[经验心得 ] 15考研英语一94分经验分享1剖析

合集下载

6份考研英语高分获得者经验贴(含92分高人分享)

6份考研英语高分获得者经验贴(含92分高人分享)

英语经验贴:(1)76分:首先说明,lz的英语并不是很好,在这篇帖子中,我主要想说下自己学习英语过程中的感受,并对用书和学习方法做一个归纳!(本系列的其他帖子请见本文最后!)英语是一个让人比较头疼的科目,你很努力的去学习它,但是呢,分数不会比提高很多,也即是说投入产出的性价比不是很高。

如果你对它简直没有兴趣,从而花很少的时间去学习它,那么,你最后有可能会遭遇英语单科不过线的尴尬。

所以,对于英语的学习,我自己的理解是:每天都要去学,但是,学习时间小于数学和专业课(这在分值上也是讲得通的)。

前期(9月20号以前)复习时间多一些(因为那时候还没有开始复习政治),后期(9月20号以后)复习时间少一些(因为这时候要分时间去给政治了),但是,要保证每天都要学英语,因为,在英语的学习过程中,一天不学,倒退两天,这句话是很有道理的!下面来具体说下!一、单词问题所谓“考研不至,单词不止”。

这句话是非常正确的,言下之意就是要我们每天都坚持背背单词,花些时间在英语上!而且,背单词是苦力活,是最没有技巧性可言的(尤其是第一遍背单词)!说到这里,要澄清一个困扰许多朋友问题!也即,有没有必要买单词书来背?如果买的话,买什么单词书才好?(因为论坛上有些经验贴说可以只背真题中出现的单词,而没有必要买单词书)我的答案是:很有必要买单词书来背单词,而且真题中出现的不认识的单词也要背!因为我在一战时,就只背了真题中出现的不认识的单词,而没有背单词书,这就造成了我后来学习英语,因为单词贫乏从而做阅读力不从心!所以我二战时就老老实实的背了21遍单词书,并且也背了10多遍历年真题里面的不认识的单词,这对我最后去参加2013的考研是很有帮助的,因为单词量足够了,心里是不发慌的,至少阅读是这样的!所以,单词书你实际上是应该有两本的,第一本是单纯的单词书,第二本是你在真题中找到的不认识的单词的整合(你可以用一个小本子把你在真题中不认识的单词全部抄写下来,然后进行背诵,也可以在真题书的疑难单词后面进行标注和补充出自己不认识的单词,然后进行背诵)至于单词书,可以选择的有很多种。

一个学渣的考研英语一75分是怎样炼成的

一个学渣的考研英语一75分是怎样炼成的

一个学渣的考研英语一75分是怎样炼成的一个学渣的考研英语一75分是怎样炼成的俗话说,基础不牢,地动山摇。

考研英语如何复习,要想取得高分,必须首先打好基础,即要重视词汇和语法的学习。

否则在做考研真题时会遇到诸多问题,比如阅读和翻译时对许多单词感到陌生,不了解句子结构及相互间关系,读不懂文章大意;写作时不知如何用词,语法使用错误;等等。

对于如何复习考研英语,作为一名英语基础比较薄弱的考生,这些问题我都遇到过。

因此,在刚开始复习考研英语时,我下定决心要在词汇和语法这两方面有所提高。

我买了专门的词汇书和语法书进行学习,每天花费大把时间背诵单词和学习语法知识,但这种填鸭式的学习方法并没有多大的成效,往往今天记住的单词或语法,过几天就忘得一干二净,甚至产生混淆,这使我非常苦恼。

