The Schematic Theory and English Reading Comprehension Teaching

合集下载

社会语言学变异研究经典文献 读书笔记

社会语言学变异研究经典文献 读书笔记

社会语言学变异研究经典文献读书笔记一、引言社会语言学是语言学中的一个重要分支,它研究语言在社会和文化环境中的变异现象。

在社会语言学中,变异研究是一个重要的课题,而经典文献则是研究者深入了解社会语言学变异的重要途径之一。

本文将以经典文献为基础,对社会语言学变异研究进行深入探讨,旨在了解社会语言学变异的现状和发展动向。

二、经典文献1. William Labov的《The Social Stratification of English in New York City》这是一部关于美国纽约市英语社会分层的经典著作,作者通过对纽约市不同社会阶层的人群进行语言调查和研究,揭示了不同社会阶层在语音、语法和词汇等方面的差异。

该文献被认为是社会语言学变异研究的开山之作,为后续研究奠定了重要基础。

2. Penelope Eckert和Sally McConnell-Ginet的《Language and Gender》这部经典文献主要探讨了语言和性别之间的关系,作者通过深入访谈和观察,揭示了在不同语境下,男性和女性在语言使用上的差异。

该文献为社会语言学中的性别变异研究提供了重要的理论框架和实证数据。

3. John Baugh的《Linguistic Profiling as a Challenge to the Assumptions of the Critical Period Hypothesis》这篇文章主要探讨了语言在种族和社会地位方面的变异。

作者通过对不同种族和社会地位的人群进行语言调查和研究,揭示了在不同社会语境下语言的歧视和分化现象。

该文献为社会语言学变异研究提供了新的视角和理论支持。

三、研究内容了解社会语言学变异的经典文献对于当前社会语言学变异研究具有重要意义。

通过分析经典文献可以深入了解社会语言学变异的理论基础、研究方法和实证数据,有助于我们对社会语言学变异现象的本质和特点有更加全面和深入的认识。

避雷针原理解析英文

避雷针原理解析英文

Text: the.Preface: early in 1749 years, American franklin, based on cutting-edge emits no vision to neutralize the charge LeiYun charge, can avoid the idea of lightning, invented the lightning rod. But after the lightning and the lightning installation, no itself not only more vulnerable to avoid thunder lightning. According to this phenomenon, the Soviet union in 1753 years SuoFu receive forward "lightning rod is crooked lead thunder substation games in itself, make its surrounding objects from lightning", namely actually lead thunder lightning itself needle explanation. LeiLan again in 1755 klingons, publish articles concerning lead thunder lightning itself has both the dual role of corona, have, but in different conditions, or show lead thunder, lightning strikes or presentation role role. This is done in a more objective lightning, comprehensive explanation. Unfortunately many people to notice of lightning rod of franklin 1755 role explanation.Two hundred years, direct lightning protection area in the lightning though a wide range of applications, but because of the complexity of lightning process, the lightning rod role is also not identical, know that now application lightning rod head shape according to the varied, have the concept of franklin in 1749, based on the tip LeiYun charge and discharge, avoid lightning, and use biforked many pointed needle. More common in buildings and structures on lightning rod. There SuoFu 1753 years according to receive, the concept of LeiYun and the earth is to turn the lightning lead thunder electric field, in itself, avoid surrounding equipment be struck by lightning, and use single flat metal pipe or great. In the power system hair, substation lightning rod. Some also think that lightning rod head actual size larger or smaller relative to the earth or LeiYun is pointed tips, so head make it small spherical also lightning does not affect its lead thunder role, see more at metal flagpole with metal pipe type ball lightning rod. And all kinds of lightning rod head what different lead thunder effect rarely research. In some authoritative magazine, the lightning rod head shape often shown as shown in figure 1 of furcated. This creates furcated lightning rod head lightning protection effect seems moreGood concept, and even appeared ray harm accident, a also blames lightning rod head without bifurcate, think in ray needles on lightning protection of bifurcation only more reliable, asks to install bifurcate lightning rod head. For example, a force of ammunition combing-out lightning protection device is installed, the original design of the steel tube of lightning rod, crew-cut but troop rotation, new head forward without biforked lightning troops, and the copper to think lightning protection effect is not reliable and refused to sign the hand to receive. This makes some local specialized production, sales, non-ferrous metal fork head type lightning rod.In order to validate all kinds of lightning rod head of lightning effect, we all shapes of lightning rod head compared the simulation test. Second, various shapes lightning rod head simulating test lead thunderLightning discharge is punctured air gap for decades to hundreds of meters, according to lightning optical, but also the photo analysis can be divided into three stages, namely guide discharge stage, after ZhuFang electric stage and light discharge stage and problems with direct lightning protection after discharge stage light is irrelevant. The direct lightning protection mainly dependson the issues lead thunder forerunner discharge stage (overvoltage protection problems depends mainly on ZhuFang electric stage). So as long as analog pilot discharge stage, length is in 1 meter or more long air discharge gap in essence, and has the same properties lightning discharge. In time due to lightning discharge not controllable and site for the study of the effect of the lead thunder lightning law and discharge gap only through long simulated experiments to. Trials with 2 x 2 LeiYun ㎡to simulate the flat, with a 1200KV by protecting resistance dc voltage generator connection, and LeiYun "for control" starting isoelectric point, in "the center of LeiYun" electrode install a 20cm long metal bar, used to simulate LeiYun pilot. To the distance of electrodes 1.1 m. Lightning rod model made use wire, high 88 ㎜. The schematic diagram as shown in figure 1.Lightning rod needles shape respectively(1) the needle, and ground it very sharp pointed needle as;(2) the lightning rod, the top ground flat as plain;(3) in the lightning rod welding a 1.55 mm on top of the ball, the abbreviation ball needle;A pointed except the central better-even from tip down the lightning rod, the whole high in model, each other poor in 3.75% 120 °, elevationFor 45 °, welding three inclined radiate upward, long for model of all high 3.75% corona needles, abbreviation fork needle tip.We have developed using optical fibre dc high voltage meter LeiYun field to simulate the dc high voltage electric fieldsStrength of different shape measurement on the lightning rod electric field intensity probe measurement results such as table 1, measurement of the barThing is, in LeiYun lead directly into different shapes respectively the lightning rod, measuring instruments in the probeLightning rod twice the lightning rod just above the position, high electric discharge pointed needle to an external voltage as 100%.When an external voltage must tip needle and fork probe in dc high voltage electric field in the electric field intensity vertical distribution curve as shown in figure 2.The simulation Y - E (that) curve: near field of electric intensity, near the lightning than fork pointed needle, needle much higher in "leading" LeiYun height, fork near field of the needleneedle inverse ratio, pointed, whether pointed needle or high needle ∫E dy fork U, U to simulate = LeiYun electrode for a dc voltage. This and electrician foundation theory is that with the measurement result is credible.Three, the conclusionNow put into use of various shapes lightning rod head all change electric field, lead thunder from their own role. But their lead thunder results are very different, bifurcate type lightning rod head wasted non-ferrous metal and increased processing fees, although many investment by lightning rod which the bifurcation in engineering of manpower and material resources of proportion of small, but bifurcate type coronaThe needle, it is worst lead thunder effect, but no harm accident to spend more money to buy ray is obviously not worthwhile. Unfortunately there are still many people have no knowledge.Through experimental research, we simulated the conclusion is the root of the head of a single lead thunder lightning rod works best, second is the lightning rod, ball head crew-cut lightning rods, and the more space occupied by bifurcation, the head of the fork of the lead thunder lightning the worse effect. To avoid thunder against accidents, we put forward that should stop the production, sale and use of bifurcation type lightning rod head suggestion. Normally, can use flat metal pipe or great do head, at the convenient lightning conditions, had better use of cutting-edge do lightning rod taper small head..References 1 LiuQingYu "jilin power technology" jilin power bureau 19912 cows MaCheng the building lightning protection "henan normal university. 19943 LongLiGong the working principles of the lightning study "the physics 2001。

英语论文-The Application of Schema Theory in Senior High School English Reading Teaching

英语论文-The Application of Schema Theory in Senior High School English Reading Teaching

