国际会计准则
国际会计准则

国际会计准则1. 引言国际会计准则(International Financial Reporting Standards,IFRS)是全球应用广泛的会计准则体系,旨在提供统一、可比的会计信息,以促进跨国公司财务报告的透明度和可理解性。
本文将探讨国际会计准则的背景、目的以及对全球财务报告的影响。
2. 国际会计准则的背景在全球化背景下,不同国家和地区都有各自的会计原则和准则,这导致跨国公司的财务报告难以比较和理解。
为了解决这个问题,国际会计准则委员会(International Accounting Standards Board,IASB)成立于2001年,致力于制定统一的国际会计准则。
3. 国际会计准则的目的国际会计准则的核心目标是提供高质量的财务报告,使投资者、债权人和其他利益相关方能够准确了解企业的财务状况和业绩。
其具体目的包括:- 提升财务报告的透明度和可比性- 减少企业在财务报告中的主观判断和自由披露- 保证财务报告的质量和真实性4. 国际会计准则对全球财务报告的影响国际会计准则的应用范围涵盖了全球范围内的上市公司、金融机构和其他组织。
其对全球财务报告的影响主要体现在以下几个方面:4.1 提供一致的会计政策选择国际会计准则的制定使得跨国公司有了一套一致的会计政策选择,降低了财务报告的主观性和歧义性,增强了国际比较的可行性和准确性。
4.2 提高财务报告的透明度和可理解性国际会计准则要求企业提供更详细和全面的财务信息,包括对业务风险和财务风险的披露。
这样一来,投资者和其他利益相关方能够更好地理解和评估企业的财务状况和业绩。
4.3 加强财务报告的质量控制国际会计准则对财务报告的准确性和真实性提出了更高的要求,要求企业建立有效的内部控制、审计和监管机制,以确保财务报告的质量和可信度。
5. 国际会计准则在全球范围的应用情况截至目前,超过120个国家和地区已经采用了国际会计准则,其中包括欧盟成员国、澳大利亚、加拿大和韩国等重要经济体。
国际会计准则(IFRS)的应用与解读

国际会计准则(IFRS)的应用与解读在全球化经济的背景下,国际会计准则(International Financial Reporting Standards,简称IFRS)的应用与解读显得尤为重要。
IFRS是由国际会计准则委员会(International Accounting Standards Board,简称IASB)制定的一系列会计准则,旨在提供符合国际标准的财务报告和信息披露的规则。
本文将探讨IFRS的应用领域、解读方法以及对全球企业的影响。
一、IFRS的应用领域IFRS适用于各个国家的上市公司、金融机构以及其他一些法律或规定要求遵循IFRS的实体。
与国家会计准则不同,IFRS具有全球通用性,帮助企业实现统一的财务报告和信息披露标准。
IFRS的应用领域包括但不限于以下几个方面:1. 上市公司:国际证券交易所上市的公司,在财务报告和信息披露方面需要遵循IFRS的要求。
2. 金融机构:包括银行、保险公司等金融机构,在财务报告和会计处理方面采用IFRS标准。
3. 国际合作项目:参与国际合作项目的企业,通常需要使用IFRS 进行财务报告,以确保各方对项目进展具有一致性的了解。
二、IFRS的解读方法IFRS的解读是确保财务报告符合国际标准的关键环节。
在解读IFRS时,应注意以下几个方面:1. 理解IFRS原则:IFRS的核心原则是公允价值、谨慎性、实质合同等,因此在解读IFRS时,应理解这些原则的含义,确保正确理解并正确应用。
2. 研究IFRS解释与指南:IFRS解释与指南提供了对具体会计问题的解释和指导,对于需要解读IFRS的企业来说,应深入研究这些解释与指南,以避免偏差和误解。
3. 利用实例和案例:在解读IFRS时,可以通过实例和案例来帮助理解和应用。
通过分析实际情况和具体案例,对IFRS进行解读和应用,既能增加理解的深度,又能提高应用的准确性。
三、IFRS对全球企业的影响IFRS的应用不仅对于遵循标准的企业而言是一种要求,也对全球企业产生了重要的影响。
国际会计准则与报表知识点总结

国际会计准则与报表知识点总结在当今全球化的经济环境中,国际会计准则的重要性日益凸显。
了解和掌握国际会计准则与报表的相关知识,对于企业的财务管理、投资决策以及国际经济交流都具有关键意义。
一、国际会计准则的概述国际会计准则是一套在全球范围内被广泛接受和应用的财务报告准则,旨在提供高质量、透明且可比的财务信息。
它由国际会计准则理事会(IASB)制定和发布,不断更新和完善以适应经济环境的变化。
国际会计准则的目标是确保财务报表能够真实、公允地反映企业的财务状况、经营成果和现金流量。
这有助于投资者、债权人、管理层等利益相关者做出明智的决策。
二、国际会计准则的主要原则1、权责发生制权责发生制是国际会计准则的核心原则之一。
它要求企业在经济业务发生时确认收入和费用,而不论现金是否收付。
这与收付实现制形成鲜明对比,收付实现制只在现金实际收付时确认收支。
2、持续经营假设企业在编制财务报表时通常基于持续经营假设,即假定企业将在可预见的未来持续经营下去。
如果存在证据表明企业无法持续经营,财务报表的编制基础将需要做出相应调整。
3、实质重于形式在某些情况下,交易或事项的法律形式可能与其经济实质不同。
国际会计准则要求按照经济实质进行会计处理,而不仅仅依赖于法律形式。
4、可比性和一致性财务报表应具有可比性,以便不同企业和不同时期的财务信息能够进行有意义的比较。
同时,企业在会计政策的选择和应用上应保持一致性,除非有合理的理由进行变更。
三、国际财务报表的构成国际财务报表通常包括资产负债表、利润表、现金流量表、所有者权益变动表以及相关附注。
1、资产负债表资产负债表反映了企业在特定日期的财务状况,包括资产、负债和所有者权益。
资产按照流动性从高到低排列,负债则按照到期日的远近排列。
资产分为流动资产和非流动资产。
流动资产如现金、应收账款、存货等,通常在一年内能够变现或被耗用。
非流动资产如固定资产、无形资产、长期投资等,具有较长的使用期限。
负债分为流动负债和非流动负债。
国际会计准则ias

国际会计准则ias国际会计准则(IAS)是全球范围内被广泛采纳的会计准则体系,旨在规范企业的财务报告和财务信息披露,以提高国际间财务信息的可比性和透明度。
本文将深入研究国际会计准则IAS,探讨其在全球范围内的应用情况、影响因素以及未来发展趋势。
第一章:国际会计准则IAS的概述本章将介绍国际会计准则IAS的发展历程、目标和主要内容。
首先,我们将回顾IAS的起源和发展历程,探讨其在全球范围内逐渐被采纳和应用的原因。
然后,我们将详细介绍IAS体系中包含的主要标准以及其对企业财务报告和信息披露所起到的作用。
第二章:国际会计准则IAS在全球范围内的应用情况本章将分析国际会计准则IAS在不同地区、不同类型企业中的应用情况。
我们将比较不同地区对于IAS采纳程度以及对于标准具体内容实施程度之间存在差异,并分析背后的原因。
此外,我们还将探讨IAS 在跨国公司和上市公司中的应用情况,以及IAS在发展中国家中的推广和应用挑战。
第三章:国际会计准则IAS的影响因素本章将探讨影响国际会计准则IAS应用和发展的因素。
我们将分析领导法规、金融市场、企业需求以及会计专业人员等方面对于IAS应用的影响。
此外,我们还将研究跨国公司和上市公司对于IAS采纳与实施的动机和挑战。
第四章:国际会计准则IAS与企业财务报告质量本章将研究国际会计准则IAS对企业财务报告质量的影响。
我们将分析采用IAS后企业财务报告中信息披露程度、信息可比性以及透明度等方面是否有所提高,并探讨其对投资者决策、债权人信任以及金融稳定性等方面所产生的影响。