在多位硕士师兄师姐的建议下,我尝试着把词汇和语法的复习纳入到真题语境当中去,通过逐句突破真题文章中的词汇和语法,来达到利用真题语境来迅速夯实英语基础的目的。

以下我以考研英语真题书《考研真相》和《历年考研英语(一)真题·汇编王》两本书为范例,给大伙详细讲讲我的复习规划和过程。

《考研真相》逐词逐句解析历年真题,专为基础薄弱者编著,很适合我这种情况。

《历年考研英语(一)真题·汇编王》一书收题全面,很适合后期练习使用。

针对《考研真相》和《历年考研英语(一)真题·汇编王》这两本书的特点,我将复习备考分为以下三个阶段:第一阶段,着重学习词汇和语法(3-6月)。

其定位在原文中,从而在四个选项中选出正确答案,之后将干扰项回文定位,与文章原文中的相关信息进行比较分析,找出错误原因,以此达到辨别真伪,去伪取真的目的。

第二,翻译:翻译的最大困惑在于不知道自己翻译出来的句子在多大程度上达到了考试的要求,如何才能最大限度的获取该项的分数。

《考研真相》所采用的“常规译文+升级译文”模式非常有效。

升级译文相较于常规译文在选词和句式结构上有所提升,我可以通过观察两种层次译文之间的联系和发展,明确改进方向和增分亮点,提升自己的翻译水平。

考研英语高分经验分享

考研英语高分经验分享

考研英语高分经验分享在考研备考过程中,英语科目一直是令很多考生头疼的一门科目。

不过,通过总结一些高分经验,我们可以帮助考生更好地应对考研英语,为高分打下基础。

本文将分享一些考研英语高分经验,希望对考生有所帮助。

1. 备考资料的准备备考英语科目首先要明确教材参考书及资料,充分了解考试大纲。

在备考过程中,可以选择一本权威的考研英语教材,并在此基础上进行扩展阅读。

此外,还可以下载一些考研英语词汇的APP,每天背诵一些单词,提高词汇量。

2. 阅读理解的答题技巧考研英语阅读理解占据了一大部分分数,因此需要掌握一些答题技巧。

首先,仔细阅读题目,明确主旨和题目要求。

其次,可以采取先读问题后读文章的方法,这样能够更快地找到答案。

另外,注意文章的段落结构,了解段落间的逻辑关系,对理解整篇文章有帮助。

3. 写作技巧的掌握写作是考研英语中另一个重要的环节。

在写作方面,可以先确立写作思路,构建一个中心论点,然后通过举例、对比等方式进行论证,最后做出结论。

此外,注意语法和拼写的正确性,避免因此而丢分。

4. 听力技巧的培养考研英语听力对于不少考生来说也是一大难题。

在备考过程中,可以通过听英语音频和视频进行训练,提高听力技巧和听力反应速度。

同时,关注提问的方式和常见的考点,为听力理解做好准备。

5. 作文的积累与练习考研英语作文是一个能够展示考生英语综合能力的环节。

为了提高作文能力,可以多读英语文章,积累写作素材。

同时,可以通过练习写作,提高写作速度与语言表达能力。

在写作过程中,注意论据的充分性、结构的合理性和逻辑的连贯性。

6. 考前的冲刺与复习考研英语是需要在长期复习基础上进行冲刺的科目,因此在考前需要有针对性地进行复习。

可以根据往年的真题进行针对性复习,了解考点和出题方式。

此外,可以参加一些模拟考试,模拟考试的环境能够帮助考生适应考试的紧张氛围。

综上所述,考研英语高分并非没有捷径可循。

通过充分准备备考资料,掌握阅读理解的答题技巧,熟悉写作技巧,培养听力技巧,加强作文练习并实施考前冲刺与复习,考生可以在英语科目上取得较好的成绩。

基础一般、考研英语75分者的经验 (1)

基础一般、考研英语75分者的经验 (1)

考研英语是个非常独特的考试,考研英语考的并不是你的英语水平有多好,而是你多会做考研英语的卷子。

我英语从高考就是拖我后腿的,高考103,四级437,六级428,考级都是突击和报班过的。

考研能考这么多,有一半是水平确实有提高,毕竟我准备了几乎1年,另一半我个人认为是我掌握了考研英语的方法。

写下与各位共享,希望能对你有所帮助。

申明,我是报了全程辅导班,也看过别的老师的视频和讲座,某些理论不是我在瞎扯,确实是老师所讲,我个人觉得有用摘录下来而已,信者自信,不信者我不强求。

我不是来炫耀的,我不会留联系方式,且这没有什么好炫耀的。

我只是想给基础一般的同学一些我个人的帮助,仅此而已。

如果你不信,右上角有个看着很舒服的键,按下即可。

考研英语和六级考试的区别我个人理解是这样,研究生英语注重的是你阅读外文文献获取信息的能力,所以他没有听力,词汇量不大、不偏,但是单词挖的很深,一词多义司空见惯,长难句极多,且极注重考你逻辑思维和辨析能力。

