公司理财罗斯第九版课后习题答案
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第13~15章)【圣才出品】

罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第13章风险、资本成本和资本预算一、概念题1.资产贝塔(asset beta)答:资产贝塔是指企业总资产的贝塔系数。
除非完全依靠权益融资,否则不能把资产贝塔看作普通股的贝塔系数。
其公式为:其中,β权益是杠杆企业权益的贝塔。
公式包括两部分,即负债的贝塔乘以负债在资本结构中的百分比;权益的贝塔乘以权益在资本结构中的百分比。
这个组合包括企业的负债和权益,所以组合贝塔就是资产贝塔。
在实际中,负债的贝塔很低,一般假设为零。
若假设负债的贝塔为零,则:对于杠杆企业,权益/(负债+权益)一定小于1,所以β资产<β权益,将上式变形,有:有财务杠杆的情况下,权益贝塔一定大于资产贝塔。
2.经营杠杆(operating leverage)答:经营杠杆是指由于固定成本的存在而导致息税前利润变动大于产销业务量变动的杠杆效应。
对经营杠杆的计量最常用的指标是经营杠杆系数或经营杠杆度。
经营杠杆系数,是指息税前利润变动率相当于销售量变动率的倍数。
用公式可以表示为:式中,EBIT为息税前利润;F为固定成本。
经营杠杆系数不是固定不变的。
当企业的固定成本总额、单位产品的变动成本、销售价格、销售数量等因素发生变动时,经营杠杆系数也会发生变动。
经营杠杆系数越高,对经营杠杆利益的影响就越强,经营杠杆风险也就越高。
经营杠杆越大,企业的贝塔系数就越大。
3.权益资本成本(cost of equity capital)答:权益资本成本就是投资股东要求的回报率,用CAPM模型表示股票的期望收益率为:其中,R F是无风险利率;是市场组合的期望收益率与无风险利率之差,也称为期望超额市场收益率或市场风险溢价。
所以要估计企业权益资本成本,需要知道以下三个变量:①无风险利率;②市场风险溢价;③公司权益的贝塔系数。
4.加权平均资本成本(weighted average cost of capital,r WACC)答:平均资本成本是权益资本成本和债务资本成本的加权平均,所以,通常称之为加权平均资本成本,r WACC,其计算公式如下:式中的权数分别是权益占总价值的比重,即和负债占总价值的比重,即。
罗斯公司理财第九版第四章课后答案

23题:This question is asking for the present value of an annuity, but the interest rate changes during the life of the annuity. We need to find the present value of the cash flows for the last eight years first. The PV of these cash flows is:PVA2 = $1,500 [{1 – 1 / [1 + (.09/12)]⌒96} / (.09/12)] = $102,387.66Note that this is the PV of this annuity exactly seven years from today. Now, we can discount this lump sum to today. The value of this cash flow today is:PV = $102,387.66 / [1 + (.13/12)]⌒84 = $41,415.70Now, we need to find the PV of the annuity for the first seven years. The value of these cash flows today is:PVA1 = $1,500 [{1 – 1 / [1 + (.13/12)]⌒84} / (.13/12)] = $82,453.99The value of the cash flows today is the sum of these two cash flows, so:PV = $82,453.99 + 41,415.70 = $123,869.9924题The monthly interest rate is the annual interest rate divided by 12, or:Monthly interest rate = .104 / 12 Monthly interest rate = .00867Now we can set the present value of the lease payments equal to the cost of the equipment, or $3,500. The lease payments are in the form of an annuity due, so:PV Adue = (1 + r) C({1 – [1/(1 + r)]⌒t } / r )$3,500 = (1 + .00867) C({1 – [1/(1 + .00867)]⌒24 } / .00867 ) C = $160.7625题Here, we need to compare to options. In order to do so, we must get the value of the two cash flow streams to the same time, so we will find the value of each today. We must also make sure to use the aftertax cash flows, since it is more relevant. For Option A, the aftertax cash flows are:Aftertax cash flows = Pretax cash flows(1 – tax rate)Aftertax cash flows = $175,000(1 – .28)Aftertax cash flows = $126,000The aftertax cash flows from Option A are in the form of an annuity due, so the present value of the cash flow today is:PV Adue = (1 + r) C({1 – [1/(1 + r)]⌒t } / r )PV Adue = (1 + .10)$126,000({1 – [1/(1 + .10)]⌒31 } / .10 )PV Adue = $1,313,791.22For Option B, the aftertax cash flows are:Aftertax cash flows = Pretax cash flows(1 – tax rate)Aftertax cash flows = $125,000(1 – .28)Aftertax cash flows = $90,000The aftertax cash flows from Option B are an ordinary annuity, plus the cash flow today, so the present value:PV = C({1 – [1/(1 + r)]⌒t } / r ) + CF0PV = $90,000{1 – [1/(1 + .10)]⌒30 } / .10 ) + $530,000PV = $1,378,422.3026题The cash flows for this problem occur monthly, and the interest rate given is the EAR. Since the cash flows occur monthly, we must get the effective monthly rate. One way to do this is to find the APR based on monthly compounding, and then divide by 12. So, the pre-retirement APR is: EAR = .11 = [1 + (APR / 12)]⌒12– 1; APR = 12[(1.11)1/12 – 1] = 10.48%And the post-retirement APR is:EAR = .08 = [1 + (APR / 12)]⌒12 – 1; APR = 12[(1.08)1/12 – 1] = 7.72%First, we will calculate how much he needs at retirement. The amount needed at retirement is the PV of the monthly spending plus the PV of the inheritance. The PV of these two cash flows is:PV A = $20,000{1 – [1 / (1 + .0772/12)⌒12*20]} / (.0772/12) = $2,441,554.61PV = $1,000,000 / (1 + .08)20 = $214,548.21So, at retirement, he needs: $2,441,554.61 + 214,548.21 = $2,656.102.81He will be saving $1,900 per month for the next 10 years until he purchases the cabin. The value of his savings after 10 years will be:FV A = $1,900[{[ 1 + (.1048/12)]⌒12*10– 1} / (.1048/12)] = $400,121.62After he purchases the cabin, the amount he will have left is: $400,121.62 – 320,000 = $80,121.62 He still has 20 years until retirement. When he is ready to retire, this amount will have grown to: FV = $80,121.62[1 + (.1048/12)]⌒12*20 = $646,965.50So, when he is ready to retire, based on his current savings, he will be short:$2,656,102.81 – 645,965.50 = $2,010,137.31This amount is the FV of the monthly savings he must make between years 10 and 30. So, finding the annuity payment using the FVA equation, we find his monthly savings will need to be: FVA = $2,010,137.31 = C[{[ 1 + (.1048/12)]⌒12*20 – 1} / (.1048/12)]C = $2,486.1227题To answer this question, we should find the PV of both options, and compare them. Since we are purchasing the car, the lowest PV is the best option. The PV of the leasing is simply the PV of the lease payments, plus the $1. The interest rate we would use for the leasing option is the same as the interest rate of the loan. The PV of leasing is:PV = $1 + $520{1 – [1 / (1 + .08/12)⌒12*3]} / (.08/12) = $16,595.14The PV of purchasing the car is the current price of the car minus the PV of the resale price. The PV of the resale price is:PV = $26,000 / [1 + (.08/12)]⌒12*3 = $20,468.62The PV of the decision to purchase is:$38,000 – 20,468.62 = $17,531.38In this case, it is cheaper to lease the car than buy it since the PV of the leasing cash flows is lower. To find the breakeven resale price, we need to find the resale price that makes the PV of the tw o options the same. In other words, the PV of the decision to buy should be:$38,000 – PV of resale price = $16,595.14PV of resale price = $21,404.86The resale price that would make the PV of the lease versus buy decision is the FV of this value, so:Breakeven resale price = $21,404.86[1 + (.08/12)]⌒12*3 = $27,189.2528题First, we will find the APR and EAR for the loan with the refundable fee. Remember, we need to use the actual cash flows of the loan to find the interest rate. With the $2,100 application fee, you will need to borrow $202,100 to have $200,000 after deducting the fee. Solving for the payment under these circumstances, we get:PV A = $202,100 = C {[1 – 1/(1.00567)⌒360]/.00567} where .00567 = .068/12 C = $1,317.54 We can now use this amount in the PV A equation with the original amount we wished to borrow, $200,000. Solving for r, we find:PV A = $200,000 = $1,317.54[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒360}/ r]Solving for r with a spreadsheet, on a financial calculator, or by trial and error, gives:r = 0.5752% per monthAPR = 12(0.5752%) = 6.90% EAR = (1 + .005752)⌒12– 1 = .0713 or 7.13%With the nonrefundable fee, the APR of the loan is simply the quoted APR since the fee is not considered part of the loan. So:APR = 6.80% EAR = [1 + (0.068/12)]⌒12– 1 = .0702 or 7.02%29题Here, we need to find the interest rate that makes us indifferent between an annuity and a perpetuity. To solve this problem, we need to find the PV of the two options and set them equal to each other. The PV of the perpetuity is:PV = $20,000 / rAnd the PV of the annuity is:PVA = $35,000[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒10 } / r ]Setting them equal and solving for r, we get:$20,000 / r = $35,000[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒10 } / r ]$20,000 / $35,000 = 1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒10 .057141/10 = 1 / (1 + r)r = 1 / .5714⌒1/10 – 1 r = .0576 or 5.76%30题。
