isthat the death penalty is acceptable in some cases. What is death penalty? Death penalty refers to a executioner who has the authorities granted by law, can end a criminal`s life . And the criminal must have committed serious crimes such as murderand severe economic crimes. Their acts have serious damage to the public security.We will prove our view from two dimensions: social justice and public opinion poll.On the one hand, in our opinion, the death penalty is the highest embodiment of justice and fairness. Those who bring serious harm to other people by cruel means should deserve commensurate punishment, especially who deprive the innocent life.On the other hand, the public opinion surveys about whether to abolish the death penalty in nearly decade in China show that more than 50% people are opposed to the abolition of the death penalty.in the survey of 2010,92% of people opposed the abolition of the death penalty.Therefore, in order to maintain the stability of social order, we support that the death penalty is acceptable in some cases. It is also the view of most people in China.。
英语演讲-死刑因不应该废除

2)、Determined by the development of the death penalty culture of China.
❖ A long history of the death penalty
❖ The dynastic rules, the Republic era and the PRC era
1、The reasons for the death penalty to be exisopment ❖ Human rights ❖ National and social security ❖ Necessary and reasonable
❖ Justify capital punishment on the grounds of retribution, deterrence
❖ “a life for a life” “killing one to warn a hundred” “killing a chicken to warn a monkey”
❖ Christianity Seeing punishment as a form of revenge and as contrary to Christ’s message of forgiveness.
4)、The death penalty has the greatest deterrence.
1)、The abolition of the death penalty is not adapt to the national conditions of China.
❖ Low level of civilization
是否同意废除死刑英语作文

是否同意废除死刑英语作文I believe that it is time to abolish the death penalty as a form of punishment. 我认为是时候废除死刑作为一种惩罚方式了。
The death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment that has no place in a civilized society. 死刑是一种残忍和不人道的惩罚,它在一个文明社会中是没有位置的。
Not only is the death penalty irreversible, but it also fails to act as a deterrent to crime. 死刑不仅是不可逆转的,而且它也不能作为对犯罪的威慑。
Countless studies have shown that the death penalty does not reduce crime rates, and in some cases, it may even lead to an increase in violent crime. 无数研究表明,死刑不会减少犯罪率,在一些情况下,它甚至可能导致暴力犯罪的增加。
Furthermore, the application of the death penalty is often biased and discriminatory, with marginalized and vulnerable populations beingdisproportionately affected. 此外,死刑的执行往往带有偏见和歧视,边缘化和弱势人群受到的影响十分不成比例。
As human beings, we should strive for a justice system that is fair, humane, and effective in deterring crime. 作为人类,我们应该追求一个公正、人道和有效的司法制度来阻吓犯罪。
死刑的目的英文作文

死刑的目的英文作文英文:The purpose of the death penalty has been a topic of debate for many years. Some argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, while others believe it is a form of justice for heinous crimes. In my opinion, the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the crime committed is so heinous that it warrants the ultimate punishment.One argument for the death penalty is that it serves as a deterrent to crime. The idea is that if people know that they will face the death penalty for committing a certain crime, they will be less likely to commit it. However, studies have shown that the death penalty does not actually deter crime. In fact, states that have abolished the death penalty have seen a decrease in violent crime rates.Another argument for the death penalty is that it is aform of justice for the victim and their family. In cases where the crime is particularly brutal, some argue that the perpetrator deserves to be punished with the ultimate penalty. However, the death penalty does not always bring closure to the victim's family. In some cases, it can prolong the pain and suffering by extending the legal process and appeals.Ultimately, the use of the death penalty should be carefully considered and reserved for the most extreme cases. It should not be used as a political tool or to make a statement. The decision to take someone's life should never be taken lightly.中文:死刑的目的一直是一个争议的话题。
死刑的利弊英文作文

死刑的利弊英文作文英文:Death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a highly controversial topic. Some people argue that itserves as a deterrent to crime and is necessary for justice to be served, while others believe that it is inhumane and violates human rights. In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished.Firstly, the death penalty is not a deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the threat of death does notprevent people from committing crimes. Instead, it is more effective to focus on addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of education.Secondly, the death penalty is irreversible and thereis always a risk of executing an innocent person. In the United States alone, there have been over 160 exonerationsof people who were wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.This is a grave injustice and cannot be undone.Furthermore, the death penalty is often applied unfairly. It is disproportionately used against people of color and those who cannot afford a good defense. This is a clear violation of human rights and goes against the principles of justice.In conclusion, the death penalty is a flawed and ineffective system that should be abolished. Instead, we should focus on addressing the root causes of crime and finding more humane and just ways to punish offenders.中文:死刑,也被称为死刑,是一个极具争议的话题。
Are you for or against death penalty(反对或赞成死刑?)