1.词汇相比六级来说,他的词汇量没有大量增加,基本就增加了1000多个词汇,但他的难点在于考一词多义。

举个典型例子,某年阅读真题第2段段首主题句“the full import may take a while to sink in。

”就这么单独一句,前后没有联系。

基本上这句读懂2分到手,读不懂2分没有。

你翻译成什么?“全部的进口需要一些时间来沉没”?很好,你达到了六级水准,但是考研你这样翻就毁了。

他的意思是:“它全部的含义需要一段时间才能为人们所理解。

”就是import和sink 这两个“熟悉的陌生人”给你制造了难度,而这种情况比比皆是,所以词汇关是大家必须首先突破的,并且要注意他与六级的区别。

2长难句相比六级,六级要求快速阅读,而考研要求精确阅读,需要你将阅读速度慢下来。

考研英语的长难句非常之多,基本占到阅读文章的一半,而翻译考的基本就是长难句找出成分正确组合以及某些单词的适宜的中文表达。

考研英语复习心得经验分享

考研英语复习心得经验分享

考研英语复习心得经验分享考研英语是考研中比较重要的一门科目,英语试卷总分40分,这一部分的分值不少,一定程度上影响整个考试的成绩。

因此,考研英语复习至关重要。

在考研英语的学习过程中,我积累了一些心得经验,现在分享给大家。

1. 切忌盲目追求词汇量词汇量在考研英语中很重要,但是,盲目地堆积词汇不但效率低,且忽略了语言应用能力。

要想在考研英语中取得优异的成绩,必须掌握一定的词汇量,但是也不能停留在被动背诵的阶段,而要通过看相关文献,看英语新闻、电影等,做听力、口语的练习来增强语言运用能力,这样才能更好地应付英语的考试。

2. 了解题型及考试策略在开始考研英语复习前,一定要了解题型及考试策略,从而制定出适合自己的复习计划。

首先要熟悉英语专业考试分为两个部分,听力+阅读和翻译。

在复习听力+阅读部分时,要注意听力理解及阅读理解的技巧,例如,了解常见的考试形式如单选、六选二等,学会快速定位信息,从而在极短的时间内找到答案。

在复习翻译部分时,不但要注意语言的正确性,还要着重考虑语言风格和表达的方式,需要注重平时翻译的练习。

3. 定时练习英语题目英语听力和阅读的能力是平时积累起来,需要不断的练习,因此我们要尽可能地找到与考试类似题目做题。

目前市面上有不少考研英语试题资源,可以进行大量练习。

对于阅读交叉题和听力部分,我们可以使用家长、老师、同学们的帮助,让他们为我们快速读入内容,并随后进行提问,这样既可以提高我们的理解能力,又可以快速锻炼出我们的英语水平。

4. 听力练习因为很多同学英语听力不够,因此需要将听英语电影等英语材料作为日常耳濡目染的过程中。

在英语听力的练习过程中,最好是在听到整句话之前就能猜出大意的能力。

因为英语口音是我们学习英语的一个难点,如果口音较好,听英语比较流利,那么我们也会更好地掌握英语。

5. 阅读练习在阅读的速度和理解力上,很多同学都存在着问题。

为了解决这个问题,我们需要一方面提高自己对英语的阅读速度和流畅度,另一方面则是要提高自己对知识点的理解能力和扩充自己的阅读量,即通过进行大量阅读,加强英语阅读和理解能力。

