写文章重投的cover letter
SCI投稿Coverletter模板大全
1.第一次投稿 Cover letter ：主要任务是介绍文章主要创新以及声明没有一稿多投Dear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled“Paper Title”,which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, andmanuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like todeclare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was originalresearch that has not been published previously,and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All theauthors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated⋯⋯(要介一下文的新性). I hope this paper is suitable for“Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1)Name A E- mail: ×××× @××××2)Name B E- mail: ×××× @××××Wedeeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don ’t hesitate to contact me at the ad dress below. Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E- mail: ×××× @××××2.催稿信：咨询稿件办理到声明步骤Dear Prof.×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time tocontact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled“Paper Title”. (ID:文章稿号), although the status of“With Editor”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent toreviewers or notI would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your timecheck the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer ’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E- mail:×××× @××××3.更正稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof.（写上负责你文章编写的姓名，显得敬爱，因为第一次的投稿不知道详尽负责的编写，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us anopportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewersvery much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled“Paper Title”. (ID:文章稿号).We have studied reviewer ’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise ourmanuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revisedversion, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewersfor comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E- mail:×××× @××××4.更正稿回答审稿人的建议（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers ’ com ments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title ” (ID: 文章稿号 ). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studiedcomments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer ’s comments areas flowing:Responds to the reviewer ’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Resp onse to comment: ( ⋯⋯要列出意⋯⋯)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: ( ⋯⋯要列出意⋯⋯)Response: ××××××。
sci拒稿重投的cover letter模板
sci拒稿重投的cover letter模板
摘要：
1.引言
2.拒稿原因
3.重新投稿的改进
4.期望与感谢
5.结束语
正文：
尊敬的编辑：
您好！我谨借此信向您提交我的论文“论文名称”的修改后稿，希望能在贵刊发表。
在此之前，我的论文曾被贵刊拒稿，我对此深感遗憾。
为了提高论文质量，我已经根据审稿人的建议和意见进行了全面修改。
我希望这次能够得到您的认可，并对您的时间和关注表示衷心的感谢。
首先，我想简要回顾一下论文被拒的原因。
审稿人认为我的论文在研究方法、数据分析和结论方面存在一些问题，需要进一步改进。
为了解决这些问题，我在修改过程中对论文的结构进行了调整，增强了论证的逻辑性。
同时，我对数据进行了重新分析，确保研究结果更加准确、可靠。
此外，我还对论文的结论部分进行了完善，以使其更加具有说服力。
在此次重新投稿中，我认真对待审稿人的每一条建议和意见，力求使论文更加完善。
我相信，经过我的努力，论文已经具备了在贵刊发表的条件。
我期待您能给予我这个宝贵的机会，让我的研究成果为学术界做出贡献。
最后，我要感谢您在百忙之中阅读我的信件和论文。
如果您需要我进一步提供任何补充材料或信息，请随时告知。
在此，我预祝您工作顺利，期待您的回复。
谨祝商祺！。
重投的文章怎么写cover letter
重投的文章怎么写cover letter摘要：I.引言- 重投文章的背景和意义- 为什么需要写一封cover letterII.cover letter 的格式和内容- 基本格式和结构- 需要包含的关键信息- 避免使用的内容III.如何让cover letter 与众不同- 个性化- 突出优势和亮点- 针对性地修改IV.结尾- 重申目标和期望- 感谢读者和编辑正文：在学术界，重投文章是一个常见现象。
有时候，我们可能需要重新提交之前被拒绝的文章，或者对已发表的文章进行修改和补充。
在这种情况下，写一封cover letter 变得尤为重要，它能帮助我们在编辑和读者心中树立良好的形象，提高文章被接受的可能性。
