莱温斯基TED演讲 中英对照
莱温斯基ted演讲稿（中英文双语文字版）
莱温斯基ted演讲稿（中英文双语文字版）
莱温斯基ted演讲稿陈述了网络语言欺凌受害者的苦楚，这里从莱温斯基22岁的时候担任白宫实习生开始，因为她爱上了她的老板，也就是克林顿总统，然之莱温斯基被贴上了丑恶的标签，这次站在TED演讲上表达了她的想法，以下是整理的莱温斯基ted演讲稿，提供中英文两种版本。
莱温斯基ted演讲稿
站在你们面前的这个女性曾在公众面前沉默了十年。
显然，现在不一样了，不过这只是最近的事。
几个月前在福布斯”30位30岁以下创业者”峰会上,我首次公开发表演讲，峰会上有1500位杰出人士，全部不到30岁。
这就意味着在1998年，其中最年长的人也只有14岁，最年轻的则只有4岁。
我同他们开玩笑，有些人似乎只是从说唱音乐中听过我的名字。
没错，说唱音乐唱过我，几乎有40首这样的说唱音乐。
莱温斯基TED2015演讲稿The price of shame.
The price of shameYou're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decade. Obviously, that's changed, but only recently.It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at the Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brilliant people, all under the age of 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and the youngest, just four. I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs. Yes, I'm in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs.But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He could make me feel 22 again. I realized later that night, I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again.At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences.Can I see a show of hands of anyone here who didn't make a mistake or do something they regretted at 22? Yep. That's what I thought. So like me, at 22, a few of you may have also taken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person, maybe even your boss. Unlike me, though, your boss probably wasn't the president of the United States of America. Of course, life is full of surprises.Not a day goes by that I'm not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deeply.In 1998, after having been swept up into an improbable romance, I was then swept up into the eye of a political, legal and media maelstrom like we had never seen before. Remember, just a few years earlier,news was consumed from just three places: reading a newspaper or magazine, listening to the radio, or watching television. That was it. But that wasn't my fate. Instead, this scandal was brought to you by the digital revolution. That meant we could access all the information we wanted, when we wanted it, anytime, anywhere, and when the story broke in January 1998, it broke online. It was the first time the traditional news was usurped by the Internet for a major news story, a click that reverberated around the world.What that meant for me personally was that overnight I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one worldwide. I was patient zero of losing a personal reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously.This rush to judgment, enabled by technology, led to mobs of virtual stone-throwers. Granted, it was before social media, but people could still comment online, email stories, and, of course, email cruel jokes. Newssources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers, banner ads online, and to keep people tuned to the TV. Do you recall a particular image of me, say, wearing a beret?Now, I admit I made mistakes, especially wearing that beret. But the attention and judgment that I received, not the story, but that I personally received, was unprecedented. I was branded as a tramp, tart, slut, whore, bimbo, and, of course, that woman. I was seen by many but actually known by few. And I get it: it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional, had a soul, and was once unbroken.When this happened to me 17 years ago, there was no name for it. Now we call it cyberbullying and online harassment. Today, I want to share some of my experience with you, talk about how that experience has helped shape my cultural observations, and how I hope my past experience can lead to a change that results in less suffering for others.In 1998, I lost my reputation and my dignity. I lost almost everything, and I almost lost my life.Let me paint a picture for you. It is September of 1998. I'm sitting in a windowless office room inside the Office of the Independent Counsel underneath humming fluorescent lights. I'm listening to the sound of my voice, my voice on surreptitiously taped phone calls that a supposed friend had made the year before. I'm here because I've been legally required to personally authenticate all 20 hours of taped conversation. For the past eight months, the mysterious content of these tapes has hung like the Sword of Damocles over my head. I mean, who can remember what they said a year ago? Scared and mortified, I listen, listen as I prattle on about the flotsam and jetsam of the day; listen as I confess my love for the president, and, of course, my heartbreak; listen to my sometimes catty, sometimes churlish, sometimes silly self being cruel, unforgiving, uncouth; listen, deeply, deeply ashamed, to the worst version of myself,a self I don't even recognize.A few days later, the Starr Report is released to Congress, and all of those tapes and trans, those stolen words, form a part of it. That people can read the trans is horrific enough, but a few weeks later, the audio tapes are aired on TV, and significant portions made available online. The public humiliation was excruciating. Life was almost unbearable.This was not something that happened with regularity back then in 1998, and by this, I mean the stealing of people's private words, actions, conversations or photos, and then making them public -- public without consent, public without context, and public without compassion.Fast forward 12 years to 2010, and now social media has been born. The landscape has sadly become much more populated with instances like mine, whether or not someone actually make a mistake, and now it's for both public and private people. The consequences for some have become dire, very dire.I was on the phone with my mom in September of 2010, and we were talking about the news of a young college freshman from Rutgers University named Tyler Clementi. Sweet, sensitive, creative Tyler was secretly webcammed by his roommate while being intimate with another man. When the online world learned of this incident, the ridicule and cyberbullying ignited.A few days later, Tyler jumped from the George Washington Bridge to his death. He was 18.My mom was beside herself about what happened to Tyler and his family, and she was gutted with painin a way that I just couldn't quite understand, and then eventually I realized she was reliving 1998, reliving a time when she sat by my bed every night, reliving a time when she made me shower with the bathroom door open, and reliving a time when both of my parents feared that I would be humiliated to death,literally.Today, too many parents haven't had the chance to step in and rescue their loved ones. Too many have learned of their child's suffering and humiliation after it was too late. Tyler's tragic, senseless death was a turning point for me. It served to recontextualize my experiences, and I then began to look at the world of humiliation and bullying around me and see something different. In 1998, we had no way of knowing where this brave new technology called the Internet would take us. Since then, it has connected people in unimaginable ways, joining lost siblings, saving lives, launching revolutions, but the darkness, cyberbullying, and slut-shaming that I experienced had mushroomed. Every day online, people, especially young people who are not developmentally equipped to handle this, are so abused and humiliated that they can't imagine living to the next day, and some, tragically, don't, andthere's nothing virtual about that. ChildLine, a U.K. nonprofit that's