2015年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题及答案详细解析

2015年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题及答案详细解析

2015年全国硕士研究生考试英语(一)试题考试时长:180分钟总分:100分Section I Use of English :Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B,C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as ―related‖ as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, ―Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.‖The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_‖functional Kinship‖ of being friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people‘s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what2. [A] defended [B] concluded [C] withdrawn [D] advised3. [A] for [B] with [C] on [D] by4. [A] compared [B] sought [C] separated [D] connected5. [A] tests [B] objects [C]samples [D] examples6. [A] insignificant [B] unexpected [C]unbelievable [D] incredible7. [A] visit [B] miss [C] seek [D] know8. [A] resemble [B] influence [C] favor [D] surpass9. [A] again [B] also [C] instead [D] thus10. [A] Meanwhile [B] Furthermore [C] Likewise [D] Perhaps11. [A] about [B] to [C]from [D]like12. [A] drive [B] observe [C] confuse [D]limit13. [A] according to [B] rather than [C] regardless of [D] along with14. [A] chances [B]responses [C]missions [D]benefits15. [A] later [B]slower [C] faster [D] earlier16. [A]forecast [B]remember [C]understand [D]express17. [A] unpredictable [B]contributory [C] controllable [D] disruptive18. [A] endeavor [B]decision [C]arrangement [D] tendency19. [A] political [B] religious [C] ethnic [D] economic20. [A] see [B] show [C] prove [D] tellSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted ―kings don‘t abdicate, they dare in their sleep.‖ Bu t embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyle?The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, mona rchs can rise above ―mere‖ politics and ―embody‖ a spirit of national unity.It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs‘ continuing popularity polarized. And also, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today –embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.While Europe‘s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example.It is only the Queen who h as preserved the monarchy‘s reputation with her rather ordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service –as non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy‘s worst enemies.21. According to the first two Paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spain[A] used turn enjoy high public support[B] was unpopular among European royals[C] cased his relationship with his rivals[D]ended his reign in embarrassment22. Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly[A] owing to their undoubted and respectable status[B] to achieve a balance between tradition and reality[C] to give voter more public figures to look up to[D]due to their everlasting political embodiment23. Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?[A] Aristocrats‘ excessive reliance on inherited wealth[B] The role of the nobility in modern democracies[C] The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families[D]The nobility‘s adherence to their privileges24. The British royals ―have most to fear‖ because Charles[A] takes a rough line on political issues[B] fails to change his lifestyle as advised[C] takes republicans as his potential allies[D] fails to adapt himself to his future role25. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined[B] Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the Throne[C] Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs[D]Charles, Slow to React to the Coming ThreatsText 2Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California‘s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California‘s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information —is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect‘s purse. The court has ruled that police don‘t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one‘s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee‘s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of ―cloud computing,‖ meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution‘s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is th e case, stating that principle doesn‘t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California‘s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution‘s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to[A] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.[B] search for suspects‘ mobile phones without a warrant.[C] check sus pects‘ phone contents without being authorized.[D]prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.27. The author‘s attitude toward California‘s argument is one of[A] disapproval.[B] indifference.[C] tolerance.[D]cautiousness.28. The a uthor believes that exploring one‘s phone contents is comparable to[A] getting into one‘s residence.[B] handling one‘s historical records.[C] scanning one‘s correspondences.[D] going through one‘s wallet.29. In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that[A] principles are hard to be clearly expressed.[B] the court is giving police less room for action.[C] citizens‘ privacy is not effectively protected.[D] phones are used to store sensitive information.30. Orin Kerr‘s c omparison is quoted to indicate that[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.[B] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.[C]California‘s argument violates principles of the Constitution.[D]principles of the Constitution should never be alteredText 3The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.―Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,‖ writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal‘s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: ―The creation of the ‗statistics board‘ was motivated by concerns br oadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science‘s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.‖Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group. He says he expects the board to ―play primarily an advisory role.‖ He agreed to join because he ―found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.‖John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the polic y is ―a most welcome step forward‖ and ―long overdue.‖ ―Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,‖ he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, ―engaging reviewe rs who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process‖. V aux says that Science‘s idea to pass some papers to statisticians ―has some merit, but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‗the papers that need scrutiny‘ inthe first place‖.31. It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that[A] Science intends to simplify their peer-review process.[B] journals are strengthening their statistical checks.[C] few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.[D] lack of data analysis is common in research projects.32. The phrase ―flagged up‖ (Para. 2) is the closest in meaning to[A] found.[B] marked.[C] revised.[D] stored.33. Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may[A] pose a threat to all its peers.[B] meet with strong opposition.[C] increase Science‘s circulation.[D]set an example for other journals.34. David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now[A] adds to researchers‘ workload.[B] diminishes the role of reviewers.[C] has room for further improvement.[D]is to fail in the foreseeable future35. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers.[B] Professional Statisticians Deserve More Respect[C] Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors‘ Desks[D] Statisticians Are Coming Back with ScienceText 4Two years ago, Rupert Murdoch‘s daughter ,Elisabeth ,spoke of the ―unsettling dearth of integrity across so many of our institutions‖ Integrity had collapsed, she argued, because of a collective acceptance that the only ―sorting mechanism ‖in society should be profit and the market .But ―it‘s us ,human beings ,we the people who create the society we want ,not pr ofit ‖.Driving her point home, she continued: ―It‘s increasingly apparent that the absence of purpose, of a moral language within government, media or business could become one of the most dangerous foals for capitalism and freedom.‖ This same absence o f moral purpose was wounding companies such as News International ,shield thought ,making it more likely that it would lose its way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking .As the hacking trial concludes –finding guilty ones-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones ,and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge –the winder issue of dearth of integrity still standstill, Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people .This is hacking on an industrial scale ,as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This long story still unfolds.In many respects, the dearth of moral purpose frames not only the fact of such widespread phone hacking but the terms on which the trial took place .One of the astonishing revelations was how little Rebekah Brooks knew of what went on in her newsroom, wow little she thought to ask and the fact that she never inquired wow the stories arrived. The core of her successful defence was that she knew nothing.In today‘s world, title has become normal that well—paid executives should not be accountable for whathappens in the organizations that they run perhaps we should not be so surprised. For a generation, the collective doctrine has been that the sorting mechanism of society should be profit. The words that have mattered are efficiency, flexibility, shareholder value, business–friendly, wealth generation, sales, impact and, in newspapers, circulation. Words degraded to the margin have been justice fairness, tolerance, proportionality and accountability.The purpose of editing the News of the World was not to promote reader understanding to be fair in what was written or to betray any common humanity. It was to ruin lives in the quest for circulation and impact. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions about how her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave no instructions—nor received traceable, recorded answers.36. According to the first two paragraphs, Elisabeth was upset by[A] the consequences of the current sorting mechanism[B] companies‘ financial loss due to immoral practices.[C] governmental ineffectiveness on moral issues.[D]the wide misuse of integrity among institutions.37. It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 that[A] Glem Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crime[B] more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.[C] Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.[D] phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.38. The author believes the Rebekah Books‘s deference[A] revealed a cunning personality[B] centered on trivial issues[C] was hardly convincing[D] was part of a conspiracy39. The author holds that the current collective doctrine shows[A] generally distorted values[B] unfair wealth distribution[C] a marginalized lifestyle[D] a rigid moral cote40. Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?[A] The quality of writing is of primary importance.[B] Common humanity is central news reporting.[C] Moral awareness matters in exciting a newspaper.[D] Journalists need stricter industrial regulations.Part BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the fist A-G to fit into each of the numbered blanks. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points) How does your reading proceed? Clearly you try to comprehend, in the sense of identifying meanings for individual words and working out relationships between them, drawing on your explicit knowledge of English grammar (41) ______you begin to infer a context for the text, for instance, by making decisions about what kind of speech event is involved: who is making the utterance, to whom, when and where.The ways of reading indicated here are without doubt kinds of of comprehension. But they show comprehension to consist not just passive assimilation but of active engagement inference and problem-solving. You infer information you feel the writer has invited you to grasp by presenting you with specific evidence and cues (42) _______Conceived in this way, comprehension will not follow exactly the same track for each reader. What is in question is not the retrieval of an absolute, fixed or ―true‖ meaning that can be read off and clocked for accuracy, or some timeless relation of the text to the world. (43) _______Such backgrou nd material inevitably reflects who we are, (44) _______This doesn‘t, however, make interpretation merely relative or even pointless. Precisely because readers from different historical periods, places and social experiences produce different but overlapping readings of the same words on the page-including for texts that engage with fundamental human concerns-debates about texts can play an important role in social discussion of beliefs and values.How we read a given text also depends to some extent on our particular interest in reading it. (45)_______such dimensions of read suggest-as others introduced later in the book will also do-that we bring an implicit (often unacknowledged) agenda to any act of reading. It doesn‘t then necessarily follow that one kind of reading is fuller, more advanced or more worthwhile than another. Ideally, different kinds of reading inform each other, and act as useful reference points for and counterbalances to one another. Together, they make up the reading component of your overall literacy or relationship to your surrounding textual environment.[A] Are we studying that text and trying to respond in a way that fulfils the requirement of a given course? Reading it simply for pleasure? Skimming it for information? Ways of reading on a train or in bed are likely to differ considerably from reading in a seminar room.[B] Factors such as the place and period in which we are reading, our gender ethnicity, age and social class will encourage us towards certain interpretation but at the same time obscure or even close off others.[C] If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using clues presented in the contest. On the assumption that they will become relevant later, you make a mental note of discourse entities as well as possible links between them.[D]In effect, you try to reconstruct the likely meanings or effects that any given sentence, image or reference might have had: These might be the ones the author intended.[E]You make further inferences, for instance, about how the test may be significant to you, or about its validity—inferences that form the basis of a personal response for which the author will inevitably be far less responsible.[F]In plays,novels and narrative poems, characters speak as constructs created by the author, not necessarily as mouthpieces for the author‘s own thoughts.[G]Rather, we ascribe meanings to test on the basis of interaction between what we might call textual and contextual material: between kinds of organ ization or patterning we perceive in a text‘s formal structures (so especially its language structures) and various kinds of background, social knowledge, belief and attitude that we bring to the text.Section III TranslationDirections:Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Within the span of a hundred years, in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, a tide of emigration—one of the great folk wanderings of history—swept from Europe to America. 46) This movement, driven by powerful and diverse motivations, built a nation out of a wilderness and, by its nature, shaped the character and destiny of an uncharted continent.47) The United States is the product of two principal forces-the immigration of European peoples with their varied ideas, customs, and national characteristics and the impact of a new country which modified these traits. Of necessity, colonial America was a projection of Europe. Across the Atlantic came successive groups of Englishmen,Frenchmen, Germans, Scots, Irishmen, Dutchmen, Swedes, and many others who attempted to transplant their habits and traditions to the new world.48) But, the force of geographic conditions peculiar to America, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes. These changes were gradual and at first scarcely visible. But the result was a new social pattern which, although it resembled European society in many ways, had a character that was distinctly American.49) The first shiploads of immigrants bound for the territory which is now the United States crossed the Atlantic more than a hundred years after the 15th- and 16th-century explorations of North America. In the meantime, thriving Spanish colonies had been established in Mexico, the West Indies, and South America. These travelers to North America came in small, unmercifully overcrowded craft. During their six- to twelve-week voyage, they subsisted on barely enough food allotted to them. Many of the ship were lost in storms, many passengers died of disease, and infants rarely survived the journey. Sometimes storms blew the vessels far off their course, and often calm brought unbearably long delay.―To the anxious travelers the sight of the American shore brought almost inexpressible relief.‖ said one recorder of events, ―The air at twelve leagues‘ distance smelt as sweet as a new-blown garden.‖ The colonists‘ first glimpse of the new land was a sight of dense woods. 50) The virgin forest with its richness and variety of trees was a veritable real treasure-house which extended from Maine all the way down to Georgia. Here was abundant fuel and lumber. Here was the raw material of houses and furniture, ships and potash, dyes and naval stores.Section IV WritingPart A51. Directions:You are going to host a club reading session. Write an email of about 100 words recommending a book to the club members.You should state reasons for your recommendation.You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use Li Ming instead.Do not write the address. (10 points)Part B52. Directions:Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay you should1) describe the drawing briefly2) explain its intended meaning, and3) give your commentsYou should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)A手机时代的聚会2015年全国硕士研究生考试英语(一)参考答案及详细解析I cloze1.【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。