The Application of Schema Theory in Senior High SchoolEnglish Reading Teaching1.Introduction (1)2. Three models of reading processing (3)2.1 The bottom-up model (3)2.2 The top-down model (4)2.3 The interactive model (4)3. Schema theory (5)3.1 The fundamental concept of schema theory (5)3.2 Classifications of schemata (6)4. The application of schema theory in senior high school English reading teaching (8)4.1 Some considerations in the application of the schema theory in reading instruction (9)4.1.1 The readers (9)4.1.2 Some preparations before reading in relation to schema theory (12)4.2 Some technique in using schema theory in reading instruction (15)4.2.1 Conceptually driven schema (15)4.2.2 Data driven schema (16)4.3 Practical application of schema theory in reading class (17)5. Conclusion (20)References (22)1.IntroductionReading has always been considered one of the most important skills in foreign language learning. It is not only a chief means to gain information and learn English culture, but also an important way to consolidate and expand foreign language know- ledge. According to statistics, about 50% of knowledge that people obtain is from reading (程世禄, 张国扬, 2004).In the traditional way of English reading teaching, senior high school teachers usually focus on teaching single words, phrases or grammatical points. The analysis of English grammar is the main activity in the process of teaching. But they neglectthe point that lacking of language knowledge, background knowledge and passage structure knowledge tends to prevent English learners from reading effectively.During the past few decades, the schema theory has been introduced to English reading classes, which makes the research of schema theory in the teaching of English reading a hot topic. Currently, the concept ―schema‖is no longer strange to the instructors and researchers in the field of reading. Schema is a term first used in the field of cognitive psychology by F.C. Bartlett (Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. CUP. 1932).Though still debatable, schema is generally being referred as a mental structure. It is abstract because it does not relate to any particular experience, although it derives from all the particular experience we have had. It is a structure because it is organized; it includes the relationships between its components (Christine Nuttall, 2002).Can schema theory be one of the most influential ways to improve students‘reading ability? And how is schema theory applied in the teaching of reading? In this thesis, we will discuss schema theory and its application in the English reading teaching to get the best answer. But the decomposition of the reading process should be done first for the purpose of the present study on the application of schema theroy in reading. Only after we unpack the reading process and have a good understanding of the component processing of reading can we investigate and speculate the use of schema theory in reading comprehension. Fundamentally, psychologists have distinguished three kinds of processing: the top-down processing, the bottom-up processing and the interactive processing. Here in part two, we will have a furtherresearch on these reading processes.2. Three models of reading processing2.1 The bottom-up modelIn bottom-up processing, the reader builds up a meaning from the black marks on the page: recognizing letters and words, working out sentence structure. We can make conscious use of it when an initial reading leaves us confused. Perhaps we cannot believe that the apparent message was really what the writer intended; this can happen if our world knowledge is inadequate, or if the writer‘s point of view is very different from our own. In that case, we must scrutinize the vocabulary and syntax to make sure we have grasped the plain sense correctly. Thus bottom-up processing can be used as a corrective to ‗tunnel vision‘ (seeing things only from our own limited point of view).Our image of bottom-up processing might be a scientist with a magnifying glass examining the ecology of a transect – a tiny part of the eagle surveys. The scientist develops a detailed understanding of that one little area (which might represent a sentence in the text); but full understanding only comes if this is combined with knowledge of adjacent areas and the wider terrain, so that their effects on one another can be recognized. In other words, bottom-up and top-down approaches are used to complement each other.2.2 The top-down modelIn top-down processing, we draw on our own intelligence and experience—the predictions we can make, based on the schemata we have acquired to understand the text. As we know, this kind of processing is used when we interpret assumptions and draw inferences. We make conscious use of it when we try to see the overall purpose of the text, or get a rough idea of the pattern of the writer‘s argument, in order to make a reasoned guess at the next step (on the grounds that having an idea of what something might mean can be a great help in interpreting it.)We might compare this approach to an eagle‘s eye view of the landscape. From a great height, the eagle can see a wide area spread out below; it understands the nature of the whole terrain, its general pattern and the relationships between various parts of it, far better than an observer on the ground. A reader adopts an eagle‘s eye view of the text when he considers it as a whole and relates it to his own knowledge and exp erience. This enables him to predict the writer‘s purpose, the likely trend of the argument and so on, and then use this framework to interpret difficult parts of the text. The top-down approach gives a sense of perspective and makes use of all that the reader brings to the text: prior knowledge, common sense, etc, which have sometimes been undervalued in the reading class.2.3 The interactive modelThis model is the interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing. Although logically we might expect that we ought to understand the plain sense if we are tounderstand anything else, in practice a reader continually shifts from one focus to another, now adopting a top-down approach to predict the probable meaning, then moving to the bottom-up approach to check whether that is really what the writer says. This has become known as interactive model. Until 1970s, reading is first considered to be an interactive model by Rumemlhart. The interactive model is a theory which can entirely explain the reading process. The interactive model is also called the schema theory model. The schema theory model uses two methods to deal with information: one is ―bottom-up‖model; the other is ―top-down‖model. During the reading progress, no matter in any moment, those two models are always carried out at the same time. Bottom-up information dealing assures readers of discovering new information and information which is different with their own supposing. Top-down information dealing helps readers distinguish different meanings and make correct choice. Both approaches can be mobilized by conscious choice, and both are important strategies for readers. Therefore, Schema Theory model is not only a theory that explains the reading process but also a theory that fits for English reading teaching (陈开顺, 1988).3. Schema theory3.1 The fundamental concept of schema theoryThe accomplishment of Schema Theory owes to American artificial intelligence expert Rumelhart in 1970s. According to Rumelhart, schema theory is basically atheory about human knowledge, about how the knowledge is organized and stored in units in human‘s brain, and about how the knowledge is applied. His important conclusion on schema which can be regarded as the most significant in reading instruction is that schema contains many variables, which lead to various output or interpretation. The application of schema is associated in different settings which include different learners, the learners‘cultural background, and their linguistic competence at the time of instruction and so on. We believe it is this variable feature of schema that makes reading instruction a complex work that is worthy of study in the practice of reading instruction.3.2 Classifications of schemataGenerally speaking, schema can be divided into three types: linguistic schema, content schema and formal schema. Linguistic schema is reader s‘ mastering degree of the language materials. Content schema is readers‘familiar degree of the topic discussed in the article. Formal schema is readers‘ understanding degree of the article style.Linguistic schema is the base of content schema and formal schema. It is important for students to build linguistic schema, because language is students‘ weak points. Without linguistic schema, students cannot make use of the information of the reading materials to apply content schema and formal schema in their mind. In this way, they can never understand the articles. For example, a student who doesn‘t know English at all read a text on Christmas which he is familiar so much. No matter howhe is familiar with that festival, he still cannot understand the meaning of the text, because linguistic schema is the base. Without linguistic schema, content schema and formal schema cannot make effect. Instead, even though readers have firm linguistic schema but not be familiar to the content and formal of the reading materials, they cannot get better understanding of the reading materials.Look at the following passage:Business had been slow since the oil crisis. Nobody seemed to want anything elegant anymore. Suddenly the door opened and a well-dressed man entered the showroom floor. John put on his friendliest and most sincere expression as he walked toward the man.“I’ll take it. Cash on the line.” The man asserted within a few minutes.Later, as he was completing the paper work, John murmured to himself, “What does he really know about elegance?”(as cited in Chen xianchun).The words in this passage are not very difficult. Many senior high students consider that there is no new word. However, when students are asked where the conversation happened, what is John, or where is ―show room‖, almost no one can answer correctly. Someone said the conversation happened in exhibition hall. Students also understand the answer to ―what john is‖. Few students can explain ―show room‖well. But if the students were American, they can easily know that ―show room‖ is car selling place and the conversation happened in car selling place. They can even know that John is a businessman who sells cars while another person is a car buyer. The whole passage didn‘t appear the word ―car‖. However, American students can stillguess that the passage is about car business. Because there is content schema in their mind, they can suppose car oil from the words ―oil crisis‖and suppose payment methods from ―cash on the line‖. Cars are rather widely used in America, so almost every American student can understand the passage well. While the Chinese students have no such schema in their mind, they cannot think as American students do. From the condition above, although readers‘language element is important, some simple problems have to be solved by cultural background knowledge. The meaning is gained from special cultural environment. Getting information from the articles depend on the knowledge people have. If people want to comprehend the articles well, they should apply the three kinds of schema. Therefore, teachers should realize that reading is not only a process of understanding words but also a process of reciprocity between mental element and cultural background. In order to gain the best understanding of reading materials, teachers should lead students to build perfect schema and enlighten students to apply schema.4. The application of schema theory in senior high school Englishreading teachingResearch on teaching reading suggests that schema theory can optimize the reading development of students and it has provided numerous benefits to English reading teaching. Most current ESL/EFL textbooks attempt schema activation through pre-reading activities. In applying schema theory to the teaching of reading, which emphasizes on getting the gist of the texts, we can see a positive influence on thepre-reading activities, as it ‗builds up absent schemata, activates resident schemata and improve L2 reader comprehension in many situations (Scott 2001: 80).For example, when students are reading a passage about the solar system, previewing the text such as the title and figures helps them predict what they are going to read and activates their ‗content schemata‘(background knowledge of the world) of the solar system. The way we interpret texts depends on the schemata activated by the text; and whether we interpret successfully depends on whether our schemata are sufficiently similar to the writer‘s. The application to schema theory explains the research findings on how personal background knowledge helps the literacy development.4.1 Some considerations in the application of the schema theory in reading instruction4.1.1 The readersReaders can be divided into different groups according to different norms. Here, the classifying of readers involves two major norms: the readers‘ linguistic proficiency and their level of schema.By ―level of schema‖ we mean:a) Whether the reader possesses a sufficient knowledge of the world that can be activated for particular needs;b) Whether the reader‘s knowledge of the world is normally organized, this means that whether his knowledge of the world is consistent to the socially andculturally recognized norms. This item is proposed because of the observation that there are many occasions when readers make wild and absurd interpretations of the text that is not meant by the writer;c) Whether the reader has a schema for some specific field and how professional his schema in this field is. Readers can be approximately classified as below. (An approximate classification is due to the consideration that very detailed one may complicate the analysis work and lead to