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第1~3章)【圣才出品】

罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第1章公司理财导论一、概念题1.资本预算(capital budgeting)答:资本预算是指综合反映投资资金来源与运用的预算,是为了获得未来产生现金流量的长期资产而现在投资支出的预算。
资本预算决策也称为长期投资决策,它是公司创造价值的主要方法。
资本预算决策一般指固定资产投资决策,耗资大,周期长,长期影响公司的产销能力和财务状况,决策正确与否影响公司的生存与发展。
完整的资本预算过程包括:寻找增长机会,制定长期投资战略,预测投资项目的现金流,分析评估投资项目,控制投资项目的执行情况。
资本预算可通过不同的资本预算方法来解决,如回收期法、净现值法和内部收益率法等。
2.货币市场(money markets)答:货币市场指期限不超过一年的资金借贷和短期有价证券交易的金融市场,亦称“短期金融市场”或“短期资金市场”,包括同业拆借市场、银行短期存贷市场、票据市场、短期证券市场、大额可转让存单市场、回购协议市场等。
其参加者为各种政府机构、各种银行和非银行金融机构及公司等。
货币市场具有四个基本特征:①融资期限短,一般在一年以内,最短的只有半天,主要用于满足短期资金周转的需要;②流动性强,金融工具可以在市场上随时兑现,交易对象主要是期限短、流动性强、风险小的信用工具,如票据、存单等,这些工具变现能力强,近似于货币,可称为“准货币”,故称货币市场;③安全性高,由于货币市场上的交易大多采用即期交易,即成交后马上结清,通常不存在因成交与结算日之间时间相对过长而引起价格巨大波动的现象,对投资者来说,收益具有较大保障;④政策性明显,货币市场由货币当局直接参加,是中央银行同商业银行及其他金融机构的资金连接的主渠道,是国家利用货币政策工具调节全国金融活动的杠杆支点。
货币市场的交易主体是短期资金的供需者。
需求者是为了获得现实的支付手段,调节资金的流动性并保持必要的支付能力,供应者提供的资金也大多是短期临时闲置性的资金。
公司理财第九版罗斯课后案例答案 Case Solutions Corporate Finance

公司理财第九版罗斯课后案例答案 Case Solutions CorporateFinance1. 案例一:公司资金需求分析问题:一家公司需要资金支持其新项目。
通过分析现金流量,推断该公司是否需要向外部借款或筹集其他资金。
解答:为了确定公司是否需要外部资金,我们需要分析公司的现金流量状况。
首先,我们需要计算公司的净现金流量(净收入加上非现金项目)。
然后,我们需要将净现金流量与项目的投资现金流量进行对比。
假设公司预计在项目开始时投资100万美元,并在项目运营期为5年。
预计该项目每年将产生50万美元的净现金流量。
现在,我们需要进行以下计算:净现金流量 = 年度现金流量 - 年度投资现金流量年度投资现金流量 = 100万美元年度现金流量 = 50万美元净现金流量 = 50万美元 - 100万美元 = -50万美元根据计算结果,公司的净现金流量为负数(即净现金流出),意味着公司每年都会亏损50万美元。
因此,公司需要从外部筹集资金以支持项目的运营。
2. 案例二:公司股权融资问题:一家公司正在考虑通过股权融资来筹集资金。
根据公司的财务数据和资本结构分析,我们需要确定公司最佳的股权融资方案。
解答:为了确定最佳的股权融资方案,我们需要参考公司的财务数据和资本结构分析。
首先,我们需要计算公司的资本结构比例,即股本占总资本的比例。
然后,我们将不同的股权融资方案与资本结构比例进行对比,选择最佳的方案。
假设公司当前的资本结构比例为60%的股本和40%的债务,在当前的资本结构下,公司的加权平均资本成本(WACC)为10%。
现在,我们需要进行以下计算:•方案一:以新股发行筹集1000万美元,并将其用于项目投资。
在这种方案下,公司的资本结构比例将发生变化。
假设公司的股本增加至80%,债务比例减少至20%。
根据资本结构比例的变化,WACC也将发生变化。
新的WACC可以通过以下公式计算得出:新的WACC = (股本比例 * 股本成本) + (债务比例 * 债务成本)假设公司的股本成本为12%,债务成本为8%:新的WACC = (0.8 * 12%) + (0.2 * 8%) = 9.6%•方案二:以新股发行筹集5000万美元,并将其用于项目投资。
罗斯《公司理财》第9版英文原书课后部分章节答案

罗斯《公司理财》第9版精要版英文原书课后部分章节答案详细»1 / 17 CH5 11,13,18,19,20 11. To find the PV of a lump sum, we use: PV = FV / (1 + r) t PV = $1,000,000 / (1.10) 80 = $488.19 13. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for r, we get: r = (FV / PV) 1 / t –1 r = ($1,260,000 / $150) 1/112 – 1 = .0840 or 8.40% To find the FV of the first prize, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $1,260,000(1.0840) 33 = $18,056,409.94 18. To find the FV of a lump sum, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $4,000(1.11) 45 = $438,120.97 FV = $4,000(1.11) 35 = $154,299.40 Better start early! 19. We need to find the FV of a lump sum. However, the money will only be invested for six years, so the number of periods is six. FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $20,000(1.084)6 = $32,449.33 20. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for t, we get: t = ln(FV / PV) / ln(1 + r) t = ln($75,000 / $10,000) / ln(1.11) = 19.31 So, the money must be invested for 19.31 years. However, you will not receive the money for another two years. From now, you’ll wait: 2 years + 19.31 years = 21.31 years CH6 16,24,27,42,58 16. For this problem, we simply need to find the FV of a lump sum using the equation: FV = PV(1 + r) t 2 / 17 It is important to note that compounding occurs semiannually. To account for this, we will divide the interest rate by two (the number of compounding periods in a year), and multiply the number of periods by two. Doing so, we get: FV = $2,100[1 + (.084/2)] 34 = $8,505.93 24. This problem requires us to find the FV A. The equation to find the FV A is: FV A = C{[(1 + r) t – 1] / r} FV A = $300[{[1 + (.10/12) ] 360 – 1} / (.10/12)] = $678,146.38 27. The cash flows are annual and the compounding period is quarterly, so we need to calculate the EAR to make the interest rate comparable with the timing of the cash flows. Using the equation for the EAR, we get: EAR = [1 + (APR / m)] m – 1 EAR = [1 + (.11/4)] 4 – 1 = .1146 or 11.46% And now we use the EAR to find the PV of each cash flow as a lump sum and add them together: PV = $725 / 1.1146 + $980 / 1.1146 2 + $1,360 / 1.1146 4 = $2,320.36 42. The amount of principal paid on the loan is the PV of the monthly payments you make. So, the present value of the $1,150 monthly payments is: PV A = $1,150[(1 – {1 / [1 + (.0635/12)]} 360 ) / (.0635/12)] = $184,817.42 The monthly payments of $1,150 will amount to a principal payment of $184,817.42. The amount of principal you will still owe is: $240,000 – 184,817.42 = $55,182.58 This remaining principal amount will increase at the interest rate on the loan until the end of the loan period. So the balloon payment in 30 years, which is the FV of the remaining principal will be: Balloon payment = $55,182.58[1 + (.0635/12)] 360 = $368,936.54 58. To answer this question, we should find the PV of both options, and compare them. Since we are purchasing the car, the lowest PV is the best option. The PV of the leasing is simply the PV of the lease payments, plus the $99. The interest rate we would use for the leasing option is the same as the interest rate of the loan. The PV of leasing is: PV = $99 + $450{1 –[1 / (1 + .07/12) 12(3) ]} / (.07/12) = $14,672.91 The PV of purchasing the car is the current price of the car minus the PV of the resale price. The PV of the resale price is: PV = $23,000 / [1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $18,654.82 The PV of the decision to purchase is: $32,000 – 18,654.82 = $13,345.18 3 / 17 In this case, it is cheaper to buy the car than leasing it since the PV of the purchase cash flows is lower. To find the breakeven resale price, we need to find the resale price that makes the PV of the two options the same. In other words, the PV of the decision to buy should be: $32,000 – PV of resale price = $14,672.91 PV of resale price = $17,327.09 The resale price that would make the PV of the lease versus buy decision is the FV ofthis value, so: Breakeven resale price = $17,327.09[1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $21,363.01 CH7 3,18,21,22,31 3. The price of any bond is the PV of the interest payment, plus the PV of the par value. Notice this problem assumes an annual coupon. The price of the bond will be: P = $75({1 – [1/(1 + .0875)] 10 } / .0875) + $1,000[1 / (1 + .0875) 10 ] = $918.89 We would like to introduce shorthand notation here. Rather than write (or type, as the case may be) the entire equation for the PV of a lump sum, or the PV A equation, it is common to abbreviate the equations as: PVIF R,t = 1 / (1 + r) t which stands for Present V alue Interest Factor PVIFA R,t = ({1 – [1/(1 + r)] t } / r ) which stands for Present V alue Interest Factor of an Annuity These abbreviations are short hand notation for the equations in which the interest rate and the number of periods are substituted into the equation and solved. We will use this shorthand notation in remainder of the solutions key. 18. The bond price equation for this bond is: P 0 = $1,068 = $46(PVIFA R%,18 ) + $1,000(PVIF R%,18 ) Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error we find: R = 4.06% This is thesemiannual interest rate, so the YTM is: YTM = 2 4.06% = 8.12% The current yield is:Current yield = Annual coupon payment / Price = $92 / $1,068 = .0861 or 8.61% The effective annual yield is the same as the EAR, so using the EAR equation from the previous chapter: Effective annual yield = (1 + 0.0406) 2 – 1 = .0829 or 8.29% 20. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are four months until the next coupon payment, so two months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $74/2 × 2/6 = $12.33 And we calculate the clean price as: 4 / 17 Clean price = Dirty price –Accrued interest = $968 –12.33 = $955.67 21. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are two months until the next coupon payment, so four months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $68/2 × 4/6 = $22.67 And we calculate the dirty price as: Dirty price = Clean price + Accrued interest = $1,073 + 22.67 = $1,095.67 22. To find the number of years to maturity for the bond, we need to find the price of the bond. Since we already have the coupon rate, we can use the bond price equation, and solve for the number of years to maturity. We are given the current yield of the bond, so we can calculate the price as: Current yield = .0755 = $80/P 0 P 0 = $80/.0755 = $1,059.60 Now that we have the price of the bond, the bond price equation is: P = $1,059.60 = $80[(1 – (1/1.072) t ) / .072 ] + $1,000/1.072 t We can solve this equation for t as follows: $1,059.60(1.072) t = $1,111.11(1.072) t –1,111.11 + 1,000 111.11 = 51.51(1.072) t2.1570 = 1.072 t t = log 2.1570 / log 1.072 = 11.06 11 years The bond has 11 years to maturity.31. The price of any bond (or financial instrument) is the PV of the future cash flows. Even though Bond M makes different coupons payments, to find the price of the bond, we just find the PV of the cash flows. The PV of the cash flows for Bond M is: P M = $1,100(PVIFA 3.5%,16 )(PVIF 3.5%,12 ) + $1,400(PVIFA3.5%,12 )(PVIF 3.5%,28 ) + $20,000(PVIF 3.5%,40 ) P M = $19,018.78 Notice that for the coupon payments of $1,400, we found the PV A for the coupon payments, and then discounted the lump sum back to today. Bond N is a zero coupon bond with a $20,000 par value, therefore, the price of the bond is the PV of the par, or: P N = $20,000(PVIF3.5%,40 ) = $5,051.45 CH8 4,18,20,22,244. Using the constant growth model, we find the price of the stock today is: P 0 = D 1 / (R – g) = $3.04 / (.11 – .038) = $42.22 5 / 17 18. The price of a share of preferred stock is the dividend payment divided by the required return. We know the dividend payment in Year 20, so we can find the price of the stock in Y ear 19, one year before the first dividend payment. Doing so, we get: P 19 = $20.00 / .064 P 19 = $312.50 The price of the stock today is the PV of the stock price in the future, so the price today will be: P 0 = $312.50 / (1.064) 19 P 0 = $96.15 20. We can use the two-stage dividend growth model for this problem, which is: P 0 = [D 0 (1 + g 1 )/(R – g 1 )]{1 – [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T }+ [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T [D 0 (1 + g 2 )/(R –g 2 )] P0 = [$1.25(1.28)/(.13 –.28)][1 –(1.28/1.13) 8 ] + [(1.28)/(1.13)] 8 [$1.25(1.06)/(.13 – .06)] P 0 = $69.55 22. We are asked to find the dividend yield and capital gains yield for each of the stocks. All of the stocks have a 15 percent required return, which is the sum of the dividend yield and the capital gains yield. To find the components of the total return, we need to find the stock price for each stock. Using this stock price and the dividend, we can calculate the dividend yield. The capital gains yield for the stock will be the total return (required return) minus the dividend yield. W: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1.10)/(.19 – .10) = $55.00 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.10)/$55.00 = .09 or 9% Capital gains yield = .19 – .09 = .10 or 10% X: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50/(.19 – 0) = $23.68 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50/$23.68 = .19 or 19% Capital gains yield = .19 – .19 = 0% Y: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1 – .05)/(.19 + .05) = $17.81 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(0.95)/$17.81 = .24 or 24% Capital gains yield = .19 – .24 = –.05 or –5% Z: P 2 = D 2 (1 + g) / (R – g) = D 0 (1 + g 1 ) 2 (1 +g 2 )/(R – g 2 ) = $4.50(1.20) 2 (1.12)/(.19 – .12) = $103.68 P 0 = $4.50 (1.20) / (1.19) + $4.50(1.20) 2 / (1.19) 2 + $103.68 / (1.19) 2 = $82.33 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.20)/$82.33 = .066 or 6.6% Capital gains yield = .19 – .066 = .124 or 12.4% In all cases, the required return is 19%, but the return is distributed differently between current income and capital gains. High growth stocks have an appreciable capital gains component but a relatively small current income yield; conversely, mature, negative-growth stocks provide a high current income but also price depreciation over time. 24. Here we have a stock with supernormal growth, but the dividend growth changes every year for the first four years. We can find the price of the stock in Y ear 3 since the dividend growth rate is constant after the third dividend. The price of the stock in Y ear 3 will be the dividend in Y ear 4, divided by the required return minus the constant dividend growth rate. So, the price in Y ear 3 will be: 6 / 17 P3 = $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)(1.05) / (.11 – .05) = $65.08 The price of the stock today will be the PV of the first three dividends, plus the PV of the stock price in Y ear 3, so: P 0 = $2.45(1.20)/(1.11) + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)/1.11 2 + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)/1.11 3 + $65.08/1.11 3 P 0 = $55.70 CH9 3,4,6,9,15 3. Project A has cash flows of $19,000 in Y ear 1, so the cash flows are short by $21,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project A is: Payback = 1 + ($21,000 / $25,000) = 1.84 years Project B has cash flows of: Cash flows = $14,000 + 17,000 + 24,000 = $55,000 during this first three years. The cash flows are still short by $5,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project B is: B: Payback = 3 + ($5,000 / $270,000) = 3.019 years Using the payback criterion and a cutoff of 3 years, accept project A and reject project B. 4. When we use discounted payback, we need to find the value of all cash flows today. The value today of the project cash flows for the first four years is: V alue today of Y ear 1 cash flow = $4,200/1.14 = $3,684.21 V alue today of Y ear 2 cash flow = $5,300/1.14 2 = $4,078.18 V alue today of Y ear 3 cash flow = $6,100/1.14 3 = $4,117.33 V alue today of Y ear 4 cash flow = $7,400/1.14 4 = $4,381.39 To findthe discounted payback, we use these values to find the payback period. The discounted first year cash flow is $3,684.21, so the discounted payback for a $7,000 initial cost is: Discounted payback = 1 + ($7,000 – 3,684.21)/$4,078.18 = 1.81 years For an initial cost of $10,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 2 + ($10,000 –3,684.21 –4,078.18)/$4,117.33 = 2.54 years Notice the calculation of discounted payback. We know the payback period is between two and three years, so we subtract the discounted values of the Y ear 1 and Y ear 2 cash flows from the initial cost. This is the numerator, which is the discounted amount we still need to make to recover our initial investment. We