从2015年考研英语试题分析一新题型解题技巧

从2015年考研英语试题分析一新题型解题技巧

从2015年考研英语试题分析一新题型解题技巧一、解题步骤(1)通读全文。

完成此类题型的第一步就是通读全文。

考生在第一次阅读的时候无需过于关注文章的细枝末节,只要迅速浏览一下,争取对文章有个大概了解。

为了节省时间,考生可以把重点放在首段和尾段,以及个个段落的首句和尾句,从常理上讲,文章的大意和段落大意即主题应该在这两部分有充分的提示。

(2)细读选项。

每个选项都不能忽视。

考生应该注意比较各个选项尤其是相似选项的异同之处。

必要的时候,考生可以根据自己的理解在重点处做出标记。

(3)再阅读。

这里所说的再阅读指的是对文章的第二次阅读,并在这次阅读的过程中结合文章和选项做出答案。

考生可以根据头脑中对文章和选项的初步了解,给要填充的文章部分和选项的关系作出一个假定的模式,将选项按这一模式放回到文章中。

(4)检查修正。

不管时间充裕与否,考生都应该在做出答案后抓紧时间检查一遍。

也就是对全文进行第三次阅读。

这一次阅读考生可以只将注意力放在选项和与选项相关的内容部分,检查一下二者是否搭配得当。

二、解题技巧及注意问题(1)缩小范围,划定重点。

这类题型的阅读量包括文章和选项两部分,信息量特别大。

如果考生分不清侧重点,会浪费很多的时间和精力。

因此考生要先找出重点,即首段尾段,首句尾句,以及文章中的黑体字等。

(2)寻找同义或相似词汇。

既然选项是为论点提供论据的,那么其内容必定和文章给出的各个分论点存在逻辑关系,如:并列关系,扩展关系,补充关系等。

无论它们是哪种关系必定有很多共同之处。

而意义上的相近很容易带来同义词以及类似句型的运用。

(3)目的明确,要获取与主旨相关的主要信息。

切忌在细枝末节上耽搁全面阅读。

在大纲样题中可以发现,有些以黑体字形式出现的小标题,很容易被考生误解为分论点。

事实上,这些小标题并不能等同于分论点或者是总结句,他们大多被作者设置用来引起读者的注意,或者突出文章的某一个方面。

因此,在答题的时候,可以结合正文去理解小标题的真正含义。

考研英语经验分享(11篇)

考研英语经验分享(11篇)

考研英语经验分享(11篇)考研英语经验分享(11篇)考研英语经验分享1第一:单词(1)最初我也是按照很多学长学姐的经验从每天刷恋练有词开始,我刷的比较快,搭配视频2倍速一天一个章节,到去考场那天我还在想说好像当初刷这个对于我自己而言并没有太大的意义,去看经验帖大家都会建议说要刷恋练有词,但是我从自己整个复习过程来说,刷恋练有词这个环节对于基础好的同学其实作用不大,但是对于基础可能稍微有点薄弱的同学刷刷这个还是很有帮助的。

(2)刷完恋练有词之后我的单词背诵就转到了使用墨墨背单词这个APP,我每天定的单词量是200个,直到上考场之前的每一天都会坚持把当天的任务量完成没有间断,所以单词打好基础真的很重要很重要。

