十二怒汉观后感英文版

合集下载

十二怒汉观后感英文

十二怒汉观后感英文

十二怒汉观后感英文After watching the classic film "12 Angry Men," I am left with profound thoughts and emotions. The movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, takes place in a single room where twelve jurors deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murder. The gripping storyline, masterful acting, and thought-provoking themes have all left an indelible impression on me.One of the most remarkable aspects of "12 Angry Men" is its powerful portrayal of the human psyche and the complex dynamics that emerge in a confined space. The twelve jurors, each with their own biases, beliefs, and personalities, are forced to confront their deepest prejudices and rethink their initial judgments.The film beautifully captures the tension and conflicts that arise during deliberations. The initial vote reveals that eleven jurors are convinced of the young man's guilt, while one, played by Henry Fonda, has reasonable doubt. What ensues is a battle of wills and a clash of ideologies as Fonda's character challenges the group's consensus and demands a thorough examination of the evidence.As the jurors engage in heated discussions, their personal baggage and unresolved issues come to the fore. Their biases towards race, social class, and personal experiences heavily influence their perceptions of the accused. Lumet masterfully exposes the flaws in the justice system, highlighting how preconceived notions and personal prejudices can influence the outcome of a trial.Furthermore, "12 Angry Men" serves as a powerful critique of conformity and the dangers of a mob mentality. As Fonda's character persists in his quest for justice, he faces resistance from those who are more interested in a quick verdict rather than a fair one. The film raises the question of individual responsibility and the importance of critically examining evidence, even when it goes against the majority opinion.The performances in "12 Angry Men" are nothing short of brilliant. Each actor brings depth and nuance to their respective characters, further enhancing the film's impact. Henry Fonda's restrained and resolute portrayal of Juror 8 is particularly noteworthy. He embodies calm rationality in the face of overwhelming opposition, effectively challenging the other jurors' biases and forcing them to question their assumptions.The film's direction deserves high praise. Lumet expertly utilizes the confined space of the jury room to intensify the dramatic tension. Through carefully crafted shots and camera angles, he captures the jurors' emotions and reactions, allowing the audience to engage fully with the unfolding drama.In the end, "12 Angry Men" offers a powerful message about the importance of empathy, critical thinking, and the pursuit of justice. It reminds us that everyone is entitled to a fair trial, regardless of their background or circumstances. The film encourages us to question our own biases, challenge the status quo, and advocate for a more just society.It is worth noting that "12 Angry Men" was made over six decades ago, yet its themes remain relevant today. In a world plagued by social and political divisiveness, the film serves as a stark reminder of the necessity toovercome our differences and work towards common understanding and justice.In conclusion, "12 Angry Men" is an extraordinary film that explores the complexities of the human psyche, the dangers of conformity, and the pursuit of justice. Its timeless themes, compelling performances, and expert direction make it a cinematic masterpiece that continues to resonate with audiences. After watching this film, one cannot help but reflect on the fragility of justice and the power of individual conviction.。

十二怒汉观后感英文版

十二怒汉观后感英文版

十二怒汉观后感英文版Twelve Angry Men - My ThoughtsI recently had the opportunity to watch the classic American film, "Twelve Angry Men," and I must say it left a deep impression on me. The movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, was released in 1957 and remains relevant even today. This gripping courtroom drama explores themes of justice, prejudice, and the power dynamics within a deliberation room.The film begins in a claustrophobic setting, a jury room, where twelve men are assigned the task of deciding the fate of a young man on trial for murder. The accused is from a disadvantaged background and faces the death penalty if found guilty. The plot unfolds as the jury initially votes overwhelmingly in favor of a guilty verdict, with only one juror, played by Henry Fonda, holding a dissenting opinion. What follows is a captivating journey of persuasion, introspection, and personal growth.One aspect that struck me about the film was the portrayal of human nature and the flaws within the justice system. Each juror brings their own biases, experiences, and preconceived notions into the room, which greatly influences their judgement. As the movie progresses, we witness how these biases manifest in different forms of prejudice, such as racial profiling and socio-economic discrimination.It becomes clear that the majority of the jurors' decision to convict the accused is not based on concrete evidence, but rather on their preconceived notions and personal prejudices. This raises pertinent questions about the flaws in the justice system and the importance of fair and impartialdeliberation. The film serves as a strong reminder that justice can be fragile, easily swayed by human emotions and biases.What makes this movie truly captivating is the character development and the power dynamics within the jury room. As the deliberations continue, we witness the transformation of the jurors, particularly those who initially held strong beliefs about the accused's guilt. Through open dialogue and critical thinking, these characters evolve from narrow-mindedness to empathy and understanding.One memorable scene involves Juror Number Eight, played by Henry Fonda, as he challenges the group's assumptions, urging them to re-evaluate the evidence presented. Despite facing immense opposition, Juror Eight remains calm and persistent, encouraging his fellow jurors to question their own biases and reconsider their initial verdict. This scene showcases the power of individual conviction and the importance of standing up for what is right, even in the face of opposition.As the film progresses, the audience is reminded of the significance of empathy and understanding in creating a fair and just society. Through the diverse backgrounds and perspectives of the jurors, we witness the human capacity for change and the potential for personal growth. The courtroom setting serves as a microcosm of society, highlighting the need for dialogue and deliberation rather than hasty judgments.In conclusion, "Twelve Angry Men" is a thought-provoking and emotionally charged film that highlights the complexities of the justice system. Through its compelling storyline and well-developed characters, the film explores the importance of unbiased deliberation and the need toquestion our own prejudices. It serves as a timeless reminder of the power of civic responsibility, critical thinking, and empathy. Despite being released over six decades ago, its themes remain relevant in today's society. I highly recommend watching this film as it offers valuable insights into the human condition and the pursuit of justice.。