the failure of locating the main problems.)This diagram illustrates the following features of readers:a) Poor readers have stronger tendency of being weak in linguistic competence.b) A basic condition of being good readers is their good linguistic competence.c) Both good and weak readers share the overlapping feature of being good at linguistic competence and weak at schema.We will first focus our discussion on the reading instruction of the first category of readers in the perspective of schema theory. Observations in the reading reveal that schema theory turns out to be less valid to the readers with low linguistic competence, since schema method more or less has the characters of ―top-down mode‖ which emphasizes processing from higher-level skills. But automatic perception and decoding is the crucial foundation for initiating the higher-level skills. When readers are in their low linguistic stage, they still cannot surmount the difficulty of decodingin order to base their prediction on or activate their schema. David E. Eskey (Patricia L. Carrell et al, 1988) pointed out that interactive processing should be the interaction between information obtained by means of bottom-up decoding and information provide by means of top-down analysis. This statement strongly supports the belief that reading instruction should be ―held in the bottom‖ without which neither interactive approach nor schema method can be effectively applied. Experiments prove that more time is consumed when using top skills like guessing, predicting and confirming. While the basic recognition of vocabulary and structure provides the primary information entailed for activating the concerning schema. Therefore, it is feasible to believe that schema method is less adaptable to the readers with low linguistic competence, since schema method cannot and should not be responsible for direct instruction of language acquisition. This conclusion especially explains why readers with good schema, yet low linguistic competence still fail to be fluent and skillful readers due to their constraint linguistic competence.The second issue worthy of discussing is about good readers and poor readers who are both linguistically proficient but weak at schema. What are the factors that classify them into two categories of being good or poor readers? Here, ―weak at schema‖ can be reflected in tw o ways. One is that the readers totally lack the relevant schema, the other is that the schema may not be activated. Patricia L. Carell et al claims after studies that ESL reading comprehension may be affected not because the ESL readers lack the appropriate schema. (Patricia L. Carell et al, 1988.). According to this judgement, we can conclude that the good readers are those who seek to useflexible reading strategies and skills in their reading activities to make association and activate their storage of schema using available information. These strategies may include flexible switch from bottom-up to top-down or vice versa in time of need and make use of any available clues. The shift of processing mode helps to eliminate the difficulties in assigning meaning to the given text, which will initiate the activation of schema. Carell also notices that less skilled readers and poor readers tend to over rely on one-direction processes, for instance on the knowledge based or top-down processing (Patricia L. Carrell et al, 1988). Reading instruction for this type of poor readers should consist reading strategy instruction and training in order to fully effectuate their linguistic competence in the activation of schema. In conclusion, identifying the difficulties of the readers and the content level and type in regard to the readers is a primary step of purposeful instruction.4.1.2 Some preparations before reading in relation to schema theorySchema can be broadly defined as one‘s general knowledge of the world organized in units, we can find that much of the schema of readers cannot be taught in the reading instruction, but can be acquired through understanding the various texts used as our reading materials that contain these knowledge. We have to bear in mind that the principal goal of reading instruction is to help the reader on how to read instead of teaching the literal contents of the text. So what left us to do in using schema theory in our instruction is to equip the readers some skills and knowledge inusing schema theory in their reading.a) Understanding the formal schemataCarell (1983) draws a distinction between formal schemata and content schemata. Here, in this part we attempt to discuss the formal schemata, since this is something we can do to prepare the readers some knowledge about the text organization. According to Carell, formal schemata means the background knowledge of the formal rhetorical organizationl structure of different types of texts (fable, expository text, story, scientific text, poetry, news etc.) As we know, each type of the texts has its particular organization and style features. A knowledge of these will engage the readers in appropriate formal schema before reading or facilitate reading by constraining the reader in a particular suitable strategy to other less efficient processing for reading a particular type of text. The formal knowledge can be instructed before the reading program begins. The features of each of the types can bedisplayed with sample texts or explained directly by the teacher. Another way found effective for the readers to get acquainted with the features of the types is to display the sample texts of each of the types at the same time. Instead of explaining, the teacher can ask the readers to make comparisons to find out the differences between one type and another and make judgement themselves.b) Understanding some truth about writingThe instruction of this topic seems to have something in common with the reading strategy instruction. It does. In the application of schema theory in reading, the reader‘s abilities of inference and making association are of crucial in successfulcomprehension.Readers should be made aware through analysis of sample texts of the fact that the writer does not express everything he means, that the words or sentences may be deliberately employed not to convey their literal meaning, and that the writer may not provide sufficient clues and information. In such situation, the conventional pre-class activities like background introduction, prediction based on topic and illustrations and pre-class discussion may produce limited effect in obtaining coherent understanding of the intersentential meaning. So in this issue, the readers should be guided, again with sample texts to be alert to discover the underlying meaning of texts instead of wrestling only with the literal expressions. Readers have to be made known that they are responsible for filling out the messages not explicitly stated, interpreting the text seemingly absurd and inconsistent with the context. All these have to be made out by making inference with both their linguistic knowledge and locating the schema unit for the particular parts or the text. Besides, they should be instructed to constantly check or monitor their understan ding. By ―understanding‖, we mean a comprehension of not only local individual details, but also a coherent understanding of the whole text. This can be achieved in reading class by, for example, asking the successful readers to present or report how a comprehension is solved, how the thinking process happens or what knowledge he resorts to.4.2 Some technique in using schema theory in reading instructionAs Carrell (1983) mentioned that comprehension inefficiency is not because the readers lack the appropriate schema, but because they fail to activate the appropriate schema. What a teacher of reading should concentrate on is to design suitable classroom activities to help readers locate an appropriate schema among the numerous schema units in their storage.4.2.1 Conceptually driven schemaConceptually driven schema means activation of reader‘s schema by high level information such as concerning situation. Previewing is a pre-reading activity that provides the reader with some important and relevant information. It proves to be important for the less proficient readers. According to Patricia L. Carrell, (Paticia L. Carell et al 1988), Preview may include:a) providing outline;b) key concepts of cultural loads;c) providing some background;d) presenting specialized vocabulary and structure.These activities help to activate readers‘ schema through providing a general setting and confining the slot, which will instantiate and activate the components of the setting. To take ―shopping‖ as an example. If the setting of ―shopping‖ is presented, people will produce such associations as ―buyers‖, ―sellers‖, ―casher‖,―goods‖, ―money‖ and the shopping activities like ―bargain‖, ―paying‖, and even every detailed scenes of shopping. In this example, when the readers are presented a ―shopping‖ setting, they would search in their schema storage and locate the unit concerning ―shopping‖, and activate the schema in the lower level, namely, the associated words and concepts, which enter the processing as input materials. So, by application of the four activities of previewing mentioned above, the readers‘ schema are conceptually driven, or activated in a way of top-to-down.4.2.2 Data driven schemaAnother type of common activities used to activate schema is applying the lower level components to activate the higher-level schema, or Data driven schema. In these activities, readers are required to focus their attention on the text source like the key words, pictures, diagrams and so on. The information derived from these sources will function as activating certain higher-level schema those components may belong to. And when the higher-level schema is activated, it will cause activation of lower level components. For instance, when the name ―Michael Jordan‖ is presented as a key word, it will activate quite several higher-level schemas different from one to another. ―NBA‖ schema may be activated in some people; ―the brilliant history of Chicago Bulls‖ schema may touch the others. If the brand name ―Nike‖ is added to ―Michael Jordan‖, then the higher schema of ―advertisement‖ will be brought to readers‘ mind. This ―advertisement‖ schema will in turn activate either the high-level schema of the fashion of popular stars in advertisement or the lower-level schema, for example,about ―Nike‖ products. Pictures or diagrams provide parts of the information, too. They can be resorted to activate the appropriate schema.4.3 Practical application of schema theory in reading classSchema theory is complex and abstract. How to apply it into English teaching is a key question. It is impossible for teachers to explain the concept of schema theory as students‘ receptivity is limited. It is difficult for students to understand or apply schema theory. Therefore, teachers should turn schema theory into activities. In this way, students can easily comprehend schema theory. How to turn schema theory into activities? With the help of previous schema methods, the researcher takes one teaching case to discuss this problem.The researcher takes one lesson of Senior High School, Body Language from Unit 4 of Student‘s Book 4 for example to explain the application of schema theory in practice.Firstly, the teacher shows some pictures such as smile, frown, embrace, handshake, and kiss etc. to the students and then put the pictures on the blackboard. In this way, students can gain information according to vision. During this course, content schema comes into being in students‘ mind. They may make hypothesis that the message will be learnt is about people‘s express ion and action.Secondly, the teacher writes the word (smile, frown, embrace, handshake, and kiss) under each picture on the blackboard. Seeing the words under the pictures, students‘ brains produce Linguistic Schema. In this sense, the pictures match wit h the words. And then the teacher gives students a phrase: body language. The phrase canimprove students‘ original hypothesis in semantic aspect. Words as gesture, manner, custom, and communicate are also showed to students. In this case, students‘ conten t schema must be reactivated. They may produce association of ideas: different gestures express different meanings; what is the most decent manner; different countries may have different customs; only understand the knowledge above can people avoid the obstacle of communication. At this moment, the teacher would like to ask students some questions: Do people in China often embrace and kiss in public? How about people in western countries? The questions can activate students‘ Schema on the difference between eastern countries and western countries. The questions also bring background knowledge of the article: English people are more conservative, so you must keep a distance while talking with them. However, people from places like Spain, Italy or South American countries are more passionate, so it is a good manner to stand closer with them while talking.Finally, the teacher would help students apply linguistic schema to read the article. Linguistic Schema is the comprehending of vocabulary and language structure. Therefore, before students read the article, besides giving them meaning of new words and the usage of key phrase, the teacher would analyze the complex sentences of the article in order to get rid of the obstacle that students meet while reading.In order to make students make hypothesis and improve hypothesis, and finally correctly understand the meaning of articles, the researcher thinks it is necessary for teachers to bring up students‘ ability of applying linguistic schema and content schema. Through continuous practice of building schema, most students can quickly and correctly answer the question of articles, including the subjective question: Which people are the most enthusiastic in the world?Different articles have different content, topic, style and structure. Therefore,。