第二:阅读英语复习另一个重要的部分就是做真题,真题包括选词填空、阅读、新题型、翻译和作文五部分。

最初做真题我主要做的是阅读,购买了张剑的黄皮书。

(1)第一遍从98年的真题一直到17年真题,18、19年是留着到最后阶段再做,做的时候要认认真真把每篇文章中的生词记下来,记录方式例如(15年Te某t1)。

遇到对答案也不理解的题目我会看唐迟老师讲解真题的视频。

(2)第一遍做完就开始了第二遍。

第二遍是从10年的真题开始做的,其实很多同学会觉得已经记住了答案就没必要做了,但是你做了会发现没理解的还是没理解,该错的还是错。

这时候就要开始有针对性地思考这些题的出题逻辑,同时要对文章中的单词查漏补缺(3)第二遍结束,继续第三遍,我身边也有同学做完第二遍就不做了,会去做英语二的真题。

但是我从始至终没做过英语二的真题,我还是继续做英语一的真题,这一遍我会对文章进行逐字逐句地翻译,但是!请注意!不是那种整篇整篇地一字不落地把翻译写下来,而是对于自己口头或者在脑海里就能读懂的那些句子不写下来,只针对比较难懂的例如长难句那种,才会进行重点分析。

(此处需要说明,我从小学习英语就没搞懂过什么宾语从句后置定语这种很官方化的定义,所以我复习的时候也没去搞这些,很多同学也会觉得搞懂这些对英语学习有帮助,这个因人而异吧,而且我买过长难句的学习资料,但是因为不想去搞那些定义所以书基本没翻过,哈哈)(4)最后剩了18,19年的真题,本来是想说考试之前再写,但是因为前面进程是一天写一年的阅读真题,所以有点快,到18,19年真题写完距离考试还有很长时间,所以无奈我又购买了两套别的老师自己出的模拟卷,其实老老实实把真题吃透就足够了,如果有同学进程比较快,三遍写完了还有很长时间,买一些模拟卷写写我个人觉得也没什么坏处吧,权当增加词汇量。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

先报一下分数,二战,2015年上海地区英语一今年英语考了九十四分,复旦新闻传播拟录取。

比我自己的估分要高一些,出乎意料之外,又在情理之中。

本不打算写经验贴的,但是这段时间找我的学弟学妹很多,昨天还和师弟师妹聊天,也和老钟聊了,发现他们还在走一些弯路甚至是歧路,所以我还是贴出来吧。

有经验也有教训。

在这里事先要声明的是,每人情况不同,所以我复习英语的一些方法也许并不适用于那些基础比较差的学弟学妹。

如果你立志考80+,我的帖子还是有点价值的。

首先,感谢钟平老师的教诲,钟老师对我在英语学习上的帮助很大,使我考研英语上更上一层楼。

如果你认为是广告贴你就别看了,我只说我自己的感受。

希望接下来考研的小伙伴们尤其是想要在考研英语中获得高分的小伙伴们跟着钟老师一起学考研英语,考研英语很不易,钟老师陪伴了我们度过难忘的考研时光,我是二战,听过很多课,他确实做了一些和别人不一样的研究,比如用数学公式翻译所有句子,比如反对几乎所有老师阅读上的所谓定位法和各种复杂的题型分类和技巧,而是提出自己简单而深刻的方法论,还有写作那牛到爆的原生态艺术。

原创性很强的老师,怎么推荐都不为过。

我在英语上我对英语向来比较重视,大学期间除了大一之外,从来都没有丢下。

考研期间,要想学好英语,最慢当然你首先得把整个文章彻底搞懂包括生词,文法,惯用法,也包括文章的结构,这些都弄懂了自然就提高了你的语感,文法能力,还有你的写作能力,有很多经典的句子,在写作的时候你完全可以去套用。