十二怒汉 观后感 英文

十二怒汉 观后感 英文

十二怒汉观后感英文I recently watched the classic film "Twelve Angry Men," which left a deep impression on me. 这部影片让我印象深刻,它讲述了一个陪审团在审判一桩谋杀案件时的故事。

The film revolves around a jury of twelve men who are tasked with deliberating the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of murder. 影片围绕着一个由十二名男士组成的陪审团,他们的任务是审议一个年轻人被指控犯有谋杀罪的有罪或无罪。

The setting of the film primarily takes place in a single room where the jury deliberates, and it showcases the intense dynamics and personal conflicts among the jurors. 这部电影的主要场景发生在一个房间里,陪审团在这里进行审议,展现了陪审员之间激烈的动态和个人冲突。

The film is a thought-provoking exploration of the American judicial system and the human nature of prejudice, bias, and the concept of reasonable doubt. 这部影片是对美国司法制度以及人类偏见、偏见和合理怀疑概念的深入思考。

One of the most striking aspects of the film is how it delves into the complexities of human psychology and social dynamics. 电影最引人注目的一个方面是它深入探讨了人类心理和社会动态的复杂性。

十二怒汉观后感英语

十二怒汉观后感英语

十二怒汉观后感英语《十二怒汉》主要讲述12个陌生的普通人组成了一个陪审团,决定一个贫民窟的男孩的生死。

下面是英语的《十二怒汉》观后感,欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感英语Before see comments, said that in 2007 the Russian remake version beyond the original, so I look at the Russian version, look after the feeling is more general, it is necessary to have a look at the original beauty. In a word: the 1957 edition is the peak!The 57 edition of 100 minute, 07 edition 160 min.. More than one hour to come, mainly the personal story of each juror. Yes, the 07 edition of the jury to make every judgment is based on personal experience, and the 57 version of the sentence according to the clues itself, so the 07 version looks more tired, the content is more verbose.But the 07 version will focus on domestic people's livelihood, many domestic situation or projections of each section of history, and personal experience about the lines of the film full of flesh and blood, very full, this is very great. Unfortunately, I'm not a Russian and I'm not too cold about these things. In contrast, the 57 edition of the rhythm of a lot faster, at very good.One thing is very rare, two versions have successfully created a different image of the 12 jurors, character, no soy sauce characters. But the 07 version did not copy the 57 version of the character set, the two sides clash also appeared different moves (07 edition of "guilty" leaders of hypnosis is really good! Impressive. I want to point out the special field this section [analog], version 07 using multi camera editing and more messy sharp props, well made a tense atmosphere, very appetizing, this period of more than 57 more attractive.In the shooting intention, the 57 edition is only to restore the truth of the incident, to defend the law and justice, the 07 version is more humane and law who is more advanced thinking, giving the audience more room for reflection. Turn the film, can keep the original taste too difficult, can be improved to adapt to today's mass is more difficult, the 07 edition did great.On the reasonableness of narrative, version 57 or more. The 57edition of a list of the various court testimony and exhibits, audience and jury information synchronization. The 07 edition of each clue appears, you have to wait for a gentleman to finish the story, thedebate is not the next one, then how do you explain the xxxxx it, completely put the audience in a passive position.Good suspense novel, should put all the clues are listed, the last time the secret, the audience should say "ah! This is so! We saw theclue! Can not be inferred!" And should not be what clues do not give you, secret, the audience said, "I do not know this thing!" And then the author retorted, "I didn't say nothing about it"In the story of fluency, the 57 edition is also more outstanding,the film successfully put all the camera frame died in a room. While the 07 version of the continuous growth of the Chechen juvenile fragments, continue to play back flash. Although it has enriched the content of the film, they have distracted me. Fortunately, the jury's personal story is dictated not shoot out with location, otherwise I really fell asleep.Let's get back to the score. For so many years and 57 years, MGM should be very mature, but the film's music is the greatest degree of narrowing the score, the total length of not more than five minutes. The five minute soundtrack is an understatement, symbolically set the mood, although not abrupt, not redundant, but also no color, no touching. I think the score can be taken away, and the rest.By the way of acting. But I first talk about another point: 57edition and 07 edition of the jury have no names, the 57 edition of the 12 jurors is sitting by serial number, I can recognize, but the 07 version of the seat is a mess, I don't know who is who...... Well,that's not the point. Well, let's talk about acting.The head of the innocent - juror number 8 (Henry Fonda) is very upright, sitting posture stance is also very firm, giving a sense of stability. When the guilty leaders - juror number 3 (no - name) to demonstrate he assassination moves very calm, do not move a mountain. Have good gas. 3, the performance is also very good, he is the most stubborn, portrayed every word and action is in place, and finally he as a father, standing in his father's position changed his mind, but also touching. And the brother asked in glasses, when a huge forehead oozing sweat, the acting is terrific. By the way, the 07 version of theinnocent leader looks like Henry, but the expression of a lot of kindness, the tone is very soft and soft, from the beginning of the beginning of decent tough.I personally love the 57 version, in my heart it is the peak.