图示理论对猜测词义的启示

图示理论对猜测词义的启示

图示理论对猜测词义的启示-教师教育论文图示理论对猜测词义的启示文/李建明近年来高考英语阅读理解对词义的推断主要考查的是生词词义判断、代词的指代判断、旧词新义的推断和普通词义的特殊意思。

在学生平时的阅读活动中,生词是影响学生阅读速度的重要因素,因此,在平时的教学中,教师应该注意有意识地培养学生猜测词义的能力。

一、图式理论和阅读模式图式(schema)这一概念最早由德国哲学家康德(Kant)提出,是知识在大脑中的储存单位,它包括各种各样的知识。

就阅读而言,图式有三种类型,即语言图式,内容图式和结构语言、内容、形式这三种图式并不是孤立的,在阅读教学中这三种图示交替出现,不可分割。

阅读模式通常分为三种:①自下而上模式(Bottom-up Model)以菲利普B.高夫(Philip B.Gough)的模式为代表,属传统的阅读理解理论,源于19世纪中叶。

模式蕴含一个基本假设,即阅读从字词解码开始,直到获取意义。

自下而上”模式,也被称作信息加工模式。

读者经过对字母、词、短语直至更大的语言单位(如句子)的逐级识别而建构语篇的意义。

②自上而上的模式:(Top-down Model)从上而下的模式以肯尼思S.古德曼(Kenneth S.(Goodman)的模式为代表。

③相互影响的模式(interactive model)相互影响的模式则以戴维E.鲁墨哈特(David E.Rumelbart)的模式为代表。

二、阅读模式对猜测词义的启示根据Goodman,阅读是自上而下进行的一种“心理语言学的猜测游戏”(Goodman,1967)阅读理解的练习活动要有明显的层次,应该让学生先了解文章的主旨大意,在去研读具体信息和提炼主要语言,从而提高学生快速理解文章的能力。

因而在高考阅读理解的猜词题中是很有用的。

根据笔者多年的高中英语教学,可以把词义猜测的技巧分为如下两大类:语境法和构词法,并从中有效指导教学。

1.利用语境法进行对词义的猜测(Context clues)(1)定义描述:定义或释义关系常由定语从句或be called,be known as,be defined as等词汇或破折号来表示;或由is,that is (to say),in other words,to put it another way引出一些具体的解释性的短语放在生词后做它的同位语,用逗号隔开,构成同位关系。

schema theory名词解释

schema theory名词解释

schema theory名词解释Schema theory, also known as a schema schema, is a psychological concept that refers to the mental framework or structure we use to organize and interpret information. A schema represents a person's prior knowledge and experiences, and it helps individuals process new information by relating it to existing knowledge.In simple terms, a schema can be visualized as a mental blueprint or framework that shapes how we perceive, process, and remember information. It acts as a filter that enables us to make sense of the world around us. Schemas are formed through personal experiences, cultural influences, and educational backgrounds.The schema theory was first proposed by the psychologist Jean Piaget, who asserted that individuals actively construct and organize their knowledge based on their experiences. According to schema theory, when we encounter new information, our brain searches for a schema that matches this information. If a schema is found, it helps us understand and interpret the new information within the context of our existing knowledge. However, if aschema is not readily available, we may need to adjust or create new schemas to accommodate the new information.Schemas can be applied to various aspects of life. For example, in social interactions, we use social schemas to understand and interpret the behavior of others. These social schemas are developed through our past experiences and cultural norms. Similarly, in the field of education, teachers often rely on schema theory to facilitate learning by activating and building upon students' existing schemas.However, it's important to note that schemas can also lead to biases and stereotypes. Our preexisting schemas can influence how we interpret information, leading to selective attention or memory bias. For instance, if someone has a negative schema about a particular ethnic group, they may interpret information in a way that aligns with their preexisting beliefs, even if the information presented is contradictory.In conclusion, schema theory is a psychological concept that emphasizes the role of mental frameworks or schemas in organizing and interpreting information. Schemas help us make sense of the world by relating new information to our existing knowledge. Understanding how schemas function can provideinsight into how we perceive and process information, and how they can influence our interpretations and judgments.。

英语论文-The Application of Schema Theory in English Reading Teaching in Senior High Schools

英语论文-The Application of Schema Theory in English Reading Teaching in Senior High Schools