divide this amount by the discounted amount we will earn in Y ear 3 to get the fractional portion of the discounted payback. If the initial cost is $13,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 3 + ($13,000 – 3,684.21 – 4,078.18 – 4,117.33) / $4,381.39 = 3.26 years 7 / 17 6. Our definition of AAR is the average net income divided by the average book value. The average net income for this project is: A verage net income = ($1,938,200 + 2,201,600 + 1,876,000 + 1,329,500) / 4 = $1,836,325 And the average book value is: A verage book value = ($15,000,000 + 0) / 2 = $7,500,000 So, the AAR for this project is: AAR = A verage net income / A verage book value = $1,836,325 / $7,500,000 = .2448 or 24.48% 9. The NPV of a project is the PV of the outflows minus the PV of the inflows. Since the cash inflows are an annuity, the equation for the NPV of this project at an 8 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 8%, 9 ) = $40,036.31 At an 8 percent required return, the NPV is positive, so we would accept the project. The equation for the NPV of the project at a 20 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 20%, 9 ) = –$23,117.45 At a 20 percent required return, the NPV is negative, so we would reject the project. We would be indifferent to the project if the required return was equal to the IRR of the project, since at that required return the NPV is zero. The IRR of the project is: 0 = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA IRR, 9 ) IRR = 14.59% 15. The profitability index is defined as the PV of the cash inflows divided by the PV of the cash outflows. The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 10 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.1 + $6,900/1.1 2 + $5,700/1.1 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.187 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 15 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.15 + $6,900/1.15 2 + $5,700/1.15 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.094 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 22 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.22 + $6,900/1.22 2 + $5,700/1.22 3 ] / $14,000 = 0.983 8 / 17 We would accept the project if the required return were 10 percent or 15 percent since the PI is greater than one. We would reject the project if the required return were 22 percent since the PI。
罗斯公司理财第九版课后习题答案中文版

第一章1.在所有权形式的公司中,股东是公司的所有者。
股东选举公司的董事会,董事会任命该公司的管理层。
企业的所有权和控制权分离的组织形式是导致的代理关系存在的主要原因。
管理者可能追求自身或别人的利益最大化,而不是股东的利益最大化。
在这种环境下,他们可能因为目标不一致而存在代理问题2.非营利公司经常追求社会或政治任务等各种目标。
非营利公司财务管理的目标是获取并有效使用资金以最大限度地实现组织的社会使命。
3.这句话是不正确的。
管理者实施财务管理的目标就是最大化现有股票的每股价值,当前的股票价值反映了短期和长期的风险、时间以及未来现金流量。
4.有两种结论。
一种极端,在市场经济中所有的东西都被定价。
因此所有目标都有一个最优水平,包括避免不道德或非法的行为,股票价值最大化。
另一种极端,我们可以认为这是非经济现象,最好的处理方式是通过政治手段。
一个经典的思考问题给出了这种争论的答案:公司估计提高某种产品安全性的成本是30美元万。
然而,该公司认为提高产品的安全性只会节省20美元万。
请问公司应该怎么做呢?”5.财务管理的目标都是相同的,但实现目标的最好方式可能是不同的,因为不同的国家有不同的社会、政治环境和经济制度。
6.管理层的目标是最大化股东现有股票的每股价值。
如果管理层认为能提高公司利润,使股价超过35美元,那么他们应该展开对恶意收购的斗争。
如果管理层认为该投标人或其它未知的投标人将支付超过每股35美元的价格收购公司,那么他们也应该展开斗争。
然而,如果管理层不能增加企业的价值,并且没有其他更高的投标价格,那么管理层不是在为股东的最大化权益行事。
现在的管理层经常在公司面临这些恶意收购的情况时迷失自己的方向。
7.其他国家的代理问题并不严重,主要取决于其他国家的私人投资者占比重较小。
较少的私人投资者能减少不同的企业目标。
高比重的机构所有权导致高学历的股东和管理层讨论决策风险项目。
此外,机构投资者比私人投资者可以根据自己的资源和经验更好地对管理层实施有效的监督机制。
罗斯《公司理财》第9版笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解[视频详解](股票估值)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》第9版笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解[视频详解](股票估值)【圣才出品】罗斯《公司理财》第9版笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解[视频详解]第9章股票估值9.1复习笔记1.不同类型股票的估值(1)零增长股利股利不变时,一股股票的价格由下式给出:在这里假定Div1=Div2=…=Div。
(2)固定增长率股利如果股利以恒定的速率增长,那么一股股票的价格就为:式中,g是增长率;Div是第一期期末的股利。
(3)变动增长率股利2.股利折现模型中的参数估计(1)对增长率g的估计有效估计增长率的方法是:g=留存收益比率×留存收益收益率(ROE)只要公司保持其股利支付率不变,g就可以表示公司的股利增长率以及盈利增长率。
(2)对折现率R的估计对于折现率R的估计为:R=Div/P0+g该式表明总收益率R由两部分组成。
其中,第一部分被称为股利收益率,是预期的现金股利与当前的价格之比。
3.增长机会每股股价可以写做:该式表明,每股股价可以看做两部分的加和。
第一部分(EPS/R)是当公司满足于现状,而将其盈利全部发放给投资者时的价值;第二部分是当公司将盈利留存并用于投资新项目时的新增价值。
当公司投资于正NPVGO的增长机会时,公司价值增加。
反之,当公司选择负NPVGO 的投资机会时,公司价值降低。
但是,不管项目的NPV是正的还是负的,盈利和股利都是增长的。
不应该折现利润来获得每股价格,因为有部分盈利被用于再投资了。
只有股利被分到股东手中,也只有股利可以加以折现以获得股票价格。
4.市盈率即股票的市盈率是三个因素的函数:(1)增长机会。
拥有强劲增长机会的公司具有高市盈率。
(2)风险。
低风险股票具有高市盈率。
(3)会计方法。
采用保守会计方法的公司具有高市盈率。
5.股票市场交易商:持有一项存货,然后准备在任何时点进行买卖。
经纪人:将买者和卖者撮合在一起,但并不持有存货。
9.2课后习题详解一、概念题1.股利支付率(payout ratio)答:股利支付率一般指公司发放给普通股股东的现金股利占总利润的比例。
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第16~18章)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第16章资本结构:基本概念一、概念题1.馅饼模型(pie model)答:馅饼模型是一种分析公司资本结构的模型,用来讨论公司应如何选择负债权益比的问题。
该理论将公司的筹资要求权之和比作一个馅饼,并且将公司的价值定义为负债和所有者权益之和。
该理论认为,债权人和股东将分别得到不同大小的馅饼块,但是整个馅饼的大小,也就是公司的实际价值,却完全不会受到馅饼分割方式的影响。
也就是说,公司的融资结构只影响公司利润的分配方式,即这个利润馅饼如何被分割以及由谁承担公司的风险,不会对公司的价值造成任何影响。
2.MM命题Ⅰ(MM Proposition I)答:不考虑公司所得税情况下的MM命题Ⅰ指的是,公司的价值取决于未来经营活动净收益的资本化程度,资本化率与公司的风险相一致。
这一命题有两个直接推论:a.公司的平均资本成本与公司资本结构无关;b.公司的平均资本成本等于与之风险相同的零举债公司的资本化率。
3.MM命题Ⅱ(MM Proposition II)答:不考虑公司所得税情况下的MM命题Ⅱ指的是,举债经营公司的权益资本成本等于零举债经营公司的权益资本成本加上风险报酬率。
风险报酬率的多少取决于公司举债经营的程度。
命题二表明,随着公司负债的增加,公司的权益资本成本也将提高。
4.MM命题Ⅰ(公司税)[MM Proposition I(corporate taxes)]答:MM命题一,零举债经营公司的价值是公司税后经营收益除以公司权益资本成本所得的结果,而举债经营公司的价值等于同类风险的零举债经营公司的价值加上税款节余额。
根据这一结论,当公司负债增加时,举债经营公司价值增加较快。
特别地,当公司负债筹资的比重为100%时,公司的价值最大。
5.MM命题Ⅱ(公司税)[MM Proposition II(corporate taxes)]答:MM命题二,举债公司的权益资本成本等于同类风险零举债经营公司的权益资本成本加上风险报酬率,而风险报酬率又取决于公司资本结构和公司所得税税率。
罗斯公司理财第九版第五章课后答案对应版
第五章:净现值和投资评价的其他方法1.如果项目会带来常规的现金流,回收期短于项目的生命周期意味着,在折现率为0 的情况下,NPV 为正值。
折现率大于0 时,回收期依旧会短于项目的生命周期,但根据折现率小于、等于、大于IRR 的情况,NPV 可能为正、为零、为负。
折现回收期包含了相关折现率的影响。
如果一个项目的折现回收期短于该项目的生命周期,NPV 一定为正值。
2.如果某项目有常规的现金流,而且NPV 为正,该项目回收期一定短于其生命周期。
因为折现回收期是用与NPV 相同的折现值计算出来的,如果NPV为正,折现回收期也会短于该项目的生命周期。
NPV 为正表明未来流入现金流大于初始投资成本,盈利指数必然大于1。
如果NPV 以特定的折现率R 计算出来为正值时,必然存在一个大于R 的折现率R’使得NPV 为0,因此,IRR 必定大于必要报酬率。
3.(1)回收期法就是简单地计算出一系列现金流的盈亏平衡点。
其缺陷是忽略了货币的时间价值,另外,也忽略了回收期以后的现金流量。
当某项目的回收期小于该项目的生命周期,则可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
回收期法决策作出的选择比较武断。
(2)平均会计收益率为扣除所得税和折旧之后的项目平均收益除以整个项目期限内的平均账面投资额。
其最大的缺陷在于没有使用正确的原始材料,其次也没有考虑到时间序列这个因素。
一般某项目的平均会计收益率大于公司的目标会计收益率,则可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
(3)内部收益率就是令项目净现值为0 的贴现率。
其缺陷在于没有办法对某些项目进行判断,例如有多重内部收益率的项目,而且对于融资型的项目以及投资型的项目判断标准截然相反。
对于投资型项目,若IRR 大于贴现率,项目可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
对于融资型项目,若IRR 小于贴现率,项目可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
(4)盈利指数是初始以后所有预期未来现金流量的现值和初始投资的比值。
必须注意的是,倘若初始投资期之后,在资金使用上还有限制,那盈利指数就会失效。
罗斯公司理财第九版第十八章课后答案对应版
第十八章:杠杆企业的股价与资本预算1、调整的净现值法(APV)如下:(UCF t=无杠杆企业项目第期流向权益所有者的现金流量R0=无杠杆企业项目的资本成本)2、APV 法用权益资本成本折现现金流得到无杠杆项目的价值,然后加上负债的节税现值,得到有杠杆情况下的项目价值;而WACC 法则将UCF 按R WACC折现,而R WACC 低于R0 。
3、FTE 法使用的是LCF,而其它两种方法使用的是UCF。
4、WACC 法在计算现金流量时使用的是无杠杆企业的现金流量,没有包含利息,但是在计算加权平均成本的时候包含了利息成本。
若在计算现金流时要把利息的支付包括进去,可使用FTF 法。
5、无杠杆企业的贝塔值可以用杠杆的贝塔来衡量,它是企业业务风险的衡量标准;另外,企业的金融风险也可以由贝塔值来衡量。