十二怒汉观后感英语Russian version has a strong sense of subtlety.I never love political overtones, did not think this movie was involved in a war of national social factors and so on, more than two hours of film has let me unable to stop procrastinating, do something else, watch more than 8 hours, it was very.The story is a Chechen boy killed stepfather was brought to court, 12 jurors in a small room from only one person that he was innocent, the people put forward all kinds of evidence of doubt, finally everyone voted innocent boy. Almost everyone's background, ideas, opinions, etc..I do not say this movie is good or not, anyway, for political white ethnic confrontation problem has always been an insulator. It is said that after the first vote, there was a man who was not guilty, because he thought he could not be so hasty to send the child to the guillotine, so he proposed to carry out second anonymous voting, a person has also been acquitted.In this section I can not understand, though it should be the expression of real name and anonymous can change a person's decisions, do not blindly follow the crowd, but after the voting, the people immediately stand out is their own investment, which will soon be exposed "defection", also really can. In particular, the argument is not to take the child's life away.Heard that the black and white version 1957 better, so the next day is the turning point of view.From the rhythm, indeed very good grasp. Pinch out all kinds of unnecessary plot, is completely 12 people for each child to put forward their own justifications.Everything is at the center: if the child is likely to be innocent, he should not be convicted of the crime.The United States Justice, I have seen in the description of Linda to be truly understand, this movie is very perfect to show the American judicial philosophy: I would rather let one thousand, not kill the wrong one.In this story, every juror has no name, did not find out who is the real murderer, (because the Russian version of the real estate business, demolitions) discrimination the boy's identity is a slum origin, rather than racial conflicts......Until the last we walked out of the court, there are only two of the most important to insist on the innocent boy reported the name of each other, no phone, no address, there will be no intersection. From the people, back to the people.Space seems to be better.十二怒汉观后感英语Read the drama "12 people", and came back to review the United States under the old film of the year twelve, "the anger of the 57 Han".The story is very simple, a child, the film is colored, the drama did not appear, was accused of murdering his father. The family lived in the slums, in the eyes of some people from generation to generation are criminals and bad ass villain, natural. And all the evidence points to the child as the murderer. The draw for the 12 jurors, all staff have what occupation, 11 people think children guilty, only Henry Fonda architects think of doubt, although he is not very sure. As a result, an increasing number of jurors saw the suspect in the case and voted to pass.The result is not important, the process can glimpse the essence of Democracy: defend everyone's right to freedom of speech (Note: should be everybody's birthright, rather than the gifts of others, power) this person is either young or old, poor or rich, or who is ru. Democracy is the freedom to give everyone the full expression of their views. Of course, from this story can also be seen, small people, muddle along without any aim of moral justice or a sense of super guard unknown to the ordinary people are likely to be the representation of fudge, may also be in the democratic system under control. So, I agree, in the overall quality of the public is not high, the democracy is likely tofail, because many people vote not worth several Steamed Buns, or a lot of people do not know what is the election of a large number ofindividual shares, so after the collapse of the Soviet Union to thepublic ownership of private ownership by capitalists acquisition the situation may also occur in the family who have an ulterior motive power.After the liberation of China, there have been grassroots democracy experiment, which is Liu Shaoji pushed, but because of the resistance of the hair, did not push down. Now the community election, there are a lot of people say it is a formality, but from a positive point of view, this is not a democratic education, at least let everyone know how is the process of election. After a few years of your community appeared in a car with the big horn canvassing, do propaganda scenes, is very likely. At this time, democracy really into the lives of ordinary people, that is, democratic life. I met several people, without exception, and they talk of democracy in Taiwan, elected, they are not interested in, it is said that the Taiwan few young people are interested in politics; but in the mainland, in the premise of not achieve universal suffrage, politics seems to often is a topic of gossip for you talk about the. This is not because, people naturally than Taiwanese people interested in politics, just like to put you in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, you think too little oxygen, need oxygen, but in the plain here, you will not care about what the air is. This is a scarce resource in economics. After the democratic life, everyone has become commonplace, It is quite common for a part of life, so everyone's interest naturally low, rather than talk about the star's private life is stimulated.Look at the handling of drama and movies, including the plot lines are exactly the same, but in the scene of the atmosphere, it reflectsthe different understanding of democracy under the two kinds of social systems. The drama is full of black background, spacious and solemn, express a kind of democracy and the divine worship, understanding of democracy from the mouth of a jury in the mouth, with the obvious meaning of religion. The scene is a small room with a narrow, is asultry fidgety summer afternoon, twelve men crowded in a small space, discuss a majority of people think a foregone conclusion, nature is not love. And one of the twelve fans, boss, advertisers are logical to have these occupation identity of a life of the background. Their tone of voice is also relatively soft and casual, although there are arguments, confrontation, but to give the feeling that this is a real life scene, their argument is part of their lives. On the stage of the jury isclearly an ideal space, let the audience start to think, in such asolemn place, the nature is a heavy topic, 12 people take is also sacred and arduous responsibility. This is a religious scene. I do not deny the 12 jurors responsibility is sacred and arduous, but in a democratic society, this responsibility has been a part of their lives, without the need for a special ceremony to worship.I think I should make it clear that the issue of democratic life, the next time to discuss the issue of democratization of life.。

