Optical gratings induced by field-free alignment of molecules

合集下载

光纤光学英文文献3

光纤光学英文文献3

All-optical dynamic grating generation based on Brillouin scattering in polarization-maintainingfiberKwang Yong Song,1,*Weiwen Zou,2Zuyuan He,2and Kazuo Hotate21Department of Physics,Chung-Ang University,Seoul,Korea2Department of Electronic Engineering,The University of Tokyo,Tokyo,Japan*Corresponding author:songky@cau.ac.krReceived January30,2008;revised March20,2008;accepted March20,2008;posted March25,2008(Doc.ID92171);published April22,2008We report a novel kind of all-optical dynamic grating based on Brillouin scattering in a polarization main-tainingfiber(PMF).A moving acoustic grating is generated by stimulated Brillouin scattering between writ-ing beams in one polarization and used to reflect an orthogonally polarized reading beam at different wave-lengths.The center wavelength of the grating is controllable by detuning the writing beams,and the3dBbandwidth ofϳ80MHz is observed with the tunable reflectance of up to4%in a30m PMF.©2008OpticalSociety of AmericaOCIS codes:050.2770,060.2310,190.4370,290.5900.A high-speed and reconfigurable dynamic grating canbe used as a powerful tool in communication or sen-sor applications as a tunable opticalfilter,an opticalswitch,and a distributed sensor[1–4].The currentlyavailable scheme is to build up a gain or absorptiongrating in an Er-dopedfiber(EDF)by counterpropa-gating optical waves with the same optical frequency.However,such an EDF-based dynamic grating suf-fers a couple of significant problems,such as diffi-culty in separating the writing and reading beams[1,2]or an amplified spontaneous emission(ASE)noise due to optical pumping[3,4],which can givedisadvantages in practical applications.In this Letter,we demonstrate a novel kind of dy-namic grating based on stimulated Brillouin scatter-ing(SBS)in a polarization-maintainingfiber(PMF).An acoustic phonon generated by SBS between twocounterpropagating writing beams of one polariza-tion is used as a tunable and dynamic grating for theorthogonally polarized reading beam at differentwavelengths satisfying the phase-matching condi-tion.The reflected probe wave experiences an ordi-nary Brillouin shift by the Doppler effect,and the op-tical frequency difference between the writing andthe reading beams is determined by the birefringenceof the PMF.The basic theory,the operation principle,and the experimental configuration are described,and the results are explained using a simplifiedtheory of Brillouin scattering.SBS is generally modeled as a three-wave interac-tion between the pump͑␯1͒,Stokes͑␯2͒,and acousticwaves.When a phase-matching condition is satisfied(␯1−␯2=␯B,␯B being the Brillouin frequency),strongenergy transfer from the pump to the counterpropa-gating Stokes wave takes place generating acousticwaves,which stimulates the process.The␯B is givenby following equation[5]:␯B=2nV a␭,͑1͒where n,V a,and␭are the refractive index,the veloc-ity of the acoustic wave,and the optical wavelength,respectively.In a PMF(or any medium with birefrin-gence),optical waves with two principal polarizations(i.e.,x and y polarization)experience different␯B’sowing to their different refractive indexes.Consider-ing that the acoustic wave generated by SBS is a lon-gitudinal one that is free of the transversal polariza-tion[6],an interesting condition can be reached thatthe x-and the y-polarized optical waves in a PMFshow the same␯B at different wavelengths.When thedispersion of the acoustic wave is ignored,the condi-tion is expressed by following equations:2n x V a␭x=2n y V a␭y,͑2͒n x␯x=n y␯y,͑3͒where n x,y and␯x,y(if n xϾn y,␯yϾ␯x)are the refrac-tive indexes and the optical frequencies in x and y po-larizations,respectively.With⌬n=͑n x−n y͒ 1and⌬␯=␯y−␯x ␯(␯x or␯y),Eq.(3)is simplified to⌬␯=⌬nn␯.͑4͒Since the SBS-induced acoustic waves can beviewed as moving gratings for the reflection of thepump wave without polarization dependence,it is ex-pected that acoustic waves generated by SBS be-tween the x-polarized pump and Stokes waves at theoptical frequency␯x will show strong reflectance tothe y-polarized pump wave at the frequency of␯x+⌬␯.Considering that the intensity and the wave-length of the acoustic waves are easily tuned by con-trolling the x-polarized“writing”beams,one may ex-pect the SBS in a PMF to play a role of a tunabledynamic grating.We composed an experimental setup,as shown inFig.1.For the writing of the dynamic grating,a926OPTICS LETTERS/Vol.33,No.9/May1,20080146-9592/08/090926-3/$15.00©2008Optical Society of America1550nm laser diode was used as a light source,and the output power was divided by a 50/50coupler.A single-sideband modulator (SSBM)and a microwave synthesizer were used to generate the Stokes wave (pump2)of the writing beams,and the output was amplified and polarized by an EDF amplifier (EDFA)and an x polarizer.The Brillouin pump wave (pump1)of the writing beams was prepared by amplifying the original wave with the same polarization as that of pump2.Pump1and the pump2were launched into a PMF in opposite direction to each other through po-larization beam combiners (PBC1,PBC2).The PMF was a PANDA fiber manufactured by Fujikura with a 30m length and a nominal ⌬n ϳ6.2ϫ10−4at the wavelength of 1300nm.For a reading beam (probe),a tunable laser with an operating wavelength near 1550nm was used as a light source after being polar-ized in the y axis.The output was launched into the PMF in the direction of the pump1through a polarization-maintaining circulator and PBC1.The transmitted power of the probe was measured using a power meter,and the backreflected spectrum was monitored using an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA)through a y polarizer.At first,we measured the Brillouin gain spectra of the PMF in the x and y axes.The ␯B in the x axis was measured to be 10.502GHz,and the difference of the ␯B ’s of two polarizations was ϳ3.6MHz,as depicted in the inset of Fig.1,which corresponds to ⌬n ϳ5.0ϫ10−4by Eq.(1).To induce the SBS in the x axis,we launched pump1and the pump2in the x axis with the output powers of 630and 10mW,respectively,setting their frequency offset ͑⌬f ͒to 10.502GHz.For the detection of the dynamic grating,the fre-quency of the probe was tuned at the higher fre-quency region while monitoring the spectrum with the OSA,and the result is shown in Fig.2.When ⌬␯(the frequency difference between pump1and the probe)was ϳ72.6GHz,a large reflection of the probe was observed (black curve)as a result of the dynamic grating at the frequency detuned from the probe by the same amount as that between pump1and pump2.When one of the pumps (pump1)was turned off,the dynamic grating disappeared as depicted by the gray curve although the probe was still propa-gated as confirmed by the Rayleigh scattering seen at the probe frequency.In both cases,the x -polarizedpumps were observed in spite of the use of the y po-larizer in front of the OSA,which originated from the finite extinction ratio ͑ϳ20dB ͒of the polarizing com-ponents.The small peaks near pump1correspond to the first-and second-order anti-Stokes waves that were suppressed in the SSBM used for the genera-tion of pump2.Figure 3(a)shows the reflectance of the dynamic grating with respect to ⌬␯,calculated from the ratio of the input and the reflected powers of the probe,while the pump powers were maintained to the same as the first measurement.The maximum reflectance was ϳ4%,and the 3dB width was ϳ80MHz.The overall shape looks asymmetric,which could be at-tributed to the irregularity of the local birefringence in the PMF.We fixed ⌬␯to 72.6GHz and swept ⌬f ,the fre-quency offset between pump1and pump2.The result is depicted in Fig.3(b),which fits well with a Lorent-zian curve with a 3dB width of 28MHz,similar to the ordinary Brillouin gain spectrum of the fiber.The dependence of the grating reflectance on the pump powers was measured by varying one of the pump powers with the other fixed,while ⌬␯was kept at 72.6GHz.Figures 4(a)and 4(b)show the reflec-tance of the grating as a function of the power of pump1and pump2,respectively.It is remarkable that the reflectance grows in an exponential form to some definite value with the power of pump1asFig. 1.Experimental setup:LD,laser diode;SSBM,single-sideband modulator;EDFA,Er-doped fiber ampli-fier;PBC,polarization beam combiner;OSA,optical spec-trum analyzer.The inset is the Brillouin gain spectra of the fiber under test in x and ypolarizations.Fig.2.Optical spectra monitored by an OSA in the gen-eration of dynamic grating.The gray curve corresponds to the case that one (pump1)of the writing beams is turned off,and the black curve with both writing beams turnedon.Fig.3.(Color online)(a)Reflectance of the dynamic grat-ing as a function of ⌬␯,the frequency difference between the pump1and the probe.(b)Reflectance of the dynamic grating at a fixed ⌬␯͑72.6GHz ͒as a function of the ⌬f ,the frequency offset between pump1and pump2.The curve shows the result of a Lorentzian fit.May 1,2008/Vol.33,No.9/OPTICS LETTERS 927shown in Fig.4(a),while it is linearly dependent on the power of pump2as depicted in Fig.4(b),where the result matches well with a linear fit with the slope of 3.8ϫ10−4͑/mW ͒.The slight inconsistency in the reflectance values of Figs.4(a)and 4(b)came from long-term drift of the optical frequencies of the pump and the probe lasers,whose effect was negli-gible in each measurement.The difference in dependence of the grating reflec-tance on the pump powers can be explained by the re-lation of the Brillouin gain and the reflectance.In the generation of the dynamic grating,the increased power of pump2through the gain of the SBS can be viewed as the reflection of pump1.Additionally,we may assume that pump1and the probe experience al-most the same reflectance,since they share the same acoustic grating.Therefore,if the pump depletion is ignored (i.e.,small reflection of pump1),the reflec-tance of the dynamic grating R can be estimated from the gain of the SBS [5]as follows:R =P probe out P probein Ϸ⌬P 2P 1=P 2͑e ͑g B P 1L eff /A eff ͒−1͒P 1,͑5͒where g B ,L eff ,A eff ,P 1,and P 2are the Brillouin gain coefficient,the effective length of the fiber,the mode effective area,the power of pump1,and the power of pump2,respectively.In Eq.(5),one can see that the reflectance of the grating linearly depends on P 2,and the reflectance will grow in an exponential form ac-cording to P 1if the gain is large enough.The final point in Fig.4(a)with pump1of 800mW looks devi-ated from the form of the exponential growth,which could be attributed to the gain saturation with the pump depletion due to too large amplification of pump2.The reflectance offset appearing in the lin-early fitted graph of Fig.4(b)can be attributed to the amplification of the SBS noise induced by the strong pump1.We think detailed properties of the grating can be explained by coupled wave equations (by five-wave mixing instead of the three-wave one in the ordinary case of the SBS),and there could be more factors that have an effect on the grating reflectance such as the probe power.Further research is needed on this point.The relation between the optical frequencies of pump1and the probe under the condition of the dy-namic grating generation is depicted in Fig.5,which shows good linearity as expected from Eq.(3).In the measurement,the powers of the pumps and the probe were kept constant,and the variation of ␯B was negligible ͑Ͻ1MHz ͒.In conclusion,we have demonstrated a novel all-optical dynamic grating based on stimulated Bril-louin scattering in a polarization-maintaining fiber.The center frequency of the grating was ϳ72.6GHz detuned from the writing beam frequency,and the re-flectance as well as the peak frequency could be tuned by controlling the power and the frequency of the writing beam.Considering the high sensitivity of the dynamic grating to local birefringence [see Eq.(4)]as well as the high on–off extinction ratio ͑Ͼ60dB ͒,the spectral flexibility [7],and the short re-sponse time ͑ϳ10ns ͒[5]of the SBS,we believe the SBS-based dynamic grating has large potential for practical applications such as an all-optical switch and a highly sensitive fiber sensor.The authors are grateful to Luc Thévenaz from EPFL in Lausanne,Switzerland,for his contribution to the development of the idea.This work was sup-ported by the “Grant-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research”and the “Global Center of Excellence Pro-gram”from the Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and Technology,Japan.K.Y.Song was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOE-HRD)(KRF-2007-331-C00116).References1.S.J.Frisken,Opt.Lett.17,1776(1992).2.B.Fischer,J.L.Zyskind,J.W.Sulhoff,and D.J.DiGiovanni,Opt.Lett.18,2108(1993).3.X.Fan,Z.He,Y.Mizuno,and K.Hotate,Opt.Express 13,5756(2005).4.X.Fan,Z.He,and K.Hotate,Opt.Express 14,556(2006).5.G.P .Agrawal,Nonlinear Fiber Optics ,2nd ed.(Academic,1995).6.W.Zou,Z.He,and K.Hotate,IEEE Photon.Technol.Lett.18,2487(2006).7.M.González Herráez,K.Y.Song,and L.Thávenaz,Opt.Express 14,1395(2006).Fig.5.(Color online)Optical frequency of the probe as a function of the frequency of pump1under the condition of the dynamic grating generation.The line is the result of a linearfit.Fig.4.(Color online)Reflectance of the dynamic grating as a function of pump power in the case of (a)pump1varied and pump2fixed to 10mW,and (b)pump2varied and pump1fixed to 200mW.The line is the result of a linear fit.928OPTICS LETTERS /Vol.33,No.9/May 1,2008。