focused on helping young people on various issues,released a staggering statistic late last year: From 2012 to 2013, there was an 87 percent increase in calls and emails related to cyberbullying. A meta-analysis done out of the Netherlands showed that for the first time, cyberbullying was leading to suicidal ideations more significantly than offline bullying. And you know what shocked me, although it shouldn't have, was other research last year that determined humiliation was a more intensely felt emotion than either happiness or even anger.Cruelty to others is nothing new, but online, technologically enhanced shaming isamplified, uncontained, and permanently accessible. The echo of embarrassment used to extend only as far as your family, village, school or community, but now it's the online community too. Millions of people, often anonymously, can stab you with their words, and that's a lot of pain, and there are no perimeters around how many people can publicly observe you and put you in a public stockade. There is a very personal price to public humiliation, and the growth of the Internet has jacked up that price.For nearly two decades now, we have slowly been sowing the seeds of shame and public humiliation in our cultural soil, both on- and offline. Gossip websites, paparazzi, reality programming, politics, news outlets and sometimes hackers all traffic in shame. It's led to desensitization and a permissive environment online which lends itself to trolling, invasion of privacy, and cyberbullying. This shift has created what Professor Nicolaus Mills calls a culture of humiliation. Consider a few prominent examples just from the past six months alone. Snapchat, the service which is used mainly by younger generationsand claims that its messages only have the lifespan of a few seconds. You can imagine the range of content that that gets. A third-party app which Snapchatters use to preserve the lifespan of the messages was hacked, and 100,000 personal conversations, photos, and videos were leaked online to now have a lifespan of forever. Jennifer Lawrence and several other actors had their iCloud accounts hacked, and private, intimate, nude photos were plastered across the Internet without their permission.One gossip website had over five million hits for this one story. And what about the Sony Pictures cyberhacking? The documents which received the most attention were private emails that had maximum public embarrassment value.But in this culture of humiliation, there is another kind of price tag attached to public shaming. The price does not measure the cost to the victim, which Tyler and too many others, notably women, minorities,and members of the LGBTQ community have paid, but the price measures the profit of those who prey on them. This invasion of others is a raw material, efficiently and ruthlessly mined, packaged and sold at a profit. A marketplace has emerged where public humiliation is a commodity and shame is an industry.How is the money made? Clicks. The more shame, the more clicks. The more clicks, the more advertising dollars. We're in a dangerous cycle. The more we click on this kind of gossip, the more numb we get to the human lives behind it, and the more numb we get, the more we click. All the while, someone is making money off of the back of someone else's suffering. With every click, we make a choice. The more we saturate our culture with public shaming, the more accepted it is,the more we will see behavior like cyberbullying, trolling, some forms of hacking, and online harassment. Why? Because they all have humiliation at their cores. This behavior is a symptom of the culture we've created. Just think about it.Changing behavior begins with evolving beliefs. We've seen that to be true with racism, homophobia, and plenty of other biases, today and in the past. As we've changed beliefs about same-sex marriage, more people have been offered equal freedoms. When we began valuing sustainability, more people began to recycle. So as far as our culture of humiliation goes, what we need is a cultural revolution. Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop, and it's time for an intervention on the Internet and in our culture.The shift begins with something simple, but it's not easy. We need to return to a long-held value of compassion -- compassion and empathy. Online, we've got a compassion deficit, an empathy crisis.Researcher Brené Brown said, and I quote, "Shame can't survive empathy." Shame cannot survive empathy. I've seen some very dark days in my life, and it was the compassion and empathy from my family, friends, professionals, and sometimes even strangers that saved me. Even empathy from one person can make a difference. The theory of minority influence, proposed by social psychologist Serge Moscovici, says that even in small numbers, when there's consistency over time, change can happen. In the online world, we can foster minority influence by becoming upstanders. To become an upstander means instead of bystander apathy, we can post a positive comment for someone or report a bullying situation. Trust me, compassionate comments help abate the negativity. We can also counteract the culture by supporting organizations that deal with these kinds of issues, like the Tyler Clementi Foundation in the U.S., In the U.K., there's Anti-Bullying Pro, and in Australia, there's Project Rockit.We talk a lot about our right to freedom of expression, but we need to talk more about our responsibility to freedom of expression. We all want to be heard, but let's acknowledge the difference between speaking up with intention and speaking up for attention. The Internet is the superhighway for the id, but online, showing empathy to others benefits us all and helps create a safer and better world. We need to communicate online with compassion, consume news with compassion, and click with compassion. Just imagine walking a mile in someone else's headline. I'd like to end on a personal note. In the past nine months, the question I've been asked the most is why. Why now? Why was I sticking my head above the parapet? You can read between the lines in thosequestions, and the answer has nothing to do with politics.The top note answer was and is because it's time: time to stop tip-toeing around my past; time to stop living a life of opprobrium; and time to take back my narrative. It's also not just about saving myself. Anyone who is suffering from shame and public humiliation needs to know one thing: You can survive it.I know it's hard. It may not be painless, quick or easy, but you can insist on a different ending to your story. Have compassion for yourself. We all deserve compassion, and to live both online and off in a more compassionate world.Thank you for listening.莫妮卡·莱温斯基主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价时间：2015年3月19日主办：Ted大会【编者按】17年前白宫性丑闻事件的当事人，前白宫实习生莫妮卡莱温斯基在沉默了十年之后，走上Ted大会的讲台，呼吁抵制网络欺凌。
莱温斯基TED演讲-中英对照
莱温斯基T E D演讲-中英对照(共18页)--本页仅作为文档封面，使用时请直接删除即可----内页可以根据需求调整合适字体及大小--The price of shame主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价You're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decade. Obvious ly, that's changed, but only recently.站在你们面前的是一个在大众面前沉默了十年之久的女人。
当然，现在情况不一样了，不过这只是最近发生的事。
It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at t he Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brilliant people, all under the age o f 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and theyoungest, just four. I joked with them that some might only have heard o f me from rap songs. Yes, I'm in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs.几个月前，我在《福布斯》杂志举办的“30岁以下”峰会（Under 30 Summit）上发表了首次公开演讲。