第五章:未来发展趋势与挑战本章将展望未来国际会计准则IAS的发展趋势与面临挑战。
我们将分析全球范围内对于会计准则的统一需求以及与国际会计准则IAS的关系。
此外,我们还将探讨新兴领域和技术对于IAS的应用和发展所带来的挑战,如数字经济、云计算以及人工智能等。
结论本文通过对国际会计准则IAS的深入研究,全面探讨了其在全球范围内的应用情况、影响因素以及未来发展趋势。
ifrs国际会计准则

ifrs国际会计准则摘要:一、IFRS 国际会计准则简介1.IFRS 的定义和背景2.IFRS 的目的和作用二、IFRS 的体系结构1.IFRS 的基本准则2.IFRS 的具体准则3.IFRS 的解释公告三、IFRS 在我国的应用1.IFRS 在我国的推广和实施2.IFRS 对我国企业的影响3.IFRS 在我国的监管和挑战四、IFRS 在全球的发展趋势1.IFRS 在全球的普及和认可2.IFRS 的改革和更新3.IFRS 对全球经济发展的贡献正文:一、IFRS 国际会计准则简介IFRS(International Financial Reporting Standards,国际财务报告准则)是国际会计准则委员会(International Accounting Standards Board,IASB)制定的一套全球统一的会计准则。
自20 世纪70 年代起,随着全球经济一体化的发展,各国企业跨境投资和融资活动日益频繁,国际间会计信息的可比性和透明度成为迫切需要解决的问题。
IFRS 便是在这样的背景下应运而生,旨在为全球提供一个统一、高质量的会计准则体系,以促进国际资本市场的有效运行。
IFRS 的主要目的是确保财务报告在各种企业和行业的跨国交易中具有可靠、可比和透明的信息,从而为投资者、债权人、管理层等利益相关者提供有用的决策信息。
IFRS 不仅在全球范围内得到广泛应用,而且已成为许多国家国内会计准则的参考标准,对全球经济发展产生了深远影响。
二、IFRS 的体系结构IFRS 体系包括三个层次:基本准则、具体准则和解释公告。
1.基本准则:是整个IFRS 体系的基石,规定了财务报告的基本原则、假设和概念。
目前,IASB 已经发布了16 项基本准则,涵盖了财务报告的编制、披露和列报等方面。
2.具体准则:是在基本准则的基础上,针对具体业务和行业制定的详细规定。
目前,IASB 已经发布了超过200 项具体准则,涉及资产、负债、收入、费用、所得税、养老金等多个领域。
国际会计准则和中国会计准则的比较

国际会计准则和中国会计准则的比较会计准则是为了规范和统一财务报告的编制和披露而制定的一系列规则和原则。
国际会计准则及国际财务报告准则(IFRS)是由国际会计准则委员会(IASB)制定的,被广泛应用于世界各国。
中国会计准则(CAS)则是中国国家财政部发布的适用于中国境内企业的会计规范。
本文将对国际会计准则和中国会计准则进行比较,从财务报告的内容、原则、应用领域和执行要求等方面展开分析。
一、财务报告的内容国际会计准则要求财务报告包括资产、负债、所有者权益、收入和费用五大要素。
资产和负债按照预期利益流入或流出的次序排列,所有者权益根据实际权益的来源归类,收入和费用按照经济性质分开报告。
中国会计准则的财务报告内容相对更加详细。
除了资产、负债、所有者权益、收入和费用外,还包括其他综合收益、现金流量表、留存收益、利润分配等内容。
这些信息可以更全面地反映企业的财务状况和经营情况。
二、原则的差异国际会计准则强调“公允价值”原则,即根据市场价格或者理论模型确定资产和负债的价值。
而中国会计准则更加注重“成本”原则,即按照实际成本进行计量。
这导致在一些具体问题上两者存在差异。
例如,在投资物业的会计处理上,国际会计准则要求将房地产按公允价值计量,而中国会计准则要求将房地产按成本计量。
这就导致同一份财务报告中,不同会计准则下的资产价值可能存在差异。
另一个例子是在金融工具的会计处理上,国际会计准则要求将金融工具按公允价值计量,而中国会计准则则允许根据合同规定或者成本计量进行分类处理。
这也导致在金融工具的计量和披露上两种准则存在一定的差异。
三、应用领域的差异国际会计准则被广泛应用于跨国公司和上市公司,以及在国际交易中需要使用国际财务报告准则的企业。
它的应用范围广泛,能够满足全球资本市场的需求。
中国会计准则主要适用于中国境内的企业,包括上市公司和非上市公司。
中国会计准则与中国公司法律、税务法规相衔接,更加符合中国国情和法律法规的要求。
会计的国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则

会计的国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则国际会计准则(International Accounting Standards,IAS)以及国际财务报告准则(International Financial Reporting Standards,IFRS)是全球范围内规范会计准则与财务报告的重要标准。
这些准则为企业提供了指导,确保其财务报告的准确性、一致性和可比性。
本文将对国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则进行详细介绍,并探讨其在全球范围内的应用和意义。
一、国际会计准则(IAS)国际会计准则是国际会计准则委员会(International Accounting Standards Board,IASB)制定的一系列会计准则。
这些准则旨在为全球企业提供一个统一的会计规则框架,以确保财务报告的准确性和可比性。
国际会计准则的制定过程严格遵循透明、公正、可复制和可公众接受的原则。
每个准则都经过广泛的民意征询和专家评审,以确保其代表了全球会计界的共识和最佳实践。
国际会计准则主要关注以下几个方面:1. 会计政策选择和会计估计的准确性和一致性。
2. 财务报表项目的定义、计量和披露。
3. 财务报表的格式和布局。
4. 各类交易、资产和负债的计量和确认。
国际会计准则的持续演进和修订使得其具备了更强的适应性和灵活性。
随着全球经济的快速发展,新的会计问题也不断涌现,因此国际会计准则需要不断地进行修订和更新,以满足新的业务需求和挑战。
二、国际财务报告准则(IFRS)国际财务报告准则是国际财务报告准则基金会(International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation,IFRS Foundation)制定的财务报告准则。
与国际会计准则不同,国际财务报告准则更加注重财务报告的内容和披露要求。
国际财务报告准则致力于提升财务报告的质量和透明度,以满足全球投资者的需求。
它规范了财务报告的核心要素、报告周期、信息披露和报表附注等方面,确保报告的准确性和一致性。
国际会计准则

国际会计准则在全球化的背景下,国际会计准则(International Financial Reporting Standards,IFRS)的应用越发重要。
本文旨在探讨国际会计准则的定义、应用以及对全球企业的影响。
一、国际会计准则的定义与特点国际会计准则是由国际会计准则理事会(International Accounting Standards Board,IASB)制定的一套会计准则,旨在提供全球通用的财务报告准则。
这些准则规范了财务报告的计量、披露和展示等方面的要求,增加了财务报告的透明度和可比性。
国际会计准则采用了以实质经济合理为导向的原则。
在制定准则时,IASB注重与各国现行法律法规和会计制度的融合,同时也考虑了全球经济发展的趋势和特点。