首先，我们需要了解cover letter 的基本格式和内容。
通常，一封cover letter 应包括以下几个部分：1.信头：包含编辑和期刊名称，以及文章的标题和编号（如有）。
2.写信目的：简洁明了地说明重投文章的原因，如修改后的内容、补充数据等。
3.文章亮点：简要介绍文章的主要发现和创新点。
4.修改内容：概述对文章进行的修改，特别是针对之前审稿人意见的回应。
5.请求审阅：礼貌地请求编辑考虑重投的文章，并表示期待收到他们的回复。
6.签名和日期：表明诚意和尊重。
在撰写cover letter 时，我们需要避免一些不当的内容，例如：1.对之前审稿人的批评和抱怨。
2.对编辑和期刊的不尊重。
3.过多地阐述与文章无关的内容。
要让cover letter 与众不同，我们需要做到以下几点：1.个性化：根据编辑和期刊的特点，调整cover letter 的语言和风格。
2.突出优势和亮点：强调文章的重要性和创新性，以吸引编辑和读者的关注。
3.针对性地修改：根据之前审稿人的意见，对文章进行有针对性的修改，并在cover letter 中说明。
总之，写好一封cover letter 对于重投文章至关重要。
我们需要遵循一定的格式和内容要求，同时注重个性化、优势突出和针对性修改。
英文文章coverletter[五篇材料]
![英文文章coverletter[五篇材料]](https://img.taocdn.com/s3/m/92916fcf846a561252d380eb6294dd88d0d23d8c.png)
英文文章coverletter[五篇材料]第一篇：英文文章 cover letter1、什么是cover letter？指的是投稿信2、cover letter的内容主要包括那些？应该简述所投稿件的核心内容、主要发现和意义，拟投期刊，对稿件处理有无特殊要求等（如“not to review” list）。
另外，请附上主要作者的中文姓名、通讯地址、电话、传真和e-mail地址。
此外有的杂志要求推荐几位审稿人及其联系方式。
以及谁已经阅读过该文（当然是牛人）。
我投的那个杂志是要求说明你论文研究的意义，以及与这个杂志的相关性，另外还有的可能要写明你没有一搞多投等。
此外临床实验要求写明符合伦理学要求。
3、如何写cover letter？各个杂志的具体要求是不一样的，在杂志的guide for authors一般会有要求。
如果没有具体的要求，大家可按照通用要求处理。
4、常用模板：（1）Cover letterDear Mr.**1.The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part, and all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.2.I have read and have abided by the statement of ethical standards for manuscripts submitted to Neuroscience.kind regards.Your sincerely,通讯作者（2）Dear Dr.主编name:We submit our manuscript entitled “ 文章title” to 杂志名for publication.接着简单介绍你文章的主要创新点和意义，不易过多，但要突出新意和关键点。
文章修改稿Cover Letter 模版
Dear *****,The review of your manuscript, Thermal Decomposition and Kinetics Studies on 1, 4-dinitropiperazine (DNP), submitted to Journal of Hazardous Materials has been completed. The reviewers recommend the need for minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript according to the reviewers' comments attached, and re-submit tome your revised version of the manuscript including an itemized response to each reviewer's comments.Please submit your revised submission before Jul 11, 2007. I will then begin the re-review process.Please note that revised manuscripts will be sent for review because revising a manuscript does not automatically mean it will be accepted for publication.For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.Please ensure that the article conforms to the format of the Journal. In particular make sure that all the articles in your references have titles included. The Journal Guide for Authors is available on the Journal homepage /locate/hazmatWhen submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.Once again, thank you for your interest in Journal of Hazardous Materials.Yours sincerely,Merv Fingas, PhDEditor Journal of Hazardous MaterialsReviewers' comments:Reviewer #1: The paper reports on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of DNP. It is a welcome addition to the literature and acceptable for publication after some revision:(i) Please provide large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP.(ii) Please assign ALL IR bands of Fig. 5Reviewer #2: authors have carried out work on the thermal analysis of the dinitropiperazine. The new information reported in the paper is scanty. The large amount of data has been already reported by the several researchers on the thermal analysis of dinitropiperazine (See the reference section of the paper and also reviewer has done thescopussearch). The only new information reported in this paper is of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. There is not much novelty in the reported work. The Table 1 and figure 1 need to be deleted from the paper since it isalready well reported in the literature.Table2 and figure 3 gives the same information. Authors are requested to delete Table 2 and the same information may be explained in the results and discussion part of the paper. May i also kindly request authors to update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper using Chemical abstracts on disk (CA on CD)data base. The quality and clarity of the figures in the paper need to be improved. English need to be improved. The paper is recommended for short communication after the minor revision.Reviewer #3: The paper is okay in terms of contents. However, since it has been written by a Chinese, the English is very poor and as such requires a lot of corrections and editing by your team. The authors have used ozawa and Kissenger methods to find out activation energy. However, they have given data for activation energy by ozawa methodonly under 3.4 thermal decomposition kinetics).The data for Eo by Kissenger methods should also be included in the paper. Also, captions of Figs1,3 &5 are missing.Reviewer #4: This paper is promising but could be improved by better kinetic analysis.1. Kissinger's method is OK as a first approximation, but Friedman's method is the best isoconversional method. Even Ozawa has abandoned his method in favor ofFriedman's.2. The method of comparing a large number of kinetic modelsagainst data at a single heating rate (page 5) is invalid, discredited, and should not be published. This issue has been discussed in several papers by Vyzovkin and in ainternational kinetic study published by Brown et al, Thermochemica Acta 355, 125-143, 2000, and following papers. Consequently, there is no real evidence presented that the equation is first-order. In fact, from my studies of energetic materials, including RDX and HMX, I would have thought that nucleation-growth kinetics would be mostappropriate. However, I would have to do a more rigorous kinetic analysis of the data to know for sure.3. The best way to judge a kinetic model is how it compares with data at multiple heating rates (using a single set of parameters). Such a comparison is not present in this paper, so it is difficult to judge the validity of the kineticparameters.4. The author's discussion of HMX kinetics is good in some respects but out of date in others. More recent papers by multiple institutions place the activation energy for HMX closer to 150 kJ/mol. A commonly cited paper on this is by Wight and Vyazovkin, Ann Rev Phys Chem 48, 119, 1997. A more recent but harder paper toget is by Burnham and Weese in the proceedings of the 2005 ICT conference. Henson has published a correlation in the detonation symposium showing that explosiontimes scalewith an activation energy of about 150 kJ/mol. Active workers in energetic materials should have access to these materials. 看完了这个,是不是会觉得很头疼,是的老外就是这么认真.要求很具体仔细,审稿细致深入.下面就是看你怎么样回复这篇审稿意见了.我回复后的第三天就收到论文录用通知,估计他们没有再次送给审稿专家重审.