12怒汉观后感英文版

12怒汉观后感英文版

12怒汉观后感英文版Introduction:"12 Angry Men" is a classic American courtroom drama film released in 1957. Directed by Sidney Lumet, the film revolves around the jury deliberations of a murder trial. The film explores themes of prejudice, justice, and the power of persuasion. After watching this thought-provoking film, I was compelled to reflect on the various aspects that made it such a significant piece of cinema.Body:1. Plot Overview:The film takes place almost entirely in a jury room, where twelve jurors deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murdering his own father. Initially, it seems like an open-and-shut case, but as the deliberations progress, diverse opinions and biases emerge among the jurors. The plot follows their intense discussions, examination of evidence, and interpersonal conflicts.2. Character Analysis:One of the remarkable aspects of the film is the depth of the characters. Each juror has a unique personality, with their prejudices and preconceived notions affecting their judgment. Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, stands out as the protagonist who challenges the assumptions and prejudices of his fellow jurors. His calm demeanor, rational thinking, and unwavering beliefin justice make him a central figure.3. Themes Explored:a. Prejudice: One of the dominant themes explored in the film is prejudice. Through the jurors' deliberations, it becomes evident how personal biases and stereotypes can cloud judgment and hinder the pursuit of justice. The film highlights the importance of looking beyond one's preconceptions in making fair and unbiased decisions.b. Justice: The concept of justice is at the core of the film. As the jurors deliberate, they grapple with their responsibility to ensure a fair trial for the accused. The film raises questions about the reliability of the legal system and the role of individuals in upholding justice. It prompts the audience to consider the moral and ethical dilemmas associated with delivering a verdict.c. Power of Persuasion: Another significant theme in the film is the power of persuasion. As the jurors engage in heated discussions, they employ various strategies to convince their peers. Each argument, presented with conviction, has the potential to sway the opinion of others. This exploration of persuasive techniques offers insights into human psychology and decision-making processes.4. Cinematic Techniques:The film's director skillfully utilizes various cinematic techniques to heighten the tension and create a sense of claustrophobia. The confined space of the jury room intensifies the emotional atmosphere, with the camera angles emphasizing the characters' reactions and interactions. The use of close-ups showcases the jurors' facial expressions, highlighting their inner conflicts and changing attitudes.5. Impact on Society:"12 Angry Men" had a significant impact on society, generating discussions about the flaws in the legal system and the need for objective judgment. Moreover, it sparked conversations around race, social inequality, and the dangers of prejudice. The film serves as a powerful reminder that justice should not be influenced by personal biases, as it has the potential to change lives and shape society.Conclusion:"12 Angry Men" is a timeless classic that transcends cultural and temporal boundaries. Its exploration of prejudice, justice, and the power of persuasion remains relevant today. The thoughtful character development, compelling themes, and skillful cinematography contribute to its enduring legacy. The film serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of open-mindedness, critical thinking, and fair judgment in the pursuit of justice.Note: The word count of the above response is 480 words. To achieve the desired word count, additional analysis, examples, and reflections could be included.。

十二怒汉观后感英文

十二怒汉观后感英文

十二怒汉观后感英文在《十二怒汉》里,由12普通民众组成的陪审团中,仅有一个8号的建筑师,凭借陪审团12位成员必须达成一致方可定罪原则,第一次投票便投了无罪一票,致使大部分陪审员只想走完程序给被告定罪的想法落空。