现场1500位才华横溢的与会者都不到30岁。
这意味着1998年，他们中最年长的是14岁，而最年轻的只有4岁。
我跟他们开玩笑道，他们中有些人可能只在说唱歌曲里听到过我的名字。
是的，大约有40首说唱歌曲唱过我。
But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 4 1, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was He could make me fe el 22 again. I realized later that night, I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again. 但是，在我演讲当晚，发生了一件令人吃惊的事——我作为一个41岁的女人，被一个27岁的男孩示爱。
【TED】处乱不惊(中英文对照)
Ted演讲标题：处乱不惊A few years ago,I broke into my own house.I had just driven home,it was around midnight in the dead of Montreal winter,I had been visiting my friend,Jeff,across town,and the thermometer on the front porch read minus40degrees,and don’t bother asking if that’s Celsius or Fahrenheit, minus40is where the two scales meet,it was very cold.And as I stood on the front porch fumbling in my pockets,I found I didn’t have my keys.In fact,I could see them through the window,lying on the dining room table where I had left them.So I quickly ran around and tired all the other doors and windows and they were locked tight.I thought about calling a locksmith at least I had my cellphone,but at midnight,it could take a while for a locksmith to show up and it was cold.I couldn’t go back to my friend Jeff’s house for the night because I had an early flight to European the next morning,and I need to get my passport and my suitcase.So,desperate and freezing cold,I found a large rock and I broke through the basement window,clear out the shards of glass,I crawled through,I found a piece of cardboard and taped it up over the opening, figuring that in the morning,on the way to the airport,I could call my contractor and ask him to fix it.This was going to be expensive,but probably no more expensive than a middle-of-the-night locksmith,so I figure,under the circumstances,I was coming out even.几年前，我闯进了我自己的房子。
TED演讲原文和翻译~
TED演讲原⽂和翻译~< your body language shapes who you are > So I want to start by offering you a free no-tech life hack, and all it requires of you is this: that you change your posture for two minutes. But before I give it away, I want to ask you to right now do a little audit of your body and what you're doing with your body. So how many of you are sort of making yourselves smaller? Maybe you're hunching, crossing your legs, maybe wrapping your ankles. Sometimes we hold onto our arms like this. Sometimes we spread out. (Laughter) I see you. (Laughter) So I want you to pay attention to what you're doing right now. We're going to come back to that in a few minutes, and I'm hoping that if you learn to tweak this a little bit, it could significantly change the way your life unfolds.0:58So, we're really fascinated with body language, and we're particularly interested in other people's body language. You know, we're interested in, like, you know —(Laughter) —an awkward interaction, or a smile, or a contemptuous glance, or maybe a very awkward wink, or maybe even something like a handshake.1:22Narrator: Here they are arriving at Number 10, and look at this lucky policeman gets to shake hands with the President of the United States. Oh, and here comes the Prime Minister of the —? No. (Laughter) (Applause) (Laughter) (Applause)1:37Amy Cuddy: So a handshake, or the lack of a handshake, can have us talking for weeks and weeks and weeks. Even the BBC and The New York Times. So obviously when we think about nonverbal behavior, or body language -- but we call it nonverbals as social scientists -- it's language, so we think about communication. When we think about communication, we think about interactions. So what is your body language communicating to me? What's mine communicating to you?2:04And there's a lot of reason to believe that this is a valid way to look at this. So social scientists have spent a lot of time looking at the effects of our body language, or other people's body language, on judgments. And we make sweeping judgments and inferences from body language. And those judgments can predict really meaningful life outcomes like who we hire or promote, who we ask out on a date. For example, Nalini Ambady, a researcher at Tufts University, shows that when people watch 30-second soundless clips of real physician-patient interactions, their judgments of the physician's niceness predict whether or not that physician will be sued. So it doesn't have to do so much with whether or not that physician was incompetent, but do we like that person and how they interacted? Even more dramatic, Alex Todorov at Princeton has shown us that judgments of political candidates' faces in just one second predict 70 percent of U.S. Senate and gubernatorial race outcomes, and even, let's go digital, emoticons used well in online negotiations can lead to you claim more value from that negotiation. If you use them poorly, bad idea. Right? So when we think of nonverbals, we think of how we judge others, how they judge us and what theoutcomes are. We tend to forget, though, the other audience that's influenced by our nonverbals, and that's ourselves.3:31We are also influenced by our nonverbals, our thoughts and our feelings and our physiology. So what nonverbals am I talking about? I'm a social psychologist. I study prejudice, and I teach at a competitive business school, so it was inevitable that I would become interested in power dynamics. I became especially interested in nonverbal expressions of power and dominance.3:56And what are nonverbal expressions of power and dominance? Well, this is what they are. So in the animal kingdom, they are about expanding. So you make yourself big, you stretch out, you take up space, you're basically opening up. It's about opening up. And this is true across the animal kingdom. It's not just limited to primates. And humans do the same thing. (Laughter) So they do this both when they have power sort of chronically, and also when they're feeling powerful in the moment. And this one is especially interesting because it really shows us how universal and old these expressions of power are. This expression, which is known as pride, Jessica Tracy has studied. She shows that people who are born with sight and people who are congenitally blind do this when they win at a physical competition. So when they cross the finish line and they've won, it doesn't matter if they've never seen anyone do it. They do this. So the arms up in the V, the chin is slightly lifted. What do we do when we feel powerless? We do exactly the opposite. We close up. We wrap ourselves up. We make ourselves small. We don't want to bump into the person next to us. So again, both animals and humans do the same thing. And this is what happens when you put together high and low power. So what we tend to do when it comes to power is thatwe complement the other's nonverbals. So if someone is being really powerful with us, we tend to make ourselves smaller. We don't mirror them. We do the opposite of them.5:24So I'm watching this behavior in the classroom, and what do I notice? I notice that MBA students really exhibit the full range of power nonverbals. So you have people who are like caricatures of alphas, really coming into the room, they get right into the middle of the room before class even starts, like they really want to occupy space. When they sit down, they're sort of spread out. They raise their hands like this. You have other people who are virtually collapsing when they come in. As soon they come in, you see it. You see it on their