二、国际会计准则的应用范围国际会计准则适用于以公开出售股票、债券或其他证券的形式融资的企业,以及那些自愿采用国际会计准则的公司。
它不仅适用于跨国公司,也适用于国内企业进行国际业务活动的部门。
许多国家和地区已经或正在逐步采用国际会计准则,以推动本地财务报告的国际化。
这样一来,全球范围内的投资者和利益相关方就能更加准确地评估企业的财务状况和经营绩效。
三、国际会计准则对全球企业的影响1. 提高财务报告的可比性国际会计准则的应用使得企业之间的财务报告更具可比性。
通过统一的计量、披露和展示要求,投资者和利益相关方能够更加准确地比较不同企业的财务状况和经营绩效,降低了信息不对称的风险。
2. 加强全球市场的透明度国际会计准则的应用提高了财务报告的透明度,使全球市场更加透明和规范。
这有助于吸引国际投资者,促进国际资本流动,提升全球市场竞争力。
3. 降低企业财务成本国际会计准则的应用减少了企业因向不同国家提交财务报告而需要进行的调整工作。
统一的准则和处理方式简化了财务报告的制作流程,降低了制度和人力成本。
4. 促进国际审核和监管合作国际会计准则的应用促进了国际间的审核和监管合作。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
International Accounting StandardsIAS 23 Borrowing Costs (revised 1993)This revised International Accounting Standard supersedes IAS 23, Capitalisation of Borrowing Costs, approved by the Board in March 1984. The revised Standard became effective for financial statements covering periods beginning on or after 1 January 1995.One SIC Interpretation relates to IAS 23:SIC-2: Consistency - Capitalisation of Borrowing Costs.The standards, which have been set in bold italic type, should be read in the context of the background material and implementation guidance in this Standard, and in the context of the Preface to International Accounting Standards. International Accounting Standards are not intended to apply to immaterial items (see paragraph 12 of the Preface).ObjectiveThe objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment for borrowing costs. This Standard generally requires the immediate expensing of borrowing costs. However, the Standard permits, as an allowed alternative treatment, the capitalisation of borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset.Scope1. This Standard should be applied in accounting for borrowing costs.2. This Standard supersedes IAS 23, Capitalisation of Borrowing Costs, approved in 1983.3. This Standard does not deal with the actual or imputed cost of equity, including preferred capital not classified as a liability.Definitions4. The following terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:Borrowing costs are interest and other costs incurred by an enterprise in connection with the borrowing of funds.A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale.5. Borrowing costs may include:(a) interest on bank overdrafts and short-term and long-term borrowings;(b) amortisation of discounts or premiums relating to borrowings;(c) amortisation of ancillary costs incurred in connection with the arrangement of borrowings;(d) finance charges in respect of finance leases recognised in accordance with IAS 17, Leases; and(e) exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings to the extent that they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs.6. Examples of qualifying assets are inventories that require a substantial period of time to bring them to a saleable condition, manufacturing plants, power generation facilities and investment properties. Other investments, and those inventories that are routinely manufactured or otherwise produced in large quantities on a repetitive basis over a short period of time, are not qualifying assets. Assets that are ready for their intended use or sale when acquired also are not qualifying assets.Borrowing Costs - Benchmark TreatmentRecognition7. Borrowing costs should be recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.8. Under the benchmark treatment borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred regardless of how the borrowings are applied.Disclosure9. The financial statements should disclose the accounting policy adopted for borrowing costs. Borrowing Costs - Allowed Alternative TreatmentRecognition10. Borrowing costs should be recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred, except to the extent that they are capitalised in accordance with paragraph 11.11. Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset should be capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. The amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation should be determined in accordance with this Standard.[1]12. Under the allowed alternative treatment, borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset are included in the cost of that asset. Such borrowing costs are capitalised as part of the cost of the asset when it is probable that they will result in future economic benefits to the enterprise and the costs can be measured reliably. Other borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.Borrowing Costs Eligible for Capitalisation13. The borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production ofa qualifying asset are those borrowing costs that would have been avoided if the expenditure on the qualifying asset had not been made. When an enterprise borrows funds specifically for the purpose of obtaining a particular qualifying asset, the borrowing costs that directly relate to that qualifying asset can be readily identified.14. It may be difficult to identify a direct relationship between particular borrowings and a qualifying asset and to determine the borrowings that could otherwise have been avoided. Such a difficultyoccurs, for example, when the financing activity of an enterprise is co-ordinated centrally. Difficulties also arise when a group uses a range of debt instruments to borrow funds at varying rates of interest, and lends those funds on various bases to other enterprises in the group. Other complications arise through the use of loans denominated in or linked to foreign currencies, when the group operates in highly inflationary economies, and from fluctuations in exchange rates. As a result, the determination of the amount of borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition ofa qualifying asset is difficult and the exercise of judgement is required.15. To the extent that funds are borrowed specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset, the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation on that asset should be determined as the actual borrowing costs incurred on that borrowing during the period less any investment income on the temporary investment of those borrowings.16. The financing arrangements for a qualifying asset may result in an enterprise obtaining borrowed funds and incurring associated borrowing costs before some or all of the funds are used for expenditures on the qualifying asset. In such circumstances, the funds are often temporarily invested pending their expenditure on the qualifying asset. In determining the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation during a period, any investment income earned