分布式布拉格反射镜结构

分布式布拉格反射镜结构

分布式布拉格反射镜结构简介分布式布拉格反射镜结构(Distributed Bragg Reflector, DBR)是一种用于光学器件中的重要结构。

它由多个周期性层组成,具有优异的光学性能,广泛应用于激光器、光纤通信和光电子器件等领域。

本文将详细介绍分布式布拉格反射镜结构的原理、制备方法和应用。

原理分布式布拉格反射镜结构借助布拉格散射原理实现高反射率和波长选择性。

布拉格散射是当电磁波(光波)与周期性介质相互作用时,由于介质的周期性结构会对电磁波产生散射,从而形成反射现象。

该现象是由于波长等于介质周期的倍数时,散射波的相位受到干涉增强而形成明显的峰值。

基于这个原理,分布式布拉格反射镜结构通过设计周期性层和层间折射率来实现特定波长的反射。

制备方法光子晶体法光子晶体法是一种制备分布式布拉格反射镜结构的常见方法。

该方法利用介电材料或金属导体的周期性结构,通过光子晶体的光学带隙原理实现波长的选择性反射。

制备过程包括以下步骤:1.设计布拉格反射光子晶体的周期性层和层间折射率。

2.选择适当的材料,并通过溶液法、电镀法或物理气相沉积法(PECVD)等制备周期性层。

3.利用自组装技术或纳米制备技术,在基底上形成周期性结构。

4.通过检测反射光谱,对制备的分布式布拉格反射镜结构进行表征和优化。

分子束外延法分子束外延法是另一种常用的制备分布式布拉格反射镜结构的方法。

该方法通过分子束外延技术在单晶基底上逐层生长材料,制备周期性层。

制备过程包括以下步骤:1.准备适当的基底和衬底。

2.设置分子束外延设备,并控制扩散源的温度和功率。

3.通过打开和关闭单层或多层源,逐层生长材料,形成周期性结构。

4.利用光谱仪等工具对制备的样品进行表征和优化。

应用分布式布拉格反射镜结构在光学器件中有着广泛的应用。

激光器分布式布拉格反射镜结构在激光器中作为输出镜,能够实现高反射率和波长选择性。

通过调整周期性层的厚度和折射率,可以实现对特定波长的高度选择性反射,从而提高激光器的效率和性能。

透射光栅和反射光栅对比-英文

透射光栅和反射光栅对比-英文

Comparison of a transmission grating spectrometer to a reflective grating spectrometer for standoff laser-induced breakdown spectroscopymeasurementsArel Weisberg,1,*Joseph Craparo,1Robert De Saro,1and Romuald Pawluczyk2 1Energy Research Company,2571-A Arthur Kill Road,Staten Island,New York10309,USA 2P&P Optica,330Gage Avenue,Suite11,Kitchener,Ontario N2M5C6,Canada*Corresponding author:aweisberg@er‑Received7October2009;revised3March2010;accepted12March2010;posted15March2010(Doc.ID118281);published30March2010We evaluate a new transmission grating spectrometer for standoff laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy(LIBS)measurements.LIBS spectra collected from standoff distances are often weak,with smaller peaksblending into the background and noise.Scattered light inside the spectrometer can also contribute topoor signal-to-background and signal-to-noise ratios for smaller emission peaks.Further,collectingstandoff spectra can be difficult because most spectrometers are designed for laboratory environmentsand not for measurements in the field.To address these issues,a custom-designed small,lightweighttransmission grating spectrometer with no moving parts was built that is well suited for standoff LIBSfield measurements.The performance of the spectrometer was quantified through10m standoff LIBSmeasurements collected from aluminum alloy samples and measurements from spectra of a Hg–Ar lamp.The measurements were compared to those collected using a Czerny–Turner reflective grating spec-trometer that covered a similar spectral range and used the same ICCD camera.Measurements usingthe transmission grating spectrometer had a363%improved signal-to-noise ratio when measuredusing the669nm aluminum emission peak.©2010Optical Society of AmericaOCIS codes:050.0050,120.6200,230.1950,280.3420,300.6365.1.IntroductionLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopy(LIBS)has a set of unique strengths that make it well suited for standoff measurement applications,where the sens-ing device is some distance removed from the target material.This is because LIBS measurements re-quire no sample preparation,and the laser pulses and plasma emissions are readily delivered and col-lected via telescopic optics.A number of standoff LIBS instruments have been built,as described in a recent review[1].Applications in the scientific literature for standoff LIBS include material inspection in the metals industries[2],measurements of radioactive materials in the nuclear power industry[3],detection of residues of explosive compounds[4],and cleaning of sculpture and other cultural objects[5].Many of the described applications would benefit from improved throughput and sensitivity of the in-strument.Improved throughput and sensitivity can result in detection of an increased number of ele-ments,lower limits of detection,greater standoff range,and improved precision.For example,in the area of explosive residue detection,the value of a standoff LIBS instrument is directly tied to the smal-lest trace residues it can detect at a given standoff distance,as this will afford the user the greatest mar-gin of safety in the field.Operating LIBS instruments in the field also pre-sents its own unique challenges.Many of the lasers,0003-6935/10/13C200-11$15.00/0spectrometers,optics,and optomechanical compo-nents used in laboratory LIBS instruments are ill suited to field operation due to several factors.First, environmental conditions of temperature,humidity, vibrations,and dust can swing to extremes in the field.Second,robustness is of primary importance because making adjustments and repairs to equip-ment in the field is impractical.Also,the instrument will likely need to be shipped to the location where it will operate,so it must be rugged enough to survive the trip intact.Third,packaging constraints,such as the size and weight of individual components,may dictate limitations on the instrument design.This would be especially true for a standoff LIBS instru-ment that must be transported manually for some distance.In particular,a great deal of potential exists for im-proving the spectrometer systems used in standoff LIBS instruments.This is because most of the spec-trometers described in the applications in[1]are simply laboratory models taken out to the field. Generally,these spectrometers do not adequately meet the operational challenges listed above,which limits the LIBS systems’overall usability and perfor-mance envelope.Furthermore,inherent limitations in optical de-signs of these spectrometers limit their performance. LIBS spectrometer systems are generally of either the Czerny–Turner or echelle configuration[6],as well as some reported Paschen–Runge designs[7].All these configurations generate diffraction patterns by re-flecting light off ruled or etched holographic gratings. These gratings have certain general characteristics that limit the overall system performance.First,their efficiency is usually a strong function of wavelength, diminishing with wavelengths departing from the blaze wavelength.This directly impacts the through-put of the spectrometer,reducing the overall sensitiv-ity and precision and raising the limits of detection for some elements.Second,light throughput generally varies inversely with resolution.Therefore,achieving high-resolution LIBS spectra generally involves the trade-off of diminished throughput.Third,because the reflecting gratings diffract light back along the op-tical path,the potential for stray light to reach the de-tector is increased.Higher levels of stray light reduce signal-to-background levels in LIBS spectra,which results in lower sensitivity and higher limits of detection.We describe here a new LIBS spectrometer that has significant performance advantages over typical spectrometers used for standoff LIBS,both in terms of analytical performance and performance in the field.This spectrometer is based on a transmission grating rather than the more typical reflective grat-ing.Further,rather than a ruled grating,the grating is a volume phase holographic design that further re-duces stray light because it has no ruled ing this type of grating allows for a spectrometer that achieves greater light throughput,higher resolution,package with no moving parts.While other compar-isons between spectrometers[8]and detectors[9–11] for LIBS applications have been reported,there have not been,to our knowledge,any studies on the merits of spectrometer designs based on different grating technologies while using the same detector with both spectrometer systems.This important equalizing factor allows for a more straightforward comparison between the systems.2.Volume Phase Holographic GratingsThe heart of the P&P Optica spectrometers is a vo-lume phase holographic(VPH)diffraction gel grating. Gel gratings work on a different principle from tradi-tional relief reflecting gratings.The manufacturing process of a gel grating begins when a layer of gel or polymer that is able to change refractive index un-der the influence of light is exposed to an optical beam whose intensity periodically changes.After proces-sing,the exposed layer is sandwiched between two transparent plates.The entire assembly then acts as a diffraction grating.For comparison,traditional gratings are usually produced as a result of a highly disruptive mechanical or chemical process,which produces periodic grooves with microscopic cracks on the surface.Efficiency of the grating depends on the profile of the grooves, while microcracks are responsible for severe light scattering.Transmission gel gratings do not have pro-blems with light scattering microcracks.Further-more,the diffracted light propagates at an angle in relation to the transmitted beam;hence,they can be used in optimal working conditions.The result is a more efficient use of available light and dramati-cally lowered scattered light levels.Figure1provides a comparison of efficiency values for a typicalspectral Fig.1.Absolute and average diffraction efficiency(AE)of P&P Optica’s600l=mm gel VPH grating at9°of incidence in compar-ison with holographic relief reflection grating(HRG)and diamond ruled reflective grating(RRG).The AE of the gel grating is mea-sured for a dispersive nonscanning configuration used in all P&P Optica Inc.spectrometers,while the efficiency of the other two gratings is measured under impractical Littrow conditions,as re-ported in the manufacturer’s catalog,corrected to representrange covering a full octave for VPH and ruled gratings.There is a great misunderstanding regarding the measurement of grating performance,including effi-ciency.First,the grating efficiencies of traditional re-flecting gratings provided in catalogs are measured in relation to the intensity of the beam reflected from a mirror coated with the same material used for coat-ing the grating(typically an aluminum layer with a reflectivity of about90%);hence,the absolute diffrac-tion efficiency is about8%–12%lower than that provided in catalogs.Second,for a given grating fre-quency,the efficiency depends on both the angle of incidence of the incoming beam and the groove pro-file of the grating.It is well known that the highest efficiency can be achieved for grating grooves is with a sawtooth profile with a90°angle at the top of the tooth.The efficiency of such gratings is optimized at a particular“blaze”wavelength when the incident beam intersects the grating at a particular“blaze an-gle”such that the diffracted beam propagates in a direction opposite to the incident beam.The efficien-cies at wavelengths other than the blaze wavelength are lower,but can be slightly increased by rotating the grating such that the diffracted beam is back in the direction of the incident beam[12–14].The reported efficiencies for reflective gratings are measured at this optimum incoming beam angle for each individual wavelength(i.e.,the grating is physically rotated between each measurement to op-timize performance).This is commonly referred to as the“Littrow”configuration.While this configuration is optimal from an efficiency point of view,it is im-practical because it can lead to interferences between the delivery and the collection optics.For this reason, typical reflective grating spectrometers(such as the Czerny–Turner system)normally use a single detec-tor and a rotating grating to register one spectral component under the best possible conditions for the chosen geometry.In most LIBS applications,it is impractical to scan every wavelength across a fixed detector.Instead,for a single LIBS measurement,the grating is held in a fixed position and the light is dispersed over an array of detectors(typically the pixels of an ICCD camera). In this case,the efficiency of a reflective grating sys-tem is significantly reduced at those wavelengths that are oriented away from their optimal angle with respect to the incoming light.In some cases,the aver-age absolute efficiency of gratings in spectrometers operating under real conditions can be as low as 10%–20%even though the reported efficiencies are high as measured in the Littrow configuration. Many of the deficiencies of reflective grating spec-trometers can be eliminated by replacing the reflec-tive grating with a transmission VPH diffraction grating and using lenses,rather than focusing mir-rors,to form both the incident and the diffracted beams.In contrast to reflective gratings,VPH grat-ings are most efficient when the diffracted beam pro-in line with,the nondiffracted part of the beam trans-mitted through the grating.This eliminates interfer-ence between the optical systems forming the incident and diffracted beams,allowing VPH grat-ings to be practically implemented in the orientation of maximum efficiency.An additional advantage is that there is less nondiffracted light,which normally contributes to the scattered light background.Appli-cation of lenses in place of mirrors,while potentially reducing the usable spectral range,allows for the construction of more compact spectrometers with better optical performance over larger detector areas,better f-numbers,and higher-quality imaging for longer slits.The increase in grating efficiency has a twofold ef-fect on the performance of a spectrometer system. First,a larger percentage of the incoming light reaches the detector,resulting in an increase in re-corded signal.Second,the number of photons enter-ing the system that do not directly impinge on the detector is reduced.This is important because these stray photons can reach the detector indirectly through multiple reflections resulting in scattered light noise.Typically,the ratio of signal to stray light is of the order of15times greater for a VPH grating than for a similar reflective grating,as shown in Fig.2. The result is a significant increase in photometric dy-namic range.3.ApparatusA.SpectrometersThe spectrometer system used to compare to the P&P Optica Inc.transmission grating spectrometer is an Acton300i Czerny–Turner system(Princeton Instru-ments,Trenton,New Jersey)with a150grooves=mm Fig.2.