6.a. The maximum price that the company should be willing to pay for the fleet of cars with all-equity funding is the price that makes the NPV of the transaction equal to zero. The NPV equation for the project is:NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 – t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)If we let P equal the purchase price of the fleet, then the NPV is:NPV = –P + (1 – .35)($140,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5Setting the NPV equal to zero and solving for the purchase price, we find:0 = –P + (1 – .35)($140,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5P = $320,068.04 + (P)(0.35/5)PVIFA13%,5 = $320,068.04 + .2462P.7538P = $320,068.04 则P = $424,609.54b. The adjusted present value (APV) of a project equals the net present value of the project if it were funded completely by equity plus the net present value of any financing side effects.In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of the cash flows resulting from the firm‘s debt, so:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)So, the NPV of each part of the APV equation is:NPV(All-Equity) = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 – t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield) The company paid $395,000 for the fleet of cars. Because this fleet will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method, annual depreciation expense equals: Depreciation = $395,000/5 = $79,000So, the NPV of an all-equity project is:NPV = –$395,000 + (1 – 0.35)($140,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (0.35)($79,000)PVIFA13%,5NPV = $22,319.49NPV(Financing Side Effects)The net present value of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm‘s debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt R B. So, the NPV of the financing side effects are:NPV = $260,000 – (1 – 0.35)(0.08)($260,000)PVIFA8%,5 – [$260,000/(1.08)⌒5] = $29,066.93 So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = $22,319.49 + 29,066.93 = $51,386.427. a. In order to value a firm‘s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, discount the cash flows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm‘s levered equity. The cash flows to equity holders will be the firm‘s net income. Remembering that the company has three stores, we find:Sales $3,600,000COGS 1,530,000G & A costs 1,020,000Interest 102,000EBT $948,000Taxes 379,200NI $568,800Since this cash flow will remain the same forever, the present value of cash flows available to the firm‘s equity holders is a perpetuity. We can discount at the levered cost of equity, so, the value of the company‘s equity is: PV(Flow-to-equity) = $568,800 / 0.19 = $2,993,684.21b. The value of a firm is equal to the sum of the market values of its debt and equity, or:V L = B + SWe calculat ed the value of the company‘s equity in part a, so now we need to calculate the value of debt. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.40, which can be written algebraically as: B / S = 0.40We can substitute the value of equity and solve for the value of debt, doing so, we find:B / $2,993,684.21 = 0.40 则B = $1,197,473.68So, the value of the company is: V = $2,993,684.21 + 1,197,473.68 = $4,191,157.898. a. In order to determine the cost of the firm‘s debt, we need to find the yield to maturity on its current bonds. With semiannual coupon payments, the yield to maturity in the company‘s bonds is: $975 = $40(PVIFA R%,40) + $1,000(PVIF R%,40) 则R = .0413 or 4.13%Since the coupon payments are semiannual, the YTM on the bonds is:YTM = 4.13%× 2 = 8.26%b. We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find the return on unlevered equity. According to the Capital Asset Pricing Model:R0 = R F + βUnlevered(R M – R F) = 5% + 1.1(12% – 5%) = 12.70%Now we can find the cost of levered equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxesR S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C) = .1270 + (.40)(.1270 – .0826)(1 – .34) = .1387 or 13.87% c. In a world with corporate taxes, a firm‘s weighted average cost of capital is equal to:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe problem does not provide either the debt-value ratio or equity-value ratio. However, the firm‘s debt-equity ratio of is: B/S = 0.40Solving for B: B = 0.4SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get: B/V = .4S / (.4S + S) = .4 / 1.4 = .29And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or: S/V = 1 – .29= .71So, the WACC for the company is: R WACC = .29(1 – .34)(.0826) + .71(.1387)R WACC = .1147 or 11.47%9. a. The equity beta of a firm financed entirely by equity is equal to its unlevered beta. Since each firm has an unlevered beta of 1.25, we can find the equity beta for each. Doing so, we find:North PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 – t C)(B/S)] βUnlevered = [1 + (1 – .35)($2,900,000/$3,800,000](1.25) = 1.87 South PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 – t C)(B/S)]βUnlevered = [1 + (1 – .35)($3,800,000/$2,900,000](1.25) = 2.31b. We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find th e required return on each firm‘s equity. Doing so, we find:North Pole: R S = R F + βEquity(R M – R F) = 5.30% + 1.87(12.40% – 5.30%) = 18.58%South Pole: R S = R F + βEquity(R M – R F) = 5.30% + 2.31(12.40% – 5.30%) = 21.73%10. First we need to find the aftertax value of the revenues minus expenses. The aftertax value is: Aftertax revenue = $3,800,000(1 – .40) = $2,280,000Next, we need to find the depreciation tax shield. The depreciation tax shield each year is: Depreciation tax shield = Depreciation(t C) = ($11,400,000 / 6)(.40) = $760,000Now we can find the NPV of the project, which is:NPV = Initial cost + PV of depreciation tax shield + PV of aftertax revenueTo find the present value of the depreciation tax shield, we should discount at the risk-free rate, and we need to discount the aftertax revenues at the cost of equity, so:NPV = –$11,400,000 + $760,000(PVIFA6%,6) + $2,280,000(PVIFA14%,6) = $1,203,328.43 11. a. The company has a capital structure with three parts: long-term debt, short-term debt, and equity. Since interest payments on both long-term and short-term debt are tax-deductible, multiply the pretax costs by (1 – t C) to determine the aftertax costs to be used in the weighted average cost of capital calculation. The WACC using the book value weights is:R WACC = (w STD)(R STD)(1 – t C) + (w LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (w Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($3 / $19)(.035)(1 – .35) + ($10 / $19)(.068)(1 – .35) + ($6 / $19)(.145)R WACC = 0.0726 or 7.26%b. Using the market value weights, the company‘s WACC is:R WACC = (w STD)(R STD)(1 – t C) + (w LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (w Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($3 / $40)(.035)(1 – .35) + ($11 / $40)(.068)(1 – .35) + ($26 / $40)(.145)R WACC = 0.1081 or 10.81%c. Using the target debt-equity ratio, the target debt-value ratio for the company is:B/S = 0.60 则B = 0.6SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get: B/V = .6S / (.6S + S) = .6 / 1.6 = .375And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or: S/V = 1 – .375 = .625We can use the ratio of short-term debt to long-term debt in a similar manner to find the short-term debt to total debt and long-term debt to total debt. Using the short-term debt to long-term debt ratio, we get: STD/LTD = 0.20 则STD = 0.2LTDSubstituting this in the short-term debt to total debt ratio, we get:STD/B = .2LTD / (.2LTD + LTD) = .2 / 1.2 = .167And the long-term debt to total debt ratio is one minus the short-term debt to total debt ratio, or: LTD/B = 1 – .167 = .833Now we can find the short-term debt to value ratio and long-term debt to value ratio by multiplying the respective ratio by the debt-value ratio. So:STD/V = (STD/B)(B/V) = .167(.375) = .063And the long-term debt to value ratio is:LTD/V = (LTD/B)(B/V) = .833(.375) = .313So, using the target capital structure we ights, the company‘s WACC is:R WACC = (w STD)(R STD)(1 – t C) + (w LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (w Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = (.06)(.035)(1 – .35) + (.31)(.068)(1 – .35) + (.625)(.145) = 0.1059 or 10.59%d. The differences in the WACCs are due to the different weighti ng schemes. The company‘s WACC will most closely resemble the WACC calculated using target weights since future projects will be financed at the target ratio. Therefore, the WACC computed with target weights should be used for project evaluation12.