on such funds is deducted from the borrowing costs incurred.17. To the extent that funds are borrowed generally and used for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset, the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation should be determined by applying a capitalisation rate to the expenditures on that asset. The capitalisation rate should be the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to the borrowings of the enterprise that are outstanding during the period, other than borrowings made specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset. The amount of borrowing costs capitalised during a period should not exceed the amount of borrowing costs incurred during that period.18. In some circumstances, it is appropriate to include all borrowings of the parent and its subsidiaries when computing a weighted average of the borrowing costs; in other circumstances, it is appropriate for each subsidiary to use a weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to its own borrowings.Excess of the Carrying Amount of the Qualifying Asset over Recoverable Amount19. When the carrying amount or the expected ultimate cost of the qualifying asset exceeds its recoverable amount or net realisable value, the carrying amount is written down or written off in accordance with the requirements of other International Accounting Standards. In certain circumstances, the amount of the write-down or write-off is written back in accordance with those other International Accounting Standards.Commencement of Capitalisation20. The capitalisation of borrowing costs as part of the cost of a qualifying asset should commence when:(a) expenditures for the asset are being incurred;(b) borrowing costs are being incurred; and(c) activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are in progress.21. Expenditures on a qualifying asset include only those expenditures that have resulted in payments of cash, transfers of other assets or the assumption of interest-bearing liabilities.Expenditures are reduced by any progress payments received and grants received in connection with the asset (see IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance). The average carrying amount of the asset during a period, including borrowing costs previously capitalised, is normally a reasonable approximation of the expenditures to which the capitalisation rate is applied in that period.22. The activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale encompass more than the physical construction of the asset. They include technical and administrative work prior to the commencement of physical construction, such as the activities associated with obtaining permits prior to the commencement of the physical construction. However, such activities exclude the holding of an asset when no production or development that changes the asset's condition is taking place. For example, borrowing costs incurred while land is under development are capitalised during the period in which activities related to the development are being undertaken. However, borrowing costs incurred while land acquired for building purposes is held without any associated development activity do not qualify for capitalisation.Suspension of Capitalisation23. Capitalisation