下面是英文的《十二怒汉》观后感,欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感英文Back to the room, slumped in a chair, all of a sudden no fighting spirit. Turn over the film, to avoid the destruction of negative emotions.This is a classic old piece called "Twelve Angry Chinese". The story is a jury of twelve members, in a small conference room to discuss whether a juvenile murderer is guilty, the process of ups and downs, the outcome of great. It is a classic, in my view is that: shooting the film in the more distant, black and white, but I very smoothly finished it; and after reading without a tired feeling, but a kind of scattered emotions, it is difficult to name. Want to know my only two live watch 3D blockbuster (Pirates of the Caribbean and Pacific rim of the Pacific Ocean), are watching the sleep of the 4. As a blind dull viewing fans, meet the"Twelve Angry Han" such a film, the top of your lungs are also top ah.The film explores the justice of the law and the freedom of the individual. The whole discussion is done in one scene. The reason in a narrow monotonous stuffy room shooting, but also let the audience watching the breath, the key is in one word: MAYBE.MAYBE, that is, that is, a hypothesis. If Xu Xian by Lady White Umbrella, there is no "White Snake" hypothesis; these twelve individuals began to agree with all the youth guilty, there is no next twelve angry men. The twelve person is not a judge or a lawyer, they did not need to prove that young guilty, they think, so the boy could sit chair; they think that no, they just need to find out the possibility of the juvenile is not a murderer.So the focus of controversy, are around a possibility. One may be denied, and the next may be raised.If we can tolerate the possibility that there is no such a possibility, then our personality, and perhaps will be more sound. You want to, the childrencame home from school late, parents immediately decidedto go, so he hit the plane delayed whiplash; passengers, decided that some officials with the right gasser, lifeto wait for the plane. There is no such a possibility: children encounter love girls, to go; do not fly the aircraft, because the captain constipation but not said.In the film, an angry mouth said: this boy is a slum grew up, where the child was born barbaric, fighting and killing no human nature, the boy must be guilty. While he was speaking, all the members of the jury have got up and left, turned back, except one, who also can't endure the angry man said: please sit down and shut up.In other words, to judge a person, who can not be based on personal bias. Once stubborn prejudice, it will kill all the precious possibilities, it will be fair and far away, to despise. Americans are proud of their laws because they tolerate all kinds of possibilities and give each person the freedom to make every choice possible.MAYBE, a chance, a chance. Many lovers break up, because they do not believe it is possible, do not giveeach other the opportunity. In some countries, good people are not happy cause bad, do not give the opportunity, but because of the justice of law with the lack of personality, more and more far away from the people, leaving only a false balance, at this time for the opportunity, but also desperate.At the end of the film, two angry men in the court gate shookhis hand, each name. And then return to the house, as if the previous argument is just a lazy rain in the evening. However, I do not know how many viewers in their back to see, is the dignity of personality independence and justice hope.十二怒汉观后感英文But think about it, or only gave three stars.Why?Because the movie is not pure. It is the theme of too much, the amount of information you want to convey is too large, although not so difficult to understand and accept, but the actual shot out of the situation is much more confusing: the jury system questioned the original Lumet preserved, influence to the Russian Chechen War mentality is he stressed, then through toRussia's dissatisfaction with the status quo of the beginning ("streets are Mercedes BMW Audi, only three minutes walk to the theatre of the road eight"), the narrative part involved everyone when mixed with too much of everyone's personal feelings, almost everyone said a case may not have with their the relationship between the piece, and then to the case itself (because of a surge in interest related to ethnic issues ah) increased the number of suspense drama elements, and finally to a strange man fancy...... Wang Yi think that this version than the conception of Lumet high, oh, maybe, but was not everything, although Kharkov has never let his film meters out of control, but still seem messy, and the strength is a scattered, feeling no matter which themes are focused on not just skimming over the surface like this in the past. No matter - I hate conception conception is not in the way of literature to discuss the film, the film quality, whether it is the rhythm, focus, or narrative control, this is a lot less than the old version.Then talk about technology. Whether new or old version, is a technology very good film, but thedifference is that the old version of the technology, with the integration of narrative is very good, whetherit is the opening track length mirror beautiful, or to enter the space after the precise positioning, had a sudden feeling, and the new version, most of the time,let the people think it is a virtuoso technique -- trya decorative. For example, 4 ed in dog holding hands through the lens, in a sense, can reduce at least once, always repeat, even the flashing lights of suspense,to finally will make people feel flat and uninteresting.Watch this movie shows a sense, not the seafood cooked together, called sea food and poultry, or a hodgepodge.By the way of Mikhalkov, the Slavophilism heavy director, is now famous Russian director in one of the largest, but I am not very love, because that kind of Slavic tastes! Sometimes, in order to render this complex, he is willing to destroy the whole structureof the film (Siberia barber), so that the mood itself has become an independent part of the film. When it comes to artistic conception, with the same Slavic complex than Sokolov, far worse.十二怒汉观后感英文I don't know when to start, when upset or depressed, I used to find old movies, especially in black and white, from which get quiet and elegant is important to me. When the movie is the movie, every word, every shot, a seamless heavenly robe.If not a summer night, in front of the 12 inch TV "murder in the Orient Express", I am afraid I will not engage in the occupation, so Sidney Lumet on my film concept that enlightenment can be formed. Not only is my occupation, Lumet outlook on life enlightenment, than the so-called supernatural forces of evil, I fear more complex. So far, I do not dare to read the murder of the Orient Express, the original, even if I have read most of Agatha's works, for fear that the text will destroy my heart on the film version of the feelings."Twelve Angry Men" is a kind of courage to cash, Henry Fonda against eleven companions of courage, personal subjective experience and attitude against the truth of courage, fairness and justice against self courage, American judicial system and social harmony of confrontation, and of course Lv Mei will have the courage.If I in twelve, I will think what what language, I am afraid that I am going with Ning Wang Zong not paranoid, or just because the bad boy will affect the society and others, so he will be charged to preach. This is not only my own narrow, I believe this is the so-called "good man" narrow.He is good at a single space, refining and performance in depth at mining and play on the event. "Twelve Angry Men", "summer afternoon", "Murder on the Orient Express" is a single main space, single and multi scene, closed interior, rich images may have been the maximum limit, but these films are undoubtedly good. Hitchcock was regarded as a master, he is often neglected, comparison of production, the style is fixed, is probably Lumet's limitations, but I still Lumet grievance. Who bought a home on film creation works in the United States, it is a pity that English, lazy I still will put on the shelf.I love those who do not show off the lens of the director, even if I teach audio-visual, but do not think that audio-visual should be placed above the film, the film is still moving me those characters and stories.So I love Billy Wilde, I love Sidney lumet. Most of the enclosed space is the scene of studio Lumet's studio, but he always prefers to use even short focus wide-angle lens, especially the "Orient Express", if not considering the light, three foot position and space depth background that really makes people think a real. So is the "Twelve Angry Men", using live scene very well, but he is not very restrained, the excessive use of "impossible shots", get consensus only at the end of twelve jurors picked up one by one, hung in the closet coat slowly out of the lens with dressing cabinet a few suits the prospect of jury they are leaving, finally leaving Henry Fonda picked up is still lying in the last like a stubborn choked the suit on the table, put him on, this is the understanding and support between men.He was restrained, even if the opening second is through the lens space and the atmosphere design of long lens typical account court, until out of the case is still the core of the film court. But as the openingis very suitable for the era, which has no feelings of infatuation to mirror director long, compared with Ocean Wells's "touch of evil", this scene actually hasbeen quite restrained.He was restrained, he did not because the single space added in the trial court, witnesses the flashback or reproduce the scene. For most of the directors, sucha structure is always inevitable, even though I, although we all understand the interest and charm ofa single space, but no confidence or ability to truly achieve such a perfect.He was restrained, he did not take Henry Fonda design into absolute hero, he is just a lot of sanity, the testimony of witnesses of the confusion is gradually put forward by other jurors, everyone to put forward their own personal experience and observation questions, such as poor background, people questioned the holding spring knife method, the old man questioned the witness of vision. Throughout the discussion, a juror number is outside the role of internal organizer, Fonda organizer, only this.He was restrained, even his warmth. At the end of the jurors out of court, the rain has stopped, summer evening and the sky, as the first man to supporters Fonda, two people for each name, then separated from.He was restrained, he did not go to revisit the superfluous case is non truth, that has nothing to do with the story of the core, the core of the story is just a boy of guilty or not guilty.A building is successful, the development of drama is successful, but the control in restraint extremely in the home.Study and drama director, "Twelve Angry Men" is absolutely worth repeatedly fine works.Once again, he to me movie ideas and life beliefs are deeply influenced, but the master.I love this summer, you can see a good movie, you can write, you can look at their own rational and restrained.。