(Color online)Discharge from a He–Ne laser measured using Czerny–Turner and VPH spectrometers under identical con-ditions with dark signal subtracted.Background levels are propor-tional to stray light,seen here to be approximately150times lower for the VPH system.The graphs are not offset from their actualgrating blazed at 500nm and coupled to a Princeton Instruments PI-Max intensified CCD camera (1024×256pixel CCD array,25mm Gen II intensifier).The grating was mounted to a rotating turret that enables scanning across multiple wavelength ranges.The po-sition of the grating was fixed in this work such that the measured wavelength range was centered at 550nm.A photograph of the system is seen in Fig.3.This system is typical of many described in the LIBS literature,being a fairly compact and flexible design with a fiber optic cable attached to the input slit.The P&P Optica VPH transmission grating spec-trometer system coupled to the same PI-Max ICCD camera is shown in Fig.4.The compact form factor of the spectrometer is evident.A comparison of the spe-cifications of the two systems is seen in Table 1.The laser used for the LIBS experiments was a Quantel USA (Bozeman,Montana,formerly Big Sky Laser)CFR-400Nd:YAG Q -switched laser oper-ating at 1064nm.The laser outputs 330mJ =pulse in ∼7ns pulses,and it was operated in single-shot mode.The laser pulses were delivered to the aluminum alloy targets via a straightforward beam expansion and collimating optical arrangement followed by a Galilean telescope,with a ϕ25mm plano –concave lens and a ϕ50mm plano –convex lens,which,when combined,resulted in a 10m focal length for the telescope.The lenses were antireflection coated for 1064nm.The light from the LIBS plasma was collected with a ϕ200mm,f =4:9,f ¼1000mm,Newtonian tele-scope (SkyView Pro 8)from Orion Telescopes (Watsonville,California)that was modified by repla-cing the viewing eyepiece with a fiber optic cable SMA-905connector.A photograph of the modified telescope is seen in Fig.5,and a view down the barrel of the telescope toward the target samples placed 10m away is shown in Fig.6.A 2m long,600μm core,fiber optic cable was attached to the telescope.The mercury lamp used in some of the experiments was an Ocean Optics (Dunedin,Florida)CAL-2000mercury –argon wavelength calibration source with an SMA-905fiber optic cable connector.The input ends of the fiber optic cables attached to the spectro-meter systems are also fitted with SMA-905connectors.4.SamplesSix different Standard Reference Material (SRM)aluminum alloy samples were used as targets in this study.These SRMs were obtained from Brammer Standard (Houston,Texas).They are in theshapeFig.3.Acton Research 300i Czerny –Turner spectrometer system with PI-Max ICCD Camera and f -number matching fiber optic cable adapter attached.A 30cm ruler is also shown forscale.Fig. 4.P&P Optica transmission grating spectrometer and PI-Max ICCD camera.A 30cm ruler is also shown for scale.Table 1.Comparison of Specifications of Transmission Grating and Czerny –Turner Spectrometer Systems when Coupled to the PI-Max ICCDCamera Used in the ExperimentsP&P Optica Transmission GratingSpectrometerActon 300i Czerny –Turner Spectrometer Spectral range 366–796nm (Δλtotal ¼430nm)266–831nm (Δλtotal ¼565nm)f =#34Entrance slitNone —uses fiber optic bundle for 37μm ×6:6mm effective slit52μm ×1mmOptical fiber cross-section specifications68×50μm fibers arranged in a ϕ600μm circular bundle at the input end and in a vertical line at the spectrometer end 19×200μm fibers arranged in a ϕ1mm circular bundle at the input side and in a vertical line at the spectrometer end Optical fiber length1:5m 3:0m Fiber optic cable f -number matching moduleNoYesof approximately ϕ25–50mm disks.The concentra-tions of the elements examined in the tests reported below are given in Table 2.These alloys were selected to achieve a range of concentration values for each of these elements.5.Experimental Procedure A.Mercury Lamp TestsA mercury –argon line source,described in Section 3,was attached to each spectrometer via a simple col-limating and focusing optical design shown schema-tically in Fig.7.The positions of the fibers relative to the lenses were optimized for maximum throughput.The neutral density filter was needed to avoid satur-ating the ICCD detector.A procedure was also devel-oped that minimized the effects of attaching and removing the fiber optic cables from the optical assembly .Fifty mercury lamp spectra were collected with each spectrometer system using a temporal window of 5ms and an intensifier gain setting of zero.Dark spectra were also collected and automatically subtracted from the mercury lamp spectra by the software supplied by Princeton Instruments (Win-Spec).The resulting corrected spectra were averaged together.Repeatability was checked by collecting 25accu-mulations of 25spectra each,detaching the fibers from the optical assembly between each ing the 435and 579nm Hg emission lines,we measured a relative standard deviation (RSD)of 0.61%in the amplitudes of these lines in the set of spectral accumulations using the transmission grating spectrometer.B.Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy TestsThe SRM alloy samples were cleaned with acetone,followed by methyl alcohol,followed by isopropanol,prior to testing.The samples were then placed 10m from the telescope (Fig.6)and oriented vertically so that their surface was normal to the laser pulses.Fifty LIBS spectra were collected from each sam-ple by first applying 50laser shots (i.e.,“cleaning shots ”)to the same spot on the sample,followed by an analysis shot when the LIBS spectrum was re-corded.The sample was then rotated slightly for collecting the next spectrum from a new spot.The temporal settings for the ICCD camera relative to the laser shot were a delay of 3μs and a width of 1μs.The gain setting on the camera was 120(out of 255)for the transmission spectrometer and 160for the reflective grating spectrometer so that the peaks would be of roughly the same amplitude.The different gain setting amounts to an increase in absolute intensities (i.e.,counts)by a factor of 3.2and an increase in the RSD of the intensities by a factor of 1.3.These factors were taken into ac-count in the reported data.A PrincetonInstrumentsFig.5.Telescope used to collect the LIBS plasmalight.Fig.6.View from the Newtonian telescope used to collect the LIBS plasma light looking toward the target samples.Table 2.Concentrations of Elements in the Aluminum Alloy Standards Used in TestingStandard Cu (wt.%)Fe (wt.%)Mg (wt.%)Mn (wt.%)HG-40.0950.120.310.39HP-10.480.7220.11HP-2 1.50.5 1.250.25HP-33.520.220.790.42NCSHS53703-40.0330.350.040.055NCSHS53703-50.0791.310.1030.112programmable delay generator,Model ST133A,was used to control the laser –camera timing via the system ’s software package.Dark spectra were also collected with the same camera settings and automa-tically subtracted from the LIBS spectra.The fiber optic cable attached to the LIBS tele-scope (Fig.5)was connected to the fiber optic cables on the spectrometers via a simple SMA-905mating sleeve.This sleeve positions the ends of the two fiber optic cables up against each other to maximize the transmission of light from one fiber to the other.C.Data ComparisonThe procedure for the comparison between the two spectrometer systems was designed to compensate for the different system specifications that are unre-lated to the fundamental strengths and weaknesses of each system.The foremost example of this was the use of the same intensified CCD camera with both spectrometer systems.We also compensated for the difference in wavelength range between the grat-ings (Table 1).This is obviously a function of the par-ticular gratings and is unrelated to any benefits or drawbacks of the respective system optical config-urations.Therefore,the analysis presented below accounts for this difference.For the purpose of comparing the two systems,we did not attempt to compensate for the differences in how the optical fibers couple to their respective spec-trometer units.Each system ’s design has advantages and disadvantages in their fiber coupling method.The advantages of the P&P unit are the lack of an entrance slit and the low f -number of the unit (f =3).The advantages of the Acton unit are its fiber optic f -number matcher and the higher fill factor of its fiber optic cable bundle (the ratio of the total cross-sectional area of all the optical fibers in the bundle to the area of the front face of the fiber tip)as compared to the P&P unit (76%versus 47%).Given the difficulty in modeling and accounting for these differences accurately ,and the fact that the re-spectrometer units during the tests,the comparison presented here will consider the fiber optic cable as an integral part of the spectrometer unit.To compensate for the different spectral ranges of the spectrometers,the intensities of the spectra col-lected by the two units were normalized into counts/nanometer units.The spectral resolutions of the systems are reported in camera pixels rather than nanometers for this reason as well.6.ResultsA.Mercury Lamp TestsA comparison of the measured 435:8nm mercury emission peak for the reflective and transmissive grating spectrometers is presented in Fig.8and on a logarithmic scale in Fig.9.This clearly shows the throughput enhancement achieved by the transmis-sion grating spectrometer.The noise level for the re-flective spectrometer is approximately 13counts =nm ,while for the transmission spectrometer it is approxi-mately 20counts =nm .The peak areas by comparison are 5016and 11,091counts,resulting in signal-to-noise ratios of 394and 568for the reflective and transmission spectrometers,respectively .This is one example of the superior throughput and stray light minimization of the transmission grating spectrometer.Thesuperiorresolutionofthetransmissiondesignis demonstrated by the comparison of peak-normalized signals from the Hg 435:8nm emission line seen in Fig.10.The full width at half-maximum (FWHM)of the peak from the transmission spectrometer is mea-sured to be 2.37pixels,while the FWHM of the peak from the reflection spectrometer is 3.33pixels,or al-most 1pixel wider.The corresponding values for the 546:1nm Hg emission line are 2.67and 3.34pixels for the transmission and reflection grating spectro-meters,respectively .This indicates that theresolutionFig.7.(Color online)Schematic diagram of optical coupling arrangement for the mercurylamp.Fig.8.(Color online)Comparison of signals from the Hg 435:8nm emission line.Solid curve,transmission grating spectrometer;advantage of the transmission grating spectrometer persists across the wavelength range.The peak amplitudes,baseline,and noise levels of a number of Hg emission peaks were measured in all 50of the Hg spectra collected with each spectro-meter.The baseline was calculated as the average in-tensity of two 10nm wide regions on either side of the respective emission peak,and the noise level was calculated as the standard deviation of the intensity values in these two regions.The results are summar-ized in Table 3.In the table,throughput is measured as the peak area (baseline subtracted),the signal-to-background ratio is the peak area divided by the baseline value,and the signal-to-noise ratio is the peak area divided by the noise level.The repeatabil-ity was measured as the standard deviation of the peak heights over the 50Hg spectra divided by the mean amplitude value of the peak.The values in Table 3demonstrate how the perfor-mance advantage of the transmission grating spec-trometer as compared to the reflective grating spectrometer increases across the wavelength range.The signal-to-noise ratio improvement increasing from 6%to 130%highlights this trend especiallywell.This finding is in line with the general charac-teristic of reflection gratings that their efficiency is a strong function of wavelength.B.Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy TestsThe LIBS experiments were designed to highlight as-pects of spectrometer performance that are of most importance to standoff LIBS applications:through-put and limits of detection.Limits of detection are not only dependent upon how many of the incoming photons reach the detector (i.e.,efficiency),but are also dependent upon the level of scattered light.Since we used the same ICCD camera with both spec-trometers in these experiments,scattered light will be the dominant source of differences in the back-ground intensity levels.Spectral resolution was not evaluated using the LIBS spectra because,typically ,only a fraction of a LIBS spectral line ’s width is due to instrument broadening.LIBS spectral lines are often modeled as Voigt profiles,which are a convolution of a Lorent-zian profile primarily due to the Stark effect,and a Gaussian profile,which is due to a combination of instrument broadening and DopplerbroadeningFig.9.(Color online)Comparison of signals from the Hg 435:8nm emission line on a logarithmic scale.Solid curve,transmission grating spectrometer;dotted curve,reflective grating spectro-meter.Fig.10.(Color online)Comparison of normalized emissions from the Hg 435:8nm line.Solid circles,transmission spectrometer;open squares,reflective spectrometer.Table 3.Improvement of Transmission Spectrometer over Reflection Spectrometer as Measured by Three Hg Emission LinesHg 404:7nmHg 435:8nmHg 546:1nm Refl.Trans.Adv .a Refl.Trans.Adv .Refl.Trans.Adv .Throughput b1817307269%501611091121%350315377339%Signal/background c 647212%1781802%161374133%Signal/noise d 1351436%39456844%296679130%Repeatability e0.0730.04340%f0.0420.02639%0.0570.02066%a Adv .,transmission system advantage ¼ðtransmission value-reflection value)/reflection value.bIntegrated peak area in counts.cPeak area/mean background as described in text.dPeak area/mean noise as described in text.eRelative standard deviation (σ=μ)of peak amplitude over the 50collected spectra.[15].Therefore,quantitatively determining the in-strument broadening from a LIBS spectral line would require deconvolving the Voigt line shape and subtracting the Doppler broadening,which is de-pendent on the plasma temperature,from the total Gaussian width.Because of the potential inaccura-cies in this procedure,we chose to measure the reso-lution advantage of the transmission grating spectrometer using the Hg lamp spectra,as de-scribed in Subsection 6.A and shown in Fig.10,as they are not impacted by the LIBS plasma broaden-ing mechanisms [16].Sample 10m standoff LIBS spectra from the HP-3aluminum alloy is shown in Fig.11,taken at the same ICCD gain setting (120)with both spectro-meters.The figure demonstrates that the raw inten-sities vary from being 1order of magnitude greater in the transmission-grating spectrum to approaching 2orders of magnitude at the longer wavelengths.This is a clear indication that much more light is reaching the ICCD camera when the transmission grating spectrometer is used.While the increase in signal in-tensity is accompanied by an increase in background level,the signal levels of the LIBS peaks are enhanced by a greater amount,as evidenced by the improvements in the signal-to-background levels (see below).Consequently ,the increase in lightthroughput allows us to measure the smaller LIBS peaks in the spectrum without saturating the larger peaks.A comparison of the intensities from single laser shot LIBS spectra taken from the HG-4SRM is shown in Fig.12in the region of the Al I 669nm emis-sion line.This figure also shows the region over which baseline and noise statistics were gathered.As expected,the LIBS results verified the findings of the Hg lamp tests with regard to throughput,back-ground,and noise ing the Al I 669nm emis-sion line,the signal-to-noise ratio and repeatability of each spectrometer was quantified based upon all the single-shot LIBS spectra collected from the six alloys.This aluminum emission line is a nonreso-nance line that is also not self-absorbed.The results are summarized in Table 4.The relatively poor per-formance of the reflective grating system in this wavelength range illustrates one of the drawbacks of such systems for LIBS applications where the grating is fixed and one or more of the measured atomic emission lines is far from the angle at which the grating isoptimized.Fig.11.(Color online)Comparison of single laser shot LIBS spec-tra from the HP-3alloy .The plots are not offset from their actualvalues.Fig.12.(Color online)Comparison of Al 669nm peak from an HG-4alloy spectrum also showing the spectral region over which the baseline and noise statistics were computed.The curves are not artificially offset from each other.Top curve,transmission spec-trometer ICCD gain ¼120;middle curve,reflection spectrometer ICCD gain ¼160;bottom curve,reflection spectrometer ICCD gain ¼120.Table 4.Summary of Spectrometer System Performance as Measured by the Al I 669nm Emission Line StatisticsThroughputaAverage Signal/Background Ratio cAverage Signal/Noise Ratio dRepeatability eTransmission grating spectrometer 10953 3.1037.713%Reflection grating spectrometer 709b 2.888.15f 15%Transmission grating improvement1445%7.5%363%13%a Integrated area under the peak in counts.bCorrected for the 3.2times factor due to the increased gain setting (see text).cPeak area/mean background as described in text.dPeak area/mean noise as described in text.eRelative standard deviation (σ=μ)of peak amplitude over the 50collected spectra from each sample.。