Are you for or against death penalty The death penalty is to break someone’s life in a “cruel and unusual” way as a legall sanctioned punishment. The purpose of our entire criminal justice system is to protect the rights of life, liberty, and property for all its citizens. To do this, the punishment for crime must be harsh enough to deter potential criminals. Death penalty is the most effective way.In my opinion,the death penalty should not exist in the world.There are many reasons why the death penalty is not the best punishment and it should be abolished.I am against death penalty,for the following reasons:First,the most important reason is that we all should defence the humen rights. The death penalty is the ultimate, irreversible denial of human rights . Is it correct to decide who should live and who should die? Does our society have the right to break someone’s life?I think everyone has the right to live and anyone should not deprive it. The right to get a life is the most fundamental and sacred right of a person.Second,although the death penalty is effective enough to deter criminals and have many benefits in some aspects, the death penalty is probably not the best way to stop the crimes.I think that education is the the most effective solution to crime. If the world is full of love and tolerance, there will not be criminals.Third, the death penalty can not save the lives of the victims ,it also can not alleviate the suffering of relatives of the victims.So we can draw only one conclusion that the death penalty should be abolished.The death penalty should not exist in a civilized society.If we can protect the rights of life and the safety of people,why we need such an inhuman punishment?why we have to use the death penalty?So I think death penalty should be abolished.。
死刑的利弊英文作文
死刑的利弊英文作文英文:Death penalty is a highly controversial issue that has been debated for many years. Some people believe that it is a necessary form of punishment for heinous crimes, while others argue that it is cruel and inhumane. In my opinion, the death penalty has both advantages and disadvantages.One of the main advantages of the death penalty is that it serves as a deterrent to crime. The fear of death can prevent people from committing serious crimes, such as murder and terrorism. Additionally, the death penalty can provide closure for victims' families and friends, who may feel that justice has been served.However, there are also several disadvantages to the death penalty. Firstly, there is always the risk of executing an innocent person. This is a grave injusticethat cannot be undone. Secondly, the death penalty is oftenapplied unfairly, with poor and marginalized individuals being more likely to receive the death penalty than wealthy and powerful individuals. Finally, the death penalty is an expensive form of punishment, as it requires extensivelegal procedures and appeals.In conclusion, while the death penalty may have some benefits, such as serving as a deterrent to crime, it also has several significant drawbacks. It is important for society to carefully consider the pros and cons of the death penalty before deciding whether or not to implement it.中文:死刑是一个备受争议的问题,已经被辩论了很多年。
【英文辩论】死刑应不应该被废除 Should death penalty be abolished or not?
Should death penalty be abolished or not?I think it should not be accepted because there might be people who go to jail to pay for the crimes other committed and it would be very unfair to kill someone who are innocent. I think that people who are very bad and who have such deep mental problems and kill people like Murderers should stay in Jail forever!In my opinion, it shouldn't be abolished. Those who make mistakes or 'blunders' must get paid so that our society has a good-conditioned order, just the same as the way we keep prisoners in prison from freedom. If there is any problem about it, it's the law's fault, but not the penalty itself.I believe in the death penalty. Like the saying goes, Eye for an eye. If someone intentionally does bodily harm to kill someone. Then they are giving up their right to live themselves. Why put them in jail for life and us tax payers fit the bill.I believe the death penalty should be abolished. In the Ten Commandments, it states, "Thou shall not kill". However, the government says it is all right to kill a murderer. "Do as I say not as I do"? There is no proof that the death penalty deters crime. Also, innocent people are sentenced to the death penalty and executed. I agree about the financial burdens. It has been proven that it is cheaper to sentence a criminal to life in prison than to the death penalty.I think the Death Penalty should still stand. Why keep a murderer alive after taking an innocent life? The appeals are there for the wrongfully convicted, but if they're caught at the scene, or have items leading to the murder, they should be sentenced to death, not life in prison. The longer we keep them alive, the higher our taxes become. When they appeal, the money should be out of their OWN pockets. Why should a murderer deserve to breathe the air that we do after committing such a heinous crime? WE pay to keep them alive. Why should we pay to keep them that way?In r eal life , ther e are still very serious crimes of endangering national security , endan ger public safety, civil rights violations , undermine social order . The existence of the death penalty system is conducive(有益于)to crack down(镇压)and punish these crimes , thus strongly on major interests of the state and the people be pr otected .The existence of the death penalty system is also conducive to achieving the purpose of punishment . For those who commit the most heinous criminals of various types , and only apply the death penalty ( including the reprieve ) , so that he can not or dare no t crime , special precautions so as to achieve the purpose of punishment .Does urbanization do more good than bad?。
法律英语基础句子:Death penalty 死刑
法律英语基础句子:Death penalty 死刑Death penalty 死刑1.A sentencing judge is required to consider anymitigating circumstances before imposing the death penalty.在处死刑之前,要求量刑法官必须考虑是否有任何减轻罪行之情节。
2.Capital punishment for murder is based on the idea:that if a person kills someone, he must pay with his own life.针对谋杀的死刑判决是基于这样一个理念,如果一个杀死了某人,他必须用自已的生命作为补偿。
3.Death penalty is usually imposed because of some typeof gross misconduct.死刑经常只对某类别的严重犯罪惩处。