The Application of Schema Theory in English ReadingTeaching in Senior High Schools1.Introduction (2)1.1 Background and purpose of this research (2)1.2Significance of this research (3)1.3Research questions (4)2. Literature Review (4)2.1 Definition of reading (4)2.1.1 Reading as a decoding process (4)2.1.2 Reading as a selective and predictive process (5)2.1.3 Reading as an interactive process (5)2.1.4 Reading as a schema-constructed process (6)2.2 Typical models of reading (6)2.2.1 Bottom-up model (7)2.2.2 Top-down model (7)2.2.3 Interactive-compensatory model (8)3. The Schema and Schema Theory (9)3.1The meaning of schema (9)3.2 Schema Theory (10)3.3 The classification of schema (12)3.4 The functions of schema (13)3.4.1 Prediction of reading content (13)3.4.2 Selection of information input (13)3.4.3 Helping remembering (13)3.4.4 Attraction of read ers’ attention (14)4. The Role of the Schema Theory on the English Reading (14)4.1 The current situation of English Reading in Senior High School (14)4.2 The reasons affect the reading by schema (15)4.3 Effective reading based on schema abilities (15)4.3.1 Activating background knowledge and establishing the content schema (15)4.3.2 Predicting meaning to assist the reading process (16)4.3.3 Extracting the main idea and analyzing the textual structure (16)5. The Application of Schema Theory in Senior English Reading Teaching (17)5.1 Hypothesis (17)5.2 Subjects (18)5.3 Instruments (18)5.4 Testing procedures (19)5.5 Materials and training procedures (19)5.6 Results and discussion (24)6. Conclusion (25)References (28)Appendix 1 (31)E (34)Appendix 2 (35)1.IntroductionAs everyone knows, reading plays a very important role in English teaching. How can the readers read to achieve the best results? The traditional reading advocates using the bottom-up model —a kind of passive decoding model, by which readers only need to read word by word and it will be very easy for them to get the whole meaning. With the development of applied linguistics and psychological linguistics, it is found that reading is not a process of passive decoding, but a process of active “guess-confirm” (Goodman, 1971:135), which is the top-down model. After that, Rumelhart (1977) said that reading is a process that the bottom-up model and the top-down model interact together and at the same time process word information, which is called an interactive model. No matter what kind of model is used, either the readers’ background knowledge or the schematic knowledge is needed.The paper mainly concerns the conception of schema theory, the function of schema to reading and the enlightenment of schema theory to the reading teaching and above all is about how the students are trained in English reading under the guidance of schema theory by the teacher with the purpose of the three research questions.1.1 Background and purpose of this research“The written word surrounds us daily. It confuses us and enlightens us, it depresses us and amuses us, and it sickens us and heals us.” From Brandy’s words(1983) we can find how important reading is to everyone in a literate society. Some experts estimated that 80% of people’s knowledge is obtained through reading with only 20% through their own experience. Clearly, reading is valuable and it is very important to all students when they learn a language. As Carrel (1987) pointed out, “for many students, reading is by far the most important of the four skills in a second language, particularly in English as second or foreign language.”In China, the current Senior High School English Curriculum Standards demand that the reading teaching purpose is, first of all, to train students to read more effectively, to develop students’reading habits and to stimulate their interests in English. Both teachers and students in high school realize English reading is so important that they spend a lot of time and energy on it. However, there are many problems in English reading instruction in Senior High Schools. Many students tend to be passive audiences rather than active participants in class. After class, they seldom read English materials except for their textbooks, and they have to do a large number of exercises modeling the test paper of NMET (National Matriculation Entrance Test). As a result, they have a narrow scope of knowledge, read with a slow speed, and cannot understand English texts successfully. In a word, their reading competence is poor.1.2Significance of this researchThis research was designed to help the teachers achieve a better understanding of the schema theory and its effect on improving English reading based on schematheory. This thesis also demonstrates how such application can be carried out at classroom level by addressing the specific procedure and evaluation method of an experimental research conducted jointly by the author and a middle school English teacher. Although the research is only at the experimental level and may still need further improvement, its basic goals have been achieved and it has displayed the power of activating schemata in language learning to the front line in-service teachers.1.3Research questions(i) Does reading training under the guidance of schema theory improve the reading ability of high school ESL (English Second Language) learners?(ii) How is the effectiveness of reading training under the guidance of schema theory related to the reading proficiency of the students?(iii) What’s the relationship between reading comprehension and schema theory?2. Literature Review2.1 Definition of readingReading behavior is a part of daily life. It is an ordinary way in which we use written language to get information for survival, learning, enjoyment and so on. So reading is so important that we can’t break away from it in the modern world.2.1.1 Reading as a decoding processThose who hold this idea believe that when a speaker or writer has a message inhis mind, he wants somebody else to share. First, he encodes it and expresses it in language. Once it is encoded in either spoken or written form, it is available outside his mind as a text. The reader or the listener can receive the text and decode the message. Then reading as a decoding process is founded.2.1.2 Reading as a selective and predictive processReading is a kind of selecting process, which the reader uses language knowledge and relevant information to piece and chooses useful things. That is, based on the reader’s predict, to use the less selective language code to form the prediction and judgment. Goodman(1971) described reading as a psycholinguistic guessing game and a cyclical process in which the reader figures out meanings with their formerly acquired knowledge. The approach to reading emphasized the reader’s use of all relevant information to get meaning.2.1.3 Reading as an interactive processReading is a process in which the reader and the text (the writer) work interactively. The meaning neither adheres to the printed symbols, nor passive waits for the reader to find out. The reader should take advantage of varied knowledge through prediction, inference to obtain the meaning and understand the text. This perspective was firstly posed by Rumelhart in 1977. He expressed his idea that reading was not a passive process of decoding the printed symbols but an interactive model which works together with both lower level and higher level. It refers to thegeneral interaction, which takes place between the reader and the text. The basic concept is that the reader reconstructs the text information based in part on the knowledge drawing from the text and on part from the prior knowledge available to the reader (Carrel & Eisterhold, 1983). While reading, according to the text information, the reader reacts to the text with his background knowledge, word knowledge and linguistic knowledge.2.1.4 Reading as a schema-constructed processReading comprehension is a complex process, which has also been described as a constructive process (Bartlett, 1932). In order to understand the text, the reader must use information, which is explicit and implicit to form a schema. Readers interpret a text according to their schemata. Schema theory believes that knowledge is systematically organized (Rumelhart, 1980). A schema can be defined as having elements or components which can be delineated and which are ordered in specific ways. Readers are thought to use schemata to anticipate text contents and structures. 2.2 Typical models of readingIn this part, some of the key theoretical perspectives on the nature of reading are examined. Linguists believe that there are two basic models of information processing: bottom-up and top-down models. Schema theory calls for operation of both approaches: interactive approach.2.2.1 Bottom-up modelBottom-up model began with individual word and structure in texts. That is, reading as a decoding process. The writer used words, symbols and certain grammar rules to encode his thought as language. The reader should decode language to his thought. That is, it began with the smallest meaning unit. From words to sentences, paragraphs and finally to the whole text, it came from the smallest textual units to larger ones and then came to the whole text. In the process readers reconstruct the author’s intended meaning via recognizing the printed letters and words, and build up a meaning for the text. This type of processing is called “data-driven processing”(Carrell & Eisterhold, 1987:221). This model thought reading problem was actually the linguistic problem. This model also underestimated the reader’s active function and did not treat the reader as active worker.2.2.2 Top-down modelTo solve the problems that bottom-up model can not solve, top-down model was posed. Top-down model described reading as a psycholinguistic guessing game. According to this model, the reader selected enough information from the text to predict rather than used the whole textual cues. In the course of reading, the reader was the active party. Readers began to read with general predictions based on their cognitive system. It assumed that on reading, the readers have some hypotheses in mind. Then the hypotheses about the meaning were confirmed or reflected, and new hypotheses came out.To read with this model, the reader might be easy to abuse his predict ability, and neglect the actual meaning. The reader also tent to use his thoughts to understand the text and it was easy for him to misunderstand the writer’s meaning.2.2.3 Interactive-compensatory modelOnce it has been understood by readers, top-down model proves to be helpful in their reading. However, reading is a complex mental process. According to schema theory, not only content schemata, but also linguistic schemata and formal schemata are necessary factors in reading. Therefore an efficient and effective reading requires both top-down and bottom-up strategies operating interactively (Rumelhart, 1980). This is the third model: interactive compensatory model.In interactive processing, top-down model and bottom-up model occur at all levels of analysis simultaneously. On reading, the two processing always work at the same time, no matter on whatever stage or whatever level. The bottom-up model confirms the reader to find new information and things that are different from his hypotheses. The top-down model helps the reader remove ambiguity and select the useful information. So, the reading is the interactive processing between the reader’s knowledge in memory and the textual cues. The article itself does not have fixed meaning, it just directs that the reader use his background knowledge to reconstruct the text. The difference of the knowledge may cause different understanding. Therefore, if the reader stored certain background knowledge, it would be very useful for him to understand the text and make correct judgment.3. The Schema and Schema Theory3.1The meaning of schemaThere are various ways of defining schema, among which the followings are quite influential. Bartlett (1932), in Remembering, A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, defined the term “schema”as “an active organization of past reactions or past experience, which must always be supposed to be operation in any well-adapted organic response”. Rumelhart (1980) came up with this concept of schema and described schema theory basically as a theory of how knowledge is mentally represented in the mind and used. Based on his “schema theory”, “all knowledge is packaged into units. These units are the schemata.” Widdowson (1987) later described schema as “cognitive constructs which allow for the organization of information in a long-term memory”. And finally Cook (1989) redefined the concept as “a mental representation of a typical instance” which helps people to make sense of the world more quickly because “people understand new experiences by activation relevant schemata in their mind”.From the above definitions, we may conclude that schema is made up of the experience stored in memory and background knowledge. The schema is the knowledge units that exist in cerebrum. Generally speaking, every of us have a uniquely personal store of knowledge gained through experiences in his or her life time. This stored knowledge along with its storage structure is called schema. A schema (pl. schemata) is an abstract structure of knowledge. When the readerintegrates the store schema and the offer information together, he can understand the text.3.2 Schema TheoryAs far back as Kant(1781), it was asserted that background knowledge plays a part in comprehension. Bartlett(1932) developed schema theory on this notion to further explain how background knowledge is used by a reader to understand a text. He reported that learners’ reading comprehension mainly depends on their knowledge structure. A learner’s comprehension won’t occur if he doesn’t know the relative background knowledge or he can’t use the background knowledge successfully. He developed schema theory to explain how a reader to understand and recall a text by using background knowledge. Bartlett found that when participants read a story from an unfamiliar culture, their memory of the change over time to fit schemata from their own culture. But Bartlett was vague about how schemata work.In 1970s and 1980s, Bartlett’s theories received an enormous amount of attention in the artificial intelligence work. Rumelhart(1980), an American artificial intelligence expert, further developed the schema concept. He regarded the schemata as “arts of interactive knowledge structure” or “the building blocks of cognition”. He described schema theory as basically a theory of how knowledge is mentally represented in the mind and how it is used.Carrel is a well-known researcher on schema theory who proposed “modern schema theory” in 1983. She maintained that skilled readers constantly shift betweentop-down and bottom-up model according to the demands of the text they are reading. Carrel refers to over-reliance on bottom-up processing as “text-boundless”, and over-reliance on top-down processing as “schema interference”. That is, reading process was a combination of top-down and bottom-up models in which low level and high-level work together interactively as parts of a reading process (Rumelhart, 1977). Carrel and Eisterhold suggested, “The role of background knowledge in language comprehension has been formalized as schema theory, which has as one of its fundamental tenets that text, either spoken or written, does not by itself carry meaning.” This means reading is an interactive process in which the reader makes use of information from his background knowledge as well as information from the printed page. Carrel posed two important concepts: formal schema and content schema. Content schemata refer to the background knowledge of the content area of a text, or the topic a text talked about (Carrell 1988, Carrell &Eisterhold 1988). Formal schemata are higher order structures containing knowledge of rhetorical organization structures, including knowledge of the general properties of text type differences in genre (Carrell & Eisterhold, 1983). A successful reading of passage depends upon a combination of linguistic knowledge, cognitive skills and general experience and knowledge of the world, whether acquired by experience or by learning, which influence greatly the reading comprehension process, for the more the reader brings to the text, the more is taken away.3.3 The classification of schemaAccording to forms of representation, schemata can be classified into three kinds: linguistic schemata, content schemata and formal schemata. The classification distinguishes the differences among the three types of schemata. It reminds teachers that they should activate different schemata and bring them into play according to the features in reading instruction, so the classification is helpful in reading instruction.Linguistic schemata contain the prior knowledge of pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar rules. Without the linguistic schemata, the reader can not recognize words, phrases and sentences, then may cause the failure in comprehension of reading materials.Content schemata contain the background knowledge of the content area or the topic involved in reading materials (Carrell, 1988). For example, readers who have ever been in rural areas might find reading materials about farming easy to understand while an urban reader may not. The content schemata about farming help the readers to understand and recall more than the readers who are less familiar with farming.Formal schemata contain prior knowledge of rhetorical structures and expressing conventions, like different types of text structures: story, play, poem, allegory, prose, etc. All these have their own structures. The prior knowledge defines the reader’s expectations about how pieces of textual information will relate to each other and in what order details will appear (Carrell, 1987).From what has been mentioned above, it is clear that in reading activities linguistic schemata deal with problems of lexical items and grammatical rules, contentschemata with problems of topics, and formal schemata with problems of rhetoric arrangement and passage organization.3.4 The functions of schemaSince the reader’s schema affects both learning and comprehending of the information and ideas of a text, it is very important for teachers and students to understand the functions of schemata if they consciously activate such faculties and put them into effective use.3.4.1 Prediction of reading contentWith the schema, the readers can guess the type of the text, can have different anticipation towards the topic of different types of texts, and especially, the readers can guess the latter context of the text with the help of the former context of the text.3.4.2 Selection of information inputThe schemata can choose input and materials in two ways: the first way is to choose the prediction that the learners make in reading process. On reading, the function of choice is to pick up the information, after finishing understanding, the function of choice is to process and store the information. The ability to choose can make the reader choose the least but the most useful thread.3.4.3 Helping rememberingThe essence of schema is a structure, a frame. It can help students to recall theinformation in the text in a planned way. We know when people are recalling, they always collect the information from long-time remembering in a certain “clue”, while the schema unites the text by using the frame structure in a clue. As a result, it is easy to be remembered.3.4.4 Attraction of readers’ attentionThe schemata can attract reader’s attention. According to the schemata, the students can control their attention while learning a text. That is, the schemata guide them to take notice of the relevant parts and select the appropriate parts, then pay more attention to the important topics, and connect the topic with the whole text.4. The Role of the Schema Theory on the English Reading4.1 The current situation of English Reading in Senior High SchoolReading is very significant to everyone in a literate society. In China, the current Senior High English Curriculum Standards demand that the teacher should help the students read more effectively and improve their reading interest. But in real situation, some students show little interest in reading, and what’s worse they are getting tired of learning English. They seldom trained to read on their own. They just busy in memorizing the words that the teacher demands.4.2 The reasons affect the reading by schemaAccording to schema theory, causes of failure in understanding the reading materials may be:(i) Readers do not have the appropriate schemata. In that case, they could notunderstand the reading materials.(ii) Clues given in the text are insufficient. If readers are provided with enough clues, they may understand the reading materials.(iii) Readers might misunderstand the author and come up with a different understanding.4.3 Effective reading based on schema abilitiesEnglish reading is a complex process of active thinking and information processing. Based on the known information, knowledge and experience, the thinking process of recognition, initiation, prediction, confirmation of the readers is also the language communicative behavior between the readers and the writer by means of text.4.3.1 Activating background knowledge and establishing the content schemaIn English reading, the factors that constrain the process of reading can be divided into two kinds: one is from the outside of the text; the other is from the text itself. The former includes history, culture, society, class and etc. the latter includesthe text structure, syntax, style, etc. Since the text reports the writer’s culture awareness, many articles fill with writer’s national culture. The culture difference in certain degree may cause the failure of comprehension. So, the teacher needs to supply some background knowledge to the students and help them to solve the difficulties. Meanwhile, teacher should guide the students with background knowledge. For example, before the students read the text, the teacher introduces some background knowledge, which will help the students read more effectively.4.3.2 Predicting meaning to assist the reading processAs is already mentioned, prediction is important because it activates schemata, that is, it calls into mind any experiences and associates knowledge that the reader already has about the topic of the text. The teacher is attempting to help the learners activate various preexisting items of knowledge that have previously been unrelated, and to help the child reassemble these items of knowledge into an integrated schema. Teachers may organize prediction based on the title of the article, pictures, questions and so on.4.3.3 Extracting the main idea and analyzing the textual structureThe textual analysis in English reading aims at the training of the students’understanding of the writer’s opinion and writing purpose, so that they can acquire the ability of the bird’s eye at the whole text. Therefore, the key point of the text is not thesentence, but the text.Any reading material has a main idea and a frame structure. Thus, what the reader should do is not to understand the literal meaning expressed by the single word, but to distill and induce the main idea, and analyze the textual structure. What the teachers need to do is to train the students’ analyze ability and induction ability. Once the point concerning the main idea and text structure is activated, the reader begins to make induction, verification and modification on these things so as to have a clear understanding of the main idea and textual structure. The more familiar with the text structure, the easier for the reader to analyze the text. Then the reading speed will be improved.5. The Application of Schema Theory in Senior English Reading TeachingIn this part an experiment of the present research is described in detail, including key questions of the present research, subjects, and instruments testing procedures, material, results and discussion.5.1 HypothesisMuch has been talked about on the rationale of the schema theory and the implication and application in ESL reading classroom within the framework of schema theory. This study aims at exploring the relation between schema theory and reading comprehension in the ESL reading instructions and proving the positive effect of schema theory upon the ESL readers. Thus, an experimental study is designed to answer such research questions as “Can reading comprehension is improved throughthe instructions of schema theory?”, “What’s the relationship between reading comprehension and schema theory?”5.2 SubjectsThe subjects consisted of 60 students (36 girls and 24 boys) which were in Grade Two. The experiment was carried out in NO.1 Middle School in XingNing, Guangdong Province, which is a key school with a total of over 3500 students. These subjects were selected eventually because they were thought to have the same learning background. Before they entered the high school, they all had taken the same entrance exams and their scores must above the enrolment cut-off point that the school set. In this study, a reading pre-test and a post-test were given to the subjects. Scores on the reading proficiency test were indicators of subjects’ proficiency level. According to their pre-test, they were divided into three groups.5.3 InstrumentsA reading proficiency pre-test was constructed to divide the students into three different reading levels. The pre-test included 20 multiple-choice items and consisted of 5 passages, ranging from 350-400 words in length. Bereither and Bird (1985) suggest that trouble-free reading does not require readers to call upon their strategic resources. Therefore, passages which were a little beyond their current reading levels were selected. Following each passage, there were 3-5 multiple-choice questions: (i) 1-2 main idea questions, (ii) 1-2 factual information or detail questions and (iii) 1-2inference questions. Among the 20 items, 5 items were main idea questions, 5 inference questions and 10 detail questions. Based on the results of the pre-test, subjects were classified into three groups: low, intermediate and high. 13 students who received below 20 points were divided into the low level group; 38 students with between 20 and 30 points into the intermediate level group; and 9 students who obtained above 30 points into the high level group.5.4 Testing proceduresBefore the onset of the reading training, the students were given a reading comprehension pre-test. Six weeks later, when the subjects finished the reading training under the guide of schema theory, all were given a post-test. Test materials were designed for pre-test and post test. Ten passages were selected from the testing passages used in NMET papers of 2006 and 2007 (see Appendix Ⅰand AppendixⅡ). These materials were quite reliable as they have been designed by professional test designers in China. Five passages were used in pre-test while the rest were used in post-test to keep the level of tests consistent.5.5 Materials and training proceduresThe reading training was carried out under the guidance of schema theory, which is based on the reader’s knowledge to form a schema in mind in order to help understand reading materials. The reading training procedures are as follows: first, we explained the procedure of the reading training. Next, we enriched the students’。