faces and their bodies, and they sit in their chair and they make themselves tiny, and they go like this when they raise their hand. I notice a couple of things about this. One, you're not going to be surprised. It seems to be related to gender. So women are much more likely to do this kind of thing than men. Women feel chronically less powerful than men, so this is not surprising. But the other thing I noticed is that it also seemed to be related to the extent to which the students were participating, and how well they were participating. And this is really important in the MBA classroom, because participation counts for half the grade.6:33So business schools have been struggling with this gender grade gap. You get these equally qualified women and men coming in and then you get these differences in grades, and it seems to be partly attributable to participation. So I started to wonder, you know, okay, so you have these people coming in like this, and they're participating. Is it possible that we could get people to fake it and would it lead them to participate more?6:57So my main collaborator Dana Carney, who's at Berkeley, and I really wanted to know, can you fake it till you make it? Like, can you do this just for a little while and actually experience a behavioral outcome that makes you seem more powerful? So we know that our nonverbals govern how other people think and feel about us. There's a lot of evidence. But our question really was, do our nonverbals govern how we think and feel about ourselves?7:24There's some evidence that they do. So, for example, we smile when we feel happy, but also, when we're forced to smile by holding a pen in our teeth like this, it makes us feel happy. So it goes both ways. When it comes to power, it also goes both ways. So when you feel powerful, you're more likely to do this, but it's also possible that when you pretend to be powerful, you are more likely to actually feel powerful.7:57So the second question really was, you know, so we know that our minds change our bodies, but is it also true that our bodies change our minds? And when I say minds, in the case of the powerful, what am I talking about? So I'm talking about thoughts and feelings and the sort of physiological things that make up our thoughts and feelings, and in my case, that's hormones. I look at hormones. So what do the minds of the powerful versus the powerless look like? So powerful people tend to be, not surprisingly, more assertive and more confident, more optimistic. They actually feel that they're going to win even at games of chance. They also tend to be able to think more abstractly. So there are a lot of differences. They take more risks. There are a lot of differences between powerful and powerless people. Physiologically, there also are differences on two key hormones: testosterone, which is the dominance hormone, and cortisol, which is the stress hormone. So what we find is that high-power alpha males in primate hierarchies have high testosterone and low cortisol, and powerful and effective leaders also have high testosterone and low cortisol. So what does that mean? When you think about power, people tended to think only about testosterone, because that was about dominance. But really, power is also about how you react to stress. So do you want the high-power leader that's dominant, high on testosterone, but really stress reactive? Probably not, right? You want the person who's powerful and assertive and dominant, but not very stress reactive, the person who's laid back. 9:37So we know that in primate hierarchies, if an alpha needs to take over, if an individual needs to take over an alpha role sort of suddenly, within a few days, that individual's testosterone has gone up significantly and his cortisol has dropped significantly. So we have this evidence, both that the body can shape the mind, at least at the faciallevel, and also that role changes can shape the mind. So what happens, okay, you take a role change, what happens if you do that at a really minimal level, like this tiny manipulation, this tiny intervention? "For two minutes," you say, "I want you to stand like this, and it's going to make you feel more powerful."10:19So this is what we did. We decided to bring people into the lab and run a little experiment, and these people adopted, for two minutes, either high-power poses or low-power poses, and I'm just going to show you five of the poses, although they took on only two. So here's one. A couple more. This one has been dubbed the "Wonder Woman" by the media. Here are a couple more. So you can be standing or you can be sitting. And here are the low-power poses. So you're folding up, you're making yourself small. This one is very low-power. When you're touching your neck, you're really protecting yourself. So this is what happens. They come in, they spit into a vial, we for two minutes say, "You need to do this or this." They don't look at pictures of the poses. We don't want to prime them with a concept of power. We want them to be feeling power, right? So two minutes they do this. We then ask them, "How powerful do you feel?" on a series of items, and then we give them an opportunity to gamble, and then we take another saliva sample. That's it. That's the whole experiment.11:28So this is what we find. Risk tolerance, which is the gambling, what we find is that when you're in the high-power pose condition, 86 percent of you will gamble. When you're in the low-power pose condition, only 60 percent, and that's a pretty whopping significant difference. Here's what we find on testosterone. From their baseline when they come in, high-power people experience about a 20-percent increase, and low-power people experience about a 10-percent decrease. So again, two minutes, and you get these changes. Here's what you get on cortisol. High-power people experience about a 25-percent decrease, and the low-power people experience about a 15-percent increase. So two minutes lead to these hormonal changes that configure your brain to basically be either assertive, confident and comfortable, or really stress-reactive, and, you know, feeling sort of shut down. And we've all had the feeling, right? So it seems that our nonverbals do govern how we think and feel about ourselves, so it's not just others, but it's also ourselves. Also, our bodies change our minds.12:36But the next question, of course, is can power posing for a few minutes really change your life in meaningful ways? So this is in the lab. It's this little task, you know, it's just a couple of minutes. Where can you actually apply this? Which we cared about, of course. And so we think it's really, what matters, I mean, where you want to use this is evaluative situations like social threat situations. Where are you being evaluated, either by your friends? Like for teenagers it's at the lunchroom table. It could be, you know, for some people it's speaking at a school board meeting. It might be giving a pitch or giving a talk like this or doing a job interview. We decided that the one that most people could relate to because most people had been through was the job interview.13:20So we published these findings, and the media are all over it, and they say, Okay, so this is what you do when you go in for the job interview, right? (Laughter) You know, so we were of course horrified, and said, Oh my God, no, no, no, that's not what we meant at all. For numerous reasons, no, no, no, don't do that. Again, this is not about you talking to other people. It's you