4.He was executed by firing squad.他被行刑队处决。
5.He was guilty of a capital crime.他犯了死刑。
6.He was sentenced to death but was reprieved by the president.他被判处死刑但被总统下令缓期执行。
7.The death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment.死刑减成终身监禁。
8.The prisoners were condemned to death.囚犯们被判死刑。
9.The punishment for treason is death.对叛国罪的处罚是处死。
10.They argued about whether the statute mandating the death penalty is unconstitutional.他们就规定死刑的法规是否违宪实行争论。
雅思英语作文 没有死刑,暴力犯罪会增加吗?death penalty
Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.Model Answer 1:(Agreement: Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.)Before talking about the essential role of the death penalty, you have to think about themeaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment. If you consider that the purpose is to prevent the guilty from being nasty again, you can be seduced by an argumentation in favour of the suppression of capital punishment. But you have to think about another aspect of the problem: a punishment is also useful to impress people, to make them fear the law.In fact, let's take the example of a young misfit, which has grown in a violent atmosphere, influenced by older delinquents, etc. He lives in the streets; he's got no aim but to survive. This is the kind of person who could possibly killsomeone for money, or even for fun. Why would he fear prison? Life would be easier for him there. In addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from penalty reductions. This young misfit needs to be impressed; he needs to know that the law is a frontier. When you cross it, you can lose your life. That is why capital punishment helps keep a distance between robbery and murder. If you abolish it, you suppress the difference between these two types of crime, which are completely different.But there is also a limit to define: even if the death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to inadequate cases. If there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to apply the death penalty. That is why the lawmakers have to establish precisely the context in which capital punishment car being pronounced. That is the price to pay to limit violence without using excessive violence.Sometimes the law and order of a country become so fragile and out of control that the Government and law enforcing agencies mustshow the mass people that a criminal is punished severely and other should not dare to do the same crime. In these cases, many criminals are hung till death or even send to the electronic chairs and there really left no alternative rather than that.Again there come situations even in a very peaceful society that all the people show contempt to the criminal and expect some exemplary punishment. For example, all the people expect a terrible penalty for a serial killer or a lunatic rapist. Most of these killers and criminals are severely damaged psychologicallyand the possibility of their being normal again is almost zero. This kind of person who has taken other people's lives and dignity should be punished with the highest penalty like death to make the society a better place to live in.Finally, those who betray with the country and compromise with the enemy with the freedom of the motherland should be hung till death in another word should be given capital punishment because of their heinous act. But we must consider that we cannot create a living being and we never have the right to take the lives of a living being. So if we punish even asingle innocent soul with the punishment he/she does not deserve then the whole system will be corrupted. If an innocent citizen is imprisoned and proved not guilty at a later time we can at least take him/her out from the prison but what if we've already killed him/her? There would be no way to remorse and the whole law will be condemned.Moreover, if there are chances that a criminal will remorse for what he/she has done and will lead a normal and peaceful life, then he/she should be given a chance. I believe that some criminals are simply dangerous for the societyand will always be no matter how much opportunities and support they are given, and they should be given the death penalty. But if there is the slightest chance that the criminal was a victim of the situation and tried to save his/herself or any logic in favour of the crime, should be given chance at least once. And the capital punishment should be used only in some extreme cases rather than using it as the law prevailing policy.Answer 2:(Agreement: Capital punishment is required in many cases to control violence in society.)Many people believe that death penalties are necessary to keep law and order under control in our society. While there are some drawbacks of capital punishment, I agree with the view that without capital punishment we will become more vulnerable to violence.The death penalty could be an uncivilised law in some cases. We have no rights to kill another human. It can be a violation of human rights to kill someone by poisonous injections, hanging or by electrocution. Besides, some innocent people could be convicted and executed for the crimes they never did. For example, sometimes the lawand administration are not efficient, and the police might capture the innocent citizens by mistake during an investigation process. Therefore, the death penalty is argued to be a barbaric and savage approach.However, I believe that many times it becomes essential to enforce capital punishment in the society. Firstly, it is an effective deterrent to major crimes. If there are stricter punishments, people will be afraid of committing offences. For example, Pakistan has controlled the rate of terrorism in the country by enforcing death penalties for the members of terroristorganisations. Secondly, the government spends an ample sum of the national budget on the maintenance of prisoners with lifetime sentences. So, by capital punishment the administration can get rid of criminals who are involved in major crimes, such as murders, terrorists, drug smuggling, rape, and consequently, can avoid the amount spends on imprisonment.In conclusion, although capital punishment could be seen as an aggressive rule in some cases, I believe that it is an extremely importantlaw that can control many violent crimes of society.。