基于核心素养的小学英语“KWL”阅读教学模式探究

基于核心素养的小学英语“KWL”阅读教学模式探究

文化意识,发展学生的思维品质,培养学生的学习
笔者通过多年的教学实践发现,在小学英语教
能力。
学中,阅读多以练习的形式存在,且阅读练习的主
要目的是检测学生对词汇、句型的学习效果,而不
一、基于核心素养的小学英语“KWL”阅读教 是通过阅读扩大学生的词汇量、引导其整体理解和
学模式的构建背景
解析话题文本、提高其语言综合运用能力。设计单
例如,对于 Spring Festival,中国人构建的主题
定阅读目标的机会,使其通过教师有层次的教学设 词汇框架有:
计,增强思维训练,最终达到提高阅读能力的目的。
(1)Decorations— ——装 饰 框 架 :Spring Festival
黄宏远(2016)通过分析两堂研讨课例,从阅读前、 couplets(春联),paper-cuts(剪纸),New Year paint-
己学到的新知识。通过使用“KWL”阅读策略进行 任何一个概念,必须以理解整个概念体系为前提;
阅读训练,能最大程度地扩大学生的词汇量,有效 谈及框架内的任何一个概念都会激活框架内的其
丰富学生的阅读图式。
他概念。以广州教科版小学 《英语》 六年级 (上)
“KWL”表格是美国中小学教学中最常用的一 Module 6 Festival 教学为例,本单元的主题是节日
【关键词】核心素养;小学英语; 到提升学生认知与培养学生学习兴趣的作
基于核心素养的小学英语“KWL”阅读教学模 用。”(王蔷 2015)我国有关小学英语阅读教学的研
式是指有效帮助学生解读文本、自主建构图式,培 究起步较晚,有效的教学策略较少;加之部分教师
养其英语阅读素养的一种教学策略。它通过猜测 对于阅读教学的理解存在偏差,认为阅读就是阅