of borrowing costs should be suspended during extended periods in which active development is interrupted.24. Borrowing costs may be incurred during an extended period in which the activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use or sale are interrupted. Such costs are costs of holding partially completed assets and do not qualify for capitalisation. However, capitalisation of borrowing costs is not normally suspended during a period when substantial technical and administrative work is being carried out. Capitalisation of borrowing costs is also not suspended when a temporary delay is a necessary part of the process of getting an asset ready for its intended use or sale. For example, capitalisation continues during the extended period needed for inventories to mature or the extended period during which high water levels delay construction of a bridge, if such high water levels are common during the construction period in the geographic region involved.Cessation of Capitalisation25. Capitalisation of borrowing costs should cease when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.26. An asset is normally ready for its intended use or sale when the physical construction of the asset is complete even though routine administrative work might still continue. If minor modifications, such as the decoration of a property to the purchaser's or user's specification, are all that are outstanding, this indicates that substantially all the activities are complete.27. When the construction of a qualifying asset is completed in parts and each part is capable of being used while construction continues on other parts, capitalisation of borrowing costs should cease when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare that part for its intended use or sale are completed.28. A business park comprising several buildings, each of which can be used individually is an example of a qualifying asset for which each part is capable of being usable while construction continues on other parts. An example of a qualifying asset that needs to be complete before any part can be used is an industrial plant involving several processes which are carried out in sequence at different parts of the plant within the same site, such as a steel mill.Disclosure29. The financial statements should disclose:(a) the accounting policy adopted for borrowing costs;(b) the amount of borrowing costs capitalised during the period; and(c) the capitalisation rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation. Transitional Provisions30. When the adoption of this Standard constitutes a change in accounting policy, an enterprise is encouraged to adjust its financial statements in accordance with IAS 8, Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Fundamental Errors and Changes in Accounting Policies. Alternatively, enterprises following the allowed alternative treatment should capitalise only those borrowing costs incurred after the effective date of the Standard which meet the criteria for capitalisation.Effective Date31. This International Accounting Standard becomes operative for financial statements covering periods beginning on or after 1 January 1995.[1]See also SIC - 2, Consistency - Capitalisation of Borrowing Costs.。