因为我的Cover Letter他很满意,我是这样写的:Dear ***,My manuscript, *********************（论文题目）, was revised according to there viewers' comments, and the itemized response to each reviewer’s comments is attached. Many thanks for your suggestion. I am so sorry to bring you so much trouble because of our careless. Correspondence and phone calls about this paper should be directed to ****（作者）at the following address，phone and e-mail：Address:*********Tel.: ********Fax:*******E-mail: ********** Thanks very much again for your attention to our paper．Once again, thank you for your help to our paper processing. Yours sincerely，******For your guidance, itemized response to each reviewer’s comments is appended below.Dear reviewer #1:(i) Suhithi M. Peiris, Richard, etc. (J. Phys. Chem. A, 104 (39), 8898 -8907, 2000.10.1021) had already reported large basis-set DFT calculations to support theassignmentof the IR bands of DNP.(ii) We assigned all IR bands of Fig.5 (now change to fig.8).(iii) Because of the IR study had been reported, the IR spectra (fig.1) wasdeleted form the paper. Anyway, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.? Dear reviewer #2:(i) G. V. Sitonina, etc. (Russian Chemical Bulletin, V ol.28, 284-288) A study has been made of the kinetics of thermal decomposition of dinitropiperazine, in melts and insolution. As you said, the only new information reported in this paperis of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to theexisting scientific data base. Nevertheless, the kinetics study in our paper isa supplement which is with multi-heating rate method.(ii) The Table 1 and figure 1 was deleted from the paper and the correlative references were put forward.(iii) Table 2was deleted and the same information was explained in the results and discussion part of the paper.(iv) We had update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper and enriched the introduction of the paper.(v) The figures were drawn again and the quality and clarity of them were improved.(vi) English expression was improved a littl e and it’s my great honor to ask your help on the language aspect.Dear reviewer #3:(i) As a Chinese, our English is very poor and a few of corrections and editing had done by our team.(ii) Now we only used Ozawa method to find out activation energy and you can check it in our paper again. According to reviewer #4, Kissinger method is invalid,discredited, and should not be published.(iii) Figures and captions of them are changed.(iv) At last, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.Dear reviewer #4:(i) This paper was improved by a better kinetic analysis. The kinetic parameters were established by Ozawa's isoconversional method because there is no Friedman's calculation program in our institute.(ii) As you just said, the method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at asingle heating rate is invalid. After the kinetic study by isoconversional method with data at multiple heating rates, we found that nucleation-growth kinetics is moreappropriate. You are seasoned in these aspects and it’s my great honor to ask your advice on these sorts of aspects.(iii) In order to judge a kinetic model, we did acomparison a single heating rate method with multi-heating method, and at last the kinetic parameters were judged. iv. You are right; the discussion of HMX kinetics is reall yout of date. The activation energy for HMX is closer to 150 kJ/mol. We had done the improvements in our paper. v. From your c omments, it’s obvious that you are an expertin thermo analysis, and there is lots of shortage in our study which need your instruction. At last, I want to thank you sincerely for your suggestions and I feel so sorry that so much of your precious time was wasted on our paper revision.认真对待修改意见.一般论文投到国外,如果满足期刊内容要求的前提下,一般会给你一个修改意见,不会直接拒绝.即使拒绝也是在第一次修改不满足要求的情况下拒绝的.他们想的是你改都改不好,还有什么话说.最后,我希望大家多多发表高质量的科技论文,多到国外投稿,这样不是为了多几篇SCI,是多增加国际交流,给自身的发展创造条件.特别是对于想出国深造的研究学者们.谨以此和大家共勉!本文多有论述不当之处,望大家批评指正!谢谢!。