新视图TM600s白光光学干涉三维扫描仪说明书

新视图TM600s白光光学干涉三维扫描仪说明书

NewView TM 600s SpecificationsZYGO CORPORATIONLAUREL BROOK ROAD • MIDDLEFIELD, CT 06455VOICE: 860 347-8506 • FAX: 860 346-4188•EMAIL:****************SS-0036 06/09 © 2009 Zygo Corporation SYSTEMMeasurementTechniqueNon-contact, three-dimensional, scanningwhite light interferometryScanner Closed-loop piezo-based, with highlylinear capacitive sensorsField of View 0.05 to 3.5 mm (0.002 to 0.138 in.);objective dependentIlluminator Integrated long-life white-light LED withcomputer-controlled light levelObjectiveMountingQuick mount single objective dovetailControls Optical Filter Tray and Focus AidMeasurementArray640x480; user-selectablePart Viewing On-screen live display standard;second LCD monitor optionalFine FocusStageMedium and fine manual control, with 1.2in. (30 mm) of travelCoarse Z-StageCoarse, large range manual control, with10 in. (250 mm) of travel; actual travel isconfiguration dependentDimensions(HWD)27.6 x 12 x 16.5 in.(702 x 300 x 420 mm) NewView onlyWeight ~70 lb (32 kg), including part stageInput Voltage 100/120/220/240 VAC, 50/60 HzComputer High-performance Pentium-based Dell PCwith LCD monitorSoftware ZYGO MetroPro software running underMicrosoft Windows XPA CCESSORIES (O PTIONS)Objectives Infiniteconjugateinterferometricobjectives; 2X, 2.5X, 5X, 10X, 20X, 50X,100X.Refer to the NewView Objective Chart forobjective specifications.Turrets • Manual 6-position turret• Motorized 6-position turretPart Stage • Manual Tip/Tilt/X/Y, with±6° tip/tilt, 4 in. (100 mm) x/y travelVibrationIsolationSystem• Table, 31 x 24 x 24 in. (HWD)(787 x 610 x 610 mm); weight ~600 lb(272 kg); requires compressed air at60 psi (4 bar) with 1/4 in. input hose• Platform, tabletop, 2.75 x 20 x 24 in.(HWD) (70 x 508 x 610 mm); includesair pumpWorktable • Wrap-around, 34 x 52 x 35 in. (HWD)(864 x 1321 x 889 mm); nests next tothe vibration isolation tableMeasurementStandards• Lateral Calibration Standard• Precision Lateral Calibration Standard• SiC Reference Flat• Step Height StandardsGREAT PHOTOGOES HEREP ERFORMANCEVertical ScanRange ≤ 150 µm (5906 µin)Vertical Res. < 0.1 nm (0.004 µin)Lateral Res. 0.36 to 5.18 µm (14.2 to 204 µin);objective dependentDataScan Rate ≤ 15 µm/sec (591 µin/sec)MaximumData Points307,200RMSRepeatability< 0.01 nm (0.0004 µin) RMSσStep Height Accuracy ≤ 0.75%Repeatability≤ 0.1% @ 1σT EST P ART C HARACTERISTICSMaterial Various surfaces: opaque, transparent,coated, uncoated, specular, andnonspecularReflectivity 1-100%ENVIRONMENTAL R EQUIREMENTSTemperature15 to 30°C (59 to 86°F)Rate ofTemp. Change<1.0°C (1.8°F) per 15 minHumidity 5 to 95% relative, noncondensingVibrationIsolationRequired for vibration frequencies in therange of 1 Hz to 120 Hz。