schema theory.doc

schema theory.doc

1.0 Introduction1.1 Research BackgroundListening deserves the equal importance as speaking, reading and writing, because as we all know language has two macro parts including input skills which means receiving information from the world such as listening and reading, and the other is output skills which means expressing information to the world such as speaking and writing. As an essential way of getting information, listening provides basis for communication.State Education Ministry is reforming college English teaching, with the target of “developing students’ comprehensive language competence, in particular, listening and speaking abilities to ensure effective communication in their future work and life.” More and more attentions are paid to the reformation of listening teaching methods."Listening has often been regarded as a passive skill. This is misleading, because listening comprehension demands active involvement from the hearer. In order to reconstruct the message that the speaker intends, the hearer must actively contribute knowledge from both linguistic and non-linguistic and sources" (Littlewood, 1981:66). Thus, the background knowledge and prior experience plays an important role in listening comprehension. This is the central idea of schema theory. The British psychologist Frederick Barlett is the first to put forward the schema theory in his works Remembering (1932), in which he defined it as follows: schema refers to an active organization of past relations, or of past experiences which must always be supposed to be operating in any well-adapted organic response. According to this theory, the past experiences and knowledge must be organized and manageable, and they will provide the framework and direction for the hearers.1.2 Organization of the PaperThe paper consists of five parts. Part 1 presents the research background and the organization of the paper. Part 2 presents the introduction of schema theory including its definition, features and categories. Part 3 presents the factors which effect listeningcomprehension. Part 4 presents the application of schema theory in listening. This part will introduce two schema listening models, the application of schema in listening and the related suggestions in listening teaching. The last part is the conclusion. The schema emphasizes on activating the existing schema to build the relationship between the prior experiences and new information. It is an effective and practical way for English listening teaching.2.0 Schema TheoryThe current part will focus on the basic ideas of schema theory including the definition, features, and main categories.2.1 Definition of Schema TheoryLast part has mentioned that it’s Barlett who firstly use the term of schema. After that, many definitions were given to schema in psycholinguistic field. American human intelligence expert Rumelhart adds, the knowledge in our mind is packed into units and these units are the schemata. He also holds the idea that the schema has the stereotyped structure and containing elements.According to Carrell and Eisterhold, only when new information and knowledge build the relationship with the previously acquired knowledge and experiences, can they have the meaning in comprehension. These acquired knowledge and experiences are called schemata.Definitions of schema are various, but the core of schema theory is that schema is organized knowledge structure just like a network which can provide framework and direction for listening comprehension.2.2Features of Schema2.2.1Hierarchically-constructed StructureSchema is consist of varied kinds of knowledge, it’s arrangement is hierarchical to present knowledge of all level from abstract such as science, philosophy, to particular objects, such as girl, dog. Every schema has its sub-schema andsuper-schema. For example, the schema “cat” might be the component of the schema for “animal” or “pet” or “living things”; it also contains sub-schema such as “fur”,“paws”, or“long tail”. The information a schema contains range from common events to the specialized one, from the micro to the macro.2.2.2Abstract Knowledge StructureSchema is abstract because the information in schema is not only the definition but also the distinctive features and properties. For instance, “desk”contains following properties: it has four legs and a slab, its distinctive feature is that it can be used for writing or having meals. On the other hand, “schema is abstract in the sense that one schema has the potential to cover a number of texts that differ in particulars”(Wilson & Anderson, 1986). The knowledge in schema is general, because it has the features shared by all the elements. For example, when the schema “tree” comes to our mind, we will think about all the trees rather than a particular tree.2.2.3Slots or Variables“Any important element or schema within a schema may be thought of as a slot that can accept any of the range of values that are compatible with its associated schemata.”(Adams & Collinse, 1979:4). That means these slots, typical and general facts can vary slightly from one another. For example, “meeting”has the general property that is many people get together and discuss something, but meetings are different from each other: different topic, different people, different time and different significance.2.2.4An Active and Dynamic Constructive ProcessAs we all know, our system of knowledge keeps changing, because our world keeps developing and our experiences and cognition capacities keep developing, too. The schemata in mind are active and they can be strengthened, modified, altered and extended in life to form new schemata continually.As to the definition of schema, there are different kinds and forms made by different scholars. According to Howard, when a schema finds concrete example in the real world, it is activate, because a schema is constructed with many slots, whennew information and existing background knowledge are matched and fit into the appropriate slot, the schema is believed to be activated.2.3Main Categories of SchemaFor understanding the schema theory much better, scholars proposed different categories of schemata. According to James, schema has three types: linguistic schema (The skills of decoding and discourse processing), formal schema (recognizing the rhetorical structure of the text) and content schema (knowledge of the content area of the text).2.3.1Linguistic SchemaLinguistic schema refers to the linguistic knowledge, including vocabulary, grammar, sentence structure, phoneme, phrase and paragraph, etc. they provide the basis for listening comprehension. It is the first step to deal with the new information. Carrell and Eisterhold point out that the listener could not activate his relevant schema unless he has had enough language knowledge and has mastered quite a number of listening skills at a certain level. If listener is lack of linguistic knowledge, he can hardly comprehend the new information. For example, if listener is lack of knowledge about stress, linking, elision and assimilation, he will encounter many problems during listening comprehension. Take the following dialogue for example:Man: My bike doesn’t work again! How can I go to school?Woman: Had my bike been repaired, I would be glad to lend it to you.Question: What does the woman mean?In this dialogue, if the listener doesn’t know the relevant schemata about subjunctive moods, he will misunderstand the woman’s words.2.3.2Content SchemaContent schema refers to the background knowledge about the topic. It helps listeners to connect their own knowledge with the new information and help them to predict the new information. Thus, the familiar schema always helps listeners to comprehend easily and remember more information, while the unfamiliar one causes difficulties. Carrell and Eisterhold pointed out that "content schema includes culturalknowledge, topic familiarity, and previous experiences with a field."2.3.2.1Culture KnowledgeCulture is social heritage, or traditional, that is passed on to future generations, so people have the same culture tend to share the same schema. Just take the answer to “thank you” as an example, the Americans’ answer is “You’re welcome.”, while the British’s answer is “Not at all.”or “Don’t mention it.”That’s because the different culture.The Chinese has very different culture from the English-speaking countries, which brings Chinese some troubles in the processing of learning English. When we listen to the news about American election, if we are not familiar with its political system, we can’t get the exact information. According to this point of view, the acquisition of second language means being familiar with culture including customs, religions, political, habits, etc.2.3.2.2 Previous ExperiencesSome schemata are gained from learning in class, while some schemata are from the daily life. In the procession of living, we get know many things. Much definition comes into being in our brain. These schemata help us to build the basic cognition about the world and to adapt to the changing environment around us. Different people living in different environment has different schemata, thus they have different inference. In the procession of listening, the closer the listener’s schema is to the speaker’s, the easier the text will be to understand.2.3.2.3 Topic Familiarity“If the topic …is outside of their experiences or base of knowledge, they are adrift on an unknown sea” (Abersold & field, 1997:41). That means the familiar topic is easier to predict and understand. The familiar topic provides a very useful framework for listeners to connect what they have known with the new information. For example, a student and an archaeologist take apart in a lecture about archaeology and it’s obvious that the archaeologist will feel easier to understand the speaker, because he has the content schema about the topic.2.3.3Formal SchemaFormal schema is also called textual schema, refers to the rhetorical structures of a discourse and the knowledge of organizational forms. In other words, formal schema is the knowledge of the way in which different genres are presented. "Formal schemata are background knowledge about differences among rhetorical structures, such as differences in genre, differences in the structure of fables, simple stories, scientific texts, newspaper articles, poetry, and so forth" (Carrell & Eisterhold, 1988). During listening, learners will encounter different genres with different characteristics. Only being familiar with the rules, can they know what to listen in the materials. For example, when a listener hears a story, they will have a story-schema in their mind: time, place, event; the plot is complicated; there must an actor or actress; the comment of the speaker always comes at the end.3.0 Knowledge Factors Affecting Listening ComprehensionThere are many factors that affect the listening comprehension; this part will focus on analyzing these factors. After understanding them, we can find the exact solution for the problems.3.1 languages Knowledge ObstaclesLangue obstacles are the main obstacles in listening comprehension. They contain the knowledge of grammar, vocabulary, phonetics and sentence patterns.Phonetics contains the listeners’knowledge of pronunciation, tones, intonation, and some pronouncing rules in English including linking, stress, elision, liaison, weak, etc. All these aspect are affecting the comprehension. For example, different tones and intonation result in different meaning in speech, so only listeners are familiar with them, can they get the meaning listener is expressing. Different pronunciation between American English and British English also sets obstacle for listeners.The second obstacle is grammar. There is much difference between Chinese and English, it’s important for the students to grasp the English grammar firmly, includingtense, sentence patterns, moods, etc.The last obstacle is vocabulary. V ocabulary is the essential component for expressing, without vocabulary listener can hardly comprehend the speaker. Mastering large amount vocabulary is urgent and vital for English learners.3.2 Non-language Knowledge ObstaclesNon-language knowledge refers to the background knowledge about the world, prior experiences. Lacking of them makes listeners feel difficult to understand the topic.Firstly, students are lack of the background knowledge about the world, such as culture, society. Language is the main carrier of culture, so lacking of culture always causes the communication failure. For example, in the following listening material: A: What do you think about meeting on Christmas Eve?B: That’s ok.Q: They will meet each other on which day?If the students are lack of the knowledge about Christmas, it’s difficult for them to get the right answer.Secondly,the students are lacking of prior experiences, such as some professional knowledge. Langue always relates with every field in the society, because it’s a basic tool for communication. That results in the urgent need of knowledge about related subjects.4.0 Application of Schema Theory to ListeningListening is a complex psychological process for the meaning construction. Listeners are active in the processing of listening and in order to achieve the right comprehension, they should reconstruct the language through analyzing, combining and including actively rather than only receive the sounds passively. It’s a complicated process which needs language knowledge and non-language knowledge, such as the schemata in brain. This chapter will focus on the application of schema inlistening. Generally speaking, there are three models: bottom-up model, top-down model and interactive model.4.1 Schema Listening Model4.1.1 Bottom-up Model“S uccessful listening is a matter of decoding the individual sounds we hear to derive the meaning of words and hence utterances” (Nunan, 1991:63). We illustrate the process in this way:Sounds, pronunciation, intonation, individual meaning ofclauses meaningThis model also called “data-driven” processing in which the listeners decode the sound they hear from the smallest meaningful units to the complex texts. According to these theories, the listening process is a linear one, which operates in a single direction-from the text to the listener. People listen to the material and regard the material as the source of information. Language knowledge plays an important role in this model, because listeners discriminate sounds, identify words, comprehend grammatical structure and build the comprehension of meaning according to the language knowledge such as pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar.For example, in an English listening comprehension class, the American president election is the topic of the listening material. In the common warm-up process, teachers often list some words about the election in the material, such as: caucus(核心会议),Conservative(保守派), Federal Election Commission(联邦选举委员会),plurality rule(简单多数原则),primary(初选),etc. Teachers will let the students get familiar with the pronunciation, intonation, individual meaning of these words. The purpose of this teaching procedure is to help students to know more words which they are not very familiar. In this way, there will be fewer barriers caused by unknown words in listening comprehension. After few times listening, teachers will test how much information the students got. As to the difficult sentence, teachers often focuson analyzing its grammar, sentence structure.This model is the most frequently used in teaching, so many teachers emphasize on teaching of vocabulary and grammar, but there exist obvious shortcomings in this model. Firstly, as we all know, the meaning of a word depend on the context, only considering the word meaning always results in misleading towards the text. Secondly, emphasizing on the words and phrases makes the lexical access slow. Without the background knowledge, the range of possible meaning is broad, listener will spend much time on choosing, which delays the comprehension of coming information. Thirdly, as we all know, the prediction can help listeners to understand information better, but in bottom-up model, there is no prediction.4.1.2 Top-down ModelBeing different to the bottom-up model, top-down model emphasizes on making use of prior experiences, background knowledge about the world, so it is also called “concept-driven” process. By using this model, listeners reconstruct the information rather than decode what they hear. The process of comprehension can be expressed in several forms:makeunderstand the utteranceIn this model, the listener rather than the text becomes to be the heart of listening process. They make use of their experiences, interest and attitudes to understand the new information. According to Richard, background knowledge can include the listener’s former knowledge about the present topic; the surrounding or contextual knowledge; or the schemata existing in the listeners’long-term memory about the general structures of the events and their relationships (Richard, 2002:51).The model can be illustrated as following:Past experience, language intuition and expectations selected aspects ofsound, intonation and pronunciationThe same listening material, by using this model, teachers will arrange very different class procedures. In the warm-up processing, teachers will introduce somebasic information about American president election including the political system, the parties in America, the procedures of election, the vital affecting elements in election, etc. After the introduction, students know more background information about the listening material, so they can prepare better for comprehension rather than only rely on the material they hear.In this model, we can see some advantages. Firstly, listeners can be more activate in listening, because they can predict the new information by using already known knowledge, cognitive capacities and culture. Secondly, it’s easier to work out the purpose of message by considering contextual clues and the content. For native speakers and skilled listeners, the top-down model is assumed to be automatic, while for beginning learners is not. This is a very valuable method which we should try our best to apply in teaching, so teachers should pay more attention on students’accumulation of background knowledge and culture.4.1.3 Interactive ModelListening comprehension process is a continuum of interacting elements from two aspects: speech perception (bottom-top) and interpretation (top-down). Top-down and bottom-up processing operate simultaneously (Anderson&Lynch 1988:13-14). That means a person arrives at understanding of a text by simultaneously synthesizing information from external and internal, which include various world knowledge, vocabulary, syntactic knowledge, etc.According to this model, teachers will focus on both the language knowledge and the background information. In the warm-up processing, teachers will help students to get familiar with the difficult words, grammar, at the same time they will introduce the background information in various ways. In this way, students will get the direction and framework before listening and encounter fewer barriers in listening.When a listener tries to understand a text, he relies on his linguistic knowledge to perceive sound, identify words which are arranged into sentences. This knowledge includes knowledge of phonology, lexicon, syntax and even discourse. When the listener is familiar with the content, he will simultaneously use his backgroundknowledge to predict the coming information. As what analyzed in last part, both bottom-up model and top-down model have their drawbacks, Bottom-up model disregards the high-level knowledge, whereas top-down model underestimates the role of low-level information. If listeners make use of them at the same time, they can get the exact understanding.4.2 Suggestions in Listening TeachingThe previous parts have introduced the schema theory and how the schemata play function in listening comprehension. To comprehend a text is to find the appropriate schemata which provide an interpretation for the text. According to schema theory, a listener fails to comprehend a text correctly for several reasons as follows: Ⅰ. He lacks the appropriate schema.Ⅱ. He possesses the appropriate schema, but the text he encounters doesn’t contain sufficient textual cues to signal the schema to be activated.Ⅲ. He arrives at a consistent interpretation for the text, but it may not be the one intended by the speaker.In teaching, teachers should apply the schema theory to reform the teaching methods. Firstly, teachers should introduce this theory to students generally. To use one theory, understand comes firstly. On the basis of understanding, students can make use of it. Teachers can apply it to solve some problems in listening. Secondly, in the process of listening teaching, teachers should pay attention on activating students’schemata. That means encourage the students to connect the known knowledge with the listening material. Thirdly, teachers should make great effort to enlarge the students’ knowledge in most fields and all aspects.4.2.1 Activate Existing SchemataEveryone has the schema of society, culture, science and language. They should have corresponding schemata for many kinds of listening materials. Then the key is to help them to make full use of these schemata.Firstly, introduce the topic and to students. This method helps to determine what prior knowledge students bring to the new topic before they listen to the passage.They can prepare enough for the listening and make prediction about the material more easily.Secondly, introduce the words and clauses to the students. By this method, students will focus on the content rather than the unknown words during listening. Teachers can ask students write down the words related to the topic as many as possible to prepare for listening.Thirdly, teachers ask some questions before listening. By this method, student can find answer for questions and at the same time to confirm what they already thought to be true. By reading questions, students can build their own expectation about the material and they can even build a framework and organization for the text.Fourthly, topic sentences are the most useful information for the students to get their comprehension. Teachers can ask students list some possibilities and suggestions about the topic sentence, in this way, more schemata can be evoked. The group work will be better and more schemata can be shared in the processing of discussion.4.2.2 Construction of New SchemataThe unfamiliar material always sets more barriers for listeners, so teachers should introduce a new schema for students before listening. Firstly, teachers can introduce the new schemata directly.Secondly, teachers can introduce the new schemata on the basis of known knowledge. As we all know, there are many existing schemata in everyone’s mind, so to motivate the existing schemata is another effective way to form the new schema. For example, the material is about “Christmas day”, and teachers can compare it with Chinese Spring Festival and help students to build new schemata on the basis of prior experiences.Thirdly, enriching the learner’s background knowledge is a useful method to form new schema to match with the listening material. Many psychologists think that the difference of understanding between adults and children may be quantitative, not qualitative. The poor understanding always is the consequence of insufficient prior knowledge. Except the teaching in class teachers also should encourage the studentsto read more books and news in their spare time. According to the study, it is important to apply schema in teaching, but that is not only emphasize on formal knowledge about pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar, but also the background knowledge about the people and events of the world.5.0 ConclusionThis thesis has analyzed the problems in today’s listening comprehension teaching and the misunderstanding of comprehension of listening teaching. In view of the problems, this thesis focuses on the introduction of schema and its application in English teaching, which means to activate student’s knowledge including the linguistic, cultural knowledge and formal knowledge to help them improve their listening comprehension competence.The thesis firstly gives a brief introduction to schema theory. Bartllet holds the view that the role of background knowledge in language comprehension has been formalized as schema theory. Comprehending a text is an interactive process between the listener’s background knowledge and the text. In the processing of listening, listeners should activate their existing schemata and create suitable schemata to interpret the new information.From the perspective of cognitive psychology, the application of schema in listening can move away the obstacles in listening comprehension. Teachers should help students to activate the existing schemata and form suitable schemata to match different kinds of material.To sum up, schema theory is an effective and practical theory which can be used in English listening comprehension. Further application of this theory in class can enhance students’ interests and comprehension competence in listening.Reference[1] Adams, M. J. &A. Collins.1979. A schema-theoretic view reading[A]. In R.O.Freedle (Eds.). Discourse processing Multidisciplinary Perspectives[C]. Norwood, NJ: Ablex[2] Anderson, R. &T. Lynch. 1988. Listening[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press.[3] Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[4]Carrel, P L. & J.C. Eisterhold. 1988. Schema Theory and ESL ReadingPedagogy[A]. In Carrel et al (Eds). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[5]Littlewood,munication Language Teaching-An Introduction[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[6] Rumellhart, D.E. 1980. Towards an Interactive Model of Reading[A]. In Dornic,D. (Ed.) Attention and Performance[C]. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.[7] 郭颖,汤淼,杨东. 2009.基于图式理论的英语听力教学研究[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