正所谓方法得当,事半功倍,英语学习方法至关重要,尤其是考研,基础不牢,地动山摇,方法不当,适得其反!
有同学为了考研放弃了四六级考试,就应付而已。

我个人感觉特别是六级考试阅读,其实逻辑是一样的。

我的第二个经验,就是一定要重视文法的学习。

考研英语和四级有一个小不同的特点,前者是半学术语言,后者是生活语言多点。

所以前者的句子一般都比较长,后者系生活语言,所以比较简短,也相对比较简单。

而长句子里面一般都会有些复杂的语法和固定搭配在里面。

he is not a teacher so much as a friend。

John is not a good student ,as his mother thinks。

Yi is handsome more than he is a good player。

上面这些
句子不仅有一些固定用法在里面,而且还涉及到英文中一个非常重要的语法现象,即比较结构。

这种语法结构高中绝对没有讲过,但是在考研英语和学术英语中却是经常出现的。

而且,这种比较结构往往都会出现在一些超级长的句子里。

你如果认真寻找的话,考研英语中类似这样的句子室友有很多的。

还有另外一个非常小的单词,as ,这个单词是考研中出现频率最高的单词之一,它人小鬼大,用法非常灵活多变,有人统计过大概有九种用法。

不懂他的用法,你也能大概读懂文章,但是绝对无法精确理解。

类似这些,最好自己搞一个精彩句子的收集本子,慢慢积累。

老钟搞的数学模型学英语,会让对长难句害怕的同学有顿悟感。

对不起,我还是忍不住不停提到他,没办法,你听过他的课就懂了。

强烈推荐!我不是为钟老师做广告,大力推广钟老师,只是因为钟老师确实有实力,业界良心呐。

讲得确实比较好。

不服?今年英语一和英语二第一名都是跟他学的。

科学的态度是自己去试听一下,然后再给出自己的评价。

我当初对那些考研机构也是比较鄙视的,后来在室友的介绍一下,去试听了一下,马上被他折服了,就立即下决心要报班了。

考研英语成绩和本身的英语能力有关系,但是相关性不强。

考研毕竟是应试,是有一定规律可循的。

我的观点可能和别人有点不同,请自己斟酌。

即使不考研,听听他的长难句也很有用,毕竟用数学模型这个太有创意了。

关于报班,我建议如果不是太差或太懒,别报太贵的。

第一年我花了很多钱,真的很多,参加了某机构vip,结果实际上不如自学。

如果遇到钟老师直播公开课,一定去听!可以在微博关注:钟平老师。

第三个就是教训了,千万不可眼高手低。

我是二战,我去年在这里就吃亏了。

我自以为平时英语比较好,所以对作文和翻译也就没有太在意。

只是到了最后时刻,才动手写了几篇文章,自我感觉良好。

对于写作没有太用心。

以至于到了考场上,思路明显跟不上,写作速度也慢,而且有很多单词会读不会写(只知大概。

从这里吸取教训是:作文一定要早早地练习,多加重视。

我以两次体验告诉各位,所谓模板,就是那些
烂大街的什么as you can see in the picture vividly之类的,会害死你!
第四、关于背记单词。

单词是最最基础的,我比较反对那种花费大块时间记忆单词的做法,既浪费时间也没有多大效果,出力不讨好好。

比较好的方法是在文章中记忆单词,这样的单词才是活的。

其实,零碎时间记忆单词是好的办法。

我总是把那些我不会的单词制成卡片,或者誊抄在那些比较方便携带的本子上,随身携带,随时记忆。

在去餐厅的路上,可以记忆单词,在排队的时候,可以记忆单词,在搭乘公交的时候,可以记忆单词。

和女朋友约会时女友迟到时候,也可以记忆单词,甚至如厕的时候你也可以记忆单词,即节约时间,又高效,强烈推荐。

关于单词,我还有另外一个建议。

如果你的英语基础比较好的话,对于一些英语中的核心词汇,尤其是那些抽象意义的单词,建议去查一下英英词典。

看看它的英文释义。

这对于你准确记忆单词,大有裨益。

而且有助于提高你的英语理解能力和阅读速度。

这种记忆单词是很多语言大师推荐的方法。

老钟有独特的单词方案,为了避免太广告哈哈,我就忍住不说啦!
都说考研有很多生僻词义,其实不是的,很多都是书面语言常见意思,只是我们不熟悉书面语言而已。

比如casualty表示伤亡,我们口语常见是casual 随意的。

这种能力一定不是背单词搞出来的,而且需要扎扎实实坐下来读书。

给大家推荐一个应用,zite,每天会根据你的选择给你推送英美外刊,强迫自己没事读一读,自然会熟悉西方书面语言思维方式和常见观点表达的词汇。

关于阅读。

第一次我阅读很差,对答案错了一大半。

这次我阅读是满分。

如何做到?我非常认同老钟的观点,不要再管命题人,不论谁命题,不论什么题型,都是围绕着你有没有读懂作者在说什么,题型的存在只是从不同侧面考察这一点。

只有回到阅读本身,才会真的恍然大悟,而不是被定位的思想牵着盲人摸象。

我算明白了为什么考研这么重视阅读,当你真的学会了读学术文章,你才会体会到一个研究者的乐趣。

我还是那句话,别人的经验,有可能成为你的教训。

用科学的态度去尝试一下,然后找到属于自己的路径。

切记!不要盲从!预祝考研学子都取得成功!祝大家好运!
哦对了,其实真的不用买那么多单词书,你懂得[呲牙]
对不起,由于是在火车上用手机写的,比较乱,以后有啥问题我慢慢回复,大家加油,尤其是二战同学,不容易,但请坚信付出是青春的本意。

相关文档
最新文档