Synopsys VR AR 光学设计与模拟手册说明书

Synopsys VR AR 光学设计与模拟手册说明书

Designing Augmented/Virtual Reality Devices using Multi-Domain Optical SimulationsSimulation and Design Using RSoft Tools and LightToolsOptics is Key for VR/AR•“Optics remains the key challenge in developing the ultimate virtual experience”Bernard Kress, Microsoft's Hololens Division @ SPIE Photonics West 2018:•New types of optical and photonics technologies need to be implemented in next-generation VR/AR systems in order to provide greater visual comfort for prolonged usage, and to achieve a better sense of display immersion or the user.AR/VR Requirements•Main VR/AR requirements:–Low weight–Small Size–Insensitive to vibration–Comfortableness•Types of existing systems include:–Freeform optical prisms projection systems–Retina scanning–Reflective systems or hybrid reflective/refractive systems–Optical planar waveguides with diffractiongratings–This system type has the potential to meet these requirements, Synopsys tools can help!•Diffractive Gratings Functions:–Couple light into waveguide plate and couple light out of plate into eyes –Wavelength selection–Wavefront reshaping•Gratings must be designed properly so that the optical system produces good imagesNear-Eye-Display (NED) SystemsBasic Schematic of Optical Waveguide System-110TIRTIRRSoft and LightTools Co-Simulation•RSoft Component Tools–Based on physical optics –Maxwell’s equations, etc–Small photonics devices–Wave propagation and multi-physics –Diffraction, polarization, nonlinearity, electro-optical, thermo-optics, etc.•LightTools–Based on geometrical optics –Snell’s law, etc.–Large bulk optical system–Ray tracing and beam propagation –Reflection, refraction, diffractionFeature Size vs. WavelengthLarger (> ~10l )Smaller…BeamPROP FullWAVELaserMOD DiffractMODPhysical optics~10lGeometrical opticsRSoftLightTools CODE VSimulating the Grating with RSoft Device ToolsDiffractMOD: RSoft’s RCWA tool •DiffractMOD is a very efficient tool to rigorously calculate diffraction properties of transversely periodic devices•DiffractMOD outputs :–Reflection/Transmission power for each diffraction order–Total reflection/transmission–Amplitude/Phase/Angle for each diffraction order–Field distribution in simulation domain•RSoft BSDF files:–Automatically calculated using RSoft’s FullWAVE or DiffractMOD packages–Contains information about how a surface (thin film, patterns, etc) scatters light–Reflection/transmission data is stored for illumination from both sides of the surface –Scatter information is stored as a function of two incident angles, wavelength, and polarization•The RSoft BSDF file is then used in LightTools to define a surface property–Rays that hit the surface in LightTools are ‘diffracted’ according to the data in the RSoft BSDF fileRSoft/LightTools BSDF InterfacePeriodic Nano-structure Light incident on BSDF surfaceScattering from BSDF surfaceBSDF SurfaceDesign Case 1•AR systems are complex and involve not only illumination optics but also imaging optics as well as ergonomic considerationsUse LightTools to Design the Nominal System •It is usual to lay the system out in LightTools usingidealized gratings in order to explore the system more easily and to discover the required grating settings that can then be designed in Rsoft–Since the imaging properties of the system are criticalto a successful design, it may be necessary to designat least part of the system in an imaging package such as Synopsys’ CODE V•Here we see half of a simple system using an imaging system, a light guide plate and two idealized gratings to transfer the image to the left eye while creating a well defined eye box (exit pupil)Light Guide PlateGratingsEye Box Image DeviceEye Lens•For wearable optical systems, the designer must make accommodations for variances inhuman size and usage The Importance of the Eye Box Imaging System in CODE VLight Guide Plate (unfolded)Eye box(Exit Pupil)Image Device–Specifically, the inter-ocular distance can vary significantly with each user–The device may also be worn at a different height with respect to the eye from user to user–This, then, requires a defined eye box•Because of this, it is critical that an AR/VR system create a proper exit pupil so that variations in the position of the eye don’t cause parts of the projected image to drop out–With a properly constructed pupil rays from every part of the image device will be found in every part of the eye boxEye Box Results for Our Nominal System•Here we see a false color illuminance map of our eye box–The eye box shows some complex structure due to the multiple bouncesand extraction events on input and exit grids–However, the image rays are uniformly represented across the eye boxas we shall see later5mm Iris overlaidon eye box•The imaging system is designed to put thevirtual image at an infinite distance from theeye–Collimated light–The system can be designed for a differentvirtual image distance, something closer to theuser (diverging light), but care should be takento avoid converging light at the eye box as theeye cannot focus converging beams•The image quality seen here is good–The field of view is +-5 degrees horizontal andvertical–There is a small amount of pincushion distortion–The circle pattern has been added in order tovisualize the imaging performance Image Quality Notice a very slight slope in the illuminance across the fieldImaging Quality at Different Eye Positions•Here we show the imaging quality at different eye positions–What we are looking for is variations in illuminance for different parts of the image (e.g. some parts may disappear)–We have removed the dots and lowered the resolution3mm Left3mm RightNominalDesigning Gratings•Once the nominal system has been developed and the designer is satisfied with the performance the ideal gratings must be converted to actual gratings•For this we use the RSoft Device suite to design actual gratings as near to the nominal specifications as possible•Once designed, the grating performance can then be transferred back into the LightTools model using the BSDF utility–The nominal gratings are simply replaced with the imported BSDF data•Further optimization can then be done to adjust the performanceDesign Case 1: Structure OverviewT Levola et al, ”Replicated slanted gratings with a high refractive index material for in andoutcoupling of light”, Optics Express, 15 (2007)Left In-coupler Right In-coupler Reflection Type Out-coupling Transmission TypeOut-coupling•Diffractive slanted gratings aremanufactured onto a highrefractive index plastic waveguidewith simple UV replicationtechnology. Large quantitymanufacturing is possible •The slanted gratings can be optimized to have high 1st order transmission efficient for right in-coupler and high -1st order transmission efficient for left in-coupling (> 92%).•Two types of slanted gratings for out-coupler. The efficiency can be optimized as well.•Grating Properties:–Wavelength:0.52 µm–Period:0.405 µm–H:grating height–A:slant angle–L:Left slope anglefrom slant axis–R:right slope anglefrom slant axis–Fill:duty ratio–Index:1.716Using DiffractMOD for Grating Design P H A L RIndex Profile Diffraction vs wavelength for different ordersDiffraction angle of -1Tvs wavelength•The charts below show the spectral bandwidth of the designed grating for the -1 through +1 orders (Reflected) as well as the diffraction efficiency as a function of angle–The angular bandwidth will limit the field of view of the projected image Grating PerformanceSpectral BandwidthAngular BandwidthDiffraction Efficiency as a Function of Rib Height •The plot below shows that the rib lengthcan be used to vary the diffractionefficiency of the +1 order•Because this is an effective parameter,we will use this to optimize the gratings tocreate a uniform output across the eyeboxRSoft BSDF Calculation for Optimal Structure•Angular range of RSoft BSDF file:–Phi(from normal): Range of [0,90] with 1°spacing–Theta(around normal): Range of [0,360] since thestructure is anisotropic with 5°spacing•BSDF Utility runs DiffractMOD simulations and bothpolarizations are automatically calculatedParametric BSDF DatabaseRSoft BSDF Generation Utility with FullWAVE FDTD or DiffractMODRCWA•In BSDF Generation Utility,parametric BSDF data issupported–Any variables defined in RSoftCAD can be selected–Multi-variables parametricBSDF is supported as wellUsing the BSDF File in LightTools•Once the BSDF data has been generated in RSoft, it is a simple matter to integrate the data into the LightTools Model•Simply create an optical property foreach grating–Set the Type to User-Defined–Select the UDOP_RSoftBSDF.dll,installed with RSoft Design Tools–Select the imported BSDF data file•Then assign the new optical propertyin place of the existing nominalgrating optical property–You may need to rotate the zone 180degrees to get the proper orientationParametric BSDF Database •In the optical propertieswith RSoft UDOPinterface, the parameterscalculated in RSoft areshown as variables, whichcan be defined asvariables in optimizationInitial Results with RSoft Gratings •Here we show the initial results from our previous system but using an initial grating design from RSoft–There are some differences in the eye box, and the image field is slightly less uniform horizontally–Also notice that the image intensity has dropped from 0.006W/mm2to 0.004 W/mm2because of the actual rather thanperfect grating efficiencyEye boxilluminancemapExpanding the Eye BoxOptics Size•As you may have noticed in the previous example, the imaging optics are quite large with respect to the device as a whole–This is undesirable because of the bulky size and excess weight–Driven by the field size and the need for the exit pupil to be a considerable distance in front of the lens–Without expanding the pupil, there is no way around this limitation•We can use an extra grating to expand theeye box and therefor allow us to greatlyreduce the size and weight of the imagingoptics•In this figure, DOE2 and DOE3 are shown as continuous regions•You can see that the output from DOE3 is far from uniform•To address this, we will sub-divide DOE2 and DOE3 into multiple zones and then use LightTools optimization to obtain a uniform output•The beams emerging from the DOE3 would be diverging and would overlap each other at the eye position, creating a large and relatively uniform eye boxBeam Expander ExampleDOE2 -TurningDOE3 -OutputDOE1 -InputRay Trace in LightTools•Here we see the ray trace of the demonstration system •DOEs 2 and 3 have not yet been sub-divided into zonesNote the strong non-uniformity ofthe DOE3 output•DOE2 and DOE3 are now sub-divided into 5 zones each•Each zone has its own optical property •Each grating property can then be optimized separately•To maximize the efficiency of the optimization the DOE2 was optimized first with the subzone furthest from DOE1 fixed for maximum extraction•Then DOE3 was optimized independently in a similar mannerSub-divide the Grating ZonesDOE3DOE2DOE1Optimizing Grating Rib Height•The grating rib height was optimized in LightTools using the standard optimizer –Parameter appears in the UDOP UI and can be made an independent variable for each zone optical property–A 5 x 5 output grid was used to optimize for uniform outputReceiver grid used for optimizationOptimized Result•Here we see the emerging collimated spots at the eye box after optimization –Note the uniformity across the entire eye box•8o projected grid pattern •Backward ray trace to improve ray trace efficiency •Some non-uniformity and residual distortion can be seen•We will now add an actual source and collimating optics andlook at the eye box uniformity and image result•Here we have put in a source with a field of view of +-4degrees–This blurs out the individual segments so that they overlapEye Boxes with Non-Collimated SourceEye-box illuminanceThinning Down the Plate•The original DOE spacing and plate thickness was chosen to give one ray bundle transmission per grating zone on the output grating–For a total of 25 exiting ray bundles•By thinning the plate down from 1.667mm to 1mm and adjusting the DOE spacing and size parameters then re-optimizing we were able to improve eye-box uniformity as well as image qualityConclusionConclusion•Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality systems are complex devices requiring careful design of the imaging, illumination and photonics portions of the system •All of these aspects need to work together•Synopsys Optical Solutions Group along with Photonics Optical Solutions Group provides an integrated solution with CODE V, LightTools and RSoft Device Tools to meet this challenge not just in simulating performance but to optimize to the best solutionThank You。

超快光学超快光谱

超快光学超快光谱

Chopper
Chopped excite pulse train
The excite pulse periodically changes the sample absorption seen by the probe pulse.
Probe pulse train
Lock-in detector
What’s going on in spectroscopy measurements
The excite pulse(s) excite(s) molecules into excited states, which changes the medium’s absorption coefficient and refractive index.
DT(t) / T0 Da0 exp(–t /tex) L
0
Delay, t
Modeling excite-probe measurements
(cont’d)
3
Excite transition
2 Probe transition
1
0
More complex decays occur if intermediate states are populated or if the motion is complex. Imagine probing an intermediate transition, whose states temporarily fill with molecules on their way back down to the ground state:
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy: Why
Most events that occur in atoms and molecules occur on fs and ps time scales because the length scales are very small.