略13. The adjusted present value of a project equals the net present value of the project under all-equity financing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. First, we need to calculate the unlevered cost of equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes: R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C).16 = R0 + (0.50)(R0 – 0.09)(1 – 0.40) 则R0 = 0.1438 or 14.38%Now we can find the NPV of an all-equity project, which is:NPV = PV(Unlevered Cash Flows)NPV = –$21,000,000 + $6,900,000/1.1438 + $11,000,000/(1.1438)2 + $9,500,000/(1.1438)3 NPV = –$212,638.89Next, we need to find the net present value of financing side effects. This is equal the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm‘s debt. So:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Each year, an equal principal payment will be made, which will reduce the interest accrued during the year. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so the NPV of the financing effects are:NPV = $7,000,000 – (1 – .40)(.09)($7,000,000) / (1.09) – $2,333,333.33/(1.09)– (1 – .40)(.09)($4,666,666.67)/(1.09)⌒2 – $2,333,333.33/(1.09)⌒2– (1 – .40)(.09)($2,333,333.33)/(1.09)⌒3 – $2,333,333.33/(1.09)⌒3 = $437,458.31So, the APV of project is: APV = NPV(All-equity) + NPV(Financing side effects)APV = –$212,638.89 + 437,458.31 = $224,819.4214. a. To calculate the NPV of the project, we first need to find the company‘s WACC. In a world with cor porate taxes, a firm‘s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe market value of the company‘s equity is:Market value of equity = 6,000,000($20) = $120,000,000So, the debt-value ratio and equity-value ratio are:Debt-value = $35,000,000 / ($35,000,000 + 120,000,000) = .2258Equity-value = $120,000,000 / ($35,000,000 + 120,000,000) = .7742Since the CEO believes its current capital structure is optimal, these values can be used as thetarget weight s in the firm‘s weighted average cost of capital calculation. The yield to maturity of the company‘s debt is its pretax cost of debt. To find the company‘s cost of equity, we need to calculate the stock beta. The stock beta can be calculated as:β= 标准差S,M / 方差M = .036 / .202 = 0.90Now we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to determine the cost of equity. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is: R S = R F + β(R M – R F) = 6% + 0.90(7.50%) = 12.75%Now, we can calculate the company‘s WACC, which is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R S = .2258(1 – .35)(.08) + .7742(.1275)R WACC = .1105 or 11.05%Finally, we can use the WACC to discount the unlevered cash flows, which gives us an NPV of: NPV = –$45,000,000 + $13,500,000(PVIFA11.05%,5) = $4,837,978.59b. The weighted average cost of capital used in part a will not change if the firm chooses to fund the project entirely with debt. The weighted average cost of capital is based on optimal capital structure weights. Since the current capital structure is optimal, all-debt funding for the project simply implies that the firm will have to use more equity in the future to bring the capital structure back towards the target15. a. Since the company is currently an all-equity firm, its value equals the present value of its unlevered after-tax earnings, discounted at its unlevered cost of capital. The cash flows to shareholders for the unlevered firm are:EBIT $83,000Tax 33,200Net income $49,800So, the value of the company is: V U = $49,800 / .15 = $332,000b. The adjusted present value of a firm equals its value under all-equity financing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from debt. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest payments)NPV = $195,000 – (1 – .40)(.09)($195,000) / 0.09 = $78,000So, using the APV method, the value of the company is:APV = V U + NPV(Financing side effects) = $332,000 + 78,000 = $410,000The value of the debt is given, so the value of equity is the value of the company minus the value of the debt, or: S = V – B = $410,000 – 195,000 = $215,000c. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the required return of levered equity is:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C)R S = .15 + ($195,000 / $215,000)(.15 – .09)(1 – .40) = .1827 or 18.27%d. In order to value a firm‘s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we can discount the cash flows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm‘s levered equity. First, we need to calculate the levered cash flows available to shareholders, which are:EBIT $83,000Interest 17,550EBT $65,450Tax 26,180Net income $39,270So, the value of equity with the flow-to-equity method is:S = Cash flows available to equity holders / R S = $39,270 / .1827 = $215,00016.. Since the company is not publicly traded, we need to use the industry numbers to calculate the industry levered return on equity. We can then find the industry unlevered return on equity, and re-lever the industry return on equity to account for the different use of leverage. So, using the CAPM to calculate the industry levered return on equity, we find:R S = R F + β(MRP) = 5% + 1.2(7%) = 13.40%Next, to find the average cost of unlevered equity in the holiday gift industry we can use Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, so:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C) =.1340 = R0 + (.35)(R0 – .05)(1 – .40)R0 = .1194 or 11.94%Now, we can use the Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes to re-lever the return on equity to account for this company‘s debt-equity ratio. Doing so, we find:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C) = .1194 + (.40)(.1194 – .05)(1 – .40) = .1361 or 13.61% Since the project is financed at the firm‘s target debt-equity ratio, it must be discounted at the company‘s weighted average cost of capital. In a world with corporate taxes, a firm‘s weighted average cost of capital equals: R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R S So, we need the debt-value and equity-value ratios for the company. The debt-equity ratio for the company is: B/S = 0.40 则B = 0.40SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get: B/V = .40S / (.40S + S) = .40 / 1.40 = .29 And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or: S/V = 1 – .29 = .71So, using the capital structure weights, the company‘s WACC is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .29(1 – .40)(.05) + .71(.1361) = .1058 or 10.58%Now we need the project‘s cash flows. The cash flows increase for the first five years before leveling off into perpetuity. So, the cash flows from the project for the next six years are: Year 1 cash flow $80,000.00Year 2 cash flow $84,000.00Year 3 cash flow $88,200.00Year 4 cash flow $92,610.00Year 5 cash flow $97,240.50Year 6 cash flow $97,240.50So, the NPV of the project is:NPV = –$475,000 + $80,000/1.1058 + $84,000/1.1058⌒2 + $88,200/1.1058⌒3 +$92,610/1.1058⌒4 + $97,240.50/1.1058⌒5 + ($97,240.50/.1058)/1.1058⌒5 = $408,125.67。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