talking to yourself. What do you do before you go into a job interview? You do this. Right? You're sitting down. You're looking at your iPhone -- or your Android, not trying to leave anyone out. You are, you know, you're looking at your notes, you're hunching up, making yourself small, when really what you should be doing maybe is this, like, in the bathroom, right? Do that. Find two minutes. So that's what we want to test. Okay? So we bring people into a lab, and they do either high- or low-power poses again, they go through a very stressful job interview. It's five minutes long. They are being recorded. They're being judged also, and the judges are trained to give no nonverbal feedback, so they look like this. Like, imagine this is the person interviewing you. So for five minutes, nothing, and this is worse than being heckled. People hate this. It's what Marianne LaFrance calls "standing in social quicksand." So this really spikes your cortisol. So this is the job interview we put them through, because we really wanted to see what happened. We then have these coders look at these tapes, four of them. They're blind to the hypothesis. They're blind to the conditions. They have no idea who's been posing in what pose, and they end up looking at these sets of tapes, and they say, "Oh, we want to hire these people," -- all the high-power posers -- "we don't want to hire these people. We also evaluate these people much more positively overall." But what's driving it? It's not about the content of the speech. It's about the presence that they're bringing to the speech. We also, because we rate them on all these variables related to competence, like, how well-structured is the speech? How good is it? What are their qualifications? No effect on those things. This is what's affected. These kinds of things. People are bringing their true selves, basically. They're bringing themselves. They bring their ideas, but as themselves, with no, you know, residue over them. So this is what's driving the effect, or mediating the effect.15:35So when I tell people about this, that our bodies change our minds and our minds can change our behavior, and our behavior can change our outcomes, they say to me, "I don't -- It feels fake." Right? So I said, fake it till you make it. I don't -- It's not me. I don't want to get there and then still feel like a fraud. I don't want to feel like an impostor. I don't want to get there only to feel like I'm not supposed to be here. And that really resonated with me, because I want to tell you a little story about being an impostor and feeling like I'm not supposed to be here.16:06When I was 19, I was in a really bad car accident. I was thrown out of a car, rolled several times. I was thrown from the car. And I woke up in a head injury rehab ward, and I had been withdrawn from college, and I learned that my I.Q. had dropped by two standard deviations, which was very traumatic. I knew my I.Q. because I had identified with being smart, and I had been called gifted as a child. So I'm taken out of college, I keep trying to go back. They say, "You're not going to finish college. Just,you know, there are other things for you to do, but that's not going to work out for you." So I really struggled with this, and I have to say, having your identity taken from you, your core identity, and for me it was being smart, having that taken from you, there's nothing that leaves you feeling more powerless than that. So I felt entirely powerless. I worked and worked and worked, and I got lucky, and worked, and got lucky, and worked.17:01Eventually I graduated from college. It took me four years longer than my peers, and I convinced someone, my angel advisor, Susan Fiske, to take me on, and so I ended up at Princeton, and I was like, I am not supposed to be here. I am an impostor. And the night before my first-year talk, and the first-year talk at Princeton is a 20-minute talk to 20 people. That's it. I was so afraid of being found out the next day that I called her and said, "I'm quitting." She was like, "You are not quitting, because I took a gamble on you, and you're staying. You're going to stay, and this is what you're going to do. You are going to fake it. You're going to do every talk that you ever get asked to do. You're just going to do it and do it and do it, even if you're terrified and just paralyzed and having an out-of-body experience, until you have this moment where you say, 'Oh my gosh, I'm doing it. Like, I have become this. I am actually doing this.'" So that's what I did. Five years in grad school, a few years, you know, I'm at Northwestern, I moved to Harvard, I'm at Harvard, I'm not really thinking about it anymore, but for a long time I had been thinking, "Not supposed to be here. Not supposed to be here." 18:07So at the end of my first year at Harvard, a student who had not talked in class the entire semester, who I had said, "Look, you've gotta participate or else you're going to fail," came into my office. I really didn't know her at all. And she said, she came in totally defeated, and she said, "I'm not supposed to be here." And that was the moment for me. Because two things happened. One was that I realized, oh my gosh, I don't feel like that anymore. You know. I don't feel that anymore, but she does, and I get that feeling. And the second was, she is supposed to be here! Like, she can fake it, she can become it. So I was like, "Yes, you are! You are supposed to be here! And tomorrow you're going to fake it, you're going to make yourself powerful, and, you know, you're gonna —" (Applause) (Applause) "And you're going to go into the classroom, and you are going to give the best comment ever." You know? And she gave the best comment ever, and people turned around and they were like, oh my God, I didn't even notice her sitting there, you know? (Laughter)19:13She comes back to me months later, and I realized that she had not just faked it till she made it, she had actually faked it till she became it. So she had changed. And so I want to say to you, don't fake it till you make it. Fake it till you become it. You know? It's not —Do it enough until you actually become it and internalize.19:33The last thing I'm going to leave you with is this. Tiny tweaks can lead to big changes. So this is two minutes. Two minutes, two minutes, two minutes. Before you go into the next stressful evaluative situation, for two minutes, try doing this, in the elevator,in a bathroom stall, at your desk behind closed doors. That's what you want to do. Configure your brain to cope the best in that situation. Get your testosterone up. Get your cortisol down. Don't leave that situation feeling like, oh, I didn't show them who I am. Leave that situation feeling like, oh, I really feel like I got to say who I am and show who I am.20:09So I want to ask you first, you know, both to try power posing, and also I want to ask you to share the science, because this is simple. I don't have ego involved in this. (Laughter) Give it away. Share it with people, because the people who can use it the most are the ones with no resources and no technology and no status and no power. Give it to them because they can do it in private. They need their bodies, privacy and two minutes, and it can significantly change the outcomes of their life. Thank you. (Applause) (Applause)中⽂翻译：⾸先我想要提供给你们⼀个免费的⾮科技的⼈⽣窍门你只需这样做改变你的姿势⼆分钟时间但在我要把它告诉你们之前，我想要请你们就你们的⾝体和你们⾝体的⾏为做⼀下⾃我审查那么你们之中有多少⼈正蜷缩着⾃⼰? 或许你现在⼸着背，还翘着⼆郎腿? 