The Schematic Theory and English Reading Comprehension Teaching Abstract:Schema theory originated from western Countries.It explained explicitly how readers world knowledge interacts with text to arrive at comprehension.Many Chinese English teachers use it to guide their teaching.but most of them can not get all ideal outcome.first,this paper represent schemata and schematic theory briefly,and then explores the interactions between schematic theory and reading comprehension.At last.the author lists out three factors that is helpful for comprehending and establishing new schemata.Key words:s chemata;schematic theory;interaction;teaching;reading comprehension1 IntroductionReading is considered as one of the most important ways toimprove English.Without reading,there is no improvement inEnglish learning.However, many students read English materialwith slower speed and Ie88 comprehension.On the surface.due to the inadequate vocabulary and grammar knowledge,or the linguistic schemata, In fact,the inadequate knowledge of formal schemata and content schemata are still prevent them to comprehend successfully.Therefore,to know much more about these factors and their interactions with reading comprehension is very necessary for Enoish teacher.2 Schematic theorySchemata are highly organized,generic knowledge structures composed of slots or placeholders which are activated consciously or unconsciously in reading comprehension Schematic theory is based on Goodman's psycholinguistic model that reading is a guessing game.The basic idea of the theory is that human memory consists of high leveh of structures known as schemata, each of which encapsulates our knowledge about everything connected with a particular Object or event.Modem schemata theory is generally approved to be advanced by Bartlett, who is a German psychologist.He elicited this theory from Gestalt psychology and represented it in his book Remembering.He described it like tllis,schemata is a reflection of past experience,and it is an active developing paRern(Bartlett,1992:197).The schematic theory has explained exphcifly how readers’world knowledge interacts withthe text to arrive to acomprehension.3 The interactions beween schematic theory and reading comprehension Reading is a process of interaction between reader and reading material,input information and reader's schemata.Comprehension depends on three main$ources d knowledge:schematic knowledge,contextual knowledge and systematic knowledge.Readers build meanings by drawing on a wider rangeof resources,including schematic and contextual knowledge,asthese knowledge fioul宅e$are drawn on,interactively,to achievecomprehension(cui Yali,2004:10).The schematic knowledgeplay an important role in reading comprehension.It consists of linguistic schemata,formal schemata an d content schemata.Unguistic schemata refer to the knowledge of grammatical,syntacticaland semantic systems,formal schemata refer to the under.standing of the style and genre of a text,while content schematarefer to the prior experience and background knowledge.Andertonhas defined the three function of t}le content schemata.First.schemata provide the basis for filling'ff/e gap8 in a text:no messageis ever completely explicit and schemata permits a coherent interpretation through inferential elaboration.Second,schemata co ntain the reader's interpretation of an ambiguous message.Third,it is by establishing a correspondence between things known.曲represented by schemata,and then given in a message,that readers monitor their comprehension and known whether they have understood the text.Perhaps the central function of鲫event.ohject,or situation(Anderson,1978:17).Therefore,the kinds of assumption we make about the world depend on what we have ex—perienced and how our minds havo organized the knowledge wehave got from our past experiences.Schematic theory suggeststhat our knowledge will strongly affect our ability to understandnew information by providing a framework within which new information might fit.(5)Nunan【2001:86].Reading comprehensionis thus an interactive process between the reader and the text.4 11he Factors that should be highlighted in theteaching of Engfish reading4.1 Activate the reader's schemata before readingIt is very important to activate a reader's schemata beforethe reading activaty to achieve a successful reading and compre—hention.As each reader carries in his head mental representa-tions of typical situations that he comes across.when he is stim—ulated by particular words。

相关文档
最新文档