十二怒汉观后感中英版

十二怒汉观后感中英版

十二怒汉观后感中英版《十二怒汉》整个故事发生在一间陪审团休息室里。

一个在贫民窟长大的18岁少年因为杀害自己的父亲被告上法庭,证人言之凿凿,各方面的证据都对他极为不利。

十二个不同职业的人组成了这个案件的陪审团,他们要在休息室达成一致的意见,裁定少年是否有罪,如果罪名成立,少年将会被判处死刑。

十二个陪审团成员各有不同,除了8号陪审员之外,其他人对这个犯罪事实如此清晰的案子不屑一顾,还没有开始讨论就认定了少年有罪。

8号陪审员提出了自己的“合理疑点”,耐心地说服其他的陪审员,在这个过程中,他们每个人不同的人生观也在冲突和较量。

下面是中英版的《十二怒汉》观后感,欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感中英版第一次看西德尼.美特的《十二怒》,想到是我看的最好的影片,本片于1957年,得了第7柏林影金熊以及其他影多提名和,一部女座作品就能得如此多,可演西德尼.美特定成一名影大。

除了和尾的境交代,全片就是在一小室的景拍完成的,能在一“枯燥”的境下故事不失精彩,度是相大的,一是得力于精彩的本,二是得力于出色的演,三是得力于精密的和度。

本本身的就非常具有可性,一人孤到最後所有人的倒戈相向,程看上去是一“不可能完成的任”,但因主角亨利.方生命的尊重、真相密的剖析、法律公平公正的持、“怒”之人的容和醒等等秀的品,最後征服了所有反他的人,并使各行各麻木之人得到了正的醒。

通一的景就明多哲理,且的相互交不失密、人物定具有典型的代表性,不能不在是高明。

影片非常具有性,甚至可以修改就能成一部舞本,已有人做了。

因景的固定所以演的表演要求甚高,而了原性,保持演於角色和的新感,很多都是用了超的一呵成,就要求演不能出差,但是12人的和度免出差,可以看得出很多是精心排的,尤其是影度的配合需要更加精和密,如果有一人出差可能就致全重,所以演的表演既要高度又要保持弛和自然,度一不於真的舞表演。

於人物性格的把握各有千秋,老和方的表演最出色。

本片有一更加突出的特色便是演於把控,面用了多分的,是很的,有一失就影整部的奏并耗大量拍源,所以在拍前演做了大量的排,互相“”,如影走到哪哪演始到哪,演道或者行到哪影怎的曲到哪,而之光音又要怎配合等等。

十二怒汉 观后感 英文

十二怒汉 观后感 英文

十二怒汉观后感英文A Reflection" with over 1000 words, written in English:The iconic film "Twelve Angry Men" is a masterpiece that has captivated audiences for generations. Directed by Sidney Lumet and released in 1957, this gripping courtroom drama delves into the complexities of the American justice system and the power of reasonable doubt. The film's enduring relevance and its ability to provoke deep contemplation make it a must-watch for anyone interested in the intricacies of human nature and the pursuit of justice.At the heart of the story is a young man on trial for the murder of his father. As the jurors retire to the deliberation room, the audience is introduced to a diverse group of individuals, each with their own biases, preconceptions, and personal experiences. The film's strength lies in its ability to showcase the nuanced and often conflicting perspectives that can arise within a jury room, where twelve strangers are tasked with determining the fate of a life.One of the most striking aspects of the film is the way it delves into the complex dynamics of group decision-making. As the jurors beginto discuss the case, it becomes clear that their initial unanimity in voting "guilty" is quickly challenged by the dissenting voice of Juror 8, played masterfully by Henry Fonda. Juror 8's unwavering commitment to examining the evidence objectively and his refusal to simply go along with the majority sets the stage for a gripping and thought-provoking exploration of the deliberation process.The film's exploration of the power of reasonable doubt is particularly captivating. As Juror 8 methodically dismantles the prosecution's case, the other jurors are forced to confront their own biases and preconceptions. The gradual shift in the jury's dynamics, as more and more jurors begin to question the certainty of the guilty verdict, serves as a powerful commentary on the importance of critical thinking and the need to challenge our own assumptions.One of the most compelling aspects of the film is the way it delves into the personal stories and motivations of the individual jurors. From Juror 3's deep-seated resentment towards his own estranged son to Juror 4's unwavering belief in the infallibility of the justice system, the film paints a nuanced portrait of the diverse perspectives and life experiences that shape each juror's decision-making process.The film's exploration of prejudice and the impact of personal biases on the judicial process is particularly poignant. As the jurors grapple with their own preconceptions and stereotypes, the audience isforced to confront the ways in which our own biases can influence our perceptions and decision-making. The film's ability to tackle these sensitive issues with sensitivity and nuance is a testament to its enduring relevance and its ability to spark important conversations.One of the most powerful moments in the film comes when Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb, is forced to confront the depth of his own prejudices. As he breaks down in tears, the audience is reminded of the profound emotional toll that the deliberation process can take on the individuals involved. The film's ability to humanize the jurors and to explore the personal struggles and conflicts that shape their decisions is a testament to its depth and complexity.The film's technical prowess is also worthy of note. The claustrophobic setting of the jury room, with its oppressive heat and the ever-present ticking of the clock, creates a palpable sense of tension and urgency. The film's use of tight framing and limited camera movement further heightens the sense of confinement and the pressure of the decision-making process.Overall, "Twelve Angry Men" is a masterful work of cinema that continues to resonate with audiences decades after its release. Its exploration of the complexities of the American justice system, the power of reasonable doubt, and the impact of personal biases on decision-making is a testament to the enduring relevance of thistimeless classic. Whether you are a seasoned cinephile or a casual viewer, this film is sure to leave a lasting impression and to spark important conversations about the nature of justice and the human condition.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

十二怒汉观后感英文版在1957年由悉尼(卢曼特执导的《十二怒汉》是探讨美国陪审员制度和法律正义的经典作~本片则是由威廉(弗里德金重新拍摄的电视版~由杰克(莱蒙取代亨利(方达演男主角~其他合演者包括金像奖影帝乔治(C(斯科特。