All_normal_dispersion_femtosecond_fiber_laser

All_normal_dispersion_femtosecond_fiber_laser

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: /publication/26294738 All-normal-dispersion femtosecond fiber laser. Opt. Express 14(21), 10095-10100ARTICLE in OPTICS EXPRESS · NOVEMBER 2006Impact Factor: 3.49 · DOI: 10.1364/OE.14.010095 · Source: PubMedCITATIONS 299READS 1644 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:Andy ChongUniversity of Dayton73 PUBLICATIONS 2,087 CITATIONSSEE PROFILE William H RenningerYale University69 PUBLICATIONS 1,894 CITATIONSSEE PROFILEFrank W WiseCornell University427 PUBLICATIONS 13,703 CITATIONSSEE PROFILEAvailable from: Andy ChongRetrieved on: 16 November 2015All-normal-dispersionfemtosecondfiber laserAndy Chong,Joel Buckley,Will Renninger and Frank WiseDepartment of Applied Physics,Cornell University,Ithaca,New York14853cyc26@Abstract:We demonstrate a modelocked ytterbium(Yb)-dopedfiber laserthat is designed to have strong pulse-shaping based on spectralfiltering of ahighly-chirped pulse in the cavity.This laser generates femtosecond pulseswithout a dispersive delay line or anomalous dispersion in the cavity.Pulsesas short as170fs,with pulse energy up to3nJ,are produced.©2006Optical Society of AmericaOCIS codes:(320.7090)Ultrafast lasers;(320.5540)Pulse shaping;(140.7090)Ultrafastlasers.References and links1.R.L.Fork,O.E.Martinez,and J.P.Gordon,“Negative dispersion using pairs of prisms,”Opt.Lett.9,150-152(1984).2. E.B.Treacy,“Optical pulse compression with diffraction gratings,”IEEE J.Quantum Electron.QE-5,454-458(1969).3.R.Szipocs,K.Ferencz,C.Spielmann,and F.Krausz,“Chirped multilayer coatings for broadband dispersioncontrol in femtosecond lasers,”Opt.Lett.19,201-203(1994).4.O.E.Martinez,R.L.Fork,and J.P.Gordon,“Theory of passively mode-locked laser including self-phasemodulation and group-velocity dispersion,”Opt.Lett.9,156-158(1984).5.H.A.Haus,J.G.Fujimoto,and E.P.Ippen,“Analytic theory of additive pulse and Kerr lens mode locking,”IEEE J.Quantum Electron.28,2086-2096(1992).6. B.Proctor,E.Westwig,and F.Wise,“Operation of a Kerr-lens mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser with positivegroup-velocity dispersion,”Opt.Lett.18,1654-1656(1993).7.S.M.J.Kelly,“Characteristic sideband instability of periodically amplified average soliton,”Electron.Lett.28,806-807(1992).8.K.Tamura,E.P.Ippen,H.A.Haus,and L.E.Nelson,“77-fs pulse generation from a stretched-pulse mode-lockedall-fiber ring laser,”Opt.Lett.18,1080-1082(1993).9. F.O.Ilday,J.R.Buckley,W.G.Clark,and F.W.Wise,“Self-similar evolution of parabolic pulses in a laser,”Phys.Rev.Lett.92,213902-1-213902-4(2004).10. F.O.Ilday,J.R.Buckley,H.Lim,F.W.Wise,and W.G.Clark,“Generation of50-fs,5-nJ pulses at1.03μmfrom a wave-breaking-freefiber laser,”Opt.Lett.28,1365-1367(2003).11.J.R.Buckley,F.W.Wise,F.O.Ilday,and T.Sosnowski,“Femtosecondfiber lasers with pulse energies above10nJ,”Opt.Lett.30,1888-1890(2005).12.H.Lim,F.O.Ilday,and F.W.Wise,“Femtosecond ytterbiumfiber laser with photonic crystalfiber for dispersioncontrol,”Opt.Express10,1497-1502(2002).13. A.V.Avdkhin,S.W.Popov,and J.R.Taylor,“Totallyfiber integrated,figure-of-eight,femtosecond source at1065nm,”Opt.Express11,265-269(2003).14.I.Hartl,G.Imeshev,L.Dong,G.C.Cho,and M.E.Fermann,“Ultra-compact dispersion compensated fem-tosecondfiber oscillators and amplifiers,”Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics2005,Baltimore,MD,paper CThG1.15.J.R.Buckley,A.Chong,S.Zhou,W.H.Renninger,and F.W.Wise,unpublished.16.H.Lim,F.O.Ilday,and F.W.Wise,“Generation of2-nJ pulses from a femtosecond ytterbiumfiber laser,”Opt.Lett.28,660-662(2003).#72994 - $15.00 USD Received 14 July 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 23 August 2006 (C) 2006 OSA16 October 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 21 / OPTICS EXPRESS 100951.IntroductionThe need to compensate group-velocity dispersion(GVD)is ubiquitous in femtosecond pulse generation and propagation.Prisms[1],diffraction gratings[2],and chirped mirrors[3]have all been used to compensate or control GVD.Reliable femtosecond lasers had to await the devel-opment of a low-loss means of introducing controllable GVD[1].Pulse formation in modern femtosecond lasers is dominated by the interplay between nonlinearity and dispersion[4,5].In all cases of practical interest,a positive(self-focusing)nonlinearity is balanced by anomalous GVD.The need to compensate normal GVD in the laser,along with the balance of nonlinearity in soliton-like pulse shaping,underlies the presence of anomalous GVD in femtosecond lasers. Most femtosecond lasers have segments of normal and anomalous GVD,so the cavity con-sists of a dispersion map,and the net or path-averaged cavity dispersion can be normal or anomalous.With large anomalous GVD,soliton-like pulse shaping produces short pulses with little chirp.Some amplitude modulation is required to stabilize the pulse against the periodic perturbations of the laser resonator.Pulse formation and pulse evolution become more complex as the cavity GVD approaches zero,and then becomes normal.The master-equation treatment of solid-state lasers,based on the assumption of small changes of the pulse as it traverses cavity elements,shows that stable pulses can be formed with net normal GVD[5].Nonlinear phase accumulation,coupled with normal GVD,chirps the pulse.The resulting spectral broadening is balanced by gain-narrowing.By cutting off the wings of the spectrum,gain dispersion shapes the temporal profile of the chirped pulse.Proctor et al showed that the resulting pulses are long and highly-chirped[6],as predicted by the analytic theory[5].Stable pulse trains can even be produced without dispersion compensation,but the output pulses are picoseconds in duration and deviate substantially from the Fourier-transform limited duration,even after dechirping with anomalous GVD external to the cavity.Fiber lasers can be constructed entirely offiber with anomalous GVD,to generate solitons as short as∼200fs in duration.However,the pulse energy is restricted by the soliton area theorem and spectral sidebands[7]to∼0.1nJ.Much higher energies are obtained when the laser has segments of normal and anomalous GVD.In general,the pulse breathes(i.e.,the pulse duration varies periodically)as it traverses the cavity.Dispersion-managed solitons are observed as the net GVD varies from small and anomalous to small and normal[8],and self-similar[9]and wave-breaking-free[10]pulses are observed with larger normal GVD.The large changes in the pulse as it traverses the laser preclude an accurate analytical treatment,so numerical simulations are employed to study these modes.Amongfiber lasers,Yb-based lasers have produced the highest femtosecond-pulse energies,recently reaching15-20nJ[11].The normal GVD of single-modefiber(SMF)around1μm wavelength has been compensated by diffraction gratings,which detract from the benefits of the waveguide medium.With the goal of building integratedfiber lasers,microstructurefibers[12,13]andfiber Bragg gratings[14]have been implemented to compensate dispersion at1μm.However,performance is sacrificed compared to lasers that employ diffraction gratings.From a practical point of view, it would be highly desirable to design femtosecond-pulsefiber lasers without compensation of the GVD of several meters offiber.However,to our knowledge there is no prior report of any laser that generates∼100-fs pulses without elements that provide anomalous GVD in the cavity.Recently,Buckley et al.showed that the introduction of a frequencyfilter stabilizes mod-elocked operation of a Yb-dopedfiber laser with normal cavity GVD(∼0.015ps2),which allows the routine generation of15-nJ pulses as short as55fs[15].The frequencyfilter pro-duces self-amplitude modulation,which allows nonlinear polarization evolution(NPE)to be biased for higher pulse energies.By altering the laser cavity to operate at large normal GVD (0.04-0.10ps2),the frequencyfilter was found to stabilize modelocked operation character-#72994 - $15.00 USD Received 14 July 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 23 August 2006 (C) 2006 OSA16 October 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 21 / OPTICS EXPRESS 10096ized by highly chirped,nearly static pulses as predicted by the theory of self-similar lasers[9]. Although Buckley et al.succeeded in enhancing the stability of modelocking at large normal GVD,the laser still required some dispersion compensation with a grating pair.Here we describe a femtosecondfiber laser with a cavity consisting only of elements with normal GVD.By increasing the nonlinear phase shift accumulated by the pulse and insert-ing a spectralfilter in the cavity,self-amplitude modulation via spectralfiltering is enhanced. The laser generates chirped picosecond pulses,which are dechirped to170fs outside the laser. These results are remarkable considering that the cavity consists of∼10characteristic disper-sion lengths offiber with respect to the dechirped pulse,yet no dispersion control is provided. The pulse energy is1-3nJ,and the laser is stable and self-starting.The laser is thus afirst step in a new approach to modelocking.Systematic understanding of the pulse-shaping and evolution will be interesting scientifically,and the freedom from anomalous dispersion offers significant practical advantages.2.Design rationale and numerical simulationsThe design of a femtosecondfiber laser without dispersion control in the cavity exploits the understanding gained by the recent work of Buckley et al.[15].The master-equation analysis does not apply quantitatively tofiber lasers,but we are guided qualitatively and intuitively by its predictions.The key elements of such a laser(Fig.1(a))are a fairly long segment of SMF, a short segment of gainfiber,a segment of SMF after the gainfiber,and components that pro-duce self-amplitude modulation.A significant nonlinear phase shift is impressed on the pulseFig.1.Numerical simulation result:a)schematic diagram of the laser.A ring cavity isassumed,so the pulse enters thefirst SMF after the NPE.Results of numerical simulationsare shown on the bottom.Power spectrum(b)and temporal intensity profile(c)after thesecond SMF.#72994 - $15.00 USD Received 14 July 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 23 August 2006 (C) 2006 OSA16 October 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 21 / OPTICS EXPRESS 10097in the SMF that follows the gain,and NPE converts the differential phase shift to amplitude modulation.Numerical simulations show that stable solutions do exist in such a laser,for a reasonable range of parameters.The gain bandwidth has a major influence on the pulse evo-lution.With large gain bandwidth (>∼30nm),approximately parabolic pulses evolve as in a self-similar laser [9].As the bandwidth is reduced to ∼10nm,the spectrum develops sharp peaks on its edges,and for narrower bandwidths the solutions do not converge.Results of simulations with 10-nm gain bandwidth and 2-nJ pulse energy are shown in Fig.1.The pulse duration increases monotonically in the SMF,and then decreases abruptly in the gain fiber.In the second segment of SMF the pulse duration increases slightly,before dropping again owing to the NPE.The spectrum (Fig.1(b))exhibits a characteristic shape,with sharp peaks near its steep edges.The pulse is highly-chirped throughout the cavity,with the duration varying from ∼10to ∼20times the transform limit (Fig.1(c)).The simulations show that spectral filtering of a strongly phase-modulated pulse can produce substantial amplitude modulation under realistic conditions.With additional amplitude modu-lation from NPE,stable solutions exist.The pulse is highly-chirped inside the cavity,but the phase is roughly parabolic near the peak of the pulse,so the pulse can be dechirped outside the laser.3.Experimental resultsThe numerical simulations offer a guide to the construction of a laser without anomalous disper-sion.The laser (shown schematically in Fig.2)is similar to the Yb fiber laser of Lim et al .[16],but without the grating pair that provides anomalous GVD in earlier designs.The fiber section consists of ∼3m of SMF and 20cm of highly-doped Yb gain fiber,followed by another ∼1m of SMF.Gain fiber with a 4-μm core diameter (which is smaller than the 6-μm core of SMF)was chosen to increase self-phase modulation (SPM)in the gain fiber.A 980-nm laser diode delivers ∼350mW into the core of the gain fiber.NPE is implemented with quarter-waveplates,a half-waveplate,and a polarizing beamsplitter.The output of laser is taken directly from the NPE ejection port.Fig.2.Schematic of all-normal-dispersion fiber laser:QWP:quarter-waveplate;HWP:half-waveplate;PBS:polarizing beam splitter;WDM:wavelength-division multiplexer.In contrast to the simulations,it is not possible to vary the gain bandwidth easily.An inter-ference filter centered at 1030nm,with 10nm bandwidth,is employed.The optimum location for the filter is not clear.Placing it after the gain or second SMFsegment would maximize the amplitude modulation from spectral filtering and correspond most closely to the simulations described above.However,we also want to output the broadest spectrum and the largest pulse energy,to achieve the shortest and most intense pulse.Considering these factors,we placed the #72994 - $15.00 USD Received 14 July 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 23 August 2006(C) 2006 OSA 16 October 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 21 / OPTICS EXPRESS 10098filter after the beam splitter.This location also allows as much of the laser to be spliced together as possible.The total cavity dispersion is∼0.1ps2.The threshold pump power for modelocking is∼300mW.Self-starting modelocked opera-tion is achieved by adjustment of the waveplates.The laser produces a stable pulse train with 45MHz repetition rate.Although the continuous-wave output power can be as high as∼200 mW,in modelocked operation the power is limited to120mW,which corresponds to a pulse energy of∼3nJ.Stable single-pulsing is verified with a fast detector down to500ps,and by monitoring the interferometric autocorrelation out to delays of∼100ps.Also,the spectrum is carefully monitored for any modulation that would be consistent with multiple pulses in the cavity.Remarkably,there is no evidence of multi-pulsing at any available pump power.How-ever,with a single pump diode the pump power only exceeds the modelocking threshold by ∼20%.Fig.3.Output of the laser:a)spectrum,b)interferometric autocorrelation of the output,c)interferometric autocorrelation of dechirped pulse and the interferometric autocorrelationof zero-phase Fourier-transform of the spectrum(inset),d)intensity autocorrelation of thedechirped pulse.Typical results for the output of the laser are shown in Fig.3.The spectrum(Fig.3(a))is qualitatively similar to the simulated spectrum(Fig.1(b))and is consistent with significant SPM within the cavity.The laser generates∼1.4-ps chirped pulses(Fig.3(b)),which are dechirped to 170fs(Fig.3(c and d))with a pair of diffraction gratings outside the laser.The dechirped pulse duration is within∼16%of the Fourier-transform limit(Fig.3(c)inset).The interferometric autocorrelation shows noticeable side-lobes,which arise from the steep sides and structure of the spectrum.Nevertheless,these amount to only∼10%of the pulse energy.The output pulse energy is∼2.7nJ,and after dechirping with lossy gratings the pulse energy is∼1nJ.Pulse ener-#72994 - $15.00 USD Received 14 July 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 23 August 2006 (C) 2006 OSA16 October 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 21 / OPTICS EXPRESS 10099gies of2nJ could be obtained by dechirping with high-efficiency gratings or photonic-bandgap fiber.The laser is stable and self-starting.In addition to verifying as carefully as possible that the laser is not multi-pulsing,we compared the pulse peak power to that of a fully-characterized femtosecond laser available in our lab.Within the experimental uncertainties,the two-photon photocurrent induced by the all-normal-dispersion laser scales correctly with the nominal peak power,which is∼5kW.Detailed understanding of pulse formation and evolution in this laser will require more ex-perimental work and theoretical analysis.Because the simulated laser is not identical to the ex-perimental version,it is not appropriate to compare the calculated and measured performance in detail.However,qualitative and even semi-quantitative observations of the laser properties are consistent with the intended pulse-shaping through spectralfiltering.The behavior of the laser depends critically on the spectralfilter:without it,stable pulse trains are not generated.By rotating the spectralfilter to vary the center wavelength,either of the sharp spectral features can be suppressed,which may slightly improve the pulse quality.When the spectrum changes,the magnitude of the chirp on the output pulse can change substantially:the pulse duration varies from approximately1to2ps.With standard femtosecond Yb-dopedfiber lasers,mechanical perturbation of thefiber extinguishes modelocking.In the laser described here,wefind that it is possible to touch and move thefiber without disrupting modelocking,which indicates that NPE plays a reduced role in pulse-shaping.The simulations(e.g.,Fig.1)show that the role of NPE is reduced compared to a laser with a dispersion map,but it is still crucial to the generation of stable pulses.4.ConclusionIn conclusion,we have demonstrated afiber laser that generates reasonably high-quality fem-tosecond pulses without the use of intracavity dispersion control.The behavior and perfor-mance of the laser agree qualitatively with numerical simulations that illustrate the intended pulse-shaping mechanism by enhanced spectralfiltering of chirped pulses in the cavity.Never-theless,our picture of this modelocking process is rudimentary,and more work will be required to obtain a systematic understanding.Improved performance should accompany better under-standing of this modelocking process.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant ECS-0500956and by the National Institutes of Health under grant EB002019.#72994 - $15.00 USD Received 14 July 2006; revised 12 August 2006; accepted 23 August 2006 (C) 2006 OSA16 October 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 21 / OPTICS EXPRESS 10100。