投完会议以后投杂志的cover letter 声明-概念解析以及定义
投完会议以后投杂志的cover letter 声明-概述说明以及解释1.引言1.1 概述在这篇长文中，我们将探讨投完会议后投杂志的cover letter声明的重要性和作用。
投完会议后，我们通常会将研究成果提交给相关的杂志，希望能够被接受并发表。
然而，由于研究领域的竞争激烈和杂志编辑们对文章的要求越来越高，撰写一份引人注目的cover letter变得至关重要。
本文将介绍cover letter的定义和作用。
首先，我们将回顾投完会议后的背景，了解为什么在投稿给杂志之前参加学术会议是一个重要的步骤。
其次，我们将讨论投杂志的重要性，以及为什么我们要花时间和精力来撰写一份精心设计的cover letter。
接下来，我们将全面介绍cover letter的定义，确保我们对它有清晰的理解。
cover letter，也被称为投递信或信函，是一封简短的信件，通常附在提交的研究文章之前。
它提供了一个机会，让作者向编辑简要介绍自己的研究主题、方法和结果。
cover letter还可以为研究文章提供一个背景和上下文，使其更容易被编辑和同行评审理解。
最后，我们将探讨cover letter的作用。
一份精心设计的cover letter可以吸引编辑的注意，并使他们对我们的研究产生兴趣。
它可以帮助我们解释研究文章的重要性和创新之处，并提供更深入的解释，以填补研究方法和结果之间的鸿沟。
一份优秀的cover letter还可以展示我们的学术素养和写作能力，并让编辑相信我们是一个有价值的合作伙伴。
在本文的其他部分，我们将进一步探讨投完会议后投杂志的重要性，强调cover letter的重要性，并提供一些建议和注意事项，帮助读者撰写一份优秀的cover letter。
通过撰写一份引人注目的cover letter，我们可以增加我们研究被杂志接受和发表的机会，并在学术界获得更多的认可和机会。
1.2文章结构文章结构部分的内容：在本篇文章中，我们将按照以下结构进行论述。
论文投稿系列之CoverLetter写法（一）
论文投稿系列之CoverLetter写法（一）1. 什么是Cover letter?Cover Letter, 即投稿信，是论文投递时与论文一起发送给编辑的信件，其目的是让编辑在阅读你的论文之前，简单了解你文章的基本情况。
Cover letter是编辑对论文的第一印象，也是初步评判你论文是否可以被期刊接收的重要依据（如果编辑看完Cover letter之后一点兴趣也没有，就没有下文了），因此Cover letter的撰写是非常重要的。
如何用简明扼要的语言抓住编辑的心是Cover letter撰写时最关键的一点！2. Cover letter应该包含哪些内容？完整的Cover letter一般包含以下内容：A. 期刊编辑的姓名（不知道编辑是谁的情况下直接用Dear editor）;B. 投稿文章的标题C. 投稿文章的类型（Letter, communications, article, review还是comments）D. 文章简介，包括：(1)研究背景；(2)论文的重要发现；(3)论文可以发表在期刊上的原因：引发读者兴趣的地方，与期刊的契合之处等等E. 稿件出版道德规范的免责说明（这个部分很多期刊在网站上投稿时会进行确认，cover letter里面可以不出现）以及对稿件有无特殊处理要求（一般指屏蔽某些竞争者成为审稿人）F. 作者信息：一般为通讯作者姓名，所属机构，通讯地址，联系电话，邮箱等G. 推荐审稿人名单（注：目前很多杂志社已经将这一部分挪到了投稿网站系统上，Cover letter中可以不再列出）3. Cover Letter的具体写法示例：A. 论文通讯作者的信息，可以放到前面也可以放到后面，这个主要看个人习惯：i) 放到最前面时，一般采用如下格式：底下紧接Dear Editor...ii) 放到后面的话，紧接作者署名的后面，可以简单地用下面的格式：B. Cover letter第一段Dear editor（如果确切知道编辑名称，可以直接写其名字）,We are submitting a manuscript entitled “论文标题” for your consideration for publication as a communication in 期刊名.Cover Letter的第一段就是要简明扼要地告诉编辑：你要干什么？类似的，还有：Dear editor,Please find enclosed our manuscript entitled “论文标题” which we would like to submit for publication as a communication in 期刊名.标准的，一般还需要在第一段进行投稿的道德规范免责说明：The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part, and all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.C. Cover letter第二段第二段开始是整个cover letter的核心部分，要告诉editor这篇文章的亮点在哪里，有何创新之处，为什么适合于发表在这个期刊上，有哪些点可以吸引到期刊的读者等等。
文章被拒后重投cover letter 模板
文章被拒后重投cover letter 模板尊敬的招聘经理，我希望这封信能够重新引起您的关注，并表达我对贵公司职位的浓厚兴趣。
我之前曾经申请过这
个职位，但很遗憾地被拒绝了。
然而，我对贵公司的热情
和对这个职位的适应能力并没有改变，因此我决定再次向
您表达我的兴趣和能力。
首先，我想再次强调我对贵公司
的钦佩和敬仰。
贵公司在行业中享有盛誉，并以其创新性、高效性和团队合作精神而闻名。
作为一个积极向上、有追求、勤奋努力的人，我相信自己与贵公司的价值观是高度
契合的。
在上次申请中，您可能对我的背景和经验已经有
所了解。
然而，为了更好地展示我的能力和适应性，我在
此附上了一份更新后的简历。
在过去几个月里，我积极参
与了一些相关项目，并通过学习和实践不断提升自己的技能。
除此之外，我还想强调一下我的动机和热情。
这个职
位与我的职业目标完美契合，我相信自己能够为贵公司带
来价值并取得卓越的成绩。
我对这个行业充满热情，并愿
意不断学习和成长，以适应行业的变化和挑战。
最后，我
希望能够有机会与您进行面试，进一步展示我的能力和潜力。
我相信通过与您的交流，您会对我的适应性、团队合
作精神和专业素养有更深入的了解。
再次感谢您抽出时间
阅读我的申请。
我期待着能够再次与贵公司合作，并为贵
公司的成功做出贡献。
诚挚地，[你的名字]。