下面是英文版的《十二怒汉》观后感~欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感英文版 As a IMDB movie,originally only read and when the university language class fuzzy again writing film is a very extravagant things, but this afternoon again like a completely blew my mind, giving too many surprises and things will still lead a person to endless aftertastes, on the next.Talk before seen a movie, called the man from Earth (the man from the earth), features a proposed very beautiful view or treason and heresy, by constantly review and logical scrutiny to details of other people's point of view in the opposite direction. The point is that the language of art and clever reasoning, give people the feeling of layers of peeling cocoon. This 12 anger is more in-depth study of human nature and the United States judicial and democratic system.Originally seemingly incontrovertible case1 / 14because the jury has an objection, so an amazing negotiations began. The opposition is a smooth and logical architect, and a producer of the film. The first round of the debate is mainly composed of a It'spossible! That led, the boy may be innocent, the witness may be wrong, false testimony could, to a 18 year old boy without thinking directly to the electric chair is a be brutal and inhuman. At this stage, the only point against the success of Davis is to let people get away from the surface of the evidence and their own prejudices, with careful scrutiny of the details of the mind, for the next stage to lay the foundation.In the details of reasoning, Davis has been a breakthrough point and support the knife, when out of pocket knife with almost the same knife, all surprised sound jump, so the evidence will lose credibility, on the knife in the back again to become a breakthrough point. Davis proposed to reproduce the boy murder scenes, so that the boy insisted that the guilty get Davis for demonstration, higher than their own people, manipulation is holding a knife stabbed in the chest from the top down, and from a slum, have seen a lot of2 / 14people stand up and fight to get stressed such adjustment method, it is a waste of time the tool, familiar boy didn't like this.To discuss the progress on many of the details in advance, such as time difference; the old man can walk out of the bedroom, through the corridor in 15 seconds, the boy rushed out to see the woman; both sides of the nose mark and kept rubbing surface of the eye is myopic. Although there are set close enough to leave the drama to overthrow the testimony of the suspects, but still very appreciated this insight.Another wonderful place is a lot of analysis of human nature of the plot, such as the first to support the Davis people to explain why the old man would do the perjury, that is because of a comic book unknown to the public suddenly one day to get attention, others want to refer to his views, and flattered him with long battle, trying to hide myself the lame. It can be said that this is a weakness of human nature, in order to other people's attention or respect, at the same time distort the facts.Confrontation and Davis and his resolute opponents,3 / 14Davis said a press button to personally chair is sadistic, who shouted I will kill rage came forward to beat Davis, you! And Davis were all pulled at him, calmly questions, you don't really want to kill me, right let him have nothing to say?. Clever people to move the stone to hit their feet very exciting, but the more exciting is the director here to give a very clear view, that is, an idiom in china.From A to Z 3 opponents is not for evil, frowning, talking is intolerable or pessimistic, but strong scream as you want the boy to death immediately said, this man has become a justice in the case when the correct, but when the error is a disaster. How can one be able to act as a judge of the fate of others by letting them have their own prejudices and that they have no prejudice? Only a disregard for human life.The discussion in the final is firmly opposed to face their own feelings with his photo when collapse over, perhaps the boy reallykilled my father, but this is a shining glory of human nature of the trial, the greatness of the judicial system reflects the most incisive. Especially with China nearly thousands of4 / 14years of autocratic centralization comparison, and even become the decision habit, look at a building built not demolished and rebuilt for several years, I can not help worrying, Chinese how many innocent common people Yuansi, how many wise decisions in authoritarian pressure die, many seemingly overweeningly ambitious construction plan also in the pipeline?十二怒汉观后感英文版 This Indoorsman empty andlonely months come out a fart, this essay is moving around the brain exercises, do not take it seriously."12 angry men", epee no front, delicate workAbout the film itselfOf all the movies I've seen, "12 fury" is not my favorite top ten, but it's definitely the most boring I've ever seen in the top 10. The whole film is only one scene, 12 men, hours of dialogue, or a black and white film. However, it is cattle, cattle cattle, with the most boring way, about the most exciting story.The whole film is about a murder trial. A bad boy was charged withthe murder of his father, hear the voice of the old man across thestreet downstairs, witnessed the process of women's murder knife,5 / 14unconvincing alibi, seems to have been placed in the electric chairin front of the child will be. 12 members of the jury will determine the child's life and death, but they have to make a unified ruling, the results can be effective. At the beginning of the film, 11 people think that the child is guilty, only one out of respect for life, that thecase pending. After hours of hard work, all the evidence is classifiedas "reasonable doubt", that is to say, there is a reason why it cannotbe fully established. The boy was acquitted.The story itself does not have any complicated place, neither brain nor burning suspense. However, the film, there is a kind of good. Thisis a typical confined space film, but there is no usually confined space film repression. The plot is fascinating, as if an invisible hand, grabbed in the viewer's mind, to promote the development of the plot. Then the hand is hidden very deep, you can only cast a tepid performance, and the degree of relaxation rhythm to feel it. It is difficult to point out that it is in which point, the plot, so that the merits of a step forward. It makes a "mission impossible" completed, but does not show abrupt. Like6 / 14warm boiled frog, unconsciously, has been the director of the road.On the confined space of the film, you can take the "12 angry Han" and "sniper phone booth" to do a comparison.The latter is my personal narrow viewing experience, in recent years considered very good confined space film. It is more intense than the "12 angry Han", more depressed, more popular. However, the latter of the wonderful, is the process of viewing the obvious exciting, the director deliberately for the tension (of course, it is not easy). It will be the hero and the audience, and placed under the gun, like a gun under the deer hunter. Every thought, every action, will determine your life and death. So it's hot, hormones are always high.The former is different, the