或者双臂交叉有时候我们像这样抱住⾃⼰有时候展开双臂(笑声) 我看到你了(笑声) 现在请⼤家专⼼在⾃⼰的⾝上我们等⼀下就会回溯刚刚的事希望你们可以稍微改变⼀下这会让你的⽣活变得很不⼀样0:58所以，我们很真的很执着于肢体语⾔特别是对别⼈的肢体语⾔感兴趣你看，我们对(笑声) 尴尬的互动，或⼀个微笑或轻蔑的⼀瞥，或奇怪的眨眼甚⾄是握⼿之类的事情感兴趣1:22解说员:他们来到了唐宁街10号，看看这个这位幸运的警员可以和美国总统握⼿噢，还有来⾃....的总理?不(笑声) (掌声) (笑声) (掌声)1:37Amy Cuddy:所以⼀个握⼿，或没有握⼿我们都可以⼤聊特聊⼀番即使BBC和纽约时报也不例外我们说到肢体⾏为或肢体语⾔时我们将之归纳为社会科学它就是⼀种语⾔，所以我们会想到沟通当我们想到沟通，我们就想到互动所以你现在的⾝体语⾔正在告诉我什么? 我的⾝体⼜是在向你传达什么?2:04有很多理由让我们相信这些是有效的社会科学家花了很多时间求证肢体语⾔的效果或其它⼈的⾝体语⾔在判断⽅⾯的效应⽽我们环视⾝体语⾔中的讯息做决定和推论这些结论可以预测⽣活中很有意义的结果像是我们雇⽤谁或给谁升职，邀请谁出去约会举例⽽⾔，Tufts⼤学的研究员，Nalini Ambady表⽰⼈们观赏⼀部医⽣和患者互动的30秒⽆声影⽚他们对该医⽣的和善观感可⽤来预测该复健师是否会被告上法庭跟这个医⽣能否胜任⼯作没有太⼤关系重点是我们喜不喜欢他和他们是如何与⼈互动的?进⼀步来说，普林斯顿的Alex Todorov 表⽰我们对政治⼈物脸部的喜好判断⼤概可⽤来对美国参议院和美国州长的竞选结果做70%的预测甚⾄就⽹络上在线聊天时使⽤的表情符号可以帮助你从交谈中得到更多信息所以你千万别弄巧成拙，对吧? 当我们提起肢体语⾔，我们就想到我们如何论断别⼈别⼈如何论断我们以及后果会是什么我们往往忘记这点，受到肢体动作所影响的那群观众就是我们⾃⼰3:31我们也往往受⾃⼰的肢体动作，想法感觉和⼼理所影响所以究竟我说的是怎样的⾮语⾔? 我是⼀位社会⼼理学家，我研究偏见我在⼀所极具竞争⼒的商业学院上课因此⽆可避免地对权⼒动⼒学感到着迷特别是在⾮语⾔表达对权⼒和⽀配的领域3:56权⼒和⽀配的⾮语⾔表达究竟是什么? 嗯，让我细细道来在动物王国⾥，它们和扩张有关所以你尽可能的让⾃⼰变⼤，你向外伸展占满空间，基本上就是展开关于展开，我说真的透视动物世界，这不仅局限于灵长类⼈类也⼲同样的事(笑声) 不论是他们长期掌权或是在某个时间点感到权⼒⾼涨他们都这么做特别有趣的原因是它让我们明⽩权⼒的展现从来是如此地⼀致，不管古今世界这种展现，被认为是⼀种荣耀Jessica Tracy研究表⽰视⼒良好⽆碍和先天视障的⼈在赢得⽐赛时都做了同样的事当他们跨过终点线赢得⽐赛之际⽆论能否看的见他们都做这样的动作双臂呈V字型朝上，下巴微微抬起那我们感到⽆助的时候呢?我们的⾏为正相反我们封闭起来。
莫妮卡。莱温斯基——耻辱的代价(汉语英语对照文本)
莫妮卡·莱温斯基主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价时间：2015年3月19日主办：Ted大会【编者按】以下是澎湃新闻()对莱温斯基演讲内容的翻译：站在你们面前的是一个在大众面前沉默了十年之久的女人。
当然，现在情况不一样了，不过这只是最近发生的事。
莱温斯基参加一次演讲。
网络图片不想回到22岁几个月前，我在《福布斯》杂志举办的“30岁以下”峰会（Under 30 Summit）上发表了首次公开演讲。
现场1500位才华横溢的与会者都不到30岁。
这意味着1998年，他们中最年长的是14岁，而最年轻的只有4岁。
我跟他们开玩笑道，他们中有些人可能只在说唱歌曲里听到过我的名字。
是的，大约有40首说唱歌曲唱过我。
但是，在我演讲当晚，发生了一件令人吃惊的事——我作为一个41岁的女人，被一个27岁的男孩示爱。
我知道，这听上去不太可能对吧？他很迷人，说了很多恭维我的话，然后我拒绝了他。
你知道他为何搭讪失败吗？他说，他可以让我感到又回到了22岁。
后来，那晚我意识到，也许我是年过40岁的女人中唯一一个不想重返22岁的人。
22岁时，我爱上了我的老板；24岁的时，我饱受了这场恋爱带来的灾难性的后果。
现场的观众们，如果你们在22岁的时候没有犯过错，或者没有做过让自己后悔的事，请举起手好吗？是的，和我想的一样。
与我一样，22岁时，你们中有一些人也曾走过弯路，爱上了不该爱的人，也许是你们的老板。
但与我不同的是，你们的老板可能不会是美国总统。
当然，人生充满惊奇。
之后的每一天，我都会想起自己所犯的错误，并为之深深感到后悔。
饱受网络欺凌之苦1998年，在卷入一场不可思议的恋情后，我又被卷入了一场前所未有的政治、法律和舆论漩涡的中心。
记得吗？几年前，新闻一般通过三个途径传播：读报纸杂志、听广播、和看电视，仅此而已。
但我的命运并不是仅此而已。
这桩丑闻是通过数字革命传播的。
这意味着我们可以获取任何我们需要的信息，不论何时何地。
这则新闻在1998年1月爆发时，它也在互联网上火了。
莱温斯基ted经典演讲稿中英文版
莱温斯基(Ted)经典演讲稿（中英文版）Introduction莱温斯基（Ted）是一位备受瞩目的演讲家和领导者，他以他的演讲能力和深入的见解而闻名于世。
他的演讲风格充满激情和力量，能够深入人心，并启发观众。
以下是莱温斯基经典演讲稿的中英文版本。
Ted经典演讲稿（中文版）标题：挑战自我，追求卓越大家好，我感到非常荣幸能够站在这个讲台上与大家分享我的经验和观点。
我曾经历过很多困难和挫折，但正是这些经历塑造了我成为今天的自己。
我们每个人都有追求卓越的欲望，但往往在面对困难和逆境时，我们会放弃自己的梦想。
但事实上，只有通过挑战自我，我们才能够发现自己的潜力和实现我们的目标。
我的人生经历告诉我，成功的关键在于如何应对挑战和逆境。
我们不能逃避困难，而是要积极面对，尽力克服它们。
只有当我们不断挑战自我，突破自己的舒适区，我们才能够成长和取得更大的成功。
我们每个人都有不同的才能和激情，但只有通过不断努力和坚持，我们才能够将这些潜力转化为卓越的成就。
我们要明确自己的目标，并制定合理的计划和策略，为达到目标而努力奋斗。
面对困难时，我们要坚持乐观的心态。
困难并不能击败我们，只有我们自己能够决定是否放弃。
我们要相信自己的能力，坚持自己的梦想。
即使失败了，我们也要从中学习并继续前进。
最后，我希望鼓励大家，在追求卓越的道路上不断挑战自我。
面对困难和逆境时，不要害怕失败，而是要相信自己的能力，坚持奋斗。
只有这样，我们才能够获得真正的成功和满足感。
Ted Classic Speech (English Version)Title: Embrace the Challenge, Pursue ExcellenceHello everyone, I feel incredibly honored to stand on this podium and share my experiences and perspectives with all of you. I have gone through many difficulties and setbacks, but it is these experiences that shaped me into who I am today.We all have the desire to pursue excellence, but often, when faced with challenges and adversities, we give up on our dreams. However, the truth is, it isonly through challenging ourselves that we can discover our potential and achieve our goals.My life experiences have taught me that the key to success lies in how we handle challenges and adversities. We cannot avoid difficulties, but instead, we should face them head-on and strive to overcome them. Only when we constantly challenge ourselves and push beyond our comfort zones can we grow and achieve greater success.Each one of us has different talents and passions, but it is only through continuous effort and perseverance that we can turn these potentials into outstanding achievements. We need to clarify our goals and develop reasonable plans and strategies to work towards them.In the face of difficulties, we should mntn an optimistic mindset. Difficulties cannot defeat us; it is only ourselves who can decide whether to give up or not. We should believe in our abilities and persist in pursuing our dreams. Even in the face of flure, we should learn from it and keep moving forward.Lastly, I want to encourage everyone to constantly challenge themselves in the pursuit of excellence. Do not fear flure when faced with difficulties and adversities;instead, believe in your abilities and persevere. Only then can we achieve true success and fulfillment.Conclusion莱温斯基的演讲意味深长，他鼓励我们要不断挑战自我，追求卓越。
小度写范文莱温斯基TED演讲-来自人生的经验与忏悔 莱温斯基的演讲模板
莱温斯基TED演讲:来自人生的经验与忏悔莱温斯基的演讲You are looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decades. Obviously, that’s changed, but only recently. It was several months ago, that I gave the speech at Forbes 30 under 30 summit, 1,500 pilliant people, all under the age of 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and the youngest ,just 4. I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs. Yes, I’m in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs. But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He could make me feel 22 again. I realized later that night, I’m probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again. At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences. Can I see a show of hands of anyone here who didn’t make a mistake or do something they regretted at 22? Yep. That’s what I thought. So like me, at 22, a few of you may have also taken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person, maybe even your boss. Unlike me, though, your boss probably wasn’t the president of the United States of America. Of course, life is full of surprises. Not a day goes by that I’m not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deeply. In 1998, after having been swept up into an improbable romance, I was then swept up into the eye of political, legal and media maelstrom like we had never seenbefore. Remember, just a few years earlier, news was consumed from just three places: reading a newspaper or magazine, listening to the radio, or watching television. That was it. But that wasn’t my fate. Instead, this scandal was pought to you by the digital revolution. That meant we could access all the information we wanted, when we wanted it, anytime, anywhere, and when the story poke in January 1998, it poke online. It was the first time the traditional news was usurped by the internet for a major news story, a click that reverberated around the world. What that meant for me personally was the overnight I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one worldwide. I was patient zero oflosing a personal reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously. This rush to judgment, enabled by technology, led mobs of virtual stone-throwers. Granted, it was before social media, but people could still comment online, email stories, and of course, email cruel jokes. News sources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers, banner ads online, and to keep people tuned to the TV. Do you recall a particular image of me, say, wearing a beret? But the attention and judgment that Ireceived, not the story, but that I personally received, was unprecedented.I was panded as a tramp, tart, whore, bimbo, and, of course, that woman.I was seen by many but actually known by few. And I get it: it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional had a soul, and was once unpoken. When this happened to me 17 years ago, there was no name for it. Now we callit cyberbullying and online harassment. Today, I want to share some of