罗斯《公司理财》第9版精要版英文原书课后部分章节答案详细»1 / 17 CH5 11,13,18,19,20 11. To find the PV of a lump sum, we use: PV = FV / (1 + r) t PV = $1,000,000 / (1.10) 80 = $488.19 13. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for r, we get: r = (FV / PV) 1 / t –1 r = ($1,260,000 / $150) 1/112 – 1 = .0840 or 8.40% To find the FV of the first prize, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $1,260,000(1.0840) 33 = $18,056,409.94 18. To find the FV of a lump sum, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $4,000(1.11) 45 = $438,120.97 FV = $4,000(1.11) 35 = $154,299.40 Better start early! 19. We need to find the FV of a lump sum. However, the money will only be invested for six years, so the number of periods is six. FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $20,000(1.084)6 = $32,449.33 20. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for t, we get: t = ln(FV / PV) / ln(1 + r) t = ln($75,000 / $10,000) / ln(1.11) = 19.31 So, the money must be invested for 19.31 years. However, you will not receive the money for another two years. From now, you’ll wait: 2 years + 19.31 years = 21.31 years CH6 16,24,27,42,58 16. For this problem, we simply need to find the FV of a lump sum using the equation: FV = PV(1 + r) t 2 / 17 It is important to note that compounding occurs semiannually. To account for this, we will divide the interest rate by two (the number of compounding periods in a year), and multiply the number of periods by two. Doing so, we get: FV = $2,100[1 + (.084/2)] 34 = $8,505.93 24. This problem requires us to find the FVA. The equation to find the FVA is: FV A = C{[(1 + r) t – 1] / r} FV A = $300[{[1 + (.10/12) ] 360 – 1} / (.10/12)] = $678,146.38 27. The cash flows are annual and the compounding period is quarterly, so we need to calculate the EAR to make the interest rate comparable with the timing of the cash flows. Using the equation for the EAR, we get: EAR = [1 + (APR / m)] m – 1 EAR = [1 + (.11/4)] 4 – 1 = .1146 or 11.46% And now we use the EAR to find the PV of each cash flow as a lump sum and add them together: PV = $725 / 1.1146 + $980 / 1.1146 2 + $1,360 / 1.1146 4 = $2,320.36 42. The amount of principal paid on the loan is the PV of the monthly payments you make. So, the present value of the $1,150 monthly payments is: PVA = $1,150[(1 – {1 / [1 + (.0635/12)]} 360 ) / (.0635/12)] = $184,817.42 The monthly payments of $1,150 will amount to a principal payment of $184,817.42. The amount of principal you will still owe is: $240,000 – 184,817.42 = $55,182.58 This remaining principal amount will increase at the interest rate on the loan until the end of the loan period. So the balloon payment in 30 years, which is the FV of the remaining principal will be: Balloon payment = $55,182.58[1 + (.0635/12)] 360 = $368,936.54 58. To answer this question, we should find the PV of both options, and compare them. Since we are purchasing the car, the lowest PV is the best option. The PV of the leasing is simply the PV of the lease payments, plus the $99. The interest rate we would use for the leasing option is the same as the interest rate of the loan. The PV of leasing is: PV = $99 + $450{1 –[1 / (1 + .07/12) 12(3) ]} / (.07/12) = $14,672.91 The PV of purchasing the car is the current price of the car minus the PV of the resale price. The PV of the resale price is: PV = $23,000 / [1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $18,654.82 The PV of the decision to purchase is: $32,000 – 18,654.82 = $13,345.18 3 / 17 In this case, it is cheaper to buy the car than leasing it since the PV of the purchase cash flows is lower. To find the breakeven resale price, we need to find the resale price that makes the PV of the two options the same. In other words, the PV of the decision to buy should be: $32,000 – PV of resale price = $14,672.91 PV of resale price = $17,327.09 The resale price that would make the PV of the lease versus buy decision is the FV ofthis value, so: Breakeven resale price = $17,327.09[1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $21,363.01 CH7 3,18,21,22,31 3. The price of any bond is the PV of the interest payment, plus the PV of the par value. Notice this problem assumes an annual coupon. The price of the bond will be: P = $75({1 – [1/(1 + .0875)] 10 } / .0875) + $1,000[1 / (1 + .0875) 10 ] = $918.89 We would like to introduce shorthand notation here. Rather than write (or type, as the case may be) the entire equation for the PV of a lump sum, or the PV A equation, it is common to abbreviate the equations as: PVIF R,t = 1 / (1 + r) t which stands for Present Value Interest Factor PVIFA R,t = ({1 – [1/(1 + r)] t } / r ) which stands for Present Value Interest Factor of an Annuity These abbreviations are short hand notation for the equations in which the interest rate and the number of periods are substituted into the equation and solved. We will use this shorthand notation in remainder of the solutions key. 18. The bond price equation for this bond is: P 0 = $1,068 = $46(PVIFA R%,18 ) + $1,000(PVIF R%,18 ) Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error we find: R = 4.06% This is the semiannual interest rate, so the YTM is: YTM = 2 4.06% = 8.12% The current yield is: Current yield = Annual coupon payment / Price = $92 / $1,068 = .0861 or 8.61% The effective annual yield is the same as the EAR, so using the EAR equation from the previous chapter: Effective annual yield = (1 + 0.0406) 2 – 1 = .0829 or 8.29% 20. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are four months until the next coupon payment, so two months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $74/2 × 2/6 = $12.33 And we calculate the clean price as: 4 / 17 Clean price = Dirty price –Accrued interest = $968 –12.33 = $955.67 21. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are two months until the next coupon payment, so four months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $68/2 × 4/6 = $22.67 And we calculate the dirty price as: Dirty price = Clean price + Accrued interest = $1,073 + 22.67 = $1,095.67 22. To find the number of years to maturity for the bond, we need to find the price of the bond. Since we already have the coupon rate, we can use the bond price equation, and solve for the number of years to maturity. We are given the current yield of the bond, so we can calculate the price as: Current yield = .0755 = $80/P 0 P 0 = $80/.0755 = $1,059.60 Now that we have the price of the bond, the bond price equation is: P = $1,059.60 = $80[(1 – (1/1.072) t ) / .072 ] + $1,000/1.072 t We can solve this equation for t as follows: $1,059.60(1.072) t = $1,111.11(1.072) t –1,111.11 + 1,000 111.11 = 51.51(1.072) t 2.1570 = 1.072 t t = log 2.1570 / log 1.072 = 11.06 11 years The bond has 11 years to maturity.31. The price of any bond (or financial instrument) is the PV of the future cash flows. Even though Bond M makes different coupons payments, to find the price of the bond, we just find the PV of the cash flows. The PV of the cash flows for Bond M is: P M = $1,100(PVIFA 3.5%,16 )(PVIF 3.5%,12 ) + $1,400(PVIFA 3.5%,12 )(PVIF 3.5%,28 ) + $20,000(PVIF 3.5%,40 ) P M = $19,018.78 Notice that for the coupon payments of $1,400, we found the PV A for the coupon payments, and then discounted the lump sum back to today. Bond N is a zero coupon bond with a $20,000 par value, therefore, the price of the bond is the PV of the par, or: P N = $20,000(PVIF 3.5%,40 ) = $5,051.45 CH8 4,18,20,22,24 4. Using the constant growth model, we find the price of the stock today is: P 0 = D 1 / (R – g) = $3.04 / (.11 – .038) = $42.22 5 / 17 18. The priceof a share of preferred stock is the dividend payment divided by the required return. We know the dividend payment in Year 20, so we can find the price of the stock in Year 19, one year before the first dividend payment. Doing so, we get: P 19 = $20.00 / .064 P 19 = $312.50 The price of the stock today is the PV of the stock price in the future, so the price today will be: P 0 = $312.50 / (1.064) 19 P 0 = $96.15 20. We can use the two-stage dividend growth model for this problem, which is: P 0 = [D 0 (1 + g 1 )/(R – g 1 )]{1 – [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T }+ [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T [D 0 (1 + g 2 )/(R –g 2 )] P 0 = [$1.25(1.28)/(.13 – .28)][1 –(1.28/1.13) 8 ] + [(1.28)/(1.13)] 8 [$1.25(1.06)/(.13 – .06)] P 0 = $69.55 22. We are asked to find the dividend yield and capital gains yield for each of the stocks. All of the stocks have a 15 percent required return, which is the sum of the dividend yield and the capital gains yield. To find the components of the total return, we need to find the stock price for each stock. Using this stock price and the dividend, we can calculate the dividend yield. The capital gains yield for the stock will be the total return (required return) minus the dividend yield. W: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1.10)/(.19 – .10) = $55.00 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.10)/$55.00 = .09 or 9% Capital gains yield = .19 – .09 = .10 or 10% X: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50/(.19 – 0) = $23.68 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50/$23.68 = .19 or 19% Capital gains yield = .19 – .19 = 0% Y: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1 – .05)/(.19 + .05) = $17.81 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(0.95)/$17.81 = .24 or 24% Capital gains yield = .19 – .24 = –.05 or –5% Z: P 2 = D 2 (1 + g) / (R – g) = D 0 (1 + g 1 ) 2 (1 +g 2 )/(R – g 2 ) = $4.50(1.20) 2 (1.12)/(.19 – .12) = $103.68 P 0 = $4.50 (1.20) / (1.19) + $4.50(1.20) 2 / (1.19) 2 + $103.68 / (1.19) 2 = $82.33 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.20)/$82.33 = .066 or 6.6% Capital gains yield = .19 – .066 = .124 or 12.4% In all cases, the required return is 19%, but the return is distributed differently between current income and capital gains. High growth stocks have an appreciable capital gains component but a relatively small current income yield; conversely, mature, negative-growth stocks provide a high current income but also price depreciation over time. 24. Here we have a stock with supernormal growth, but the dividend growth changes every year for the first four years. We can find the price of the stock in Year 3 since the dividend growth rate is constant after the third dividend. The price of the stock in Year 3 will be the dividend in Year 4, divided by the required return minus the constant dividend growth rate. So, the price in Year 3 will be: 6 / 17 P 3 = $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)(1.05) / (.11 – .05) = $65.08 The price of the stock today will be the PV of the first three dividends, plus the PV of the stock price in Year 3, so: P 0 = $2.45(1.20)/(1.11) + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)/1.11 2 + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)/1.11 3 + $65.08/1.11 3 P 0 = $55.70 CH9 3,4,6,9,15 3. Project A has cash flows of $19,000 in Year 1, so the cash flows are short by $21,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project A is: Payback = 1 + ($21,000 / $25,000) = 1.84 years Project B has cash flows of: Cash flows = $14,000 + 17,000 + 24,000 = $55,000 during this first three years. The cash flows are still short by $5,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project B is: B: Payback = 3 + ($5,000 / $270,000) = 3.019 years Using the payback criterion and a cutoff of 3 years, accept project A and reject project B. 4. When we use discounted payback, we need to find the value of all cash flows today. The value today of the project cash flows for the first four years is: Value today of Year 1 cash flow = $4,200/1.14 = $3,684.21 Value today of Year 2 cash flow = $5,300/1.14 2 = $4,078.18 Value today of Year 3 cash flow = $6,100/1.14 3 = $4,117.33 V alue today of Year 4 cash flow = $7,400/1.14 4 = $4,381.39 To find the discounted payback, we use these values to find the payback period. The discounted first year cash flow is $3,684.21, so the discounted payback for a $7,000 initial cost is: Discounted payback= 1 + ($7,000 – 3,684.21)/$4,078.18 = 1.81 years For an initial cost of $10,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 2 + ($10,000 –3,684.21 – 4,078.18)/$4,117.33 = 2.54 years Notice the calculation of discounted payback. We know the payback period is between two and three years, so we subtract the discounted values of the Year 1 and Year 2 cash flows from the initial cost. This is the numerator, which is the discounted amount we still need to make to recover our initial investment. We divide this amount by the discounted amount we will earn in Year 3 to get the fractional portion of the discounted payback. If the initial cost is $13,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 3 + ($13,000 – 3,684.21 – 4,078.18 – 4,117.33) / $4,381.39 = 3.26 years 7 / 17 6. Our definition of AAR is the average net income divided by the average book value. The average net income for this project is: Average net income = ($1,938,200 + 2,201,600 + 1,876,000 + 1,329,500) / 4 = $1,836,325 And the average book value is: Average book value = ($15,000,000 + 0) / 2 = $7,500,000 So, the AAR for this project is: AAR = Average net income / Average book value = $1,836,325 / $7,500,000 = .2448 or 24.48% 9. The NPV of a project is the PV of the outflows minus the PV of the inflows. Since the cash inflows are an annuity, the equation for the NPV of this project at an 8 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 8%, 9 ) = $40,036.31 At an 8 percent required return, the NPV is positive, so we would accept the project. The equation for the NPV of the project at a 20 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 20%, 9 ) = –$23,117.45 At a 20 percent required return, the NPV is negative, so we would reject the project. We would be indifferent to the project if the required return was equal to the IRR of the project, since at that required return the NPV is zero. The IRR of the project is: 0 = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA IRR, 9 ) IRR = 14.59% 15. The profitability index is defined as the PV of the cash inflows divided by the PV of the cash outflows. The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 10 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.1 + $6,900/1.1 2 + $5,700/1.1 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.187 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 15 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.15 + $6,900/1.15 2 + $5,700/1.15 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.094 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 22 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.22 + $6,900/1.22 2 + $5,700/1.22 3 ] / $14,000 = 0.983 8 / 17 We would accept the project if the required return were 10 percent or 15 percent since the PI is greater than one. We would reject the project if the required return were 22 percent since the PI。