director will be shot, placed on the spectator's point of view, and without any emotional color. Group play is also very difficult to bring the audience into the sense. This kind of calm angle of view, can let a person look at the whole process more calmly. The former is like the slalom, the latter7 / 14is watching the scenery is better, but also the reader's taste.About humanityThe director cut the case in the form of a jury, but also brought another narrative convenience, no matter what kind of decisions made by the 12 angry men, will not have any impact on their own, they are bystanders. Moreover, the restriction of 12 people, a person's decision, the role of both large and small. This is like 100 thousand people pulling the hair of a person, everyone will think, he pulled out a hairof others will produce what kind of impact on the people, but when tenth million individuals pulled over the last hair, who is responsible forthis thing? The individual in the collective judgment, are more likelyto get a sense of security even moral, ah q would say, I feel the monk can not be touched? As a result, the only thing that can restrain the 12 anger is the moral of the individual, respect for life, the fear of the law, and the American dream of American pride. However, it is for the respect of other people's lives, the value of the personal status of citizens, can better reflect the8 / 14reason why the "social man" noble.On Jurisprudence11:1, does not represent the overwhelming victory, the minority tothe majority, also did not see so reasonable. Let a few people speak freely, is a fair basis.十二怒汉观后感英文版 "The twelve fury", ablack and white film that was shot in the 50s of the last century,still holds the top spot in the list of legal films. The filming of the film is now still seems to be very good or even fresh, a jury of twelve people to discuss the scene occupies the vast majority of the film. The basic circumstances of the case is almost a convicted juvenile patricide after the trial requires twelve man jury made unanimous verdict. Finally, after a long and bitter debate, the kind of people in the aura of human nature under the leadership of the hero to the boy to freedom.A movie is great, it must be that it allows everyone to find their own interpretation and indirect exposure to real life. What does thefilm say? The responsibility of the rights and obligations of unity, American9 / 14judicial system, "would rather let ten thousand can not kill the wrong one" judicial policy on human, fine, deep dig of character psychology analysis, inference of life precious goodness of life, respect, in the face of adversity to find a breakthrough in the actual combat skills, logical reasoning method and so on. Among them, my most shocking is the jury in the system of human feelings and legal justice in the game between the precise performance of the game.First of all, from the significance of the establishment of the jury system. As everyone knows, the jury system is a more common in the countries of Anglo American law system for the realization of democracy and set up the court ruling, but in this case is obviously that consisting of 6-12 people, a case of a group, decide whether the defendant guilty of petty jury. The task of the jury is to find the truth, to seek the defendant's heart, to judge whether the law is fair, and to fight against the dictatorship and oppression of the government. Judging from the case, twelve different personalities, different origins of the jury finally completed this sacred mission, although the10 / 14process is full of hardships and disputes, although meager pay.Obviously, the jury system establishment greatly to the "people"will have reflected the way, representative of the first throw to the "people" problems, from the set goal, one of the ways of expression also embody the will of the consciousness of law. This movie is a result tothe satisfaction of all, "people's democracy" successful practice,worthy of praise.It can be said that this kind of non professional, only the simpleway to judge the feelings of law to a certain extent reflects the demographiccharacteristics and values of a society, naturally has a natural rationality and institutional affinity. This kind of justice can makethe majority of the people in this society to be convinced, and not like the law of the general cold ruthless, the decision was also less likelyto be overturned. This is also the system from the Anglo Saxon era has been widely used and today there are still many reference reasons.The next step is to discuss whether the justice11 / 14based on human judgment is the justice required on the legal balance.In the movie "Twelve Angry Men", each juror all have some worry, anxious to help their own work and entertainment, because of some emotional problems naturally to the case of the boy off, some because of hot weather to escape from the narrow discussion room...... All these practical problems are unable to avoid or even to be taken into account when the jury system is set up. But this is real life. As the mostcommon people, the jury will be influenced by all kinds of personal and environmental factors.A great movie is that it takes all kinds of factors affecting the justice of Law -- or clear or vague to show in front of the audience, the audience from the heart to feel, if oneself is in jury, it is very difficult to guarantee that complete justice. Just one example, in seemingly irrefutable evidence, even lawyers are too lazy to defend for the boy, the judge is also a lazy way, that will make everyone believe: the child First impressions are strongest had killed his father and have to pay the price to be sent to the12 / 14chair in the end has not yet started life. That is why there is abig gap between 11 and 1, which is likely to have an impact on the environment.It is a little question although it is difficult to have a keen insight into matters but people-oriented "actor has been discussed by expanding, finally let more and more jurors tend to believe that the boy innocence. But this calm person in reality is very rare, if we depend on every case in each group the jury can have a "hero" to calm to control, it is not realistic! As one of the judges in the film said to himself, "it's a little bit of a heart attack" if it's a long time to change into another jury. Just imagine, as a result, the jury system has become a kind of terrible, if the jury random selection will lead to two completely different results for the case even for a young life anddeath, let the life in the legal system of the people and how to maintain adequate sense of security and justice of law faith?So I think that any system has its own defects, the rationality of its existence and its inevitable, certainly not in personal feelings or political stance13 / 14over highly or completely system, the disadvantages and system optimization is the right path of human progress. It may also be a more than half an hour to convey the meaning of the film more far-reaching.Finally, it is worth mentioning that the opening and the end of the film is very interesting, with the film language1.十二怒汉观后感英文版2.十二怒汉观后感英文3.十二怒汉观后感英语4.十二怒汉观后感中英版5.精选十二怒汉观后感6.看不见的好朋友读后感怎么写7.坚定信念超越自我演讲稿200字8.什么的变化作文400字年重庆开学第一课观后感14 / 14。

相关文档
最新文档