my experience with you, talk about how that experience has helped shape my cultural observations, and how I hope my past experience can lead to a change that results in less suffering for others. In1998, I lost my reputation and my dignity. I lost almost everything, and I almost lost my life. Let me paint a picture for you. It is September of 1998. I’m sitting in a windowless office room inside the Office of the Independent Counsel underneath humming fluorescent lights. I’m listening to the sound of my voice, my voice on surreptitiously taped phone calls that a supposed friend had made the year before. I’m here because I’ve been legally required to personally authenticate all 20 hours of taped conversation. For the past eight months, the mysterious content of these tapes has hung like the Sword of Damocles over my head. I mean, who can remember what they said a year ago? Scared and mortified, I listen, listen as I prattle on about the flotsam and jetsam of the day; listen as I confess my love for the president, and of course, my heartpeak; listen to my sometimes catty, sometimes churlish, sometimes silly self being cruel, unforgiving, uncouth; listen, deeply, deeply ashamed, to the worst version of myself, a self I don ’t even recognize. A few days later, the Starr Report is released the congress, and all of those tapes and transcripts, those stolen words, from a part of it. That people can read the transcripts ishorrific enough, but a few weeks later, the audio tapes are aired on TV,and significant portions made available online. The public humiliation was excruciating. Life was almost unbearable. This was not something that happened with regularity back then 1998, and by this, I mean the stealing of people’sprivate words, actions, conversations or photos, and making them public—public without consent, public without context, and public without compassion. Fast forward 12 years to 2010, and now social media has been born. The landscape has sadly become much more populated with instances like mine, whether or not someone actually make a mistake, and now it’s for both public and private people. The consequences for some have become dire, very dire. I was on the phone with my mom in September of 2010, and we were talking about the news of a young college freshman from Rutgers University named Tyler Clementi. A sweet sensitive, creative Tyler was secretly webcam med by his roommate while being intimate with another man. When the online world learned of this incident, the ridicule and cyberbullying ignited. A few days later, Tyler jumped from the George Washington Bridge to his death. He was 18. My mom was beside herself about what happened to Tyler and his family, and she was gutted with pain in a way that I just couldn’t quite understand, and then eventually I realized she was reliving 1998, reliving a time when she sat by my bed every night, (sorry) reliving a time when she made me shower with a bathroom door open and reliving a time when both of my parents feared that I would be humiliated to death, literally. Today, too manyparents haven’t had the chance to step in and rescue their loved ones. Too many have learned of their child ’s suffering and humiliation after it was too late. Tyler’s tragic, senseless death was a turning point for me. It served to recontextualize my experiences, and I began to look at the world of humiliation and bullying around me and see something different. In 1998, we had no way of knowing where this pave new technology called the internet would take us. Since then, it hasconnected people in unimaginable ways, joining lost siblings, saving lives, launching revolutions, but the darkness, cyberbullying, and slut-shaming that I experienced had mushroomed. Every day on line, people, especially young people who are not developmentally equipped to handle this, are so abused and humiliated that they can’t imagine living to the next day, and some, tragically, don’t, and there’s nothing virtual about that. Child Line, a UK nonprofit that’s focused on helping young people on various issues, released a staggering statistic late last year: from 2012 to 2013, there was an 87 percent increase in calls and emails related to cyberbullying.A meta-analysis done out of the Netherlands showed that for the first time, cyberbullying was leading to suicidal ideations more significantly than offline bullying. And you know what shocked me, although it shouldn’t have, was other research last year that determined humiliation was more intensely felt emotion than either happiness or even anger. Cruelty to others is nothing new, but online, technologically enhanced shaming is amplified,uncontained, and permanently accessible. The echo of embarrassment used to extend only as far as your family, village, school or community, but now it’s the online community too. Millions of people, often anonymously, can stab you with their words, and that’s a lot of pain, and there are no perimeters around how many people can publicly observe you and put you in a public stockade. There is a very personal price to public humiliation, and the growth of the internet has jacked up that price. For nearly two decades now, we have slowly been sowing the seeds of shame and public humiliation in our cultural soil, both on-and offline. Gossip websites, paparazzi, reality programming, politics, news outlets and sometimes hackers all traffic in shame. It’s led to desensitization and a permissive environment online which lends itself to trolling, invasion of privacy, and cyberbullying. This shift has created what professor Nicolaus Mills calls a culture of humiliation. Consider a few prominent examples just from the past six months alone. Snapchat, the service which is used mainly by younger generations and claims that its messages only have the lifespan of a few seconds. You can imagine the range of content that gets. A third-party app which Snapchatters use to preserve the lifespan of the messages was hacked, and 100,000 personal conversations, photos, and videos were leaked online to now have a lifespan of forever. Jennifer Lawrence and several other actors had their iCloud accounts hacked, and private, nude photos were plastered across the internet without their permission. One gossip website had overfive million hits for this one story. And what about the Sony Pictures cyberhacking? The documents which received the most attention were private emails that had maximum public embarrassment value. But in this culture of humiliation, there is another kind of price tag attached to public shaming. The price doesnot measure the cost to the victim, which Tyler and too many others, notably women, minorities and members of the LGBTQ community have paid, but the price measures that profit of those who prey on them. This invasion of others is a raw material, efficiently and ruthlessly mined, packaged and sold at a profit. A marketplace has emerged where public humiliation is a commodity and shame is an industry. How is the money made? Clicks. The more shame, the more clicks. the more clicks, the more advertising dollars. We’re in a dangerous cycle. The more we click on this kind of gossip, the more numb we get to the human lives behind it, and the more numb we get, the more we click. All the while, someone is making money off the back of someone else’s suffering. With every click, we make a choice. The more we saturate our culture with public shaming, the more accepted it is, the more we will see behavior like cyberbullying, trolling, some forms of hacking, and online harassment. Why? Because they all have humiliation at their cores. This behavior is a symptom of the culture we’ve created. Just think about it. Changing behavior begins with evolving beliefs. We’ve seen that to be true with racism, homophobia, and plenty of other biases, today and in the past.As we ’ve changed beliefs about same-sex marriage, more people have been offered equal freedoms. When we began valuing sustainability, more people began to recycle. So as far as our culture of humiliation goes, what we need is a cultural revolution. Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop, and it’s time for an intervention on the internet and in our culture. The shift begins with something simple, but it’s not easy. We need to return to long-held value of compassion and empathy. Online, we ’ve got a compassion deficit, an empathy crisis. researcher Brenna Brown said, I quote:“shame can ’t survive empathy.“ shame cannot survive empathy. I’ve seen some very dark days in my life, and it was the compassion and empathy from my family, friends, professionals, and sometimes even strangers that saved me. Even empathy from one person can make a difference. The theory of minority influence, proposed by social psychologist Serge Moscovici, says that even in smallnumbers, when there’s consistency over time, change can happen. In the online world, we can foster minority influence by becoming upstanders. To become an upstander apathy, we can post a positive comment for someone or report a bullying situation. Trust me, compassionate comment help abate the negativity. We can also counteract the culture by supporting organizations that deal with these kinds of issues, like the Tyler Clementi foundation in the US. In the UK, there’s anti-bullying pro, and in Australia, there’s project rockit. We talk a lot about our right to freedom of expression,but we need to talk more about our responsibility to freedom of expression. We all want to be heard, but let ’s acknowledge the difference between speaking up with intention and speaking up for attention. The internet is the superhighway for the id, but online, showing empathy to others benefits us all and helps create a safer and better world. We need to communicate online with compassion, consume news with compassion, and click with compassion. Just imagine walking a mile in someone else’s headline. I’d like to end on a personal note. In the past nine months, the question I’ve been asked the most is why. Why now? why was I sticking my head above the parapet? You can read between the lines in those questions, and the answer has nothing to do with politics. The top note answer was and is because it’s time: time to stop tip-toeing around my past; time to stop living a life of oppropium; and time to take back my narrative. It’s also not just about saving myself. Anyone who is suffering from shame and public humiliation needs to know one thing: you can survive it. I know it’s hard. It may not be painless, quick or easy, but you can insist on a different ending to your story. Have compassion for yourself. We all deserve compassion, and to live both online and off in a more compassionate world. Thank you for listening.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The price of shame主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价You're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a de cade. Obviously, that's changed, but only recently.站在你们面前的是一个在大众面前沉默了十年之久的女人。
当然，现在情况不一样了，不过这只是最近发生的事。
It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at the Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brillian t people, all under the age of 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and the youngest, just four. I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs. Yes, I'm in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs.几个月前，我在《福布斯》杂志举办的“30岁以下”峰会（Under 30 Summit）上发表了首次公开演讲。
现场1500位才华横溢的与会者都不到30岁。
这意味着1998年，他们中最年长的是14岁，而最年轻的只有4岁。
我跟他们开玩笑道，他们中有些人可能只在说唱歌曲里听到过我的名字。
是的，大约有40首说唱歌曲唱过我。
But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declin ed. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He c ould make me feel 22 again. I realized later that night, I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again. 但是，在我演讲当晚，发生了一件令人吃惊的事——我作为一个41岁的女人，被一个27岁的男孩示爱。
我知道，这听上去不太可能对吧？他很迷人，说了很多恭维我的话，然后我拒绝了他。
你知道他为何搭讪失败吗？他说，他可以让我感到又回到了22岁。
后来，那晚我意识到，也许我是年过40岁的女人中唯一一个不想重返22岁的人。
At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences. Can I s ee a show of hands of anyone here who didn't make a mis take or do something they regretted at 22? Yep.That's what I thought.So like me, at 22, a few of you may have also t aken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person, maybe even your boss. Unlike me, though, your boss proba bly wasn't the president of the United States of America. Of course, life is full of surprises.Not a day goes by that I'm not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deep ly. 22岁时，我爱上了我的老板；24岁的时，我饱受了这场恋爱带来的灾难性的后果。
现场的观众们，如果你们在22岁的时候没有犯过错，或者没有做过让自己后悔的事，请举起手好吗？是的，和我想的一样。
与我一样，22岁时，你们中有一些人也曾走过弯路，爱上了不该爱的人，也许是你们的老板。
但与我不同的是，你们的老板可能不会是美国总统。
当然，人生充满惊奇。
之后的每一天，我都会想起自己所犯的错误，并为之深深感到后悔。
In 1998, after having been swept up into an improbable r omance, I was then swept up into the eye of a political, le gal and media maelstrom like we had never seen before. R emember, just a few years earlier,news was consumed from just three places: reading a newspaper or magazine, listeni ng to the radio, or watching television. That was it. But that wasn't my fate. Instead, this scandal was brought to you b y the digital revolution. That meant we could access all the information we wanted, when we wanted it, anytime, anywh ere, and when the story broke in January 1998, it broke onli ne. It was the first time the traditional news was usurped by the Internet for a major news story, a click that reverberate d around the world. 饱受网络欺凌之苦1998年，在卷入一场不可思议的恋情后，我又被卷入了一场前所未有的政治、法律和舆论漩涡的中心。
记得吗？几年前，新闻一般通过三个途径传播：读报纸杂志、听广播、和看电视，仅此而已。
但我的命运并不是仅此而已。
这桩丑闻是通过数字革命传播的。
这意味着我们可以获取任何我们需要的信息，不论何时何地。
这则新闻在1998年1月爆发时，它也在互联网上火了。
这是互联网第一次在重大新闻事件报道中超越了传统媒体。
只要轻点一下鼠标，就会在全世界引起反响。
What that meant for me personally was that overnight I w ent from being a completely private figure to a publicly hum iliated one worldwide. I was patient zero of losing a persona l reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously. This rush to judgment, enabled by technology, led to mobs of v irtual stone-throwers. Granted, it was before social media, b ut people could still comment online, email stories, and, of course, email cruel jokes. News sources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers, banner ads online, and to keep people tuned to the TV. Do you recall a particular ima ge of me, say, wearing a beret? 对我个人而言，这则新闻让我一夜之间从一个无名小卒变成了全世界人民公开羞辱的对象。
我成了第一个经历在全世界范围内名誉扫地的“零号病人”。
科技是这场草率审判的始作俑者，无数暴民向我投掷石块。
当然，那时还没有社交媒体，但人们依然可以在网上发表评论，通过电子邮件传播新闻和残酷的玩笑。
新闻媒体贴满了我的照片，借此来兜售报纸，为网页吸引广告商，提高电视收视率。
记得当时的那张照片吗？我戴着贝雷帽的照片。
Now, I admit I made mistakes, especially wearing that ber et. But the attention and judgment that I received, not the s tory, but that I personally received, was unprecedented. I w as branded as a tramp, tart, slut, whore, bimbo, and, of c ourse, that woman. I was seen by many but actually known by few. And I get it: it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional, had a soul, and was once unbroken. 现在，我承认我犯了错，特别是不该戴那顶贝雷帽。
但是，除了事件本身，我因此受到的关注和审判是前所未有的。
我被贴上“淫妇”、“妓女”，“荡妇”，“婊子”，“蠢女人”的标签，当然，还有“那个女人”。
许多人看到了我，但很少有人真正了解我。
对此我表示理解，因为人们很容易忘记“那个女人”也是一个活生生的人，她也有灵魂，她也曾过着平静的生活。