光纤的色散与非线性效应

光纤的色散与非线性效应
光纤的色散与非线性效应
光纤的色散
随着脉冲在光纤中传输,脉冲的宽度被展宽
模间色散(Mode Dispersion) 色度色散(Cromatic Dispersion) 偏振色散(Polarization Mode Dispersion)
劣化的程度随数据速率的平方增大
决定了电中继器之间的距离
色散对传输的限制
结论: 不适用于10Gb/s以上速率传输,但可应用于 2.5Gb/s以下速率的DWDM。
G.653单模光纤(DSF)
低损耗 零色散 小有效面积 长距离、单信道超高速EDFA系统 四波混频(FWM)是主要的问题,不利于DWDM技术Fra bibliotek结论:
适用于 10Gb/s 以上速率单信道传输,但不适 用于 DWDM应用,处于被市场淘汰的现状。
Calculating Dispersion
• in a typical single-mode fibre using a laser with a spectral width of 6 nm over a distance of 10 km : Dispersion = 17ps/nm/km × 6 nm × 10 km = 1020 ps • At 1 Gbps a pulse is 1 ns long. So the system would not work. (20% is a good guideline for the acceptable limit.) But it would probably work quite well at a data rate of 155 Mbps (a pulse length of 6.5 ns). • A narrow spectral width laser might produce only one line with a linewidth of 300 MHz. Modulating it at 1 Gbps will add 2 GHz. 2,300 MHz is just less than .02 nm (at 1500 nm). So now: • Dispersion = 17ps/nm/km × .02 nm × 10 km = 3.4 ps
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

a r X i v :q u a n t -p h /0609155v 1 20 S e p 2006Optical gratings induced by field-free alignment of moleculesA.Rouz´e e,V.Renard,S.Gu´e rin,O.Faucher,andvorelLaboratoire de Physique de l’Universit´e de Bourgogne,UMR CNRS 5027,BP 47870,21078Dijon Cedex,France(Dated:February 1,2008)We analyze the alignment of molecules generated by a pair of crossed ultra-short pump pulses of different polarizations by a technique based on the induced time-dependent gratings.Parallel polarizations yield an intensity grating,while perpendicular polarizations induce a polarization grating.We show that both configurations can be interpreted at moderate intensity as an alignment induced by a single polarized pump pulse.The advantage of the perpendicular polarizations is to give a signal of alignment that is free from the plasma contribution.Experiments on femtosecond transient gratings with aligned molecules were performed in CO 2at room temperature in a static cell and at 30K in a molecular expansion jet.PACS numbers:33.80.b,32.80.Lg,42.50.Hz,42.50.MdI.INTRODUCTIONExcitation with non-resonant high power laser pulses has become a powerful technique for preparing aligned molecules [1].With ultra-short laser pulses,typically of less than 100fs pulse duration,molecules periodically re-align after the pump extinction,showing revivals in the observed signal.Various methods are employed to mea-sure such post-pulse molecular alignment.They make use either of ionization-fragmentation combined with an imaging technique [1,2]or of non-linear optical prop-erties [3,4].In the methods of the latter category,the depolarization or the spatial deformation of a probe pulse is measured as a function of time elapsed after the align-ing pulse.The effect is based on the time-dependent non-linear contribution of alignment to the refractive in-dex [3,4].Transient grating experiments have been also performed to explore alignment of molecules [5,6].In these experiments,a transient grating was produced by two synchronized pump pulses,and the amount of light diffracted from a third probe pulse was recorded at differ-ent delays.It appeared that the recorded signal exhibited the same time behavior than other alignment signals,i.e.confirming the detection of post-pulse molecular align-ment.As in Refs.[3,4]a deformation of the measured signal with increasing intensity has been noted.Whereas in Ref.[5],the change in the shape of the revivals has been attributed to molecular changes and the apparition of a constant background due to ionization and plasma formation,a more likely explanation for this modifica-tion of DFWM transient shapes has been suggested [7]:the background is due to permanent alignment and the alteration of revivals is a consequence of heterodyning with this background.In fact,this had been already pointed out for all experiments with homodyne detec-tion [3].Stavros et al.[6]corroborated this explanation in the case of DFWM for O 2molecules.At the highest intensity investigated in Ref.[6],the possible contribu-tion of an ion grating has also been suggested.The aim of the present work is to investigate the mech-anisms involved in high intensity DFWM experiments byusing two types of gratings (intensity or polarization grat-ing)produced by two crossed beams.Furthermore,it will be shown that quantitative measurement of alignment with both configurations is possible with this technique.II.EXPERIMENTAL SETUPThe experimental setup uses the well known femtosec-ond degenerate four-wave mixing technique (DFWM)also called femtosecond transient grating spectroscopy [8].It consists of exciting the molecular sample by two synchronized pump pulses at 800nm (pulse duration of 90fs)focused and crossed at a given angle Θ(Fig.1).They are both derived from a chirped pulse amplified Ti:Sapphire system working at 20Hz.The energy and the polarization direction of the two pump pulses are controlled by means of a half-wave plate and a polar-izer.A third probe pulse,time delayed with respect to the pumps,is mixed with the others.The probe beam sees a transient grating and is diffracted.The amount of diffracted light is monitored as a function of the time delay with a photomultiplier.The sample is a CO 2gas,either at room temperature in a static cell,or in a molec-ular supersonic jet for lower rotational temperatures.Both beams are focused and collimated with f =300mm lenses.It is noticed that,like in other all-optical methods,DFWM gives the opportunity to work with a good sensitivity in a wide pressure range (typically from 1mbar to a few bars).The role of the two pump pulses is to excite the rotational coherence of the molecules.Two different experiments have been performed which corre-spond to parallel and perpendicular polarizations of the pump pulses.The two cases are treated separately in the next sections.2III.THEORYA.Parallel polarizations:linear total polarization,intensity gratingWe consider a simplified model for thethe grating.We assume two plane waves,with length λ,propagating in the (x,z )plane with tors (−k x ,0,k z )and (k x ,0,k z )(see Fig.1).The cross-angle between the two pump beams is sin(Θ/2)=k x λ/2π≈Θ/2.With two pump pulses ized along the y -axis (of vector unit e y ),an ing is formed with a total electric field periodically lated along the x -axis: E pump =2E p (t )cos(k x x )k z z ) e y ,where E p (t )is the pump field envelope same for both fields).We are facing therefore the molecules interacting with a non resonant linearly ized laser field,which has been extensively Ref.[1]and references therein).The additional dient is the spatial modulation of the total we consider a weak probe pulse polarized parallel pumps (y -axis)and which propagates with the tor (−k x ,0,k z ),the only component of the induced at a position r =(x,y,z )whose expectation not average out is the y -component :µind r ,t =¯α+∆α cos 2θy r ,t−1/3×E probe (t )cos(ωt +k x x −k z z ) e y ,(1)where ¯αis the mean polarizability,∆α=α −α⊥is the difference of polarizability parallel and perpendicular to the molecular axis,E probe (t )is the probe envelope,and θy is the angle between the molecular axis and the common polarization direction (y -axis).The expectation value cos 2θy r ,t is a measure of alignment and is a func-tion of the total pump intensity at the position r .Conse-quently,it has the same spatial period as the total inten-sity.It also depends on the time delay between the pump and probe pulses.The signal electric field measured by the photo-detector is then obtained by summation over the interaction volume of spherical waves radiated by the dipole.The first term of the right hand side of Eq.(1)describes the effect of the linear index of refraction on the probe beam and is not interesting for our purpose.The second term is periodic and leads to constructive interference along symmetric phase-matching directions x/z =(2n −1)k x /k z ,with n the diffraction order.Only the order 1is considered experimentally (see Fig.1).The experimental signal measured at a position r 0,pro-portional to the modulus squared of the total electric field,is interpreted as the diffraction of the probe beam by the transient grating produced by the pumpsI sig ( r 0,t )∝| E sig ( r 0,t )|2∝|Vdr R [ Erad ( R,t )]|2,(2)with Erad the spherical electric field radiated by the dipole momentE rad ( R,t )=k 2R(3)cos 2θy r ,t −1/3is approximately proportional to the total pump intensity 4I 0cos 2(k x x )=2I 0(1+cos 2k x x ),where I 0is the peak intensity of a single pump (see Ap-pendix A 1).The constant term 2I 0corresponds to the zeroth order of diffraction and is responsible for nonlinear variation of the refractive index seen by the probe pulse.The second term 2I 0cos 2k x x leads to diffraction orders n =±1.It is shown in Appendix A 1that :cos 2θy r ,t −1/3≈ cos 2θy t −1/3 (1+cos 2k x x ),(4)withcos 2θy t −1/3≈2ξ0[δ+κf (t )],(5)andξ0=∆α/4dtE 2p (t ),(6)the intensity area of a single pump. cos 2θy t corre-sponds to the alignment that would be induced by asingle linearly polarized pulse of intensity 2I 0.For a given molecule and temperature,δand κare constant (δand κ→0at low intensity),and f (t )is a specific func-tion independent of ξ0.The summation over the volume (Eq.(2))gives a signal of intensity :I sig (t )∝ cos 2θy t −1/3 2,(7)where the spatial dependence has now disappeared.Themeasured signal (order 1)can thus be calculated for any pump-probe time delay,solving the time-dependent3Schr¨o dinger equation [3]usingasinglelinearly polarizedpump beam of intensity 2I 0.This takes into account the fact that the spatial distribution of the total intensity is modulated between 0and 4I 0.In other words,the sample of aligned molecules presents a nonlinear index of refraction,which depends on the pump intensity.As the intensity along the grating is modulated by optical interferences,a spatial modula-tion of refractive index is formed.This gives a refractive index grating and a signal directly related to the post-pulse alignment,as shown by Eq.(7).B.Perpendicular polarizations:elliptic total polarization,polarization gratingFor perpendicular polarizations,with one pump aligned at −45◦and the other at +45◦with respect to the y -axis,the resulting field is in general elliptically polar-ized.The state of polarization of the total pump electric field depends on the spatial position and alternates be-tween linear and circular,forming a polarization grating.In a grating period,the total electric field varies from lin-ear (along the y -axis),circular (right),linear (along the x -axis),to circular (left),with intermediate elliptic polar-izations.Furthermore,its magnitude varies periodically along the x -coordinate and is maximum for the linear polarization and minimum for the circular one.Since Θis a small angle,the total pump field is indeed polarized in the (x,y )plane asE pump =√2E 2p (t )∆αsin 2θz × A 2(x )−B 2(x ) cos 2φz +B 2(x )(9a)=−12∆αE probe (t )cos(ωt +k x x −k z z )×( cos 2θx r ,t − cos 2θy r ,t ).(10)It is shown in Appendix (A 2)that the preceding equationcan be approximated by :µind r ,t ≈∆αE probe (t )cos(ωt +k x x −k z z )×32((1−cos 2k x x )−(1+cos 2k x x )).Itfollows that the induced dipole can be considered as cre-ated by two out of phase intensity gratings with a spatial modulation (1±cos 2k x x ).This has been initially demon-strated at low intensities when the perturbation theory applies [12]:a polarization grating can be decomposed in two out of phase intensity gratings with perpendicular polarizations.One result of the present work is to show that this simple decomposition can be extended beyond the perturbation regime at moderate intensities.As in Section III A,the calculation of the observable requires the summation of the radiated spherical electric fields over the interaction volume.We consider the signal pro-duced along the phase-matching direction x/z =k x /k z (order 1)and find that the associated signal can be ob-tained by calculating numerically cos 2θ t −1/3using a linearly polarized field at an intensity I 0since the induced dipole moment (11)is modulated between 0(circular po-larization,A =B )and a maximum value corresponding to a pump linear polarization with an intensity 2I 0.IV.RESULTSA.Parallel polarizationsFor parallel polarizations,optical interferences be-tween the two pumps lead to an intensity grating.The in-teraction Hamiltonian can thus be directly derived from earlier studies of alignment with a linear polarization.The molecular alignment reflects the total intensity and follows the fringe pattern.An example is shown in Fig.2for pump intensities I 0=19TW/cm 2.As in the po-larization technique,the modification of the experimen-tal signal with respect to the weak field signal,is inter-preted as alignment revivals heterodyned by the perma-nent alignment.The simulations (Eq.(7))should be per-formed at an intensity taking into account the transverse profile of the two pump beams (gaussian distribution)which was not considered in the theoretical section.This effect can be roughly accounted for by a factor 1/2in the experimental intensity,i.e.by comparing the theoretical4intensity (about 20TW/cm 2for the best fit)to the peak intensity I 0of only onepump beam (19TW/cm 2).It is noted that,unlike in Ref.[5],here no molecular de-formation is put forward to interpret the experimental signal.FIG.2:Recorded DFWM signal (dots)as a function of pump-probe time delay in a static cell of CO 2at room temperature for parallel polarizations.Pressure is 0.1bar and the peak intensity of each pump is 19TW/cm 2.Simulated signal [full line,Eq.(7)]is calculated at 20TW/cm 2.At higher intensity,a strong background is observed which heterodynes and distorts the alignment signal.This phenomenon is attributed to the contribution of a refractive index grating due to a spatial distribution of electron density.Indeed,the electronic density pro-duced by ionization follows the spatial intensity distri-bution of the pump with a lifetime of several nanosec-onds [13].As a consequence,the refractive index seen by the probe is modified and a grating is formed.The effect becomes very strong as the peak intensity of the bright fringes approaches the ionization saturation inten-sity (200TW/cm 2for CO 2).Some applications of this effect,which limits the range of intensity for the present study of alignment,is discussed in Ref.[14].B.Perpendicular polarizationsTo overcome the intensity limitation discussed above,the polarizations of the two pump beams have been crossed.In that case,no optical interferences occur,and the intensity is constant over the interaction volume,ex-cept for the overall Gaussian distribution.A polarization grating is formed as discussed in the previous sections.Nevertheless,the instantaneous total intensity for the lin-ear polarization is twice that of the circular one.As the ionization process is a function of the instantaneous in-tensity,the ionization rate and the electron density reflect the periodic distribution of this quantity.A refractive in-dex grating due to the electrons is formed as in the linear case.But as the ionization rate is the same for the two linear (along the x and y -axis)and for the two circular polarizations (left and right),the grating has a periodic-ity twice that of the parallel polarizations case (A).Theangle of diffraction is doubled and the probe diffracted by this grating can be spatially resolved from the one diffracted by the alignment-induced grating.The exper-iment is therefore not sensitive to the electron density grating.The Hamiltonian describing the interaction of the molecules with an elliptic electric field as well as the induced dipole moment have been given in the theo-retical section.It has been shown that the observed signal can be approximated by using the dipole mo-ment (11)at low and moderate intensities.To simu-late the experimental data,we thus used the same rou-tine as for parallel polarizations.Some results are shown in Fig. 3.Again the transverse spatial profile of the pump pulses should be taken into account through a factor 1/2,i.e.the simulated intensity has to be com-pared to 1/2times the maximum intensity of one pump beam.The degree of alignment,quantified by cos 2θ t ,is directly deduced from simulations.Even though the higher experimental intensities correspond to saturation of cos 2θ r,t −1/3,the calculated intensity approaches the expected value (see Fig.3).The volume averaging of the signal tends to smooth out the saturation pro-cess of alignment.For much higher intensities,discrep-ancies between calculated and experimental (I 0/2)inten-sity should appear,as shown in Ref.[10].This effect is due to the strong saturation of alignment at the center of the pumped volume.In that case,Eq.(11)can not be used and the observed signal is no more accurately sim-ulated by Eq.(A9).Nevertheless,it would be possible,even though it would be time consuming,to reproduce the experimental data by numerical simulation of Eqs.(9,10).One of the goals of the present work was to align cold molecules in order to increase the efficiency of the pro-cess.To obtain low temperatures,we used a pulsed su-personic jet in which the pressure is only a few mbar,de-pending on the distance from the nozzle.Before attempt-ing an experiment,some preliminary studies at low static pressure and room temperature have been performed.The sensitivity was high enough to record signals at a pressure around 6mbar of CO 2,with an excellent sig-nal to noise ratio.The supersonic jet has allowed us to decrease the temperature down to 30K (Fig.4).The alignment that can be achieved at this temperature with an experimental intensity of 47TW/cm 2corresponds to cos 2θ =0.65.This value is comparable to the one achieved at higher intensity in our previous study using a polarization technique at 60K.But in the present case the experiment is free from heterodyne contribution due to spurious birefringence from optics.The polarization grating (case B)can be discussed in terms of alignment distribution,as for the intensity grat-ing (case A).For example at a delay close to zero (modulo T R ),the molecules are aligned along the linear polarized field (x and y -axis)and delocalized in the plane of polar-ization xy (circular right and left).At time delay T R /4(modulo T R ),the molecules are delocalized in the planes5FIG.3:Experimental DFWM signal recorded as a function of the pump-probe time delay in CO 2at room temperature for perpendicular polarizations.The pressure is 0.03bar and pump peak intensity is (a)37TW/cm 2,(b)78TW/cm 2,and (c)135TW/cm 2.The numerical simulations [Eq.(7)]are shown inverted for (a)15TW/cm 2,(b)30TW/cm 2,(c)and 55TW/cm 2.These theoretical values compare well with I 0/2(see text).xOz or yOz ,or aligned along the z -axis (circular right and left).Intermediate elliptic polarization leads to in-termediate state of alignment.V.CONCLUSIONThe main conclusions of this work are the follow-ing.DFWM experiments with two synchronized spa-tially crossed femtosecond pulses allow to produce tran-sient gratings reflecting alignment of molecules.A contri-bution due to ionization and plasma formation appears at high intensities that heterodynes and therefore dis-turbs the experimental signal.With perpendicular po-larizations,the alignment signal can be isolated from the plasma contribution.The experiments can thus be per-formed at higher intensity keeping a good signal to noise ratio.DFWM experiments prove to be very sensitive for probing low density and low temperature samples suchas those obtained with a supersonic jet.Furthermore,it is shown that quantitative measurements of alignment are obtained through simulations by using a simplified model,even in the case of perpendicular polarizations which was a priori non-trivial.Using different polarization schemes would permit toFIG.4:Recorded DFWM signal (lower panel,dots)as a func-tion of pump-probe time delay in CO 2at 30K in the super-sonic jet for perpendicular polarizations.Measured peak in-tensity of one pump is 47TW/cm 2.Simulated signal [lower panel,full line,Eq.(7)]is calculated at 25TW/cm 2.The calculated time dependence of cos 2θ is shown in the upper panel.create interesting patterns of aligned molecules that could be used as a large frequency bandwidth spatial modulator.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the Conseil R´e gional de Bourgogne,the ACI photonique ,the CNRS,and a Marie Curie European Reintegration Grant within the 6th Eu-ropean Community RTD Framework Programme.The authors thank H.R.Jauslin for helpful discussions.[1]H.Stapelfeldt and T.Seideman,Rev.Mod.Phys.75(2),543(2003).[2]H.Sakai,C.P.Safvan,rsen,K.M.Hilligsøe,K.Hald,and H.Stapelfeldt,J.Chem.Phys.110(21),102356(1999); F.Rosca-Pruna and M.J.J.Vrakking,Phys.Rev.Lett.87(15),153902/1(2001);P.W.Dooley,I.V.Litvinyuk,K.F.Lee,D.M.Rayner,M.Spanner,D.M.Villeneuve,and P.B.Corkum,Phys.Rev.A68(2), 23406(2003).[3]V.Renard,M.Renard,S.Gu´e rin,Y.T.Pashayan,B.Lavorel,O.Faucher,and H.R.Jauslin,Phys.Rev.Lett.90(15),153601(2003).[4]V.Renard,O.Faucher,and vorel,Opt.Lett.30,70(2005).[5]stock,V.Senekerimyan,and M.Dantus,J.Phys.Chem.A107,8271(2003).[6]V.G.Stavros,E.Harel,and S.R.Leone,J.Chem.Phys.122(6),64301(2005).[7]vorel,H.Tran,E.Hertz,O.Faucher,P.Joubert,M.Motzkus,T.Buckup,ng,S.H.,G.Knopp,P.Beaud,and H.M.Frey,C.R.Physique5,215(2004).[8]E.J.Brown,Qingguo-Zhang,and M.Dantus,J.Chem.Phys.110(12),5772(1999).[9]M.Renard,E.Hertz,S.Gu´e rin,H.R.Jauslin,-vorel,and O.Faucher,Phys.Rev.A72,025401(2005).[10]V.Renard,M.Renard, A.Rouz´e e,S.Gu´e rin,H.R.Jauslin,vorel,and O.Faucher,Phys.Rev.A70, 033420(2004).[11]D.Daems,S.Gu´e rin,E.Hertz,H.R.Jauslin,vorel,and O.Faucher,Phys.Rev.Lett.95,063005(2005). [12]J.T.Fourkas,R.Trebino,and M.D.Fayer,J.Chem.Phys.97(1),69(1992).[13]C.W.Siders,G.Rodriguez,J.L.W.Siders, F.G.Omenetto,and A.J.Taylor,Phys.Rev.Lett.87(26), 2630021(2001).[14]V.Loriot,E.Hertz,A.Rouze,B.Sinardet,vorel,and O.Faucher,Opt.Lett.31(19),2897(2006).APPENDIX A:POSTPULSE ALIGNMENT FOR LOW AND MODERATE INTENSITIESWe analyse in this appendix the dependence of the postpulse alignment of linear molecules on the pump field intensities below the intrinsic saturation regime.We show in particular that(i)for a linearly polarized pulse the baseline of cos2θ obeys the following law:quadratic and next linear,(ii)its shape is linear and(iii)the align-ment induced by an elliptically polarizedfield can be ana-lyzed in term of the decomposition into linearly polarized fields.1.Linearly polarizedfieldA linearly polarizedfield leads to a postpulse alignment characterized by cos2θ t,withθthe angle between the molecular axis and thefield polarization axis,which can be generally characterized bycos2θ t−1/3=C+ J|a J|cos(ωJ t+φJ),(A1)where C is a constant value corresponding to the per-manent alignment,and the second term,describing the rotational wave packet revivals,is written in terms of Fourier components of the amplitude|a J|,the phaseφJ, and the frequencyωJ(Raman frequency of rotational transitions).In the present experimental conditions,the phases are roughly constant:φJ≈−π/2[9].Within the sudden impulsive regime(i.e.forτ≪h/B withτthe duration of the pulse and B the rotational constant of the molecule in Joule),where the pulse can be considered as aδ-function,the coefficients C and|a J|depend on the effective areaξ=∆α/4 dtE2,(A2)which is proportional to the peakfield intensity I.For CO2molecules interacting with a Gaussian pulse of a full-width at half maximumτFWHM=0.1ps,we have ξ≈0.444×I[TW/cm2].Figure5shows the dependence of the law(A1)on the pump intensity(centrifugal distorsion has not been con-sidered in this study.)This allows us to define three regimes of intensity:(i)low intensity associated to a quadratic dependence of C(here up to I=30TW/cm2), (ii)moderate intensity associated to a linear dependence of C,and(iii)high intensity associated to the satu-ration of max t cos2θ −1/3−C.Below the satura-tion,one can consider with a good approximation that max t cos2θ −1/3−C is approximately linear with the field intensity.This leads for low intensities tocos2θ t−1/3≈βξ2+κξf(t)≈κξf(t),(A3) where,for a given molecule and temperature,κandβare constant and f(t)is a specific function independent ofξ.7as a function of the peak pump intensity ofτFWHM=0.1ps in CO2at T=293K(dotted lines).The former is quadratic (fullfitting line)approximately up to I=30TW/cm2and linear for higher intensities.The latter is linear(fullfitting line)for moderate intensities.Similar dependencies can be found for other linear molecules and temperatures.We can notice that the regime of low intensities extendsthe result of the perturbative regime,even if it is not itself a perturbative regime(usually defined as a smallpopulation transfer),since it can exhibit a non negligible alignment(max t cos2θ t≈0.45for I=30TW/cm2). We also haveβξ2≪κξ,which shows that the permanent alignment is negligible for low intensities.For moderateintensity,Fig.5shows that the permanent alignment is linear with respect to the peakfield intensity,which leads tocos2θ t−1/3≈[δ+κf(t)]ξ.(A4) We can thus conclude that at low and moderate intensi-ties(i.e.below the saturation of alignment), cos2θ t−1/3is approximately proportional toξ,i.e.to the pump intensity I.2.Elliptically polarizedfieldWe consider here the postpulse alignment induced by an elliptically polarizedfield E(t)=E(t)(A cos(ωt) e x+ B sin(ωt) e y),A2+B2=1.The associated interaction readsH int=−∆α4E2(t) A2cos2θx+B2cos2θy (A5b)with the particular cases of linear polarizations along x for A=1,along y for B=1,and of circular polarization in the(x,y)plane for A=B=1/√2B2ξ(δ+κf(t)),using again A4.The summa-tion in(A7)gives cos2θx t−1/3≈ξ(A2−B2/2)(δ+κf(t)).Performing the same calculation for i=y,z,we finallyfind that in the intermediatefield regime,cos2θx t−1/3≈ξ(A2−B2/2)(δ+κf(t)),(A8a) cos2θy t−1/3≈ξ(B2−A2/2)(δ+κf(t)),(A8b) cos2θz t−1/3≈−ξ(δ+κf(t))/2.(A8c) We have in particular that cos2θx t−1/3is well approx-imated by the quantityξ(δ+κf(t))obtained from the interaction with a linearly polarizedfield of peak inten-sity I times the scale factor(A2−B2/2).We remark that cos2θz t−1/3does not depend on the ellipticity.We also notice that cos2θy t−1/3≈0when B2=A2/2,i.e. B2=1/3,A2=2/3.This particular ellipticity allows the directionsθx andθz to play a symmetric role in(A5a). This property has been used in Ref.[11]to demonstrate the optimal alternation of postpulse alignment.For perpendicular polarizations,the observable cos2θx t− cos2θy t is required.We obtaincos2θx t− cos2θy t≈38We can conclude that a good approximation for cos2θx t− cos2θy t can be obtained in the interme-diate regime by calculating numerically cos2θi t−1/3with a singlefield linearly polarized along i of intensity I and by applying the scale factor3。

相关文档
最新文档